26.16 2017 ASHRAE Handbook—Fundamentals (ST) Tabled Ait Permeability of Dilfernt Materials “Table Air Permeability o Different Matera on ‘ea Ar Perma, erm, nei teen) Meat igre) Geet toa, Stan, TD Egat Sai em Fierce bear 63 em E00 at Srio peal rd 125m, 25 gn santo? erpeenpet aouos withen cost prinetwocodelin pint 230 10? @: st" mat onotn Harta! sing 9 S300 iscios z nor cso Opens eed (O83), IU Kp, 98mm_—— 10? E vores 1 20? 223mm s0 z ‘Douglas fir plywood, 12.5 mm, 455 kg/m? ato! 2 Tsim 85 ke Talo? Q Cardin softwood yon, 19am a30kpw? 2 Wood fier board, 9:5 mm, 320 kein? 25x 107 z asonry Notre a. WORE CINE ‘Aerated concrete, 460 kg/m? Sx 109 E SAMOSGLIS§ = SLTSCLAYS Coren mer 10 ee eto? i mer ame hy, 00 100y 200mm, 190g? Dw IE Eto Gio Linx, 2500 Kn neaile i, Risser’ Dist Porn sco, 1950 git Teo ge Fave wie cou (anevene) 19mm, seaile seosrun coment or kss ‘cohen Esiem wie pie (raven 19mm, 465g? 110° Fig.6- Trends of Apparent Thermal Conductivity Seuthom yl pane) 19 tm. ato of Mas ols 500 kgm? ‘Spruce, (transverse) 19 mm, 400 kg/m? Sx lol is assumed that the moisture contents of most field soils lie between Wester red cedar, (transverse) 19 mm, 350 kpim’ <1 x 1-1? the wilting point of the soil (Le. the moisture content of a soil Cellalose insulation, dry blown, 32 kgm? 29% 104 Delow which a plant cannot alleviate its wilting symptoms) and the Giese eige ascios eld eapeiy ote sl (the moire cont of «so at ill Motes engande 6 kn! Listos been thorough weted ar then drained ntl the canage ate has verre Gams kale bot become negligibly small). After a prolonged dry spell, moisture is eee este mies near the wiking pin, at ater arity pertod, shar mois Ricigeresi ene 28S ba oe Contentnearts field cepa. Moisture contents a thes mis have ae : beenstudiedby many acura researchers od data fo differen. Axintceopegsted eee Lx 10% types of soil are given by Kersten (1949) and Salomone and. 110, (transwerse) 0.13 mun, 95 kyin® owe (1989), Shaded areas in Figure 6 approximate (1) the full range fn ems OiSmm HOG? 6610 of moisture contents er diferent sil pes nd (2) aang be fet, emsvons)023 mm x0Kgm Teo Tene ps crea int ‘tau bonded polyolefin (SBPO) (ansverse) 46%107 ‘Table 8 summarizes design values for thermal conductivities winrar vee)00750.1 am, 3167 thea ol les Table 9 gives mnges of them! condut moe : for some baie classes of rock. The vale chosen dopends Gane cap cmmresoosseceatet SY side whether heat afr calulted for minima het os th Extortion (LPS) mm ‘ thesollasina ground hat exchange system, ora maximum al ino as inpeat ter eatln cacalats fora basement Hence, As heat flows through soil, moisture tends to move away’ from ‘the heat source. This moisture migration provides initial mass trans- Portof heat, butt also dies the soil adjacent to the heat source, thus lowering the apparent thermal conductivity in that zone of sil ‘Typically, when other factors are held constant, increases with ‘moisture content and with dry density ofa soil, but decreases with {increasing organic content ofa sol and for uniform gradations and rounded soil grains (because grain-o-grain contacts are reduced), ‘The k of frozen soil may be higher or lower than that of the same tunfrozen soil (because the conductivity of ice is higher than that of ‘water but lower than that of typical sol grains). Differences in k below moisture contents of 7 8% are quite small. Atapproximately, 15% moisture content, k may vary up to 30% from unfrozen values. ‘When calculating annual energy use, choose valucs that repre sent typical mean ste conditions. In climates where ground freezing, is significant, accurate heat transfer simulations should include the and low values are given foreach soil class effect of the latent heat of fusion of water, Energy released dui this phase change significantly retards the progress ofthe frost fe in moist soil For further information, see Chapter 17, which includes ‘method for estimating heat loss through foundations. 4.8 SURFACE FILM COEFFICIENTS/ RESISTANCES As explained in Chapter 25, the overall thermal resistance of assembly comprises its surface-o-surface thermal resistance R the surface film resistances beween the assembly's surfaces and interior and exterior environment (R, and R,). Table 10 gives ‘values forthe surface film coefficients hand, and thei recip the surlace resistances 2, and R,. AS shown, the indoor val depend on position ofthe surface, direction of heat tansfer, and