Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter IIB Fully-Restrained (FR) Moment Connections
Chapter IIB Fully-Restrained (FR) Moment Connections
Chapter IIB
Fully-Restrained (FR) Moment Connections
The design of fully restrained (FR) moment connections is covered in Part 11 of the
AISC Steel Construction Manual.
IIB-2
Given:
Design a bolted flange-plated FR moment connection between a W18×50 beam and a W14×99
column flange to transfer the following forces:
RD = 7 kips MD = 42 kip-ft
RL = 21 kips ML = 126 kip-ft
Use d-in. diameter ASTM A325-N bolts in standard holes and E70 electrodes.
Material Properties:
Geometric Properties:
Beam W18×50 d = 18.0 in. bf = 7.50 in. tf = 0.570 in. tw = 0.355 in. Sx = 88.9 Manual
in.3 Table 1-1
Column W14×99 d = 14.2 in. bf = 14.6 in. tf = 0.780 in.
IIB-3
Solution:
LRFD ASD
Ru = 1.2 ( 7 kips) + 1.6 ( 21 kips) Ra = 7 kips + 21 kips
= 42 kips = 28 kips
Mu = 1.2 ( 42 kip-ft ) + 1.6 (126 kip-ft ) M a = 42 kip-ft + 126 kip-ft
= 252 kip-ft = 168 kip-ft
Afn = Afg − 2 ( db + 1 8 in.) t f = 4.28 in.2 − 2 ( 7 8 in. + 1 8 in.)( 0.570 in.) = 3.14 in.2
Fy 50 ksi
= = 0.769 < 0.8 , therefore Yt = 1.0.
Fu 65 ksi
( )
Fu Afn = ( 65 ksi) 3.14 in.2 = 204 kips
( )
Yt Fy Afg = (1.0)( 50 ksi ) 4.28 in.2 = 214 kips > 204 kips
Therefore the nominal flexural strength, Mn, at the location of the holes in the tension flange is
as follows:
LRFD ASD
φ = 0.90 Ω = 1.67
353 kip-ft
M n / Ωb = = 211 kip-ft
φb M n = 0.90 ( 353 kip-ft ) = 318 kip-ft 1.67
318 kip-ft > 252 kip-ft o.k. 211 kip-ft > 168 kip-ft o.k.
Try a PL a×4×0’-9, with three d-in. diameter ASTM A325-N bolts and 4-in. fillet welds.
IIB-4
LRFD ASD
Design shear strength of the bolts Allowable shear strength of bolts Manual
Table 7-1
Single shear; Single shear;
φ = 1.00 Ω = 1.50
= 72.9 kips > 42 kips o.k. = 48.6 kips > 28 kips o.k.
(3 bolts)(d in.+ z in.+ z in.) = 3 in. (3 bolts)(d in.+ z in.+ z in.) = 3 in.
Anv = (9 in. – 3 in.)(a in.) = 2.25 in2 Anv = (9 in. – 3 in.)(a in.) = 2.25 in2
= 58.7 kips > 42 kips o.k. = 39.2 kips > 28 kips o.k.
LRFD ASD
(
φRn = φFu AntU bs + min φ0.6 Fy Agv , φFu Anv ) Rn Fu AntU bs
=
⎛ 0.6 Fy Agv Fu Anv ⎞
+ min ⎜ ,
Ω Ω ⎝ Ω Ω ⎟⎠
= 100 kips > 42 kips o.k. = 66.8 kips > 28 kips o.k.
⎛ 2 ⎞⎛ D ⎞
0.6 FEXX ⎜⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟ Section J4.2
⎝ 2 ⎟⎠ ⎝ 16 ⎠ 3.09 D
tmin = =
0.6 Fu Fu
Plate; t = a in.
LRFD ASD
8 in. 8 in.
( 33.4 kips) = 29.3 kips
3 3
φRn = ( 50.1 kips ) = 44 kips Rn / Ω =
0.427 in. 0.427 in.
Design of bolts
LRFD ASD
M u ( 252 kip-ft )(12 in./ft ) M a (168 kip-ft )(12 in./ft ) Manual
Puf = = = 168 kips Paf = = = 112 kips Part 12
d 18.0 in. d 18.0 in.
Shear controls, therefore the number of bolts Shear controls, therefore the number of bolts
required is as follows: required is as follows:
LRFD ASD
Puf =
Mu
=
( 252 kip-ft )(12 in./ft ) Puf =
Mu
=
(168 kip-ft )(12 in./ft )
d + tp (18.0 in. + 3 4 in.) d + tp (18.0 in. + 3 4 in.)
= 161 kips = 108 kips
φ = 0.90 Ω = 1.67
IIB-7
170 kips > 161 kips o.k. 113 kips > 108 kips o.k.
Ae = 3.75 in.2
(
Pn = Fu Ae = ( 58 ksi ) 3.75 in.2 = 217 kips ) Eqn. D2-2
LRFD ASD
φ = 0.75 Ω = 2.00
There are two cases for which block shear rupture must be checked. The first case involves the
tearout of the two blocks outside the two rows of bolt holes in the flange plate; for this case Leh
= 12 in. and Lev = 12 in. The second case involves the tearout of the block between the two
rows of the holes in the flange plate. Manual Tables 9-3a, 9-3b, and 9-3c may be adapted for
this calculation by considering the 4 in. width to be comprised of two, 2-in. wide blocks where
Leh = 2 in. and Lev = 12 in. Thus, the former case is the more critical.
LRFD ASD
Manual
(
φRn = φFu AntU bs + min φ0.6 Fy Agv , φFu Anv ) Rn Fu AntU bs
=
⎛ 0.6 Fy Agv Fu Anv ⎞
+ min ⎜ ,
Table 9-3a
Ω Ω ⎝ Ω Ω ⎟⎠
Manual
Table 9-3b
Tension component Tension component
φU bs Fu Ant = 43.5 kips ( 3
4 in.)( 2) Fu Ant / Ω = 29.0 kips ( 34 in.)( 2)
Manual
Shear yielding component Shear yielding component Table 9-3c
φ0.6 Fy Agv = 170 kips ( 3
4 in.)( 2) 0.6 Fy Agv / Ω = 113 kips ( 3 4 in.)( 2)
φRn = (170 kips + 43.5 kips)( 3 4 in.)( 2) Rn / Ω = (113 kips + 29.0 kips)( 3 4 in.)( 2)
= 320 kips > 161 kips o.k. = 213 kips > 108 kips o.k.
IIB-8
Determine the required size of the fillet weld to supporting column flange
LRFD ASD
Puf Paf
Dmin = Dmin =
2 (1.5 )(1.392 ) l 2 (1.5 )( 0.928 ) l
Use a-in. fillet welds, 6 > 5.51 o.k. Use a-in. fillet welds, 6 > 5.54 o.k.
Try PL w×7
Assume K = 0.65 and l = 2.0 in. (12 in. edge distance and 2 in. setback).
LRFD ASD
φ = 0.90 Ω = 1.67
Fy Ag ( 36 ksi ) ( 5.25 in.2 )
(
φPn = φFy Ag = 0.90 ( 36 ksi ) 5.25 in.
2
) Pn / Ω =
Ω
=
1.67 Eqn. J4-6
= 170 kips > 161 kips o.k. = 113 kips > 108 kips o.k.
The compression flange plate will be identical to the tension flange plate; a w in.×7 in. plate
with eight bolts in two rows of four bolts on a 4 in. gage and a in. fillet welds to the
supporting column flange.
Note: Tension due to load reversal must also be considered in the design of
the fillet weld to the supporting column flange.
The column must be checked for stiffening requirements. For further information, see AISC
Design Guide No. 13 Wide-Flange Column Stiffening at Moment Connections – Wind and
Seismic Applications (Carter, 1999).
IIB-20
Plate tp = a in.
LRFD ASD
Rn 3 in.
8 in.
( 33.4 kips) = 29.3 kips
3
φRn = ( 50.1 kips ) = 44 kips = 8
0.427 in. Ω 0.427 in.
A complete-joint penetration groove weld will transfer the entire flange force in tension and Table J2.5
compression.
Note: The column must be checked for stiffening requirements. For further information, see
AISC Design Guide No. 13 Wide-Flange Column Stiffening at Moment Connections – Wind
and Seismic Applications. (Carter, 1999).
IIB-21
RD = 7 kips MD = 42 kip-ft
RL = 21 kips ML = 126 kip-ft
Use ASTM A325-N snug-tight bolts in standard holes and E70 electrodes.
a. Use design procedure 1 (thick end-plate and smaller diameter bolts) from AISC Steel
Design Guide 16 Flush and Extended Multiple-Row Moment End-Plate Connections.
b. Use design procedure 2 (thin end-plate and larger diameter bolts) from AISC Steel
Design Guide 16 Flush and Extended Multiple-Row Moment End-Plate Connections.
Material Properties:
Geometric Properties:
Beam W18×50 d = 18.0 in. bf = 7.50 in. tf = 0.570 in. tw = 0.355 in. Sx = 88.9 in.3 Manual
Column W14×99 d = 14.2 in. bf = 14.6 in. tf = 0.780 in. Table 1-1
IIB-22
Solution A:
LRFD ASD
Ru = 1.2(7 kips) + 1.6(21 kips) = 42 kips Ra = 7 kips + 21 kips = 28 kips
tf 0.570 in.
d o = h0 − = 19 1 2 in. − = 19.22 in.
2 2
tf 0.570 in.
d1 = h1 − = 15.93 in. − = 15.6 in.
2 2
LRFD ASD
2M u 2M a Ω
dbreq = dbreq =
πφFnt (∑ d )n πFnt (∑ d )
n
bp g ( 7 12 in.)( 5 1 2 in.)
s= = = 3.21 in.
2 2
bp ⎡ ⎛ 1 1 ⎞ ⎛ 1 ⎞ ⎤ 2
Y= ⎢h1 ⎜ + ⎟ + h0 ⎜
2 ⎢⎣ ⎝ p f ,i s ⎠ ⎝ p f ,o ⎠
1
⎥⎦ g
(
⎟ − 2 ⎥ + ⎣⎡ h1 p f ,i + s ⎦⎤ )
7 12 in. ⎡ ⎛ 1 1 ⎞ ⎛ 1 ⎞ 1 ⎤
= ⎢(15.93 in.) ⎜⎝ 1 + ⎟ + (19 1 2 in.) ⎜
⎝ 1 12 in. ⎟⎠
− 2⎥
2 ⎣ 1 2 in. 3.21 in. ⎠ ⎦
2
+ ⎡(15.93 in.)(1 1 2 in. + 3.21 in.) ⎤⎦
5 1 2 in. ⎣
= 133
π (1 in.) ( 90 ksi)
2
πd 2 F
Pt = b nt = = 70.7 kips
4 4
LRFD ASD
φ = 0.75 Ω = 2.00
4930 kip-in.
Mn / Ω = = 2460 kip-in.
φM n = 0.75 ( 4930 kip-in. ) = 3700 kip-in. 2.00
φ = 0.90 Ω = 1.67
1.11γ r φM np 1.11γ r ⎛ M np ⎞
t p req ' d = t p req ' d =
φb FpyY ⎛ Fpy ⎞ ⎝⎜ Ω ⎠⎟
⎜⎝ Ω ⎟⎠ Y
b
LRFD ASD
Calculate end-plate design strength Calculate end-plate allowable strength
φ = 0.90 Ω = 1.67
φb M pl φb Fpy t p 2Y M pl Fpy t p 2Y
= =
γr γr Ωb γ r Ωb γ r
0.90 ( 36 ksi )(1 in.) (133 in.) ( 36 ksi )(1 in.) (133 in. )
2 2
= =
1.0 1.67 (1.0 )
⎛ φb M pl ⎞ ⎛ M pl ⎞
φM n = min ⎜ φM np ,
⎝ γ r ⎟⎠ M n / Ωb = min ⎜ M np / Ωb ,
Ω ⎟
⎝ bγ r ⎠
308 kip-ft > 252 kip-ft o.k. 205 kip-ft > 168 kip-ft o.k.
Try the minimum of four bolts at tension flange and two bolts at compression flange.
LRFD ASD
φRn = nφrn = ( 2 bolts )( 28.3 kips/bolt ) Rn / Ω = nrn / Ω = ( 2 bolts )(18.8 kips/bolt ) Manual
Table 7-1
= 56.6 kips > 42 kips o.k. = 37.6 kips > 28 kips o.k.
Determine the required size of the beam Determine the required size of the beam web- Manual
web-to end-plate fillet weld to end-plate fillet weld Part 8
Use a in. fillet welds on both sides of the beam web from the inside face of the beam flange to
the centerline of the inside bolt holes plus two bolt diameters.
The end reaction , Ru or Ra, is resisted by weld between the mid-depth of the beam and the
inside face of the compression flange or between the inner row of tension bolts plus two bolt
diameters, which ever is smaller. By inspection the former governs for this example.
IIB-25
d 18.0 in.
l= −tf = − 0.570 in. = 8.43 in.
2 2
LRFD ASD
Ru 42 kips Ra 28 kips
Dmin = = Dmin = =
2 (1.39) l 2 (1.39)( 8.43 in.) 2 ( 0.928) l 2 ( 0.928)( 8.43 in.)
⎛ 2 ⎞⎛ D ⎞
0.6 Fexx ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ ⎜ ⎟
tmin = ⎝ 2 ⎠ ⎝ 16 ⎠ = 3.09 D
0.6 Fu Fu
LRFD ASD
⎛ 0.355 in. ⎞ ⎛ 0.355 in. ⎞
Ru = 1.392 Dl ⎜ Ra = 0.928Dl ⎜
⎝ 0.285 in. ⎟⎠ ⎝ 0.476 in. ⎟⎠
Determine required fillet weld size for the beam flange to end-plate connection
( )
l = 2 b f + t f − tw = 2 ( 7.50 in. + 0.570 in.) − 0.355 in. = 15.8 in.
IIB-26
LRFD ASD
2 M u 2 ( 252 kip-ft )(12 in./ft ) 2 M a 2 (168 kip-ft )(12 in./ft )
Puf = = Paf = =
∑ dn 19.2 in. + 15.6 in. ∑ dn 19.2 in. + 15.6 in.
Use a-in. fillet welds at beam tension flange. Welds at compression flange may be 4-in. fillet
welds (minimum size per Specification Table J2.4).
Rn = Fu Ae Section J4.1
⎛ 2 ⎞⎛ D ⎞
0.6 Fexx ⎜⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟
⎝ 2 ⎟⎠ ⎝ 16 ⎠ 1.86 D
tmin = =
Fu Fu
Solution B:
Only those portions of the design that vary from the solution “A” calculations are presented
here.
LRFD ASD
Determine required end-plate thickness Determine required end-plate thickness
φ = 0.90 Ω = 1.67
γ r Mu γ r M a Ωb
t preq = t preq =
φb FyY FyY
1.0 ( 252 kip-ft )(12 in./ft ) 1.0 (168 kip-ft )(12 in./ft )(1.67)
= =
0.90 ( 36 ksi )(133 in.) ( 36 ksi)(133 in.)
Select a trial bolt diameter and calculate the maximum prying forces
bp
− ( db + 116 in.) =
7.50 in.
w' = − (1 116 in.) = 2.69 in.
2 2
3
⎛ tp ⎞
3
⎛ 7 in. ⎞
ai = 3.682 ⎜ ⎟ − 0.085 = 3.682 ⎜ 8 − 0.085 = 2.38
⎝ db ⎠ ⎝ 1 in. ⎟⎠
⎡ ⎛ bp ⎞ ⎤ πd 3 F
t p 2 Fyp ⎢ 0.85 ⎜ ⎟ + 0.80 w '⎥ + b nt
⎣ ⎝ 2⎠ ⎦ 8
Fi ' =
4 p f ,i
⎡ ⎤
( 7 8 ) 2 ( 36) ⎢0.85 ⎛⎜⎝
7 12 ⎞
+ 0.80 ( 2.69) ⎥
⎣ 2 ⎟⎠ ⎦
=
4 (1 1 2 )
π (1) ( 90)
3
+ 8
4 (1 1 2 )
= 30.4 kips
IIB-28
2
w ' tp2 ⎛ F' ⎞
Qmax i = Fyp 2
− 3⎜ i ⎟⎟
4ai ⎜ w't
⎝ p ⎠
( 2.69 )( 7 8 )
2
⎛ 30.4 ⎞
2
= 362 − 3 ⎜
4 ( 2.38 ) ⎜ 2.69 ( 7 8 ) ⎟⎟
⎝ ⎠
= 6.10 kips
ao = min ⎡⎣ ai , pext − p f ,o ⎤⎦ = min [ 2.38 in., 1 1 2 in.] = 1 1 2 in.
⎛ pf i ⎞ ⎛ 1 1 2 in. ⎞
Fo ' = Fi ' ⎜ ⎟ = ( 30.4 kips) ⎜⎝ 1
⎝ p fo ⎠ 1 2 in. ⎟⎠
= 30.4 kips
2
w ' tp2 ⎛ F ' ⎞
Qmax o = Fyp 2
− 3⎜ o ⎟⎟
4ao ⎜ w't
⎝ p ⎠
( 2.69 )( 7 8 )
2
⎛ 30.4 ⎞
2
= 362 − 3 ⎜
4 (1 1 2 ) ⎜ 2.69 ( 7 8 ) ⎟⎟
⎝ ⎠
= 9.68 kips
Calculate the connection available strength for the limit state of bolt rupture with prying
action
πdb 2 Fnt π (1 in.) ( 90 ksi)
2
Pt = = = 70.7 kips
4 4
Unmodified Bolt Pretension, Tb 0 = 51 kips
Tb 0 51 kips
Tb = = = 12.8 kips AISC Design
4 4
Guide 16
Table 2-1,
Table 4-2
IIB-29
LRFD ASD
Mq
φM q = =
Ω
⎧1 ⎫
⎧φ ⎡⎣ 2 ( Pt − Qmax o ) d0 + 2 ( Pt − Qmax i ) d1 ⎤⎦ ⎫ ⎪ Ω ⎡⎣( Pt − Qmax o ) d0 + 2 ( Pt − Qmax i ) d1 ⎤⎦ ⎪
⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪
⎪⎪φ ⎡⎣ 2 ( Pt − Qmax o ) d0 + 2 ( Tb ) d1 ⎦⎤ ⎪ 1 ⎡2 ( P − Q ) d + 2 ( T ) d ⎤ ⎪
⎪⎪ ⎪Ω ⎣ t max o 0 b 1⎦
⎪
max ⎨ ⎬ max ⎨ ⎬
⎪φ ⎡⎣ 2 ( Pt − Qmax i ) d1 + 2 ( Tb ) d0 ⎤⎦ ⎪ ⎪ 1 ⎡2 ( P − Q ) d + 2 ( T ) d ⎤ ⎪
⎪ ⎪ ⎪Ω ⎣ t max i 1 b 0⎦
⎪
⎪⎩φ ⎡⎣ 2 ( Tb )( d0 + d1 ) ⎤⎦ ⎪⎭ ⎪1 ⎪
⎪ ⎡⎣ 2 ( Tb )( d0 + d1 ) ⎤⎦ ⎪
⎩Ω ⎭
⎧ 1 ⎡ 2 ( 70.7 − 9.68)(19.2) ⎤ ⎫
⎧ ⎡ 2 ( 70.7 − 9.68 )(19.2 ) ⎤ ⎫ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥⎪
⎪0.75 ⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪ 2.00 ⎣⎢ +2 ( 70.7 − 6.10)(15.6) ⎦⎥ ⎪
⎪ ⎣⎢ +2 ( 70.7 − 6.10 )(15.6 ) ⎦⎥ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪
⎪ 1 ⎡2 ( 70.7 − 9.68)(19.2) ⎤ ⎪
⎪ ⎪
⎪ ⎡ 2 ( 70.7 − 9.68 )(19.2 ) ⎤ ⎪
⎪⎪ 2.00 ⎢ +2 12.8 15.6 ⎥ ⎪
⎪0.75 ⎢ ⎥ ⎪ ⎢⎣ ( )( ) ⎥⎦ ⎪
= max ⎨ ⎣⎢ +2 (12.8 )(15.6 ) ⎦⎥ ⎬ = max ⎨ ⎬
⎪ ⎪ ⎪ 1 ⎡2 ( 70.7 − 6.10)(15.6) ⎤ ⎪
⎪ ⎡2 ( 70.7 − 6.10 )(15.6 ) ⎤ ⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥ ⎪
⎪ 0.75 ⎢ ⎥ ⎪ ⎪ 2.00 ⎢⎣ +2 (12.8)(19.2) ⎥⎦ ⎪
⎪ ⎣⎢ +2 (12.8 )(19.2 ) ⎦⎥ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪
⎪0.75 ⎡2 12.8 19.215 + 15.6 ⎤ ⎪ ⎪ 1 ⎡2 (12.8)(19.215 + 15.6) ⎤ ⎪
⎩ ⎣ ( )( )⎦ ⎭ ⎩⎪ 2.00 ⎣ ⎦ ⎪⎭
3275
φM q = 3275 kip-in. Mq / Ω = = 2183 kip-in.
1.5
= 273 kip-ft > 252 kip-ft o.k. = 182 kip-ft > 168 kip-ft o.k.
For Example IIB-4, design procedure 1 produced a design with a 1-in. thick end-plate and 1-
in. diameter bolts. Design procedure 2 produced a design with a d-in. thick end-plate and 1-in.
diameter bolts. Either design is acceptable. Design procedure 1 did not produce a smaller bolt
diameter for this example, although in general it should result in a thicker plate and smaller
diameter bolt than design procedure 2. It will be noted that the bolt stress is lower in design
procedure 1 than in design procedure 2.