Professional Documents
Culture Documents
109 Ideal case: Act abetted has been committed as a Punished with the punishment
result of abetment. provided for the offence.
(no express provision is made under IPC)
110 Where the abetted person commits an act with The abettor shall be punishable
different intention or knowledge than that of the for the offence which would have
abettor. been committed if the act was
done with the same intention or
Example: where X tells Y that Sheena has her
knowledge.
taken her diamond necklace and instigates Y to
bring it back to her hideously because Sheena has
not been returning it back intentionally. Y who is
Sheena’s friend visits her house and gets the
necklace for X. Y had lied about owning the
necklace.
111 Act abetted and act committed are different. Abettor is liable for the act done
in the same manner as if he had
(Difference can be in terms of the offence
abetted that act only.
entirely, the victim etc.)
Provided: the act done was a
e.g., A gives poison to B to administer to C. B
probable consequence of the act
confusing D to be C, administers poison to D.
abetted.
112 Where act abetted is committed + additionally, Cumulative punishment for both
liability under section 111 is also there, meaning the act committed and act done.
thereby that there was another offence
committed.
113 Effect caused by the act abetted is different than The abettor is liable for the effect
that intended by the abettor. actually caused in the same
manner and to the same extent
(act committed is graver than the act abetted,
as if he had intended to cause
however, a likely consequence)
that effect only.
Difference between
111 and 113
114 Abettor present when offence abetted is Punishable not as an abettor but
committed. as the principal offender.