You are on page 1of 9

ZCSPC Mission, Vision and Department Goals

INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES


After studying this lesson, you are expected to :

 Relate the Vision and Mission of the college to the real life
situation as well as to their area of field specialization.

 Explain the importance of ZCSPC’s vision and mission.

INTRODUCTION

Every institution whether educational, government, public and private ones


has its own Mission and Vision that defines their purpose and direction to
employees, clienteles, vendors and other stakeholders. Below are the
Vision, Mission, Institutional Outcomes and Core Values of Zamboanga City
State Polytechnic College.

Source: https://www.zcspc.edu.ph/vision-and-mission/
ACTIVITY

QUICK WRITE:

Interpret the meaning of the ZCPSC’s Mission.


________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
_
_______________________________________________________________
_
_______________________________________________________________
_
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
_______________________

What is the relevance of the ZCSPC’s Vision to your field of expertise/course?


________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
_
_______________________________________________________________
_
_______________________________________________________________
_
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
_
_______________________________________________________________
_
_______________________________________________________________
_
_______________________________________________________________
_
________________________________________________________________
_________________________________

MODULE 1: SCIENCE COMMUNICATION OVERVIEW


I

Lesson 1.1
TITLE: What is Science Communication?

INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES


After studying this module, you are expected to:

 Discuss the true meaning of Science Communication and its uses.


 Differentiate various concepts Science education and various
terminologies.

 Examine the aims of Science Communication.

INTRODUCTION

It’s easy to get blinded by public engagement possibilities. You could write a
vlog, perform a nerdy pub night, join a debate on a science festival, be a guest
on a podcast, or run a table pop demo on an open day. If you haven’t asked to
do a specific event and you are keen to try some science communication, how
on Earth do you choose what to do? This module will give you an idea on how to
talk about science with the public. It is very helpful on practicing scientist and it is
also for anyone interested in Science Communication.

ACTIVITY

QUICK WRITE: Name at least 5 YouTube vlogger, TV host, Radio Commentator or


writer.
1. ____________________
2. ____________________
3. ____________________

4. ____________________
5. ____________________

ANALYSIS

LET’S COMPARE:
Among the 5 communicators you mentioned above, choose
only one and write anything about him and his topic that catches your interest.
Discuss why he was able to get your attention. Write it on the space provided
below.
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________

ABSTRACTION

Science Communication

- Science communication is the practice of informing, educating, sharing


wonderment, and raising awareness of science-related topics. Science
communicators and audiences are ambiguously defined and the expertise and
level of science knowledge varies with each group (en.wikipedia.org)

Other definition of Science Communication

- sharing ongoing discoveries and energy for science

- increasing open valuation for science


- increasing information and comprehension of science

- influencing the sentiments, strategy inclinations or conduct of individuals, and

- ensuring that an assorted variety of points of view about science held by various
gatherings is viewed as when answers for cultural issues are sought after

Two Paradigms of Science Communication

1. Dissemination Paradigm

- Dissemination worldview considers science to be as an issue of (effectively)


sending data about science from logical specialists to general society.

- The most unmistakable perspectives expect that the transmission is to be


effectuated through training in a proper school setting or (re)education through broad
communications

- The ramifications of the attention on formal training remembers the inception for
some nations of broad updates of public science educational programs

- Implications of the emphasis on scattering through the broad communications


incorporate the creation of well-known science books, TV narratives, science
magazines and, all the more as of late, correspondence through science web journals
and sites

2. Public Participation Paradigm

Public interest worldview is on encouraging two-way correspondence, that is, discourse


and (some of the time) consideration between the general population, specialists and
strategy producers

- Numerous methods of doing so have been recommended, extending from


recognizable methodologies, for example, formal reviews and choices, to the maybe
less natural methodologies, for example, Science Shops, Scenario Workshops, Citizens
Juries, Planning Cells, Deliberative Polling, and numerous others.

- In request to give a more clear image of how a portion of the models having a
place with this worldview are organized and how differing they can be, we will quickly
audit two paradigmatic instances of models authorized by this worldview, specifically
Citizens Science and Consensus Conferences (frontiersin.org, 2019). Science
Communication Aims (Kappel and Holmen, 2019)

a. Improving the populaces convictions about science

b. Generating social acknowledgment

c. Generating open epistemic and good trust

d. Collect resident’s contribution about worthy/advantageous examination points


and utilizations of science

e. Generating political help for science

f. Collect and utilize nearby information

g. Make utilization of circulated information or intellectual assets to be found in the


populace.

h. Enhance the majority rule authenticity of financing, administration and use of


science or explicit sections of science.

APPLICATION

TIME FOR IDEAS:

Briefly discuss the essence of the 8 aims of science


communication
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
_____________________________

Differentiate the two paradigm of science communication on the basis of


transmission and implication to the audience.
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
_______________

RUBRIC
Description
Score Understanding Strategies Thinking Skills
Understanding of Uses effective Uses logical thinking
4 concept is clearly strategies to get to arrive at
evident accurate results conclusion

Understanding of the Uses appropriate Shows thinking skills


3 concept is evident strategies to arrive to arrive at
at a result conclusion
Has limited
understanding of a Uses strategies Attempts to show
2
concept that are ineffective thinking skills

Has a complete lack of


understanding of Makes no attempt Shows no
1
concept to use a strategy understanding

UNIT SUMMARY

The point of this exercise has been to step toward creating scientific
classification of points of science correspondence endeavors and consequently
looking over the observational writing to explore whether these points are
reached by and by.
- That would we say we is, have endeavored to respond to the inquiries
additionally presented in the title of the paper: why take part in science
correspondence, and accomplishes it work? To do as such, we initially
distinguished two totally different standards of science correspondence by
concentrating on the methods of correspondence authorized by various science
correspondence models.
- Models having a place with what we named the scattering worldview of
science correspondence utilize single direction transmission of logical data, while
the method of correspondence authorized by what we named the open
investment worldview is two-or multi-way correspondence.
- We then inspected the science correspondence writing concentrating on
the express or understood points clung to by researchers and experts, conveying
models from the two standards and afterward dissected these points utilizing
standard ideas from epistemology and political way of thinking.
- We found that utilizing this methodology made conceivable an all the more
fine-grained differentiation between the points and how they might be coolly
related than is generally found in the science correspondence writing. With these
points close by, we at that point went to the exact writing trying to decide if these
points could be said to have been reached practically speaking by models having
a place with both of the two observed standards.

You might also like