Att 89.

Evicdence
Tndian
0
t r o d u u b o n -

ra ot EA: visitd
Sumer Mainu
Evidence Att? Sir Hem
Why
5i Evidence
Act Tndis
Aa 3 t c h oTT
ndi in 1868,

evidene

Stephen C3T
5
James
181 Sx
34 T

Evidence Act aAU

ndia

Nturt
natut- 34u1A
eohausie in
7 Not

Les For law ot Land

L a w dtprocedut
Pro cedure
Substantit
Tsulbstunku

Laws d a
5T Righs& Lab. Rig n s E Las

Consaet Lawet SATA

Evidence is procedue yT
vls stte AlR 146
Dat kshin

Retoos p eehe in nature -

Law effec
Reospeehie

Prosp eeA
Past
Fu t
effcri from
Pat dati
rom u u e
dat
 Commenement-

whole part of indL

1S sept 1372
A l l judicial Phocesdinqs ( t i s applicadt tv al judicial
poceeding)
Crfe See 2Ci)

On Aftidavit.

Court

AFhdavit
u c proceedins

where not appli'cabe - - Court Martial (Army)

-
Afidavit orclr 19 Rul o)

TT IEA -
BUT

1E you are taan dny

aa E in COuat a t
econce
discnehon, Aa EA
your oLDn

Shemaj S i h APBahr
AIR 1ST ALL 638

Contempt Cou Rocthdinr

Baj andan Sinha Vs Jyoi

AIR 11sG SC 66
Nareya
Arbtdatrs. ( ordr lo Rule Ia,)B,)
Se 26
rder 4.
In Civil Suit: - Proced u t
Plaint
ISSuL dt Sumrn

Ordu S
Summon 9 sevice

cte tdar
d issues TETTT A
SetHement

EA E vidence
Ovder

Judgment Here> Eeecuhon.

cPC
 ( g n z p b l s

n o n o g n i2sbl
n riminal (anhe tfen

Judical u t e l y

Ioveatigahon P
Framn
chage charge
she chasge She [i73(2)lcrpc
Court 5 T TRIL START.

ot charge TRI
nveshaNon Framiy 4 pro.
is d o n by
o.
T-0.Cckaje deisicn t buden
Evidene
hen ev idonct,
bwdon suat)
on 0. Lawer
defon se Acquttal.
3udg ment

a5AT Convichon

Strueturt of-
16A

Par 2 Part 3
Port
Pvoduehon e
On Proot
Relevany o¥ Effeat oP Evicdarxe
Pats
HA roo Concuuion pat
T S 3Tu dT T AA 2nd pat
T H produe hi
Tfa S? sequenee rHiH

- Se 66758f Cm)
- Sea teA (CyT)
s e 5-55Cch
tos C)T) Appreaiaton ot
-
s
esidence. - Valuue,
D e Finition Clause-

Se3 COurt

include- AI Corts
Mogisralu + Judges

-All per son who is

legat autho'sed tu
take evi denct.

Magstatu g pB aT To bE paiding tBces

Judge -Civil urt

preiding thcer
Al Perronu NT| TAK 51ar evidence

Exept-Abitratn
Faer Mearu? include

Meanij
- Any thunn, any s t l e dF ngs r relahon of

+ing
relahon
e am eahng
F a - eahn, Me.

- Which can be perceid by e sense_(y T a )

- Any menta condidon. f which any Pesons

Consci os.

Types Fati- Faet

EvidenaM
Princi pal
Fautum
Faetun robone.
Probahdom
Relevant faet
Fau in issue

P a t BaasT cout
TTfA T
In SSue T Prove
Faes in issue
Means &include

-
where the ex1stence dt Foes is
DisPte
Accept| Asiert
Denied

Relevant Factt-
Fass
Relahon ) (
Relevant fat Fat in isrue

relahon l
A Paet chT B faat 6 AyT
S cs s-aT relahon ATT&
AT JE
reluvant Past &|
Evidenc
Stuhenment
any documenteleehonie relord
Stt preented for obsevahon
t h Cour.
+include -s

Docum enta
In Statemenh form. in Document/eleetonic Form.

Tye eidences -- 7 Divect Evidenct - TA

CicumstnHal Eviden ce

P doc|ra evid ence

is pres enkd
segsregatt hAT u3aT
issues rove dhAT TA
Disec F a s in

Fist pridity jndgto

circumstanha evidenco.
diveet evi thin
IE no
 - Murdo
e dh cUFt aT charge
Staement
Evidenco eye
witmvss ( Oral)
Vide ce fy Footage Doc) documenhay

What are DE C E:

eye witnes

Vid ee SaksPut
s
w hich
T e evid e n e t deuide
veo Substantie Evidence Convich'on acquitta

Coro borautive Eviclen ce - Goet Supri eidences.

(4) Proved Disproved, Not roved

Fat

See S-S3(Fas 5 6+aa)

P a c is BH)
Rel erant fart iE
Evidence

A N UTAT sr?
Admissibility (s.13¢ ) - eiden ce aa C o u r t resen raH
PTOved. eci'sion Cowt CT ETRT
Proe cAT TSupPri
ev idence a o i

Pre umph'on- seL4 Are + a3sump hon

HIAATT

Pat B 4

May be due2
toainfas

s i u m P hon,
al

- Taker for aranttd with out peeef proving

cS TIA op h'on ENT E to airept

May resune. Court
Tcet
 the faat
is bound to alcept
If court
S h a l reourme
-

Preume atept Aa A5 ZRT

itmuo+

sT concluoi
t
Proof AT pr eoumpt ion
Concluaive
þAT
ysAT ?
Prot ar aecepr

Conelusi
Shau
Mo seum
reume
see(2, 13,lls, 116, 19

Preump Hon f
resumphon of
,82
Fout

Preswmf do
Pre sump hio
Juris
Huminis
Rebutable t
Rebutable
Irebuttable.

L resumphion le ma
-8s
87, 1 ,|/4A, baby AT ÀT
A
1einmel

10, 1O A 270
s
6,94,28
du'ss ol 5 z
4 1SA
T egi hmata
Se - aT aarE
Prov icded
AT T4T &7|.
 1EA

See5&6 -oP h zelewanty of Paut-

Relevancy (s s t Sr)

kegical
Tndu'au Law
Engish Law

Cour's discrehona
Power
SS Evidence may be given t Faets in issue
elevant
7Evidence may be gien in any sutlproceedirg

th eroist e n c e or non. erist ehce f ew en

Paet ore
ssue and Suh others a
hereinaPher deelared +o be relevant SF
no others

MEANSs
Evidence mabe gin Fat in issue
existence rP e e
exist ence n o n
-

aP he be
to
a are dleclared
other
Pats
such

eevant P no othar.

som

Relevancy o
Paes Pormi ng part ot
S.6
rauauhon

Relahon.
e (A)
F a t in issueL
Fa
Essential eltment
)Therc muut be a Fat
issuL.
f a e in
Fa must be Conneted w itth
same
hme & Plaie or at
occuured aE m e
They
different imu f plaue
Faut>A beated to murder.
Whakever A
cusedcused
M uer f
(B) Faets t s u e
Relevannt did wih B
Paes
be Pore beahng
him.
 The dochrine Re Tetae -

Under English law, he fat rom the part o same

tronsahon is caled Re Crestae,

-
kaA do chine
Critcism- Pro P. Wighmre
The role ot R is notonly useles butt also hamPd.
-1is sele»s becase eve Part dP it is covered b
Some Other Tule cs to tne elewany dE Falt.
- 1+ is harm Pu becauue it Create con Fusion

about limitahons df h e other rue.

Ratten Vs aueen
The vichm has caUed the police Fr help b t
be fere operatos Could Connet fo the Police e

wa olis conneeted.

Later he police Found het dead body Prom ber

calu made,death
im= Cald
houuwe from where h e wa
Same

-Hence the Cal made to the Þolice are relevan+

S 6 a a Part ot he Same trnsaehon.

R Vs BedingPield

A women coith her thOat Cut came suddenly

out of a room in h i c h she had beeh înjwed

and beFore she died sasd

shorHy
what seddina Petd ha
Oh dear aunty see

done to me."
BedingBeld
1+ wa held nodmissible part ot Same ranauhon

her
stakment ha» a
autua event

large hims 3apP

Sponteneous EAT ad
Time
 Faus which a r e + h e OccaDson
ncaielertest

of Paet in issue
Cause
OCcaps 1on Ae,
Fat in issue Reca
UTT olele elevant
J3AT p o r
e Pfect He
the oCass ion, C a u e , efFect
Fats which are
relevant Pats r f a c t s
otherwise eB
immed iate o R
state hings
Th
consitute
In sSue ds which
dn
affordes
which
und er hich they happened or

rransautOn
For their occUrance

PPortunity

Relevant

a Occassion
Relevant Pasts | Caue
A1I Pacs R Effea+
Faets in issue
State t thinas.

AT àE relerant F
OCcasion| cles

occawsion Murder

RÍH33AH T r e l erant HA

R vS ichaodson.

A) ofFene(WHY?)

o thus Ohy
anwer

IS Tel ewant.

Ind ian Airlines V Madhuri Chandha

ALR 19GS
Erfet uf~oTEHIATT.
Effce is the cauoe Acident.

e eid ences T TTo

(A)Mwder 6
esidences found on the Plae fats

re relesant

Stade hins-akn
State t h i na s t T otfernce bT
bakaround 1
Murd e
AcCued

Relevant

Se: 03
See o 3

Motie Preparahion Co ndu

Relevant Paut Relent Pat

Any Party
F a t in iSsue F a t in issue Ag ent t party.

Pats T
TT T 2
elevant AiT
und er .o3
 emehon Supposed to have led t h e aut

-evitene ot moti a2T a ET o r AAIdA a

aAT
d ewi vls stak t
Tara
UP AIR 11 sc

Bhagirath Vs state Hayana AIR Iq 16 SCC.

reparction devisin9 atraging the mean measures

n e Eps a y to committ q Cime.

Conduut- Conduet

Prewiow» Subs eq uent

Cond u
Cond
otPence a
TZ T Ao.

n the F m
In the Pemm
eftest iFis
Preparhan, iE reevank.
Can e
eant
Cuean vs Adulle.

Ese-0 Cond u t do e not include sttemens

hose statmets acom pany eplain
UNLESSS
alts other Hhan statenmens.

elewant
when the cond u r d any person is Relewant: mhy

Stakment made to him in is Preen cE & heari n9

which aPfecs suh.

hen statemenk dre
Condut is selevant
alno elavanf

Crangasaran Vls enmprdr

Bht.
Nag enia v/s stafe f