You are on page 1of 10

EFFECTS OF SUPERCRITICAL FLUID TREATMENTS ON PHYSICAL

PROPERTIES OF WOOD-BASED COMPOSITES'


Menandro N. Acda
Graduate Research Assistant

Jeffrey J. Morrell
Associate Professor
Department of Forest Products
Oregon State University
Corvallis, OR 97331

and

Keith L. Levien
Associate Professor
Depanment of Chemical Engineering
Oregon State University
Corvallis. OR 97331
(Received June 1996)

The effects of supercritical fluid (SCF) impregnation on physical properties of composites were
investigated at various pressures, temperatures, and treatment times with carbon dioxide as the fluid
and tchuconazole as a biocide. In general, within the ranges tested, SCF treatment had no negative
effects on modulus of rupture. (MOR), modulus of elasticity, (MOE), or dimensional stability of
panicleboard, flakeboard. or medium-density fiberboard: in some instances. SCF treatment appeared
to be associated with slight property improvements in some panel types. Shear tens of plywood
suggested a similar lack of treatment effect. Results indicate that, despite the elevated pressure em-
ployed during the process, SCF impregnation does not adversely affect the mechanical properties of
various wood-based composites.
Keywords: Composites, preservative treatment. supercritical fluid, plywaod, medium-density fiher-
hoard, paniclehoard, flakeboard, strength properties.

lNTRODUCTION with conventional liquid treatments of solid


Supercritical carbon dioxide (CO,) repre- wood suggest that considerable losses in me-
sents an attractive alternative to conventional chanical properties can occur at these elevated
liquid solvents for impregnating wood-based pressures (Walters 1967; Walters and Whit-
materials with biocides. The pressures em- tington 1970). Similar trials of small beams of
ployed with these processes exceed 7 MPa, spruce and ponderosa pine treated with super-
and are approximately 7-10 times those used critical CO, under various pressure and tem-
for conventional impregnation processes perature regimes suggest that these processes
(Hunt and Garratt 1967; American Wood-Pre- have no negative effects on wood properties
servers' Association 1994). Previous studies (Smith et al. 1993 a, b). The effects of such
processes on composites, with their differing
'
This is Paper 3147 of the Forest Research Laboratory, particle geometrics, voids, and wood/resin in-
Oregon State University. Corvallis. OR. terfaces, however, remain unknown. The de-
Wundrrnd fihsr S'irnm 2YlZI. 1997. pp. 121-130
n Iwn hy the Lcicfy < O f W<xd science and Technology
122 WOO0 AND FIBER SCIENCE. APRIL. 1997, V. 29(21

TAM.,I . Mr,difi(icrl di,npnsions of ramplrs used for eualuafion of mrckanical properlies of sul>ercriricnlfluidrreared
ond lorrrearcd ponrls (ASTM D 1037).
Tmt Rcniic~s!ionr S~rnplcdiinsnhiotlr

Static hcnding 9 38 mm X 305 mm X pancl thickness


Internal hond 4 38 mm X 50 mm X panel thickness
Moistrirc ahsorption 6 38 mm X 203 mm X panel thickness
Thickness swellinn 6 38 mm X 203 mm X oanel thickness

lineation of these effects is an important aspect Panel assessment after treatment


of the development of impregnation processes. At the conclusion of treatment, the panels
In this report, we describe trials to define thewere carefully inspected for evidence of col-
potential effects of treatment with tehucona- lapse, splits, delamination, or other treatment
zole in supercritical CO, on various physical defects. The presence and morphology of pre-
properties of 4 wood-based composites. cipitated particles of hiocide were also noted.
Thickness swelling, calculated as the differ-
MATERIALS AND METIIOOS ence between initial and final thickness after
Commercial plywood, particleboard. flake- treatment and expressed as a percentage of the
board, and medium-density fiberboard (MDF) initial thickness, was measured at 3 points
were cut into specimens with dimensions 38 along the length of the panel with a digital
mm X 150 mm X panel thickness. These spec- sliding caliper. Weight gain (nearest 0.01 g)
imens were edge-coated with epoxy and con- was determined as the difference between the
ditioned to a constant weight (nearest 0.01 g) pre- and post-treatment weights.
at 65% relative humidity and 21°C. Panel
thickness was then measured at 3 points along Evaluation of physical and mechanical
cach sample (nearest 0.25 mm). Panel samples properties
were impregnated in a high-pressure vessel as The potential effects of exposure to high
described previously (Acda 1995). Briefly, the pressure and elevated temperature under su-
samples were placed in a treatment vessel, percritical conditions on the dimensional sta-
which was screwed closed. Liquid CO? with bility and mechanical properties of each panel
3.5 mole % methanol as a cosolvent was type were evaluated according to test methods
flowed over a packed bed of the biocide te- described in ASTM Standard D 1037 (Amer-
buconazole (u(2-(4-chlorophenyl)ethyl}a- ican Society of Testing and Materials 1995a).
( I , l -dimethyl)-1H-l,2,4-triazole-I-ethanol),Some modifications in specimen size were
which has been shown to have excellent activ- necessary because of constraints imposed by
ity against a variety of wood-degrading fungi. the size of the treatment vessel (Table I). Prior
The mixture flowed through the bed at 12 to testing, all samples were conditioned to a
mllmin, a rate which previous trials suggested constant moisture content in a chamber main-
would produce a saturated biocide solution tained at 21°C and 65% relative humidity.
(Sahle-Demessie 1994). The biocide-laden Particleboard, flakehoard, and MDF were
mixture was then introduced into the treatment tested for static bending (ASTM D 1037;
vessel and pressure was increased to 12.41, American Society for Testing and Materials
24.81, or 31.02 MPa temperatures of 45, 60, 1995a). Modulus of elasticity (MOE), modu-
or 7592 for 5, 15, or 30 min. Once the desired lus of rupture (MOR), maximum load, and de-
treatment conditions were met, the pressure flection were determined for each specimen by
was released and the specimens were removed applying the load at the rate of 6 m d m i n on
from the treatment vessel. a 280-330-mm span, depending on panel
Arda t t 01.-SUPERCRITICAL FLUID TREATMENT OF COMPOSITES 123

thickness, with an Instron Universal Testing jected to regression analyses or analyses of


Machine. Load and deflection were recorded variance (ANOVA), and the means were com-
continuously with Workbench PC (Strawberry pared to similar tests of untreated, unexposed
Tree, Inc. 1991) running on a personal com- samples with Tukey's Highly Significant Dif-
puter. Specimens for testing internal bond, ference (HSD) test (Statistical Graphics Sys-
thickness swelling, and water absorption were tems Corp. 1993) (a = 0.05) to determine if
cut from the undamaged portion of the failed treatment induced significant strength losses.
bending strips.
Internal bond tests (ASTM D 1037) were RESULTS AND DlSCUSSlON
performed by gluing specimens to aluminum
blocks with a hot-melt adhesive. A uniform Effects of supercritical conditions on
load was applied perpendicular to the surface physical properties
at the rate of Immlmin with an Instron. The No signs of splits, collapse, delamination,
maximum load necessary to pull the speci- or other treatment defects were observed in
mens apart was recorded continuously. Load any of the panel types tested. The lack of treat-
at failure for each sample was reduced to ment defects suggests that significant pressure
pounds per unit cross-sectional area of the gradients that affect structural integrity were
sample. absent during trcatment. In comparison, pre-
Tests for water absorption and thickness vious trials of high-pressure liquid treatments
swelling were performed by submerging spec- of coniferous woods induced collapse and oth-
imens horizontally in water at room tempera- er structural changes (Walkers and Whittington
ture (23-25'C) for 2 and 22 hours. Samples 1970). Most treated samples were dry and
were drained of excess water after each sub- clean, with no marked changes in appearance.
mersion period, and measured for changes in As a result, supercritical fluid-treated panels
amount of water absorbed and thickness. The could be used immediately after treatment.
water was changed after the 2-h submersion. Some samples, however, contained tcbucona-
Thickness swelling (nearest 0.01 mm) was zole crystals at the ends. Crystals ranged in
measured from 3 marked points along the size from very fine to up to 1 mm in diameter.
length of each sample with a digital sliding This suggests that variations in biocide solu-
caliper. Water absorption and thickness swell- bility caused uneven deposition near the vessel
ing were expressed as a percentage of the orig- outlet during the rapid expansion stage (vent-
inal weight and thickness, respectively. ing) at the conclusion of the impregnation pro-
Plywood samples were tested for shear cess. Further trials will be required to identify
strength and wood failure following the U.S. treatment schedules that control surface de-
Product Standard 1-83 (American Panel As- position.
sociation 1983). Each sample was cut to shear No significant changes in specimen thick-
specimen geometry and grooved 2h through ness were noted after treatment, although sam-
the core. All specimens were boiled in water ple weights increased slightly (Table 2). In
for 4 h, dried at 63°C for 20 h, boiled again some instances, samples exhibited small
for another 4 h, and finally cooled in water weight losses and slight thickness compres-
prior to testing while wet. Shear strength was sion. Weight losses may have resulted from
measured with an Instron Universal Testing the removal of wood extractives or resin com-
Machine and load was recorded continuously ponents during exposure to supercritical CO,
as described for earlier bending tests. Orien- (Tillman and Lee 1990; Riner and Campbell
tation of the lathe checks was ignored in all 1991; Larsen et al. 1992; Kumar and Morrell
tests. Percentage wood failure was assessed by 1993). Particleboard, flakeboard, and MDF ex-
two persons after the specimen dried. hibited greater weight losses than did plywood
Results of all mechanical tests were sub- (Table 2). This could be the result of the larger
124 WOOD AND FIBER SCIENCE. APRIL 1997. V. ?9(2)

TABLE 2. Effect of supercriticol fluid impregnation of tebuconazole on r l ~ i c k n e swell


. ~ ~ and weight gain qf various
panel rypes under vaving combinations of prossure, temperature and rreatmrnr rime.

Varinhle Stiltistic Plvwmd Pnniclcbnrd Rrkcho~~d MDF

Thickness swella (%) Mean 1.17 0.68 2.78 1.04


Std. Dev. 0.80 1.09 1.49 0.70
Minimum -0.336 -2.01 -0.98 -0.38
Maximum 3.439 4.17 6.19 2.82
Weight gain (5%) Mean 1.52 0.43 0.86 -0.32
Std. Dev. 1.11 0.58 0.70 0.37
Minimum -0.05 -0.65 -0.72 -1.14
Maximum 4.97 2.29 2.86 0.62
~ ~ f f ~ r r nhtwecn
ec thirkncs h b r e and after Ireamen, ur r prcenwge of initinl ~hickness.

surface area available for extraction, becauseor MDF after a 24-h soak in water compared
these panels are composed of wood fibers, to untreated controls (Table 3). Flakeboard ex-
hibited significant reductions in water absorp-
small particles, or flakes. The slight decrease
in thickness in some samples may have re- tion (39-53%) and thickness swelling (45-
sulted from the compression of void spaces 58%) with increasing treatment pressure or
within the panels during exposure to high temperature (Fig. 2). This suggests that treat-
pressure. In contrast, excessive and unrecov- ment under supercritical conditions may result
erable thickness swelling can result from con-in improved dimensional stability, apparently
ventional liquid treatment of wood-based through reduced hygroscopicity. Release of in-
composites (Deppe 1970; Hall et al. 1982). ternal stresses within and between wood par-
Traditionally, weight gain after treatment ticles during exposure to supercritical CO,
has been used as a measure of preservative may also have contributed to this effect (Hal-
absorption. However, in this study, weight ligan 1970; Hsu et al. 1989). Improved di-
gain was poorly correlated with chemical ab- mensional stability of flakeboard was ob-
sorption for all panel types (Fig. 1). Simulta-
served at pressures from 12.41 to 31.02 MPa
neous extraction of wood extractives and othermaintained at 60°C for 30 min.
wood constituents by supercritical CO, ap- The reduction in hygroscopicity could be
peared to have masked biocide absorption the result of either pressure-heat stabilization
(Tillman and Lee 1990; Ritter and Campbell or the bulking effect of tebuconazole on wood
199 1). Combinations of weight gain and other fibers. Heat treatment is known to impart di-
process variables were also poorly correlated mensional stability to wood (Stamm 1956).
with chemical absorption. As a result, chemi- This effect may be the result of thermal deg-
cal analysis was the only reliable method for radation of hemicelluloses to water-insoluble
determining tebuconazole retention. Further polymers that are less hygroscopic than the
study is needed to increase understanding of hemicelluloses from which they are formed
the relationship between process variables and(Stamm 1956). However, reductions in anti-
biocide deposition for various panel types. shrink efficiency of about 40% required ex-
This information will be essential for devel- posure to high temperatures (120-315°C) and
opment of a controllable treatment process. long heating periods (Stamm et al. 1946). In
addition, heat treatment was accompanied by
Effects of supercritical conditions on relatively large strength losses, especially in
dimensional stability toughness and resistance to abrasion (Stamm
Treatment pressure and temperature had no et al. 1946). These losses were so great that
significant effects on water absorption or they eliminated the possibility of commerical
thickness swelling of plywood, particleboard, application of this technique (Stamm 1964).
Acdo el ol.SUPERCRITICAL FLUlD TREATMENT OF COMPOSITES 125

Weight Gain (g)


Ro. I . Relationship hetween tehuconazole retention
and weight gain in (A) plywood. (8)particlehoard. (C)
flakehard. and (D)MDF after treatment with supercritical
C01 at various pressures, temperatures. and treatment
times.
126 WOOD AND FIBER SCIENCE. APRIL 1997. V. 29(2)

A Panabad

14
12
10

m
- 0 12.41 24.81 31.02 'g 0 12.41 24.81 31.02
C
(0 Pressure (MPa) Pressure (MPa)

Time. 30 m8n

14
12
-
Time 30 mln

30
PO
10

0 45 60 75 0 45 60 75
Temperature (OC) Temperature (OC)
FIG.2. Relalionship hetween thickness swelling or water absorption (24-h soak) and pressure or temperature for
various panel types following impregnation with supercritical C02 for 30 min.

Reports of dimensional stabilization by com- had no significant effect on water absorption of


binations of high pressure and heat are limited. plywood, particleboard, flakeboard, or MDF
Seborg et al. (1945) pressed thin veneers up treated from 12.41 to 31.02 MPa at 60°C for
to 11 MPa at 177'C sufficient to cause the 30 min (P = 0.266, 0.269, 0.998, and 0.055,
flow of lignin to relieve internal stresses. The respectively) and at temperatures of 45-75°C at
process greatly reduced the tendency of the 12.41 MPa for 30 min (P = 0.437, 0.681,
wood to swell when wet. Dimensional stabi- 1.000, and 0.600, respectively). The amount of
lization of wood by exposure to inert gas at chemical deposited had no significant effect on
about 1.03 MPa and 200°C was also explored thickness swelling for plywood, particleboard,
by Giebeler (1983). or flakeboard treated at various pressures (P =
The deposition of tebuconazole, a water-in- 0.306, 0.081, and 0.814, respectively) except
soluble chemical, into cell walls or void spaces for MDF (P = 0.042). or temperatures (P =
within the panels may have affected moisture 0.776, 0.175, 0.951, and 0.649, respectively).
absorption by blocking (bulking) potential wa- These results suggest that the bulking effect of
ter absorption sites. Similar bulking effects tebuconazole was not responsible for improve-
have been reported with such water-insoluble ments in the dimensional stability of treated
chemicals as polyethylene glycol and phenol- panels. Thus, the nature of the stabilization ef-
formaldehyde resin (Stamm 1956; Rowell fect of supercritical CO, will require further
1983; Ward 1989). However, an ANOVA study to establish the mechanism and the po-
showed that various concentrations of tebucon- tential of this technique for producing dimen-
azole, within the range obtained in this study, sionally stable panels.
nl.dn rr GI.-SWERCRITICAI. FLUIDTREATMENT OF COMPOSITES 127

TABLE 4. Effect of treatment pressure. temperature, and d~irafio~r on modulu. of rlosricit~~, Incan (and .strr,rdctr~l
de~,irrtion),~
"J'porficlebourd, jiflakebourd, and MDF after impregnnrion with sripperm'rir<rl C02,1'
Modalus nf elraicily IKP;&I
TE'rtmcn,
EOntlill,lll). Pmiclchl?lrd nnkrbvtnl MI>>'

Pressure (MPa)
0
12.41
24.81
31.02
Temperature ("C)
0
45

Timc (minj
0
5

'Means of R-q replicotcs. Values iullowcd by the same lencr in B pivcn column wirhin u rrrllllncnl do nut diiic~r\ipniflr.unlly hy 'rokry'r HSn I" - 11.111
lmprcynrtion with ruperctilical C02 rt M I T ior 30 mi" for prs>rurr. 12.41 MPll fur 30 min 1~11l e m p e n l t a ~ :mil
. 1241 MPa on 6II'.(. hrr clar&linn r f l c c f r .

Effects of supercritical conditions on


mechcmical properties
Effective biocide protection is essential for
the performance of panel products under ad-
TABLE 5. Effect of trentmenr pre.rsure, tempemture, and verse conditions, hut equally important is the
duratio~ron ~,~odulus of ruplure, mean (and standard de-
~ i a t i o n )of, ~particleboard. flokeboard, and MDF arer im-
impact of treatment on physical and mechan-
pregnation with stiprrcriricul C02.h ical properties of the treated product. Increas-
ing pressure from 12.4 1 to 3 1.02 MPa at 60°C.
temperature from 45 to 75'C at 12.41 MPa or
treatment time from 5 to 30 min produced no
Pressure (MPa)
significant negative effects on MOE of parti-
0 8-9 272 (36)A 482 (72)A 766 (73)A
cleboard, flakeboard, or MDF (Table 4).
12.41 8-9 276 (I9jA 541 (40)A 733 (29)A
24.81 8-9 285 (29jA 550 (86)A 700 (47)A Flakeboard, however, exhibited a 24% in-
32.02 8-c) 244 (85)A 590 (9 l ) A 682 (34)A crease in MOE as temperature increased from
Temperature ("Cj 45 to 75°C. In contrast, previous studies with
0 6-8 272 (36)A 482 (72)A 766 (73)A liquid solvents indicated that prolonged ex-
45 8 317 (SjA 637 (46)B 819 (53)A posure of wood to high pressures and elevated
60 6-8 276 (19)A 541 (90)A 733 (29)A temperatures during treatment can result in
75 9 282 (21)A 619 (178)B 742 (38)A considerable mechanical damage (Walters
Time (min) 1967; Walters and Whittington 1970; Mitchell
0 8-9 272 (36)A 482 (72)A 766 (73)A and Barnes 1986). Our results indicate that
5 8-9 300 (13)A 558 (73)A 770 (27)A
these effects are absent in supercritical fluid-
15 8-9 309 (I8)A 549 (39)A 789 (57)A
30 8-9 246 (19)A 541 (90)A 733 (29)A impregnated materials.
m V ~ l a crollowed
r hv the silrnr lrlter in o niven uohlmn within n rrsntmenL
Similarly, no significant decreases in MOR
do not diffe? rienificrntly by Ttlkey's HSD I<,= I I i I S i . were noted for particleboard. flakehoard, or
I' Impxynatio#rwlrh ,upwcritir.ill COi ;a M1"C for 30 mi" fur preasurc. 12.41
MP;I I,. XI ",in for tcmpcolttlrc. 12.41 MP,, ,,I 60-cbrdurntion MDF after exposure to the same pressures,
128 WOOD AND FIBER SCIENCE. APRIL 1997. V. 29(2)

TABLE6. Effect of variations in supercriticalJluidpressure, temperature, and duration on internal bond, mean (and
standard deviation).' of tebuconazok-treated panicleboard, pokehoard, and MDF panels.b
lntcrnrl band (KPal
k M e n t conditions Paniclebasrd Makcbunrd MDF

Pressure (Mpa)
0
12.41
24.81
3 1.02
Temperature ('C)
45
60
75
Time (min)
5
15
30 6.96 ( 1 . 4 5 ) ~ 1 l .hO ( 3 . 4 8 ) ~ 17.1 1 (3.04)A
~ c 8 n . iof 5 rcp1ic.t~~.Valucr followed by the rmme lcncr for all lrcatrn~ntrwithin a given prncl type do not diffcfct significantly hy Tukrhy'r HSI) la =
.. ....,.
""<I
,
h imp~gnarionwith ruprrcriheal C02 a8 W C for 30 min for presrun. 12.41 MPa for M min for temperature. and 12.41 MPa at MT for duntion effecu.

temperatures, and treatment period regimes preservatives resulted in reductions in me-


(Table 5). Flakeboard, however, again exbib- chanical properties (Boggio and Gertjejansen
ited a 28-32% increase in MOR as tempera- 1982; Hall et al. 1982; Schmidt 1982). Our
ture increased from 45 to 75'C. results, however, indicate that tebuconazole
The different amounts of tebuconazole re- had no effect on the strength properties of par-
tention obtained in this study had no signifi- ticleboard, plywood, or MDE probably be-
cant effect on either MOE or MOR of tested cause tebuconazole does not interact chemi-
panels, regardless of pressure, temperature, or cally to a significant extent with the wood.
duration of treatment (P > 0.05). Previous The reason for the improvement in elastic
studies indicated that treatment of wood-based and strength properties of flakeboard after im-
composites with several conventional wood pregnation under supercritical conditions re-

TABLE 7. Effecr, mean (and standard deviation),' of temperature, pressure, and duration period during suprrcritical
Puid impregnnrion of plvwood on shear srrengrh and wood failure.
Trealrncnt conditions
Rcrlivrc (MPal Temperalure ("C)
Timc (minl Conlml 12.41 24.81 3 1.02 45 MI 75

Shear strength (KPa)


0 19 (3)A - - - - - -
5 - 19 (4)A - - - - -
15. - 19 (3)A - - - - -
30 - 20 (6)A 19 (4)A 19 (3)A 18 (3)A 20 (6)A 17 (3)A
Wood failure (R)
0 94 (4)A - - - - - -
5 - 97 (3)A - - - - -
15 - 94 (4)A - - - - -
30 - 92 (7)A 95 (4)A 95 (5)A 93 (6)A 92 (7)A 96 (4)A
Mcrnr of 9-19 replicates. Valucs fallowed by the r m c lcllcr for a given psncl rypc do not differ significanlly by nkey'r HSD ln = 11.05).
A C ~ Oer 01.-SUPERCRITICAL FLUID TREATMENT OF COMPOSITES 129

mains unclear. Postcuring of resin, polymer- bond of particleboard (P = 0.002, 0.043, and
ization of wood components, or direct reaction 0.053, respectively). This effect suggests that
of tebuconazole with wood components may tebuconazole may have interacted with parti-
account for this effect. Further study will be cleboard components, either by direct chemi-
required to elucidate the potential causes of cal reaction or a bulking effect that resulted in
this improvement. increased cohesion between wood particles.
Further study will be required to verify this
Internal bond effect. Tebuconazole levels were not related to
internal bond changes in flakeboard or MDF
Internal bond tests (tensile strength perpen- (P > 0.05).
dicular to the surface) were made to assess the
effect of treatment conditions on wood-adhe-
sive integrity. The increased use of wood- Plywood shear strength and wood failure
based composites in which wood or other ma- Increasing treatment pressure from 12.41 to
terials are glued to the boards or the cohesion 31.02 MPa at 60°C, temperature from 45 to
of wood fibers or particles determines bond 75°C. and treatment period from 5 to 30 min
strength increases the need to evaluate internal had not significant effect on shear strength or
bond strength (ASTM D 1413; American So- wood failure in plywood compared to untreat-
ciety for Testing and Materials 1995b). In- ed controls (Table 7). These results suggest
creasing treatment pressure from 12.41 to that supercritical conditions used in this study
31.02 MPa at 60°C for 30 min produced sig- did not interfere with wood adhesion, and the
nificant increases in internal bond in particle- glue-wood bond remained unchanged. Further
board and flakeboard compared to untreated analyses also showed that the presence of te-
control panels (Table 6). Particleboard exhib- buconazole had no significant effect on either
ited a 2 6 7 1 % improvement in internal bond shear strength or wood failure (P > 0.05).
at 31.02 MPa, whereas flakeboard showed a Very high percentages of wood failures in
16% increase at 24.81 MPa. Increasing treat- treated samples support these results. In con-
ment pressure from 12.41 to 31.02 MPa at trast, reductions in mechanical properties have
60°C for 30 min had no effect on the internal been noted in previous studies with conven-
bond of MDE tional preservative treatments of plywood
Similar increases in internal bond were ob- (MacKay 1978; Lee 1985; Winandy et al.
served as temperature was increased from 45 1988).
to 75'C and pressure was maintained at 12.41
MPa. Particleboard and flakeboard exhibited a CONCLUSIONS
2 6 6 8 % and 50% increase in internal bond,
respectively, but no significant changes were Exposure to elevated temperatures and pres-
noted with MDF (Table 6). Increasing the du- sures during supercritical CO? impregnation
ration of treatment from 5 to 30 min at 12.41 with tebuconazole produced no negative ef-
MPa and 60°C produced no significant effect fects on the physical and mechanical proper-
on internal bond for flakeboard or MDF (Table ties of plywood, particleboard, flakeboard, and
6). Particleboard, however, exhibited a 26- MDE To the contrary, supercritical fluid im-
45% improvement. pregnation improved some panel properties,
The increased internal bond of particleboard although the effects and their relative value are
could be associated with chemical absorption. questionable. The results indicate that super-
An ANOVA of tebuconazole retention in var- critical fluid impregnation of panel products
ious combinations of pressure, temperature, poses little risk to panel properties, although
and duration of treatment revealed that reten- further study on full-scale treatments would be
tion had a significant effect on the internal advisable once this process is commercialized.
WOOD AND FIBER SCIENCE, APRIL 1997. V. 29(2)

REFERENCES ing temperature on the clear wood strength of southern


pine treated with CCA-Type A. Forest Prod. I. 360):
ACDA,M. N. 1995. Supercritical fluid impregnation of 3-12.
wood hased composites. Ph.D. dissertation, Oregon RtTrER, D. S., AND A. G. CAMPRELL. 1991. Supercritical
Statc University, Corvallis, OR. 160 PP... carbon dioxide extraction of southern pine and pondcr-
AMBRCAN PANEL ASSOCIATION.1983. U.S. Product Stan- osa pine. Wood Fiber Sci. 23(1):24-44.
dard 1-83 far construction and industrial . . with
olvwood RoweLL, R. M. 1983. Chemical modification of wood.
typical APA trademarks. American Panel Association. Forest Prod. Abstr. 6(12):363-382.
T a a ~ n ~WA.
a. SAIILE-DEMESSIE, E. 1994. Deposition of chemicals in
A M ~ ~ R I SCnArN l m ~FOR TESTING
A N D MATERIAI.~ (ASTM). semi-porous solids using supercritical fluid carriers.
1995a. Methods of evaluating the properties of wood- Ph.D. dissertation, Oregon State University, Corvallis,
hase liher and particle panel materials. D 1037. Pages OR. 301 pp.
137-166 in Annual hook of ASTM standards. 4.09 SCHMIDT. E. L. 1982. Effects of a formaldehyde and sulphur
Wood. Philadelphia, PA. dioxide treatment on the decay and mechanical pmpcrtics
. 199% Standard tcsl method for wood preser- of aspen waferboard. Int. J. Wwd Preserv. 2:173-175.
vatives hy lahoratory soil-hlock cultures. D 1413. Pages SRBORO, R. M., M. A. MILLFJ, AND A. 1. STAMM.1945.
207-213 B Annual hook of ASTM standards. 4.09 Heat-stabilized compressed wood (Staypak). Mech.
Wood. Philadelphia, PA. Eng. 67(1):25-31.
AMERICAN WO~~>-PRESRRVRRS' ASSOCIATION. (AWPA). SMITH, S. M., 1. 1. MORREIS., E. SAHLCDIIMESSIR. AND K.
1994. All timher products-preservative treatment by L. LEVIEN.1993a. Supercritical fluid treatments: Effects
prcssurc process. Standard CI-95. Pages 17-23 in on bending strength of white spruce heartwood. Docu-
AWPA hook of standards. Woodstock, MD. ment No. IRGiWP 93-20008. International Research
DOWIO.K., AND E. I. GBRTJRIANSRN. 1982. InRucnce of Group on Wood Presevation, Stockholm, Sweden.
ACA and CCA watcrbornc preservatives on the prop- -, E. SAHLE-DEMESSIE, 1. I. MORRELL, K. L. LF.VIEN.
erties of aspen wafcrhoard. Forest Prod. 1. 32(3):22-26. AND H. Nc. 1993b. Supercritical fluid (SCF) treatment:
DEPPE. H. 1. 1970. The protection of sheet material Its effect on bending strength and stiffness of ponderosa
against water and decay. 1. Inst. Wood Sci. 5(3):41-45. pine sapwood. Wood Fiber Sci. 25:119-123.
GIRBBLRR, E. 1983. Dimensional stabilization of wood by STAMM,A. 1. 1956. Thermal degradation of wood and
moisture-hcat-pressurc-treatment.Holz Roh-Werkst. 41: cellulose. Ind. Eng. Chem. 48:413-417.
87-94, -. 1964. Wood and cellulose science. Ronald Press
t~A1.l.. H. 1.. R. 0.GliRTJFJANSEN, E. L. SCHMlm. C. G. Co., New York, NY.
CARI..AND R. C. DE GRWT. 1982 Preservative treat-
ment effects on mechanical and thickness swelling
-. H. K. BURR,AND A. A. KLINE.1946. Stayhwood.
Heat-stabilized wood. Ind. Eng. Chem. 38:630-634.
pr<lp~fii~s of aspen wafcrhoard. Forest Prod. 1. 32(11/ STATISTICAL GRAPHICS SYSTEMS CORP.1993. StatGraphics
12):lY-26. users guide. Version 7. Rockville, MD.
IIAI.I.IGAN, A. F. 1970. A review of thickness swelling in STRAWBERRY Tnep., INC. 1991. Workbench PC users
particlehoard. Wood Sci. Tcchnol. 4:301-312. guide. Version 2.0.2. Sunnyvale, CA.
tfSU, W. E., W. SCHWALD, AND 1. A. SHIELDS. 1989. TILLMAN, L. M.,ANDY. Y.1,F.E. 1990. Pulping of southern
Chemical and physical changes required for producing pine under low water, alkaline conditions using super-
dimensionally stahlc wood-hased composites. Wood critical carbon dioxide-sulfur dioxide mixtures. Tappi
Sci. Tcchnol. 23:?81-288. 73(7):140-146.
HUNT,G. M.. AND G. A. GARRAT. 1967. Wood preser- WALTERS, C. S. 1967. The effect of treating pressure on
vation, 3rd cd. McGraw-Hill, New York. NY. 433 pp. the mechanical properties of wood: I. Red gum. Proc.
K ~ M A S.. R . AND 1. I. MORREI.~..
1993. Effect of fatty acid Am. Wwd Preserv. Assoc. 63:l66-178.
removal on treatahility of Douglas-fir Document No. -, AND L. WHITTINGTON. 1970. The effect of treat-
TRGMiP 93-40008. International Research Group on ing pressure on preservative ahsorption and on the me-
Wood Prcservation. Stockholm. Sweden. chanical properties of wood. 11. Douglas fir. Proc. Am.
I.ARSEN.A,. N. A. JRWOFT,AND T GEIROKK.1992. Ex- Wood Preserv. Assoc. 66179-193.
traction of formaldehyde from particleboard with su- WARD,D. T 1989. Supercritical fluid-aided deposition of
percritical carhon dioxide. Forest Prod. J. 42(4):45-48. methyl methacrylate into wood. M.S. thesis, University
LEE,A. W C . 1985. Effect of CCA treating and air-dry- of Southern Florida, Tampa, FL. 102 pp.
ing on the pmpeRies of southern pine lumher and ply- WINANDY. 1. E.. S. L. LEVAN,E. L. SCHAFFTR. AND P W.
wood. Wood Fiher Sci. 17(2):209-213. LFX. 1988. Effect of fire-retardant treatment and redry-
MACKAY, J. R G. 1978. Kiln drying of treated plywood. ing on the mechanical properties of Douglas-fir and as-
Forest Prod. 1. 28(3):19-21. pen plywood. USDA For Serv. Res. Pap. FPL RP-485.
M1'rctal.l.. P H.. AND H. M. RARNRS. 1986. Effect of dry- Madison, WI. 19 pp.

You might also like