Professional Documents
Culture Documents
and critical thinking is also thinking aimed at overcoming ‘egocentric and socio-
centric thinking’”.1 Then they add that critical thinking is basically an art of
analysing and evaluating thinking with a view to improving it (Paul and Elder,
2007, p. 4). From these statement, it is clear that all students must perform their
own knowledge construction as the core concept of thinking critically. Critical
thinkers are able to analyse arguments as well as produce their arguments. In this
case, teachers’ role is merely to stimulate the students to take the key concept and
principle which are underlying the subject matter.
Thus, critical thinking is the intellectual and active process of
respond critically. According to Scriven and Paul (2012), in its exemplary form of
sound evidence, good reasons, depth, breadth, and fairness.2 The process of
before drawing conclusions. In other words, the critical thinking process enables
students to analyse, evaluate, explain, and restructure their own thinking in order
communities, are not familiar with critical thinking. They are accustomed to
However, these students are capable of critical thinking when teachers use
effective teaching methods. One such approach to build critical thinking abilities
1
www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/.../TIS_Gray.pdf
2
www.art.vcu.edu/arteducation/files/2012/02/Lampert_IJETA.pdf
3
components such as English poems, has never been introduced in formal English
classes of secondary schools. Both teachers and students, in fact, have commonly
used Indonesian poems which they translated into English ones only for particular
events outside the classrooms such as for graduation parties, competitions, class
It is commonly known poems can bring students not only joy, nourish and
sustain but they can help them to develop the reading, writing, and critical
thinking skills for success in school. Through poetry students basically have many
opportunities to express and share their ideas and opinions. It is because there is
think critically. They need to think beyond the text for the interpretation. It is
students to think critically using poetry due to the understanding and appreciating
discussions and close analysis of texts which require logic and imagination. In this
case, the students will explore and create ideas in the process of thinking critically
when they are engaged in reading activity. Through reading English poems
4
students will interact with others to discuss the poems, to develop their abilities to
see existing situations in new ways, and to explore their ideas in English. In
discussion, students develop critical thinking as they state and justify a point of
view and respond to the views of others. Indeed, through reading English poems,
the students critically analyse the opinions, points of view, and unstated
demonstrating ways and steps of how to teach reading using poems can improve
students’ critical thinking skills. Finally, this research closes to the discussion and
used. English poems are considered as the appropriate learning objects in reading
activities for developing critical thinking skills to students who live in rural areas
like students of grade X of MAN Lumajang with low English vocabularies and
other words, for students with such kinds of condition and situation, developing
needed and success. Thus, the research focuses on two questions. They are:
1.1.1 How does the teacher teach reading using poems to develop the
1.1.2 How are the students’ critical thinking skills developed after they are
using English poems can improve students’ critical thinking. However, the detail
objectives are formulated based on the two research questions. They are:
1.2.1 The research is to describe how the teacher teaches reading using
1.2.2 The research is to describe how the students’ critical thinking skills
This research has two main significance of the study with detailed
elaboration as follows:
1.3.1.1 The result of this research can be used as the input in English
1.3.1.2 This research also give contribution to Senior High School teachers
1.3.2.1 This research gives suggestion to the English teachers in which the
In this research, there is only one important term that needs to be clarified in
order to have the same perspective and to avoid ambiguous meaning about the
Critical thinking is the ability to analyse and interpret information with a view to
CHAPTER 2
This chapter deals with elaborating main literatures that underlie this
research. This chapter emphasizes on clarifying that critical thinking is totally not
the same as creative thinking, discussing deeply about the definitions, meanings,
explaining learning materials completed with their criteria as the appropriate ones,
and showing previous studies done by others about critical thinking skills in
education setting as the core topic of their studies. Each of them is explained
deeply in this chapter. In other words, this chapter gives detailed and completed
basic information of main related literatures for going further to the next chapters.
As a matter of fact that both creative and critical thinking skills are involved
in educational process and affect teachers and students to have effective learning.
It is because both teachers and students need to be able to connect ideas, to see
similarities and differences, and to think effectively, flexibly and curiously. The
complementary for each other during teaching-learning process. Indeed, both will
8
That is why the creative thinking and critical thinking are mostly applied in
modern education.
It is known well that the abilities which are crucial needed by students in
critically. These foundation skills underlie the students’ success and progress for
their studies. These skills will also help them to be active participating themselves
into globalization era which has full of competition in all aspects of lives such as
In fact, both critical and creative thinking are different. Unfortunately the
meanings of critical and creative thinking for most people are overlapped. Fisher
(2002) tries to show that both terms are totally different. By using this following
cart of table 2.1 the overlapped meanings including definitions, functions, and
between critical thinking and creative thinking. The table shows that critical
thinking is different from creative thinking due to the processes and factors
underlying both terms. According to him, critical thinking is done by left brain in
order to find the answer, while the right brain is used for creative thinking to
create an answer. It means that critical thinking is basically dealing with closed
matters whereas the open-ended one belongs to creative thinking. That is why
answer based on the logical reasons underlying that problem. Next, he views that
associative is the style of creative thinking but the linear is considered as the style
the facts. He believes that both critical and creative thinking apply different way
According to him, making any speculation needs to employ intuition but logic
learning tools and learning activities which enable students to develop their
understand about what the critical thinking is, how important it is, and how to
think critically, and how to learn and to teach critical thinking to students. Indeed,
not all educational institutions, especially the ones that have program of teaching
who can be able to engage themselves well in thinking critically during learning
Indonesia have low English proficiency, especially the ones who live in rural or
evaluating thinking with a view to improving it. In details, Paul and Elder (2007,
raise vital questions and problems by formulating them clearly and precisely, (2)
(5) to communicate effectively with others in figuring out solutions for the
complex problems.
Indeed, some of them believe that critical thinking cannot be measured because
On the other hand, there are many theorists who proved that critical thinking is
possible to be taught such as Brookfield (2005), Buskist & Irons (2009), Connor-
Greene & Greene (2002), Cotter & Tally (2009), Dunn et al., (2009) Johanson,
(2010), Lawrence et al., (2009), McKeachie & Svinicki, (2006), Paul & Elder,
(2006) and also this skill can be measured as stated by Cuseo, J (2012), Paul and
Elder (1996), and Foundation for Critical Thinking (2013). According to these
interpreting, and evaluating information by using their own points of views before
formulating, assessing, and concluding their assumptions with the logical reasons
and proofs. The students will weigh an idea or a thing before accepting or
rejecting it. In this case, the students are being involved in analytical and
evaluative processes.
thinking through his or her teaching. As a matter of fact the best strategy of
teachers must create certain teaching design through lesson plans including the
strategy the teacher must base on the main factors of learning, namely the
students in a city, for example, are quite different from the characteristics of rural
students that lead teachers to use different strategies. In this case, the city students
may have higher motivation, self-confidence, and good English proficiency that
need different teaching strategy from the rural students who may have less
this section. Thus, this section discuss about the meaning and the function of
teaching reading, the aspects or factors that influence much on the reading
The students will know new information served in the texts after they read and
understand the texts. Before reading, the students have no prior information
served in the text which they are going to read. The role of teachers in teaching
13
teachers of EFL students is reading with fun. To teach reading with fun the
teacher must use appropriate reading materials. One of the materials is dealing
experience of the author that can be seen, heard, smelt, felt, and tasted by the
Beside the appropriate reading materials, the teacher must understand well
maximum comprehension towards the reading materials which are being learned
by the students. In this case the teacher has a significant role to motivate students
to understand. Indeed, the teacher also must be aware that in the process of
reading there is a communication between a writer and reader. That is why the
teacher should make the students know well that the reading activity basically
deals with the process of decoding and comprehending. It is because the reader in
the process of reading tries to catch well what the writer has expressed in the text.
teacher also must be aware that there are factors which effect the reading
very crucial to develop the comprehension. It is in line with what Burns et al.,
14
(1996, p. 237) claim that there are factors which affect the reader’s
comprehension namely the reader, the text, and the reading situation. Moreover,
giving appropriate reading materials for students which they can comprehend is
Undoubtedly in choosing the reading materials for the students the teacher must
because the interaction between students and reading texts are very crucial for the
Other aspect that must be known well by the teacher is about three stages of
reading activities which are involved in teaching reading. They are pre-reading,
to Burns et al., (1996, p. 237), relate to the subject of type of text to read in order
to enhance the comprehension of the material. The pre-reading activities are done
before the students are engaged in reading the text which will be comprehend
deeply. The pre-reading activities are conducted to prepare the students’ focus on
the reading text. As a result the teachers will know better whether the students are
ready or not for the next reading activity. Then Burns et al., (1996, p. 237) adds
that there are some activities involved in pre-reading activities namely predicting,
activities, according to Burns et al., (1996, p. 237), there are some activities
included to promote the comprehension. In this case, the students as the readers
should monitor their comprehension constantly. The students will take steps to
correct the situation when they are failed in comprehending the text well. The role
15
of the teacher in this case is helping the students to become more strategic through
direct guidance in order to enable the students how to comprehend the text better.
237) states that post-reading activities help students integrate new information
into existing schemata. These activities strengthen their comprehension toward the
given text which have been learned. The activities that categorized in post-reading
representation.
Another one is the teacher must know well in teaching reading is the
this taxonomy has three main levels of reading comprehension. They are literal
In line with this, Roe et al., (1995, p. 98) state that literal comprehension is
concerned with facts and ideas that are directly stated in the reading content. Thus,
comprehend some facts or contents which are taken literally from the reading
texts. In this case, they are as the readers will get information which are clearly
written in the reading texts. It means that the information stated explicitly in the
texts will be obtained by students while they are reading them. Moreover Burns et
al., (1996, p. 255) add that at the level of literal comprehension, the aim of
sentences, or a paragraph in the text. The students recognize the facts and details
lines or making inferences which requires students to derive ideas that are
compiled rather than directly stated. Roe et al., (1995) have similar view about
this level. They state that interpretative reading is concerned with deeper
meanings and readers must relate facts, generalizations, definitions, ideas, cause-
effect relationships which are not stated directly. The students as the readers need
abilities of students to relate their schemata and the contents of a text in order to
guess the implicit ideas in the text. Roe et al., (1995) emphasize that effective
readers basically are active readers who use a variety of strategies and processes
to construct meaning.
students in this level will compare information and ideas expressed in the text
with other materials which are presented by the instructor or other authorities and
with their own knowledge and experiences to construct the judgements. Burns et
discovered in the material with known standards and drawing conclusion about
their accuracy and appropriateness. Therefore, as readers the students should read
17
decisions. The considerations are based on the materials that they have read. It
can be inferred that critical reading refers to the synthesis level of Bloom
taxonomy. In this case, the students become critical readers by being active
readers, questioning, searching for facts and appropriateness (Burns, 1996, p.278).
engage in both literal and interpretative reading. It means that they can master
critical reading after they are able to comprehend implicitly and explicitly the text
that they are reading. In other words, teaching reading with poems as learning
materials enable the students to be engaged in critical reading which can develop
their critical reading skills. That is why in this following part of this chapter, the
researcher provide literatures which show the relationship between critical reading
There are many definitions and assumptions of critical thinking skills that
are proposed by scholars. Some of them have been explained in the previous part
the higher-level thinking skills that had six processes, namely knowledge,
meant. Application was dealt with applying information in order to find some
practical use for it. While analysis was meant to analysing for braking information
down into parts and seeing how these parts work together. Next was synthesis. It
was related to synthesising for taking the knowledge one had and connected it
with other knowledge. The last was evaluation. This was correlated to evaluating
Thus, Bloom has inspired many scholars to elaborate his six processes of
(1986). He believes that critical thinking is a skill that needs a process. The
importance of the context and culture. According to him, the process involves four
questioning something that has been believed, has been done for years, or has
been said right for years to be proven to be right, true, or the best way to be done.
Other two scholars who find characteristics of critical thinker are S. Ferret
and Joe Old. According to Ferret (1977), there are 14 characteristics of critical
thinkers. They are (1) asking pertinent questions, (2) assessing statements and
having senses of curiosities, (5) being interested in finding new solutions, (6)
being able to define clearly criteria for analysing ideas, (7) willing to examine
beliefs, assumptions, and opinions, and weigh them against facts, (8) listening
19
carefully to others and being able to give feedback, (9) seeing that critical thinking
assumptions and beliefs, (11) being able to adjust opinions when new facts are
found, (12) looking for proof, (13) examining problems closely, and (14) being
(1998) there are 14 activities of critical thinking. They are (1) prioritising things,
(2) identifying purpose in things the student reads, (3) determining consequences,
(4) determining effects, (5) identifying bias, (6) identifying assumptions, (7)
drawing conclusion, (8) making contrasts and comparison, (9) doing synthesising,
(10) developing hypotheses and testing them, (11) using figurative language, (12)
making critiques, (13) making summaries, and (14) making evaluations. Thus,
the researcher sums up them as the characteristics of critical thinking skills. The
researcher compiled them into several critical thinking components as the abilities
of critical thinking. These critical thinking skill components are (1) being able to
identify or state issues clearly, (2) being able to interpret issues logically, (3)
being able to question, (4) being able to have own position towards the issues, (5)
being able to develop back arguments of the issues, (6) being able to summarize,
(7) being able identify relevant points of views, (8) being able to analyse, (9)
being able to synthesize, (10) being able to making decisions, (11) being able to
20
criticize, (12) being able to integrate other perspectives, (13) being able to use
However, not all of these critical thinking components were trained to the
students in this research due to the fact that the students were unfamiliar with the
reading texts in the form of poems. That was why the teacher took only two
reading activities using poems to develop their critical thinking skills. They were
the ability of interpreting poems and the ability of analysing poems. These two
the form of students’ tasks in order to know the progress of critical thinking skills
introduces basic reading skills to the students which make them focus on
knowing, comprehending, and applying. The basic skills of reading that some
scholars call them as three components of reading are language, content, and
rhetorical structure. They introduce the students to the theory and practice of
reading English texts. In this case the students will focus their abilities on
knowing and understanding the content of the text explicitly and implicitly. Thus,
critical reading enable the students to think while they are reading poems.
21
level of reading which provides the students with the skill of being critical
readers. The abilities of the students to think and read critically will improve their
understanding about the poems which they are reading. They claimed that making
critical thinking to written literary works or texts such as poems can be (1)
identifying specific flaws of the text, (4) taking exception to certain ideas, (5)
questioning the authenticity and authority of the text, (6) formulating different
opinion to the author’s, and (7) making comparison about style, language, and
substance of other authors. These views of Burns et al., are more deliberated by
Leo (1994) who states that critical reading is basically evaluative and
I feel about this?”, “how accurate do these figures seem?”, and “how would
another expert in this field respond to these ideas?”. Thus, it can be assumed that
the critical reader is basically the thinking reader in which the critical reader can
readers as readers who have critical thinking skills while reading. The steps
between fact and opinion, recognising the purpose and tone, analysing
of views. More details about this, according to Skidell and Becker (2001), in real
practical activity the critical reading involves the making use of critical thinking
and newspaper analysis. As a result evaluating information served in the text can
readers, the students must have the ability of separating between facts and
opinion. Finally, teaching reading with poems as learning materials should make a
critical reading class which enable the students to have the ability of making
inference, recognising the tone of the author, and the purpose of the author in
students’ critical thinking skills. The researcher needs to discuss deeply about the
poems as learning materials in this section. She will clarify the meaning and the
learning materials are resources that practitioners and learners use in learning
processes. Learning material has two kinds of forms namely print and non-print
23
catalogue, and job application for print formats, and online courses, audio and
animated activities, and alternative formal materials including audio and braille
In choosing learning materials used for teaching reading the teacher has to
Senior High school students in Indonesia are assumed to have low English
proficiencies both in oral and written. The strongest indicator of this fact is taken
from surveys done through analysing the results of English tests for English
teachers in Indonesia. The surveys have shown that the English proficiency of
Pendidikan Nasional. The PMTK finds that most of students of Senior High
School in Indonesia are considered as low in English due to the fact that most of
The PMTK analyses the results of the competency tests for English teachers of
3
www.tcu.gov.on.ca/.../OALCF_Foundations_of_Learning_Materials_Oct_2011.pdf
4
http://www.slideshare.net/guruonline/mentransformasitenagapendidikanindonesiavol1 and
http://edukasi.kompas.com/read/2011/09/26/21320318/Kemampuan.Bahasa.Inggris.di.Indonesia.R
endah
5
http://www.slideshare.net/guruonline/mentransformasitenagapendidikanindonesiavol1
24
Senior High Schools in 2004. The data shows that the average of correct answers
of the English teachers in English tests are only 58%. Then second survey is done
by the English First (EF). EF is one of the big international English courses in the
countries which English is not their first language in those countries including
Indonesia, Malaysia, India, and China. The report shows that English Proficiency
34th position, while Malaysia is in the 9 th level.6 Thus, it can be assumed that if the
proficiency in English too. Having low English proficiency means that these
students have low English vocabularies, basic grammar, and minimal English
students as those who do not speak English or whose native language is not
English, and who are unable to perform ordinary classroom work in English. Then
Education, those students are reflected as Low Intermediate (LI) students. These
speaking and comprehension with basic structure. They cannot produce English
both oral and written with complicated grammar. Their sentences are simple but
complete.
explained by him. He said that early production or low intermediate students are
students who (1) can communicate at a basic level, (2) can understand some
themselves, (3) use single words and simple phrases to answer questions, (4) learn
through non-verbal cues and the native language, (5) feel difficult in higher order
thinking in English, and (6) are limited in reading and writing of English.
According to him, the appropriate instructional They are (1) providing alternative
or simplified texts, (2) giving highlight important concepts, (3) stressing key
vocabulary, (4) modelling vocabulary and concepts, (5) speaking and writing
directions in simple English, (6) providing notes in simple English, (7) avoiding
slang and idiomatic phrases, (8) incorporating schematic mapping, (9) activating
sounds, and the like, (13) using graphic organizers, (14) providing real or practical
experiences, (15) doing demonstrations and role plays, (16) using body
movements and gestures, (17) utilizing music such as chants and songs, (18) using
videos, (19) allowing extra time to complete work, (20) assigning a peer learning,
26
important concepts, (23) allowing illustrated answers, (24) accepting errors, (25)
allowing questions of the obvious matters, (26) allowing a tape recorder for note-
taking, (27) asking if students understand or not, (28) allowing simple phrased
above, the appropriate learning materials of teaching critical thinking for them are
As a matter of fact that poems pose a challenging cognitive task for the
students. Poems make the students try to have the basic understanding of poems
before they can develop their own creative interpretation. Consequently the
students use their critical thinking skills to construct deep meaning of the poems.
the fact that a poem is basically composed by imagery and choice of the specific
of a topic which make the poem interesting as the statement of Halonen (1995, p.
112). According to him, surprised is a catalyst for the reader’s critical thinking to
7
http://jamiedavi.es/msc/teaching-critical-thinking-in-psychology
27
It is agreed that a poem has not only the aesthetic pleasure but also the
ability to arouse the senses of surprises. This is in line with the statement of
Harrison and Holderith (2009). In Nieuwenhuis, they viewed that a poem made
both teacher and students laugh, taught powerful lessons, and renewed the souls. 8
A poem helps the students to ponder, observe, ask questions and discover sights,
Hogshead (1990), the teachers can fulfil the basic objectives of promoting
essential critical thinking skills. In this case, according to Helpern in Nieto, Ana
M and Saiz, Carlos (2008), the students have to elaborate authors’ ideas by
thinking. Through a poem the students will develop their vocabulary and critical
Education in 2012 said that the poem will involve firstly the students in critical
discourse by making connections to build skills which support both their creative
and critical thinking. Then it is believed that words in a poem can utilize the
languages, storytelling and resistance which can foster dialogue and action and
8
http://melanienieuwenhuis.weebly.com/uploads/5/.../embracing_poetry.pdf
28
selecting English poems as the critical thinking materials of learning for those
students. In this case, Low Intermediate level students are assumed to have similar
considerations in selecting English poems for them. The teacher can list some
quality of imagination, substance and purpose within the poems. They must have
Natarella (1982) also have interesting criteria. Both of these scholars had
investigated on the poems which are preferred much by children. They found that
(1) most children preferred narrative poems over lyric poems, (2) limericks were
also more liked by children than the haiku, (3) children preferred poems with
sound patterns or rhymed poems, (4) children preferred poems with regular and
distinctive rhythm, and (5) children liked humorous poems, poems about animals,
poems is that the teachers must enjoy the poem which they decide to present it to
their students. If the teacher likes a poem, for example, this poem will be enjoyed
by the students. The teacher will totally and successfully deliver the poem in front
of the students. This attitude will interest the students to know more about the
poem. Finally, this research will take not only narrative poems due to the fact
29
narrative poems can be able to trigger and interest students to think critically when
Thus, the teacher selected the English poems which gave the students ample
English language abilities, and develop their critical thinking skills through
analysing poems and songs. The carefully designed and sequenced, the poems as
range of poems and songs, helped the students to respond to and give expression
to the imaginative ideas, moods and feelings expressed in poems and songs, and
Nizwa viewed that in selecting the poems, the teacher had to take into
consideration about the needs of the students, their motivation, interest, and
cultural background had to be taken into consideration while selecting a poem for
the classroom teaching. It was because the shorter poems were easier to use within
Panavelil (2001). They were the poems or songs were not only narrative but also
humorous, enjoyable, and familiar experiences in which both teacher and students
in this research felt interested in knowing more about the poems. The poems and
songs were preferred by the students in terms of its popularities and funny stories
30
inside them. Indeed the songs and poems had low English barriers to the students
which made them understand well about the content. The poems or song used in
this research could be interpreted variously by the students. In short, the teacher
considered much on the level of language used in the poems or songs that might
fit to the students’ English proficiencies. The teacher did not end up having to
explain every single word which could lose the spark of the poems or songs. In
this research the students were also supported throughout and were pre-taught
some of the vocabularies or given some visual aids like modelling with gestures to
help them to be able to tackle more challenging texts than they were used to.
recommended by Fehl L. Shirley (1983). Shirley saw learning poems as one stage
helped the students recognize the texts implicitly and explicitly. Indeed, the poems
were integrally related to critical thinking. That was why the teacher needed to
have deep consideration in choosing the appropriate poems for her students.
In selecting the poems the teacher could also adopt the criteria suggested by
Shirley (1983). The first was the language used in the poems. This meant that the
poem used the appropriate and repetition for the beginners. Knowing these helped
the teacher guide the students into recognizing and utilizing and using these
language techniques when talking about the poems to have good comprehension.
The second was how obvious was the rhythm. It dealt to the preference of the
31
students towards the poems whether they were likely to honour the poem with
In addition, the short text of poem gave benefits to both the teacher and
students. According to Dr. Kiranjeet Kaur Bedi (2011), there were five benefits of
using short literary works such as poems in the classroom. First, the short or
simple poems helped the teacher to acquaint herself with language use, to develop
her own competence and understand language as a social phenomenon, and not as
language. Third, the poems helped the teacher to consider language as entailing
carrying resemblance with the outside language. As a result this would raise
developed the intellectual ability of the learners and expose them to a variety of
Fifth, the short poems contextualized the language to help the students to acquire
grammar implicitly.
The lesson plans was crucial in teaching. The lesson plans reflected what the
students learned, how the teacher intended them to learn it, and how the teacher
knew that the learning had taken place. The lesson plans designed by the teacher
made her teaching effective in achieving the learning target that was developing
the students to think critically through reading activities with poems. Madeline
32
Hunter (1982) viewed that the effective lesson planning was at the core of
effective teaching because the effective teacher was the one who taught to an
objective, at the correct level of difficulty, and then monitored and adjusted the
designing the lesson plans that teachers might consider them much. They were (1)
the review, (2) anticipatory set including focus attention and gain interest, (3)
stating the objective, (4) input and modelling, (5) check for understanding, (6)
guided practice which provided feedback without grading, and (7) independent
In addition, the anticipatory set, according to Hunter (1982), was to grab the
student's attention: actions and statements by the teacher to relate the experiences
of the students to the objectives of the lesson, to put students into a receptive
framework for the ideas, principles, or information that was to follow, to extend
the understanding and the application of abstract ideas through the use of
example, and to activate and assess prior knowledge. Still according to Hunter
(1982), the teacher designed all of the lesson plans based on the curriculum and fit
the designs to the target of teaching-learning. Those lesson plans contained the
teaching materials given to the students through the learning processes. The
learning processes were implemented using the principles of learning, namely the
About the lesson plans, Jack H. Shrawder and David Warner Roane (2006)
also had the similar views as Hunter (1982). They viewed that the teacher might
be good at making the lesson plans which helped the teacher maintain the focus of
teaching. With a classroom full of students, the teacher was able to put teaching-
learning activities remain in the right track of learning objectives. With the lesson
plans, the teacher also had actual paperwork of whatever the teacher had taught.
The lesson plans helped the teacher learn from the mistakes and missteps. In other
words, the lesson plans designed by the teacher reflected the accomplishment and
kept track of what had worked and what had not worked.
The teacher had to prepare the lesson plans well before teaching. This made
the teacher could pay more attention to the learning process which aimed to hire
the students to develop their critical thinking skills through reading activities with
poems. This was the concept of lesson plan proposed by Spratt (2005). He
recommended that the lesson plan as the set of planning of learning which gave
the guidelines for the teacher about what learning materials which would be
taught and also about of how to teach them. These two main components might be
stated clearly on the lesson plans made by the teacher due to the fact that the
student learning was correlated to the teacher planning. That was why the lesson
plans were ready well before the implementation in the classroom. As the result
the teachers could focus on its implementation which made the teacher did not
have to think so much about what they needed to do the next. The teacher was
suggested that the lesson plans designed by the teacher had to meet two important
elements of teaching. They were coherence and variety. Coherence referred to the
unity of each step of teaching or learning. While variety referred to the various
kinds of learning activities which were used to avoid the monotony of learning so
that the students did not get bored. In short, the teacher should design the lesson
plans should with internal coherence but which allowed the students to do
different things in their lesson plans. The reading activities with poems, for
example, was not monotonous but was run differently in various activities for
The lesson plans used by teachers might be good. Good lesson plans,
that a good lesson plan (1) might be coherence and flow, (2) exhibits variety, and
(3) should be flexible. Coherence means all learning activities might hang
together because the activities were not just a sequence of discrete activities. This
coherence and flow enabled the students to understand the rationale of each
learning activity. As a result, the students learned best when there were clear and
good transitions from one learning activity to the next one. The lesson plan also
should have some variety in terms of learning activities, learning materials, and
assignments. These triggered the good mood of the students to participate actively
in every learning activity. The last basic principle of making a good lesson plan
was a good lesson plan should be flexible. The flexibility referred to the
implementation of each step of learning activities. Each step was contextually run.
35
This meant that the change and the activity depended on the situation happened in
the classroom. The interesting questions from the students or the opinion of the
informative enough for other teachers to use them when necessary and had a
In addition, by creating the lesson plans, the teacher saved a great deal of
time and reduced the stress of dealing with confused students. She prepared for
every class meeting or constructed entire courses well. This was the view of
Richard Pregent (1994). He viewed that the teachers who had carefully prepared
lesson plans saved an enormous amount of time when they taught the course again
due to the fact that they had a written record of everything they had done (Pregent,
1994, p. 97). The lesson plans were basically all about the students’ success and
achievement. That was why the teacher cared greatly about learning activities
lesson plans. The lesson plans (1) provided the teacher with a structured ‘route’
through reading classes so that the teacher was sure of meeting the lesson
objectives, (2) gave the teacher a secure base from which she projected to the
class dealing to the impression that she organised and knew what she was doing,
and (3) provided the teacher her mentor, tutors and colleagues with insights into
the way the teacher approached her teaching, and showed that she helped the
According to Roger and Kagan (1992), the group works referred to the
cooperative learning. They viewed that group learning activities were designed or
in group in which each learner was held accountable for his or her own learning
and is motivated to increase the learning of others. The teachers designed the
all students would participate meaningfully in their groups. This also related to
what Johnson & Johnson (2000) convinced that when the students communicate
one another, they were involved in face to face interaction which provided one
another with feedback, challenged reasoning and conclusions, and teaching and
interaction were related to Erik Erikson’s view. According to Erikson (1956), the
stage at which the students in this classroom were at was identified as Industry
versus Inferiority. In this stage, the students learned to cooperate and work with
peers, acknowledge rules when playing and learning, and mastering the core
subjects in school. The learning activities of reading with poems fit directly into
this stage because the students were working with their peers, paying attention to
and developing an important skill in reading poems which was thinking critically.
domain as well as the social. A peer leader provided support and scaffolding from
37
a more competent other” who could also provide a “cognitive model of competent
there were five crucial benefits of peer learning. They were (1) the peer learning
encouraged the active participation in learning, (2) the peer learning fostered
personal as well as social development, (3) the peer learning facilitated the
the peer learning grew motivation, confidence, and enjoyment in learning, which
are sustainable, and (5) the peer learning demonstrated a caring ethos that
The peer learning showed that the advantages by Jacobs (2005) on his
paper. According to Jacobs (2005), the peer learning was essential for embedded
learning. The peer learning provided the students with a comfortable discipline-
based forum where both social and academic integration and skill development
could occurred well. The peer learning also benefit the student leaders as much as
the students who were not the leaders. The engagement with leadership activities
participating students.
The peer learning activities also typically result in basic aspects which gave
According to Nelson (1994) the aspects included (1) team-building spirit and
learning strategy was a valuable tool for the teacher to utilise. However, placing
students in groups of two and telling them to work together were not going to
automatically get the satisfied results. The teacher still needed supported with the
accomplish the assignments or student tasks that represented the shared meaning
and conclusions of the groups of two. Rochelle & Teasley (1995) said that the
1995, pp. 9-97). Between students in peer group learned and shared actively their
views about the poems and what and how they completed the student tasks. It
means that there was mutual and supporting relation between the students during
the learning activities. Both of the students in their peer groups assisted each other
There was also the relationship between peer social interaction and
cognitive development in the peer learning. Piaget (1959) cited in Tudge (1992, p.
and active interaction with the environment. The central to this learning process
were states of disequilibrium because there was an imbalance between what the
student understood and what the student encountered. Moreover, the peer
knowledge of the student and the knowledge of his peer as the result of dis-
39
equilibration. Through dialogue and discussion among the students of equal status
in their peer groups, the equilibration was restored and the cognitive change
occurred simultaneously.
Turkanis, & Bartlett (2001), the basis for the development of a community that
fostered the students’ learning due to the fact that both of the students varied and
the partnerships between the students and their pairs which encouraged the active
learning in them.
The assignments were not only to assess the critical thinking of the students
but also to train the students to think critically. This was dealt to what Brownie &
Freeman (2000, pp. 56-89) believed that the learning course that was designed to
thinking. The assignments were created in such a way which focused on critical
relationship between parts, developed the relationship of cause and effect in the
events, searched out the reasons of why the characters in the narrative poems
improve students’ abilities to think their way through content, using disciplined
40
skill in reasoning. The more particular the teacher can be about what the teacher
wants students to learn about critical thinking, the better can the teacher creates
assignments with that particular end in view. The assignments were used to enable
According to Linda Elder, Richard Paul, and Rush Cosgrove (2013) in The
critical thinking teaching and learning are (1) course evaluation form provides
evidence of whether and to what extent the students perceive faculty as fostering
critical thinking abilities, (2) critical thinking subtest in the form of analytic
reasoning provides evidence of whether and to what extent the students are able to
reason analytically, (3) critical thinking assignment in the form of critical thinking
concepts and understanding provides evidence of whether and to what extent the
hence the tests students readiness to think critically, (4) fair mindedness test
provides evidence of whether and to what extent the students can reason
effectively between conflicting points of view and hence tests the students’
reasoning, (5) critical thinking reading and writing test provides evidence of
whether and to what extent the students can read closely and write substantively
and hence test the students’ abilities to read and write critically, (6) international
critical thinking test provides evidence of whether and to what extent the students
are able to analyse and assess the excerpts from textbooks or professional writing,
9
http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/international-critical-thinking-basic-concepts-amp-
understan/782
41
(7) commission study protocol for interviewing faculty regarding critical thinking
provides evidence of whether and to what extent critical thinking is being taught
at a college or university which can be adapted for high school, (8) foundation for
provides evidence of whether and to what extent critical thinking is being taught
at a college or university which can be adapted for high school, (9) foundation for
provides evidence of whether and to what extent the students are learning to think
critically at a college or university which can be adapted for high school, and (10)
rubrics for assessing the students’ reasoning abilities is a useful tool in assessing
the extent to which the students are reasoning well through course content. All of
these assessment instruments can be used as part of pre- and post- assessment
strategies to gauge development over various time periods because they focus on
the five essential dimensions of critical thinking, namely (1) the analysis of
thought, (2) the assessment of thought, (3) the dispositions of thought, (4) the
skills and abilities of thought, and (5) the obstacles or barriers to critical thought.
the teacher feedbacks on students’ works in verbal forms could improve the
students’ critical thinking. Through the feedbacks, the students would learn about
how to interpret and analyse poems appropriately for similar critical questions.
42
Indeed, the oral feedback sessions could dig the self-confidence of low students to
express their feeling and ideas as the fundamental modal of thinking critically.
There were criteria of good feedback. Chamberlain, Dison & Button (1998,
pp. 71-111) suggested that good feedback might be constructive and pointed the
students to ways in which they could improve their learning and achievement.
They added that providing a mark or a grade only, even with a brief comment like
“good work” or “you need to improve” was rarely helpful. Furthermore good
feedback given by the teacher focused on giving the students opportunities to act
on the feedback itself. They added that in giving the teacher’s feedback the
teachers had to (1) give useful feedback, (2) keep the time between the task and
the feedback short, (3) keep her feedback clear and simple, (4) balance the
positive with the negative, (5) indicate how the student could improve, (6) avoid
had to inform, question, prompt, assess, encourage and guide your students to
achieve the learning outcomes. The teacher let the students know that a large part
of the teacher’s role was to provide feedback on their progress towards achieving
the learning outcomes. That was why the teacher might be very specific with them
about how much and what form of feedback they expect and when. This was
determined by the student tasks which the teacher had designed. The teacher also
might inform the students that feedback was verbal which the students needed to
be prepared for this by taking notes, asking questions and seeking advice as
needed.
43
In addition, Duncan (2007, p. 117) viewed that the students were commonly
did not read the teacher feedback comments. The most effective feedback for the
students was done during the learning activities. This was called as the feedback
process (Taras, 2003, p. 23). The students could be required to document how
they used feedback to advance to the next stage of assignments (Nicol, 2008, p.
80). According to him, the workload for teachers can be offset by the reduction of
time needed to give feedback on the final product and by incorporating peer
The students did not pay attention to the comments because they did not
make sense to them (Duncan, 2007, p. 93). It means that they did not understand
the purpose of the feedback process. This was happened when feedback was
delivered solely by the teacher and was often associated with the students as the
marking of what was right and wrong. Many teachers tended to focus on the
correctional rather than the instructional aspects of feedback (Hattie & Timperley,
2007, p. 119). That was why careful preparation beforehand in this research
helped to prime the students about the nature of feedback and its role in the
learning process. They added that withholding feedback was needed to allow the
This research also served previous studies related to critical thinking skills
thinking skills in educational setting. In this section, the researcher shows two of
The first research was done by Nancy Lampert. She was from Virginia
programme and critical thinking in 2011. She connected critical thinking and art
sketchbooks, and also reflecting on the reminder of the lessons. She designed
community art programme to enhance the critical thinking skills of ten urban
elementary students by engaging them in enquiry-based art lessons. She also did
the assessment of the programme at the end of the research. In this case, she used
order to assess the students’ critical thinking gains. She described in the research
focused the students on art lessons that required open-ended problem solving and
critical analysis. The programme could empower the children to think for
themselves and also improve their critical thinking ability. She showed that the
represent support for the theory that enquiry-based art curriculum and instruction
can increase the ability of the students to think critically. According to her
research result, teaching of manual skills, formal elements, and the other various
connected with enquiry could sharpen the students’ critical thinking skills.
The second was the research done by Shaheera Jaffar in 2004. She was an
for students of literature in this university. She trained the students in critical
perspectives, and tried to analyse how different aspects of a literary a text fit in
with each other to create a design and world of its own. She believed that when
not to say anything without evidence from the text. In this case, the students
learned how to use that evidence to support their opinions. It meant that their
opinions had to be backed up by proofs. In her research, she created such kinds of
atmosphere to make the students learn to value their thinking processes and an
interactive classroom which taught them to respect different opinions from others.
Thus, she developed their critical thinking through critical reading. The students
were encouraged to have responding to the literature texts. The materials used in a
texts as the learning materials were broken down in the form of activities which
challenge the students’ critical thinking ability. She gave the students practice in
showed that critical thinking was an important area of teaching to help students
become self-motivated and autonomous learners who could apply their acquired
modes of inquiry inside and outside classroom. According to the result, critical
thinking could be developed through critical reading which involved training the
students what to look for and how to think about what they find. The students
46
and questioning. Finally, this research proved that teaching critical thinking
CHAPTER 3
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This chapter is about the research methods applied in this study. Basically
this chapter aims to describe the research methodology which reflects the research
47
design, data and sources of data, data collection techniques, data analysis, research
implementation, and instrument forms. In other words, this chapter outlines the
This research used descriptive qualitative methods for the research design.
This research gave sufficient details to what extent and how teaching reading with
poems as learning materials can develop students’ critical thinking skills. This
study aimed to answer two research questions using qualitative methods for added
detail and nuance. The results of this research described how teaching reading
with poems as learning materials could develop students’ critical thinking skills.
Moreover, the researcher had an important role in obtaining the data in which the
sentences in representing the related data which would be analysed to show the
conclusion for this study. According to Fraenkel and Wallen (2006), the
qualitative data were collected in the form of words rather than numbers.
Moreover this research used a teacher and an observer. In this study, the teacher
of reading class played a role as the researcher too. Then the observer was taken
from her teaching partner whom observed all reading activities. This was because
the researcher wanted to keep the naturalistic setting of where the research was
being conducted. Thus, this research had natural activities in which the behaviour
They were EFL students with Maduranese language as their mother tongue and
Javanese and Indonesia languages as their second languages. For them, Javanese
language was for informal communication, while Indonesia language was for
formal interaction. They were considered as the students with low English
proficiencies (Low Intermediate students/ LI students) since they got low scores
Indeed, based on their report books of the first semester of the academic year of
This study observed and investigated their English reading activities. The
English reading activities using poems to develop their critical thinking skills.
Most of the students of XA could not retell the story using their own words. Even,
they were not able to analyse beyond the text dealing to the theme, setting, or
massage that the author wanted to share through the story which the students
learned. They had low in critical thinking skills due to the fact that they felt very
difficult in expressing their opinion using their own words towards English texts.
This could be proven by the pre-test that they had done. Thus, she was challenged
49
to help the students to improve their critical thinking skills of English through
The source of data is the subject from the data were obtained (Arikunto,
2006, p. 129). The source of data in this research were the researcher, observer
who was a native from USA and also an English teacher at MAN Lumajang, and
the research was conducted because of three factors. First, she needed her students
enjoy learning English, especially English reading, with English poems which a
new type of learning material for them. Second, she needed to introduce a
literature to her students since they never got that in English classes. Third, she
needed to encourage her students to have better critical thinking skills. It was
because most of students in this school where she worked as an English teacher
were had high difficulties in expressing their opinion beyond the texts when they
were involved in reading activities. This indicated that their critical thinking skills
remain low. She focused on students of class XA to make her easier to apply the
research and find the meaningful data after the process of data reduction.
Thus, the data in this research referred to the information that the researcher
collected for the study. They included written data materials and teaching-learning
activities which were recorded actively in field notes. The researcher collected the
data from pre-tests, post-tests, field notes of observation, and observation sheets
written during the classroom activities. The study used qualitative methods to
50
analyse subjective data; data existing within the minds of people and typically
activities. The teacher facilitated the strategies in the classroom and the students
used the strategies. In addition, the researcher collected more detailed information
by the teacher in teaching reading with poems as learning materials to develop the
research, this study was directed to discover who, what, and where of teaching
In this research the data collection was conducted through two ways,
namely observation and students’ tasks. Observation was used to get qualitative
data about teaching learning activity especially in teaching reading using poems to
develop students’ critical thinking skills. The researcher would use observation
sheets and field notes. Observation sheet was in the form of short guidelines
which was used to observe the students activities and teacher activities during the
process of implementation the action. The observer checked and graded the
students’ activities and the teacher’s activities in the categories. Field notes were
51
records of the explanation how the strategy was implemented. These also gave
detailed information and description of what was happening, what the observer
heard, saw, felt, and experienced during the teaching-learning process. Students’
post-test. Students’ tasks were used to get data of whether there is improvement,
given poems including song lyrics due to the fact that song lyrics were considered
as poems which were sung. The students should answer reading questions
consisting critical thinking questions which made them analyse and interpret the
Thus, in this research, the researcher became the key instrument in obtaining
all of data from the sources. She collected the students’ answers of pre-tests and
post-tests, analysed all of them to make conclusion narratively about the condition
of students’ critical thinking skills, and applied teaching reading using poems. In
collecting the data, she also employed observation technique which was done by
the observer in order to avoid the subjective bias when collecting data from
observations.
learning processes from the beginning until the end. He wrote field notes during
the observations. The field notes were used to write the occurance during the
observations. The field notes were used as eligible instruments in this research.
According to Susanto (2010) a field note is used to record what the observer
52
heard, said, and thought. Observation sheets were another instrument used by the
observer.
daily recording of students’ written tasks. To be detailed, this study had several
instruments including (1) an observation checklist used to observe the use of the
lesson plan, the instructional materials, and the teaching and learning process, (2)
documentation such as lesson plan which is used to collect data related to research
problems, and (3) teacher-made tests which are used to assess the students’ critical
Thus, the results of these observations would explain in detail what had
been observed. The researcher would analyse it together with the data from pre-
This research used qualitative data. It was dealing to the activity of teaching
learning process done by teacher and students. The collected data of observation
and field notes were searched out and arranged systematically to be analysed by
Thus, the data of this qualitative research were analysed inductively. The
data were gained from the teaching-learning processes including pre-tests, post-
tests, field notes of observations, observation sheets in which they were very
useful to develop the research reports. In this case, the data from observations and
the students’ answers from pre-test and post-tests were used to describe and
53
reflect what was happening in the classroom activities in order to address the
The analysis was written in the form of words and sentences to explain them
had a dynamic form of content analysis for visual data in written form which was
summary of the informational contents of data which were organized in a way that
perfectly fit the data. This researcher did fact finding with critical analysis.
In analysing the data this research started by processing all of the available
Moloeng (2000). Next this research used three steps to analyse the data including
by Sunarto (2001).
Finally the researcher used two kinds of data analysis. They were data
analysis of the process of teaching reading with poems and data analysis of
students’ answers in open ended questions. In this case, the data analysis of
process was based on the observation checklist during classroom activities. Then
the researcher also analysed the students’ written answers using teacher-made
tests. After that the researcher rechecks the methods applied, the theories stated,
and the references used to support applicable procedures which showed that
critical thinking skills could be taught to the students by using poems in reading
comprehension activities.
54
focusing, simplifying, abstracting, and transferring the raw data gathered from
students’ answers, field notes, and observation sheets to compile meaningful data.
After collecting the data, the researcher classified the data based on the topic and
the data analysis accurately. In this case, the data reduction was a sort of analysis
which sharpened, classified, reduced, and organized the data in such a way to
meaningful data. She reduced the data from 29 students into 24 data students. She
chose the 24 research subjects because the 24 students were never absent to join
the reading classes using poems from February 6th, 2014 up to May 30th, 2014. While
other 5 students had ever been absent in joining the reading classes using poems
from February 6th, 2014 up to May 30th, 2014.Thus, this research reduced the data
based on the continuity of the research subjects who joined all of the meetings
including joining the pre-test and the post test. The students who had ever been
absent in one of the meetings were not taken into account in this research.
This research used data display to draw conclusions and to determine the
next at activities. So the researcher presented the data based on these aspects and
linked to the matters, and then analyse them based on the research problem. The
activity which involved inductive thinking to obtain the valid data before deciding
the final conclusion. As a result, in this step the researcher accomplished crossing
and detecting the data by consulting to the expert in this field that was the main
English teacher at SMAN 2 Lumajang, the best senior high school in Lumajang.
triangulation.
method of collecting the data. She used non participant observation and analysis
Basically there were several benefits to using the triangulation model in this
research. They were (1) the collected data are naturalistic, (2) describing the
situation of the object in particular time, (3) identifying data which reflect the
indication, (4) using the data which shows the appearance of reality, (5) disclosing
certain phenomenon, and (6) explaining the why factors of certain problems
examining the validity of the data or information of this research. This was done
to make sure of the accuracy and the validity of information presented. This meant
The research was conducted in February until May 2014 during the second
conducted this research over the course of 15 meetings including pre-test and
post-test. This was described in Table 3.1. The table was the research schedule
that had been done by the researcher. This table told the dates, time, learning
activities, and learning materials which contributed lots of data to this research.
The table was also later explained in general in this part of discussion.
From the table 3.1 it was shown that there were 13 meetings of teaching reading
using poems with explanations and tables of results of students’ critical thinking
skills on the tasks given in the meetings. The 13 meetings were basically activities
That was why the teacher gave different poem for each meeting.
The teacher selected the poems based on the two factors. They were the
characteristics of students who were considered as the students with low English
Chapter 2 and the low level of their critical thinking skills as proven in the results
of pre-test. In addition, the teacher let the students to choose or ask the learning
material for next meeting. All of them preferred funny poems and song lyrics. As
the result she decided to use funny narrative poems and familiar song lyrics to
teach reading to train the students to think critically. They were “Home” by
Michael Buble, “Hero” by Mariah Carey, “Puppy and I” by A.A. Milne, “Story-
time” by Judith Nicholls, “Tears in Heaven” by Eric Clapton, “Jimmy Goes to the
City” by Arthur Read, “You Raise Me Up” by Josh Groban, “Heaven was
Needing a Hero” by Joe Dee Messina, “My Teacher Took My iPod” by Kenn
Nesbitt, “Daddy Fell into the Pond” by Alfred Noyes, “Soledad” by Westlife,
“The People Upstairs” by Ogden Nash, and “The Dentist and the Crocodile” by
Roald Dahl.
58
in this research the teacher trained the students to think critically using all of those
poems as learning materials of teaching reading. She established only two skills of
critical thinking which were trained to the students in this research, namely
interpreting and analysing due to their low English proficiencies. In this case,
interpreting was dealt to understanding a poem and to clarify its meaning, while
On the pre-test the students completed the pre-test for 90 minutes at the
language laboratory. They were ordered to have a seat based on their absent
numbers written on the language laboratory desks. They got a page of song lyric
and 10 open-ended questions. The students were given instruction orally by the
instruction of pre-test. It was done due to their low English proficiencies. They
were allowed to ask the teacher about the instruction that they did not understand
well.
Next was they listened to the song that the teacher played to them in order
to interact their interest and curious and also to make them feel fine and relax in
joining the pre-test. They listened to the song while they were reading the song
During pre-test activity, the students were given a poem in the form of song
lyrics for Michael Buble’s “Home”. The teacher distributed a page with the lyrics
59
for each student. After that, she played the song once to make the students feel
interested, relaxed, and curious. She allowed the students to use their dictionaries
For each meeting, both teacher and students were observed by an observer
setting which made the teacher and students feel at ease. Moreover, the observer
who was US Peace Corps volunteer who had previously taught to the classes
observed. He had co-taught alongside the teacher or the researcher. This helped in
making the research setting feel natural. In each meeting, he used three
instruments for observations. They were field notes sheet, lesson plan observation
sheet, and feasibility observation sheet. The researcher used these to contextualize
the data which would be descriptively analysed. With these observations, the
researcher was able to objectively monitor her real teaching activities of reading
In post-test activity, the students were given a narrative poem. The poem
was “The Mountain and the Squirrel” which was written by Ralph Waldo
the language laboratory. They did it individually in a test setting in which the
http://www.familyfriendpoems.com/poem/the-mountain-and-the-squirrel-by-ralph-
10
waldo_emerson#ixzz32QyFMp5A
60
This research uses instruments to gain the data, namely pre-test, post-test,
lesson plans, field notes, observation sheets, and validator sheets. Each of them
has different format which some of them are described as in the Appendixes.
CHAPTER 4
This chapter features the results and discussions of the research together
constituting answers to the research questions, namely how the teacher teaches
reading using poems to develop the students’ critical thinking skills and how the
students’ critical thinking skills are developed after they are taught reading using
poems. Thus, this chapter provides descriptive results and discussions of the
is how the teacher teaches reading using poems to develop students’ critical
61
thinking skills. Therefore, the processes of teaching reading using poems done by
the teacher are described in details in this session. All of them relate to the
As explained clearly in Chapter 3 that the teacher used different poem and
also gave the assignments to train and measure their critical thinking skills in
every meeting. The teacher applied three stages of reading activities, namely pre-
three stages the students were trained to think critically by completing tasks in
The researcher found out that the pre-reading activities were really warming
up activities consisting of (1) greeting and checking the students’ attendance, (2)
giving motivation, (3) checking the dictionary, (4) asking the students to form
groups of two, (5) distributing each of them a poem on a piece of paper, (6)
playing an easy English song to keep their focus and interest or reading a poem
aloud together, (7) modelling and explaining the types of reading questions which
reflected critical thinking elements, and (8) asking them to go back to their seats
translate difficult words, phrases, and sentences which they found in the poems.
The students discussed them in groups of two. Dictionaries were the main tools
62
during this activity. Because of the need for dictionaries, the teacher started each
meeting by checking students for dictionaries. It was clearly stated in the field
prepare the students well for the next reading activities. The teacher also
encouraged the students to be more interested in and curious about the poem. As
stated in the lesson plans, the teacher used different ways of stimulating the
students in the pre-reading activities. They were playing songs using audio aids
before the students learned to understand poems in the form of song lyrics and
reading poems aloud before the students analysed them in depth in during-reading
activities. At the end of the pre-reading activity, the teacher asked the students to
translate orally and classically for every sentence that the teacher read aloud from
the poem. By doing this, the teacher knew the students understood every sentence
In addition, the most interesting fact that was found in the research was that
pre-reading activities took the longest period compared with the periods of the
during-reading activities and the post-reading activities. It was because the pre-
reading activities were used by the teacher to overcome not only the language
barriers but also the critical thinking barriers of the students. The language
critical thinking for the students were dealt with the self-confidence in expressing
their feelings and opinions. These two barriers were the basic ingredients that
63
enabled them to achieve better critical thinking skills. That was why the teacher
made groups to engage the students in discussions and sharing with their friends.
The second stage of teaching reading using poems that was conducted by
the teacher in this research was the during-reading activity. In this research the
researcher found that the during-reading activities consisted of (1) asking them to
read the text silently, (2) providing the students with the critical thinking
the given poem, and (4) giving individual attention to the students if needed.
learning for difficult poems, but they did the assignments individually for the
simple ones. All of these were clearly stated in the lesson plans and field notes.
Referring to peer learning, Tsui (2008) believed that peer learning which involved
and ideas could be helpful factors for supporting critical thinking. In this case, the
The students did the assignments individually after the group discussion
ended. The assignments consisted of critical thinking questions which trained the
students to interpret and analyse the poem in depth. For earlier meetings of this
research, the teacher trained the students to interpret and analyse the poem in
depth by giving them multiple choice questions. These could make the students
know well of how to interpret and analyse poems beyond the texts. After the
64
poems, they were given open-ended questions which needed them to interpret and
the students to acquire all of two components of critical thinking skills by giving
them questions such as “What was happening in the poem? Tell this using your
own words”, “Where does it happen? Give your reason, please”, “When does it
take place? Why?”, “What does the poem talk about? Give the reason, please”,
“What is the theme of the poem? Why do you think so?”, and the like. In order to
stimulate the students’ more critical thinking skills, sometimes the teacher added
questions such as posing the students as the author or poet like “If you were the
speaker, what would you do? And why would you do that?” and “If you were the
singer, what would you do? And why would you do that?” and analysing the
feelings of the speakers or singers like “Does the singer feel happy? Why do you
say so?”, “What do you think about the speaker’s feelings? Why do you say so?”,
and “What was happening to the speaker? Why do you say so?” These kinds of
questions were added by the teacher in several of the last meetings after the
the end of each during-reading activity, the students submitted assignments to the
teacher.
research included three activities, namely (1) giving a chance to the students to
65
share their difficulties in accomplishing the assignments, (2) giving feedbacks for
the students who still failed in responding to the critical thinking questions, and
(3) drawing conclusions together about the poem that they had learned, and (4)
closing the meeting. In this case, the teacher allotted less time for post-reading
were asked about their difficulties in interpreting and analysing the poems they
had just read and done in during-activities. By knowing their difficulties, the
teacher knew how to improve the learning materials and assignments for the next
meeting.
At the end of the post activity for each meeting the teacher gave the
students the feedback. She gave the spoken feedback classically for students’
feedbacks classically for every unsatisfied critical thinking performance which the
students told to the teacher, automatically the teacher also trained the students to
answer the second research question. It is how the students’ critical thinking skills
are developed after they are taught the reading using poems. They would be
students’ critical thinking skills before and after teaching reading using poems.
66
very difficult time not only in thinking independently but also in having any depth
to their thought process. The students were turned out to have very little ability to
process and think beyond the texts. As Low Intermediate students, they had no
reading texts. This hindered their abilities to comprehend the texts in order to lead
Surprisingly, this research proved that the critical thinking skills of Low
Intermediate students could be developed after they were taught reading using
poems for several meetings. This could be seen clearly in the following chart.
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
AA BAR DF DPS EKR EPK APP MA ANF AAR DPA RF NIF QA NF NLF NSR NA NAP NAF RI DN YS ZR
Y E F I I I M M N N S
BA
Axis Title
Pre-Test Post-Test
The Table 4.1 informed that there were good progresses of critical thinking
skills of Low Intermediate students. The blue line of the chart represented the
results of the post-test that the students did on May 30 th, 2014. They achieved
better skills of thinking critically after they had engaged in reading activities using
67
poems. The students performed low in thinking critically before the reading
activities with poems as reading texts. It was clearly shown by the green line of
Chart 4.1. This line represented the results of the pre-test which had been done by
the students on February 6th, 2014. In other words, the results of pre-test and post-
test featured that the low students were able to have good achievements in critical
thinking skills after they were regularly trained through reading activities with
poems. This was in line with Fischer (1980) emphasized that the development of
critical thinking skills because their classroom experiences had provided sufficient
support not only for their critical thinking skill development but also for their
built on the previous experiences, provided proper opportunities for the students
to produce better performance, and laid a foundation for further skill development
thinking skills. The Low Intermediate students could be trained and taught and
they could learn in constant periods. This underlined what Helper (1993) believed
that critical thinking skills were not only teachable but also learnable as well. The
students became better critical thinkers when they acquired and utilized thinking
skills to interpret and analyse information served in poems. In this case the teacher
might have effective ways of teaching the students to think such as well-prepared
lesson plans, funny narrative poems which were adjustable to the characteristics
68
learning to eliminate the language constraints, direct oral instructions, and the
like. This was related to the statement of Fisher (2001) that direct instruction in
critical thinking improves students’ critical thinking skills. That was why the
teacher in this research gave direct instruction orally for every reading activity and
In general, the students who developed their critical thinking skills in this
research were able to achieve better marks, became less dependent on the teacher
and textbooks, and were able to create arguments through logical steps. Through
display their critical thinking skills in interpreting and analysing the poems. The
teaching reading using poems helped the students improve their critical thinking
skills.
The Low Intermediate students who participated in reading activities using poems
as learning materials in groups and individually had been found to have performed
significantly better on the critical thinking skills. These students developed their
critical thinking skills step by step. They were trained regularly and periodically
to interpret and analyse the poems in each meeting. In individually the students
had been found to have performed significantly better on the critical thinking
and analysis towards poems at higher intellectual level that were having logical
However, the chart indicated that the classroom activities with poems in
earlier meetings were still un-familiar for the low students. They were not
accustomed to those kinds of things. This affected their performance and results in
the students’ barriers to allow them to interest, to focus their attention, and to
the students to develop their critical thinking skills since both of them were
Delphi Panel consisting of 46 experts that the researcher cites from Facione
Thus, all of those activities of teaching reading using poems, especially for
low students, proved that critical thinking skills did not automatically and quickly
required a great deal of teacher efforts in helping the low students to think
critically. Consequently the teacher had to learn first about incorporating critical
questioning into her class. Undoubtedly the teacher had the power to trigger,
stimulate, develop, and shape the abilities of the low students to think critically. It
was in line with what Chalupa and Sormunen (1995) believed that the instructors
might be prepared to lead the students towards critical thinking skills. The teacher
might be totally ready to create proper lesson plans, to choose best poems for low
students, and good critical thinking assignments to train and to measure the low
4.3 Discussions
This research shows that the students successfully improve their critical
thinking skills after having activities of the poems interpretation and analysis in
71
reading classes. There are five factors that make this happens, namely the lesson
student assignments, and the feedbacks given by the teacher. These factors are
proven successful in helping the students to develop their critical thinking skills
The lesson plans designed by the teacher in this research make the effective
teaching in achieving the learning target that is developing the students to think
critically through reading activities with poems. In making the lesson plans, the
teacher applies three basic principles of making good lesson plans, namely
coherence, variety, and flexible so that the students do not feel bored during the
reading activities.
The lesson plans with internal coherence allow the students to do different
things and make the students learn well because there are clear and good
transitions from one learning activity to the next one and having varieties of
learning activities with various poems and assignments which trigger the good
1982; Pregent, 1994; Harmer, 2001; Jansen, 2002; Spratt, 2005; H. Shrawder and
David Warner Roane, 2006). As a result, with a classroom full of 29 students, the
developing the students’ critical thinking skills since the lesson plans keep both
teacher and students on the track of the teaching-learning aims which run not
and analysing various poems which are done in different groups and with different
assignments.
The second factor that succeed this research in helping the students to
develop their critical thinking is the poems. As the learning materials, the English
poems are selected well by the teacher which leads the students to develop their
critical thinking skills. Due to the Low Intermediate students, the teacher selects
the poems based on the principles of selecting poems for EFL beginners. The
poems are short, suit for the needs of the students, their motivation, interest,
cultural background, have the appropriate language to the level of the students'
comprehension, and proper with the class time available (Fisher & Natarella,
Those kinds of poems give the students ample opportunities to enrich their
themes, and features of the poems, help the students to respond to and give the
expression to the imaginative ideas, moods and feelings expressed in the poems,
and enable the students to have satisfied progress in thinking critically. Thus, the
poems used in this research are narrative, humorous, funny stories, enjoyable,
familiar experiences with the students, popular, and having low English barriers
which make the students understand well about the content. As a result, these
poems help the students to develop their critical thinking skills through
The third factor is teaching and learning strategy applied by the teacher in
this research. She takes cooperative learning in the form of peer learning as the
strategy. The reading activities are done in groups of two students. The groups are
learning objectives, and the learning materials. These enhance the optimal
the poems, analyse the poems, and accomplish the assignments that are resulted
communication skills (Erikson, 1956; Piaget, 1959; Tudge, 1992; Nelson, 1994;
Rochelle & Teasley, 1995; Johnson & Johnson, 2000; Rogoff, Turkanis, &
The students in their peer groups solve their language barriers dealing to
new vocabularies or new terms that they found in the poems, solve their anxieties
in expressing their feeling, and participate meaningfully in their groups. When the
students communicate one another, they are involved in face to face interaction
which provide one another with feedback, challenged reasoning and conclusions,
The fourth factor is the assignment. The assignments are created in this
research not only to assess the critical thinking of the students but also to train the
students to think critically. In making the assignments, the teacher considers five
thought, the dispositions of thought, the skills and abilities of thought, and the
assessment of thinking (Brownie & Freeman, 2000; Elder, Paul, and Cosgrove,
2013).
The students’ critical thinking skills in this research are assessed and trained
namely interpreting and analysing poems. The interpreting assignments lead the
students to figure the content as an argument or point of view of the author which
shared in the poem by using their own words. The analysing assignments guide
the students to break down the poem into parts of identifications, namely the
authors. These analysis activities enable the students to determine the relationship
between parts, to develop the relationship of cause and effect in the events, and to
search out the reasons of why the characters in the narrative poems behave in such
a way.
The last factor is the teacher feedbacks. The teacher feedbacks in this
research are oral feedbacks. They are given by the teacher in the post reading
activities. The teacher provides sufficient time to give oral feedbacks to the
In giving the feedbacks, the teacher applies the principles of giving good
feedbacks. The teacher points the students to ways in which they can improve
their learning and achievement. She focuses on giving the students opportunities
to act on the feedback itself, and uses clear, short, simple, motivating words, clear
direction, well-developed, and text specific such as “What’s your main point here?
75
If it’s that you disagree, put that idea up front and explain”, “Consider integrating
these ideas”, and “Be more specific. Say where and when”. She gives the useful
feedbacks which indicate how the student can improve, avoids sarcasm, informs,
questions, prompts, assesses, encourages and guides the students to achieve the
Button, 1998; Taras, 2003; Duncan, 2007; Hattie & Timperley, 2007; Nicol, 2008;
Scholes, 2012).
Those kinds of oral feedbacks improve the students’ critical thinking, make
the students learn about how to interpret and analyse poems appropriately for
similar critical questions, and dig the self-confidence of low students to express
their feeling and ideas as the fundamental modal of thinking critically. Thus, the
feedbacks are given after assessment tasks in order to give the students sufficient
opportunities to use the feedbacks for improving subsequent performance for the
next meeting. The feedbacks in this research are given as soon as possible after
the completion of the learning tasks. It is because the students also need to see the
CHAPTER 5
This chapter is the last one of this research. This chapter features
5.1 Conclusions
Critical thinking implies that the information is not right or wrong or simply
response in the context, and reasoning that lead to a valid interpretation and
analysis. Therefore, critical thinking skills can be taught, trained, or guided by the
teacher in order to refine and improve their these skills repeatedly although the
The ability of thinking critically does not always belong to smart students with
high academic competencies, especially in English subject. But this skill can also
The students can develop their critical thinking skills when several
treatments are given by their English teacher using certain method and strategy.
critical assignments to train and to assess the students’ critical thinking skills, and
giving the teacher feedbacks orally in post reading activities, the students
77
succeeded in thinking critically. They needs time and multiple opportunities in the
In this research, the good lesson plans, proper English poems, peer learning,
assignments, and oral teacher feedbacks are designed specifically for promoting or
upgrading and measuring the critical thinking skills of the low students. All of
them can serve as guidance, best practices, and best experiences for fostering the
critical thinking skills of Low Intermediate students. In this regard, they can be
used by the teacher to provide with guidance in the selection of poems and critical
Intermediate students is not a simple task. It is because there are many barriers to
its implementation such as the poor language barriers, lack of proper poems for
However, this research proves that when the LI students are aligned in
pursuit of critical thinking by the teacher through reading activities using proper
poems and critical assignments in which both of them are included in the well-
designed lesson plans, being run in the peer learning, and having good teacher
feedbacks, these students can successfully improve their critical thinking skills.
They can perform interpreting and analysing poems with reasonable point of
views.
5.2 Suggestions
78
and effectively, the teacher should be able to see the abundant learning that is
possible to apply in the classroom. The learning activities must be based on the
characteristics of the students. That is why there are several preparations that must
be done by the teacher. They are (1) planning for the learning scenarios and
materials which use topics or situations that have a high interest value for the
students, (2) asking questions to find out the students’ interests, (3) providing
activities, (4) asking open-ended questions which are interesting to the students,
(5) making statements which enable the students can interact with the concepts at
their own level, (6) providing concrete materials that can trigger the students’
interests and curiosities, (7) encouraging the students to taste, smell, touch, look,
or listen towards the learning materials, (8) giving the students opportunities to
represent what they have learned by their own strengths such as retelling stories
by their own words, making their own conclusions, giving reasonable arguments,
and so forth, and (9) giving the students to remember, discuss, and think about
what they are learning. But for further research selecting the poems based on
whether they are satirical or didactic in order to make the poems as learning
skills is suggested. All of these may optimize the best performance of the Low
REFERENCES
Duron, R., Limbach, B., & Waugh, W. (2006). Critical Thinking framework for
any discipline. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in
Higher Education, 17(2), 160-166.
Facione, P. A. (1997). Critical Thinking: What is it and why it counts. [On-line].
Available at: http://www.calpress.com/critical.html .
Ferret, S. (1997). Peak Performance. Cited in GED 20902: Online professional
development at http://www.ket.org/ged2002/critical/cr3.htm
Fischer, K. W. (1980). A Theory of Cognitive Development: The Control and
Construction of Hierarchies of Skills. Psychological Review, 87, 477-51.
Fisher, R. (1990). Teaching Children to Think. Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes.
Fisher, R. (2002). Creative Minds: Building communities of learning for the
creative age. Paper at Thinking Qualities Initiative Conference, Hong
Kong Baptist University, June 2002.
Fraenkel, Jack R and Wallen Norman E. (2006). How to Design and Evaluate
Research in Education. New York: Mc Graw Hill.
Halonen, J. S. (1995). Demystifying critical thinking. Teaching of Psychology, 22.
75-81. In http://jamiedavi.es/msc/teaching-critical-thinking-in-
psychology.
Harrison. (2008). In www.arareading.org/Harrison%20HANDOUTS%20FOR
%20ARA%202008.pdf
Hattie, J. and Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of feedback. Review of
Educational Research, 77, 81-112.
http://eyeonlifemag.com/eye-on-educators/10-criteria-for-evaluating-childrens-
poetry
Helpern, D. F. (1999). Teaching for Critical Thinking: Helping College Students
Develop the Skills and Dispositions of a Critical Thinker. New
Directions for Teaching and Learning, 80, 69-74.
Jacobs, C. (2005). On being an insider on the outside: New spaces for integrating
academic literacies. Teaching in Higher Education, 10(4), 475- 87.
doi:10.1080/13562510500239091
Key, James P. (1997). Research Design in Occupational Education: Qualitative
Research. Oklahoma: Oklahoma State University Press.
Khatib, Muhammad. (2011). Literature in ESLF/EFL Classroom. English
Language Teaching, Vol. 4, No. 1, March 2011. In www.ccsenet.org/elt.
Kormanski, M. Luethel. (1992). Using Poetry in the Intermediate Grades.
Reading Horizon, 1992, volume 32, #3, pp. 184-190.
Krajicek, Stephanie. (2008). The Next Step: Making Sense of Limited English
[Proficiency (LEP) Levels & English Language Proficiency (ELP)
Standards. Volume 3, Number 4 issue of the Write Connections quarterly
newsletter (2008).
Lambert, J., & Cuper, P. (2008). Multimedia technologies and familiar spaces:
21st century teaching for 21st century learners. Contemporary Issues in
Technology and Teacher Education, 8(3), 26-276.
Leo, Eleanor S. (1994). Powerful Reading, Efficient Learning. United States:
Macmillan Coll Div.
81
Paul, Richard and Elder, Linda. (2007). The Miniature Guide to Critical
Thinking: Concepts and Tools. California: Foundation for Critical
Thinking Press.
Pregent, Richard. (1994). Charting Your Course: How to Prepare to Teach More
Effectively. Madison, WI: Magna Publications.
Pirozzi, Richard. (2003). Critical Reading, Critical Thinking. New York: Addison
Weasley Educational Publisher Inc.
Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge.
Rochelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in
collaborative problem solving. In C. O’Malley (Ed.), Computer
supported collaborative learning (pp.69–97). Berlin: Springer.
Roe, D Betty, Stoodt, Barbara D, & Burns, Paul C. (1995). Secondary School
Reading Instruction – The Content Areas. Boston: Houhton Mifflin.
Rogoff, B., Turkanis, C. G., & Bartlett, L. (Eds.). (2001). Learning together:
Children and adults in a school community. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Shrawder, Jack H. and David Warner Roane. (2006). Planning a Successful
Lesson in A Teaching For Success Focalite. South Lake Tahoe, CA:
Pentronics Publishing.
Susanto. (2008). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Surabaya: Unesa University Press.
Susanto. 2010. Konsep Penelitian Tindakan Kelas dan Penerapannya. Surabaya:
Lembaga Penerbitan FBS UNESA.
Skidell, M. B and Becker, S. G. (2001). The Main Idea: Reading to Learn (Third
Edition). United States: Pearson Education Inc.
Taras, M. (2003). To feedback or not to feedback in student self-assessment.
Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 28 (5), 549- 565.
Topping, K. (2005). Trends in Peer Learning. Educational Psychology, 25(6),
631-45. doi: 10.1080/01443410500345172.
Topping, K., & Ehly, S. (1998). Peer-assisted learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates.
Tudge, J. R. H. (1992). Processes and consequences of peer collaboration: A
Vygotskian analysis. Child Development, 63, 1364–1379.
UNESCO. (2013). MODULE A4: Use of Information in Monitoring, Planning
and Management. Systematic Monitoring of Education for All. In
http://www4.unescobkk.org/education/efatraining/module-a4/8-learning-
materials/
83
Appendix 1:
Results of Pre-Test with a Poem “Home” at February 6th, 2014
Abse
Score Score Score of
N Na nt Interpreting Analysing
of of CT
o me Num (I) (A)
I A Skills
ber
BY
1 1 0 0 0 0 0
AA
2 BA 2 0 2.5 0
0.25 0.25
R
3 DF 3 0 0 0 0 0
4 DPS 4 0 1.5 0 0.15 0.15
5 EKR 5 0 2 0 0.2 0.2
6 EPK 6 0.5 2 0.05 0.2 0.25
EAP 2 0
7 7 0 0.2 0.2
P
FM 2.5
8 8 0.5 0.05 0.25 0.3
A
IAN 2
9 9 1.5 0.15 0.2 0.35
F
1 IAA 1,5 0
10 0 0.15 0.15
0 R
1 Absent without information (A/Alpha)
IS 11
1
1 IDP 1
12 0 0 0.1 0.1
2 A
1 MR
13 0 0 0 0 0
3 F
1 MF 1.5 0
14 0 0.15 0.15
4 Y
1 MS
15 0 0 0 0 0
5 M
1 MNI 1
16 0 0 0.1 0.1
6 F
1 NQ 1,5 0
17 0 0.15 0.15
7 A
1 NF 18 0 1 0 0.1 0.1
84
8
1 1
NLF 19 0 0 0.1 0.1
9
2 2 0
NSR 20 0 0.2 0.2
0
2 NN 1
21 0 0 0.1 0.1
1 A
2 2 0
NAP 22 0 0.2 0.2
2
2 1
NAF 23 0 0 0.1 0.1
3
2 NM Absent without information (A/Alpha)
24
4 A
2 Absent without information (A/Alpha)
RL 25
5
2 1
RI 26 0 0 0.1 0.1
6
2 1
SDN 27 0 0 0.1 0.1
7
2
YS 28 0 0 0 0 0
8
2
ZR 29 0 0.5 0 0.05 0.05
9
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
AA DF EK
R PP F IS RF SM
A
NL
F A F RL N ZR
Y EA IA
N
M M NQ NN NA SD
BA
Students' Names
Interpreting Analysing
85
Appendix 2:
Results of Students’ CT Skills on Task 1 “Home” at February 7th, 2014
Abse Score of
Interpre
N Na nt Analysing Score Score CT
ting
o me Num (A) of I of A Skills
(I)
ber
BY 0.5
1 1 2 3 0.2 0.3
AA
2 BA 2 2 2 0.2 0.4
0.2
R
3 DF 3 2 2 0.2 0.2 0.4
4 DPS 4 2 4 0.2 0.4 0.6
5 EKR 5 4 3 0.4 0.3 0.7
6 EPK 6 3 3 0.3 0.3 0.6
EAP 4 0.1 0.5
7 7 1 0.4
P
FM 4 0.7
8 8 3 0.3 0.4
A
IAN 3 0.6
9 9 3 0.3 0.3
F
1 IAA 3 0.3 0.6
10 3 0.3
0 R
1 Absent - -
IS 11 - -
1 (Alpha /A)
1 IDP 4 0.6
12 2 0.2 0.4
2 A
1 MR 0
13 0 0 0 0
3 F
1 MF
14 Alpha
4 Y
1 MS 0.2
15 0 0 0.1 0.1
5 M
1 MNI Absent -
16 - - -
6 F (Permission/I)
1 NQ 4 0.5 0.9
17 5 0.4
7 A
1 1 0.3
NF 18 2 0.2 0.1
8
1 3 0.5
NLF 19 2 0.2 0.3
9
2 NSR 20 4 3 0.4 0.3 0.7
86
0
2 NN Absent -
21 - - -
1 A (Sick/S)
2 4 0.2 0.6
NAP 22 2 0.4
2
2 Absent -
NAF 23 - - -
3 (Sick/S)
2 NM Absent -
24 - - -
4 A (Permission/I)
2 Absent -
RL 25 - - -
5 (Sick/S)
2 Absent -
RI 26 - - -
6 (Permission/I)
2 3 0.8
SDN 27 5 0.5 0.3
7
2 0.3
YS 28 1 2 0.1 0.2
8
2 Absent -
ZR 29 - - -
9 (Alpha /A)
0.5
0.4
Scores' Scale
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
AA DF EK
R PP F IS RF SM
A
NL
F A F RL N ZR
Y EA IA
N
M M NQ NN NA SD
BA
Students' Names
Interpreting Analysing
Appendix 3:
87
Abse Score of
N Na nt Interpreti Analysing Score Score CT Skills
o me Num ng (I) (A) of I of I
ber
BY 0.2
1 1 0 1 0 0.2
AA
BA Absent -
2 2 - - -
R (Alpha/A)
3 DF 3 1 0 0.2 0 0.2
4 DPS 4 3 2 0.6 0.4 1.0
5 EKR 5 2 2 0.4 0.4 0.8
6 EPK 6 0 1 0 0.2 0.2
EAP 0.8
7 7 2 2 0.4 0.4
P
FM 0.8
8 8 3 1 0.6 0.2
A
IAN 0.6
9 9 2 1 0.4 0.2
F
1 IAA 1.0
10 3 2 0.6 0.4
0 R
1 Absent -
IS 11 - - -
1 (Alpha/A)
1 IDP 0.2
12 0 1 0 0.2
2 A
1 MR 0.8
13 3 1 0.6 0.2
3 F
1 MF Absent -
14 - - -
4 Y (Sick/S)
1 MS 0.4
15 1 1 0.2 0.2
5 M
1 MNI 0.6
16 2 1 0.4 0.2
6 F
1 NQ 0.8
17 2 2 0.4 0.4
7 A
1 0.2
NF 18 0 1 0 0.2
8
1 0.8
NLF 19 2 2 0.4 0.4
9
2 0.4
NSR 20 0 2 0 0.4
0
2 NN 0.6
21 1 2 0.2 0.4
1 A
2 NAP 22 0 2 0 0.4 0.4
88
2
2 0.6
NAF 23 2 1 0.4 0.2
3
2 NM 0.6
24 2 1 0.4 0.2
4 A
2 1.0
RL 25 3 2 0.6 0.4
5
2 0.2
RI 26 0 1 0 0.2
6
2 0.8
SDN 27 2 2 0.4 0.4
7
2 0.6
YS 28 2 1 0.4 0.2
8
2 0
ZR 29 0 0 0 0
9
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
A DF R PP F IS RF SM
A
NL
F A F RL N ZR
YA EK EA IA
N
M M NQ NN NA SD
BA
Students' Names
Interpreting Analysing
Appendix 4:
Results of Students’ CT Skills on Task of Poem “Puppy and I”
at March 28th, 2014
nt
o me Num ng (I) (A) of I of A CT Skills
ber
BY 1 0.05
1 1 0.5 0.1 0.15
AA
2 BA 2 6 0.3
3 0.6 0.9
R
3 DF 3 1.5 3.5 0.15 0.35 0.5
4 DPS 4 2 6 0.2 0.6 0.8
5 EKR 5 3 7 0.3 0.7 1.0
6 EPK 6 3 7 0.3 0.7 1.0
EAP 4 0.15
7 7 1.5 0.4 0.55
P
FM 7 0.3
8 8 3 0.7 1.0
A
IAN 7 0.3
9 9 3 0.7 1.0
F
1 IAA 7 0.3
10 3 0.7 1.0
0 R
1 7 0.25
IS 11 3 0.55 0.8
1
1 IDP Absent -
12 - - -
2 A (Sick/S)
1 MR 4.5 0.15
13 1.5 0.45 0.6
3 F
1 MF Absent -
14 - - -
4 Y (Alpha/A)
1 MS Absent -
15 - - -
5 M (Alpha/A)
1 MNI 4.5 0.15
16 1.5 0.45 0.6
6 F
1 NQ 7 0.2
17 2 0.7 0.9
7 A
1 3.5 0.2
NF 18 2 0.35 0.55
8
1 7 0.3
NLF 19 3 0.7 1.0
9
2 7 0.25
NSR 20 2.5 0.7 0.95
0
2 NN 7 0.3
21 3 0.7 1.0
1 A
2 7 0.3
NAP 22 3 0.7 1.0
2
2 7 0.25
NAF 23 2.5 0.7 0.95
3
90
2 NM 2.5
24 1.5 0.15 0.25 0.4
4 A
2 4.5
RL 25 1 0.1 0.45 0.55
5
2 3.5 0.2
RI 26 2 0.35 0.55
6
2 7 0.3
SDN 27 3 0.7 1.0
7
2 3.5 0.15
YS 28 1.5 0.35 0.5
8
2 Absent -
ZR 29 - - -
9 (Alpha/A)
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
AA DF EK
R PP F IS RF SM
A
NL
F A F RL N ZR
Y EA IA
N
M M NQ NN NA SD
BA
Students' Names
Interpreting Analysing
Appendix 5:
Results of Students’ CT Skills on Task of Poem “Story-time”
at April 3rd, 2014
Abse Score
N Na nt Interpreti Score Score of
Analysing (A)
o me Num ng (I) of I of A CT
ber Skills
91
BY 1 0.2 0.4
1 1 1 0.2
AA
2 BA 2 2 0.4 0.8
2 0.4
R
3 DF 3 1 1 0.2 0.2 0.4
4 DPS 4 2 2.5 0.4 0.5 0.9
5 EKR 5 2 3 0.4 0.6 1.0
6 EPK 6 2 2.5 0.4 0.5 0.9
EAP 2.5 0.4 0.9
7 7 2 0.5
P
FM 2.5 0.4 0.9
8 8 2 0.5
A
IAN 2.5 0.4 0.9
9 9 2 0.5
F
1 IAA 3 0.4 1.0
10 2 0.6
0 R
1 1 0.2 0.4
IS 11 1 0.2
1
1 IDP 2 0.4 0.8
12 2 0.4
2 A
1 MR 1 0.2 0.4
13 1 0.2
3 F
1 MF Absent - -
14 - -
4 Y (Permission/I)
1 MS 3 0.4 1.0
15 2 0.6
5 M
1 MNI 2.5 0.4 0.9
16 2 0.5
6 F
1 NQ 2.5 0.4 0.9
17 2 0.5
7 A
1 2.5 0.4 0.9
NF 18 2 0.5
8
1 2.5 0.4 0.9
NLF 19 2 0.5
9
2 3 0.4 1.0
NSR 20 2 0.6
0
2 NN 2.5 0.4 0.9
21 2 0.5
1 A
2 3 0.4 1.0
NAP 22 2 0.6
2
2 3 0.4 1.0
NAF 23 2 0.6
3
2 NM 2.5 0.4 0.9
24 2 0.5
4 A
2 RL 25 2 2.5 0.4 0.5 0.9
92
5
2 2.5 0.4 0.9
RI 26 2 0.5
6
2 2.5 0.4 0.9
SDN 27 2 0.5
7
2 1 0.1 0.3
YS 28 0.5 0.2
8
2 1 0.1 0.3
ZR 29 0.5 0.2
9
0.6
0.5
0.4
Scores' Scale
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
AA DF EK
R PP F IS RF SM
A
NL
F A F RL N ZR
Y EA IA
N
M M NQ NN NA SD
BA
Students' Names
Interpreting Analysing
Appendix 6:
Results of Students’ CT Skills on Task of Poem “Tears in Heaven”
at April 4th, 2014
Abse Score of
N Na nt Interpreti Analysing Score Score of CT Skills
o me Num ng (I) (A) of I A
ber
BY 1 0.5 1.0
1 1 1 0.5
AA
2 BA 2 1 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.75
93
R
3 DF 3 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.25 0.5
4 DPS 4 0 0 0 0 0
5 EKR 5 0.5 0 0.25 0 0.25
6 EPK 6 0 0 0 0 0
EAP 0.5 0.25 0.5
7 7 0.5 0.25
P
FM 1 0.25 0.75
8 8 0.5 0.5
A
IAN 1 0.25 0.75
9 9 0.5 0.5
F
1 IAA 0.5 0.25 0.5
10 0.5 0.25
0 R
1 0 0 0
IS 11 0 0
1
1 IDP 0.5 0.25 0.5
12 0.5 0.25
2 A
1 MR 0 0 0
13 0 0
3 F
1 MR Absent - -
14 - -
4 Y (Sick/S)
1 MS 0 0 0
15 0 0
5 M
1 MNI 0 0 0
16 0 0
6 F
1 NQ 0.5 0.25 0.5
17 0.5 0.25
7 A
1 0.5 0.25 0.5
NF 18 0.5 0.25
8
1 1 0.5 1.0
NLF 19 1 0.5
9
2 1 0.5 1.0
NSR 20 1 0.5
0
2 NN 1 0.5 1.0
21 1 0.5
1 A
2 0.5 0.5 0.75
NAP 22 1 0.25
2
2 0.5 0.25 0.5
NAF 23 0.5 0.25
3
2 NM 0 0 0
24 0 0
4 A
2 0 0.25 0.25
RL 25 0.5 0
5
2 0 0 0
RI 26 0 0
6
94
0.5
0.4
Scores' Scale
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
A DF R PP F IS RF SM
A
NL
F A F RL N ZR
YA EK EA IA
N
M M NQ NN NA SD
BA
Students' Names
Interpreting Analysing
Appendix 7:
Results of Students’ CT Skills on Task of Poem “Jimmy Goes to the City”
at April 24th, 2014
Abse
N Na nt Interpreti Analysing Score Score Score of
o me Num ng (I) (A) of I of A CT Skills
ber
BY
1 1 0 0 0 0 0
AA
BA Absent
2 2 - - - -
R (Sick/S)
3 DF 3 0.5 1 0.1 0.25 0.35
4 DPS 4 0.5 1.5 0.1 0.4 0.5
95
8
2
ZR 29 0 1 0 0.25 0.25
9
0.5
0.4
Scores' Scale
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
AA DF EK
R PP F IS RF SM
A
NL
F A F RL N ZR
Y EA IA
N
M M NQ NN NA SD
BA
Students' Names
Interpreting Analysing
Appendix 8:
Results of Students’ CT Skills on Task of Poem “You Raise Me Up”
at April 25th, 2014
Abse Score of
Interpre Score Score
N Na nt Analysing CT
ting of of
o me Num (A) Skills
(I) I A
ber
BY Absent - -
1 1 - -
AA (Alpha/A)
2 BA 2 1 0.5 1.0
1 0.5
R
3 DF 3 0.5 0 0.25 0 0.25
4 DPS 4 0.5 1 0.25 0.5 0.75
5 EKR 5 1 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.75
Absent - -
6 EPK 6 - (Dispensation/D -
)
97
Absent - -
EAP
7 7 - (Dispensation/D -
P
)
FM 1 0.5 1.0
8 8 1 0.5
A
IAN 1 0.5 1.0
9 9 1 0.5
F
1 IAA 0.5 0.25 0.5
10 0.5 0.25
0 R
1 Absent - -
IS 11 - -
1 (Alpha/A)
1 IDP 0.5 0 0.25
12 0 0.25
2 A
1 MR 0.5 0.25 0.5
13 0.5 0.25
3 F
1 MF 0.5 0.25 0.5
14 0.5 0.25
4 Y
1 MS 0.5 0 0.25
15 0 0.25
5 M
Absent - -
1 MNI
16 - (Dispensation/D -
6 F
)
1 NQ 0.5 0.5 0.75
17 1 0.25
7 A
1 0 0 0
NF 18 0 0
8
1 0.5 0.5 0.75
NLF 19 1 0.25
9
2 0.5 0.5 0.75
NSR 20 1 0.25
0
2 NN 1 0.5 1.0
21 1 0.5
1 A
2 1 0.25 0.75
NAP 22 0.5 0.5
2
2 1 0.5 1.0
NAF 23 1 0.5
3
2 NM 0.5 0 0.25
24 0 0.25
4 A
2 Absent (Sick/S) - -
RL 25 - -
5
2 1 0.25 0.75
RI 26 0.5 0.5
6
Absent - -
2
SDN 27 - (Dispensation/D -
7
)
98
Absent - -
2
YS 28 - (Dispensation/D -
8
)
2 0.5 0 0.25
ZR 29 0 0.25
9
0.4
Scores' Scale
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
A DF EK
R PP F IS RF SM
A
NL
F A F RL N ZR
YA EA IA
N
M M NQ NN NA SD
BA
Students' Names
Interpreting Analysing
Appendix 9:
Results of Students’ CT Skills on Task of Poem “Heaven Was Needing a
Hero” at May 2nd, 2014
Abse Score of
Interpre
N Na nt Analysing Score Score CT Skills
ting
o me Num (A) of I of A
(I)
ber
BY Absent - -
1 1 - -
AA (Alpha/A)
2 BA 2 1.5 0.1 0.5
0.5 0.4
R
3 DF 3 0.5 1 0.1 0.25 0.35
4 DPS 4 0.5 1 0.1 0.25 0.35
5 EKR 5 0.5 1.5 0.1 0.4 0.5
99
2 Absent - -
ZR 29 - -
9 (Alpha/A)
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
A DF EK
R PP F IS RF SM
A
NL
F A F RL N ZR
YA EA IA
N
M M NQ NN NA SD
BA
Students' Names
Interpreting Analysing
Appendix 10:
Results of Students’ CT Skills on Task of Poem “My Teacher Took My iPod”
at May 8th, 2014
Abse Score of
Interpre Score Score
N Na nt Analysing CT Skills
ting of of
o me Num (A)
(I) I A
ber
BY 1.5 0.25 0.65
1 1 1 0.4
AA
2 BA 2 Absent - -
- -
R (Sick/S)
3 DF 3 0 1.5 0 0.4 0.4
4 DPS 4 0.5 1.5 0.1 0.4 0.5
5 EKR 5 0.5 1.5 0.1 0.4 0.5
6 EPK 6 0.5 3 0.1 0.75 0.85
EAP 1.5 0.1 0.5
7 7 0.5 0.4
P
101
FM 2 0.25 0.75
8 8 1 0.5
A
IAN 3 0.25 1.0
9 9 1 0.75
F
1 IAA 2.5 0.25 0.85
10 1 0.6
0 R
1 Absent - -
IS 11 - -
1 (Alpha/A)
1 IDP 1.5 0 0.4
12 0 0.4
2 A
1 MR 1.5 0 0.4
13 0 0.4
3 F
1 MF 1.5 0 0.4
14 0 0.4
4 Y
1 MS Absent - -
15 - -
5 M (Alpha/A)
1 MNI 2 0 0.5
16 0 0.5
6 F
1 NQ 1.5 0.1 0.5
17 0.5 0.4
7 A
1 1 0 0.25
NF 18 0 0.25
8
1 1.5 0.1 0.5
NLF 19 0.5 0.4
9
2 1.5 0.25 0.65
NSR 20 1 0.4
0
2 NN 2 0.25 0.75
21 1 0.5
1 A
2 1.5 0.25 0.65
NAP 22 1 0.4
2
2 2 0.25 0.75
NAF 23 1 0.5
3
2 NM 1.5 0.1 0.5
24 0.5 0.4
4 A
2 1 0.1 0.35
RL 25 0.5 0.25
5
2 1.5 0 0.4
RI 26 0 0.4
6
2 2 0.25 0.75
SDN 27 1 0.5
7
2 1.5 0.1 0.5
YS 28 0.5 0.4
8
2 0.5 0 0.1
ZR 29 0 0.1
9
102
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
A DF EK
R PP F IS RF SM
A
NL
F A F RL N ZR
YA EA IA
N
M M NQ NN NA SD
BA
Students' Names
Interpreting Analysing
Appendix 11:
Results of Students’ CT Skills on Task of Poem “Daddy Fell into the Pond”
at May 9th, 2014
Abse Score
Interpre
N Na nt Analysing Score Score of
ting
o me Num (A) of I of A CT
(I)
ber Skills
BY 3 0.05 0.35
1 1 0.5 0.3
AA
2 BA 2 Absent (Sick/S) - -
- -
R
3 DF 3 1.5 3.5 0.15 0.35 0.5
4 DPS 4 3 2.5 0.3 0.25 0.55
5 EKR 5 3 3 0.3 0.3 0.6
6 EPK 6 3.5 3.5 0.35 0.35 0.7
EAP 2.5 0.4 0.65
7 7 4 0.25
P
FM 5 0.5 1.0
8 8 5 0.5
A
IAN 4 0.45 0.85
9 9 4.5 0.4
F
103
0.5
0.4
Scores' Scale
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
AA DF EK
R PP F IS RF SM
A
NL
F A F RL N ZR
Y EA IA
N
M M NQ NN NA SD
BA
Students' Names
Interpreting Analysing
Appendix 12:
Results of Students’ CT Skills on Task of Poem “Soledad” at May 16th, 2014
Abse Score of
Interpre
N Na nt Analysing Score Score CT Skills
ting
o me Num (A) of I of A
(I)
ber
BY 1.5 0.15 0.3
1 1 1.5 0.15
AA
2 BA 2 2.5 0.25 0.5
2.5 0.25
R
3 DF 3 2 1 0.2 0.1 0.3
4 DPS 4 2.5 3.5 0.25 0.35 0.6
5 EKR 5 2.5 2,5 0.25 0.25 0.5
6 EPK 6 2.5 2.5 0.25 0.25 0.5
EAP 1.5 0.15 0.3
7 7 1.5 0.15
P
FM 5 0.5 1.0
8 8 5 0.5
A
IAN 5 0.5 1.0
9 9 5 0.5
F
1 IAA 10 2.5 3.5 0.25 0.35 0.6
105
0 R
1 2 0.25 0.3
IS 11 2.5 0.2
1
1 IDP Absent - -
12 - -
2 A (Sick/S)
1 MR 1 0.1 0.2
13 1 0.1
3 F
1 MF 4.5 0.2 0.65
14 2 0.45
4 Y
1 MS 2.5 0.05 0.3
15 0.5 0.25
5 M
1 MNI 3 0.3 0.6
16 3 0.3
6 F
1 NQ 3.5 0.35 0.7
17 3.5 0.35
7 A
1 2 0.1 0.3
NF 18 1 0.2
8
1 5 0.35 0.4
NLF 19 3.5 0.5
9
2 4.5 0.5 0.5
NSR 20 5 0.45
0
2 NN 4 0.3 0.7
21 3 0.4
1 A
2 4 0.4 0.8
NAP 22 4 0.4
2
2 5 0.35 0.4
NAF 23 3.5 0.5
3
2 NM 3 0.2 0.5
24 2 0.3
4 A
2 2.5 0.2 0.3
RL 25 2 0.25
5
2 3.5 0.1 0.45
RI 26 1 0.35
6
2 5 0.4 0.9
SDN 27 4 0.5
7
2 1.5 0.05 0.2
YS 28 0.5 0.15
8
2 1 0 0.1
ZR 29 0 0.1
9
106
0.5
0.4
Scores' Scale
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
AA DF EK
R PP F IS RF SM
A
NL
F A F RL N ZR
Y EA IA
N
M M NQ NN NA SD
BA
Students' Names
Interpreting Analysing
Appendix 13:
Results of Students’ CT Skills on Task of Poem “The People Upstairs”
at May 22nd, 2014
Abse Score of
Interpre
N Na nt Analysing Score Score CT Skills
ting
o me Num (A) of I of A
(I)
ber
BY 0.5 0.1 0.16
1 1 1 0.06
AA
2 BA 2 2 0.3 0.55
2.5 0.25
R
3 DF 3 1.5 2 0.2 0.25 0.45
4 DPS 4 2 3 0.25 0.4 0.65
5 EKR 5 2.5 3 0.3 0.4 0.7
6 EPK 6 3 3.5 0.4 0.5 0.9
EAP 1.5 0.25 0.45
7 7 2 0.2
P
FM 4 0.5 1.0
8 8 4 0.5
A
IAN 4 0.5 1.0
9 9 4 0.5
F
107
0.5
0.4
Scores' Scale
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
AA DF EK
R PP F IS RF SM
A
NL
F A F RL N ZR
Y EA IA
N
M M NQ NN NA SD
BA
Students' Names
Interpreting Analysing
Appendix 14:
Results of Students’ CT Skills on Task of Poem “The Dentist and the
Crocodile” at May 23rd, 2014
Abse Score
Interpre
N Na nt Analysing Score Score of
ting
o me Num (A) of I of A CT
(I)
ber Skills
BY 1.5 0.25 0.4
1 1 2.5 0.15
AA
2 BA 2 Absent - -
R - (Dispensation/D -
)
3 DF 3 3.5 3 0.35 0.3 0.65
4 DPS 4 4.5 3.5 0.45 0.35 0.8
5 EKR 5 4 2.5 0.4 0.25 0.65
6 EPK 6 5 3 0.5 0.3 0.8
EAP 2.5 0.3 0.55
7 7 3 0.25
P
FM 4 0.6 1.0
8 8 6 0.4
A
9 IAN 9 6 4 0.6 0.4 1.0
109
F
1 IAA 3.5 0.35 0.7
10 3.5 0.35
0 R
1 Absent - -
IS 11 - -
1 (Alpha/A)
1 IDP 3 0.15 0.45
12 1.5 0.3
2 A
1 MR 2.5 0.25 0.5
13 2.5 0.25
3 F
Absent - -
1 MF
14 - (Dispensation/D -
4 Y
)
1 MS Absent - -
15 - -
5 M (Alpha/A)
1 MNI 2.5 0.25 0.5
16 2.5 0.25
6 F
1 NQ 3 0.4 0.7
17 4 0.3
7 A
1 2 0.2 0.4
NF 18 2 0.2
8
1 4 0.55 0.95
NLF 19 5.5 0.4
9
2 3 0.55 0.85
NSR 20 5.5 0.3
0
2 NN 3.5 0.55 0.9
21 5.5 0.35
1 A
2 4 0.55 0.95
NAP 22 5.5 0.4
2
2 4 0.6 1.0
NAF 23 6 0.4
3
2 NM 3 0.4 0.7
24 4 0.3
4 A
2 2 0.25 0.45
RL 25 2.5 0.2
5
2 3 0.25 0.55
RI 26 2.5 0.3
6
2 3.5 0.55 0.9
SDN 27 5.5 0.35
7
2 1.5 0.3 0.45
YS 28 3 0.15
8
Absent - -
2
ZR 29 - (Dispensation/D -
9
)
110
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
AA DF EK
R PP F IS RF SM
A
NL
F A F RL N ZR
Y EA IA
N
M M NQ NN NA SD
BA
Students' Names
Interpreting Analysing
Appendix 15:
Results of Post Test with the Poem “The Mountain and the Squirrel”
at May 30th, 2014
Abse
Total
N Na nt Interpreting Analysing Score Score
Score
o me Num (I) (A) of I of A
of CT
ber
BY
1 1 0.5 2.5 0.05 0.25 0.3
AA
BA
2 2 2.5 7 0.25 0.7 0.95
R
3 DF 3 1.5 2.5 0.15 0.25 0.4
4 DPS 4 3 7 0.3 0.7 1.0
5 EKR 5 3 7 0.3 0.7 1.0
6 EKP 6 3 7 0.3 0.7 1.0
EAP
7 7 1 3 0.1 0.3 0.4
P
FM
8 8 3 7 0.3 0.7 1.0
A
IAN
9 9 3 7 0.3 0.7 1.0
F
111
1 IAA
10 3 7 0.3 0.7 1.0
0 R
1
IS 11 0.5 3 0.05 0.3 0.35
1
1 IDP
12 2 4.5 0.2 0.45 0.65
2 A
1 MR
13 1 0.5 0.1 0.05 0.15
3 F
1 MR Absent
14 - - - -
4 Y (Alpha/A)
1 MS Absent
15 - - - -
5 M (Alpha/A)
1 MNI
16 1.5 4.5 0.15 0.45 0.6
6 F
1 NQ
17 3 7 0.3 0.7 1.0
7 A
1
NF 18 0.5 2.5 0.05 0.25 0.3
8
1
NLF 19 3 7 0.3 0.7 1.0
9
2
NSR 20 0 2 0 0.2 0.2
0
2 NN
21 3 7 0.3 0.7 1.0
1 A
2
NAP 22 3 7 0.3 0.7 1.0
2
2
NAF 23 3 7 0.3 0.7 1.0
3
2 NM
24 0.5 1.5 0.05 0.15 0.2
4 A
2
RL 25 1.5 2.5 0.15 0.25 0.4
5
2
RI 26 1 2 0.1 0.2 0.3
6
2
SDN 27 3 7 0.3 0.7 1.0
7
2
YS 28 2 5 0.2 0.5 0.7
8
2
ZR 29 1 2.5 0.1 0.25 0.35
9
112
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
A DF EK
R PP F IS RF SM
A
NL
F A F RL N ZR
YA EA IA
N
M M NQ NN NA SD
BA
Students' Names
Interpreting Analysing
“Home”
By Michael Buble
May be surrounded by
A million people I
Still feel all alone
I just wanna go home
Oh, I miss you, you know
Another aeroplane
Another sunny place
I’m lucky, I know
But I wanna go home
Mmmm, I’ve got to go home
Let me go home
I’m just too far from where you are
I wanna come home
Let me go home
I’ve had my run
Baby, I’m done
I gotta go home
Let me go home
It'll all be all right
I’ll be home tonight
I’m coming back home
(Source: http://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/michaelbuble/home.html)
“Hero”
By Carey, Mariah / Afanasieff, Walter N. / Nkosi, Bongani
There's a hero
If you look inside your heart
You don't have to be afraid
Of what you are
There's an answer
If you reach into your soul
And the sorrow that you know
Will melt away
Lord knows
Dreams are hard to follow
But don't let anyone
Tear them away
115
Hold on
There will be tomorrow
In time
You'll find the way
(Source: http://artists.letssingit.com/mariah-carey-lyrics-hero-
5sglqt9#axzz3OF5uzCGY )
Appendix 18: Poem “Puppy and I”
“Puppy and I”
By A. A. Milne
“Storytime”
By Judith Nicholls
Please, Miss,
Jamie’s made a dragon.
Out in the sandpit.
Lovely, Andrew.
Now this dragon
Had enormous red eyes
And a swirling, whirling tail…
Lovely, Andrew.
Now this dragon was
As wide as a horse
As green as the grass
As tall as a house…
Please, Miss,
I did try to tell you, Miss.
(Source: http://www.poetryarchive.org/poet/judith-nicholls)
Note:
Judith Nicholls is one of Britain's best-known poets for children, with over 50
books published and more than 500 schools visited since 1985.
Appendix 20: Poem “Tears in Heaven”
“Tears in Heaven”
By Eric Clapton
118
I must be strong
And carry on,
'Cause I know I don't belong
Here in heaven.
I must be strong
And carry on,
'Cause I know I don't belong
Here in heaven.
(Source: http://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/ericclapton/tearsinheaven.html )
(Source: http://pbskids.org/arthur/games/poetry/narrative.html )
Note:
This poem is included in the Poetry Club with full title "Poetry Club: Francine's
Poem/Buster's Poem/Jimmy in the City". It is the sixteenth track on the album
Arthur and Friends: The First Almost Real Not Live CD (or Tape). It is a
collection of three poems read in "I'm a Poet"
(Source: http://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/joshgroban/youraisemeup.html )
By Jo Dee Messina
(Source: http://www.metrolyrics.com/heaven-was-needing-a-hero-lyrics-jo-dee-
messina.html)
By Kenn Nesbitt
(Source: http://www.poetry4kids.com/poem-330.html#.VK44dqM9TtQ )
Note:
Kenn Nesbitt is an American children's poet. On June 11, 2013 he was named
Children's Poet Laureate by the Poetry Foundation.
By Alfred Noyes
(Source: http://www.poemhunter.com/poem/daddy-fell-into-the-pond/ )
Note:
Alfred Noyes, (1880-1958), was an English poet, best known for his ballads,
namely The Highwayman and The Barrel-Organ.
“Soledad”
By Carlsson, Andreas Michael / Porter, Karl Cameron / Yacoub, Rami
124
If only you could see the tears in the world you left behind
If only you could heal my heart just one more time
Even when I close my eyes
There's an image of your face
And once again I come to realize
You're a loss I can't replace
Soledad
It's a keeping for the lonely
Since the day that you were gone
Why did you leave me
Soledad
In my heart you were the only
And your memory lives on
Why did you leave me
Soledad
Soledad
It's a keeping for the lonely
Since the day that you were gone
Why did you leave me
Soledad
In my heart you were the only
And your memory lives on
Why did you leave me
Soledad
Soledad
It's a keeping for the lonely
125
Soledad
In my heart you were the only
And your memory lives on
Why did you leave me
Soledad
(Source: http://www.metrolyrics.com/soledad-lyrics-westlife.html )
(Source: http://www.poemhunter.com/ogden-nash/poems/ )
Note:
Frederic Ogden Nash (1902 – 1971) was an American poet well known for his
light verse. At the time of his death in 1971, The New York Times said his "droll
verse with its unconventional rhymes made him the country's best-known
producer of humorous poetry".
126
(Source:http://teachers.cpcsc.k12.in.us/jstanley/websites/Audio%20Poems/The
%20Dentist%20and%20the%20Crocodile.htm )
Note:
Roald Dahl (1916-1990) was a British novelist, short story writer, poet, screen
writer, and fighter pilot.
127
(Source: http://www.familyfriendpoems.com/poem/the-mountain-and-the-
squirrel-by-ralph-waldo-emerson#ixzz3OCsbBLim)
Note:
Ralph Waldo Emerson is considered one of the most influential writers and
thinkers of the 1800s. He was an American poet, essayist, and lecturer who was
born in Boston, Massachusetts on May 25, 1803.
128
5. Competence Standard
To understand the meaning of short functional written text and simple essay in the
form of recount, narrative and procedure, in the context of daily life and to access
knowledge.
Basic Competence
5.2. To respond the meaning and the rhetoric of essay written text accurately,
smoothly and acceptably in the context of daily life and to access knowledge in
the form of narrative, recount and procedure text.
Indicators
Identification of the meaning of words in the text.
Interpretation of the meaning of words in the text.
Interpretation of the meaning of sentences in the text.
Analysis of the content of the text.
Analysis of the information beyond the text.
A. Learning Objectives
129
B. Learning Material
“…………………………………………..”
By Michael Buble
Another summer day
Has come and gone away
In Paris and Rome
But I wanna go home
May be surrounded by
A million people I
Still feel all alone
I just wanna go home
Oh, I miss you, you know
And I’ve been keeping all the letters that I wrote to
you
Each one a line or two
“I’m fine baby, how are you?”
Well I would send them but I know that it’s just not
enough
My words were cold and flat
And you deserve more than that
Another aeroplane
Another sunny place
I’m lucky, I know
But I wanna go home
Mmmm, I’ve got to go home
Let me go home
I’m just too far from where you are
I wanna come home
And I feel just like I’m living someone else’s life
130
F. Assessment
Assessment tool : Written Test
Methods : Open ended questions
Instrument : (Enclosed)
Score : Score I + Score A
Evaluation Heading
Element of Critical Indicator Score
Thinking
Acceptable based on the implicit meaning
100%
of the text and fluent
Acceptable based on the implicit meaning
Interpretation 50%
of the text
Not acceptable based on the implicit
0%
meaning of the text
Reasonable based on the implicit meaning
100%
of the text and fluent
Reasonable based on the implicit meaning
Analysis 50%
of the text
Not reasonable based on the implicit
0%
meaning of the text
5. Competence Standard
To understand the meaning of short functional written text and simple essay in the
form of recount, narrative and procedure, in the context of daily life and to access
knowledge.
Basic Competence
5.2. To respond the meaning and the rhetoric of essay written text accurately,
smoothly and acceptably in the context of daily life and to access knowledge in
the form of narrative, recount and procedure text.
Indicators
Identification of the meaning of words in the text.
Interpretation of the meaning of words in the text.
Interpretation of the meaning of sentences in the text.
Analysis the content of the text.
Analysis of the information beyond the text.
Identification the proper title for the reading text.
A. Learning Objectives
Students are able to:
identify the meaning of words in the text
interpret identify the meaning of words in the reading text
interpret the meaning of sentences in the reading text
analyse the content of the reading text
analyse the information beyond the reading text
identify the proper title for the reading text
134
B. Learning Material
“…………………………………………..”
By Michael Buble
May be surrounded by
A million people I
Still feel all alone
I just wanna go home
Oh, I miss you, you know
Another aeroplane
Another sunny place
I’m lucky, I know
But I wanna go home
Mmmm, I’ve got to go home
Let me go home
I’m just too far from where you are
I wanna come home
Let me go home
I’ve had my run
Baby, I’m done
I gotta go home
Let me go home
It'll all be all right
I’ll be home tonight
I’m coming back home
(Source:
http://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/michaelbuble/home.
html)
Please choose the best answer these following questions based on the text
above.
1. Pay attention to the words “wanna” and “gotta”. Do you think that they are
English words?
a. I think that they are not English words.
b. They are not.
c. They are English words.
d. I think they are English words.
e. I don’t think so
2. For the question number 2, there are two questions. But you need to answer
one question only based on your opinion.
If you think that they are not English words, so they are the words of
……….. language.
a. Arabic
b. Germany
c. French
136
d. Tamil
e. Urdu
If you think that they are English words, so “wanna” has the same meaning
as …………. and “gotta” has the same meaning as …………..
a. want to – get to
b. went to – go to
c. wanted to – going to
d. went to - get to
e. want to – going to
3. Do you agree if the speaker in the text feels happy?
a. I agree.
b. I disagree.
c. I do agree.
d. I don’t know.
e. I don’t feel happy.
4. Why do you say so for the question number 3?
a. It is because the person in the text sings a song.
b. It is because the person in the text feels lonely.
c. It is because there is a word of showing happiness in the text.
d. It is because I don’t know.
e. It is because I feel sorry to the speaker.
5. Do you think that the speaker has a problem? What is the problem?
a. Yes, I think so. The problem is home.
b. Yes, I think so. The problem is missing someone at his hometown.
c. Yes, I think so. The problem is going back home.
d. No, I don’t think so. There is no problem for the person in the text.
e. No, I don’t think so. There is no problem at all.
6. If you were the speaker, what would you do to overcome the problem?
a. If I were the speaker, I would be at home.
b. If I were the speaker, I would see the person that I am missing at my
hometown.
c. If I were the speaker, I would go home.
d. If I were the speaker, I would be very happy at home.
7. In your opinion, what does the text talk about?
a. In my opinion, the text talks about the speaker.
b. In my opinion, the text is about the person.
c. In my opinion, the text talks about the speaker feels lonely.
137
d. In my opinion, the text is about the person feels lonely and wants to go
home.
e. In my opinion, the text talks about feeling lonely and missing someone
at home.
8. After you read and comprehend well the text above, what is the appropriate
title for the text?
a. The appropriate title for the text is “Let Me Go Home”.
b. The appropriate title for the text is “Going Back Home”.
c. The appropriate title for the text is “I Wanna Go Home”.
d. The appropriate title for the text is “I Gotta Go Home”.
e. The appropriate title for the text is “Home”.
9. According to you, is the text above a lyric of a song or a lyric of a poem?
Give the reason for your answer, please.
a. For me, the text is a lyric of a song. It is because I feel that.
b. I think the text is a lyric of a poem because the sentences are short.
c. In my opinion, the text is a lyric of a song because the topic is unique.
d. I think that the text is a lyric a song and also a lyric of a poem. It is
because a lyric of a song can be considered as a poem.
e. In my opinion, both are correct. It is because, they are the same.
10. What is your opinion about the text above?
a. In my opinion, the text is good.
b. In my opinion, the text is interesting and easy to be understood well.
c. In my opinion, the text has nice words and simple sentences to be
understood well.
d. In my opinion, the text makes me feel happy and lonely as what the
speaker feels in the text.
e. In my opinion, the text has nice and simple words that make me easier to
understand the text well.
Attendance: (2 minutes)
“Okay, let me check your presence today.”
“Who is absent today?”
Motivating the students to do the best: (1 minute)
Presentation of basic competence standard: (1 minute)
“Now I am going to read the basic competence standard. So, you will
know the basic competence that you will achieve for our meeting today.”
Reading Activities:
Pre-Reading Activities (40 minutes)
Checking dictionary: (1 minute)
“Okay, from your seat, show me that you bring your dictionary, please.”
Students make a group: (1 minutes)
“Well, Students. Your partner of learning today is your desk mate.”
“You can discuss everything with your partner.”
“But you have to answer the assignment individually. Do you understand,
dear?”
Students get the text individually (distribution of the reading text papers):
(1 minute)
Teacher plays a song once to interest the students more towards the text:
(3 minutes)
“While I am playing this, you can listen to and look at the text. So you can
know how to pronounce the each words that the speaker says in this
recording.”
Now, let’s we read this song lyric aloud together. Repeat after me when
you still feel difficult to pronounce that: (5 minutes)
Teacher asks students to list and discuss the difficult words with their
partners: (10 minutes)
Teacher asks the students comprehend the text with their partner: (10
minutes)
Teacher lets the students to comprehend the question sentences to get clear
meaning of the sentences: (10 minutes).
Teacher lets the students to ask a help for their difficulties when they still
cannot find the clear meaning of words or sentences: (4 minutes)
F. Assessment
Assessment tool : Written Test
Methods : Multiple choice questions
Instrument : (Enclosed)
Evaluation Guide : Maximum points: 10
- Wrong Answer
140
Subject : English
Grade/ Semester : X / 2
Session : 6
Time allotment : 2 x 45 minutes
5. Competence Standard
To understand the meaning of short functional written text and simple essay in the
form of recount, narrative and procedure, in the context of daily life and to access
knowledge.
Basic Competence
5.2. To respond the meaning and the rhetoric of essay written text accurately,
smoothly and acceptably in the context of daily life and to access knowledge in
the form of narrative, recount and procedure text.
Indicators
Identification of the meaning of words in the text.
Interpretation of the meaning of words in the text.
Interpretation of the meaning of sentences in the text.
Analysis the content of the text.
Analysis of the information beyond the text.
Analysis the message of the text
Analysis the opinion towards the text
A. Learning Objectives
Students are able to:
identify the meaning of words in the text
interpret identify the meaning of words in the reading text
interpret the meaning of sentences in the reading text
analyse the content of the reading text
analyse the information beyond the reading text
analyse the message of the text
analyse the opinion towards the text
B. Learning Material
“Hero”
142
III. Choose the best answer based on the text! Do this individually!
4. What is the message that the author wants to share to the reader?
a. We have to believe in ourselves.
b. We have to trust to God.
c. Don’t be afraid. Everything will be fine.
d. Don’t give up. You can make it.
e. Don’t worry. Be happy.
5. What is your opinion about the poem?
a. In my opinion, the poem is good.
b. In my opinion the poem is interesting and easy to be understood.
c. In my opinion, the poem has nice words and simple sentences to be
understood well.
d. In my opinion, the poem makes me feel spirit and motivated to survive
in this life as what the speaker tells in the poem.
e. In my opinion, the poem has nice words that makes me feel spirit and
motivated in this life as the speaker tells in the poem and simple
sentences that make me easier to understand the poem well.
Reading Activities:
Pre-Reading Activities (40 minutes)
Checking dictionary: (1 minute)
Students make a group: (1 minutes)
Students get the text individually (distribution of the reading text papers):
(1 minute)
Teacher plays a song once to interest the students more towards the text:
(3 minutes)
Teacher models and asks the students to read the poem together.: (5
minutes)
Teacher asks students to list and discuss the difficult words with their
partners: (10 minutes)
Teacher asks the students comprehend the text with their partner: (10
minutes)
Teacher lets the students to comprehend the question sentences to get clear
meaning of the sentences: (10 minutes).
145
Teacher lets the students to ask a help for their difficulties when they still
cannot find the clear meaning of words or sentences: (4 minutes)
F. Assessment
Assessment tool : Written Test
Methods : Open ended and multiple choice questions
Instrument : (Enclosed)
Score for multiple choice = Earned Points x 100
Maximum Points
Evaluation Heading
Test Number Notes Point
146
- Right Answer 25
1-4
- Wrong Answer
0
5. Competence Standard
To understand the meaning of short functional written text and simple essay in the
form of recount, narrative and procedure, in the context of daily life and to access
knowledge
Basic Competence
5.2. To respond the meaning and the rhetoric of essay written text accurately,
smoothly and acceptably in the context of daily life and to access knowledge in
the form of narrative, recount and procedure text
Indicators
Identification of the meaning of words in the text.
Interpretation of the meaning of words in the text.
Interpretation of the meaning of sentences in the text.
Analysis the content of the text.
Analysis of the information beyond the text.
Analysis the message of the text
Analysis the opinion towards the text
A. Learning Objectives
Students are able to:
identify the meaning of words in the text
interpret identify the meaning of words in the reading text
interpret the meaning of sentences in the reading text
analyse the content of the reading text
analyse the information beyond the reading text
analyse the message of the text
analyse the opinion towards the text
B. Learning Material
“Puppy and I”
By A. A. Milne
6. What do you think about why the poet or the speaker did not want to go
with the Man? Give the reason for your answer.
7. What do you think about why the poet or the speaker did not want to go
with the Horse? Give the reason for your answer.
8. What do you think about why the poet or the speaker did not want to go
with the Woman? Give the reason for your answer.
9. What do you think about why the poet or the speaker did not want to go
with the Rabbit? Give the reason for your answer.
10. What do you think about why the poet or the speaker did not want to go
with the Puppy? Give the reason for your answer.
Reading Activities:
Pre-Reading Activities (40 minutes)
Checking dictionary: (1 minute)
Students make a group: (1 minutes)
Students get the text individually (distribution of the reading text papers):
(1 minute)
Teacher models and asks the students to read the poem together.: (6
minutes)
Teacher asks students to list and discuss the difficult words with their
partners: (10 minutes)
Teacher asks the students comprehend the text with their partner: (10
minutes)
Teacher lets the students to comprehend the question sentences to get clear
meaning of the sentences: (10 minutes).
Teacher lets the students to ask a help for their difficulties when they still
cannot find the clear meaning of words or sentences: (6 minutes)
F. Assessment
Assessment tool : Written Test
Methods : Open ended questions
Instrument : (Enclosed)
Score : Score I + Score A
Evaluation Heading
Element of Critical Indicator Score
Thinking
Acceptable based on the implicit meaning
100%
of the text and fluent
Acceptable based on the implicit meaning
Interpretation 50%
of the text
Not acceptable based on the implicit
0%
meaning of the text
Analysis Reasonable based on the implicit meaning 100%
of the text and fluent
151
5. Competence Standard
To understand the meaning of short functional written text and simple essay in the
form of recount, narrative and procedure in the context of daily life and to access
knowledge
Basic Competence
5.2. To respond the meaning and the rhetoric of essay written text accurately,
smoothly and acceptably in the context of daily life and to access knowledge in
the form of narrative, recount and procedure text
152
Indicators
Identification of the meaning of words in the text.
Interpretation of the meaning of words in the text.
Interpretation of the meaning of sentences in the text.
Analysis the content of the text.
Analysis of the information beyond the text.
Analysis the message of the text
Analysis the opinion towards the text
A. Learning Objectives
Students are able to:
identify the meaning of words in the text
interpret identify the meaning of words in the reading text
interpret the meaning of sentences in the reading text
analyse the content of the reading text
analyse the information beyond the reading text
analyse the message of the text
analyse the opinion towards the text
B. Learning Material
“Storytime”
By Judith Nicholls
Please, Miss,
Jamie’s made a dragon.
Out in the sandpit.
Lovely, Andrew.
Now this dragon
Had enormous red eyes
And a swirling, whirling tail…
Lovely, Andrew.
Now this dragon was
As wide as a horse
153
Please, Miss,
I did try to tell you, Miss.
(Source: http://www.poetryarchive.org/poet/judith-nicholls)
Do these in your group!
1. The poem is told by two people.
2. With your partner, read the poem aloud again.
3. Which words indicate that the teacher is telling a story in the poem? Which
words also indicate that the pupil is talking to the teacher? Make a list of
words using this table:
4. How old do you think the pupil in the poem? Which word gives you the clue
of that?
5. Imagine you are the headmaster of the school where the poor teacher gets
eaten. Write a simple paragraph of what the headmaster may say to the rest
of the people there to calm them down.
154
6. Imagine you are in the class and see the teacher gets eaten. You want to tell
that to a group of friend who are not there. You want to scare them! Write
your statements about that in a simple paragraph!
7. What are the differences between the way the headmaster describes the
dragon and the way you describe it to your friends?
8. Which paragraph did you enjoy the most? Can you say why?
Reading Activities:
Pre-Reading Activities (40 minutes)
Checking dictionary: (1 minute)
Students make a group: (1 minutes)
Students get the text individually (distribution of the reading text papers):
(1 minute)
Teacher models and asks the students to read the poem together.: (6
minutes)
Teacher asks students to list and discuss the difficult words with their
partners: (10 minutes)
Teacher asks the students comprehend the text with their partner: (10
minutes)
Teacher lets the students to comprehend the question sentences to get clear
meaning of the sentences: (10 minutes).
Teacher lets the students to ask a help for their difficulties when they still
cannot find the clear meaning of words or sentences: (6 minutes)
Teacher asks the students to answer orally and classically for each
comprehension question that they have accomplished: (5 minutes)
Teacher gives the feedbacks for the students orally and classically for
every question: (10 minutes)
F. Assessment
Assessment tool : Written Test
Methods : Open ended questions
Instrument : (Enclosed)
Score : Score I + Score A
Evaluation Heading
Element of Critical Indicator Score
Thinking
Acceptable based on the implicit meaning
100%
of the text and fluent
Acceptable based on the implicit meaning
Interpretation 50%
of the text
Not acceptable based on the implicit
0%
meaning of the text
Reasonable based on the implicit meaning
100%
of the text and fluent
Reasonable based on the implicit meaning
Analysis 50%
of the text
Not reasonable based on the implicit
0%
meaning of the text
156
5. Competence Standard
To understand the meaning of short functional written text and simple essay in the
form of recount, narrative and procedure, in the context of daily life and to access
knowledge.
Basic Competence
5.2. To respond the meaning and the rhetoric of essay written text accurately,
smoothly and acceptably in the context of daily life and to access knowledge in
the form of narrative, recount and procedure text.
Indicators
Identification of the meaning of words in the text.
Interpretation of the meaning of words in the text.
Interpretation of the meaning of sentences in the text.
Analysis the content of the text.
Analysis of the information beyond the text.
Analysis the message of the text
Analysis the opinion towards the text
157
A. Learning Objectives
Students are able to:
identify the meaning of words in the text
interpret identify the meaning of words in the reading text
interpret the meaning of sentences in the reading text
analyse the content of the reading text
analyse the information beyond the reading text
analyse the message of the text
analyse the opinion towards the text
B. Learning Material
“Tears in Heaven”
By Eric Clapton
Would you know my name
If I saw you in heaven?
Would it be the same
If I saw you in heaven?
I must be strong
And carry on,
'Cause I know I don't belong
Here in heaven.
Would you hold my hand
If I saw you in heaven?
Would you help me stand
If I saw you in heaven?
I'll find my way
Through night and day,
'Cause I know I just can't stay
Here in heaven.
Time can bring you down,
Time can bend your knees.
Time can break your heart,
Have you begging please, begging please.
Beyond the door,
There's peace I'm sure,
And I know there'll be no more
Tears in heaven.
Would you know my name
If I saw you in heaven?
Would it be the same
If I saw you in heaven?
I must be strong
And carry on,
158
Reading Activities:
Pre-Reading Activities (40 minutes)
Checking dictionary: (1 minute)
Students make a group: (1 minutes)
Students get the text individually (distribution of the reading text papers):
(1 minute)
Teacher plays a song once to interest the students more towards the text:
(3 minutes)
Teacher models and asks the students to read the poem together.: (5
minutes)
Teacher asks students to list and discuss the difficult words with their
partners: (10 minutes)
Teacher asks the students comprehend the text with their partner: (10
minutes)
Teacher lets the students to comprehend the question sentences to get clear
meaning of the sentences: (10 minutes).
Teacher lets the students to ask a help for their difficulties when they still
cannot find the clear meaning of words or sentences: (4 minutes)
F. Assessment
Assessment tool : Written Test
Methods : Open ended questions
Instrument : (Enclosed)
Score : Score I + Score A
Evaluation Heading
Element of Critical Indicator Score
Thinking
Acceptable based on the implicit meaning
100%
of the text and fluent
Acceptable based on the implicit meaning
Interpretation 50%
of the text
Not acceptable based on the implicit
0%
meaning of the text
160
5. Competence Standard
To understand the meaning of short functional written text and simple essay in the
form of recount, narrative and procedure, in the context of daily life and to access
knowledge.
Basic Competence
5.2. To respond the meaning and the rhetoric of essay written text accurately,
smoothly and acceptably in the context of daily life and to access knowledge in
the form of narrative, recount and procedure text.
Indicators
Identification of the meaning of words in the text.
Interpretation of the meaning of words in the text.
Interpretation of the meaning of sentences in the text.
Analysis the content of the text.
Analysis of the information beyond the text.
Analysis the message of the text
Analysis the opinion towards the text
A. Learning Objectives
Students are able to:
identify the meaning of words in the text
interpret identify the meaning of words in the reading text
interpret the meaning of sentences in the reading text
analyse the content of the reading text
analyse the information beyond the reading text
analyse the message of the text
analyse the opinion towards the text
B. Learning Material
“Jimmy Goes to the City”
By Arthur Read
I. After you read the poem, underline the difficult words. Then find out
the meaning.
III. After you comprehend the poem with your partner, now answer these
questions individually. Use your critical thinking skills to interpret and
analyze it.
1. What was happening in the poem?
2. Where did the event happen?
3. When did the event take place?
4. What is the poem about?
Reading Activities:
Pre-Reading Activities (40 minutes)
Checking dictionary: (1 minute)
Students make a group: (1 minutes)
Students get the text individually (distribution of the reading text papers):
(1 minute)
Teacher models and asks the students to read the poem together: (6
minutes)
Teacher asks students to list and discuss the difficult words with their
partners: (10 minutes)
Teacher asks the students comprehend the text with their partner: (10
minutes)
Teacher lets the students to comprehend the question sentences to get clear
meaning of the sentences: (10 minutes).
Teacher lets the students to ask a help for their difficulties when they still
cannot find the clear meaning of words or sentences: (6 minutes)
164
F. Assessment
Assessment tool : Written Test
Methods : Open ended questions
Instrument : (Enclosed)
Score : Score I + Score A
Evaluation Heading
Element of Critical Indicator Score
Thinking
Acceptable based on the implicit meaning
100%
of the text and fluent
Acceptable based on the implicit meaning
Interpretation 50%
of the text
Not acceptable based on the implicit
0%
meaning of the text
Analysis Reasonable based on the implicit meaning 100%
165
5. Competence Standard
To understand the meaning of short functional written text and simple essay in the
form of recount, narrative and procedure, in the context of daily life and to access
knowledge.
Basic Competence
5.2. To respond the meaning and the rhetoric of essay written text accurately,
smoothly and acceptably in the context of daily life and to access knowledge in
the form of narrative, recount and procedure text.
Indicators
Identification of the meaning of words in the text.
Interpretation of the meaning of words in the text.
Interpretation of the meaning of sentences in the text.
166
B. Learning Material
“You Raise Me Up”
By Brendan Graham
When I am down and, oh, my soul, so weary;
When troubles come and my heart burdened be;
Then I am still and wait here in the silence,
Until you come and sit awhile with me.
You raise me up, so I can stand on mountains;
You raise me up to walk on stormy seas;
I am strong when I am on your shoulders;
You raise me up to more than I can be.
You raise me up, so I can stand on mountains;
You raise me up to walk on stormy seas;
I am strong when I am on your shoulders;
You raise me up to more than I can be.
There is no life - no life without its hunger;
Each restless heart beats so imperfectly;
But when you come and I am filled with wonder,
Sometimes, I think I glimpse eternity.
You raise me up, so I can stand on mountains;
You raise me up to walk on stormy seas;
I am strong when I am on your shoulders;
You raise me up to more than I can be.
You raise me up, so I can stand on mountains;
You raise me up to walk on stormy seas;
I am strong when I am on your shoulders;
167
I. In pairs, underline the difficult words or phrase. Then find out the
meaning by discussing.
II. Answer these following questions individually using your own words.
1. This question is about the content of the poem.
What is happening in the poem?
2. This question is about the theme of the poem.
What is the poem about?
D. Teaching and Learning Activities
Warm up Activities (5 minutes)
Greetings: (1 minute)
Attendance: (2 minutes)
Motivating the students to do the best: (1 minute)
Presentation of basic competence standard: (1 minute)
Reading Activities:
Pre-Reading Activities (40 minutes)
Checking dictionary: (1 minute)
Students make a group: (1 minutes)
Students get the text individually (distribution of the reading text papers):
(1 minute)
Teacher plays a song once to interest the students more towards the text:
(3 minutes)
Teacher models and asks the students to read the poem together.: (5
minutes)
Teacher asks students to list and discuss the difficult words with their
partners: (10 minutes)
Teacher asks the students comprehend the text with their partner: (10
minutes)
Teacher lets the students to comprehend the question sentences to get clear
meaning of the sentences: (10 minutes).
Teacher lets the students to ask a help for their difficulties when they still
cannot find the clear meaning of words or sentences: (4 minutes)
168
F. Assessment
Assessment tool : Written Test
Methods : Open ended questions
Instrument : (Enclosed)
Score : Score I + Score A
Evaluation Heading
Element of Critical Indicator Score
Thinking
Interpretation Acceptable based on the implicit meaning
100%
of the text and fluent
Acceptable based on the implicit meaning
50%
of the text
Not acceptable based on the implicit 0%
169
Session : 15
Time allotment : 2 x 45 minutes
5. Competence Standard
To understand the meaning of short functional written text and simple essay in the
form of recount, narrative and procedure, in the context of daily life and to access
knowledge
Basic Competence
5.2. To respond the meaning and the rhetoric of essay written text accurately,
smoothly and acceptably in the context of daily life and to access knowledge in
the form of narrative, recount and procedure text
Indicators
Identification of the meaning of words in the text.
Interpretation of the meaning of words in the text.
Interpretation of the meaning of sentences in the text.
Analysis the content of the text.
Analysis of the information beyond the text.
Analysis the message of the text
Analysis the opinion towards the text
A. Learning Objectives
Students are able to:
identify the meaning of words in the text
interpret the meaning of words in the reading text
interpret the meaning of sentences in the reading text
analyse the content of the reading text
analyse the information beyond the reading text
analyse the message of the text
analyse the opinion towards the text
B. Learning Material
“Heaven Was Needing a Hero”
By Jo Dee Messina
171
(Source: http://www.metrolyrics.com/heaven-was-needing-a-hero-lyrics-jo-dee-
messina.html)
Do these following questions individually. You can discuss with your partner
in doing these questions.
1. This question is about the content of the song lyric.
What is happening in the song? Use your own words to tell that.
172
Reading Activities:
Pre-Reading Activities (40 minutes)
Checking dictionary: (1 minute)
Students make a group: (1 minutes)
Students get the text individually (distribution of the reading text papers):
(1 minute)
Teacher plays a song once to interest the students more towards the text:
(3 minutes)
Teacher models and asks the students to read the poem together.: (5
minutes)
Teacher asks students to list and discuss the difficult words with their
partners: (10 minutes)
Teacher asks the students comprehend the text with their partner: (10
minutes)
Teacher lets the students to comprehend the question sentences to get clear
meaning of the sentences: (10 minutes).
Teacher lets the students to ask a help for their difficulties when they still
cannot find the clear meaning of words or sentences: (4 minutes)
F. Assessment
Assessment tool : Written Test
Methods : Open ended questions
Instrument : (Enclosed)
Score : Score I + Score A
Evaluation Heading
Element of Critical Indicator Score
Thinking
Interpretation Acceptable based on the implicit meaning
100%
of the text and fluent
Acceptable based on the implicit meaning
50%
of the text
Not acceptable based on the implicit 0%
174
5. Competence Standard
To understand the meaning of short functional written text and simple essay in the
form of recount, narrative and procedure, in the context of daily life and to access
knowledge.
Basic Competence
5.2. To respond the meaning and the rhetoric of essay written text accurately,
smoothly and acceptably in the context of daily life and to access knowledge in
the form of narrative, recount and procedure text.
175
Indicators
Identification of the meaning of words in the text.
Interpretation of the meaning of words in the text.
Interpretation of the meaning of sentences in the text.
Analysis the content of the text.
Analysis of the information beyond the text.
Analysis the message of the text
Analysis the opinion towards the text
A. Learning Objectives
Students are able to:
identify the meaning of words in the text
interpret identify the meaning of words in the reading text
interpret the meaning of sentences in the reading text
analyse the content of the reading text
analyse the information beyond the reading text
analyse the message of the text
analyse the opinion towards the text
B. Learning Material
“My Teacher Took My iPod”
By Kenn Nesbitt
Reading Activities:
Pre-Reading Activities (40 minutes)
Checking dictionary: (1 minute)
Students make a group: (1 minutes)
Students get the text individually (distribution of the reading text papers):
(1 minute)
Teacher models and asks the students to read the poem together: (6
minutes)
Teacher asks students to list and discuss the difficult words with their
partners: (10 minutes)
Teacher asks the students comprehend the text with their partner: (10
minutes)
Teacher lets the students to comprehend the question sentences to get clear
meaning of the sentences: (10 minutes).
Teacher lets the students to ask a help for their difficulties when they still
cannot find the clear meaning of words or sentences: (6 minutes)
F. Assessment
Assessment tool : Written Test
Methods : Multiple choice and open ended questions
Instrument : (Enclosed)
Evaluation Guide : Maximum points: 25
Score for multiple choice = Earned Points x 100
Maximum Points
Evaluation Heading
Test Number Notes Point
179
- Right Answer 25
1-4
- Wrong Answer
0
Evaluation Heading
Element of Critical Indicator Score
Thinking
Acceptable based on the implicit meaning
100%
of the text and fluent
Acceptable based on the implicit meaning
Interpretation 50%
of the text
Not acceptable based on the implicit
0%
meaning of the text
Reasonable based on the implicit meaning
100%
of the text and fluent
Reasonable based on the implicit meaning
Analysis 50%
of the text
Not reasonable based on the implicit
0%
meaning of the text
180
5. Competence Standard
To understand the meaning of short functional written text and simple essay in the
form of recount, narrative and procedure, in the context of daily life and to access
knowledge.
Basic Competence
5.2. To respond the meaning and the rhetoric of essay written text accurately,
smoothly and acceptably in the context of daily life and to access knowledge in
the form of narrative, recount and procedure text.
Indicators
Identification of the meaning of words in the text.
Interpretation of the meaning of words in the text.
Interpretation of the meaning of sentences in the text.
Analysis the content of the text.
Analysis of the information beyond the text.
Analysis the message of the text
Analysis the opinion towards the text
A. Learning Objectives
Students are able to:
identify the meaning of words in the text
181
B. Learning Material
“Daddy Fell into the Pond”
By Alfred Noyes
9. What was the theme of the poem? Give the reason for your answer.
10. What was the message of the poem? Give the reason for your answer.
Reading Activities:
Pre-Reading Activities (40 minutes)
Checking dictionary: (1 minute)
Students make a group: (1 minutes)
Students get the text individually (distribution of the reading text papers):
(1 minute)
Teacher models and asks the students to read the poem together: (6
minutes)
Teacher asks students to list and discuss the difficult words with their
partners: (10 minutes)
Teacher asks the students comprehend the text with their partner: (10
minutes)
Teacher lets the students to comprehend the question sentences to get clear
meaning of the sentences: (10 minutes).
Teacher lets the students to ask a help for their difficulties when they still
cannot find the clear meaning of words or sentences: (6 minutes)
F. Assessment
Assessment tool : Written Test
Methods : Multiple choice and open ended questions
Instrument : (Enclosed)
Score for multiple choice = Earned Points x 100
Maximum Points
Evaluation Heading
Test Number Notes Point
- Right Answer 25
1-4
- Wrong Answer
0
Subject : English
Grade/ Semester : X / 2
Session : 20
Time allotment : 2 x 45 minutes
185
5. Competence Standard
To understand the meaning of short functional written text and simple essay in the
form of recount, narrative and procedure, in the context of daily life and to access
knowledge.
Basic Competence
5.2. To respond the meaning and the rhetoric of essay written text accurately,
smoothly and acceptably in the context of daily life and to access knowledge in
the form of narrative, recount and procedure text.
Indicators
Identification of the meaning of words in the text.
Interpretation of the meaning of words in the text.
Interpretation of the meaning of sentences in the text.
Analysis the content of the text.
Analysis of the information beyond the text.
Analysis the message of the text
Analysis the opinion towards the text
A. Learning Objectives
Students are able to:
identify the meaning of words in the text
interpret identify the meaning of words in the reading text
interpret the meaning of sentences in the reading text
analyse the content of the reading text
analyse the information beyond the reading text
analyse the message of the text
analyse the opinion towards the text
B. Learning Material
“Soledad”
By Carlsson, Andreas Michael / Porter, Karl Cameron / Yacoub, Rami
186
If only you could see the tears in the world you left behind
If only you could heal my heart just one more time
Even when I close my eyes
There's an image of your face
And once again I come to realize
You're a loss I can't replace
Soledad
It's a keeping for the lonely
Since the day that you were gone
Why did you leave me
Soledad
In my heart you were the only
And your memory lives on
Why did you leave me
Soledad
Walking down the streets of Nothingville
Where our love was young and free
Can't believe just what an empty place
It has come to be
I would give my life away
If it could only be the same
Cause I conceal the voice inside of me
That is calling out your name
Soledad
It's a keeping for the lonely
Since the day that you were gone
Why did you leave me
Soledad
In my heart you were the only
And your memory lives on
Why did you leave me
Soledad
Time will never change the things you've told me
After all we're meant to be love will bring us back to you
and me
If only you could see
Soledad
It's a keeping for the lonely
Since the day that you were gone
Why did you leave me
Soledad
In my heart you were the only
187
Reading Activities:
Pre-Reading Activities (40 minutes)
Checking dictionary: (1 minute)
Students make a group: (1 minutes)
Students get the text individually (distribution of the reading text papers):
(1 minute)
Teacher plays a song once to interest the students more towards the text:
(3 minutes)
188
Teacher models and asks the students to read the poem together.: (5
minutes)
Teacher asks students to list and discuss the difficult words with their
partners: (10 minutes)
Teacher asks the students comprehend the text with their partner: (10
minutes)
Teacher lets the students to comprehend the question sentences to get clear
meaning of the sentences: (10 minutes).
Teacher lets the students to ask a help for their difficulties when they still
cannot find the clear meaning of words or sentences: (4 minutes)
F. Assessment
Assessment tool : Written Test
Methods : Open ended questions
Instrument : (Enclosed)
Score : Score I + Score A
189
Evaluation Heading
Element of Critical Indicator Score
Thinking
Acceptable based on the implicit meaning
100%
of the text and fluent
Acceptable based on the implicit meaning
Interpretation 50%
of the text
Not acceptable based on the implicit
0%
meaning of the text
Reasonable based on the implicit meaning
100%
of the text and fluent
Reasonable based on the implicit meaning
Analysis 50%
of the text
Not reasonable based on the implicit
0%
meaning of the text
5. Competence Standard
To understand the meaning of short functional written text and simple essay in the
form of recount, narrative and procedure, in the context of daily life and to access
knowledge.
Basic Competence
190
5.2. To respond the meaning and the rhetoric of essay written text accurately,
smoothly and acceptably in the context of daily life and to access knowledge in
the form of narrative, recount and procedure text.
Indicators
Identification of the meaning of words in the text.
Interpretation of the meaning of words in the text.
Interpretation of the meaning of sentences in the text.
Analysis the content of the text.
Analysis of the information beyond the text.
Analysis the message of the text
Analysis the opinion towards the text
A. Learning Objectives
Students are able to:
identify the meaning of words in the text
interpret the meaning of words in the reading text
interpret the meaning of sentences in the reading text
analyse the content of the reading text
analyse the information beyond the reading text
analyse the message of the text
analyse the opinion towards the text
B. Learning Material
“The People Upstairs”
By Ogden Nash
The people upstairs all practise ballet
Their living room is a bowling alley
Their bedroom is full of conducted tours.
Their radio is louder than yours,
They celebrate week-ends all the week.
When they take a shower, your ceilings leak.
They try to get their parties to mix
By supplying their guests with Pogo sticks,
And when their fun at last abates,
They go to the bathroom on roller skates.
I would love the people upstairs wondrous
If instead of above us, they just lived under us.
(Source: http://www.poemhunter.com/ogden-
nash/poems/ )
191
Reading Activities:
Pre-Reading Activities (40 minutes)
192
F. Assessment
Assessment tool : Written Test
Methods : Open ended questions
Instrument : (Enclosed)
Score : Score I + Score A
Evaluation Heading
Element of Critical Indicator Score
Thinking
Acceptable based on the implicit meaning
100%
of the text and fluent
Acceptable based on the implicit meaning
Interpretation 50%
of the text
Not acceptable based on the implicit
0%
meaning of the text
Reasonable based on the implicit meaning
100%
of the text and fluent
Reasonable based on the implicit meaning
Analysis 50%
of the text
Not reasonable based on the implicit
0%
meaning of the text
194
5. Competence Standard
To understand the meaning of short functional written text and simple essay in the
form of recount, narrative and procedure, in the context of daily life and to access
knowledge.
Basic Competence
5.2. To respond the meaning and the rhetoric of essay written text accurately,
smoothly and acceptably in the context of daily life and to access knowledge in
the form of narrative, recount and procedure text.
Indicators
Identification of the meaning of words in the text.
Interpretation of the meaning of words in the text.
Interpretation of the meaning of sentences in the text.
Analysis the content of the text.
Analysis of the information beyond the text.
Analysis the message of the text
Analysis the opinion towards the text
195
A. Learning Objectives
Students are able to:
identify the meaning of words in the text
interpret the meaning of words in the reading text
interpret the meaning of sentences in the reading text
analyse the content of the reading text
analyse the information beyond the reading text
analyse the message of the text
analyse the opinion towards the text
B. Learning Material
“The Dentist and the Crocodile”
By Roald Dahl
1. Do you think that the dentist liked the crocodile’s coming? Give the reason
for your answer.
2. Do you think that the crocodile wanted to eat the dentist? Give the reason
for your answer.
3. What was happening in the poem? Retell this using your own words.
4. Where did that happen? Give the reason for your answer.
5. When did that happen? Give the reason for your answer.
6. What is the theme of the poem? Give the reason for your answer.
7. What is the message of the poem? Give the reason for your answer.
8. If you were the dentist, what would you do? Give the reason for your
answer.
9. If you were the crocodile, what would you do? Give the reason for your
answer.
10. If you were the lady, what would you do? Give the reason for your answer.
Teacher lets the students to comprehend the question sentences to get clear
meaning of the sentences: (10 minutes).
Teacher lets the students to ask a help for their difficulties when they still
cannot find the clear meaning of words or sentences: (6 minutes)
F. Assessment
Assessment tool : Written Test
Methods : Open ended questions
Instrument : (Enclosed)
Score : Score I + Score A
Evaluation Heading
Element of Critical Indicator Score
198
Thinking
Acceptable based on the implicit meaning
100%
of the text and fluent
Acceptable based on the implicit meaning
Interpretation 50%
of the text
Not acceptable based on the implicit
0%
meaning of the text
Reasonable based on the implicit meaning
100%
of the text and fluent
Reasonable based on the implicit meaning
Analysis 50%
of the text
Not reasonable based on the implicit
0%
meaning of the text
Session : 25
Time Allotment : 2 x 45 minutes
5. Competence Standard
To understand the meaning of short functional written text and simple essay in the
form of recount, narrative and procedure, in the context of daily life and to access
knowledge.
Basic Competence
5.2. To respond the meaning and the rhetoric of essay written text accurately,
smoothly and acceptably in the context of daily life and to access knowledge in
the form of narrative, recount and procedure text.
Indicators
Identification of the meaning of words in the text.
Interpretation of the meaning of words in the text.
Interpretation of the meaning of sentences in the text.
Analysis of the content of the text.
Analysis of the information beyond the text.
Analysis the theme of the text
A. Learning Objectives
In doing the post-test, the students are able to:
identify the meaning of words in the text
interpret the meaning of words in the text
interpret the meaning of sentences in the text
analyse the information beyond the text
analyse the content of the text
analyse the theme of the text
B. Learning Material
I. Read this text carefully!
“The Mountain and the Squirrel”
200
(Source: http://www.familyfriendpoems.com/poem/the-mountain-and-the-
squirrel-by-ralph-waldo-emerson#ixzz3OCsbBLim)
F. Assessment
Assessment tool : Written Test
Methods : Open ended questions
Instrument : (Enclosed)
Score : Score I + Score A
Evaluation Heading
Element of Critical Indicator Score
Thinking
Acceptable based on the implicit meaning
100%
of the text and fluent
Acceptable based on the implicit meaning
Interpretation 50%
of the text
Not acceptable based on the implicit
0%
meaning of the text
Reasonable based on the implicit meaning
100%
of the text and fluent
Reasonable based on the implicit meaning
Analysis 50%
of the text
Not reasonable based on the implicit
0%
meaning of the text