Professional Documents
Culture Documents
* The data reported in this paper are taken from the dissertation pre-
sented by Verz R. Goddard in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the
degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Yale University, 1927.
r He showed that ricin neutralized by antiricin would not agglutinate
rabbit corpuscles in a test-tube. From quantitative work, he concluded
that this neutralization followed the law of multiple proportions.
2 A detailed summary of the principal plant sources which have been
investigated with reference to the occurrence of hemagglutinins and of the
animal species furnishing the blood corpuscles tested is included in the
dissertation of Verz R. Goddard, Yale University, 1927.
417
TAI3LlG I.
Measure of Agglutinating Activity.
1926 VW.
Mar. 14 0.0004
“ 15 0.0006
(‘ 18 0.0006
“ 24 0.0006
“ 31 0.0006
Apr. 9 0.0005
“ 9 0.0006
“ 12 0.0005
The hemagglutinin was added to 0.5 cc. portions of a 2.5 per cent suspen-
sion of washed, rabbit erythrocytes in a total volume of 1 cc.
TABLE II.
Agglutinability of Erythrocytes of Different Species.
1923 mg.
Mar. 15 Rabbit. 0.0006
“ 28 Man. 0.0007
“ 30 “ 0.0008
“ 31 I‘ 0.0007
Apr. 13 ‘I 0.0007
Mar. 20 Duck. 0.0008
Apr. 15 Dog. 0.0008
8‘ 15 “ 0.0008
“ 29 “ 0.0009
“ 29 Mouse. 0.002
May 4 “ 0.002
(‘ 9 Rat. 0.003
Mar. 20 Chicken. 0.006
“
Apr. 17 0.006
“ 17 ‘< 0.006
To 0.5 cc. portions of 2.5 per cent suspensions of the washed erythrocytes
in isotonic sodium chloride were added 0.5 cc. portions of isotonic sodium
chloride containing the quantity of hcmagglutinin to be tested.
V. R. Goddard and L. B. Mendel 453
mg.
0.05 - - -
0.06 + - -
0.07 -
+ +
0.08 + + -
0.09 + + -
TABLE IV.
Inhibitory Influence of Serum upon Hemagglutination.
- 7-
I Winimum effec-
Kind of
Suspension. erythrocytes. 1,ive quantity of
agglutinin.
_-
vol. per cent cc. w.
2.5 Rabbit. None. 0.0006
2.5 “ Rabbit. 0.012 0.002
2.5 “ Turtle. 0.012 0.006
5.0 “ Rabbit. 0.025 0.003
5.0 Duck. None. 0.0008
5.0 “ Duck. 0.025 0.002
5.0 “ Hen. 0.025 0.006
- -
0.5 cc. portions of a suspension of washed corpuscles were used in a total
volume of 1 cc. with and without additions of equal volumes of serum, the
suspension being diluted with isotonic saline solution to a total volume of
1 cc. Before dilution to final volume, serum was added in a proportion
equivalent to the actual volume of the corpuscles.
begin at 68”, but the greater part of the coagulable protein sepa-
rated out between 75” and 81”. The filtrate from the coagulum
at the higher temperature, showed a greatly lowered potency to
agglutinate rabbit erythrocytes. At 100” coagulation became so
complete that no agglutinating power remained. Heating the
dry preparation to the same temperature was without influence
upon solubility or potency of the material unless the heating
TABLE VI.
Minimum effective
quantityt;;iemagglu-
mg.
Untreated protein..................................... 0.0008
0.0008
Dissolved in pepsin-HCl and neutralized at once.. . .
i 0.0007
After 1 hr. digestion.. ... .. ... ... ... ... .. .. 0.002
‘L
14 hrs. “ . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... ... ... ... . 0.004
“ 3 days “ . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... ... .... ... 0.007
“ 6 “ “ . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... ... .... ... Activity lost.
To 0.1 gm. portions of the protein weighed out exactly and placed in
test-tubes were added 2 cc. of 0.1 N HCI solution and 2 cc. of 1 per cent
pepsin solution with 2 cc. of water. The tubes were stoppered and incu-
bated in a constant temperature water bath at 37.5” for the periods of time
indicated in the summary. At the end of the incubation period, the solu-
tion was exactly neutralized by adding the calculated quantity of sodium
hydroxide. The sodium chloride content was increased to make the solu-
tion exactly isotonic to rabbit erythrocytes after dilution to 20 cc. with
water. Further dilutions were made with isotonic sodium chloride and the
agglutinating potency of the preparations with rabbit erythrocytes were
determined by the method already outlined. The minimum effective
weight of hemagglutinin was expressed in terms of dry weight of the protein
before digestion.
apparent effect upon the protein. When 0.1 gm. portions were
treated with 1 cc. of 0.1 N hydrochloric acid and neutralized within
5 minutes, solubility and agglutinating potency were unaffected.
Upon longer exposures, the protein gradually separated out in an
insoluble form with an accompanying loss in agglutinating value.
Thus after 3 days exposure to 0.1 N hydrochloric acid, the requi-
site weight of protein for clumping a given volume of erythrocyte
suspension was increased to 5 times the amount required before
the exposure to acid.
Peptic Digestion.-This also destroys the agglutinating po-
tency. Hemagglutinating protein was dissolved in pepsin-HCI.
When the solution was immediately neutralized no change in the
minimum effective hemagglutinating dose of the protein could be
detected. With the progress of digestion, however, the agglutinat-
ing activit,y of the solution was lowered; and at the end of a
considerable period of incubation, it seemed to be entirely lost.
The preceding summary of protocols (Table VI) illustrates these
observations.
Date of Kind of
experiment. erytbrooyte. For 3
successive
portions.
Practical Considerations.
Berczeller, L., and Wastl, H., Biochem. Z., 142, 524 (1923).
Coulter, C. B., J. Gen. Physiol., 3,309 (1920).
Dorset, M., andHenley, R. R., J. Agric. Research, 6, 333 (1916).
Ehrlich, P., Fortschr. Med., 15,41 (1897).
Eisler, M., and Portheim, L., 2. Immunitiitsforsch., Orig., 1, 151 (1909).
Eisler, M., and Portheim, L., Ber. deutsch. bot. Ges., 29,419 (1911).
Eisler, M., and Portheim, L., Centr. Bakt., 1. AU., Orig., 66, 309 (1912).
Eisler, M., and Portheim, L., 2. Immunitiitsforsch., 47,59 (1926).
Gardner, A. D., Lancet, 1,21 (1919).
Gates, F. L., J. Am. Med. Assn., 77,2054 (1921).
Gates, F. L., J. Ezp. Med., 35, 63 (1922).
Hadley, P., J. Immunol., 2, 463 (1916).
Karrer, P., Smirnoff, A. P., Ehrensperger, H., van Slooten, J., and Keller,
M., 2. physiol. Chem., 135, 129 (1924).
Kobert, R., Lehrbuch der Intoxikationen, Stuttgart (1902).
Kolmer, J. A., Infection, immunity and biological therapy, Philadelphia
and London (1923).
Kraus, R., and Levaditi, C., Handbuch der Technik und Methodik der
Immunitatsforschung, Jena (1911).
Landsteiner, K., and Raubitschek, H., Centr. Bakt., f. AU., Orig., 46,
660 (1908).
Marcusson-Begun, H., 2. Immunittitsforsch., 46,49 (1926).
Mend& L. B., Arch. Jisiol., 7, 168 (1909).
Mudd, S., J. Immunol., 13, 113 (1927).
V. R. Goddard and L. B. Mendel 463
Osborne, T. B., Mendel, L. B., and Harris, I. F., Am. J. Physiol., 14, 259
(1905).
Rona, P., and Gyiirgy, P., Biochem. Z., 106,120 (1920).
Russ, V. K., and Oesterlin, E., Biochem. Z., 114,258 (1921).
Schneider, E. C., J. Biol. Chem., 11, 47 (1912).
Wells, H. G., The chemical aspects of immunity, New York (1925).
Wienhaus, O., Biochem. Z., 18,228 (1909).