Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
In Bangladesh, the principal direct taxes are personal income taxes and
corporate income taxes, and a value-added tax (VAT) of 15% levied on all
important consumer goods. The top income tax rate for individuals is 25%. For
the 2004/05 tax year (July 1 2004–June 30 2005) the top corporate rate was
45%. However, publicly traded companies registered in Bangladesh are charged
a lower rate of 30%. Banks, financial institutions and insurance companies are
charged the 45% rate. All other companies are taxed at the 37.5% rate. Effective
1 July 2002, the VAT rate on computer hardware and software was reduced to
7.5%, and certain agricultural equipment and electricity supplied to the
agricultural sector was exempted from VAT altogether. VAT on the transfer of
land is also to be abolished. Essential agricultural implements and irrigation
pumps had previously been excluded from certain taxes
Tax (definition)
To tax is to impose a financial charge or other levy upon a taxpayer (an individual
or legal entity) by a state or the functional equivalent of a state such that failure to
pay is punishable by law.
Taxes are also imposed by many subnational entities. Taxes consist of direct tax
or indirect tax, and may be paid in money or as its labour equivalent (often but
not always unpaid labour). A tax may be defined as a “pecuniary burden laid
upon individuals or property owners to support the government a payment
exacted by legislative authority.” A tax “is not a voluntary payment or donation,
but an enforced contribution, exacted pursuant to legislative authority” and is
“any contribution imposed by government whether under the name of toll, tribute,
tallage, gabel, impost, duty, custom, excise, subsidy, aid, supply, or other name.”
The legal definition and the economic definition of taxes differ in that economists
do not consider many transfers to governments to be taxes. For example, some
transfers to the public sector are comparable to prices. Examples include tuition
at public universities and fees for utilities provided by local governments.
Governments also obtain resources by creating money (printing bills and minting
coins), through voluntary gifts (contributions to public universities and
museums),by imposing penalties (traffic fines), by borrowing, and by confiscating
wealth. From the view of economists, a tax is a non-penal, yet compulsory
transfer of resources from the private to the public sector levied on a basis of
predetermined criteria and without reference to specific benefit received.
In modern taxation systems, taxes are levied in money, but in-kind and corvée
taxation are characteristic of traditional or pre-capitalist states and their functional
equivalents. The method of taxation and the government expenditure of taxes
raised is often highly debated in politics and economics. Tax collection is
performed by a government agency such as Canada Revenue Agency, the
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in the United States, or Her Majesty’s Revenue
and Customs (HMRC) in the UK. When taxes are not fully paid, civil penalties
(such as fines or forfeiture) or criminal penalties (such as incarceration) may be
imposed on the non-paying entity or individual.
Tax Classifications
Direct tax:
A direct tax is a form of tax is collected directly by the government from the
persons who bear the tax burden. Taxable individuals file tax returns directly to
the government. Examples of direct taxes are corporate taxes, income taxes, and
transfer taxes.
Indirect tax:
An indirect tax is a form of tax collected by mediators who transfer the taxes to
the government, and also perform functions associated with filing tax returns.
The customers bear the final tax burden. Examples of indirect taxes are sales tax
and value added tax (VAT).
There are other types of taxes, which may either be direct tax or indirect taxes,
including capital gains tax, corporation tax, consumption tax, inheritance tax,
property tax, excise duty, retirement tax, tariffs, wealth tax or net worth tax, toll
tax, and poll tax.
Money provided by taxation have been used by states and their functional
equivalents throughout history to carry out many functions. Some of these
include expenditures on war, the enforcement of law and public order, protection
of property, economic infrastructure (roads, legal tender, enforcement of
contracts, etc.), public works, social engineering, and the operation of
government itself. Governments also use taxes to fund welfare and public
services. These services can include education systems, health care systems,
pensions for the elderly, unemployment benefits, and public transportation.
Energy, water and waste management systems are also common public utilities.
Colonial and modernizing states have also used cash taxes to draw or force
reluctant subsistence producers into cash economies.
Governments use different kinds of taxes and vary the tax rates. This is done to
distribute the tax burden among individuals or classes of the population involved
in taxable activities, such as business, or to redistribute resources between
individuals or classes in the population. Historically, the nobility were supported
by taxes on the poor; modern social security systems are intended to support the
poor, the disabled, or the retired by taxes on those who are still working. In
addition, taxes are applied to fund foreign aid and military ventures, to influence
the macroeconomic performance of the economy (the government’s strategy for
doing this is called its fiscal policy – see also tax exemption), or to modify
patterns of consumption or employment within an economy, by making some
classes of transaction more or less attractive.
A nation’s tax system is often a reflection of its communal values or/and the
values of those in power. To create a system of taxation, a nation must make
choices regarding the distribution of the tax burden—who will pay taxes and how
much they will pay—and how the taxes collected will be spent. In democratic
nations where the public elects those in charge of establishing the tax system,
these choices reflect the type of community that the public and/or government
wishes to create. In countries where the public does not have a significant
amount of influence over the system of taxation, that system may be more of a
reflection on the values of those in power.
The resource collected from the public through taxation is always greater than
the amount which can be used by the government. The difference is called
compliance cost, and includes for example the labour cost and other expenses
incurred in complying with tax laws and rules. The collection of a tax in order to
spend it on a specified purpose, for example collecting a tax on alcohol to pay
directly for alcoholism rehabilitation centres, is called hypothecation. This
practice is often disliked by finance ministers, since it reduces their freedom of
action. Some economic theorists consider the concept to be intellectually
dishonest since (in reality) money is fungible. Furthermore, it often happens that
taxes or excises initially levied to fund some specific government programs are
then later diverted to the government general fund. In some cases, such taxes
are collected in fundamentally inefficient ways, for example highway tolls.
The main purpose is revenue: taxes raise money to spend on armies, roads,
schools and hospitals, and on more indirect government functions like market
regulation or legal systems.
Tax incidence
Law establishes from whom a tax is collected. In many countries, taxes are
imposed on business (such as corporate taxes or portions of payroll taxes).
However, who ultimately pays the tax (the tax “burden”) is determined by the
marketplace as taxes become embedded into production costs. Depending on
how quantities supplied and demanded vary with price (the “elasticities” of supply
and demand), a tax can be absorbed by the seller (in the form of lower pre-tax
prices), or by the buyer (in the form of higher post-tax prices). If the elasticity of
supply is low, more of the tax will be paid by the supplier. If the elasticity of
demand is low, more will be paid by the customer. And contrariwise for the cases
where those elasticities are high. If the seller is a competitive firm, the tax burden
flows back to the factors of production depending on the elasticities thereof; this
includes workers (in the form of lower wages), capital investors (in the form of
loss to shareholders), landowners (in the form of lower rents) and entrepreneurs
(in the form of lower wages of superintendence).
To illustrate this relationship, suppose the market price of a product is $1.00, and
that a $0.50 tax is imposed on the product that, by law, is to be collected from the
seller. If the product has an elastic demand, a greater portion of the tax will be
absorbed by the seller. This is because goods with elastic demand cause a large
decline in quantity demanded for a small increase in price. Therefore in order to
stabilise sales, the seller absorbs more of the additional tax burden. For example,
the seller might drop the price of the product to $0.70 so that, after adding in the
tax, the buyer pays a total of $1.20, or $0.20 more than he did before the $0.50
tax was imposed. In this example, the buyer has paid $0.20 of the $0.50 tax (in
the form of a post-tax price) and the seller has paid the remaining $0.30 (in the
form of a lower pre-tax price).
Types Of Taxes
Paying Taxes
Taxes are monies paid by citizens and residents to federal, state, and local
governments. The money collected from these taxes help fund for services
provided by the government. It is the one of the main sources of government
revenue. Types of taxes include income tax, sales tax, and property tax.
Income Tax
These are paid on a federal level and in some cases to state or local
governments as well. “Taxable income” is essentially money obtained through
wages, self-employment, and tips and from things like sale of property. The large
majority of people pay their income taxes by having the money withheld from
their paychecks. The proportion of income tax an individual is required to pay will
vary according to earnings. Income tax rates are generally lower for those who
make less money. However, any individual who earns an income, live in the
United States and satisfies certain criteria is needed to file a tax return and also
pay any taxes that they owe.
These types of taxes are usually withheld from your paycheck. Social security
benefits are provided for retired workers and their families, for disabled workers
and their families and also for certain family members of deceased workers.
Medicare (healthcare) taxes provides for medical services (this applies for people
aged 65 and above). In the large majority of cases, a will qualify for Social
Security retirement benefits and Medicare benefits after having served a period
of 10 years (or 40 quarters) over the course of your life. However, in the case of
disability benefits for you or your family it is likely that you will require less than
10 years of work depending on your earnings.
Sales Taxes
Sales taxes are more or less state or local taxes and usually added to the buying
cost of certain things. These taxes will be based on the cost of items and help
fund for services provided by state and local government, such as roads, police,
and firefighters.
Property taxes
These are also state and local taxes that are charged on your home and land. In
most situations, these property taxes contribute to funding of local public schools
and other services in the area person.
This is a concept summary. It aims to show how different types of taxes are
categorized, and to highlight the strong and weak points of each type.
Bangladesh personal income tax rates for assessment year 2010 – 2011 is
progressive up to 25%.
Bangladesh Income Tax Rates for individuals other than female taxpayers,
senior taxpayers of 65 years and above and retarded taxpayers –
Assessment Year 2010 – 2011
Time to submit income tax return: Unless the date is extended, by the 30th day of
September next following the income year.
Consumption tax
A consumption tax is a tax on spending on goods and services. The tax base of
such a tax is the money spent on consumption. Consumption taxes are usually
indirect, such as a value added tax. However it can also be structured as a form
of personal taxation, as a sales tax, or as an income tax that deducts
investments and savings. A direct consumption tax may be called an expenditure
tax, a cash-flow tax, or a consumed-income tax, and can be flat or progressive.
Types
This tax applies to the market value added to a product or material at each stage
of its manufacture or distribution. If a retailer buys a shirt for $20 and sells it for
$30, this tax would apply to the $10 difference between the two amounts. A
simple VAT is regressive in that lower-income consumers generally consume a
higher fraction of their income than others, and the VAT does not apply to income
that is saved/invested. VATs often exclude certain goods, with the intent of
creating some degree of progressivity. It is widely used in countries within the
European Union.
Sales tax
This tax typically applies to the sale of goods, and less often, to the sales of
services. The tax is applied at the point of sale. Like VAT, simple sales taxes hit
lower-income consumers harder than others, leading to exemptions for basic
items such as food.
Excise tax
This tax is a sales tax that applies to a specific class of goods, typically alcohol,
gasoline, or tourism. The tax rate varies according to the type of good and
quantity purchased, and is typically unaffected by who purchases it.
Value Added Tax (VAT) a percentage tax on the value added of a commodity or
service as each constituent stage of its production and distribution is completed.
VAT may be classified in three ways: (i) on the basis of coverage of stages –
throughout the production and distribution stages, or confined to limited stages –
manufacturing plus wholesale, or wholesale plus retail; (ii) on the basis of the
method of calculation – tax credit method, subtraction method, and addition
method; and (iii) on the basis of tax treatment of final-product capital goods such
as machinery, equipment, and supplies – the consumption form, the income
form, and the product variety. Thus the three broad types of VAT are the gross
national product (GNP) type, income type and consumption type. A consumption
type VAT is an indirect tax. An income type or a GNP type VAT might be
considered as a direct tax but a commodity tax cannot be considered so.
Consumption type VAT is also considered as an alternative form of ‘sales tax’.
In April 1979, the Taxation Enquiry Commission (TEC) officially took up the issue
of introducing VAT in Bangladesh as an alternate to sales tax. Until 1982, sales
tax was being collected under the Sales Tax Act 1951, which was replaced by
the Sales Tax Ordinance 1982 with effect from 1 July 1982. The World Bank
played the pioneering role in introduction of VAT in Bangladesh. A World Bank
Mission visited Bangladesh for preparing an agenda for tax reform in Bangladesh
in December 1986. The mission submitted its final report on 15 October 1989.
The report recommended the introduction of a manufacturing-cum-import stage
VAT at a single standard rate within three years. Thereafter, a Bangladesh Tax
Mission visited India, Indonesia, the Philippines and Thailand during 13
November – 04 December 1989. The Mission submitted its report in January
1990. The government discussed the issues relating to introduction of VAT with
all related private and public agencies including the various leading Chambers of
Commerce and Industry from time to time. The government prepared the Value
Added Tax Act 1990 (Draft) in June 1990.
Final version of the Value Added Tax Act was promulgated 31 May 1991 as a
Presidential Ordinance with eight sections (relating to registration under VAT
system and the appointment and powers of VAT authorities). It was made
effective from 2 June 1991. The Value Added Tax Bill 1991 was introduced in the
Parliament on 1 July 1991 and the Parliament passed it on 9 July 1991. With the
Presidential assent to the bill on the next day it came into effect as The Value
Added Tax Act 1991. The VAT Act 1991 replaced the Business Turnover Tax
Ordinance 1982 and the Sales Tax Ordinance 1982 with effect from 1 July 1991.
It imposed VAT @ 15% on importer or supplier (producer) of taxable goods and
provider of taxable services having annual turnover of Tk 1.5 million or more. It
imposed Turnover Tax (TT) @ 2% (currently 4%) on supplier of taxable goods
and provider of taxable services having annual turnover of less than Tk 1.5
million (Tk 2 million at present). The new law imposed VAT at zero-rate on export
sales of any goods and services, brought excise duties on most goods under the
VAT net, and imposed Supplementary Duty (SD) @ 10% to 85% on goods and
services which are luxurious and non-essential and are socially undesirable.
VAT introduced in Bangladesh in its initial form was a sort of consumption tax (by
allowing purchase of capital goods as input), which extended its coverage up to
the level of import, production or manufacture and service-rendering but not to
export (which is zero-rated), wholesale or retail level. Since the financial year
1996-97, VAT in Bangladesh has become a broad-based consumption
expenditure tax by covering the wholesale and retail levels. VAT is imposed on
the following goods and services: all goods imported in Bangladesh except those
mentioned in the First Schedule of the VAT Act; all goods supplied except those
mentioned in the First Schedule of the VAT Act; and all services provided in
Bangladesh except those mentioned in the Second Schedule of the VAT Act.
The standard tax rate for VAT has been fixed all along at 15% (for taxable goods
and services). The adoption of truncated value-bases caused multiplicity of
practical tax rates, but VAT rate is a single, flat or uniform one. The rate of
turnover tax (TT) is also uniform at 4% (2% up to 11 June 1997). But the rates of
supplementary duty (SD) are multiple. At the beginning (FY 1991-92), there were
five different rates which ranged from 10% to 85%. Next rates were eleven in
number and ranged from 5% to 350%. For FY 2000-01, there are 31 different
rates that ranged from 2.5% as on coffee to 350% as on cigarettes.
VAT was introduced in Bangladesh as a consumption tax and allowed the full
deduction of ‘machinery’ as an input from the ‘output value’ (sale proceeds of
taxable goods and services) to compute the tax-base (i.e., value added).
Although the initial coverage was up to import and production stages, the VAT-
net is now expanded to wholesale and retail stages. Initially, the number of VAT
taxable services were 25 (under 21 Heading numbers), but now the number is
theoretically unlimited, although for practical purposes this number is kept limited
to 70 services under 57 heading numbers for which the scope is defined. Goods
other than primary unprocessed agricultural products and food items listed in the
First Schedule of the VAT Act (live animals or poultry, human or animal hair,
parts of animal body or animal products, parts of plant, green or dried
vegetables, fruits, unprocessed spices, food items, oil seeds, natural gums or like
products, wood, uncarded wool or cotton, and raw jute, etc) are subject to VAT.
Thus almost the whole economy falls under the VAT-net and as a consumption
tax, VAT is supposed to streamline the economic activities with corrective
measures by applying supplementary duty.
Tax revenue Summary of Bangladesh
Bangladesh’s tax revenue income in the immediately past fiscal year ending in
June fell short of target by around 1.19 percent as the world economic recession
constricted imports growth, chopping off big slice of earnings from customs
duties, officials said on Monday.
Bangladesh’s total revenue collection target in the 2008-09 fiscal year was earlier
set at 693.82 billion taka, of which the government set a tax revenue target of
545 billion taka.
Later on in May this year, the tax revenue target was reduced to 530 billion taka
following a sluggish trend in earnings of import duties amid a volatile global
economic situation.
Director (Research and Statistics) of the NBR, Sachindra Nath Sarker, said the
fall in import duties was due mainly to decline in customs and supplementary
duties, triggered by a big prices erosion of imported goods in the global market in
context of financial tsunami.
The provisional statistics of the NBR, however, showed tax revenue earnings of
the country was 10.41 percent higher than the collections in the previous 2007-
08 fiscal year (July 2007-June 2008).
The South Asian country’s tax revenue income in the previous 2007-08 fiscal
year stood at 474.35 billion taka, with nearly 27 percent growth over that of the
2006-07 fiscal year.
“We missed a large sum of customs and supplementary duties because of price
fall of imported items,” a senior official in the customs department under the NBR
said, requesting to be unnamed.
He said the NBR data showed the country’s tax revenue earnings growth steadily
decelerated from 19.80 percent in the first quarter of 2008-09 fiscal year to 13.24
percent in the first half and 12.21 percent in the first nine months.
However, of three major revenue wings including income tax, customs and value
added tax (VAT), the official said earnings from the customs department, which
accounts for more than 40 percent of the NBR’s annual tax revenue collections,
was 5.19 billion taka less than the revised target of 213.22 billion taka in last
2008- 09 fiscal year.
Apart from this, the provisional data showed earnings from VAT also fell short of
target with around 4.55 billion taka in the last 2008-09 fiscal year, largely
because of shortfall of supplementary duty collection.
The official of customs department said if the sliding trend in tax revenue
collections continue, the government will face problem managing finance for its
current 2009-10 fiscal year’s budget.
Bangladesh Parliament last month passed 1.14 trillion taka ( about 16.5 billion
US dollars) national budget for the current 2009-10 fiscal year began from July 1.
The budget set a revenue earning target of around total 794.60 billion taka for
current fiscal year. Of total, the tax revenue collection target for the country’s
revenue board has been set at 610 billion taka. (1 US dollar equals about 70
taka)
Tax Expenditure
In recent years, analysis of tax expenditures has received much attention in the
literature of public policy, particularly in the developing and transition economies.
This policy note attempts to introduce the concept and size of tax expenditures in
the context of Bangladesh with special
references to experiences of India and Pakistan. It shows that the amount of tax
expenditures in Bangladesh is 2.52 per cent of GDP in FY05, in which
expenditures in the direct taxes and indirect taxes are 0.28 per cent and 2.24 per
cent, respectively. The note identifies that tax expenditure accounting is
necessary to establish an efficient and effective tax system as well as fiscal
accountability and transparency in the country, since tax expenditures are viewed
as part of government expenditures. Thus, a detailed assessment of tax
expenditures including an appropriate definition and a methodology for
measuring ‘tax expenditures’ is essential along with restructuring the existing tax
expenditure measures in Bangladesh.
The tax system of Bangladesh includes several tax expenditure measures under
the broad headings of direct taxes and indirect taxes. These provisions,
introduced with the enactment of the tax law, have been subject to changes from
time to time. The major policy objectives behind the tax expenditure measures in
Bangladesh are to accelerate the process of industrialization, to attract foreign
currency through increasing exports and foreign direct investment (FDI) and to
ensure social security and welfare of low and modest income groups. Tax
expenditure measures exist in sectors such as Public Services, Agriculture,
Labour and Employment Affairs, Transport and Communication and Social
Security and Welfare, etc.
Various tax expenditure measures exist for corporate and personal income
taxpayers under the existing income tax law. These are summarized below.
Under the various acts of indirect taxes, exemptions and deductions are given in
the area ofcustoms duty, supplementary duty and Value-Added Tax (VAT).
Exemptions are granted to local industrial units of a few specific sectors, viz. EPZ
enterprises,power generation companies, poultry and dairy farms, etc.
Concessionary rates are applicable toagro-processing, textile and leather
industry, educational institutions, hospitals, privilegedpersons, etc. Incentives are
also given to those sectors, which are complying with the international and
bilateral agreements and conventions.
Value–Added Tax
Goods and services exempted from VAT include food and agricultural products,
animal products,poultry sector, agriculture inputs, basic services for living, social
welfare services, culture relatedservices, finance and financial activities related
services, transport services, personal services, etc.
– Donation upto five lac to (1) Shishu Swasthya Foundation Hospital Mirpur,
Shishu Hospital, Jessore and Hospital for Sick Children, Satkhira run by Shishu
Swasthya Foundation, Dhaka, (2) Diganta Memorial Cancer Hospital, Dhaka, (3)
The ENT and Head-Neck Cancer Foundation of Bangladesh, Dhaka; and (4)
Jatiya Protibandhi Unnayan Foundation, Mirpur, Dhaka;
– Asiatic Society of Bangladesh;
– Muktijudha Jadughar;
Tax deducted at source for the following cases is treated as final discharge of tax
liabilities. No additional tax is charged or refund is allowed in the following cases:
Tax Holiday
Tax holiday is allowed for certain industrial undertaking, tourist industry and
physical infrastructure facility established between 1st July 2008 to 30th June
2011 in fulfillment of certain conditions.
Tax holiday is allowed to industries subject to the relevant rules and procedures
set by the National Board of Revenue (NBR) for the following period according to
the location of the establishment.
The period of such tax holiday will be calculated from the month of
commencement of commercial production. The eligibility of tax holiday to be
determined by the NBR and the time of the commencement of commercial
production is certified by the respective sponsoring agencies. The industrial
establishment should be registered under the companies Act. 1994.
Tax avoidance
Tax avoidance is the legal utilization of the tax regime to one’s own advantage, to
reduce the amount of tax that is payable by means that are within the law. By
contrast, tax evasion is the general term for efforts not to pay taxes by illegal
means. The term tax mitigation is a synonym for tax avoidance. Its original use
was by tax advisors as an alternative to the pejorative term tax avoidance.
Latterly the term has also been used in the tax regulations of some jurisdictions
to distinguish tax avoidance foreseen by the legislators from tax avoidance which
exploits loopholes in the law.
Some of those attempting not to pay tax believe that they have discovered
interpretations of the law that show that they are not subject to being taxed: these
individuals and groups are sometimes called tax protesters. An unsuccessful tax
protestor has been attempting openly to evade tax, while a successful one avoids
tax. Tax resistance is the declared refusal to pay a tax for conscientious reasons
(because the resister does not want to support the government or some of its
activities). Tax resisters typically do not take the position that the tax laws are
themselves illegal or do not apply to them (as tax protesters do) and they are
more concerned with not paying for particular government policies that they
oppose.
The formula for economic development and curing poverty is well known:
Security of property rights, low taxes, reasonably free trade and stable and
readily convertible currency — the economic policy that has been demonstrated
to be highly successful in moving countries from third world to first world
In the past century there has been an enormous improvement in human well
being, almost all of it from economic development, almost none of it from
redistribution. The most extreme exercises in redistribution created gigantic
suffering, and resulted in the murder of about a hundred million people.
The question then is: Are taxes dangerously high in the advanced countries as
well? Are taxes so high that cutting taxes will, in few years, increase the returns
to the government? This is derided as “voodoo economics”, yet it is fairly obvious
that ruinous taxation is a major part of why the third world is third world. Is then
taxation also keeping the first world much poorer than it would otherwise be? For
the United States, I defined “high taxes” as the federal government taking more
than 18.1% of GDP, for during the Reagan Revolution, the archetype of “voodoo
economics” the largest portion of GDP taken by the federal government was
slightly more than 18%. Alternatively, I defined “a high taxes period” as any
period where the federal government took substantially and persistently more
than 18% of GDP.
I graph the natural log of GDP, rather than the actual GDP, so that you can read
the growth rate directly from the slope of the graph: For example in 1983, first
year of the Reagan tax cuts, log of GDP is 10.052, and in 1989, last year of the
Reagan presidency, log of GDP is 10.250, so the log increased 0.198 in six
years, 0.198/6= 0.033, so during those years GDP growth was 3.3% a year.
Average growth during high tax periods was 1.08%, average growth during
normal times was 2.45%. Every high tax period was a long period of economic
stagnation, malaise, or decline or else contained a long period of decline. Such
events were rare during normal tax periods.
The graph suggests that taxes are well and truly on the wrong side of the Laffer
curve — that increasing taxes will lead to decreased revenue after a fairly short
period — at least if federal taxes seize more than 18.1% of GDP
Of course, this depends on who you tax, which the data I had available do not
reveal. I suspect that if you tax the poor good and hard with heavy taxes on
petrol, beer, and cigarettes, like those wonderfully redistributive welfare states in
europe, you can collect a lot more than 18.1% of GDP without the economy
going down the drain, for such taxes will cause the poor to work harder, while
progressive taxes are likely to cause the rich to go underground, or retire to
house on a hill overlooking the Coral Sea, unless, like certain progressive
European countries, you have a few little loopholes here and there so that you
can get the political credit for soaking the rich, without actually soaking them so
much as to sink the economy.
Growth for the first three high tax periods was negative – possibly because they
were trying to soak the rich, unlike Clinton, possibly because they did not have
the internet boom increasing their revenues and boosting growth, unlike Clinton,
possibly because Clinton “ended welfare as we know it”, whereas the early high
tax periods were great society taxes. We really need statistics giving a
breakdown on who is paying taxes to distinguish between these possibilities. We
also need statistics giving hints as to who is goofing off and going underground.
In third world countries it is largely the poor who go underground, which is
consistent with the conjecture that it was “ending welfare as we know it” that
made the difference, but the Reagan experience suggests that what smacks
down the economy is high taxes on the rich, who have the option of fleeing or
retiring.