The LRMDS Evaluation Tools with notations:

Individual Report Team Report

EVALUATION TOOL FOR CONTENT

DepEd-developed Learning Activity Sheet

Learning Area : Grade Level :

Title:

Instructions:

1. Carefully read the learning resource (LR) page by page to evaluate the LR for compliance to
standards indicated in the criterion items under the six (6) factors below.

2. Put a check mark () in the appropriate column beside each criterion item. If your answer is NO,
cite specific pages, briefly indicate the errors found, and give your recommendations in the
attached Summary of Findings, Corrections, and Review form.

3. Write Not Applicable (NA) for criterion items that does not apply in the LR evaluated.

4. Based on the number of criterion items marked “YES” under each factor, mark the appropriate
column to indicate if the LR complied or not to the standards.

5. For factors with items marked Not Applicable, count the total applicable criterion items and
multiply this with 75% to determine the cutoff for compliance.
Standards / Criterion Items Yes No
Factor I. Intellectual Property Rights Compliance
1. The learning resource has no copyright violations. This means that
all the pictures used in the IM were personally captured by the writer
and/or information were taken from the allowed and reliable sources
such as the 1] sites of government agencies (with .gov.ph) like DepEd
websites, LGU sites, DTI, DOT; 2] DepEd common, 3] Open
Education Resource (OER); or 4] from those websites of private
individual or group but with official permission to use the materials
from their sites; 5] from sources whose writer died for more than 70
years; 6] public documents like the Philippine Constitution. (NOTE:
This item is non-negotiable)
2. The copyrighted texts and visuals used in the LR are cited.
NOTE: Only those identified in Item 1
3. The copyrighted materials used in the LR are accurately cited.
NOTE: Only those identified in Item 1
4. The references are properly cited in the Bibliography or references.
NOTE: Only those identified in Item 1
Note: At least 3 criterion items must be marked YES to indicate Complied Not Complied
compliance to this factor.
Factor II. Most Essential Learning Competencies (MELC)
1. The Learning Activity Sheet covered the targeted Most Essential
Learning Competencies (MELCs) intended for the quarter.
Note: The item must be marked YES to indicate compliance.   Complied Not Complied

Factor III. Instructional Design and Organization

1. LAS has learning objectives that are anchored on the MELCs.
2. LAS uses a variety (at least 3) of self-directed techniques, learning
 tasks and formative assessment.
3. LAS has content that is logically developed/activities are arranged
from simple to complex, from observable to abstract.

4. LAS contains essential instructional design elements that

contribute to the achievement of learning objectives.
5. LAS allows review, comparison, and integration with previous
lessons (if applicable)

6. LAS uses various motivational strategies (i.e., advance organizers,

puzzles, games) to hook the target user’s interest and
engagement.
7. LAS uses process questions and activities which require different
levels of cognitive domain to achieve desired learning outcomes.
8. LAS has written and performance tasks that are differentiated
based on target user’s multiple intelligences, learning styles and
readiness levels.
9. LAS develops 21st century skills and higher order cognition (i.e.,
critical thinking, creativity, learning by doing, problem solving)
Note: At least 8 criterion items must be marked YES to indicate Complied Not Complied
compliance to this factor.
Factor IV. Instructional Quality of Texts and Visuals
1. All content and information in the LAS are accurate and up-to-date.
2. The LAS is free from any social content violations.
3. The LAS has free from factual errors.
4. The LAS is free from computational errors (if applicable)
Note: At least 3 criterion items must be marked YES to indicate Complied Not Complied
compliance to this factor.  
Factor V. Assessment
1. The LAS provides sufficient assessment activities that will help the
learners track his/her progress and mastery of the target
competencies. Note: These should be at least 3 assessment
activities in a LAS.
2. LAS has assessment that are aligned with the specific objectives
and content (e.i., lesson / topic)
3. The LAS provides variety of assessment types.
Note: There should at least 3 assessment types in a LAS.
4. The LAS contains assessments that have clear demonstrations /
examples, instructions, and/or rubrics to serve as guide on how
these will be used.
5. The LAS has assessment activities that ensure active
engagement of the learners.
6. The LAS has answer keys that provide exact answer for objective
type assessment and discussion points for non-objective types.
7. The LAS has pre-and-post assessment items that are constructed
differently.
Note: At least 6 criterion items must be marked YES to indicate Complied Not Complied
compliance to this factor.  

Factor VI. Readability

1. Vocabulary used in the LAS is appropriate to the target user’s level
of comprehension and experience.
2. Length and structures of sentences in the LAS are suited to the
comprehension level of the target users.
3. Paragraph structures in the LAS facilitate smooth flow of ideas and
concepts.
4. Topics and ideas presented from one lesson to the next coherent
and integrated with each other.
5. Instructions, discussion points, questions and activities are clear to
the target users.
Note: At least 4 criterion items must be marked YES to indicate Complied Not Complied
compliance to this factor.  
Recommendation: (Please put a check mark ( ) in the appropriate box.)

 Minor revision. This

material is found compliant to the minimum requirements in all six factors. Revision based
on the recommendations included in the Summary of Findings, Corrections, and Review
form and LR with marginal notes must be implemented.

 Major revision. This

material is non-compliant to the requirements in one or more factors. Revision based on
the recommendations included in the Summary of Findings, Corrections, and Review form
and LR with marginal notes must be implemented.

 For field validation. This

material is found compliant to all factors with NO corrections.

I / We certify that this evaluation report and the recommendation(s) in the summary report are my /
our own and have been made without any undue influence from others.
Evaluators(s):
Signature(s):
Date
accomplished:
The LRMDS Evaluation Tools with notations
Individual Report Team Report

EVALUATION TOOL FOR LAY-OUT AND DESIGN

DepEd-developed Learning Activity Sheet

Learning Area : Grade Level :

Title:

Instructions:
1. Carefully read the learning resource (LR) page by page to evaluate the LR for compliance to
standards indicated in the criterion items under the four (4) factors below.
2. Put a check mark () in the appropriate column beside each criterion item. If your answer is NO,
cite specific pages, briefly indicate the errors found, and give your recommendations in the
attached Summary of Findings, Corrections, and Review form.
3. Write Not Applicable (NA) for criterion items that does not apply in the LR evaluated.
4. Based on the number of criterion items marked “YES” under each factor, mark the appropriate
column to indicate if the LR complied or not to the standards.
5. For factors with items marked Not Applicable, count the total applicable criterion items and
multiply this with 70% to determine the cutoff for compliance.

Standards / Criterion Items Yes No

Factor I. Design and Layout
1. Consistency of
elements (i.e., main heads, subheads, sections, and
subsections are consistently classified)
2. Simple (i.e., does not distract the attention of the reader)

3. Attractive and pleasing to look at

4. Adequate illustrations in relation to text. Follow the art-text ratio

per grade level with K to G1 (65%-35%), G2(60%-40%), G3(50%-50%),
(40%-60%), G5-12(30%-70%) Reference: Regional Memo No. 36, s.
2020
5. Harmonious blending of elements (e.g. Illustrations & text)

6. Suitable to the target users

Note: At least 5 criterion items must be marked YES to indicate Complied Not Complied
compliance to this factor.
Factor II. Typographical Organization (e.g., size of letters, choice
of font, use of boldface and italics, etc.)
1. Size of letters is appropriate for the target user. Refer to
Regional Memo No. 36, s. 2020
2. Font styles used are appropriate for the target user and easy
to read. Refer to Regional Memo No. 36, s. 2020
2. Size of letters and choice of font enable the target users to
 easily identify themes / ideas and rank them in order of
importance. Refer to Regional Memo No. 36, s. 2020
3. The use of boldface and italics are relevant and appropriate to
the text.
Note: At least 3 criterion items must be marked YES to indicate Complied Not Complied
compliance to this factor.
Factor IV. Visuals (e.g., illustrations, photographs, maps, tables,
graphs, etc.)
1. Supplement the text

2. Clarify the concept / topic and facilitate comprehension

3. Consistently clear in content and detail

4. Relevant to the learner’s age, culture, and life situation

5. Sustain interest and do not distract the learner’s attention

6. Appropriately placed in the page and proportionately drawn in

size
7. Properly labelled / captioned (if needed)

8. Artistically appealing, simple, and easily recognizable

9. Realistic and use appropriate color (optional) where needed

10. Colored visuals are set in greyscale for black-and-white

reproduction
11. Line drawings are not shaded to avoid poorly and blotchy
printed pages
12. Illustrations of animals and people are facing inside the page

13. Illustrations of a process involving separate steps or actions

have individual pictures or frames
Note: At least 11 criterion items must be marked YES to indicate Complied Not Complied
compliance to this factor.

Recommendation: (Please put a check mark ( ) in the appropriate box.)

 Minor revision. This material is found compliant to the minimum requirements of all four
factors. Revision based on the recommendations included in the Summary of Findings,
Corrections, and Review form and LR with marginal notes must be implemented.

 Major revision. This material is non-compliant to the requirements in one or more factors.
Revision based on the recommendations included in the Summary of Findings,
Corrections, and Review form and LR with marginal notes must be implemented.

 For field validation. This material is found compliant to all factors with NO corrections.

I / We certify that this evaluation report and the recommendation(s) in the summary report are my /
our own and have been made without any undue influence from others.

Evaluators(s):
Signature(s):
Date
accomplished:
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region V
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF CAMARINES SUR
EDITOR’S NOTE

Peer Writer Coverage and Title MELC Improvement Made in

the Modules/LAS

________________________________________
NAME AND SIGNATURE OF EDITOR
 Individual Summary Report Team’s Summary Report

Summary of Findings, Corrections, and Review

for the DepEd-developed Learning Activity Sheets

Learning Area : Grade Level :

LR Type:
Title:

Accomplish this Summary Report based on the marginal notes in the LR and the findings guided by the criterion items in the evaluation tools for
content, language, and design and layout. For each error found, write chronologically the page number and paragraph or line number where it was
seen. Provide a description of the error and indicate whether the finding is a content, language, or design and layout type of error (Refer to the
legend below). Write specific recommendations on how to improve the errors found. Provide a final recommendation based on the decision made
on the accomplished evaluation tools for content, language, and design and layout.

Paragraph / Brief Remarks (To be accomplished by the

Line / Page Description of Type development team)
Specific Recommendations for Improving
Number (in Errors/ of
the Errors/Findings/Observations
chronological Findings/ Error Not Implemented
order) Observations Implemented
(Reasons/Justifications)

Legend: Type of Error: (C for Content, L for Language, DL for Design & Layout)

Other Findings: (Write additional comments and recommendations not captured in the evaluation tools used.)
 Final Recommendation: (Please put a check mark ( ) in the appropriate box.)

 Minor revision. This material requires minor revision in the three (3) focuses. Revision based on the recommendations included in this
summary report form and LR with marginal notes must be implemented.

 Major revision. This material requires major revision in at least one (1) focus. Revision based on the recommendations included in this
summary report form and LR with marginal notes must be implemented.

 For field validation. This material is found compliant to all factors in the three focuses with NO corrections.

(Please sign below and at the back of each previous page.)

I / We certify that this summary of corrections (s) are my / our own and have been made without any undue influence from others.

Evaluators(s):
Signature(s):
Date accomplished:

References:

1] Learning Resource Management and Development (LRMDS) Standards

2] Regional Memo Number 36, s. 2020 – Regional Learning Continuity Tasks and Guidelines

3] Continuous Improvement (CI) Manual

4] Insights gained from series of trainings attended on IM/LM Development