2020 2nd International Conference on Industrial Electrical and Electronics (ICIEE)

5G NR Planning at Frequency 3.5 GHz : Study

Case in Indonesia Industrial Area
Rai Nur Esa
Telecommunication Engineering
Institut Teknologi Telkom Purwokerto
Purwokerto, Indonesia
Raynuresa@gmail.com
Alfin Hikmaturokhman
Telecommunication Engineering
Institut Teknologi Telkom Purwokerto
Purwokerto, Indonesia
alfin@ittelkom-pwt.ac.id
Achmad Rizal Danisya
Telecommunication Engineering
Institut Teknologi Telkom Purwokerto
Purwokerto, Indonesia
achmad rizal@ittelkom-pwt.ac.id

Abstract—This research used the 5G NR network planning
with the frequency of 3.5 GHz simulated using the Mentum
Planet 7.2.1 software with the planning method in the coverage
side by employing a case study in Pulogadung industrial zone
with a total area of 5 km2 . This planning used the 5G NR
planning method with the propagation model in accordance
with the plan, that is, UMa (Urban Macro – Street canyon)
model based on the standard of 3GPP TR 38.901, using 8
design scenarios for the uplink; and downlink; outdoor-to-
outdoor (O2O) and outdoor-to-indoor (O2I); line of sight (LOS)
and non-line of sight (NLOS) conditions. The simulation result
showed that the design with the downlink scenario required more
sites to fulfill the area services that the uplink scenario since
influenced by the link budget parameter, that is, the value of
interference margin downlink which is greater than that of the
uplink margin interference; From all scenario parameters of SS-
RSRP observed, scenario 1 (downlink-O2O-LOS) had the highest
average SS-RSRP of -92.95 dBm and the lowest average SS-RSRP
resulted from the scenario 2 (uplink-O2O-LOS) of -97.16 dBm.
The average SS-RSRP value was influenced by the number of
sites covering the planning areas that scenario 1 had the highest
SS-RSRP parameter.
Index Terms—5G Network Planning, Coverage area, Frequency
of 3.5 GHz, Link Budget 5G, Mentum Planet
I. I NTRODUCTION
Nowadays, the needs on technology have developed rapidly
characterized by the changes from voice communication to
data communication due to the increasing needs of customers
on big data services encouraging the Third Generation Part-
nership Project (3GPP) to develop the 5G New Radio (5G NR)
technology. Unlike cellular network of the previous generation,
the 5G cellular network supports the audio system and network
architecture with extreme connectivity of broadband, ultra-
robust, low latency, and internet of things. This fifth gener-
ation technology is planned to be officially released for the
operational system in 2020 and then commercialized for some
developed countries, such as US, Japan, Europe, and China.
Some developed countries have made some preparations and
trials to implement the technology. As a developing country,
Indonesia is one of the highest internet cellular users that
this development technology roadmap becomes an important
subject to discuss in both national and international meetings
[1].
The 5G New Radio network requires various spectrums
with different characteristics, higher frequency spectrum with
bigger bandwidth to provide higher capacity with relatively
lower latency. 5G New Radio is a cellular technology using
milimeterWave (mmWave) frequency as a spectrum addition
form to reach the rate multi-Gigait-per-second (Gbps) data for
each user and is predicted using the frequency of 1 GHz–100
GHz. Thus, this high frequency makes the 5G technology
require more base stations to reach certain coverage, when
compared to 3G or 4G technology. Of course, this high fre-
quency encourages each telecommunication service provider
in Indonesia to provide their best services [2].
This research aims at performing the coverage planning in
5G New Radio network at one industrial area in East Jakarta,
that is, Pulogadung. This planning will use the mid-band
frequency range of 3.5 GHz as on Radio frequency band to be
tested in the implementation of IMT-2020 or 5G technology.
Before performing the coverage planning, the propagation
model is calculated as recommended by the 5G network.
Furthermore, the calculation will obtain the value of MAPL;
propagation; and cell radius with the final result in the form of
site number possibly required by Pulogadung industrial zone
in East Jakarta. The collected data will be simulated using
the planning tools known as Mentum planet version 7.2.1 to
obtain the value of SS-RSRP.
A. 5G Generation
5G communication network is the first radio system sup-
porting the high frequency spectrum-based radio system. This
extensive spectrum choice provides the best combinations
from high capacity, high data speed, range anywhere, to ultra-
reliability. The low band less than 6 GHz has met the needs
of wide range and data speed up to some Gbps. The main
spectrum option for 5G in the initial phase is about 3.5 GHz
and 4.5 GHz as well as millimeter wave of 24-28 GHz and
39 GHz with the Time Division Duplex (TDD) technology.
This technology is the next generation designed to provide
better services for speed to create new innovative services in
industrial field [4].
• Mobile broadband (eMBB): the growth for the requests
on mobile broadband increases day by day. Thus, this
vision strives to increase the ability of mobile broadband
to access the contents of media, services, and data. The

978-1-7281-9702-9/20/$31.00 ©2020 IEEE 187

Authorized licensed use limited to: Universitas Indonesia. Downloaded on January 04,2021 at 03:49:22 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
 2020 2nd International Conference on Industrial Electrical and Electronics (ICIEE)

TABLE II
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DEVELOPING 5G NR CAPABILITIES
FROM ITU-R [2]

IMT IMT-
Parameter
Advanced 2020
Peak Data Rate (Gbps) 1 20
User Experienced Data Rate (Mbps) 10 100
Spectrum Efficiency (bps/Hz) 10 30
Mobility (km/h) 350 500
Latency (ms) 10 1
Area Traffic Capacity (Mbps/m2 ) 0.1 10
Connection Density (dev/km2 ) 105 106

Fig. 1. 5G Technology Vision

C. 5G NR Technology Capability
scenarios of mobile broadband users will present the The parameter value in Table I is generally not accurate
latest application area and additional requirements for the in the maximum value for 5G system. For mMTC, the main
existing mobile broadband application to better increase priority is connection density, while the spectrum and peak
the performance. data rate is not greatly needed. Latency and mobility are the
• Ultra-reliable and low latency communications (URLLC): main priority for URLLC, while area traffic capacity; peak
to fulfill the reliable communication ability and low data rate; user experienced data rate; latency; mobility; and
latency, this vision is required as a tight requirement, connection density are important parameters for eMBB [1].
such as the existence of good throughput, low latency, and
high availability. Some examples include wireless control II. METHOD
to the production or industrial processes, long distance A. Research Method
medical operation, distribution automatization in a smart
grid, transportation security, etc.
• Massive machine type communications (mMTC): this
communication ability is characterized by the devices
connected with the sensitive data delivery without delay
in a relatively low volume. To achieve this vision, the
terminal device should be produced in low budget and
have long battery endurance.

B. Frequency Ranges 5G
Based on the Directorate General Decision No. 235 Year
2018 on Radio Frequency Band Establishment for Trial in
Using the IMT-2020 Technology, it is mentioned that the radio
frequency band may be used in the trial in using the IMT-2020
technology is as follows:

TABLE I
INDONESIA FREQUENCY BAND

Frequency Center Range

Frequency band of 3.5 GHz 3.3 - 4.2 GHz
Frequency band of 15 GHz 14.5 - 15.35 GHz Fig. 2. Flowchart
Frequency band of 26 GHz 24.25 - 27.5 GHz
Frequency band of 28 GHz 26.5 - 29.5 GHz
The value of path loss and link budget aims at revealing the
weakening signal happening between UT (User Terminal) and
The frequency band was selected due to some considera- gNodeB that the calculation may determine the inter-gNodeB
tions. The main consideration was the frequency band global maximum distances. The final result in this research will be
trial ecosystem and availability of devices used by the cellular in the form of site number required in the predetermined
operators in performing the trial which could only succeed in area. The initial stage in this research was by determining the
certain band ranges. Thus, the cellular operators also suggested area used to implement the 5G NR network planning, that is,
using those bands. Pulogadung area. The data required in this research included

188

Authorized licensed use limited to: Universitas Indonesia. Downloaded on January 04,2021 at 03:49:22 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
 2020 2nd International Conference on Industrial Electrical and Electronics (ICIEE)

the width of Pulogadung industrial zone, geographic position, Nthermal = Thermal Noise
and population. To determine the service classifications, the K = Boltzmann Constanta (1.38 × 10−20 mWs/K)
regional population density data was also required. T = Temperature (293◦ K)
The value of MAPL uplink and downlink calculation is
used in UMa (Urban Macro) propagation model. From the TABLE IV
JUMLAH RESOURCE BLOCK UNTUK MEDIUM FREQUENCY
MAPL calculation, the smallest value was selected because BAND [5]
between link budget uplink and downlink should be balance
that the value of cell radius might be determined as maximum μ (numerologi) 0 1 2
distance value of gNodeB with User Terminal (UT). Thus, SCS 15 30 60
the cell radius calculation result might be used to calculate Bandwidth (KHz) (KHz) (KHz)
the width of area coverage in one site. From the width of 5 (MHz) 25 11 N/A
one site’s coverage area, the comparison between the width of 10 (MHz) 52 24 11
Pulo Gadung industrial zone and that of site coverage area is 15 (MHz) 79 38 18
conducted to result in the form of site number required by the 20 (MHz) 106 51 24
industrial zone areas. 25 (MHz) 133 65 31
The last stage of this research was analysis and planning 30 (MHz) 160 78 38
simulation from the obtained data and result calculation. The 40 (MHz) 216 106 51
data was then processed using Mentum Planet version 7.2.1 50 (MHz) 270 133 65
software, as the most important part in this research since the 60 (MHz) N/A 162 79
simulation will present the area coverage and parameter to 70 (MHz) N/A 189 93
compare with the link budget coverage calculation result. 80 (MHz) N/A 217 107
90 (MHz) N/A 245 121
B. Link budget 100 (MHz) N/A 273 135
Link budget calculation aims at estimating the maximum
value of Allowable Path Loss (MAPL) or the weakening signal
received between mobile antenna and mobile station antenna Scq = RB × SRB (2)
at downlink and uplink side. Description:
Ssq = Subcarrier quality
TABLE III RB = Resource Block
LINK BUDGET 5G NEW RADIO [4] [5] [6]
SRB = Subcarrier per Resource Block
MAPL The amount of calculation value of this pathloss is greatly
unit
Comment parameter Downlink Uplink influenced by some parameters will be used in the link budget
dBm gNodeB Transmiter Power 49 49
Resource block 273 273 of 5G NR network planning. This calculation has the function
Subcarrier quantity 3276 3276 to calculate the signal attenuation maximum total lost between
dBi gNodeB antenna gain 2 2
dBi gNodeB cable loss 0 0
the accepted devices to gNodeB. In addition, calculate the
dB Penetration loss 26.85 26.85 pathloss with the following equation [6]:
dB Folliage loss 19.59 19.59
dB Body block loss 3 3
dB Interference margin 6 2 P athloss(dBm) =
dB Rain/Ice margin 0 0
dB Slow fading margin 7 8 7 8
gN odeB transmit power (dBm)
dB UE antenna gain 0 0 −10 log10 (subcarrierquantity)
MHz Bandwidth 100 100
mWs/K Boltzman Constant (K) 1.38×10-20−20 1.38×10-20−20 +gN odeB antenna gain (dBi)
Kelvin Temperature 293 293
dBm Thermal noise power -153.93 -153.93 − gN odeB cable loss (dB)
dB UT noise figure 9 9 − penetration loss (dB)
dB Demodulation threshold SINR -1.1 -1.1
− f oliage loss (dB)
The Coverage calculation considers the loss happening − body block loss (dB)
between gNodeB device and User Terminal (UT) device, in
− interf erence margin (dB) − rain/ice margin (dB)
performing the calculation required by the link budget data
showing the parameters used by UT and gNodeB presented in −slow f ading margin (dB) + U T antenna gain (dB)
Table II. First, Determine the value of Thermal Noise using −thermal noise f igure (dBm) − U T noise f igure (dB)
equation (1) and that of Subcarrier Quantity using equation − demodulation threshold SIN R (dB)
(2) as follows [6]: (3)
To obtain the value of d3D from the above Pathloss formula,
Nthermal = 10 × log (K × T × B) (1)
it first requires the values of d’BP, h’BS and h’UT, with the
Description: equation (4), (5) and (6) as follows [6]:

189

Authorized licensed use limited to: Universitas Indonesia. Downloaded on January 04,2021 at 03:49:22 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
 2020 2nd International Conference on Industrial Electrical and Electronics (ICIEE)

 
2 2
d2D = (d3D) − (hBS − hU T ) (8)

From that cell radius, the possibly covered area may be

figured out in one site of gNodeB using the formula the
coverage of three sectors [5] :

CA = 2.6 × d2 (9)
To figure out the site number required in one area, the
comparison value of surface area width with the coverage area
from the predetermined gNodeB that the calculation design
Fig. 3. Link Budget 5G NR Factor [6]
of gNodeB site number for LOS (light of sight) case is as
follows::

Area
hBS = hBS − hE (4) NgN odeB = (10)
CA
Description:
hU T = hU T − hE (5)
Area = Total width of area surface (m2 )
CA = Coverage Area from gNodeB (m2 )
dBP = 4 × hBS × hU T × fc /c (6)
C. Coverage area
Meanwhile, the calculation from this LOS-PL formula re-
The cellular network planning generally covers two calcu-
sults in the value of d3D in scenario 1 (O2O-Downlink-LOS)
lations consisting of capacity planning and coverage planning.
with the value [6]:
Coverage planning is network planning which calculation is
based on the area covered by the network, this planning
Lp = 28.0 + 40 log (d3D ) + 20 log (fc ) is influenced by some parameters: transmit power, pathloss,
  (7)
2 2
−9 log (dBP ) + (hBS − hU T ) device sensivity, radio link budget calculation, and cell radius.
The link budget calculation is used to determine the value of
Description: maximum pathloss accepted between gNB and UE antenna.
Lp = Value from pathloss (dBm) Meanwhile, the Urban Macrocell is used to determine the Cell
d3D = resultant from the distance between hBS and hUT Radius using the propagation modeling.
(m) The planning in this research aims at determining the
d’BP = break point (m) distance ideal or good site number for Pulogadung industrial zone
fc = frequency (GHz) by calculating the coverage area for each site based on the
hBS = height from gNB (m) propagation model which is then used in the simulation.
hUT = height from UT (m) Tabel II shows the distance Resultant value (d3D) and Cell
Radius (d2D) using the Urban Macro propagation model as the
calculation value to figure out the site number from gNodeB.

TABLE V
RSRP VALUE CATEGORY [9]

Category Range
Good -70 dBm until -90 dBm
Normal -91 dBm until -110 dBm
Bad -110 dBm until -130 dBm

D. Secondary Synchronization - Reference Signal Received

Fig. 4. Pythagoras between d3D ; d2D and (hBS -hU T ) [6]
After the value of d3D is obtained from the calculation of
PL propagation model, the value of d2D is then resulted as cell
radius from (8) in accordance with the principles of Pythagoras
in figure 3:
Power (SS-RSRP) Parameter
In 2G and 4G technology, Reference Signal Received Power
(RSRP) is known as Rx level, while in 3G technology is
known as Reference Signal Code Power (RSCP). RSRP is
signal strength from the reference signal. This parameter is
a specific type and device used to perform the transfer. in
5G network, User Equipment (UE) performs the measurement

190

Authorized licensed use limited to: Universitas Indonesia. Downloaded on January 04,2021 at 03:49:22 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
 2020 2nd International Conference on Industrial Electrical and Electronics (ICIEE)

of signal strength accepted in the Secondary Synchroniza- The calculation result of h’BS; h’UT; and d’BP is obtained
tion Signal (SSS) for each closest cell trasmitter. Secondary from:
Synchronization - Reference Signal Received Power (SS- h’BS = hBS – hE
RSRP) is defined as the avarage power (Watt) in total time = 25 – 1
measured in the User Equipment (UE) from the secondary = 24 m
synchronization signal (SS) given by the cell transmitter. The h’U T = hU T – He
time measurement resource for SS-RSRP is limited in the = 1.5 – 1
Secondary Synchronization - Physical Broadcast Channel (SS- = 0.5 m
PBCH) window duration. d’BP = 4 x h’BS x h’U T x fc / c
In gNodeB, there is a configured processing circuit for cod- = 4 x 24 x 0.5 x 3.5 x 109 / 3x108
ing some Synchronization Signal Blocks (SSBs). Each SSB is = 560 m
related to different beams from some multiple-in-multiple-out Meanwhile, the calculation from this LOS-PL formula re-
(MIMOs). Furthermore, each SSB consists of Primary Syn- sults in the value of d3D in scenario 1 (O2O-Downlink-LOS)
chronization Signal (PSS); Secondary Synchronization Signal with the value:
(SSS); and Physical Broadcast Channel (PBCH) containing Lp = 28.0 + 40 log (d3D ) + 20 log (fc ) - 9 log ((d’BP )2 +
system information. (h’BS - h’U T )2 )
III. RESULT AND ANALYSIS 97.44 = 28.0 + 40 log (d3D ) + 20 log (3.5) – 9 log((560)2
+ (25-1)2 )
A. Urban Macro (UMa) Propagation Model
40 log (d3D ) = 97.44 + 49.47455705 – 28 – 10.88136089
To obtain the site number in Pulogadung industrial zone log (d3D ) = 108.033/40
planning area, the propagation model is performed. The d3D = 502.11 m
propagation model used is based on the link budget for 5G In scenario 1 (O2O-Downlink-LOS), the obtained value of
network based on 3GPP 38.901. The propagation model used d2D is: 
in this research is Urban Macro (UMa). Uma with Outdoor- 2 2
to-Outdoor (O2O) is similar with the 3D-UMa scenario where ’ = ((d3D) − (hBS − hU T ) )
’d2D
= ((563.410)2 − (25 − 1.5)2 )
Base station is set above the surrounding building rooftop with = 501.56 m
Tx height of about 25m, Rx height of about 1.5-2.5 m and ISD
So, with the existing previous calculation, the covered area
height of about 500 m [6].
may be figured out by one gNodeB in scenario 1 (O2O-
First, determine the value of Thermal Noise and Subcarrier
Downlink-LOS) with the calculation as follows:
Quantity which are then included in table II:
CA = 2.6 x (d2D )2
• Thermal Noise
= 2.6 x (562.919)2
N thermal = 10 log (1.38 • 1020 × 293◦ × 100) = 654064.73 m2
N thermal = 153.93 dBm Last but not least, the site number required in the coverage
• Subcarrier Quantity area where the planning is performed, the width of research
Scq = 273 × 12 area surface is 5 km2 or 5000000 m2 when compared to that
Scq = 3276 of the gNodeB coverage area with the calculation as follows:
Thus, the obtained value for pathloss calculation is: N gN odeB = Area
CA
• Scenario 1 Downlink Outdoor-to-Outdoor
= 5000000 / 654064.73
= 7.64
Pathloss = 49 – 35.15 + 2 – 0- 26.85 – 19.59 – 3 - 6 – 0
≈ 8 site
– 7 + 0 – (-153.93) – 9 – (-1.1)
Pathloss = 97.44 dB
TABLE VI
• Scenario 2 Uplink Outdoor-to-Outdoor CALCULATION RESULT
Pathloss = 49 – 35.15 + 2 – 0- 26.85 – 19.59 – 3 - 2 – 0 gNodeB d2D
Scenario
– 7 + 0 – (-153.93) – 9 – (-1.1) Number (Cell Radius)
Pathloss = 103.44 dB Scenario 1:Downlink (O2O) -LOS 8 562.88 m
Scenario 2 : Uplink (O2O) – LOS 4 708.86 m
Based on the calculation using the equation (3), the pathloss
from some scenarios has different values. The factors greatly
influencing the pathloss different values are located in the
interference margin parameter influencing the scenario of B. Simulation Result
uplink using 2 dB and downlink using 8 dB as well as the slow This research used 8 simulation scenarios in which the new
fading margin parameter influencing the scenario of Outdoor- site locations were created in accordance with the distance
to-Outdoor using 7 dB and scenario of Outdoor-to-Indoor from coverage. This network planning did not use the site ex-
using 8 dB. This different is caused by the different conditions isting location. Thus, the new recommendation of site location
used from various scenarios. placement in accordance with the area coverage consideration

191

Authorized licensed use limited to: Universitas Indonesia. Downloaded on January 04,2021 at 03:49:22 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
 2020 2nd International Conference on Industrial Electrical and Electronics (ICIEE)

or just known as coverage. The site placement was automat- TABLE IX

ically organized using the Automatic Site Placement (ASP) SMULATION RESULT SS-RSRP SCENARIO 1 VALUE
tools contained in the Mentum Planet software. SS-RSRP Value Percentage Area (km2)
The Planet Mentum simulation result shows that the value <-104,9 dBm (Outside Range) 0.2% 0.01
of average SS-RSRP was obtained in all Pulogadung industrial -104,9 until -99,03 dBm 5.2% 0.259844
-99,03 until -93,16 dBm 36.08% 1.786304
zones and coverage dimensions. -93,16 until -87,3 dBm 31.72% 1.570426
-87,3 until -81,43 dBm 20.20% 1.00035
TABLE VII -81,43 until -75,56 dBm 5.70% 0.282568
MAIN SYSTEM PARAMETERS [11] [12] [13] -75,56 until -69,7 dBm 0.41% 0.020748
-69,7 until -63,83 dBm 0.38% 0.019266
Key Parameter System
Technology template NR
Carrier frequency 3500 MHz
Start frequency 3450 MHz
End frequency 3550 MHz
Bandwidth 100 MHz
Duplex TDD
Antenna file Kathrein (omnidirectional)

1) Scenario 1 Outdoor-to-Outdoor (O2O) Downlink

Fig. 6. ASP for gNodeB mapping scenario 2

2) Scenario 2 Outdoor-to-Outdoor (O2O) Uplink

Fig. 6 is site location placement recommendation used
in the simulation scenario 2 consisting of 2 sites.

TABLE X
STATISTICS CALCULATION FOR SCENARIO 2

Raster Statistic Value

Minimum -112.88
Maximum -63.84
Mean -97.17

Fig. 5. ASP for gNodeB mapping scenario 1

TABLE XI
Figure 5 is the site location placement recommendation SMULATION RESULT SS-RSRP SCENARIO 2 VALUE
used in the simulation scenario 1 consisting of 3 sites. SS-RSRP Value Percentage Area (Km2 )
<-112.87 dBm (Outside Range) 2.22 % 0.11
TABLE VIII -112.87 until -105,86 dBm 10.60 % 0.52514
STATISTICS CALCULATION FOR SCENARIO 1 -105.86 until -98,86 dBm 35.70 % 1.767568
-98.86 until -91,85 dBm 30.12 % 1.491204
Raster Statistic Value -91.85 until -84,85 dBm 13.71 % 0.679052
Minimum -104.9 -84.85 until -77,84 dBm 7.11 % 0.352352
Maximum -63.83 -77.84 until -70,83 dBm 0.27 % 0.013552
Mean -90.8 -70.83,86 until -63,83 dBm 0.23 % 0.011616

The average SS-RSRP obtained for prediction using 8
gNodeB is -90.8 dBm, meaning that the signal strength
is in good category in the perious technology (LTE).
Meanwhile, this research shows the SS-RSRP with the
minimum value of -104.9 dBm and with the maximum
value of -63.83 dBm. From this simulation result, 0.2%
sub area cannot obtain the services provided by gNodeB.
The average SS-RSRP obtained for prediction using 4
gNodeB is -97.17 dBm, meaning that the signal strength
is in good category in the previous technology (LTE).
Meanwhile, this research shows the SS-RSRP with the
minimum value of -112.88 dBm and with the maximum
value of -63.84 dBm. From this simulation result, 2.22%
sub area cannot obtain the services provided by gNodeB.

192

Authorized licensed use limited to: Universitas Indonesia. Downloaded on January 04,2021 at 03:49:22 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
 2020 2nd International Conference on Industrial Electrical and Electronics (ICIEE)

IV. CONCLUSION
1) The permitted Pathloss value is between gNodeB and
UT by 97.44 dB for the scenario of Downlink-O2O;
and 103.43 dB for the scenario of Uplink-O2O.
2) To accommodate the traffics available in Pulogadung
industrial zone, 8 sites are required for scenario 1 and
4 sites for scenario 2.
3) The observed (SS-RSRP) parameter shows that scenario
2 (Downlink-O2O-LOS) has the lowest average value
of SS-RSRP by -97.17 dBm and the highest average
value of SS-RSRP resulted by scenario 1 (Downlink-
O2O-LOS) was -92.95 dBm as planned in scenario 1
which has the highest site number covering the planning
area.
R EFERENCES
[1] M. Series, IMT Vision Framework and Overall Objectives of the Future
Development of IMT for 2020 and Beyond, 2015.
[2] A. Hikmaturokhman, M. Suryanegara and K. Ramli, ”A Comparative
Analysis of 5G Channel Model with Varied Frequency: A Case Study
in Jakarta,” 2019 7th International Conference on Smart Computing &
Communications (ICSCC), Sarawak, Malaysia, Malaysia, 2019, pp. 1-5,
doi: 10.1109/ICSCC.2019.8843632.
[3] A. Sarah and K. W. Sung, ”Optimization of Enhanced Mobile Broadband
Solution for Rural and Remote Areas: A Case Study of Banten,
Indonesia”. Buletin Pos dan Telekomunikasi, 16(1), 41-54., 2018
[4] S. Hur et al., ”Proposal on Millimeter-Wave Channel Modeling
for 5G Cellular System,” in IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in
Signal Processing, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 454-469, April 2016, doi:
10.1109/JSTSP.2016.2527364.
[5] ”5G Link Budget, Best Partner for Innovation,” Huawei Technologies
Co., 2018.
[6] 3GPP TR 38.901 version 14.0.0 Release 14, ”Study on Channel Model
for Frequencies from 0.5 to 100 GHz,” ETSI, Technical Report 2017.
[7] A. Hikmaturokhman, V. Lutfita and A. R. Danisya, ”4G-LTE 1800
Mhz coverage and capacity network planning using Frequency Reuse 1
model for rural area in Indonesia.,” Proceedings of the 6th International
Conference on Software and Computer Applications, 2017.
[8] Yujian Zhang, Han , and Morozov , Patent Application Publication, vol.
US 2019 / 0268947 A1, Agustus 2019.
[9] ”3GPP TR 38.104 Release 16,” ETSI, Technical Report 2019.
[10] Bjorn Halvarsson et al., ”5G NR Testband 3.5 GHz Coverage Results,”
Ericsson,.
[11] A. C. Situmorang, D. Gunawan, and V. G. Anggraini, ”5G Trials
on 28 GHz Band ind Indonesia,” The 28th Wireless and Optical
Communication Conference (WOCC 2019), 2019.

193

Authorized licensed use limited to: Universitas Indonesia. Downloaded on January 04,2021 at 03:49:22 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.