Problematic Area Justification

AREA 2

AREA 1

Remarks: The highlighted area located at -103 dBm based on scanner RSRP (TDD2300) Vs Prediction Plot.

Cell Information:
TDD2300
(20Mhz)
FDD850
20Mhz)

TDD2300
20Mhz+1
0Mhz)

TDD2300
(20Mhz)
TDD2300
20Mhz+10
Mhz)

TDD2300 FDD850
20Mhz) 20Mhz)

Before After
Antenna
No Site ID Cell Name Sector PCI Azimuth RET RET
Height M-Tilt M-Tilt
850 2300 2600 850 2300 2600
1 NP1128 NP1128_CORNERSHOPLOT 1 72 19 70 0 4 2 N/A 0 4 2 N/A
2 NP1128 NP1128_CORNERSHOPLOT 2 73 19 180 0 2 2 N/A 0 2 2 N/A
3 NP1128 NP1128_CORNERSHOPLOT 3 74 19 300 0 2 2 N/A 0 2 2 N/A
4 NP1130 RESTAURANTOMARMAHMUD 1 58 14 90 0 2 2 N/A 0 2 2 N/A
5 NP1130 RESTAURANTOMARMAHMUD 2 57 14 210 0 2 2 N/A 0 2 2 N/A
6 NP1130 RESTAURANTOMARMAHMUD 3 59 14 310 0 2 2 N/A 0 2 2 N/A
7 NP4711 PDC BUKIT MINYAK 3 286 22 340 2 2 2 N/A 2 2 2 N/A
8 NP1133 JALANIMPIANRIA 2 141 15 200 0 2 2 N/A 0 2 2 N/A
9 NP1133 JALANIMPIANRIA 3 142 15 340 0 2 2 N/A 0 2 2 N/A
8 NP1132 ORANGEPOINT SALOON 1 10 10 10 0 2 2 N/A 0 2 2 N/A
9 NP1132 ORANGEPOINT SALOON 3 11 11 270 0 4 2 N/A 0 4 2 N/A
Problematic Area 1
Area: Area 1
Remark: Least optimum RSRP due to blockage by building and dense tree as can be seen in TSSR view.
ConclusionNP1128 sector 2 and NP4711 sector 3 already at maximum uptilt and area 1 is located at -103dBm based on scanner RSRP (TDD2300) Vs
Prediction Plot.
Hence this is the optimum result could be done.

Scanner RSRP (TDD2300) Vs Prediction Plot

AREA 1

Remarks:
1. PA 1 located at -105dBm based on Scanner RSRP (TDD2300) Vs Prediction Plot.
2. There are three cell is targetted into this area which is NP1128-S2, NP1133-S2 & NP4711-
S3.

Scanner RSRP TDD2300 vs Scanner RSRP FDD850

Scanner RSRP (TDD2300) Scanner RSRP (FDD850)

Remarks: PA 1 area having better RSRP with FDD850 compare with TDD2300 at PA 1 area.

UE DL Serving Band
 Remarks: Low RSRP for TDD2300 is served by FDD850 sites.

Scanner Coverage Footprint

NP1128-S2 RSRP NP1128-S2 Antenna View

Google Earth View:

Remarks:
1. PA 1 located at the side lobe from NP1128-S2 with distance 1.2km away from site.
2. There are flat terrain from NP1128-S2 to PA 1 area.
3. NP1128-S2 having low antenna height (H: 19m, M: 0, E: 2). Suggest to keep with current
RET since antenna height only 19m.

UE DL RSRP UE DL SINR

PCI UE DL throughput
 Conclusions: From the above UE plot, shown this area having low TDD2300 RSRP based on prediction plot.
NP1128 is set to maximum up-tilt for better coverage since this cell having low antenna height (H:19m,M: 0, E:
2). Suggest to keep with current RET since DL throughput shown the acceptable value throughput.

Problematic Area 2
Area: Area 2
Remark: Least optimum RSRP due to blockage by building and dense tree as can be seen in TSSR view.
ConclusionNP1128 sector 3 and NP1130 sector 1 and 3 already at maximum uptilt. Morover, area 1 is located at -103dBm based on scanner RSRP (TDD2300)
Vs Prediction Plot.
Hence this is the optimum result could be done.

AREA 2

Remarks:
1. PA 2 located at -105dBm based on Scanner RSRP (TDD2300) Vs Prediction Plot.
2. PA 2 having low RSRP due to blockge by high factory building.

Scanner RSRP TDD2300 vs Scanner RSRP FDD850

Scanner RSRP (TDD2300) Scanner RSRP (FDD850)

Remarks: PA 1 area having better RSRP with FDD850 compare with TDD2300 at PA 1 area.

UE DL Serving Band
 Remarks: Low RSRP for TDD2300 is served by FDD850 sites.

Scanner Coverage Footprint

FOOTPRINT NP1128 SECTOR 3 E-Tilt=2 FOOTPRINT NP1130 SECTOR 1 E-Tilt=2

AREA 2
AREA 2

ANTENNA VIEW NP1128 SECTOR 3 E-Tilt=2 ANTENNA VIEW NP1130 SECTOR 1 E-Tilt=2
Further Justification:
RSRP 39494 is limited than 39350 is due to 39494 is standalone.
Below figure shows that footprint for each sector as can be compare between 39350 and 39494 is almost similar.

RSRP 39350 RSRP 39494

FOOTPRINT 39350 SECTOR 1 FOOTPRINT 39494 SECTOR 1

FOOTPRINT 39350 SECTOR 2 FOOTPRINT 39494 SECTOR 2

FOOTPRINT 39350 SECTOR 3 FOOTPRINT 39494 SECTOR 3