Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Submitted By-
1
1. Concept of Corporate finance:
Corporate funds include sources of financing, the corporate capital structure, the steps taken by
management to maximize the profitability of the company to shareholders, as well as the instruments
and analysis used to assign financial resources. Corporate financing is mainly targeted at optimizing
or rising shareholder value. Since the principal principles of corporate finance analysis relate to the
financial concerns of all types of companies, although this is in theory separate from managerial
finance, which analyze the financial management of all organizations rather than only businesses.
Each decision a corporation takes has financial effects and often decisions that impact the finances
of a company are a decision on corporate finance
2
effect of inflation, companies must conduct their business in a manner that they ensure that
cash is received as soon as possible.
• Opportunity Cost: Also, every dollar that the company is not receiving has an opportunity
cost of capital. Let’s say the company’s debtors owe it $100 and they pay $100 the next year.
The nominal value of the money that they have paid is $100 however the real value is less.
This is because had the debtors paid immediately, the company would have cash immediately
on hand. They could then invest this cash in risk free securities and could have earned a year’s
interest on the same. By accepting the same $100 a year later, the company has in effect loaned
out $100 to its debtors and that too interest free!
Rule # 2: Risk free money is worth more than risky money
Corporate financial services require the sharing between existing and potential cash flows.
Companies will meet numerous ventures promising various cash flows in the future. It must be
understood, though, that not all cash flows are equal in the future. Any cash flows may be nearly
assured, such as investment in treasury notes, and others may be highly unsure, such as expected
stock market returns. The second rule then states that before making comparisons and choices, the
organization must change each cash flow at its own risk.
The following factors must be considered:
• Return of risky Capital: Some projects are extremely risky. Here, the company is concerned
about whether or not the money they are investing will be recovered. A higher rate of return
must be demanded from such projects to offset the likelihood of losing their entire capital that
the investors face.
• Return on less risky Capital: In other cases, the cash flow may be a little less uncertain. In
these cases, companies must consider the low risk before making their decision.
The bottom line is that before making a choice, all projects have to be made comparable. This is done
by adjusting for cash flow that will be received in different time periods as well as adjusting for the
different amounts of risks that are involved in different projects.
3
pay back the obligation in full whenever the company feels it is in their best interest to pay off the
debt payments. If interest expenses cannot be made by the corporation through cash payments, the
firm may also use collateral assets as a form of repaying their debt obligations (or through the process
of liquidation).
Equity capital
In order to collect the money, the companies will even sell their shares to buyers. Investors or lenders
seek an increase in the valuation (or appreciation in value) of the company over time to make a
successful transaction with their assets. Shareholder capital is improved as the equity and other assets
are spent in ventures (or investments) that receive a good return on their owners. Investors tend to
purchase equity shares in businesses that regularly receive a favorable capital gain, thereby increasing
the market value of the company's stock.
a. Investment Decision:
The decision on spending or capital budgeting shall require the decision to assign capital, or
the allocation of funds to long term investments that will yield potential benefits. Two
important factors are: (a) an estimation of the potential return on investment and (b) an
assessing of the cut-off rate against which a distinction may be made between the future return
on new investment. It is difficult to calculate the potential gains of investments and cannot be
estimated with accuracy. Investment decisions entail ambiguity because of the unpredictable
future
b. Financing Decision:
The second significant role of the financial planner is the funding judgment. She has to
determine basically when, how and where funds can be acquired to satisfy the investment
needs of the company. The primary question before him is assessing the equity and debt ratio.
The debt-to-equity mix is considered the financial structure of the company. The financial
planner must seek to protect his firm's best finance combination or the desired capital
structure. When the market value of shares is maximized, the financial structure of the
company is called optimal. The use of leverage impacts shareholder returns and risks; it may
increase equity fund returns, but it still raises risk. A right balance of return and danger must
be struck. The stock profit per share is to be maximised and the financial structure of the
company deemed to be optimal as the shareholders return is maximized at a minimum risk.
When the financial analyst will decide the right balance of debt and equity, the required sum
must be collected from the best available sources.
c. Dividend Decision: The third big financial decision is the dividend decision. The
financial officer must determine whether the company should transfer or hold all earnings or
distribute a share and preserve its balance. Like its debt strategy, its effect on shareholder
4
equity should be calculated by the dividend policy. The best dividend strategy maximizes the
market value of the shareholdings of the company. Therefore the financial officer must
calculate the optimal dividend – distribution ratio, provided the company's owners are not
oblivious to the dividend strategy. The distribution ratio is proportional to the owners'
percentage of dividends. Future problems of stability, incentive shares and cash returns can
also be considered in effect by the financial planner. Many profitable firms routinely pay cash
dividends.
d. Liquidity Decision:
In addition to controlling long-term investments, present asset management that affects the
liquidity of a business is yet another essential financial feature. In order to shield the company
from the risks of illiquidity and insolvency, existing assets should be handled effectively.
Present asset management impacts sustainability of the business. Responsibility and liquidity.
Profitability and liquidity in the handling of existing assets are in dispute. If the company does
not spend enough capital in current assets, it will become illiquid. Yet profitability would be
lost, as silent current assets would be unprofitable. A successful trade-off between
profitability and liquidity must therefore be accomplished. The financial planner must develop
sound wealth management strategies in order to ensure that neither inadequate nor excess
funds are invested in current assets. It should estimate the needs of the company in terms of
existing assets and ensuring that funding is made available if necessary.
5
5.1 The main Focus of Corporate finance On:
Corporate Finance is needed for Research and Development. Today, a company cannot survive
without continuous research and development. The company has to go on making changes in its old
products. It must also invent new products. If not, it will be get automatically thrown out of the
market.
2. Motivating Employees:
Manager and employees must be continuously motivated to improve their performance. They must
be given financial incentives, such as bonus, higher salaries, etc. They must also be given non-
financial incentives such as transport facilities, canteen facilities (eatery), etc. All this requires
finance.
3. Promoting a Company:
Finance is needed for promoting (starting) a company. It is needed for preparing Project Report,
Memorandum of Association, Articles of Association, Prospectus, etc. It is needed for purchasing
Land and Buildings, Plant and Machinery and other fixed assets. It is needed to purchase raw
materials. It is also needed to pay wages, salaries and other expenses. In short, we cannot start a
company without finance.
6
4. Smooth conduct of Business:
Finance is needed for conducting the business smoothly. It is needed as working capital. It is
needed for paying day-to-day expenses. It is needed for advertising, sales promotion, distribution,
etc. A company cannot run smoothly without finance.
Expansion means to increase the size of the company. Diversification means to produce and sell
new products. Modern machines and modern techniques are needed for expansion and
diversification. Finance is needed for purchasing modern machines and modem technology. So,
finance becomes mandatory for expansion and diversification of a company.
6. Meeting Contingencies:
The company has to meet many contingencies. For e.g. sudden fail in sales, loss due to natural
calamity, loss due to natural calamity, loss due to strikes, etc. The company needs finance to meet
these contingencies.
7. Dividend and Interest:
The company has to pay dividends to the shareholders. It has to pay interest to the debenture holders,
banks, etc. It also has to repay the loans. Finance is needed to pay dividend and interest.
8. Replacement of Assets:
Plant and Machinery are the main assets of the company. They are used for producing goods and
services. However, after some years, these assets become old and outdated. They have to be
replaced by new assets. Finance is needed for replacement of old assets. That is, finance is needed
to buy new assets.
CONCLUSION
Even if conceptually sound, these intricate financial techniques would be difficult to implement. At
some companies the discounted cash flow analysis errs by taking inflation into account in one part
of the formula, the calculation of the discount rate, but fails to do so in calculating the cash flows
that are to be discounted. At other companies, the system collapses, or at least bends, under the
weight of corporate politics. People simply produce the numbers that are needed to justify the
desired result.
Like some other aspects of corporate finance, the appeal of a discounted cash flow analysis is that it
seems to think broadly and reduce to a common denominator any type of proposal, large or small,
in any industry. A corporate staff sitting at headquarters can contemplate a new food product one
7
day, a new electronics factory another, and a major business acquisition the next. All of them fit
neatly within the discounted cash flow “discipline.” Most business diversification decisions were
subjected to just this sort of analysis. Alas, as Michael Porter found in a 1987 study, the results have
been awful. Thirty-three large, prestigious companies had made over 2,000 acquisitions in new
fields (or industries) between 1950 and 1986, an average of 61 per company. Included were some of
the best managed companies such as General Electric, and some of the worst, such as Wickes. The
number of acquisitions retained (and divested) were used as a rough but reasonable measure of
success. Of the businesses acquired by 1980, 53.4 percent had been divested or shut down by
January 1987. And the results were conservatively calculated, because a good number of the
failures had been buried privately.
Quaker Oats, a profitable company, said that it is trying to maintain a return on equity of 20
percent, far above what American industry as a whole has been able to achieve. But neither
“scientific” financial tools nor any other off-the-shelf formula will get it there. In fiscal 1989, the
same year the company distributed the annual report that exulted in these tools, the company’s
Fisher-Price toy division stumbled badly, as did the pet food division. The following year, having
absorbed substantial losses at Fisher-Price, management decided to spin it off while it grappled with
declining sales elsewhere. The company may once again achieve those high overall returns, but
only rare ideas and rare good people, rather than scientific finance, will enable it to do so.
Admittedly there is a seductive aspect to finance: the possibility of making money in the purest
form, by dealing directly with money selling parts of the business, raising a war chest for hostile
acquisitions, and framing ingenious new capital structures. All the world becomes an oversized
chessboard, and people, factories, and products figure only as bit players in ambitious strategies.
Finance is a modestly useful discipline, and only that. It is a mistake to let it get out front, as we did
during the 1980s, in the process attracting to it much of the nation’s young talent who should
instead have gone to a no-nonsense city, such as Toledo, and gotten their hands dirty. One purpose
of this book is to reinforce that message.”