Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Tony Bush
Transformational leadership is one of the most popular models, judging by the number of papers
on this topic, and it has attracted global interest, expressed for example in numerous doctoral
theses around the world. The concept has also been captured by political leaders anxious to
reform their educational systems, in the light of international league tables, such as the
Programme for Inter- national Student Assessment (PISA). It suggests a powerful influence
process, where (often char- ismatic) leaders persuade followers to adopt certain behaviours in
order to bring about what the leader regards as beneficial change. The central construct here is
that of ‘vision’, and followers are enjoined to seek a ‘better’ future for the organisation and to
commit to seeking the goals arising from the vision. However, the vision may not always be
shared and sometimes leads to negative consequences. For example, the narrow pursuit of
improved test results may marginalise students who are less academic and whose talents, music,
drama and sport, for example, lie outside the prescribed vision.
Izhak Berkovich examines what he describes as three common conceptions about transforma-
tional leadership. First, principals’ transformational leadership behaviours are more prevalent in
national contexts that are restructuring. Second, transformational behaviours are more effective
than transactional behaviours. Third, principals are either transformational or transactional. He
shows that transformational leadership is second only to instructional leadership in the number of
published papers in three leading journals, including EMAL. The author shows that the three
common conceptions are not supported by this body of literature. For example, transactional
models may be complementary, rather than contradictory, to transformational behaviours, and
principals may exhibit both sets of behaviours, not just one. He concludes that leadership concep-
tions are context-dependent, task-dependent and complex.
An alternative, and enduring model is that of managerial leadership. This is particularly sig-
nificant in centralised systems, where school principals are regarded as part of the wider admin-
istrative hierarchy, charged with implementing externally-prescribed policies. As Stanley
Semarco and Seokhee Cho note, Ghana’s headteachers are expected to be ‘managerial leaders
with admin- istrative oversight’. These authors explore the impact of managerial behaviours of
headteachers on teachers’ retention intentions in Ghana. They surveyed heads and teachers in 279
schools in five regions and conclude that teacher retention can be influenced by task-oriented
managerial lead- ership behaviours.
Managerial leadership, when practised to excess, can lead to managerialism, where adherence
to bureaucratic procedures is regarded as more important than educational purposes. Stephanie
Chong, Alan Geare and Roger Willett examine the influence of managerialism and collegiality in
a New Zealand university and note that collegial decision-making is threatened by increasing
man- agerialism. Drawing on documents, and transcripts of interviews with 75 current and
former staff, they show that the introduction of ‘executive academic managers’, and similar
apparatus, has
884 Educational Management Administration & Leadership 46(6)
increased managerialism but they also conclude that vice-chancellors retain individual agency
and exercise their powers in very different ways.
A managerial approach is often adopted when accountability pathways are vertical, and princi-
pals’ primary responsibility is to the external hierarchy rather than to students, parents and edu-
cators. A different pattern of accountability is required for school networks, as Melanie Ehren
and Jane Perryman indicate. The introduction and expansion of multi-academy trusts (MATs) in
England formalise such networks and change the nature of accountability. The authors discuss
several aspects of accountability within and beyond MATs and conclude that, where there are
high levels of reciprocal trust, accountability becomes a tool for learning and improvement
instead of control.
Margaret Sims, Manjula Waniganayake and Fay Hadley examine the evolving role of early
childhood leadership in Australia. They note the impact of policy reform on leaders but add that
expectations of them are unclear. Early childhood organisations may face sanctions if they do not
meet certain standards. The authors recruited 164 early childhood leaders to participate in their
research and conclude that these leaders are using their past experiences to understand the policy
changes, a key aspect of ‘sense-making’.
Miri Yemini discusses the role of intermediaries in pursuing entrepreneurship in Israeli
schools, and in providing services to schools, one aspect of privatisation. She interviewed
managers within these intermediate organisations, and Ministry of Education officials, as well as
scrutinising related documents. She notes the contradictions inherent in the links between
privatisation and public education and concludes that the involvement of intermediaries allows
private agendas, conflicting values, and systemic inequality to penetrate public education.
John Decman and his colleagues examine the perceptions of superintendents in Texas, USA,
about the Educational Leadership Constituents’ Council (ELCC) standards for leadership
prepara- tion. They interviewed 18 superintendents, to address research questions focused on
district finan- cial resources, involving stakeholders in decision-making, and school
improvement. Significantly, however, one superintendent stressed the need to rely on student
needs to drive decisions. The authors conclude that, despite the need to consider many
stakeholders, decisions need to be guided by a consistent strategic framework of values, mission
and vision.
Liz Hollingworth and her colleagues discuss how principals build school culture to sustain
improvement initiatives. The article reports the findings of an evaluation of the implementation
of state-driven reform initiatives in Michigan, USA. The four participants were all identified as
excellent leaders by the State Department of Education. The authors observed staff meetings and
also interviewed the four principals. They note the important role played by the principals in
establishing school culture and conclude that building trust, knowing their staff well, and com-
municating effectively, are important aspects of a positive culture.
The high quality of the journal depends greatly on the knowledge and judgement of the many
referees who review manuscripts. I am most grateful to all the referees (named below), who
reviewed papers during the 12 months from July 2017–July 2018.
Narina A. Samah
Ian Abbott Audrey Addi-Raacah Gazi Alam
Malcolm Abbott Bilal Afsar Noeline Alcorn
Suriani Abdul-Hamid - Airini David Allen
Curt Adams Mohamed Ajoud Yasser Al-Mahdy
Mete Akcaoglu Kirk Anderson
Bush: Transformational 885
leadership