Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hydropower has been officially declared a renewable energy source in the UN Summit on
Sustainable Development in Johannesburg 2002 (IHA, 2004 a). Third world Water Forum
in Kyoto in March 2003 acknowledged “the role of hydropower as one of the renewable
and clean energy sources and that its potential should be realized in an environmentally
sustainable and socially acceptable manner” (WWC and IHA, 2003). However, it has to be
acknowledged that the recognition of hydropower as a legitimate renewable energy
resource has been questioned by a number of influential interest groups. In the lead up to
International Conference for Renewable Energies 2004 in Bonn for example, there had
been a concern that hydropower would not be recognized as renewal energy resources on
the grounds that new hydro projects would be unlikely to meet pre-requisite WCD
guidelines (Peter Rae, 2005).
However, the Political Declaration made at the conclusion of International Conference for
Renewable Energies 2004 in Bonn gave recognition to hydropower as a renewable energy
resource, and further went on to estimate that up to 1 billion people could be given access
to energy services from renewable resources-including hydropower. Ministers and
Government representatives from 154 countries gathered from June 1 st to 4th, 2004 in Bonn
(Germany) and political declaration signed in Bonn, identifies hydropower as one of the
renewable technologies.
Reservoirs are man-made structures and considered as important water bodies that are
primarily used to collect, store, and save water behind dams and manage water that is
essential to fulfill basic human needs and requirements. Water stored in reservoirs are
essential for all forms of life and serves several different functions that mainly include
drinking and industrial uses, hydropower generation, irrigation and water supply, and
flood control (Palmieri, et al., 2003).
Currently sedimentation is one of the major issues to deal with, for professionals, as it
causes continuous loss of storage and hinder the intended purposes of a dam. More
research and case-specific studies are required to understand the behavior of sediment
transport mechanism in order to propose remedial measures. Morris and Fan (1997)
provided different criteria of sustainability of new and existing reservoirs. The
sustainability criteria suggested for new reservoirs is to design for a minimum of 1000
years of operation. This may be accomplished by balancing sediment inflow and outflow, by
providing 1000 years of sediment storage capacity, or some combination thereof.
The current practice of design and operation of the hydropower assumes a “design life” for
projects, which implies that the project has a beginning and an end. This approach in dam
and reservoir design, which assumes that over the course of its life, a water resources
project would recover investment costs through the benefits generated by the projects.
This approach does not take into account what happens to the project at the end of its
design life and it is assumed that problems with reservoir sedimentation and eventual
retirement will be addressed by future generations. This flaw can be corrected by
implementing the Reservoir Life Cycle Management approach (Annandale, 2002; Palmieri,
2003; Palmieri et al., 2003).
A fundamental assumption in the Reservoir Life Cycle Management concept is that natural
resources should be used in a sustainable manner. The life cycle of a dam or reservoir
should be used as the general frame work for sediment management studies (Annandale,
2002; Palmieri, 2003).
This linear concept or beginning and an end concept of the project (See Figure 6.1) assume
that the resources will not be used in a sustainable manner. Once it has been decided how
long the design life would be, say 50, 75 or 100 years, the project is planned, constructed,
operated and maintained for that period of time. Conventionally the economic evaluation of
such project did not account for the cost of decommissioning/replacing from the economic
assessment clearly ignores inter-generational equity (Palmieri, 2003; Palmieri et al., 2003).
Such costs are borne by future generations. This has been the practice on most, if not all,
projects that have been conceived using the design life approach.
The ultimate goal of the reservoir life cycle management approach is sustainable use,
where the major functions of the dam are maintained, through good management and
maintenance, in perpetuity. This approach contains the same elements as the design
approach but arranged in a circular fashion, indicating perpetual use of the infrastructure
(see Figure 6.2).
Although life cycle management approach promotes the use of sustainable management
approaches, it may in some cases not be feasible to manage facilities in a sustainable
manner. When it is not possible to manage a dam and reservoir in a sustainable manner it
is recommended to create and maintain a financial instrument that will accumulate funds
to pay for the decommissioning and/or replacement of such facilities (Palmieri, 2003;
Palmieri et al., 2003). The idealization of the life cycle management approach shown in
Figure 6.2 cannot necessarily be applied to all projects, especially not most existing dams
and reservoirs, because they have not been designed to effectively manage reservoir
sedimentation. If at all possible, existing water resources infrastructure should be
refurbished to allow reservoir sediment management (Palmieri et al., 2003).