53. Assessing the Price of Unpriced Items 84. Evaluation of Domestic Preference 55. Price Comparison 56. Negotiation 57. Post-qualification 53.1 532 541 542 543 544 551 552 553 554 56.1 57 {tis so permited under ITT Cizuse 23, any Tenderer offered only eighty percent (80%) or minimum percent ofthe items of alot as stated under ITT Sub-Clause 235, the TEC shall Calla the total ot value by adding up the average prices ofered by other responsive Tenderers forthe missing items tothe lot value to establish the winning lt Tender. f the Tenderer offered less than the specified, the Tender shall be evaluated as sated under ITT Clause 23, lf the winning otis missing some items as stated under ITT Sub Clause 53.1, comprising less than twenty percent (20%), the Purchaser may procure the missing items from the Tenderer offering the least cost for those remaining tems, Ifthe Tender document so specifies, the Tenderer wil grant a margin preference to goods ‘manufactured in Bangladesh as stated in ITT Caluse 51 for the purpose of Tender ‘comparison, in accordance withthe procedure outlined below ‘The Purchaser will first review the tenders to confi the appropriateness of, and to modify as necessary, the tenderer group classification to which Tenderers assigned their tenders inppreparing their Tender Forms and Price Schedules. Al evaluated tenders in each group will then be compared fo determine the lowest evaluated tender of each group. Such lowest evaluated tenders shall be compared with each other and i as a result of this comperison a tenderer from Group A and the Tenders ‘offering Goods manufactured in Bangladesh is the lowest, it shall be selected forthe award, |, as a result ofthe preceding comparison, the lowest evaluated tender is from Group B, (2) al Group B tenders wil then be futher compared with the lowest evaluated tender ‘rom Group A, after adding to the evaluated tender price of goods offered in the tender for Group B, for the purpose of further comparison only an amount equal to fiteen (15) percent of the CIFICIP (named place of destination or named port of destination) tender price, (b) The lowest-evaluated tender determined from this last comparison shall be selected forthe award, ‘The TEC shall compare all responsive Tenders to detemine the lowest-evaluated Tender, as stated under ITT Clause 54. |n the extremely unlikely event that there is a tie for the lowest evaluated price, the Tenderer withthe superior past performance with the Purchaser shall be selected, whereby factors such as delivery period, qualty of Goods delivered, complains history and Performance indicators could be taken into consideration, Inthe event that there isa tie for the lowest price and none of the Tenderers has the record ‘of past performance with the Purchaser, then the Tenderer shall be selected, subject to firm confirmation through the Post-qualifcation process described in ITT Cause 57, after Consideration as to whether the quality of Goods that is considered more advantageous by the end-users, The successful Tenderer as stated under ITT Sub Clauses 55,1, 85.2 and 55,3 shall not be selected through lttery under any circumstances. "No negotiations shall be held during the Tender evaluation or award with the lowest or any ‘ther Tenderer pursuant to Rule 99 of the Public Procurement Rules, 2008, ‘After determining the lowest-evaluated responsive tender as sated under ITT Sub-Clause 55.1, the Purchaser's TEC pursuant io Rule 100 of the Public Procurement Rules, 2008, shall carryout the Post-Qualficaton ofthe Tenderer, using only the requirements specified in Sub-Section C, Quaification Criteria, ie KW oe 20