Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Kareem2016 Article NewExplicitCorrelationForTheCo
Kareem2016 Article NewExplicitCorrelationForTheCo
DOI 10.1007/s13202-015-0209-3
Received: 14 October 2014 / Accepted: 17 October 2015 / Published online: 18 December 2015
Ó The Author(s) 2015. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com
Abstract The compressibility factor (z-factor) of gases is Keywords Z-factor Explicit correlation Reduced
a thermodynamic property used to account for the devia- temperature Reduced pressure Natural gas
tion of real gas behavior from that of an ideal gas. Corre-
lations based on the equation of state are often implicit,
List of symbols
because they require iteration and are computationally
P Pressure (psi)
expensive. A number of explicit correlations have been
Ppc Pseudo-critical pressure
derived to enhance simplicity; however, no single explicit
Ppr Pseudo-reduced pressure
correlation has been developed for the full range of pseudo-
T Temperature (R)
reduced temperatures 1:05 Tpr 3 and pseudo-reduced
Tpc Pseudo-critical temperature (R)
pressures 0:2 Ppr 15 , which represents a significant Tpr Pseudo-reduced temperature
research gap. This work presents a new z-factor correlation Ppc Pseudo-critical pressure (psi)
that can be expressed in linear form. On the basis of Hall Ppr Pseudo-reduced pressure
and Yarborough’s implicit correlation, we developed the v Initial guess for iteration process
new correlation from 5346 experimental data points Y Pseudo-reduced density
extracted from 5940 data points published in the SPE z-factor Compressibility factor
natural gas reservoir engineering textbook and created a
linear z-factor chart for a full range of pseudo-reduced
temperatures ð1:15 Tpr 3Þ and pseudo-reduced pres-
sures ð0:2 Ppr 15Þ. Introduction
123
482 J Petrol Explor Prod Technol (2016) 6:481–492
(Trube 1957; Dranchuk et al. 1971; Abou-kassem and Implicit z-factor correlations
Dranchuk 1975; Sutton 1985; Heidaryan et al. 2010).
Dranchuk et al. (1971) defined pseudo-reduced tem- The three most popular correlations for calculating the
perature and pressure as the ratio of temperature and z-factor are implicit. The three correlations, described in
pressure to the pseudo-critical temperature and pressure of the following subsections, are well known for their accu-
natural gas, respectively: racies, almost unit correlation of regression coefficients and
T P low maximum errors.
Tpr ¼ ; Ppr ¼ ð3Þ
Tpc Ppc
Hall and Yarborough’s correlation (Trube 1957)
The pseudo-critical properties of gas are the molar
abundance (mole fraction weighted) mean of the critical Hall and Yarborough’s correlation is a modification of the
properties of the constituents of the natural gas: hard sphere Carnahan–Starling equation of state, with
X n Xn constants developed through regression, and 1500 data
Tpc ¼ yi Tci ; Ppc ¼ yi Pci ð4Þ points extracted from Standing and Katz’s original z-factor
i¼1 i¼1 chart, as shown in Fig. 2.
As a function of specific gravity (air = 1.0), Sutton A1 Ppr
(1985) provides z¼ ; ð7Þ
y
Tpc ¼ 169:2 þ 349:5cg 74:0c2g ð5Þ where y is the root of the following equation:
Ppc ¼ 756:8 131:07cg 3:6c2g ð6Þ y þ y2 þ y3 y4
A1 Ppr þ A2 y2 þ A3 yA4 ¼ 0
ð1 yÞ3
A plot of 5346 data points covering a full range of 2
A1 ¼ 0:06125te1:2ð1tÞ ; A2 ¼ 14:76t 9:76t2 þ 4:58t3 ;
pseudo-reduced temperatures ð1:15 Tpr 3Þ and pseudo-
1
reduced pressures ð0:2 Ppr 15Þ is shown in Fig. 1 A3 ¼ 90:7t 242:2t2 þ 42:4t3 ; A4 ¼ 2:18 þ 2:82t; t¼
Tpr
123
J Petrol Explor Prod Technol (2016) 6:481–492 483
123
484 J Petrol Explor Prod Technol (2016) 6:481–492
Dranchuk, Purvis and Robinson’s Correlation (Dranchuk Table 1 Constants of Heidaryan et al.’s correlation
et al. 1971) Constants for Ppr 3 Constants for Ppr [ 3
123
J Petrol Explor Prod Technol (2016) 6:481–492 485
2:16 2:1 0:5 Sanjari and Nemati’s Correlation
A ¼ aTpr þ bP1:028
pr þ cP1:58
pr Tpr þ d ln Tpr
2:4
B ¼ e þ fTpr þ gP1:56 0:124 3:033
pr þ hPpr Tpr Using 5844 data points, Sanjari and Lay (2012) developed
an explicit correlation for the z-factor. This correlation, as
1:28 1:37
C ¼ i ln Tpr þ j ln Tpr þ k ln Ppr þ l ln P2pr
with Heidaryan et al. (2010) correlation, has different
þ m lnðPpr Þ lnðTpr Þ constants for the values of Ppr below and above 3, but a
5:55
D ¼ 1 þ nTpr þ oP0:68 0:33 total of 16 constants (Table 2). The procedure for calcu-
pr Tpr
lating the z-factor is as follows:
1:18 2:1
E ¼ p ln Tpr þ q ln Tpr þ r lnðPpr Þ þ s ln P2pr
þ t lnðPpr Þ lnðTpr Þ
a ¼ 0:0373142485385592; b ¼ 0:0140807151485369; Table 2 Constants of Sanjari and Lay’s correlation
c ¼ 0:0163263245387186; d ¼ 0:0307776478819813; Constants for Ppr 3 Constants for Ppr [ 3
e ¼ 13843575480:943800; f ¼ 16799138540:763700;
A1 0.007698 0.015642
g ¼ 1624178942:6497600; h ¼ 13702270281:086900;
A2 0.003839 0.000701
i ¼ 41645509:896474600; j ¼ 237249967625:01300; A3 -0.467212 2.341511
k ¼ 24449114791:1531; l ¼ 19357955749:3274; A4 1.018801 -0.657903
m ¼ 126354717916:607; n ¼ 623705678:385784; A5 3.805723 8.902112
o ¼ 17997651104:3330; p ¼ 151211393445:064; A6 -0.087361 -1.136000
q ¼ 139474437997:172; r ¼ 24233012984:0950; A7 7.138305 3.543614
s ¼ 18938047327:5205; t ¼ 141401620722:689; A8 0.083440 0.134041
123
486 J Petrol Explor Prod Technol (2016) 6:481–492
A3 PApr4 ðA þ1Þ
A6 Ppr 4
ðA þ2Þ
A8 Ppr 4 of 15 and a Tpr of 1.05 is 1.753, but this correlation gives a
z ¼ 1 þ A1 Ppr þ A2 P2pr þ A5
þ A7
þ ðA þ1Þ value of 3.3024. Therefore, the actual maximum error for
Tpr Tpr Tpr 7
this correlation is 104.3206 %.
ð13Þ To resolve the limitations in the application of the
This correlation, however, is less efficient when existing explicit correlations, a single correlation that is
compared with that of Heidaryan et al. (2010). Its continuous over the entire range of pseudo-reduced pres-
regression correlation coefficient is 0.8757 and its error sure is required.
rate at a certain point can be as high as 90 per cent. For
instance, the actual value of z from the experiment for a Ppr
New explicit z-factor correlation
Table 3 Constants of the new correlation A new explicit z-factor is developed as a multi-stage cor-
Constants relation based on Hall and Yarborough’s implicit correla-
tion. The implicit correlation was rearranged to return a
a1 0.317842 a11 -1.966847 value of y using an approximate value of z. The y-values on
a2 0.382216 a12 21.0581 the right side of the expression were replaced by
a3 -7.768354 a13 -27.0246
A1 Ppr =z . Non-linear regression was performed using the
a4 14.290531 a14 16.23
derived model. The resulting correlation for reduced den-
a5 0.000002 a15 207.783 sity is given in Eq. 15, while Eq. 14 provides an extra
a6 -0.004693 a16 -488.161 iteration to bring the results closer to those obtained by
a7 0.096254 a17 176.29 Hall and Yarborough. The constants for these two equa-
a8 0.166720 a18 1.88453 tions are shown in
a9 0.966910 a19 3.05921 Table 3. The z-factor chart shown in Fig. 4 was gener-
a10 0.063069 ated from this new correlation:
123
J Petrol Explor Prod Technol (2016) 6:481–492 487
DPpr ð1 þ y þ y2 y3 Þ 1 þ A2 A 2 B
z¼ ð14Þ z¼ 3 ð16Þ
ðDPpr þ Ey2 FyG Þð1 yÞ3 C C
DPpr A plot of Eq. 16 is shown in Fig. 5.
y ¼ 1þA2 A2 B ; ð15Þ A careful analysis of Eq. 16 shows that it can be
C C3
rewritten in the following form:
where
2 B
1 zC ¼ 1 þ MPpr 1 2 ð17Þ
t¼ ; C
Tpr
2 The values of M are chosen to be a function of reduced
A ¼ a1 tea2 ð1tÞ Ppr ; B ¼ a3 t þ a4 t2 þ a5 t6 P6pr ; temperature and a regression analysis performed to extend
C ¼ a9 þ a8 tPpr þ a7 t2 P2pr þ a6 t3 P3pr the applicability of Eq. 17 to cover the ranges
2 1:15 Tpr 3 and 0:2 Ppr 15. For this range of
D ¼ a10 tea11 ð1tÞ ; E ¼ a12 t þ a13 t2 þ a14 t3 ;
values of reduced temperature and pressure, M is given by
F ¼ a15 t þ a16 t2 þ a17 t3 ; G ¼ a18 þ a19 t 2
M ¼ m1 t2 em2 ð1tÞ ;
Linearized z-factor isotherms m1 ¼ 0:1009332; m2 ¼ 0:7773702
Given that the reduced temperature and pressure fall within It should be noted that B and C maintain the same
1:15 Tpr 3 and 6 Ppr 15, the first nine constants can definition as in Eq. 16. Hence, a graph of zC against
be used to predict z with a correlation regression coefficient P2pr 1 CB2 gives straight lines passing through the point
of 0.99899. For this range of pseudo-reduced properties, P2pr 1 CB2 ¼ 0; zC ¼ 1 with slopes M. A plot of the
the simplified single-stage correlation of the z-factor is
given by straight line form of the z-factor is shown in Fig. 6.
123
488 J Petrol Explor Prod Technol (2016) 6:481–492
Results and discussion for computation of the derivatives of the z-factor over the
whole range ð0:2 Ppr 15Þ, which is not possible with
Figure 7 shows the cross plot of the z-factor from the new other explicit correlations.
correlation against the measured values. The cross plots An application of the new correlation shown in Eq. 17
show that the plotted points fall on the unit slope line produces a good correlation of regression of 0.9999
through the origin, which implies that the new correlation between zexp C and 1 þ MP2pr 1 CB2 . The maximum
reproduces the measured values to a considerable degree of relative error is the same as that in Eq. 14. This maximum
accuracy. error is shown in Fig. 8 to occur at Ppr ¼ 2 and
Table 4 shows the statistical detail of the constants of Tpr ¼ 1:15.
the new correlation. The narrowness of the 95 per cent Plots of the z-factors generated using the three most
confidence interval is in agreement with the near-zero recent explicit correlations (Sanjari and Lay 2012; Hei-
P-values. This implies that the probability that these values daryan et al. 2010; Azizi et al. 2010) were compared with
could have been developed by chance is negligible, which those generated using Eqs. 14 and 16 (Fig. 9). While
signifies that the new correlation is reliable (Wolberg Sanjari and Lay (2012) and Azizi et al. (2010) show
2006). marked deviations from the unit line, Heidaryan et al.
As shown in Table 5, within the range of pseudo-re- (2010) and Eqs. 14 and 16 fall on the unit line. This shows
duced temperatures ð1:15 Tpr 3Þ and pseudo-reduced that the correlations of Heidaryan et al. (2010) and Eqs. 14
pressures ð0:2 Ppr 15Þ, Eq. 14 outperforms Heidaryan and 16 (and by extension Eq. 17) are better at predicting
et al.’s (2010) correlation in terms of correlation regression the values of the z-factor than those of Sanjari and Lay
coefficient, average percentage error and root mean square (2012) and Azizi et al. (2010). Since these functions have
of error, with the exception of maximum percentage error. no point of discontinuity, they can be used in applications
Most importantly, the new correlation is continuous over where the derivative of the z-factor with respect to its
the entire pseudo-pressure range. Therefore, it would allow independent variables is required.
123
J Petrol Explor Prod Technol (2016) 6:481–492 489
123
490 J Petrol Explor Prod Technol (2016) 6:481–492
123
J Petrol Explor Prod Technol (2016) 6:481–492 491
DPpr
2.4 Sanjari et al y ¼ 1þA2 A2 B ; ð19Þ
Heidaryan et al C C3
2.2
Azizi et al
where
Equation 14
Z-factor obtained from correlations
2
2 2
Equation 16 A ¼ a1 tea2 ð1tÞ Ppr ¼ 0:62708; D ¼ a10 tea11 ð1tÞ ¼ 0:02934
1.8
E ¼ a12 t þ a13 t2 þ a14 t3 ¼ 6:56232; F ¼ a15 t þ a16 t2
1.6 3
þ a17 t ¼ 17:08860
1.4 DPpr
G ¼ a18 þ a19 t ¼ 3:80547; y ¼ 1þA2 A2 B ¼ 0:10869
1.2 C C3
1
Therefore,
0.8
DPpr ð1 þ y þ y2 y3 Þ
z¼ ¼ 0:8242
0.6
DPpr þ Ey2 FyG ð1 yÞ3
0.4
Fig. 9 Cross plot comparing several explicit correlations A simple accurate correlation for evaluating the z-factor
that can be linearized has been developed. This corre-
The problem can also be solved using Eq. 14 directly: lation performs excellently in the ranges 1:15 Tpr 3
and 0:2 Ppr 15. It is simple and single-valued. A
DPpr ð1 þ y þ y2 y3 Þ noteworthy advancement is that the new correlation is
z¼ ð18Þ
DPpr þ Ey2 FyG ð1 yÞ3 continuous over the full range of pseudo-reduced
123
492 J Petrol Explor Prod Technol (2016) 6:481–492
pressures ð0:2 Ppr 15Þ. This will widen its applica- Abou-kassem JH, Dranchuk PM (1975) Calculation of z factors for
bility to include cases such as the evaluation of natural natural gases using equations of state. J Can Pet Technol. doi:10.
2118/75-03-03
gas compressibility, in which the derivative of the Beggs DHU, Brill JPU (1973) A study of two-phase flow in inclined
compressibility factor with respect to the pseudo-re- pipes. J Pet Technol 25:607–617
duced pressure is required. For the range outside the Dranchuk RA, Purvis DB, Robinson PM (1971) Generalized
coverage of this correlation, implicit correlations can be compressibility factor tables. J Can Pet Technol 10:22–29
Heidaryan E, Salarabadi A, Moghadasi J (2010) A novel correlation
applied; however, this new explicit correlation can be approach for prediction of natural gas compressibility factor.
used to provide an initial guess to speed up the iteration J Nat Gas Chem 19:189–192. doi:10.1016/S1003-
process. 9953(09)60050-5
O’Neil PV (2012) Advanced engineering mathematics, 7th edn.
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Cengage Laerning, Stamford
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http:// Sanjari E, Lay EN (2012) An accurate empirical correlation for
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted predicting natural gas compressibility factors. J Nat Gas Chem
use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give 21:184–188. doi:10.1016/S1003-9953(11)60352-6
appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a Sutton RP (1985) Compressibility factor for high-molecular-weight
link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were reservoir gases. In: 60th annual technical conference and
made. exhibition of society of petroleum engineers
Trube A (1957) Compressibility of natural gases. J Pet Technol.
doi:10.2118/697-G
Wolberg J (2006) Data analysis using the method of least squares:
References extracting the most information from experiments, 2nd edn.
Springer, Berlin
Azizi N, Behbahani R, Isazadeh MA(2010) An efficient correlation
for calculating compressibility factor of natural gases. J Nat Gas
Chem 19:642–645. doi:10.1016/S1003-9953(09)60081-5
123