Accommodation Building

PROJEC T TITLE
EPCI OF 5.5KM X 24” OBIAFU/OBRIKOM TO OB3 CTMS

GAS PIPELINE
DOCUMENT TITLE
GATE HOUSE STRUCTURAL CALCULATION
DOCUMENT TITLE
OSL-NNPC-OB/OB-LX-C-EC-014
NIGERIAN NATIONAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION

(EMPLOYER)
OILSERV LIMITED/FRAZIMEX ENGINEERING LIMITED

(EPC CONTRACTORS)
APPROVAL STATUS
R01 20-Feb-18 ISSUED FOR REVIEW KELVIN I. MAURICE N.

PROJECT GM, GAS
REV DATE DESCRIPTION PREPARED BY CHECKED BY REVIEWED BY MD, NGPTC
MANAGER PIPELINE
NIGERIAN NATIONAL PETROLEUM

FRAZIMEX ENGINEERING
REVISION HISTORY CONSULTANT
LIMITED CORPORATION
EPCI OF 5.5KM X 24” OBIAFU / OBRIKOM TO OB3 CTMS GAS PIPELINE
Doc. No: OSL-NNPC-OB/OB-LX-C-EC-014 FRAZIMEX NO:FEL/NPC/OBOB/ CV/018
EMPLOYER: NIGERIAN NATIONAL

PETROLEUM CORPORATION Page 2 of 15 REV:R01
ITEM
LOCATION OB/OB PLANT; OB/OB

S/No.
1
REVISION DATE SECTION OR PAGES REVISED DESCRIPTION
2
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
NNPC-OB3-LOTB-P-DS-004 REV - A01

ACCOMMODATION BUILDING STRUCTURAL CALCULATION
OSL-NNPC-OB/OB-LX-C-EC-007 FEL/NPC/OBOB/ CV/011

CORPORATION Page 6 of 20 REV:R02
ITEM
LOCATION CTMS PLANT; CTMS

DESIGN INFORMATION
Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures - Part

Relevant Codes 1-1: General rules and rules for
buildings (NEN-EN 1992-1-1)
Design stresses
EN 1992-1-1:2004(E)-Sec 3.1. fck = Characteristic Cylinder strength of concrete at 28 days =
EN 1992-1-1:2004(E)-Sec 3.2. fyk = Characteristic strength of steel
EN1992-1-1:2004(E)-Sec2.4.2 γc = partial safety factor for concrete = 1.5
γs = partial safety factor for steel = ###
αcc = coefficient of long term effect on strenght = 1
EN 1992-1-1:2004 (E)-Sec 3.6. Design compressive strenght of concrete; fc.d = αcc*fck/γc =
EN 1992-1-1:2004 (E)-Sec 3.6. Design tensile strenght of steel; fy.d = fyk/γs = 360 N/mm2
fctm = mean tesile strength of concrete = 2.6 N/mm2
Fire Resistance
Exposure condition Exposure condition XD1 (Moderate Humidity)
Structural class 2 (S2) , (Min. cover due to Envirometal condition Cmin =
EN 1992-1-1:2004 (E)-Sec 4.4. Nominal cover; cnom = cmin +∆cdev = 15 + 10 = 25

Table 4.4N Beam and Column(mm) =
Nominal cover; cnom = cmin +∆cdev 40 + 10 = 50
Foundation(mm) = 50 mm
slab depth------- 175 mm
Beam width 225 mm
soil Condition Allowable soil bearing capacity = 100 kN/mm2 at 1.0m depth(Assume
General Loading condition

Variable action, Qk = 1.00 kN/mm2
Finishes (screeding and felting) Gk1 --= 3.38 kN/mm2
Design Data
K' = 0.167
2
K= M/(fckbd )< Kbal = 0.167
Reinforced Concrete Design, z=d(0.5+sqr(0.25-K/1.134))
Bill Mosley,John Bungey and
Ray Hulse, Seventh Edition As=M/(0.87fykZ)

ITEM

ITEM
MEMBER REF. CALCULATION

Assumed Slab thickness (h) = 175 mm
i loading
Slab Design slab own load; Gk2 =(h*25kN/m2)--0.15*25 = 4.375 kN/m2
Finishes Gk1------------------------------- = 3.38 kN/m2
Total Permanent action Gk= 7.755 kN/m2
Variable action, Qk = 1.00 kN/m2
Design Load (n) = 1.35Qk+1.5Gk = 11.97 kN/m per m run
Parapet Loading
Parapet size = 0.7 m x 0.1 m
Parapet own load; w = 0.1*0.6*25kN/m3 = 1.75 kN/m
Ultimate design load; P =1.35*w = 2.4 kN per m run
Roof Slab Moment And Shear Analysis ---- Section XX
2.4 kN 2.4
11.97 kN/m
RA 2.35 2.35 RB
1.00 4.7 1.00

b s e
3.35
6.7
REACTION ESTIMATION
RA + RB = 84.92 where RA = RB RA = 42.5 kN
SHEAR FORCE AND BENDING MOMENT CALCULATION
SH and BM At section 0 < x < 1.000
Vx = ### - ### x , Mx = -2.4 x - 6 x2
V0 = -2.36 kN M0 = 0.00 kNm
V0.713 = ### kN M0.713 = -8.35 kNm
SH and BM At section 1 < x < 5.700

Vx = 40 - 11.97 x
Mx = ### x + 42.46 (x-b) 5.98 x2
V0.713 = 28.1 kN M0.713 = -8.35 kNm
V4.538 = -28.1 kN M4.538 = -8.347125 kNm
At V = 0 x = 3.35 Moment is Maximum
ITEM

V2.6255= 0.0 kN M2.656 = 24.7 kNm
SH and BM At section 5.700 < x < 6.700

Vx = 82.6 - 11.97 x
Mx = ### x + 42.46 (x-b) + 42.5 (x-b-s) + 5.98 x2
V4.538 = 14.3 kN M4.538 = -8.347 kNm
V5.251= 2.36 kN M5.251 = 0 kNm
SHEAR FORCE DIAGRAM

x### 1 1 3 6 5.7 6.7
SFD
############
28.1### ### 2.4
14.3
-2.4 0.0 2.4
-14.3
-28.1
BENDING MOMENT DIAGRAM

8.3 8.3
0.0 0.0
x###### 1 1 3 5.7 5.7 6.2 ###
BMD
############### 8.3 8.3 0.0
###
-24.7
ROOF SLAB REINFORCEMENT DESIGN

i Reinforcement for Cantilever Section
Assumed bar dia = 12 mm
Effective depth(d) =h-c-ɸ/2 = 150 -25-12/2 = 144 mm
Applied Moment; M = 8.35 kNm
Bill Mosley,John
Bungey and Ray
2
K = M/(fckbd ) = 0.015 < K' (0.167)
Hulse, Seventh OK Section is singly reinforced
Edition
z=d(0.5+sqr(0.25-K/1.134)) = 142 mm 0.95d = 137 mm
Reinforced
Concrete Design, Since Z > 0.95d, Hence; Z = 137 mm
to Eurocode 2 X = (d-Z)/0.45 = 16.0 mm
Areq = M/(0.87fykZ) = 169 mm2/m
Min. Reinforcement = 0.0013btd = 0.0013*1000*150= 228 mm2
Therefore, provide H 12 Bars @ 250 mm c/c Top ( 453 )mm2/m
ITEM

ii Reinforcement for Span Section

Applied Moment; M = 24.70 kNm
K = M/(fckbd2) = 0.043 < K' (0.167)
OK Section is singly reinforced
z=d(0.5+sqr(0.25-K/1.134)) = 138 mm 0.95d = 137 mm
Since Z > 0.95d, Hence; Z = 137 mm
X = (d-Z)/0.45 = 16.0 mm
Areq = M/(0.87fykZ) = 501 mm2/m
Min. Reinforcement = 0.0013btd = 0.0013*1000*150= 228 mm2
Therefore, provide H 12 Bars @ 250 mm c/c BOT. ( 453 )mm2/m
ROOF SLAB DEFLECTION CHECK

i Deflection for Cantilever Section
Deflection Check
ρ =100 As req/bd = 0.118 %
2
For fyk < 500N/mm ie 414 N/mm2
Basic span effective depth ratio; S =32*500/fyk 38.6473429951691
K = factor for structural system, for Cantilever = 0.4
Limiting Span/Effective depth ratio = KS = 38.647342995 x 0.4 = 15.4589
Lx= 1 m
The actual basic span effective depth ratio; B = 1000 / 144 = 6.94
KS>B Hence the chosen effective depth is acceptable
ii Deflection for span Section

Deflection Check
ρ =100 As req/bd = 0.35 %
2
For fyk < 500N/mm ie 414 N/mm2
Basic span effective depth ratio; S =28*500/fyk 33.8164251207729
K = factor for structural system, for 2 way span slab = 1
Limiting Span/Effective depth ratio = KS = 33.816425121 x 1 = 33.8164
Lx= 4.700 m
The actual basic span effective depth ratio; B = 4700 / 144 = 33
KS>B Hence the chosen effective depth is acceptable
Beam TYP.1 Assumed Beam size 450 X 225 mm

BT1 Loading
Slab Load on beam 1/2wlx=0.5*8.21*1.725 = 10 kN/m
Slab Load on beam 1/3*8.21*3.825 = 19 kN/m
Beam own load = 0.45x0.225x25x1.35= 3.42 kN/m
Finishes ---------------------------------- = 0.5 kN/m
Total 33 kN/m
ITEM

Note: ULS Slab load is inclusive of live load

33.0 kN/m
4.7
A B
Designed as Simply supported
Span Moment MAB = 0.125wl2=0.125*21.5*3.825^2= 91.101 kNm
BENDING MOMENT DIADRAM

DIST
0 0 2 5 0
BMD 0### 0
-91.10
Assumed bar dia of = 16 mm Assumed link dia = 8

Effective depth(d) =h-c-ɸ/2 = 450 -50-16/2-ɸlink= 384 mm
Span beff =0.2[0.5(L-bw)+0.1L] < 0.2*(L) < b1=0.5(L-bw
beff =bw+0.2[0.5(L-bw)+0.1L] =### mm , bw+0.2L = 1165 mm b1 = ### mm
Reinforced b = kbal=
Concrete Design, eff 1143 mm M = 91.1 kNm 0.02
Bill Mosley,John z= 377 mm As = 670 mm 2
Bungey and Ray Minimum Reinforcement A =0.26*f /f * b d=

Hulse, Seventh s,min ctm yk t 141 mm2
Edition Provide 4 H 16 mm btm ( 804.571 )mm2 > 670 mm2 OK
Shear
Shear force (VEd) = 0.5x21.5*3.825 = 77.5 KN
DIST 0.0 2.4 4.7

SHEAR FORCE DIAGRAM
77.5
SFD ### 0.0 ###
-77.5
Assuming angle θ = 22 0 , cot θ = 2.6

Crushing strength VRd,max 0.124bwd(1-fck/250)fck = . kN
ITEM

VRd,max > VEd OK
Asw = VEd
= 0.24
s 0.78dfykcotθ
Using table A.4 in the Appendix
Provide 8mm links at 300mm centres, Asw/s = 0.335
Beam TYP.2 End Shear of BT 1 on BT 2 =27.7x3.825x0.5= 77.53 kN
BT2
Beam Type 2 (BT 2) Loading
w1 w2
Slab Load = 18.99 0 kN/m
Beam load = 3.42 3.42 kN/m
Cantilever load= 11.97 11.96925 kN/m
34.37 15.39 kN/m
77.53 kN
34.37 kN/m 15.39 kNm
4.025 m 1.725 m
5.75 m
A B C
Taking moment from point A
5.75RC=41.06x4.025+19.88x4.0252/2+9.27x1.725(4.025+1.725/2)
5.75 RC = 720.23
RC = 125.26 kN
RA+RB= 19.88x4.025+41.06+9.27x1.725 = 242.43 kN
RA= 117.17 kN
V(x)=66.72-19.88x M(x)= 66.72x-9.94x2 0<x< 4.025
V(x)=25.06-19.88*4.025-9.27x
0<x< 1.725
M(x)=66.72-19.88(4.025)(4.025+x)-41.06x-4.64x2
when V = 0, Moment is Max. 0= 66.72-19.88x x = 3.41 m
Moment
M(0) = 0 kNm, M4.025/2= ### kNm M(3.36) = ### kNm
M4.025= -193.2 kNm M5.75= 0.0 kNm
Shear force
V(0) = ### kN V(3.36) = 0.0 kNm
V4.025= -98.7 kNm V5.75= -125.3 kNm

ITEM
BENDING MOMENT DIAGRAM

0.0 0.0
-102.3
-166.2
-199.7 -193.2
SHEAR FORCE DIAGRAM

117.17
0 0.00 0
-98.72
-125.26
Design
Span moment = 199.7 kNm
Effective depth(d) =h-c-ɸ/2 = 450 -50-16/2-ɸlink= 384 mm
Span
beff =0.2[0.5(L-bw)+0.1L] < 0.2*(L) < b1=0.5(L-bw)
beff =bw+0.2[0.5(L-bw)+0.1L] = 1353 mm, bw+0.2L= 1375 mm, b1 = ###
Reinforced b = kbal=
1353 mm M = 199.70 kNm 0.036
Concrete Design, eff
Bill Mosley,John z= 371 mm As = 1493 mm2
Bungey and Ray Minimum Reinforcement A =0.26*fctm/fyk* btd=
Hulse, Seventh s,min 141 mm2
Edition Provide 4H25 btm(1963mm2)
Shear
Shear force (V) = 125.26 kN
Crushing strength VRd,max 0.124bwd(1-fck/250)fck = 263.1 kN
VRd,max > VEd OK
Asw = VEd
= 0.39
s 0.78dfykcotθ
ITEM

PLINTH BEAM Beam size 450 X 225 mm
TYPE 1 (PBT1) Unit weight of 225mm wall= 2.87 kN/m2 wall height= 3.00
Unit weight of wall Finishes= 0.6 kN/m2
SIMPLIFIED Loading
REINFORCED
CONCRETE Partition wall load =2.87kN/m2*3.8m*1.35 = 12 kN/m
DESIGN, SECTION Wall Finishes = 0.6kN/m2*3.8m*1.35 = 2.43 kN/m
10.1 BY ENGR.
V.O. OYENUGA Beam own load = 0.45x0.225x25kN/m3x1.35 = 3.28 kN/m
Total 17.3 kN/m
17.3 kN/m
3.825 m
A B
Typical beam for all the plinth beams
FLEXURE
DIST 0 2 4 BMD
BMD
0 0### 0 0
-31.70
Effective depth(d) =h-c-ɸ/2 = 450 -50-12/2-ɸlink 386 mm
Span
b = 225 mm M= 31.7 kNm kbal= ###
Reinforced
Concrete Design, z= 374 mm As = 235 mm2
Bill Mosley,John Minimum Reinforcement As,min =0.26*fctm/fyk* btd= 142 mm2
Bungey and Ray
Hulse, Seventh Provide 3 H 16 mm 603 mm2 btm> 235 mm OK and
2
Edition Provide 3 H 10 mm 236 mm2 top, as hanger bars

SHEAR
Shear force VEd=0.5x17.3*3.825 = 33 KN
SHEAR FORCE DIAGRAM

40.0 33.2
20.0
0.0 DIST 0.0 1.9 3.8 0.0
SHEAR FORCE DIAGRAM
-20.0 ### 0.0 ###
-40.0 -33.2

ITEM
VRd,max > VEd OK
Asw = VEd
= 0.1
s 0.78dfykcotθ
PLINTH BEAM Beam size 450 X 225 mm

TYPE 2 (PBT2) Unit weight of 225mm wall= 2.87 kN/m2 wall height= 3.00
Unit weight of wall Finishes= 0.6 kN/m2
Loading
SIMPLIFIED Partition wall load =2.87kN/m2*3.8m*1.35 = 12 kN/m
REINFORCED
CONCRETE Wall Finishes = 0.6kN/m2*3.8m*1.35 = 2.43 kN/m
DESIGN, SECTION Beam own load = 0.45x0.225x25kN/m3x1.35 = 3.28 kN/m
10.1 BY ENGR.
V.O. OYENUGA Total 17.3 kN/m
17.3 kN/m
5.75 m
A B
Typical beam for all the plinth beams
FLEXURE
DIST 0 3 6 BMD
BMD
0 0### 0 0
-71.64

Effective depth(d) =h-c-ɸ/2 = 450 -50-12/2-ɸlink 386 mm
Span
b = 225 mm M= 71.6 kNm kbal= ###
Reinforced
Concrete Design, z= 358 mm As = 556 mm2
Bill Mosley,John Minimum Reinforcement As,min =0.26*fctm/fyk* btd= 142 mm2
Bungey and Ray
Hulse, Seventh Provide 3 H 16 mm 603 mm2 btm> 556 mm2 OK and
Edition Provide 3 H 10 mm 236 mm2 top, as hanger bars
ITEM

SHEAR
Shear force VEd=0.5x17.3*5.75 = 50 KN
SHEAR FORCE DIAGRAM

50
DIST 0 3 6
SHEAR FORCE DIAGRAM
50 0 ###
0
-50

VRd,max > VEd OK
Asw = VEd
= 0.2
s 0.78dfykcotθ

ITEM

CALCULATION

ITEM

COL. TYP. 1 Column Size = 225 x 225 mm x 4.3 m

Loading
i. BT1 Maximum Shear reaction on column = 77.5 kN
ii. BT2 Maximum Shear Reaction on Column = 125.3 kN
iii. Colum Self weight. =(0.225x0.225x4.3x25*1.35) = = 7.3 kN
iv. Column Finishes. = 1.5*1.35 = 2.0 kN
Total ULS Design Load; NEd = 212.2 kN
COL. TYPE 1 is B- Axial

FEM (BT. 1) (Mx) = WL2/12 =21.5x3.8252/12 = 60.73 kNm
FEM (BT. 2) (My) = WL2/12 =19.88x5.752/12 = 94.71 kNm
Member Moment of Initial using( I )= bd3/12
Col. (225x225),I= 0.00021 m4 Beam 1 and 2, I= 0.00171 m4
Thus,
Member Stiffness (k),(using I/L)
Col. k = I 0.000050 m3 Beam1 k= 0.0004 m3
Beam2 k = 0.000297 m3
Thus,
Mcol.(x-x)= Mx*kcol./(kcol.+kbeam1) Mcol.(y-y)= My*kcol./(kcol.+kbeam2)
Mcol(x-x) = 7.3 kNm Mcol(y-y) = 14 kNm
Total column moment ; M = Mcol.(x-x) + Mcol.(y-y) =
T 20.8638805742754 kNm
Colum Reinforcements

ITEM

Main Bars
Reinforced Concrete Column Cover; C 50 mm as stated above
Assumed bar dimeter; ф = 16 mm
d2/h =(C + ф/2)/h = 0.26 mm Use d2/h = 25mm
N/bcdcfck = 0.15 MT/b d f = 2
c c ck 0.07
From column design chart, Asfyk/bcdcfck = 0.05
Area of reinforcement required; As = 0.05 *(f b d )/fyk =
ck c c 169 mm2
Provide 4 H 16 mm 805 mm2 btm> 169 mm2 OK
b Links
Minimum Size; s = 1/4*ɸ = 4 mm ----- Use 10 mm link size
Maximum spacings; r = 12*ɸ = 192 mm --- use 175 mm c/c
Provid H### mm link @ 175 mm c/c
PAD BASE REINFORCEMENT DESIGN

a Ultimate Net Pressure -- Used for reinforcement design
Loading
i. PBT 1 Maximum Shear reaction on Column = 33.2 kN
ii. PBT2 Maximum Shear reaction on Column = 49.8 kN
iii. Column Design Load; NEd = 212.2 kN
Total design axial load; V = = 295.1 kN
Design axial load; V = 295.1 kN ultimate limit state load
Design axial load for foundation sizing; V1=V/1.35 = 218.6 kN serviceability limit sate
Soil Bearing Capacity ; qsbc= 100 kN/m 2
(Assumed)
Area of base required =V1/qsbc = 2.2 m2
Provide 1000 X 1000 X 300 mm base ( 1.0 m2 )
Earth pressure =Ep = V/Apad = 295.15 kN/m2
b Maximum Shear resistance at Colum (Pedestal) face
u = column perimeter -------- 2*Lped + 2*Bped = 900 mm
Mean Effective depth, d = h-C-ɸ/2 = 244 mm
VRd,max = 0.5ud*{0.6(1-fck/250)}*fck/1.5 = 1078 kN > V1
The value above is satisfactory as it is greater than the ultimate load on
support earlier calculated
Concise c Preliminary check for Punching shear:
Eurocode 2 Critical perimeter of column, Crp =u + 4πd = 3966 mm
table 7.1 Area within critical perimeter =(225+4d) -(4-π)(2d) =
2 2
748453 mm2
Punching Shear force; VEd =Ep(Apad-Ap) = 74.24383550891 kN
Punching shear stress; vEd = VEd/(Crp x d) = 0.08 N/mm2 < vR,dc
From tables, the above stress is not critical since it is less than the
ultimate stress in concrete at the given effective depth even at 0.25%
steel ratio of vR,dc = 0.5N/mm2;
Hence VEd < VR,dc --- The means effective depth of 244 mm is OK
d Moment Steel and Bending Design:
ITEM

Width of critical criticla section for bending; Cs = 0.4 m
The moment at column face MEd = (Ep*Bpad*Cs)*Cs/2 = 22 KNm
Ultimate moment in concrete, Mbal.=0.167fckBpadd2 = 274 KNm
Concise Hence, Mbal > MEd Cs=0.5
Eurocode 2 K = MEd/(Bpad*d *fck) =

2
0.013
Section 6.2.1 K' =0.167
Reinforced K < K' -- section is singly reinforced

Concrete
Bpad =1.2
Design, Z = d*(0.5+sqrt(0.25-K/1.134))
Bill Mosley,
John Bungey Z= 241 mm
and Ray Hulse,
7th Edition 0.95d--------- = ### mm
tab. 6.8
Since Z > 0.95d, Hence; Z = 232 mm
X = (d-Z)/0.45 = 27.11 mm
Area of reinforcement required; Areq = MEd/0.87fykZ = 243 mm

Minimum area of reinforcement ;Amin=0.13*Bpad*d/100= 317 mm2
Therefore provide for expediency'
5 H 12 Bars @ 250 mm c/c Longitudina B
5 H 12 Bars @ 250 mm c/c Transverse B
Area of reinforcement provided; As.prov = 452.5714 mm2
Numb of logit bars reqd; NLr = Bpad -(2*C))/S = 4 use 5 Nos.
Numb of Transv bars reqd; NLr = Lpad -(2*C))/S = 4 use 5 Nos.
Minimum steel area requirement = 100As/bd = 0.19 > 0.26fctm/fyk
Where 0.26fctm/fyk = 0.0245 OK Minimum steel area is satisfied
1.0 5 H 12 mm Bars @ 250 mm c/c Btm
1.0
5 H 12 mm Bars @ 250 mm c/c Btm

OSL-NNPC-OB/OB-LX-C-EC-007
NIGERIAN NATIONAL PETROLEUM FEL/NPC/OBOB/ CV/011
ITEM

300
1000
e Final check on punching shear:

Concise Average of the steel ratios in both direction
Eurocode 2 ρt = As/Bpadd = 0.19 %
table 7.1 From table, vRdc = 0.5 N/mm2 (by interpolation)
Shear resistance of the concrete; VRdc = vRdc*ud = 110 kN > VEd
OK
f Maximum Shear Force
At the critical section for shear, 1.0d from the column face;
Design Shear Ved = Ep*X*Y = 42 kN
1.0
Y= ###
Y 1.0
X= 0.14 , 1.0d= 0.244 m

( Shaded area = critical section )
The shear resistance of the concrete
VRdc = vRdc *Y*1.0d = 122 kN > VEd OK
(No shear reinforcement is required)


ITEM

CHECK FOR SETTLEMENT
a Settlement in Sand
GEOTECHNICAL i Soil bearing type = Well graded and well draining imported sandfill
DATA material 6.5 m
Characteristic value of angle of shearing resistance;ɸk
OSL-NNPC-
OBOB-GE-S-DR- ɸk = 28 o = 0.49 rad
003 Proposed unit weight of backfill (A well draining material); ɣd
ɣd = 20.0 kN/m3
Serviceability load SLS; V1 = V/1.35 = 218.62849 kN
Length of foundation; L' = 1.00 m Width; B' = 1m
Si = (q0 B*/E)*IF ----- Boussineesq Generalised Elastic Solution
qo = Intensity of contact pressure = V/A' = 218.628486972 kN/m2
2
E =Young modulus = 50000 kNm
μ = poisson's ratio = 0.4
Curves for Htt from bottom of foundation to base of sand layer; Hs = 5.4 m
Steinbrenner Hs/B' = 5.4 ; Lf/Bf = 1.00
influence factor α0 = 0.9 αI = 0.04
estimation from Influence factor; If =(1+μ)*((1-μ)*α0-α1) = 0.7
Taylor and Si = 3.06 mm
Matyas--1983

ITEM

b Settlement in Clay
Half length of foundation; L'f= Lf/2 = 0.50 m
Half width of foundation B'f = Bf/2 = 0.50 m
GEOTECHNICAL Hc; Depth of Clay layer = 5.35 m
DATA mv = Volume compressibility for Clay layer = 0.00019 m2/kN
Depth of middle layer of Clay; Hmc = 7.625 m from grade
OSL-NNPC-
OBOB-GE-S-DR- Depth of foundation = 1.1 m
003 Htt from bottom of foundation to center line of Clay; Zm = 6.53 m
Volume of Excavation; Vexc. =LF*BF*DF = 1.10 m3
Effective unit weight of fill; ɣe-fill = 20 kN/m3
Volume of sandfill; Vfill. =LF*BF*hs = 6.50 m3
Weight of excavation; Wexc = Vexc * ɣe-fill = 22.00 kN
Curves for Weight of sand fill on Clay layer; Wfill =Vfill * ɣe = 130 kN
Steinbrenner Gross Weight from foundation at SLS;V = 218.6 kN
influence factor Net Weight; Wnet = (V3+Wfill)-Wexc. = 326.63 kN
estimation from Net Pressure from Equivalent Loaded Area; Pnet=Wnet/A' = 327 kN/m2
Taylor and Influence Ratio; mi = B'f/Zm1 = 0.08 and ni = L'f/Zm1 = 0.08
Matyas--1983 NewMark influence Coefficient equation with respect to the ratio above;
Influence factor; IN =
1/2π*{(mini/(mi2+ni2+1)^0.5)*((mi2+ni2+2)/(mi2+ni2+mi2+1))+sin-1(mini/(mi2+ni2+mi2+ni2+1)^0.5)}
(mini)/(mi2+ni2+1)^0.5) = 0.0058
((mi2+ni2+2)/(mi2+ni2+mi2+1)) = 1.97
sin-1(mini/(mi2+ni2+mi2+ni2+1)^0.5) = 0.00580417
Influence factor; IN = 0.003
m = Number of corners contributing to Settlement at center = 4
Increase in pressure at center of clay; ẟ = IN*Pnet*m = 3.5 kNm2
Sc1 = Hc1*mv1*ẟ = 3.606 mm
Total Settlement; S = Si +Sc = 6.67 mm OK Less than Allowable
PIPELINE
CTMS
art
27.6 N/mm2
414 N/mm2
18.40 N/mm2
N/mm2
15 mm
25 mm (slab)
mm (beam)
at 1.0m depth(Assumed)
PIPELINE
CTMS
PIPELINE
CTMS
OUTPUT
kN
PIPELINE
CTMS
OUTPUT
mm
Provide H12
mm 2
at 250mm c/c
)mm2/m btm(453mm2/m)
PIPELINE
CTMS
OUTPUT
mm
Provide H12
mm2 at 250mm c/c
)mm2/m btm(453mm2/m)
15.4589
33.8164
Beam Size
450 X 225
kN/m
kN/m
kN/m
kN/m
kN/m
PIPELINE
CTMS
OUTPUT
kNm
mm
b1=0.5(L-bw)
mm
mm2 Provide 4 H 16
OK mm bottom
PIPELINE
CTMS
OUTPUT
Provide R8@
300mm c/c
as links
PIPELINE
CTMS
OUTPUT
26
mm
mm
mm2 Provide 4H25

btm(1963mm2)
Provide R8@
200mm c/c
as links
PIPELINE
CTMS
OUTPUT
Beam Size
m 450 X 225
kN/m
kN/m
kN/m
kN/m
kNm
mm
Provide
mm 2
3 H 16 btm
and ( 603 mm2)
( 236 mm2)
33.2
PIPELINE
CTMS
OUTPUT
Provide H8@
300mm c/c
as links
Beam Size
m 450 X 225
kN/m
kN/m
kN/m
kN/m
kNm
mm
Provide
mm 2
3 H 16 btm
and ( 603 mm2)
( 236 mm2)
PIPELINE
CTMS
CTMS
OUTPUT
Provide H8@
300mm c/c
as links
PIPELINE
CTMS
CTMS
PIPELINE
CTMS
OUTPUT
225 X 225
m3
)
eam2
PIPELINE
CTMS
OUTPUT
Provide
4Y16mm
bars (805mm2)
& H10@
175mm
erviceability limit sate
1000 X ###
300 mm base
PIPELINE
CTMS
OUTPUT
mm c/c Btm
PIPELINE
CTMS
OUTPUT
PIPELINE
CTMS
OUTPUT
PIPELINE
CTMS
OUTPUT
kN/m2
s than Allowable
NIGERIAN NATIONAL
PETROLEUM CORPORATION Page 21 of 21 REV:R02
LOCATION OB/OB PLANT; OB/OB
SAFE BEARING CAPACITY(SBC) ESTIMATE FOR PROPOSED SANDFILL MATERIAL PROPERTIES

Using Hansen's Approach
Qult =CNcScdc +ɣDNqsqdq + 0.5ɣBNɣsɣdɣ Where ɣD is the Overburden pressure
Hensen's shape factor ; Hensen's Depth factor ;
Sc = 1+Nq/Nc*B/L dc = 1+0.4*(D/B)
Sq = 1+(b/L)*TAN(RADIANS(ɸ)) dq = 1+2*(TAN(RADIANS(phi))*(1-SIN(RADIANS(phi)))^2)*(D/B)
Sɣ = 1-0.4B/L dɣ = 1
Soil Material Properties
Density of existing material ɣ 17 kN/m3 [Density of fine grained loose uniform sand]
Cohession strength for Existing Soil; C = 0 kN/m2 [Refer to Doc. Assumed]
Angle of Internal friction for sharp sand; ɸ = 30 deg. [Refer to Doc. Assumed]
Density of Sandfll material ɣ = 15 kN/m3 [Density of fine grained loose and uniform sand]
Depth of sandfill after excavation D; 1.0 m
Meyerlof Bearing capacity factor for different ɸ ;
Nc = ###
Nq = ###
Nɣ = ###
A factor of safety Fs = 3 is used as in the attached
Table 1 - Safe Bearing Capacity Extimates
FoundatiFoundation Ultimate Bearing capacity Safe Bearing capacity Ave. SBCEffec. overburden
depth D Width B kN/m2 kN/m2 kN/m2 Pressure (kN/m2)
(m) (m) L/B= 1.0 L/B= 1.5 L/B= 3.0 L/B = 1.0 L/B = 1.5 L/B = 3.0 qs=Ave. SBC+ɣD
1.0 462 445 428 150 145 139 145 155
1.5 502 499 497 164 163 162 163 178
0.6 2.0 550 562 573 180 184 188 184 199
3.0 656 694 732 215 228 241 228 243
6.5 1047 1175 1302 345 388 431 388 403
1.0 750 698 646 244 227 210 227 242
1.5 760 726 692 248 236 225 236 251
1 2.0 793 775 757 259 253 247 253 268
3.0 884 894 904 289 292 296 292 307
6.5 1258 1360 1462 414 448 482 448 463
1.0 1175 1071 967 383 348 314 348 363
1.5 1125 1047 969 367 340 314 340 355
1.5 2.0 1129 1070 1011 368 348 328 348 363
3.0 1190 1163 1135 388 379 370 379 394
6.5 1532 1601 1670 502 525 548 525 540
Effect of Overburden pressure on soil after excavation of 1000mm depth

qs=Ave. SBC+ɣD =
Where ɣD is the Overburden pressure
ɣ = Density of sandfill material = 15 kN/m3
D = depth of sandfill 1.0 m
Therefore the soil bearing capacity after sandfill =qs=Ave. SBC+ɣD 242 kN/m3
Use assumed Safe soil Bearing Capacity of 200 kN/m3
REF. CALCULATION SHEET OUT PUT
1.0 GENERAL SKETCH
DIAGRAM
2.0 DESIGN NOTES
i The calculation provides design details and reinforement for pipe support
concrete foundations.
ii Vibration analysis not considered because of very negligible anticipated
dynamic motion
iii Reinforcement design was carried out using the Ultimate limit state
iv Pad base sizing check was carried out using the serviceability limit state
v Refer to sketch figures above for relevant calculation references
3.0 PIPE/ PIPE SUPPORT DATA
Pipe Elevation ; Hs = 1400 mm= 1.4 m
Pipe Diameter ; Dp = 18 inches = 457.2 mm
Pipe thickness ; Tp = 0.875 inches = 22.225 mm
Mechanical Pipe Weight ;Wp = 160 lb/ft = 238.41 kg/m
Data Weight of water content ;Wc = π/4(Dp-2Tp)2 *1000*1 ---------- 133.8 kg/m
Sheet Weight of U-Bolt from UEC Standard Pipe Support tables ;Wcl -- 2.52
= kg
Test weight of pipe ; Wo -- Wp+Wc = 372.21 kg/m
Maximum centers of pipe support along the 18'' line -- L =5.0 m
Total Point Load for the pipe ;P = (Wo + Wcl ) ------ 18.28 kN
drawing no. Steel Support Section provided -- UC 203 X 203 X 46.1 kg/m
Length of beam section ; Lb = 0.90 m Width of section; Ds 203 mm
Base plate thickness provided = 20 mm = 0.02 m
Height of Steel Section provided ; hs=648.40 m = 0.65 m
Weight of Support Ws = (Lb + hs)*46.1kg/m = 71 kg = 0.7 kN
Total Point Load on foundation ;PT = (WP + Ws) ------ 18.98 kN
Dry Weight of Pipe & Support; Wd = 12.394 kN
Test Weight of Pipe & Support; Wt = 18.98 kN
Steel Section Reference Area; Aref =Ds*hs + Lb*Ds = 0.31 m2
4.0 MATERIAL DATA

ɣgk = density of concrete = 25 kN/m3
EN1992-1-1: Denign bar diameter; ɸ = 16 mm
2004 (E); ɣc = partial safety factor of concrete =1.5
Sec 2.2.2.4 ɣs = partial safety factor of steel = 1.15
Tab 2.1N fck = Characteristic strength of concrete =25 kN/mm2
Sec 3.1.6 αcc= coefficient of long term effect on strenght1=
fyk = Characteristic strength of steel =410 kN/mm2
Design strenght of reinforcement = fy = fyk/ɣs = 357 kN/mm2
5.0 CONCRETE COVER REQUIREMENT

Tab 4.4N Exposure condition: Exposure condition XD1 (Moderate Humidity)
Sec 4.4.1 Structural class = S3, (Corrosion induced by chloride apart from sea water)
Sec 4.4.1.2 Min. cover due to Envirometal condition Cmin = 30 mm
Allowance in design for deviation; ∆cdev = 10mm
Sec 4.4.1.3 Nominal cover; cnom = cmin +∆cdev = 40 mm say ### mm
6.0 CONCRETE FOUNDATION DATA
Foundation type; = Pad with Pedestal
Length of Pedestal ; Lped = 0.45 m
Width of Pedestal ;Bped = 0.45 m
Area of Pedestal; Aped = 0.2 m2
Depth of Pedestal above grade; za 0.3 m
Depth of Pedestal below grade; zb 0.6 m
Thickness of Pedestal; hped = 0.9 m
Length of Pad ; Lpad = 1.5 m
Width of Pad ;Bpad = 1.5 m
Area of Pad; Apad = 2.25 m2
Thickness of Pad; hpad = 0.3 m
Length of Pad beyond pedestal; a = 0.53 m
Width of Pad beyond pedestal; b = 0.53 m
Depth of foundation ; Df = 1.00 m
7.0 GEOTECHNICAL DATA
i Soil bearing type = Well graded and well draining imported sandfill
material 6.04 m
ɸk = 28 o = ### rad
Partial factor for angle of shearing resistance; ɣɸ1.25
tanɸk =0.53 rad tanɸk/ɣɸ = ### rad
Design value of angle of shearing resistance; ɸdtan-1(tanɸk/ɣɸ)
ɸd = 24 o
= 0.4 rad
Effective unit weight of soil; ɣb =18 kN/m 3
Proposed unit weight of backfill (A well draining material); ɣd

ɣd = 18 kN/m3
Depth of bearing soil; Hs = 6.04 m
ii Second Soil Layer = Elastic Silt 3.5

Clay Soil angle of shearing resistance;ɸ = 0 Degs = 0 Rad
tanɸk = 0 rad tanɸk/ɣɸ = ### rad
ɸd = 0 o
= 0.0 rad
Bulk unit weight ; ɣsilt = 17 kN/m 3
Depth of Layer; Hc = 3.5 m

Coefficient of compressibility; mv = 0.00016 m2/kN
Undrained Shear Strenth; Cu = 10 kN/m2
Partial factor for Undrained Shear Strenth; ɣcu = 1.40
Design value of Undrained Shear Strenth; Cud = Cu/ɣcu 7.14 kN/m2
iii Third Soil Layer = Medium Dense to Dense Silty sand
material 14.3 m
ɸk = 34 o = ### rad
ɸd = 28 o
= 0.50 rad

ɣd = 18 kN/m3
iv Fouth Soil Layer = Dense to very Dense sand

material 9.75 m
ɸk = 38 o = ### rad
ɸd = 32 o
= 0.56 rad
Effective unit weight of soil; ɣb = 18 kN/m 3
Depth of soil; Hs = 9.75 m

WaterTable; Hwt = 0 m Before sandfill
Water Table; Hwt = 3.5 m After sandfill
8.0 DESIGN LOADINGS

A. WIND LOAD ESTIMATION FOR POLE
a 3sec. Gust wind speed;VG 128 Km/hr = 35.556 m/s
i Gust wind conversion factor;k 1.46 from 3sec to 10min
EN 1991‐1‐4
Section 4.5 ii Air density ; r = 1.25 kg/m3
iii Fundamental value of the basic wind velocity
Vb0 = 24.35 m/s 10min wind speed
Basic wind velocity calculation

Section 4.2 cdir = 1 directional factor cseason = 1 season factor
Section 4.2 (1)P vb = cdir * cseason * vb,0 = 24.35 m/sec.
Section 4.5 (1) Basic velocity pressure qb = 1/2 * r * vb 2 = 371 N/m2

Exp. (4.10)
Table 4.1 Terrain category: III
z0 = 0.3 m zmin = 5 m (roughness lengths)
The reference height; z 1.4 m
Terrain roughness:
Section 4.3.2 cr(z) = kr * ln(z/z0) for zmin < z < zmax cr(z) = cr(zmin) for z < zmin
Expressionz0,II
4.5= 0.05 m zmax = 200 m
kr = 0.19*(z0 /z0,II)0.07
= 0.2154
cr(z) = kr * ln(z/z0) = 0.3318
section 4.3.3 Terrain orography:
& Annex A.3 co (z) = 1 for flat terrain
Section 4.4 (1) Wind turbulence
kl = 1 ‐ turbulence factor; recommended value is 1.0, other values may
be specified by the National Annex
lv(z) = kl /(c0(z)*ln(z/z0)) for zmin < z < zmax
lv(z) = kl /(c0(z)*ln(z/z0)) = 0.649 m
Mean wind velocity

Section 4.4 (1) vm(z) = cr(z)*c0(z)*vb 8.1 m/sec
Expr. 4.7 Peak velocity pressure
qp(z) = ce(z)*qb where ce(z) = [1+7*Iv(z)]*cr(z)*co(z)
ce(z) = [1+7*Iv(z)]*cr(z)*co(z) 0.61
qp(z) = ce(z)*qb = 0.23 kN/m2
Section 5.3 Wind force ; Fw =( cscd)*cf*qpz*Aref =
Section 6.2 i cscd --- Structural factor = 1
ii qp(z) --- Peak velocity pressure = ### kN/m2
iii Support Reference Area ; Aref, as above = 0.31 m2
Equation 7.19 iv cf --- Force coefficient = cf,0 *ψλ =
Section 7.7 cf,0 = the force coefficient of sharp edged structural section=
2.0
Note 1 ψλ = the end-effect factor
End effect factor;ψλis a function of effective slenderness ratio(λ)
effective slenderness ratio; λ= Ref. height/Ds =6.9 < 70 use 6.9
Solidity ratio; ϕ = 1.0 Since no opening exist
End effect factor;ψλ= ### (from figure above)

Force coefficient ; cf = cf,0 *ψλ = 1.6
Wind force ; Fw =( cscd)*cf*qpz*Aref = 0.11 kN
B. Variable Loads
from Vendor Water of water; Qk1 = Wt - Wd = 6.588 kN
drawing Total Variable load; Qk = Qk1 = 6.588 kN
C. Permanent Loads
Pad Self weight ; Gk1 =Apad*hpad*ɣgk = 16.875 kN

Pedestal Self Weight ; Gk2 = Aped*hped*ɣgk = 4.5563 kN
Weight of backfill soil; Gk3 =2*(a*bpad*(Df-Hpad)*ɣb+2*(b*Lpad*(Df-hpad)*ɣb)
= 26 kN
Dry Weight = Gk4 =Wd = 12.394 kN
Total Permanent Load; Gk = Gk1 +Gk2 + Gk3 +Gk4 = 60 kN
Concise D. Ultimate structural and geotechnical load combinations

Eurocode 2
CASE 1 Partial factors
Partial factor for variable load = ɣQ = 1.5
Partial factor for permanent load = ɣG =1.35

Partial factor for permanent load = ɣG = 1
CASE 3 Partial factors for Serviceability Limit State

Partial factor for variable load = ɣQ = 1
COMBINATIONS CASE 1, CASE 2 AND CASE 3
1.35Gk + 1.5Qk = V1 = 90 kN( ULS Structural load combination)
1.0Gk + 1.3Qk = V2= 68.2 kN( ULS Geotechnical load comb.)
1.0Gk + 1.3Qk = V3 = 66.2 kN( ULS Geotechnical load comb.)
EN 1997-1: 9.0 BEARING RESISTANCE CHECK

2003(E)- I Drained conditions -Case 1
Annex D
The design bearing resistance
cohesion intercept in terms of effective stress
R/A' =c'NcScicbc +q'Nqsqiqbq + 0.5ɣBNɣsɣiɣbɣ =
A' = Design effective foundation area
cohesion intercept in terms of effective stress; c' = 0 kN/m2
angle of shearing resistance in terms of effective stress; ϕ' = 28 o
Design values of dimensionless factors for:

- the bearing resistance:
Nc = 25.80
Nq = 14.72
Ny = 16.72
Shape factors; Assuming some eccentricity;

R =Height from top of Support to bottom of pad 2.40 m
H = 1.5Fw = 0.17 kN (Max. horizontal reaction@ ULS-STR Load Comb.
B' = Effective foundation width = Bf-2(H*0.5R/V1)= 1.5 m
L' = Effective foundation Length = Lf-2(H*0.5R/V1)= 1.5 m

- the shape of foundation
Sq = 1+(sinɸ)*(B'/L') = 1.5
Sy = 1-0.3B/L = 0.7
Sc = (Sq*Nq-1)/(Nq-1 ) = 1.5
Inclination of the load caused by a horizontal load;

H = Horizontal load = 0.17 kN
m = mB = [2+(B'/L')]/ [1+(B'/L')] when H acts in the direction of B'
m = mB = [2+(L'/B')]/ [1+(L'/B')] when H acts in the direction of L'
In both cases; m = 1.5 and 1.5 Respectively
iq = [1-H/(V1+A'c'cotɸ')]m = 1.00 and 1.00
iɣ = [1-H/(V1+A'c'cotɸ')]m+1 = 1.00 and 1.00
ic = iq-(1-iq)/(Nc*tanɸ') = 1.00
- the inclination of the foundation base:

α = The inclination of the foundation base to the horizontal=
0
bq = bɣ = (1-αtanɸ')2 = 1 Foundation is not inclined
bc = bq-(1-bq)/(Nctanɸk') = 1 Foundation is not inclined
The design effective weight density of the soil below the foundation level;
Effective unit weight ;ɣe = 18 kN/m3
the design effective overburden pressure at the level of the
foundation level
q' = ɣe*Df = 18 kN/m2
A' = Ar = the effective foundation area = B'*L' = 2.24 m2
R=A' (c'NcScicbc +q'Nqsqiqbq + 0.5ɣBNɣsɣiɣbɣ) = 1219 kN > V1
CASE 1 DRAINED CONDITION IS SATISFIED
II Drained condition ------ Case 2


Nc = 18.05
Nq = 8.66
Ny = 8.20

L' = Effective foundation Length = Lf-2(H*0.5R/V2)=1.49 m

Sq = 1+(sinɸ)*(B'/L') = 1.39
Sy = 1-0.3B/L = 0.7
Sc = (Sq*Nq-1)/(Nq-1 ) = 1.44

iq = [1-H/(V2+A'c'cotɸ')]m = 1.00 and 1.00
iɣ = [1-H/(V2+A'c'cotɸ')]m+1 = 0.99 and 0.99
ic = iq-(1-iq)/(Nc*tanɸ') = 1.00

α = The inclination of the foundation base to the horizontal= 0
foundation level
q' = ɣe*Df = 18 kN/m2
R2=A' (c'NcScicbc +q'Nqsqiqbq + 0.5ɣBNɣsɣiɣbɣ) = 655 kN > V2
III Calculated bearing resistance Ratio
Rb = V2/R2 = 0.10 < 1 OK
IV Calculated Allowable bearing Pressure
Qcalc. =R2/Ar = 293 kN/m2
30.0 kN/m2
30.6 kN/m
2
(Pmin.)
(Pmax.)
P = Earth Bearing pressure;

B = Bpad = 1.5 m D = Dpad = 1.5 m
N = Total Vertical axial load = V2 = 68.2 kN
Geotech. Load Comb.
Maximum Lateral Force Along X-axis due to bearing loads; H
Reinforced H = 0.14 kN
Concrete Overturning moment Mo = H*0.5R = 0.19 kNm
Design, Bill
Mosley, John Eccentricity;e =Mo/V2 =
Bungey and
Ray Hulse, 7th If eccentricity;e = 0, P = N/BD Case1
Edition page
If eccentricity;e = < D/6, P = N/BD + 6M/BD2 Case2
285
If eccentricity;e = > D/6, P = 2N/BY Case 3
Eccentricity; e =Mo/V2 = 0.0028 m D/6 = 0.25 m
e= < D/6 Case 2
Length of positive contact; Y =3(D/2-e) = 2.241 m

Soil Allowable bearing pressure; Qcalc. = 293 kN/m2
Earth Bearing pressure; P = 30.3 + 0.3 kN/m2
Maximum pressure; Pmax. = 30.65 kN/m2
Minimum pressure; Pmin. = 30.0 kN/m2
NO BEARING CAPACITY FAILURE
Bearing Pressure Ratio = Pmax/Qcalc. = 0.105 < 1 OK
10.0 PEDESTAL REINFORCEMENT DESIGN
a Main Reinforcement
Since pedestal is designed as a braced column under the action of
axial compressive loads;
Total pedestal axial design load; NEd = 1.35Gk + 1.5Q### kN
Area of steel required ; As = 0.1NEd/0.87fyk or 0.002Ac, Which ever
is greater
As = 0.1NEd/0.87fyk = 9.19 mm2 0.002Ac = 405 mm2
Area required is taken as ------ 405 mm2
Provide 8 H 12 mm 905 mm2 > 405 mm2
b Links
Maximum spacings; r = 12*ɸ =144 mm --- use 175 mm c/c
Provide 6 H 10 mm link @ 175 mm c/c
11.0 PAD BASE REINFORCEMENT DESIGN
Column design axial load; V1 = 90.4 kN ultimate limit state load
Earth pressure =Ep = V1/Apad = 56.87 kN/m2
VRd,max = 0.5ud*{0.6(1-fck/250)}*fck/1.5 =1976 kN > V1
c Preliminary check for Punching shear:
Concise Critical perimeter of column, Crp =u + 4πd = 4866 mm
Eurocode 2 Area within critical perimeter =(800+4d)2-(4-π)(2d)2 1829353 mm2
table 7.1
Punching Shear force; VEd =Ep(Apad-Ap) = 24 kN
Width of critical criticla section for bending; Cs =
0.53 m
The moment at column face MEd = (Ep*Bpad*Cs)*Cs/2 =12 KNm
Ultimate moment in concrete, Mbal.=0.167fckBpadd2 =373 KNm

Concise Hence, Mbal > MEd
Eurocode 2 K = MEd/(Bpad*d2*fck) = 0.00527
Section 6.2.1 K' =0.167

Concrete
Design, Z = d*(0.5+sqrt(0.25-K/1.134))
Bill Mosley,
and Ray Hulse,
7th Edition 0.95d--------- = 232 mm
tab. 6.8
Since Z > 0.95d, Hence; Z 232 mm
X = (d-Z)/0.45 = 27 mm
8 H 12 Bars @ 200 mm c/c Longitudina T&B

8 H 12 Bars @ 200 mm c/c Transverse T&B
Area of reinforcement provided; As.prov = 566 mm2
Numb of Transv bars reqd; NLr = Lpad -(2*C))/S =7
use 8 Nos.
Minimum steel area requirement = 100As/bd =0.15 > 0.26fctm/fyk
1.5 8 H 12 Bars @ 200 mm c/c
T&B
1.5
1.5
###
8 H 12 Bars @ 200 mm c/c T&B
300
1500

Shear resistance of the concrete; VRdc = vRdc*ud =199 kN > VEd
OK
1.5
Y= ###
Y 1.5
X= 0.281 , 1.0d= 0.244 m

Concise g Maximum bar spacing for crack control;

Eurocode 2 Steel stress; fs = (fyk(Gk+0.3Qk))/(1.15(1.35Gk+1.5Qk)) = 243 Nmm2
table 10.2 Maximum allowable bar spacing from tabls224 mm (interpolation)
Hence, bar spacing of 150 mm is adequate for crack control
h Maximum bar diameter for crack control;

Concise Steel stress; fs = (fyk(Gk+0.3Qk))/(1.15(1.35Gk+1.5Qk)) = 243 Nmm2
Eurocode 2 Maximum allowable bar size from table = ### mm (interpolation)
table 10.1 Hence, bar size o 12 mm is adequate for crack control
12.0 CHECK FOR STABILITY
DIAGRAM

A Overturning Check in x-direction
i factored Restoring Moment; Mr =Zx(Wrack + Wpedestal+ Wpad + Wbackfil)*rr
Wsupport = 12 kN
Wpedestal = 4.6 kN
Wpad = 16.9 kN
Wbackfill = 0 kN Ignore for maximum effect
Partial factor for resisting force: rr =0.9
Factored Resisting force; Wg = 30.4 Zx1 = 0.75 m
Resisting Moment from Restoring loads; Mr= Wg*Zx1### kNm
ii Factored Overturnig Moment
Partial factor for unfavourable overturning forces rou =1.5
Overturning moment in x- direction;Mox = ruo*(WLpx*0.5Zy) 0.2
= kNm
Factor of safety against overturning; Fso =Mr/Mox =102 > 1.5
OK, There is no overturning in X-direction
B Overturning Check in z-direction

Overturning moment in z- direction;Moz = ruo*(WLpz*0.5Zy) 0.2
= kNm
Factor of safety against overturning; Fso =Mr/Moz =102 > 1.5
OK, There is no overturning in z-direction
13.0 CHECK FOR SETTLEMENT

qo = Intensity of contact pressure = V3/A' = 30 kN/m2
E =Young modulus = 24000 kNm2
Length of foundation; L' = 1.50 m Width; B' = 1.5 m
Steinbrenner Hs/B' = 3.37 ; Lf/Bf = ###

Matyas--1983
b Settlement in Silt
Hc; Depth of Silt layer = 3.5 m
mv = Volume compressibility for Silt layer = 0.00016 m2/kN
Depth of middle layer of silt; Hmc = 7.79 from grade
Htt from bottom of foundation to center line of Silt; Zm 6.79 m
Volume of Excavation; Vexc. =LF*BF*DF = 2.24 m 3
Volume of sandfill; Vfill. =LF*BF*hs = 13.51 m3

Weight of excavation; Wexc = Vexc * ɣe-fill = 40.26 kN
Curves for Weight of sand fill on Silt layer; Wfill =Vfill * ɣe = 243.19 kN
Steinbrenner Gross Weight from foundation at SLS;V 66.2 kN
influence factor Net Weight; Wnet = (V3+Wfill)-Wexc. =269.14 kN
estimation from Net Pressure from Equivalent Loaded Area; Pnet=Wnet/A' =120 kN/m2
(mini)/(mi2+ni2+1)^0.5) = 0.012
((mi2+ni2+2)/(mi2+ni2+mi2+1)) = 1.93
m = Number of corners contributing to Settlement at center 4
Increase in pressure at center of clay; ẟ = IN*Pnet*m = 26 kNm2
Sc1 = Hc1*mv1*ẟ = 0.01
Total Settlement; S = Si +Sc = 1.33 mm
0.964
6.04759
+mi2+ni2+1)^0.5)}
1.0 GENERAL SKETCH
DIAGRAM
2.0 DESIGN NOTES
i The calculation provides design details and reinforement for pipe support
concrete foundations.
ii Vibration analysis not considered because of very negligible anticipated
dynamic motion
iii Reinforcement design was carried out using the Ultimate limit state
iv Pad base sizing check was carried out using the serviceability limit state
v Refer to sketch figures above for relevant calculation references
3.0 PIPE/ PIPE SUPPORT DATA
Pipe Elevation ; Hs = 1400 mm= 1.4 m
Pipe Diameter ; Dp = 18 inches = 457.2 mm
Pipe thickness ; Tp = 0.875 inches = 22.225 mm
Mechanical Pipe Weight ;Wp = 160 lb/ft = 238.41 kg/m
Data Weight of water content ;Wc = π/4(Dp-2Tp)2 *1000*1 ---------- 133.8 kg/m
Sheet Weight of U-Bolt from UEC Standard Pipe Support tables ;Wcl -- 2.52
= kg
Test weight of pipe ; Wo -- Wp+Wc = 372.21 kg/m
Maximum centers of pipe support along the 18'' line -- L =5.0 m
Total Point Load for the pipe ;P = (Wo + Wcl ) ------ 18.28 kN
drawing no. Steel Support Section provided -- UC 203 X 203 X 46.1 kg/m
Length of beam section ; Lb = 0.90 m Width of section; Ds 203 mm
Base plate thickness provided = 20 mm = 0.02 m
Height of Steel Section provided ; hs=648.40 m = 0.65 m
Weight of Support Ws = (Lb + hs)*46.1kg/m = 71 kg = 0.7 kN
Total Point Load on foundation ;PT = (WP + Ws) ------ 18.98 kN
Dry Weight of Pipe & Support; Wd = 12.394 kN
Test Weight of Pipe & Support; Wt = 18.98 kN
Steel Section Reference Area; Aref =Ds*hs + Lb*Ds = 0.31 m2
4.0 MATERIAL DATA

ɣgk = density of concrete = 25 kN/m3
EN1992-1-1: Denign bar diameter; ɸ = 16 mm
2004 (E); ɣc = partial safety factor of concrete =1.5
Sec 2.2.2.4 ɣs = partial safety factor of steel = 1.15
Tab 2.1N fck = Characteristic strength of concrete =25 kN/mm2
Sec 3.1.6 αcc= coefficient of long term effect on strenght1=
fyk = Characteristic strength of steel =410 kN/mm2
Design strenght of reinforcement = fy = fyk/ɣs = 357 kN/mm2
5.0 CONCRETE COVER REQUIREMENT

Tab 4.4N Exposure condition: Exposure condition XD1 (Moderate Humidity)
Sec 4.4.1 Structural class = S3, (Corrosion induced by chloride apart from sea water)
Sec 4.4.1.2 Min. cover due to Envirometal condition Cmin = 30 mm
Allowance in design for deviation; ∆cdev = 10mm
Sec 4.4.1.3 Nominal cover; cnom = cmin +∆cdev = 40 mm say ### mm

6.0 CONCRETE FOUNDATION DATA
Foundation type; = Pad with Pedestal
Length of Pedestal ; Lped = 0.45 m
Width of Pedestal ;Bped = 0.45 m
Area of Pedestal; Aped = 0.2 m2
Depth of Pedestal above grade; za 0.3 m
Depth of Pedestal below grade; zb 0.6 m
Thickness of Pedestal; hped = 0.9 m
Length of Pad ; Lpad = 1.5 m
Width of Pad ;Bpad = 1.5 m
Area of Pad; Apad = 2.25 m2
Thickness of Pad; hpad = m 0.3
Length of Pad beyond pedestal; a = 0.53 m
Width of Pad beyond pedestal; b = 0.53 m
Depth of foundation ; Df = 1.00 m
7.0 GEOTECHNICAL DATA
i Soil bearing type = Well graded and well draining imported sandfill
material 6.04 m
ɸk = 28 o = ### rad
ɸd = 24 o
= 0.4 rad

ɣd = 18 kN/m3
ii Second Soil Layer = Elastic Silt 3.5

Clay Soil angle of shearing resistance;ɸ = 0 Degs = 0 Rad
tanɸk = 0 rad tanɸk/ɣɸ = ### rad
ɸd = 0 o
= 0.0 rad
Bulk unit weight ; ɣsilt = 17 kN/m 3
Depth of Layer; Hc = 3.5 m

Coefficient of compressibility; mv = 0.00016 m2/kN
Undrained Shear Strenth; Cu = 10 kN/m2
Partial factor for Undrained Shear Strenth; ɣcu = 1.40
Design value of Undrained Shear Strenth; Cud = Cu/ɣcu 7.14 kN/m2
iii Third Soil Layer = Medium Dense to Dense Silty sand

material 14.3 m
ɸk = 34 o = ### rad
ɸd = 28 o
= 0.50 rad

ɣd = 18 kN/m3
iv Fouth Soil Layer = Dense to very Dense sand

material 9.75 m
ɸk = 38 o = ### rad
ɸd = 32 o
= 0.56 rad
Effective unit weight of soil; ɣb = 18 kN/m 3
Depth of soil; Hs = 9.75 m

WaterTable; Hwt = 0 m Before sandfill
Water Table; Hwt = 3.5 m After sandfill
8.0 DESIGN LOADINGS

A. WIND LOAD ESTIMATION FOR POLE
a 3sec. Gust wind speed;VG 128 Km/hr = 35.556 m/s
i Gust wind conversion factor;k 1.46 from 3sec to 10min
EN 1991‐1‐4
Section 4.5 ii Air density ; r = 1.25 kg/m3
iii Fundamental value of the basic wind velocity
Vb0 = 24.35 m/s 10min wind speed
Basic wind velocity calculation

Section 4.2 cdir = 1 directional factor cseason = 1 season factor
Section 4.2 (1)P vb = cdir * cseason * vb,0 = 24.35 m/sec.
Section 4.5 (1) Basic velocity pressure qb = 1/2 * r * vb 2 = 371 N/m2

Exp. (4.10)
Table 4.1 Terrain category: III
z0 = 0.3 m zmin = 5 m (roughness lengths)
Terrain roughness:
Section 4.3.2 cr(z) = kr * ln(z/z0) for zmin < z < zmax cr(z) = cr(zmin) for z < zmin
Expressionz0,II
4.5= 0.05 m zmax = 200 m
kr = 0.19*(z0 /z0,II)0.07
= 0.2154
cr(z) = kr * ln(z/z0) = 0.3318
section 4.3.3 Terrain orography:
& Annex A.3 co (z) = 1 for flat terrain
Section 4.4 (1) Wind turbulence
kl = 1 ‐ turbulence factor; recommended value is 1.0, other values may
be specified by the National Annex
lv(z) = kl /(c0(z)*ln(z/z0)) for zmin < z < zmax
lv(z) = kl /(c0(z)*ln(z/z0)) = 0.649 m
Mean wind velocity

Section 4.4 (1) vm(z) = cr(z)*c0(z)*vb 8.1 m/sec
Expr. 4.7 Peak velocity pressure
qp(z) = ce(z)*qb where ce(z) = [1+7*Iv(z)]*cr(z)*co(z)
ce(z) = [1+7*Iv(z)]*cr(z)*co(z) 0.61
qp(z) = ce(z)*qb = 0.23 kN/m2
Section 5.3 Wind force ; Fw =( cscd)*cf*qpz*Aref =
Section 6.2 i cscd --- Structural factor = 1
ii qp(z) --- Peak velocity pressure = ### kN/m2
iii Support Reference Area ; Aref, as above = 0.31 m2
Equation 7.19 iv cf --- Force coefficient = cf,0 *ψλ =
Section 7.7 cf,0 = the force coefficient of sharp edged structural section=
2.0
Note 1 ψλ = the end-effect factor
End effect factor;ψλis a function of effective slenderness ratio(λ)
effective slenderness ratio; λ= Ref. height/Ds =6.9 < 70 use 6.9
Solidity ratio; ϕ = 1.0 Since no opening exist
End effect factor;ψλ= ### (from figure above)
Force coefficient ; cf = cf,0 *ψλ = 1.6
Wind force ; Fw =( cscd)*cf*qpz*Aref = 0.11 kN
B. Variable Loads
from Vendor Water of water; Qk1 = Wt - Wd = 6.588 kN
drawing Total Variable load; Qk = Qk1 = 6.588 kN
C. Permanent Loads
Pad Self weight ; Gk1 =Apad*hpad*ɣgk = 16.875 kN

Pedestal Self Weight ; Gk2 = Aped*hped*ɣgk = 4.5563 kN
Weight of backfill soil; Gk3 =2*(a*bpad*(Df-Hpad)*ɣb+2*(b*Lpad*(Df-hpad)*ɣb)
= 26 kN
Dry Weight = Gk4 =Wd = 12.394 kN
Total Permanent Load; Gk = Gk1 +Gk2 + Gk3 +Gk4 = 60 kN
Concise D. Ultimate structural and geotechnical load combinations

Eurocode 2
Partial factor for permanent load = ɣG =1.35

CASE 3 Partial factors for Serviceability Limit State

Partial factor for variable load = ɣQ = 1
COMBINATIONS CASE 1, CASE 2 AND CASE 3
1.35Gk + 1.5Qk = V1 = 90 kN( ULS Structural load combination)
1.0Gk + 1.3Qk = V2= 68.2 kN( ULS Geotechnical load comb.)
1.0Gk + 1.3Qk = V3 = 66.2 kN( ULS Geotechnical load comb.)
EN 1997-1: 9.0 BEARING RESISTANCE CHECK

2003(E)- I Drained conditions -Case 1
Annex D

Nc = 25.80
Nq = 14.72
Ny = 16.72

L' = Effective foundation Length = Lf-2(H*0.5R/V1)= 1.5 m

Sq = 1+(sinɸ)*(B'/L') = 1.5
Sy = 1-0.3B/L = 0.7
Sc = (Sq*Nq-1)/(Nq-1 ) = 1.5

iq = [1-H/(V1+A'c'cotɸ')]m = 1.00 and 1.00
iɣ = [1-H/(V1+A'c'cotɸ')]m+1 = 1.00 and 1.00
ic = iq-(1-iq)/(Nc*tanɸ') = 1.00

α = The inclination of the foundation base to the horizontal=
0
foundation level
q' = ɣe*Df = 18 kN/m2
R=A' (c'NcScicbc +q'Nqsqiqbq + 0.5ɣBNɣsɣiɣbɣ) = 1219 kN > V1
II Drained condition ------ Case 2


Nc = 18.05
Nq = 8.66
Ny = 8.20

L' = Effective foundation Length = Lf-2(H*0.5R/V2)=1.49 m

Sq = 1+(sinɸ)*(B'/L') = 1.39
Sy = 1-0.3B/L = 0.7
Sc = (Sq*Nq-1)/(Nq-1 ) = 1.44

iq = [1-H/(V2+A'c'cotɸ')]m = 1.00 and 1.00
iɣ = [1-H/(V2+A'c'cotɸ')]m+1 = 0.99 and 0.99
ic = iq-(1-iq)/(Nc*tanɸ') = 1.00

α = The inclination of the foundation base to the horizontal= 0
foundation level
q' = ɣe*Df = 18 kN/m2
R2=A' (c'NcScicbc +q'Nqsqiqbq + 0.5ɣBNɣsɣiɣbɣ) = 655 kN > V2
III Calculated bearing resistance Ratio
Rb = V2/R2 = 0.10 < 1 OK
IV Calculated Allowable bearing Pressure
Qcalc. =R2/Ar = 293 kN/m2
30.0 kN/m2
30.6 kN/m
2
(Pmin.)
1.2m
(Pmax.)
P = Earth Bearing pressure;

B = Bpad = 1.5 m D = Dpad = 1.5 m
N = Total Vertical axial load = V2 = 68.2 kN
Geotech. Load Comb.
Maximum Lateral Force Along X-axis due to bearing loads; H
Reinforced H = 0.14 kN
Concrete Overturning moment Mo = H*0.5R = 0.19 kNm
Design, Bill
Mosley, John Eccentricity;e =Mo/V2 =
Bungey and
Ray Hulse, 7th If eccentricity;e = 0, P = N/BD Case1
Edition page
If eccentricity;e = < D/6, P = N/BD + 6M/BD2 Case2
285
If eccentricity;e = > D/6, P = 2N/BY Case 3
Eccentricity; e =Mo/V2 = 0.0028 m D/6 = 0.25 m
e= < D/6 Case 2
Length of positive contact; Y =3(D/2-e) = 2.241 m

Soil Allowable bearing pressure; Qcalc. = 293 kN/m2
Earth Bearing pressure; P = 30.3 + 0.3 kN/m2
Maximum pressure; Pmax. = 30.65 kN/m2
Minimum pressure; Pmin. = 30.0 kN/m2
NO BEARING CAPACITY FAILURE
Bearing Pressure Ratio = Pmax/Qcalc. = 0.105 < 1 OK
10.0 PEDESTAL REINFORCEMENT DESIGN
a Main Reinforcement
Since pedestal is designed as a braced column under the action of
axial compressive loads;
Total pedestal axial design load; NEd = 1.35Gk + 1.5Q### kN
Area of steel required ; As = 0.1NEd/0.87fyk or 0.002Ac, Which ever
is greater
As = 0.1NEd/0.87fyk = 9.19 mm2 0.002Ac = 405 mm2
Area required is taken as ------ 405 mm2
Provide 8 H 12 mm 905 mm2 > 405 mm2
b Links
Maximum spacings; r = 12*ɸ =144 mm --- use 175 mm c/c
Provide 6 H 10 mm link @ 175 mm c/c
11.0 PAD BASE REINFORCEMENT DESIGN
Column design axial load; V1 = 90.4 kN ultimate limit state load
Earth pressure =Ep = V1/Apad = 56.87 kN/m2
VRd,max = 0.5ud*{0.6(1-fck/250)}*fck/1.5 =1976 kN > V1
c Preliminary check for Punching shear:
Concise Critical perimeter of column, Crp =u + 4πd = 4866 mm
Eurocode 2 Area within critical perimeter =(800+4d)2-(4-π)(2d)2 1829353 mm2
table 7.1
Punching Shear force; VEd =Ep(Apad-Ap) = 24 kN
Width of critical criticla section for bending; Cs =
0.53 m
The moment at column face MEd = (Ep*Bpad*Cs)*Cs/2 =12 KNm
Ultimate moment in concrete, Mbal.=0.167fckBpadd2 =373 KNm

Concise Hence, Mbal > MEd Cs=0.2
Eurocode 2 K = MEd/(Bpad*d *fck) =

2
0.00527
Section 6.2.1 K' =0.167
Bpad =1.2

Concrete
Design, Z = d*(0.5+sqrt(0.25-K/1.134))
Bill Mosley,
and Ray Hulse,
7th Edition 0.95d--------- = 232 mm
tab. 6.8
Since Z > 0.95d, Hence; Z 232 mm
X = (d-Z)/0.45 = 27 mm
8 H 12 Bars @ 200 mm c/c Longitudina T&B

8 H 12 Bars @ 200 mm c/c Transverse T&B
Area of reinforcement provided; As.prov = 566 mm2
Numb of Transv bars reqd; NLr = Lpad -(2*C))/S =7 use 8 Nos.
Minimum steel area requirement = 100As/bd =0.15 > 0.26fctm/fyk
1.5 8 H 12 Bars @ 200 mm c/c
T&B
1.5
###
8 H 12 Bars @ 200 mm c/c T&B
300
1500

Shear resistance of the concrete; VRdc = vRdc*ud =199 kN > VEd
OK
1.5
Y= ###
Y 1.5
X= 0.281 , 1.0d= 0.244 m
Concise g Maximum bar spacing for crack control;

Eurocode 2 Steel stress; fs = (fyk(Gk+0.3Qk))/(1.15(1.35Gk+1.5Qk)) = 243 Nmm2
table 10.2 Maximum allowable bar spacing from tabls224 mm (interpolation)
Hence, bar spacing of 150 mm is adequate for crack control
h Maximum bar diameter for crack control;

Concise Steel stress; fs = (fyk(Gk+0.3Qk))/(1.15(1.35Gk+1.5Qk)) = 243 Nmm2
Eurocode 2 Maximum allowable bar size from table = ### mm (interpolation)
table 10.1 Hence, bar size o 12 mm is adequate for crack control
12.0 CHECK FOR STABILITY
DIAGRAM

A Overturning Check in x-direction
i factored Restoring Moment; Mr =Zx(Wrack + Wpedestal+ Wpad + Wbackfil)*rr
Wsupport = 12 kN
Wpedestal = 4.6 kN
Wpad = 16.9 kN
Wbackfill = 0 kN Ignore for maximum effect
Partial factor for resisting force: rr =0.9
Factored Resisting force; Wg = 30.4 Zx1 = 0.75 m
Resisting Moment from Restoring loads; Mr= Wg*Zx1### kNm
Overturning moment in x- direction;Mox = ruo*(WLpx*0.5Zy) 0.2
= kNm
Factor of safety against overturning; Fso =Mr/Mox =102 > 1.5
OK, There is no overturning in X-direction
B Overturning Check in z-direction

Overturning moment in z- direction;Moz = ruo*(WLpz*0.5Zy) 0.2
= kNm
Factor of safety against overturning; Fso =Mr/Moz =102 > 1.5
OK, There is no overturning in z-direction
13.0 CHECK FOR SETTLEMENT

qo = Intensity of contact pressure = V3/A' = 30 kN/m2
E =Young modulus = 24000 kNm2
Length of foundation; L' = 1.50 m Width; B' = 1.5 m
Steinbrenner Hs/B' = 3.37 ; Lf/Bf = ###

Matyas--1983
b Settlement in Silt
Hc; Depth of Silt layer = 3.5 m
mv = Volume compressibility for Silt layer = 0.00016 m2/kN
Depth of middle layer of silt; Hmc = 7.79 from grade
Htt from bottom of foundation to center line of Silt; Zm 6.79 m
Volume of Excavation; Vexc. =LF*BF*DF = 2.24 m 3
Volume of sandfill; Vfill. =LF*BF*hs = 13.51 m3 0.964

Weight of excavation; Wexc = Vexc * ɣe-fill = 40.26 kN 6.04759
Curves for Weight of sand fill on Silt layer; Wfill =Vfill * ɣe = 243.19 kN
Steinbrenner Gross Weight from foundation at SLS;V 66.2 kN
influence factor Net Weight; Wnet = (V3+Wfill)-Wexc. =269.14 kN
estimation from Net Pressure from Equivalent Loaded Area; Pnet=Wnet/A' =120 kN/m2
(mini)/(mi2+ni2+1)^0.5) = 0.012
((mi2+ni2+2)/(mi2+ni2+mi2+1)) = 1.93
m = Number of corners contributing to Settlement at center 4
Increase in pressure at center of clay; ẟ = IN*Pnet*m = 26 kNm2
Sc1 = Hc1*mv1*ẟ = 0.01
Total Settlement; S = Si +Sc = 1.33 mm

Accommodation Building

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Accommodation Building

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PROJEC T TITLE

EPCI OF 5.5KM X 24” OBIAFU/OBRIKOM TO OB3 CTMS

NIGERIAN NATIONAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION

OILSERV LIMITED/FRAZIMEX ENGINEERING LIMITED

R01 20-Feb-18 ISSUED FOR REVIEW KELVIN I. MAURICE N.

NIGERIAN NATIONAL PETROLEUM

Doc. No: OSL-NNPC-OB/OB-LX-C-EC-014 FRAZIMEX NO:FEL/NPC/OBOB/ CV/018

EMPLOYER: NIGERIAN NATIONAL

LOCATION OB/OB PLANT; OB/OB

NNPC-OB3-LOTB-P-DS-004 REV - A01

NIGERIAN NATIONAL PETROLEUM

LOCATION CTMS PLANT; CTMS

Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures - Part

EN 1992-1-1:2004 (E)-Sec 4.4. Nominal cover; cnom = cmin +∆cdev = 15 + 10 = 25

General Loading condition

EPCI OF 5.5KM X 24” OBIAFU / OBRIKOM TO OB3 CTMS GAS PIPELINE

LOCATION CTMS PLANT; CTMS

EPCI OF 5.5KM X 24” OBIAFU / OBRIKOM TO OB3 CTMS GAS PIPELINE

LOCATION CTMS PLANT; CTMS

MEMBER REF. CALCULATION

Roof Slab Moment And Shear Analysis ---- Section XX

1.00 4.7 1.00

SH and BM At section 1 < x < 5.700

LOCATION CTMS PLANT; CTMS

V2.6255= 0.0 kN M2.656 = 24.7 kNm

SH and BM At section 5.700 < x < 6.700

SHEAR FORCE DIAGRAM

BENDING MOMENT DIAGRAM

ROOF SLAB REINFORCEMENT DESIGN

LOCATION CTMS PLANT; CTMS

ii Reinforcement for Span Section

ROOF SLAB DEFLECTION CHECK

ii Deflection for span Section

Beam TYP.1 Assumed Beam size 450 X 225 mm

LOCATION CTMS PLANT; CTMS

Note: ULS Slab load is inclusive of live load

BENDING MOMENT DIADRAM

Assumed bar dia of = 16 mm Assumed link dia = 8

Bungey and Ray Minimum Reinforcement A =0.26*f /f * b d=

DIST 0.0 2.4 4.7

SFD ### 0.0 ###

Assuming angle θ = 22 0 , cot θ = 2.6

LOCATION CTMS PLANT; CTMS

EPCI OF 5.5KM X 24” OBIAFU / OBRIKOM TO OB3 CTMS GAS PIPELINE

LOCATION CTMS PLANT; CTMS

MEMBER REF. CALCULATION

BENDING MOMENT DIAGRAM

SHEAR FORCE DIAGRAM

LOCATION CTMS PLANT; CTMS

Edition Provide 3 H 10 mm 236 mm2 top, as hanger bars

SHEAR FORCE DIAGRAM

EPCI OF 5.5KM X 24” OBIAFU / OBRIKOM TO OB3 CTMS GAS PIPELINE

PLINTH BEAM Beam size 450 X 225 mm

Assumed bar dia of = 12 mm Assumed link dia = 8

LOCATION CTMS PLANT; CTMS

SHEAR FORCE DIAGRAM

Assuming angle θ = 22 0 , cot θ = 2.47473

EPCI OF 5.5KM X 24” OBIAFU / OBRIKOM TO OB3 CTMS GAS PIPELINE

LOCATION CTMS PLANT; CTMS

EPCI OF 5.5KM X 24” OBIAFU / OBRIKOM TO OB3 CTMS GAS PIPELINE

LOCATION CTMS PLANT; CTMS

COL. TYP. 1 Column Size = 225 x 225 mm x 4.3 m

COL. TYPE 1 is B- Axial

Bungey and Ray Minimum Reinforcement A =0.26f /f b d=

Eurocode 2 K = MEd/(Bpadd fck) =