Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MATHEMATICS
7357/3 - PAPER 3
Mark scheme
7357
June 2018
Mark schemes are prepared by the Lead Assessment Writer and considered, together with the relevant
questions, by a panel of subject teachers. This mark scheme includes any amendments made at the
standardisation events which all associates participate in and is the scheme which was used by them in
this examination. The standardisation process ensures that the mark scheme covers the students’
responses to questions and that every associate understands and applies it in the same correct way.
As preparation for standardisation each associate analyses a number of students’ scripts. Alternative
answers not already covered by the mark scheme are discussed and legislated for. If, after the
standardisation process, associates encounter unusual answers which have not been raised they are
required to refer these to the Lead Assessment Writer.
It must be stressed that a mark scheme is a working document, in many cases further developed and
expanded on the basis of students’ reactions to a particular paper. Assumptions about future mark
schemes on the basis of one year’s document should be avoided; whilst the guiding principles of
assessment remain constant, details will change, depending on the content of a particular examination
paper.
AO Description
AO3.2b Where appropriate, evaluate the accuracy and limitations of solutions to problems
3
MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL MATHEMATICS – 7357/3 – JUNE 2018
General
If a student uses a method which is not explicitly covered by the marking instructions the same
principles of marking should be applied. Credit should be given to any valid methods. Examiners should
seek advice from their senior examiner if in any doubt.
4
MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL MATHEMATICS – 7357/3 – JUNE 2018
No Method Shown
Where the question specifically requires a particular method to be used, we must usually see
evidence of use of this method for any marks to be awarded.
Where the answer can be reasonably obtained without showing working and it is very unlikely that the
correct answer can be obtained by using an incorrect method, we must award full marks. However,
the obvious penalty to students showing no working is that incorrect answers, however close, earn no
marks.
Where a question asks the student to state or write down a result, no method need be shown for full
marks.
Where the permitted calculator has functions which reasonably allow the solution of the question
directly, the correct answer without working earns full marks, unless it is given to less than the
degree of accuracy accepted in the mark scheme, when it gains no marks.
Diagrams
Diagrams that have working on them should be treated like normal responses. If a diagram has been
written on but the correct response is within the answer space, the work within the answer space
should be marked. Working on diagrams that contradicts work within the answer space is not to be
considered as choice but as working, and is not, therefore, penalised.
Erased or crossed out work that is still legible and has not been replaced should be marked. Erased
or crossed out work that has been replaced can be ignored.
Choice
When a choice of answers and/or methods is given and the student has not clearly indicated which
answer they want to be marked, mark positively, awarding marks for all of the student's best attempts.
Withhold marks for final accuracy and conclusions if there are conflicting complete answers or when an
incorrect solution (or part thereof) is referred to in the final answer.
5
MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL MATHEMATICS – 7357/3 – JUNE 2018
Total 3
6
MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL MATHEMATICS – 7357/3 – JUNE 2018
7
MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL MATHEMATICS – 7357/3 – JUNE 2018
f '( x) = ( 2x − 2)
3
2
OE
( 2x − 2)
x−2
=
Obtains correct derivative in AO1.1b A1
( 2x − 2)
3
2
unsimplified form
( 2 x − 2 ) ( 2 x − 2 ) − 3 ( x − 2 ) =
1
Gives a valid reason for rejecting AO2.4 E1 2
0
x = 1, or cancels factor of
( 2x − 2) ( 4 − x ) =
1
(2x – 2) 1/2
stating x ≠ 1.
2
0
=x 1=
or x 4
Tests either side of ‘their’ x = 4 AO1.1a M1
x ≠ 1 because of domain
Completes rigorous argument to AO2.1 R1
1
conclude they have one point of f '' ( 3=) >0
inflection 32
Do not award this mark if 2nd E1 − 2
mark not awarded f='' ( 5 ) <0
256
Therefore point of inflection at x=4
6(d) Deduces values of x for convex AO2.2a B1 1< x < 4
section of graph
Total 13
8
MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL MATHEMATICS – 7357/3 – JUNE 2018
9
MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL MATHEMATICS – 7357/3 – JUNE 2018
∫ AO1.1a M1 =−u 4 + c
3
Obtains k u du correctly
− cos 4 2θ + c
=
PI by solution in form k cos 2θ , if
4
by inspection
Obtains −u 4 or − cos 4 2θ OE AO1.1b A1F
Only FT value of a
Completes rigorous argument to AO2.1 R1
obtain − cos 4 2θ + c OE
Total 9
10
MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL MATHEMATICS – 7357/3 – JUNE 2018
9(c) Explains that the model would have AO3.5c E1 The total length will now include an
to include an additional 3 mm for additional 3 mm for each tile.
each tile The total length will not have an
Explains that the total length will AO3.5a E1 upper limit.
not have an upper limit
Or
The total length may now exceed
3.5w
Total 7
11
MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL MATHEMATICS – 7357/3 – JUNE 2018
12
MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL MATHEMATICS – 7357/3 – JUNE 2018
13
MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL MATHEMATICS – 7357/3 – JUNE 2018
Shows AO2.1 R1
P( studies Physics) × P( studies Geography ) 4 1
= P( studies Physics ∩ studies Geography ) P( P ∩ G ) = =
24 6
and correctly concludes that the Hence P ( P ) × P (G ) =P ( P ∩ G )
events are independent
or
Therefore events are independent
Shows that the appropriate
conditional probability is equal to
P ( studies Geography ) or
P ( studies Physics ) and correctly
concludes that the events are
independent
14(b) Uses conditional probability to AO3.1b M1 𝑃𝑃(𝑀𝑀 ∩ 𝐵𝐵)=𝑃𝑃(𝑀𝑀) × 𝑃𝑃(𝐵𝐵|𝑀𝑀)
calculate 𝑃𝑃(𝑀𝑀 ∩ 𝐵𝐵) 1 3 3
= × =
Obtains the correct value of AO1.1b A1 5 8 40
𝑃𝑃(𝑀𝑀 ∩ 𝐵𝐵) 𝑃𝑃(𝑀𝑀) + 𝑃𝑃(𝐵𝐵) − 𝑃𝑃(𝑀𝑀 ∩ 𝐵𝐵)
Uses the addition rule to calculate AO1.1a M1 1 1 3
= + −
𝑃𝑃(𝑀𝑀 ∪ 𝐵𝐵) 5 6 40
Obtains the correct value of AO1.1b A1
7
=
𝑃𝑃(𝑀𝑀 ∪ 𝐵𝐵) 24
Total 6
14
MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL MATHEMATICS – 7357/3 – JUNE 2018
𝑃𝑃(𝑋𝑋 ≥ 2) = 0.224
15
MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL MATHEMATICS – 7357/3 – JUNE 2018
16
MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL MATHEMATICS – 7357/3 – JUNE 2018
Accept H0
There is not sufficient evidence
that Suzanne’s new racket has
made a difference
17
MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL MATHEMATICS – 7357/3 – JUNE 2018
TOTAL 100
18