Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mathematics
Paper 2
Mark scheme
Version 1.0
Mark schemes are prepared by the Lead Assessment Writer and considered, together with the
relevant questions, by a panel of subject teachers. This mark scheme has been prepared for practice
papers and has not, therefore, been through the process of standardising that would take place for
live papers.
If a student uses a method which is not explicitly covered by the marking instructions the same
principles of marking should be applied. Credit should be given to any valid methods. Examiners
should seek advice from their senior examiner if in any doubt.
No method shown
Where the question specifically requires a particular method to be used, we must usually see
evidence of use of this method for any marks to be awarded.
Where the answer can be reasonably obtained without showing working and it is very unlikely that the
correct answer can be obtained by using an incorrect method, we must award full marks. However,
the obvious penalty to candidates showing no working is that incorrect answers, however close, earn
no marks.
Where a question asks the candidate to state or write down a result, no method need be shown for
full marks.
Where the permitted calculator has functions which reasonably allow the solution of the question
directly, the correct answer without working earns full marks, unless it is given to less than the
degree of accuracy accepted in the mark scheme, when it gains no marks.
Diagrams
Diagrams that have working on them should be treated like normal responses. If a diagram has been
written on but the correct response is within the answer space, the work within the answer space
should be marked. Working on diagrams that contradicts work within the answer space is not to be
considered as choice but as working, and is not, therefore, penalised.
Erased or crossed out work that is still legible and has not been replaced should be marked. Erased
or crossed out work that has been replaced can be ignored.
Choice
When a choice of answers and/or methods is given and the student has not clearly indicated which
answer they want to be marked, only the last complete attempt should be awarded marks.
MARK SCHEME – AS MATHEMATICS – PAPER 2 – PRACTICE PAPERS SET 1
Total 1
Total 1
NMS = 3 marks
Total 3
Total 5
Version 1.0 5 of 17
MARK SCHEME – AS MATHEMATICS – PAPER 2 – PRACTICE PAPERS SET 1
Total 3
a=4
Total 1
Total 6
Version 1.0 6 of 17
MARK SCHEME – AS MATHEMATICS – PAPER 2 – PRACTICE PAPERS SET 1
Total 4
( p − 1) + ( p + 10 ) = ( p − 5 ) + ( p + 2 )
2 2 2 2
Total 4
Version 1.0 7 of 17
MARK SCHEME – AS MATHEMATICS – PAPER 2 – PRACTICE PAPERS SET 1
Total 5
Version 1.0 8 of 17
MARK SCHEME – AS MATHEMATICS – PAPER 2 – PRACTICE PAPERS SET 1
Total 1
x4 7 x2
∫ (x − 7 x + 6 ) dx = − + 6x + c
3
7 (b) Integrates each term – at AO1.1a M1
least two terms correct 4 2
Total 2
∫
2
integrals with correct limits ( x 3 − 7 x + 6 ) dx =
−0.75
1
Total 4
Version 1.0 9 of 17
MARK SCHEME – AS MATHEMATICS – PAPER 2 – PRACTICE PAPERS SET 1
Total 1
1
dV −
Differentiates the AO1.1a M1 = −3000t 2
expression for V dt
AO1.1b A1 –1500
Substitutes t = 4 into ‘their’
derivative to obtain the
required value
Total 3
8 (a)(iii) Interprets the model AO3.2a E1F After 4 years the value of the car is
correctly to state the value £6000
of the car, after 4 years
It is depreciating by £1500 per year after
4 years have elapsed
Interprets the model AO3.2a E1F
correctly to state the rate
of change of the value
after 4 years, including
units
Total 2
When t = 4, V = 6000
Substitutes t = 4, ‘their’ a AO3.4 M1 18 000b −4 = 6000
and ‘their’ value of V at t =
1
4 from (a)(ii) to form an b −4 =
equation 3
b =3
4
Total 3
Version 1.0 10 of 17
MARK SCHEME – AS MATHEMATICS – PAPER 2 – PRACTICE PAPERS SET 1
8 (c) States with a reason which AO3.5a E1 The second model is likely to be the
model is better better model.
Total 2
Version 1.0 11 of 17
MARK SCHEME – AS MATHEMATICS – PAPER 2 – PRACTICE PAPERS SET 1
Total 4
Version 1.0 12 of 17
MARK SCHEME – AS MATHEMATICS – PAPER 2 – PRACTICE PAPERS SET 1
d 2 A 800 10π
= +
Finds the correct value AO1.1b A1F dr 2 r3 3
of h d2 A
When r = 3.4, >0
dr 2
Hence it is a minimum value
Uses the second AO1.1a M1
derivative or investigates
the gradient around
r = 3.4
Total 7
9 (c) States one limitation of the AO3.5b E1 The thickness of the material has not
model and comments on been taken into account so the
the accuracy of their dimensions are smaller than they would
answer be in reality.
Total 2
Version 1.0 13 of 17
MARK SCHEME – AS MATHEMATICS – PAPER 2 – PRACTICE PAPERS SET 1
Total 1
Total 1
Total 1
Total 3
Total 1
Version 1.0 14 of 17
MARK SCHEME – AS MATHEMATICS – PAPER 2 – PRACTICE PAPERS SET 1
13 (a) Deduces the graph shows AO2.5 E1 The graph shows negative correlation
negative correlation between purchases of low calorie soft
drinks and not low calorie soft drinks
Total 2
13 (b) Infers that Charlotte is not AO2.2b E1 Charlotte is incorrect because a scatter
correct with an graph does not show a trend over a
explanation. given time period
Total 2
Total 4
Version 1.0 15 of 17
MARK SCHEME – AS MATHEMATICS – PAPER 2 – PRACTICE PAPERS SET 1
2
10 p 3 (1 − p ) = 5 p 4 (1 − p ) p =
2
Total 1
Total 1
Version 1.0 16 of 17
MARK SCHEME – AS MATHEMATICS – PAPER 2 – PRACTICE PAPERS SET 1
Assumption 2:
States second correct AO3.3 E1 Probability of flowering yellow is constant
assumption in terms of from seed to seed
validity of the binomial
model in context Assumption 3:
There are only two possible states ‘flower
yellow’ or ‘not flower yellow’
Total 2
16 (b) States both hypotheses AO2.5 B1 X is ‘No of seeds that flower yellow’
correctly for a one-tailed H0: p = 0.9 H1: p < 0.9
test
Reject H0
Compares to significance AO3.5a M1
level of test There is sufficient evidence to suggest
that the garden centre is overstating the
proportion of seeds that flower yellow.
Infers H0 is rejected AO2.2b A1F
Total 6
TOTAL 80
Version 1.0 17 of 17