Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FOUNDING EDITOR
Geoffrey Boothroyd
University of Rhode Island
Kingston, Rhode Island
VLADIMIR B. GINZBURG
ROBERT BALLAS
Headquarters
Marcel Dekker, Inc.
270 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016
tel: 212-696-9000; fax: 212-685-4540
Neither this book nor any part may be reproduced or transmitted in any
form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying,
microfilming, and recording, or by any information storage and retrieval
system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Current printing (last digit)
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
PREFACE
The steel industry has a long history of development, and despite the
many decades that have passed, it still demonstrates all the signs of
longevity. New ideas continue to revolutionize the steel-producing
process today as much as they did 150 years ago. The last two decades
were especially beneficial for the steel industry, which went through a
series of revolutionary steps, significantly improving the quality of steel
and, at the same time, reducing the production cost. In the flat rolling of
steel, these revolutionary steps included successful implementation of
continuous strip production plants utilizing both thin and intermediate
thickness slabs, introduction of strip profile and flatness control
technology, and, most importantly, the complete automation and
computerization of the entire rolling process. Remarkably, all these
developments were achieved with a simultaneous reduction in the
workforce, greatly reducing the labor cost per ton of rolled steel.
VLADIMIR B. GINZBURG
ROBERT BALLAS
Vladimir Ginzburg would like to thank the many intelligent and studious
people that he had the pleasure of meeting throughout his long career in
the steel industry. I am also thankful to my children, Ellen and Eugene,
who in spite of their deep involvement with their own careers, have
always found time to express interest in my work. My special gratitude
goes to my wife Tatyana for her great contribution in preparing this book
and her constant encouragement and support, without which this
endeavor would not have been possible.
Bob Ballas would like to thank the many colleagues and friends who
contributed their insight and knowledge to the research effort in
producing this book. As the third generation in my family to work in the
steel industry, I am deeply indebted to my parents and grandparents, who
began working in the steel mills of Western Pennsylvania nearly 100
years ago and always provided stability, guidance and inspiration. And
finally, to Kathy, Lauren, and Andrea, whose love and support not only
made the effort possible, but also provide the source of all my joy.
Page v
CONTENTS
Preface
iii
Index 831
Page vii
Part I
PRINCIPAL CHARACTERISTICS OF STEEL
Page viii
Chapter 1
STRUCTURE OF METALS
Fig. 1.1 – Principal types of crystal lattices. Adapted from Higgins [1].
Page 2
Fig. 1.4 – Allotropic changes in the density of iron. Adapted from Higgins
[1].
Figure 1.5 illustrates the atomic planes in a cubic cell that is made up of
eight atoms, with one at each corner. The atomic planes are described by
3-digit numbers where each digit corresponds to a unit coordinate in
relation to the crystallographic axes X, Y, and Z. For example, the set of
planes designated by the symbol (001) would not cut either the X or the Y
axis [2].
strength lies in the direction of the atomic plane (111) and the weakest
along the atomic plane (100) as indicated in Fig. 1.6a.
Fig. 1.5 – Atomic planes in a cubic cell. Adapted from Sauveur [2].
Fig. 1.7 – Typical cooling curve of a pure metal. Adapted from Higgins [1].
Fig. 1.9 – Dendrite growth of metallic crystals from liquid state. From
Higgins [1]. Copyright Hodder & Stoughton Ltd. England. Reprinted with
permission.
Page 7
In a large ingot, the grain size may vary considerably from the outside
surface to the center as shown in Fig. 1.11. This is due to the variation in
temperature gradient as the ingot solidifies and the heat is transferred
from the metal to a mold. It is possible to distinguish the following three
forms in the grain structure [1]:
Pure metals
Intermetallic compounds
Solid solutions
Carbon
Page 9
Phosphorus
Silicon
Sulfur
Arsenic
Aluminum
The important compound that is present in the alloys of iron and carbon
is the carbide Fe3C or cementite, which has an orthorhombic space
lattice.
Fig. 1.12 – ASTM grain size chart. Adapted From Johnson and Weeks
[7].
Page 10
When a metal A forms a solid solution with another metal B that has a
different space lattice, the space lattice of the solid solution may either be
similar to the lattice of one of the metals or different from both. In the
case where the lattice of the solution is identical to one of the metals, A
for example, that metal may logically be considered the solvent, and
metal B the solute. If the space lattice of the solution is unlike the lattice
of either metal, the metal that is present in larger proportions can be
considered as the solvent. There are two types of solid solutions that can
be described as follows [2]:
2. Sauveur, A., The Metallography and Heat Treatment of Iron and Steel,
Fourth Edition, McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc., New York and London,
1935.
4. Roberts, W.L., Cold Rolling of Steel, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York,
1978.
Page 11
Chapter 2
METALLURGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF STEEL
Fig. 2.1 – Phase diagram of A-B alloy. Adapted from Johnson and Weeks
[1].
Fig. 2.2 – Iron-cementite phase diagram.
Page 14
2.3 Austenite
In iron-carbon alloys, austenite is the solid solution that is formed when
carbon dissolves in face-centered cubic (gamma) iron in amounts up to
2%. The microstructure of austenite is usually large grained as shown in
Fig. 2.3.
2.4 Ferrite
In iron-carbon alloys, ferrite is a very dilute solid solution of carbon in a
body-centered cubic (alpha) iron and contains at most only 0.02%
carbon. Figure 2.4 shows that the microstructure of ferrite appears as
polyhedral grains. Ferrite is very ductile and soft with a low tensile
strength of approximately 40,000 lb/in.2 and an elongation in 2 in. of
about 40% [2,3].
2.5 Graphite
Graphite, or graphitic carbon is a free carbon in steel or cast iron where
the carbon is amorphous, having no particular form. Figure 2.5 illustrates
the metallographic appearance of graphite in a low-carbon steel that has
been subjected to prolonged heating at a temperature below that at
which austenite is formed [2].
Page 15
2.6 Cementite
Cementite, or iron carbide is an interstitial compound of iron and carbon
with the approximate chemical formula Fe3C that contains 6.69% carbon.
When cementite occurs as a phase in steel, the chemical composition is
altered by the presence of manganese and other carbide-forming
elements.
2.7 Pearlite
Pearlite is a lamellar aggregate of ferrite and cementite that is a result of
the eutectoid reaction which takes place when a plain carbon steel of
approximately 0.08% carbon is cooled slowly from the temperature range
at which austenite is stable.
2.8 Ledeburite
Ledeburite is an eutectic of the iron-carbon system that is comprised of
an austenite and a cementite. Ledeburite contains 4.3% carbon and is a
constituent of the iron-carbon alloys that contain more than 2.0% carbon.
For this reason, the dividing line between steels and cast iron is set at
2.0% carbon. Figure 2.8 illustrates the microstructure of ledeburite in cast
iron [2].
Fig. 2.8 – Microstructure of ledeburite (Magnification: 150×). From The
Making, Shaping and Treating of Steel [2]. Copyright AISE, Pittsburgh,
Pa. Reprinted with permission.
Page 18
Aecm,
Ae1,
Ae3,
Ae4=Temperatures of phase changes at equilibrium.
After the reaction begins, the gamma iron separates the two reacting
phases. During this process, the atoms of these two reacting phases
diffuse through solid gamma iron. Since diffusion through a solid is very
slow, a segregated microstructure containing both the delta and gamma
iron is produced [5]. Segregation during a peritectic reaction can lead to
longitudinal cracking during casting of steels, especially when casting thin
slabs.
Page 19
Fig. 2.10 – Phase diagram related to peritectic steel. Adapted from Porter
and Easterling [6].
Fig. 2.11 – Phase transformation in steel containing 0.4% carbon.
Adapted from Higgins [7].
Page 21
2.17 Bainite
Bainite is a decomposition of austenite consisting of an aggregate of
ferrite and carbide. Figure 2.15 shows the appearance of bainite as
featherlike if formed in the upper part of the temperature range and
acicular if formed in the lower part. The hardness of bainite increases as
the transformation temperature decreases due to the finer distribution of
carbide that forms at lower temperatures.
2.18 Martensite
Martensite is an interstitial supersaturated solid solution of carbon in iron
having a body-centered tetragonal lattice. It is a metastable phase of
steel that is formed by the transformation of austenite below the Ms
temperature.
References
1. Johnson, C.G. and Weeks, W.R., Metallurgy, Fifth Edition, American
Technical Society, Chicago.
Chapter 3
CHEMICAL COMPOSITIONS OF STEEL
1. Low alloy steels containing less than 5% elements other than iron
2. High alloy steels containing more than 5% elements other than
iron.
Austenite formers
Ferrite formers
Carbide formers.
Carbon (C)
Cobalt (Co)
Copper (Cu)
Manganese (Mn)
Nickel (Ni)
Nitrogen (N).
Titanium (Ti)
Tin (Sn)
Tungsten (W)
Vanadium (V).
Fig. 3.3 – Physical states in which the principal alloying elements exist in
steel. From Engineering Metallurgy, Part 1, by Higgins, R.A., 1983.
Copyright Hodder & Stoughton Ltd., England. Reprinted with permission.
The symbols in Eqs. (3-1) and (3-2) represent the weight percent of the
element indicated. By using ASE and FSE as the coordinates in a
modified Schaeffler diagram as shown in Fig. 3.4, it is possible to define
the microstructure of alloyed steel after air-cooling from its austenite
conditions.
Fig. 3.5, the addition of manganese and nickel lowers the eutectoid
temperature, whereas the other elements cause this temperature to rise
[3].
Vanadium, titanium and niobium inhibit the grain growth by forming finely-
dispersed carbides and nitrides that are relatively insoluble at high
temperatures and act as barriers to grain growth. The carbides of
tungsten and molybdenum that are present in high-alloy tool steels
reduce grain growth at heat-treatment temperatures. Aluminum that is
present in aluminum-killed steel makes it inherently fine-grained.
Tool steel:
High-speed steel 0 –
Hot-work steel 10.00
Cold-work steel 0 – 5.50
0 – 1.80
Stainless steel:
Austenitic chromium-nickel 0 – 4.00
steel 0 – 1.25
Martensitic chromium steel 0 – 1.25
Ferritic chromium steel
Stainless steel:
Austenitic chromium-nickel 15.0 –
steel 30.0
Martensitic chromium steel 4.0 –
Ferritic chromium steel 18.0
Precipitation hardening 10.5 –
steel 27.0
12.2 –
18.0
The range of nickel content in various types of steel is shown in Table 3.5
[9]:
Stainless steel:
Austenitic chromium- 1.00 –
nickel steel 37.00
Martensitic chromium 0 – 2.50
steel 3.00 – 8.50
Precipitation hardening
steel
Tool steel:
High-speed steel 0.90 – 5.25
Hot-work steel 0 – 2.20
Cold-work steel 0 – 5.15
Page 43
The range of tungsten content in various carbon and tool steels is shown
in Table 3.7 [9]:
Tool steel:
High-speed steel 1.15 – 21.0
Hot-work steel 0 – 19.0
Cold-work steel 0 – 2.0
Shock-resisting 0 – 3.0
steel
Tool steel:
High-speed steel 0 – 13.0
Hot-work steel 0 – 4.5
Heat-resistant casting
alloys: 0 – 18.5
Nickel-base alloys 42.0 – 67.5
Cobalt-base alloys
Forms brittle sulfides that have a low melting point causing steel to
crumble during hot working. The steel also becomes unsuitable for
cold-working processes.
When a sufficient amount of manganese is added to steel, sulfur
forms manganese sulfides MnS which are plastic at hot-working
temperatures. These sulfides are distributed throughout the steel
as rather large globules (Fig. 3.12b) that are not soluble in steel
and thus, not associated with the steel structure.
Therefore, in order to produce mild steel with high ductility, the nitrogen
content must be kept as low as 0.002%. This reduction in nitrogen
content also reduces quench aging.
References
1. Peters, A.T., Ferrous Production Metallurgy, John Wiley & Sons, New
York, 1982.
7. Shiga, C., et al, Kawasaki Steel Technical Report, No. 4, 1981, pp. 97-
109.
8. Metals Handbook, Eighth Edition, Vol. 1, Properties and Selection of
Metals, American Society for Metals, Metals Park, Ohio, 1961.
Chapter 4
CLASSIFICATION OF STEEL
Grade, type, and class are additional terms that are used to classify steel
products. Although these terms are used interchangeably in various
specifications, within the steel industry they have very specific uses.
Grade is used to denote chemical composition, type indicates
deoxidation practice, and class describes other attributes such as
strength or surface conditions.
composition. The first digit identifies the type of steel. In the case of a
simple alloy steel, the second number usually indicates the percentage of
the predominant alloying element. The last two digits indicate the carbon
content in hundredths of a percent. Thus, AISI-SAE 2517 indicates a
nickel steel of approximately 5% Ni (4.75 to 5.25) and 0.17% C (0.15 to
0.20).
Chemical composition
Method of manufacturing
Element Maximum
Content, %
Carbon (C)
1.04
Manganese
(Mn) 1.65
Silicon (Si)
0.60
Copper (Cu)
0.60
On the basis of carbon content, plain carbon steel can be divided into the
following groups:
Type of Plain Carbon
Carbon Steel Content, %
Table 4.2 shows the chemical composition and mechanical properties for
selected standard carbon sheet steel [2,4].
Page 51
Table 4.1 AISI-SAE designation system for carbon and alloy steels [2].
Carbon Steels
Plain carbon 10XX 1.00 — — — —
Resulfurized 11XX max — — — —
Resulfurized and 12XX — — — — —
rephosphorized 15XX — — — — —
Plain carbon 1.00–
1.65
max
(a) XX in the last digits of these designations indicates that the carbon content
(in hundredths of a percent) is to be inserted.
Page 52
Tensile Yield
Strength Strength
Chemical Composition Ranges and Limits, %
(As-rolled) (As-
AISI-SAE
rolled)
No.
Mn MPa ksi MPa ksi
C P S
Note: When silicon is required, the following ranges and limits are used:
Tensile Yield
Chemical Composition Ranges and
Strength Strength
Limits, %
AISI-SAE (Normalized) (Normalized)
No.
Mn Ni Cr Mo MPa ksi MPa ksi
C
Table 4.4 shows the chemical composition for HSLA steel grades that are
designated by ASTM specifications, while Table 4.5 provides the
mechanical properties [3]. HSLA grades have specified minimum yield
points that range from 275 MPa (40 ksi) to as high as 1035 MPa (150 ksi)
and typically contain small amounts of alloying elements in order to
achieve their strength in hot-rolled or heat-treated conditions. HSLA
steels are generally utilized in applications where weight reduction is a
major factor.
Page 54
A242
Type 1 0.15 1.00 0.45 0.05 — — — 0.20 — —
Type 2 0.20 1.35 0.04 0.05 — — — min — —
0.20
min
A572
Grade 42 0.21 1.35 0.04 0.05 0.30 — — 0.20 — (a)
Grade 45 0.22 1.35 0.04 0.05 0.30 — — min — (a)
Grade 50 0.23 1.35 0.04 0.05 0.30 — — 0.20 — (a)
Grade 55 0.25 1.35 0.04 0.05 0.30 — — min — (a)
Grade 60 0.26 1.35 0.04 0.05 0.30 — — 0.20 — (a)
Grade 65 0.23 1.65 0.04 0.05 0.30 — — min — (a)
0.20
min
0.20
min
0.20
min
A588
Grade A 0.10–0.90– 0.04 0.05 0.15–0.40– — 0.25–0.02– —
Grade B 0.19 1.25 0.04 0.05 0.30 0.65 0.25– 0.40 0.10 —
Grade C 0.20 0.75– 0.04 0.05 0.15–0.40– 0.50 0.20–0.01– —
Grade D 0.15 1.25 0.04 0.05 0.30 0.70 0.25– 0.40 0.10 Nb: 0.04; Zr
Grade E 0.10–0.80– 0.04 0.05 0.15–0.30– 0.50 0.20–0.01– 0.05–0.15
Grade F 0.20 1.35 0.04 0.05 0.30 0.50 — 0.50 0.10 Mo: 0.10–0.25
Grade G 0.15 0.75– 0.04 0.05 0.50–0.50–0.75– 0.30 — Mo: 0.10–0.20
Grade H 0.10– 1.25 0.035 0.04 0.90 0.90 1.25 — 0.05 Mo: 0.10; Ti: 0.07
Grade J 0.20 1.20 0.04 0.05 0.15– — 0.40–0.30–0.01– Mo: 0.15; Ti:
0.20 0.50– 0.30 0.30 1.10 1.00 0.10 0.005–0.030
0.20 1.00 0.30 0.50– 0.80 0.30– — Ti: 0.03–0.05
0.20 1.20 0.25– 1.00 0.30– 0.50 0.02–
1.25 0.70 0.10– 0.60 0.20– 0.10
0.60– 0.25– 0.25 0.50– 0.35 —
1.00 0.75 — 0.70 0.30
0.30– min
0.50
A606 — — — — — — —
0.22 1.25 0.05
A607
Grade 45 0.22 1.35 0.04 0.05 — — — 0.20 — (a)
Grade 50 0.23 1.35 0.04 0.05 — — — min — (a)
Grade 55 0.25 1.35 0.04 0.05 — — — 0.20 — (a)
Grade 60 0.26 1.50 0.04 0.05 — — — min — (a)
Grade 65 0.26 1.50 0.04 0.05 — — — 0.20 — (a)
Grade 70 0.26 1.65 0.04 0.05 — — — min — (a)
0.20
min
0.20
min
0.20
min
A618
Grade I 0.22 1.25 — 0.05 — — — — — —
Grade II 0.22 0.85– 0.04 0.05 0.30 — — 0.20 0.02 —
Grade III 0.23 1.25 0.04 0.05 0.30 — — min min Nb: 0.005 min
1.35 — 0.02
min
A633
Grade A 0.18 1.00– 0.04 0.05 0.15– — — — — Nb: 0.05
Grade B 0.18 1.35 0.04 0.05 0.30 — — — 0.10 —
Grade C 0.20 1.00– 0.04 0.05 0.15– — — — — Nb: 0.01–0.05
Grade D 0.20 1.35 0.04 0.05 0.50 0.25 0.25 0.35 — Mo: 0.08
Grade E 0.22 1.15– 0.04 0.05 0.15– — — — 0.04– Nb: 0.01–0.05; N:
1.50 0.50 0.11 0.01–0.03
0.70– 0.15–
1.60 0.50
1.15– 0.15–
1.50 0.50
A656
Grade 1 0.18 1.60 0.04 0.05 0.60 — — — 0.05– Al: 0.02 min; N:
Grade 2 0.15 0.90 0.04 0.05 0.10 — — — 0.15 0.005–0.030
— Ti: 0.05–0.50; Al:
0.01 min
A715
Type 1 0.15 1.65 0.0250.035 0.10 — — — — Ti: 0.05 min
Type 2 0.15 1.65 0.0250.035 0.60 — — — — N: 0.005 min (b)
Type 3 0.15 1.65 0.0250.035 (b) — — — 0.08 Nb: 0.005 min; N:
Type 4 0.15 1.65 0.0250.035 0.60 0.80 — — (b) 0.020 (b)
(b) (b) — Nb: 0.005–0.06
Type 5 0.15 1.65 0.0250.035 0.90 — — (c); Ti: 0.10 (b);
(d) 0.15 1.65 0.0250.035 — — — — Zr 0.05 min; B:
Type 6 0.15 1.65 0.0250.035 0.30 — — — — 0.0025
Type 7 0.90 — 0.005 Mo: 0.20 min;
— min Nb: 0.03 min
(e) Nb: 0.005–0.10
N: 0.020
(a) May be purchased as type 1 (0.005 – 0.05 Nb), type 2 (0.01 – 0.15 V), type 3
(0.05 max Nb plus 0.02 – 0.15 V), or, type 4 (0.015 max N plus V ≥ 4N).
(b) Not added to Grades 50 and 60. (c) Might not be added to Grade 50. (d)
Available as Grade 80 only. (e) 0.005 min Nb may be added in place of or in
addition to V.
Page 55
Minimum Minimum
ASTM Tensile Strength Yield Strength
Type, Grade, or Condition (a) (a)
Spec.
MPa ksi MPa ksi
—
A690 485 70 345 50
Tool steels can be grouped into eight main categories as shown in Table
4.6, which also provides the chemical composition for these grades.
Table 4.7 shows the mechanical properties of some selected tool steels.
(M1 – M48,
0.75–0.10–0.15– 3.50– 0.30 3.25– 1.15– 0.95– 4.75–
M62)
1.55 0.60 0.65 4.75 11.00 10.50 4.50 13.00
Standard Molybdenum max
High Speed
Tool Steels
(T1 – T15) 0.65–0.10–0.15– 3.75– 0.30 0.40– 11.75– 0.80– 4.25–
Tungsten 1.60 0.40 0.40 5.00 1.25 21.00 5.25 13.00
max
Intermediate
(M50 – M59) 0.75–0.15–0.20– 3.75– 4.00– 1.05– 0.90–
High Speed
Molybdenum 0.95 0.35 0.60 4.50 — 4.75 1.45 2.10 —
Tool Steels
(A2, A4, A6 –
Cold Work A11)
0.45–0.35–0.15– 0.90– 0.30– 0.90– 0.50– 0.15–
Tool Steels Medium
2.85 2.50 1.50 5.75 2.05 1.80 1.50 10.25 —
Alloy
Air Hardening
(O1 – O2, O6
0.85–0.30–0.50– 0.30–
– O7) 0.30 0.20– 0.40– 0.30– —
1.55 1.80 1.50 0.85 0.30 2.00 0.40
Oil Hardening max
Shock
(S1 – S2, S4 – 0.40–0.10–0.15– 0.50– 0.30 0.20– 1.50– 0.15–
Resisting
S7) 0.65 1.50 2.50 3.50 1.80 3.00 0.50 —
Tool Steels max
Special
(L2, L6) 0.45–0.10– 0.50 0.60– 1.25– 0.25– 0.10–
Purpose
Low Alloy 1.00 0.90 1.20 2.00 0.50 — 0.30 —
Tool Steels max
Water
(W1 – W2, 0.70–0.10–0.10– 0.15– 0.20 0.10 0.15 0.10–
Hardening
W5) 1.50 0.40 0.40 0.60 0.35 —
Tool Steels max max max
Page 57
16.00–10.00–2.00–
18.00 14.00 3.00
16.00–10.00–2.00–
18.00 14.00 3.00
Minimum Minimum
Tensile Strength Yield Strength
Type
MPa ksi MPa ksi
Chemical Composition
Ranges and Limits, %
Type
Other
Mn Si Cr Ni Mo
C P S Elements
Minimum Minimum
Type Tensile Strength Yield Strength
MPa ksi MPa ksi
Mn Si Cr Ni Mo Other Elements
C P S
The main alloying elements in electrical sheet steels are silicon and
aluminum with a predominant content of silicon. Electrical sheet steels
can be divided into the following two general groups [1,15]:
Oriented steels
Nonoriented steels
Nonoriented steels are made with a mill treatment that yields a grain
structure or texture of a random nature. As a result, the magnetic
properties in the rolling direction of the strip are not significantly different
from those in the transverse direction.
Table 4.16 shows the alloy content and mechanical properties of selected
electrical sheet steel grades.
Table 4.16 Alloy content and mechanical properties of electrical sheet steel
grades [1].
4.9 Superalloys
Superalloys are iron, cobalt and nickel-base alloys with outstanding heat-
resisting characteristics. These heat-resisting alloys are developed for
very high temperature service where relatively high tensile, thermal,
vibratory, or shock stresses are encountered and oxidation resistance is
frequently required [2]. Table 4.17 shows the chemical composition of
selected superalloys while Table 4.18 shows typical mechanical
properties of selected cobalt-base and nickel-base superalloys.
Page 63
Chemical Composition, %
Type/Alloy Cr Ni Co Mo Nb Ti Fe Other
W C
Solid-Solution Alloys
Iron-Base
Incoloy 800 21.0 32.5 — — — — 0.38 45.7 0.05 Al: 0.38
Incoloy 801 20.5 32.0 — — — — 1.13 46.3 0.05 —
Incoloy 802 21.0 32.5 — — — — 0.75 44.8 0.35 Al: 0.58
Cobalt-Base
Haynes 25 20.0 10.0 50.0 — 15.0 — — 3.0 0.10 Mn: 1.5
(L-605) 22.0 22.0 37.0 — 14.5 — — 3.0 0.10 La: 0.90
Haynes 188 max
Nickel-Base
Hastelloy B 1.0 63.0 2.5 28.0 — — — 5.0 0.05 V: 0.03
Hastelloy max 69.0 max 28.0 — — — 2.0 max —
B-2 1.0 56.0 1.0 17.0 4.5 — — max 0.02 —
Hastelloy C max 63.0 max 15.5 — — 0.7 6.0 max —
Hastelloy 16.5 59.0 — 16.0 3.7 — max 3.0 0.15 —
C-4 16.0 72.0 2.0 16.0 — — — max max —
Hastelloy 15.5 67.0 max 15.5 — — 0.5 5.0 0.015 Al: 0.2; La: 0.02
C-276 7.0 61.0 — 24.5 — — max 5.0 max V: 0.6
Hastelloy N 15.5 49.0 — 9.0 0.6 — — max 0.02 Al: 2.0
Hastelloy S 5.0 76.0 — — — — — 1.0 max Cu: 0.25 max
Hastelloy 22.0 60.5 2.5 — — — — 5.5 0.06 Al: 1.35; Cu: 0.5 max
W 15.5 74.0 max — — 2.25 — 15.8 0.02 Cu: 0.03 max
Hastelloy X 23.0 55.0 1.5 9.0 — — — 8.0 max Al: 1.0
Inconel 600 16.0 61.0 max 9.0 — 3.60 — 14.1 0.12 Al: 0.2
Inconel 601 22.0 — — 7.5 max
Inconel 604 21.5 — 0.2 — 0.15
Inconel 617 — 2.5 0.08
Inconel 625 12.5 0.05
— 0.02
0.07
0.05
Precipitation-Hardening Alloys
Iron-Base
A-286 15.0 26.0 — 1.25 — — 2.00 55.2 0.04 Al: 0.2; B: 0.005; V:
Discaloy 14.0 26.0 — 3.00 — — 1.70 55.0 0.06 0.3
W-545 13.5 26.0 — 1.50 — — 2.85 55.8 0.08 Al: 0.25
Al: 0.2; B: 0.05
Cobalt-Base
MP-35N 20.0 35.0 35.0 10.0 — — — — — —
MP-159 19.0 25.0 36.0 7.0 — 0.6 3.0 9.0 — Al: 0.2
Nickel-Base
Astroloy 15.0 56.5 15.0 5.25 — — 3.5 <0.3 0.06 Al: 4.4; B: 0.03; Zr:
Incoloy 901 12.5 42.5 — 6.00 — — 2.7 36.2 0.10 0.06
Inconel 706 16.0 41.5 — — — — 1.75 37.5 max —
0.03 Al: 0.2; (Nb + Ta):
Inconel 718 19.0 52.5 — 3.0 — 5.1 0.9 18.5 2.9; Cu: 0.15 max
Inconel 751 15.5 72.5 — — — 1.0 2.3 7.0 0.08 Al: 0.5; Cu: 0.15 max
Inconel 15.5 73.0 — — — 1.0 2.5 7.0 max Al: 1.2; Cu: 0.25 max
X750 19.5 73.0 1.0 — — — 2.25 1.5 0.05 Al: 0.7; Cu: 0.25 max
Nimonic 19.5 55.5 18.0 — — — 2.4 1.5 0.04 Al: 1.4; Cu: 0.10 max
80A 11.0 56.0 20.0 5.0 — — 1.5 2.0 0.05 Al: 1.4
Nimonic 90 20.0 51.0 20.0 5.9 — — 2.1 max 0.06 Al: 5.0; +B; +Zr
Nimonic 13.0 44.0 4.0 6.0 — — 3.0 0.7 0.30 Al: 0.45
100 18.0 38.0 20.0 3.2 — — 2.6 max max Al: 1.0; B: 0.01
Nimonic 19.0 55.0 11.0 10.0 — — 3.1 28.9 0.06 Al: 0.2; B: 0.015
263 14.0 61.0 8.0 3.5 3.5 3.5 2.5 16.0 0.05 Al: 1.5; B: 0.1
Pyromet 9.5 61.0 15.0 3.0 — — 4.2 <0.3 0.03 Al: 3.5; B: 0.01; Zr:
860 <0.3 0.09 0.05
Refractory 19.0 48.0 19.0 4.0 — — 3.0 1.0 0.16 Al: 5.5; B: 0.015; Zr
26 17.0 50.0 — 3.0 3.0 6.5 1.0 max 0.16 0.06; V: 1.0
René 41 19.5 57.0 13.5 4.3 — — 3.0 Al: 3.0; B: 0.005
René 95 4.0 0.08 Al: 0.7; B: 0.004
René 100 max 0.04 Al: 1.4; B:0:006; Zr:
Udimet 500 18.0 0.07 009
2.0
Udimet 630 max
Waspaloy
Page 64
Deg. C Deg. F
MPa
ksi
MPa
ksi
Cobalt-Base
Haynes 25 (L-605)
Solid-Solution
21 70 1010 146 460 67
540 1000 800 116 250 36
Sheet 650 1200 710 103 240 35
760 1400 455 66 260 38
870 1600 325 47 240 35
Cobalt-Base
Haynes 188
Solid-Solution
21 70 960 139 485 70
540 1000 740 107 305 44
Sheet 650 1200 710 103 305 44
760 1400 635 92 290 42
870 1600 420 61 260 38
Nickel-Base
Solid-Solution
Hastelloy X
21 70 785 114 360 52
540 1000 650 94 290 42
Sheet 650 1200 570 83 275 40
760 1400 435 63 260 38
870 1600 255 37 180 26
Nickel-Base
Inconel 601
Solid-Solution
21 70 740 107 340 49
540 1000 725 105 150 22
Sheet 650 1200 525 76 180 26
760 1400 290 42 200 29
870 1600 160 23 140 20
Nickel-Base
Inconel 718
Precipitation-Hardening
21 70 1280 185 1050 153
540 1000 1140 166 945 137
Sheet
650 1200 1030 150 870 126
760 1400 675 98 625 91
Regular Quality
Structural Quality
Cold Flanging Quality
Forging Quality
Pressure Vessel Quality
Aircraft Quality
Regular Quality is a common designation for plates having only a
limitation of 0.33% maximum carbon by heat analysis. Plates of this
quality are not normally produced to mechanical property, cold bend or
ductility requirements.
Forging Quality plates are intended for forging, quenching and tempering,
or when uniformity of composition and freedom from injurious
imperfections are important. Forging quality plates are ordinarily
furnished with the phosphorus content limited to 0.035% maximum and
the sulfur content limited to 0.040% maximum by heat analysis.
Table 4.19 lists the quality descriptors for steel plate products along with
the category of steel associated with those qualities.
The following index lists the table numbers for the chemical compositions
and mechanical properties of carbon, alloy, HSLA, and ultrahigh-strength
steel plate products of structural and pressure vessel quality according to
ASTM specifications [3].
Plate Product
Table
Type
Quality Descriptor
Chemical Composition
Mechanical Properties
Carbon Steel
Structural Quality Table 4.20 Table 4.21
Pressure Vessel Quality Table 4.20 Table 4.21
Alloy Steel
Structural Quality Table 4.22 Table 4.23
Pressure Vessel Quality Table 4.24 Table 4.25
Ultrahigh-Strength Steel
Pressure Vessel Quality Table 4.28 Table 4.29
Page 67
(a) Limiting values vary with plate thickness. (b) Applicable only if copper-
bearing steel is specified.
(c) Upper limit of Mn may be exceeded provided C + 1/6 Mn does not exceed
0.40% based on heat analysis.
(d) Also requires minimum of Ti 4 × C.
Page 68
Table 4.22 Chemical compositions of alloy steel plate for structural quality
according to ASTM specifications [3].
(a) Vanadium may be substituted for part of or all of titanium content on a one
for one basis.
(b) Limiting values vary with plate thickness.
Table 4.24 Chemical compositions of alloy steel plate for pressure vessel quality
according to ASTM specifications [3].
Table 4.25 Mechanical properties of alloy steel plate for pressure vessel quality
according to ASTM specifications [3].
ASTM Spec.
Material Grade or Type Tensile Strength (a) Yield Strength (a)
MPa
ksi
MPa
ksi
(a) Total Al; acid soluble Al = 0.060% max. (b) Al may be either partly or totally
replaced by V (0.10% max) or Nb (0.05% max). (c) Limiting values vary with
plate thickness.
(d) V = 0.02 to 0.15% plus Nb (0.05% max). (e) Nb, when added either singly or
in combination with V, is restricted to plate up to 13 mm (0.5 in.) thick.
(f) N is reported when added as a supplement to V, and the minimum ratio of V
to n is 4 to 1. (g) 0.01 to 0.05% Nb may also be present.
(h) For normalized steel, max C = 0.22% and max Mn = 1.40%. (j) Applicable
only when copper-bearing steel is specified. (k) 0.05% max Nb may be present.
Page 73
Tensile Yield
ASTM Material Grade Strength (a) Strength (a)
Spec. or Type
MPa ksi MPa ksi
50 450 65 345 50
A709 50W 485 70 345 50
Standard pipe
Special pipe
Line pipe
Oil country tubular goods
Water well pipe
Pressure pipe
Tubes can also be divided into the following named use groups:
Pressure tubes
Structural tubing
Mechanical tubing
Table 4.30 shows the chemical compositions of selected carbon and alloy
steel pipes according to American Petroleum Institute (API)
specifications, while Table 4.31 provides the mechanical properties.
Hot rolled carbon, high-strength low-alloy (HSLA) and alloy steel sheet
can be classified by dimension as shown in Table 4.32, while Table 4.33
shows the dimensional classification for hot rolled carbon, HSLA and
alloy steel strip. Emphasis will be given to sheet products in regards to
type and quality since sheet incorporates both narrow and wide products,
while strip entails narrow products only.
Page 75
Table 4.30 Chemical compositions of carbon and alloy steel pipes according to
API specifications [3].
C Mn P S Si Others
Spiral Welded (e) X56, X60 0.26 1.35 0.040 0.050 — Nb: 0.005
5LS (c) min;
0.26 1.40 0.040 0.050 — V: 0.02 min;
X65 (c) Ti: 0.03 min
0.23 1.60 0.040 0.050 — Nb: 0.005
X70 (c) min;
V: 0.02 min
—
Welded (f) X56, X60 0.26 1.35 0.040 0.050 — Nb: 0.005
5LX (c) min;
0.26 1.40 0.040 0.050 — V: 0.02 min;
X65 (c) Ti: 0.03 min
0.23 1.60 0.040 0.050 — Nb: 0.005
Seamless (f) X70 (c) 0.26 1.35 0.040 0.050 — min;
X56, X60 V: 0.02 min
(c) (g) (g) (g) (g) (g) —
Nb: 0.005
min;
X65, X70 V: 0.02 min;
(c) Ti: 0.03 min
(g)
(a) Specified by purchaser. (b) Electric resistance. (c) Open hearth, electric
furnace, or basic oxygen. (d) Electric resistance, electric flash, or electric
induction. (e) Submerged arc or electric resistance. (f) Cold expanded or
nonexpanded. (g) By agreement.
Page 76
Table 4.31 Mechanical properties of carbon and alloy steel pipes according to
API specifications [3].
Tensile Yield
Manufacturing Material Strength (a) Strength (a)
API Spec.
Process Grade/Class
MPa ksi MPa ksi
(a) Single values are shown as minimum values. (b) Specified by purchaser. (c)
Electric resistance. (d) Electric resistance or electric flash. (e) Furnace butt,
electric resistance, electric flash, or electric induction. (f) Submerged arc,
electric resistance, electric flash, or electric induction. (g) For pipe less than 20
in. OD with any wall thickness and for pipe 20 in. OD and larger with wall
thickness greater than 0.375 in. (h) For pipe 20 in. OD and larger with wall
thickness 0.375 in. and less. (j) Minimum tensile strength for electric resistance
welded pipe is 517 MPa (75 ksi).
Page 77
Table 4.32 Dimensional classification for hot rolled carbon, HSLA, and alloy
steel sheet [4, 18-19].
Table 4.33 Dimensional classification for hot rolled carbon, HSLA, and alloy
steel strip [17-18,20].
Coils and Cut Lengths Coils Only
Steel
Composition Width, in. Thickness, in. Width, in. Thickness, in.
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
Hot rolled sheet is produced as coils and cut lengths for various
applications. Edges can be trimmed or untrimmed as specified and there
may be additional processing after hot rolling such as rewinding, pickling
and oiling. The ends of the coils are cut back to conform to the
appropriate thickness and width tolerances.
Hot rolled bands are produced as mill edge coils for various applications
but without the additional processing after hot rolling. The ends of the
coils are not cut back to conform to the established thickness and width
tolerances.
Hot rolled skelp is produced exclusively as coils for hot or cold forming
into tubular products. Additional processing after hot rolling may also be
required for specific requirements.
Quality descriptors for hot rolled carbon sheet steel – Hot rolled carbon
sheet steel is produced in the following four principal qualities [19]:
Conventional Type
Improved Atmospheric Corrosion Resistance Type
Improved Formability Type
Improved Formability Type HSLA hot rolled sheet is produced from killed
steel, made to fine grain practice and includes microalloying elements
such as columbium, titanium, vanadium, zirconium, etc. This steel may
also be treated to achieve inclusion control. This type of HSLA sheet
steel is produced with special forming properties to various strength
levels where maximum formability is required. This product is intended
for structural and miscellaneous applications where higher strength,
savings in weight, and improved formability and weldability are important.
Improved formability type HSLA sheet steel can be specified to ASTM
A715 [28].
Page 80
Quality descriptors for alloy sheet steel – Alloy sheet steel is produced in
the following qualities [19]:
Regular Quality
Drawing Quality
Structural Quality
Aircraft Quality
Aircraft Structural Quality
Bearing Quality
Saw Quality
Aircraft Quality alloy sheet steel is intended for highly stressed parts of
aircraft, missiles, and similar applications that involve stringent
performance requirements. Internal soundness, uniformity of chemical
composition, cleanliness, austenitic fine grain size (5 or finer) and good
surface are primary requirements of this quality. Aircraft quality is
normally furnished in the annealed, spheroidize annealed or normalized
condition.
Aircraft Structural Quality alloy sheet steel meets all of the stringent
requirements of aircraft quality plus additional specific requirements for
mechanical properties. These properties may include tensile strength,
yield strength, elongation, bend test or any similar test results that may
be specified or required.
Saw Quality alloy sheet steel is intended for applications involving the
fabrication of metal-cutting band saw blades. Internal cleanliness,
soundness, and good surface and weldability are the primary
requirements of this quality. Dimensional control is often an additional
primary requirement. Saw quality alloy sheet steel is produced under
closely controlled steelmaking practices and special tests for grain size,
microstructure, graphitization, decarburization and nonmetallic inclusions
are generally made.
After cold reduction, the product possesses high hardness and low
ductility and usually requires a thermal treatment such as annealing,
normalizing, quenching or tempering before further processing on a
temper or skin pass mill. The final cold rolled sheet or strip product can
be supplied in either coils or cut lengths and is characterized by improved
surface quality and greater uniformity of thickness and mechanical
properties when compared to hot rolled products. The dimensional
classification for cold rolled carbon, high-strength low-alloy, and alloy
steel sheet and strip is shown in Table 4.34. As with hot rolled products,
cold rolled sheet will be emphasized.
Table 4.34 Dimensional classification for cold rolled carbon, HSLA, and alloy
steel sheet and strip [4,18-19,30].
Sheet Strip
Steel
Width, in. Thickness, Width, in. (mm) Thickness,
Composition
(mm) in. in.
(mm) (mm)
24 to 48, Up to 0.230,
incl excl
(610 to Up to
1200 incl) Up to 23.94, incl 0.250, excl
Alloy
(Up to 600, incl) (Up to
Over 48 Up to 0.180, 6.35, excl)
(Over excl
1200)
Page 82
Cold rolled carbon sheet steel can be supplied in coils and cut lengths
and is available in the following two classes:
A366 [31], while cold rolled commercial quality sheet steel over 0.15% to
0.25% maximum carbon can be specified to ASTM A794 [32].
Matte Finish
Commercial Bright Finish
Luster Finish
Hot Rolled Sheet Steel is often produced as commercial quality and used
primarily for d-c applications. The magnetic characteristics of this type
vary greatly throughout coils and cut lengths because of the inherent
variations in normal mill processing of a hot rolled product.
Type I
Type II
Type III
Type 1 Sheet Steel for Porcelain Enameling has an extremely low carbon
level and is suitable for direct cover coat enameling practice when
specified by the purchaser. Type I is also suitable for ground and cover
coat enameling practice and has good sag resistance and formability.
Type II Sheet Steel for Porcelain Enameling has moderately low carbon
and manganese levels as produced in the melting operation and is
suitable for applications where ground and cover coat enameling
operations are employed. The chemical composition of Type II can be
varied to provide either maximum sag resistance or good formability.
Quality descriptors for sheet steel for porcelain enameling – Type I and
Type II are supplied in the following three qualities:
Regular Spangle
Alloyed Coatings
Differentially Coated
One Side Coated
Minimized Spangle Galvanized
Extra Smooth or Temper Rolled
One Side Coated is a galvanized sheet steel that has a specified coating
designation on one surface for corrosion protection and normally a
spangled appearance. The other surface is free of coating and suitable
for painting.
Quality descriptors for hot dipped galvanized sheet steel – Hot dipped
galvanized sheet steel is produced in the following principal qualities [19]:
Zn-5% Al Alloy Lock Forming Quality is specified when the sheet steel is
to be subjected to machine lock forming.
Type 1
Type 2
Quality descriptors for hot dipped aluminum coated sheet – Hot dipped
aluminum coated sheet can be specified according to ASTM A 463 [44]
and is produced in the following principal qualities:
Regular Spangle
Extra Smooth or Temper Rolled
Regular Spangle is the surface finish that results from the normal pattern
of accelerated solidification of the aluminum-zinc coating. A fine spangle
size is produced by applying upleg air cooling to the molten coating.
Al-Zn Alloy Lock Forming Quality is specified when the sheet steel is to
be subjected to machine lock forming.
Al-Zn Alloy High Temperature Quality is specified for applications that are
subjected to elevated temperatures, such as certain appliances and
automotive exhaust components. High temperature quality will resist
oxidation and scaling while avoiding base metal embrittlement.
Page 91
Electrolytic zinc coated sheet can also be specified to ASTM A 879 [48]
which covers both hot and cold rolled zinc coated products. This
specification provides specific rules for ordering one and two-sided
coating weights as well as for base metal mechanical testing. When
ordered to ASTM A 879, electrolytic zinc coated sheet is available in the
following qualities [19]:
References
1. The Making, Shaping and Treating of Steel, 10th Edition, eds.
Lankford, W.T., et al, Association of Iron and Steel Engineers, Pittsburgh,
Pa., 1985.
5. ASTM A 506 - 93, Standard Specification for Steel, Sheet and Strip,
Alloy, Hot-Rolled and Cold-Rolled, Regular Quality and Structural Quality,
1994 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 01.03, pp. 197-200.
6. Roberts, G.A. and Cary, R.A., Tool Steels, Fourth Edition, American
Society for Metals, Metals Park, Ohio, 1980.
8. Lula, R.A., Stainless Steel, American Society for Metals, Metals Park,
Ohio, 1980.
9. Steel Products Manual: Stainless and Heat Resisting Steels, Iron and
Steel Society, Warrendale, Pa., Nov. 1990.
10. ASTM A 666 - 93, Standard Specification for Austenitic Steel Sheet,
Strip, Plate, and Flat Bar, 1994 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol.
01.03, pp. 279-284.
12. ASTM A 167 - 93, Standard Specification for Stainless and Heat-
Resisting Chromium-Nickel Steel Plate, Sheet, and Strip, 1994 Annual
Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 01.03, pp. 12-14.
13. ASTM A 176 - 93a, Standard Specification for Stainless and Heat-
Resisting Chromium Steel Plate, Sheet, and Strip, 1994 Annual Book of
ASTM Standards, Vol. 01.03, pp. 15-17.
14. ASTM A 693 - 93, Standard Specification for Precipitation-Hardening
Stainless and Heat-Resisting Steel Plate, Sheet, and Strip, 1994 Annual
Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 01.03, pp. 302-307.
15. Steel Products Manual: Electrical Steels, Iron and Steel Society,
Warrendale, Pa., Jan. 1983.
16. Steel Products Manual: Plates, Iron and Steel Society, Warrendale,
Pa., May 1991.
17. ASTM A 749/A 749M - 93, Standard Specification for Steel Strip,
Carbon, and High-Strength, Low-Alloy, Hot-Rolled, General
Requirements for, 1994 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 01.03, pp.
314-320.
18. ASTM A 505 - 87, Standard Specification for Steel, Sheet and Strip,
Alloy, Hot-Rolled and Cold-Rolled, General Requirements for, 1994
Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 01.03, pp. 188-196.
19. Steel Products Manual: Sheet Steel, Iron and Steel Society,
Warrendale, Pa., Jan. 1988.
20. Steel Products Manual: Strip Steel, Iron and Steel Society,
Warrendale, Pa., Aug. 1988.
21. ASTM A 569/A 569M - 91a, Standard Specification for Steel, Carbon
(0.15 Maximum, Percent), Hot-Rolled Sheet and Strip, Commercial
Quality, 1994 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 01.03, pp. 240-241.
22. ASTM A 659/A 659M - 92, Standard Specification for Steel, Carbon
(0.16 Maximum to 0.25 Maximum, Percent), Hot-Rolled Sheet and Strip,
Commercial Quality, 1994 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 01.03,
pp. 276-278.
23. ASTM A 621/A 621M - 92, Standard Specification for Steel, Sheet
and Strip, Carbon, Hot Rolled, Drawing Quality, 1994 Annual Book of
ASTM Standards, Vol. 01.03, pp. 265-266.
Page 94
24. ASTM A 622/A 622M - 92, Standard Specification for Steel, Sheet
and Strip, Carbon, Drawing Quality, Special Killed, Hot Rolled, 1994
Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 01.03, pp. 267-268.
25. ASTM A 570/A 570M - 92, Standard Specification for Steel, Sheet
and Strip, Carbon, Hot Rolled, Structural Quality, 1994 Annual Book of
ASTM Standards, Vol. 01.03, pp. 242-244.
26. ASTM A 607 - 92a, Standard Specification for Steel, Sheet and Strip,
High-Strength, Low-Alloy, Columbium or Vanadium, or Both, Hot-Rolled
and Cold Rolled, 1994 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 01.03, pp.
255-258.
27. ASTM A 606 - 91a, Standard Specification for Steel, Sheet and Strip,
High-Strength, Low-Alloy, Hot-Rolled and Cold Rolled, with Improved
Atmospheric Corrosion Resistance, 1994 Annual Book of ASTM
Standards, Vol. 01.03, pp. 252-254.
28. ASTM A 715 - 92a, Standard Specification for Steel Sheet and Strip,
High-Strength, Low-Alloy, Hot-Rolled, and Steel Sheet, Cold Rolled,
High-Strength, Low-Alloy, with Improved Formability, 1994 Annual Book
of ASTM Standards, Vol. 01.03, pp. 311-313.
29. ASTM A 507 - 93, Standard Specification for Steel, Sheet and Strip,
Alloy, Hot Rolled and Cold Rolled, Drawing Quality, 1994 Annual Book of
ASTM Standards, Vol. 01.03, pp. 201-204.
30. ASTM A 109 - 93, Standard Specification for Steel, Strip, Carbon,
Cold Rolled, 1994 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 01.03, pp. 1-5.
31. ASTM A 366/A 366M - 91, Standard Specification for Steel, Sheet,
Carbon, Cold Rolled, Commercial Quality, 1994 Annual Book of ASTM
Standards, Vol. 01.03, pp. 88-89.
32. ASTM A 794 - 91, Standard Specification for Steel, Sheet, (Carbon
0.16% Maximum to 0.25% Maximum), Cold Rolled, Commercial Quality,
1994 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 01.03, pp. 355-356.
33. ASTM A 619/A 619M - 92, Standard Specification for Steel, Sheet,
Carbon, Cold Rolled, Drawing Quality, 1994 Annual Book of ASTM
Standards, Vol. 01.03, pp. 261-262.
34. ASTM A 620/A 620M - 92, Standard Specification for Steel, Sheet,
Carbon, Drawing Quality, Special Killed, Cold Rolled, 1994 Annual Book
of ASTM Standards, Vol. 01.03, pp. 263-264.
35. ASTM A 611 - 92, Standard Specification for Steel, Sheet, Carbon,
Cold Rolled, Structural Quality, 1994 Annual Book of ASTM Standards,
Vol. 01.03, pp. 259-260.
36. ASTM A 424 - 92, Standard Specification for Steel, Sheet, for
Porcelain Enameling, 1994 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 01.03,
pp. 163-164.
37. ASTM A 526/A 526M - 90, Standard Specification for Steel Sheet,
Zinc-Coated (Galvanized) by the Hot-Dip Process, Commercial Quality,
Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 01.06.
38. ASTM A 528/A 526M - 90, Standard Specification for Steel Sheet,
Zinc-Coated (Galvanized) by the Hot-Dip Process, Drawing Quality,
Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 01.06.
39. ASTM A 642/A 642M - 90, Standard Specification for Steel Sheet,
Zinc-Coated (Galvanized) by the Hot-Dip Process, Drawing Quality,
Special Killed, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 01.06.
Page 95
40. ASTM A 446/A 446M - 91, Standard Specification for Steel Sheet,
Zinc-Coated (Galvanized) by the Hot-Dip Process, Structural (Physical)
Quality, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 01.06.
41. ASTM A 527/A 527M - 90, Standard Specification for Steel Sheet,
Zinc-Coated (Galvanized) by the Hot-Dip Process, Lock-Forming Quality,
Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 01.06.
42. ASTM A 816/A 816M - 91, Standard Specification for Steel Sheet,
Zinc-Coated (Galvanized) by the Hot-Dip Process, High-Strength, Low
Alloy, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 01.06.
43. ASTM A 875/A 875M - 88, Standard Specification for Steel Sheet,
Zinc-5% Aluminum Alloy Metallic-Coated by the Hot-Dip Process, Annual
Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 01.06.
44. ASTM A 463 - 88, Standard Specification for Steel Sheet, Cold
Rolled, Aluminum-Coated, Type 1 and Type 2, Annual Book of ASTM
Standards, Vol. 01.06.
45. ASTM A 792 - 89, Standard Specification for Steel Sheet, Aluminum-
Zinc Alloy-Coated by the Hot Dip Process, General Requirements,
Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 01.06.
46. ASTM A 308 - 88, Standard Specification for Steel, Sheet, Cold-
Rolled, Long Terne Coated, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 01.06.
47. ASTM A 591/A 591M - 89, Standard Specification for Steel Sheet,
Electrolytic Zinc-Coated, for Light Coating Mass Applications, Annual
Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 01.06.
48. ASTM A 879 - 87, Standard Specification for Steel Sheet, Zinc-
Coated by the Electrolytic Process for Applications Requiring Designation
of the Coating Mass on Each Surface, Annual Book of ASTM Standards,
Vol. 01.06.
49. ASTM A 599 - 84, Standard Specification for Steel Sheet, Cold-
Rolled, Tin-Coated by Electrodeposition, Annual Book of ASTM
Standards, Vol. 01.06.
Page 96
Chapter 5
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF STEEL PRODUCTS
When applied to shear (Fig. 5.2c), engineering strain is equal to the ratio
of the shear shift a to the
Page 98
Yield point is the first stress in a material, usually less than the maximum
attainable stress, at which an increase in strain occurs without an
increase in stress (point Y′, Fig. 5.3a.). This phenomenon occurs only in
certain ductile materials. If there is a decrease in stress after yielding, a
distinction is made between the upper and lower yield points.
where
yield strength.
Y =
where
K = strength coefficient.
Figure 5.4 illustrates the following types of true stress-strain diagrams [2]:
The values for K and n for various steels at room temperature are listed
in Table 5.1.
Page 101
K
Steel Type n
psi × 103 MPa
According to the procedure described in ASTM E517 [4], the plastic strain
ratios ro, r45, and r90 are first determined as a function of the amount of
plastic flow along the specimen axis that are oriented 0, 45, and 90° with
respect to the rolling direction of the sheet. The weighted average plastic
strain ratio r̄ is then used as a measure of the normal anisotropy by the
following equation:
Another parameter called the planar anisotropy Δr is used to predict
whether a sheet of metal will draw nonuniformly and form ears on deep
drawn cylindrical parts. Planar anisotropy can be
Page 103
When Δr > 1, large ears are noted in the rolling and transverse directions.
When Δr < 1, earring occurs at 45° to the rolling direction. Thus, as the
value of Δr decreases, there is less tendency for ear formation.
5.9 Ductility
Ductility is the ability of a material to deform plastically without fracturing.
The two quantities that are commonly used to define ductility in a tension
test are percent elongation and percent reduction of area [2]. Percent
elongation can be defined as follows:
where
where
as follows:
where
speed of deformation.
V =
Cold working
Forging, rolling 0.10 – 1.0 – 103
Explosive 0.50 10.0 – 105
forming 0.05 –
0.20
where
strength coefficient
C=
Unlike the tension test, where necking of the specimen begins after
relatively little elongation, compression testing can be carried out
uniformly for ductile materials if effective means are provided to minimize
the detrimental effect of friction. It has also been shown that the
compressive stress reduces with an increase in the initial height of the
specimen (Fig. 5.9b) as well as with a decrease of its initial contact
surface area (Fig. 5.9c). In more general terms, the compressive stress
increases with an increase in the aspect ratio, which in the case of a
cylindrical specimen with an initial diameter Do and an initial length Lo, is
equal to:
Page 107
torque
M=
where
where
ν Poisson’s ratio.
=
For plain carbon steel ν = 0.33, thus E is 2.66 times greater than G.
These combined deformation tests are conducted on round bars that are
simultaneously twisted and either axially compressed or stretched. Figure
5.10 shows that from the torsion-compression test, the shear strain at
fracture increases substantially as the axial compressive stress
increases. This indicates that the compressive stress improves the
ductility of materials. On the other hand, it was found from the torsion-
tension test that the axial tensile stress results in a reduction of shear
strain at fracture, meaning that the ductility of materials is being reduced.
The axial compressive stress has been found to have no effect on the
magnitude of shear stress that is required to cause yielding or to continue
the deformation.
Page 109
where
D = diameter of indenting ball, mm
Brinell HB 500
10-mm steel or 1500
tungsten carbide 3000
ball
Scleroscope — Diamond-tipped —
hammer
where
L length of indentation.
=
One hardness scale is used for all ranges of hardness from very soft lead
to a tungsten carbide. The Vickers hardness test gives essentially the
same hardness number (HV) regardless of the load.
Table 5.4 Hardness values for steel from various hardness tests. Adapted from ASM Metals
Reference Book [6].
Figure 5.11 shows that hardness values are approximately three to five
times that of the uniaxial yield stress of the metal, when both values are
expressed in the same units. When the ultimate tensile strength (UTS) is
expressed in psi and the Brinell hardness number is expressed in
kg/mm2, the following equation can be used [2]:
where
One of the most common tests that is used for determining hardenability
is the end-quench test, also known as the Jominy test [7]. During this
test, a cylindrical specimen with a 1 in. diameter is cooled at one end by
a column of water; thus the entire specimen experiences a range of
cooling rates between those associated with water and air cooling. After
quenching, opposite ends of the specimen are grounded to be parallel to
each other and hardness readings are taken every 1/16 in. from the
quenched end as shown in Fig. 5.12.
Fig. 5.12 – Method of plotting hardness test data from end-quenched
Jominy specimen. (From Principles of Heat Treatment of Steel, by G.
Krauss, 1980, Copyright ASM International. With permission).
any load, the metal will flow if the maximum shear stress exceeds a
certain value and will fracture or fail when the maximum normal stress
exceeds a certain value.
In torsion testing, the ratio of the maximum normal stress that causes
fracture to the maximum shear stress is 1 to 1. When testing by
compression, tension, or bending, this ratio becomes 2 to 1. In a dynamic
impact test, such as a Charpy or Izod test, the ratio of the maximum
normal stress to the maximum shear stress can be considerably higher
than 2 to 1. As this ratio increases, it becomes more likely that fracture
will occur before the flow [2].
Modulus of elasticity
Tensile strength
0.2% offset yield strength
Elongation
Reduction in area
Fig. 5.15 – Effect of temperature on modulus of elasticity for various
materials. Adapted from Kalpakjian [2].
Page 116
The two parameters that are frequently used to evaluate the heat
resistance of metals are creep strength and rupture strength (Fig. 5.17).
Creep strength is the constant nominal stress that will cause a specified
quantity of creep in a given time or a specified creep rate at a constant
temperature. Rupture strength is the constant nominal stress that will
cause rupture in a specified time at a constant temperature [11].
Fig. 5.17 – Stress versus rupture time and creep rate curves based on
average data for killed carbon steel, 0.15% C, annealed. From Metals
Handbook (1961). Reprinted with permission.
where
where
temperature rise, °F
dT =
Page 118
m body mass, lb
=
Thus, the specific heat is equal to the amount of heat that is necessary to
transfer to a unit mass of a body in order to increase its temperature by a
unit degree. Specific heat is temperature dependent and also sensitive to
allotropic transformations in a metal as shown in Fig. 5.19.
5.22 Density
Density is usually defined as the mass of a matter in a unit of its volume
as follows from the following equation:
where
ρ density, lb/in.3
=
m mass of matter, lb
=
where
No.
Metal or Alloy No.
Metal or Alloy No.
Metal or
Alloy
where
Permeability (μ), which is the measure of the relative ease with which a
metal can be magnetized and is equal to:
where
Total core loss (Pc), which is the energy dissipated as heat within the
magnetic core in the presence of a cyclically alternating induced current.
Total core loss consists of the following two components [8]:
chined with relative ease when evaluating tool life, surface finish, and
power consumption. The physical condition of steel, mainly the
microstructure and hardness in the annealed state, are the two major
factors that affect the machining characteristics of tool steel.
References
1. Miller, F.E. and Doeringsfield, H.A., Mechanics of Materials,
International Textbook Company, Scranton, Pa., 1955, pp. 3-55.
3. Larke, E.C., The Rolling of Strip, Sheet, and Plate, Second Edition,
Chapman and Hall, London, 1963, pp. 186-214.
4. ASTM E 517 - 92, Test Method for Plastic Strain Ratio r for Sheet
Metal, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 03.01.
8. The Making, Shaping and Treating of Steel, 10th Edition, eds. W.T.
Lankford, Jr., et al, Association of Iron and Steel Engineers, Pittsburgh,
Pa., 1985, pp. 1321-1446.
10. Roberts, G.A. and Cary, R.A., Tool Steels, Fourth Edition, American
Society for Metals, Metals Park, Ohio, 1980, pp. 51-70.
12. Schack, A., Industrial Heat Transfer, Chapman and Hall, London,
1965, pp. 4-60, 205-216, 429.
Chapter 6
METALLURGICAL FACTORS CONTROLLING THE
PROPERTIES OF STEEL
Δ (ITT)
=
change in impact transition temperature
Grain size
Substitutional solid-solution strengthening
Interstitial solid-solution strengthening
Page 129
where
σy yield stress
=
ky constant.
=
where
σ flow stress
=
concentration of solutes.
C =
Page 130
Fig. 6.1 – Effect of grain size of ferrite on yield stress and impact
transition temperature (0.10% C, 0.50% Mn, 0.2% Si, 0.006% N). (From
Physical Metallurgy and the Design Steels, by F.B. Pickering. Copyright
Elsevier Applied Science Publishers Ltd., England. Reprinted with
permission).
Fig. 6.2 – Solid solution strengthening effects in austenitic stainless
steels. (From Physical Metallurgy and Design of Steels, by F.B. Pickering.
Copyright Elsevier Applied Science Publishers Ltd., England. Reprinted
with permission).
Page 131
where
f precipitate fraction
=
Since 1/x̄ is the predominant function of x̄, the stress increment due to
fine precipitates increases with the reduction in precipitate size and the
increase in fine precipitate fraction as shown in Fig. 6.3. The main
precipitation strengthening systems used in commercial HSLA steels are
listed in Table 6.1. The effect of these systems are described in the
following sections [4].
Page 132
Vanadium + nitrogen
VN
Copper Cu
Aluminum + nitrogen
AIN
Fig. 6.5 – Increase in the yield strength from nitrogen and vanadium as a
result of the precipitation of vanadium nitride for a controlled-cooled coil
product with a coiling temperature of 593°C (1100°F). (From Grozier,
Microalloying ‘75. Copyright Stratcor, Pittsburgh, Pa., Reprinted with
permission).
σf
=
total flow stress
ρ
=
dislocation density
k constant.
=
As it follows from Eq. (6-5), the flow stress increases with increase in the
density of dislocations. Since most hot-rolled steels have polygonal ferrite
microstructure that is virtually dislocation-free, the increase in yield
strength due to dislocation strengthening is negligible. The contribution of
dislocation strengthening, however is much greater in some high-strength
sheet steels which have acicular ferrite microstructures containing a high
dislocation density.
where
Xf
= volume fraction of ferrite
The following empirical formulas have been proposed for calculating the
mechanical properties of ferritic-pearlitic steels [7]:
where
In these formulas, the symbols for the elements represent the weight of
the specific element. Martensite is used as a second-phase
strengthening component in dual-phase steels in which martensite is
dispersed within a fine-grained ferrite matrix. Both yield strength and
tensile strength are found to be a function of the volume fraction of
martensite.
where
Page 137
Pearlite (i.e. carbon) has little or no effect on the yield stress of low
carbon steels
Free nitrogen substantially increases yield stress
Grain refinement would increase the yield stress.
As it follows from Eq. (6-11), both pearlite content and grain refinement
contribute to the tensile strength. The tensile strength of low-carbon
steels with a bainitic microstructure is given by [8]:
where
∈w true-width strain
=
∈t true-thickness strain.
=
When the properties in the plane of the sheet are sensitive to direction,
the average R-value is used [1]:
where
It has been shown that the materials with a greater R-value are better
suitable for deep drawing. The variation in the R-value in the actual plane
of the sheet can serve as a measure of planar
Page 140
where
Ro, k constants
=
where
true strain
∈ =
strength coefficient
K=
HSLA steels:
Page 141
HSLA steels:
where
HSLA steels:
Weldability ratings that are based on carbon equivalent may vary from
one steel producer to another. An example of weldability ratings based on
carbon equivalent is shown in Table 6.2.
Up to 0.35 Excellent
Lamellar tearing – One of the sources for lamellar tearing is the presence
of excessive hydrogen. Lamellar tearing can also take place in the parent
metal during welding as a result of shrinkage forces in the plate-thickness
direction. This problem can be minimized by [4]:
Fig. 6.10 – Portion of the Fe-C diagram showing temperature ranges for
process annealing, recrystallization annealing, stress relieving and
spheroidizing. From Principles of Heat Treatment of Steel, by G. Krauss,
ASM International (formerly American Society for Metals), 1980. With
permission.
Dual-phase
Ferrite and martensite
The main purposes of annealing are to relieve the cooling stresses that
are induced during hot and cold working along with softening the metal to
improve its machinability or formability. The annealing process also
produces a uniform microstructure of ferrite and pearlite [15].
Page 145
Fig. 6.14 – Effect of carbon (C) and manganese (Mn) contents on tensile
strength for continuously annealed and batch annealed products. From
W. F. Gasse, et al, 1998 AISE Annual Convention Proceedings,
Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.
Page 148
Table 6.4 Typical steel chemistries recommended for batch annealing and
continuous annealing. (Data from F. Gasse (1998).
6.27 Normalizing
Normalizing is a heat treatment process that is similar to full annealing
and having a main objective of producing a uniform microstructure of
ferrite and pearlite. Another objective of normalizing is to refine the grain
size, which frequently becomes very coarse during hot working or is
present in steel casting [14,15].
Normalizing in hypoeutectoid steels is performed at temperatures that are
higher than those used for annealing. Hypereutectoid steels are heated
above the temperature Acm as was shown in Fig. 6.9. Figure 6.15 shows
that for both hypoeutectoid and hypereutectoid steels, heating is followed
by air cooling, which provides a much faster cooling rate in comparison
with that of full annealing. As the cooling rate increases, the temperature
range over which ferrite and pearlite are being formed is lowered,
resulting in a more refined microstructure of the product. Consequently,
the product would have higher strength and hardness along with lower
ductility.
6.28 Spheroidizing
Spheroidized microstructures in steels consist of spherical carbide
particles that are uniformly dispersed in a ferrite matrix as shown in
Chapter 2 (Fig. 2.6b). The spheroidized microstructure is the most stable
microstructure in steels and provides for improved ductility, which is
important for low and medium-carbon steels. This type of microstructure
is also used to obtain a lower hardness, which is important for high-
carbon steels that undergo machining prior to final hardening [14,15].
6.33 Austempering
Austempering is a heat treatment that is used to obtain a lower bainite
microstructure which is similar in strength and superior in ductility to
those of tempered martensite [15]. This heat treatment includes
quenching to the desired temperature in the lower bainite region, usually
in a molten-salt bath and holding the workpiece at this temperature until
the transformation to bainite is completed (Fig. 6.19). After austempering,
the workpiece is either quenched or air cooled to room temperature. The
workpiece can also be tempered to a lower hardness level if required.
References
1. Pickering, F.B., Physical Metallurgy and the Design of Steels, Applied
Science Publishers, London, 1978, pp. 1-88.
10. Blickwede, D.J., Transaction of the American Society for Metals, Vol.
61, 1968, p. 653.
11. Gladman, T., et al, Journal of the Iron and Steel Institute, Vol. 208,
1970, p. 172.
12. Butler, R.D., Sheet Metal Industries, Vol. 39, 1964, p. 705.
Page 155
13. Butler, R.D. and Wallace, J.F., Iron and Steel Institute Special Report,
No. 79, 1963, p. 131.
15. The Making, Shaping and Treating of Steel, 10th Edition, eds. W.T.
Lankford, Jr., et al, Association of Iron and Steel Engineers, Pittsburgh,
Pa., 1985, pp. 1258-1287.
17. Metals Handbook, American Society for Metals, Metals Park, Ohio,
1948, p. 439.
Page 156
Chapter 7
MICROSCOPIC AND MACROSCOPIC PLASTICITY
Slip occurs in the direction in which the atoms are most closely packed
since this requires the least amount of energy. In a face-centered cubic
lattice (Fig. 7.2), the (111) plane of the densest atomic population
intersects the (001) plane in the line ac. When the (001) plane is
assumed to be the plane of the paper (Fig. 7.3), slip is seen as a
movement along the (111) plane in the close-packed [110] direction [3,4].
The result of slip in a polycrystalline mass of metal can be observed by a
microscopical examination and is known as slip bands.
Slip can also occur by the movement of screw dislocations which differs
from edge dislocations in such a way that the direction of movement of
the dislocation is normal to the direction of the slip step as shown in Fig.
7.4. When slip takes place by a combination of a screw dislocation with
an edge dislocation, the resultant curved dislocation evolves as shown in
Fig. 7.5 [5].
Page 161
the dislocations that are present at the start of stress application move
into jammed positions. The material is also undergoing strain hardening
or work hardening. At the point when no further slip by movement of
dislocations is possible, the material reaches its maximum strength and
any further increase in stress would cause fracture.
1. Recovery
2. Recrystallization
3. Grain growth
These rates however, vary widely from metal to metal and greatly depend
on the composition, purity, grain size of the sample before deformation,
and amount of deformation. Generally, metals with low melting points
exhibit high rates at low temperature, as in the case of tin. Furthermore,
the three processes sometimes overlap and are difficult to distinguish,
while in other cases they can be clearly separated [7].
7.7 Recovery
Recovery is a mechanism by which some of the crystal imperfections are
eliminated or rearranged into new configurations [8]. The principal effect
of recovery is the relief of internal stresses that accumulate during the
cold working process [2,3]. Recovery can be achieved by heating to a
relatively low temperature.
The amount of reduction in residual stress that occurs during a given time
increases with an increase in temperature. Also, at a given temperature,
the rate of decrease in residual strain hardening is fastest at the
beginning and substantially slows down with time as shown in Fig. 7.8.
7.8 Recrystallization
The recrystallization process begins when the annealing temperature
reaches a certain level and commences with the formation of new
crystals (Fig. 7.9a,b). The new crystals generally appear at the most
drastically deformed portions of the grain, usually the grain boundaries
and slip planes. The cluster of atoms from which the new grains are
formed is called a nucleus. The new crystals are equiaxed in form and
grow at the expense of the old crystals (Fig. 7.9c,d,e), until
recrystallization is complete (Fig. 7.9f).
The extent of grain growth can be determined by the following four major
factors [2,3]:
Uniaxial
Biaxial
Triaxial
Page 167
Tensile stress – The tensile stress over the cross-section m-m (Fig.
7.12a), and perpendicular to the axis of the bar is equal to:
where
In the plane n-n (Fig. 7.12c) perpendicular to the cross-section m-m, the
normal stress is equal to:
The sum of normal stresses acting in the cross-sections m-m and n-n is
equal to:
Thus, the sum of the normal stresses σΦ, and σΦ′ acting on two
perpendicular planes remains constant and equal to σx. When Φ = 0
(Fig. 7.12a), the normal stress σΦ reaches its maximum value that is
equal to σx. In order to apply Eqs. (7-1) through (7-5) to the case of axial
compression, the sign of P must be changed, i.e., P = -P.
Shear stress – The shear stresses τΦ and τΦ′ (Fig. 7.12b,c) acting in the
planes m-m and n-n respectively, have the same absolute value but
opposite signs as given by:
When Φ = 45°, the shear stresses reach their maximum value that is
equal to σx/2.
The shear stress τf is equal to zero on the plane located at the angle Φ =
Φo, which is given by:
If Φ = Φo, then the normal stresses σΦ and σΦ′ reach their limiting
values σ1 and σ2 respectively, which are known as principal stresses and
are equal to:
where
τmxy maximum shear stress in the x-y plane that is equal to:
=
Prior to reaching the elastic limit, the Poisson’s ratio ν is equal to 0.3.
However, after the yield point is exceeded, the volume of metal remains
constant, i.e.
After substituting Eqs. (7-14a,b,c) into Eq. (7-15), the Poisson’s ratio ν is
equal to 0.5 at the yield point.
C1, C2 constants.
=
Since yielding occurs when the maximum shear stress τmax reaches the
value of the yield shear stress k, the constants C1 and C2 are usually
expressed as a function of k, or yield stress Y, that is determined in a
simple tension test.
Page 171
The two most widely used yield criteria are maximum-shear-stress and
distortion-energy. In their derivation, it is assumed that the material is
continuous, homogeneous and isotropic, i.e., it has the same properties
in all directions. The tensile stress is positive and the compressive stress
is negative, and the yield stress in tension and compression are
essentially equal [11].
This criterion considers not only the maximum and minimum principal
stresses as the maximum-shear-stress criterion does, but also
intermediate principal stresses. In a more general form, this criterion can
be written as:
Figure 7.15 illustrates two yield envelopes. The stress applied to the
elemental cube should fall on the outside of these envelopes to cause
yielding. The envelope of straight lines is obtained from the maximum-
shear-stress criterion (Eq. 7-18). The second envelope is derived from
the distortion-energy criterion (Eq. 7-19), which for plane stress (σ2 = 0)
reduces to:
Plane strain is the state of stress in which one of the pairs of faces on an
elemental cube undergoes zero strain as shown in Fig. 7.14b. It follows
from Eqs. (7.14a,b,c), for plane strain (∈2 = 0) in the yielding state (ν =
0.5) that
After substituting Eq. (7-22) into Eq. (7-19), the distortion-energy criterion
reduces to the following for plane strain compression (Fig. 7.14b):
where
The best results are obtained when incremental loading is employed with
2 to 5% strain per increment. Furthermore, caution should be taken in
preparing the indenter surfaces and lubricating the contacting surfaces,
etc. When testing ductile materials, the true stress-strain curves obtained
from the compression test coincided with those from the tension test.
However, this is not true with respect to brittle materials.
For a material subjected to uniaxial stresses and strains, the ideal work
per unit volume for any strain ∈x is equal to the area under the true
stress-true strain curve (Fig. 7.17) and can be expressed as [11]:
where
where
ut total energy
=
Temperature Rise
Specimen
°C °F
Aluminum
75 165
Copper
140 285
Low-Carbon Steel
280 535
Titanium
570 1060
When the stresses in all fibers of a beam are within the elastic range, the
stress distribution within the beam is linear (Fig. 7.19a). As the moment is
increased, the outer fibers of the beam begin to yield and a non-linear
stress distribution is obtained as shown in Fig. 7.19b. Unloading can be
considered as equivalent to applying an equal and opposite moment to
the beam (Fig. 7.19c). The resulting stresses that remain in the beam
after unloading are the residual stresses (Fig. 7.19d).
References
1. ASM Metals Reference Book, American Society for Metals, Metals
Park, Ohio, 1981, pp. 1-80.
10. Hosford, W.F. and Caddell, R.M., Metal Forming: Mechanics and
Metallurgy, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1983, pp.
1-249.
Chapter 8
ANALYSIS OF WORKPIECE DEFORMATION
Table 8.1 Equations for standard terms used in theories of flat rolling.
Page 179
Table 8.1 Equations for standard terms used in theories of flat rolling
(continued).
where
h1, w1
=
entry thickness and width respectively
As shown in Fig. 8.1, when the work rolls are rotating with a peripheral
speed V, at some point N in the roll gap, the peripheral velocities of the
rolls and workpiece are equal. This point is known as the neutral point. To
the left of this point, the surface velocity of the metal V is lower than the
roll peripheral velocity V. This difference in speeds produces friction
between the metal and the rolls which tends to draw the metal into the
roll gap. To the right of N, the metal velocity V2 is greater than the roll
peripheral velocity V, so the friction tends to retain the metal in the roll
bite. Because of this roll-metal velocity relationship, the pressure
distribution at the interfaces between the work roll and rolled metal will be
uneven forming the so-called friction hill. The force-strain relationship for
a workpiece can be derived from known rolling theories that can be
classified as follows:
Slab analysis
Upper-bound analysis
Slip-line field analysis
Microstructural analysis
Finite element analysis
Page 180
Figure 8.2 illustrates the stresses that act upon the elemental vertical
section of a flat workpiece between the rolls. The horizontal forces that
act on the vertical faces of the section dx produce compressive stresses
σx + dσx that act on the face of the section of height h + dh and
compressive stresses σx acting on the face of the height h.
where
yield stress
Y =
and taking into account that the pressure p in the roll bite zone is equal to
the normal stress σy, the following differential equation is derived:
Page 182
Fig. 8.3 – Types of frictional force and its distribution along the arc of
contact according to different theories of rolling.
Von Karman’s solution [6] is based on the assumption that dry slipping
occurs over the whole arc of contact between the rolls and the rolled
material (Fig. 8.3a). This solution also claims that the frictional force τ is
directly proportional to the value of the local normal pressure, i.e.
Ekelund’s solution [7] is based on the assumption that dry slipping occurs
over the entire entry side and sticking occurs over the entire exit side of
the arc of contact (Fig. 8.3b).
Siebel’s solution [8] is obtained for the case when dry slipping occurs
over the whole arc of contact between the rolls and the rolled material
(Fig. 8.3c). This solution also assumes that the frictional force is constant
along the arc of contact. Therefore, we can obtain the following:
zones (Fig. 8.3d). This solution also claims that the frictional force is
proportional to the relative velocity of the slip according to the following
equation:
where
h oil-film thickness.
=
Orowan and Pascoe’s solution [10] is derived for the case when sticking
occurs over the whole arc of contact (Fig. 8.3e). A similar assumption is
made by Sims [11] and Alexander [12].
Tselikov’s solution [13] is provided for the case when there is a zone of
restricted plastic deformation in the middle of the sticking zone. This
solution also assumes that dry slipping occurs at the entry and the exit of
the arc of contact as shown in Fig. 8.3f.
Figure 8.4 shows the distribution of normal pressure and frictional force
along the arc of contact as calculated by Tselikov according to the four
theories discussed: Von Karman’s, Siebel’s, Nadai’s and Tselikov’s.
Tselikov also found a solution of Von Karman’s differential equation, Eq.
(8-3) for a more general case when both the entry specific strip tension
s1 and the exit specific strip tension s2 are considered. Examples of this
solution are presented in Fig. 8.5 [14].
Fig. 8.4 – Distribution of: a) normal pressure, b) frictional pressure, with
respect to yield stress Y along arc of contact for four rolling theories.
Rolling of wide strip: h1 = 2 mm, h2 = 1 mm, R = 100 mm, μ = 0.2. (From
Waziri, AISE Year Book, 1963. Copyright AISE, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Reprinted with permission).
Page 184
vertical sections of sheet before rolling are deformed during rolling (Fig.
8.6). Also, it is assumed that the stress distribution in a vertical plane is
not homogeneous. The distribution of shear stresses can be described
by:
Fig. 8.6 – Stress distribution in the roll bite according to the theory of
nonhomogeneous deformation.
where
where
The position of the neutral plane is described as the distance xn from the
plane of exit:
where
given by:
Fig. 8.9 – Simplified friction hill for rolling with sticking friction.
Gupta and Ford [19] showed that Eq. (8-21) is also valid in the presence
of roll flattening which is described by Eq. (8-12). Taking into account the
equations from Table 8.1, Eq. (8-21) can be rewritten in the following form
[20]:
A more sophisticated expression for the average rolling pressure was
also proposed by Sims [11].
Page 190
The equation for the radius of the flattened roll can be expressed in the
form:
where
Figure 8.11 gives a graphical solution for heavily rolled steel where S =
100,000 psi, μ = 0.2, Er = 30,000 psi, r = 0.05, and R = 5 in. The initial
thicknesses h1 of 0.100, 0.040, and 0.020 in. were used in the
calculations. The intersection of these two plots satisfies both equations.
There is no intersection point for the sheet where h1 = 0.020 in. which
indicates that this thickness cannot be reduced under the rolling
conditions specified above. The minimum thickness that can be rolled is
given by the following equation [17]:
where
where
Fig. 8.11 – Variation of roll separating force per unit of width with a
flattened roll radius: solid lines from Eq. (8-12), dotted lines from Eq. (8-
23). (From William F. Hosford/Robert M. Caddell, Metal Forming:
Mechanics and Metallurgy, Copyright 1983, Reprinted by permission of
Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.).
VAB, VBC velocity discontinuities at entry and exit of the die respectively.
=
Since the material in triangle ABC moves as a rigid block, the velocity VA
must be drawn parallel to AC. Since the velocity discontinuity VAB is
parallel to AB, the magnitudes of both VA and VAB can be established if
the magnitude of V1 is known. Similarly at the exit side, the velocity
discontinuity VBC is drawn parallel to BC, where its magnitude is
established by the fact that the resultant velocity V2 (drawn from point 0)
must be parallel to V1. The obtained hodograph meets the requirements
of self-consistency and the following mass-flow relationship is
maintained:
The energy balance for the two parts ABD and DBC of the rigid block
ABC is obtained by equating the rate of external work per unit of width to
internal energy dissipation at the shear plane AB. The energy balance for
the part DBC is obtained by equating the rate of external work per unit of
width to internal energy dissipation at the shear plane BC. Subsequently,
the total vertical force applied to the rigid block ABC can be calculated
as:
Page 194
Fig. 8.12 – Simplified deformation field for rolling with sticking friction.
Fig. 8.13 – Slip-line field and pressure distribution for the hot rolling
process (R/h1 = 80; r = 0.1). Adapted from Ford and Alexander.
References
1. Hosford, W.F. and Caddell, R.M., Metal Forming: Mechanics and
Metallurgy, Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1983, pp. 115-142.
6. Von Karman, T.H., “On the Theory of Rolling,” Journal for Applied
Mathematics and Mechanics (German), Vol. 5, 1925, pp. 139-141.
8. Siebel, E., “Resistance and Deformation and the Flow Material During
Rolling,” Stahl und Eisen, Vol. 50, 1930, p. 1769.
9. Nadai, A., “The Forces Required for Rolling Steel Strip Under Tension,”
Journal of Applied Mechanics, June 1939, pp. A54-A62.
11. Sims, R.B., “The Calculation of Roll Force and Torque in Hot Rolling,”
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, No. 168, 1954,
pp. 191-200.
12. Alexander, J.M., “A Slip Line Field for the Hot Rolling Process,’’
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Vol. 169, 1955,
pp. 1021-1030.
13. Tselikov, A.I., “Present State of Theory of Metal Pressure upon Rolls
in Longitudinal Rolling,” Stahl, Vol. 18 No. 5, May 1958, pp. 434-441.
14. Tselikov, A.I., “Effect of External Friction and Tension on the Pressure
of the Metal on the Rolls in Rolling,” Metallurg (USSR), No.6, 1939, pp.
61-76.
15. Orowan, E., “The Calculation of Roll Pressure in Hot and Cold Flat
Rolling,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Vol. 50,
No. 4, 1943, pp. 140-167.
16. Trinks, W. and Hitchcock, J.H., Roll Neck Bearings, American Society
of Mechanical Engineers, New York, 1935.
17. Stone, M.D., “Rolling Thin Strip”, AISE Yearly Proceedings, 1953, pp.
115-128.
18. Alexander, J.M. and Ford, H., “On the Limit Analysis of Hot Rolling,”
Progress in Applied Mechanics, 1963, pp. 191-203.
19. Gupta, S. and Ford, H., “Calculation Method for Hot Rolling of Steel
Sheet and Strip,” Journal of the Iron and Steel Institute, Feb. 1967, pp.
186-190.
21. Bland, D.R. and Ford, H., “Cold Rolling with Strip Tension, Part 3 –
An Approximate Treatment of the Elastic Compression of the Strip in
Cold Rolling,” Journal of the Iron and Steel Institute, Vol. 171, July 1952,
pp. 245-249.
22. Ford, H., and Alexander, J.M., “Rolling Hard Materials in Thin
Gauges,” Journal of the Institute of Metals, Vol. 88, 1959-60, pp. 193-
199.
23. Hosford, W.F. and Caddel, R.M., Metal Forming: Mechanics and
Metallurgy, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1983, pp. 143-238.
24. Green, J.W. and Wallace, J.F., “Estimation of Load and Torque in the
Hot Rolling Process,” Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, Vol. 4
No. 2, 1962, pp. 136-142.
31. Li, G.J., and Kobayashi, S., “Rigid-Plastic Finite Element Analysis of
Plane Strain Rolling,’’ Transactions of the ASME Journal of Engineering
for Industry, Vol. 104, Feb. 1982, pp. 55-64.
Chapter 9
RESISTANCE TO DEFORMATION IN HOT ROLLING
where
where
Since the entry and exit strip tensions reduce the roll separating force,
the resistance to deformation of the material rolled with tension can be
determined by modifying Eq. (9-1) in the following manner:
Page 200
where
The strain rate defines the rate of deformation that occurs in the roll bite.
Table 9.1 shows four equations for strain rate that were derived by
various authors.
Page 201
where
Figure 9.2 shows a comparison of the relative mean strain rates that
were derived from the selected author’s formulas.
Fig. 9.2 – Comparison of the relative mean strain rates calculated by
different formulas.
Page 202
μ
=
coefficient of external
friction
kt
=
temperature effect coefficient
Fig. 9.3 – Diagram for determination of yield stress at 20°C and melting
point for carbon steels as a function of carbon content. Adapted from
Fundamentals of Rolling, by Z. Wusatowski.
where
where
δ 2μL/Δ
=
where
γ 1.0 to 1.15 (1.15 for plane strain conditions, i.e., during rolling without
=spread; 1.0 during rolling with free spreading)
The coefficients kσ′ and kσ″ are expressed as the functions of the aspect
ratio za as shown in Fig. 9.5. Both coefficients are derived for the case
when kσ″′ = 1 and the coefficient kσ is calculated assuming that μ = 0.4
and r = 0.2.
Page 205
where
roll radius, mm
R=
Fig. 9.6 – Mean constrained yield stress used for force calculations in
rolling carbon steel (0.17% C) at 1000°C. (From Sims. Reprinted with
permission of the Council of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, from
Proceedings of Institution of Mechanical Engineers, No. 168, 1954).
Page 207
where
a r(1 – r)
=
k shear yield stress of rolled material as shown in Fig. 9.8 and Table 9.2 [7].
=
constrained yield stress of the rolled material for plane strain compression
S=
kg geometrical coefficient.
=
Page 208
Fig. 9.8 – Shear yield stress for various steels from Table 9.2. (From
Gupta and Ford, Journal of the Iron and Steel Institute, Vol. 205, 1967.
Reprinted with permission).
Page 209
Chemical Composition, %
Steel No.
C Si Mn P S Cr Ni W Mo
1 — — — — —
0.10 0.47 0.063 0.026
2 —
1.03 0.22 0.27 0.030 0.024
3 — —
1.00 0.30 0.26 0.029 0.013 1.19
4 — —
0.13 0.25 0.55 0.020 0.018 0.75 2.94
5 — —
0.55 0.26 0.46 0.017 0.013 0.95 0.31
6 — —
0.22 0.81 0.50 0.020 0.015 24.00 0.03
7 —
0.08 0.45 0.67 0.015 0.015 10.20 9.90 0.66
8 —
0.10 0.81 0.40 0.016 0.017 16.70 20.60 1.18
where
where
Fig. 9.9 – Resistance to deformation for alloy steels listed in Table 9.3.
Adapted from Fundamentals of Rolling, by Z. Wusatowski, 1969.
A — — — —
0.110.220.500.0200.018
B — — — —
0.880.180.630.0140.016
C —
0.061.190.290.0100.00222.50.14 2.25
D — —
0.110.630.640.0150.02618.49.10
E — —
0.141.900.090.0150.01025.020.5
F —
0.471.980.850.0150.01015.413.11.95
where
r% percent reduction
=
t strip temperature, °F
=
Constant Value
a0
102.278
a1
−0.0012
a2
−0.000013
a3
1.494
a4
−0.014
a5
−106.363
a6
71.888
a7
−0.070
a8
0.000018
where
b0, … b7 constants
=
rolling temperature.
T =
where
After the specific power curves are developed, the rolling parameters for
the pass reductions that are different from those used for deriving the
power curves can then be calculated. The resistance to deformation is
computed from the following equation:
where
tc temperature read from rolling temperature curve, °F (Figs. 9.10 and 9.11)
=
Fig. 9.10 – Specific power curve for low carbon steel. (From Ballenger
and Rhea, AISE Yearly Proceedings, 1941. Copyright AISE, Pittsburgh,
Pa. Reprinted with permission).
Fig. 9.11 – Specific power curve for stainless steel. (From Ballenger and
Rhea, AISE Yearly Proceedings, 1941. Copyright AISE, Pittsburgh, Pa.
Reprinted with permission).
Page 214
Kn
=
normalized resistance to deformation
kg
=
geometrical coefficient
kt temperature coefficient.
=
a0,… a5
=
coefficients
bl, b2
=
temperature effect coefficients
Coefficient Value
a0
0.783
a1
0.217
a2 0
a3
0.365
a4
0.450
a5 0
b1
0.001
b2 0
At the same time, the resistance to deformation in hot rolling was also
found to be nearly independent on the strain rate, i.e. rolling speed. For
example, there was no change in the resistance to deformation when the
rolling speed changed from 250 to 1200 ft/min. Utilizing equations that
are based on the physics of the deformation process insures the
extrapolative properties of the applied formulas. This can be illustrated by
calculating the resistance to deformation in hot rolling as a function of
reduction and roll diameter using the following two methods:
Since the specific power method is not based on the physics of the rolling
process, it does not provide adequate extrapolative properties. In fact,
the specific power method predicts a decrease in resistance to
deformation with an increase in the amount of reduction as shown in Fig.
9.14a. This method also predicts no change in the resistance to
deformation with an increase in roll diameter (Fig. 9.14b). Both of these
predictions contradict the results obtained from actual rolling test data. In
contrast, the aspect ratio method correctly predicts the dependence of
the resistance to deformation on the amount of reduction and change in
roll diameter.
Page 217
References
1. Wusatowski, Z., Fundamentals of Rolling, Pergamon Press, Oxford,
1969, pp. 203-386.
2. Ford, H. and Alexander, J.M., ‘‘Simplified Hot Rolling Calculations,”
Journal of the Institute of Metals, Vol. 92, 1963-64, pp. 397-404.
3. Sims, R.B., “The Calculation of Roll Force and Torque in Hot Rolling,”
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, No. 168, 1954,
pp. 191-200.
7. Gupta, S. and Ford, H., “Calculation Method for Hot Rolling of Steel
Sheet and Strip,” Journal of the Iron and Steel Institute, Vol. 205, Feb.
1967, pp. 186-190.
8. Denton, B.K. and Crane, F.A.A., “Roll Load and Torque in the Hot
Rolling of Steel,” Journal of the Iron and Steel Institute, Aug. 1972, pp.
606-617.
9. Green, J.W. and Wallace, J.F. “Estimation of Load and Torque in the
Hot Rolling Process,” Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, Vol. 4,
1962, pp. 136-142.
10. Siebel, E., ‘‘Calculation of Roll Force Anti-Friction Bearings for Rolling
Mills,” (German), Schweinfurt, 1941.
11. Ride, J.S., “Analysis of Operational Factors Derived from Hot Strip
Mill Tests,” AISE Yearly Proceedings, 1960, pp. 867-880.
14. Ballenger, W.M. and Rhea, T.R., “Power Consumption of Hot Strip
Mills,” AISE Yearly Proceedings, 1941, pp. 142-150.
Chapter 10
ROLL FORCE AND TORQUE IN FLAT ROLLING
where
where
The pure torque of deformation is equal to the total torque that is required
to drive both rolls. When rolls of equal diameter are used, the general
equation for pure rolling deformation torque can be given by:
Page 220
where
10.2 Formulas for Rolling Force and Roll Torque in Hot Rolling
Cook and McCrum [2] proposed the following formulas for roll separating
force P and torque M:
where
The geometrical factors Cp, Ip, Cg, and Ig are determined from:
Page 221
where
The values for Cp, Cg, Ig, and Ip are plotted in Figs. 10.1 and 10.2a,b.
The above method is also known as the BISRA method for calculating
the roll separating force and roll torque. Other formulas from various
authors that can be used to calculate the roll separating force and roll
torque are shown in Table 10.1.
Wright and Hope [3] derived formulas for roll separating force as a
function of rolling temperature. In application to stainless steel, these
formulas can be presented in the following form:
Fig. 10.2a – Cook and McCrum’s Ig function for low carbon steel.
Adapted from Wusatowski [9].
Page 223
Fig 10.2b – Cook and McCrum’s Ip function for low carbon steel. Adapted
from Wusatowski [9].
Page 224
Table 10.1 Formulas for roll separating force and roll torque in hot rolling.
Table 10.2 shows several equations from various authors that can be
used to derive the lever arm coefficient m.
Table 10.2 Equations for deriving lever arm coefficient m in hot rolling.
When the relative reduction r < 0.2 and the ratio R/h2 < 10, the equation
derived by Ford and Alexander yields substantially different values of m
when compared with the values of m obtained
Page 225
from the equation derived by Denton and Crane. This discrepancy can be
explained by the fact that these theories do not take into account the so-
called peening effect.
Wright and Hope [3] have experimentally established values for the lever
arm coefficient m by taking into account the friction losses in the backup
roll bearings and using the following formula:
where
where
The values of the lever arm coefficients as calculated from Eqs. (10-14)
and (10-15) are plotted and shown in Fig. 10.5.
Fig. 10.5 – Lever arm coefficient as a function of R/h2 ratio. (From Wright
and Hope, Metals Technology, 1975. Copyright ASM International,
formerly American Society for Metals. Reprinted with permission).
out using a 2-high rolling mill stand with initial roll diameters of 308 mm
(12.126 in.). The rolled specimens were made of mild steel with the
following composition:
The obtained curves are nearly rectilinear for the relative reductions r <
0.5. The steepness of these curves, however, increases with an increase
in reduction r > 0.5. With a change of relative reduction r from 0.5 to 0.8
at a temperature of 1100°C (2012°F) and for the ratio w1/h1 = 1, the roll
force becomes five times greater. When r = 0.9, the roll force is more
than 20 times greater. Figure 10.7 illustrates the results of torque
measurements where the curves have a relationship between their
steepness and reduction that is similar to the curves for roll force.
Using the value for the total rm obtained from Eq. (10-16), the average
yield stress Sym of the material in compression can then be determined
by using the curves that were developed by BISRA and shown in Fig.
10.8 [11].
Fig. 10.8 – BISRA curves for yield stress in compression for some grades
of carbon steel. (From Ginzburg, Iron and Steel Engineer, Sept. 1985.
Copyright AISE, Pittsburgh, Pa. Reprinted with permission.)
Page 230
The roll force can then be calculated from the following formula:
where
The values for the tension effect coefficients used by Stone are β1 = β2 =
0.5. Other values that are more frequently used such as β1 = 0.7 and β2
= 0.3 are based on rolling data which confirms that the resistance to
deformation is affected more by entry strip tension that exit strip tension.
In the graphical method proposed by Stone, the ratio μL′/ha is found from
the nomographic chart that is shown in Fig. 10.9. The values for the
coefficient of friction μ depend on a number of factors which will be
discussed in the following chapter. The yield stress Y can be defined from
the work-hardening curves that are shown in Fig. 10.10. Once the
resistance to deformation Kw is found, the length of the arc of contact of
the flattened roll L′ can be calculated from the following formula:
Page 231
where
The roll force P can then be obtained by substituting the values for Kw
and L′ into the following equation:
Taking into account that the projected length of the arc of contact of the
unflattened roll L is equal to , the resistance to deformation Kw can be
obtained from Eq. (10-22) in the form:
After considering Eqs. (10-24) through (10-26), the roll torque can be
expressed in the following more commonly known form:
rolling speed.
V =
Page 233
Yt yield strength of rolled strip as measured in tension at a very low strain rate
=
The total roll torque for two rolls M is given by the following formula:
where
Pm, S1m, measured values of roll force, entry strip tension, and exit strip
S2m=tension respectively
wm, h1m, measured values of strip width, entry strip thickness, and exit strip
h2m=thickness respectively.
The measured length of the arc of contact Lm′ can be calculated from the
following formula:
Page 234
where
Figure 10.11 shows a typical plot of Eq. (10-35) that was derived from
rolling tests at a 5-stand tandem cold mill [11].
Case 1 (Fig. 10.12a) – The bottom roll is driven and the top roll is
dragged by friction between the rolled stock and roll surface. When both
rolls have the same diameter, the roll torque can be expressed by:
Page 235
Case 2 (Fig. 12.12b) – The top and bottom rolls have different peripheral
speeds and both rolls have the same diameter. In this case, the roll
torques corresponding to each roll can be given by:
where
Case 3 (Fig. 10.12c) – One roll diameter is considerably greater than the
other and the roll peripheral speeds are equal. In this case, the roll
torques for each roll are presented by Eqs. (10-37) and (10-38) in which
the angle ψ is equal to:
Fig. 10.12 – Direction of forces acting on the rolls with: a) bottom driven
roll and top dragged roll, b) different peripheral speeds, c) different
diameters. Adapted from Wusatowski [9].
Page 236
The values of the lever arm a and angle θ in Eqs. (10-36) through (10-40)
are determined from the distance between the point of action of the
resultant roll force of the roll surface and the plane passing through the
roll axes. The point of action is defined as the center of gravity of the roll
pressure distribution curve along the arc of the roll contact.
As follows from Eq. (10-2), both the entry and exit tensions s1 and s2
decrease the roll separating force P which then proportionally reduces
the roll torque M. The entry and exit tensions also modify the lever arm a
due to the redistribution of normal pressure along the arc of the roll
contact. As shown in Fig. 10.13, the solid lines represent the normal
pressure distribution and corresponding lever arm a0 when no tension is
applied to the strip. For comparison, the dotted lines represent the
pressure distribution with strip tension and the corresponding lever arm
as.
Fig. 10.13 – Effect of entry and exit strip tension on roll torque.
By neglecting the variation in length of the lever arm due to tension and
assuming that the exit thickness h2 < R′ and w1 = w2 = w, the following
formula for roll torque can be applied when strip tension is present:
Page 237
Since by definition, that power is equal to the work done in unit time, the
true power Nw required for a pass is equal to:
where
The ratio of the roll torque Mw to the required rolled torque is defined by
the rolling efficiency coefficient ηw that is equal to:
References
1. Sims, R.B., ‘‘The Calculation of Roll Force and Torque in Hot Rolling,”
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, No. 168, 1954,
pp. 191-200.
2. Cook, P.M. and McCrum, A.W., “The Calculation of Load and Torque in
Hot Flat Rolling,” BISRA, 1958.
3. Wright, H. and Hope, T., “Rolling of Stainless Steel in Wide Hot Strip
Mills,” Metals Technology, Dec. 1975, pp. 565-576.
6. Denton, B.K. and Crane, F.A.A., “Roll Load and Torque in the Hot
Rolling of Steel,” Journal of the Iron and Steel Institute, Aug. 1972, pp.
606-617.
7. Green, J.W. and Wallace, J.F., “Estimation of Load and Torque in the
Hot Rolling Process,” Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, Vol. 4,
1962, pp. 136-142.
8. Sims, R.B. and Wright, H., “Roll Force and Torque in Hot Rolling Mills
– A Comparison Between Measurement and Calculation,” Journal of the
Iron and Steel Institute, Vol. 201, March 1963, pp. 261-269.
12. Stone, M.D., “Rolling of Thin Strip,” AISE Yearly Proceedings, 1953,
pp. 115-128.
13. Roberts, W.L., Cold Rolling of Steel, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York,
1978.
Page 239
Chapter 11
FRICTION AND LUBRICATION IN ROLLING
1. Mechanical viewpoint
2. Macroscopic viewpoint
3. Microscopic viewpoint.
The assumption that the die is rigid, means that the effect of the die
deformation on the frictional forces can be ignored. In addition to that, the
mechanical viewpoint does not require the knowledge of the substance of
interface and assumes that any changes in the interface can be taken
into account simply by choosing an appropriate value of τ.
where
normal force
P=
p normal pressure.
=
and
Fig. 11.1 – Deformation with: a) sliding friction (μ → 0), b) sticking friction.
Page 241
The following two basic laws of friction are stipulated by Eq. (11-1):
In contrast, when τ reaches the value of k, it will take less energy for the
material to shear inside the body of the workpiece, rather than slide
against the tool surface. In this case, the friction is referred to as sticking
friction, although there is no actual sticking to the die surface. The
condition of sticking friction is:
Under this condition, the apparent contact area Aa between the deformed
workpiece and a rigid tool remains the same, so that Aa = Ao (Fig.
11.1b). Since there is no relative sliding at the interface, it is fair to
assume that the term “coefficient of friction” is no longer applicable (Fig.
11.2).
The value of the interface shear factor varies from m = 0 for a frictionless
interface to m = 1 for sticking friction.
Surface minute peaks (asperities) and valleys of both the tool and
workpiece and their magnitude and geometry are considered to
affect not only frictional force, but also the stability of the lubricant
film.
Tool material is viewed as a multiphase structure in which hard,
wear-resistant particles (usually intermetallic compounds) are
embedded in a softer and more ductile matrix.
Tool surface can be different from the bulk as a result of an
intentional surface treatment or diffusion process during which
alloying elements are removed or added to the surface.
Workpiece material is described as either a single phase (pure
metals or solid-solution alloys) or a multiphase structure. The
phase structure of the surface may differ from the bulk because of
an intentional deposition of some elements on the surface or
because of a diffusion of alloying elements.
Technical surfaces are considered to be covered with the products
of interaction with the environment. The films formed from the
different reactions are usually superimposed. For example, the
oxide film may be covered with an absorbed lubricant film.
Chemical reaction between different films often takes place.
Lubricants are viewed as chemically active substances whose
properties depend on elemental composition and the molecular
forms in which the various elements are present.
where
hardness of asperities.
H =
Page 244
Fig. 11.4 – Contact between die and rough workpiece with plastic
deformation of asperities. (From J.A. Schey, Tribology in Metalworking:
Friction, Lubrication and Wear, ASM International, Metals Park, Ohio,
1983, p. 34. Reproduced with permission.)
The force F required to move the body relative to the tool (Fig. 11.4b),
assuming that the shear strength of the junction is roughly equal to the
shear yield stress k, is:
As the normal pressure increases, the stress fields acting on the adjacent
asperities start to interact and the plastic flow begins in the substrate
[2,7]. This leads to lower pressure that is required for asperity
deformation. The asperity flattens giving a rise to the valley located
between them. Initially, the real contact area Ar increases rapidly with
pressure and then approaches the apparent contact area Aa
asymptotically (Fig. 11.7). This is accompanied by both the hardening of
asperities and an increase in the frictional force as follows from Eq. (11-
8).
Fig. 11.7 – Distortion of asperities on sliding. (From J.A. Schey, Tribology
in Metalworking: Friction, Lubrication and Wear, ASM International,
Metals Park, Ohio, 1983, p. 38. Reproduced with permission.) The
average frictional stress over the entire apparent area of contact can be
expressed as [2,7]:
Page 247
Wanheim and Bay [7] derived from slip-line field theory that the ratio
Ar/Aa depends on both the interface pressure p and the interface shear
factor of the real contact zone mc. When p/2k < 1.3, the ratio Ar/Aa
increases linearly with the interface pressure p. Since the average
frictional stress τi also increases linearly, the coefficient of friction μ
remains constant. At higher pressures, however, it also becomes
pressure dependent.
Rubbing model that relates to the case when interactive forces are
too weak to produce plastic deformation of the workpiece
asperities.
Wear model that describes the conditions when workpiece
asperities are destroyed by plastic deformation.
Cutting model that relates to the case when workpiece asperities
are machined away.
11.12 Solid-Film Lubrication
Solid-film lubrication prevents metal-to-metal contact. The lubrication can
be with full conformity, i.e. when there is no metal-to-metal contact (Fig.
11.8a), or with partial conformity (Fig. 11.8b). Some solid-film lubricants
are briefly described in the following sections [2].
Oxide films – As will be discussed later, the scale that is formed on iron at
higher temperatures consists of three layers. The outermost oxygen-rich
Fe2O3 and the intermediate layer of Fe3O4 are brittle and do not deform
plastically. The FeO layer adjacent to the metal, however, becomes softer
than iron above 900°C (1652°F), where the phase transformation from
ferrite into the stronger austenite occurs. Under these conditions the
softer oxide can act as a soft-film lubricant.
Polymer films – The most suitable polymer films are thermoplastic. Below
the glass-transition temperature, these films are brittle and do not follow
the surface deformation. Above this temperature they behave as
viscoelastic solids, but have no spreading ability. Strong adhesion
between the polymer and metal substrates can be obtained by rubbing,
melting on, fusing of dry powder, or application from a dispersion or
solution. A coating that is deposited on a bar or strip can withstand
drawing or rolling. At high interface pressures the shear strength of
polymers is proportional to hydrostatic pressure and is also affected by
temperature and strain rate.
When the lubrication fluid has an excess into the space between two
parallel surfaces moving against the other at a relative velocity ν, the fluid
layer located at the moving surface is dragged at the same velocity, and
is stationary at the nonmoving surface (Fig. 11.10a). The shear stress
which is necessary to overcome for movement is given by:
Page 250
where
When the dynamic viscosity η is independent of the shear strain rate γ̇,
the fluid is referred to as Newtonian. Many fluids exhibit complex
relationships between the dynamic viscosity and the shear strain rate and
are often called Non-Newtonian. To prevent a collapse of the film under
the load normal to the lubricant film, one of the following methods can be
used:
where
where
where
where
Roughness, μm
Surface Finish 10-point Peak-to-
Ra
average valley
Lapped 0.12 –
0.15 0.25 0.5
Ground 0.5 –
perpendicular 0.7 1.0 3.0
Fatigue wear – Fatigue wear occurs during cycling loading which involves
the generation of shear stress below a compressed tool surface. The
repeated loading produces microcracks that are usually below the
surface and propagate from the subsequent loading and unloading. After
a
Page 256
Figure 11.13 shows that the frictional force vector F at any point of the roll
contact surface has the following three components Fx, Fy, and Fz
where:
The frictional forces acting in the lateral direction resist the spread of the
workpiece and are distributed in the plane view of the contact zone as
shown in Fig. 11.15. In the point a, the lateral component Fy of the
frictional force is equal to zero. In the point c, both lateral Fy and vertical
Fz components are equal to zero. In the point b, at which the neutral line
ed intersects with the longitudinal axis ac, all three components Fx, Fy,
and Fz of the frictional force are equal to zero.
Page 257
Fig. 11.14 – Distribution of frictional forces along the arc of the contact
zone with different values of average aspect ratio za. Zone 1: zone of
sliding friction; Zone 2: zone of maximum friction; Zone 3: zone of sticking
friction. Adapted from Grudev [6].
Fig. 11.16 – Forces acting in the roll bite during initial entry of the
workpiece.
where
t = workpiece temperature, °C.
Smirnov and Uk [16] derived the following equations for the entry
coefficient of friction as a function of workpiece temperature, roll surface
roughness, and workpiece chemical composition:
where
k2 1 – 1.44 –
0.1V 0.28V 0.5
In both cases, the work roll diameters were equal to 990 mm (39 in.).
Results of their experiments are shown in Fig. 11.17.
Fig. 11.17 – Variation of maximum bite angle with rolling speed. Adapted
from Grudev [6]
Page 261
The maximum bite angle and entry coefficients of friction for different
types of rolls with various surface roughnesses are shown in Table 11.2
according to Wusatowski [18]. As expected, ragging the rolls increases
the maximum bite angle.
Without lubricant
0.136 0.131 0.133 0.131
Cotton-seed oil
0.116 0.118 0.118 0.117
Castor oil
0.109 0.109 0.109 0.115
Effect of lubrication – Table 11.4 shows the ranges and average values
for the entry coefficient of friction μe with different lubricants. A relatively
weak effect of lubrication on μe is due to the poor conditions for forming a
lubricant film when the strip leading edge enters the roll bite.
Page 262
Effect of rolling speed – Fig. 11.18 illustrates the effect of rolling speed on
the entry coefficient of friction during the rolling of carbon steel (0.3% C)
samples with a thickness of 3.9 mm (0.154 in.). Castor oil is used as a
lubricant, while the RMS roughness of the rolls is between 0.2 and 0.4
μm. The entry coefficient of friction reduces very steeply within the speed
range from 0 to 0.15 m/s. Beyond this range, there is a more moderate
decrease of the entry coefficient of friction as the speed increases.
Fig. 11.18 – Effect of rolling speed on entry coefficient of friction during
cold rolling of carbon steel. Adapted from Grudev [6].
Effect of roll material and roll surface roughness – Table 11.5 shows the
values for the maximum bite angle and entry coefficient of friction for
some rolls with various surface roughness.
Page 263
As the friction increases, the neutral plane moves toward the middle of
the arc of contact.
Page 264
When rolling with strip tension, the neutral angle can be defined from the
following equation proposed by Ford, et al [19]:
where
Thus, with an increase of exit tension s2, the neutral plane moves toward
the entry side. With an increase of entry tension s1, as well as an
increase in draft, the neutral plane moves toward the exit side. Figure
11.20 illustrates the extreme condition when the neutral plane is shifted to
the end of the arc of the roll contact, so that all frictional forces are acting
in the rolling direction.
Fig. 11.20 – Forces acting along the arc of the roll contact with large entry
tension. Adapted from Wusatowski [19].
As was shown by Ford, et al [19], the forward slip can be calculated from
the roll bite geometry as follows:
Page 265
Fig. 11.21 – Edge profiles of rolled slabs. (From J.A. Schey, Tribology in
Metalworking: Friction, Lubrication and Wear, ASM International, Metals
Park, Ohio, 1983, p. 266. Reproduced with permission.)
Since F = μN, and also assuming that the forces P and F are applied in
the middle of the arc of the roll contact (θ = μ/2), we can obtain from Eqs.
(11-31) and (11-32) the following expression for the steady-state
coefficient of friction:
Fig. 11.22 – Forces acting in the roll bite during skidding. Adapted from
Grudev [6].
Roll torque method – Whitton and Ford [22] have shown that under
skidding conditions, the steady-state coefficient of friction can be
determined from the following simple relationship:
where
roll torque
M =
roll radius.
R =
This method is valid when the back tension is sufficient to move the
neutral plane to the exit point as shown in Fig. 11.20.
Roll force method – According to the roll force method, the steady-state
coefficient of friction μ is determined by using the equations for the roll
force P, in which P is expressed as a function of μ. As an example, see
Eqs. (10-19) through (10-24) which are related to Stone’s method of
calculating roll force.
where
Maximum Oil
Lubricant Type
Concentration, %
Polymerized cotton
oil emulsion 5
Stearic acid
20
Rapeseed oil
40
The four major causes of roll wear which are closely related to these
conditions are as follows [27]:
Abrasion of the roll surface due to its contact with the rolled
material and backup roll.
Mechanical fatigue of the roll surface layer as a result of cyclical
loading of the rolls.
Thermal fatigue of the roll surface layers as they are periodically
heated by the rolled material and cooled by water sprays.
Corrosion.
The two types of roll wear that are generally considered are uniform wear
and localized wear [2].
Localized wear – Localized wear is a local wear along the bands on the
roll surface that is mainly caused by accumulating secondary scale on
the roll surface. This scale accumulation increases with an increase in roll
surface roughness and rolling temperature. Therefore, localized wear is
more likely to occur in the early stands of a finishing mill.
wide hot strip mill (Fig. 11.27). Figure 11.28 shows that the application of
synthetic oil substantially reduces roll wear, whereas applying
hydrocarbon fluid is detrimental to the roll life.
Coefficient of friction 34 to 67
reduction
t workpiece temperature, °C
=
Smooth roll surface: 0.0011 – 0.0015
Rough roll surface: 0.0035 – 0.0073.
As follows from Eq. (11-42), the entrained film thickness increases with
an increase in the lubricant viscosity. Therefore, frictional forces
decrease, which is confirmed by numerous experiments.
Sims and Arthur [30] have shown that at a speed greater than 0.25 m/s
(50 ft/min), the speed effect on the steady-state coefficient of friction can
be expressed in the following form:
where
a, b, c empirical constants
=
rolling speed.
V =
In the case of dry rolling, friction increases with speed as shown in the
following formula proposed by Starchenko, et al [31]:
where
a, b empirical constants.
=
In Eq. (11-44), the minus sign corresponds to rolling with lubrication while
the plus sign relates to the dry rolling condition.
where
r pass reduction
=
As follows from Eq. (11-45), the oil film thickness h increases when the
bite angle α decreases. Since an increase in the work roll diameter
results in a smaller bite angle α, it can be expected that a lower value of
the coefficient of friction μ will be obtained.
Fig. 11.33 – Roll forces measured in rolling of steel strip under conditions
of limiting reduction. Adapted from Pawelski and Kading [32].
Vac. R.O. 37 1
950 15.6 0.069
Vac. R.O. 59 1
40A 17.0 0.061
Esso Pale 81 3
885 24.0 0.052
Esso 5500 4
Baywest 27.5 0.050
Olive oil — 2
18.1 0.057
Castor oil — 4
23.1 0.045
Lanoline — 4
26.5 0.041
Camphor — 4
flowers 27.2 0.038
Page 278
References
1. Glossary of Terms and Definitions in the Field of Friction, Wear and
Lubrication: Tribology, OECD, Paris, 1969.
3. Bowden, F.P. and Tabor, D., The Friction and Lubrication of Solids,
Clarendon Press, Oxford, Pt. I, 1950, and Pt. II, 1964.
8. Challen, J.M. and Oxley, P.L.B., Wear, Vol. 53, 1979, pp. 229-243.
11. Lancaster, P.R. and Rowe, G.W., Wear, Vol. 2, 1959, pp. 428-437.
12. Sargent, L.B. and Tsao, Y.H., ASLE Trans., Vol. 23, 1980, pp. 70-76.
14. Tselikov, A.I., Izvestia Vuz. Machinostroenie (Russian), No. 11, 1959.
15. Ekelund, S., Steel Vol. 93, Aug. 21, 1933, pp. 27-29.
17. Tafel, W., Rolling and Roll Pass Design (German), Dortmund, 1923.
19. Ford, H., et al, “Cold Rolling with Strip Tension, Part 1 – A New
Approximate Method of Calculation and Comparison with Other
Methods,” Journal of the Iron and Steel Institute, Vol. 168, May 1951, pp.
57-72.
20. Sheppard, T. and Wright, D.S., Metals Technology, Vol. 8, 1981, pp.
46-57.
22. Whitton, P.W. and Ford, H., “Surface Friction and Lubrication in Cold
Strip Rolling,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, No.
169, 1955, pp. 123-140.
26. Robinson, C.L. and Westlake, F.J., “Roll Lubrication in Hot Strip
Mills,” Proceedings of the First European Tribology Congress, London,
Sept. 25-27, 1973, pp. 389-398.
27. Wandrei, C.L., Review of Hot Rolling Lubricant Technology for Steel,
ASLE Special Publication SP-17, Park Ridge, IL, 1984.
28. Judd, R.R. “Surface Deterioration of Grain Iron Work Rolls in the First
Stands of a Hot Strip Mill Finishing Train,” AISE Yearly Proceedings,
1979, pp. 65-74.
Page 279
29. Pawelski, O., “Lubrication and Wear,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Pt. 3D,
1964-65, pp. 80-92.
31. Starchenko, D.I., et al, Izv. Vuz. Chernaya Metallurgia, No. 8, 1967,
pp. 86-91.
32. Pawelski, O. and Kading, G., Stahl von Eisen, Vol. 87, 1967, pp.
1340-1355.
Page 280
Chapter 12
HEAT TRANSFER IN HOT ROLLING
where
k, a, b constants
=
T temperature.
=
Page 284
1. Fuel-fired furnaces
2. Electrical resistance furnaces
3. Induction furnaces
4. Dual-fuel furnaces.
Pusher furnaces
Rotary hearth furnaces
Walking beam furnaces
Walking hearth furnaces
Roller-hearth (tunnel)furnaces.
Page 287
Pusher furnaces, shown in Fig. 12.5, are designed so that slabs can be
charged from either the end or through the side door [7]. The steel slabs
are moved through the furnace by pushing the last slab charged with a
pusher at the charging end while a heated slab is simultaneously
removed through the discharge door.
Rotary hearth furnaces, shown in Fig. 12.6, have a hearth section of the
furnace that revolves, while the external walls and roof remain stationary.
Fig. 12.5 – Schematic longitudinal section through a three-zone counter-
current fired pusher-type continuous furnace. (From Vance, et al, AISE
Year Book, 1978. Copyright AISE, Pittsburgh, Pa. Reprinted with
permission.)
Walking beam furnaces, shown in Fig. 12.7, move the heated slabs
intermittently with so-called ‘‘walking beams”. The slabs at rest are
supported on the raised stationary ridges on the hearth. At this time, the
walking beams are located below the slabs. The walking motion is
provided in the following four steps:
1. Walking beams are raised by pivoting the bell cranks, thus lifting
the slabs from the stationary ridges.
2. Walking beams with the slabs are pushed in the direction of travel
by means of a travel cylinder.
3. Bell cranks are pivoted to lower the walking beams, thus placing
the slabs on the stationary ridges in the advanced position.
4. Walking beams are returned to the initial horizontal position by the
travel cylinder.
Both walking beam and walking hearth furnaces can have two entrances
[8]. The second entrance is provided for preheated slabs and is usually
located at the midway of the furnace. In order to achieve the optimum
slab moving rate through the furnace, the walking beam or walking hearth
mechanism can be split into two or more independently driven sections.
Since the heating conditions for the top and bottom furnace zones are
different, both top and bottom zone wall temperature-time curves must be
considered to accurately simulate the heating process. Mill experiments
have shown that the heat transfer in these furnaces is mainly due to
radiation, whereas heat transfer by convection contributes less than 5%
to the total heat transfer [16,17]. The heat radiated to the slab can be
expressed by the following equation:
where
where
Using the finite difference method (Fig. 12.11) proposed by Schmidt [18],
Eq. (12-3) can be replaced by:
where
n layer number
=
Δx layer thickness
=
For a given furnace wall temperature distribution along the furnace and a
given slab push rate, heat transfer analysis can define the following
parameters (Fig. 12.12):
The three most common methods of hot slab charging are as follows:
When charging both hot and cold slabs into a single-entrance reheating
furnace, the furnace length is designed to receive cold slabs, and
therefore, is too long for hot charge slabs (Fig. 12.14). Furthermore, the
in-furnace stock traveling speed is matched to the cold stock. As a result,
this type of operation impairs not only the heat economy, but also product
quality and productivity because it can cause washing on the surface of
the hot stock. To achieve the optimum moving rate of both hot and cold
slabs through the furnace, the walking beam mechanism can be split into
two or more independently driven sections.
When charging both hot and cold slabs into a double-entrance reheating
furnace, the second slab charging port is designated for hot slabs. This
port is usually located at the midpoint where the temperature of the
traveling cold stock becomes equal to that of the hot stock (Fig. 12.15).
This allows the hot stock to be heated more efficiently along with the cold
stock. The double-
Page 294
When charging only hot slabs into a single-entrance furnace, the furnace
length can be substantially reduced to achieve maximum fuel savings.
These effects result in the reduction of fuel efficiency and the generation
of so-called skid marks, or cooler regions on the slabs as shown in Figs.
12.16 and 12.17. The heat absorbed by a skid system can be described
by the following equation [21]:
where
Various types of heat transfer from the rolled workpiece to its surrounding
matter occur during the rolling cycle. Some of the lost heat is recovered
by generating heat inside the workpiece during its deformation. The main
components of the workpiece temperature loss and gain in hot strip mills
can be identified as follows:
where
Stefan-Boltzmann constant
S=
Ta ambient temperature, °F
=
t time, s
=
ξ emissivity.
=
where
kcv ratio between temperature loss due to convection and radiation (varies
=between 0.01 and 0.22).
qw′ amount of heat passing through outer surface of the workpiece, Btu
=
Tw water temperature, °F
=
where
From the heat balance condition qw′ = qw″, Eqs. (12-13) and (12-14), the
temperature loss due to water cooling is equal to:
where
where
ρw = density of water, lb/in.3
From the heat balance qw″ = qw′″, the formula for the temperature rise of
water is as follows:
where
where
Tr roll temperature, °F
=
The amount of heat lost by the rolled metal in the roll bite is given by:
where
ΔTc temperature loss by rolled material due to contact with work rolls, °F.
=
From the heat balance condition qc′ = qc″, the formula for the
temperature loss due to conduction to work rolls is as follows:
where
The heat transfer process can be described by the following heat balance
equations. The heat generated due to mechanical work is equal to [27]:
where
From the heat balance condition qm′ = qm″, the formula for temperature
rise due to mechanical work is derived as follows:
Equations for the rise in temperature due to mechanical work, that have
been obtained by reducing some of the known equations
[25,29,34,35,37] to a compatible form, are summarized in Fig. 12.22.
The heat transferred to the stock is equal to the amount of heat absorbed
by a portion of the stock residing in the furnace during the same time as
given by:
where
The rate of temperature rise of the stock αf in the tunnel furnace can be
calculated from the heat balance qf′ = qf″:
After all of the interacted heat balance relationship are derived, the
equations that describe the heat transfer rates between the adjacent
components of the system can be obtained. To calculate the temperature
of each component of the system, the equations must be solved
simultaneously. The following heat balance equations are considered:
Figure 12.26 illustrates the temperature rundown of the tail end of the
transfer bar inside of the thermal covers. When the metallic shield
thickness is equal to 0.5 mm (0.020 in.), up to four bars are needed to
reach the optimum heat conservation level, whereas first bar
performance is achieved when the metallic shield thickness is reduced to
0.05 mm (0.002 in.)
Page 307
Fig. 12.26 – Temperature rundown of the tail end of the transfer bars
inside thermal covers. (From Bakhtar and Ginzburg, Proceedings of 4th
International Steel Rolling Conference, 1987. Copyright IRSID, France.
Reprinted with permission.)
References
1. The Making, Shaping and Treating of Steel, 10th Edition, eds. W.T.
Lankford, Jr., et al, Association of Iron and Steel Engineers, Pittsburgh,
Pa., 1985, pp. 783-860.
3. Flux, J.H., “Reheating for Hot Working in the Steel Industry,” Reheating
for Hot Working, Iron and Steel Institute Publication, No. 111, London,
1968, pp. 70-82.
12. Finkle, H.P., “Internal Experience with Low NOx Burners,” Iron and
Steel Engineer, March 1995, pp. 23-28.
16. Schack, A., Industrial Heat Transfer, Chapman and Hall, London,
1965.
22. Sengupta, G., “Hot Skid System at Inland’s 80 in. Hot Strip Mill,” Iron
and Steel Engineer, Aug. 1987, pp. 40-43.
26. Vasin, I.I. and Gindin, A.S., Ural Metallurgical NII Proceedings
(Russian), 6, 1968, pp. 105-107.
32. Ventzel, H., “Rolling Process and Rolling Equipment,” Viniti (USSR),
27, 1965, pp. 8-43.
34. Wright, H. and Hope, T., “Rolling of Stainless Steel in Wide Hot Strip
Mills,” Metals Technology, Dec. 1975, pp. 565-576.
35. Zheleznov, Y.D. and Tsifrinovich, B.A., “Problem of the Heat Balance
of Sheet in the Continuous Hot Rolling Mill,” IZV VUZ Chernaya Met., Vol.
9, 1968, pp. 105-111.
36. Wilmotte, S., et al, “Model of the Evolution of the Temperature of the
Strip in the Hot Strip Mill,” Centre de Researches Metallurgiques,
Belgium, C.R.M. Report No. 36, Sept. 1973, pp. 35-44.
39. Rudnev, V.I. and Loveless, D.L., “Induction Heating of Slab, Plate,
and Bar for Continuous Casting Lines,” 33 Metal Producing, Oct. 1994,
pp. 32-44.
44. Nelson, J.G., “Transfer Bar Edge Heating Using Oxy-Gas Burners,”
Iron and Steel Engineer, Jan. 1998, pp. 51-55.
45. Sugita, K. and Oi, J., “Maintenance of Temperature in Hot Strip Mill
Under Continuous Casting – Direct Rolling Process,” Nippon Steel
Technical Report, No. 23, June 1984.
46. Laws, W.R., et al, “New Roller Table Thermal Insulation Systems
Increase Product Range and Save Energy in Hot Strip Mills,”
Proceedings of the 4th International Steel Rolling Conference: The
Science and Technology of Flat Rolling, Vol. 1, Deauville, France, June
1-3, 1987, pp. A.6.1-A.6.7.
47. Hewitt, E.C., “Hot Strip Mill Developments’’, Iron and Steelmaker, 17,
Sept. 1982.
50. Polukhin, P., et al, “Efficiency of Screening the Metal on the Roller
Tables of Wide Hot Strip Mills,” Steel in the USSR, Aug. 1974, pp. 649-
650.
51. Laws, W.R., et al, “Rolling to Low Fuel Cost,” Iron and Steel
International, June 1984.
Chapter 13
STRUCTURAL CHANGES IN STEEL DURING HOT
ROLLING
where
A, n constants
=
Zener-Hollomon parameter.
Z=
where
strain rate
∈̇ =
gas constant
R =
absolute temperature.
T =
k constant.
=
where
strain
∈ =
absolute temperature, K.
T =
The recrystallized grain size dr for stainless steel is given by the following
equation [11]:
where
k constant.
=
Equation (13-7) shows that the recrystallized grain size increases linearly
with an increase in initial grain size. A similar relationship is also true for
HSLA steels [5] as shown in Fig. 13.6.
Fig. 13.6 – Effect of initial austenite grain sizes and rolling reductions on
recrystallized austenite grain size at 1050°C. (From Katsumata, et al.
Reprinted with permission from Thermomechanical Processing of
Microalloyed Austenite, edited by A.J. DeArdo, G.A. Ratz, and P.J. Wray,
The Metallurgical Society, 420 Commonwealth Dr., Warrendale, Pa.
15086, 1981.)
Page 317
Region I – In region I, the grain growth starts from a mixed structure that
consists of either recovered grains and giant grains or recrystallized
grains and recovered ones, depending on the amount of reduction.
Page 320
A′, Q′
=
constants
t time.
=
Page 321
Region III – Region III corresponds to abnormal grain growth when very
large grains suddenly develop among small grains. The size of grains
coalesced from the small grain structure during this secondary
recrystallization process is much larger than the size of grains coalesced
from a large grain structure.
As shown in Figs. 13.12 and 13.13, the critical holding time required for
abnormal grain growth increases with the addition of niobium. This
differentiates the niobium-bearing steels from plain-carbon steels, as well
as the other types of steel that are microalloyed with vanadium,
aluminum, and titanium [15].
The first case is illustrated in Fig. 13.16 where d01 is the initial grain size
prior to the first pass. The grain structure is completely recrystallized (XR
= 1) after time tR at which the grain size is equal to dR. Therefore, in this
case, the flow stress for the second pass can be determined by using the
known equation that is applicable for a completely recrystallized grain
structure.
Page 323
If the static recrystallization has not been completed prior to the second
pass, then the equation for flow stress would consist of the following two
components as shown in Fig. 13.17:
where
References
1. Speich, G.R., et al, Proc. Phase Transformation in Ferrous Alloys,
TMS-AIME, Warrendale, Pa. 1984, p. 341.
8. Djaic, R.A.P. and Jonas, J.J., Metall. Trans., No. 4, 1973, pp. 621-624.
10. McQueen, H.J., Journal of Metals., Vol. 20, April 1968, pp. 31-38.
11. Towle, D.J. and Gladman, T. Met. Sci., 13, 1979, pp. 246-256.
12. Cuddy, L.J., “The Effect of Microalloy Concentration on
Recrystallization of Austenite During Hot Deformation,”
Thermomechanical Processing of Microalloyed Austenite, Metallurgical
Society of AIME, New York, 1981, pp. 129-140.
15. Irvine, K.J., et al, Journal of Iron and Steel Institute, Vol. 208, 1970,
pp. 717-726.
18. Choquet, P., et al, “FAST: A New Model for Accurate Prediction of
Rolling Force Application on the Solmer Hot Strip Mill,” Proceedings of
the 4th International Steel Rolling Conference, Deauville, France, June 1-
3, 1987, pp. B5.1-B5.8.
19. Licka, S., et al, “Rolling Load Calculation in Hot Strip Rolling with
Respect to Restoration Processes,” Proceedings of the International
Conference on Steel Rolling, Tokyo, Japan, Sept. 29-Oct. 4, 1980, pp.
840-851.
Page 325
Chapter 14
THERMOMECHANICAL TREATMENT COMBINED WITH
ROLLING
Since all of these processing factors serve the same purpose, a suitable
combination of some of them enables the desired properties of the
controlled-rolled steel to be obtained. The diversity of the developed
controlled rolling practices is due mainly to the difference in capacity,
cooling power, and stability of operation in rolling mills. To reduce the
delay time between roughing and finishing rolling (step 3), Intermediate
Forced Cooling (IFC) was introduced in some mills [21].
The process of rolling acicular ferrite, HSLA steel, has been developed by
Climax Molybdenum Company. A significant improvement in toughness
of this steel is obtained by:
Lowering the finishing temperature
Increasing the amount of deformation in the non-recrystallization
region.
The principal processing factors that affect the quality of steel through
formation of the appropriate microstructure are finish rolling temperature,
intermediate temperature, and coiling temperature. These factors are
briefly discussed in application to low-carbon Si-Mn steel [23] in the
following section.
Page 340
Finish rolling temperatures that are below 800°C (1472°F) are also
detrimental to the mechanical properties due to the formation of a
deformed microstructure with a high density of dislocation. The most
favorable dual-phase structure is obtained at a finish rolling temperature
just above Ar3.
Extra-low carbon (ELC) steel that is used for ferritic rolling typically
contains the following elements [25].
C Mn Si S P Al N
<
0.0180.1500.0100.0100.0150.0500.0035
The two principal types of ferritic rolling that are utilized are high-
temperature ferritic rolling and low temperature ferritic rolling as shown in
Fig. 14.23.
RAC Process – In the RAC process that was developed by Usinor, the
plates are conveyed in a tunnel by 9 pairs of rollers and the cooling water
flows over the two plate surfaces in passages which are bounded by the
sides of the tunnel and the plate itself. The prototype plant was installed
in Usinor, Dunkirk, after the hot leveller and designed for plates of 8 to 50
mm in thickness, 1500 to 4000 mm in width and 12 to 16 meters in
length. The cooling rate is 120°C/s for a 10 mm thick plate and 30°C/s for
a 30 mm thick plate [30]. This process was developed for the
manufacture of water-quenched and tempered weldable structural steels.
Consequently, reheating in an austenizing furnace was eliminated. After
quenching the plates, conventional tempering is carried out.
Subsequently, this process was also applied for quenching only to
improve the properties of microalloyed steels or for the same properties,
reduce the content of microalloying elements and the carbon equivalent.
During cold rolling the material is also work hardened, due to the
jamming of dislocations. As shown in Fig. 14.28, the original equiaxed
grain structure is distorted by cold working and an elongated grain
structure with a smaller grain size is produced [32,33]. These internal
changes are mainly responsible for increasing both hardness and
strength, as well as decreasing the ductility of steel subjected to cold
rolling. The increased-energy state of a cold-worked metal causes it to be
more chemically active and consequently less resistant to corrosion [34].
Page 348
Temper rolling is also used to improve the shape, profile, and surface
conditions of flat rolled products. The process features of temper rolling
depend on the product requirements as described in the following
sections.
Tin mill products – Temper rolling is used to develop the proper stiffness
or temper by cold working the steel in a controlled amount.
Page 349
The influence of temper reduction on yield strength and the drop in yield
strength from the as-annealed values for various columbium steels are
shown in Fig. 14.31. Most of the decrease in yield strength for these
steels occurs after less than 1 percent temper reduction [36]. Although
the initial yield strength is obviously lower at higher annealing
temperatures, the decrease in yield strength after tempering is not related
to the annealing temperature. However, with similar cementite
morphologies, the decrease appears to be larger for finer grain sizes.
According to Bon and Perdix [37], the hardness difference Δ(HV) can be
found from the following empirical equation:
where
h plate thickness, m
=
Ceq
=
carbon equivalent
b constant, 46.3.
=
Figure 14.32 shows several plots of Eq. (14-2) for various hardness
differences Δ(HV). This graph shows that lower cooling rates must be
used to reduce the hardness difference. The cooling rates must also be
reduced inverse proportionally to the square of the plate thickness to
reduce the hardness difference.
References
1. ASM Metals Reference Book, American Society for Metals, Metals
Park, Ohio, 1981, pp. 73-74.
13. Tanaka, T., “Controlled Rolling of Steel Plate and Strip,” International
Metals Reviews, No. 4, 1981, pp. 185-212.
14. Bairn, J.D. and Preston, R.R., “Processing and Properties of Low-
Carbon Steel,” Mechanical Working of Steel I, Metallurgical Society of
AIME, New York, 1973, pp. 1-46.
15. Lafrance, M., et al, Microalloying ‘75, Union Carbide Corp., New York,
1977, pp. 367-374.
23. Okita, T., et al, “Production and Quality of Hot Rolled Dual Phase
Steel,” Nippon Kokan Technical Report, Overseas No. 43, 1985, pp. 25-
32.
25. Harlet, P.H., et al, “New Soft Steel Grades Produced by Ferritic
Rolling at Cockerill Sambre,” International Symposium on Low-Carbon
Steels for 90’s, The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, 1993, pp. 389-
396.
26. Herman, J.C. and Leroy, V., “Ferritic Hot Rolling and the Potential for
Hot Rolled and Cold Rolled Products,” The Future of Flat Rolled Steel
Production, Vol. 2, AISE Specialty Conference, Chicago, Ill, June 11-14,
1995, pp. 1-10.
31. The Making, Shaping and Treating of Steel, 10th Edition, eds. W.T.
Lankford, Jr., et al, Association of Iron and Steel Engineers, Pittsburgh,
Pa., 1985, pp. 1103-1120.
35. Sauveur, A., The Metallography and Heat Treatment of Iron and
Steel, Fourth Edition, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York and
London, 1935.
Chapter 15
METALLURGICAL DEFECTS IN CAST SLABS AND HOT
ROLLED PRODUCTS
Internal defects
External cracks
Surface defects
Shape defects.
Entrapped scum - These are the patches on the ingot or slab surfaces.
They are formed by the products of deoxidation or refractory erosion that
are trapped at the meniscus.
Bruises - This is a mechanical injury to the ingot or slab skin such as dog
marks from crane or indentations caused by sharp objects.
d1
=
longer diagonal
d2 shorter diagonal.
=
Page 360
Wustite (FeO) is the innermost phase adjacent to metal (Fig. 15.1) with
the lowest oxygen content. Below 570°C (1058°F) wustite is not stable.
Its content in scale increases with increase in temperature and when the
steel temperature is above 700°C (1292°F), wustite occupies about 95%
of the scale layer. The wustite phase has a relatively low melting point,
1370 to 1425°C (2498 to 2597°F), compared with that of other phases of
scale and of the steel itself. Melting of the wustite layer (‘washing’)
accelerates the scaling rate and further increases grain boundary
penetration that produces inferior surface quality, increases fuel
consumption and reduces yield.
Fig. 15.1 – Sketch illustrating the structure of scale. From Hot Rolling of
Steel, by W.L. Roberts, 1983. Marcel Dekker, Inc. Copyright Marcel
Dekker, Inc. Reprinted with permission.) Magnetite (Fe3O4) is the
intermediate phase of scale. When the steel temperature is below 500°C
(932°F), the scale contains only magnetite (Fig. 15.2). As the
temperature increases to about 700°C (1292°F), formation of wustite
takes place at the expense of magnetite and, at elevated temperatures,
magnetite occupies only 4% of the scale layer. Magnetite is harder and
more abrasive than wustite.
where
t scaling time
=
slab temperature, °F
T=
For slabs made of carbon steel with 0.30% C, residing in the furnace with
100% combustion air, a = 31.7 and b = 22.8 (Fig. 15.3). Scaling model for
hot strip mill is described in [11].
1. Oxidizing gases: oxygen (O2), water vapor (H2O), and carbon dioxide
(CO2)
2. Reducing gases: carbon monoxide (CO) and hydrogen (H2).
The quantitative effect of the air-gas ratio on scaling rate is shown in Fig.
15.5 for carbon steel with 0.30% C after one hour of heating. At elevated
temperatures, the scale-free atmosphere requires the air-gas ratio to be
close to 50 percent. Figure 15.6 illustrates a firing strategy to reduce
furnace scale losses. According to this strategy, the air-gas ratio is
gradually reduced from 100 to 50% while the slab surface temperature
increases from 760 to 1038°C (1400 to 1900°F).
Gas velocity is another factor that affects the scaling rate. It was found [7]
that the oxidation rate increases progressively with gas flow rate until
critical flow rate was reached. The critical flow rate for both carbon
dioxide and air is equal to 1.5 m/min (5 ft/min). For steam it is as high as
7 m/min (23 ft/min).
Fig. 15.6 – Heating practice utilizing variable air-gas ratio control. (From
Cook and Rasmussen, AISE Year Book, 1970. Copyright AISE,
Pittsburgh, Pa. Reprinted with permission.)
Silicon - Silicon reacts with oxygen diffusing into the steel ahead of the
oxide-metal interface and precipitates as a silicon oxide SiO2 [14]. The
particles of SiO2 form a separate phase, fayalite Fe2SiO4, that retards
the scaling rate. This phase melts at 1171°C (2140°F). With the formation
of the molten phase the protective effect disappears and the scaling rate
increases sharply [15, 16]. Silicon-killed steels contain only about
0.25%Si. However, this is sufficient to form pools and extended silicate
stringers in the scale layer that increase the adhesion of the scale to steel
[7].
Nickel - Since the diffusion coefficient for nickel in iron is low, it is
concentrated in the thin layer around the alloy core. This layer lowers the
scaling rate. However, the resulting nickel-alloy lacework in the oxide
makes the scale adhere during rolling giving rise to excessive rolled-in
scale [7,17]. This problem becomes more severe with increase in nickel
content.
As the slab enters the second pass the scale becomes less plastic due to
lower temperature and breaks into smaller pieces. These pieces will be
more deeply embedded into the slab surface with greater gaps between
them. The slab surface along those gaps will be exposed to oxidation and
a secondary scale (oxide) will begin to form. By the time the slab enters
the third pass, the scale has lost its plasticity and compressibility due to
low temperature and further embeds into the steel.
During the fourth pass (Fig. 15.9), the scale is totally embedded in the
steel. Since the bite angle is reduced, the fracturing of the particles is
also reduced. The roll is now sliding across the
Page 367
scale particles resulting in so-called sandpapering the scale off the steel
surface.
Fig. 15.9 – Schematic presentation of the scale behavior during the fourth
roughing pass. (From David T. Blazevic-Hot Rolling Consultants, 1983.
Reprinted with permission.)
Figure 15.12 shows the scale pattern after the finishing mill produced by
the patch of scale 25 × 25 (1 × 1 in.) in size entering the roughing mill. So
the patch of scale is now a series of small jagged ‘teardrops’ spread in a
pattern about 25 mm (1 in.) wide and up to 2030 (80 in.) long.
of the coil cool off at the fastest rates and are usually covered with blue
oxide. This oxide is very dense and is the hardest to pickle. Following the
shoulder of the strip cross-sectional profile, there is a narrow band of
dark blue and/or gold color. Finally, the center of the strip is varying
shades of light grey.
Table 15.5 shows the appearances of various types of scale. The scale
can be identified by color as well as by shape and patterns. As shown in
Table 15.6 the color of the scale or its resulting defect on the strip
depends on where the scale is observed. The color varies from black to
yellow with many combinations in between. Table 15.7 identifies the
various types of scale by shape and patterns. The probability of
occurrence of each type of scale in relation to the location or pattern is
shown in Table 15.8. More detailed description of various types of scale
is given below according to Blazevic [20].
Cleaning off all loose scale prior charging the slab into the reheat
furnace
Maintaining oxidizing atmosphere
Firing the bottom zones at a lower temperature than the top zones
Setting the burners to produce long soft flames, rather than short
hot flames
Avoiding overheating the slab surface.
The color of the refractory scale on hot rolled surface depends on the
type of refractory used and can be red, reddish orange, purple, brown or
black (Fig. 15.5c). The measures for reducing the surface defects caused
by refractory scale usually involve tighter control on refractory used in the
furnace as well as cleaning of the slab surfaces after extensive repairs of
the furnace refractory.
smooth smeared area (d) as shown in Table 15.5d. Because of the small
grain size, the patterns of secondary scale are much more narrow than
those of primary scale. Reduction of surface defects relating to
secondary scale can be achieved by a proper design and operation of the
secondary descaling system.
Table 15.5 Appearances of various types of scale. Adapted from D.T. Blazevic,
Hot Rolling Consultants (1983).
Page 372
Table 15.5 (cont) Appearances of various types of scale. Adapted from D.T.
Blazevic, Hot Rolling Consultants (1983).
Teardrop red oxide scale - Appears on the finished hot rolled sheet as
shown in Table 15.5e. The teardrop shapes are very symmetrical, and
the edges of the surface defects are very smooth. The color is usually
rust red. The defect can be seen in different parts of the sheet surface
but occurs primarily on the top surface. The teardrop red oxide scale is
found to be originated by droplets of water splashing on the rolled sheet
surface between finishing mill stands, especially in the F1, F2 and F3 mill
areas. The surface defects due to the teardrop red oxide are eliminated
by drying up this mill areas. Also, the problem can be alleviated by
moving the secondary descaling box closer to F1 mill stand, thus
reducing the oxidation time prior to the finishing rolling.
Primary blotchy red oxide scale - Originates in the roughing mills and
appears as shown in Table 15.5f. The pattern often includes geometric
corners, jagged straight lines, indentations on the edges within the
general free-form or blotchy appearance of the top surface [17].
Line Type Red Oxide Scale - Usually appears on the finished hot rolled
sheet as very precise stream-line patterns [21] as shown in Table 15.5h.
It may look like scratches (a) which may be either very fine lines within 6
to 18 mm (0.25 to 0.75 in.) of the edge or much heavier lines extending in
further from the edges. The rust red color can be seen in the scratches.
The scratch pattern may also be located in the middle of the strip (b).
Another variation of the line type red oxide scale may look like the red
oxide painted along the edges (c). The scratch pattern in the middle of
the strip is mostly seen on the top surface while the other types can be
seen on both top and bottom surfaces.
Tail End Red Oxide Scale - Occurs on the tail end of the coil [21] and
appears as a band of red oxide 50 to 125 mm (2 to 5 in.) wide that
follows the contour of the tail end. This surface defect is not seen on coils
which have the fishtail end but it often occurs on the strip with the tail end
curved outwardly as illustrated in Table 15.5i.
Plugged nozzle scale - A more serious type of scale streak that is caused
by a plugged nozzle, or nozzle strainer (Table 15.5k). This also may be
caused by an oversized strainer or by operating without strainers.
Elevating the pass line at the F1 mill stand above the pass line at
the descaler, so the water will flow away from the mill.
Enclosing the descaling hood.
Protecting the entry of the mill from bouncing descaling water by
installing soft curtains, damming rolls, etc.
Salt and pepper - Salt and pepper owes its name to its appearance on
the finished hot rolled sheet (Table 15.5m). It is believed to come from
fracturing the finishing mill scale by worn-out work rolls of the F2 mill
stand [20]. The fractured particles are then carried by the rolls and
embedded back into the strip on the next revolution.
Heat pattern scale - Heat pattern scale (Table 15.5n) is caused by the
same phenomena as salt and pepper scale but usually occurs on heavier
thickness sheets. Since these sheets are rolled at higher rolling
temperatures and slower speeds, the rate of growth of the oxide prior to
the entry of the F2 mill increases.
Roll wear scale - Roll wear scale is related to peeling and banding of the
work rolls. Pealing is a result of the breakdown of the roll surface. The
broken rough surface of the roll tears the oxide layer off the strip surface
and the oxide layer bands around the roll and embeds back into the strip
surface on the next revolution [20,22]. The heaviest scale particles are
usually located near the periphery of the peeling area (Table 15.5o). Salt
and pepper scale can be seen inside the pattern boundary. When a roll is
completely peeled in a band (a) around its circumference, the surface
begins to polish itself, and the scale may disappear. The rolled-in scale
problem related to roll wear is minimized by:
comet tail and small black dots as shown in Table 15.5p. The comet tail
can be parallel or perpendicular to the rolling direction, or have a curved
shape. The color of the pits before pickling are usually gold (straw),
whereas the comets are dark grey. The small dots are thin layers of oxide
and are black. The defect usually occurs during coiling at high
temperature and high tension, causing oxide to weld together on the high
spots between the coil layers where the pressure is the greatest. The
comet effect is created by the spot of oxide pulling free and scraping the
surface of the opposite wrap. The problem is alleviated by lowering both
coiling temperature and coiling tension.
Checking the pass line on all mills to eliminate the potential spots
for scratching
Eliminating the metal stringers, or scablike pieces near the vertical
edges
Checking the speed matching of the table rolls with the mill
Water cooling of all aprons, spacers, plates, etc., to prevent
firecracking, and providing lubrication as the strip passes over.
Table 15.6 Scale color at point of observation. After D.T. Blazevic, Hot Rolling
Consultants [20].
Page 376
15.24 Slivers
Slivers and scabs are often confused with rolled-in scale. In case of
slivers, the confusion comes in two ways: (1) the black edges and
surface openings often look like scale, and (2) the slivers are not seen
prior to the hot rolling or pickling [20]. The slivers are mainly caused by
subsurface defects, or impurities in the steel. During rolling the impurities
will be elongated in the rolling direction. This gives them a long stringy
appearance. Since the impurities do not elongate the same amount as
steel, the surface area often breaks open.
Page 377
References
1. Definitions and Causes of Continuous Casting Defects, BISRA, ISI
Publication 106, The Iron and Steel Institute, London, 1967, pp. 1-39.
8. Roberts, W.L., Hot Rolling of Steel, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York,
1983, p. 644.
10. Browne, K.M., “Modeling Scaling and Descaling in Hot Strip Mills,”
1995 International Mechanical Engineering Conference and Exposition,
Nov. 12-17, 1995, San Francisco, Calif., pp. 1-12.
13. Lula, R.A., Stainless Steel, American Society for Metals, Metals Park,
Ohio, 1986, pp. 129-130.
14. Schurman, E., et al, “On the Scaling of Unalloyed Steel,” Archivfur
das Eisenhuttenwesen, Vol. 44 No. 12, Dec. 1973, pp. 927-934.
15. Haffe, K., Oxidation of Metals, Plenum Press, New York, 1965.
21. Blazevic, D.T., “Rolled in Scale: The Continual Problem, Part IV - Red
Oxide Scale,” Hot Rolling Consultants, Ltd., Olympia Fields, Ill., July
1985.
22. Betts, W.H., “Basic Concepts of Roll Surface Behavior in Stands F1,
F2, and F3,” AISE Yearbook, 1977, pp. 12-18.
Page 379
Part IV
ROLLING MILLS FOR FLAT PRODUCTS
Page 380
Chapter 16
TYPES OF ROLLING MILLS
Fig. 16.2 Schematic illustration of two horizontal mill stands (front view)
with: a) pinion stand drive and b) independent drive.
Work rolls are the work tools which directly contact the rolled
product.
Backup and intermediate rolls support the work rolls to reduce
their deflection under rolling load.
Mill housing is designed to contain the mill stand components and
to withstand the rolling load.
Main drive train provides rotation of the rolls with desired speed
and rolling torque.
Roll gap actuators provide the required gap between work rolls
Pass line adjustment mechanism provides adjustment of elevation
of the pass line.
Strip profile and flatness actuators provide the displacement
and/or deflection of the rolls to achieve the desired strip profile and
flatness.
Page 383
Fig. 16.3 Vertical mill stand (front view). Adapted from IHI Publication
8403-1000.
a) Horizontal mill stand. In the horizontal mill stand all rolls are parallel to
the mill floor (Figs. 16.1, 16.2)
b) Vertical mill stand, or edger. The roll axes of the vertical mill stands are
perpendicular to the mill floor (Fig. 16.3)
a) Two-high (2-hi) mill stand. This mill stand contains two work rolls.
b) Three-high (3-hi) mill stand. In three-high mill stands, the top and
bottom rolls revolve in the same direction and the middle roll in the
opposite direction. After completing the bottom pass (solid line), the
workpiece is lifted to provide the reversing top pass (dotted line).
c) Four-high (4-hi) mill stand. This is the most common roll arrangement
that includes two work rolls and two backup rolls.
d) Five-high (5-hi) mill stand. In the five-high mill stand arrangement, an
intermediate roll is added between one of the work rolls and a backup
roll.
e) Six-high (6-hi) mill stand. In addition to two work rolls and two backup
rolls, the six-high
Page 384
Direction of rolling - Three types of the mill stands are usually considered
with regard to rolling direction:
a) Direct drive. The direct drive train provides connection of the motor
with driven rolls without any change in angular speed.
b) Gear drive. In the gear drive, the angular speed of the motor is either
reduced or increased by installing a gear box in the drive train.
c) Pinion stand drive. The drive train with a pinion stand (Fig. 16.2a)
allows one to drive both top and bottom rolls from a single motor.
d) Independent drive. In the independent drive train (Fig. 16.2b), top and
bottom rolls are driven by independent motors.
A brief description of some of these mills will be given in the next chapter.
Rolled product - In relation to a type of rolled product, the rolling mills are
identified as:
Slabbing mills - The slabbing mills roll ingots into slabs which
usually vary in thickness from 150 to 300 mm (6 to 12 in.). The mill
stand may have a provision for a large opening of the roll
Page 386
high lift), so the width reduction can be made by rolling the slab on its
edge. Plate mills - The hot plate mills roll slabs into plates. The rolled
product can be either in a flat form or in a coil form with a consequent
uncoiling and cutting the product into the plates of desired lengths. The
most distinguished characteristic of both hot and cold plate mills is the
width of the rolled plates which for some mills may be as wide as 5334
mm (210 in.). Strip mills - Conventional hot strip mills reduce a slab to a
strip with thickness as thin as 1.2 mm (0.047 in.). Cold strip mill further
reduce the strip to a desired final gauge. The width of the steel coils are
usually between 600 and 2000 mm (23 and 79 in.).
Rolling from ingot - The ingots with initial thickness up to 900 mm (35.4
in.) are rolled in a slabbing mill where they are reduced to a thick slab
size of about 180 - 250 mm (7-10 in.) in thickness. The slabs are then
reduced in thickness in a roughing mill to obtain a transfer bar with
thickness that usually ranges from 19 to 45 mm (0.75-1.75 in.). The final
hot rolled coils are obtained after rolling in a finishing mill. The thickness
of the hot rolled coils is usually between 1.0 and 12.7 mm. If the coils are
intended for cold rolling they are further reduced in a cold mill to a
desired thickness.
Rolling from thick slab - This process eliminates rolling in a slabbing mill
but still requires the roughing and finishing hot rolling, and also a cold
rolling when cold reduction is needed.
Rolling from thin slab - The thickness of the thin slab varies from 10 to 80
mm (0.4 - 3.15 in.). The process may eliminate roughing rolling passes.
In some cases, however, at least one roughing pass may be found
beneficial to improve surface quality.
Rolling from cast strip - The cast strip thickness ranges from 1 to 10 mm
(0.040 - 0.4 in.). This allows to eliminate completely the hot rolling
process.
Reheat furnaces - In the reheat furnaces, cold or warm slabs are heated
to a desired temperature for rolling.
and tail ends of the transfer bar prior to their entry into the finishing mill.
Runout table - The runout table is located between the finishing mill and
coilers. A series of water cooling headers are installed above and under
runout table. The water coolant system is designed to reduce the strip or
plate temperature before the rolled material enters a coiler.
Coilers - The coilers are usually located at the end of the runout table. In
some cases, when cooling of the strip is not required, the coilers may be
installed right after the finishing mill.
Descaling system - Removing the scale from the surfaces of the rolled
piece is provided by using a series of high-pressure water spray headers
installed at different location of hot strip mills. In some hot strip mills,
vertical and horizontal mill stands, known as scale breakers, are added to
improve efficiency of descaling process.
Roll coolant system - In the mill stands, the rolls are cooled with the water
spray headers located in close vicinity with the rolls. The roll coolant
system is frequently supplemented with the roll lubrication system.
Hot strip mill with twin reversing roughing train - This mill contains two
universal roughing mill stands (Fig. 16.7b).
Three-quarter continuous hot strip mill - The roughing train of the three-
quarter continuous hot strip mill has one or more horizontal single-pass
stands after reversing roughing mill, in open or close-coupled
configuration (Fig. 16.7c).
Fully continuous hot strip mill - Fully continuous hot strip mill has four or
more horizontal roughing mill stands, the last two stands being either
open or close-coupled.
Twin reversing hot strip mill - In this arrangement [7], the distance
between reversing roughing and finishing mill stands is very short and the
coiling furnaces are located as shown in Fig. 16.8d. Roughing passes are
intended to be rolled without coiling. Since the mill stands are close-
coupled, the rolling passes can be made simultaneously on both stands.
Single-stand reversing hot strip mill - This mill is designed to roll both
roughing and finishing passes using the same mill stand (Fig. 16.8e).
This is the simplest hot strip mill arrangement which is used for rolling
both strip and plate in coil form [8].
Fig. 16.9 Nippon Kokan Hot Direct charging Rolling (HDR) combined
with continuous casting (From Emoto, et al, Proceedings of London
Conference on Restructuring Steel Plants for the Nineties, May 1986.
Copyright Institute of Metals. Reprinted with permission.)
Page 391
16.9 Hot Strip Mill Integrated with Intermediate and Thin Slab
Casters
The hot strip mills integrated with thin and intermediate slab casters can
be divided into the following four groups: Group A - Hot strip mills that
include only tandem finishing mills (Tables 16.1 and 16.2) Group B - Hot
strip mills that include at least one roughing mill stand followed by a
tandem finishing mill (Tables 16.3 - 16.8) Group C - Hot strip mills that
include coilbox as a heat retention device followed by a tandem finishing
mill (Tables 16.9 - 16.14) Group D - Hot strip mills that incorporate
Steckel mill (Tables 16.15 - 16.22).
Table 16.1 Hot strip mills integrated with thin slab caster - Group A1 [10-12].
Slab thickness range, mm Number of roughing stands 0
40 - 60
Table 16.2 Hot strip mills integrated with thin slab caster - Group A2 [10].
Table 16.3 Hot strip mills integrated with thin slab caster - Group B1 [13].
Table 16.4 Hot strip mills integrated with intermediate slab caster - Group B2
[14].
Table 16.5 Hot strip mills integrated with thin slab caster - Group B3 [15-17].
Slab thickness range, mm Number of roughing stands 1
60 - 70
Table 16.6 Hot strip mills integrated with intermediate slab caster - Group B4
[18].
Table 16.7 Hot strip mills integrated with intermediate slab caster - Group B5
[19].
Slab thickness range, mm Number of roughing stands 1
100 - 150
Table 16.8 Hot strip mills integrated with thin slab caster - Group B6.
Table 16.9 Hot strip mills integrated with thin slab caster - Group C1 [20].
Slab thickness range, Number of roughing 2
mm 50 - 60 stands
Table 16.10 Hot strip mills integrated with thin slab caster - Group C2 [21].
Table 16.11 Hot strip mills integrated with thin slab caster - Group C3 [22, 23].
Slab thickness Number of roughing 3
range, mm 50 - 60 stands
Table 16.12 Hot strip mills integrated with thin slab caster - Group C4 [24].
Table 16.13 Hot strip mills integrated with intermediate slab caster - Group C5
[24-26]
Slab thickness Number of roughing 2
range, mm 80 - 100 stands
Table 16.14 Hot strip mills integrated with thin slab caster - Group C6 [24, 27].
Type of reheat furnace tunnel, rotary hearth Location of rouging mill n/a
Table 16.15 Hot strip mills integrated with thin slab caster - Group D1.
Slab thickness range, 60 - 80 Number of roughing 0
mm stands
Table 16.16 Hot strip mills integrated with intermediate slab caster - Group D2
[28-30].
Table 16.17 Hot strip mills integrated with thin slab caster - Group D3 [31].
Table 16.18 Hot strip mills integrated with thin slab caster - Group D4 [32].
Table 16.19 Hot strip mills integrated with thin slab caster - Group D5 [33].
Slab thickness range, Number of roughing 0
mm 40 - 60 stands
Table 16.20 Hot strip mills integrated with thin slab caster - Group D6.
Table 16.21 Hot strip mills integrated with thin slab caster - Group D7 [34].
Slab thickness range, Number of roughing 2
mm 40 - stands
60
Table 16.22 Hot strip mills integrated with thin slab caster - Group D8 [20].
16.10 Hot Strip Mill Integrated with Thick and Thin Slab Casters
Hot strip mill can simultaneously be integrated with both thin and thick
slab casters as proposed by Danieli United and International Rolling Mill
Consultants [35]. As shown in Table 16.23, both thick slab caster and thin
slab caster feed a combination roughing and finishing hot strip mill. After
reheating in the reheat tunnel furnace, thin slabs are rolled straight
through the mill. Thick slabs are reheated in the walking beam furnace
and then rolled in three reversing passes. The first two reversing passes
are the roughing passes. They can be performed by using from two to all
four mill stands. After the second pass, the bar is coiled in the coiling
furnace before initiation of the last reversing pass that is the finishing
pass.
Page 403
Table 16.23 Hot strip mills integrated with thin and thick slab caster [35].
Endless rolling can be applied to the hot strip mills utilizing thick,
intermediate and thin slabs.
Page 404
Endless rolling with thick slabs - An example of the hot strip mill utilizing
thick slabs is shown in Figure 16.10. In this mill, developed Kawasaki
Steel, the transfer bar with thickness from 20 to 40 mm (0.79 to 1.58 in.)
is first coiled in the Coilbox. The crop shear is installed downstream the
Coilbox and is used to crop end of the preceding bar and head end of the
following bar. The next in line is the bar joining machine that is self-driven
and is equipped with induction heaters. The joining machine travels with
the transfer bars. Inside the joining machine, the tail end of a preceding
bar and a head end of succeeding bar are clamped with a slight gap, the
joint is heated and then upset to complete the joining operation. The
joining the bars is completed within a 20-meter (65.6 ft) traveling stroke.
Then the clamps open and the joining machine returns to the initial
position. Following the joining machine is the deburring unit that cuts the
raised area at the joint. At the entry of two downcoilers, there is a high-
speed shear to cut the strip and to deflect the head end of the new coil
toward the appropriate downcoiler.
Fig. 16.10 Endless hot rolling process with thick slabs. From Takano, et
al [36]. Reproduced through the courtesy of Iron and Steel Engineer.
A similar endless hot rolling process for thick slabs was developed by
Nippon Steel [37] in which the induction type welder was replaced with
the hot-laser flying welder.
Endless rolling with intermediate and thin slabs - When intermediate and
thin slab caster are arranged in line with the hot strip mill, it is possible to
introduce endless rolling without welding the bars [38]. In that case,
multiple slab lengths are cast in one piece without having to be divided.
The long slab is then rolled in the finishing mill as one piece. After rolling
and cooling the strip is divided by a flying shear before coiling. Mill
configurations can vary depending on the type of product to be produced
as shown in Fig. 16.11.
Fig. 16.11 CSP endless hot rolling process with thin slabs. From Kneppe
and Rosenstahl [38]. Reproduced through the courtesy of MPT
International.
Combination
reversing
cold/temper
mill
Page 407
Reversing cold
mill
Temper mill or
Double cold
reduction (DCR)
mill
Combination
reversing
cold/temper/DCR
mill
Page 408
Reversing cold
mill
Temper mill or
Double cold
reduction (DCR)
mill
Combination
reversing
cold/temper/DCR
mill
Page 409
Three-stand
Four-stand
Five-stand
Page 410
5. Endless Rolling Tandem Cold Mill (Table 16.28 and Fig. 16.13),
including: a) Continuous tandem cold mill
b) Fully continuous tandem cold mill [39]
c) Fully integrated process line [40].
Although the high reduction rolling mills also utilize small work roll
diameters, they have, in addition to that, a number of other features
added to their design to avoid the drawbacks typical for conventional
rolling mills using small work roll diameters.
Offsetting the work rolls in relation to the backup roll center line
and incorporating the support rolls for lateral restraining of the
work rolls [41-43].
Supporting the work rolls by utilizing the cluster roll arrangements
[44-46].
Combining the rolling deformation process with drawing and
bending [47-49].
Extending the length of the deformation zone by either
reciprocating movement of the work rolls in relation to the
workpiece [50-53] or by introducing the planetary arrangement of
the rolls [53-56].
The rolling mills utilizing these design features are briefly described
below.
The 4-high mill configuration with offset rolls is known as MKW mill [41,
42] shown in Fig. 16.15. In MKW mill, the work rolls of substantially
smaller diameters are displaced to one side from the vertical center-line
of the backup rolls and are laterally restrained by intermediate rolls and a
Page 412
support system. Torque is transmitted through the backup rolls and the
work rolls are driven by frictional forces transmitted from the backup rolls.
This design allows one to substantially reduce the work roll diameter that
can be as much as six times smaller than the backup roll diameter.
Fig. 16.15 Distribution of forces in MKW cold mill. (from Hilbert, et al,
AISE Book, 1976, Copyright AISE, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Reprinted
with permission.)
Table 16.29 presents main data for MKW cold mills designed for
production of both nonoriented and oriented silicon steel strip. 6-high mill
configuration with offset rolls is known as UC mill; it will be described
later.
nonorientedoriented
Further improvement in strip profile and shape control are achieved with
introduction of Flexible
Page 413
Flatness Control (FFC) mill that utilizes the following concepts [43]:
Figure 16.16 shows the predominant layout of the Sendzimir mill [44, 45]
that is known as the 1-2-3-4 arrangement. In this mill, there are eight
backing shafts A through H. Shafts B and C have roller bearings. Vertical
position of these shafts is controlled by hydraulic cylinders installed on
the top of the mill. This control allows one to adjust the roll gap. Vertical
position of shafts F and G is controlled by hydraulic cylinder installed in
front of the mill. This control serves two purposes: first, it adjusts the
passline in the mill and second, it allows one to take out all the slack
between the rolls.
Fig. 16.16 Roll arrangement in type 1-2-3-4 Sedzimir cold mill. (From T.
Sendzimir, Inc. Publication 3/80/5M 1980. Copyright T. Sendzimir, Inc.
Reprinted with permission.)
Page 414
Fig. 16.17 Z-high cold reduction mill. (from T. Sendzimir, Inc. Publication
3/80/5M 1980. Copyright T. Sendzimir, Inc. Reprinted with permission.)
Fig. 16.18 Typical Sendzimir Z-high insert. Adapted from 33 Metal
Producing Publication (1981).
Page 415
Work roll:
Backing roll:
References
1. Kawamani, T., et al, ‘‘Characteristics of Shape Control in Cluster Type
Rolling Mill (CR),” Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Review, June
1985, pp. 171-177.
2. Hilbert, H.G., et al, “MKW Cold Mill-Rolling Silicon Steel Strip,” AISE
Year Book, 1976, pp. 364-370.
4. Keefe, J.M., et al, “Review of Hot Strip Mill Developments,” Iron and
Steelmaking, No. 4, 1979, pp. 156-172.
5. Mitsubishi Hot Strip Mill Brochure HD 20-04662, (1.0), 85-9,B, pp. 1-2.
6. Husken, H.G. and Herwig, K., “Use of the Coilbox in the Wide Hot Strip
Mill of Krupp Stahl AG,” Metallurgical Plant and Technology, No. 4, 1983,
pp. 53-59.
7. Wiesinger, H., et al, “Hot Strip Rolling for Compact Mills: The HSRC
Mill,” Iron and Steel Engineer, August 1987, pp. 50-55.
8. “Southern Cross Builds Stainless Steel Mill for Half the Cost,” Iron and
Steel Engineer, Jan. 1984, p. 73.
9. Wakatsuki, H., et al, “The Facilities and Operation of the HDR Process
at the No. 2 Hot Strip Mill of Fukuyama Works,” Proceedings of the 4th
International Steel Rolling Conference, Deauville, France, June 1987, pp.
A.3.1-A.3.9.
10. Mott, R. and Chase, D., “The Outstanding Performance of the Nucor
CSP plant at Hickman and its Expansion by an Additional Casting
Strand,” METEC Congress 94 Proceedings, Vol. 1, 2nd European
Continuous Casting Conference, VDEh, Dusseldorf, Germany, June 20-
22, 1994.
11. LeDuc-Lezama, L. A., et al., “Hot Rolling of Thin Gauge Strip Steel at
Hylsa,” Iron and Steel Engineer, April, 1997.
13. Flick, A., et al., “The Conroll Process for Flexible and Quality-
Oriented Hot Strip Production,” Metallurgical Plant and Technology
International, May 1993.
16. Flemming, G., et al., “CSP - The Advanced Technology for Mini-Mills
Leading into the next Century,” Metallurgical Plant and Technology
International, March. 1997.
17. Borsi, R. and Rotti, M., “Algoma Direct Production Plant for Quality
Steel,’’ Metallurgical Plant and Technology International, Jan. 1998.
18. Dunholter, D. A., “Design and Start-up of the North Star BHP Steel
Mini Mill,” Iron and Steel Engineer, Dec., 1997.
19. “The Conroll Turnkey Thin Slab Caster at ARMCO Mansfield Steel
Operation,” VAI Brochure.
20. Meyer, P., et al, “Rolling Mill Configuration Based on Thin Slab,” 1994
AISE Spring Convention, Memphis, Tennessee., April 25-27, 1994.
21. Plschiutschnigg, F. P., et al., “The I.S.P. Progress, Its Potentials and
First Operating Results,” Metallurgical Plant and Technology
International, March 1993.
22. Uetz, G. K., “Automation System and Automation Functions for the
First ISP-Plant for Hot Strip Production at Arvedi in Cremona, Italy,” 1994
AISE Spring Convention, Memphid, Tennessee, April 25-27, 1994.
23. Kothe, D., et al., “ISP - Thin Slab Casting and Rolling Concept for
Economical Processing of Quality Products,” Iron and Steel Engineer,
June, 1997.
24. Hofinann, F., et al., “State of the Art in CSP Technology,” Unarc
Family Meeting, Memphis, Tennessee, 7-9 Sept., 1993.
25. Huskonen, W. D., “Trico Takes Off,” 33 Metalproducing, July, 1997.
26. Samways, N. “Trico Steel-A 2.2 Million ton/Year Joint Venture Flat
Rolled Mini Mill,” Iron and Steel Engineer, March, 1998.
27. Flemming, G., et al., “The CSP Plant Technology and Its Adaptation
to an Expanded Production Programme,” Metallurgical Plant and
Technology International, Feb. 1993.
28. Wilson, A. and Pietryka, J., ” TSP, a New Method of Thin Slab
Casting and Rolling,” Metallurgical Plant and Technology International,
March 1994.
31. Meyer, P., “Thin Slab Caster Combined with a Steckel Mill,” 6th
I.A.S.M.O Annual Meeting, Outokumpu Oy Polarit, Tornio, Finland, 10-14
Sept., 1990.
32. Ginzburg, V.B. and Tippins, G.W., “Continuous Rolling Method and
Apparatus,” US Patent No. 4,630,352, Dec. 23, 1986.
33. Tippins, G. W., “Hot Rolling Strip,” US Patent No. 4,348,882, Sept.,
1982.
34. Frommann, K., et al., “Making Hot Roller Steel Strip From
Continuously Cast Ingots,” U.S. patent Nò. 4,698,897, Oct. 13, 1987.
35. Di Giusti, B., and Ginzburg, V. B., “Apparatus and Method for the
Manufacture of Hot Rolled Strip,” US Patent 5,435,164 Jul. 25, 1995.
36. Takano, T., “Endless Hot Strip Rolling at Kawasaki Steel Chiba
Works,” Iron and Steel Engineer, Feb, 1997.
Page 417
38. Kneppe, G. and Rosenthal, D., “Hot Strip Rolling Technology: Tasks
for the New Century,” Metallurgical Plant and Technology International,
March 1998.
39. Matsuzuka, K., et al., “High Performance Cold Strip Mill with
Integrated Control and Rolling Technology: New Cold Strip Mill ofNSC’s
Yawata Works,” Presented at 1991 AISE Annual Convention in
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Sept. 25, 1991.
41. Hilbert, H.G., et al. ‘‘MKW Cold Mill - Rolling Silicon Steel Strip,” AISE
Year Book, 1976, pp. 364-370.
42. Giermann and, G., and Kennepol, K.A., “MKW Mills for Rolling Silicon
Strip and Non-Ferrous Metals,” Flat Rolling: A Comparison of Rolling Mill
Types, Metals Society Conference Proceedings, Cardiff, Wales,
September 1978, pp. 142-146.
43. Fujita, F., et al, “Development of a New Type of Cold Rolling Mill for
Sheet Products,” Iron and Steel Engineer, June 1985, pp. 41-48.
44. Ohama, T., et al, “World’s First Sendzimir Tandem Mill,” AISE Yearly
Proceedings, 1973, pp. 173-179.
46. “Universal-Cyclops Gives Z-Hi Retrofit Scheme its First Break in the
US,” 33 Metal Producing, October 1981.
47. “What are PV and IPV Mill?” IHI heavy Industries Co. Publication,
Tokyo, Japan, January 1978.
51. Krausse, F.R., “A New Metal Rolling Process - Its Theory and
Operation”, AISE Yearly Proceedings, 1938, pp. 414-427.
52. Buch, E., and Fink, P., “Platzer Reciprocating Mill for Cold High
Reduction of Metal Strip”, Flat Rolling: A Comparison of Rolling Mill
Types, Metal Society Conference Proceedings, Cardiff, Wales,
September 1978, pp. 136-141.
53. Fink, P., and Jungmann, H.D., “Economic Application of the Krupp-
Platzer Planetary Mill for the Production of Hot Rolled Strip”, AISE Yearly
Proceedings, 1971, pp. 81-90.
54. Sendzimir, T., “The Planetary Mill and Its Uses”, AISE Yearly
Proceedings, 1958, pp. 49-55.
56. Fink, P. and Buch, E. “Platzer Planetary Mill for Hot High Reduction of
Metal Strip”, Metals Society Conference Proceedings, Cardiff, Wales,
September 1978, pp. 73-81.
Chapter 17
OPTIMIZATION AND MODERNIZATION OF HOT STRIP
MILLS
The temperature rundown in hot strip mill is shown in general form in Fig.
17.1. The main parameters of the temperature rundown include [1]:
ΔTF absolute value of temperature differential between transfer bar head and
=tail ends at
Page 419
finishing
train entry
H1, H2 total specific power for rolling slab to coil for cases 1 and 2, hp-hr/ton
=
ts scaling time, hr
=
hi
=
exit thickness for each pass
Page 422
where
where
Thus, the temperature loss rate due to radiation αr can be reduced by the
following methods:
Conserving and adding heat - Typical systems for conserving and adding
heat in hot strip mills are:
Page 424
Coilbox
Intermediate Steckel mill
Intermediate reheat facilities
Thermal covers.
Rolling parameters of a continuous hot strip mill have been calculated for
the following conditions: slab thickness, 10.0 in.; slab width, 50.0 in.; slab
weight, 1000 PIW; slab material, low-carbon steel; and strip thickness,
0.080 in.
The simulated temperature rundown for both head and tail ends of the
product rolled in a continuous hot strip mill prior to the optimization of
operating parameters is shown in Fig. 17.2. In this simulation, the slab
was assumed to be evenly heated. It was rolled in roughing train to a
transfer bar thickness of 25.4 mm (1.0 in.) and then rolled in finishing mill
at constant speed (no zoom).
The high-speed entry rolling method involves threading the strip through
the finishing mill at higher speed until its head end reaches the last mill
stand as shown schematically in Fig. 17.5.
Under the zigzag method, the strip exits finishing mill at the speed higher
than that in conventional rolling. The strip loop caused by high traveling
speed is eliminated by short-time deceleration. The strip is repeatedly
accelerated and decelerated in a zigzag manner to increase the average
threading speed as illustrated in Fig. 17.6.
This method of heat conservation has also been utilized in the concept of
a continuous tandem hot strip mill [6, 7]. An example is shown in Fig.
17.7 which illustrates steps by which a typical continuous hot strip mill
with five roughing mill stands is gradually converted to a continuous
tandem hot strip mill by relocating the roughing mill stands closer to the
finishing train. As a result, the transfer bar thickness increases each time
another roughing mill stand is relocated. After relocating the last mill
stand, the transfer bar thickness will be equal to the slab thickness. The
computer study shows [1] that the final mill configuration will reduce the
mean temperature differential to 14°C (26°F).
Fig. 17.8 Close coupling of Reversing roughing mill with finishing mill.
(From Ginzburg and Schmiedberg, Iron and Steel Engineer, 1986.
Copyright AISE, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Reprinted with permission.)
Fig. 17.9 Combining Reversing roughing mill with finishing mill. (From
Ginzburg and Schmiedberg, Iron and Steel Engineer, 1986. Copyright
AISE, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Reprinted with permission.)
17.12 Coilbox
The Stelco Coilbox [10] is usually installed at the entry side of the
finishing train. Upon leaving the mill after the last roughing pass, the
transfer bar is directed into the Coilbox entry chute and through the
bending rolls to form the coil (Fig. 17.10a). This coil is then transferred to
the uncoiling position for threading through the finishing train while the
next transfer bar is being coiled.
This problem has been solved in the inverse design of the Coilbox (Fig.
17.10b), which provides coiling of the transfer bar beginning from its tail
end rather than head end [11]. In the inverse arrangement, the coiling
process begins after the transfer bar head end enters the finishing train
and the tail end leaves the roughing train. This method of control allows
the required temperature rundown to be maintained by adjusting the
coiling rate. It can also be applied when mill acceleration is desirable.
Fig. 17.11 Steckel mill as an intermediate stand between roughing and
finishing mills. (From Ginzburg and Schmiedberg, Iron and Steel
Engineer, 1986. Copyright AISE, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Reprinted
with permission.)
thicker transfer bar can enter the Steckel mill (a feature similar to that
with the M stand arrangement), and then after passing through the mill
stand, the material is coiled (a feature similar to that with the Coilbox).
As an example, the case when three reversing passes are being made at
the Steckel mill before material enters the finishing train is illustrated in
Fig. 17.11a. A major drawback of this arrangement is that it does not
allow use of the Steckel mill to roll the next bar during the final finishing
pass of the previous bar; consequently, it results in a lower production
rate. This problem is eliminated by introduction of a third coiling furnace
[13] (Fig. 17.11b).
For example, during transfer of the head end of the bar from the roughing
train to the shear, the thermal covers can be kept in threading position,
which would protect them from possible damage due to abnormal rolling
conditions such as bar turn-up, cobble, etc. Then, as soon as the head
end of the bar reaches the shear, the covers can be lowered to rolling
position. The required temperature rundown can be achieved by
regulating the elevation of the thermal covers during threading as
suggested by Gray [14].
The heat conservation effect of thermal cover system with the reradiating
insulating blocks installed above and underneath the pass line of the
transfer table is illustrated in Fig. 17.13. With a use of these system, the
mean temperature differential can be reduced to as low as 9.5°C (17°F).
Page 432
Fig. 17.13 Simulated temperature rundown in hot strip mill with the
reradiating thermal cover system installed between roughing and
finishing mills. (From Ginzburg and Schmiedberg, Iron and Steel
Engineer, 1986. Copyright AISE, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Reprinted
with permission.)
Year
Mill parameters
1927 1947 1954
The main objectives for modernization of the existing hot strip mills may
vary from one mill to another. At Weirton Steel those objectives in the
recent modernization program have included:
Production
rate:
temperature
differential: deg.F 65 47 44 37
• mean deg.F 55 0 0 0
• exit
• electric
power
Figure 17.14 presents schematically the hot strip mill arrangements used
in sensitivity analysis at Weirton Steel [15]. The following criteria have
been used in this analysis:
In addition to the above criteria, the following factors have been taken
into account:
Adverse effect of temperature differential between head and tail
ends of the strip on its shape
Scale losses in reheat furnace
Conservation of energy.
Page 435
References
1. Ginzburg, V.B. and Schmiedberg, W.F., “Heat Conservation Between
Roughing and Finishing Trains of Hot Strip Mills,” Iron and Steel
Engineer, April 1986, pp. 29-39.
2. The Making, Shaping and Treating of Steel, 10th Edition, eds. W.T.
Lankford, Jr., et al, Association of Iron and Steel Engineers, Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania, p. 851 (1985).
8. Tippins, G.W. and Ginzburg, V.B., U.S. Patent No. 4,433,566, Feb. 28,
1984.
9. Tippins, G.W. and Ginzburg, V.B., U.S. Patent No. 4,503,697, March
12, 1985.
11. Ginzburg, V.B. and Thomas, J.E., US Patent No. 4,491,006, Jan 1,
1985.
13. Tippins, G.W., Ginzburg V.B., and Pottmeyer W.G., U.S. Patent No.
4,430,874, Feb. 14, 1984.
Chapter 18
DEFINITION OF GEOMETRICAL PARAMETERS OF
ROLLED PRODUCTS
Center zone
Edge drop zone
Feather zone.
With this division into three zones, the strip profile can be described in
more precise terms. It is also more convenient to analyze the effects of
various factors on the shape of these zones.
Page 440
Since the strip profile is not exactly symmetrical, the key strip profile
thicknesses are measured from both operator and drive sides of the strip.
The arithmetic average of these measurements is also commonly used
as defined and illustrated in Table 18.1.
Feather
thickness: hI′ Workpiece thickness I′ = 9.5
• drive measured at distance I′ from to 25
side drive side edge mm
Edge
thickness: he′ Workpiece thickness e′ = 2 to
• drive measured at distance e′ from 3 mm
side drive side edge
Center crown
Side crown.
where
hc center gauge
=
where
Center
crown: chl Difference between the center gauge chI = hc
• overall and arithmetic average feather - hI
thickness
Side
crown: chI′ Difference between the center gauge chI′ =
• drive and drive side feather thickness hc - hI′
side
Fig. 18.2a and 18.2b. In the first case, both overall and partial center
crowns chI and chJ are greater than zero. Therefore, when the overall
center crown chI is decreased by an actuator, it would also result in the
reduction of the partial center crown chJ as well. However, in the second
case, the overall center crown chI and the partial center chJ have
opposite signs and attempts to reduce the overall crown chI may lead to
an increased convexity of the partial center crown chJ.
Side crown - Side crown is defined as the difference between the center
gauge and the feather thickness of either the drive or operator sides.
Therefore, the drive side crown is equal to:
hI′
=
drive side feather thickness
chI
=
overall center crown
hc center gauge.
=
Profile wedge - The term profile wedge describes the workpiece profile
asymmetry in qualitative terms. The drive side profile wedge is identified
as the strip profile with the center gauge hc being less than the drive side
feather thickness hI′ and greater than the operator side feather thickness
hI″
The operator side profile wedge is identified as the strip profile with the
center gauge hc being less than the operator side feather thickness hI″
and greater than the drive side feather thickness hI’ as shown in Table
18.3.
Parameter
Symbol
Definition
Formula
Strip profile with center gauge being less than drive side feather
thickness and greater than operator side feather thickness
• operator side
Strip profile with center gauge being less than operator side feather
thickness and greater than drive side feather thickness
δhI
Parameter
Symbol
Definition
Formula
eh′
Difference between drive side edge drop thickness and drive side feather
thickness.
• operator side
eh″
Difference between operator side edge drop thickness and operator side
feather thickness.
• average
eh
fh′
Difference between drive side feather thickness and drive side edge
thickness.
• operator side
fh″
• average
fh
fh′=(fh′+fh″)/2
Ridge/Valley
hs
b = 10 mmh = 10μm
zones are predefined (see Table 18.1), the rates of change in the strip
profile thickness can be readily obtained from the measured values of the
edge drop and feather.
Edge drop - Three kinds of edge drop [3] can be identified: drive side
edge drop, operator side edge drop, and average edge drop as shown in
Table 18.4.
Feather - Similar to edge drop, there are three kinds of feather that are
usually identified: drive side feather, operator side feather, and average
feather as shown in Table 18.4.
Ridge and valley - The ridge and valley are the parameters that describes
respectively the local thickening and thinning in the workpiece profile as
shown in Fig. 18.3. Quantitatively, the ridge and valley are proposed to
be measured as the deviation in thickness either above or below the
nominal thickness in the local workpiece profile that projects beyond the
rectangular window of the predefined width b and height h with the
dimensions given in Table 18.4. The nominal thickness can be
determined by a nonlinear curve-fitting method utilizing regression
analysis [3].
Fig. 18.3 Definition of ridge and valley. Adapted from Ginzburg [1].
Each of these profiles can be further classified into the following three
groups:
Symmetrical
Asymmetrical
Irregular.
or valleys and are known as irregular flat, irregular convex, and irregular
concave.
hb
=
workpiece thickness at peak bulging
Drawn in or overlap
Square
Bulged.
Fig. 18.6 Edge cross-sectional shape. Adapted from Pawelski and Piber
[7].
The drawn in and bulged edges appear in a slab as a result of the
nonuniform lateral spreading that occurs in the slab during flat horizontal
passes. Pawelski and Piber [7] have determined the conditions of
occurrence of various edge shapes after a slab, with an initial square
cross section, was rolled in a horizontal mill. The drawn in or overlap
edge appears when the ratio of the roll contact length to the initial slab
thickness is less than 0.68. When this ratio is greater than 0.68, the edge
becomes bulged. Thus, by selecting an appropriate draft, a square edge
shape can be
Page 448
Fig. 18.9 End shapes of rolled stock. Adapted from Pawelski and Piber
[7].
Pawelski and Piber [7] have established that the tongue shape appears
when the ratio of the width draft to the thickness draft is approximately
less than 0.55. When this ratio is greater than 0.55, the end shape will
resemble a fish tail.
The fish tail is usually accompanied with either widening (Fig. 18.10a) or
narrowing (Fig. 18.10b) of the workpiece ends. The end portions of the
workpiece with the width deviations exceeding the acceptable tolerances
are usually cut. The length of the workpiece being cut is known as the
crop length.
Fig. 18.10 Two types of fish tail: a) widening and b) narrowing.
Ideal shape
Latent shape
Page 450
Manifest shape
Dual shape
Shape affected by tension.
Ideal shape - Ideal shape is a flat shape which is a result of the equality
of the internal stresses acting across the strip width. The ideal shape
remains flat after the external stresses are removed as well as after the
strip has been slit.
Latent shape - Latent shape corresponds to the case when the internal
stresses are not uniform across the strip width but the strip internal latent
forces are sufficiently strong to resist deterioration of the shape. The
latent shape remains flat after the external forces are removed. Slitting of
the strip, however, releases the latent forces which causes irregularities
in shape.
Manifest shape - Manifest shape relates to the case when the internal
stresses across the strip width are not uniform and, at the same time, the
internal latent forces are not strong enough to
Page 451
Dual shape - Dual shape occurs when various portions of the strip have
different forms of strip shape. For example, when one portion of the strip
has latent shape, the other portion of the strip has manifest shape.
Coilset or curl
Crossbow or guttering
Upbow
Twist.
Upbow - Upbow occurs when all four corners of the sheet curve in the
same direction. Types of upbow include:
Twist - Twist occurs when two diagonally opposed corners curve up and
two curve down. Types of twist include:
Page 452
Long center - Long center is also known as full center, long middle,
center wave, and loose center. It is produced by a gradual decrease of
the strip elongation across the entire width of the strip from its center
toward both edges.
Long edges - Long edges are also known as edge waves. This shape is
produced by a gradual increase of the strip elongation across the entire
width of the strip from its center toward both
Page 453
Edge buckles - Edge buckles are also known as pie crust edges and are
produced by local increases in the strip elongation along the strip edges.
Center buckles - Center buckles are also known as center ridges and
wavy lines in the center. This shape is a result of local increases in the
strip elongation along its center line.
Side buckles - Side buckles are also known as side ridges and wavy lines
along the strip. This shape is produced by local increases in the strip
elongation along the lines located very close to the strip edges.
The up and down flutter corresponds to the case when the deviations
from a perfect flat plane of all points of the strip across its width are
identical as shown in Fig. 18.14a. The swing flutter (Fig. 18.14b) relates
to the case when there is no height variation in the center of the strip, but
only at the edges. These height oscillations at the edges of the strip have
opposite phases.
Fig. 18.14 Strip running flutter: a) up and down motion and b) swing
motion. Adapted from Matsui, et al [14].
Fig. 18.15 Flatness defects due to the thermal gradients.
The appearance of the strip having these flatness defects across its width
is similar to either long edges or edge buckles. The through the thickness
on body flatness defect appears as a bow along the strip body whereas
the through the thickness on head and tail end flatness defect appears as
local tapered bows at the strip ends. The along the length flatness defect
can be seen in relatively short thin plates.
The values of Δεe and Δεq shown in Fig. 18.18 are determined by the
equations:
where
Δεe
=
edge wave differential elongation
Δεq
=
quarter buckle differential elongation
εe′
=
drive side edge wave elongation
εe″
=
operator side edge wave elongation
εq′
=
drive side quarter buckle elongation
εq″
=
operator side quarter buckle elongation
where
wavelength.
L =
where
wave height.
H =
For the sinusoidal wave k = π/2, we are able to obtain from Eqs. (18-9)
Per cent (%) elongation (e) for a sinusoidal wave is equal to:
Page 459
Per cent (%) flatness (f) for a sinusoidal wave is expressed as follows:
References
1. Ginzburg, V.B, Steel-Rolling Technology: Theory and Practice, Marcel
Dekker, New York, 1989.
2. Ginzburg, V.B., ‘‘Strip Profile Control with Flexible Edge Backup Rolls,”
AISE Year Book, 1987, pp. 277-288.
3. AISE Hot Strip Mill Profile and Flatness Study, Phase I, Association of
Iron and Steel Engineers, Pittsburgh, Pa., 1986, pp. 20-22.
12. Wistreich, J.G, “Control of Strip Shape During Cold Rolling,” Journal
of the Iron and Steel Institute, Dec. 1968, pp. 1203-1206.
13. Luling, L. and Hollmann, F.W., “Thermal Flatness Control During Cold
Rolling,” Proceedings of the 4th International Steel Rolling Conference:
The Science and Technology of Flat Rolling, Vol. 2, Deauville, France,
June 1987, pp. E.16.1-E.16.5.
14. Matsui, K. et al, “Shape Meter for Hot Strip Mill,” Sumitomo Search,
No. 38, May 1989, pp. 105-114.
Page 460
16. Fujita, F. et al, “Development of a New Type of Cold Rolling Mill for
Sheet Products,” AISE Year Book, 1985, pp. 264-271.
Page 461
Chapter 19
STANDARD DIMENSIONAL TOLERANCES OF ROLLED
PRODUCTS
During the last decade, tremendous efforts have been made by all parties
to improve the quality of products that are produced by their own
facilities. There are, however, two questions which one may ask. The first
question is if the burden of improving quality has been fairly distributed
between all parties so that the overall economy is maximized. If the
answer is no, then who is going to make this fair distribution of
responsibilities for improvement of quality. Obviously, in the long run, it
will be enforced by our market system. In the short term, however, it is
very difficult to prevent the passing of a disproportionate burden by the
parties located at the higher hierarchical levels of the production process
to the ones at the lower levels.
An attempt was made by the Association of Iron Steel Engineers [2] and
others including the author [3], to unify the terminology related to the
geometry of flat rolled products. As will be shown in Chapter 20, the
tolerances that are stipulated by various standards can be unified as well
as presented in a more effective way.
Standards may also play a very important role in defining the quality
level. The chairman and CEO of a leading steel producer was quoted as
saying [4], “I don’t want any defects [shipped] to our customers.” This
statement may be applauded politically, but is somewhat idealistic and
lacks technical and economic merit. As tolerances become increasingly
tighter, the importance of random errors proportionally increases. Since
these types of errors will always be present in any manufacturing
process, we can only speak about the quality level in statistical terms
which can indicate how close we are to the ideal case.
Wi
=
invoiced coil weight
hmin
=
specified minimum thickness
wmin
=
specified minimum width
Page 464
ρ steel density.
=
In the case of a hot rolled product intended for cold rolling, there are
internal requirements for tightening the geometrical tolerances so that the
gauge performance during cold rolling can be improved. There is,
however, a principal difference between the gauge requirements for hot
rolled coils that are sold as hot band as compared to those intended for
cold rolling. It is expected to have the hot band gauge as close as
possible to the target value. However, the most important goal in
application to coils intended for cold rolling would be to produce a gauge
of a constant value which may not necessary be its target value.
Width variation can also cause problems in press lines by jamming the
coil that is being fed into a blanking press. Width variation also introduces
inaccuracies in nested blanking operations and results in asymmetric
dimensions in interleaved “T” shapes.
Flatness defects such as long edges may also cause jamming of a coil
being fed into a blanking press. Fouling edges can also create a debris
problem and promote surface defects via particles that are transferred to
the punch and die. Blank waviness within a stack of blanks can cause
erratic magnetic pick-up on transfer or lead to backward ejection as
sensors mistake the condition for a double blank.
component panels.
Draw and wall iron (DWI) process, where a cup after being formed
from a disc by deep drawing is subsequently subjected to further
thinning of its wall by ironing between carbide dies.
Draw/redraw (DRD) process, which also uses a disc and cupping
operation but is followed by one or more redraws that does not
reduce the can thickness but reduces the can diameter along with
increasing the can height [6].
Welding tinplate onto cylinders by electrical resistance welding.
DWI process - The length of the can wall obtained by the DWI process is
heavily dependent on the blank volume, and more particular, on the
combination of blank thickness and blank diameter. As shown in Fig.
19.3, an increase in the blank thickness would require a smaller blank
diameter. There is however, a certain combination of the blank diameter
and thickness at which the relative material cost is minimum. It is,
therefore, desirable to maintain the thickness tolerances as tight as
possible so that the minimum cost can be assured.
Tighter thickness and width tolerances are also required for a more
effective use of material. This would allow, for example, to reduce the
earring levels (Fig. 19.4) and thus reduce scrap losses. Simultaneously,
the useful cup height increases so that the blank diameter can be
reduced leading to additional savings in metal cost.
Fig. 19.4 Effect of earring level on useful cup size. Adapted from
Habberley [7].
Welding - The welding process also requires tight material specifications.
Maintaining a high-speed welding line involves achieving the desired
specified overlap (Fig. 19.6) with a minimum resetting of the roll forming
station. For a given roll forming station setting, the overlap is affected by
both plate thickness and plate strength or springback. If the latitude on
overlap is too small or the distribution of the material thickness-strength
too large, then persistent resetting of the roll forming station is required,
which reduces the line efficiency.
Page 467
Tolerances, %
Process
1980 1985 1992 Future
General ± 10 ± 10 ± 5 to ± 8 ± 5
DRD process ± 7 ± 5 ± 4 ± 2
Tolerances, crown/feather, %
Process
1980 1985 1992 Future
Tolerances, crown/feather, %
Process
1980 1985 1992 Future
General 39 39 39 20
DWI process 39 39 39
10 - 20
DRD process 39 39 20 5 - 10
Lamination steels are generally purchased as full coils and slit in required
widths by either
Page 469
straight or scroll slitters. Three to five master coils can be made out of
one full coil. Many apparatus manufacturers purchase coils already slit.
Lamination steels are usually punched or slit into two fundamental
configurations before assembly by stacking apparatus. Transformer
punchings take the form of E’s or I’s if the unit is stacked. If wound, the
strip is conventionally slit before winding.
The first reason is related to the quality and efficiency of the appliance
production process. Contemporary appliance production processes utilize
automated transfer systems along with sophisticated sensors that can be
adversely affected when materials with flatness problems are processed.
Flatness defects can also lead to distortions on porcelain enameled
parts.
These standards are applied to the flat rolled products which are
classified as strips, sheets, and plates. The dimensional tolerances,
provided by the industrial standards, are usually applied to a steel
product of a specified quality.
Strip - According to the German Standard DIN 1016 [10], strip is defined
as “a flat product which is wound to form a coil immediately after the final
rolling pass or after having passed the installations connected to the
rolls.”
The Japanese Industrial Standard JIS G 3193 [17] simply defines steel
strip as flat “rolled steel supplied in coil form.” A similar definition of strip
is stated by the British Standard BS 1449, Part 1 [22].
Sheet or plate - The German Standard DIN 1016 defines sheet or plate
as “a flat product of unspecified edge form which is supplied in panels
usually of quadrangular (square or rectangular) shape, its edges being as
rolled (i.e. slightly curved) or cut mechanical means.” Sheet is identified
as a product with a thickness less than 3 mm and plate is a product with
thickness equal or greater than 3 mm.
Strip:
hot Up to 88.9 From 0.65 to
rolled From 89 to 5.16
152 From 0.87 to
From 152 to 12.7
cold 305 From 1.14 to
rolled From 13 to 12.7
608 Up to 6.35
Sheet:
hot 305 and From 1.14 to
rolled over 12.7
cold 305 and From 0.36 and
rolled over over
Table 19.4 presents the dimensional ranges of plates, strip, and sheet as
defined by the Iron and Steel Society (ISS) in application to carbon steels
[25-27].
For cold rolled strip, the German Standard DIN 1541 [11] states that the
thickness tolerances for the ends of the coils over the total length of 30
meters per coil are permitted to be increased with respect to the
tolerances for the coil body by the following ratio R:
Page 473
Allowance for weld - Both the German Standard DIN 1541 and the
International Standard ISO 3574 recognize the difficulties in controlling
the strip thickness at the weld and its vicinity. For strip, in the vicinity of
the welds over a specified strip length, the thickness tolerances are
permitted to be increased with respect to the tolerances for the coil body
by the ratios shown in Table 19.5.
20 15
1.5 and 1.6 2.0
greater
Thickness deviation within one coil - For hot rolled strip intended for cold
rolling, it is very important to reduce the variation of strip thickness.
However, in many instances, when the head end of the strip is rolled off-
gauge, it is more advantageous to maintain the thickness of the
remaining length of the coil as close as possible to the head-end gauge
rather than trying to achieve the target gauge. This preference is
reflected by the German Standard DIN 1016 and shown in Fig. 19.13.
difficulties in controlling the strip thickness near the strip edge inside the
so-called feather edge zone. The second reason is the difficulties in
accurately measuring the strip thickness inside these zones.
Length, mm Length, mm
Width, Width,
Standard Mill Cut Standard Mill Cut
mm mm
edge edge edge edge
Table 19.9 summarizes the strip zones with the exclusions for thickness
tolerances as specified by various industrial standards. Although, the
majority of standards specify the exclusions for thickness tolerances for
the edge zones, there is no unanimity regarding exclusions for the weld
and end zones. So the question still remains as to whether the exclusions
for the weld and end zones shall be part of the standards for the
geometry of flat rolled products. There is a good reason to positively
answer this question.
Table 19.8 Lengths from longitudinal edges excluded
from thickness measurements for cold rolled products
[10, 17, 20, 22].
Fig. 19.7 DIN (German) thickness tolerances of hot rolled unalloyed and
alloyed steel. Data from DIN 1016 [10].
Fig. 19.8 JIS (Japanese) thickness tolerances of hot rolled steel sheet
for automobile structural uses. Data from JIS G 3113 [12].
Page 476
Fig. 19.9 JIS (Japanese) thickness tolerances of hot rolled carbon steel
for pipes and tubes. Data from JIS G 3132 [15].
Fig. 19.10 ASTM (USA) thickness tolerances of hot rolled carbon steel
sheet. Data from ASTM A 568 [20].
Page 477
Fig. 19.11 ASTM (USA) thickness tolerances of hot rolled high strength
low alloy steel sheet. Data from ASTM A 568 [20].
Fig. 19.12 BS (British) thickness tolerances of hot rolled carbon and
carbon-manganese steel strip. Data from BS 1449, Part 1 [22].
Page 478
Fig. 19.15 DIN (German) close (F) thickness tolerances of cold rolled
unalloyed steels. Data from DIN 1541 [11].
Fig. 19.16 JIS (Japanese) thickness tolerances of cold rolled carbon
steel sheets and strip. Data from JIS G 3141 [19].
Page 480
Fig. 19.17 ASTM (USA) thickness tolerances of cold rolled carbon and
high strength low alloy steels. Data from ASTM A 568 [20].
Fig. 19.18 BS (British) thickness tolerances of cold rolled carbon and
carbon-manganese steels. Data from BS 1449, Part 1 [22].
Page 481
Fig. 19.19 Chart recording of mill speed and deviation from nominal
finish thickness of tandem cold mill.
Fig. 19.21 JIS (Japanese) width tolerances of hot rolled flat products.
Data from JIS G 3193 [17].
Fig. 19.22 ASTM (USA) width tolerances of hot rolled carbon steel sheet
with mill edge. Data from ASTM A 568 [20].
Page 483
Fig. 19.23 ASTM (USA) width tolerances of hot rolled cut edge sheet
and cold rolled sheet of carbon and high strength low alloy steels. Data
from ASTM A 568 [20].
Fig. 19.24 BS (British) width tolerances of hot rolled carbon and carbon-
manganese steel strip. Data from BS 1449, Part 1 [22].
Page 484
Fig. 19.25 DIN (German) width tolerances of cold rolled unalloyed steels.
Data from DIN 1541 [11].
Fig. 19.26 JIS (Japanese) width tolerances of cold rolled carbon steel
sheets and strip (A = regular tolerances, B = close tolerances). Data from
JIS G 3141 [19].
Page 485
Fig. 19.27 BS (British) width tolerances of cold rolled carbon and carbon-
manganese steel strip. Data from BS 1449, Part 1 [22].
Fig. 19.28 DIN (German) flatness tolerances of hot rolled sheet. Data
from DIN 1016 [10].
Fig. 19.29 JIS (Japanese) flatness tolerances of hot rolled plate and
sheet. Data from JIS G 3193 [17].
Page 487
Fig. 19.30 ASTM (USA) flatness tolerances of hot rolled carbon steel
sheet. Data from ASTM A 568 [20].
Fig. 19.31 BS (British) flatness tolerances of hot rolled carbon and
carbon-manganese steel strip. Data from BS 1449, Part 1 [22].
Page 488
Fig. 19.32 DIN (German) flatness tolerances of cold rolled strip. Data
from DIN 1541 [11].
Fig. 19.33 JIS (Japanese) flatness tolerances of cold rolled carbon steel
sheets and strip (A = regular tolerances, B = close tolerances). Data from
JIS G 3141 [19].
Page 489
Fig. 19.34 ASTM (USA) flatness tolerances of cold rolled carbon steel
sheet. Data from ASTM A 568 [20].
Fig. 19.35 BS (British) flatness tolerances of cold rolled carbon and
carbon-manganese steel strip. Data from BS 1449, Part 1 [22].
Page 490
where
Lm measured length
=
Ls specified length
=
Fig. 19.41 DIN (German) permissible crown range for reduction with
minimum distance between measuring point and longitudinal edge of 40
mm. Data from DIN 1016 [10].
References
1. ‘‘An Introduction to Steel Standards,” Steel Times, Vol. 218, March
1990; p. 161.
2. AISE Hot Strip Mill Profile and Flatness Study, Phase I, Association of
Iron and Steel Engineers, Pittsburgh, Pa., Oct. 1986.
4. Dinnen, S., “Can American Steel Find Quality?,” Industry Week, Jan.
20, 1992, pp. 36-38.
6. Bentz, R.J., “The Container Maker’s Needs,” AISE Cold Strip Mill
Profile, Flatness and Surface Seminar, Association of Iron and Steel
Engineers, Pittsburgh, Pa., Feb. 1992.
7. Habberley, P.J., “Market Requirements of Metal Packaging,” 5th
International Rolling Conference: Dimensional Control in Rolling Mills,
London, Sept. 1990, pp. 8-17.
10. DIN 1016, German Standard for Steel Flat Products; Hot Rolled
Sheet and Strip; Permissible Dimensional Deviations and Deviations of
Form and Mass, Deutsches Institut fur Normung e.V., Berlin, 1986.
11. DIN 1541, German Standard for Flat Steel Products; Cold Rolled
Wide Mill Strip and Sheet of Unalloyed Steels; Dimensions, Permissible
Variations on Dimension and Form, Deutsches Institut fur Normung e.V.,
Berlin, 1986.
Page 500
12. JIS G 3113, Japanese Industrial Standard for Hot Rolled Steel Plates,
Sheets, and Strip for Automobile Structural Uses, Japanese Standards
Association, Tokyo, 1987.
13. JIS G 3116, Japanese Industrial Standard for Steel Sheets, Plates,
and Strip for Gas Cylinders, Japanese Standards Association, Tokyo,
1987.
14. JIS G 3131, Japanese Industrial Standard for Hot Rolled Mild Steel
Plates, Sheets, and Strip, Japanese Standards Association, Tokyo, 1987.
15. JIS G 3132, Japanese Industrial Standard for Hot Rolled Carbon
Steel Strip for Pipes and Tubes, Japanese Standards Association, Tokyo,
1987.
16. JIS G 3134, Japanese Industrial Standard for Hot Rolled High
Strength Steel Sheets with Improved Formability for Automobile
Structural Uses, Japanese Standards Association, Tokyo, 1986.
18. JIS G 3135, Japanese Industrial Standard for Cold Rolled High
Strength Steel Sheets with Improved Formability for Automobile
Structural Uses, Japanese Standards Association, Tokyo, 1986.
19. JIS G 3141, Japanese Industrial Standard for Cold Rolled Carbon
Steel Sheets and Strip, Japanese Standards Association, Tokyo, 1987.
20. ASTM A 568, American Society for Testing and Materials Standard
Specification for Steel, Sheet, Carbon and High Strength, Low Alloy, Hot
Rolled and Cold Rolled, General Requirements for, Annual Book of
ASTM Standards, Vol. 01.03, American Society for Testing and Materials,
Philadelphia, Pa., 1992, pp. 232-250.
21. ASTM A 623, American Society for Testing and Materials Standard
Specification for Tin Mill Products, General Requirements, Annual Book
of ASTM Standards, Vol. 01.06, American Society for Testing and
Materials, Philadelphia, Pa., 1988, pp. 143-168.
22. BS 1449, Part 1, British Standard for Steel Plate, Sheet, and Strip,
Part 1, Specification for Carbon and Carbon-Manganese Plate, Sheet,
and Strip, British Standards Institution, London, 1983.
23. ISO 3574, International Standard for Cold Reduced Carbon Steel
Sheet of Commercial and Drawing Qualities, 2nd Edition, International
Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 1986.
24. ASM Metals Reference Book, American Society for Metals, Metals
Park, Ohio, 1981, p. 71.
25. Steel Products Manual # Sheet Steel: Carbon, High Strength Low
Alloy, and Alloy Coils and Cut Lengths (Including Coated Products), Iron
and Steel Society, Warrendale, Pa., Jan. 1988.
26. Steel Products Manual # Strip Steel: Carbon, High Strength Low
Alloy, and Alloy, Iron and Steel Society, Warrendale, Pa., Aug. 1988.
27. Steel Products Manual # Plates: Rolled Floor Plates, Carbon, High
Strength Low Alloy, and Alloy Steel, Iron and Steel Society, Warrendale,
Pa., May 1991.
29. Hongo, Y., et al, “Crown Control Technologies for Hot Strip Mill on
Modifying Existing Mills,” AISE Hot Strip Mill Profile and Flatness
Seminar, Association of Iron and Steel Engineers, Pittsburgh, Pa., Nov.
1988.
30. Wood, G.E. and Wilbers, P., “The Major Upgrade to the Port Kembla
Hot Strip Mill Control System,” AISE Hot Strip Mill Profile and Flatness
Seminar, Association of Iron and Steel Engineers, Pittsburgh, Pa., Nov.
1988.
Page 502
Chapter 20
STATISTICAL AND ANALYTICAL DIMENSIONAL
TOLERANCES
n
=
number of observations
equation:
xmax
=
maximum measured value
μ
=
mean of probability distribution
The maximum deviations from the nominal dimensions that are provided
by a production process are called natural tolerance limits. The natural
tolerance limits are a function of the proportion P of the population that
have deviations from the nominal dimensions within the natural tolerance
limits. The relationship between the proportion P of the population and
the limits depends on the character of the distribution of measurements.
In most practical applications, the true values of m and σ are not known.
Nevertheless, it is possible to determine the symmetrical natural
tolerance limits by using the following equation [1]:
where
s
=
standard deviation of practical
sample
Proportion of Natural
population P, tolerance
% coefficient, m
68.27 1.000
90.00 1.645
95.00 1.960
95.45 2.000
99.00 2.580
99.73 3.000
99.90 3.290
For example, by using Eq. (20-8) and Table 20.2, one can assert with a
confidence level of 99% that for a practical population with 100 samples,
95% of the population will have deviations from the nominal dimensions
within the tolerance limits of ±2.355s.
Page 507
Confidence level C, %
95 99
Sample size n
Proportion of population P, %
95 99 95 99
20
2.752 3.615 3.168 4.161
40
2.445 3.213 2.677 3.518
80
2.272 2.986 2.414 3.173
100
2.233 2.934 2.355 3.096
200
2.143 2.816 2.222 2.921
500
2.070 2.721 2.117 2.783
1000
2.033 2.676 2.068 2.718
If the tolerance limits are symmetrical (USL = LSL = SL and UNL = LNL =
NL), then for a normal population, we can obtain from Eqs. (20-7) and
(20-9) the process capability index Cp that is equal to the following:
where
Similarly, for a practical population, we can consider Eqs. (20-8) and (20-
9) and find the following expression for the process capability index Cp:
Thus, if the standard deviation σ is equal or less than 0.39 times the
specified tolerance ± SL, then 99% of the units of the entire population
will be within the specified tolerance ± SL. Let us consider another
example in application to a practical population of 100 samples with the
selected proportion P of the population equal to 99%. Assuming the
confidence level C = 99%, we can find from Table 20.2 that k = 3.096.
Therefore, for Cp = 1, we can obtain from Eq. (20-13) the following
expression for the standard deviation s:
Thus, if the standard deviation s for 100 samples of data is equal or less
than 0.32 times the specified tolerance ± SL, then we can believe with a
99% confidence level that 99% of the samples of the entire population
will be within the specified tolerance ± SL. The non-statistical tolerance
limits SL that are specified by the standards, can be then converted into
statistical tolerances such as standard deviation s (Fig. 20.5).
Fig. 20.5 Quality control utilizing non-statistical and statistical terms.
Page 510
During the rolling process, there are no step changes in the rolling
conditions when small increments in geometry of the rolled product are
made. Therefore, step changes in the tolerances that are provided by the
existing tolerance tables are not warranted. The best way of providing a
smooth dependence of tolerances on the nominal thickness and width of
the product is by expressing the tolerances in an analytical form. Both
absolute and relative tolerances are considered in the following sections.
Examining Figs. 20.6 through 20.9 shows that the thickness tolerances
that are presented by the standards in table form can be replaced with
high accuracy by the analytical Eqs. (20-16) or (20-18) with each of them
containing only five constants. When presenting tolerances in statistical
terms, the natural tolerance limit coefficient k in Eq. (20-13) can also be
approximated with the following equation (Fig. 20.10):
where
n
=
number of samples
The gauge, flatness, crown, and width performance of the mill are
presented in Tables 20.4 through 20.9.
Mill stand
Equipment
F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7
Less than
2.50 0.0225
From 2.50
to 7.19 0.0190
Greater than
7.19 0.0218
Strip length, %
Gauge range,
mm within ± 0.025 within ± 0.050
mm mm
From 2.50 to
7.19 96.9 99.3
Greater than
7.19 86.7 98.0
From 2.50 to
7.19 82.8 92.4
Greater than
7.19 93.0 98.1
Page 517
μ, mm σ, mmμ, mmσ, mm
All 19
products 0.015 0.0330.0610.031
51
0.000 0.0190.0200.016
Less than 19
3 0.040 0.0270.0580.029
51
0.008 0.0130.0170.013
From 3 to 19 0.008 0.0280.0670.033
5
51
-0.0050.0160.0260.018
Greater 19
than 5 0.000 0.0390.0410.027
51
-0.0040.0230.0160.017
± 3 mm ± 6 mm
Roughing mill
exit average 1.80 91.5 98.7
width
Finishing mill ….
exit strip body 71.3 90.8
width
± 0.035 98
1.8
± 0.040 98
2.4
± 0.045 97
3.3
± 0.055 96
4.5
± 0.065 95
8.0
± 0.025 99 ± 0.035
1.8 99.6
± 0.030 99 ± 0.040
2.4 99.6
± 0.035 98 ± 0.045
3.3 99.2
± 0.045 97 ± 0.055
4.5 98.5
± 0.050 97 ± 0.065
8.0 98.5
References
1. Miller, I.,et al, Probability and Statistics for Engineers, 4th Edit.,
Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1990.
7. DIN 1016, German Standard for Steel Flat Products; Hot Rolled Sheet
and Strip; Permissible Dimensional Deviations and Deviations of Form
and Mass, Deutsches Institut fur Normung e.V., Berlin, 1986.
Page 519
8. DIN 1541, German Standard for Flat Steel Products; Cold Rolled Wide
Mill Strip and Sheet of Unalloyed Steels; Dimensions, Permissible
Variations on Dimension and Form, Deutsches Institut fur Normung e.V.,
Berlin, 1986.
11. BS 1449, Part 1, British Standard for Steel Plate, Sheet, and Strip,
Part 1, Specification for Carbon and Carbon-Manganese Plate, Sheet,
and Strip, British Standards Institution, London, 1983.
12. JIS G 3141, Japanese Industrial Standard for Cold Rolled Carbon
Steel Sheets and Strip, Japanese Standards Association, Tokyo, 1987.
14. E.C. Hewitt and E. Earnshaw, “Technical Options for Modernizing Hot
Strip Mills,” Restructuring Steelplants for the Nineties, Institute of Metals,
London, 1986, pp. 85-95.
Page 520
Chapter 21
PRINCIPLES OF MEASUREMENT OF ROLLING
PARAMETERS
process of measuring the strip thickness during rolling. The standard can
be readily converted to an electrical signal. For example, the output
signal of 10 volts can correspond to a standard thickness of 1 mm. The
same conversion scale of 10 v/mm can be used for the conversion of the
measured thickness so that the comparison of the measured thickness
with the standard can be made in volts. The device that converts a
physical quantity into an electrical signal is known as a transducer.
Elastic:
Tension load cell Tensile force Linear
Compression loadCompressive force displacement
cell Bending force Linear
Bending load cell Torque displacement
Torsion load cell Force Linear
Proving ring Pressure displacement
Bourdon tube Pressure Angular
Bellows Pressure displacement
Diaphragm Force Displacement
Helical spring Pressure Displacement
Liquid column Displacement
Displacement
Linear
displacement
Displacement
Inertial:
Seismic mass Forcing function Relative
Pendulum Gravitational displacement
Pendulum acceleration Frequency or
Liquid column Force period
Pressure Displacement
Displacement
Thermal:
Thermocouple Temperature Electric current
Bimaterial Temperature Displacement
Thermoresistive Temperature Electrical
Chemical Temperature resistance
composition Chemical phase
Page 528
Hydropneumatic:
Float Fluid level Displacement
Hydrometer Specific Relative
Obstruction meter gravity displacement
Pressure probes Fluid Pressure
Pitot tube velocity Pressure
Vanes Fluid Pressure
Turbines velocity Force
Fluid Angular velocity
velocity
Velocity
Linear
velocity
Electrical resistive:
Contacting (switch) Displacement Electrical
Variable length Displacementresistance
conductor Displacement Electrical
Variable area resistance
conductor Electrical
resistance
Inductive:
Variable coil DisplacementInductance
dimension DisplacementInductance
Variable air gap DisplacementInductance
Variable core material DisplacementInductance
Variable core position DisplacementInductance
Variable coil position Velocity Inductance
Moving coil Velocity Inductance
Moving core Velocity Inductance
Moving permanent Inductance
magnet
Capacitive:
Variable air gap DisplacementCapacitance
Variable plate area DisplacementCapacitance
Variable dielectric DisplacementCapacitance
Piezoelectric:
Direct DisplacementVoltage
Inverse Voltage Displacement
Photoelectric:
Photovoltaic Light Voltage
Photoresistive intensity Electric resistance
Photoemissive Light Electric current
intensity
Light
intensity
Magnetoelastic:
Direct Stress Magnetic
Inverse Magnetic properties
(magnetostrictive) field Elongation
Radiation absorption Thickness
Density
Voltage
Doppler
Velocity
Velocity
Page 529
Um
=
result of measurement
In the strictest sense, a true value is never really known. Therefore, either
conventional or theoretical true values are used. For example, if the
calibration of a pressure meter, having a maximum permissible error of
±0.5%, is verified by means of a standard pressure gage having an error
of indication in the same range not greater than ±0.05%, then the
standard pressure gage will indicate the conventional true value of
pressure.
α slope angle.
=
Dead band - Dead band is the largest change of the measurand to which
the instrument does not respond and is produced by friction, backlash, or
hysteresis in the instrument.
Drift (Creep) - Drift is a change in output that occurs over a specific time
period while the measurand is held constant at a value other than zero,
and all environmental conditions are held constant. Drift may be caused
by internal temperature changes and component instability.
Fig. 21.8 Backlash.
Zero drift - Zero drift is the change in output from its set zero value over a
specified period of time. Zero drift occurs due to changes in ambient
conditions, changes in electrical conditions, aging of components, or
mechanical damage. The error that is introduced may be significant when
a transducer is used for long-term measurement.
Page 533
Zero stability - Zero stability is the measure of the ability of the instrument
to restore to a zero reading after the measurand has returned to zero,
and other variations (temperature, pressure, humidity, vibration, etc.)
have been removed.
Static friction - Static friction, or sticking friction is the force or torque that
is necessary to initiate motion from rest.
where
qo output quantity
=
qi input quantity
=
static sensitivity.
K =
The zero order instrument output responds and reaches its steady value
almost instantaneously following a step change in the measured quantity
that is applied to its input.
where
a1, a, bo constants
=
t time.
=
where
s Laplace operator.
=
The time constant T is defined as the time taken for the output quantity
qo to reach 63% of its
Page 535
final value. In a first order instrument, the output quantity qo, in response
to a step change in the measured quantity qi, varies with time in the
manner shown in Fig. 21.10.
a1, a, bo = constants.
where
Random errors - Random errors are accidental errors that occur in all
measurements. These errors are inconsistent by nature and their origin
can not be determined in the measurement process. In general, an error
always has two components: a systematic component and a random
component. It is assumed that accidental errors and major blunders have
been avoided. The examples of systematic errors are the static or
dynamic instrument errors, zero offset, incorrect calibration, etc. The
errors caused by sporadic noise or by inconsistent reading of the results
of measurements are typical examples of random errors. These random
errors can be estimated by statistical analysis.
The following types of errors can occur during signal treatment [1,7,10-
23]:
If we assume, that all of the errors listed above are random, then the
overall error of the measurement can be calculated based on the formula
for propagation of errors. In the case of the addition of n values
containing errors, the overall error Esum is given by the Eq. (21-10).
AC signal conditioner fc ≥ 5 fh
carrier frequency
Signal sampling fp ≥ 5 fh
frequency
Time-division fs ≥ 5 fh
multiplex sampling
rate
In Table 21.2:
Figures 21.13b and 21.13c compare the original signal, which is shown in
Fig. 21.13a, with the output signals that are obtained by scanning the
original signal every 10 µs and averaging the scanned signal every 100
µs. A comparison of Figs. 21.13b and 21.13c clearly shows that the
goodness of fit of the output signals after scanning and averaging with
the input signal is greatly affected by mill speed. A good fitness of the
output signals was obtained for a mill speed of 1000 ft/min (Fig. 21.13b).
However, for a mill speed of 5000 ft/min (Fig. 21.13c), the sampling and
averaging produces a substantial attenuation of the original signal.
possible, it is generally done only for the center portion of the strip
leaving the remaining portions unchecked.
Fig. 21.13 Sampling of thickness deviation signal: a) original output, b)
sampling at mill speed of 1000 ft/min, and c) sampling at mill speed of
5000 ft/min.
Page 541
References
1. Beckwith, T.G. and Marangoni, R.D., Mechanical Measurements, 4th
Edition, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1990.
20. Soliman, S.S. and Srinath, M.D., Continuous and Discrete Signals
and Systems, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1990.
Chapter 22
CAUSES OF GAUGE VARIATION
where
P roll force
=
The ratio P/Ks is known as the mill spring. Thus, to obtain the desired exit
rolled product thickness h2, the no-load roll gap Co must be less than the
exit rolled product thickness h2 by the amount that is equal to the mill
spring P/Ks.
where
ΔP increment in roll force
=
α slope of line A.
=
Δh
=
change in rolled material thickness
β slope of line B.
=
Effect of roll gap setting - Opening the roll gap shifts line A to the right
(Fig. 22.1b). A new equilibrium in the mill will be achieved at the lower roll
force P′ with the thicker exit rolled material thickness h′2.
22.1c), so that the equilibrium in the mill is achieved at the higher roll
force P′. This results in the rolling of a thicker exit thickness h′2.
Gauge variation
Hardness variation
Width variation
Page 547
Profile variation
Flatness variation.
Figure 22.5 shows the gauge deviation after the last finishing pass when
measures are not taken to correct the gauge error. In this case, the
gauge gradually increases from the head end to the tail end of the coil
along with a decrease in strip temperature. There is also local increases
in gauge caused by skid marks.
Fig. 22.5 Strip temperature and thickness variation in hot strip mill
without gauge control. From Jenkins, et al, [1]. Reproduced through the
courtesy of Iron and Steel Engineer.
where
Kw resistance to deformation
=
m1, m2 strip tension effect factors related to entry and exit tension respectively.
=
The effect of entry strip tension on the roll separating force was found to
be much greater than that of the exit strip tension. Based on various
sources, the factor m1 varies between 0.5 and 0.667, whereas the range
for the factor m2 is between 0.333 and 0.5. A change in the roll force Ps,
due to variations in strip tension, leads to a variation in the mill stretch Ps
/ Ks, thus producing changes in the strip gauge.
The oil film thickness depends on mill speed and roll force. To enhance
formation of the oil film at slower speeds, it is a common practice to use a
hydrostatic lubricating system which is activated
Page 549
when the mill speed decreases below a certain value. When hydrostatic
lubrication is used, oil viscosity becomes approximately constant and the
oil film thickness hf can be expressed by the equation [5]:
where
roll speed
V =
roll force
P =
a, b constants.
=
Figure 22.6 compares Eq. (22-5) with the test results obtained by
Kawamata, et al [5]. The observations were made under kiss-rolling
conditions, i.e. by loading the mill without the strip. Measurements were
also taken after accelerating or decelerating the mill as well as holding
the mill at constant speed. The transient conditions in the formation of an
oil film during acceleration and deceleration result in noticeable variations
of the oil film thickness and are compensated as a function of the mill
acceleration rate.
The lubricant film thickness in the roll bite changes with the speed in the
same manner as the oil film thickness in the bearings. As the mill speed
increases, a greater amount of lubricant is sucked into the roll bite, thus
increasing the lubricant film thickness. As a consequence of this process,
the effective roll gap decreases and a thinner strip gauge is produced.
The cumulative effect of the oil film and lubricant film thickness variation
on strip gauge is shown in Fig. 22.7. The strip was rolled in a 5-stand
tandem cold mill without speed effect compensation control. A distinct
increase in strip thickness can be seen at lower mill speeds especially
below 500 ft/min. The gauge performance, however, is almost
independent of the mill speed when the speed is greater than 1000 ft/min
[6].
Fig. 22.7 Strip thickness at exit of 5-stand tandem cold mill as a function
of mill speed without speed effect compensation control. Adapted from
Stoltz and Brinks [6].
Page 550
where
where
Jw, Jb rotary inertia of one work roll and one backup roll respectively
=
Fig. 22.8 Strip thickness variation during chatter in 5-stand tandem cold
mill. Adapted from Chefneux, et al [9].
Contrary to the third mode of chatter, the fifth mode of chatter tends to
develop gradually and is often accompanied by the development of
chatter marks on the rolls. These roll marks can excite the mill into
resonance and cause parallel lines to be printed on the strip surface. The
fifth-octave mode of chatter does not affect the strip gauge and is only
detrimental from an aesthetic and operational viewpoint.
Eccentricity of the backup roll journals with respect to the roll body
and to each other
Ovality of work rolls and backup rolls determined as a difference
between maximum and minimum dimensions of the roll body
Eccentricity of the rotating sleeves of the backup roll bearings with
respect to the roll journals and to the roll body
Nonuniformity of the roll bodies around their peripheries
Nonuniformity of the journals around their peripheries
Nonuniformity of the rotating sleeves of the backup roll bearings
around their peripheries
Nonuniformity of the rollers in the roller bearings.
Fig. 22.9 Backup roll surfaces used for grinding and measuring of roll
eccentricity. Adapted from Walker and Davies [10].
Page 553
Roll and bearing distortions - The distortions in geometry of both the rolls
and the bearings may occur after loading beyond their design capacity
resulting in local plastic deformations and metal disruptions. Overloading
of sleeved backup rolls may produce distortion of roll geometry as a
result of shifting the sleeve with respect to roll arbor [13-15]. When the
wear of the rolls and the bearings is not uniform around their peripheries,
it would also cause roll eccentricity.
Roll gap control imperfections - Depending on the type of roll gap control,
the roll eccentricity effect may be suppressed, exaggerated, or not
changed at all [20].
The cyclic variation of the roll force is not sinusoidal because it is affected
by the roll imperfections, changes in the material thickness and hardness,
as well as by variations in strip tension. The main frequency cycle times,
however, will still be dependent on the frequency of the rotation of the
backup rolls (Fig. 22.10).
where
Fig. 22.10 Variations in roll force during rolling in 5-stand tandem cold
mill.
Fig. 22.11 Beat phenomenon in 4-high mill stand. Adapted from
Hashimoto, et al [21].
Page 555
At the same time, the rolled material thickness will be decreased by the
amount Δhe that is equal to:
Page 556
where
The ratio of the variation of rolled material thickness Δhe to the combined
roll eccentricity e is called the roll eccentricity imprint ratio, it is equal to:
Roll force mode - In this control mode, the roll force is maintained
constant. Therefore, as soon as the roll gap tends to close or open due to
roll eccentricity, the control will immediately produce a roll gap correction
signal to maintain a constant force. As a result, the same physical
distance between the peripheral surfaces of the work rolls in the roll bite
will also be maintained. With an adequate response time, this control
mode practically eliminates the effect of roll eccentricity on the gauge of
the rolled product. This condition is met when the apparent mill structural
stiffness KSA is equal to zero, i.e. a = 0. Thus, the apparent mill structural
stiffness is infinitely small. In this case, Δhe = 0, or no change in the
rolled material thickness.
Page 557
Position mode - In this control mode, the position of the roll gap actuator
(hydraulic cylinder or screwdown mechanism) is held constant. The
apparent mill structural stiffness KSA is kept equal to the natural mill
structural stiffness KS, i.e. a = 1. In the position mode, a part of the
combined roll eccentricity will be imprinted on the rolled material. The
imprinting portion depends on the ratio between the material stiffness KM
and the mill natural structural stiffness KS. As this ratio increases, the
portion of the roll eccentricity that will be imprinted on the rolled material
decreases as shown in Fig. 22.13.
The exit gauge spectra (Fig. 22.15) explicitly reveals that the majority of
peaks corresponds to the rotational frequencies of the cold mill backup
rolls. However, the influence of the hot strip mill backup rolls, as well as
the cold mill work rolls, may also be significant.
This summary shows that the roll eccentricity of the stand 1 backup rolls
and the hot strip mill gauge variability are the major factors that affect the
exit gauge variation in tandem cold mills.
References
1. Jenkins, W.G., et al, ‘‘Sparrows Point 56 in. Hot Strip Mill Gauge
Control System,” AISE Yearly Proceedings, 1969, pp. 339-348.
2. Bland, D.R. and Ford H., “The Calculation of Roll Force and Torque in
Cold Strip Rolling with Tensions,” Proceedings of the Institution of
Mechanical Engineers, Vol. 159, 1948, pp. 144-153.
3. Hill, R., “Relations Between Roll Force, Torque, and the Applied
Tensions in Strip Rolling,”
Page 560
6. Stoltz, G.E. and Brinks, J.W., ‘‘Cold Rolling of Tinplate,” AISE Yearly
Proceedings, 1950, pp. 654-673.
8. Roberts, W.L., Flat Processing of Steel, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York,
1988.
11. Barnes, K.R., et al, “Close Tinplate Gage Tolerances Through Low-
Cost Technological Improvements,” Iron and Steel Engineer, Jan. 1988,
pp. 49-55.
14. Linhart, J.W., “Differential Heat Treatment of Rolls to Improve Life and
Performance,” AISE Yearly Proceedings, 1972, pp. 662-668.
15. Roberts, W.L., Hot Rolling of Steel, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1983,
p. 553.
16. Easter, H.C. and Gridley, T.H., “Automated Roll Grinding: Finish,
Concentricity, and Roll Crack/Bruise Detection,” Proceedings of the
Seminar on Rolling Assembly Technology, Aluminum Association,
Chicago, Nov. 4-5, 1987.
19. Ooi, T., et al, “Advanced Thickness Control Technology for Tandem
Cold Mill,” Proceedings of the 4th International Steel Rolling Conference:
The Science and Technology of Flat Rolling, Vol. 2, Deauville, France,
June 1-3, 1987, pp. E.27.1 - E.27.12.
23. Wiedemer, K., et al, “Cold Rolling with Direct Hydraulic Roll Screw-
Down and Roll Gap Measuring and Regulating System,” Metallurgical
Plant and Technology.
24. Tajima, S., et al, “Development of a New Type AGC System for a
Tandem Cold Mill,”
Page 561
26. Cory, J.F., et al, “Roll Eccentricity Monitoring for Strip Quality Control,”
Iron and Steel Engineer, Feb. 1990, pp. 24-26.
Page 562
Chapter 23
GAUGE CONTROL SENSORS AND ACTUATORS
Optical gages
Isotope gages
X-Ray gages.
The thickness gages that belong to each of these groups differ not only
by their principle of operation but also by the range of measured
thickness, accuracy of measurement, and dynamic response
characteristics.
laser beam and receiving camera axes are fixed with respect to the table
roller. The image m1 corresponds to the laser spot a1 on the table roller
whereas the image m2 corresponds to the laser spot a2 on the slab top
surface. After measuring the distance between the images m1 and m2,
the slab thickness h can readily be calculated by using well-known
trigonometrical relationships.
Scanning frequency:
16,000 Hz
Response time
1 ms for step change
Source
1 Ci Americium 241
The most important advantages of X-ray thickness gages are the fast
response and relative insensitivity to steam and ambient air temperature.
The most serious disadvantage of X-ray gages is the hazardous radiation
energy, although its potential danger is moderated by the fact that
radiation is present only when the X-ray generator is powered. Typical
specifications of X-ray thickness gages in application to both hot and cold
rolled products are listed as follows [7]:
Maximum thickness 25 mm (1
in.)
Calibration time 3 - 4 s 3 - 4 s
Head-end response
0.3 s max 0.3 s max
Fig. 23.3 Radiation thickness gage developed by Isotope Measuring
System with: a) single detector and b) dual detector. Adapted from [8].
When a carrier sine wave sin (ωt/2) is fed into a multi-gap head and the
scale-reading head is moved along the magnetic scale, the following pair
of second harmonic signals e1 and e2 are generated:
Page 567
where
signal amplitude
E=
ω circular frequency
=
t time.
=
The detector is the electronic circuit that rectifies the signals expressed
by Eqs. (23-2) and (23-3), and makes them applicable to various uses.
The detector generates pulses at the points where the sine and cosine
waves of the scale signal cross the zero level. These pulses are then
used for the digital indication. A more refined treatment of the sine and
cosine waves allows for interpolation of the measurement between the
zero level pulses and also to detect the direction of displacement.
Another modification of a digital induction type transducer is known as
Inductosyn. The principle of Inductosyn is similar to that of the Sony
Magnescale, but the main difference is that electromagnets rather than
permanent magnets are used in Inductosyn.
To sense the torsional strain pulse, two magnetic strain sensitive tapes
are used. These tapes are attached to the waveguide and located inside
sensing coils in the transducer head. A dc magnetic field is generated
inside the magnetic tapes by permanent magnets that are located near
each sensing coil. When the strain tapes remain motionless with respect
to the sensing coils, voltage will not be induced in these coils. The
torsional strain pulse from the waveguide causes a small vibration of the
tapes producing a change in the magnetic field. This magnetic field
induces a voltage in the coils that is amplified and conditioned in the
transducer head assembly and then sent back to the electronics box as
the return pulse.
Fig. 23.5 Principle of operation of Temposonics™. Adapted from [14].
Fig. 23.6 Vertical forces transmitted through roll stack and rolled
material.
Pf frictional force.
=
Load cells.
Extensiometers.
Pressure transducers.
Load cells - The two types of load cells that are most frequently installed
in rolling mills are strain gage [15-18] and magnetoelastic [19]. The strain
gage type load cells are less sensitive to overload conditions than the
magnetoelastic type load cells. The magnetoelastic type load cells,
however, have a more powerful output signal that makes this signal less
sensitive to noise as well as to losses of cable resistance to ground.
Fig. 23.7 Two types of Kelk load cells: a) washer load cell installed under
screwdown nut and b) disk load cell installed between screw and top
backup roll chock. From [15, 16].
The load cells are made in the form of a washer, disk, slab, or T-block
[15-18]. The washer load cells are mounted under the nut of a
screwdown mechanism as shown in Fig. 23.7a [15]. The disk load cells
are commonly installed under the screw of a screwdown mechanism as
illustrated in Fig. 23.7b [16]. The usual location for the slab and T-block
load cells is under the bottom backup roll chock as shown in Fig. 23.8
[17,18]. The desired performance characteristics of load cells are
achieved by the appropriate machining of the mill parts that contact the
load cell to avoid off-center loading.
Fig. 23.8 Kelk T-block load cell installed under bottom backup roll chock.
From [18].
Table 23.1 Typical specifications for strain gage load cells, extensiometers,
pressure transducers, and tensiometers [15, 20, 22, 23].
Parameters
Strain gage load cells
Extensiometers
Pressure transducers
Tensiometers
Accuracy of calibration* ±0.1% ±0.1% ±0.1%
-
where
strip tension
S=
The load cell senses the load Flc that is proportional to the force Fv and
hence to the strip
Page 573
The light beam that is generated by the laser is split into two beams of
equal intensity by an acousto-optic modulator (AOM). The light source
frequency is generally 40 MHz. As the material passes through the
measurement region C, where the two beams cross, the scattered light is
shifted in frequency by the small amount Fr which is proportional to the
material velocity V. This phenomenon is known as the Doppler effect.
The material velocity V can be calculated by using the following equation:
Page 574
where
Since both the light source wavelength Y and the angle between the split
laser beams 2α are maintained constant, the material velocity V is
directly proportional to the Doppler shift frequency Fd.
Fringe flare error - Fringe flare error is caused by aberrations in the laser
beam wave fronts. This aberration produces an error as large as ±0.05%
when the measuring region is equal to ±100 mm (±4.0 in.) and reduces to
±0.02% for a measuring region of ±38 mm (±1.5 in.).
Mechanical
Hydraulic.
Fig. 23.12 Wedge type roll gap control actuator. Adapted from Lefoley
[25].
the fine roll gap control is achieved with the short-stroke hydraulic
cylinder. A more advanced solution is when the screwdown mechanism is
eliminated and the roll gap control is solely provided by the long-stroke
hydraulic actuator (Fig. 23.13b).
Fig. 23.13 Hydraulic actuators installed above top backup roll: a) short-
stroke and b) long-stroke.
References
1. Vollmer, F. and Wallace, J., ‘‘Advanced Continuous Gauging
Techniques for Cold Strip Rolling Mills,” Light Metal Age, Aug. 1975, pp.
16-19.
11. Hegenscheid, H.H., et al, “The SGC Method for Strip Thickness
Control,” Achenbach BBC Publication, DIA 70 111 E, Germany.
16. “Disc Load Cell,” Kelk Publication DLC-DS-539, George Kelk Limited,
Toronto, Canada.
17. “Slab Load Cell,” Kelk Publication SLC-DS-538, George Kelk Limited,
Toronto, Canada.
25. Lefoley, G.M., “Servo Controlled Wedge Actuator Rolls Steel Sheet,”
Hydraulic & Pneumatics, Oct. 1967, pp. 108-114.
Page 578
Chapter 24
AUTOMATIC GAUGE CONTROL SYSTEMS
Step-function response
Frequency response
Phase shift.
Decibels (dB) are widely used to specify the power gain (or attenuation)
which is equal to:
Page 580
where
Phase shift - Phase shift is the change in the phase relationship between
the input and output periodic functions.
where
roll force
P=
The gaugemeter system increases the mill stiffness beyond its natural
value. By a complete compensation (100%) for mill stretch, the mill stand
can be made infinitely stiff so that the roll gap will not vary with the
variation in thickness or hardness of the incoming product. To achieve
optimum gauge and strip flatness performance characteristics, along with
stability of the control
Page 582
Feedback.
Feedforward.
Fig. 24.6 Strip tension control with a hydraulic actuator. From Dendle [1].
Copyright Institute of Metals. Reprinted with permission.
Fig. 24.7 Schematic presentation of AGC proposed by Tippins
Machinery employing gaugemeter control combined with strip tension
and roll bending control. Adapted from Ginzburg and Snitkin [6].
Page 584
feedforward AGC tracks the strip thickness deviation at the entry side of
the mill stand and produces an appropriate roll gap adjustment.
Simultaneously, the strip tension correction signal is calculated to
compensate for the change in the entry strip tension that is caused by the
AGC roll gap adjustment. By deducting the strip tension correction from
the uncoiler tension reference, a new uncoiler tension reference is
produced that decouples the roll gap and entry tension control loops.
current regulator of the looper motor. The current regulator then adjusts
the torque of the looper motor so that the desired strip tension is
achieved.
a) During tight threading, the looper is pulled down causing the strip
tension to increase above the target value and resulting in a lower roll
separating force of a downstream stand. If the roll gap is controlled by
using the gaugemeter principle, this decrease in roll force will generate a
roll gap correction signal to open the roll gap which tends to pull the strip
even tighter. Eventually, this interaction may cause narrowing of the strip
which is known as strip necking.
b) When large gauge corrections are made by a gauge monitor, the strip
tension control may not be able to keep up with the changes in mass
flow. Therefore, the strip tension will be either too high causing strip
necking or too low resulting in crimps, folds, and cobbles.
The best solution to resolve these two problems is to increase the speed
of response of the strip tension control. However, even when low inertial
loopers are used, the speed of response of the tension control still has an
order of magnitude lower than that of the roll gap control with hydraulic
actuators. A compromised solution may be found by implementing the
following strategies:
The droop in stand speed is another cause for destabilizing the mass
flow during threading. This problem can be prevented by speed droop
compensation that is based on stand speed and predicted roll torque.
After the material has entered the (i +1)-th stand and strip tension has
been established, the roll torque of the i-th mill stand GR(i) will be equal
to:
where
mt,(i) arm length at the i-th stand with respect to strip tension
=
During the calculation of the torque arm for the (i +1)-th stand and the
other stands, the tension value determined for the i-th stand must be
taken into account to achieve the value for tension-free conditions. The
difference between the preset set point and the actual value, known as
the control actuation differential, is fed into a proportional integral (PI)
controller which then generates the correction actuation value for the
speed controller.
Entry AGC
Interstand AGC
Exit AGC.
The entry AGC (Fig. 24.11) incorporates the gaugemeter and gauge
deviation control and, as an option, roll eccentricity compensation on
stands S1 and S2. The interstand AGC provides constant mass flow on
stands S3 and S4. The exit AGC regulates the constant roll gap and also
includes the gauge deviation feedback control on stand S5. The
gaugemeter control at stands S1 and S2, along with the gauge deviation
feedback control, assures constant gauge material exiting stand S2.
Since the speed of stand S2 is also constant, the material will be fed into
stand S3 with a constant mass flow.
Fig. 24.11 Davy-Loewy three-stage AGC for tandem cold mills. From
Dendle [1]. Copyright Institute of Metals. Reprinted with permission.
Fig. 24.12 Three-stage AGC for tandem hot strip mills. 1 - roll gap
gaugemeter control, 2 - roll gap position control, 3 - looper control, 4 -
main drive speed control, 5 - exit gauge error feedback control.
thickness and roll force. This fluctuation is used for calculating the
optimum roll gap for stand 2, taking into account the time delay in the
control system and the strip transfer time from stand 1 to stand 2.
Fig. 24.14 Flow-stress feedforward AGC for tandem cold mills developed
by Kobe Steel. Adapted from Nakada, et al [17].
The roll gap setup errors and variations in thickness and hardness of the
incoming strip are corrected by an automatic gauge control system (Fig.
24.15a) that incorporates three feedback control loops. Feedback for
each loop is provided by thickness gages that are installed after stands 2,
4, and 5. The first control loop adjusts the roll gaps of stands 1 and 2
while the second loop controls the roll gaps of stands 3 and 4. The third
loop controls the gauge by adjusting the speed of stand 5 and, thus,
affecting the exit strip tension. The interstand strip tension is maintained
constant by a roll speed controller. Stand 3 is selected to be the pivot
stand (key stand), as shown in Fig. 24.15b. A computer simulation of the
non-interactive AGC was conducted by Hitachi, Japan [19], who
determined that application of this control system can improve the
thickness accuracy from ±0.8% to ±0.4%.
Mass flow gauge calculating system - This system as shown in Fig. 24.16
calculates the mass flow gauge of the i-th stand by the following
equation:
where
Hi
=
mass flow entry gauge
hi
=
mass flow exit gauge
fi forward slip.
=
ri
=
reduction
μi
=
coefficient of friction
R′i
=
deformed work roll radius
tfi
=
forward tension
tbi
=
backward tension
Ki
=
mean resistance to deformation
Φ modification coefficient.
=
Gauge and tension control system - The gauge and tension control
system uses either a low-speed or high-speed mode of operation. At low
rolling speeds, the control continuously maintains the desired interstand
tension and quickly minimizes the gauge error at each stand by
regulating the roll gaps and tension references. The interstand tension is
adjusted by changing the roll speeds. The required changes in the roll
gap and tension references are calculated by utilizing a multivariable
optimum control concept. This concept is based on minimizing the
integration of the square sum of the thickness deviation.
At high rolling speeds, the roll speeds of the mill stands are regulated by
utilizing the following control loops:
The gauge and tension control compensates for the lack of front tension
during threading by an
Page 594
The accuracy of the AGC system can be determined when the response
of the roll speed control system is changed in equal amounts on all
stands. The AGC accuracy can be evaluated in relative terms by
employing the AGC error ratio Ar that is expressed as:
where
δ7.5 AGC error corresponding to roll speed control system response ω = 7.5
=rad/s.
Figure 24.18 shows that the AGC error ratio reduces and hence the AGC
performance improves with an increase in the response of the roll speed
control system.
Fig. 24.18 Effect of mill motor response on AGC accuracy. Adapted from
Hattori, et al [21].
Local cold spots on the strip known as skid marks that are
generated in the slab reheat furnace as the surface of the slab
contacts the furnace skids.
The feedforward AGC, that was developed by the Bethlehem Steel [23],
is designed to reduce the effect of temperature variation on both the strip
gauge and strip flatness performance. Figure 24.19 shows the
feedforward AGC block diagram for hot strip mills. Since the first mill
stand is the sampling stand, no roll gap adjustment is made on this stand
during rolling. The roll gap control of the next three stands is designed to
overcorrect (negativity control) in-bar thickness variation that is caused
by overall and local temperature variations along the strip. The roll gap
control of the last three stands allows the overcorrected or negative
gauge to grow back, so that a constant roll force is maintained at these
stands.
Fig. 24.19 Control block diagram of feedforward AGC for hot strip mills.
Adapted from Wagner, et al [23].
Fig. 24.20 Block diagram of fast adaptive threading (FAT) control
implemented at Dofasco 68 in. hot strip mill. Adapted from Vandenberg,
et al [10].
Page 597
The temperature readings from a sensor that is installed after stand 1 are
sampled 10 times per second and used to predict the strip temperature at
the roll bite of each downstream stand. The growback predictor and
negativity determinator, using these temperature data along with other
strip characteristics, develop the gauge references for each sample of
steel, so that the necessary negativity and growback criteria are met. In a
modified control system that is known as force feedforward (FFF) AGC
[24, 25], the signal from the temperature sensor is replaced with the roll
separating force signal that is measured at the F1 stand (see dashed
lines in Fig. 24.19).
A somewhat similar concept was used at the Dofasco 68 in. hot strip mill
to control strip threading [10]. The control function, known as feedforward
adaptive threading (FAT), scans the head end force on the F2 stand and
uses the force error to adjust the force prediction and roll gap references
at the downstream mill stands (Fig. 24.20). The control is complemented
with the force feedback signals that improve the accuracy and
consistency of the gauge performance during threading.
X-ray gage to calculate the next mill setup values for stands F1 through
F4 while the actual measurements by the exit X-ray gage are used to
calculate the next mill setup values for stands F5 through F7.
Compensation for variation of the oil film thickness in oil film type backup
roll bearings is usually based on utilization of the experimental curves
that represent the relationship between the roll force and roll speed.
Analyzing methods
Synthesizing methods.
limit reaches the minimum value of the input signal. The value of the
output signal of the dead band circuit is equal to the average value
between the upper and lower dead band limits (Fig. 24.22b).
Fig. 24.23 Block diagram of roll gap control system utilizing floating dead
band control method of roll eccentricity compensation.
Figure 24.23 shows an application of the dead band method to a gauge
control system based on the gaugemeter principle. The signal P + ΔPe
from a load cell contains a periodic component ΔPe corresponding to roll
eccentricity. The dead band circuit transforms this input signal into a
Page 601
signal P′ free of the periodic component ΔPe. After dividing the value of
this signal by the value of the mill structural stiffness KS of the
corresponding side of the mill, the mill stretch value P′/KS is calculated.
The calculated value of the exit gauge ha is equal to:
where
Since the value for P′ may differ from the actual roll force value P by as
much as one half of the dead band b, the error dha in calculating the exit
gauge is equal to:
Equation (24-11) allows one to evaluate the applicability of the dead band
method depending on the desired accuracy of the gauge control system.
For example, if the dead band for each side of the mill is equal to 15 tons
(33,070 lb) and the mill structural stiffness of each side of the mill is equal
to 268 tons/mm (15×106 lb/in.), the gauge error may be as large as 0.028
mm (0.0011 in.).
KM
=
rolled material stiffness
KS
=
mill structural stiffness
ω
=
angular speed of backup roll
t time.
=
Fig. 24.24 Block diagram of roll gap control system utilizing roll force
control method of roll eccentricity compensation.
Figure 24.26 shows the block diagram of the IHI roll eccentricity
compensation control employing the FARE method. The gauge control is
based on the gaugemeter principle. The input signals to the FARE control
are signals from a load cell and a pulse generator connected to the
backup roll end. The eccentricity signal detected by means of FARE,
passes through the pressure control loop and adjusts the roll gap so as to
increase or decrease the eccentricity correcting load. The signal
producing the eccentricity correcting load continues to accumulate until
the roll eccentricity load component vanishes in the rolling load signal.
The output of FARE will then be stored in the core memory when no
further eccentricity load component can be detected. In the case when
several pieces are rolled, it is continuously stored in the memory
Page 603
force when the roll eccentricity eliminating control was not activated and
the middle part shows the load variation when this control was operating.
It is evident from this figure that the roll force variation was reduced four
times after the roll eccentricity eliminating control was activated. The
main deficiency of the FARE method is that it does not provide for
compensation of the second and higher harmonics of the roll eccentricity.
Imai and Shiozaki [33] have applied a similar method to compensate roll
eccentricity in a plate mill. The Fourier analysis technique has also been
utilized in the roll eccentricity compensation methods proposed by King
and Stewart [34], Puda [35], Oliver and Stewart [36], and Stewart and
Oliver [37] all of Aluminum Company of America, and also by Anbe, et al
[38] of Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba, Japan.
Fig. 24.27 Reducing roll eccentricity effect with FARE control during “kiss
rolling” on cold mill. Adapted from Imai and Sizuki [32].
Fig. 24.28 Strip gauge variation during flying gauge change with: a)
decrease in finished gauge and b) with increase in finished gauge.
Adapted from Hikino, et al [39].
Page 605
Figure 24.28 illustrates two cases that were studied by Hikino, et al [39].
Figure 24.28a shows the case when the finished gauge decreases and
Fig. 24.28b shows the case when the finished gauge increases. In both
cases, the strip length with transient gauge does not exceed 10 meters.
exceeding 0.8 mm. Incidentally, this is true for both conventional and
flying gauge change methods. With the flying gauge change method,
however, the off-gauge length is approximately 2.5 times shorter than
that obtained by a conventional gauge change method.
References
1. Dendle, D.W., “Hydraulic Position-Controlled Mill and Automatic Gauge
Control,” Flat Rolling: A Comparison of Rolling Mill Types, Metals Society,
Cardiff, Wales, 1978, pp. 103-111.
6. Ginzburg, V.B., and Snitkin, S.R., U.S. Patent No. 4,513,594, Apr. 30,
1985.
7. Hishikawa, S., et al, “New Control Techniques for Cold Rolling Mills -
Applications to Aluminum Rolling,” Hitachi Review, Vol. 39 No. 4, 1990,
pp. 221-230.
8. Imai, S., et al, “IHI New Type Hydraulic Looper,” IHI Engineering
Review, Vol. 11 No. 1, Jan. 1978, pp. 29-37.
11. Bass, G.V. and Hartmann, R., “Minimum Tension Control in Finishing
Train of Hot Strip Mills,” Iron and Steel Engineer, Nov. 1987, pp. 48-53.
13. Akamatsu, J., et al, “Looper-less Tension Control of a Hot Strip Mill
Finisher,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Steel Rolling:
Science and Technology of Flat Rolled Products, Vol. 1, Sept. 29 - Oct. 4,
1980, Tokyo, pp. 410-417.
14. Oishi, A., et al, “New Tension Control System in Finishing Stands of a
Hot Strip Mill,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Steel
Rolling: Science and Technology of Flat Rolled Products, Vol. 1, Sept. 29
- Oct. 4, 1980, Tokyo, pp. 418-427.
15. Tanimoto, S., et al, “New Tension Measurement and Control System
in Hot Strip Finishing Mill,” Statistical Process Control in the Steel
Industry, Iron and Steel Society, Warrendale, Pa., 1985.
16. Tajima, S., et al, “Development of a New Type AGC System for a
Tandem Cold Mill,” AISE Year Book, 1981, pp. 240-245.
Page 607
17. Nakada, T., et al, “Feedforward AGC System for Cold Rolling Tandem
Mills,” Proceedings of the 3rd Process Technology Conference:
Application of Mathematical and Physical Models in the Iron and Steel
Industry, Vol. 3, March 28-31, 1982, Warrendale, Pa., pp. 117-121.
18. Okamoto, T., et al, “Advanced Gauge and Tension Control of Tandem
Cold Mill with Hydraulic Screwdown System,” Transactions of the Iron
and Steel Institute of Japan, Vol. 16, 1976, pp. 614-622.
20. Eto, T., et al, “The Automatic Tension and Gauge Control of Tandem
Cold Mill,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Steel Rolling:
Science and Technology of Flat Rolled Products, Vol. 1, Tokyo, Sept. 29 -
Oct. 4, 1980, pp. 439-450.
21. Hattori, M., et al, “Latest Control System for Cold Strip Mill,” Nippon
Steel Technical Report, No. 49, April 1991, pp. 51-58.
22. Jenkins, W.G., et al, “Sparrows Point 56 in. Hot Strip Mill Gauge
Control System,” AISE ear Book, 1969, pp. 339-348.
23. Wagner, F., et al, “Feedforward Control System for a Hot Strip Mill,”
Iron and Steel Engineer, Oct. 1984, pp. 44-48.
24. Readal, G.J., and Wagner, F., “Force Feedforward (FFF) Automatic
Gauge Control Installed on USS Fairfield Works 68 in. Hot Strip Mill,”
Paper presented at the 1989 AISE Annual Convention, Association of
Iron and Steel Engineers, Pittsburgh, Pa., Sept. 18-21, 1989.
25. Yamashita, A., et al, “Development of Feedforward AGC for 70 in. Hot
Strip Mill at Kashima Steel Works,” Sumitomo Search, No. 16, Nov. 1976,
pp. 34-39.
26. Haraki, H., et al, “Hot Strip Mill Gauge Control Using Interstand
Thickness Meter,” Iron and Steel Engineer, Aug. 1992, pp. 54-59.
27. Sharma, U. and Parfitt, G.I., “The Application of Fuzzy Logic
Technology to Tandem Mill Transitional Gage Variation,” Proceedings of
the 1997 AISE Annual Convention, Vol. 2 Cleveland, Ohio, Sept. 23 -
Oct. 2, 1997, pp. 679-690.
28. Oda, T., et al, “Adaptive Technology for Thickness Control of Finisher
Set-up on Hot Strip Mill,” ISIJ International, Vol. 35 (1995), No.l, pp. 42-
49.
29. Desrochers, A. A., and Saridis, G. N., “Control Methods for Hot Steel
Rolling Mill: An Application of Learning Theory and Pattern Recognition,”
Transaction of the ASME, vol. 102, May 1980, pp. 118-122.
30. D.J. Fapiano and D.E. Steeper, “Control of Strip Thickness in Hot
Rolling,” AISE Year Book, 1985, pp. 487-496.
31. Shiozaki, H., and Takahashi, N., U.S. Patent No. 3,709,009, Jan. 9,
1973.
32. Imai, I., and Suzuki, T., “FARE (Fourier Analyzer of Roll Eccentricity)
Detector and Control System for Elimination of Roll Eccentricity,” IHI
Publication, Sept. 1973, pp. 1-12.
33. Imai, I., and Shiozaki, H., U.S. Patent No. 3,920,968, Nov. 18, 1975.
34. King, E.O. and Stewart, D.F., U.S. Patent No. 4,222,254, Sept. 16,
1980.
35. Puda, M.E., U.S. Patent No. 4,531,392, July 30, 1985.
36. Oliver, D.T., and Stewart, D.F., U.S. Patent No. 4,648,257, March 10,
1987.
37. Stewart, D.F., and Oliver, D.T., U.S. Patent No. 4,656,854, April 14,
1987.
Page 608
38. Anbe, Y., et al, U.S. Patent No. 4,763,273, Aug. 9, 1988.
39. Hikino, K., et al, “Operation of Fully Continuous Tandem Cold Mill at
Fukuyama,” AISE Year Book, 1977, pp. 81-85.
Page 609
Part VII
WIDTH CONTROL
Page 610
Chapter 25
BASIC PRINCIPLES OF WIDTH CHANGE
w1, w2 mean cross-sectional width of workpiece before and after flat rolling.
=
Equation (25-1) takes into account the fact that the edges of the rolled flat
products are not necessarily straight. Figure 25.1 illustrates the three
most common edge cross-sectional profiles as follows:
The relationship between the absolute value of lateral spread Δws and
the width spread coefficient Sw can be readily derived from Eq. (25-2) as
follows:
Page 613
Thus, the absolute value of lateral spread is a function of not only the
width spread coefficient Sw, but also the initial width w1 and the relative
thickness parameter h1/h2.
substantially reduces when the initial slab thickness is between 200 and
250 mm (8.0 and 10 in.).
Fig. 25.4 Effect of horizontal mill work roll diameter on width spread
coefficient.
Fig. 25.5 Effect of thickness draft on width spread coefficient.
Page 616
ha
=
average workpiece thickness
Δ draft.
=
The last equation also indicates that the lateral spread also increases
with the increase in the coefficient of friction in rolling direction.
Fig. 25.6 Slab cross-sectional profile before (dashed line) and after
edging. Adapted from Shibahara, et al [8].
Fig. 25.8 Effect of initial slab thickness and width draft on relative
thickness at peak bulging.
Table 25.2 summarizes the equations used for determining the relative
slab thickness at peak bulging. Figures 25.8 and 25.9 illustrate the plots
of the equation derived by Tazoe, et al and modified by. Ginzburg based
on the experimental data obtained by Shibahara, et al. These plots
indicate that the relative thickness at peak bulging hb/ho increases with
an increase in width draft de and decreases with an increase in the initial
slab thickness ho as shown in Fig. 25.8.
The relative slab thickness at peak bulging hb/ho is also affected by the
edger roll diameter De = 2Re and initial slab width wo. An increase in
edger roll diameter reduces the relative thickness at peak bulging
whereas an increase in the initial slab width produces the opposite effect
as
Page 619
Fig. 25.9 Effect of the edger roll diameter and initial slab width on relative
thickness at peak bulging.
Okado, et
[12]
al
Tazoe, et
[11]
al
Tazoe, et
al,
modified [11]
by
Ginzburg
we
=
bar width after
edging
A diligent analysis of the width spread components Δws and Δwb was
made by Shibahara, et al. According to their analysis, the bar width
spread due to thickness reduction Δws may be presented in the following
form:
where
ho, hf bar thickness prior to edging and after reduction in thickness respectively
=
a geometrical parameter.
=
b geometrical parameter.
=
Page 621
A typical variation of the rolled product width after several edging and
thickness reductions in a roughing train of a continuous hot strip mill is
shown in Fig. 25.11.
Fig. 25.11 Width change in roughing stands of a continuous hot strip mill.
Adapted from Shibahara, et al [8].
Figures 25.14 and 25.15 depict the results of an edge rolling test with
grooved rolls conducted by Takeuchi, et al. This test shows that the
position of the dog bone peak A increases with an increase in both the
width reduction and the initial slab width (Fig. 25.14). The amount of
material spread (wf - we) after flattening of the dog bone also increases
with an increase in both width reduction and initial slab width (Fig. 25.15).
Page 624
Fig. 25.15 Amount of material spread after flattening dog bone formed
during edging with grooved rolls. Adapted from Takeuchi, et al [14].
Fig. 25.16 Edging efficiency with grooved rolls. Adapted from Vathaire, et
al [15].
Figures 25.16 and 25.17 illustrate the results of another edge rolling test
with grooved rolls conducted by de Vathaire, et al [15]. This test indicated
that the edging efficiency for both
Page 625
grooved and flat rolls generally increases with an increase in the width
draft. This increase is minimal when the width draft is less than 50 mm
(2.0 in.) and becomes very pronounced when the width draft exceeds 50
mm. The test also shows that the edging efficiency is greater for narrow
slabs (Fig. 25.16). The application of grooved rolls may almost double the
edging efficiency for narrow slabs in comparison with the edging
efficiency obtained with the use of flat rolls (Fig. 25.17).
Fig. 25.17 Comparison of edging efficiency with grooved and flat rolls.
Adapted from Vathaire, et al [15].
Huismann has found that the spread after a horizontal pass can be
decreased by making the groove height hg smaller in respect to the initial
slab thickness ho as illustrated in Fig 25.18. By reducing the ratio hg/ho
from 1.0 to 0.8, the spread after a horizontal pass can be cut in half.
Ten intermediate edging phases of the head end are shown in this figure.
It is clear, that beginning from edging phase 4, the head end of the slab
loses contact with the roll surface even before the roll gap exit is reached.
It is only when a sufficient length of the rolled product has passed
through the roll gap that complete contact of the rolled product with the
roll surface is made.
Page 626
Fig. 25.19 Deformation of head end of rolled stock during start of edging.
Adapted from Pawelski and Piber [16].
This metal deformation behavior can be explained by the fact that the
slab head end is generally stress-free. Thus, there are no reverse
moments to hold the material in contact with the rolls. Only when a
sufficiently long piece has been rolled and the head end has emerged
from the plastic deformation zone, does the reverse-acting shear
stresses form internally to force the material to fill the narrowed part of
the roll gap. A similar explanation can be given for unsteady rolling
conditions when the tail end of the slab passes through the roll bite.
Page 627
Fig. 25.20 Formation of ends of rolled stock. Adapted from Pawelski and
Piber [16].
Fig. 25.21 Width necking of head end of the rolled bar after one edging
pass. Adapted from Fau, et al [17].
The three principal parameters that are used to adequately describe the
workpiece end shapes are as follows [16]:
Page 628
The length of the nonuniform zone at the head and tail ends of the slab is
known as crop length.
Based on rolling tests conducted by Fau, et al at the Sollac hot strip mill
in France [17], width necking of a slab head end after one edging pass
greatly varies with the slab width as shown in Fig. 25.21. These tests
showed that as the initial slab width wo increases, the width necking will
also increase.
25.11 Buckling
A loss of the slab stability in the transverse direction is known as
buckling. Okada, et al conducted a thorough investigation of the buckling
phenomenon by carrying out model experiments with samples made of
lead. The experimental data were compared with the data observed in an
actual rolling mill and are found to be in good agreement with each other.
Fig. 25.22 Limits of buckling. Adapted from Okado, et al [12].
Fig. 25.24 Edge cross-sectional shape produced by: a) flat edging rolls,
b) tapered edging rolls, and c) grooved edging rolls.
The geometry of the roll bite is the other major factor that affects the slab
cross-sectional shape. According to an investigation conducted by
Pawelski and Piber, the drawn in or overlap edge appears when the ratio
of the roll contact length to the initial slab thickness is less than 0.68.
When this ratio is greater than 0.68, the edge is bulged. Thus, by
selecting an appropriate draft, a square edge shape can be obtained.
Page 630
Under sticking conditions in the roll bite, a folding over of the side
surfaces (Fig. 25.23) may take place resulting in drawn in shape. When
the deformation is homogeneous, the edge cross-sectional shape is
square. Under combined sticking and slipping frictional conditions in the
roll bite, a convex or bulged edge shape is produced.
References
1. Ginzburg, V.B., Steel-Rolling Technology: Theory and Practice, Marcel
Dekker, New York, 1989.
7. Beese, J.G., “Some Problem Areas in the Rolling of Hot Steel Slabs,”
AISE Year Book, 1980, pp. 360-363.
11. Tazoe, N., et al, “New Forms of Hot Strip Mill Width Rolling
Installations,” Paper Presented at 1984 AISE Spring Conference,
Dearborn, Mich., April 30 - May 2, 1984.
12. Okado, M., et al, “New Light on Behavior of Width of Edge of Head
and Tail of Slabs in Hot Strip Rolling Mills,” Journal of the Iron and Steel
Institute of Japan, Vol. 67 No. 15, 1981, pp. 2516-2525.
16. Pawelski, O., and Piber, V., “Possibilities and Limits of Deformation in
Width Direction in Hot Flat Rolling, ” Stahl und Eisen, Vol. 100 No. 17,
Aug. 25, 1980, pp. 937-949.
17. Fau, F., et al, “Optimization of the Shape of Slab Ends on the
Reversing Roughing Mill of Sollac Hot Strip Mill,” Proceedings of the 4th
International Steel Rolling Conference: The Science and Technology of
Flat Rolling, Vol. 1, Deauville, France, June 1-3, 1987, pp. A.8.1 - A.8.5.
Chapter 26
WIDTH CHANGE BY ROLLING AND PRESSING
When a slab is rolled from an ingot, the desired width is usually obtained
by rolling the slab on its edge in a slabbing mill having horizontal rolls [1].
Fig. 26.1 Main arrangements of vertical and horizontal mills: a) open mill
stand, b) VH, c) HVH, and d) VHV. From Ginzburg [1].
vertical edgers. The vertical edgers that are immediately installed after
the reheating furnaces are known as vertical scalebreakers because of
their ability to enhance the breaking of scale during the squeezing of a
slab.
Fig. 26.3 Vertical edger with top horizontal main drive motors. Adapted
from Holterhoff [3].
The arrangement having a horizontal main drive motor has a lower height
in comparison with the edger arrangement having two vertical main drive
motors. There is, however, an advantage in using the vertical main drive
motors since more reliable cylindrical gears can be used rather than the
less reliable bevel gears that are used in the edgers with horizontal main
drive motors.
The four principal shapes of edging rolls that are used in vertical edgers
are:
Fig. 26.5 Four types of edging rolls: a) flat, b) tapered, c) grooved with
flat or convex inner surface, and d) grooved with tapered inner surface.
Flat rolls require a minimum amount of energy for edging. However, the
edging efficiency with flat rolls is low, and also one side of the slab has a
tendency to rise when edging. With tapered rolls, the probability for this
type of instability of the edging process is significantly reduced. Edging
with grooved rolls increases the edging efficiency by pushing the peak of
the dog bone closer to the centerline of the slab. Grooved rolls, however,
are only effective when the slab thickness is compatible with the groove
height. To provide stability of the slab when the slab thickness is less
than the groove height, these rolls can be designed with a tapered inner
surface.
The width change range of the roughing train is defined as the difference
between the width produced without edging and the width produced by
taking the maximum possible width reduction at each edging stand. In the
example shown in Fig. 26.6, the width change range is equal to 72 mm
for a slab with an initial width of 1270 mm.
The VHV arrangement (Fig. 26.1d) is used in the Nippon Steel Oita
Works, Japan [6]. This slab sizing mill, which was developed by IHI,
Japan, is an off-line reversing mill that provides reduction in both
thickness and width and also utilizes grooved rolls in the edger. The
principal specifications of this slab sizing mill are:
For all these tests, the same thickness reductions were taken as
illustrated in Table 26.1. Figure 26.8 shows the pass schedules for the
vertical edger when edging was done during the early passes which is
designated as Schedule A, and during the late passes (Schedule B).
These investigations have shown that when the edging work is done
early in the schedule, a strong fish tail is created in the slab ends.
2 1205°C
155.9
mm
3 1195°C
123.1
mm
4 1180°C
90.2
mm
5 1165°C
60.4
mm
6 1145°C
39.7
mm
7 1120°C
26.4
mm
Fig. 26.8 Pass schedules for edger with early edging (schedule A) and
late edging (schedule B). Adapted from Pera, et al [7].
Page 639
Figure 26.9 shows that the length of the fish tail increases with the
increasing reduction and increasing slab width. Edging late in the
schedule is always advantageous with regard to the amount of end
scrap. On the other hand, such a procedure may lead to buckling of the
slab. Late edging tends to give a more inhomogeneous deformation,
concentrated along the side of the slab resulting in increased spread
when the dog bone is rolled out in the next flat pass. As the height of the
dog bone decreases in the slab ends, the width shortage in the ends is
accentuated.
Fig. 26.9 Fish tail length and maximum width shortage for early edging
(schedule A) and late edging (schedule B). Adapted from Pera, et al, [7].
Figure 26.9 shows the maximum width shortage at the strip ends. This
width shortage increases with an increasing reduction and decreased
slab width. During these trials, a maximum width reduction of 150 mm
was achieved for wide slabs and nearly 100 mm for narrow slabs. The
width shortage was as much as 55 mm and the nonuniform length at the
bar ends was as long as 20 meters, resulting in crop losses of up to 10%.
For the same reduction rate, the smaller the width reduction ratio
and the greater the number of rolling passes, the more refined
deformation can be obtained at the slab edge. Therefore, the
mechanical properties of the rolled material are superior to the
ones obtained with a large reduction and fewer passes. However,
if the width reduction is small, the slab center is less deformed and
therefore the thickness at the center is reduced. This causes an
increase in the crop losses at the head and tail ends of the slab,
and would be even further increased if an inner crack existed in
the center section of the slab.
If horizontal rolling only is performed, without vertical rolling, the
direction of the columnar structure at the slab edge does not
change, and therefore the mechanical properties do not improve.
Generally, the yield stress and tensile strength of the material
rolled by a horizontal mill alone are greater than in the material
that is rolled by both horizontal and vertical mills. However, this
difference is minimal and the overall properties of the hot rolled
steel slabs processed from continuously cast slabs by heavy
width-reduction rolling are superior to those processed by
horizontal rolling only.
h
=
strip thickness
km
=
flow stress
σx
=
strip tension
Fig. 26.10 Width restoration after edging and flat rolling in finishing mill.
Adapted from Matoba, et al [9].
Knowing this fact, the width enlargement methods may be clearly divided
into two groups. The first group utilizes the fact that the thickness
reduction during rolling is mostly translated into an elongation in the
longitudinal direction. A typical example of this method is the broadside
rolling method. According to this method (Fig. 26.11), width enlargement
is achieved by changing the rolled slab orientation in respect to a
horizontal rolling mill by 90 degrees so that the thickness reduction is
made in the width direction until a required slab width wb is obtained.
Page 642
All of these methods will produce the same result and should be selected
based on each particular application.
Long-tool sizing presses with the tool length Lt being greater than
the initial slab length as shown in Fig. 26.13a.
Short-tool sizing presses with the tool length Lt being less than the
initial slab length as shown in Figs. 26.13b and 26.13c.
Only one stroke of the press tools is usually required for sizing a
workpiece with a long-tool sizing press. Width reduction with a short-tool
sizing press employs a series of reciprocated movements of the press
tools with the workpiece being advanced either between or
simultaneously with the tool squeezing strokes. These short-tool sizing
presses can be classified in the following manner.
Start-stop type sizing presses - In the start-stop type sizing press, the
workpiece is maintained in a stationary position during squeezing. After
the completion of each squeezing
Page 644
stroke, the press tools are retracted and the workpiece is advanced to the
next working position by a separate mechanism, such as pinch rolls. In
this type of sizing press, the shape of the press tool contact zone can be
either rectangular (Figs. 26.13a and 26.13b) or have a tapered portion
(Fig. 26.13c).
This difference in design significantly affects the press tool stroke that is
needed to produce a certain width reduction. Indeed, when the press tool
shape is rectangular, the minimum total stroke required to be made by
both press tools is equal to the slab width draft. When the press tools
have tapered portions, the width reduction can be produced with a tool
stroke that is substantially less than the width draft.
Fig. 26.13 Various types of slab sizing presses: a) long-tool, b) short-tool
with flat press tools, and c) short-tool with tapered press tools. Adapted
from Nikaido, et al [24].
Flying type sizing presses - Flying type sizing presses are designed to
produce a squeezing of the workpiece along with its simultaneous
advancement, which is usually accomplished by devising a sophisticated
motion of the press tools. This action reportedly improves the workpiece
edge surface quality. In this type of sizing press, the press tool contact
zone has a specific shape that is needed to produce the desired contact
pattern between the press tools and the workpiece. The tool cross-
sectional shape can be either flat or grooved. Similar to edging with
rolling mills, the use of grooved press tools in sizing presses moves the
peak of the bulge closer to the center of the slab which results in better
edging efficiency.
Rocking type sizing presses - In rocking type sizing presses, the slab is
squeezed in a similar manner as in a start-stop type sizing press. In
addition, a rocking motion of the press tools is employed. This design
combines the simplicity of the start-stop type sizing presses with the
Page 645
During each oscillating cycle the press tools retract to provide a gap m
between the straight portions of the press tools and the slab (Fig.
26.14b). This allows the slab to be advanced a distance s that is equal to
n frequency of oscillation.
=
The contact length Ls between the slab and the press tools (Fig. 26.14c)
is equal to:
where
de width draft.
=
new slab, the press tools are separated and the slab is advanced forward
with the entry pinch rolls so that the head end of the slab is located within
the area between the parallel portions of the press tools. The press tools
then squeeze the slab of initial width wo with a screw-nut mechanism
until the desired width we of the head end is obtained. Squeezing of the
remaining portion of the slab is provided by oscillating the hydraulic
cylinders which is accompanied by an appropriate advancement of the
slab. As soon as the tail end of the slab leaves the entry pinch roll area,
the slab continues to be fed into the press with the exit pinch roll.
Fig. 26.16 Effect of press tool angle and slab width on edging efficiency
of sizing press. Adapted from Nikaido, et al [26].
Crank radius 50 mm
Crank frequency
1.43 Hz
Fig. 26.18 Crop length of head and tail end of rolled stock when edging
with sizing press. Adapted from Nikaido, et al [26].
Fig. 26.19 Effect of width reduction and slab width on edging efficiency
of sizing press. Adapted from Nikaido, et al [26].
The squeezing load developed in the sizing press was found to be almost
linearly proportional to the width draft. It was also established that for the
same initial slab thickness ho
Page 650
and width draft, the effect of the initial slab width wo on the squeezing
load was small (Fig. 26.20).
The slab feeding speed varies with the width draft. When the draft is
equal to 300 mm (11.8 in.), the average slab feeding speed is equal to
174 mm/s (6.86 in./s).
Fig. 26.20 Squeezing load developed by the sizing press. Adapted from
Nikaido, et al [26].
Two major motions of the press tools, transverse and longitudinal, are
provided by two separate drives. The transverse motion produces
squeezing of the slab and is activated by a transverse drive motor
through two transverse crankshaft mechanisms, each connected to a
press tool. The slab feeding is achieved with synchronous longitudinal
motions of the press tools that are generated by two independent
longitudinal drive motors through their respective crankshaft
mechanisms.
The coordinated motions of the press tools in both the longitudinal and
transverse directions produce elliptical shape locuses of the tools as
shown in Fig. 26.21. This action reportedly eliminates surface defects
which may appear during sizing by the start-stop type sizing presses. The
sizing press is installed upstream of the vertical scalebreaker and
reduces the slab width as the slab moves in direction of the rolling. The
main parameters of the SMI Kashima Works sizing press are as follows
[28]:
Cycle frequencies 35 to 50
strokes/min.
Fig. 26.21 Schematic presentation of IHI flying type sizing press installed
at SMI Kashima Works hot strip mill. Adapted from [28].
One of the main features of this flying type sizing press is that the slab
feeding speed is constant and independent of the width draft. The press
first sizes the head end of the slab (Fig. 26.22a), then, for a light
reduction, works its way along the complete slab length (Fig. 26.22b). For
heavy reductions, before completing the sizing cycle, the press first sizes
the tail end of the slab (Fig. 26.22c) and then the rest of the slab length
(Fig. 26.22d) so that better shape of both head and tail ends of the slab
can be obtained.
Fig. 26.22 Slab width reduction sequence with IHI flying type sizing
press installed at SMI Kashima Works hot strip mill. Adapted from [28].
Page 652
The flying type sizing press at the SMI Kashima Works is designed to
reduce the number of standard slab widths that are produced by the
caster and increase the average slab width. This in turn helps to increase
the caster output and hot direct charging ratio along with reducing the
reheating fuel consumption and increasing the yield at the hot strip mill.
The rocking type sizing press utilizes press tools that have parallel and
tapered portions. In order to provide a variable slope angle and be able to
reverse the direction of the taper with respect to the direction of slab
movement, each press tool is driven by a pair of hydraulic cylinders.
StepThe slab is then advanced forward so that the head end of the slab is located
2 - within the area between the head portions of the press tools. The slab is then
squeezed by an appropriate extension of the hydraulic cylinders. As shown
in Fig. 26.24a, Lc is the distance between two adjacent cylinders.
StepThe press tools are then rotated in the horizontal plane so that their tail
3 - portions will additionally squeeze the slab until full contact of the tail
portions of the press tools with the slab is achieved (Fig. 26.24b). At the
same time, the head portions of the press tools rotate away from the slab.
StepThe press tools are then moved a distance m away from the slab by the
4 - retraction of all hydraulic cylinders (Fig. 26.24c).
StepThe slab is then advanced a distance s (Fig. 26.24d). This would complete
5 - the first
Page 654
Some of the design features that have been proposed to achieve these
goals are described as follows.
In flying type sizing presses, the actions of slab squeezing and transfer
are combined, thus
Page 655
Stable support of press load - In a sizing press, the location of the center-
of-load varies with the amount of reduction, the head and tail pre-forming
lengths, and other factors. To avoid vibration and assure stable slab
deformation, the location of the center-of-load must be kept within an
acceptable range. In the sizing presses with mechanical screwdown
mechanisms [31], this can be achieved by an appropriate positioning of
the screws that support the press tools. In the hydraulically driven sizing
presses [30], this positioning can be provided at a much faster rate.
References
1. Ginzburg, V.B., Steel Rolling Technology: Theory and Practice, Marcel
Dekker, New York, 1989.
13. Greenfield, E.T., U.S. Patent No. 1,217,750, Feb. 27, 1917.
14. Gersman, H.M., U.S. Patent No. 1,814,593, July 14, 1931.
15. Okado, M., et al, U.S. Patent No. 4,294,094, Oct. 13, 1981.
16. Hope, T., et al, “Hi-Spred: A New Hot Rolling Process Which Can
Affect Major Changes of Slab Width,’’ Proceedings of 4th International
Steel Rolling Conference: The Science and Technology of Flat Rolling,
Vol. 1, Deauville, France, June 1-3, 1987, pp. A.13.1 - A.13.5.
17. Ginzburg, V.B., U.S. Patent No. 4,793,169, Dec. 27, 1988.
19. Hiramatsu, T., Japan Patent No. 57-52504, March 29, 1982.
20. Ginzburg, V.B., U.S. Patent No. 4,730,475, March 15, 1988.
22. Kimura, T., U.S. Patent No. 4,578, 983, April 1, 1986.
23. Naoi, T., et al, “Development of a Slab Sizing Press,” Hitachi Review,
Vol. 37 No. 4, 1988, pp. 189-194.
24. Nikaido, H., et al, U.S. Patent No. 4,760,728, Aug. 2, 1988.
25. Hira, T., et al, “Deformation of Slab under Heavy Reduction of Width
by Sizing Press,” Kawasaki Steel Technical Report, No. 22, May 1990,
pp. 32-40.
26. Nikaido, H., et al, “Development of Slab Sizing Press for Heavy Width
Reduction in Hot Strip Mills,” Iron and Steel Engineer, Sept. 1990, pp. 21-
26.
28. Nikaido, H., et al, “Hitachi’s Highly Reliable Slab Sizing Press,”
Hitachi Review, Vol. 39 No. 4, 1990, pp. 183-188.
29. Imai, Y., et al, “Development and Engineering of a Slab Sizing Press
Applied to a Full Continuous Hot Strip Mill,” The Sumitomo Search, No.
46, April 1991, pp.1-10.
30. Ginzburg, V.B., et al, U.S. Patent No. 5,046,344, Sept. 10, 1991.
Page 657
Chapter 27
OPTIMIZATION AND CONTROL OF WIDTH CHANGE
PROCESS
To quantify the influence of the roll concave crown on end crop losses,
experimental trials were completed using flat rolls and rolls with a
concave crown of 0.1 and 0.15 mm over a 200 mm roll face length.
During these tests, plasticine slabs of the same initial dimensions were
rolled to a final thickness of approximately 2.5 mm. After 10 passes of
rolling, the thickness had been reduced from a nominal 23 mm to 4.5
mm. It was shown that the rolled slab crown had a major influence on the
plan view. As shown in Fig. 27.1, by using a roll crown of 0.15 mm, the
end crop losses were reduced by 50% in comparison with the case when
flat rolls were used.
Page 658
Fig. 27.1 Effect of crown of horizontal rolls on the length of end crop.
Adapted from Chong, et al [2].
Pre-forming slab ends - This method squeezes the slab end corners prior
to edging by rolling. Pre-forming of the slab ends can be accomplished
with the following methods [5]:
Flame cutting.
Roll edging.
Pressing.
Page 659
27.3. This press comprises a pair of press tools 2. The center portion of
the tool is flat and parallel to the slab edge while its end portions are
tapered. The press tools 2 move reciprocatively in the widthwise direction
with their movement being guided by the guiding rods 5 and guiding
plates 7. This movement is provided by the hydraulic cylinders 3 with the
piston rods 4. The slab 1 is transferred toward the press by the table rolls
6 and is positioned between the press tools 2. The press tools have
grooves to prevent slab buckling and to move the peak of bulging toward
the slab center.
Center support.
Both ends support.
Three points support.
The three points support system was developed by Kawasaki Steel and
IHI, both of Japan [10] in application to plate rolling. In this system, the
support rolls at the end are also capable of
Page 662
The desired width change range in a hot strip mill is usually determined in
relation to the production rate and width change capability of a
continuous caster. Therefore, the production rates of both systems are
closely balanced. As the overall production rate becomes greater, it is
usually preferred to have a lesser number of width changes made by the
continuous caster, thereby, leaving the major burden of width changes to
be made at the hot strip mill.
Once the desired width change range in a hot strip mill is selected, a
comparative analysis should be performed in order to select the optimum
width change technology (Fig. 27.8) [11]. As an example, Figure 27.9
illustrates schematically ten various mill arrangements and pass
schedules that were used in the width change technology comparative
analysis for a 56 in. semi-continuous hot strip
Page 663
mill. The main purpose of this analysis, which was sponsored by Warren
Consolidated Industries (WCI Steel), was to define the optimum
modernization program for the existing roughing train so that it could
achieve a width reduction capability of up to 6 inches.
Fig. 27.9 Mill arrangements and pass schedules used in width change
technology analysis for semi-continuous hot strip mill. From Ginzburg, et
al [11]. Reproduced through the courtesy of Iron and Steel Engineer.
Fig. 27.10 Maximum width change range of existing semi-continuous hot
strip mill prior to modernization. From Ginzburg, et al [11]. Reproduced
through the courtesy of Iron and Steel Engineer.
Figure 27.10 shows the maximum width change range of existing semi-
continuous hot strip mill prior to modernization. The mill configurations
that were investigated for the optimization study incorporate the following
main features:
Noncontact
Contact.
Comparison method.
Survey method.
Combined method.
between the object and camera, the dimensions of the image can be
related to the real size of the object.
Width Gage with Horizontal Optical Beams - Figure 27.14 depicts a laser
type width gage that was developed by Kawasaki Steel, Japan [16]. In
this gage, the optical beams are transmitted in a horizontal plane. A ray
of helium-neon laser beam is cast onto the surface to be measured at an
angle of incidence of approximately 2.5°. Light is reflected from this
surface and is dispersed mainly in the direction of the angle of reflection
equal to the angle of incidence.
Fig. 27.14 Laser type width gage developed by Kawasaki Steel. Adapted
from Tomiya, et al [16].
Part of the reflected and dispersed light is received with a lens that
projects an image of a bright spot generated on this surface onto a photo
detector. If the surface to be measured shows a displacement, the image
on the photo detector also moves and the output of the photo detector
changes. As a result, an analog output that is proportional to this
displacement is obtained from an arithmetic unit circuit.
This width gage consists of two displacement gages called laser 1 and
laser 2. The position of these displacement gages is controlled with
position sensors (Magnescales) that are based on the specified slab
width so that the edges of the slab on the roller table are kept within the
measuring range of the displacement gages. The slab width is
determined from the displacement gage and position sensor output.
Accuracy of ±1 mm was reportedly obtained with this width gage.
w
=
plate width
Li
=
plate length along inner edge
In the proposed measuring device, the plate lengths are measured with
two pulse counters that are connected with the axes of two measuring
rolls. These rolls are pivotally mounted on movable blocks to
accommodate different plate widths. The measuring rolls are pressed
against the plate edges with two independent pressure cylinders and the
plate width is measured with the position transducers that are attached to
the pistons of the pressure cylinders. Once the plate width w and the
plate lengths Lo and Li are measured, the average camber radius of the
plate centerline Rc can be calculated by an on-line computer according to
Eq. (27-3).
A similar actuator is used in the edger (E4) with hydraulic automatic width
control (AWC) that has been installed at the Kawasaki Steel, Chiba
Works No. 2 hot strip mill. This edger, which was
Page 670
Power 2 × 560 kW dc
Width control for skid marks - In conventional edging, when skid marks
are present in a slab, the dog bone at the skid marks becomes thicker.
This dog bone will produce additional spread
Page 671
during the following horizontal pass (Fig. 27.18a). To compensate for this
spread, the width control system provides an additional squeezing of the
slab near the skid marks during edging as shown in Fig. 27.18b.
Fig. 27.18 Effect of skid marks on plate plan view: a) without automatic
width control and b) with automatic width control. Adapted from [21].
Roll gap position control mode - When the system operates in this mode,
the signal representing the roll gap reference is compared with the signal
representing the actual roll gap. The error signal is used to drive a
servovalve so that the desired roll gap is maintained. This mode requires
the use of a roll gap position transducer, which is usually installed inside
a hydraulic cylinder.
Width meter mode - This mode is similar to the gaugemeter mode that
was previously developed for controlling the workpiece thickness. This
control system maintains the roll gap δ as given by the equation:
where
Pe
=
roll force during edging
Me edger spring.
=
Thus, the width meter mode requires the application of both a position
transducer that measures the roll gap Go and either a load cell or
pressure transducer that measures the roll force Pe.
Target value wo of the plate width at the entry side of the vertical
edger.
Edging opening setting value w1.
Plate width w2 that is based on the supposition that only dog
bones produced in the edging rolling process are horizontally
rolled.
Plate width w3 after horizontal rolling.
Target width deviation distribution Δw3(x) required at the exit of the
horizontal mill.
The lower level computer calculates the desired distribution of the edger
roll gap opening Δw1(x) striving to obtain the target width variation
distribution after horizontal rolling Δw3(x). The calculation of Δw1(x) is
made by taking into account the edger efficiency η(x). The obtained
values of Δw1(x) are then supplied to the edger roll gap setting unit of the
feedforward control system.
Figure 27.21 depicts the automatic width control system that was
developed by Hoesch Stahl, Germany in application to a 3-stand
roughing mill [23]. The slab is generally reduced in thickness in five
passes, with one pass taken by the first and the last mill stands, and
three reversing passes taken by the second mill stand.
Δw2 of the upstream edgers V1 and V2. The signals w2 and w3 from the
width gages B and C are also utilized in the same feedforward-feedback
manner with respect to the roll gap control of the edger V3.
Edger setup (ESU) control sets the edger roll gaps that are based on the
predicted values for both slab width and target width. Rougher automatic
width control (RAWC) is accomplished by a variable control of the gap
between the edging rolls. The RAWC system provides control of average
width (bar-to-bar control) and also reduces the width variations in each
bar (in-bar control).
Sizing rolling - In this stage, the slab is rolled in the longitudinal direction
to produce the required intermediate thickness.
Broadside rolling - To obtain the required plate width, the slab is turned
around 90° and rolled in the transverse direction.
Finishing rolling-The slab is turned around 90° again and rolled to the
final thickness.
Fig. 27.23 Evolution of plate plan view during rolling: 1 - initial slab, 2 -
after sizing rolling, 3 - before broadsiding, 4 - after broadside rolling, 5 -
before finishing rolling, 6 - after finishing rolling. Adapted from Tsubota
[30].
The term plan view control is customarily applied to the technique that is
designed to produce a true rectangular shape of the rolled plate. A
number of plan view control methods have been
Page 676
DBR process - Dog bone rolling process developed by NKK, Japan [31].
Fig. 27.24 Plate view after rolling with: a) less broadside elongation and
greater longitudinal elongation and b) greater broadside elongation and
less longitudinal elongation. Adapted from Tsubota [30].
h
=
final plate thickness
Fig. 27.25 Sequence of sizing MAS method utilized for less broadside
elongation. Adapted from Yanazawa, et al [29].
Fig. 27.26 Sequence of sizing MAS method utilized for greater broadside
elongation. Adapted from Yanazawa, et al [29].
27.15 Automatic Plan View Control Systems
Typically, an automatic plan view control system is employed as an
addition to the well-known automatic gauge control systems. Figure
27.27 illustrates a block diagram in which an automatic plan view control
system is implemented as part of a hydraulic automatic gauge control
system that is based on the gauge-meter principle. The output signal P
from the load cell that measures the roll separating force, is divided by
the value KS which represents the mill spring. The resulting signal P/KS
is equal to the mill stretch and is input into the roll gap regulator along
with the output signal co from the roll gap sensor, the gauge reference hr,
and the plan view gauge correction signal Δhe.
The roll gap regulator operates to maintain the roll gap reference hr
according to the following equation:
Page 678
The plan view gauge correction signal Δhe is equal to Δh(x) calculated by
Eqs. (27-5). The coordinate X, used in Eq. (27-5), is measured by an
angular position sensor that is connected to either the work roll or backup
roll as shown in Fig. 27.27.
The dog bone rolling (DBR) process developed by NKK, Japan [31]
reportedly provides adequate control for the following extreme conditions:
bite. Consequently, the plate shifts off the mill center in the roll bite,
causing a difference in roll separating force. The automatic camber
control (ACC) system performs a feedback control that closes the roll gap
of the mill side at which the roll separating force has increased. This
increases the elongation at the concave side, thus straightening the
plate.
The main deficiency of this method is that the differential roll separating
force is not only a function of plate camber, but also depends on other
factors, such as variation of plate temperature in the transverse direction
and the difference in roll eccentricity between the two sides of the mill.
The performance of this system is also negatively affected by the delayed
responses of the hydraulic cylinders. To reduce the effect of roll
eccentricity, the differential components of the first and second orders
were incorporated along with a digital filter.
The output signal from the strip displacement sensor 15 that is installed
at the upstream side is compared in an operational amplifier 17 with the
reference signal generated by the reference circuit 16. The output signal
from the amplifier is then processed by a lateral displacement regulator
18, which generates two equal in amplitude and opposite in sign
reference signals for the regulators 19 and 20. These regulators control
the oil flow through the servo-valves 21 and 22, and thus, adjust the
extension of the hydraulic cylinders 8 and 9 that are installed under the
chocks 6 and 7 of the bottom backup roll 5. The extension of the
cylinders is measured by the position transducers 4. The output signal
from the strip displacement sensor 23 that is installed at the downstream
side of
Page 680
References
1. Tazoe, N., ‘‘Prevention of Fish Tail During Intensive Edging in Hot
Roughing Mill Line,” IHI Engineering Review, Vol. 14 No. 3, July 1981,
pp. 42-47.
2. Chong, C.J., et al, “Plan View Plate Prediction Model for Plate Rolling,”
Paper presented at the 1989 AISE Spring Conference, Cincinnati, Ohio,
April 1989.
3. Stone, M.D. and Talbot, H.H., U.S. Patent No. 3,580,032, May 25,
1971.
6. Tazoe, N., “New Forms of Hot Strip Mill Width Rolling Installations,”
Paper presented at the 1984 AISE Spring Conference, Dearborn, Mich.,
April 1984.
7. Awazuhara, H., et al, U.S. Patent No. 4,387,586, June 14, 1983.
8. Matoba, T., et al, “Reduction of Crop Loss in Slab Edge Rolling - 1,”
Transactions of the Iron and Steel Institute of Japan, Vol. 22, 1982, p. B-
272.
9. Kokubo, I., et al, U.S. Patent No. 4,712,414, Dec. 15, 1987.
Page 681
11. Ginzburg, V.B., et al, “Width Control in Hot Strip Mills,” Iron and Steel
Engineer, June 1991, pp. 25-39.
14. van Moll, H.F. and Meier-Engelen, E., “Improved Optical Scanning
System for Gauging and Control,” Wire World International, Vol. 16,
May/June 1974, pp. 156-159.
15. Münch, G., “Width Gaging, Automatic Width Control and Crop
Optimization in Hot Strip Mills,” Metallurgical Plant and Technology
International, No.4, 1992, pp. 122-127.
16. Tomiya, et al, T., “On-Line Slab Width Gage with Laser Displacement
Gages,” Transactions of the Iron and Steel Institute of Japan, Vol. 22,
1982, p. B-350.
17. Ichahara, J., U.S Patent No. 4,528,756, July 16, 1985.
19. “A New Roll Force AWC System for Roughing Train in Hot Strip Mill,”
Transactions of the Iron and Steel Institute of Japan, Vol. 27, 1987, p.
993.
20. “Automatic Width Control Equipment for No. 2 Hot Strip Mill,” IHI
Engineering Review, Vol. 19, No. 1, Jan. 1986, p. 47.
21. “IHI Hydraulic AWC Edger for Hot Rolling,” Ishikawajima-Harima
Heavy Industries Co. Publication, Tokyo, 1984.
22. Tsukamoto, H., et al, U.S. Patent No. 4,672,830, June 16, 1987.
24. “RAWC Edger for Hot Strip Mill,” Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.
Publication, Tokyo.
25. Nagai, T., et al, “Improving Strip Width, Profile and Shape Control in
Sumitomo Hot Strip Mill,” Restructuring Steelplants for the Nineties,
Institute of Metals, London, 1986, pp. 238-255.
26. Shaw, D., et al, “LTV Steel Indiana Harbor Works’ 84-in. Hot Strip Mill
Automatic Width Control Using Hydraulic Edger,” Iron and Steel
Engineer, August, 1994, pp. 43-51.
27. Giles, W. and Tiley, J. B., “Automatic Width Control at Dofasco’s No.
2 Hot Strip Mill,” Iron and Steel Engineer, January, 1994, pp. 35-40.
29. Yanazawa, T., et al, “Development of the New Plan View Pattern
Control System in Plate Rolling,” Kawasaki Steel Corp. Publication,
Japan, April 1984.
30. Tsubota, K., U.S. Patent No. 4,238,946, Dec. 16, 1980.
31. Haga, Y., et al, “Development of New Plan View Control Technique in
Plate Rolling (NKK-DBR),” Nippon Kokan Technical Report, No. 39,
1983, pp. 21-30.
33. Morel, M., et al, “Quality Control and Production Optimization in Plate
Mills Using the HYDROPLATE System,” AISE Year Book, 1984, pp. 221-
226.
34. Kuwano, H., U.S. Patent No. 4,570,472, Feb. 18, 1986.
Page 683
Part VIII
PROFILE AND FLATNESS CONTROL
Page 684
Chapter 28
STRIP PROFILE AND FLATNESS ANALYSIS
By knowing the difference between the derivative and base strip center
crowns Δc, that corresponds to the change in value of the selected
variable parameter ΔS, it is possible to establish an analytical relationship
between these two parameters which in general form, can be expressed
by the following function:
A strip profile and flatness analysis was performed with the ROLLFLEX™
three-dimensional finite element analysis model that has been developed
jointly by United Engineering and International Rolling Mill Consultants
[1]. The results of this analysis are described in the subsequent sections
of this chapter.
Page 686
Geometrical parameters.
Material parameters.
Force parameters.
where
hc center gauge
=
where
w strip width
=
Page 688
Δ draft.
=
Force parameters - The force parameters that affect the strip profile and
flatness are:
The pass schedule used in this analysis along with the unit roll separating
forces P/w and strip modulus M are shown in Table 28.1.
- 33.000 - -
F1 75
18.160 1.107
F2 137
10.540 1.045
F3 244
6.350 1.023
F4 420
4.060 0.962
F5 695
2.845 0.845
F6 1038
2.286 0.580
F7 1343
2.000 0.384
Fig. 28.3 Variation of strip center crown with strip width for 1676 mm (66
in.) wide hot strip mill.
Page 689
Once these parameters are determined, the derivative strip center crown
c can be readily calculated from the following general formula:
Page 690
where
Xo, disturbance parameters for the base and derivative strip center crown
X=respectively.
Simple beam deformation theory [3] predicts that roll deflection, and
therefore strip crown, increases with an increase in roll force. Since roll
force is proportional to strip width, it can be expected to have a greater
strip crown for wider rolled products. Finite element analysis shows that
this relationship is only valid up to a certain strip width. As shown in Fig.
28.3, a more complex dependence exists between strip crown and strip
width.
Base strip center crown substantially changes with strip width. For
narrow widths, the strip center crown increases with an increase in
strip width, whereas for wider widths, strip center crown decreases
with an increase in strip width reaching its maximum value at a
strip width of approximately 70 to 80% of the roll barrel length.
Base strip center crown is generally greater for wider mills.
As the strip modulus increases, the base strip center crown
decreases.
The effect of strip width on strip center crown can be shown by the strip
width effect parameter kw that can be defined by the equation:
where
Δc
=
change in strip
crown
Δ(P/w) = change in roll force per unit of strip width that produces strip
crown change Δc.
Fig. 28.4 Variation of roll force effect rate with strip width for 1676 mm
(66 in.) wide hot strip mill.
The effect of the work roll diameter on strip center crown can be shown
by the work roll diameter effect rate kdw that is expressed by the
equation:
Page 692
where
ΔDw change in diameter of work rolls (top and bottom) that produces strip
=crown change Δc
Fig. 28.5 Variation of work roll diameter effect rate with strip width for
1676 mm (66 in.) wide hot strip mill.
The effect of the backup roll diameter on strip center crown can be shown
by the backup roll diameter effect rate kdb that is given by the equation:
Page 693
where
ΔDb change in diameter of both top and bottom backup rolls that produces strip
=crown change Δc
Fig. 28.6 Variation of backup roll diameter effect rate with strip width for
1676 mm (66 in.) wide hot strip mill.
One can easily visualize that when a convex work roll crown is used, the
roll gap profile will be greater at the strip edges resulting in reduced strip
crown. For example, if the strip profile was flat using flat work rolls, then
the application of convex-crowned rolls would lead to a concave strip
profile.
The effect of the work roll crown on strip crown can be shown by the work
roll crown effect rate kcw that is given by the equation:
Page 694
where
ΔCw change in work roll crown that produces strip crown change Δc
=
The work roll crowns Cw and Cwo are defined as the differences in the
roll diameters Dwm and Dwe at the middle of the roll barrel and at its
edge respectively with a parabolic or similar shape of the roll barrel, i.e.:
Fig. 28.7 Variation of work roll crown effect rate with strip width for 1676
mm (66 in.) wide hot strip mill.
backup roll crown modifies only the interface conditions between the
backup rolls and work rolls, it yields no effect on the no-load roll gap.
Therefore, a given value of backup roll crown produces a substantially
smaller change in the strip crown when compared to the strip crown that
is produced by a work roll crown of the same value.
The effect of the backup roll crown on the strip crown can be shown by
the backup roll crown effect rate kcb that is expressed by the equation:
where
ΔCb change in backup roll crown that produces strip crown change Δc
=
The backup roll crowns Cb and Cbo are defined as the differences in the
roll diameters Dbm and Dbe at the middle of the roll barrel and at its edge
respectively with a parabolic or similar shape of the roll barrel, i.e.:
Fig. 28.8 Variation of backup roll crown effect rate with strip width for
1676 mm (66 in.) wide hot strip mill.
Similar to the relationship between the work roll crown effect rate kcw
and strip width w as shown in Fig. 28.7, the backup roll crown effect rate
kcb continuously increases with an increase in the strip width w.
The effect of the roll contact length Lc between the backup roll and work
roll on the strip crown can be shown by the roll contact length effect rate
krc that is defined by the equation:
where
Page 697
ΔLc change in roll contact length that produces strip crown change Δc
=
When roll bending forces are applied in the direction of opening the roll
gap, this bending is known as positive or crown-in roll bending. Inversely,
when the roll bending forces are applied in the direction of closing the roll
gap, this type of bending is known as negative or crown-out roll bending.
Positive roll bending causes the strip profile to be concave whereas
negative roll bending causes the strip profile to be convex.
Fig. 28.10 Variation of work roll bending effect rate with strip width for
1676 mm (66 in.) wide hot strip mill.
The effect of work roll bending on the strip crown can be shown by the
work roll bending effect rate kbw that is expressed by the equation:
Page 698
where
change in work roll bending force that produces strip crown change Δc
ΔF=
The work roll bending forces are defined as the total forces Fp + Fn that
are applied in the vertical direction to each work roll chock as shown in
Fig. 28.1.
where
When δ < 0, the strip will tend to develop edge waves. Conversely, when
δ > 0, the strip will tend to develop center buckles. However, due to
internal stresses, the deterioration of strip flatness does not occur as long
as the values for the change in relative strip crown δ are within a certain
range that is known as flatness dead band.
In the strip flatness model that was developed by Shohet and Townsend
[4] and further studied by Somers, et al [5], the flatness dead band in hot
rolling can be given by (Fig. 28.11):
that a = b = 1.86.
It shows that the strip after stands F1, F2 and F3 is within flatness
tolerances, while the strip after stands F4 and F6 has full center and after
stand F5 has edge waves.
where
strip wavelength
L=
Thus, the established formula for strip flatness can be expressed in the
following forms [9]:
References
1. Ginzburg, V.B., et al, ‘‘Application of the ROLLFLEX™ Computer
Model for Analysis of the Strip Profile and Flatness in Rolling Mills,”
Paper presented at the 1987 AISE Annual Convention, Pittsburgh, Pa.,
Sept. 21-24, 1987.
2. Ginzburg, V.B., Geometry of Flat Rolled Products, Rolling Mill
Technology Series, Vol. 2, United Engineering, Inc., Pittsburgh, Pa.,
1990.
3. Larke, E.C., The Rolling of Sheet, Strip and Plate, Science Paperbacks
and Chapman and Hall Ltd., London, 1967, pp. 71-126.
and Technology of Flat Rolling, Vol. 2, Deauville, France, June 1-3, 1987,
pp. E.7.1 - E.7.10.
8. Takashima, Y., et al, “Studies on the Strip Crown Control for Hot Strip
Rolling - Double Chock Work Roll Bending System (DC-WRB),” IHI
Engineering Review, Vol. 12 No. 3, Oct. 1979, pp. 28-34.
Chapter 29
ROLL THERMAL EXPANSION AND WEAR
the rolls would obey Newton’s law of cooling. This law states that the rate
of cooling a body under given conditions is proportional to the
temperature difference between the body and its surroundings; this
means, when specifically applied to roll cooling, that the rate of change of
expansion is proportional to the amount of expansion at any given time.
where
k constant
=
where
Eo = roll expansion at t = 0.
Fig. 29.3 Cooling curves for cast iron work rolls cooling in air from initial
expansion of 0.010, 0.020, and 0.030 in. Adapted from Sibakin, et al [8].
Work roll
3.410.470.0940.0740.844.451.78 0.26
Backup roll
0.871.050.0350.0370.370.121.04 0.38
If the roll temperature T is measured at time t after the rolling process has
been stopped, the initial roll temperature To at t = 0 can be determined
from the following:
where
Ta ambient temperature.
=
The following two major components of the variation of the roll middle
temperature (Fig. 29.4) must be considered in application to strip profile
and flatness control [9]:
Fig. 29.4 Roll middle temperature build-up during rolling schedule in hot
strip mill. Adapted from Van Steden and Tellman [9].
Fig. 29.5 Influence of roll contact time on center expansion of top and
bottom work rolls. Adapted from Sibakin, et al [8].
Fig. 29.6 Variation of roll thermal crown in respect to mill pacing factor
and time.
Mignon [10] in application to a hot strip mill. Two types of roll thermal
crown were determined:
trol
=
rolling time
Fig. 29.7 Variation of strip center crown during hot rolling of tinplate
product. Adapted from Somers [16].
Fatigue wear - Fatigue wear occurs during cyclical loading. This process
involves the generation of shear stress below a compressed tool surface.
Repeated loading produces microcracks, usually below the surface,
which propagate on subsequent loading and unloading. After a
microcrack reaches a critical size, it changes direction and emerges at
the surface resulting in detachment of a flat sheet-like particle
(delamination wear). When this detached particle is very large, the
process is called spalling. Small-scale surface fatigue is known as
micropitting. A very destructive thermal fatigue process known as crazing
or firecracking can arise during hot rolling, producing a mosaic network of
cracks.
The four major causes of roll wear are closely related to the following
conditions [20,21]:
Page 710
Abrasion of roll surface due to contact with the rolled material and
backup rolls
Mechanical fatigue of roll surface layer as a result of cyclical
loading of the rolls
Thermal fatigue of roll surface layers as they are periodically
heated by the rolled material and cooled by water sprays.
Corrosion.
A general trend in the amplitude of roll abrasion and fatigue from stand to
stand in a hot strip mill can qualitatively be related to the values of the
rolling parameters at these stands as shown in Fig. 29.8. Since both
workpiece temperature and roll contact time are greater in the initial
rolling passes, it is natural to expect that roll thermal fatigue will also be
greater at the upstream mill stands of a hot strip mill. On the other hand,
since both roll speed and material hardness increase from pass to pass,
the rolls at the downstream mill stands will experience greater roll
mechanical fatigue and abrasion.
As the roll segment enters the roll bite at point A, it heats up and would
normally expand. However, the surrounding metal has not undergone this
rapid heating and therefore constrains the small surface element thus
producing compressive stresses. The magnitude of these stresses
increases until the roll segment exits the roll bite at point B where the roll
material is still behaving elastically.
α
=
coefficient of thermal
expansion
The roll barrel material would normally behave elastically to very high
stress levels until the yield stress is exceeded. As the temperature
increases, however, the yield stress will drop. As surface temperatures in
excess of 600°C (1100°F) are experienced, a point is reached when the
yield stress is exceeded. When this happens, plastic deformation occurs
between points B and C.
The element comes out of the roll bite at point C and is cooled by the
water cooling system. The element is then put under a reverse stress
system and moves into an elastic tensile stress system between points C
and D. It is inevitable that the element will be cooled below the average
roll temperature, which causes the development of additional tensile
plastic strain ∈D that can be given by [21]:
where
(ΔT)D temperature difference between roll surface and roll body at point D.
=
During the remainder of the cycle the element returns to the neutral
stress condition as it regains thermal equilibrium with the rest of the roll.
The area covered by the hysteresis loop is a measure of the thermal
fatigue damage that will occur.
cracks form various size cells on the roll surface. For example, near the
roll surface where the temperature gradients are very high, a very fine
crack network exists with cells having 0.001 to 0.002 in. (25 to 50 µm)
sides. The deeper cracks appear to define larger cells with 0.010 to 0.020
in. (250 to 500 µm) sides.
Figure 29.11 shows typical patterns and magnitudes of the overall work
roll wear that was observed in stands F1 through F6 of a 56 in. wide hot
strip finishing train [30]. In these figures, the original roll ground contours
at room temperature are depicted with dashed lines. The roll data for this
mill are given in Table 29.2.
Fig. 29.11 Work roll wear contours of finishing mill stands of 56 in. hot
strip mill. Adapted from Tong and Chakko [30].
The overall work roll wear is influenced by the tonnage rolled at various
strip widths. The
Page 714
cumulative ton-width distribution curve that was plotted from the rolling
schedules is similar in shape to the work roll wear pattern in stands F3 to
F6. This relationship shows up even more explicitly in Fig. 29.12 which
presents the ton-width distribution curve and the work roll wear observed
in stand F5 of a 96 in. wide hot strip finishing train. As can be seen from
Figs. 29.11 and 29.12, the overall work roll wear is generally nonuniform.
Roll data
Stand
number Material Hardness Diameter Crown Rolled
Shore in. in. tonnage
Fig. 29.12 Work roll wear contours of stand F5 of 96 in. hot strip mill after
rolling 2500 tons of steel. Adapted from Tong and Chakko [30].
The unit roll wear parameters Wt and WL are relatively small in the work
rolls of stand F1 as shown in Fig. 29.13. These parameters begin to
increase at stand F2. The unit roll wear parameter Wt reaches its
maximum value at stand F4, whereas, the unit roll wear parameter WL is
maximum at stand F3.
Fig. 29.13 Differential wear of top and bottom work rolls for different
stands of 58-in. hot strip mill. Adapted from Sibakin, et al [8].
w strip width
=
Page 716
r reduction
=
Somers, et al [34] have found, on a simplified basis, that the work roll
wear rate varies inversely with the work roll diameter. They also state that
the wear rate for the work rolls of the first two stands of a hot strip mill
differs from the remaining stands. The average rate of radial wear for
grain iron rolls during a typical tin mill cycle can be expressed by:
where
Elements C Mn P S Si Ni Cr Mo
Cast steel
0.43 0.72 0.040 0.024 0.42 0.34 3.10 0.84
0.41 0.75 0.029 0.033 0.50 0.26 2.70 0.54
Forged
0.47 0.68 0.009 0.003 0.32 0.80 3.00 0.31
0.48 0.75 0.010 0.003 0.31 0.81 3.00 0.31
The rate of the backup roll wear at the center of the roll is fairly constant
for up to 8 to 12 initial operating turns but then decreases thereafter as
shown in Fig. 29.14. The amount of the backup roll wear was found to be
greatly dependent on both roll material and roll surface hardness.
According to the roll wear data collected at the Inland Steel 2032 mm (80
in.) wide hot strip mill [37], the wear of forged steel rolls is substantially
less than that of cast steel rolls. The chemical composition for both
grades of rolls is given in Table 29.3 and the roll wear profiles are shown
in Fig. 29.15.
Page 717
Fig. 29.14 Rate of backup roll wear at roll center of finishing train of 56
in. hot strip mill. Adapted from Tong and Chakko [30].
Fig. 29.15 Wear of forged steel and cast backup rolls on finishing stands
F4 and F5 of 80 in. hot strip mill. Adapted from Easter [37].
Local roll wear near strip edges - During rolling of flat products, there is a
rapid decrease in the amount of deformation (flattening) of the work rolls
near the workpiece edges. This action produces local tensile stresses in
the transient zone of the roll body which are combined with shear
stresses also acting in the same zone. The result is more extensive roll
wear near the strip edges in comparison with the remaining roll wear.
Page 718
In the roll wear model for a hot strip mill that was developed by
Nakanishi, et al [35], an assumption is made that the absolute local roll
wear at the edge of the strip Ce is proportional to the absolute local roll
wear in the middle of the strip Cm (Fig. 29.16), i.e.:
where
It was found that when the roll wear geometry at the strip edge is defined
by: a = 10 mm and b = 50 mm, the roll wear increase coefficient k = 1.3.
The differential local roll wear Cr at the edge of the strip is equal to:
The amount of differential local roll wear in a 7-stand finishing hot strip
mill was found to be very small in the upstream stands F1 and F2, with a
maximum value of Cr = 0.5 mm reached in stand F5, as shown in Fig.
29.17.
Differential local roll wear leads to the appearance of ridges and valleys
on the strip profile. When the differential local roll wear Cr exceeds 10
µm, it produces ridges in the strip profile. The imprint that the roll wear
leaves on the strip varies with the type of roll and also depends on the
stand number. The local roll wear imprinted on the strip Cs can be
expressed as [35]:
Page 719
where
The experimental values for Cs, kw, and Cr are shown in Fig. 29.17 for a
7-stand hot strip finishing train. The imprinting coefficient kw is nearly
zero at stands F1 and F2 and increases almost linearly at stands F3
through F7. The differential local roll wear Cr is very small at stands F1
and F2, but increases substantially, attaining its maximum value at stand
F5. The resulting local roll wear imprinted on the strip Cs is small at
stands F1 through F3 and then increases sharply, reaching its maximum
value at stand F6.
Fig. 29.17 Local work roll wear and its imprint on strip in hot strip
finishing train. Adapted from Nakanishi, et al [35].
The results that were obtained from Eq. (29-13) can be summarized as
follows:
Fig. 29.18 Crown of hot rolled strip as a function of strip width, roll
contact time during half hour preceding measurement, and a number of
turns rolled on backup rolls.
5 Forged 400
steel - 0.003
convex
The two halves were then welded together and the 5-stand cold rolled
samples were cut about 1 to 2 ft ahead of the weld to avoid any
mechanical disturbance caused by the passage of the weld through the
rolls. The temper rolled samples were cut 25 to 50 ft from the weld to
avoid the non-temper rolled section on either side of the weld. The
thickness measurements were made by means of hand micrometers
graduated in 0.0001 in. divisions.
Fig. 29.19 Work roll wear for 56 in. tandem cold mill. Adapted from Tong
and Chakko [30].
Crown measurements of hot rolled coils were made at 0.375, 1.5, and 3.0
in. from the strip edge. The 0.375 in. measurements were not satisfactory
because they usually fell on the edge area where the strip thickness
changes rapidly, and hence a small error in the lateral placing of the
micrometers could make a large difference in the crown reading. Both
measurements at 1.5 and 3.0 in. from the strip edge were generally
beyond this sharply sloping edge area.
The measure of strip crown that was used throughout the investigation
was the average difference in thickness between the center and the two
edges of the strip measured at 1.5 in. from the edge. Since about 0.5 in.
is trimmed off both edges after pickling, the measurements after 5-stand
cold rolling and temper rolling were made at the corresponding distance
from the strip center, rather than at 1.5 in. from the edge.
Some typical strip profiles are shown after rolling in a 58 in. hot strip mill
(Fig. 29.20a), 56 in. 5-stand tandem cold mill (Fig. 29.20b), and 56 in. 4-
high temper mill (Fig. 29.20c). It could
Page 722
ch, cc, ct crowns of hot, cold, and temper rolled strips respectively
=
hh, hc, ht thicknesses of hot, cold, and temper rolled strips respectively.
=
Fig. 29.20 Typical strip profiles after: a) hot rolling, b) cold rolling, and c)
temper rolling. Adapted from Tong and Chakko [30].
The statistical analysis of the actual strip profile measurements that were
made on 24 coils after cold rolling on a 5-stand tandem mill (Fig. 29.21a)
and on 13 of these coils after temper rolling (Fig. 29.21b) have produced
the following relationships between the strip crowns after hot, cold, and
temper rolling:
Page 723
Fig. 29.22 Hot rolled strip profile where arrows indicate ridges that
persisted through cold reduction as coil build-up. Adapted from Christoph
and Griffin [38].
Numerous irregularities of the hot rolled strip profile can affect the strip
profile of any subsequent rolling operation. The most explicit effect is
produced by ridges that are developed in the strip profile during the hot
rolling operation. This phenomenon is known in the cold and temper mill
operations as coil build-up [36,38]. There is usually a very small and
detectable irregularity in the thickness of the strip in line with the ridge
(Fig. 29.22) on the coil. It is obvious that extremely small differences in
thickness, when multiplied by the thousand or more
Page 724
wraps in a coil, can account for a substantial ridge up to 0.25 in. in height.
References
1. Cerni, S., et al, ‘‘Temperatures and Thermal Stresses in the Rolling of
Metal Strip,” AISE Yearly Proceedings, 1963, pp. 717-725.
3. Sumi, H., et al, “A Numerical Model and Control of Plate Crown in the
Hot Strip or Plate Rolling,” Advanced Technology of Plasticity, Vol. 2,
1984, pp. 1360-1365.
8. Sibakin, J.G., et al, “Factors Affecting Strip Profile in Cold and Hot
Strip Mill,” Flat Rolled Products: Rolling and Treatment, Metallurgical
Society of AIME Conferences, Vol. 1, 1959, pp. 3-45.
10. Wilmotte, S. and Mignon, J., Thermal Variations of the Camber of the
Working Rolls During Hot Rolling,” C.R.M Report, No. 34, March 1973,
pp. 17-34.
11. Yasuda, K., et al, “Rolling of Dead Flat Strip Using UC Mill with Small
Diameter Work Rolls,” Proceedings of the 4th International Steel Rolling
Conference: The Science and Technology of Flat Rolling, Vol. 2,
Deauville, France, June 1-3, 1987, pp. E.22.1 - E.22.12.
12. Goodman, T.R., “The Heat Balance Integral and its Application to
Problems Involving a Change of Phase,” Transactions of the ASME, Vol.
80 No. 2, Feb. 1958, p. 335.
13. Goodman, T.R., “The Heating of Slabs with Arbitrary Heat Inputs,”
Journal of Aeronautical Science, Vol. 26 No. 3, 1959, p. 187.
14. Knox, T.J., and Moore, J.M., “Improving Dimensional Control in the
Hot Mill,” Proceedings of the 4th International Steel Rolling Conference:
The Science and Technology of Flat Rolling, Vol. 1, Deauville, France,
June 1-3, 1987, pp. A.23.1 - A.23.13.
16. Somers, R.R., “Effect of Hot and Cold Rolling Operations on Strip
Crown and Feather Edge,” Proceedings of the International Conference
on Steel Rolling: Science and
Page 725
19. Robinson, C.L. and Westlake, F.J., “Roll Lubrication in Hot Strip
Mills,” Proceedings of the First European Tribology Congress, London,
Sept. 25-27, 1973, pp. 389-398.
20. Wandrei, C.L., “Review of Hot Rolling Lubricant Technology for Steel,”
ASLE Special Publication SP-17, American Society of Lubrication
Engineers, Park Ridge, Ill., 1984.
21. Stevens, P.G., et al, ‘‘Increasing Work Roll Life by Improved Roll
Cooling Practice,” Journal of the Iron and Steel Institute, Jan. 1971, pp.
1-11.
22. Harper, P., “The Water Cooling of Rolls,” Iron & Steelmaker, Oct.
1988, pp. 34-37.
23. Judd, R.R., “Surface Deterioration of Grain Iron Work Rolls in the
First Stands of a Hot Strip Mill Finishing Train,” AISE Year Book, 1979,
pp. 65-74.
24. Betts, W.H., “Basic Concepts of Roll Surface Behavior in Stands F1,
F2, and F3,” AISE Year Book, 1977, pp. 12-18.
25. Siefer, W., “On Firecracking,” Translated from Giesseri, 1968, pp.
737-742.
26. Parke, D.M. and Baker, J.L., “Temperature Effects of Cooling Work
Rolls,” AISE Yearly Proceedings, 1972, pp. 675-680.
27. Peck, C.F., et al, “Temperature Stresses in Iron Work Rolls,” AISE
Yearly Proceedings, 1954, pp. 389-402.
28. Zorowski, C.F. and Weinstein, A.S., “An Analysis of the Stresses and
Deformations in Work Rolls,” AISE Yearly Proceedings, 1961, pp. 392-
398.
30. Tong, K.N. and Chakko, M.K., “Predictions of Roll Spalling in 4-High
Mills Based on Fatigue Strength of Roll Materials and Wear Pattern of
Rolls,” AISE Yearly Proceedings, 1964, pp. 539-569.
32. Soeno, K., et al, “Some Problems of Front Stand Work Rolls in Hot
Strip Finishing Mills,” Hitachi Review, Vol. 18 No. 7, pp. 262-267.
35. Nakanishi, T., et al, “Application of Work Roll Shift Mill HCW Mill to
Hot Strip and Plate Rolling,” Hitachi Review, Vol. 34 No. 4, 1985, pp. 153-
160.
37. Easter, H.C., “Inland’s Application of Forged Steel Backup Rolls for
Hot and Cold Strip Mills,” Iron & Steelmaker, Oct. 1986, pp. 27-34.
Page 726
38. Christoph, G.R. and Griffin, J.F., “Influence of Hot Strip Profile on
Subsequent Operations,” Flat Rolled Products: Rolling and Treatment,
Metallurgical Society of AIME Conferences, Vol. 1, 1959, pp. 47-65.
Page 727
Chapter 30
BACKUP ROLLS WITH SPECIFIC PROFILES
The advantages of stepped backup rolls over rolls with a full roll body
contact length were investigated by Nakanishi, et al [3] and are illustrated
in Fig. 30.1 [2]. When a strip of the width w = B is rolled on a 4-high mill
with adjacent rolls having contact along the full roll body length (Fig.
30.1a), there are so-called undesirable contact zones A that transfer
additional bending forces from the backup rolls to the work rolls. This
action produces an undesirable increase in strip crown and its variation
with a variation of roll force.
Figure 30.1b shows that by using stepped backup rolls and, thus,
eliminating the undesirable contact zones A, the effectiveness of a
conventional roll bending system can be significantly improved [4].
Page 728
With stepped backup rolls, the change in strip crown c with the change in
rolling load ΔP becomes considerably smaller when compared to a
conventional 4-high mill (Fig. 30.2a). Simultaneously, the change in strip
crown c with the change in roll bending force ΔF substantially increases
as shown in Fig. 30.2b.
Fig. 30.2 Comparison of crown control performances of conventional mill
(LB = L) and mill equipped with stepped backup rolls (LB = B < L): a) roll
force effective rate and b) roll bending effective rate.
Fig. 30.3 Crowned roll with tapered ends. Adapted from Adachi, et al [6].
In the case when a regular convex roll crown is ground in the middle of
the roll, the end tapered zones are made as a smooth continuation of the
crown portion of the roll as shown in Fig. 30.3 [6,7]. Another solution is to
profile the backup rolls with end bevels that can be described by the
following fourth-degree polynomial [8]:
where
Fig. 30.4 Rolls with variable barrel length. From Ginzburg [2].
Reproduced through courtesy of Iron and Steel Engineer.
Fig. 30.5 Working principle of variable barrel length (VBL) backup roll
developed by INNSE Innocenti Santeustacchio, Italy. Adapted from
Galletti, et al [16].
One of the examples of adjustable stepped backup rolls are the variable
barrel length (VBL)
Page 731
Fig. 30.6 Flexible body adjustable crown rolls. From Ginzburg [2].
Reproduced through courtesy of Iron and Steel Engineer.
The rolls that utilize hydraulic means can be divided into the following two
groups depending on the number of pressurized zones that are located
along their body length:
Two examples of the backup rolls with single pressurized zone are
described below:
Inflatable crown (IC) backup roll - This roll was developed by Blaw-Knox
Foundry and Mill Machinery [34-37]; its design is schematically illustrated
in Fig. 30.7. The IC roll consists of an arbor 1 with a double-sleeve
arrangement where the outer sleeve 2 is welded to the inner sleeve 3 at
their edges forming a cylindrical cavity between them. Both welded
sleeves are shrunk onto the
Page 732
Fig. 30.7 Blaw-knox inflatable crown (IC) backup roll. Adapted from Eibe
[35].
An intensifier unit 4 is built into one roll neck having a piston ratio of
approximately 5:1. This means that only 2000 psi of pressure has to be
transmitted through the rotary joint 5 to create a maximum inflation
pressure of approximately 10,000 psi. A hydraulic pressure transducer 6
is used for continuously monitoring the inflation pressure. Figure 30.8
shows typical IC roll crown variation under light rolling load (zone A),
medium rolling load (zone B), and heavy rolling load (zone C).
Fig. 30.8 Typical IC roll crown variation under various rolling loads.
Adapted from Eibe [34].
Variable Crown (VC) Backup Roll - This roll was developed by Sumitomo
Metals Industries, Japan [38-40]. The VC roll is a sleeve-type roll (Fig.
30.9) that has an oil chamber between the sleeve and arbor. The sleeve
is shrunk tightly to the arbor at both ends to hold it under pressure of the
rolling torque and, at the same time, seal the high-pressure oil in the
chamber. The high-pressure oil is supplied to the VC roll by a hydraulic
power unit through a rotary joint. Specification of the VC backup roll is
shown in Table 30.1.
Page 733
Fig. 30.9 Sumitomo Metals Industries variable crown (VC) backup roll.
Adapted from Yamada, et al [38].
Parameter Value
Rotational speed of
rotary joint 0 - 500 rpm
Fig. 30.11 Dynamic shape roll (DSR) developed by Clecim. From Morel
and Bosch [44]. Reproduced through the courtesy of Iron and Steel
Engineer.
Two sets of roller bearings E are mounted between the shaft B and
sleeve A at each end of the shaft/sleeve assembly to absorb axial
stresses. These roller bearings are completely free in the vertical
direction. By controlling the pressure applied to the various pads, it is
possible to adjust the roll force distribution in the roll gap or the roll gap
profile itself. By controlling the stroke of two symmetrical pads, it is
possible to adjust and control the roll gap as well as the thickness of the
rolled product. The oil pressure that is applied to each pad is controlled
by a separate closed loop control system that utilizes hydraulic
servovalves.
The DSR system is designed for application to both 4-high and 6-high
mills and for rolling both steel and aluminum. The main characteristics of
the DSR system for a single stand cold mill are:
Outer diameter:
maximum
1524 mm
minimum
1463 mm
Barrel length
2286 mm
Number of pads 7
Sleeve thickness:
maximum 200 mm
minimum 170 mm
mill with the Dynamic Shaperoll in the upper position and a regular solid
roll in the bottom position. The following mill parameters were assumed:
Barrel length
2286
mm
The results of a computer simulation have shown that the DSR efficiency
in changing the strip crown is 5% greater than roll bending for 1700 mm
wide strip and 29% greater than roll bending for 1092 mm wide strip. It
was also shown that by using both DSR and a roll bending system, it is
possible to produce various changes in the strip profile including a
quarter buckle effect as shown in Fig. 30.12.
Fig. 30.12 Computer simulation of strip profiles for various pressure
repartitions in Dynamic Shape Roll (DSR). From Morel and Bosch [44].
Reproduced through the courtesy of Iron and Steel Engineer.
The latter design (Fig. 30.13) comprises an arbor 1 with a sleeve 2 that
has been shrunk-fitted over the arbor. The grooves 3 are formed in the
external surface of the arbor and are connected to the radial channels 4
and axial channels 5 through which heating or cooling liquid is supplied
from external sources to expand or contract the sleeve and change the
roll contour. The fins 6, or material between the grooves, can have a
higher heat conductivity than the material of the arbor and sleeve
Page 736
and are designed to transmit the rolling forces without reducing roll
stiffness. A liquid supply system provides liquids of different temperatures
to selected sections of the grooves along the roll working surface to
accommodate various rolling conditions.
Fig. 30.14 Flexible edge nonadjustable crown rolls. From Ginzburg [52].
Reproduced through the courtesy of Iron and Steel Engineer.
30.7 Flexible Edge Nonadjustable Crown Rolls
Flexible edge nonadjustable crown rolls have a reduced rigidity near their
edges that can be provided by the following means [51-54]:
Shifting the wedges inside the chambers that are formed between
arbor and sleeve (Fig. 30.16c) [61].
Shifting two end sleeves on the tapered ends of the arbor (Fig.
30.16d) [62].
Adjusting pressure in a number of chambers that are located near
the roll ends with either the same pressure in each chamber or
with pressure individually controlled in each chamber [63].
Fig. 30.16 Flexible edge adjustable crown rolls. From Ginzburg [52].
Reproduced through the courtesy of Iron and Steel Engineer.
The principal parts of the TP roll are shown in Fig. 30.17. The roll arbor 1
is supported inside
Page 739
Each pair of pistons, the inner pair 9 and 12 and outer pair 10 and 11,
can be moved individually either toward or away from the roll center. The
displacement of the pistons is provided by applying hydraulic pressure to
their front and rear ends while the piston position is monitored by
displacement sensors. The piston and sleeve are slightly tapered which
causes the ends of the sleeve to expand when the pistons are pushed
toward the barrel center resulting in a concave crown. To shift the crown
control range, the roll is ground flat when the pistons are in the closest
position to the roll center. As a result, the roll will have a convex crown
when the pistons are moved toward the ends of the sleeve. Hydraulic
fluid is supplied to the roll through a rotary joint that is located at one end
of the roll whereas, the electrical connections to the piston displacement
sensors are provided through a slip ring that is installed at the opposite
roll end.
When both top and bottom TP rolls are used, the strip crown control
range can be expected to increase by approximately three times.
References
1. Ginzburg, V.B., Steel-Rolling Technology: Theory and Practice, Marcel
Dekker, Inc., New York, 1989.
2. Ginzburg, V.B., ‘‘Strip Profile Control with Flexible Edge Backup Rolls,”
AISE Year Book, 1987, pp. 277-288.
3. Nakanishi, T., et al, “Application of Work Roll Shift Mill HCW Mill to Hot
Strip and Plate Rolling,” Hitachi Review, Vol. 34 No. 4, 1985, pp. 153-
160.
4. Furuya, T., et al, “High Crown Control Mill: A Newly Developed 6-High
Cold Mill to Solve Shape Problems,” Flat Rolling: A Comparison of
Rolling Mill Types, Metals Society, Cardiff, Wales, 1978, pp. 147-154.
5. Nakajima, K., et al, “Research on Crown Control for Hot Strip Mills,”
Nippon Steel Technical Report, No. 15, June 1980, pp. 110-126.
9. Yarita, I., et al, “Flatness and Profile Control in Hot and Cold Rolling of
Steel Strip,” Kawasaki Steel Technical Report, No. 1, Sept. 1980, pp. 60-
69.
10. Matsubara, S., et al, “Optimization of Work Roll Taper for Extremely
Thin Strip Rolling,” ISIJ International, Vol. 29 No. 1, 1989, pp. 58-63.
11. Matsubara, S., et al, “Studies on Foil Rolling by Work Rolls of Large
Diameter - II: Application to the Commercial Production Mill,”
Transactions of the Iron and Steel Institute of Japan, Vol. 27, 1987.
12. Feldmann, H., et al, U.S. Patent No. 4,479,374, Oct. 30, 1984.
16. Galletti, C., et al, “Variable Barrel Length Backup Roll: A New
Approach to Strip Shape and Flatness Control,” Proceeding of the 5th
International Rolling Conference: Dimensional Control in Rolling Mills,
London, Sept. 11-13, 1990, pp. 278-285.
18. Noe, O., et al, U.S. Patent No. 3,457,617, July 29, 1969.
20. Eibe, W.W., U.S. Patent No. 4,553,297, Nov. 19, 1985.
23. Hausman, J.M., U.S. Patent No. 3,140,512, July 14, 1964.
24. Bretschneider, E., U.S. Patent No. 3,604,086, Sept. 14, 1971.
25. Appenzeller, V., U.S. Patent No. 2,908,964, Oct. 20, 1959.
26. Appenzeller, V., U.S. Patent No. 3,196,520, July 27, 1965.
28. Appenzeller, V., U.S. Patent No. 3,043,211, July 10, 1962.
30. Justus, E.J., U.S. Patent No. 3,119,324, Jan. 28, 1964.
31. Wahlstrom, P.B. and Larsson, P.B., U.S. Patent No. 3,266,414, Aug.
16, 1966.
32. Hold, P., U.S. Patent No. 3,587,152, June 28, 1971.
33. Kusters, E., and Appenzeller, V., U.S. Patent No. 3,131,625, May 5,
1964.
35. Eibe, W.W., U.S. Patent No. 4,062,096, Dec. 13, 1977.
37. Eibe, W.W., U.S. Patent No. 4,553,296, Nov. 19, 1985.
39. Nagai, et al, T., ‘‘Strip Shape and Profile Control with Sumitomo
Variable Crown Roll System,” AISE Year Book, 1983, pp.68-75.
41. Lehmann, R., et al, “The NIPCO System for the Rolling of Metals,”
Advances in Cold Rolling Technology, Institute of Metals, London, 1985,
pp. 122-127.
42. Wiendahl, H. P., “The NIPCO Roll: From Idea to New Product,”
Escher Wyss News, 2/1978-1/1979, pp. 47-52.
43. Shutler, M.V., and Guettinger, H., “NIPCO Technology for Aluminum
Foil Rolling,” Shape Control Workshop Papers, Aluminum Association,
Louisville, Ky., Nov. 15-16, 1984, pp. 41-54.
44. Morel, M. and Bosch, M., “Shaperoll Actuator and Results of Hot and
Cold Mill Applications,” Iron and Steel Engineer, April 1992, pp. 74-77.
45. Boulot, D., and Christoffel, J.C., “The Shaperoll: An Actuator for
Shape and Profile Control in Hot and Cold Aluminum Rolling Mills,”
Rolling Mill Gauge, Shape/Profile Seminar, Aluminum Association,
Atlanta, Ga., June 8-9, 1988, pp. 295-350.
46. Quehen, A. and Boulot, D., “The Shaperoll: A New Actuator for Shape
and Profile Control,” Proceedings of the 4th International Steel Rolling
Conference: The Science and Technology of Flat Rolling, Vol. 2,
Deauville, France, June 1-3, 1987, pp. E.21.1 - E.21.6.
47. Ginzburg, V.B., “Technology for Strip Profile and Flatness Control in
Rolling Mills,” World Steel Review, Vol. 1 No. 1, Spring 1991, pp. 162-
172.
48. Luling, L. and Hollmann, F.W., “Thermal Flatness Control During Cold
Rolling,” Proceedings of the 4th International Steel Rolling Conference:
The Science and Technology of Flat Rolling, Vol. 2, Deauville, France,
June 1-3, 1987, pp. E.16.1 - E.16.5.
Page 742
50. Eibe, W.W., U.S. Patent No. 4,793,172, Dec. 27, 1988.
51. Schurmann, W.R., U.S. Patent No. 242,058, May 24, 1881.
52. Ginzburg, V.B., “Strip Profile Control with Flexible Edge Backup
Rolls,” AISE Year Book, 1987, pp. 277-288.
53. Sendzimir, T., U.S. Patent No. 2,187,250, Jan. 16, 1940.
54. Justus, E.J., U.S. Patent No. 3,097,590, July 16, 1963.
55. Ginzburg, V.B., and Guo, R.-M., U.S. Patent No. 4,722,212, Feb. 2,
1988.
56. Ginzburg, V.B., U.S. Patent No. 4,813,258, March 21, 1989.
57. Ginzburg, V. B., U.S. Patent No. 5,347,837, Sept. 20, 1994.
58. Ginzburg, V.B., U.S. Patent No. 5,093,974, March 10, 1992.
59. Imai, I., Japan Patent No. 57-68206, April 26, 1982.
60. Honjiyou, H., Japan Patent No. 59-54401, March 29, 1984.
61. Kato., H. and Shiozaki, U.S. Patent No. 4,599,770, July 15, 1986.
62. Shiozaki, H., Japan Patent No. 58-196104, Nov. 15, 1983.
63. Ginzburg, V.B. and Kaplan, N.M., U.S. Patent No. 4,683,744, Aug. 4,
1987.
65. Nitanda, M., “High Crown Control Mill with Taper Piston Rolls,” Rolling
Mill Gauge, Shape/Profile Seminar, Aluminum Assoc., Atlanta, Ga., June
8-9, 1988, pp. 353-374.
66. Mori, T., et al, U.S. Patent No. 4,837,906, June 13, 1989.
Page 743
Chapter 31
ROLL DEFORMATION AND DISPLACEMENT SYSTEMS
Acting plane of roll bending forces - Depending on the plane in which the
roll bending forces are acting, a roll bending system may belong to one of
the following two groups:
In the positive roll bending systems, the roll bending forces tend to open
the roll gap, whereas in the negative roll bending systems, the roll
bending forces tend to close the roll gap.
Single-direction
Page 744
Dual-direction.
In the single-direction roll bending systems, the roll bending forces are
applied to the roll in one direction, which is parallel to the direction of
rolling, whereas in the dual-direction roll bending systems, the roll
bending forces are applied to the roll in two opposite directions.
Site of application of roll bending forces - The following three types of roll
bending systems can be identified with respect to the site of application
of the roll bending forces:
In single-chock roll bending systems, the roll bending forces are applied
at each end of the roll through a single chock. In multiple-chock roll
bending systems, the roll bending forces are applied at each end of the
roll through two or more chocks. In the chockless roll bending systems,
the roll bending forces are applied directly to the roll body through either
intermediate rollers or hydraulic pads. The following sections provide a
more detailed description of the various types of roll bending systems.
The single-chock work roll bending systems [3,4] can utilize either
positive roll bending cylinders that act between the top and bottom work
roll chocks (Fig 31.1a), negative roll bending cylinders that act between
the backup rolls and work rolls (Fig. 31.1b), or a combination of both (Fig.
31.1c). Various sophisticated designs of single-chock work roll bending
systems have been proposed [5-7].
Figure 31.2a depicts a design in which both positive and negative roll
bending forces are applied to the work roll chocks by double-acting
cylinders that are located in the backup roll chocks. In the design shown
in Fig. 31.2b, positive roll bending forces, negative roll bending forces, or
roll bending torque are applied to the work roll chocks by two sets of
cylinders working in parallel. Figure 31.2c illustrates a design in which
positive roll bending forces and work roll balance forces are created by
separate sets of cylinders that are located in the work roll chocks.
Fig. 31.1 Vertical plane (VP) single-chock roll bending systems. From
Ginzburg [1].
Fig. 31.2 Vertical plane (VP) single-chock roll bending systems. From
Ginzburg [1].
Page 746
Fig. 31.3 Vertical plane (VP) double-chock work roll bending systems.
From Ginzburg [1].
The designs of the VP work roll bending systems differ with respect to the
following two features:
Fig. 31.4 Vertical plane (VP) chockless roll bending systems. From
Ginzburg [1].
The reader can find various designs of the horizontal plane work roll
bending systems in [22, 23, 26-30]. Figure 31.7 illustrates the
performance of the HP work roll bending system that was developed by
IHI, Japan [23] in application for a 5-high mill arrangement and known as
the flexible flatness control (FFC) mill.
Page 748
One of the main advantages of the FFC mill is the capability to reduce
the relative edge drop or edge thinning ratio that can be quantified using
the following equation [23]:
Page 749
where
er
=
edge thinning ratio
Fig. 31.7 Change in edge thinning effect with cold reduction in FFC mill
in comparison with conventional 4-high mill. Adapted from Fijita, et al
[23].
α
=
change in edge
thinning effect
Figure 31.7 shows the change in the edge thinning effect α as a function
of the cold reduction ratio that is produced by an FFC mill with equivalent
circumferential speed rolling, an FFC mill
Page 750
In the case of direct application of roll bending forces, these forces can
be transmitted through either a single roller (Fig. 31.8a) [31] or through a
series of rollers that contact the backup roll. In the arrangement shown in
Fig. 31.8b [32], the roll bending forces are applied to the roll body by
adjusting the pressure in the segmented pads that support the backup
roll. In the design illustrated in Fig. 31.8c [33], the roll bending forces are
applied to the roll body through a flexible pad that supports the backup
roll.
Fig. 31.8 Backup roll bending systems with bending forces applied to roll
body. From Ginzburg [1].
Page 751
Fig. 31.9 Backup roll bending systems with bending forces applied to
outer chocks. From Ginzburg [1].
Fig. 31.10 Backup roll bending systems with bending forces applied to
main chocks. From Ginzburg [1].
Roll bending forces can also be applied to the outer backup chocks either
directly (Fig. 31.9a) [34], or through lever arms (Fig. 31.9b) [35] that have
adjustable lengths. In the triple-chock arrangement, the roll bending
moments are created by applying opposing forces to the two outer
Page 752
The reader can find some examples of the mill designs with the backup
roll bending systems in [31, 34, 40-43].
Fig. 31.11 Axially shifted cylindrical rolls. From Ginzburg [2]. Reproduced
through the courtesy of Iron and Steel Engineer.
For a given strip width, the ideal solution to this problem is the use of a
stepped backup roll (Fig. 31.12a) that has a contact length with the work
roll that is equal to the strip width. This solution, however, is impractical
when products of various widths are being rolled. This problem can be
solved in the HC mill by implementing bi-directional shifting rolls (Fig.
31.12b) that can accommodate each strip width to be rolled.
Page 754
Fig. 31.13 High crown control (HC) mill family. Adapted from Fujino, et al
[55].
HCW mill - The HCW mill is a modification of the HC mill that can be
applied to 4-high mills. As shown in Fig. 31.13a, a provision is made in
the HCW mill for bi-directional shifting of the work rolls and a positive roll
bending system. A modification of the HCW mill that was developed
jointly by Hitachi and Kawasaki Steel, Japan is known as the K-WRS mill
[51,56].
HCM mill - The HCM mill is a modification of the HC mill that can be
applied to 6-high mills. As illustrated in Fig. 31.13b, the strip profile and
flatness control functions are accomplished with the use of bi-directional
shifting of the intermediate rolls along with positive roll bending.
HCMW mill - The HCMW mill combines the main features of the HCW
and HCM mills by providing bi-directional shifting of both the work rolls
and intermediate rolls. A positive work roll bending system is also
incorporated as shown in Fig. 31.13c.
Page 755
UCM mill - The UCM mill is designed to further improve the strip profile
and flatness control capabilities of the HCM mill by implementing an
intermediate roll bending system (Fig. 31.13d).
Page 756
UCMW mill - The UCMW mill (Fig. 31.13e) includes an intermediate roll
bending system in addition to the strip profile and flatness functions that
are provided in the HCMW mill.
MB mill - The MB mill includes two modifications for 5-high and 6-high
mill arrangements that are called 5MB mill and 6MB mill respectively.
One of the principal features of the MB mill is the use of stationary
tapered backup rolls. In the 5MB mill (Fig. 31.13f), only one backup roll is
tapered while in the 6MB mill (Fig. 31.13g), both backup rolls are tapered.
Both of these mills also utilize work roll and intermediate roll bending
systems.
UC2 - UC4 mills - The UC2 through UC4 mills, which are versions of the
universal crown control (UC) mills, are designed for rolling thinner, wider,
and harder strips. The UC2, UC3, and UC4 mills (Figs. 31.13h and
31.13i) are modifications of the HCM mill that are equipped with small
diameter work rolls. The work rolls are offset with respect to the
intermediate rolls and supported by a set of side rolls. These mills are
also provided with an intermediate roll shifting system along with work roll
and intermediate roll bending systems.
Strip crown control (HC) method - The strip crown control method
involves adjusting the axial contact length between conventionally
crowned work rolls and backup rolls by axial work roll shifting.
Taper adjusting (TA) method. The work rolls are shifted according
to the strip width to minimize strip crown and edge drop.
Taper oscillating (TO) method. The work rolls are oscillated in a
short stroke to reduce the strip crown and to prevent local
abnormal roll wear at the edge portion of the strip.
Cyclic shifting (CS) method - The main purpose of the cyclic shifting
method is to prevent high spots and coil build-up as well as attaining
schedule-free rolling by maintaining a uniform wear contour and thermal
profile of the work rolls. This purpose can be achieved by bi-directional
axial shifting of the work rolls.
Figure 31.14 illustrates the simulation results of the strip crown control
capability of a single stand HCW mill. The distance between the roll and
strip edges is depicted as C. As the distance
Page 757
C becomes smaller, the strip crown decreases and the crown control
range of the roll bending system increases. The roll bending effect almost
doubles after shifting the edges of the work rolls very close to the strip
edges.
Fig. 31.14 Strip crown control capability of HWC mill. Adapted from
Nakanishi, et al [52].
When the strip crown becomes less dependent on the variation of roll
force, this condition can be defined as strip profile stability. In a
conventional 4-high mill, as the roll force increases, it becomes
necessary to increase the positive roll bending force to achieve the same
strip crown. However, in the HCW mill, the roll bending force that is
required to correct the same variation in roll force is substantially smaller.
Fig. 31.15 Effect of intermediate roll shift stroke C in stands F5 - F7 on
hot rolled strip crown. Adapted from Miake, et al [57].
The application of the HC method to the HCM mill produces results that
are similar to those found when this method was applied to the HCW mill.
Figure 31.15 shows the relationship between the strip crown and
intermediate roll shift stroke in a hot strip mill with the F5, F6, and
Page 758
F7 mill stands being HCM mill stands [57]. It can be seen that when the
intermediate roll shift stroke and roll bending forces are changed
simultaneously on stands F5 to F7, the strip profile can be changed over
a wide range from a conventional convex profile to nearly a flat profile.
It is apparent from Fig 31.15 that the intermediate roll shift produces
approximately 0.1 µm change in strip crown for each 1 mm change in roll
shift stroke. As the intermediate roll shift stroke increases, the effect of
roll bending becomes more evident. In the case of the strip size given in
Fig. 31.15, a strip crown control capability of about 90 µm was attained
through the combined application of intermediate roll shifting and
increased roll bending. It has been further confirmed that as the strip
width becomes wider, the strip crown control capability of the HC mill
becomes greater.
Fig. 31.16 Strip crown controllability with tapered work rolls installed at
F6 mill stand. Adapted from Nakanishi, et al [52].
The optimum position for the beginning of the tapered portions of the
work rolls across the strip width is determined as a function of the strip
thickness and width. A simulation of the application of the TA method for
reducing the strip profile is shown in Fig. 31.16 [52]. The distance from
the strip edge to the roll cross-section where the taper zone begins is
depicted as E and is called effective taper length. As the effective taper
length value becomes greater, i.e. the farther inside from the strip edge
the roll taper begins, the strip crown becomes smaller.
Figure 31.17 illustrates the change in strip crown in one rolling campaign
for silicon steel that was rolled by the taper oscillating method on a 2032
mm hot strip mill [56]. The oscillating
Page 759
stroke was selected to be very short to avoid a change in strip crown due
to the variation in effective taper length E. In spite of the roll wear, the
effect of the tapered rolls on strip profile was maintained throughout one
rolling campaign with a resulting strip crown variation of approximately
±20 µm.
Fig. 31.17 Strip crown obtained by using taper oscillating (TO) method in
hot strip mill. Adapted from Kitahama, et al [56].
Fig. 31.18 Two types of rolling schedules: a) fixed ‘‘coffin-type’ schedule
with conventional 4-high mill and b) schedule-free rolling with HC mill.
Adapted from [58].
Page 760
Schedule-free rolling - To reduce local roll wear near the strip edges in a
conventional hot strip mill, the rolling sequence after roll changing must
be limited to the same or similar type of steel that is rolled in a certain
pattern with respect to the strip width. This sequence usually starts with
rolling narrow width coils and then the coil width is rapidly increased until
the maximum value is reached. All subsequent coils are then rolled with a
gradual decrease of the strip width. This type of rolling campaign uses a
fixed “coffin-type” schedule as illustrated in Fig. 31.18a [58].
Fig. 31.19 Effect of roll shifting on wear and thermal crown. Adapted
from Nakanishi, et al [52].
Fig. 31.20 Comparison of the work roll thermal crown obtained with
cyclic shifting (CS) and conventional rolling method for F4 stand of 56 in.
hot strip mill. Adapted from Kitahama, et al [56].
Stabilization of strip crown - The main reason for the variation of strip
crown between work roll changes is the variation of the work roll profile
due to roll wear and thermal crown. The redistribution in roll wear with the
use of the CS method was previously discussed. Another feature of the
CS method is the reduction and redistribution of roll thermal crown [56].
The thermal crown of a work roll that was obtained after one rolling
campaign by the CS method in a 56 in. hot strip mill is shown in Fig.
31.20 and compared with the thermal crown that was generated after a
similar rolling campaign without roll shifting. With conventional rolling
without roll shifting, the thermal crown becomes as large as 285 µm. With
cyclic roll shifting, the heat transferred from the strip to the work roll is
dispersed, causing the thermal crown in the strip path to decrease
approximately one-half of that experienced in conventional rolling without
roll shifting.
Fig. 31.21 Strip crowns obtained with cyclic shifting (CS), taper adjusting
(TA), and conventional rolling methods for 56 in. hot strip mill. Adated
from Kitahama, et al [56].
Figure 31.21 shows the change in strip crown in one rolling campaign by
three different methods including cyclic shifting, taper adjusting, and
conventional methods. With the conventional method, the strip crown
changes from 100 to 40 µm after rolling 100 coils due to the growth of
thermal crown. In the case of cyclic shifting, the average strip crown is
approximately 40 µm and the deviation is reduced to ±20 µm by
decreasing the thermal crown. With the taper adjusting method, the
average strip crown can be reduced to 20 µm by using tapered work rolls
with a deviation of ±20 μm.
Fig. 31.22 Patterns of cyclic shifting (CS) method and respective local
roll wear. Adapted from Nakanishi, et al [52].
The roll wear amount per radius at the strip center Cm can be calculated
from the following equation:
where
wear coefficient
A =
roll force
P =
w strip width
=
roll radius.
R =
The roll wear amount per radius at the strip edge Ce can be calculated as
a linear function of
Page 763
As shown in Fig. 31.22, when roll shifting was not used, the local roll
wear amount linearly increases with the number of rolled coils and
reaches a selected allowable limit of 10 µm after rolling 10 coils. In the
roll shifting pattern A, the roll shift parameters were ΔS = 20 mm and n =
1, i.e. the rolls were shifted 20 mm after rolling one coil. In this case, the
allowable roll wear limit was reached after rolling 50 coils.
A further decrease in local roll wear was achieved by using the roll
shifting pattern B which features a greater number of coils n being rolled
between each roll shifting having lower values of the shift pitch ΔS. In this
case, as many as 140 coils can be rolled within the allowable local roll
wear limit of 10 µm.
To provide optimum strip crown control, the work rolls are usually shifted
to position their end portions at the optimum distance from the strip edge.
This roll position, however, may not necessarily be optimum with respect
to roll wear.
When initially flat rolls are cyclically shifted to minimize local roll wear, the
part of the work roll in contact with the strip edge is worn less than the
middle of the roll. As a result, the work roll wear profile becomes
trapezoidal in shape as shown in Fig. 31.23a. This pattern will be more
explicit when the products of the same or nearly the same width are
rolled. The main inadequacy of this trapezoidal shape roll wear profile is
that it produces a large strip crown.
One possible solution to this problem is the use of a work roll that is
profiled like an isosceles
Page 764
Se roll shift required to make initial start point for roll wear pattern that
=coincides with strip edge
So
=
oscillating roll shift
Ct
=
total roll wear
This roll shift pattern, which is known as the wear compensating shift
(WCS) method, moves the roll wear taper start point outward, while
maintaining the roll wear profile flat at the center. As a result, the
following two principal goals can be achieved:
The edge drop can be evaluated by the edge drop ratio α that is equal to
[60]:
where
Page 765
Fig. 31.24 Relationship between intermediate roll shift stroke C and edge
drop ratio α. Adapted from Asamura [60].
The edge drop in cold mills is a result of transverse material flow near the
strip edge. As follows from a study that was conducted by NKK, Japan
[61], the area of transverse material flow depends on the number of
reduction passes as well as the total reduction rate.
toward the strip edge after the strip is rolled. A greater displacement will
occur for these sections that move closer to the strip edge leading to
thinning of the strip edge.
edge drop
Fig. 31.26 Edge drop caused by a change in roll flattening near the strip
edge.
Fig. 31.27 Roll profile printed ratio. Adapted from Jimba, et al [61].
To remedy this problem, the ends of the work rolls that have special
tapered profiles are shifted to be located near each strip edge. The shape
of the roll end profile is selected to produce the desired recovery of strip
thinning due to edge drop. The efficiency of this recovery can be
described by the roll profile printed ratio δ(x) that can be given by:
Page 767
where
dh change in strip thickness along strip width at distance x from strip edge
=
ds change in roll gap along strip width at distance x from strip edge.
=
The change in the roll gap ds fined by the geometry of the tapered
portion of the roll end. When there is no strip profile recovery, the roll
profile printed ratio δ(x) = 0. Conversely, a full strip profile recovery
occurs when the roll profile printed ratio δ(x) = 1.
According to the data obtained from a laboratory cold mill [61], the roll
profile printed ratios are greater at the initial rolling passes (Fig. 31.27).
Therefore, it is easier to correct the edge drop problem at the upstream
stands in the case of cold reduction in a tandem cold mill. Consequently,
a long-stroke work roll shifting system was introduced by NKK in the first
three stands to correct for the excessive edge drop.
Figure 31.28 shows the relationship between the wave steepness change
of the strip Δλ and the roll bending force change ΔF for an HC mill and a
conventional 4-high mill [51]. These relationships are expressed with
straight lines in which the slopes are equal to the flatness control
capability f. As follows from Fig. 31.28, the flatness control capability of
the HC mill is substantially greater than that of a conventional 4-high mill.
Figure 31.29 shows the relationship between the rolling force and the
required optimum roll bending force to produce flat strip in an HC mill
[51]. This relationship is derived from test data that was obtained from a
laboratory HC mill. With the HC mill, it can be seen that the slope of the
straight lines differs in accordance with the intermediate roll position C.
When C = - 24 mm, the inclination becomes negative, meaning that the
roll bending force must be reduced as the rolling load increases, unlike
the case with a 4-high mill. Further, when C = - 20 mm, the roll bending
force does not change even though the rolling load changes. When this
condition exists, the strip flatness does not change with a change in the
width of the rolled strip and the mill has what is known as infinite width
rigidity.
Fig. 31.31 Contours of axially shifted noncylindrical work rolls. From Guo
[64]. Reproduced through the courtesy of Iron and Steel Engineer.
Figure 31.32 illustrates the principle of CVC technology with shifting work
rolls [65]. The work rolls are mounted in their chocks and shifted in
opposite directions either with the chocks remaining stationary or
together with the chocks.
Fig. 31.32 Continuously variable crown (CVC) and conventional roll gap
contours. Adapted from Bald, et al [65].
Both the top and bottom CVC rolls have an S-shape over their full barrel
length. However, the S-shape waveforms in each of the rolls are offset
from each other by 180 degrees. This arrangement provides a
symmetrical roll gap contour with respect to the vertical line that passes
through the middle of the roll gap. Figure 31.32a illustrates the case
when the work rolls are not shifted and the roll gap height is the same
over the full roll barrel length. Although the roll gap is slightly S-shaped, it
produces no detectable effect on strip flatness because of the high width-
to-thickness ratio of flat rolled products. Thus, when CVC rolls are not
shifted, the effect on strip profile would be the same as when flat work
rolls are used (Fig. 31.32b).
By shifting the top work roll to the right and the bottom work roll by the
same amount to the left (Fig. 31.32c), the distance between the two roll
contours at the center of the rolling stock becomes smaller as compared
with the roll gap distances at the roll edges. This type of shifting would
produce the same effect on the strip profile as when work rolls having a
convex crown are
Page 771
Fig. 31.33 Adjustment range of CVC system with work roll bending.
Adapted from Wilms, et al [67].
If the top work roll is shifted to the left and the bottom work roll by the
same amount to the right (Fig. 31.32e), the distance between the two roll
contours at the center of the rolling stock becomes greater as compared
with the roll gap distances at the roll edges. This type of shifting would
produce the same effect on the strip profile as when work rolls having a
concave crown are used (Fig. 31.32f).
The S-shape of the work rolls that are offset from each other by 180
degrees would naturally produce a difference in roll diameters over the
barrel length which is normally between 0.3 and 0.8 mm. This results in a
difference in the peripheral roll speed of 0.05 to 0.4% with the low values
corresponding to the smaller roll diameter [66]. This difference in speed,
however, is small when compared with the difference in speed between
the work roll and strip, which can be 5 to 40% in the forward slip zone
depending on the pass reduction.
Typically, the axial shifting of the CVC work rolls by ±100 mm produces
the effect that would be produced by changing conventionally ground roll
crowns from 100 to 500 µm as shown in Fig. 31.33 [65, 67].
When CVC rolls are in the middle position, the maximum axial
forces that act on the rolls are equal to those produced with
conventional crowns, but these forces increase when the rolls are
shifted under load.
Fig. 31.34 Contact pressure with CVC rolls. From Bald, et al [65].
Reproduced through the courtesy of Iron and Steel Engineer.
Alternative designs of the roll shifting systems with noncylindrical rolls are
described in [68-77, 91]. The following two technologies are considered
below:
a1, a2, … am
=
polynomial constants
x
=
distance from the roll center
b2 and b4 polynomial constants that are the functions of the roll shifting stroke.
=
Fig. 31.35 Contours of: a) CVC roll and b) IVC rolls. From Ginzburg, et
al. [91]. Reproduced through the courtesy of Iron and Steel Engineer.
a1, a2, … a5
=
polynomial constants
x
=
distance from the roll center
the roll and increasing at the other side. The shifting of the IVC rolls
having the fifth-order polynomial profile will create the equivalent work roll
profile ye that is described by the polynomial that contains all the
components from the second to the fourth orders:
where
b2 and b4 polynomial constants that are the functions of the roll shifting stroke.
=
Fig. 31.37 Axially shifted sleeved rolls. From Ginzburg [2]. Reproduced
through the courtesy of Iron and Steel Engineer.
Fig. 31.38 Roll crossing systems. Adapted from Ginzburg, et al. [91].
The known systems of crossing the roll axes [81-83] can be classified as
follows (Fig. 31.38):
Work roll (WR) cross system in which only the work rolls are
crossed [84, 85]
Backup roll (BU) cross system in which only the backup rolls are
crossed [84]
Page 776
Pair crossed (PC) system in which during crossing the work roll
axis and backup roll axis of each top and bottom roll unit are kept
parallel [86]
Dual cross (DC) system in which the work roll and backup roll of
each top and bottom roll unit are crossed in opposite directions
Intermediate roll (IR) cross for 5-hi mill stand [87]
Intermediate roll (IR) cross for 6-hi mill stand [87].
Fig. 31.39 shows the relationship between the equivalent roll crown and
cross angle for various roll crossing systems that correspond to
equations listed in Table 31.1. The work roll cross system is the most
efficient while the backup roll cross system is the least efficient. Pair
cross system is nearly efficient as the work roll cross system, followed by
the 6-high and 5-high intermediate roll crossing systems. Par cross (PC)
system was successfully implemented in both hot and cold strip mills [81-
83, 90].
Table 31.1 Equations for equivalent work roll crowns related to various roll
crossing systems. From Ginzburg, et al. [91].
According to Mitsubushi, Japan, changing the cross angle has no
appreciable effect on the roll force, rolling torque, strip forward slip, or
work roll wear.
Page 777
Roll axial thrust - Roll axial thrust force is created as a result of the
relative slip in the width direction between a crossed work roll and the
strip. From tests conducted by Mitsubishi along with theoretical
consideration, the following simplified equation for the roll axial thrust
force Ft can be derived [82]:
Page 778
where
roll force
P=
r reduction ratio.
=
where
δh strip profile wedge or difference between drive side strip thickness and
=operator side strip thickness
Figure 31.41 illustrates that the walking index increases with an increase
in the cross angle.
Fig. 31.41 Relationship between walking index and cross angle. Adapted
from Tsukamoto and Matsumoto [81] and Nakajima, et al [82].
The control philosophy of the Uni-Cross system is based on the fact that
crossing of work rolls, intermediate rolls or backup rolls produces
different effect on the strip profile. At the same time, the adverse effects
on the strip quality are also different, depending what rolls are crossed.
The crossing system which involves crossing the work rolls produces the
largest adverse effect to the quality of the strip.
Fig. 31.42 Block diagram of strip profile and flatness control system
utilizing Uni-Cross technology. From Ginzburg, et al. [91]. Reproduced
through the courtesy of Iron and Steel Engineer.
In the control system (Fig. 31.42), the strip profile and flatness controller
examines the information produced by both entry and exit sensors
measuring the strip flatness and profile. It then compares the actual and
target exit strip profile parameters and makes a decision which crossing
system shall be employed to achieve the required corrections with
minimum adverse effects to the strip quality.
31.25 Combined Pair Cross and Work Roll Shifting (PCS) Mill
The combined pair cross and work roll shifting (PCS) mill was installed at
the NKK Keihin hot strip mill, Japan in 1989 [88]. The pair cross mill
provides crown control while work roll
Page 780
shifting produces a more uniform roll wear along the roll face.
Fig. 31.43 Combined pair cross and work roll shifting (PCS) mill. From
Miyai, et al [88]. Reproduced through the courtesy of AISE.
The PCS mechanisms were installed on the last four stands (F4 to F7) of
the Keihin 7-stand finishing train. A schematic drawing of the combined
pair cross and work roll shifting mechanism is shown in Fig. 31.43. Roll
crossing is activated by vertical hydraulic motors while bi-directional work
roll shifting is provided by horizontal hydraulic cylinders.
Work roll motion: spiral versus circular - In conventional rolling mills, the
work rolls are engaged in circular motion in respect to the rolled strip. In
COSMOS, the work rolls are involved in two kinds of motion, the circular
motion and transverse motion along their axes, so each point of the roll
moves along a spiral path as shown in Fig. 31.45.
is prevented due to the frictional forces acting between the work roll and
the rolled product. In COSMOS, the spiral motion of the work rolls
produces shear stresses that act along the roll axes, providing more
efficient three-dimensional deformation of the rolled product.
Fig. 31.45 Work roll motions: a) spiral and b) circular. From Ginzburg, et
al. [91]. Reproduced through the courtesy of AISE.
Work roll shifting stroke: full versus partial - In conventional rolling mills,
the work roll shifting stroke is usually much shorter the maximum strip
width rolled in the mill. This permits to redistribute roll wear mainly only
near the strip edges and to make limited redistribution of the roll thermal
expansion. In COSMOS, the work roll shifting stroke is greater than the
maximum strip width (Fig. 31.47), providing more efficient redistribution of
both the roll wear and roll thermal expansion.
Fig. 31.46 Rolled stock deformation: a) 3-dimensional (for spiral motion
rolling process) and b) 2-dimensional (for circular motion rolling process)
versus. From Ginzburg, et al. [91]. Reproduced through the courtesy of
AISE Steel Technology.
The expanded roll shifting stroke increases the lever arm for roll bending
force, the efficiency of the roll bending system is increased.
Page 783
Fig. 31.47 Work roll shifting stroke in COSMOS. From Ginzburg, et al.
[91]. Reproduced through the courtesy of AISE.
Fig. 31.49 Roll thermal profile control by: a) cooling and b) heating.
Adapted from Ginzburg [96].
Figure 31.50 illustrates the design of the Roll Thermal Crown (RTC)
control system that has been developed by United Engineering and
International Rolling Mill Consultants [96]. The principle of operation of
the RTC system is based on the fact that roll cooling efficiency is
dependent on the spray angle β.
When the RTC header is set at a certain angular position, the spray
angle β at the center of the roll is at one given value, while the spray
angles of the nozzles that are spaced away from the center are
progressively offset at increasing or decreasing angles. As a result, a
nonuniform cooling rate is produced along the work roll body. Figure
31.51 shows the cooling efficiency along the work body as a function of
the spray angle β.
Page 785
Fig. 31.51 Roll cooling efficiency along the work roll body obtained with
Roll Thermal Crown (RTC) control system.
30.7 On-Line Roll Grinding
Another technology that has been developed for maintaining the contour
of either conventional or nonconventional rolls is on-line roll grinding. The
principal purpose of on-line roll grinding is to smooth the wear of the work
rolls during rolling operations, thus maintaining the appropriate roll
contour at all times. When applied to hot strip mills, the on-line roll
grinding system can
Page 786
The principle of operation of the on-line roll grinder (ORG) that was
developed by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Japan [97] is illustrated in Fig.
31.52. Each grinding wheel, which has a cup shape and supported by
bearings, is installed with an offset e with respect to the work roll axis to
provide rotation. The axis of rotation is inclined against the line normal to
the work roll surface by the small angle α.
When the grinding wheels are pressed against the work roll surface, the
roll and the wheels make a line contact which causes the roll velocity Vr
to produce the following components: grinding wheel velocity Vg and
wheel slip velocity Vs. The component Vg defines the peripheral
rotational velocity of the wheel while the component Vs defines the slip
between the wheel and the work roll which allows the grinding operation.
This arrangement provides for the optimum utilization of the grinding
material and reduces the probability of welding or dulling the wheel
surface.
Fig. 31.52 Principle of operation of on-line roll grinder (ORG) developed
by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries. Adapted from Hayashi, et al [97].
Item Description
Number of grinder 6
heads
Maximum
oscillating length 300 mm
The main parameters of the full-scale ORG test machine are shown in
Table 31.2. The grinding capability Cg was estimated as the depth of
grinding per each single rotation of the work roll and can be calculated
from the following equation:
where
Lo oscillating length, mm
=
tg grinding time, s
=
References
1. Ginzburg, V.B., ‘‘Technology for Strip Profile and Flatness Control in
Rolling Mills,” World Steel Review, Vol. 1 No. 1, Spring 1991, pp. 162-
172.
2. Ginzburg, V.B., “Strip Profile Control with Flexible Edge Backup Rolls,”
Iron and Steel Engineer, July 1987, pp. 23-34.
8. Goulding, Jr., A., U.S. Patent No. 2,611,150, Sept. 23, 1952.
10. Imai, I., Japan Patent No. 57-68206, April 26, 1982.
11. Takashima, Y., et al, “Studies on the Strip Crown Control for Hot Strip
Rolling - Double Chock Work Roll Bending System (DC-WRB),” 4IHI
Engineering Review2, Vol. 12, No. 3, Oct. 1979, pp. 28-34.
12. Galpin, P.H., et al, UK Patent No. 2702, Dec. 31, 1907.
13. Dolenc, A., et al, U.S. Patent No. 4,041,752, Aug. 16, 1977.
14. Schlatter, B., et al, U.S. Patent No. 4,530,227, July 23, 1985.
16. O’Brien, J.W, U.S. Patent No. 3,446,050, May 27, 1969.
17. Eibe, W.W., U.S. Patent No. 3,864,955, Feb. 11, 1975.
19. Bournez, L.R., et al, U.S. Patent No. 3,555,872, June 19, 1971.
20. Cozzo, G., U.S. Patent No. 2,792,730, May 21, 1957.
Page 788
21. Volkhausen, C., U.S. Patent No. 2,909,088, Oct. 20, 1959.
22. Iwanami, T., et al, U.S. Patent No. 4,539,834, Sept. 10, 1985.
23. Fujita, et al, F., “Development of a New Type of Cold Rolling Mill for
Sheet Products,” AISE Year Book, 1985, pp. 264-271.
24. Richter, G., et al, U.S. Patent No. 4,691,548, Sept. 8, 1987.
25. Ginzburg, V.B., U.S. Patent No. 4,724,698, Feb. 16, 1988.
26. Kato, H., et al, U.S. Patent No. 4,539,833, Sept. 10, 1985.
28. Bald, W., et al, U.S. Patent No. 4,598,566, July 8, 1986.
29. Hilbert, H.G., et al, “MKW Cold Mill - Rolling Silicon Steel Strip, AISE
Year Book, 1976, pp. 364-370.
30. Bald, W., et al, U.S. Patent No. 4,563,888, Jan. 14, 1986.
31. Talbot, H.H., U.S. Patent No. 2,985,042, May 23, 1961.
32. Bond, H.L.F., U.S. Patent No. 3,572,079, March 23, 1971.
33. Krylov, N.I., et al, U.S. Patent No. 4,212,504, July 15, 1980.
34. Stone, M.D., U.S. Patent No. 3,250,105, May 10, 1966.
35. Eibe, W.W., et al, U.S. Patent No. 3,621,695, Nov. 23, 1971.
37. Diolet, L., U.S. Patent No. 3,599,466, Aug. 17, 1971.
38. Elton, D.A.L., et al, Canada Patent No. 800,283, Dec. 3, 1968.
39. Archipov, N.B., et al, USSR Patent No. 588,277, Feb. 9, 1978.
40. Stone, M.D. and Gray, R., “Theory and Practical Aspects in Crown
Control,” AISE Yearly Proceedings, 1965, pp. 657-667.
41. Stone, M.D., “Backup Roll Bending $ For Crown and Gage Control,”
AISE Yearly Proceedings, 1969, pp. 669-688.
42. Kono, K. and Nakamura, H., “Effects of Backup Roll Bending in the
Plate Mill,’’ Transactions of the Iron and Steel Institute of Japan, Vol. 11,
1971, pp. 684-687.
43. Ellis, R.H., U.S. Patent No. 4,676,085, June 30, 1987.
45. Ginzburg, V.B., “Technology for Strip Profile and Flatness Control in
Rolling Mills,” World Steel Review, Vol. 1 No. 1, Spring 1991, pp. 162-
172.
46. Ginzburg, V.B., “Strip Profile Control with Flexible Edge Backup
Rolls,” AISE Year Book, 1987, pp. 277-288.
47. Shida, S. and Kojiwara, T., U.S. Patent No. 4,162,627, July 31, 1979.
48. Kimura, T., Japan Patent No. 58-53304, March 29, 1983.
49. Honjiyou, H., Japan Patent No. 59-110401, June 26, 1984.
50. Phillips, C.W., U.S. Patent No. 2,047,883, July 14, 1936.
51. Furuya, et al, T., “New Design 6-High Cold Mill (HC Mill) Solves
Shape Problems,” AISE Year Book, 1979, pp.282-287.
52. Nakanishi, T., et al, “Application of Work Roll Shift Mill HCW Mill to
Hot Strip and Plate Rolling,” Hitachi Review, Vol. 34 No. 4, 1985, pp. 153-
160.
53. “The HC Mill: The Ultimate Technology in Flat Product Rolling,”
Hitachi, Ltd. Publication,
Page 789
Tokyo, 1986.
54. Nakanishi, T., and Sugiyama, T., “Applications of HC Mill in Hot Steel
Strip Rolling,” Hitachi Review, Vol. 32 No. 2, 1983, pp. 59-64.
55. Fujino, N., et al, “Recent Trends for Rolling Equipment,” Hitachi
Review, Vol. 39 No. 4, 1990, pp. 177-182.
56. Kitahama, M., et al, “Profile Control of Hot Rolled Strip by Work Roll
Shifting (K-WRS) Mill,” AISE Year Book, 1987, pp. 474-483.
59. Hongo, Y., et al, “Crown Control Technologies for Hot Strip Mill on
Modifying Existing Mills,” AISE Hot Strip Mill Profile and Flatness
Seminar, Pittsburgh, Pa., Nov. 2-3, 1988.
60. Asamura, T., et al, “Development of Shape Control System for Cold
Rolling Process and Practical Application of High Reduction Rolling,”
Nippon Steel Technical Report, No. 18, Dec. 1981, pp. 22-36.
61. Jimba, T., et al, “Continuous Close-Coupled Pickling Line with a New
Cold Rolling Mill at NKK Fukuyama Works,” AISE Year Book, 1990, pp.
125-133.
62. Feldmann, H., et al, U.S. Patent No. 4,440,012, April 3, 1984.
63. Ginzburg, V.B., U.S. Patent No. 4,656,859, April 14, 1987.
64. Guo, R.-M., “Characteristics of Rolling Mills with Roll Shifting,” AISE
Year Book, 1988, pp. 497-506.
65. Bald, W., et al, “Continuously Variable Crown (CVC) Rolling,” AISE
Year Book, 1987, pp. 127-136.
66. Klamma, K., “CVC Technology in Cold Rolling Mills,” Stahl und Eisen,
Vol. 104 No. 22, 1984, pp. 65-68.
67. Wilms, W., et al, “Profile and Flatness Control in Hot Strip Mills,”
Metallurgical Plant and Technology, No. 6, 1985, pp. 74-90.
69. T., Kajiwaka, U.S. Patent No. 3,857,268, Dec. 31, 1974.
70. Michaux, J., U.S. Patent No. 4,589,269, May 20, 1986.
71. Kimura, T. and Miyakozawa, K., U.S. Patent No. 4,491,005, Jan. 1,
1985.
72. Schiller, G., et al, U.S. Patent No. 4,736,609, April 12, 1988.
73. Kuhn, H., U.S. Patent No. 4,785,651, Nov. 22, 1988.
74. Ginzburg, V.B. and Vidil, F.R., U.S. Patent No. 4,898,014, Feb. 6,
1990.
75. Giacomoni, J.G., U.S. Patent No. 4,934,166, June 19, 1990.
76. German Patent No. DE 3604 133 Al, Aug. 13, 1987.
77. Honjiyou, H., Japan Patent No. 57-202910, Dec. 13, 1982.
78. Matsumoto, H., et al, U.S. Patent No. 4,299,109, Nov. 10, 1981.
81. Tsukamoto, H. and Matsumoto, H., “Shape and Crown Control Mill -
Crossed Roll System,” AISE Year Book, 1984, pp. 467-474.
84. Keller, A.T., U.S. Patent No. 1,860,931, May 31, 1932.
85. Ono, H., et al, “Application of the HCX-Mill to Hot Strip Mills,” Hitachi
Review, Vol. 45, No.6, 1996, pp. 271-278.
86. H. Hino, et al, U.S. Patent No. 4,453,393, June 12, 1984.
87. Ginzburg, V. B., U.S. Patent No. 5,839,313, Nov. 24, 1998.
88. Miyai, Y., et al, “Modernization and Operation of NKK’s Keihin Hot
Strip Mill,” Iron and Steel Engineer, Nov. 1991, pp. 35-40.
89. Ginzburg, V.B., U.S. Patent No. 5,165,266, Nov. 24, 1992.
90. Kaneko, T., “Advanced Technologies of the New Cold Strip Mill at
Kashima Steel Works,” Proceedingd of METEC Congress 94 & 6th
International Rolling Conference VDEh, Dusseldorf, Germany, June 20-
22, 1994, pp. 229-236.
91. Ginzburg, V. B., “New Strip Profile and Flatness Control Technologies
for Rolling Mills,” Proceedings of 1999 AISE Convention, Cleveland, OH,
September 20-24, 1999.
92. Ginzburg, V. B., U.S. Patent No. 5,970,771, October. 26, 1999.
93. Ginzburg, V. B., Unified Spiral Field and Matter - A Story of a Great
Discovery, Helicola Press, Division of IRMC, Pittsburgh, PA, 1999.
94. Luling, L. and Hollmann, F. W., “Thermal Flatness Contol During Cold
Rolling,” of the 4th International Steel Rolling Conference: The Science
and Technology of Flat Rolling, Vol. 1, Deauville, France, June 1-3, 1987,
pp. E.16.1 - E.16.5.
96. Ginzburg, V. B., U.S. Patent No. 5,212,975, May 25, 1993.
97. Hayashi, K., et al, “Development of On-line Roll Grinding System for
Hot Strip Mill,” ISIJ International, Vol. 31 No. 6, 1991, pp. 588-593.
Page 791
Chapter 32
STRIP PROFILE AND FLATNESS CONTROL SYSTEMS
Fig. 32.1 Outline of Kawasaki Steel profile meter. Adapted from Tamiya,
et al [1].
The calculator computes the strip profile as the difference between the
two measured values
Page 792
that are obtained by the fixed gage and scanning gage. The scanning
gage is driven by a dc motor with a variable speed that ranges from 1.8
to 18 m/min through a rack and pinion. In alternative designs of profile
meters, an increased scanning rate can be achieved by adding a second
scanning gage that moves in the opposite direction of the first scanning
gage.
Fig. 32.2 Profile measuring method with three X-ray gages. Adapted
from Naganuma, et al [2].
Fig. 32.3 Profile thickness gage from Isotope Measuring Systems.
Adapted from [3].
Linearity ≤ ±0.05%,
not better
than ±2 µm
where
ΔL difference between the longest and shortest ribbons across the strip width
=
L wave length
=
Fx
=
force on measuring zone
Page 795
strip tension
T=
strip width
B=
t strip thickness
=
n number of zones.
=
Figure 32.5 shows the signal processing for one measuring zone (the
blocks within the dashed line) as well as the common part for the entire
equipment. The transducer signal from zone x is rectified and filtered in
block 1. The output signal is a dc voltage that is proportional to the force
Fx. In block 4, the mean value Fm of the forces Fx from all zones that are
covered by the strip is formed. The mean tensile stress σo is calculated
in block 6 with the aid of data for the strip. The quotient σo/Fm is formed
in block 5 and multiplied by Fx in block 2. The output signal Fxσo/Fm is
equal to the local tensile stress σx in the strip. Finally, σo is subtracted in
block 3 and the difference Δσx = σx - σo constitutes the output signal and
is displayed on a separate instrument for each measuring zone.
Fig. 32.6 Shapemeter for application in hot strip mill. From Kelk, et al [5].
Reproduced through the courtesy of Iron and Steel Engineer.
The technical specifications of the ROMETER hot strip flatness gage are
as follows [36]:
Page 798
Lasers Helium-Neon
Measuring
range 200 mm
An optical flatness meter that utilizes the light section method was
developed by Sumitomo Metal Industries, Japan [37] for measuring strip
flatness at the exit of a hot strip mill. Figure 32.9 shows the principle of
operation for this system. A laser beam is directed toward the rolled strip
which produces three bright lines on the strip surface. A video camera is
set above the strip and records the bright lines. When the strip is flat (Fig.
32.9a), the bright lines are also flat and appear straight on the video
monitor screen. These lines will remain straight even when a flat strip is
floated with respect to the pass line.
When the strip has center buckles (Fig. 32.9b), the bright line images
become distorted in the middle. Edge waves will distort the end portions
of these images as shown in Fig. 32.9c. The height of the strip portion
that corresponds to the i-th bright line is equal to (Fig. 32.10):
where
k scale factor.
=
The flatness error can be calculated by using the elongation index ε that
is given by the following equation:
where
32.4 Shapemeter-Looper
A shapemeter-looper has a dual purpose which is to provide a continuous
measurement of both strip shape and strip tension and at the same time
perform the functions of a conventional strip tension looper between two
stands of a finishing train. To accomplish these operations, a
shapemeter-looper must meet the following requirements:
To measure variations in tension across the strip width, the traditional full
length roll is replaced by a row of segmented rolls 3, each with its own
bearings and arbor. These rolls have 10 in. diameters on 6 in. centers.
For a 66 in. wide mill, 11 rolls would be used. Each roll segment
assembly 4 is attached to the cantilever beam 5 which is made of spring
steel. All of the cantilever beams are mounted on the main looper shaft 7.
A wedge assembly 6 is supplied to adjust the height of any roll on
dressing.
Fig. 32.11 Cross-section and plan view of shapemeter-looper proposed
by United Engineering, International Rolling Mill Consultants, and George
Kelk, Ltd.: 1 - coolant water header, 2 - sensor bar, 3 - segmented roll, 4 -
roll segment assembly, 5 - cantilever beam, 6 - wedge assembly, 7 -
looper shaft, 8 - apron, 9 - counter-balance weight, 10 - subframe, 11 -
adjustable stop, 12 - target, 13 - motor, 14 - gear box, 15 - angular
position transducer. From Ginzburg [5].
Fig. 32.12 Alignment of the segmented rolls of Shape Actimiter for rolling
the strip with a) latent shape and b) manifest shape. From Kelk, et al [5].
Reproduced through the courtesy of Iron and Steel Engineer.
The two basic modes of operation of the Shape Actimeter are the
position mode and tension mode. In the position mode, the elevation of
individual rolls HA is maintained based on the magnitudes of the position
reference signals HR. The strip tension signals SA are calculated by
Page 802
using data from both pressure and position transducers. In the tension
mode, strip tension is maintained by the individual rolls according to the
reference signals SR. The strip flatness is calculated based on the actual
elevations of the individual rolls.
In cold mills, the strip crown is generally defined by the crown of the hot
rolled strip. There-
Page 803
To develop a strategy for strip profile and flatness control, the following
main steps must be considered:
In this case, the shape form can be presented by the so-called shape
index ρ that is computed from the wave height H and length L by
assuming a sinusoidal form of the strip flatness defect (Fig. 32.14) and
given by the following equation:
Page 804
zontal axis represents the normalized strip width and the vertical axis
represents the strip transverse tension difference with respect to the strip
center. The points xq and xe are fixed at 0.538 and 0.906 respectively,
while the point xn = 0.8.
The components Se, Sq, and Se of the shape vector S are defined as the
gradients of the three lines that are shown in Fig. 32.17. Various forms of
strip shape can be expressed with the shape vector S including center
buckles, edge waves, M-type quarter buckles, and W-type quarter
buckles. It is possible to recognize these shape forms by establishing a
relationship in absolute values and signs between the components Se,
Sq, and Se of the shape vector S.
The components ΔSe, ΔSq, and ΔSe of the shape vector S are then
determined as a function of the strip tension differences Δσe, Δσq, and
Δσn. These values are then used to calculate the references for adjusting
the work roll bending force Fw, intermediate roll bending force Fi, and
intermediate roll shift ΔC. The calibration factor γ is proportional to the
exit thickness and is calculated by comparing the predicted and
measured values of the shape vector S.
j
=
basic strip shape pattern
number
The coefficients Aj are the weighing factors for the respective basic strip
shape patterns Φj(i). Thus, for example, as the coefficients A1 and A3
increase, the asymmetrical components of the integrated strip shape
pattern will become more pronounced. A positive value of the coefficient
A2 indicates the presence of center buckles whereas a negative value
indicates wavy edges. The amount of quarter buckles in the integrated
strip shape pattern is determined by the coefficient A4.
This method involves correcting the strip flatness error that is shown in
Fig. 32.24 in the fol-
Page 811
StepProduce the second order correction by curve-fitting the curve shown in Fig.
2: 32.24b to determine the amplitude and polarity of the correction to be
produced by the actuator such as a VC backup roll, which exhibits a
predominantly parabolic response.
StepProduce the fourth order correction. During this step, the curve depicted in
3: Fig. 32.24c is curve-fitted with the fourth (or higher) order polynomials that
are used to supply the work roll bending system.
StepControl the residual flatness errors. The residual flatness errors that are
4: determined in the curve shown in Fig. 32.24d are used to develop the
references for the roll coolant control system which produces further
corrections to achieve the target flatness (Fig. 32.24e).
Fig. 32.24 Control strategy for correction of flatness with VC backup roll.
Adapted from Collison and Gore [64].
where
ular the value of the finished product. In the case of rolling on a 6-stand
mill, the ρ value of the strip exiting the last stand can be given by:
where
m0 … m6 = constants.
StepReduction in the last stand is determined in such a way that the target value
1: of profile index Σ is attained.
the exit of the last finishing mill stand. Their signals are used for final trim
corrections of the profile and flatness of the strip as well as adaptive
adjustments to the profile and flatness models.
Fig. 32.26 Block diagram of “Pro-Flat” process control system for hot
strip mills proposed by United Engineering and International Rolling Mill
Consultants. [65].
In the neural network diagram shown in Fig. 32.27c, the neurons are
represented by small circles that are interconnected to produce a
hierarchical arrangement that is capable of pattern recognition. This
process of pattern recognition involves learning. During each learning
cycle, the weight coefficients W1, W2, … Wn are adjusted which leads to
improved quality of pattern recognition.
certainty of 0.8 with the hot membership function and 0.2 with the nice
temperature membership function. Similarly, a humidity of 86% would
produce a 0.6 degree of certainty with the damp membership function
and a 0.4 degree of certainty with nice humidity membership function.
In cold mills, the strip crown is generally defined by the crown of the hot
rolled strip. Therefore, the main target to be achieved in cold mills is
related to the strip flatness that usually
Page 818
Functional characteristics
Quantitative characteristics.
Static modifiers of roll gap profile - These actuators allow for adjustments
of the roll gap during the gap time between the rolling of coils. Examples
of these actuators are roll crossing systems and axially shifted non-
cylindrical rolls. These actuators are used to increase the crown control
range, reduce edge drop, and limit the effect of roll wear on strip surface
quality.
Optimizers of controllability of roll gap profile - These actuators have the
dual function of reducing the adverse effect of disturbance parameters,
such as variation of rolling load and at the same time, enhance the crown
control range of the roll bending system. Examples of these actuators are
nonadjustable and adjustable stepped backup rolls, tapered rolls, axially
shifted cylindrical rolls, axially shifted sleeved rolls, and flexible edge
nonadjustable crown rolls.
Strip crown control range - The strip crown control range provided by an
actuator ca is
Page 819
where
cmax maximum strip crown for a particular strip provided by the actuator
=
cmin minimum strip crown for a particular strip provided by the actuator.
=
Strip profile control range - The strip profile control range provided by a
strip profile and flatness actuator can be determined by using one of two
parameters:
Fig. 32.31 The strip crown control ranges provided by the work roll
bending and pair roll crossing systems. Adapted from Nakajima, et al
[66].
hj
=
strip thickness at
center
where
where
w strip width
=
The edge drop control capability of the strip profile and flatness can be
determined by the relative edge drop reduction that is given by:
Page 822
where
Figure 32.33 shows the relative edge drop reduction obtained at the 4-
stand tandem cold mill by application the shifting tapered rolls. The edge
drop reduction of 24% is obtained by using tapered rolls at the stand 1
only; 36% by using the tapered rolls at the stands 1 and 2; 42% by using
the tapered rolls at the stands 1, 2 and 3, and 45% by using the tapered
rolls at the stands 1 through 4. Thus, the maximum effect is achieved at
the upstream stands with a minimal improvements made at the last
stand.
Required Strip Crown Control Range - Defining the required strip crown
control range is the first step in selecting the optimum strip profile and
flatness actuators. The required strip crown control range that is provided
by an actuator car can be presented as the sum of the following
components:
where
csr
=
required strip crown
range
The first option solves the problem by introducing two or more sets
of the work roll crowns, with each set to be applicable for a certain
product mix. For example, it is
Page 823
Work roll bending actuators - Work roll bending force exerted by the work
roll bending actuators introduces two principal detrimental effects:
Increases stresses in the work roll neck
Page 824
This limits the maximum values of the work roll bending forces. To
increase the bearing life, the roll bending force is commonly applied
through the centerline of the bearing. Also, when the roll bending force is
greater than 150 tons per chock, it is recommended to supplement the
conventional radial bearings with the thrust bearings.
Work roll crossing actuators - Crossing the work rolls introduces several
possible problems:
Work roll shifting actuators - Shifting of the rolls with special profiles, such
as CVC, HC, and IVC, my lead to three principal problems:
Hot strip mill - In a finishing train of a hot strip mill, the optimum locations
of the strip profile and flatness actuators are determined by three
principal features of the hot rolling process (Fig. 32.35):
Fig. 32.35 - Optimum locations of the strip profile and flatness actuators
in hot strip mills.
The effectiveness of the shifted tapered (HC) work rolls for edge
drop control increases down stream of the finishing train.
Therefore, the application of the shifted tapered (HC) work rolls is
the most effective at the downstream stands.
Cold mill - In a tandem cold mill, the optimum locations of the strip profile
and flatness actuators are determined by three principal features of the
cold rolling process (Fig. 32.36):
Fig. 32.36 - Optimum locations of the strip profile and flatness actuators
in cold rolling mills.
References
1. Tamiya, T., et al, ‘‘An On-line Measurement of Hot Strip Profile,”
Kawasaki Steel Technical Report, No. 5, May 1982, pp. 55-67.
2. Naganuma, T., et al, “Shape and Profile Control for Hot Strip Rolling,”
Nippon Steel Technical Report, No. 27, Oct. 1985, pp. 43-49.
4. Sheppard, T., “Shape in Metal Strip: The State of the Art,” Shape
Control, Metals Society, London, 1976, pp. 11-18.
8. AISE Hot Strip Mill Profile and Flatness Study - Phase I2, Association
of Iron and Steel Engineers, Pittsburgh, Pa., Oct. 1986., pp. 10-11.
12. Barreto, J.P. and Hillier, M.J., “Shape Control in Cold Strip Rolling,”
Sheet Metal Industries, Vol. 45, Oct. 1986, pp. 707-709.
13. Misaka, Y., et al, U.S. Patent No. 3,442,104, May 6, 1969.
16. Diolot, L., U.S. Patent No. 3,817,095, June 18, 1974.
19. Cabaret, P.M., et al, U.S. Patent No. 4,289,005, Sept. 15, 1981.
20. Hsu, Y.W., U.S. Patent No. 4,512,170, April 23, 1985.
24. Montastier, J.G., et al, “Clecim Shapemeter Roll,” AISE Year Book,
1983, pp. 502-504.
27. Ishimoto, et al, U.S. Patent No. 4,188,809, Feb. 19, 1980.
28. Ginzburg, V.B. and Jones, G.B., U.S. Patent No. 4,680,978, July 21,
1987.
29. “Mitsubishi Shape Meter for Cold Strip Mills,” Mitsubishi Electric
Publication, Feb. 1979.
30. Asamura, T., et al, “Development of Shape Control for Cold Rolling
Process and Practical Application of High Reduction Rolling,” Nippon
Steel Technical Report, No. 18, Dec. 1981, pp.22-36.
31. “Practical Shape Meter for Hot Strip Mill,” Transactions of the Iron and
Steel Institute of Japan, 1985.
32. Tsurutani, S., et al, “Shape Meter for Hot Strip Rolling,” Kobe
Engineering Reports, Vol. 30 No. 4, 1980.
33. Ginzburg, V.B., U.S. Patent No. 4,771,622, Sept. 20, 1988.
35. Pirlet, R., et al, “A Noncontact System for Measuring Hot Strip
Flatness,” AISE Year Book, 1983, pp. 284-289.
36. “ROMETER Hot Strip Flatness Gage,” I.R.M. Publication P107 E-001,
Industry Research and Metallurgy, Belgium, June 1984.
37. Matsui, K., et al, “Shape Meter for a Hot Strip Mill,” Sumitomo Search,
No. 38, May 1989, pp. 105-114.
Page 828
38. AISE Hot Strip Mill Profile and Flatness Study - Phase II, Association
of Iron and Steel Engineers, Pittsburgh, Pa., July 1989., pp. 52-59.
39. “Hot Strip Mill Shape Meter,” Kawasaki Steel Publication, Japan.
40. Ginzburg, V.B., U.S. Patent No. 4,674,310, June 23, 1987.
43. Okado, M., et al, “A New Shape Control Technique for Cold Strip
Mills,” Iron and Steel Engineer, June 1982, pp. 25-29.
46. Shohet, K.N. and Townsend, N.A., “Flatness Control in Plate Rolling,’’
Journal of the Iron and Steel Institute, Oct. 1971, pp. 769-775.
48. Takashima, Y., et al, “Studies on the Strip Crown Control for Hot Strip
Rolling # Double Chock Work Roll Bending System (DC-WRB),” IHI
Engineering Review, Vol. 12 No. 3, Oct. 1979, pp. 28-34.
49. Ginzburg, V.B., “Technology for Strip Profile and Flatness Control in
Rolling Mills,” World Steel Review, Vol. 1, No. 1, Spring 1991, pp. 162-
172.
50. Ginzburg, V.B., “Basic Principles of Customized Computer Models for
Cold and Hot Strip Mills,” Iron and Steel Engineer, Sept. 1985, pp. 21-35.
52. Ginzburg, V.B., et al, “Strip Profile Control with Flexible Edge Backup
Rolls,” AISE Year Book, 1987, pp. 277-288.
54. Hata, K., et al, “Universal Crown Control Mills,” Hitachi Review, Vol.
34 No. 4, 1985, pp. 168-174.
55. Wilmotte, S., et al, “The Sigma-Ro Process: A New Approach to the
Hot Strip Mill Computer Control,” C.R.M Reports, No. 52, May 1978, pp.
7-15.
56. Sivilotti, O.G., et al, “ASEA-ALCAN AFC System for Cold Rolling Flat
Strip,” AISE Year Book, 1973, pp. 263-270.
57. Yasuda, K. et al, “Rolling of Dead Flat Strip Using UC Mill with Small
Diameter Work Rolls,” Proceedings of the 4th International Steel Rolling
Conference: The Science and Technology of Flat Rolling, Vol. 2,
Deauville, France, June 1-3, 1987, pp. E.22.1 - E.22.12.
59. Saito, T., et al, “Automatic Flatness Control System in Tandem Cold
Rolling Mill
Page 829
for Ultra-thin Gauge Strip,” Kawasaki Steel Technical Report, No. 24,
April 1991, pp. 41-46.
60. Asamura, T., et al, “Development of Shape Control System for Cold
Rolling Process and Practical Application of High Reduction Rolling,”
Nippon Steel Technical Report, No. 18, Dec. 1981, pp. 22-36.
61. Imai, I., et al, “New 6-High Mill (NHM) and Automatic Shape Control
System in Cold Rolling,” Proceedings of the International Conference on
Steel Rolling: Science and Technology of Flat Rolled Products, Vol. 2,
Tokyo, Sept. 29 - Oct. 4, 1980, pp. 807-818.
64. Collison, C.D. and Gore, T.A., “Automatic Flatness Control Using a
VC Roll,” Steel Times, Nov. 1985, pp. 555-556.
65. Ginzburg, V.B., U.S. Patent No. 5,546,779, Aug. 20, 1996.
67. Ginzburg, V.B., “New Strip Profile and Flatness Control Technologies
for Rolling Mills,” Proceedings of 1999 AISE Convention, Cleveland, OH,
Sept. 20-24, 1999.
Page 830
INDEX
A
Aging, 153, 154
Allotropic changes, 2
effect of on:
corrosion resistance, 36
electrical resistance, 36
grain growth, 36
hardenability, 33, 34
hardness, 34
microstructure, 30, 31
transformation rate, 32
Alloys:
cobalt-base, 41-45
nickel-base, 41-45
Aluminum, 44
Angstrom unit, 2
Anisotropy:
crystallographic, 3, 4
Atomic planes, 3
Austenite, 14
formers, 28, 29
supercooling of, 23
B
Bainite, 23
Bending, 141
Buckling, 628
Bulging, 446
C
Calibration of:
Camber:
Carbide formers, 30
Carbon, 37, 38
Cementite, 16
Page 832
Chromium, 40, 41
Cobalt, 43, 44
Coiler, 388
superlarge, 405
Control:
gaugemeter, 580-582
Cooling:
accelerated, 344-347
controlled, 334
curve, 4
interstand, 388
rate, critical, 25
Copper, 45, 46
Crystal, 1-8
Crystallographic anisotropy, 3
D
Decarburization, 365, 366
Deformation:
Dendrite, 5, 6
Diagram:
constitutional, 12
equilibrium, 12
isothermal transformation, 24
Drawabiility, 138-140
Ductility, 104
E
Edge:
control, 764-767
heating, 304
Edgers, 632-641
Edging:
efficiency, 621-625
rolls, 617-626
Energy:
in rolling, 237
savings, 420
Errors:
Eutectoid, 16-22
F
Feather, 444, 445
Ferrite, 14, 15
formers, 28-30
Force:
compressive, 96, 97
frictional, 256-258
tensile, 96, 97
Formers:
austenite, 28, 29
carbide, 30
ferrite, 29, 30
Friction, 239-279
variation, 543-561
Gauge control:
automatic, 578-608
deviation, 582
feedback, 582
gaugemeter, 580-582
monitor, 582
non-interactive,
sensors, 562-575
three-stage, 588-590
variation, 543-561
Geometry:
Ghost bands, 47
Grain:
formation, 8
recovery, 163-166
Graphite, 14, 15
H
Hardenability, 112, 113
Heat:
transfer, 283-310
treatment, 143-155
Heating, 283-296
performance, 515-518
Hydrogen, 48
I
Impact-Transition-Temperature (ITT), 137, 138
Impurities, 36
Inclusions, 36
Intermetallic compounds, 8
L
Lamelar tearing, 142
Ledeburite, 17
Lead, 46
Limit:
elastic, 99
proportional, 99
Lubrication, 239-279
M
Machinability, 124, 125
Manganese, 39
Martensite, 23, 24
Measurand, 523
Measurement
bond, 2
dendrite, 5
Metalloids, 8, 9
Metallurgical
defects, 354-378
design, 128
factors, 127-155
Microalloying, 127-143
Microstructure:
Modulus:
of resilience, 100
shear, 108
Molybdenum, 40
N
Necking, 106, 107
Nickel, 41, 42
Niobium (columbium), 46
P
Pearlite, 16, 17, 23
Phase:
diagrams, 12-27
reactions, 18
Phosphorus, 47
Plan view:
control, 675-678
shape, 449
Plastic deformation:
Plasticity, 159-177
Plate, 64-76
Point:
critical, 18
freezing, 5
yield, 99
Population:
Power:
rolling, 237
savings, 420
Q
Quality descriptors, 77-95
R
Rate
cooling, 23-27
Ratio
air-gas, 362
aspect, 106
Resistance to:
abrasion, 125
corrosion, 121
deformation, 199-218
pitting, 57
rusting, 57
staining, 57
wear, 125
Rise time,
Roll:
arrangement, 383
bearings, 548
cooling, 388
crazing, 709
firecracking, 709
flat, 617
force:
transducers, 181
grooved, 622-626
heating, 784
micropitting, 709
spalling, 709
thermal:
crown, 706-708
torque, 219-238
Rolling mills:
types, 381-417
Rolling process:
continuum, 329-334
controlled, 329-336
endless, 403-405
Rolling theory:
variable:
S
Scale, 360-378
Scalebreakers, 388
Shape:
ideal, 449-453
latent, 449-453
manifest, 449-453
Shapemeters, 793-802
modulus, 108
Silicon, 45
Sizing:
presses, 643-655
Slab:
caster, 391-405
defects, 354-368
Slip:
Solid solutions:
interstitial, 10
substitutional, 10
Solidification, 5, 6, 12, 13
Solution:
interstitial solid, 10
liquid, 12, 13
substitutional solid, 10
Space lattice:
constant, 2
forms, 1
Spalling
Speed effect,
States of metals, 1
Steel products:
Steels:
alloy, 53
sheet, 80, 81
arctic grade, 341-343
boron, 46
eutectoid, 19, 20
carbon, 50-52
sheet, 77-79
cold-rolled strip, 81
Page 837
dual-phase, 338-341
electric sheet:
nonoriented, 62
oriented, 62
sheet steel, 79
hypereutectoid, 21, 22
hypoeutectoid, 19, 20
manganese, 39
peritectic, 18-20
plain carbon, 38
shock-resisting, 43
stainless:
tool, 56, 57
cold-work, 38-40, 43
high-speed, 38-44
tungsten-chromium, 43
Stiffness:
Strain:
engineering, 97, 98
plane, 171-174
rate, 104-106
true, 97, 98
Strength:
creep, 116
rupture, 116
tensile, 115
Stress, 96-103
plane, 171-174
Strip:
crown, 439-443
flatness:
profile:
control, 791-829
waviness, 457
Sulfide:
formation of, 47
Sulfur, 46, 47
Superalloys, 62-64
Supercooling of austenite, 23
T
Temperature:
critical, 18
convection, 299
radiation, 296-298
Test:
hardness, 109-113
tension, 98-100
torsion, 107
wear, 125
Time-Temperature-Transformation (TTT):
curves, 24-26
diagrams, 24-26
Tolerances:
absolute, 510-512
analytical, 510-515
dimensional:
standard, 461-501
Transducers:
Transfer:
table, 387
Transformation:
diagrams, 24-27
temperature, 18
Tribology, 239
Tungsten, 43
V
Valley, 444, 445
W
Warping, 177
change, 611-656
by pressing, 636-655
by rolling, 632-636
range, 636
technology, 662-664
control:
actuators, 669-672