I

1
MeGRA W-HItr, CIVIL ENGLNEERING SERIES
HARMER E. DAVIS, Consulting Editor . "

OPEN-CHANNEL HYDR~AULICS
BABBI'IT '. Engineering.in Public Health
)
BENJAMIN' Statically Indeterminate St~uctures
Cnow . Open,-cha,nnel Hyqraulics i
I
I
DAVIS, TROXELL,'AND WrsKoCIL . Tl1e Testing and Inspection of '
I Engineering Materials
I
I
'{
\ r VEN TE CHOW, Ph.D.
) DUNl'iAM . Foundations of Structures i
I

DUNHAM' The Theory and Practice of Reinforced Concrete

I
Proiessot of Hydtaulic En(finl!erin(f
!
DUNHAM AND YOUNG.' Contracts, Specifications, and Law for Engineers University of Illinois
GAYLORD AND GAYLORD' Structural Design
HALLERT 'Photogrammetry
HENNES AND EKSE . Fundamentals of Transportation Engineering
KRYNINE AND JUDD' Principles of Engineering Geology and Geot.echnics
LINSLEY AND FRANZINI . Elements of Hydraulic Engineering
INTERNATIONAL STUDENT EDITION
LmsLIDY, KOHLER, AND I'A ULHUB ' Applied Hydrology
LINSLEY, KOHLER, AND PAULHUS' Hydrology f9r Engineers
LU:8DER . Aerial Photographic Interpretation
MA'l'SON, SMITH, AND HURD' Traffic Engineering . '. 'T'1::'

MEAD, MEAD, AND AKERMAN' Contracts, Specifications, and KHAL1D PHOTO STAlb
J Engineering Relations U.E.T
I NORRIS, HANSEN, HOLLEY, BIGGS, NAMYET, AND 1fINAMI . :Structural
Design for Dyiramic Loads (, 'i
l:
PEURIFOY' Construction Planning, Equipment, and Methods' McGRAW·HILL BOOK COMPANY; I:r.;G.
PEURIFOY' gstimating Constructi()u Costs •
New York St. Louis .. San Francisco Di.isseldorf .;
TROXELL AND DAVIS' Composition and Properties of Concrete
~anama
"
London lViexico Sydney Toront9
TSCHEBOTARIOFF . Soil Mechanics, Foundations, and Earth Structures
URQUHART, O'ROURl<::t, AND WINTER' Design of
Concrete Structures KOGAKUSHA·COMPANY, LTD.
WANG AND ECKEr. . Elementary Theory of Structures .Tokyo
"

-.

, ;
i
!
 )

1fi l
.I
!
·1 -!
.1
l
},,
i

ce
,
i
1
{.
OPEN-CHANNEL HYDRAULICS :i 6"it
INTERNATIONAL STUDENT EDlTION
To
Exclusive rights by Kogakusha Co., Ltd., for manufacture and export from ~.
Humanity and Human Welfare
_. Japan. This book cannot be re-exported from the cou\ltry to which it is
consigiled by Kogakllsha Co., Ltd., or by McGraw-Hill Boak Company, ~.
Inc., or any .of its subsidiaries.
VIII ~.
Copyright © 1-959 by the McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc. All rights
reserved. This bo"k, or parts thereof, may not be reprodlJced in any
for~ without pClmissioll of the publishers. Libra,,' of COI1g1·es.r Catalog
Card Number 58-13860

~
(

-€.

i
',!!-
o.
ttJe

(;;.
f

'toano PR,IN'tlNG co'. l.:TO;. TOKYO. J .... PAN

 ,
,

"t,
~i;" T
.j.

i
1

~.
l~~
... 1 I
i

@-,- I
1,
!
(~

tm· ;.,

~
In recent years water-resources projects and hydraulic engineering
~"
works' have been developing rapidly throughout the world. The knowl-
( edge of .open-chp,nnel hy~raulics, which is essential to the de~ign of many
,, ~ hydraulic structures, has thus advanced by leaps and bounds: To the
\
~.
I I
students and engineers in the field of hydraulic engineering, such valuable
new knowledge should be .made available in suitable book form. It is
': therefore not that some 'new books have already appeared.
Gt. ;
Howi:lver, most of them a.re present-ed in limited scope and 1111 2.re written
in foreign In the· English langu!l.ge, the t\>,ro well-known
f?\'
f
t
I
i, books, respectively' by Bakhmeteff and by 1VoodwI1l'd and Posey, were
published nearly two decades ago. 2
This book gives broad coverage.of recent developments; it should meet

f
I .fi r
the present Ilead. It is designed as a. textbook fo\, both undergrachui.te
and graduate stuuents .and also as a compendium for practicing <:;,ll'=>lU"'"
Emphasis is given to the qualities of "teachability" and" practicability,"
t\- and t1tt,empts were made in preaenting the material to bridge the gap
which is generally to exist between the theory and the practice.

•
.}

at ',1»
In order to achieve these objectives, the use of .advanced mathematics is
deliberately avoided as much as possible, and the exp~a.nation of hydraulic
t

! )
\ .,0.
eie 1 Such. as: Etienne Orausse, "Hydrauliquc des can~ux decouvel·ts en regime perma-

nent" (" Hydraulios of Open Channeld with Steady Flow"), Editions Eyrolles,
Paris, 1951; R. Silber, "Etude at trace des ecouleroents permanents en canaUl( et
rivieres" ("Study and Sket<lh of Stelldy Flows ill Ca.nals and Rivers It), Dunod,

Ii'
de Pa.ris, 1954; Martin Schmidt, "Gerinnehyqraulik" ("Open-cha.nnel Hydraulics"),
VE'B Verlag Teehn:ik-Bauverlag GMBH, B~rlin and Wiesbaden, 1957; N. N. PllV-
10vskiT, "Otkrytye rusla i sopdazhenie biefov sooruzhenil" (Open channels and adiust-

..h.•
/;"
" ment of water l~veh), in the "Sobranie sochinonil" ("Collected Works"), voL 1,
fftJ pp. 309-543, Academy of Scieooes of U.S.S,R., Moscow and Leningrad, :1955; and

~~'
the new edition of M, D. Chertousov, "Qidraivlika" ("Hydraulias':), Gosenergoizdat,
Moscow and Leningra.d, 1957.

r • Boris A. Bakhmeteff," Hydraulics of Open Channels," McGraw-Hill IIook Com-

pa.ny, Too" New York, 1932; ao.d Sherman M. Woodward a.ud Chesley J. Posey,

..... /i['
"Hydraulic.s of Steady Flow ill Open Channels," John Wiley and SOIlS, New'
York,' 1941. '
, \1 ' Y'~:i' . .,l
I yii
;·f

I
)
\
~.
 viii PREFACE
i
i
theories is greatly simplified as far as practicable, ~Illustrativ.e example~
. are to show the application of the theories, and practical problems
are provided Jor exercises. Furthermore, short historical accounts are
given in footnotes in order to stimulate the reader's interest, and ample
references are supplied for his independent .studies. Some references,
hO'\'8ver, may not be readily available to the reader, but they are liste:d
for academicaud historical intercst.
In essence, the book is the outgrowth of the author's 20 year,,' experi-
ence as a student,teacher, engineer, rese.iucher, and consultant in' the
field of hydra\llic engineeTing, The manuscript of the book was drafted
for the first time in the academic year of 1951-1952 for use in teaching
the students of civil, agricultural, and mechanical engineering and of
.. theoretical' ahd applied mechanics at the University of Illinois. Since
then several revisions have been made. In .the beginning, the material
was prepared solely for graduate students. Owing to the general demand
for a book on the design of hydraulic structures for undergraduate studies,
the manuscript was expanded to include more fundaments;! principles and
design procedures. At the sa.me time, most of the advanced mathematics
and theories were either omitted or replaced by more practic.'l..l approaches
using mathematical operations of a level not higher than calculus..
Fro!!. 1951 to 1955, the author made several special visits to many
major engineering agenCies and firms in the United Stat,es tQ discuss
problems with their engineers. As a result, a Yl'.st fund of information
on hydraulic design pnictices was collected and incorporated into the
manuscript. Thereafter, the author also visited many hydraulic insti-
tutions and laboratories in other countries and exchanged knowledge with
their staff members..In 1956 he visited England, France, Belgium, the
Netherlands,.Germany, Italy, <I.lld Switzerland. In 1958 he visited
Austria, Turkey, India, and Japan, and again England, France, and
Belgium, The information obtained from these countries and from other
countries through publications and correspondenc'e was eventually added
.to the final draft of the manus!}ript as supplements to the American
practice. . channels. The erodible channels in general may be classified under three
The text.is Ol:ganitlec,i into five parts-namely, Basic Principles, Uni-
form Flow, Gradually Varied Flow, Rapidly Varied Flow, and Unstea,dy
Flow. The fin;t three parts cover the material which would ordinarily be
treated in a one-semester .course 011 open-channel ;hydraulics. For a one~
semester course on the! design of hydraulic structures, Chaps. 7 and 11
and part IV should suJ:iply most of the material fpr..the t'eaching purpose.
Part V on unsteady fldw may' be used either fOl' advanced studies or as
supplemental material ;to the one-semester course, depending If),rgeiy 011
the discretion of the irlstructor with .reference to the time available and
the interest 'ahown by the students. . is introduced which requires the use of a, varied-flow function table first
T l'REFACE ix
In Part I on basic principles, the type of flow in open channels is cla~i-·
fied according to the vliriation in the parrunetersof flow with respf.ct to
space and time. For simplicity, the depth of flow is used as the flow
parameter in the classification. The state of flow is classified according
to the range of the invariants of flow with r~spect to viscosity and
gravity. The flow invariants used are the Reynolds number and the con·
(~
Froude number. Since the effect of surface tension of water is insignifi-
cant l.n most engineering problems, the Weber nU!l1b~r as it flow invariant ?4
is not introduced. In fact, the state of fiow c~n be further classified it IS
for its stability in u.ccordu.nce with the Vedernikov number or other suit- ther
ahlf?l:rlt!:!rla. However, ::mch a criterion h.as not been weli established in I J
engil1eering praatice, and therefore it is taken up only briefly later in la~
Chap,8. COInj
FOUl' coefficients for velocity and pressure distributions are introduced,
particular, the f.mel'gy coefficient is presented throughout the book.
This coefficient is usuHlly ignored ill most books on hydraulics. In
practical applications, the effect of the energy coefficient on computations in rn
and hence on is quite significant f:Ll1d therefore should not be a~ I
overlooked, e,reHl though the value of the coefficient miJ,y not always be
shou;
I
determined accurately.
The energy and momE,ntum principles constitute the basis of interpre- Tjpj
tation for most hydraulic phenomena. A thorough treatment of the two hel i
prfnclples is in Chap. 3. SilIce the book is intended for the use of
practicing engineel's, the treatment of a problem i~ in m013t cases based on
a ollEl- or two-dimensional flow: . . riar
In Part II 011 \ll1ifol'm flow, eeveral uniform-flow formulas are. intro- ail'! 1
duced. ,Despite many new proposals for a formula having a theore~ical POl~ta;
background, the Manning formula still holds its indisputable top position in tJu
in the field of practical a;pplicatioI)s. This formula. is therefore used I) ,
extensively in the book. In certain specific problems, however, the RuL
Che2iY formula is used occasionally. ' .
The design for uniform flo\v covers nonerodible, erodible, and grassed
types: chapl1els which scour but do ilOt silt, channels which silt but do
not ~cour, and channels which ;icour and silt simultlllleously. In channels
of tlie second and third types, it is nec€6sary for the walter to carry sedi-
ments, As will be stated later, the sediment transportation il'; consid~red
as a subject in the domain of river hydraulics, Therefore, only the chan-
nels: of the first type, which :carry relatively clear wa~er in stable con-
dition, are treated in this bodk ,.
Iii Part III ongl'adually va-ried flow, se,,-eral methods for the compu-
tation of flow profi1.~s are discussed. .A new method of direct integration
.•
 i.i
I • . Ii
t
.x . PREFACE . PREF~CE
. .. xi
developed by Professor Boris A~ Bakhmeteff in 1912. 1. The table given in Similarly, the transient flow in chanI).els subject to the iilfiuence of the
• ... Appendix D of th IX. book ]s an ~xten8ion of the table to n~arly: three times tides is a special topic in the rapidly developed fields of tiditl hydraulics

:
i• j
i'
I its original size. This extended table \1nd a table for negative slopes were
prepared during 1952 to 1954 by the author for teaching purposes at the
Universjty of Illinois,2 For the computation of fiow profiles in circular
i
~,
and cOD,stalel1gineering and is therefore b9yond the scope of this book.
In a science which has reached so advanced a state of development,
a large portion of the work is necessarily one of coordination of' existillg
, e) J'" ..
conduits, a varied-ft.ow function table is also· provided in Appendix E. :
The method of singular point is a powerful tool for the analysis of flow
cOlltributions. Throughout the text} the auth6r hr,s attempted to make
specinc acknowledgment regarding the source of m:lter.ial employed} and
l ,
.)~
• profiles. Since this method requires the use of advancedmatheml1tics}
it is described only briefly in Chap. 9 for the purpose of st.imulating £ur-
any failure to do so is o.n unintention:al oversight. .
In the preparation of this \:lOok, engineers and a,dministrators in many
. the I' interest in the theoretical study of flow problems. . engineering agencies hl1ve ~!1thusi<:1st.ically furnished information and
alit In Part IV on rapidly varied fiow, the treatmellt of the problems is extend~d cooperation. The author is especially indebted to those in the
1
I largely supported by experimental data, because this t.ype of flow is so U.S. BUl'cau of Reclamation, U.S. Geological Survey, U.S. Soil Conser-
~:, ,ration Ser~ice. U.S. Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Army Engineer.
complicated that a mere theoretical analysis. in most cases will not yield
I sufficient information fO!' the purpose of practical design. The use of the . WiLterways E~periment Stat.ion, Offices .of the Chief Engineer and
~!i fiow-n!;i metllod and the method of characteristics is mentioned but no District EnD'ineers of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Weather
. details are given, becallse t.he former is so popular that it, can be found Bureau} U,S~Buref~u of Public Roads; and the Tennessee Vilrey Authority .

i
on,
.. in most hydraulics books; while the latter requires t.he knowledge .0£ Also, mn.ny friends and colleagues have kindly. supplied information
and generously offered suggestions. In particular, the author wishes·
I advanced Tiiathematics beyond the scope of this wbrk. . to thank Dr. Hunter Rouse, Professor of Fluid Mechanics and Director of
\ Iii In Pnrt V on llnsteady:fiow, the keatment is general but practical. It
I·1 should be recognized that this type of f10wia a highly specialized subj ect. 3 Iowa Institute of Hydraulic Reseal'ch, State Unive·rsity of Iowa; Dr. Arthur
'1'. Ippen, Professor of Hydraulics and Director of Hydrodynamics Labora-
t.::,The knowledge of advanced mathematics would be required if a compre-

i
I hensive treatment were given. .
It should be noted that the subject matter of this book dwells mainly
tory, Massachusett.s Institute of Technology; Dr. Giulio De Marchi,
Professor of I:1ydraulics and Director of Hydraulic Laboratory, Institute
t/) on the flow of water in channels where water contains little foreign mate- of Hydraulics and Hydraulic Construction, Polytechnic Institute of
rial.· Consequently, problems related to sediment trAnsportation and Milan,Italy; Dr. Roman R. Chugayv, Professor and Head of Hydraulic
I)) air entnl.inment are not fully discussed. In recent years, sedirrient tr!lns- Con:;truction, Scientific Research Institute of Hydraulic Engineering,
i portatim in channels has become abroad subject that is generally COvered Polytechnic Jl1sti;tute of Leningrad, U,S.S.R.; Monsieur Pierre Danel,
a1 -'~e) in the study of river hydraulics, which is often treated iI).depc:mdently.1 President of SOGREAH (Societe Grcnobloise d'Etudes et d'Applications
I Hydrauliques), France, and President of the Interun,tional AssociatiO!l of
, r ... 1 Boris A. Bakh~ete.ff,"O Neravnomernom Dvizhenii Zhidkoati v Otkrytorn
(I Hydraulic Research; Dr. Charles Jaeger, Special L.ectul'er at the Imperial
hJ I
Rusle" {"Varip.d Flow in Open Channels"),·St. Petersburg, Russia, 1912.
, Ven Te Chow, Integratmg the eC\uation of gra~ually varied /lOw, paper no. 838, College of Science and Technology, Univemityof Londoll, and COllsulting
{J'
I
Proc!;ecHngs, A.men·caT' Society of Civil ETl{/in~er3, vol. 81, pp. 1-32, November} 1055. Enginee!' of. The English Electric Company, Ltd., England; Professor
; .t Closing disc~ssioil by the author in J01trnal of HydrauHcs Division,vol. 83, no. HY1, L. J. Tison, Director of Hydraulic Institute, University of Ghent, Bel-
~ ~ (1,
I
paper no. 1177, pp. 9·-22, February, 195;'. : '
• Spedal references are: J: J. Stoke". "W';'ter Waves," vol. IV of "Pilre and Applied
gium; Dr. Tojil'O' Ishihara, Professor of Hydraulics and Dean of Facult.y
do of Engineering, 'Kyoto University~ Japan; and Dr. Otto Xirschmer,
tL, Mathenlatics," Interscience Publishers, New Yorle, 1957; V. A. ArkhangelskiI,

'-1
o -
~lC
(~
"Ra~chety Neustanovivsh~gosia pvizheniill. v Otkrytykh Vo40tokakh" ("Calcu-
la.tion of Unsteady Flow in Op£,n Channels"), Academy of ScieRces, U.S.S.R., 1947;
and ·8. A. Khristianovich, "N eustanovivsheiesia d vizhenie v kana.lakh i rekakh"
Yrofessor 'of Hydraulics and Hydralllic Structures, Technical Jnstitute of
Darmstadt, G e l ' m a n y . . ,
Special acknowledgments are due. Dr. Nathan M. Newmarlt, Professor
1an- ("Upstea.dy Motion ill Channels and.Rivers"), in "Nekotoryie!Vopl'osy Mekhaniki and Head; ofthe Department of Civil Engineering} University; of Illinois}
(
f- I Sp19~hnol Sredy" (" Several Que~tions on the Mechanics of Oontinuous Media "),
Aca~emy of Sciences, U.S.S.R., 1938, pp. l3-154. .. for his encouragement and unfailingisupport of this project; D~. James M.
)
npu-
3+.;on
~. ~'st
1 I
• ~pecial references on the subj'eet of river hytlrauiics are:· Serge Lelia.vsky, "An
Introduction to Flilvial Hydrauli~s," Constable and Co., Ltd.; London, 1955; and
T.Blench, "Regime Dehaviour of yanllis and Rivers," Butterwor;th & Co. (Publishers)
Ltd" London, 1957. . f
RobertsoiJ., Professor of Theoretica~ and Applied Mechanics, ;University
of Illinoi.':\, for his review of and c~mmellts on Chapter 8 onitheoretical
concepts;: nnd Dr. Steponas Kolu~aila, Professor of Civil Engineering,

t
\ i
1

·1
 -,
. i
l
xii PREFACE'

University of Notre Dame, for h.is readi~g of the entire manuscript and
his valuable suggestions, Dr. Kolupaila' also helped in interpreting and
collecting information from the hydraulic literature written ill Russian,
Polish, Lithuanian, and several. other languages which are unfamiliar to
theauthol', . The author also wishes to express his warm gr[l.titucie t,o
those whQ have constantly shown a keen intei'est ill .his work, as this
iuterest lent a strong impetus toward the completion. of this volume. CONTENTS

Ye.nTe Chow
Prefacs . vii
."

PART I, BASIC PRINCIPLES

Chapter 1. Open-channel Flow !llld Its Classiffcations 3

1-1. D~scriptiori . 3 r
",.
1-2. Types 'Of Flow . 4
1-3. State Qf FlQW 7
1·4. Regimes Qf Flow .

Chapter 2. Open Channels and Their·Properties HI

2-1. Kinds of Open bl~annel 19
2-2, Channel Geometr)~ . 20 ,J ' ..
~J
2-3, Geometric Elements of Cha.nnel Section, 22
2-4, Velocity Distribution in a. Channel Section. 24
2-5. Wide Open Channel 26
2-6. Measurement of Velocity , 27
2·7. Velodty-dbtribution Coeflicienu, . 27
2·8, DeterminaHon of Velocity-distribution Coefficients 28
2-9. PrllS<!ure Dh;tribution in a Channel Section. 30
2·10. Effect of Slope on Prcssui'e Distribution. 32

Chapter 3. Energy and Momentum Principles. 39

3-1. Energy in Open-channel Flow. 39
3·2.. Specific Energy. 41
3-3. Criterion for a CriticnJ State of Flow 42
3-4. Inte~pretation of Local'Phenomena 43
3-5. Energy in Nonpri~atic Chl!.nnels 46
3-6. Momentum in Open-charinel Flow 49
3-7, Specific Force. . ,. 5~
3-8. Momentum Priu¢iple Applied to Nonprisffiatic, Channels. 56

Chaptet 4. Critical Flow: Its CQl~nputation and Appllcations . 63 ()

4-1. Critical Flow 6(1
4-2. The8ection Factor for Crit.ical-fiow Computa.tion .
_ 4-3. The HydrILulic'
4-4. Computation of
for Criticru-fiow Computation
Flow.
64
5f!
59
I
4-5. Control of Flow. 70 r )
4-6; Fl9W Measurement. 74
,,
/. xiii
1

\
I
I
 xiv CO!-T'l'ENTS CONTENTS xv

PART 11. UNIFOR.M FLOW 7-19. Selection of Gr8.53. . 184

. 7~20. Procedure of Design 184
Chapter 5. Development ()f Uniform Flow and Its Founulas 81l
.\ Chaptllr 8. Theoretical Concepts of Boundary Layer, Surface Roughness,.
5-1. Qualifications for Uniform Flow : 89 Velocity Distribution, and Instability of Uniform Flow. .-192
5--2. Establishment of Uniform Flow . 89
i~
1....1
5--3. Expressing the Velocity of a Uniform Flow.
5-4. The Chezy Formula
91
93
8-1. The Boundary Layer .
8-2. Concept of Surface Roughness
192
194
5-5. Determination of Ch,s'Oy's Resistanoe Factor 94 8-3. Computation of Boundary Layer. 198
5-6. The Manning Formula. 98 S.4. Velocity Distribution in Turbulent Flow 200
5-7. Determination of l\-1anning's Pw:mghneas Coefficient 10l 8-S. Theoretica.l Uniform-flow: Equations. . 202
5-8. Factors Affecting Manning's Roughness Coefficient 101 8-6. TheOl·etica.l Interpretation of Manning's Roughneas Coefficient 205
5-9. The Table of :VIa.nnillg's Roughness Coefficient 108 8-7. ::Vlethods for Determining MalUling's Rougbneas Coefficient 206
5-1.0. Illustro.tions of Chimnels with Various Roughnesee3 114 8-8. Instability of U:uiform Flow . . 210

, Chapter 6. Computation of Uniform Flow . 128 PART III. GRADUALLY VARIED FLOW.."
6-1. The Conveyance of a Channel Section 128 Chapter 9. . Theory and Analysis. 217
6-2.,The Section Factor [or Uniform-fio;; Computation . . ,12.8
i 6-3. The Hydraulic EXjlQnent for Uniform,.flow COmputation. . 131 9-1. Basic Assumptio!l.9 . 217
I() 6-4. Flow Chua.cteristics in Jl. Closed Conduit with Of/en-channel Flow 134 9-2. Dynamic Equation of Graduallv Varied Flow 218
I
6-5. Flow in a Channel Section' with Composite Roughness 136 9-3. Che.ra.cteristiDs of Flow Profiles' 222
6-6. Determination of the Normal Depth and Velocity. 140 9-4. Cla.ssification of Flow Profiles. . ~ -i : 227
6-7. Determination of the Normal a.nd Critice.l Slopes 142 9-5. Analysis of Flow Profile 232
6-8. Problems of Uuitorm-fiow Computa.tion. 144 9-6. Metnod of Singular Point. 237
, 6-9. Computation of Flood Discharge. 146 9-7. The Transitio,nal Depth 242
-'
6-10. Uniform Surface Flow . 148 249
Chapter 10. Methods of Computa.tion
Chapter 7. D<"sign of Channels for Uniform Flow 157 10·1. The GrD.phical-int!lgration Method 249
10-2. Method of Direct Integration. 252
A. NONERODIBLE CHANNELS 10-3. The Direct Step Method 262
7-1. The Nonel"Ddlble Channel. 157 10-4, The Standard St.ep Method 265
. 7-2. Nonerodible r-,·laterilll and Lining. 157 10-5. Computation of iii Family of Flow Profiles 268
" ) 7-3. The Minirmlm Permissible Velocity 158 10-6. Th~ Standard Stap Method for Natural Channels. 274
7-4. Channel Slopes . . 158 10,7. The SLage-fall-discharge Method ior Natural Channell! 280
7-5. FreebofJ.l"d 159 10-8. The E.m. Method for Natural Channels. 284
7-6. The Best Hydraulic Section 160
7-7. Determination of Section Dimensions 162 Cb,apter 11. Practica.l Problems . 297
B, ERODIBLE CHANNELS WHICH SeOUR BU'l' Do NOT SILT 11·1. Delivery of a Canal for Subcritical Flow 297
7-8. MethOds of Approach . 164 11-2. Delivery of a Cana.! for Supercrit.ical Flow 302
7-9. The Maximum Pel'missible Velocitv . 165 11-3. Prublems Related to Cana.! Design . . 303
7-10. Method of Permissible Velocity . 167 11-4. Computation of Flow Profile in Nonprismlltic Channels 306
7-11. The Tra.ctive· Force. 168 . 11-5. Design of Transitions . 307
7-12. Tractive-force Riltio 170 11-6. Transitions between Canal and Flume or Tunnel 310
7-13. Permissible '1;'raotive Force 172 11-7. Transitions between Cana.l and Inverted Siphon .317
7-14. Method of Tractive Force. 175 11-8. Backwater Effect of a Da.m 319
7-15. The Stable Hydra.ulic Section. liB 11-9. Flow P!l.SSing Isla.nds . . 320
11-10. River Confluence 321
C. GRA8SEDCHANNELS
7-16. The Gra.ssed. Channel . ( . 179 Chapter 12. Spatia.!ly Vflried Flow 327
7-17. The Retardance Coefficient .179
f 7-18. The Permissible Velocity 184
12-1. Basic Principles and' Assumptions
12-2. Dynamic Equa.tion for Spa.tia.lly Varied Flow
327
329
 .. I
l..i

xvi CONTENTS
333 Chapter 17.
CONTENTS

Flow through Nonprismatic Channel Sections

xvii
461
J(
12-3. Analysis of Flow Pro5Ie . .
341 '--:,....
12-4. Method of Numerical Integration 17-1. Sudden Transitions,. 461
346
12-5. The Isoclinal flilethod . . 17-2. Subcritica.l Flmv through Sudden Transitions 464
347
12-6. Spati~.lly Varied Surface flow Contractions in Supercritical Flo''''' 468
17-3. \...-
17-4. Expansions in Supercritical Flow. 470
PART IV. RAPIDLY VARIED FLOW
1t-5. Constrictions 475 .',
357 17-6. Sl!bcritical Flow through Constrictions 476 ''''-
Chapter 13. IntroducUon.
3.57 17-7. Backwater Effect due to Constriction 490
13-1. Characteristics of the Flow 17-8. Flow through Culverts. 493
'357 L ..
13.2. Approa.ch to the Problem . 17-9. Obotructions. 499
360 17-10. ro'loW' between Bridge Piers 501 ,
Chapter 14. Flow over Spillways
17-11. Flow through Pile Trestles 506 '-...-
360
14-1. The Sharp-crested Weir 17..12. Flow through Trash Racks 506
362
14-2. Aeration of the Nappe . 17-13. Underflow Gates 507 \.,
363
14-3. Crest Shape of Overflow Spillways 17-14. Channel Junctions 512
365
14-4. Discharge of the Overflow Spillway
368
'14-5. Rating of Overflow Spillways. ' . ' . . (-
~70
14-6. 'Upper Nappe Profile of Flow over Spillways UNSTEADY FLOW
370 PART V.
14-7. Effect of Pi~rs in Gated Spillways'
374 l~.
.14-8. Pressure on Overflow Spillways .
380 Chapter 18. Gradually Varied Unsteady Flow 525
14-9. Drum Gates. . . 382
14-10. Flow at the Toe of Ov.erllow Spillways ,~
384 18-1. Continuity of Unsteady Fiow 525
14-11. The Ski-jump Spillway
385 18-2. Dynamic Equation 'for Unsteady Flow,. 626
14-12. Submerged OverfloW' Spillways
18-3. Monoclinal Rising Wave . 528
Chapter iii. Hydra.ulic Jump and Its Use as EneIgy DissipatoI 393
18-4. Dynamic Equa.tion for Uniformly Progressive Flow 631 .(
3113 18-5. Wave Profile of UnIformly Progressive Flow 533
15-1. The Hydra.ulic Jump . (
395 18-6. Wave Prupagation . 537 '--'
15-2. Jump in Horizontal Rectangular Channels
395 18-7. Solution of the UnsLeady-flow Equations 640
15-3. Types of Jump . 396
15-4. BllSic Cha.racteristics of the Jump 18-8. Spatially Varied Unsteady Surface Flolv 543 l_
398
15-5. Length' of Jump. 399
15-6. The Surface Profile .. Chapter 19. Rapidly Varied UnsteadY Flow 554
399 -.'
15-7. Location of Jump .' 404
15;8. Jump as Energy Dissipator 19-1. Uniformly Progressive Flow 554
408
15-9. Control of Jump by Sills . 19-2. The Moving Hydraulic Jump, 557 C
412
15-10. Control of Jump by Abrupt Drop 19-3. Positive Surges . 559
414
15-11. Stilling Basins of GeneraU"ed Design 19-4. Negative Surges. 566
15-12. The SAF stilling Basin
415
19,5. Surge in Power Canals. 568
'-...,' Ii
417 l.
15-13. USBR Stilling Ba.3in II 19-6 .. Surge in Naviga~ion Canals 572
422
15-14. USBR Stilling Basin IV 19-7. Surge through Channel Transitio!IS 575 I..
423
15-15. The St.l'aight Drop Spillway 19-8. Surge at Channel.Junctions 578
425
15-16. Jump in Sloping Channels.
429
19-9. Pulsating Flow. .. 580
i, __
15-17. The Oblique Jump.
439 Chapter 20. Flood Routing 586
Chapter 16. Flow in Channels of Nonlinear Alignment
439 (
16-L Nature of the Flow . 20-1. Routing of Flood ,. 586
'-
439
16.2. Spiral Flow . 441 20-2. Method of Characteristics. 587
16-3; Energy Loss. 444 20-3. Method of Diffusion Analogy. 601 \
~,

16-4. Super elevation 448 20-4. Principle of Hydrologic Routing 604

16-5; Cross Waves. . . . . : . . . . .
455 20-5. Methods of Hydrologic Routing 607 i \
16-6:
16.7.
Design Considerations for Subcritical Flow.
Design Considerations for S~percritical Flow
456 20-6. A Simple HydrologIC Method of Routing 609
,--
I

"~._~ • • ' _ _ _ _ V~· y.'.----.-... ---

 CHAPTER ,1

OPEN~C:HANNEL FLOW AND ITS CLASSIFICATIONS

1-1. Description. The flow of water in a conduit may be either open-

channel flotu or 'Pip~ flow. The two kinds of flow are similar in many ways
but differ in ohe important respect. Open-channel flow must have a
free surface, whereas pipe flow has none, since the water must fill the
I
whole conduit. A free surface is subject to atmospheric pressure. _:PiR~ ,,--.. :

---'--> , flow, being connnedin a .closed "£Q~1duit, x~rts irect atl!lo,§ heri
pressure but hydraulic pressure only. ., , "--,, ,,-
The t\VO kinds of flow are compared in Fig. 1-1. Shown on the left
side is pipe flow. Two piezometer tubes are installed on the pipe at' . '-....
sections 1 and 2. ,The water levels in the tubes are maintained by the
pressure in the pipe at elevations represented by ~he so-cag~a.lYJdr,guliq
~
g.rade line. The pressure exerted.
by the water in each section of the
pipe is indicated in the corresponding tube by the height y of the watet
c;olumn above the center line of the pipe. The tIJt.al energy in the flow
of the section with reference to a datum line is the sum of the elevation z
of the pipe-center line, the piezoine'tric height y, and the velocity head
V2/2g, where V is the mean velocity of flow. l The energy is represented
in the figure by what is called the energy grade line or simply the energy
line. The loss of energy that results when w:ater flows from seqtion 1
to sectiori 2 is .represented by hi. A similar diagram for open-channel
flow is shown on the right side of Fig. 1-1. For simplicity, it is assumed
. that the flow is parallel and has a uniform velocity distribu,tion and that
the slope of the channel is, small. lP,..i,his c!1;,§e, the 'Y~~!t~ §~rj~ce is ,the
.hldraulic m£l~dine, and ~~~.1t£.Qf..1~j~OIUjUg",,~
piezometric h~@t.2 '., . .
~ Despite the similarity between the two kinds of flow, it is much more
cl.ifficult to solve problems of flow in open channels than.in pressure pipes.
~low conditions in open c~annels are complicated Py the ',fact that the
: 1 It is here assumed that the velocity is uniformly distrib\.ited across the conduit
s~ction; othenvise a correc,tion ,,",ould have to be made, such Ilf is desaribed in Art. 2-7
fbr open c h a n r r e l s . ! ,
: 2 If the flow were curvilinear or if the slope of the channel w~re large, the piezometric
height would be appreciably different from the depth of flow (l<ilts. 2-9 and 2-10). As
!
;~
a result, the hydraulic grade Une would not coincide exactly with the water surface.
-"1"'- 3

I" .,
 "

.~

xviii CONTENTS

Appendix A. Geometric Elements for Circular Channel Sections 625

Appendix B. Geometric Elements for. Trapezoidal, Triangular, and Parabolic ,,
Cb-annel Sections 629 !

Appendix C. NQIDographic Solution of the Manning Formula 640 ·PART I

'~

, Appendix D. Table of the Varied-flow FuncH,ms

.
F(u.,N)
r " I-UN
= Jo
dlt
and F(u,N)_s, =
r" dtl
)0 l+'uN 641
BASIC PRINCIPLES

Appendix E. Table of the Varied-flow Functions for Circular Sections 657

Name Index. 663
. Subiect Index 669

)
 r ,- .
)
4 BASIC PRINCIPLES
""
position of the free surfa.ce is likely to ch~nge with respect to time .and
space and also by Lhe fact that the depth of flow, the discharge, and the
slopes of the channel bottom and of the free surface are interdependent.
Reliable experimental data. on flow in open channels are usually difficult to
obtain. Furthermore, the physical condition of open channels varies
-'much more widely than that of pipes. In pipes the cross section of flow
is fixed, since it is completely defined by the geometry of the .conduit.
; _I The cross section of a pipe is generally round, but that of an open channel
may be of any the circular to the irregular forms of natural
streams.' In pipes, the interior Surface ordinarily ranges in roughness
Pipe flow Open-chann,1 flow
FIG. 1-1. Comparison between pipe flow and open-channel flow.
from that of new smooth brass or wooden-stave pipes, on the one hand,
t,o.that of old corroded iron or steel pipes, on the other. In open channels
the surface varies from tha.t of the polished metal used in testing flumes
to that of rongh inegular river bed'l. :.vloreover, the roughness in an
open channel varies with the position of the free surface. Therefore, the
selection of fdction coeffic~el1tS is attended by greater uncertainty for
~ open channels than for pipel$. In general, the treatment of open-channel
flow is 30mew~at morl:l~Ip.Eirical than that of pipe flow. The empirical
) method is the best available at present and, if cautiously applied, can
yield results of practical value.
The flow in a. closed conduit is not necpssarily pipe flow. It must be
" classified as open-channel flow if it has a free surface. The storm sewer,
. .1 for example, which is a closed conduit, is generally designEld for open-
channel flow because the flow in the sewer is ekpected to maintain a free
surface most of .the .time. '.
1-2. Types at Flow. Open-channel fiow call be classified into many
'\ types and descri:be'd in various ways, The following classification is made
according to the change in flow depth with respect to time and space.
, ...
OPEN-CHANNEL FLOW AND ITS, cL'ASSlPICATI0NS
Steady Flow and Unsteady Fww: Time as the Criterion, Flow in an
open channel is said to be steady if the depth of flow does not change or if '
it can be assumed to be constant during the time interval under consider-
ation. The flow is unsteady if the depth changes with time. In most
open~channel problems it is necessary to studyftow behavior only under
sready conditions., .If, however, the change in flow condition with respect
. to time is of maior concern) the flow should be .treated as unsteady. In
floods and surges, for instance, which are typical examples of unsteady
now, the stage of flow changes instantaneously as the Wf1ves PMS by, and
the time element becomes vitally important in the design of control
structures.
For any flow, the discharge Q at a channel section is expressed by
Q 'VA (I-I)
where V is the mean velocity and A is the flow cross-sectional area normal
to the direction of the flow, since the mean velocity is defined as the
discharge divided by the cross-sedional area.
In most problems of steady flow the discharge is constant throughout
the reach of the channel under cOllsideration;in other words, the flow is
continuous. rrhus, using (1-1),
(1-2)
where' the subscripts designate different cllannel sections. .This is the
'/::::,.. continuity equation for a Qontinuous steady flow.
' -------~----.-,.-~-"'- .. -.-,..-'-.-.--.~-- . --~~~-----
Equation (1-2) is obviously invalid, however, where the discharge of a
steady flow is nonuniform along the channel, that is, where- water runs in
or ont along th.&..Q~...QLfloW'. This type of flo,!!L. kn2wn as_~/Ltiql.l'!l
~!ied .!!!...!ii8c<!,.ntinuo,,!-s A.!?llI,_.i~.J91!gQ.._tt.:l._!()a-!si~~e gutters., side-channel
spillways,' the wa.shwa.te.r troughs in filters, the efHuent channels around
sewage-treatment tanka, and the mrun drainage c~annels and feeding
channels in irrigation 8YSt~lDS:-------'-'----- ----~--.-.-.--_..
--The la\v~ntiriufty-orunsteady. flow requires consideration of thEf,,,
--,--~time effect. Hence, tJ?'~. ~<?f:1tjn~i~ ~~~a~i..Ol~J.oE-~(.:mtiIll!qu.s_~.~tead"y
flow should include the time element as a variable (Art. 18-1).
Uniform Floi»-'anil VariedJji;;;;aHu;;;;;'s thecrit;iQ;!:-:.Opell-channel
flow is said to be uniform if the depth of flow is the same at every section
of the channel. A uniform flow may be steady or unsteady, depending
on whether or not the depth changes with time. .
.P. • .... [Jteady uniform flow is. the fundg,mental type of flow treated in open-
channel hydraulics. The depth of the flow does· not change during the
time interval undercons'ideration. The establishment of unsteady 'Uni~
form flow would require that the water ~urface fluctuate from time to
·time w.!!ile reE}aininlLIW:!eJlel.!Q.t~nl1el.tott;om: Obvio~his
 I,

i
6
.~"
BASIC PRINCIPLES
I OPEN-CHANNEL FLOW AND ITS CLASSIFICATIONS 7
is a practically impossible condition. The term «uniform flow" is , For clarity, the classification of open-channel flow is summarized as
,

therefore, used hereafter to refer only to steady uniform flow. I f'

I
follows:
Flow is varied if the depth of flow changes along the length of the
channel. Varied flow may be either steady or unsteady. ~nce unsteady I
I
A. Steady flow
I
2l~fI.~~e, the t~,rm II unsteady flow" is used hereafter to designate '{' L Uniform flow
unsteady varied flow exclusively:-'-. ._ ... .2. Varied flow t ~'.

Varied. flow roay be furt~; da.ssified as either rapidly or gradually c. Gradually varied flow
I varied. The flow is rapidly; varied if the depth changes abruptly over a b. Rapidly varied flow
comparatively short distance; otherwise, it is gradually varied. A B. Unsteady flow
rapidly varied flow is also known as a local phenomenon,' examples are the L Unsteady uniform flow (rare)
hydraulic jump and the hydraulic drop. 2. Unsteady now (i.e., unsteady varied flow)
I
r a.Gradually varied unsteady flow
I
Chong'e of depth from b. Rapidly varied unsteady flow
time to
time
Various types of flow are sketched in Fig, 1-2. For iIlu.strative purposes,
these diagrams, as well as other similar sketches of open channels in this
book, have been draw.l to a greatly exaggerated vertical scale, since
ordinary channels have small bottom slopes.
Uniform 'flow - Flow in a Unsteady unifarm flow - Race
1-3. State of Flow. The state 01' behavior of open-channel flow is
laboratory' channel governed basically by the effects of viscosity and gravity relative to the
in.ertial forces of the flow. The surface tension of water may affect the
behavior of-flow under certain circumstances, but it does not piay a signifi-
RV.F. G.V.F. RV.F.
cant role in most open-channel problems encountered in engineering. ,
Effect of Viscosity, Depeilding on the effect of viscosity relative to
inertia, the flow may be laminar, turbulent, or transitional.
The flow is laminar if t.he viscous forces are so strong relative to 'the
Sluice
inertial forces that viscosity plays a signiftcant part in determining flow
behavior. i~ laminaLfl.mY...Jh~~arti.91esa,ppeal' to IAove in deE!lite
Confraction
below the smooth paths, or streamlines, and infinitesimally thin layers of. fi»id se~11l
sluice To slia:e ove~\:n~Q~!.lt l~ye.r~: . - . - . - - - . - - . - - - - . - . - - -
The flow is turbulent if the viscous forces are 'weak relative to the
inertial fDrces. In turbulent flDW, the water particles move in irregular
Varied flow paths which are ,neither smooth nor fixed but which in the aggregate still
represent the .forward motion of the entire stream.
Between the laminar and turbulent ,states there is a mixed, or tran-
sitional, state.
----:---~-
The effect .of viscosity relative to inertia can be represented by the

~
- -'.
' ,
//
G.v. F. - Flood wove R.V.F. - Bore
lJnsteqdy flow •
FlG. 1-2. Various types of open-channel Bow. G.V.F. = gradually varied flow;
RV.F. ~mpidly varied flow.
Reynolds number, defined as
1
i R == VL (1-3)
I JJ
I
where V is the velocity of flow in fps; L is a characteristic length in ft,
II here consider'ed equal ,to the hydraulic radius R of a conduit; and 11 (nu)
i
j.
is the kinematic viscosity of water in fV/sec. The kinematic viscosity
 8 . "BASIC PRINCIPLES '
OPEN-CHANNEL FLOW AND ITS CLASSIFICATIONS 9
ill ft2/sec is equal ~o the dynamic viscosity, f.I (mu) in shlg/ft-sec divided
by the mass densl(;Y p (rho) in slug/ft,·. For water at 68"F (2000)
f.I = 2.09 X 10- and p = 1.937; hence, 11
5
1.08 X 10-$. "
An open~chan?,el flow is laminar if the ReYl10lds number R is small and I v..'ith the data obtained b Nikuradse 8 ~ The resulting Prandil-:von
tUl'bt~lent if. R IS ,large. Numerous experinlents have shown that the I

flow 10 n. pIpe . c~an~es, from laminar to tul'l)ul~l1t in the range of R r d1'man equ~..!4sm Is

betwee~ the cntlCal val.ue~&Q.Q. ~n~ a valuethfl,t inay be as high as I i

1
2 log (R ...;'1) + 0.4 ' (1-7)
50,000. . I~ th~se exp~nment.s the dIameter of the pipe was taken as the
\..J chal'act~rIStlC. le~gth m defining the Reynolds number. When the -'--~Eciuations (1-6) and (1-7) will be used i'n the follo\ving discussion as
I ,
hYdra~11C radlUS 15 taken as the characteristic length, the corresponding' I), basis for comparing flow conditions in open channel.s. It may be noted
"- range IS from ,500 to 11,50q, ,. since th.e~!.fl:,l!l~~~_ of '!..,Eipe is fo~r times its that corresponding equations forflO'wi'n open channels have been derived
hydraulic mdlUs. ' - --'--.•-.-.--~--'-''''------ byJf~~~l~L§>lld ~.epear to be very_similaLtQ_ihrnQe-fiow t:lJl'\l.!:l:jJ.QTI!3~
~Th~-i~mi~~:, turbul~ntJ and transitional stat.es ot open-.channel flow giYQ!L:;tj;lov:e. It must be remember.ed, however, that, owing to the free
c~m be expressed by. a.~lagram thatshows a relation between the Reynolds "mlrface and to the ~~oUhe }u~draulic ~us. discharge... and
, , number and the fnctlOn factor of the Darcy-Weisbach formula. Such slope, the f-R relationship inopen-channel flow does not follow exactlyJ;htl.
9~ dlUgra~, g~I1el'ally knoWn us the BtanloTL4:f.ggn;,m Ill, has beeg.<!~veloped I , sinlpleConcepts thathohlfor pipe flow. Some specific features of the
f?r flow 11l plP£lS- The Darcy-WfJisbach formula, 1 also developedpJ:i~;'
I

,,I '.f-R relationshiP in open-chann.erfloware described below. ,t

nly for flow in pipes,is i Experimental data available, for the .determinationof the f-R relation-
;t
I ship in open-channel flow can be found in various publications on hydmu-'
(1-4) lics. 1 Figure which plots the relationship for flow iIi
is based on data developed at the University of HUn an
,where 14, ~ the fl'1::Lional los; i.n ft. for flow in the pipe, i is the friction University of Minnesota [20]. In this plot the following features may be
fact~~. L L~ the l~ugth of the pIpe III ft, do is the diameter of the pipe in
:t,V IS the velocIty of flow in fps, and g is the acceleration due to gravity
In ftfsec~. '
noted:
l.The 'plot shows clearly how the state of flow changes from laminar to
turbulent. as the Reynolds number, increases. The discontinuity of the
Since da = 48 and the ~ne~gy gradie.u,t S hJlL, the above equation plot and the spread of data characterize the transitional regIon, as they
may be rewritten for the friction factor do in ,the Stanton for fio'w in pipes. The transitional range,
however, so as "pipe flow. The iower critical
1. .." (1-5) Reynolds number depends to some extentoa channel shalle. The value
I :ia~0rQD1 Q.OQJ;9~-(i60;oemgg~i;~rally l~g~;-th-;:;-th-; value 'for pipe
:'hls equation may a.lso be applied to uniform ahd nearly uniform flows
~/-m...0pen channels. ' , - - -_________ ---flow. For practical purpoSes,thetransitioUal range of:R Iol:-opei1='channel
-~.~
flow mfty be a.~sumed to bc..§QQJ.Q..~..QQP. ' It should be noted, however,
. Th f-R[IiJrelati~l1S~pJ.~smo~t~J;_~~~ can ~~~e,!2I'.!lssed bv th, e Blas:ius
? that the uppe.r value is arbitrary, since there is no definite upper limit
equatton ' . '. - ----"-,---- , .. for all flow conditions. '
.---'- - ., 0.223 2. The: data in the laminar regiQu can be defined by a general equation
f = RO.~' (1-6) t 'I(
f F -R • (1-8)
;. It snould be noted that there is actually no definite upper limit.. , r'l
,! .1 t8 a result ~f Darc(s. stud.: [21: ~n flo~ in pipes, his name is commonly associated
wlthithat ~ WelS~o.ch [31 deslgna,tJng~hlS. equation which Weisbach firstformulated..
In
From Eq;S.
i
(1-3)• and (1-5) it can be shown that
~ I

Act~IlYI dAubulSson [4] presenteji, prIOr to Darcy, a formula. that can be reducEid to , K = 8gR 2S
the form of Eq. (1-4). i . (1-9)
! .V'
, t tn. this equation, ~he hydraulic :radius is used as the characteristic lengtll in defin-
I ,

I Se~ [l(~1 to [23].'

1 ! ' : .
.. -.. mg the Reynolds .number. If the; diameter of pipe were used as ~he characteristic The da.;ta. for the rectangular channel; were furnished through the cdurtesy of Pro-
length, the numerlllal constant of ~he numerator in this equationfwould be 0.316. I
I
2
fessor W. :/;1. lAnsford ann processedJoi the present purpose by the author.
Y
 11
10 BASIC PRINCrPLES

Since V and R have speeific ~'alues for any given chantiel shape, K is a
purely numerical factor dependent only on channel shape. For laminar
. flow in smooth cha.nllE)ls, the value of J( call be determined theoretically
[20} .. The pJot in Fig. 1-3 indica.tes that Kia approximately 24. for tht> ree- e R .. ',{I td
o F: '. a.o AI
tanguJar channels and 14 fol' the triangular channel under consideration. (C
$
R • 3,0*
R ., 4,01;:11
• a .. 4, a til
~ R .. ~4 tK
e R • 0.0 tloll
to (I A ... 1.:2 C!A
eta

-i.lli:vtRS;'TY n,= fLl!NOlS DATA

G fI£CTAlfGlA.AR c.HAflNa~,1.5Ff \\'10£. wlTK GL,us WALlS 0.2
0•• &. POI.JSH(O 9Fl4SS PLATE lhjrro~, !~
e . TRtANCiULi\J'i CHNfh£i..'(P VE~TEX MOLt. wr:'H SMOO'lM

.,.. • RECrANGtJt.AI\ C:Io!IAIfN!:l..1.7 1M WfDt~ 'Wt!'H SJ,t0Q'l',.. SlJFl~

FACE; or Sl'Flt;CTtiRAL srUL
o nU4NCAA...A.R CHA'HN£l.,l'd" TO fsd''V~Rrt)t ,t~I.ES,WlrH 0.08

f
0.1
O.Oi
om
f 0.06

().04
Q k 100.0rt9fM

.. k. 0.02.831"

O.qz
0.02

, \
1
0.01 O.OIl-----4----+-....:..--·t---~·'r-~
0.000
0.008

O.OO41--+-+++4-+-~-+-'f+-+-'-JHh-+-'-I--+-l-+I--!·-++H 10 "--'
.' . h channelS. . Bo.zin's channeis; No.4,
\, I
i
.J 4 • $1'0' FIG. 1-4. The f-R. ~elatlonshlp for Row In rOU~ed wood; No. 14, 'unpolished wo~d '-.---
~
gravel embedded In aement; No. Il,. unpo m lon 10 mm high, and·lO mm In
R
roughened by tra.nsverse wooden stripS 27.
.. 7
;n
Ne 14. except WIt .1 a
50
sp.~in'" of mm; No. 24, cem, ent
te· :
..
FIG. 1-3. The f-R relationship for flow in smooth channels.
t
.Q "
;
\ spacmg; No.1, same B.S. ' d K' her's cha.nnel: smooth concre . ~

lining; and No. 26, u~p<Jhshed woo. IrSC In . "

I 3. The data in the turbulent region correspond closely to the Bllisius-

:j=lrandtl-vo1n Karman curve. This ~ndicates that the law for turbulent
fiowin smaoth pipes may be approximately representative of a.Usmooth
channels. The plot also shows that the shape of the channel does not
\ .r
.

k
. .
(15,16}, Elsner [221, and Kozelnny
(Fig. 1-4).
. • h'
whic IS a
.
SIze
(23] are shown in the diagram for fio~ in

m
f the' data channel roughnes.~ is
13Qme 0 ' • f I _
e8.SUre of the roughness fll1rttcles or;m
. f t ' s'.
~-"

have an important influence 011 friction in turbulent flow, as'it does in represen Y , . d' . illustrates the followmg ea ur.e
I, ing the channel surface. The lsgram d fi d b Eq (1-8) In this
laminar fl o:W. ," . . th d til. can be e ne Y . . • •
. L In the lammat reg~on e ~ly h' h than it is for smooth channels
The dataJor laminar flow obtained at the University of Minnesota [20J
l
region, the value of K l.S genera 19 e r . .
and the da~ for turbulent flow cdllected individually by Kirschmer

)-J 12 BASIC PRINCIPLES
(J. and ranges bfltween 60 and 33, indicating the pronounced influence of the
r channell'oughnesson the friction factor. .
2. In the turbulent region the channel shape has a pronounced effect
L on the friction factor. It is believed that, when the degree of rough-
ness i~ const.ant the fdction. factor decreases roughly in the order
.",
r of rectangular, t:'iangular, trapezoidal, and circular channels. At the
suggestion of Prandtl, Kirschmer [15,lDj explained that the effect of
channel shape may be due to the development of secondary flow, which
is ~pparently more pronounced in rect(1ngular channels than in,say, tri-
angular channels: The secondary flow is the movement of water particles
on /l, cross section normal to the longitudinal direction of the channel. A
( ) high secondary flowrinvolves high energy loss andthns r.,ccounts for high
'ru chaI!!lE11.J:{:!§.i..frul.nce. . . . .
3. In the turbl,1lent region most plots appear parallel to the Prandtl-
von Karman curve, This curve serves as an approximate limiting posi-
tion toward which a plot moves as the over-all resistance becomes less,
Accoi'dingtQ a concept advanced by Morris [241 (Art. 8-2), the rise of the
plots above the smooth-conduit curve may be explained as a resul~ of
additional energy loss generated by the roughlless elements. When the
Reynolds number is very high, some plots become essentially horizont,al,
reaching a stllte of SO-Galled complete turbulrnce. At this state the value
of fis independent of Reynolds number and dep~nds solely on roughness,
hydraulic' radius, .and channel shape .
. 4. The' plot of Varwick's data [16J for a give~ roughness,- hydraulic
radius, and channel sha~ star~ off from ll. curve parallel to thLPran..Q.tj~
Voill'{arman curve, then rises as the Reypolds n~mber incre~§, and
f'J final1y becomes horizo'ntal as a state of complete turbulence is reached.
I' The rise of the plot is a peculiar phenomenon which demands explanation, I
)-- and, since this finding has not been verified by other data, mor.e experi-
mental studies .seem necessary to substantiate it.
~-'-~It should be noted that the ab'Jve descriptions are limited to low-
") and to Row onwhich 8.ll:.rface
~.-.-.--- -_._._-,_
- tension
.. _._._----- -
velocity, 01' subcritical, flow (which will be defined later in this.-ar.ti.cl.e)_
dOEls not have a §1IDlificant influence. ---
;---,. .. - ....
-In most open channels laminar flow occurs very rarely. ,Th~!!l;~t tfu;.1
.S!"'1 G.€:
Ir- the surface of a streilr!!:J!:eE!~!g_~<JmlOoth and glassY_.JQ..Jtn ob.sru:.v.ru.2...by
E,.!,.
~". no mea~__a..lL.i.ll.dicati2.~~inar; }llOID;' prohllJily, it
} i
<dl.:(',(
indicates that the sU11aqe vel.QQi!! is lower than that required for capillary
."-"'
.0(.
wav~Qnn.· :J;.,.aminat open-cha~Jm9,!..n t'O exist, however,
~~::wJ1~~ th.in sheets...2f_ ~t?l' flow over the grq,,';1nd Dr where it is
created deliberat~ ~testlng ~~!lnels,
1 According to thelloncept of Morris [241. thIS phenomenon probably represents a
tJ'ansition of thefiow to a.nother type of flow having higher energy loss. As the Rey-
nolds nu~ber increases, the fio'IV may be cha.nging from quasi-smooth flow to wake-
" interference flow, and then tomolatecl·rou.ghness flow (~t. 8-2).
IJ.
t
[ OPEN-CHANNEL FLOW. AND ITS Ci..AftSIFICATIONS 13
j) -1. As the flow in most channels is turbulent, a model empl.oyed to simulate
- a prototype channel should be designed so that the Reynolds number of
flow of the model channel is in the turbulent range.
E.ffect oj Gravity. The effect of gravity upon the .state of flow is repre-
sented bt aratio...91 ine~al forces to gravity forc~ This l'atio is,given
by the FrQuile numbe1'z' defined» ',.
v
(1-10)
where, V is the mean velocity of fiow in fps, g is the acceleration of gra Yity
in ft/sec z) and Lis a.characteristic length in ft. In open-channel fiow the
characteristic leng~h is made equal to the lmdraulic deptAJ2., which is
defined as the cross-sectional area of the water normal to the direction of.
flow in the channel divided by the width of .the fr¢e surface. For rec-
tangular channels this is equal to the depth of the flow' section,
When F is equa.l to unity, Eq. (1-10) gives
V = .../gD (1-11)
and the flow is said to be in a critical sta.te. If F is less thaJ1 unity. or
V < V(jJ5, the flow is s'libcriticaZ. In this state the role played. by
gravity forces is mOfe pronounced; so the flow has a low velocity and is
often described as tranquil a.nd streaming. If F is greater than unity, or
V > v'{jD; the flow is 8upercriticaZ. In this state the inertial forces
become domL'lant; so the flow has a high velocity and is usually described
as rapid, shooting, and torrentiaL
IE the mechanics of water wave~Jhe.critic& velocity v'gD is ideirtified
as the celerity of the small gl'avitywaves that~ccu;fns-hallo;v wnterm
channels as a result of any momentary change in the local depth of the
. _water (Art. 18-6). Such a change may .Q~opecLbjullsJ;urha.ll.c~~u;l.!:
obstacl~in...thJL!lb.!IJlp.el that cause a di§placement of waj;.!'lr.J.!.b.<n'§..Jl.nd..
below the mean surface level and thus create waves th~t...!~~~..2'::~g.l.!-l
...
.or gravity force. It should be noted that a gravity wave can be propa-
gated upstream in water of subcritical flow but· not in water of super-
critical flow, .since the celerity is~ater tha11 the velocity of flQ}! in th.e
>IL
.1.Q!m~t.~~e and less in the latter. T)terefore,~the possibilitY_2I'il!!PQ§.sJ:-
f ~ of propagating a gravi~y wa'::~)J.:2stream can be used as a criterion
for aistinguiShing between subcritical and supercritical flow.
n-2
Since the flow in most channels is controlled by the gravity effect, a
;::..-~ model used to simulate it prototype channel for testing purposes must be
I O~ber dimensionless ratios used for the. sa.me purpoae.include (1) the lcinenc-flow
factor}. VI/uL ... FI, first tlsed by Rehbock [251 and then by Ba.khmetefi' f26Ji
(2) the Bouuinesq number B "'" V / v'2UR, first used by Engel [27J; 8.nd (3) the kinel-
icity or velocitY-head ratio 11; = V'/2gL, proposed by Stevens [28] alld Posey [29J
respecti vaLr. . •
 -I

'J itJ
14 BASIC PRINCIPLES r OPEN-CHANNEL FLOW AND ITS CLASSIFICATIONS 15
. .
designed for this effect ;that is, the Froude llumhflr of the flow in the model'
channel must be made "qual to tha,t of the flow in the prototype channeL
I
I
1\........,;;

1-4. Regimes of Flow. A combined effect of viscosity and gravity may

produce anyone of four 'regimes of flo7JJ in an open channel, namely,
(1) 8ubcritical-larninar, when F is less than unity and R is in the 19,ininal'
1 ~
range; (2) 8upel'cl'itical-laminar, when F is greater than unity and R is in
the laminar range; (3) ::mpercritical-turbulBnt, when F ia greater than unity
1
I
,_I
1
I
'1 (

1 '-J

I
j
~\
i
I
,-,'
~J
f,
)
i
I C:--'\
I
!
\..-
\

Velocily, Ips
~.~
FIG. 1~5. Depth-velocity relationships for four regimes of open':channel flow. (Afler ,_-
Roberlson and Rouse [3D].)

and R is in the turbulent range'; and (4) subcritical-turbulent, when F is '-

less than unity and R is in the tui:bulentrange. The depth-velocity
relationships for the four flow regimes in a wide open channel can be shown'
by a logarithmic plot (Fig. 1-5) [30]. The heavy line for F = 1 and the
shaded band for the laminar-turbulent transi.tional range inters,ect on
. th~ graph and divide the whole area into four portions, each pf which
repres~nts a flow regime. The first two regimes, sub critical-laminar and
,supercritical-Iaminar, are not commonly encountered in applied open-
channel hydraulics, since the flow is generally turbulent in the channels
considered in engineering problems. However, these regimes occur
: frequeI).tly where then~ is very thin depth-this is known as sheet flow-
. and they become significant in such problems as the testmg of hydraulic
, models, the study of overland flow, and erOSlOn cOlltrol for such flQlY:-
• Photographs of the four regimes of flow are shown in Fig. 1-6. In each
~
I L
Fw. 1-6. Photographs showing four flow regimes in a laboratory cll!1nnel. (Courtesy
of H. Rouse.) i . . .. {_.
photograph the direction of flow is from left to right. All flows are uni-
form except those on the right side of the middle and bottom views.
The top view represents uniform subcritical-laminar flow, . The flow is
su.b:ritical, since the Froude number was I',djusted to slightly below the
cntical value; and the streak of undiffused dye indicates that it is laminar.
Th~ middle ~i~w shows a uniform supercritical~laminar fl'ow changing to
v~r~ed subcntical-turbulent. The bottom view shows a uniform super-
c:'1.tlCal-turbulent flow changing to varied subcritical-turbulent. In both
cases, the diffusion of dye is the evidence. of turbulence.

, ,
16 BAstC ' PRINCIPLES
It is'believed th~t gravity action may have a definitive effect upon the
flow resistance in cliurmels at the tut'bulent-flow range~ The experi-
,mental data studied by Jegorow [311 and Iwagaki [32J for smooth rec-
'tangular channels. and by Hom-:ma [33J for rough :channels have shown
that, ~n the supol'critical-turhulent regil;l1e of flo~, the friflj;ion fact<l!:...~
~Y~.lI!:_~!"~~~(L1:yj.ili increas~de n1Enbt:~. Generally, I;}le effect
of gravity is practically negligible where the Froude numbeds small, say,
less than 3. A further irivestigation by Iwagaki [34J indicates that, with
'increasing Froude number) the friction factor of turbulent flow in both
I
(
smooth and rough open channels becomes lal'ger than that .in pipes.
\. is possible that the presence of the free surface in (J~n~channel flow makes
. the channelrougw- than the pipe.--Whellmore data -and --:evidell(;e
oecome avaiTab-le, the'-Froude number, ,representing the gravity effect,
may have to be' considered as an additional faotor in defining the J-R
relationshipfm' supercritical-turbulent flow. ' 11. H. Ba.zin: Recherches experimentrues, sur l'ecoulement de l'eau dans les canaux
PROE\LEMS
, 1-1. 'With reference to Fig. 1-1, show that the theoretical dischl.i:ge of the open-
channel flow may be expressed by
0-12)
where A 1 and A. are the cross-sectional areas of the flow at sections' 1 and 2, respec-
tively, a.nd lJ.y'is the drop in water surface between the sections.
1-2. Verify Eq. (1-10).
1~3. Verify by computation the depth-velocity' relationships shown in Fig. 1-5 £0:
the four flow regimes in a wide rectangular open channel. The temperature, o,f the
water is tnken as 68°F. . pp. 649-663, 1939.
1-4. A model channel is used to simulate a prototype channel 100 ft wi~e, carrying
(
I
;t disclmrge of 500 ds aL. a depth of 4 ft. The model is designed fOI' gravity effect,
Itnd a: tUl'bu[ent-fiow condition is asaured. Determinet.he minimum size of the model
and the scale ratio, BSSuming the upper limit of the \'r1lnsitionru-flow region to be
R = 2,000. The sCII.le ratio is the ratio 'of the linear dimension of the model tot,ha.t
of the prototype. .
REFERENCES
1. T. E. Stanton and J. R. Pannell: Similarity of, motion in relation to surfa.ce ftiction
of fluids, PMlosophical1'r(l?!sactions, Roya! S()ciety of LaMon, vol. 214A, pp; 199-
224, 11114. : . ' : McGrll.w-Hill Book Co,npany, Inc., New York, 4th ed., 1954, p. 7-35.
2. H. Darcy: Sur des rechercbes experimentales relatives au mouvement des eaux
dans les tuya~ (Experimental researches on the floW' of water in pipes), CiJmptes
rendus des 8~an;ces del' Aoodemie des Sciences, vol. 38; pp. 1109-112~, June 2tlj 1854.
3. Julius Weishach: "Lefu-bueh der Ingenieur-! und Maschinemnechanik" (,IText-
book of Engineering Mechanics"), Brunswidk, Germa.ny, 1845. ' j.
4. J. F. d'Aubuisson de Voisins: "Tl"aite d'hydrl:\.ulique" ("Treatise on Hydraulics"),
Levrant, Pari", '2d ed., 1840; trll.nslated int(l) English by Joseph Bennett, :Little,
'\
Brown &: COllj,pany, Boston, 1852, pp. 202-211.
I
~l
OPEN-CHANNEL FLOW. AND JTS CLASSIFICATIONS 17
I 5. H. Blasius: Das Ahnlichkeitsgesetz bei Reibungsvorgiingenin Flilasigkeiten
(The In.w oLsimilitude for: frictions in fl\1ids), Forschungsheft des VereitUl deutscher
I Il1gimieure, No. 11:11, Berlin, Illi3. .' "
6. Theodor von Ruman:. Mechauische Ahnlichkeit und Turbulenz (Mechanical
! similitude and turbulence), Proceedings afthe 3d In/ema/irma! ConfITBsl!liar Applied
!I M ecka1!.ics, Stockhol1n, vol. I, pp. 85"-93, 1930.
7. L. Prandtl: The mechanics of viscous fluids, in W. F. Durand (editor-in-chiei):
,I "Aerodynamic Theory./' Springer-Verlag,Berliu, 1935, vol. III, div. a,.p. 142.
8. J. Nikuradse: Gesetzmlissigkeiten der t,Ul'bulenten Stromung in glatten Rohren
(Laws of turbulent flow· in smooth pipes), Forsck'ungsheft des .Vereins deutllcher
Ingenieur~, No.'3M, Berlin, 1932.
9. Garbis H. Reulegan: Lews of turbulent flow in open channels, paper RP1151,
Jou;'!1.al of Research, U.S. Na.t.iollaL Bureau of Sl.c.ndards, vol. 21, pp. 707-741,
Dllcember, 1938.
10. J. Allen: Streamline and turbulent, flow in open channels, The London, EdinbuTgh
and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of SciencfI, ser. 7; vol. 17, pp.
1081-1112, June, 1934. . ,
decouveris (Ex.perimental researches on the flO\v of wa.ter in open cha.nnels),'
M emClires pT~senUs par d'!IIBrS savnll!~ d l' Academie des Sciences, Paris, voL 19, 1865.
12. Studies of river bed materials and their mQvement, with special referance to
the lower Mississippi River, U.S. Waterways Experiment Sta.tion, Technical
Paper 17, January, 193.5. '
13. 8. P. Raju: Versuche uberden Stromungswidersta.nd gekrummter o:ffener Ka.n!!.le
(Study of flow resistance in curved open ehannels), Miu"ilunge:TL des hydro.uli8chen
In~tiluts der lel:h'rr.ischrn Hochschule Muncher£, no. 6, pp. 45-60, Munich, 1933.
English translation by Clarence E. Bardsley: Resistance to flow in curved open
channels, Proceedings, American Society of Civ'ii Engineers, vol. 63, pt. 2, p. 49
after p. 1834, Novembet:, 11)37.
14. Lorenz G. Strllub: Studies of the transition-region between laminar and turbulent
flow in open channels, Transactions, American GeQphY~icat Union, vol. 20J pt. iv,
15. Otto Kirachtner: Reibungsverluste in Rohren und Kanalen (Frictional losses in
pipEllj l1nd channels); Die Wass~rwirtschaft, Stuttgart, voL 39, no. 7, pp. 137-142,
April; no. 8, pp. 168-174, May, 1949.
16. Ott.o Kirschmer: Pertes de charge dansles conduites forcees et lea eaI!o.ux decou-
VllJ'ts (En:ergy losses in pressure conduits and open channels), RllIIue q6n~rale de
l'hydrauUllue, vol. 15, no. 51, pp.1l5-138, May-June, 1949.
17. Yuichi Iwaga.ki: em Lllmina.r to turbulent Row in a wide open channel,
by W. hi. Owen, Tran8actions, .Ameriron Society of Civil .Engineers, vol. 119, pp.
1:165-1166, 1954. • .
18. Horace William King: :"Handbook of HydmIlIics," revised by Ernest F. Brater,
19. F. Bettes: Non.uniforln flow in cli.annels, Ciuil Ertgineering and P,.blicW01'ks
Review, London,· vol. 52, no. 609, pp. 323-324, M~rch; no. 610, pp~ 434-4,36,
April, 1957. , .
20. Lorenz G. Straub, Edvtard Silberman, and Herbert O. Nelson: Open-channel flow
at. small Reynolds nUfnbers, Transacfions, American Society of Civil Engineers,
vol. 123, pp. 685-706, ,1958. !
.21. Walll1ce M. Lansford ~nd James M. Robertson: DiB~lIssion·of Open-channel flow
at small ReynCllds nUl)lbers, by.Lorenz G. Stra.ub, Edward Silberman, and H"r-
'

18 BASIC PRINCIPLES :
b!lrt C. Nels01l, Trqnsaction8, American So.ciety o.J Civil Engineers, vol.. 123, pp.
707-712, 1 9 5 8 . .
22. FtlLnz Eisner:- Offene Gerinne (Open channeL), sec. 4 of vol. IV, "Hydro- und
Aerodynamik," in \V. Wien and F. Hanns (editors-in-chief): "Handbuch der
Experimentalphysik," Akademische Veda.gsgesellschaIt mbH, Leipzig, 1932,
p.298.
23. Josef l(ozeny: "Hydraulik" ("Hydraulics"), Springer-Verlag, Vienn9., 1953,
p.574. . OPEN CHANNELS AND THEIR PROPERTIES
24. Henry M. Mcirris, Jr.; Flow in rough condl,lits, Transactions, American Society oj
Civil Engi1J,ee1's, vo.l.120, pp. 373-398, 1955. Discussio.ns on pp. 3.99-410.
25. Th.R.ehbock: Zur Frage des Briickenstaues (On the prDblem Df bridge constric-
tions), Zenlralblail der B(11!verwaZtun!l, BerUn, vol. 39, ~o. 37, pp. 197-200, 1919.
26. Boris A. Bakhmeteff: "Hydraulics of Open Channels,"McGraw-Hill Book Com-
. pany, Inc., New York, 1932, p. 64.
27. F .. V. A. E. Engel: Non-uniform flow of water: Problems a.nd phenomena. in open
channels with side cont.ractions, The Engineer, vol. 155, pp. 392-394, 429-430,
456-457, 1933. . ... . Natural channels include all watercoUl:~ that exist naturally on the <......1
28. 1. C. Stevens: Discussion Dn The hydraulic jump in sloping channels, by C. E.
Kindsva.ter, TramactiO'nll, American Society of Civil Engineers, vol. 109, pp: 1125-
1135, 1944.
29. C. J. Posey: DiscussiDn on The hydraulic jump in sloping channels, by C. E.
Kindsvater, TransactioTLI/, American Society oj Civil Engineers, vol. 109, pp. 1135-
1138, 1944.
30. J. M. Robertson and lIunter Rouse: On the four regimes· of open-channel flow,
Civil E'lI.{Ji11eering, vol. 11, no.. 3, pp. 169-171, !vIa.rch, 1941.
31. S. A. JegorDw: Turbulente 'Oberwellenstromung(Schiesscnl in offenen Gerinnell
mit gla.tten Wanden (Turbulent 5up'<!rcritical flow in open channel with smoDth
wa.lls) , WGSS/!iTkraJt unci Wasserwirf.8chaJt, Munich, ·vol. 35, no.. 3, pp. 55-59, 1940.
32. Yuichi Iwagaki; On the laws of resistance to turbulent flow in .open smooth
channels, llfemoirs of: tJte Faculty oj Engin.eerill,f/, Kyo.to University, Jilpan, vol. 15,·
no. 1, pp. 27-40, Janua.ry, 1953.
33. Masashi Hom-rna: Fluid resistance in water flow of high .Froude number, Pro-
ceedings oj the ed Japan National Congress Jor Applied Mechanics, pp. 251-254,
1952.
34. Yuichi Iwagaki: On the laws of resistarrce to turbulent flow in open rough channelS,
Proceedings oj the 4th Japan N a./irma!. C(mgres8 Jor Applied Mechanics, pp. 229-233,
1954. . extent desired or designed to meet given requirements. The application
.j
I·I \..:.·,1
i
I \
. i,
CHAPTER 2
2-1. Kinds of Open Channel. An open channel is a conduit in which
. water flows with a iree surface. Classified according to its origin a chan-
nel may be either natural 01' artificial. (
earth, varying in size from tiny hillside rivulets, through brooks, stl·eams,. \
smaH and large rivers, to tidal estuaries. Underground streams ca~
water with a fr~e surface are also considereclrulturul open chann~.
The hydraulic properties of nll,tural channels are generally very irregu-
lar. In some cases empirical assumptions reasonably consistent with
actual obs:ervl;ttiol1s and experience may be made such that the conditions
of flow. in these channels become amenable ~o the analytical treatment
of theoretical hydraulics. A comprehensive study of the behavior of
flow in natural channels requires knowledge of other fields, such as
hydrology, geomorphology, :sediment transportation, f1tc, . It constitutes,
in' fact, a subject of its own, known as river lLJlP,raulics,
Artificial channels are those constmcr,ed or developed by human effort:
navigation channels, power canals, irrigation canals f),nd flumes, drainage
ditches, trough spillways, floodways, log chutes, roadside gutters, etc., as
well as model channels that are built in the laboratory for testing pm·poses.
The hydraulic properties of such channels can be either controlled to the
ofhydra.ulic theories to artificial channels will, therefore, produce results
.
fairly close to actual conditions and, hence, are reasonably accurate fOl' ,.........
practical design purposes. .
Under various circumstances in engineering practic\'l the.artificial open
channel is 'given different names, such as "canal," :'\ftume," "chute,"
"drop," "culvert," "open-flow tunnel," etc. These names, however, are
used rather loosely and can be.defined only in a very genernl way. The
canal is usually a long and mild-sloped channel built in, the ground, which
may be unlined C!r lined with stone masonry, concrete, cement, wood, or
bituminous materials. The flume is a channel of wood, metal, concrete,
or masonry, usually supported on or above the surface of the ground to
carry water across a depression. The chute is a channel having steep
19
 20 BA.SIC PRINCIPLES
(
slopes. The drop is similar to a. chute, but the change in elevation is I
effected in a shott distance. The culvert flowing partly full is a covered I
channel of comparfl,tively short length installed to drain water through
highway and railroad embankments. The open-flow t'unnel is a com- !
paratively long covered channel used to ca.rry water through a hill or any
obstruction on the ground. I
I
2-2. Channel Geometry. A chann\'ll built witlulllY.a:t+ing cross sectiOll i
ti..'1dc~bottom slope is ~~lled a 'B.risma(ikma1Jnel. Otherwise, the
i
I
channel is nonprismaticj an example is a trough spillway having variable r
width and curved alignment. Unl\lss specifically indicated, the channels
dGScl:ibed in this book are prismatic.
The term channel Bection used in this book refers to the cross section of
1
i
a channel taken normal to the direction of the flow. A l'ertical channel I
s8ctio-n, howeve".is the vertical section passing through the lowest or !
bottom point of·the channel section. For hvl'izontal channels, therefore,
the channel section is always a vertical channel section.
Natural channel sections are in general very irregular, usually varying
from an approximate parabola to an approximate tmpezoid. For
streams subject to frequent fioods, the channel may consist of a main
channel section carrying normal discharges and one or more side channel
sections for accommodating overflows.
Artificial channels are USUally designed with sections of regular geo-
metric shapes. Tablc 2-1 lists seven geometric shapes that are in common
use. The trapezoid is the commonest shape for channels with unlined
earth banks, for it provides side slopes fol' stability. The rectangle and
triangle are special cases of the trapezoid. Since the rectangle has .i!: I;'.>
+
vertical sides, it is commonly used for channels built of stable materials,
such as lined masonry, rocks, metal, or timber. The triangular section
is used only for small ditches, roadside gutters, and laboratory works.
The cirde is Hle popular section for sewers and culverts of small and
medium sizes. The parabola l is used as an approximation of sections of
small and medium-size natural channels. The round-cQrnered rectangle
is a modification of the rectEmgle. The round-bottom triangle L':! an +
~
. approximation of the parabola; it is a form usually created by excavation
with .shovels.
Closed geometric sections other than the circle are frequently used in
sewerage, particularly for sewers enough for a man to enter. These
sections are given various names according to their form; they may be
1 The side slope z; 1 of a pa.rl!.boli~ section at the intersection of the sides with the

free surface can be computed easily'by the simple formula z =

Russian e!lgineers [11 also use semielliptica! and para.bolic of higher order:
y azP with 11 .;, 3 Qr 4. The constant CL is computed fl'om the side slope assumed·
at the' free surface ..
21
 22 BASIC PRINCIPLES
OPEN CHANNELS AND THEIR PROPERTIES 23,\
egg-shaped, ovoid, semielliptical, U-shaped, catenary, horseshoe, basket- The hydr.aulic radiu,$ R is the ratio of the water area to its wetted
handle, 'etc. The complete rectangle and square are also common for perimet.er, or.
large sewers. Dimensions and'properties of sewer sections may be found A
in textbooks on sewerage.! R (2-1)
A special geometric section kilOwn as hydrostatic catenary or lintMrw
[4,5J is the shape of the cross section of a trough, formed of flexible sheets The hydr~ulic de1Jth D is the ratio of ~le wa.ter area to the top width~ or '1
assumed to be 'Iveightless, filled with water up to the top of the seCtion,
. and firmly supported at the upper edges of the sides but with no effects D = T (2-2)
of fixation~ The hydrostatic catenary has been used for the design of the
sectiolls of some elevated irrigation flumes. These flumes are constmcted The slJction factor for critical-flow contputtllion Z is the product of the
of metal plates so thih that their weight is negligible, and are :firmly . water area and the square root of the hydraulic depth, or
attached to beams at the upper
2-3, Geometric Elements of Channel Section.' Geometl"l:c elements are Z=A (2-3)
pro'perties of a channel section tha.t can be defined entirely by the geome-
try of the section B.nd the depth of flow. These elemerits are very . The section factor for uniform-flow compulaUon A]z% is the product of
.j
importa.nt and are used extensively in flow computations. the water area and the two-thirds power of the hydraulic radius. .
For simple regular channel 'sections. the geometric element.s can be
expressed mathematically ill terms of the depth of flow and other dimen-
sions. of the sectioll. For complicated sections and sections of natural
streams, however, ,110 simple formula can be 'written to express these
elements, but curves representing the relation -between these elements
and the depth of flow can be prepared for use in hydraulic computations.
The definitioris of several geometric elements of basic importance are
given below. Other geoIlwtric elements used in this book will be defined
where they first appear. \
"
The depth of flow y is the vertical distance of the lowest point of a
/' 'chanilel section from the free surface. This term is often used inter-'
changeably with the depth offlow section d. Stridly sp~aking, the depth
of flow section is the depth of flow normal to the direction of flow, or the
height of the channel section containing the water. For a channel with
a longitudinal slop~ angle e, it can be 8een that the depth of flow is equal I
.!
to the depth of flow section divided by cos e. In the case of steep chan-
nels, therefore, the two tei'ms should be used discriminately.
The stage is the elevation or vertical distance of the free smfa-ce above
. FIG. 2-1. Geometric elements of a. circular section., I
'a' datum. If the lowest point of the channel section is chosen as the
datum, the stage is identical with the depth of flow.
The top width T is the width of channel section at the free surface.
Tabie 2-1 furnishes 11 list of formulas for six basic geometric ~lements
of' 1
/ seVf\11 . commonly' used channel sections, For a circular section, the
/
The wafer al'ea A is the cro~s-sectional area of the fi~w norlD,al to the curves in Fig. 2-1 represent the ratios of the geometric elements of the I
direction of flow. s~ction to' the corresponding elements when t11e section is fl~wing full.]
The wetted perimeter P is the length of the line of intersection of the These curves are prepared from It table. given in Appendix,A. For cer- '.
channel wetted surface' with a cross-sectional plane normal to the direc- tain trapezoidal, triangular, and parabolic sections commonly found in
tion bf flow. ' practical uses, the diag.rams given in Appendix B provide a convenient Ii
I Many typica.! seWer sections arEi described in [2J nnd [3]. means of determining the geometric elements. . '

I
'{
[

·1
,\
\ '
\ --
i

24 BASIC PIIINCIPLES OPEN CHANNELS ,AND 'TIIEIR PROPERTIES 25

)
, Example 2-1. Compute the'hydraulic radius, hydraulic dep~h, and section factor.?: ~',.#
), ,- " Of the~ra.pezoidal chUlluel section in Fig. 2-2. The depth of flow is' 6 ft.
, ' ' \

~Q,?!/'
.
'
,
,

.
1.5
t~.5'
I
'.

~~'
~~ .~'
, ' T:44" ....&.. Tropezuidal chonnel

C~b=20':, .1' \
'~//l7~~0~ P=46,8 - ,
Triangular channel

FIG. 2-2. A channel crosS'section.

. NarroW'
$oluti{)ll. By formulas given in Table 2-1, the following are computed: P = 20 +' Sholtow ditch (@c!anglJlar
2 X 6 ";5 = 46.8 ft; A = 0,.5(20 + 4'!L0 6 = 192.0 ft>; R = Hl2/46.8 = 4.10 ft; 5~ction

D = 19%4 = 4.37 ft; and Z = 192 -./4.37 = 401 ft,·,:

a
2-4. Velocity Distribution in Channel Section. Owing to the pres~
ence of a free surface and to the friction along the Ghannel wall, the
velocities in a channel are not uniformly distributed in the channel section.
), The measured maximum velocity in ordinary channels usually appears to Pipe
\'I occur below the free .sUlface at a distance of 0.05 to 0.25 of the depth; Natural irregular channel

FIG. 2-4. Typical curvea of equal velocity in various channel sections.

channel~ <md the pJ·esence of bends. In a broad, rapid, !111d, shallow

FIG. 2-3. Velocity distrib,ution in'·a. rectangula; 'channeL
the closer to the banks, the deeper is the maximum. Figure 2-3 illustrates
*e general pattern of veJocity distributio;l over \;al'ious vertical and
I horizontal sections of a rdctangular channel sectio~ and the curves of
r equal velocity in the cross section. The general patterns for velocity
distribution in several channel sections of other shapes are illustrated in
r Ji]ig. 2-4. ; ,
I, . I The velocity distributfoJ in a channel section depends also on other
f('l.clors, such as the unusu~l shape of the section, tlle roughness of the
stream,or in a very smooth channel, the maximum velocity may often be
found l,Lt the h'ee surface. The ,roughness 6f the channel will cause the
curvature of the vertical-velocity-distribution
curve to increase (Fig. 2-5). On a bend the veloc-
ity increases greatly at the convex side, owing to
the centrifug!11 action of the flow. CCfmtrary to
the usual belief, a surface wind has very little effect
i
on velocity distribution. '/
As revealed by cv.refullaboratory investigations, ~ROugh'
bed
the flow in a straight prismatic channel is in fact
three-dimensiqnal, manifesting a spiral motion,
although the velocity component in the transvel:se 'FIG., ,2-5. Effect of
chann~i section is usu!),lly small, and insignificant roughness on velocity
compMecl with the longitudinal velocity com- distribiltion in an open
, chann~I.
ponents. Shukry [6] found that, in short labora- .
tory fl~mes, a small disturbance ~t the entrance, which is usually unavoid-
able, is sufficient to cau()e the zqne of highest water level ito shift to one
side, thus giving rise to a single ~piral motion (Fig. 2-6). : In a long and
uniforrri reach femotefl'om the entrance, a double spiral mqtion will oc~ur
to per¢it equalization of shear stresses on both sides of th~ channel [7,8J.
26 BASIC PRINClPLES OPEN CHAN)lELS AND THEllR PROPERTIES 27 )
The pattern will include. one spira}.on
. each side of the center line , where the width. h,grea~.E 5 to 10 times. the depth <:>f flow ...4~IJe~on the
th€ water level is the highest. In practical considerations, it is quite .2_'?~ion of l:lu):fac~ roughness. Thus, a wide Open channel can safely be
safe to ignore the :;piral motion in straight prismatic channels. Spiral defined as a rectangular channel whose width is greater than 10 tiri1es the
flow in curved channels, however, is an important phenomenon to be dept.h of flow. For either experimental or anaJytical purposes, the flow
considered in design add wHl be discussed later (Art. 16-2). in the cen tral region of a wide open channel may be' considered to be the
same as the flow in !1 rectangular channel of infinite width.
2-6. Measurement of Velocity. According to the stream-gaging proce-
dure of the U~S. Geological Survey,'lthe channei crosssecticH1 is-ciivid~d
-~rti6a1 strips by a number of successive vert~cals, and mean velocities 'I
in verticals are determined by measuring t.he velocity at 0.6 of the depth !
) .
J!-l_~Gh vertical, or, where morc reliable results are required, by taking the
average of the velocities at 0.2 and 0.8 of the depth. When the stream
i.s covered with ice, the mean velocity is no longer close t.Q 0.6 of the water
dept.h, l;mUI!e average at 0.2 and 0.8 of the water depth still gives reliable
resul.1§. The average of the ~ean velocities in any two adjacent verticals
multiplied by the are:1- between the verticals gives the discharge through
this vertical strip of the cross section.: ThG sum of discharges through all
(o)Con!our lines 01 Co I Con lou, lines of
equal ve c for (v) equal componenHv,1 strips is t.he total discharge. The mean velocit.y of the who.Ie section is,
therefore, eq ua! to the total discharge divided by the whole· area.
It should be noted that the above methods are simple and approximate.
For precise measurements more elaborate methods must be used, which
are beyond the scope of this book.
2-7. Velocity-distribution Coefficients. As a result of nonuniform
9.istributiol1 of velocities over a channel section/the velocity hea.d of an
open-channel flow is generally greater than the value computed according
to the expression V 2 /2g, where V is the ri;lea.n velocity. When the,energy
principJe is used in computation, the true velocity head may be expressed
as a V 2/2g, where a is known as the energy coefficient or Co-riolis coe.fficient,
in honor of G .. Coriolis [12J who first proposed it. Experimental data
(cleonlcur Jines 'or (d) ConI our lines 01 (e) Dire clio n Jines and indicate that. the value of a varies from about 1.03 to 1.36 for fairly
equal componenl lv'l . equal component (vyl
Jr ma9niludes of the
IOlerol currenlslvor ' straight pri!:imR.tic channels. The value is generally higher for small
channels and lower for large streams of considerable depth.
FIG. 2-6. Distribution of the velocity components, fa.cing downstream a.t the mid- The nOllUniform di.stribution of '/elocities also affects the co.rnputation
section of a. straight flume. Voloeitiestl.re In em/sec (= 0.0328 fps); y/b = 1.0;
R "" 73,500; and Q = 701iters/s.ee (= 2.47 cfs). (Afler .A. ShlLkry [6J.) of momen~umin open-channel flow. From the principle of mechanics,
the "momentum of the fluid passing through a channel section per unit
2-5. Wide Open Channel. Observations in very wide open channels time is expressed· by {JwQVj(J, where f3 is known as·the mom.entum coef-
have shown that the velocity disttibution in the central region of the ficient or Boussinesq coe:ffi.cient, after J. Boussinesq [13] who fii'st proposed
a
section is essentially the same as it ;would be in rectangular channel of it; w.is the unit weight of water; Q is the discharge; and V i.'3 the mean
infinite width. In other words, under this condition, the sides of the velocity. It is ,generally found that the value of (3 for fairly straight
!iliJ!imel h~i practically DO influence on the velocit.y distribution in the prismatic cha.nnels varies approximately from 1.01 to 1.12.
C~gi~l, and. the flow i~_Y;~~.Eehtral region c~n therefore be regarded The two velocity-distribution coefficients are always slightly larger
as two-dimensional in hydraulic ana:1yses. Careful experiments indicate, than the limiting value of unity, a.t which the velocity distribution is
further, that this central region '~Xi~t8 in rectangular channels only when 1 For details see !9J to [11 J.
~ I .

_,. t:../ _
 · ,

28 BASIC PRINCIPLES OPEN CHANNELS AND THEIR PROPERTIES 29

\ ,
strictly uniform across the channel section. For channels of regular cross 2
corrected velocity head for the whole area as a V /2g, the total kinetic
section and fairly straight alignment, the effect of nonuniform velocity va
energy 'is ,aw A/2g. Equating this quantity with 2:wv 3 AA/2g and
distrihution on the computed velocity head and momentum is small, reducing,
especially in comparison with other uncertainties involved in ~he com- J1]3 dA L;'~! LlA (2-4)
putation. Therefore, the coefficients are often assumed to be unity. In V3A ,'"'"
channels of complex cross section, the coefficients for energy and momen-
tum Can easily be asgreat as 1.6 and 1.2, respectively, and can vary quite
The momentum of water passing AA, per unit time is the product of
the mass W<I AA/g and the velocity v, or wv 2 AA/g. The total momentum
rapidly from section to section in case of il'I'egular alignment. Upstream'
is :Z1l!V2 AA/g. Equating this quantity with the corrected momentum
from weirs, in the vicinity of obstructions, or near pronounced irregu-
larities in alignment, values of a greater than 2.0 have been observed. 1 , for the w'hole area, or {3wA V2 / (I, and reciuping,
Precise studies or analyses of flow in such channels will require measure- , Jy 2 dA 2:v 2 LlA
(2-5)
ment of the'actual velocity and accurate determination of the coefficients. {J = V2 A "". V2 A
In regard to the effect of channel slope, the coefficients are usually higher
O'Brien nnci Johnson [19] used a graphical solution of the above
, in steep channels than in flat channels.
For practical purposes, Kolupaila [16J proposed the values shown below formulas sa follows:
I "I From the measured velocity-distribution curves, the area ivithin each
for the velocity-distribution coefficients. Actual values of the coefficients
I! for a number of channels may be found in {l7) and [18J.
curve of equal velocity is planimetered. Taking the velocity indicated
by each equal-velocity l!'!!rve as v, a curve of 1]3 against the corresponding
Vo.lue of", ' Value of {j planimetered area is constructed. . It is ,evident that the area beneath
Channels this v3 curve is the integral 2:v 3 AA, which can be obtained by planim-
Min Av 'Max lVIin Av Ma.x etering again. Similai:ly, integrals 1:v 2 Ail. and 2:v LlA can also be
'-"0- obtained. The integral 2:v AA divided by A gives V. With these
Regular channels, flumes, spillway:;: .... , 1.10 1.15 1.20 1.03 1.05 1.07 quantities determined, the above equations can be solved for the coef- .
N o.tural streams and torrents ..... . .
~ ~ 1.15 1. 30 1.50 L05 1.10 1.17 ficients a and p.
Rivers.under ice cover., ..... ....... 1.20 1.50 2,00 1.07 '1.17 1.33 For approximate values, the energy and momentum coefficients can
River vlllleys" ove,flooded ..... ...... 1.50 1.75 2,00 L 17 1.25 1.33
be 'compl.lteaDytne following formulas: 1
r
I, 2-8. Determination of Velocity-distribution Coefficients. Let LlA be Ct = 1 + 3.% - 2t 3 (2-6)·
an elementary area in the whole water area A, and w the unit weight of 'p 1 + f2 (2-7)
water; then the weight of water pasSing LlA per unit ,time with a velocity
where Ii = v.u/V 1, VM being the maximum velocity and V being the
v is 'wv LlA. The kinetic energy of water passing AA per unit time is
mean velocity; .
wv 3 AA/2g. This is equivalent to the product of the weight wu AA and
Computation of the velocity-distribution coefficients for. irregular
the velocity head v2/2g. The total kinetic energy for the whole ,WB.ter
area is equal to 2:wv ll t1Aj2g. natural channels will be discussed later (Art. 6-5). In most pl'nctical
problems dealing with regular cha~nels it is not necessary to consider
I Now, taking the whole area as A, the mean velocity as V, and the
1 A va.lue of", = 2.08 was computed by Lindquist [141 uslng da.~a from Wl}it' measure-
the varia.tion of velocity throughout the cross section, since use of the
average· veiocity will give the accuracy required. The expressions
ments made by Ernest W. Schoder and Kenneth B. Turner. V2/2g and wQ V j g a~e used extensively in this book with the understand:-
In the case;of clolled conduits, much larger values of ,. have been obS,erved [15]. ing either that these items have been cOlTected for the effect of the non~
A value of '" = a.87, observed at the outlet section of a. dro.ft tube in the Rublevo
power pmnt, is probably the largest known value obtained from actual measurements; uniform velocity dis~ributionj Of that a value of unity is asiumed. 2
the re",l value there must have been still lar!!~r-,-10,2% more, if the effect of a. IS" I These formula.s a.re obLained by I1ssuming a. logtLrithmic distribution Qf velocity

r
I
curvattire of the streamlines is taken into account. The largest known value from
laboratory meO:suremen1;$ is believed to be '", = 7.4, which was derived by V. S.
Kv:ia.tkovskii in 1940 in the VIGM (All-Union Institute for Hydraulic Machinery,
(Art. 8-5, Prob. '8-9). Assuming a lincar velocity distribution, Rehbock [201 obtained
c< = 1+ +
f" I1nd.{j = 1 "/3. .
• For discussions on this subject, the reader may look into. 121J and [22]. However,
U.S.S.R.) for the spiral flow under !l. model turbine wheeL he should use' judgment in reading these references because they contain erroneous

30 BASIC PRINCIPLES
2-9. Pressu're Distribution in a Channel Section. The pressure at any
point on the crO,';fi section of the flow in a channel of small slop: can be
, measured by the height of the water column in a piezometer tub~ Instayed
at the point (Fig. 2-7). Ignormg mInor
disturbances due to turbulence, etc., it
is apparent that this water column should
rise from the point of measurement up to
the hydraulic grade line or the water sur-
B face. Therefore, the pressure at any
(al point on the section is directly propor-
tional to the depth of the point below the
free ~ui'face 9,nd equal to the hydrostatic
pressure corresponding to this depth. In
other words, the distribution of pressute
over the cross section of the channel is the
'same as the distribution of hydrostatic
pressure j that is;the distribution is linear
and can be represented by a straight line
AB (Fig. 2-7a). This is known ,as the,
hydrostatic latO of preSS1lrB distribution . ./
Strictly speaking, the application of
the hydrostatic law to the pressure dis-
, 8 s' tribution in the ,crQ§s se~tiQn of a flQwing
(c 1 channel is valid only if th&.!o\v filaments
FIG. 2-7. Pressure distribution in
have no accele~~n coinponertts in the
straight and curved channels of ·plane·gf cross sectioE' This type of flow
small or horizontal slope at the ~oretically known as parallel flow, l
section under considera.tion. h =
piez~metric head; h. = hydrosta.tic
that is, such th'at the streamlines ha VI!
head; and c "" pressure-bead cor, neither substantial curvature nor diver-
rection for curvature. (a) Par~ gence. ~~uently, there are n.o ag-
allel flow; (b) convex flow; (c)
preciablc acceleration component.§..JlQ!:=
concave flow.
mal to the direction of flo'\' that \VO~
disturb the hydrostatic-pressure d~J;.iQ.u in thfLcros~ctien of-flt--
, ~l"tlow.
~
statements. Some authors have proposed the use of the mOluentUnl coeffic~en.tto ,
r'epJace the energy coefficient even in computations based on the energy PrJ?ClpJ~,
" t ec't V'Nhether the energy coefficient or the momentum . , coeffiCient
. . o1 ,IS
TI 1IS IS no carr .
to be used depends on whether the energy or the moment?m prw::lple IS Ill:r -:,e .
The two coefficients are derived independently from baslca.lly different principles
(Art. 3-6). Neither of them is wrong and neither ca.n be replaced by t~e other; both
should be used in th~ correct sense. ' "
I Specific qualifica.tions for parallel flow were clea:rly stated for the first tlme by
Belanger [23]. '
)
OPEN CHAN,lIjELS AND THEIR PROFER'I'IES 31
In actual problems uniform flow i:s practically parallel flow. Gradually
_----7
varied flow may also be l'egarded .as parallel flow, since the cha.nge in
depth of flow is so mild that the streamlines have neither appreciable
curvature hoI' divorgence; that is, the curvature and divergellce are so
small that the effect of the acceleration components in the cross-sectional
plane is negligible. For practical p1.rposes, therefore, the hydrosta.tic law
. of pressure dislribution is applicable to gra,dually varied flow as well as to
1miform flow.
If the curvature of stl'eamlines is substantial, the flow is theoretically
~-> known as curvilinear flow. The effect of the curvature is to produce appre- .I
ciable ELGceleration components or cell trifugal forces normal to the direction
of flow. Thus, the pressure distribution over the section deviates from the
h}'drostatic if ourvilinear flow occurs rn the vertical plane:' Such curvi-
iinear flow may be either convex or concave (If;lg~nd c). In both \ ;
cases the .nonlinear pressure distribution is represented by AB' instead of
tlte straight distribution AB that would occur if the flow wel'e parallel.
It is assumed that ail streamlines are horizontal at the section under
consideration. In concave flow the centrifugal forces are pointing dDW:l- )
ward to reinforce the gravity action; so the resulting pressure is greater
than the otherwise hydrostatic pressure of a parallel flow. In convex
flow the centrifugal forces are acting upward against the gravity action;
consequently, the resulting pressure is less than the otherwise hydro-
static pressure of a parallel flow. Similarly, when divergence of stream-
lines is great enough to developappl'eciable acceleration components
normal to the flow; thehydrostati'c pressure distribution will be disturbed
accQrdingly.
Let the deviation from an otherwise hydrostatic pressure h. in a curvi-
linear flow be designated by c (Fig. 2-7b and c). Then the true pressure
or the piezometric height h = h; + c. '
If the channel has a curved longitudinal profile, the approximate
centrifugal pressure may be computed, by Newton's law of acceleration,
~~,~he E~~~~~ oL~L@iWt d and a croSQ..§ection. Qf
1 sq ft, that is, wd/g, and the centrifugal ac~ v2/r; or '
~.-~--- .
p = wd~~ (2-8)
g r
",/'
where w is the unit weight of water, g is the gravitational acceleration,
v is the velocity of flow, and'r is the radius of curvature. The pl'esstire-
d head correction is, therefore,
d v2
, )
c=-- gr
(2-9)
'
For computing the value ofc at the channel bottom, r is the radius of
cu::',rature of the bottom, d is the depth of flow, and for practical purposes
( .
J,
 . i

"
32 BASIC PRINCIPLES
v m~y be ass~med equal to the average velocity of the flow. Apparently,
c is positive for concave. flow, negative for convex flow, and. zero for
parallel flow. ,.
In parallel flow the pressure is hydrostatic, and the pressme head may
be represe11ted by the depth of flow y. For simplicity, the pressure head
of a curvilinear fiow may be represented by City, where a'is a correction
~oefficiimt for the curvature effect. The l:orrecti.on~oeffici~nt is referred
to as apressure-dislribtttion coejfiy'ient.. Since this coefficient is applied to
a pl'esswe head, it may be specifically SLa~'/m1~:!t!~~!1fficienl. It can
OPEN CHANNELS AND 'l'HEIR PROPERTIES 33
sure head at any vertical depth is equal to this iiepth multiplied by a cor-
rection fact·or cos 2 e. . Apparently, if the angle (J is small, this factor will
not differ apprecill.bly .fl'Om unity. In fact, the correction tends' to
decrease the pressure head by an amount less than 1 % until e is nearly
, 6" i a slope of about 1 in 10. Since the slope of ordinary channels is far
less than 1 in 10; the correction foi: slope effect can usually be safely
_ _-:i"" ignored .. However, when the cha~l_slope is large and its eff5l9t becoroe~
appreciable, thecorrection should be made if Mcumte comput~ttion is
-'-~-.----. - .

be shown that the pressure coefficient is expressed by

a' =~
~y}o
r.
A hI! dA 1 + 1 rA
}o '
cv dA (2-10)

where Q is the total discharge andy is the depth of flow. It can easily be
seen that a' is greater than 1.0 for concave flow, less than 1.0 for convex.
flow, and equal to LO for parallel flow.
. For complicated curved profiles, the total pressure distribution can be
determined approximately by the fjow~net method or DlOre exactly by
/., i model testing. , Pressure di.stribution
In ra..mr!l.t.Y!1ried flow theghange in depth of fl.oJYJs so rapid and abl'Upt 'on. ~ertical section A'C
.:that th<L§trea!!J.1ines l,:!9ssess 8ubstfilliia.UIJD!J)J,m1Ul.nd di;v~nce. ~
seguently, the hy~ro8tatic law of pressure ,distribut~s not hold strictlJl.
i!!!.IJ!1riifl:U...Y!1:riedJto£ .
- It should be noted at the outset .that throughout this boqk flow is
treated in general as either parallel or gradually varied. Ther~ore, the
FrG. 2-8. Pressure tlistribution in parallel How in cha.nnels of lurge slope.
effect of the curvature of streamlines, will not be considered (~hat is, it
will be assumed that a' = 1) unless the flow is specifically described as
desired. A channel qf this type, say, with a slope gre~ter than 1 in 10,1.'.3
either curvilinear or rapidly varied.
hereafter called a channel of large slope. Unless specifically mentioned,
2-10. Effect of Slope on Pressure Distribution. With fPjerence to a
all chMlnels descrlbeanereafte-r are ~onsidered to be channels of small
straight sloping channel of unit width and slope angle 6 (Fig. 2-8), the
slope, where the slope effect is negligibie.
weight of the shaded :"vater element of lengt;h dL is equaltq..:l:!:'lUlQ~.
If a channel of large slope ,has a. 10ngitudin!11 vertical profil£,; of appreci-
The pressure due to this weight is wy cos 2 fJ dL. The unit pressure is,
therefore,equal to wy cos~ e, and thehead 1 is able. curvatul'e~ the pressure head should be cOl;rected fo]' the effect of the
I\ curvature of streamlines (Fig. 2-9). In simple notation, the pressure
I
-'
h = Y cos 2, e head may be expressed as g'y cos 2 Jt., """~~~~S==
or h = d 90S e In channels of large slope the usu . andhighel'
where d = ~ cos e, the depth measured perpendicularly from the water thl1n the critical velobity. When this velocity reaches a certain riHl.gni,
surface. It should be noted from geometry (Fig. 9-1) that Eq. (2-11) "tude, the flowing water ,vill entrain nil', produ'cing a swell in its volume:i
.and Ml increase in depth.l For this rel1son the pressUl'C computed uy
does not apply strictly to varied flow) piwticularly when 0 is v~ry large,
whereas Eg. (2-12) still applies. Eq~lition ·(2-11) states that ,the pres- Eq. {2-11) or (2-12) 4,~n shown in several gases to b.e higher than th~
1
JAil' becomes entraine~.in ",,,,ter generally...!!! v"e19\l~ of !>~t go Ips and higher.[
or--, ' ,

1 M. Hasurrh has measured the distributibn of pressure along the slopihg faces of
Besides velocity, however. other factors such'as entrance condition, channel rough.,
we~ [241. The data. obtained from these ekperimenta have verified Eqs'. :(2 .. 11) and ness, distance .traveled, cha.nnel cross section. volume or discharge, etc •• all have some;
(2-12) very sa~Jsf!l.Ctorily (25]. .
bearing on a.ir entrainment. ' . ;
i
I

I
34 BASIC PRINCIPLES OPEN CHANNELS AND 'rHEIR PROPERTIES 35
actual measured pressure obtained 'by model testing. If the average struct curves showing the relationships between the depth y and the section elementS
density of the air-water mix~ure is known, it shouM be' used to, replace A; R, D, and Z; and (b) determine, from the curves the geometric elements for y = 4. j
the density of pnrc water in the computation when air entrainment is \\
Distance f,om Distance fro~
expected. The actual density of the mixture varies from the bottom to:
a reference point Stage, a referenc(J point Stage,
the surfafaTor the floV\L For practical purpo;es, however, the density neClr left bank, ft ft near .left bank, ft ft
may be assumed constant; this assumption of I!!llform air distributi_o_I?:_i~_ Left bank: -5 5.6 7 -0.1
-4 4.6 9 -0.1
-2 4.0 11 -0.4
0 1.9 13 -0.1
1 0.8 15 0.7
2 0.2 17 2.6
3 0.3 19 3.2
'1 5 0.2 Right bank: 20 4.1
j
\
2-6. The hydrostaLil" cll.tenary may be plott.ed for [Lny given depth l/ and slDpe angle
O. at its ends by the following two approximate equations:
. I
:1:)= fk [(1 - %k' - 1)1.g,k4).p + (%k' + %2k4) sin 21/> ~ %56k~ sin 4.j.] (2-13) l I
YI = if cos 10 (2-14)

where :1'1 and YI, respectively, are the ordinate and abscissa measured from t,h.e mid- (,
point of the free surface; k = sin (110/2); '" = sin- 1 f [sin (1/>/2)l!kl; and 11 is the slope "

Convex, flow Concave flow
FIG. 2-9. Pressure distribution in curvilinear flow in channels of large slape.
the cross section wiII simplify cQmputation, with, the errors on the safe
.[
side.
PROBLEMS
2-1. Verify the formulas far geometrio elements of the seven channel sections given
in Tahle 2-1.
$-2. Verify the cUrY'es shown in Fig. 2-1.
2-3. Construct curves siinilar tQ those shown in Fig. 2-1, for a square channel
section.
2-4. Construct cu'rY'es similar to those shown in Fig. 2-1 for an equilateral triangle
with one side as the channel bottom.
9.-5. From the data g(ven below on the cross section 1 of a natural stream /a) con·
1 It is common practioe to show the cross section of a stream in a direction looking
, downstream and to prepare the lQngitudinal profile qf a channel so that the wate~
flows from left to right, ;unless this arrangement would bit to show the feature to b~
illustrated by the cross'section and profile. This practice is generally fqllowed bt
most 'engineering offices. However, for geographical reasons or in order to depict
clearly the location and profile of a stream, the profile may be shown with water ftow~
ing from right to left and the cross section ma.y be shown looking upstream. This
happens in ma.ny drawings pre'pared by the TennesseEj Valley Authority, because the
Tennessee River and most of its tributaries flow from:east tQ west, and so are shown
with the direction of flow from right to left on a, conventional map.
, i
angle at the point (XI,l!I), varying from 0 at the bottom of the curve to 9, at the ends.
The above equations will define' the. cross section when the flow is at its full dept.h.
The slope angle at the ends of a hydrostatic catenary of best hydraulic efficiency is
found mathema.tically to be II, = 35'37'7". (a) Plot this section with' a depth
y = 10 ft, and (bl determine the values of A, R, D, and Z at the full depth .
2-7. Estimate the Ylllues of momentum coefficient (j for., the- given values of energy
c(lefficient ex = 1.00, 1.50, and 2.op. ,
2-8. Compute the energy and mo~entum coefficients of the cross st'ction shown in
Fig. 2-3 (a) by Eqs. (2-4) and (2-5), and (b) by Eq~; (2-6) and (2-7). The cross sec-
tion and the curves of equal velocity can be transferred to a piece of drawing paper
and enlarged for deSired ll.ccuracy.
2-9. In designing side walls ofsteep chutes and overflow spillways, prove that the
overturning moment due to the pressure of the flowing water is equal to Yswy' cos' 9,
wherew.is the unit weight of water, y is the vertical depth of the flowing water, and 9
is t,he slope angle of the channel.
2 ..10. Prove Eq. (2-10).
2-11. A high-head overflow spillway (Fig. 2-10) has a 60-ft-radius flip bucket u.t
its downstream end. The bucket is not submerged, but acts to change the direction
of the flow from the slope of the lipillway face to the horizontal and to discharge the
flov1 into the air' between vertical training walls so ft apart. , At: a discharge of 55,100
ds, ;the water surface at the vertical section OB is at El. 8.52. 'Verify t.he curve that
represents the computed hydraulic ,pressure acting on the training wall at section DB.
The computatiQn is bailed an Eq,' (2-9) and on'the following assumptions: (1) the
velqcity is uniformly di~tl'ibuted across the section; (2) the vo.lu,e used for r, fQr pres-
sur~ values near the wall base, is 'equal to the radius of the bucket but, for other
pre;isure values, is equal to the radius of the concentric flow lines; and (3) the flow is
entto.ined with air, and the density ,of the air-water mixtureca~ be estimated by the

1 j
f
) )
 .1 ,.
!
36 BASIC PRINCIPLES OPEN CHANNELS. AND THEIR PRO'PERT1ES 37
Douma. formula,' that is, 5. George Higgins: "Water Channels," Crosby, Lockwood &: Son Ltd., London, 1927,
'U - 10 ~0.2V:
. gR
- 1 (2-15)
pp.15-36. . .
6. Ahmed Shukry: Flow around bends in an open flume, Transactions, AmericilTl
Society of Civil Engineers, vol. 115, pp. 751-779, 1950.· '
where u is the percentage of entrained .air by voiume, V is the velocity of flow, and 7. A. II. Gibson: "Hydraulics and Its Applications,'" Constable &: Co., Ltd., London,
R Is the hydraulic radIus.
4th ed., 1934, p .. 332. ,
. 2-12. Compute the wall pressure on the section OA (Fig. 2-10) of the spillway
8.J. R. Freeman: "Hydr·a.ulic Laboratory Practice," Amedcan Society of Mecha.nical
described in Prob. 2-11. It is assumed that the depth of tlow section is the same!l.S
Engineers, New York, 1929, p. 70: ' ,
that at section DB.
9. Don M. Corbett and ot.hers:8trealn-ga.ging procedure, U.S. Geologicnl SlI1vey,
Water Supply Paper 888, 1943.
10. N. C. Grover and A. W. Harri'ngtoo.: "S.ream FlOW," John Wiley &; 80·ns, Inc.)
New York, Hl43.

;:;
/
\« $PilIW1!Y
Iraining wall,
eo II cpO!1
11. Standards for methods and records of· hydrologi~ measurements, United Natio7ls
Economic Comm.isslcn for Asia: and the Fa:r Ei.I$~, Flood Control Series, No.6,
Ba.ngkok, 1954, pp. 26-30. ,
12. G. CorioUs: Sur.l'etablissemellt de Ill. formule qui donne la figure des remons, et .sIU·
12. ilorrection tiu'on doH y int,roduire POllr tenir compte des diffel'ences de vitesse
dans les diVers points d'une marne section d'un COUl'ant (On the ba.ckwater-curve
C equation a.tid the corrections to be introduced to !lccount for the difference of the
.2
::l velocitie$ at different points on the same cross section), Ivnmoire No. 268,
:-

.) OJ
t;j
..,l,n'nalca du punts et chaw;sees, vol. 11, ser. 1, pp. 314-335, 1836.
13. J. Boussinesq: Esg's'i sur la theorie des eaux courantes (On the theory of flowing
i. waters), M~moire& ]fr/;sentes par diven savants ri l'Academie des Sciences, Paris,
2
1877. . .
14. Erik G. W. Lindquist: Discussion un Precise. weir measurements, by Ernesf W.
~ Schader andT(ennethB. Turner, 1"7'(tllaac:l.ions, American Society of Civil Engineers,
I /, vol. 93, pp. 1163-1176, 1929.
i 4 ,a 15. N. M. Shcha.pov: H Gidrometriia Gidrotelchnicheskikh SoorllllheniI i Gicir,omashin"
Un;l pressare, II 01 woler (" Hydrometry of Hydrv.lllic Structures and MacJ:Jnery ") I Gosenel'goizciat,
Moscow, 1957, p. 88. . .
FIG, 2-10. Side-wall pressures on the flip bucket of a spillwa.y.
\I 2-13. Compute the wall pressure on the section OA (Fig. 2-10) of the spillway
16. Stcponas Kolupaila: Methods of determin!l.tion of the kinetic energy facto!', The
Port Engineer; Calcutta, India., vol. 5, no. I, pp. 12-18, Januo.ry, 1956.
17. M. P. O'Brien and G: H. Hickox: "Applied Fluid Mechallics," McGraw-Hill
descrIbed in Prob. 2-11 if the bucket is submerged with a tailwater level at EL 75.0. Book Company, Inc., New York, 1st ed., 1937, p'.272. '
It is !l.SSulned that the pressure resultbg from the centritugal force or the submerged 18, Horace William·King; i'Handbook of Hydraulics," 4th ed., l'evised by Ernest F.
jet need not be considered beca.use the submergence will reault in a severe reduction Brater, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York, 1954, p. '7-12.
in velocity. 19. Morrough P. O'Brien and Joe W. Johnson: Velocity-head correction for hydrau1ia
REFERENCES flow, Engineering News-Record, vol. 113, 0.0.7, pp. 214-216, Aug. 16, 1934. .
20. Th. P..ehbQck': Die Bestimmung der I,age der Energielinie bei ftiessenden Gewful-
1. S. F. Averillnov: 0 gidravlicheskom raschete rusel krivolineinoI formy poperech, sern mit HilIe des GeschwindigkeitshOhen-Ausgleichwertes (The determina.tion of
nogo secheniia (Hydraulic design of channels with curvilinear form oithe crosS the position of the energy line in flowing water with the o.id of velocity-head
section), lzvestiia Akademii Nauk S.S.S.R., Otdelenie ~'ekhnic"eskfk;h Nauk" a.djustment), Der Bau.ingenieuT, Berlin, vol.. 3, no. 15, pp. 453-455,·· Aug. 15, 11122.
Moscow, no. 1, pp. 54-58, 1956. 21. Boris A. Bak&meteff: CorioIis and the energy principle in hydraulics, in "Theodore
2. Leonard Metcalf and H. P. Eddy: "American Sewerage Pra.ctice," McGraw-Hm von !Urman Anniversary Volume," California. Institute of Teohnology, Pasadena,
Book Company, 1M., New York, 3d ed., ,1935, vo!. 1. 1941, pp. 59-65.
3. Harold E. Babbitt: "Sewerage and Sewage Treatment," John Wiley &: Sons, Inc., 22. W. S. Eisenlohr: Coefficient's for velocity distribution in open-Channel flow, Tra.ns-
. New York, 7th ed., 1952, pp. 60-:.66. ac:I.ior/.$, American. Socie4/ of Civil Enginee7's, voL 11:0, pp. 633-644, 1945. Dis-
4. H. M. Gibb: Curves for solving the hydrostatic oatenary, Engineering News, cussions, pp. 645-668.
vol. 73, no .. 14, pp. 668-670, Apr, 8, 1915. 23. J. B. Bela.nger: "Essai sur la solution numeriqne de ql,lelques problemes relatifs
au mou.-ement permanent des eaux courantes" ("Essa.y on tIle Numerica.l Solu-
I This iormull!. [26J is based on da.ta obtained from actual· conorete and wooden
chutes, involving errOnl of ±10%. ' tion of Some Problems Relative to Steady Flow of Wa.ter"), Carilian-Goeury,
Paris, 1828, pp. 10-24.

\ ,
 38 BASIC PRINCIPI..ES

24. It Ehrenberger: Versuche Iiber die Verteilung der Drucke an Wehrriicken infolge
des I1bsturzcnden '.Vassers (Experiments on the distribution 'of pressuresa\ong the
f~~e of w(d ..;; resulting from the impact of the fa.lling water), Die W IMJserwirtschaft,
Vienna, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 65-72, 1929.
25. 'H&rald Lauffer: Druck, Energie und Fliesszustand in Gerinnen mit grossem CHAPTER 3
Gefiille (Pressure, energy, and flow type in channels with high gradients), Was-
serkrafl, und Wasserwirtschaft, Munich, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 78--82, 1935.
26. J. H. Douma: Discussion on Open channel flow at high velocities, by L. Standish
ENERGY AND MOMENTUM PRINCIPLES 1
Hall, in Entra.inment of atr in flowing water: a symposium,T1'ansactions, American
Society of Civil Engineers, vol. 108, pp. 1462-1473, 1943.
LeI!.'foI.l- Pit' 67/\1c: ,Il.1 ,f;.-N eN
3-1. Energy in Open-channel Flow. It is known in elementary
hydraulics that the total energy in foot-pounds per ponild of water in any
.2. . h}jc/rct,;.d.i :/'t'--10 c: c ,'" Y . 5 . , . (, <
streamline passing through 9, channel section may be expressed as the
total head in feet of water, which is equal to the sum of the elevation
W/ibn .ftu;o 4,4ff luitf& Yl 7 tUi, rv:5 (id.. t

f? . d tU. ,lillJ-' foe-t ~ Y-'.c,tt/).Je1' @

,

..k.": In a CCt·n~l.pdjW 4t- /~1{."fp"U.1/f'A(iCL

I
HI]~II tt'l"1
_ P ,~,> J: ..
::>..;t;.1".!/f"''' V"'r1.tl.-7
. c. "e J' .,t:;
VW' _..:!.~,~" .it.-.:.~(j
'I
1
d

~'i._ .:di.l:£nnd~~L4;'1~ -t&.4i-:5 p,ttt'a .

~
e>J rret ,/·1/0 fall . Saelioil 0
I I
I
I
..vV ,he. ellA-of /:J~"m
·'n'YII!'.
(I!
;$ dtre,·r/6..,;tLul
.s~t:rt, 1.__ ~:lum _1_1. 1.~_
__ •

Vr';,t.. cd cbf #.. is /l. J'Vi4 v..u ¢ ,pver.( e @'we <5 FrG. 3-1. Energy in grad'.lo1ly varied 'open-channel Row.

~y.& o,C;...l."< ~ above a datum, the pressure head, and the velocity head. For example,
with respect to the datum plane, the totltl head H at a section 0 conta.in-
ing point A on a streamline of flow in a channel of large slope (Fig. 3-1)
r1.!1 /!.~Ci//.
bkrl~)~""'p1)
iJ
/,1 (f?)e.'!, 6 rtf..~'( • .§
d
"'"'t / /J /
CttYD.iJ,.u.:; r;~yo;o (}v'Iv: vI<
'. I IS may be written

/u..-",,' fYr..f t! Ci.~"Vl/ r1 f~J t·'1' . H = ZA + d A, cos 8+ V2; 2

(3-1)

. '7.... ('/. " .) • ( ftvtAP. t'k,~e l',., ctylv) where ZA is the elevation of pain t A above the datum plane, dA is the depth
!/YiM..ltU... (l!':71tdVt) ~-;P. f ' of point A below the, water surface measured along the channel section,
8 is the slope angle of the channel bottom, and V.{2j2g is the velocity hea~
T>/~~cf Jt#rry.: (IU9A .~) . of the flow in the streamline passing through A.
In general, every streamline passing through a channel section will have
~it..d-(c4blh < .5q,-'Ui4'V"t d.c;ot/.., . 39 _. r"',

( .bq:...... e It:;rY:J
 • i

,
40 BASIC PRINCIPLES ENERGY AND MOMENTUM PRINCIPLES 41
~ different velocity head, owing to· the nonuniform vel~ity distribution -3-2. Specific Energy, Specific energyl in a channel section is defined
U1 ~ctual fl~w, .Onl~ in un ideal pal'a:lel fl~w of uniform velocity distri- as the energJi per pound of water at any section of· a channel measured
butl.on can .he velocIty head be truly IdentlCal for aU points on the cross with respect to the channel bottom. Thus, according to Eq. (3:-2) with
sectlOn. In the ~ase of gradually varied flow, however,· it may be Z = 0, the specific energy becomes .
assumed, for pr~ctlCal purposes, that the velocity heads for all points on V2
the ch~nnel sectIOn are equa.l , and the el~ergy coefficient may be used ·to S. = d cos 8 + a 2g (3-7)
correct for the over-all effect of the nonuniform velocity distribution.
or, for 8: channel of small slope and a = 1,
Thus, the total energy at the channel section is
V!
H = z + rl cos () V
+ a --.:.
2
E =y+- (3-8)
. 2g (3-2)
.' . 2g
For channels of small slope, 0 = O. Thus, the tots'! energy at the chan.. which illdic!l.tes that the specific energy is equal to the sum of the depth
nel section is of water and the velocity head. For simplicity, the following discussion'
will be based on Eq. (3-8) for a channel of small slope. Since V = Q/ A,
H = z +d + c ;P2g
.- (3-3) Eq. (3-8) may be written E = y + Q2/2gAz. It can.be seen that, for a
Consid~r !lOW a prismatic channel of large slope (Fig. 3-1). The line given channel section and discharge Q, the specific energy in a channel
r~pl'eSelltlltgJhL~_~~va~ion of the tota.Lhea..cLO-f.Jlow is the lill.&gy_line. section is a function of the depth of flow only.
;rhe slope of the hne IS known as the energy g'radient, denoted by Sf. When the depth of flow is plotted against the specific energy for a given
The slope oLthe water surface is de;noted by Sw and the slope of the channel section and discharge, a specific-energy CUTve (Fig. 3-2) is obtained.
channel bottom l by So = sin () . In uniform £10'" This curve has ,.two limbs AGand BG. 'rh~ .lifl.lb AC.~J)proache;3the
. ", S J-- S w-- S o-Sln.
- . ()
According to the principle of conservation· of energy, the total energy ,horiz.ontall\-xis asymptoticallx toward the righ.t. The limb Be approaches
head at the upstream section 1 should be eql.lal to the· total energy head the line OD as. it extends l.lpward and to the right. Line OD is a line that
) at t~e downstream seetion 2 plus the loss of energy hf between the two passes through the origin and !ul:,s _ananglfi Qf lr~eJlP.ati.QJUiQl!j11 to '!5~!-­
I, sectIons; or ... For a channel of large slope, the angle of inclination of the line OD will
,.
V;2 . V" . be different from 45°. (Why?) At any point P on this curve, the ordi-
Zl +d l cos /1
.
+ al ~2·g = Z2 + d z COs /1 + az ---.l:
2g
.L
,
h
'f (3-4) ) nate represehts the depth, and the: ,abscissa represents the specific
energy, which is equal to the snm:6f the pressure head y a.nd the'velocity
This equation applies to parallel or gradualJy varied flow. For a channel head V 2 /2g. .
of small slope, it becomes .
The curve shows that, for a given specific energy, there are tW9 possible
.
ZI
V;
+ YI .+ al -2
g
= Z2 + Y2 + a2 -V~
2g
.
+h.f (3-5) depths,. for instance, the low stage YI and the high stage y~. The low
stage is· called the alternate depth· of the high stage, and vice vel'sa. At
Either of these tW? equations is known as the energy equation. Wh~n point G; the specific energy is a n~inimum. It will be proved Inter that
al = .a2 = 1 and hr = 0, Eq. (3-5) becomes this condition of minimllriJ. specific energy corresponds to the critical
. V I2 .·. V 22 state of fio.v. Thus, at the critical state the two alternate depths
Zl +
. . Yl+ -2
g = Z2 +y~ + -2g const (3-()) apparently become one, which is known as the critical depth 1/e. When the
depth of ;fiowis greater than the critical depth, the velocity of flow is less
This is the well-known BernoHl,li energy equation.2
than the critical velocity for the given! discharge, and, hence, th:e fiow js
. 1 The slo~e is generally defined as tan O. For the present purpose, however it is sub criticaL When the depth of flow is less than the critical depth, the
defined as sm O. ' flow is supercritical. Hence, YI is the. depth of a supercritical flow, and
.. It ~s .believed th~t this equil-tioni is ascribed to the Swiss mathematician Daniel
2
1/2 is the depth .of a subcritical flow. ' '
, \ Berno\llh only ?y lllf~l'ence, to gjve recognition to his pioneer achievement in
If the discrarge changes, the specific energy will be changed· aucord-
hy.dro1yn~mICs, m ,partlcular the in~roductio'n of the concept of "~ead." Actuall}',
'JI
tlu~ e~uatlOn was first formulated by; Leonhard Euler a.nd later popularized by Julius ingly. The 1wo curves A' B' and A" B."
(Fig. 3-2) represent positions of
WelSbl\ch [1 J. .. .
1 The concept of specific energy was first ir~troduced by Bakhrneteff [21 id 1912.
42 BASIC PRINCIPLES ENERGY AND MOMENTUM PRINCIPLES 43· ~~1
,the specific-energy curve when the discharge is less 'and greater, respec- At the critical state of ftowthe specific energy is a min~mum, or
tively, than the discharge used for the construction of the curve AB. dE/dy =0. The above equation, therefore, gives (j
3-3. Criterion for a Critical State of Flow. The critical state of flow ' N\':;"
has been defined (Art. 1-3) as the condition for which the Froude number VI D
2g - 2 ,~
4 (3-10) {

is equal to uni~y. A more common definition is that it is the state of flow

at which the specific energy is a minimum for a given discharge. 1 A This is the criterion for critical flow, which states that at the critical state ()
of flow, the velocity head is equal to half the hydraulic depth. The above
eq~ation may also be written V!...;gJ5 == 1,which means F = 1; this is
the definition of critical flow given previously (Art. 1-3). I,
" 1
If the above criterion is to .beused in any problem, the following con- i.,'
ditions must be satisfied: (1) flow parallel or gradually val:ied, (2) channel
ro---- y -----I
01 small stope, alld (3) energy coefficient assumed to be unity, If the I'
energy coefficient is not assumed to be unity, the criti~al-flow criterion is j
(3-11)
,
j
Supercritica I For a channel of large slope angle 8 and energy coefficient ct, the criterion
,I
I
) for critical flow can easily be proved to be
Vl D cos e (3-12)
ct 2g = 2

where D is the hydraulic depth of the wateI: area normal to the channel
bottom. In this case, the Froude number may be defined as
,Fw. 3-2. Specific-energy curve.
(3-13)
theoretical criterion for critical flow may be developed from this definition
as follows: It should be noted that the coefficient a of a channel section actually
Since V = Q/ A, Eq. (3-8), the equation for specific energy in a ·varies with depth. In the above derivation, however, the coefficient is
channel of small slope with a = 1J may be written assumed to be constant; therefore, the resulting equation is il0t absolutely
Q2 exact.
E=y+--, (3-9) 3-4. Interpretation of Local Phenomena. Change of the state of flow
217A -
Diffe~entiatiilg with respect to y and noting that Q is a constant,
from subcritical to supercritical orvice versa occurs frequently in open
channels. Such change is manifested in a corresponding ch&nge in the
dE = 1 _ ~ dA = I _ VI dA depth of flow from a high stage to a low stage or vice versa. If the change
dy gA3 dy gAdy takes place rapidly o'/er a relati velyshort distance, the flow is rapidly
. . "

The differential water area dll near the free surface (Fig. 3-2) is equal varied and is known as a local phenomenon. ' The hydraulic drop
~ , ,
and
.
to T dy. Now dA/dy = T, and the hydraulic depth D:= A/T; so the hydraulic jump are. the two types M local phenomena, and, may be
above equation becomes ' described as follows: .
Hydraulic Drop. A rapid change in the depth of flow from a high
dE V2T 'V2 stage to a low stage will result in a steep depression in the water surface.
-=1--=1--
dy 'gA , gD Such a phenomenon is generally caused by an abrupt change .in the
I Th~ concept of critica.l depth bas'ed on the theorem of minimurh energy Wall first channel slope or cross section and is known as a hydraulic drop (fig. 1-2).
introdl.).ced by BOss [3J. ' At the transitory region of the hydraulic drop a reverse curve usually

,
,<
 44 BASIC PRINCIPLES
appears, connecting the water surfaces before and after the 'drop.' The
point of inflection on the reverse curve marks the approximate position
of the cdtical depth nt which the specific energy is a minimum and the
flow passes from a "SUbcritical state to a supercritical state.
The free ove'rfall (Fig. 3-3) is a special case of the hydraulic drop. It
occurs 'where the bottom of a fiat' channel is discontinued. As the free
overfall entel'S the air in the form of a nappo, there will be no reverse curve
\I,
\
in the water surface until it strikes some object at a lower eleva.tion. It.
is the law of nature that, if no energy were added from the outside, the
ENERGY AND MOME~TUM PRINCIPLES - 45
.~~h~~ the brin~. T~actual situation i~ that the brink section is thg
true section of minimum energy, but it is not the critical section as com-
jnite(fEyt'te prineiple based on the parallel-flow assumpti~ Rouse [~l ...
found that for small slopes the computed critical depth is about 1.4 times
the brink depth, or Yo = 1.4yo, and that it is located about 3y< to 4yc
"behind the brink in the channel. The actual water surface of the over-
fall is shown by the full line (Fig. 3-3). ,..--
It should be noted that, if the change in the depth of flow from Do high
stage to a low stage is gradual, the flow becomes a gradually varied flow

y
v'{ijl,/::~LJ) '7 f"'~'''1i
-
o
-, ""c.
-::!~ <U
_ Ii Y '0 Y
o "
"" "
o.tl:
/Theore.licOi water surfoce
---"""",-""-,,,,- ==:::t' ~s~~nLP~~e.!...! I~ _ _ _ -'-
Actual WQter surface - -- - -'\. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~

E Ir.ilial
deplh

Specific-ene'g)' CUrye Hydraulic jump Specific-·force Culye

FIG. 3-4. Hydro.ulic ju~np interpreted by.specific-energy and specific-force curves.

~

FIG. 3-3. Free overfa.ll interpreted by specific-energy c~rve.
water sl1T~!:\cewould seek its lowest possible position corresponding to the
\ ' least possIble content of energy dissipation. If the specific energy at an
upstream section is E, as shown On the specific-energy curve, it will COl1-
1 ti~u.e to be dissipated on the way downstream and 'Will finally reach a
mllllmum energy content E",,,.. The specific-energy curve shows that
the section of minimum energy or the critical section should occur at the
brink. r~~~~tie less_tha!Lth.~,J~titical depth _because
!Er~he:~ecl'eas.e," In deJ2th woul£.!eguire a.TI, increo.se in sgecific energy,
~.pos~ll>l~o.!ll.p~nsating external en~,ls sup~lie<!: .The
theoretIcal water-surface curve of an overfall is shown with a dashed line
in Fig. 3-3. . When the jump is high, that is, when, the change in depth is great, the
It ~hould be reme~bered that the detel;mination of critical depth by
Eq. ,c3-1O) or !3.11) IS based on the assumption of parallel flow a.rid is
ap.phc~ble only approximately to gradually varied flow. 1'he flQW at the
brink E' actually ..llllt:llilinear, fru:...:the curYatl..lli} of .flow is -P..'CQllQl!nclill;
.hen~, the method is invalid 'for determining the critical depth asJ.~
having a prolonged reversed curve of water surface; t.his.phcnomenoll may
~Clllled ~ grad'unl hud7'a1t~ic drop and is no longer a local phenomenon~
Hydraulic Jump. When the rapid change in the depth of fiow is from
a low stage to a. high stage, the result is usually an abl'llPt rise of water
~e. (Fig;. 3-4, in which the vertjc!l,l scale is exaggerated). This local'
phenomenon is known a~J.he hydraulic j1tmp. It occurs frequently in a
canal below a regulating sluice, at, the foot of a spillway, or at the place
where a steep chann!)l slope suddenly turns jlat.'
If thejump is low, that is, if the change in depth is small, the water will
not rise obviOtisly and abruptly but will pass from the low to the high
stage through a series of undulations gradually diminishing in size.
Such a low jump is called an uooular jtimp. .
jump is called a direct jump. The direct jump involves a relatively large
amount of energy loss thro,ugh dissipation in the turbulent body of water
in the jump. Consequently, the energy content in the flow after the
jump is appreciably less than that before the jump. .
It may be noted that the depth before the jump is always less than the
 46 BASIC PRINCIPLES
ENERGY AND MOMENTUM PRINCIPLES 47
depth after the jump. The depth before the jump is called the initial
alternate-depth line. At the critical section, it is noted that the three
.depth y 1 and that after the jump is called .the .sequent depOt Y2; The initial
lines, namely, the .yater surface, the critical-depth line, and the alter-
and sequent depths VI and Y2 are shown on the specific-energy curve
nate-depth line, intersect at a single point. It is seen' tho.t, in passing
(Fig. 3-4). They· should he distinguished from the altern!J.te. A~p~hs
through the critical Reotion, t,he water surface entei'S the supercritical-
YI and Y2'! whi(J~~e the two nossible depth~ fo!:....the same specific ener~l' flow region smoothly.
_.~~itial and s~lent depths are actual depths before and after a jump
The· three-dimensional plot of energy curves is complicated. The
in which ~rgy lOss b.E is invoh-ed. In other words, the specific
description given here is used only for helping the reader to visualize the
-energy E 1 at the initial depth Vl is greater tha.n the specific energy
problem. In actual applications, the energy C'lrves may be constructed
at the sequent depth .y~ by an amount equal to the energy loss AE. II
there were 110 energy losses, the initial and sequent depths would become
identical with the alternate depths in a prismatic channel.
3-5. Energy in NQnprismatic Channels. In preceding discussions the 1
channel has been assumed prismatic so t.hat one specific-el~ergy curve \
could be applied to evil sections of the channel. For non prismatic chan-
nels, however, the channel section varies along the length of the channel
and. hence, the specific-energy curve differs from section to section. This II
cbm'plication can be seen in a three-dimensional plot of the energy curves
along the given reach of a nonpl'ismatic channel. I
I
For demonstrative purposes, a nOllprismatic channel with variable I
slope is taken as an example, in which agradually varied flow is carried i
from a, stibcritical state to a supercritical state: (Fig. 3-5) .. The vertical I
!
profile of the channel along its center line is plotted on the Hx plane with
the x axis chosen as the datum. For a variable-.slope channel, it is more I
convenient to plot the total energy head H = z + y + V Z/2g, instead of
the specific energy, against the depth of flow on the By plane. For
!
II
simplicity, the pressure correction due to the slope a.ngle and curvature of
flow is ignored in this discussion. An energy line is then plotted on the
Hx plane below a line parallel to the x axis and passing through the initial
X
total head at the H axis. The exact position of the energy line depends
FIG'. 3-5. Energy in a non prismatic channel of variable-slope, carrying gradually
on the energy losses along the channel. Four channel sections are then va.ried flow from sllbcritical to supen::ritical state.
selected and four energy curves for these sections are plotted in the Hy
planes ~ shown. The initial section 0 is an upstream section in the separately on a number of tWo-dimensional Hy planes for the chosen
sUbcritical-flow region. The two depths corresponding to a given total sections. The data obtained from these curves are then used to plot the
energy H 0 can be obtained from the energy curve. Shice this section is water surface, critical-depth line, and alternate-depth line on a two-
in the subCl'itical-flow region, the high stage yo should be the actual depth dimensional Ex plane. For simple channels, the energy curves are not
of flow, whereas the low stage is the alternate depth. Similarly, the necessary because thi;l critical depth and alternate depths C3.n easily be
alternate depths in other sections can be obta,ined. In the downstream computed directly,
sections rand 2, the low stages Yl and Y2 are the actual depths of flow singe
they are in the supercritical-flow region. The critical depth at each se y-
Eumple3-L ·A rectangular cha.nnell0 ft wide is narrowed down to 8 ft by a con-
trMtion 50 ft long, built of straight wa,lls and a horizontal fiooc. If the discharge is
{
\
tion can also be obtained from the energy curve at the point of minimum . 100 cfB and the depth of Bow is 5 ft On the upstream side of the transition section,
energy. At &ection C the critical flow occurs, and the depth y, is the determine the flow-surface profile in the contra.ction (0.) allowing no gradual hydraulic
critical depth. On the H x plane, varioUs lines can finally be' plotted; drop in the contraction, Ilnd(b) a.llowing a gradual ,hydraulic drop ha.ving its point of :l
inflection a.t the mid-sectioll of the contra.ction. Th!Jrip.tionalloss through the con-
showing the channel bottom, water surface, critical-depth line, and traction is negligible. - .

, .
48 BASIC PRINCIPLES ENERGY AND MOMENTUM PRINCIPLES 49
", . .

Sol1ttiDn. From the given data; the total'energy in the approaching flow meas~red ., critical depth at t}Jis section is equal to the total head divided by 1.5 (Prob. 3-3), or
above the channel bottom i~ u: = 5 +
{100/(5 ?< 1O)1'/2g = 5.062 ft. This energy is 5.062/1.5 = 3.375 ft. By :r::q, (3-10), the critical velocity ts'eqllnl to V, = V3.375g =
kept constant throughout l,lIC contractIon, since energy losses are negligible. A hori- 10.4.5 fps. Hence, the width of this' critical section should be 100/(10.45 X 3.38) =
zontal energy line showing the elevation'of the tobl head is, therefore, drawn on the 2.83 fi. '
channel· profile (Fig. 3-6). . With the size of the mid-section determined, the side walls of the contraction can
bo drawn in ,with straight lines. The lm~ and high stages at each section are then
computed by the equation previously'given, As the flow upstream from the critical
section is subcritical, lts water surface should follow the high stage. Downstream
from the critical secti6n, the flow is sllpercritical and its Burface profile 'follows the
low-stage line.
The criti.::al-depth line is shown to sepai'ate the high from the low stage or the sub-
Cl'itical from the stipercritical region of flow. On the basis of Eq. (3-10), the critica.l
depth can be computed from the equation
(lOO/by,), y,
2g = '2
or . y = {/lO,OOO
, "gb%
where' b is the width of the channel, which can be measured from the plan,
It should be noted :that the vertical scale of the channel profile is greatly exagger-
ated. Furthermore, the outline of the gradual hydraulic drop is only theoretical,
based on the theory of parallel flow. In reality, the flow near the drop is more or less
curvilinear, and the .actual profile would deviate from th/'! theoretical one.. .
This example also serves to demonstrate 11 method of designing a channel transition
(Arts. ll-5 to 11-7), The designer may fit any type of contraction walls he desires
to suit a given flow profile, or vice versa, .
3-6. Momentum in Open-channel Flow. As stated earlier (Art. 2-7),
the momentum of. thefiow passing a channel section per 'unit time is
FIG. 3-6. Energy principle applied to a channel contraction (a) without gr:adual expressed by pwQV /y, where p is the momentum coefficient, w is the l.mit
hydraulic drop; (b) with gradual hydraulic .(hop. ' weight of water in lb/ft i , Q is the discharge in cfs,
and V is the mean
velocity in fps,
The alternate depths for the given tot ..l energy. e..n be computed by Eq. (3-9) as ,-----?'?>- According to Newton's second law of motion, the change of momentum
follows: . '
" 100'
per unit of time in the body of water in a flowing channel is equal to the
5.062 = Y + 2g(by)' . resultant of all the external forces that are acting on the body,Applying
or . , - 5 06'> "
y . ~Y
+ 155.25
b'.
= 0 a
this principletO channel of large slope (Fig. 3-7), the fplfo~~ing expl:ession.
for the momentum change per unit tirnein;the body of water enclosed
This is a cubic equtl.tion in which b is the width of the channel. At the entrance sec-' betv.:een sections 1 and 2 may be written:
tion, where b = 10 ft, its s61ution gives two positive roots: a low stage 'YI = 0.589 ft,
which is the altemate depth; and ahigh stage Y2 := 5.00 ft, which is the depth of flow. '~l 0(.
J(.. 1 (3-14)
At the exit section ,where 11 = 8 ft, this. equation gives a low ati\ge YI =. 0.750 ftiand a •.;.. "'>l·~)(qt
high stage Y. = 4.964 ft. ! - cit! , . ,
When no gr~dual hydraulic drop is allowed in'the contraction (Fig. 3-6a), the1depth
where Q, w, and 1:::' are :as.. previously defined, with subscl'ipts refe1'l'in'g to '
of flow at the exit section.should be kept at the high stage, as shown, The high stages
)>1' C(
sectionr-l~nd 2;
P! and P 2 are the resultants of pressures acting on the
for other interm£ldiate sections are then compute~ by the above equation, whicli giveB _, Yn two sections; W is the weight of water enclosed between the sections; and
the flow-surface ptofile. Similarly, the low stages are computed by the aboye pro-
I F! is the total external force QL friE,tion and reslstanc~~ing-,ilong the
cedure and indicated by the alternate-depth line~ ; ,I lLUliace of conta,Qt bet\V'een.the water and the cha;nl)el.The above equa-'
When a grodua:~ hydrauiic drop is desired in the contraction (Fig. 3-6b), theldepth I
of flow at the exit ~ection should be at the low stage, Since the point of inAection of ! tion. .is known as the m;omentum
I ·
equation, l ,

the drop or 11. critipal section is maintained at th~ mid-section of the c~ntracti<?n, the !, 1 The application of the inomentum principle was first suggested by Belanger [5J.
,
 50 BASIC PRINCIPLES ENERGY AND )';IOMENTUJI{ PRINCIPLES 51
For a parallei or gradually varied flow, the values of PI and P 2 in the rectangular channel of small slope and wi~lth b (Fig. 3-7),
r- momentum equation may be computed by assuming a hYdrosta.tic ;'~Wb1l1:l.
distribution of pressure. For a cur:-vilinea.r or rapidly varied flo"l,' how- . and
PI
P z = 7§.wb yz2 L
ever, the pressure distribution is no longer hydrostatic; hence the ~alues Assume FI = wh/by
of PI and P z cannot be so computed but must be cOl'rected for the curva-
ture effect of the streamlines of the flow. For simplicity, P 1 and P2 may where h/ is the friction head and ii is the avera.ge depth, or (YI+ Y2)/2.
be replaced, respectively, by {)!'P 1 and f1~'P2' where {:Jt' and {)z' are the The discharge ~hrcillgh the reach may be taken as the produot of the
correction coefficients at the two sections. The coefficients are referred average velocity and the avera.ge area, or

I Q ~ ~i(Vl + V~)bii

I Also, it is evident (Fig. 3-7) that eha weight of the body of water is
W = wbfjL
and sin {j =
Substituting :111 the abo,'e expressions for the corresponding items in
.\ Eq. (3-14) and simplifying, .

(3-16)1

I This equation appes,rs to be practically the same as the energy equation I

I • (3-5).
Co t1r IC!cr-'T(~ 0 'tl. The.oretically sp'3aking, however, the two equations not only use dif-

Fro. 3-7. Application of the momentum.principle. 1. t'Yltkfr; ~t·-Z,a:k.~ ferent velocity-distribution coefficient,s, although these are nearly equal,
but al~o invol;e different meanings of the frictiollltllosses. ,II!. the energy
1.iJ" ~ e"" t Jt-l'!' !ill.!ll!-t!.on, the Item hr mea::;yres t.he intl?rna.l energy dissipat.ed in the whole
to as pressure-dislribution coefficients, Sjnce and P2 are forces, the. ~.~~?} ~.~s of the water iI!tbe reseh, whereas the item hi in the momentum
coeffi(Jients may be specificall~r (JaIled force coefficients. It can be shown i equatirJll measures the losses due to external forces exerted 011 the water
i
thu,t the force coefficient is expressed by by the walls of the channel. Ignoring the small difference between the
{:J' = 1-::
AZ)o
fA hdA= 1 +~ fA
AzJ~
cdA (3-15)
coefficients a and fJ, it seems that, in gradually varied flow, the internal-
ellergy losses are practically identical with the losses due to external
where z is the depth of the centroid of the wa.ter area A below the free forces. In uniform flow, the rate with which surface forces are doing
surface, h is the pressure head on the elementary area dA, andc is the work is equal to the rate of energy dissipation, In that case, therefore,.
pressure-head correction [Eq. (2-9)1, It can easily be seen th'1t pI is a dist,inction between hI and h/ does not exist except in definition.
!.Treater than 1.0 for ooncave flow, less than 1.0 for and equai The simila.rit,y between the applications of the energy and momentum
=~~ principles may be confusing: A clear ullderstandingof the basic differ-
to 1.0 f <2.r...1lllJ:allel flow:
It can be shown that the momentum e.quation is similar to the energy ences in their constitution is important, de.'lpite the fact that mmany
equation when ~pplied to certain flow problems. In this case, a gradually instances the two principles will produce practically. identical results.
varied flow.is considered; accordingly, the pressure distribution in the The inherent distinction between the two principles lies in the fact that
sections may be assumed hydrostatic, and (1' = 1. Also, the slope of the energ'J is a i5calar quantity whereas momentum is a vectC)r quantitT also·
. channel is ass~ed relatively small. 1 · Thus, in the short reach of a the ~nergy equation contains a term for' internal losses, where:s th~
momentum equation contains a term for external resistance.
1 If the slope a.!l~le 8 is large, then PI = }iwdl~ cos 0 and P. = ;fW~1 cos O,where
ell and el, are the Beptbs of flow section and cos IJ is a. correction factor (Art. 2-10). Generally speaking, the energy principle offers a simpler and clea~er
, ,a. tI
/::}.

j'(,h .{- c)id JI. = " j.Ad4 . 1 <.l(cd

I;
A
.4 r +~ (colA
()
A >(:i:.;. ! c dA 1/ z )
j:
'"
 ~.
52 BASIC PRINCIPLES
explanation than does the momentum principle. But the momentum
principle has certain advl.I.ntages in application to problems involving high
internal-energy changes, such as the problem of the hydraulic jump. If
the energy equation is applied to such problems, the unkriown internal-
energy loss represented by h, is indeterminate, and· the omission of this
term would result .in considerable errors. If instead the momentum
equation is applied to these problems, since it deals only with extemal
forces, the effects of the internal forces will be entirely out of considerfltion
and need not be evaluated. The term for il'ictionallosses due to ex~ernal
forces, on the other hand, is unimportant in such problems and can safely
be omitted, because the phenomenon takes place in a short reach of the
channel mid the efiect due to external forces is negligibl~ compfkreq with
the internal losses. . Further discussions on the solution of the hydraulic-
jump problem by both principles will be given IELter (Example 3-3).
An example showing the application ·of the momentum principle to the
problem of It broad-crested weir is given below.
Example 3-2. Derive the discharge per unlt width ofa broad-crested weir across a
rectangular channel.
FIG. 3-8. Momentum principle ~pplied to flow over a broad-cregted weir.
Boilltiun. The assumptions to be made in this solution (Fig. 3"8) are (1) the fric-
tional forces Fr' and F," are negligible; (2) the depth y. is the minimum depth on the
weir; (3) at the channel sections under consideration there is parallel flow; and (4)
~~~r ,pressure £w'on ~e weir surface is equal to the total hydros~.tic p~.!!.!!re ,
meD.S\.Ired below the upstreamwatei: surface, or..
p .. = Hwh[y, +- (YI - 11,)] = Hwh(2YI - h)
The accuracy (If the last assumption has been checked ~xperimentally [61. If the
momentum equation (3-14) is ·applied to the body of water between the upstream
J ..
r0 0 1">'1 e'Y°;t~,- [1""< a-"1,..""; 7 (~~4li/M ,rgf1lJ,o/,J<. (){;.:aty/'b .d:./n Ct"7fd-t. 'c.~ t5 If) f3 L
:: /, .ve-.le, i:-~ ' r ·
, . '- 'Y) c'Af:i
j .. /.:: .r-? .1: /)~;..<_. r . . ' _ .. ,:Ad .rI.r...,~;,;,;",,! f. ....u,:u.,
ENERGY AND MOMENTUM PRINCIPLES 53
approach section 1 and the downstream section 2 at themininium depth OIl the top
of the weir, the following equation may be written:
qw
g
(!1.Y2 _!J_)
YI
= HWYI' - MWy2 2 - Hwh(2y, - h)
. .
where q is the discharge per unit width of th~ weir'. /'
Experiments by Doeringsfeld and Barker 181 ·have shown that, on the/average,
VI - 11, = 2Y2. III that case the above equation can be simplified ani1 solved for q,
q = 0.433 V2Y (-4-h ) l~ H% I (3-17)
. ·Y'T //.
Conslderillg the limit.of h from ,zero to Infinity, this equation variesjfo~'!l'lR.~L
tv q = 2.4.6RH. It is interesting to note that the practical range·1lf tfie coefficient to
H~" obtained by actnal observations' is from 3.05 to 2.67. In applying the momentum
principle tiJ"this problem, .it can be seen that knowledge of the internal-energy losses
due to separation of flow at the entrance and to other causes ·is not needed in the
,analysis. .
3-7. Specific Force. In applying the momentum principle to a short
horizontal reach of fl. prismatic channel, the extern:al force of friction and
the weight effect of water can be ignored. Thus, with (J = 0 and F, = 0
and assuming also {31 = {3z = 1, Eq. (3-1.4) becomes
Qw (V2 -- 17 1) = PI - P2
g
The hydrostatic forces PI and 'P 2 may be expressed as
PI = wi 1 A. 1 a.nd P 2 = wi 2 A 2
where i l a~d i2 are the distances of the centroids of the respective wa.ter
areas Al and Az below the surface of flow. Also, Y I = Q/ Al a.nd
V 2 = Q/ A z• Then, the above momentum equation may be written
ir. + ilAl = il.... + ZZA2 (Qr //.,-c 1-1,) (3":18)
gAl g.fi 2
'The v:llue of the coefficient actually depends on many factors: mainly, the round-
ing of the upstream corner, the length and slope of the weir crest, and the height of
the weir. Many experiments on bl'oad~crested weirs haye been performed. From
several of the wen-known experiments King [7J has interpolated the data and pre-
pared tables for the coefficient uncle·r various conditions. A comprehensive analysis
including more recent data and a presentation of the results for practical applications
were made by Tracy [8J. The well"known experiments all broad-crested weirs are
(1) Bl].zin tests performed in Dijon, France, in 188.6 [9]; (2) U.B.D.lV.Bi Cornell tests
performed at Cornell University in 1899 by the U.S. Deep Waterways Board under
the direction of G. W. Rafter, and U.S.G.B. Corncllle.sts performed·by the U.S. Geo-
logical Survey under the direction of Robert E. Horton in 1903 [101; (3) Michigan
tests performed at the University of Michigan during H)28-1929 [11]; and (4) Minne-
Bola and· Washington tests performed,'respectively, at the university of Minnesota and
Washington State University [6]. For some formulas and coefficients of discharge
developed in the U.S.S.R., see [12]. For an analytical treatment of the problem, lIee·
'[13].
»( , I <Y'£.
 54 BASIC PRINCIPLES ENERGY AND MOMENTUM PRINCIPLES 55
The two sides of Eq. (3-18) are analogous and, hence, may be expressed For a minimum yalue of the specific force, the first derivative of F
with respect to iJ should bl') zero, or, from Eq. (3-19), '
.
for ahy channel section by a general function
"

Qz'
F - i t zA "(3-19)
u4'_
, ' '
This function cOMists of two terms. The first term is the momentum of
the flow passing through the channel section per unit time per unit weight
of water, and the second is !:.l!.e for.J<.ELrillr....unit weigb.:Lm w~t.!lr. Since
, both terms al~e essentially force per unit weight of water, their sum may
, , be ,c~lled the 8PlJcifjE.l(jr.c~.1 ,Accordingly, (3-18) may be expressfld
B
c·
I !i
~=-:-_. I (
o 45° for () Ez '£lEiE:,
channel of ,......,
zero or small
slope (0] l.bl
3-9. Specific-fofce curve supplemented \~ith specific-energy curve. (a) Specific-
energy curve; (b) channel section; (e) specific-force curve. ' NQw, comp£1,re the specific-force curve with the specific-energy curve,
as F 1 = F 2. . This means that the specific forces of section,s 1 and 2 are
equal, p.r:ovided t~t the e~rnal forces and the weight effect of water in
the..rea<;h between the two s~ctiQns can be igno];ed.
By plottillg the depth against the spec~fic force for a given. channel
section and discharge, a ~pecific-jorce CU'fve is obtained (Fig. 3-9). This
curve has two limbs AC and BC. The limb AC approaches the horizontal
axis asymptotically toward the right, The limb BC rises upward and
extends indefinitely to the right. For a given value of the specific force,
the curve has two poss(ble depths Yl and Yl' " A13 will be shown later, the
two depths constitute the il1it~al and sequent depths of a hyqraulic
jump. At point· C on the curve the two depths become one, and the
specific force is a minimum. The following argument shows that the
depth at the minimum value pf the specific force is eqv,al to the critical
depth.~ , flow and uniform velocity distribution. However, the concept of !lritico.l depth is: a
1 This has been variously called the "force plus momentum,'~ the "momentum
ftux," the "total force;" or, briefly, the "force" pf a stream (see pp. 81 and 82 of [14J).
The {unction represented by Eq. (3:'19) was formula.ted by Bresse [15J for the study of
the hYdra.ullc jump to be described in Example 3-3. :
i The conoept of critic!!.1 depth based on tbe theorem of momentum :is believed to
ha.ve:been developed by Boussinesq [16).
dF Q2 dA ,d(zA) 0
gP dy T --elY
For a change dy in the depth, the correspo,nding change 'd(iA) in the
static'moment of
the water area. about the free surface is equal to
[A (2 + dy) + T(dyP/2] - zA, (Fig. 3-9). Ignoring the differential of
higher degree, that is, assuming (dy) 2 = 0, the change in static moment
becomes d(iA) = A dy. Then the preceding equation may be written
dF _ Q! dA +A = 0
,I
gA2 dy I,
Since dA/dy = T, Q/ A V,and AfT = D, the above equation may be
reduced to
i" (3-10)
i
This is the criterion for the criMeal state of How, derived e~rlier (Art. 3-3).
Therefore, it is proved that the dep~h at the minimum va-lueaf the specific
force is the critical depth.I It may also be stated that at the critical state
of flow the specific'jorce is a minim.'um for the given discharge.
(Fig. 3-9). For a gi;iell specific energy Ell the specific-energy curve indi-
cates two possible depths, namely, a low stage YI in the supel'critical flow
region and a high stage yz' in the subcritical flow region. 2 , For a given
v~lue of F1, the specific-force curve also indicates two poosible depths,
namely,.ail initial depth lit in the supercritica.l region nncla sequent depth
ljz in the sub critical flow region. It is assumed that the low stage and
the initial depth are both equaJ to YI' Thus, the two curves indicate
jointly that the sequent depth Y2 is a.lways less than the high stage 1/2'.
Furthermore, the specific-energJ' curve shows that the energy content
E2 for the depth Vi is less than the energy content El for the depth Y2'.
Therefore, in order to maintain a constant value of F1, the depth of flow
may be changed from Yl to Y2 at the price 'of losing a certain amouilt of
energy, which is equal to El - E, = I:J.E. One example o( this is the
1 It should be noted that the above proof is based on the assumptidrul of para.liel
genera.l concept, tl:..a.t is valid for aU flows, whether derived from energy or from
momentum considerations. This validity has beeJ;!. proved by Jaeger [14,17,18), and
the proof is known llS the J a.eger theorem {I9]. '
~ In order to make 2. clear distinction between the sequent depth and the high
of tile alternate depths, the sequent depth is designated by y. and the ):ligh sta.ge
lit. In some other places in thLs book, however, both are designated by 1/1'

56 BASIC PRINCIPLES
hydraulic jump on a horizontal floor, in which the specific forces before
and after the jump are equal and the loss of energy is a consequence of
the phenomenon. This will be explained further in the following exam-
ple,' It may be noted at this point, however, that the depths YI and
yz' shown by the specific-energy curve are the alternate depths; whereas
the ?epths. Yl and Y2 shown by t.he specific-force curve are, respectively,
the mitinl depth and the sequent depth of !1 hydraulic jump. '
!' Example 3-11. Dedve a relationship b~tween the initial depth and the sequent
depth of 8: hydraulic jump on a horizontal floor in a rectangular channel.
, Sob/ion. The el:ternal forces of friction and the wet'lH effect of Wil.Wr in the
hydl'~ulic jump o~ a horizontal floor are negligible, because~ the-jump't.;;:kes place in a
relatively short distance and the slope angle of the ,horizontal fioor is zero. The'
specific forces of sections 1 and 2 (Fig. 3-4), respectively, before and after the jump,
can,therefore be considered equal; that is,
'.. ,I
"'i
f ENERGY AND MOMENTUM PRINCIPLES 57
i
\
I section.' In applying the mornentur~l principle to nonprismatic channels,
therefore,a three-dimensional plot similar to that shown for the applica-
tion of the energy principle (Fig. 3-5) can be constructed. For practical
purposes, however, this is rarely necessa.ry.
Where there is no interyention 'of external forces or where these forces
are either negligible or given, the momentum pdriciple can be applied to
its best advantage to problems, such as t.he hydr.alllic jump, that deal
;"!I"':';...~;.tJ,,""'!j12!JiJ."'J="_<".bJ'-JlJ""'''''' th.at..!:~l!!!i~~. jUhe energy
' -
following example shows how the momentum
design of a channel transition in which a
hydraulic jump is involve(i.
Example 8-4., A rectangular channel Sit wide,.earrying 100 cfs at a depth of 0,5 ft,
is connected by a str:oight-wall transition to Il. channel 10 it wide, flowing nt.s. depth.

(3-18)

For ll. recLanguinr channel of width b, Q = V,A, = V.A.., Al = by" A, = bYt,

2, = yi/2, and ii' - y~/2. Substituting these relations IlJld F, = V d v'Uih in the
above equation and simplifying,

(:1!!)'
y,.
- (2F,' + 1) (J!J)+ 2F,' 0
~
= (3-20)

Factoring, [(1Lt)' +. ~ - 2F,'] (~ - 1) - 0

YI YI YI '
~V + 1l! _
Then, let ( Y.:/ y,
2F • = 0
I

TIle solutjon of this quadra.tic equation is

(3-21) .

For a. J:!.iv:? ,F'roude ?u~ber FI of the apprQaching flow, the xatio of the sequent. depth
to the IlUt1l3l depth IS given by the above equa.tion.
It should be understood that the momentum principle ill used in this solutiou because
the hydraulic jump involves a high amount of internal-energy losses whioh cannot be
evaluated in the energy equation., '
.The jOilit. UIlB of the specific-energy curve aud the specific-force curve helps to d~ter­
~ne gra.plllcally the energy loss involved in the hydraulic jump for II. given appro8.ch-
mgflow. For the given approaching depth 11., points P, ana. P,' are located on the
spe~itic-force curve and the spec~c~energy curve, respectively (;Fig, 3-4). The point
FIG. 3-10. (mnergy and'momentum principles applied to II. channel expansion (a.) with
Pi'!gives the initial energy content E , . Dralv a vertical line, passing through the hydraulic jump; (b) without hydraulic jump. . .:
P?int PI and intercepting the upper limb of the specific-force curve at point P" which
gives the sequent depth 1)2. 'Then, draw a horizontal line passing through the point
o~ 4 n (Fir;. 3~lO). Determine the flow; profile in the transition if th~ frictional loss
P a and intercepting the specific-energy curve a.t point P.", which: gives the energy con- through tl;\e tra.n&'ition is negligible. If, a hyqraulic jump occurs in the transition,
tent E, after the j';lmp. The energy loss in the jump is then equal to El - E"
how C!l.n i~ be eliminated? -:' ,
represented by / l E . : ' S"l'Uti"n~ From the given data, the tptal energy with respect to the channel bot~'
priIicipl~ Nonprisrnati~ tom in the approaching flow is E ~ 0.5 + [IOO/(O.S X 8))'/2g = 10.207 It, and in the
a-8.Momentum Applied to Channels.
sp~cifj.c force, like the specific' energy, varies with the snape ofthechannel
The
dowiistrea.i:n,
,
E - 4,0 + (100/(4 X 10)Ji/2y, . = 4.097 ft. ,It is appnhnt that this
 58 'BA.SIC PRINCIPLES ENERGY A.ND MOMENTUM PRINClPLES 59
IlMrgy difference 01 6.110 It must be dissipated through the transition by ~ome means, for instance, by bolting orOM ,!limbers to the bottom. of the transition. It can be
since the frictlontll lru;s is negligible. Furthermore, the Fro.ude numbers 6.24 and !LSSumed ill this a'(ample that the energy diff-crcnce of 6.1 10 ft is dissipated uniformly
0.22 of the 8.pproaching a,nd downstrea.m flo'YS are, respectively, greater and less than in tlte transition by artificial roughness. TllUB, the energy line in the tl'ansition is
unity, indicll.ting IJ. change of the flow from supercritical to Bubcritica.l. Therefore, a simply a straight line joining the total heads of the two end sections (Fig. 3-lOb). For.
hydra.ulic jump can be expected to occur to dissipate the energy difference and to deSign p1l1-poses, it is convenient first to assUlne the lIow profile and then to proportion
effect a change in the flow st,ate, Whether this jump will occur within the transition the dimensions of the tranllition so 'that the jump can be eliminated, In proportion-
or in the upstream or. the downstream channel is, however, to be disclosed by fur~her ing the transition, the jump is eliminated either by varying the wid~h or by raising
analysis. . the bottom of the transition. In this example. it is assumed that the bottom is to
be raised, 01' "humped" (Fig.3-10b). The subsequent procedure of the compuGlttion
TABLE 3-1. CObfPUTATION FOR A CHAI'1N1:lL EXF.Ai'/SlON DESCRIBED IN
is to (1) a,!lsume the flow profile; (2) compute the velocity head, which is equal to the
EXAMPLE 3-4 .,
difference. between the total heo.d B.nd the water-surface eleva.tion, at a llumbe!' of
sel",cted sections; (3) compute the velocity and then the water area and depth of flow
Section Low stage High stage foreayh section; (4) determine the elevation of the bottom or the transition, which is
width 'II" ft PI 1/2, ft F, equal to the devation of the water surfar.:e minus the depth of flow; (5) compute the
b, ft for E = 10.207 for E = 4.097 o.lternate depth, ~ince the bottom of the transition is fixed; and (6) compute F'l and
F, lines fo!' the low and high stages, an.d plot them on II convenient Sl'ale. It can be
8.00 0.500 78.6 3.940 71.9 seen that the two F' lines inter3ect and' become tangent to each other a.t a critical sec-
8,50 o 470 78.7 3.960 75.9 tion, where the :flow cha.nges from low to high stage, that is, from 8upercritical to sub-
9.00 0.4'.1:3 78.8 ,3.979 79.9 critical stale. If the critic31-depthlinc is plotted, it will intersect the alternate-depth
9.50 0.419 78.8 3.987 83.6 line and th~ water surface simultaneously at the critical section. Bl\Scd on the criti-
10,00 0.398 78.8 4.000 87.8 ca.l-depth line, a line of minimum speCific energy can also be construc,ted. This line
should be tangent to the total-energy line at the critical flection.

Take 'five sections of the transition with their widths shown in Table 3-1. For
the total approaching enel'gy of 1O.20i ft,.the low stage YI for each section call be com- PRODLEMS
puted by means of Eq. (3-8) or (3-9), or
3-1. With reference to a channel of small slope !l.ud a section shown in Fig. 2-2, (a)
construct a family of specific-energy cllrves f(or Q = 0, 50, 100, 200, 300, and 400 ds,
"':"""-1::--=::'- + VI,:"" 10.207 (b) draw the locml of the critical-depth point on these curves, (c) plot a curve of the
critical depth against the'diilcharge, and (d) plot a family of curves of alternate depths,
where b is the width of the section. Similarly, the high st,age 1/2 for a total ene1'gy of Yl vs. V~, for the given discharges_ .
4.097 can be computed from 8-2. Construct the specific-energy curve for a 36-in. pipe carrying 3:n open-channel
flow of 20 cis (a) on It. flat slope, and (bj on a 30 slope.
0

+ V2 = 4.097 S-B. Show that at the critical state of How tha specific-energy head in a rectangular
channeli;; equal to 1.5 times the depth of flow, assuming zero slope and a = 1.
Thelow- and high-stage linea are then construeted slong with t·lle energy lines (Fig. 3-4. Derive the equations for the lOCI15 of the critiMl-depth point on the specific-
3-lOa). After these stage and energy lines are determined, the specific forces P! and energy curve and for the curve of critical depth vs. discharge, as oota.ined in Prob. 3-L
F. for low and high stages, respectively, at ea.ch section are computed and plotte~ to 3-6. Prove (3~12).
any convenient scale and datum. The hydraulic jump must, occur where the specific 3-6. PrC/ve Eq. (3-13).
'forces for the low and IUgh stages are equal, or at the intersection of the F lines. At. 3-7. Prove that at the critica.l state o( flow the discharge is II ma::dmum for a given
this <laction the water surface at low ,stage will jump to the high stage, as indicated specific energy. 1 .
by a vertic,al line. (Fig. 3-10a.). Actuall:)" however, the jump will take place over a 3-8. Show that 'the relation between the altc;rnate depths Y1,and 1/. in !1 rectangular
'short distance, as shown by the dotted line.' The energy loss in the jump is repre- channel ca.n be expressed by .
sented bj' the vertical intercept between the upstr.9a.m and downstream energy lines,
which is equal to 6.110 ftl covering the energy; difference between the flows in the con- (3-22)
ne¢ting channels. By varying tlie shape of the cross sections of the connecting chan:
nels the location of the intersection of theF lines, or the position of the jump, can be where Y. is the critical depth. Using values of y.!Yc as ordinates !tud of Yz/Yt as
altered. Changing the depth of flow in the downstrea.m channel will also change the abscissas, .construct a dimensiouleSiil graph for the above equation rand study its
po~ition of tile jump. Generally, an increase in the downst~eam depth will mon characteristics. '
the. jump upstream, and a decreaSe in the depth will move the jump do:wnstream. \
The hydraulic jump (lan be eliminated if the energy loss can be dissipated gradually 1 The .concepG of critical depth based. on the theorem of maximum diacharge was ".!
And ·smoothly. This can. be done by introducing proper roughness in the transition, first introduced by Belanger [20J.

r
~
'1
I \' .1
60 !!ABIC PRINCIPLES ENERGY A.ND MOMENTUM PRINCIPLES 61
, '

3-9. Solve the problem given in Example 3-1 (a) if there is a. total energy 108s of
0.60 ft unifol'Jnly diStributed throughout the lel!gth of the contraction, and (0) if
a gradual hydraulic drop is desired with its point of inflection at !l. diStance 20 it
upstream from tlie exit section.
3-10. Applying the momentumpl'inciple and the continuity equation to the analysis
of a submerged hydrllulic jump which occurs at the sluice outlet in a rectangular chan-
nel (Fig. 3-11), prove that
where V is the mean veloility, D is the hydraulic depth of the section, and t3 is the
'momentum coefficif;nt for nonuniform velocity distribution. '
3-1'1. For eliminating the hydraulic jump in Example 3-4, the flow profile is
assumed to be composed of two Feversed circular curves tangent to el1ch other at the
middle aection of the transition and also to the water surfaces "in the connecting chan-
nels at the two ends of the transition. Verify the computation (shown in scale on
Fig. 3-100).
3-18. A frictional loss of 1.0 ft is p,Ssumed to be uniformly distributed along the, '
length of the tra.nsition in EXMllple 3-4. Determine the flow pro.file in the tmnsition.

where y. is thesubme!"ged depth; y, is the height of sluice-gate opening; y, is th~ tail-

water depth; und F,' g~/gy!3, IJ being the discharge per unit width of the channel. REFERENCES
Neglect the channel-bed friction i,.
1. 'Huntel' Rouse and' Simon Ince: "History of H:rdraulics," Iowa Institute of
Hydraulic Research, Iowa City, IOlVa, 1957.
2. Boris A. Bakhmeteff: "0 Neravnomernoln Dvizltenii Zhidkosti v Otkrytom
Rusle" (U V9.r!ed, Flow in Open Channel "), St,. Petersburg, Russia, 1912.
3. PItHI Boss: "Berechnungder Wasserspiei\'ellage beim Wechsel des Fliesszustu,udes"
("C'Almputation of Water Surface with Change of the Flow Type"), Springer-
Verlag, Berlin, 1919, pp. 20 and 52.
4. Hunter Rouse: Discharge characteristics of the fre.€; overfall, Civil E1I{}ineering,
vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 257-250 .. April, 1936.
5. J. B. Belanger: "Resume de lec;.ons" ("Summary of Lectures"), Paris, 1838.
6. H. A, Doeringsfeld and C, L. Barker: Pressure-momentum theory a.pplied to the
broad-created weir, Transactions, American .societv of Civil Engineers, vol. 106,
pp. 93~-946, 1911.' .r ,
7. Horace William King: "Handbook of Hydraulics," 4.th ed., revised by Emest F.
FIG. 3-11. A submerged hydraulic jump at sluice outlet. Brater. McGraw-Hili Book Company, Inc" New York, 1954, pp, 6-1 to 6-Ht
8. H. J. Tracy: Discbar~e characteristics of broad-crested weirs, U.S. Geologica!
3-11. Prove tlmt the energy loss in a. horizont,.l hydraulic jump is Sm'vcy, Cir~ltlar 397, 1957.
9. H. Bazill: Experienceli nouvelles sur l'ecoulement en deversoir {Recent experi-
()J2 -YI)' ./'
AE 4j/lY2
_(3-24)* inents on tile flow of water over weirs}, 111"tmO'ires et Dor:u:mlmts, Anna/as des pants
III cha1IssJ.S, 2e semestre, pp, 393-448, October, 188B. English trllnslatioll by
3-12, If !I. hydrAulic jump is forllled on the ,horizontal floor at the toe of the spill- Arthur Ma.richal and John C. Tl'antwine, Jr., Proc~ed:in.gs, Engingers' Club of
way descl'ibed in Prob. 2-11, determine the sequent depUl and the energy loss involved Philadelphia, voL 7, no. 5) p.p. 259-310, 1890; Vi.)!. 9, no. 3, pp. 231-24~, and no. 4,
in the jllmp. pp. 287-319, 1892; and vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 121-164, 1893.
3-ill. ,With reference to a Ilha.nnel of small slope and Ll. section shown in Fig. 2-2, 10, R. E. HOI·ton: Weir experiments, coefficients, and formul!J.s, U.S; Geologi.cal
(a) construct afamily of specific-force cUI'ves for Q = 0, 50, 100, 200, SOO, and 400 cfs, Survey, Waler S1I'pply and Irrigation Paper 150, 1906; revisedas Paper 200, 1907.
and (b) plot a family of curves of initial depth against sequent depth for the given 11. James G. Woodburn: Tests of broad-erested weirs, Trarlsuctian.1, American Society
discharges. of Civil Engi1lee,s, vol. 96, pp. 387-416, 1932.
3~14. Construct the specific-force curve for a 36.-in. pipe c,nrying an open-channel 12. M. A. Mostk~w: "Handbuch der Hydraulik" ("Handbook of Hydraulics"),
flow of 20 cfs on Ii small sIope. VEB Verl£1,g Technik, Berlin, 1956, pp. 188-195.
3-lD. Prove Eq. (3-15). 13. L. J. Tison: Le deversoir l\.seuil epais (The broad-creste'd weir), La' Houille blanche,
3-16. Using the momentum principle, show th!Lt the Froude number of a parallel Grenoble, 5th yr., no. 4, pp. 426-439, July-August, 1950.
or gradually Vllried flow in a cha.nnel of slope !Lngle IJ may be defined by 14. Charles Jaeger: "Engineering l;'luid ~[echanics/' translated from the German by
P. O. Wolf, Blackie & Son, Ltd., London and Glasgow,·pp. 98-112, 1956.
F = V (3-25) 15. 'J. A. Ch. Bresse: "Cou~s de mecanique appliquee," 2e partie, Hydraulique
VgD cos 8/13 (" Course in Applied Meeha:nics," pt. 2, Hydralllics), M"tlet-BacheUer, Paris,
1860.
* This formula wliU, shown by Brcsse early in 1850 115J. At the slime time Bresse 16. J. V. Boussinesq: Essai sur Ill. theorie des eaux eonrantes (Essay on thli theory of
illtrodu,ced the concept of critical depth, as a. dllpth at which the subcritical flow water flow), Memoiresp1'sslmtes par diver~ savants a l'Academie des Sciences, Paris,
chl>nges to BUpel'criticai, or vice versa. vol. 23, ser. 2, no. 1, pp. 1-680, 1877.
62 BASIC PRINCIPLES

17. Cll!irles Ja.eger: Contribution a l'etude des courants liquides a 8urf8.c.oe libre
(Contributil1nto the St11dy of Iree-surface liquid flo;,vs), RIWWi genlrale .de
L'hydrauliq1l.{l PI'tTis, yol. 0, no. 33, pp. 111-120; no. 34, pp. 139-153, 1943.
18. Charles Jae~e.l·: De l'impulsion toto.le at de ses rapports a,yac I'energie totaled'un
cou:u,nt liquide a surface libre (The tota.l impulse and its relations with the toto.l CHApTER 4
I~-
energy of a fl"ee-Ilurface liquid flow), RlWue gtntrale de l'hydravliq1l.e, Paris, voL 13, .
no. 37, pp ..12-1\); no. 38, pp. 86-87; no. 39, pp. 143-151; no. 40, pp. 191-197; CRITICAL FLOW: ITS COMPUTATION
llO •. 41, pp. 257-2iH, 1947.
HI. Etienne Crausse; "lIydr3ulique des canaux deco\lverts en regime permanent" AND AP:PLICATIONS
("Hyciro.ulio5 of Open Ch!lJlneL'! with Steady Flow"), Editions Eyrolles, Paris,
1951, pp. 111-112. . ,
20. J. B. Bela.nger: Notes sur Ie cours d ' hydraulique (Notes on the course in hydrl:lu-
lies), llHmoire, gmt" Na.tionale de$ Pont8 e~ ChaU$88I3$, Paris, 1849-1850, pp~ 32-33.
4-1. Critical Flow. As described in the previous chapter, the llritic!1!
stf1.te of flow through a channel section is characterized by severa.l impor-
tant conditions. 1 Recapitulating, they are (1) the specific energy is a
minimum for (l. given discharge; (2) the discharge is a maximum for a
given specific energy (Frob. 3-7); (3) the specific force is a minimum for a
discharge; (4) the velocity head is equal to half the hydraulic
depth in a channel of small slope; (5) the Froude number is equal to
unity; and (6) the velocity of flow in a channel of small slope with uni-
form velocity distribution is equal to the celeri~y of small gravity waves
in shallow wat,el' caused by local clisturbances.
Discussions 011 critical state of fiow have referred mainly to a particular
section of a channel, known as the critical sectiQu. If the critical state of
flow exists throughout the entire lellgth of the channel or over 11 reach of.
the cha.nnel, the flow in the channel is a criticaL flow. Since, as indicated
by the critical-flow criterion Eq. (3-10), the depth of critical floW' depends
on the geometric elements A' and D of the channel section when the
discharge is constant, the critica.l depth in a prismatic channel of unilorm .,)
slope will be the same in all sectio1l3, and cl'itteal flow in a prismatic
'channel should, t.herefore, be uniform flow. At this condition, the slope
of. the channel that sustains a given discharge at a uniform and critical
depth is called the critical slope S~. A slope oithe c;tiannelless than the
I.
critical slope will cause a slower flow of subcritica,l state for the given
discharge, as will be shown later, and, hence, is called a mild or subcritical
. slope. A slope grel1ter th~\n the critical slope will result in a faster fiow
of super critical state, and is called a steep or supercritical slope.
A flow at or near the critical state is ullstable. This is becau~e a minor
in specific ellergy at. or close to Cl'itical state will cause a major
( '.

chl111ge in depth. This.fact can o,lso be recognb>ed in the specific-energy

. curve (Fig. As the curve is almost verticalliear the critical depth,
a slight in energy would change the depth to a much smaller or
much greater alternate depth corresponding to the specific energy after
l For a historic~l account of the theory of critical £low, see [1J.
63
 64 BASIC .PRINCIPLES

the change. It can be observed· also that, when the flow is near the
critical state, the water sUl'face appears unstable and wavy. Such
phenomena are generally caused by the minor chnnges in energy due to
variations in channel roughness, cross section, slope, 01' deposits of
sediment or debris. In the design of a channel, if the depth is found at
or neart,he critical depth fOl" a great length of the chinnel, the shape or
slope of the channel should be altered,if practicable, in order to secure
I greater stability.
, \
The criterion for a critical state of flow (Ar~. 3-:3) is the basis for the
"'1
I

computation of critical flow/which will be explained in subsequent

·11

tJ
articles. Two major applications of critiClll-fiow theory nre flow control
and flow measurement, which will also be discussed in this chapter. . II .
4-2. The Section Factor for Critical-flow Computation. Substituting
V Q/ A in Eq. (3-10) and Simplifying, ~~,.. ...g.
.<i
.., -0
. Q c
";l
--:.~
z=-
v'g (4-1) 0,-,
'"!"
:3
'-'

Q
... 't
When the energy coefficient is nO& assumed tobe unity, ..,... . ..c::..,"
:5
tj)

. Q 'w .5
...
z=--
v'g!cY.
('1-2) ..,..':! .~...
"'0 ...
'0
OJ

In the above equations, Z A.v' D; which is the t;ection factor Jor

"-N "...
'0

critical-flow compu.tation [Eq. (2--3)]. Equation (4-2) states that the ....o 1> .s
section facto!: Z for a channel section at the critical state of flow ~s equal a '" ~...
OJ
fIl

dt5;;:.. ::>
to the discharge divided by the squaJ.~e root of U/Ol. Since the section 0
factor Z is !l. function of the depth, the equation indicates that there is -<
.j,
only one possible critical depth for maintaining the given discharge in a. ci
channel and similarly that, when the depth is fixed, the~'e can be 'only ~
one discharge that maintains a critical flow and makes the depth critical
in the g'iven channel section.
Equation (4-1) or (4-2) is ll. very useful tool for the computation and
analysis of critical 'flow in 1111 open channel. When the discharge is (5
given, the equation gives the critical section factor Zc and, hence, the g
critical depth Yo_ On the other hand" when the depth and, hepce, the
section factw' are given, the critical! disharge can be compu~ed by
Eq. (4-1) 'in the following form:
Q =Z Vg
I
(4-3)
or by Eq. (4-2) in the following form: .

Q=z:(2 (4-4)
N;'
ci
OpI ~ puo' q/,( lO SGnlOI\
65

66 BASIC PRINCIPLES
A subscript 0 is sometimes used to specify the oondition of oritical flow.
Formulas fOI' t,he section factor Z of seven common channel sections are
given in Table 2-1. The Z values for a circular section can be found
either from the curve in Fig. 2-1 or from the table in Appendix A.
In Ol·aer to simplify the computation of critical flow, dh:nensionless
curves sho.wing the· relatiOll between the depth and section factor Z
(Fig .. 4-1) have been prepared for rect<:.ngular, trapezoidal, 'and circular
channels. .These self-explanatory; curves will
·help to determine the depth
. .
CRITICAL :FLOW: ITS C.OMPUTATION AND. APPLICATIONS 67
This equation indicates that the value of M for the trapezoidal section is
a function of z and y/b. For values of z = 0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0,
and 4.0, a family of curves for 111 versus y/b are constructed (Fig. 4~2).
These curves in.dicate.that the value of JI.f varies in a range froni 3.0 to 5.0.
!
S.C , . . - - -.......--.,-----,---7""',--,"'7'1rm-"----,
5.0 1
4.0 I-----.... ~-'-.-.----- --'-----+.........,f'--I'--7'-HI+-+------j

y for a given section factor Z, and vIce versa. 5.0

Example 4-1. Derive arl equatioI! showing critic:u dillcharge through a rectangular 2.0
cha.nnel section in terms of the cha.nnel width and the total head.
Sol~tion. For the rectangular section, Tal?le 2-1 gives the sQcti6n fantor Z = by!.J;.
At the critica.l state'of flow, the depth y HI1.5 (see Frob. 3-3). Substituting these
expressions in Eq. (4-3), using· g = 32.16, and simplifying, we find that the cri~icar 1,0
discharge is o.a
Q. 3.087bHu . (4-5) 0
~
,.. 0.6
4.,.3 .. The Hydraulic Exponentfo.r Critical-flow Computation. Since '0
c 0.5
0
the section factor Z is a function of the depth of flow y, it may be assumed 0,4
......a,..
that
(4-6)
...
0
0.3
.,.
."

where C is a coefficient and M is a parameter called the hyd"a-ulic ·expo- . .2 0.2

~
nent Jor critical-flow comp-utation.
Taking logarithms on both sides of Eq. (4-6) and then differentiating ·r
wi th respect to y,
d(ln Z) IvI
.
(4-7)
0.1
o,oe I
dif" "'" 2y O.os
0.05
Now, taking logarithms on both sides of Eq. (2-3), or Z = A vi A/T, and 0.04
then differentiating with respect to 1/, .
0.03
dOn Z) 3 l' 1 dT (4-8)
--ay- = 2 J.- 2T \
Equating the r~ght sides of Eqs. (4-7) an~ (4-8) and solving for M,
0.02 .
25 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 ,!
Volues of M

M = JL
.A
(31' -'- .:1-TdydT). (4-9)
FIG. 4-2. Curve:; of Mvalues.

A curve for a circular section with M plotted against 1Ildo, where d u

This is a general equation for the hydrauUc exponent M, which is a func~
is t,he diameter, is alsoflhown (Fig. 4-2). This curve .w~ developed by
tion: of the channel' section a,nd the depth of flow. For a trapezoidal
a similar procedure but constructed from a much more complicated
section, the exptessions for A and T olJtained from Table 2-1 are SUbsti-
formula. The curve shows that ~he value of M varies within a rather
tuted in Eq. (4-9); the resulting equation [2] is simplified arid Mcomes
narrow range for values of yjd D less than 0.7 or so, but increases rapidly
M = 3[1 + 2z(y/b)P - :2z(y/b)[l + z(y/b)J . (4-10)* as the value of y/do becomes greater than 0.7. The significance of this
. [1 + 2z(y/b>:J[1 + z(yjb)] I
z(1/(b) may be constructed. It is obvious that this curve: be identical with the
• This equl).tion was a.lso developed indepe~dently by Chuga8v 13J. In this eq~e,­ eurve for z 1 in Fiilj. 4-2. Fo, convenience in application, however, a. family of ·1
tion, M ca.n be regarded as a function of z(ylb):; a.ccordingly, a single curve aiM versus ourves of M versusy(b an shown, using If. as & pammeter.
"
I.
~
I
58 BASIC,P~INClPLES CRITICA.L FLOW: ITS COMPUTATION .AND APPLICATIONS 69
characteristic is that, when the depth of flow in a circular section 4 ...4. Computation of Critical mow. Computation of critical flow'
approaches the top of the circle, the section factor and with it the critical involves the determination of critical depth and velocity when the dis-
discharge, as shown hy Eq; (4-3) , become indefinitely large. In other charge and the channel section are known. Three methods illustl'ated
words,it is practically impossible to maintain a critical flow in a circular . by simple examples will be given below. On the other hand, if the critical
conduit at a depth approaching the top of the section. In fact, the wavy, depth and channei section are known, the critical discharge can be deter-
surface of the c!'itical flew will touch the top of the conduit before it ' mined by the method described in Art. 4-2.
act\lally comes so near as to approach ~he top. A similar characteristic A. Algebra·ic Method. For It simple geometl'icchannel section, the
and phenomenon occur also in other critical flow can be determined by an algebraic computation using the
ne pial bee om .. curved' I! types of closed conduit with gradu- basic equations. The method has already been used (Example 3-1), but
"~.n Ihe depth approach.. I ally closing crown, when the water
the Q1oduo II}' converging the follOWing e.:1-:.ample is given for further illustration:
crown of a closed conduit P surface approaches the crown of the
Example 4-2. Compute the critical depth and velocity of the trapezoid"l channel
i:~g<~~~;o conduit.
(Fig. 2-2) carrying ll. disoha.rge of 400 ofs. '
ot P For channel sections of other than Solution. The hydraulic depth and water area of the trapezoidal section arc
trapezoidal or circular shape, exact eXIueflSed in terms oithe depth lras
1.1=2. lon9 values of M can be computed di~
rectly by Eq. (4-9), pi'ovided that' D = 1[(10 + 1/) and A = V(20 + 2y)
N

'" the derivative dT jdy can be evalu-

10 + 2y
~ The velocity is
ated. Approximate values of Mfor
any channel section, however, may
,be obtained . hom the following Substituting the a.bove expressions for D and l'in Eq. (3-10) a,nd simplifying,
equation
2,484(5 + Y) [!I(10 + II)]!
M (4-11) Solving this equation for y by a trial-and-error procedure, Ye '"' 2.15 ft. This is the
critical depth. The corresponding area is A. 52.2 iV, !l.lld the critical velocity is
V< = 400/52.2 = 7.66 fps.
log y' where Z 1 and are section factors
B. Graphical Method. For!l. complicated or natu~al channel section, a
FIG. 4-3. Graphical determination of the for any two depths Yl and Yz of the
M value. given section. This equation can graphical procedure for critical~flow cOll)putation is genernlly employed.
eesily be derived from Eq. (4-6). By this procedure a curve of yversus Z is constructed. The value of
In applying Eq. (4-11), a graphical m~thod is recommended instead of Q/ Vg is then com.puted. . Using Eq. (4-1), the critical depth may be
direct computa.tion. This involves a logarit.hmic plotting of Z as ordi- obtained directly from the curve, where Z == Qjv'g.
nate against the depth as a.bscissa (Fig. 4~3). For most channels, except Example 4-3. A 36-in. concrete circular culvert carries a. dischD,rge of 20 cfs.
for closed conduits with depth approaching !J, gradually closing crown and Determine the critical depth.
some channels of peculiar shapes, the plot takes a more or less straight- Solution. Construct a ~tlrve of Y VB. Z (Fi.g. 4-4.). Then compute Z == Q/-vii ==
20/-vii 3.53. FrOIXl the curve the critical depth for this value of Z is found to be
line fOl'm. The hydraulic exponent is
equal to twice the slope of the '!Ie 1.44 ,ft.
plot.ted stra.ight line. For a. depth approaching the gradually closing The dimensionless curve (Fig, 2-1) or the table in Appendix A for the geometric ,
ci'own of a closed conduit,the plot becomes a curve, and the hydraulic elements of a circular section might· also be used to solve this problem. Sinee d.
exponent of a given depth is equal to twice the slope of the tangent to the 3.0 ft and· do" s == 15.6, Z/d. u = 3.53/15.6 = 0,226. From the dimensionless curve
curve at that depth, or from the table, Vida = 0.48, ,and so y. = 0.18 X 3 == 1,44. ft.
The hydraulic exponent M is described here only as a characteristic C. Method of Design Chart. The design chart for determinin.g the
v.alue of a channel section under the condition of critical flow. The critical depth (Fig. 4-1) can be used with great expedienCY.
a:pplication of .this exponent will be further described in the computation In Example 4-2, Z = 400/ v'i "" 70.5 (Eq. (4-1)J. Thtl value of Z IbM is 0.0394-
of gradually vari~d flow (Art. 10-2), this value, the chart gives '!I/b = 0.108 or '!I. ":' 2.Hi ft.
1:<'01'

f,

I
t
70 BASIC PRINCIPLES
. CIUTICAL FLOW: ITS COMPUTATION AND APPLICATIONS 71
If the channel has a critical slope (middle sketch in Fig. 4.5), then the
flow is initially uniform and critical throughout the channel. In the
presence of the dam, however, the flow through the pool Will be subcritical
, and the pool surface will approach the horizontaL At the dowllstream
! end a so-called drawdown ettrve will be developed, extending upstream
Flo'..,. oon<lilian controlled 01 the downstream e~

"I BOCkWO!il( Add~d depth due I r

~ ---.
j curve h:I backwater effect 1 Drowdawn
rr---_
,
~
---~

FlO: 4-4. Curve Df y versus Z for a. cir(lular 5C)ction. 1

In Example 4-3, Zld~'" = 0.226. For this value the clHLrt. gives yld = 0.48 or
Depth of subcriticol
flow without dam L
y. = 1.44 ft.
l.critIC<J~..s..2~..!.e_ctions;
4-5. Control of Flow. The control of fim:v in 3,11 open channel is defined I
loosely in many v'ays. As used here the tertn means the establishment of ,\ .
I
a definitive flow condit.ion in the channel or, more specifically, a definitive
relationship between the stage and the discharge of the flow. When the
contror of flow is achieved at a certain section of the channl?l, this section
is a control section. It will be shown later that the control section controls
tbeflow in such a way that it restricts the transmission of the effec~ of
changes in flow qondicion either in an upstream direction or in a down-
stream direction depending on the state of flow in the Chlll111el. Since the
control section holds a definitive st,age-discharge relationship, it is always
Row condition contrnl1ed Qt lhe
upstream enc
L
a suitable site for a gaging station and for developing the dis.charg6 raturtg
Gwrve, a curve representing the depth-discharge relationship at the gaging
station.
At the critical state of flow a definitive stage-discharge relationship
can be established and represented by Eq. (4-1). This equation shows
that the stage-discharge relationship is theoretically independent of. the
channel roughiless and other tlllcontrolled circumstances. Therefore, a Depth of supercrilicol
flow wilhoul dam
critical-flow section is a control section. ,
The location of the control section in a prismatic channel is generally FIG, 4-5. Flow conditions in a long prisma.tic ohaullel.
governed by the state of flow, wmchin turn is determined by the slope of
!rom a section near the spillway crest and becoming asymptotic to the
the channeL Take for an example a long straight prismatic channel in pool level. .
which a pool is created bya dam across the chalUlel and the water flows. If the channel has a sub critical slope (top sketch in Fig. 4-5), the flow
over the dam through an overflow spillway (Fig. 4-.5). Three flow con- is initially subcritical. In the presence of the dam, the pool surface will
ditions in the channel are shown, representing the subcriliical, critical, be fllrther raised for a long distance upstream from the pool in a so-called
and supercritical flows, respectively. The slopes of the channel in the backwater curve. The additional depth of water is required to build up
three cases are, correspondingly, mild or ilubcritical, critical, and steep enough head to give the increased velocity necessary to pass water over
or 8upercritical. the spillway. This effect of backing up the water behind tb.e dam' is
i
t
.~
I
J
 ·{l
72 BASIC PRINCIPLES
i

known as the backwater effect. At the downstream end the backwater r

curve is conllected. with a !':imooth drawdown curve which leads the water 1J .~
over the spillway.
If the channel has a supercritical slope (bottom sketch in Fig. 4-5) 1 the
flow is initially supercriticaL In the presence of the dam, the backwater
i
~
Ii

* ''.N '
><: S;:-MMc<:)M:r.I~MP)(o)Mp')

,...r:OOOMp')~¢I'lO~tO<a\O

j.:! '<J' "\!1 "¢I ae Q) co QO Q 000'0

r:- . . . ----roI.<;q~:1N~

..
..100C::OOOOQOOOOO

~_-:-l_."C"')C'}(t)~.:";ImMI.'I?
N-N
;; " " 0 0 0 ~ 0 <:;I 0 0: 0 0- <:)

t: : : ;) ""'" - C'l N ~ C'1 ~'~ ("1 cq ~

~oo(Oooooooooo
SECTION L-L a:-t;~~ (I'lC'lVlr')MC<')(?tnC")

FIG, 4-6, Plan, elevation, ana dimensions o.f ,he Parsholl flume. (U.s. SlIil Conser-
vation 8811>ilie [26J.} Plan and elevation of a concrete Parshall measuring fIl\me show-
ing lettered dimensions as follows.:·
I W - size of flume in in, 01' ft; A = length of side wall of converging seetion;
,%A = dista.nce back"from end of orest to gage point: B . '"
i Ilxiallength of converging
section; (} = wid.th ofdownstl'ea.m end of flume; D = width of upstrea.m end of flume;
..:; ..... ;:;-CO)oc)OOOQOOO
~Q..-t ..... NC'-lC')"Iq'IV)~,....OOCl!
E = depth of flume; F length ofthl'oat; G "" length of diverging section; K = differ-
ence in ele.... ation between lower eml oj' flume and crest; ,yI = length of approach /lOOI'; ~~~~~~;::~~
2 '" ::.•~ e ~ S'
,
~ q;) Q S 'otI t--<,
N ~ depth af depression in throat \:lelow crest; P = width between ends of curved
~. ~ C"ol C'.J "'tt "ttl <qO U1 t.e ~ CC ..... 1:--
wing wa.lls; R radius of curved willg wall; X = hol'izontn.l distanoe to E. gage I~""~~~------------------I
point from low point in tlu'Oll.t; Y "" verticil.l dilltance to. Eo ga.ge point from low
point in throl1t. See the tlible on the next page for actual dimellsions for various
sizes of flume."
~
'"
~
.:~i:f
.=~M.~O .• O.
l~ .... ·,......-tto':l(#)MM~"~"'')LI':l

effect originlj.tillg from ~hepool will not extend far upstream. Instead, ii~~~
~tO :::fOOlQIt)OIOOf;!)Q
the flow in the upstream channel will eontinue in:the downstz-eam direc-
:~ ..:. Col ,,' 'ttl ~ l.O·tn 0: 10 ..,;. l'-< co
tion at a supercritical state until the flow-s]lrface profile is actually below
the poolle'Tel;1 the~ .it will rise abruptly to the pool elevation in a hydrau-
1 Itshoul:l: be noted that; the pool level in this case is ~ot. horizontal but curved.
The curved water surface has an 81 profile, which will be :described later (Art. 9-4).
73

l
74 BASIC PRINCIPLES CRITICAL FLOW: ITS COMPUTATION AND APPLICATIONS 75 J
lie jump. The backwater effect will not extend upstream through the or free-flow condition having the critical depth at a contracted section and
hydraulic jump. The fiowupstream from the jump.is governed entirely a hydraulic jump in the exit section. Under certain conditions of flow
by t.he Upst.l·cam conditions. however, the jump may be submerged. . . '
The above example explains the important fact that on subcritical ,. One of the most extensively used critical-flow flumes is the Parshall
slopes the effect of change in water-suI:face elevation downstream is I' flume l (Fig. ,1-6) which was developed in 1920 by R. L. Parshall. The
transmitted upstream by a ba:ckwater curve, whereas on supercritical depth-discharge relationships of Parshall flumes of' various sizes as
slopes the effect cannot. be transmitted far upstl:eam. The flow condi- calibrated empirically, are represented by the following equations: '
tion in a sub critical channel is affected by downstream conditions; but,
in a supercritical channel, the flow condition is dependent entirely upon ThrQat width Equ.a.lion
the condition upstream or at the place where water enters the channel. 3" Q = 0.9921I.u4T (4-12)
Accordingly, tile control of flow is said to be at th,~ downst.ream end for 6" Q= 2.06H.ua {4-13}
channels ,,,ith sub critical slope and at the upstream end £01' channels 9" Q= 3.07 H.l.63 (4-14)
with supercritical slope. 12" to 8' Q~ 4WH.uuw'·'" (4-15)
10' to 50' Q= (3.6875W -I- 2.5)H.1.G (4-16)
When t.he challnel is on a subcritical slope a control section at the
downstream end may be a critical5('1ction, sunh as that created on the top
of an overflow spillway. On a supercritic~l slope, the r;ontrol section at· In the above equations Q is the free discharge in cfs Wis the width of
the upstream end may also be a critical section, 2.S shown in the figure. .thro~t inft, ~nd Ha is the gage reading in ft. Whe:l the ratio of gage
A sluice gate or an orifke or other control structure may also be used to readmg Hb (FIg. 4-6) to Ha exceeds the limits of 0.6 for 3-, 6-, and 9-in.
create a control section. It should be noted that whether the channel flumes, 0.7 for 1- to 8-ft flumes, and 0.8 for 10- to 50-ft flumes, the flow
slope is critical, subcritical, or supercritical will depend not only on the becomes submerged. The effect of submergence is to reduce the dis-
measure of the actual slope.but also on the discharge 0; the depth of flow. charge. In this case the discharge computed by the' above equatiollS
4-6. Flow Measurement. It was mentioned in the preceding article ~ust be correc~~d by a negative quantity. The diagrams in Fig. 4-7
that, at a critical control section, the relationship between the depth gIVe the correct1Ons for submergence for Pa.rshall flumes of various sizes.
and the discharge is defillitive, independent of the channel roughness and The correction for the I-ft flume is made applicable to the larger flume's
other '.Incontrollable circumstances. Such a definitive stage-discharge by multiplying the correction for the 1-ft flume by the fador given
relationshipoffers.r. theoretical basis for the measurement of discharge in below for the particular size of the flume in use. .
open channels.
Based on the principle of critical flow, various devices for flow measure- Size of flu.me W, ft Correction factor
ment have been developed. In such devices the critical depth is usually 1 1.0
created either by the construction of a low hump on the channel bottom, 1.5 1.4
2 1.8
such as a weir, or by a contraction 'in the cross section, such as a critical-
3 2.4
flow fiwne. The use of a weir is a simple method,. but it causes relati vely 4 3.1
high head 109s. If water contains suspended particles, some will be 6 4.3
deposited in the upstream pool formed by the weir, result.ing in a ,gradual 8 5.4
change in the discharge coefficient. .These difficulties, however, can be
overcome at least partially by the use of a critical-flow flume. Similarly, the correction for the 10-ft flume is made applicable to the
,The critir.al-flow flume, also known as the Vent~ri flume, has been
designed in various forms.l : J+, is usually operated with an unsubmerged I Experin).ents on this type of mea.suring. device, then called the Ventu.ri flu rite, were

began by y. M. Cone at,the hydraulic laboratory of the Colorado Agricultural Experi-

1t
I The critical-flow flumes mentioned in the text are those developed and studied in ment Station, Fort Collins, Colo.' The initial studies were reported ill [20[ and {211.
'the United States. Outstanding designs of critical-flow flumes were aIso developed ~he name ." Parshall measuring flume" was adopted for the device oy the Execu-
and tested by ,Jamcson [4,5J, Engel [ft,7], and Linford f8] in England; byCrump [9] and ~Ive. Commlttee of the !rrigation Division; American Society of Civil Eq.gineers, dur- r
Inglis [10] in India; by De Marchi [11,12], Contessini[ll], Nebbia [13-15], and Citrini mg 1~.Dec~mber meetIng of 1929. Further developments on the Parshall flume arc ~l
[16,17J in Italy; by Khafagi [18] in Switzerlandj and by Balloft;et [19J iIi. Argentina. d~scflbed by R. L. Parshall in [22] to [26J. :

.i
..;.
~.
]
"
·r
76 BASIC PRINCIPLES
GRITICAL FLOW: ITS OOMI'iJTATIONAND APPLICA.TIONS 77

i
Correction, cIs
U
Discharge, cIs
1.9 ZD I (tt)

(OJ

Discharge, cIs
( b) Correction. cis
(e)
Fro. 4-7. Diagrams ior computing Bubme.!"ged flow through ParshaU flumes of various
sizes. (Colorado Agricullural Ezperime:n.t Sta.tion [25J a.nd U.S. SlYil Conservation
Service [26).) (a) Diagram showing the rate of submerged flow. in cubic feet per
~econd,through a 3-in. Pa.rshall measuring flume. (bl Dia.gram s!lOwing the rate of
submerged flow, in cubic feet per second, through a. 6-in. Pars!lall measuring flume.
(el Diagram showing the rate of submerged flow, in cubic feet per second, through a
9-in. P!lrshall measuring flume. (d) Dia.gra.m for computing the rate of $ubmerge.d
b flow, in eubic feet per second, through a loft Parshall measl.lring flume,' (e) Diagram
'" aa for determining the correction in cubic feet per second Plll': 10 ft of crest for subDlerged-

f
c.
flow discharge.

4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0

Oischarge, cIs
(~)

FIG. 4~7
 78 BASIC PRINCIPLES CRITICAL FLOW: ITS COMPUTATION AND APPLICATIONS 79

larger flumes by multiplying the correctioll for the lO~ft flume by the \ 1
factor given below for the paJ,ticular flume ill use. I
Size rJ/ flume W, f/, CorrectiOlt factor I
I
j [
10 LO
12 1.2 1
15 1.5
20 2.0
25 2.5
30 3.0
40
50
4.0
5.0 II
It is desiiable to set the crest of the Parshall flume so that free flow will
occur. If conditions do not permit free-floW operation, the percentage ,
of submergence Hb/H" should be kept, whenever possible, below the I,
practical limit of about 95 %, since the flume will not measure dependably
if the submergence is greater. The size and elevatiori of the crest depend
upon the discharge to be measured and upon the 5i;(;e of the flume and,
consequently, upon the loss of head through the flume. The loss or head
can be determined from ~he diagrams in Fig. 4-8. A practical example
(Example 4-5) will be given' to show the deterrcinatiol1 of the size and
elevat.ion of the flume crest.
Because of the contraction at the throat, the velocity of water flowing
through the flume is higher than that of the flow ill the channeL For
this. reason any sand or silt in suspension or rolled along the bottom call.
be carried through, leaving the flume free of deposit. When a heavy
burden of erosion debris is pl't;lsent in the stream, ho\yever, the Parshall
flume will become invalid like the weir, because deposition of ths debris
will produce undependable results. For use under such circumstances,
a modified Parsh.aLl flume known as the San DimGSfiume (27,28] has been
developed, which has the advantage of a self-cleaning mechanism for
heavily debris-laden flows in the stream.
For measuring open-channel flow in closed conduits, such as sewers and
;; .
covered irrigation canals, critical-flow flumes of special designs have been
proposed. Palmer and Bowlus [29-31J have developed several of these
flumes, including one'which is simplr a flat slab on the bottom and has no.
side contractions, one with a rectangular croSs section, and several witp
trapezoidal-shaped throats. Stevens [32], recommended a critical-flow
flume in which he used a blister-shaped' hump control on the bed of the
conduit to produce a critical flow over it. The frictional.1osses in this
design are believed to be very small.
~~:s' 4-8;cD()lio!l.Tgar;~sAf{)O~ del~ermalirunE''g th.s los,s h~!l.d t(hrough Parshall flumes of various
~ :
Like. many measuring devices, the critical~flow flume has certain dis- of -\
advantages. The flume CD.nnot be used directly with or, combined with Seroi~e ~61.) Slat~{)'11 251 and U.S. Sml Ccm.ssnJl1tion
a head gate. "It is more expensive to build and requires more accurate II lW • • ell .ur
,:z:pmmen

, .:~.
I
"\'..:,
 "

80 BASIC PRINCl;l'LES CRITICAL FLOW: ITS (TO¥PUTATION AND APPLrcATIONS 81

workmanship in its construction than other commonly used devices,
i
the tailwater depth D ~ 2.5 ft, and the elevation of the c~est above the channel b;t;..
such as weirs or submerged orifices. Technical information on other torn is X =
2.5 - 0.81 = 1.69 ft. . . '
kinds of open-channel measuring devices and methods can easily be. From Fig. 4-8, the head loss corresponding to H~I H u = 0.7. Q = 20 cfs, and W =
found in ml1ny textboQks and handbooks on :hydraulics (such as [33J 4 rt is 0.43 ft. .Therefore, the depth of water upstrcuim from the flume will be
to [35]). .
l ~+~=~~. ,
Similarly, try 2" and 3-ft flumes. It is found that the respective crest elevo.tion~
Many culverts along modern high ways can be used as or converted to
critical-flow flumes for measuring runoff from the adjoining agricultural
I are L53 and 1.23 ft and that the respective upstream water depths £1.1'(> 2.98 and 3.12 ft.
In deciding them,!st practical aize of flume to use, it will btl necessary to examine
lands. This idea was first suggested by Mavis [361 and others and was the freeboard or the ch!LIInel and the effect of rise of the water surface upon the flow
later studied at the Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station [37,381
by carrying out extensive experimental tests on rectangular highway
I through the h~adgate. If these conditions arc satisfactory, the 2-ft flume will be the.

culverts. The results of this experimental study indicate that the culvert j
,
can be used as a flow-rate measuring device if it flows part full and has
free outlet fall. A weir sill should be installed, however, to improve the
accuracy ofthe measurement in the low-flow ,range. In this investigation,
, { a standard Villemonte-type weir silP was developed and its location on
the culvert floor determined. Head-discharge relationships were also
determined for various flow ranges.
Example 44. Using the theory of criticaillow, derive an equation for the discha,ge
FIG. 4:-9.
8.9ction of a Parshall Ilume illustrating ,th,e determination of the' proper crest
elevatlOn [26].
over a broad·crested weir.
Solution. COllsiaer the section on the weir crest where critical flow occurs. At this
section, y, = 2(V,'/2g} HJ1.5 or V, "" VUH,/1.5, where H. is the specific-energy most eoonomical because of its small dimensions. However when the width of the
head at the section. The discharge per foot width of the weids, therefore, equal to channel is considered, the final selection may be in bvor of th~ 3- or 4-ft flume because
moderat~ or long wing wall.s may be required for a smeoll structure. Usually, the
g = V.y, =%H. V%i'if. = 3.09H.1.S
,
(4--17) throat wldth of the flume Will be from one-third to one-h!'\lf of the channel width.
This is a theoreticru discharge equation i1) which H. is uncertain since the critical sec-
tion is usually difficult to locate. For' practical purposes, however, the t\quation is
PROBLEMS
generally written q = CH'Jl, where H is the elevation of the upstream wa~er surface
iLbovethe weir c~est. This is the form described earlier (Example 3-2). . 4-1. Prove the following critical-discharge equations for the triangular trapezoidal '
If an ...!'sated free overfall exists at the downstrea~end of the weir, the a\'ove equa- aud circular' sections: I ' , ,

tion ca.n be expressed in termso! the brink depth Y" which can easily be measured.
Since y, :. l.4y~ (Art. 3-4), the equ!l.tion required is Channel 8e£!lion Equation
,
q = 9.38y ol.l (4-18)
, Triangular Q, = 2.295zH..·• (4-19)
Experiments h9.V~ shown that, when the head on the broad-crested w!:!r is greater Trapezoidal Q _ 5.671{(b + zy)yJu
than about 1.5 times the length of the crest, the nappe of the free overfall becomes , - -(I) + 2zy)',$ - (4-20)
detached and the weir is in effect a sharp-crested weir. Circular Q.= 0.251(0' - sin OJ''' d U
Example 4-6. Design ft. Parshall flume for handling 20 cfa of now in a.: chann'cl of (sin Yz 9) 0,6 n (4-21)
moderate slope when the water depth in the channel is 2.5 ft." Parabolic Q. = 2.005TH.L5 (4-22)
Solulimt. The discharge given can be m!"llsured by flumes of several si~es, but the
best selection' is the flume of most practical' a.nd economical size. i ' , In the above equation~, IX = 1 and H, is the specifiiJ..energy head; other notation'
Assume W .. 4 it ,and H,/H. 0.7, For Q = 20 cfs, Eq, (4-15) gives' H. ~ L15 . follows that of Table 2-1; ; ' '
ft. Hence, H, = Q,81 f t . ; , ' 4-2. C~mpute the hydr£lulic exponent M of the trapezoidnl cha.nnel section (lfig:
At 70% submergence, the 1vater surface ih the throat, at Hb gage. is essentially level 2-2) ~avlDg a flow dept!h of 6 ft, using (a) Eq. (4-10), (0) Fig. 4-2, and (e) the
with the surface of the tailwater. Under :this condition of flow, sllown lin Fig. 4-9, graphlCru method based on Eq. (4-11).. •
4.-3. Compute .the hydraulic. exponeD.t M of a 36"1n. circular conduit having a,;
1 The Vilhimonte weir sill consists or two; tri!LIIgular. tapered cotlvergin~ sills placed
flow depth of 24 In. above the Invert, uSing (a) Fig. 4-2 and (b) the graphical method;
on the culvert Hoor with an opening left between them (39}. ' based on Eq. (4-11). ' '
• This example is sdopted from [26J. ' 4-4. Prove that the critical depth and velocity for a rectangular channel are'
 82 BASIC FRINCIFl;IllS
CRITICAL FLOW; ITS COMPUTATION AND ,APPLICATIONS 83
expressed by

(4-23)

and (4-24)

where Q is the. discharge, b is the channel width, and "dll the energy coefficient.
4-5. A rectangular channel, 20 ft wide, carries g, discharge of 200 cfs. Compute
the critical depth and velocity.
4-6. Solve Example 4-2 by various methods if the discharge is 300 cfs.
4-7. Solve Example 4-3 by various methods if tr.e discharge is 15 cis.
4-8. An' a.pproxhnate but practiclJ.I fonnula for the critical depth of a circular sec-
tion of <iiameter do, derived by BrILine [40] from ~.n equaticm equ.ivalent to Eq. (4.-21),
is
y. = 0.325 (£t + [).083d. (4:-25) I
is
which accurate only when 0.3 < y./d Q < 0.9. ' Solve Example 4-3 and Prob. 4-7 by
this formula,
I
I (

4-9. Referring to the naturalchaonel given in Frob. 2-5, construct a CUrve of critical -{
depth aga.inst discharge, ranging from 0 to 400 crs.
4-10. Prove that the section of a cha.nnel in which the flow is critical at any st'lge
takes the form expressed by !
(4-26) J
whhle z is half the top width and II is the di5~ance of the water surface below the energy
line. Draw II skeLch of the section and d!lscripe its properties. Is this channel possi-
ble? If not, how could it be made pOllSible? Is this channel practicable ind the
flow stable?
1
4-11. Verify the computa.tions for the 2- and :HtPa.rshal! flumes tried in Exam- FIG. 4-10. Rating curves of ;l. critical-flow flume proposed for a clos"d conduit. (After;
ple 4-5. J. C. Stevens [32J.) d. ""diameter of the cor.duit. '
4-12. Determine the dischltrge through the 4i-ft Parsha.ll flume described in Exam-
ple 4-5 if the percentage of submergence is .:l00/".
dh'ided lJy the water area. corresponding to th'e energy head instead or'the actual
4-13. Determine the discharge measured by a 10-ft Parshall flume if the gage rea.d-
area.: corresponding to Y" and (3) that the critical-flaw section i3 at the maximnm
ing H. is 3Al ft at a. free~flow condition. .
~leight of. t~e cDntrol "hump." The second assu.mption elimina.te,s a. trial procedure
4-14. Design a Parshall f!IJme to mell.sure 10 ers of flow in J1 channel ha.ving a depth
In determmmg the velocity hegd of the a.pproa.ching flow !l.nd, furthermore, tends to .1

I
of flow equal to 1.5 ft. '
, co,"?pensatc for the error involved in the first a,'55umption. Verify anyone of the
4-16. A uniform flow of 300 cfs occurs'a.t a depth of 5 ft in a long rectan!!;lliar chan- , ra tmg curves.
nel ,10 ft wide, Compute the mini,mum IH~ight of a. fiat-top hUmp that ca.n be built
on the floor of the channel in order to produce' a critical depth. What wilLresult if REFERENCES
the hump is lower or higher tha.n the computed minimum height? I
1. Charles Jaeger: "~ngineering Fluid Mllchanics,~) trrulsu;,ted from the German by
4-16. If the critical depth in the above problem is produced by a contraction of the
channel, wha,twill be the maximum contracted width? I
1
P. O. Wolf, Bla.ckle & Son, Ltd., London and Glasgow, 1955, pp. 93-119. '
4-17. A low da.m 5 ft, high having a broad horizontal crest is built in a. t"6ct~ng\llar 2. Ven Te. Chow: Integrating the eq1!aticns of gra.du!l.lly varied flow, paper 833,
channel 20 ft wide. Assuming that a depth df 2.5 ft measured on the crest is the Proceedtngs, Am.erican, Society of Civil Engi1l.llers voL 81 pp. 1-32 November
1955. ' , , ' ,
critical depth, compute the discharge and the depth of flow upstrea.m from the dam.
4-1B. On the basis-of the theory of critical flow, Stevens [32] has derived the rating I 3. R., R. C~uga~v: Nekutorye vop.osy neravonomernogo dviphenna. vody v o tkrytykh
curves for the blister-lShaped critical-flow flume tlll~t he proposed for use in circular f pnz~tlchesJ{lk~ ruslakh (About some questions concerning n'Jnuniform flow of
conduits (Fig. 4-10). In the deriva.tion, it is as~umed (1) that there is no energy loss
I wat~r m op~n pnsma:i~channels), I zVcsliia. V sesoi11.Z1logo N a.uChno-l ssledClValel' alcaga
from !ll to !It, (:~) that the !;I.pproachingvelocity in the pipe is eq ual to the discharge Imt';.llila Gidrlliekhntk~' (Tramactians, All-l"lnian Scientific. Research Institu.te of
I '
I Hydra.ulic Engineering), Leningra.d, vol. 1, pp. 157-289, 1931.
84 BASIC PRINCIPLES
4. A. H. Jameson: The Venturi flume and the effect of contractions in open channels,
1'ransactions, Institul-iolt of Water Engineers, vol. '30, pp. 19-24, June 30, 1925.
5. A. H. Jameson: The (il.rvelopment of the Venturi flume, Wawr and Water Engineer-
ing, London, voL 32, no. 375, pp. 105-107, Mar. 20, 1930.
6. F. V. A. E. Engel: Non-uniform flow of water: Problems and phenomena in open
ehannels with side contrn.c.tions, The Engineer, vol. 155, pp. 392-394, Apr. 21;
pp. 429-430, Apr. 28; pp. 45[':'457, May 5, 1933.
7. F. V. A. E. Eagel: The Venturi flume, The EngincliT, voL 158, PP: 104-107,
Aug. 3; pp. 131-133, Aug. 10, 19&4.'
8. A. Linford: Venturi flume flow meter, Civil Engineering and Publ'ic W01'ks Rev-iew,
London, vol. 36, no. 424, pp. 532-587, October, 19'11. An abstract is given in Jour-
nal, Americar;. Waler Works Association, vol. 34, pp. 1473-1475, September, 1942:
9. E. S. Crump: Moduling of irrigatioIl channels, Pt"dab Irrigation Brar4ch Publi-
cations, Paper Nos. 26 and 30A, Lahore, India, 1922 and' 1\)33. . Statton, BttLettn No. 3R~, May, 1932; revised as Bulletin No.· 426A, March, 1953.
lO. C. C. Inglis, NoteB on standing wave flumes and flume meter baffle falls, Pl:bUc
Works Department, Government of Bombay, Techn·ical Papers, No. 15, India, 1928.
11. Giulio De Marchi (anthoT, pis. I and III) and FraMesco Contessi~i (author,
pt. II): Dispositivi per la misura della pOl·tatll dei canali con minime perdit,e di
quota: Nuove ricerche sperimentali slii misuratori a risalto !draulico (C'l.llnli
Venturi); Part,e I, Esame del pro(;esso idmulico; Parte II, Descri,.ione delle
esperienze; Pal·te III, Risultati delle esperienze [D.evices for measuring discharge
in cannls with minimum loss of level: New expaTimentnl researches on standing
wave flumes (Venturi flumes); pt. 1, AnnJysis of the hydralilic process; pt. II,
Description of the experiments; and pt. lII, Results of the experiments], L' Enfn'gia
. elettrica, Milano, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 6-15, Jil.nnary, 1936; vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 236-244,
May, 1936; vol. 11, no. 3, p'p. 189-214, March, 1937. Reprinted as lstituto di
Idraulica e Co,~truz'io7'li JdJ'auliche, .Milano, Memorie e sludi Nos. 17, 25, and 26,
1936-1937.
.12. Giulio Dc Marchi: Nouvelles recherches experimentales sur Ie jaugeur !I. ressaut
hydra.uliqne, canal Venturi (New expel'imental researches' on standing-wave
.flume, Venturi flume), Ministry of Agriculture, Pa.ris, France, 1937. This is an
abstract of pt. I of \11]. .'
la. Guido Neuhia: Ventul'imetri-per canali a sezioni di forma generica (Venturi meter
for canals with cross sections of general forms), Acqua e gas, vol, 25, no. 11, pp.
2'rD-291, November, W36.
14. Guido Nebbia: VeJ,lturimetri per canali a sezioni di tipo monomio (Venturi 'meter
for canals with cross sections of monomial type), Acqua e gas, vol. 25, no. 12, pp.
326-333, December, 1936.
15. Guido Nebbia: Venturimetri per can ali a sezione di forma. generica: Primi rj;,'Ultat~
sperimentali (Venturi meter for cano.ls with cross sections of geneml forms: Pre-
liminary experimental results), Aequo e (las, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 155-181, May, 103S;
vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 199-214, June, 1938.
16. Duilio Citrini: Miauratori a risalto (Standing-wave flumes), L' Energia elettrica,
Milano, voL 16, nu. 10, pp. 758-763, October,1939; reprinted as Istitutodi Idra1,&lica
e Costruz'ioni Idrauliche, Milano, .Memorie e studi No. 35, 1939.
-17. Duilio Citrini: Modellatori a risalto: Guida al progetto (Standing-wave meters:
Direction~ for design), Centro studi per Ie. aPl?lica.zioni dell'ingegneria all'agri-
coltura, Sindaeato ingegn.eri di :A{ilano, Se;oorate Paper No.5, Milan,. 1941 ; reprinted
as I stituio Ji I draulica e Cos!ruzione' I drauliche, Milano, JIIlemorie e studi No. 44, 1941.
lB. Anwar Khafa.gi: Der Venturikanal: Them'ie und Anwendung (The Venturi flume:
theory and application), Eidgenossisehe Itchnische Hochscitu/e Zurich, Mitteilungen
der Versuchsallslaltfv.r Wasserbau und Erdbau, No. I, Zurich, 1942.
CRITICAL FLOW: ITS COMPUTATION AND APPLICA~ONS 85
19. Arma~do Ball.offet: C:i~ical fl~w meters (Venturi flumes), paper 743, Proceedings,
Amencan Soc.ety of Cwtl Engmeers, vol: 81, pp. 1-31, JlIly, 1955.
20. V. M. Cone: The Ventnri flume, Journal of Agricultm·aIResea·rch, voL 9, no. 4,
pp. 115-129, Apr. 23,1917. . . . , .
21. Ralph L. Parshnll and Carl Rohwer: The Venturi flume, Coloraclo Agricultural'
Experiment Station, Bulletin No. 265 February 1921 ..
22. R. L. Parsho.ll: The improved Vent~ri flume, Trans~clions, AmeJ";cr!.n SlJciety lJf
Ciuil.Enyineers, vol. B9, pp. B41~B51, 1926.
23.R. L. Parshall: The Parshall mell-suring flume, Colorado Agricultural Experimen l
Siation Btdlet'in No. 423, March, 1936. '
24 R. L. Parshall: Measuring water in irrigation channels, U.S. Department lJf Ag"i-
. ~ulh!rB, Parmer's Bulletin No. 1883, January, 1932; revised, October, 1941. .
25. R. ~. Par.sl;al~: Parshall flumes of large size, Colorado A(Jricul/ural Experiment
26. H. L. Parshall: Measurmg i.vater in irrigation channels with Parshall flumes and
s:nalt weirs, U.S. Soil Consenlation Senlicc, Circula?' 843, May, 1950. This
Circular supersedes [24],
27. H. G. Wilm, John S. Cotton, and H. C. Storey: Measurement. of debris-laden
stre~m flow with critical-depth flumes, Transactions, Ami-rican Society of Civil
Eng-meers, vol. 103, pp. 1237-1253, 1938. . .
2B. K. J. Bermel: Hydraulic influence of modifications to the San Dimas critical-
depth measuring flume, Transactions, American Geophysical Union, vol. 31 no. 5
pp. 763-768, October, 1950. . ' ,
2fl. Harold K. Palmer and Fred D. Bowlus: Adaptation of Venturi flumes to flow
measurements in conduits, Transactions, American' Society of CilJU E7tginee;s
vol. 101, pp. 1195-1216, 1936. . '
30. John H. Lu~wig and Russel G. Ludwig: Design of Pltlmer-Bowlus flumes, Sewage
a;:d ~ndltst"al Wastes, vol. 23, no.,g, pp. 1096-1107, September, 1951.
31. Edwl~ A. Wells, Jr., I'.nd Harold B. Gotaas: Design of Venturi flumes in circular
condUits, Transactions, American Society of Civil ElIginee1's, vol. 123, pp. 749-771,
1958.
32. !. C. Ste;ens: Discussion on Adaptation of Venturi flumes to flow measurements
III c~ndUlts; by Ha.rold re. Palmer and Pred D. Bowlus, Transactions, American
Society of Ciuil Enginee1's, vol. 101, pp. 1229-1231, 193fl.
. 33. Herbert Addison: "Hydmulic Measurements" JohnWile v & Sons In N
York, 1941. . ' J . ' c., ew
34. "Wate'l' 'tvIell.sunnnent Manual," U.S. Bureau of Il.eclamo.tioll May W53
43-58. ' , , pp.
35. Horace William King: "Handbook of Hydraulics," 4th ed., revised by Ernest F
, . Brater, Mct;lraw-Hill. Book Company, Inc., New York, 1954. ' '..
;;6. F. T. MaVIS: Reducmg unknowns in small culvert' design, Engine~rin(l News-
Record, vol. 137, no. 2, pp. 51-52, July 11, 1946.
37. W; O. Ree and F. R. C~ow: Measuring runoff rates with rectangular highway
culverts, Oklahoma AIlT!CUU'Ural Experiment Stat'ion, Technical Bulletin T-51
November, 1954. . '
38. W. O. Ree ~nd ~. R. Crow: Culverts as Wo.teT rUIloff measuring' devices, Agri-
C1!/tural Eng~neenng, \"01. 35, no. I, pp: 28-31 and 39, January, 1954.
39. James R. Villemonte: New type gaging station for small streams; Enginee1'ing
News-Record, vol. 131, no. 21, pp. 748-750, Nov. 18, 1953.
40. C. D. C. Braine: Draw-down and other factors relating to the design of storm-
w2.ter outflows on sewers, Journal, Institution of CiviL Engineers, London vol. 28
no. 6, pp. 136-163, April, 1947. . ' "
,
I
l
 .PART II

UNIFORM FLOW

1
i.

1 I

'1;

. \

. j,
 CHAFTER 5
DEVELOPMENT OF UNIFORM· FLOW
AND ITS FORMULAS

. .)

15-1. Qualifications for Uniform Flow. The uniform flow to be con-

sidert:d has the following mn.in features; (1) the depth, water area,
velooity, und discharge at every section of the channel reach I.1r,e constant;
and (2) the energy line, water surface, and channel bottom are allparal-
lei; that their slopes are all equal, or Sj = S'" = Sn = S. For practica.l
pm-poses, the requirement of constant velocity may be liberally inter-
preted as requiremel1t thtl.t the flow possess a constant mean velocity.
Strictly speaking, however, this should mean that· thB flow possesses a
constant, velocity at every point on the clHmnel section within the uni-
form-flow reach. In other words, the velocity distributIon across the
channel section is uualtered in the I'each. Such fl. stable pattern of
velocity distribution call be attained when the so-called" boundary layer"
is fully developed (Art. 8-1). '
Uniform flow is considered to be steady ouly, since unsteady uniform
I
J
flow is practically nonexistent. In natural streams, even steady uniform
1 flow is rare, for rivers and streams in natural states seanleiy ever experi-
!I ence a strict uniform-flow condition .. Despite this deviation from the
truth, the uniform-flow condition is frequently assumed in the computn:-
,I tiOD of flo\v in natural streams. The results obtained from this assump-
tion are understood to be apPl·oximo.teallq. general, but they offer a
relatively simple and satisfactory solUtion to many prnctico.l problems.

II As turbulent tmiform flow is most commonly encountered in engi-

neering problems, it will be discussed e,.'(tensively il1 tbe following chapters.
Laminar uniform flow has limited engineering applications, and will be
described only in Art. 6-10. I

" It should be noted that unifor:m flow cannot occur at very high veloci-
ties, usually described as ttltTarapid. 'This is because, when uniform flow
reache~ i certain high velocity, It becomes very unstable. At highel'
vetoci~ies' the fl~ "'1ill eventually entrain Edr and becbme unsteady.
i
I
The criterion fOl: instability of u,niform flow will be discussetl1i:1':A:rt:1f-8:
~ 5-2. Establishment .of Uniform Flow. When flow OCCtll'S in an open
channel, resistu.nce is encountered by the water as it flO\vs downstream.
89

'"
~,
l I~~, '

,.: ~.. , '

 1
90 UNIFORM FLOW DEVELOPMENT OF 1}NIFORl'rl FLOW AND ITS FORM,'()'LAS 91 l
This resistance is generally cO,unteracted by the compon~llts of gravity may again be exceeded by gravit:r forces •.apd the flow may become varied
forces acting on the body of the water in the direction of motion (Fig. 5-2). again.
A uniform flow will be developed if the resistance· is balanced by the For purposes of explanation. a long channel is showll with three dif-
gravity forccs, The magnitude of the resistance, when other physical ferent slopes: sub critical, critical, and supercritical (Fig. 5-1). At the
factors of the channel are kept unchanged, depends on the velocity of flow. subcritical slope (top sketch in Fig. 5-1) the water surface in the transi-
tory zone appears tmdulatoi:y. The flow is uniform in the middle reach
of the channel but varied at the two ends. 1 At the critical slope (middle
sketch in Fig. 5-1) the water surface of the critical Row is unstable.
Possible undula.tions may occur in the middle reach, but Ql1 the average
the depth is constant and the flow may bf'. considered uniform. At the 1
sl.lpc,rcritical slope (bottom sketch 'in Fig. 5-1) the transitory water surface
passes from the subcritical stage to the supercritical stage. through a
gradual hydl'aulic drop. Beyoml the transitory zone the flow Is approach- )
ing uniformity. The depth of a uniform flow is caned the nonnaJ depth.
Ivorled~w un[f~rm flow on the ove''::Qe ,J
In all figures the long dashed line represents the llormal-depth line,
Tronsitor yt--I abbreviated as N.D.L., and the short clashed or dotteclline represents
I zone I .. ' . ' I the critioal-depth line, or C.D.L.
I The length of the transitory zone depends on the discharge and on the

r~~;::~1
phj"Sical conditions of the channel, Buch as entrance' condition, shape,
slope, and roughness. From a hydrodynamic standpoint (see Art. 8-1),
the length of the transitory zone should not be less than the length
required for the full development of the boundary layer under the given
t;"ifOftl1 fl 0 "'_ _ _-I.1 conditions.
I 5-3. Expressing the Velocity of a Uniform Flow. For hydraulic com-
i
I I putations the mean velocity of a turbulent uniform flow in open channels
I
I . is usually expressed il,pproximately by a so-called unifol·tn-flow formula.
I I Most practical uniform-fiow form1.lia,s ca:n be expressed in the following .\
t t
I general form:

! where V is t,he mean velocity in ips; R is the hydraulic rf;1,dh15 in ft'; S is

the energy slope,2 x and yare exponents; and, C is a factor of flow resist~
(5-1)
I
. i

FIG. 5-1. :&!ts.blishment of uniform flow in Il long ohe.nne1.
If the water enters the channel slowly, the velocity and hence th(;l resist-
a~ce are, small, and the resistance is outba,lanced by the gra;~ity forces,
resulting:in an accelerating flo~v in the upstr~am reach. The velocity and
. the resistance will gl·adually 'increase until a balance between resistance
aDd gravity forces is reached. At this moment alld' a.fterward the flow
becomes uniform. The upstream reach that is required for the establish-
ment of uniform flow is known as the transilory zone;' In this zone the
;1' flow is accelerating and varIed. If the channel is shorter than the transi-
"
tory length required by the given conditions,. unIform flow cannot be.'
. attained. Toward the downstream end of the channel the resil5tance
ance, varying with the mean v:elocity, hydraulic channel rough-
ness, viscosity, and many QtheJ: factors.
For practical purpos~s, the fiow in a natural channel may be assumed
l,miform under normal conditions, that is, if there are 110 flood Rows or
markedly varied flows caused by. channel irregularities. 'In applying
1 Theoretically speaking, the varied depth a.t each end approaches the uniform
dept.h in the middle llSymptotically and gradually. For praotica\ PUfilvS\lS, however,
the depth ma.y be considez:ed constant if the variation in depth is within a certain
margin, say, 1 % of the lwerage uniform-fiow depth.
Z In. uniform flow f S :'" Sf =' S,. = So. When the uniform-flow formula is applied
t.o the computation of energy slope in a gradually varied flow, the energy slope will -\
be denoted specifically by Sf instead of S. .

t
. .l·.
92 UNlF'ORM FLOW
the uniform-flow formula toa natural stream, it is understood that the
result is very approximate' since: the flow condition is subject to more
imcertnin betors th}l[l would be involved in it regular artificial channeL
As pointed out by Schneckenberg [1]; a good uniform-flow formula for
an alluvi.al channel with sediment transport and turbulent flow should
take equal aecount of aU the following variables;
A the water area
.V the mean velocity
V ma the maximum surface velocity'
P the wetted perimeter
R the hydraulic radius
y . the maximum depth of w-ater area
SUI the slope of the water surface
n a coefficient representing the channel roughness, known as the
coefficient of 7'oughness 1
Q. the sllspended sediment charge
Qb the bed load
'IL the dynamic viscosity of the water'
T the temperature of the water
There have been dev,eloped and published a large number of practical
uniform-flow formulas, t but none of these formulas meets the qualifica-
tions of a good form'lIla as defined above. The best known and most
widely used formulas are the CMzy and Manning fOl'mulas, which will
be described in the' following articles alid used extensively in this book.
Theoretical uniform-flow formulas have also beell derived on the basis of
a theOl'etir.AI velocity distribution across the channel section, wl1i~h will
he discussed later (Art. 8-5).
A different approach to the determina.tion of the velocity in a natural
channel has been attempted by Toebes [5]. In this approach amultiple-
correlation analysis is applied to the following significant factors affecting
the velocity in a gi.ven alluvial channel: water area, maximum surface
velocity, wett~d perimeter, maximum depth,slope of water surface,
coefficient of roughness, and temperature of water. By this method it is
, possible to e"aluate the independent individual influence of each variable
on the magnitude of the velocity. When such an evahULtion is made,
the velocity under any givell condition of the variables is simply equal to
the algebraic summation of the individual contl'ibut,ions as <\ffected by
each variable. However, this method applies only to the streams in the
geographical region for which the analysis is made; hence, its applica.tion
cannot be generalized. . revealed that the formula' was developed and verified by experiments made on an
In British literature the term "l'llgosity coefficient IJ is used.
1
, A number of weH-known uniform-flow formulas are given Md discussed in [2]
to [5J. . dynamics. The open channel can be coneeived as a. ftnt plate warped into a oylinder
DEVELOPMF.NT OF UNIFORM FLOW AND 1'1'13 FORMULAS 93
. 5-4. The ChezyFormula. As early as 1769 the French engineer
Antoine Chez)" was developing probably the first uniform-flow formula, the
famous CMzy furmula l which is usually expressed as follows:
(5-2)'
where V is the mean velocity in fps, R is the hydraulic radius in ft, S is
the slope of the -energy line, and C is a factor of flow resistance, called
ChezY'$ G.
, .
..
,
' .\,.-,',
,FIG, 5-'.l. Derivation of the CI~ezy forml;!a. for uniform flow; in open channel.
The CMzy formula C.:l.n be'derived mathematically from two assump-
tions. The first assnmption was made by CMzy. It states that the
foi'ce resisting the flow per unit, area of the stream bed is proportional to
the square. of the velocity; that ls, this force is equal to X"V2 where ]( is a
constD.nt of proportionBlity. The surface of contact of the flow with the
stream bed is equal to the product of 'the wetted peri~eter and the length
of the channel l'efLClh, or PL (Fig. 5-2). The total foroe resisting the flow 2
is then equal to ](VSPL.
1 The source of this famous formula. is.not mentioned in most hydraullcs textbooks.
In fact, this knowledge has long been sought for. In 1876, the German engineer
Gotthilf Heinrich Ludwig Hagen mentioned in his 'work [7] that Geapard de Prony
, had stated tha.t Chezy set up this formula in 1775, on the occa$ion of a report that
Chezy made on the Canal de j'Yvette in conjunction with Jean-Rodolphe Perro net, .
"But," says Hagen, "I have sought in vain for further information on the' Bubject."
Then, in 1897, the American engineer Clemens Herschel through the assistance of a
friend in Paris traced the original Canal de I'Yvette report to its hiding place, then
translated the portion relating to the formula, IlInd published it in [8]. Chezy's report
earthen canal, the Courp!1let Canal, and on the Seine River in late 1769 ..
• Thi~ channel resisting iorce may alao be ,explained by the principlea of fluid
 i
94 UNIFORM FLOW i
DEVELOPMENT OF UNIFORM FLOW AND ITS FORMULAS
95
The second asst1l~ption is the basic principle of uniform flow, which is
believed to have been claimed first by Brahms [9] in 1754. It states the formula appears cumbersome, it usua-lly produces satisfactory results.
that,' in uniform flow, the effective component of t~e gravity force caus~ng It has been so widely used that many tables and charts are available for
the flow musl', be equal to the total force of reslStance. The effectIve its application; so the use of the, formula itself is seldom found necessary
gravity-force component (Fig. 5-2) is parallel ~o th~ chal~nel bott.o~ and in engineering offices. Figure 5-3 gives a popular chart for the solution
equal to tuAL sin e = wAL8, where w is the Ulllt weIght Ol water, A lS the j of the G..K formula.
water a;'ea, fJ is the slbpe angle, and 8 is the channel slope. l Thence,
!
i
.~.~ B. The Bazin Formula.. In 1897, the French hydraulician H. Ba'lin l
proposed a formula according to which Ch~zy's C is considered a function
1
wAL8 = KPPL. Let, AlP = R and let vw/K be replaced by a factor i
C; then the previous equation is reduced to the Chezy formula, Of
I of R but not of 8. Expressed in Engli8h units, this formula is
I
V = v(wIK){AIP)S = C vRS. . I
C = __
157.t'_·_
M~my
attempts have been made to de~ermine the value of Chezy's C. 1 + m/vR (5-4)
Three important fOI'mulas developed for this purpose will be given in the >;".here m is 9. coeiIicient of roughness whose values proposed by Bazin are
next article , given in Table ·5-1.
5-5. Determination of Chezy's Resistance Factor. Three importltnt
formulas for the determination of CMzy's C are given as follows: . TABLE 5-1. PROPOS!lD VALUES OF BAZIN'S 171.

~ ~ICk'l11Jj,la~_ In 1859, tw~ Swiss engineers, ?[mguillet and

Description of chanael Bazin's.1n
. Kutter [10], published a formula expressmg the value of C m terms of the
slope 8, hydraulic radius R, aild the coefficient of roughness n. In Very smooth cement of planed wood ............... . 0.11
English units, the formula is Uuplaned wood, concrete, or brick: ............... . 0.21
.0.00281 + 1.811 Ashla.r, rubble masonry, or poor brickwork .......... .
.41.65 + 8 -n° Earth channels in perfect condition ........... : .... .
0.83
1.54
C - (5-3) Earth channels in ordinary condition .............. .
- n 2.36
1 + ( 41.65 + 0.00281)
S vB, Earth channels in rough condition ................ .

The formula was developed primarily from data collected from

The co~ffi~ient n in this formula is specifically known as [(utter's n. The
value of n will be discussed in.Ads. 5-7 and 5-8. .
The G. IL formula was derived elaborately from flow-measurement
data in channels of ..various types, including Bazin's gagings and the
gagings of many European rivers and of the Mississippi River. 2 Although
but unclosed on one si.de which corr'osponds to the free surbce of the. ~~en-channel
flow. A fluid flowing ill the uncloaed cylinder will create a drag or resls"mg ~orce on
the inside surface.. This force is equal to tha drag created by the flow of .flUld along
a flat plate whose tl\,O surfaces offer resistance to th.e flow. The la~ter' IS equal.t,)
CdP V'PL/2, wherp. Cd is tbe coefficient of drag and P IS the ma~s de~lty _of the flUid ..
Thus;the factor CdP/2 is equivalent to the constant. of proportlonabt;' .K.. . .
1 The' slope under consideration is defined as the sme of the angle 0, inclinatIOn, or
S = sin 11. .
, The Mississippi River gagings were made by Humphreys and Abbot on the I.ower
Mississippi RiYer between 1850 and t860, and the data thus o.btained were published
in a report submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Topographica'J.Engin~ers in 1861 (11].
The term containing S was introduced into the G. K. formula Simply m order to make
the formula ~gree with the Humphreys and Abbot d.ata. Thi~ se.ems somewhat
ridiculous nolY, .becllu.se these data are known to have been qUite maccurate (see
pp. 133-136 of (2]). Some authors have suggested that the slope term 0.00~81/S of
small experimenta.l channels; hence, its general application is found to be
less satisfactory than the G. K. formula.
The Miami ConservancY'District [2] has made a study comparing the
v!l.riations ill Chezy's C, Bazin's m, and I{utter's n for Bazin's experi-
mental data and several naturaL streams. The results based on this
study are showll in Table 5-2. The values of the average variation indi-
cate that Bazin's formula is not as good as Kutter's even for his own
measurements.
.~ C. The. Powell Formula. In 1950; Powell [14) suggested a logarithmic.
formula for the roughness of artificial channels. This formula, an
implicit function of C, is
C = -42 (4i + It)
log (5-5)
-----------------------------------
the G . .K. formula be omitted in order to simplify the aP?lmranCe of the formula. a.nd
even to make -the general results more satisfactory.
1 From 1855 and 1862 an exten.~ive seiie:s of experiments on open-ch,mnel flow were
first begun by H. Darcy and then completed by Bazin. The results were published
by Bazin in 1865 (12). On the basis of the accumulated date., Baziu finally proposed
the formula in 1897 (13).
-\

1
. I
 ., DEVELOPMENT-OF UNIFORM FLOW AND ITS FORMULAS 97
!J
... .8

J
'A
'-'
'"
OJ i'l 1l where R is the hydraulic radiusin H; R is the Reynolds numbel';and E is
.,m- ~
c 'tl
.~ a measure of the channel roughness, having the tentative values shown
.S.
j tQ "'"
.S t1. r:I in Table 5-3.
Q)
,..
.>
0
A
t:i
Q) '"
A,
j;: For rough channels, the flow is generally so turbulent that R beoomes

J
A
g :El'" il: very large compare~~th C; thus, Eq. (5-5) approximates the. form
., ~-
p" ...,'"
I
"
0; ~
~

..,:il
...'"
til T.tUILE 5-2, COMPARISON OF VARIATH)NS IN CHi:z.y's C, BAZIN'g m,

lI 5.,'" '"
c
:= .. :a
oil
oil
c AND KTJT'J'ER'S 11

... :a
'"
'0
'"
ill
U
'"~
..::;.... ... !5
;i!

.., .i1III ....'" .~'"

<J
0
-III
Measurements
Average vaiue3
varia.tions, %
"'
en
"'- '0'" ... .!!l
..,
OJ 1:j
0- C m C n
u.. ,S
:S'"
0 Q)
.c:
., tQ t:i
'"s<
<f
.J:!
g tJ"
~~
Bazin's Series 6 .. , .......... " .. "'... . . . . 0.185 O. 0121 .. 1 1
;0;:
is
"I
"'-~
.,.,..,
<l " '"
... 0 7 .... , .................. , ... , .. , 0,156'0.0120 .. .
8 ........ " ........ " ...... , ..... 0,1420.0116 .... .
1.0
2,5
'"~ g.~ ~ ~ 9 .................. " .... ' ..... 0.1990.0130 ... .. 1.2
.~. '0>.gj Jl 10 ............................... 0.1440.0117 .... , 1.4
'" Q
en

-
~
"
"'
.~
~~]
., c
~g'O
'"""""
,~

oil

~ l:t:1
ill' ",.",
.q
'"
'0
.!!l
~
11., ............................
12 ............ , .................
Ill ...........................
14., ............... , ........ , ..
0.129 O.OU3 .... ,
0.324,0.0151.
OJHI0.0148 .... :j2.7
0.3210.0150 .... 4.4
1.6
3.8
1.0
1.2
1.8
....
A
Q)
:El~
'"
:El 15 ..............................
16 .............. ·~ ...............
0.'7150.0209 . . . . 4,2
0,7110.0212 ..... ' 5.7
1.2
1.5
17 ....... :: ............... 1.... 0.7210.0215 16.1 2.2 .;
32 .......................... j.... 0.4240.0' 1.8 0.4
o S.AZ~H:>
33 , ., ..••.......... ,. . .... , ..... 0.444 0.0 3 .1 L2
. 44, ..... .' ..................... 0.8580. , ... ;1118:6 8,8
2~!!!~g.~E~i.~ii!~~ gg 45 .. , .......... :.; .............. 0.7040. . .... 11.1
fL~.tG,~I~,LIW.!~I~!~I'L1UT~.ll~ttLI~I~.llk'~~~~~~WW~~WU~~~~o 5.7
S3l'iNlmlO .:Ici SIXV Mia.mi River at Tadmor, Ohio, 1915-1916". 167.4* L9S O. 4.0810.9 4.9
Bogue Phalia River, Miss .• 1914 .... " ....... 63.3· 4.09 0.070424.20.35.1 22.2
Arkansas Drainll.ge Onnals, Ark., J915 ....... 165.9· 2.12 O. :3 18 4.8
Mississippi River, Carroltoll, La., J912 ..... , ...... 1.33 1.30 5.4
MiSSissippi River, 'Oarrolton, La., 1913 ... , ....... , 1.46 12.8
IrraWllddy River, Burm!l ......................... 1. 35 23.0
Volgu. River at Sa.mara., R.ussia. ... ,.......... .58 0.0311 1.8713.0
Volga River at Zhiguly, RUl~sia., ........ " . ,76 0.0363 18.8036,5
Average va.riation.. .. . " .:, ... , .. , .. ,

• Values a..veraged by the author.

I
, (
C = 42 log (R/e). For smooth channels, the iurface roughness may be: .
so slight that e becomes negligible compared with R; then the formula
approaches the fbrm,C = 42 log (4R/C). Sinoe Chezy's is expressed a
implioitly in the Powell formula, the solution of 'the formula for C requires:
!l. trial-and-error procedure. . .
The Powell formula was developed from limited laboratory experiments:
on smJoth and rougn channels and from the theoretical velooity distri-;
i'
96

. :1\
."

~ ,',
98 UNIFORM, FLOW DEVELOPMENT OF UNIFORM FLOW AND ITS' FORMULAS 99
butioll studied by Keulegan (Art. SA). The practical application of this well-known form
formula is limited, since further investigation is needed for determination
(5-6)
of the properva.[ues of E.
TAIILll 5-3. TllNTATlYE VALUES OF POWELL'S.
where V is the mean velocity in fps, R is the hydraulic radius in ft, S is
Powell's. the slope of energy line, and n is the coefficient of roughness, specifically -1
Description of channel
known as 111anning' 8 n. This formula was developed from seven differ-
New Old ent formulas, based 011 Bazin's experimental data, and further verified
by 170 observatipns} Owing to its simplicity of form and to the satis-
Neat cement surface ............... . 0.0002 0.0004
Unplaned-plank flmlles .... ; ............ . 0.0010 0.0017
0.006 a linear meas,ure of roughness and </>(Rlk) is a iunction of Rlk. If <p(Rlk) is considered
Concrete-lined channels. . . . . . . .. . ..... . 0.004
climensionless, It ,\yil! have the same dimensions as those of kH, that is, ~H.
Earth, straight and uniform ............ .
Dredged ear~li channels ................. i
0.04
0.10
On the ot.her hand, of course, it is equally possible to assume tha~ the numerator j
l.
of 1.486/n can a.bsorb the dimen'sions of Lwr-- I , or that ",(Rlk) involves a dimensional
factor, thus leaving no dimen~ions for n. Some authors, therefore, preferring the
Example 5-1. Compute the velocity and discharge in the trape~oidal channel simpler choice, consider n it dimensionless coefficien t. '
described in Example 2-1, hONing a bottom width of. 20 ft, side slopes 2: 1, and a depth It is inte~esting to note that the conversion of the units for the l\'Ianning formul!l.
\
of wat,er 6 ft. Given: Kutter's n = 0.015, and S = 0.005. is independent of the dirn~nsions of n, as long as the same value of n is used in both I
Solution. From Example 2-1, A = 192.0 it' and R = 4.10 It. Using the G. l{.. systems of units. If n is .assumed dimensionle~s; then the formula in Engliah units
formula, the value or Ch6zy's C i" .gives the numeric."l Gonstallt 3.2B08~ = 1.486 since 1 meter = 3.2808 ft: NfliV" if n
is assumed to have the dimensions of LhI, it" nllmerical value in English units must be
41 65 + 0.00281 + 1.811 different from its valuo in metric units, unless a nnme.rical ~orrection factor is intro-
. . 0.005 0.015 = 1242
0= duced for compensation. Let n be the vallie in metric units and II' the value in Eng-
'41 6- + 0.00281) 0.015 .
+( • 0 0.005 V4J.O lish units. Then,n' = (3.2B08H)n = 1.2190n. When the formul(l. is converted from
metric to English lin its, the resulting form takes the numerical constant 3.2808'~+~~ =
Then, by the Chc~y formula,
V = 124.2 V4.10 X 0.005 = 17.8 fps
3.2BOB~~ = 1.811, since. n has the dimensions of Lli. Thus, the reSUlting equation
should be writtan V = 1.811R~~S}i/n' Since the same. value of n is used in both sys- J
tems, the practical form of the formula in the English .system is Y = 1.8UR~S!h1
Therefore, 1.2HlOn = 1.48I}R~S"~/n, whiGh is identical with the formula derived on the assump-
Q = 192.0 X 17.8 = 3,420 ds
. tiori that II has no dimensi.olls.
5-6. The Manning Formula. In 1889 the Irish engineer' Robert In a search of early Ii~erature on hydmulics, the author has failed to find an y
significant discussion regarding ~he dimensions of n. It seems that this was not ~
Manning I presented a formula, which was later modified to its present
problem of concern to the forefathers of hydraulics. It is most likely, however,. that
1 Manning first presented the formula in a paper read on December 4, 1889, at a
11: was unconsciously taken 2-S dimensionl¢Ss in the conversion of the Manning formula,

meeting of the Institution of Civil Engine:ers of Ireland. The paper ,...-as Io.ter pub-
lished in the Transa.ctions of the Institution [15J. The formula \V'as first given in a
complicated form and then simplified to V '= CR?~S'\, where V is the mean velocity,
C is a factor of flow resistance, R is the hydraulic radius, and S is the slope. This was
further modified by others and expressed in me.tric units as V = (1ln)R~\SH. Later,
it was converted back again to English uni~,resulting in V = (1.486/n)R;~S'~. In
this conversion, as iIi the conversion of the: GanguilLet and Kutter formula, tlie
numerical value,of n is kept unaffected. Cons:equently, the same value of n is widely
used in both systems of units.
In the vielV of modern flllid mechanics, which pays much attention to dimensions,
the 'dimensions of n become a matter of consideration. Directly from the Manning
formul!l, the din).ensions of·n are seen to be TL-H. Since it is unreasonable to sup-
pose that the roughness coeHicient w01..lld contain the dimension T, some, authors
assume that the, numerator contains -../g, thus yielding the dimensions cif i>~ for n.
Also, for physical reasons, it will be seen that n = (</>(Rlk)Jk>~ IEq. (B-26)J, \~here k is
becau,se such a conversion, as shown above, is more direct a.nd simpler.
Now, considering the approximations involved in the derivation of the formula
and the uncertainty in the value of n, it seems unjustifiable to carry the numerical
constant to more than three significant figures. For practical purposes, a value of
1.49 is believed to be sufficiently ac.;urate [161.
Manning mentioned that the simplified form of the forl11ulahad been suggested
independently by G. H. L. Hagen prior to Mo.nning's own work, ,according to a state.-
ment by Major Cunninghllm (171. Hagen's formula was believed to have appeared
first in 1876 [7J. It is also known that Pllilippe-Gaspl1rd Gauckler [18J had all early
proposal of the simplified form of Manning's formula in 1868 and that Strickler [191
presented independentiy the Same form of the formula ill: 1923. '
I For the derlva.tion of the exponent of Il, use was made of Bazin's experimental
do.ta on artificial channels [12J. For different shaj:les and rOllghnesses, the average
yalue of the el{ponent was found to vary from 0.6499 to: 0.8395. ConsiderinC' these
variations, Mll,nning adopted an approximate v[l.lue of % for the exponent. 'On the
 i
,
100 UNIFQRMFLOW I DEVELOPj\HlNT OF UNIFORM FLOW A.ND ITS FORMULA.S
, i
factory results it lends to practical applications, the Manning formula has
become the most widdy used'of all uniform-flow formulas for 6pen-chan-
nel flow computations.; A nomographic solution of the formula is given
in Appendix C.
Within the normal ranges of slope and hydraulic radius; the values of
Manning's n and Kutter's n are generally found to be numerically very
close. For practical purpose~ the two values may be considered identical
when the slope is equal to or greater than 0.0001 and the hydl'aulic radius
is betwe~n 1.0 and 30 ft. Typical values good fer both Kutter's nand
Manning's n are shown in Table 5-0 and illustrated in Fig. 5-S.
Comparing the Chezy formula with the Manning' formula, it can be
seen that
c (5-7)
This' equation provides an important relationship: between Chezy's C
and :Manuing's n.
) The exponent of the hydraulic radius in the Manning formllla is !'.ctnally
-I not a constant but varies ina range depending mainly on the channel
shape !l.nd roughness (see 11 previous footnote). For this reason, some'
hydraulicians prefer to use the. formula with a variable (lxponent. For
example, the unifomi-flow formulil. widely used in the U.S.S.n. is of this
type; this is the Pavlovskiiformttla [21], proposed in 192£$.* This formula
in mei)'ic linits is
(5-8)
(5-9)
. where
and where C is'the resistance factor in the Chezy formula expressed in
'metric units. The exponent y depends on the Ioughnesscoefficient and
hydraulio radius, Tile formula is valid Jor R between O.i'and 8.0 ill and
, "
basis of other later studies, some authors Stiggested ll. value oi % [20], and others sug-
gested a variable depending on Rand 11. [21J. .
l The Manning formula was suggested for intern~tionaJ use by Lindquist [3j at the
Scandinavie:Sectional Meeting oi the World Power Conierenee in 1933 in Stockholm.
The final recommendation for such use was mlide by the Executive Committee at the
3d World Power Conference in 1938 in Washington, D.C. .
2 On account of this relationship, the Manning formula is sometimes oonsidered a
variation'oi the CItezy fortimla with Chezy's C defined by Eq. (5~7).
*' The Pa.vlovsIl.il formula. was published in severa! editions of Pll.v!ovskiI's "Ha.nd-
book of Hydraulics" [211_ An article o.bout this formula. entitled Ft)1'l1m!a dlia
kt)effitlrien/.ll Chazy (Formula fur a Chtzy coefficient) is given in pp. 140-149 of the 193T
edition or the book. A footnote in this article reads: "'1'.he formula. was proposed in
1925."
101
for n between 0.011 and 0.040. For practical purposes, the following
approximate forms of Eq. (5-9) are generally suggested for use:
Y= 1.5 vrn for R < 1.0 m
Y"" 1.3 vn for R > 1.0 m
15-7. Determination of Manning's Roughness Coefficient, In applying
t~e Manning formula or the G. 1C. foi'Inula, the greatest difficulty lies
iIi" the determination of the roughness coefficient n; for there is no exact
method of f'electing the n value. At the present of knowledge, to
select !1 value of n actually means to estimate the resistance to flow in a
given channel, which is really a matter of intangibles. To veteran
engineers', this means the exercise of sound engineering judgment and
experience; for beginners, it. can be no mOl'e than agness, and different
individuals will obtain different results. .
.III Qrder to give guid::mce in the proper determination of the roughness
coefficient, four general approaches' will be discussed; namely, (1) to
understand thefa,ctors th!l.t affect the value of n and thus to acauire a
basi~ knowledge of the problem and l~arrow the wide range of gues;work,
(2) to consult a table of typical n values for channels of various types,
(3) to examine and become acquainted with t.he appearance of some
typical ehannels whose roughness coefficients are known, and (4) to
determine' the value of n by an rmalytical procedure based on the theoreti-
cal velocity distribution in the channel cross section and on the data of,
either velocity or roughness measurement. The first three approaches
will be given in the next three articles, and the fourth approach will be·
taken up in Art. 8-7,
5-8. Factors Affecting Manning's Roughness Coefficient, It is not
uncommon for engineers to think of a channel as having a single value of
n for aU occasions. Ii1 reality, the value of n is highly vELdable and
depends on a number of factors. In selecting a propel' vaiue of n for
various design conditions, fl,basic knowledge of these factors should be
found very usefuL 'The factors that exert the greatest influence upon the
coefficient of roughness in both artificial and natural channels are there-
fore described below. It should be noted that these factors are to a Cer-
tain extent int/ilrdependent; hence discussion abou,t one factor may be
repeated in connection 'with anothel'. '
A. Surface. Rm€ghness, The surface roughness is represented by the
size and shape of the grains of the material forming the wetted perimeter
and producing a retftrding effect on the flow. This is often considered
the only factor in selecting a rOllghness coefficient, but it is actually
just one of several major factors. Generally speaking, fine grains result
in a relatively low value of n and coarse grains, in a high value of n.
In alluvial streams where the material is fine in grain, such as sand,
 UNIFORM FLOW
102
clay, loam, or silt, ,the retardiI).geffect is much less tha;n whe:e t?e material
is coarse such as gravel;; or boulders. When the materIal IS fine, the
value of ~ is low and relatively un.affected by change i.n flow stage, 'Yhen
the material consists of gravels and boulders, the value of 71 is generally
high, particularly at low or high stage. Larger boulders usually collect
at the bottom of the st.ream, making the channel bottom rougher than the.
banks and increasing the value of 71 at low stages; At high stages, a
. portion of the energy of flow is used in rolling t.he boulders downstream,
thus increasing the value of n. A theoretical discu,ssion of surface rough-
ness will be 'given in Art. 8-2.
B. T1 egetation. Veget.ation may be regarded as a kind of surface
roughness, but it also markedly reduces the·capacii~ ~f the c~annel. an~
retards the flow. This effect depends mainly on heIght, denmty, dlstn-
butiol1, and type of vegetation, I;1nd it is very important in designing
small d[ainl;1ge channels. . in wetted perimet.er and variations in cross section, size, and shs.pe along
At the University of Illinois an investigation has been made to deter-
mine the effect of vegetation on the coefficient of roughness [22]. On one
of the drainage ditches in central Illinois under investigation, an avera~e
n :value of 0.033 was measured in March, 1925, when the channel was ill
good condition .. In April, 1925, there were bushy willow? a~d dry w~eds
on the side slopes, and n was found to be 0.055. ThIS ll1crease m. 71
represwts the result of one year 's growt~ of vegetation. D~ring the
summers of U)25 and 1925 there waS a thICk growth of cattaIls on the
bottom of the channel. The n value at medium summer stages w~s
about 0.115, l,tnd at a nearly bankfull stage it was 0.099. The cattaIls
inihe channel were washed out by the high water in September, 1926; the
average value of 71 found after this occurrence was 0.072 .. The conclusions.
drawn from this investigati'on were, in part, as follows:
1. The minimum value of 11, that should be used for designing drain~ge
ditches in· centml Illinois is .0.040. This value is obtainable at high·
stages duri!1g the summer months in th~ most carefully n:aintained ch~n­
nels where the bott.om of the channel IS clear of vegetatiOn and the. Side
slop~s are covered with grass or low weeds, bU,t no bushes. This low
value of n shonld not be used unless the channel IS to be cleared a:nnuaUy
of all weeds and b u s h e s . . .
2. A value of n = 0,050 should be used if the channel is to be cleared
in alternate years only. Large weeds and bushy willows from 3 to 4ft
high on the side slopes will produce this value of n.
3. In channels that are not cleai'ed for a number of .years, the growth
may become so abundant that values of n· ~ 0.100 may. be found.
,.
. 4. Trees from (3 to 8 in. in diameter growmg on the Side slopes do not
impede the flo\v so much as do small bushy growths, provided overhang-
ing branches are cutoff, .
",1\.,'.,..
."'
DEVELOPMENT OF UNIFORM FLOW AND ITS FORMULA.S 103
The U.S. Soil Conservation Service has made studies on flow of water
in small shallow channels protected by vegetative linings (Chap. 7, \
1
Sec ..0), It was found that n values for these channels varied with· the
shape and cross section of the channel, the slope of the channel bed, and
. the depth of flow. Comparing two channels, all other factors being equal,
the lesser average depth gives the higher n value, owing to a larger -1
proportion of affected vegetation. Thus, a triangular channel has a
higher n value than a trapezoidal channel, and a wide channel has a
lower n value th11D. a narrow channel. A flow of sufficient depth tends to
bend over and submerge the vegetation and to produce low n values. A
.steep slope causes greater velocity, greater flattening of the vegetation,
and low n valu,<::s. .
The effect of vegetation on flood plains will be discussed later in item H.
. C. Channel Ir:regularity. ChanneUrregularity comprises irregularities
the channel length. In na.tural channels, such irregularities are uSl,lally
introduced by the presence of sand bars, sand waves, ridges and depres-
sions, and holes and humps on the channel bed. These irregul9.rities
definitely introduce. roughness in addition to that caused by surface
roughness and other factors. Generally speaking, a gradual and uniform
change in cross. sectioll, size, and shape will not a.ppreciably affect the
value of n, but abrupt changed or alternation of small and large sections
necessitates the use of a large value of 71. In this case, the increase in n
may be 0.005 or more. Changes that cause sinuous flow from side to
side of the channel will produce the same effect.
D. Channel Alignment . . Smooth curvature with large radius will give
a relatively low value of 71, whereas sharp curvature with severe meander-
ing will increase 71. On the basis of flume tests, Scobey [23] suggested
that the value of 71 be increased 0.001 for each 20. degrees of curvature 111
100 ft of channel. . Altholagh. it is doubtful ,..hether curvatllre ever 1
increases 11, mOfe than 0.002 or 0.003, its effect should not be ignored, for I
curvature may induce the accumulation of drift and thus indirectly
increase the value of n. Generally speaking, the increase of roughness 1
in unlined channels carrying water at low velocities is negligible. An
increase of 0.002 in n value would constitute an adequate allowance for I
curve losses in most flumes containilig pronounced curvatures, whether
built of concrete or other materials. The meandering of naturai streams,
however, may increase the 71 value as' high as 30 %.
E. Silting and Scouring. Generally speaking,.8ilting may change a
'.'
j very irregular channel into a comparatively uniform one and decrease n,
'whereas scouring may do the reverse and increase 71 • . However, the
dominant effect of silting will depend on the nature of the material
. \
i deposited. Uneven deposits such as sand. bars and sand waves 'are
'"
 104 UNIFORM FLOW i l' ;DEVELOPMENT OF UNIFORM FLOW AND ITS FORMULAS 105
, channel irregularities and will increase the 'roughness. 1 The amount f of .inundfltion, as obseryed in the Nishnabotna River, low-a,fof the aver-
!
· uniformity of scouring will depend on the material forming the wetted age gfowing season [24]. It should be noted, however, that vegetation
· perimeter. Thus, a sandy or gravelly bed will be eroded more uniformly !I a
has a marked effect only up to certain stage and that the roughness
than a clay bed. . The deposition of silt eroded from the uplands will i
I coefficient can be considered to remain constant for pl'actical purposes in
tend to even out the irregularities in:a channel dredged through clay, I determining overbank flood discharges.
The energy used in eroding and carrying the material in suspension or I
rolling i~ along the bed will also increase the n value, The effect of
50
scouring is not significant as long as .the erosion on channel bed caused by Mississippi River oetweenMemphis
and Fulton, Tennessee .
high velocities is.progressing eyenly and uniformly. o o U,S, Geologicol Survey doto
.. U.S, Corps of Engineers dato
F. ObstrucHon. ,The presence of log jams, bridge piers, and the like i!:
· tends to increase n. The amount cif increase depends on the nature of ~ ~O
the obstructions, theil' size, shape, numbel', and distribution. .'2
G. Size and Shapl'J of Channel. There is no definite evidence about g" 20
the size and shape of a channel as an important factor affecting the value '"
;:;:

of n. An increase in hydraulic radius may either increase or de.creasen,

depending on t,he condition of the channel (Fig. 5-4).
H. Stage and Di,scha1'{}e. The n value in most strearas decreases ,vith o I
O.k02;;;5.----:O':::-:03~O"..----;:O,..,.Oi,.3.",5-.---,;,.,!-,=---=~::,!
increase in stage and in' diseharge. When the water is shallow, the n value
irregularities of the. channel bottom are exposed and their effects become
pronounced. However, the n value may be large at high if the Tennessee River at Cholloooogc, Tenn,
banks are rough and gra.ssy.
When the discharge is too high, the stream may overflow its and
a portion of· the flow will be along the flood plain. . The n v3,lue of the
flood plains is generally larger than that of the yhannel proper, and its •
magnitude depends on the surface condition or vegetation. !f the bed 0.045·
and banks of a channel are equally smooth and regular and the bottom.
slope is uniform, theyalue of n may remain almost the same at all
so a constantn is usually assumed hi the flow computation.
happens mostly in artificial channels. On flood plains the value of n
usually varies with the stage of submergence of the vegetation at low
stages. This cnnbe seen, for example, from Table 5-4, which shows the·
n values for various flood stages according to the type of cover and depth n value
TAriu:l 5-4. VALUES OF n FOR VARIOUS' STAGES m THE NI5HNJ..BOTNA RIVEI!., FIG. 5-4, Va.riations of the n value with tile.me!tn stage or depth.
IOWA, FOR THE AVlllRAca; GROWING SEl.SON.
Curves of n v!\lue versus stags (Fig. 5-4) in streams have been given
Flood-pilli~ cover by Lane (25\; showing how vahle of n varies with stage three
Depth of Channel river channels. For the roughness of large canals, it study in connection
water, it section Small Brush and with the design of the Panama Canal ,yas made by IVley~r& and .Schultz
Corn Pasture Meadow
gt'ains waste
i [26).1 . The two most important conclusions reached from this study were
(1) that the n value fol' a river !channel is least when the stage is at 01'
Under 1
1 to 2
0.03
0.03
0,06
0,06
0,10
O,O~
0,10
0.09
0,12
0.11 I somev;rhat above normal bankfull stage, and tends to in~rease for both
I
1 A tJble of ; vJlues for eleven lar~e cbanneJs at tbe most efficie[lt depths and tlle
2 to 3 0,03 0.07 0.04 0.07 0,08 0,10
3 to 4
Over 4
0,03
0,03
I 0,07
0,05
0.04
0,04
0,06
0.05
0,07
0,06
0.09
O,Oi ! curVel, showing th.e variations 01 11 value with hydra.ulic radius in eight river channels
are also given in this reference.

1
:106 UNlFORM FLOW
;higher and lower stages; and (2) that the bankfulLn values do Dot vary .
greatly for rivers and canals in different kinds of material and in widely.
separated locfl.i;ions.
For circular conduits, Camp [27,28] was able 'to show that the n value
for 11 conduit flowing partially fuBis greater than that for a full conduit.
Using measurements on clean sewer pipe and drain tile, both clay and
concrete, from 4 to 12 in. in size, he found an increase of about 24% in the
n value at the half-depth (Fig. 6-5).l The n value for the pipe flowing
full was found to vary from 0.001:15 to 0.011. Taking an average value of
0.0103, the nvalue at half-depth should be about 0,013. This is identical
with the usual design value,which is based largely on measured values in
sewers Hov\e'ing partially fulL .
I. SeasonoJ Change. Owing to the seasonal growtih of aqus,hicplants,
grass, weeds, willow, and trees in the channel or on the banks, the value
of n may increase in the growing seasOl]. and diminish in the dormant
season. This seasonal change may cause changes in other factors.
J, Suspended Material and Bed Load. The suspended material and
DEVELOPMJilNT OF UNIFORM FLOW AND ITS. FORMULAS 107
In selecting,. the. value of nl, the degree of irregularity is considered
smooth for surfaces comparable to the best attainable for the materials
involved; minor for good dredged chm1l1els, slightly ei'oded or scoured
side slopes of canals or dra.inage cha.nnels; moderate for fair to peor dredged
channels, moderately sloughed or eroded side slopes of canals cr drainage
.channels; and severe for badly sloughed banks of natural strea.ms, badly
eroded or sloughed sides. of canals or drainage channels, and unshaped,
r-
jagged, and irregular surfaces of channels excavated in rock. .
III selecting the value ofn2' the character of variations in size and 1
shape of cross section is considered gmdlLal when the change in size or ,-I
shape occurs gradually, alternating occasionally when lal'ge and small
se·::tions alterna.te occasionally or when shape changes r,ause occasional
shifting of main flow from side to side, and alternating frequently whim
iarge arid small sections alternate frequently or when shape changes
J
cause frequent shifting of main flow from side to side,
The selectioll of the value of n3 is based 011 the presence and character-
istics of obstructions such as debris deposit", .stumps, exposed roots,
--\
\'

the bed load, whet.her moving or not moving, would consume energy and
cause head loss or increase the apparent channel roughness.
All the above factors should be studied I1nd evaluated wit,h respect to
conditions regarding type of channel, state of flow, degree of mainten~~ce,
and other related considerations. They provide a basis for determmmg
the proper value of n for a given problem. As a general guide to judg-
ment it may be accepted that conditions tending to hldtlce turbulence
and c~use retardance will increase 1. value and that those tending to reduce
turbulence and retardance. will decrease n value. <
Recognizing several primary £actors affecting the roughness coeffic,el1~, .
Cowan [32J developed a procedure for estimating the value of n. By thIS
procedure, the value of n may be computed by
n = (no + ",1 + n2 + nl + n()m5 (5-12)
where no is a basic n value for a straight, uniform, smooth channel in the
natural ~aterial:; involved, nl is 8, value added to no to correct for the
effect of surface in'egularities, 'lt2 is a value forvf.tl'iations in shape and
size of the channel cross sectiol1, Tt3 is a value for obstructions, n4 is a
value for vegetation and flow conditions, and mil is a correction factor
fllr meanderiIlg of channeL ' Proper values of. no to n, and m, may be
selected from Table 5-5 according to the given conditions. . .,
,j
. I The n/n~ curve was based O.D measurements by Wilcox [29] on 8-in, clay and con~
~rete sewer pipes a.nd by Yarnell a.nd Woodwa.rd 130] on open-butt-joint concrete
. ahd cla.y drain tiles 4. to 12 in. in eiZe. For depths less thaD about O.I5d., the
I
!
eurve was verified by the data of Johnson [311 forlarge sewer!!, .
t where the average depth of flow is about equal to the height of vegetation,
t
:~'
boulders, and fallen and lodged logs. One should recall that conditions
considered in other steps must not be reevaluated or' double-counted in
this selection, In ,iudging the relative effect of obstructions; consider
the following: t.he. extent to which the obstructions occupy or reduce the
average water area, the character of obstructions (sharp-edged or angular
objects induce greater turbulence than curved, smooth-surfaced objects),
and the position and spacing of obstructions transversely and longitudi-
nally in the .reach under consideration. . .
In selecting the value of n~, the degree of effect of vegetation is
considered' .
(1) Low for conditions comparable to the following: (a) dense gl'owths
of fla"{ible ~urf grasses Qr weeda,of which Bermuda and blue grasses are
examples, where the average depth of flow is 2 to 3 times the height of
vegetation, and (b) supple seedling tree switches, such as willow, cotton-
wood, Or salt cedar where the average depth of flow is 3 to 4: times the
height of the vegetation.
(2) 1l1edi11.?n for conditions comparable to the following: (a) turf grasses
where the average depth of flow is 1 to 2 times the height of vegetation,
(b) stemmy grasses, weeds, or tree sCl'ldlings with moderate cover where
the average depth of flow is 2 te 3 times the height of vegetation and
{c) brushy growths, moderately dense, similar to willows 1to2 ~ean;
old, dormant season, along side slopes of a channel with no significant
vegetation along the channel bottom, where the hydraulic radius is
greater than 2 ft. .
'(3) High for conditions comparable to the f;llowing: ea) turf grasses -\
,1
~!

,:i:; 'r.~.' '. ~~. I

~""---'"~--'.".-~.-.-,'~ .
'I
 '\
!
,
4;1
I'
108 UNIFORM: FLOW
I, DEVELOPMENT OF UNIFORM FLOW AND ITS FORMULAS 109
(b) dormant season-willow or cottonwood trees 8 to 10 years old, inter- I 'fAllLl!l 5-5. VALUES FOR THE CO]>tl'UTATlON OF THE ROTlGHNESS COE·FFICI.!!lNT
grown with .some v,l:eds and brush, none of thp- vegetation in foliage, fi
:BY EQ. (5-12)
where the hydraulic radius is greater than 2 ft, and (c) growing season-
bushy willoW's about 1 year old intergrown with some weeds in full foliage I, Channel conditionB Values'
along side slopes, no signifieant vegetation along channel bottom, where' I
hydraulic radius is greater than 2 ft. . Earth 0.020
(4) Very high for conditions comparable to the following: (a) 'turf
. grasses where the average depth of fio~ is less than one-half the height M.ateriul
Rock cut 0.025
of vegetation, (b) growing season-bushy willows about 1 yellr old, inter- in vo I.... ed nQ
Fine gravel 0.024
grown with weeds in full foliagealon.g side slopes, or dtmse growth of
eat tails along Ghannel bottom, with any value ofhydratilic radius up to Coarse gravel 0.028
1001' 15 ft, aIld (c) growiIlg season:-trees intergro,vn with weeds and brush,
all in full foliage, with any value of hydraulic radius up to 10 or 15 ft. Smooth 0.000
Ir:. selecting the value of ms, the degree of meandering depends all the
Minor 0.005
ratio of th.e meander length to the straight length bf the channel reach. Degree of
r.,
The meandering isconsidel'ed minor for ratios of 1.0 to 1.2, appreciable irregularity
for mtios of 1.2 to L5, and severe for ratios of 1.5 and greater.
., Modernte 0.010
j

In applying the above method for determining the n value, several Severe 0.020
things should be noted. The method dQes not consider the effect of
Gradual 0.000
suspended and bed loads. The values given in Table 5-5 were developed Va.ria.tions. of
from a study of some 40 to 50 cases of small ftnd moderate channels. channel cross Alternating oceaSionally n2 . 0.005
Therefore, the method is qU<jlstionable when applied to large channels section
whose hydraulic rn,dii exceed, say, 15 ft. The method applies only to Alternating irequently O.010~.015
unlined natural streams, Rood ways, and drainage channels and shows.il.
Negligible 0.000
rninimum value of 0.02 fol' the 11, value of such channels. The minimum
value of n in general, however, may be as low as 0.012 in lined channels Relative Minor O. 01O-{}. 015
and as 0.008 in artificiH1 laboratory flumes. effect of '11..
6-9. The Table of Manning's Roughness Coefficient. Table 5-6 gives obstruutions 1\...." .. ~ .~ 0.030-{}.030
a list of n values for channels of various kinds. I For each kind of channel
the minimum,. nOimal, and maximum values of 11, are ShO\VIl. The nor- 0.040-0.080
mal values for artificial channels given in the table are recommended only Low 0.005-0.010
for channels with good maintenance. The boldface figures are values
generally recommended in design .. For the case in which poor mainte- Medium 0.010-0.025
nance is expected in the future, values should be increased accordiQ.g to VegeLfLtion
High 0.02S-{}.050
the situation expected. Table 5-6 will be found very usp-Iul as a guide to
" the quick selection of the 11. value to be used in !\, given problem. A Very high 0.050-0.100
) poplllur table of this type was~prepn.red by Horton [34) from an examina-
tion of the best available experiments at his time. 2 Table 5-6 is compiled Minor 1.000
L The minimum value lor Lucite was observed in the Hydra.ulic Engineel'ing La.bol'a-
Degree of
meandering Appreciable m. 1.150
Lory nt the University or Illinois [33). Such a low n value Inay perhaps be obtained
also for smoot\) brass o.nd glass, but no observntions have yet been reported. Severe 1.300
t A table showing n values and other elements hom 269 observations made on many
existinga.rtifiCia.l cha.Ilnels is also given by King [35J.
 I
) -(
110 UNIFORM FLO>'i DEVELOPMENT OF UNIFORM FLOW AND ITS FORMULAS 111
. TABLE 5-6. VALUES OF THE ROUGHNESS COEFFICIENT n
(Boldface figures are values generally recommended in design)

Typ~ of channel and description I Minimum I Normal Maximum

II
. TABLE 5-6. VALUES OF THE ROUGHNESS COEFFICIENT n

Type of channel and description Minimum

(continued)

Normal Maximum
1
----~~~~~~~~~-I . I
------
A. CLOSED CONDUITS FLOWING. PaRTLY FULL D. LINED OR .BUILT-UP CHANNE1.S
A-I. Metal
a. Brass, smooth 0.009 0.010 0.013
I . B-l. Meta!
a. Smooth steel surface
b. Steel 1. Unpainted
1. Lockbar and welded
2. Riveted and spiral
c. Cast iron
O.OlD
0.013
0.012
0.016
0.014
. 0.017 . I 2. Painted
b. Corrugated
B-2. Nonmet.al
0.011
0.012
0.021
0.012
0,013
0.025
0.014
0.017
0.030
1. Coated
2. Uncoated
d. Wrought iron
0.010
0.011
0.013
0.014

0.014
0.014
0.016

0,015
I a. Cement
1. N el1t, surf!lce
2. Morta-r.
0.010
0.011
0.011
0.013
0.013
0.015
1. Black 0.012 b. Wood
2. Galvanized 0.013 0.016 0.017 L Planed, untreated O.OlD 0.012 0.014
e. Corrugated met.al 2. Planed, creosoted 0.011 0.012 0.015
1. Sub drain . 0.017 0.019 0.021 3. Unplan(ld 0.011 0.013 0.015
2. Storm drain 0.021 0.024 0.030 4. Plank with battens 0 .. 012 0.015 0.018
A-2. Nonmp.tal. 5. Lined with roofing paper 0.010 0.014 0.017
a. Lucite 0.003 0.009 O.OlD c. Concrete
b. Glasll 0.009 0.010 0.Of3 . 1. Trowel finish 0.011 0.013 0.015
c. Cemen't 2. Float finish
1. Neat, surface O.OlD
0.011
0.011
0.013
0.013
0.015
I
!
3. Finished, with gravel on bottom
4. Unfiliished .
0.013
0.01.5
0.015
0.017
0.016
0.020
2. Mortar f 0.014 0.017 0.020
d. Concrete iI 5. Guuite, good section 0.016 0.019 0.023
1. Culvert, straight and free of debris 0.010 0.011 0.013 J. 6. Gunit8, wavy section 0.018 0.022 0.025
2. Culvert with bends, connections, 0.011 0.013 0.014 f 7. On good excavated rock 0.017
! O.OZI)
and some debris 8. On irregular excavated rock 0.022 0.027
3. Finished 0.011 0.012 0.. 014 d. Concr'lte bottom float finillhed with
4. Sewer wit.h manholes, inlet, etc., 0.013 0.015 1).017 sides of
strl!-ight 1. Dressed stone in mortar 0..015 0.017 0.020
5. Unfinished, steel form 0.012 0.013 0.014 2. Random stone in mortar 0.017 0.020
0.016 0.024
6. Unfinished, smooth wood form 0.012 0.014 3. Cp,ment rubhle masonry, plastered 0.015 0.020 0.024
7. Unfinished, rough wood form 0.015 0.017 0.020 4. Cement rubble maSQnry 0.020 0.025 0.030
e. Wood 5. Dry l'Ubble or riprap 0.020 0.030 0.035
1. Stave O.OlD 0.012 0.014 e, Gravel bottom with sides of
2. Laminated, treated 0.015 0.017 0.020 1. Formed cOllCrete 0.017 0.020 0.025
f. Clay 2. Random stone in mortar 0.020 0.023
1. Commondrain8.ge tile
2. Vitrified sewer
3. Vitrified.sewer with manhol,~s, illlet,
0.011
0.011
0.013
0.013,
0.014
Q.015
0.017
0.017
0.017
3. Dry rubble or riprap
f. Brick
1. Glazed
0.023

0.011
0.033

0.013
0.026
0.036
J
0.015
etc. 2. In cement mortar 0.012 0.016 0.018
4. Vitrified subdrain with open joint 0.014 0.016 0.018 11. Masonry
g. Brickwork 1. Cemented I'Ub ble 0.017 0.025 0'.030
1. Glazed 0.011 0.013 0.015 2. Dry rubble 0.023 0.032 0.03.5
2 .. Lined with cement mortar 0.012 0.015 0.017 h. Dresse.d ashlar 0.013 0.015 0.017
h. S'anitary sewers coated with sewage 0.012 0.013 0.016 i. Asphalt
slimes, with bends and connections 1. Smooth 0.013 0.013
i. Paved invert, sewer, smooth bottom 0.016 0.019 0.020 2: Rough 0.015 0.016
j. Rubble masonry, cemented 0.018 0.025 0.030 . j. Vegetal lining 0.030 0.500 '-,
·fI I
I: ,
. ~;

.·'h· I

t,
:.::." ,.,,,""::".:
 112 UNIFORM FLOW DEVELOPMENT OF UNIFORM FLOW' AND ITS FORMULAS ll3
'l"\13LE. 5-6: VALUES OF TliE Ro'l1GllNESS COEFFlCllilNT n (continued) TABLE5c6. V,u,UES OF THE ROUCnl'NESS COE)"FICIENT 7i (continued)

Type 01 channel and description ·Minimum Normal Maximum description ~inimum Normal Maximum'
--~--------------~---I·----~I
C. Exe.WATIilD OR DREDGED b. Mountain strea.ms, ·no vegetation in
a. Ea.rth, straight and uniform cha.nnel, ba.nks usually steep, trees
.1. Clean, recently completed 0.016 0.018 0.020 and brush along banks submerged· at
2. Clean, e.fter weathering 0.018 0.022 0.025 high sta.ges .
3. Gravel, uniform section, clean 0022 0.025 0.030 1. Bo~tom: gra.vels, cobbles, and fetv 0.030 0.040 0.050
4. With short gr!l.8S, f.ew weeds 0.022 0.027 0.033 boulders
b. Earth, winding and sluggish 2. Bottom: cobbles with large boulders
i' 1. No vegetation 0.023 0,025
0.040 0.050 0.070
0.030 D-2. Flood plains
I 2. Grass, some wGeds 0.025 0.030 0.033 <l. Pasture, DD brUsh
3. Dense weeds or aquatic plants in 0.030 0.035 0.040 . 1. Short grass 0.025 0.030 0.035
deep channels ,2: High grass 0.030 0,035 0.050
4. Earth bottom lind rubble sides 0.028 0.030 0.035 b. Cultivated areas
5. Stony bottom and weedy banks 0.025 0.035 0.040 1. No crop 0.020 0.030 0.040
6. Cobble bottom nnd clea.n sides 0.030 0.040 0~050 2. Mature row crops
c. Dritgline-eltcavated or dredged
0.025 0.035 0.045
g. !vIa ture field crops 0.030 0.040
1. No vegetation 0.025 0.028 0.033 c. Brush 0.050
2. Light brush on banks 0.035 0.050 0.060 1. Scattered brush, heavy weeds 0.035 0,050 0.070
d. Rock cuts
1. Smooth and uniform
2. Jagged and irregular .
e. Channels not maintained, wc.eds and'
I 0.025
0.035
0.035
0.040
0.040
0.050
2. LIght brush and trees, in winter
3. Light brmlh and trees, in sumInar
,4. Medium to densl'l brush, in winter
5. Medium to dense brush, in summer
0,035
0.040
0.045
0.050
0.060
0.070
0~060
0.080
0.110
0.070 0.100 0.160
brush uncut d. Trees
. l.Dense weeds, high as flow dept.~ 0.050 0.080 0,120 1. Dense willows, summer, straight 0.110 0.150 0200
: 2. Clean bottom, brush on sides 0.040 0.050 0.080 2. Cleared land with .tree stumps, no 0030 0.040 0.050
3. Same, highest stage of flow 0.045 0.071iJ 0.110 sprouts

I
4. Dense brush, high stage 0.080 0.100 0.1<10 3. Same ¥ above, but with heavy, i 0.050 0.060 0.080
D. NATuML S'IREAMS' growth of sprouts I'
D-l. l\llnnr streams (top width at flood stage 4. Heavy stand of timber, f.l few down
<100 it) 0.080 0.100 0.120
trees, little undergrowth, flood stage
a. Streams on plain below branches
I: Clean, straight, fun stage, no rifts or 0.025 0.030 0.033 6. Same as aboye, but with flood stag" 0.100 0.120
deep pools I 0.160
reaching bra.nohes
2. Same as ..bove, but more stones and I I
0'.030 0.035 0.040 D-3. Major streams (top width at flood stage
weeds >1.00 it). The 11. vallie is Jess than that
I
3. Clean, winding, some pools and
shoals .
4. Same ail above, but llome weeds a.nd
I 0.033

0.035 .
0.040

0.045
0;04:>

stones . ,
5. Same as above, lower stages, more
ineffective slopes and sections
0.050
for minor streams of similar ,description,
becll.use banks offer less effective resistance.
a. Regular section with no boulders or /1 0.0215 0.060
1 brush
II 0.040

!
0.0'48 0.055 .
____b_._I_f_re_g_u_la_r_a_:n_d_ro_U_g""h_s_e_ct_i_on_ _ _ _...i:-_O_,0_3_5_'11___L_0 .100,

1·
6. Same as 4, but more stones
7. Siuggish reaches, weedy, deep pools I 0.045
0.050
0.050
0.010
0.060
0.080
I
J
13. Very weedy rea.ches, deep pools, or 0.075
ftoodways with heavy stand of tim- 1 I 0,100 0.150

ber a.nd underbrush

I'
 l
I

114 UNIFORrk FLOW -l

from up-to-date information collected from various sources ([34,36,38]'
I
and unpublished data) ; hence it is much broader in scope than the Horton
table.
5-10. Illustrations of Channels with Various Roughnesses. Photo-,
I

I
I
J
graphs of a number of typical channels, accompanied by brief descriptions I
of the channel conditions and the corresponding n values, are shown in
Fig. 5-5. These photographs' are collected from different sources and
arranged in order of increasing magnitude of the n vslues. They provide
I i
a [eneral idea of the appearance of the channels having different n values
8.nd so should facilitate selection of then value for a given channel con- 1
dition. The n vaJue given for each che-nnel represents approximately
the coefficient of roughness when the photograph was taken. -<I--
The above type of visual aid is also employed by the U.S. Geological
Survey. The Survey has made several determinations of channel rough- I
ness in streams, mostly in the northwes~ern United S~ates. These in-
clude measurements of cross-sectional area.) width, 9.epth, mean velocity,
slope, and computation of the roughness coefficient. The reaches were 1
photographed in stereoscopic color, and the photographs have been
fl'
circulating among the district offices 'of the Survey as !!- guide in evalu-
ating n. FIG. 5-5. Typical channels ~howing different n values. (These photo h '
duced ft~m [3~J and [38J with the permi,nion of the U.S. Departme~~~f ~ ~~l~!t~:,:­
~1~1~rtlj.m~1 rc~ure~ used Jo~ reprodu.ctil]ll purposes were supplied thTUugh th~ courtes;
~, •.rr" C' E' ";0 ey tofr ph,otogrhrkphs 1 10 14 rkncl phol()gl'aph 19, rknd lhrou(lh the courtesy
~ ,,,. • . ,.am.!er or l!e 01 !Jrs.) ,
1
-'

.)
't '.

: .~

115
,-1
 ~l'
!I
I
I
1
i
t (1) j (4)
! I
)
1i
I
i
I!
!
t
\' (

;
,
I

.\ ~ii)
!
I

I
I

(6)

FtG. 5-5 (4-6)

FIG. 5.-5 (1-3)
1. n = 0.012. Canal lined with concrete slabs havir;lg smooth neat cement joints
and very smooth surface hand-troweled a.nd with cement wash on concrete ba.!Ie.
2. n == 0.014. Concr~te canal poured behind s~reeding and. smoothing platf?rm.
3. n _ 0.016. Small concrete-lined ditch, straight ~nd u;Uf~rm, bottom slightly
dished, the sides and bottom covered with 0. rough depoSIt, which Increases the n va.lue.
ll6 .
4. n = O.OlB. Shot-concrete lining without smooth trea.tment. Surface covered
with fine a.lgae and bottom with drifting sand dunes.
S. n = 0.018. Earth channel excavated in a clay loam, with deposit of clelln sand
in the middle and slick silty mud near the sides.
6. n = 0.020. 'Concrete lining made in a. tough lava-rock. cut, clean-scoured very
Tougb, and deeply pitted. . '
. 117
 -
\

(8)

(9)

FiG. 5-5 (10-12)

10. n "" O.024.l:!i~c~ lined on both sides a.nd bottom with dry-laid un~hinked
rubble. Bottom qUite lrregular, with sca.ttered loose cobbles.
. . 1"10. 5-5 (1:"'9) . 11. 1'1 = 0.026. Canal excavated on hillside, with upper bank mostly of willow
7. 1'1 = .0.020. Irrigatiollcanal, straight, in hard-packed smooth sand. of' roots and lower bank with well-made concrete wall. Bottom co:"ered with coarse
8. 1'1 - .0.022.. ~ent-plaster lining applied directly tp the trimmed suria.ce gravel.

IL :;
,. '\.
the earth
9. 1'1 =
channel. With weeds in broken places and looStl ssnd on bottom.
0.024. Canal excavated in silty clay loam. Slick and hard bed.
12. 1'1 = .o.O~8. Cobbl~bottom channel, where there is. insufficient silt in the
wa.ter Or too hIgh a velOCIty, preventing formation of a graded smooth bed.

~
US . lW .

~1

'I
I·
 (13)

(16)

(17)
(14)

!
I
I
l
i (18)
I,
t

(15)

t.
I,
FIG; 5-5 (16-18)
! 16. 11 ,= 0.040. Rock channel excav!\ted byexpl~sives. .
17. 7L;-= 0.040. Ditch in clay and sar.dy loam; irregular side slopes bottom !Lna
! cross section; grass on s l o p e s . : :' ,
13. 11 = ().029. Ea.rth c~nal excavated in alluvial silt 'soil, with deposits of sand 18. 11"" 0.045. Dredge channel, irregular side slopes .and bottom, in bla.ck, waxy
clay at}op to yellow clay at bottom, sides covered with small'saplings and brush
on. bottom and growth of gi-ass.
14. 11 = 0.030. Canal with large-cobbleswne bed. slight and gradual variations in cross section. '
15. 11 = 0.035. Natural channel, somewhat irregular side slopes; fa.irly even, clean 121
a.nd regular bottom; in light gray silty cla.y to light tan silt loam; very little varia.tion .
in cross section.
12Q
 (22)
(19)

./

(20)
I
(23)

(21)

(24)
I
I
I i
!
I
~
Flo. 5-5 (19-21)
'19. 11. = 0.050. Dredge channel ~ith very irregul~r side slopes ap.d. bo~tom, in
dark-colored waxy clay, with growth of weeds and gra.ss. Slight vanatlOn In shape
I
I
.'{1
of cross section for variation iin size. i, . FIG. 5-5 (22--241 .
· 20. 11 = 0.060. Ditch in heavy silty clay; irregular side slopes and bottom; practi-
· cally entire seotion filled with large-size growth 'of troos, principally willows and
.22. n = 0.110. 8~me as (21), but with much foliage and covered for about 40 It
WIth growthresembllllg smart weed. .
cottonwoods. Quite uniform cross seotion. . 23. n = 0.1~5. Natural channel floodway hi median line sand toj fine clay none
21. 11. = 0.080. Dredge dianne! in black slippery clay and gray silty clay loam,
: irregulrtr wide slopes and bottom, covered with dense gro\vth of bushy ~illOWIl, some
sId~ s!oPe:'; fairly e17ell and regular bottom with occasional Ba~ bpttom sl~ughs'
l~ariation Hi depth; practically 17irg;in timber, very little undergrowth except occa~
· in bottom; remainder of both slopes c017ered with weeds and a soatteflng growth of slUnal dense patches or btlllh~d a.~d small trees, some logs and dead fallen trees.
willows and poplars, no' foliage; some silting on bottom... . . . 24. n ... 0.150. Natur:J.1 river In sandy clay soil. Very crooked course, irregular
. . . 122
sl~e slopes and uneven bottom. Many roots, trees .and bushes, large logs and otb r
drift on bottom; trees continua.Uy falling into ch",rmel due to bank caving. e
. 123

f
 .;;."
Jt

124 UNIFORM FLOW DEVELOP!'.{ENT OF UNIFORM FLOW AND ITS FORMULAS 125
Stage, ft Discharge, cis Stage, It Discharge, cfs
PROBLEMS
0.3 1.'0 1.50 50.0
5-1. Expiain why a uniform flow cannot occur (a) in Il frictionless channel, and (b) 0.4 2.3 1. 75 62.0
in a. horizontal channel. ' , ' 0.5 4,.6 2.00 75.0
6-2. When Chezy's C determined by the G. Ie formula becomes independent of '0.6 7.8 2.25 88.0
the slope S, show that the value of R 3.28. Find the corresponding relation 0.7 1l.0 2.50 10'2.0
between C all.:! Kutter's n. ., 0.8 15.0 3.00 132.0
li-S. For tbe conditions given in Example 5-1, compute the values of Ba.zin'i! m and 0.9 20.0 3.50 164.0
Powell's ~. 1.'0 25.0 4.00 199.0
6-4. Compute the velocity and discharge of flow in a new etu'th canlll having the 1.25 38.0
same shape, si;;e, slope, and depth of flow as the channel given in Example 5-1. Use 6-1S: By the Cowan method, estimate the n value for !l. slightly curved rellch ill
(a) tile G. K. formula, ,assuming'Kutter's n "" 0.022; (b) the Bazin formula, selecting
channel 21 of FIg. 5-5. '
!l p'roper value of 11>; and (e) the Powell formula, selecting a proper value of •.
5-6. Taking Manning'S n as the given value of Kutter's n, solve E):ample 5-1 by REFERENCES
the Manning formula. , '
5-6. If the coefficient of l'oughness 11 is unknown for the channe.l ill Example 5-1, L E. C. Schnack~nberg: Slope discharge formuiae for alluvial streams and rivers,
but a discharge of 2,000 cfs is observed under the given conditions, compute the v!Liues Proceedings, New Zea.land·lnsWt!lion of Enginesrs, vol. 37, pp. 340-409, Welling-
of l{utter's 1~ and Manning's 11. ton, 1951. Discussions, pp. 4.10-4.4.9.
5-7. From the MllJlning formula (using a consta.nt of 1.486 instead of 1.49 for 2. IVllJl E. Houk: Calculation of flow in {)pen channels, Miami Conservancy District,
theoretical a~curacy) and the Chazy formula, determine the reilltion betweeu CMzy's Technical Report, ·Pl. IV, Dayton. Ohio, 191B. '
C and Manning's n for the condition de:;ocribed in: Pl·ob. 5-2. This \\'iii show that the 3. Erik l,indquist: On velocity formulas for open channels and pipes, Transactions
G. K. formula and the Manning formula are theoretically identical at the condition of the World Power C01~feTimce, Sedional Meeting, Scand'inavi(l, Stockholm; vol. I,
when ,Cl,ezy's 'C is independent of the slope S. pp. 177-234, 1933. '
, 6'-8. Prov~ that the friction factor f in the Darcy-Weisbach formuir.,Eq. (1-4), is 4. Philipp FOfchheimer, "Hydraulik" (" Hydraulics JI), Teubner Verlagsgesellscha.ft,
related to .Manning's n by f = 116n~/R~~. Leipzig e.nd Berlin, pp. 139-163, 1930.
1i-9. Run 12-4 of Bll.zin's teats [12J was made on a rectangular plank flume ,fi.±4 ft 5. Zivko Vladislavlievitch: Apen;u critique sur le~ formules pour la predetermination
wide with wooden strips 1 em thick and 2.7 cm wide nailed crosswise on the bottom de Ie. vitesse moyenne de I'ecoulement uniforme (Critical surveyor the formula()
and ~ides at a spacinll; of 3.7 em center to center or strips. This fiume gave, a mean for predetermination of mea.n velocity of uniform flow), Transacli(]11)1 of th~ lst
velocity 0[3.33 fps at a flow depth of 1.02 ft and a slope of 0.0015. The t.emperature Congress, InternationaL Com'mislrion on Irrigalion and Drainage, New Delhi,
rending WIl.S 8.5·C. Determine Manning's n, and compute (a) CM.2y'S C, (b) Kutter's voL 2, rept. 12, question 2, pp. 405-4.28, 1951.
n, (c) ,Bazin's m; and, (d) Powell's •. " 6. Oornelis. Toehes: Stres.mfiow: Poly-dimensional treatment of vari!).ble factors
6-10. Run 15-·1 of Bazin's tests was the san1e as run 12-4, described in the preceding affecting the velocity in alluvia.l streams and rivers, Proceedings, Inslittttion of
problem, ex~ept that the spacing of stripa was increaaed to 7.7 ern. 'Using the same Civil Engineers, Lut,do'/1., vol. 4., no. 3, pt. Ill, pp. 900-93S, December, 1955. ,
disc,harge as that of run '12-4., the depth of flow wn.s found to be 1.33 :it. Determine 7. G. H. L. He.gen: "Untersuchungen fiber die gleichformige Bewegung des Wassers"
Mnnning's IL, and compute (a) Chez)"s C, (b) Kutter's 7'" {~} Bllzin's m, and (d) ("Research'!S on. Uniform Flow of Water"), Berlin, l~7f.L , '
Powell's ..Oomptu'e the values of • obtained from runs 1274 and 15-4 with the height 8. Clemena Herschel: On the origin of the Chezy formula, J(l,.rnal, Association of
of the strips, and explain I,he effect of roughness in both cases. Engineering Sooel:ie3, vol. 18, pp. 363-368. Discussion, pp. 368-369, Jalluary-
'6-11. U!iing the Manning formula., construct 0. discharge-rating curvel for the June, '1897.
natural chlll\uel section given in Prob. 2-5. The slope ii! 0.0016, and, 11; ;= 0.035, 9. A. Brahms: "Anfangsgriinde dcr Deioh- und Wasserbaukunst" ("Elements of
Extend the sides of the channel by ~traight lines at high stages if necessary. Dam and Hyd!,aulic Engineering"), Aurich, Germa.ny, 1754 and 1757, vol. I,
'6-12. Tile actual rating curve of the channel section in Prob. 2-5 is described below. p.l05. , '
Construct a CUTve showing the' variation in Manning's r. with respect to the stllg'l 10. E. Ge.nguillet llJld W. R. Kutter: Versuch zur Aufstellung einer neuen allegemeinell.
above the datum. ' Formel fUr die gleichfllrmige Bewegung des Wassers in CaniLlen und Fliissen (An
investigation to establish a new general formula for uniform Bow of water in canals
1 It should be noted that the synthetio rating curve thus obtained is very approxi-
a.nd rivers), Zeitsclirift cIes Oeslerreichischel~ Ingenieu.r- u.nd Architekten Vern1les,
ma.te, parti~ularly for a natural channel, beoause the n vDJue is a.ctually not !l. constant vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 6-25; no. 2-3, pp. 46-59, Vienna, 1869. Published as e. book in.
but a function of th.e depth (see Art. 5-8). ' Bern, Switzerland, 1877; translated into English by Rudolph Hering a.nd John C.
 126 UNIFORM FLOW
DEVELOPMENT OF UNIFOIUI{ FLOW A~m ITS FORM (JLAS
127
Trautwine; Jr., 1.\5 "A general Formula for the Uniform Flow of Water in Rivers parties," prelimi~ary ~raft, U.S. Soil Conservation Sel'vice, Milwaukee, Wis., 1954.
and Other Glumnais," John 'Wiley &; Sons, Inc., Nevv York, 1st ed., 1888; 2d ed., 25. E. W. Lane: DISCUSSIon on Slope discharge formulae for alluvial streams a.nd
18!H and i\)Ol.
by E. C. Schnackenberg, Pr(JcllJldin(J~, New Zealand 1~lItitu.l.ion of Enqillee!'s
11. C:.\pt:.\in A. A. Humphrey.s and Lieut. H. L. Abbot, U.S. Army Corps of Topo- vol. 37, pp. 4.35-438, Wellington, 1951. '. )
graphical Engineers: "Report upon thB physics and hydraulics of the Mississippi 25. J•. S. ~ey~!,~ :'I,nd E. A. Schultz: P~na;Ha Canal: The sea-level pI'oject, in A
River; U!Jon the protection of the alluvi!>l region a,gainst overflow; and upon the symposIUm. Tlda.l currents, Tran,~act!OnB: Ametican Society of Civil Engineers
deepening. of the mOllths; based upon surveys and investigations . . . ," J. E·, voL 114, pp. 668-571, ~g49. '
Lippincott Company, Philadelphia, 1861; reprinted in Washington, D.C., in 18157, 27. Thomas R. Camp: Design of sewers to facilitate flow, Sewage 'Work.:; Joumal, voL
and as U.B. Army Corps (Jf Ellllineel's, PtofC8sionai Pap.,. No. 13, 1875. 18, pp. I-HI, .January-December, 194.6.
12. H. DI.\!'cy a.nd H. Ballin: "Recherches hydra.uliques,'· lre partie, Recherches
28. 1i"lomas It <A1.tnp; Disoussion Oil Dete.rmination of Kutter's 11 for sewers pal.t!y
experimenta.les sur l'ecoulement de Feau dans ies canaux decouverts; 2e partie,
filled, by C. FI ank Johnson, Trans(lcl~ons, American Societ!! of Civil Engineers
Recherches experiment&les rel().tives aux ramous et il. In. propaga.tion des ,andes V<ll. 109, pp. 240-243, 1944. •
("Hydralllic Resea.rches," pt. 1, 'Experimental research on flmv of water in open 29. ~, ~, Wilcox: A compara.tive test of the ftow Gf water in 8~inch concrete and
channels; p~. 2, Experimenta.l research on 'bMkwater and the propagation of vltTl.Hed clar .sewer pipes, Ur;.ilJersill1 ,of W'ashil1(Jlon, ElI(Ji'l'tee:ring Expariment
'wave:;), ACMiemie des Sciences, Paris, 1865. Slatton, Bulwt.ll 27, Mar. 1, 1924.
13. H. Bnzin: li:tude d'one nouvelle fonnuls pour ca.lculer Ie debit des canaux deooll-
30. D. L. Yarn~ll and 8. M. Woodward: The flow of water in drain tile, U.S. Depart-
verts (A llllW formula.' for the calcula.tion of discharge in open channels), Mtmoire menl of A.gnc!tll.u.re, Bullelin No. 854,1920. '
No. 41, Allnal6~ deB ponti I~t cha!,~~ees, vol. 14, seT. 7, 4me trimestrs, pp. 20-70, 31. C. }'rank Johnson: Determination of Kutter's n for sewers partly Hl'led T
1897. . ti A'S' , . , ransa;c·
ons, 'mcnoon oClely of Ct~ll vol. 109, pp. 223-239 1944.
14. Ralph W. Powell: Resi~tance to flow in l'ough cha.nnels, 'l',u,naadion'5, American
32. Woody ~. Cow~n: Estimating hydraulic roughne;;s coeffici:nts, Agricultural
Geophysical Union, vol. 31, [lO, 4, pp. 575-582, August, 1950. EngmeerL1l{/, vol. .3(, no. 7, pp. July, 1956. '
1.5. Hobert Manning: On the flow of water in open channels and pipes, Transactions, 33, Donal~ Schnepper B,nd Ven Te Chow: Full scale toe-of-slope gutter model
·I1/.~titution of Civil Ellgine(Jl'8 'of Ireland, vol. 20, pp. 161-207, Dublin, lSIH;
unp~bI1SI:ed rep~'rt ~f an ~n",:,es~ig~t,ion conducted by the Department of Civii
Engmeenn.g, ,?nlverSlty of ~l1mols, In coopera.tion with the Division of Highways,
supplement, voL 24, pp. 179-207, 1895,
15. Ven Te Chow: A note on the Manning formula, Transadidns, American Geo- State of IllinOIS,. and the Bureau of Public Roads, U.S. Departn\ent of Commerce
physical U'~ion, vol. 36, no. 4, p. 688, August, 1955. May, 1954 (ava.tlable at the University of Illinois library). '
17. Allen J. C. OUlmingham: Recent bydrl'luIic experiments, Proceedings, Institution 34. Robert E, Horton: Some better Kutter's formula coefficients Eng' : N
. of Civil Engineel's, London, voL 7l, pp. 1-36, 1883. . 1 75"" ( , tneer·"ng ews
'1'0, " no. 8, pp. 3r3-374, Feb. 24, 1916. Discussions. by Fred C. Scobey and1
18. Ph. Gauckler: Du 1l10UVeme[lt d~ l'eau da.::ls les ()onduites (The flow of water Robert E .. ~orton., vol. 75, no. IS, pp, 862-863, May 4, 1916.
conduits), Annates de~ pOJ~ts .1 chriu.ssees, vol. 15, ser. 4, pro 229-281, 1868. 35 . .Romce Wilham I{i?g, "Handbook of Hydraulics," 4th ed., revised by Ernest F.
10. A. St.ridder: J3eitriige zur Frage der Geschwindigkeitsformr.i und der Rauhi,g-
~rate~, M?Gra.w-Htll Book Company, Iuc., New York, 1954, pp. 7-102 to 1-111
keitsia.hlen fur Strome, !{a,nii.le und ge.schbssene Leitungen (Some contributions
to the problem of velocity fonnul" and roughness c(lI;lfficient for rivers, canals, and
3a. 'Engmeer,mg ~Handbook: Hydra.ulics," U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soii'
Oonservation uervice, 1955, sec. Ii.
37. F. ~. Scobey; Flow of water ip irrigation and similar canals, U.S. Department of
dosed conduits). Jfillcil!l.nge'l des eidgen6:isischen Amteofiir }Vasserwirtachajt, Bern,
Swit~erland, no. 16,1923. Agr::cu1tw'~, Technical BuUeiin No. 852, February, 1939.
20. Thomas Blench: A new theory of turbulent fto,v in liquids of small viscosity, 38. C;.t.. Ramser; Flow of water in drainage channels U.S. DSDartmeni 01 Anr' It
Journal, b'stittlt'ion of einil Engineer., Lolkion, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 611-612, April, • I B UL'1 etm
T ec11.n~ca . N o. 129, November, 1929, ' . . ten u.re,
• I~~ .
21. N. N. Pavlov'skiI: "GidravlkheskiI Spravochnik" ("Handbook of Hydraulics").
This book ha.~ many editions: (1) "Giclrl\vlicheskiI Spravochnilc," Put, Letlingrad,
1924, 192 pp.; (2) "Uchebnyl GidravlicheskiI Spravoclwik'" (for schools),.!~ubuch,
'Leningrad, lng, 100 pp.; 2d ed, W3l, 168 pp.; (3) "Gidrnvlicheskii Spravochnik,"
Onti, Leningrad and Moacow, H}37, 890 pp; !lnd (4) "Kratki! GidravlicheskiI .
Sprflvochnik," (concise version), Gosstrolizd'at, Leningrad and Moscow, 1940, .
314 pp. ,
22. George W; Pickets: Ru·n-off investigat.ions in central IllinQis, University of Illinois,
Engineering Experim.ent Sta.iion, Bulletin 232, ,vol. 29, no. 3, September, 1931.
23. Frederick C. Scobey: The flow of water in flumes, U.S. Departm.ent of ;Agriculture,
1
Technical Bulletin No. 393, December, 1933.
24. Methodology for cmp and pasture inundation damage appraisal: "Training
manual for hydrologists on watershed protection and flood preventiQn work pIau
 ..~ . r

COMP!UTATION OF UNIFORM FLOW 129

~
(6-6), this factof may be expressed as

CHAPTER· 6
and, from Eq. (6-4), (6-8)
COMPUTATION PF.UNIFORM FLOW
Primarily, Eq. (1)-8) applies to a channel s~ction when the flow is uni-
form. The right side of the equation contains the values of n, Q, and
S; but the left side depends only on the geometry of the water area.
6-1. The Conveyance of a Channel Section. The discharge of uniform Therefor'}, it shows that, fora giv~n condition of n,Q, and S, there is
flow in a channel may be expressed ns the product of the veloc:ity, repre- only one possible depth for maintaining a uniform flow, provided that the
sented by EC[. (5-1), and t.he water area, or value of AR~i always increases with increase in depth, which is true in
(6-1) most. cases. .This Q~h is the normal depth. Wyen nand S are known at
Q = VA = CAR-S· = KS"
. a .()1~~!l!!!)1 section, it can 'be seeii1l1ilXl.f1Ji}]6-8) that there can beomyr!ne
(6-2) discharge for maintainin a unjform flow through th~ sectlOD.~provlaect
where
..-:Ui8:tARW'a ways increases withincrease of depth.l ThTs discharge 18
The term J{ is known as the comeY(1,nce of the channel section; it is a . 'tfi'e-normal d~8~'i.a.r.gr----·· .,._ ....,-.--.. :-_._-.... ,._-,- -.' ...------.--:.-
measure of the carrying capacity of the channel seDtion, since it is directiy
''Equation'T6-8) is avery useful tool for the computation and analysis
proportional,to Q . . . . . I· of uniform flow. When the discharge, slope, and roughness are known,
When either the Ch~zy formula or the Mmmmg formult\ IS used D.s t"le.
this equation gives the section factor A"R"H and hence the norml\.l depth
uniform-flolv formula, i.e., when y = 72, the discharge by Eq. (6-1)
Yn' . On the other hand, when n, S, and the· depth, hence the section factor,
becomes are given, the normal discharge Q" can be computed from this equation
Q= K',IS (6-3)
in the following form: .
and the conveyance is
l( = Q- (6-4) Q = 1.49 AR%
. n
v'S (6-9)
.yS . '

This equation can Qe used to compute the convey!mce when the discharge
and slope of the channel are given. . by the Manning formula. The).'UP-.?cript ~_g,--.§ometill!!lL1L~.d t<L§Qecify
When the Chezy formula is used, Eq. (6-2) becomes
K = CAR~~ (5-5)
where C' is Chezy's resistance facto::. Similarly, when the Manning
formula is used,
K = 1.49 AR~ (6-6)
n lar section can also· be 'found from the table in AppeEi!ix A.
The above two equations are used to compute the Conveyance when
the geometry of the water area and t1')e resistanc~ factor or rou~hlless coef-
ficient are :given. Since the Manning formula IS used extensively, mos~
of the folldwing discussions and computations will be based on:Eq. (6-6).
6-2. Th~ Section Factor for Uniform-flow Computati<:n. '11h: ex~re:­
sion AR~i is called the section factor for uniform-flow. eomputatwn; It IS
an important element in the computation of uniform flow. From Eq.
. 1~8
Thisis essentially thc product of the water area and the velocity defined
ihe_c..Qpdition of uniform ·fl9,F-.
In order to simplify the computation, dimensionless curves showing
the relation between depth and section fuctor ARH (Fig. 6-1) have been
prepared for rectangular,. trapezoidal, and cirpular channel' sections.
These self-ex:planatory curves will help to determine ,the depth for a
given section factor A.8~, and vice versa. .Ihe A R~ val ue~ for a circu-
I .
1This is true for channels in which the v'alue of AR3, al'ways increasllII. with increase
of depth. since Eq. (6-8) will give one value of AR~,. which in turn gives only one
depth. In the CMe of a closed conduit having a gradua.ily closing top, the va.lue of
Ami will first increase wit~ depth and then decrease with depth when the full depth
is approached, becaUse a n;taximum value of AR3i usually occurs in such a conduit at
a depth slightly less than :the full depth. Consequentlj, it is possible to have two
depths for the 'lame value pf ARH, one greater and the either le5J3 than the depth for
the maximum value of Ami. For further discussion onthie subject see Art. 6-4.
 COMPUTATION OF UNIFORM FLOW 131
6-3. The Hydraulic Exponent for UniformAiow Computation. Since
a
the conveyance !{ is function of the depth of flow y, it may be assumed
that
(6-10J
where C is a coefficient and lV is a pn.rameter called the hydra.ulic l3:cponent
for uniform~jlowcompulalton.
Ta.king logari~hlTIs on both side.$ of Eq. (6-10) and then differentiating
with respect to V,
d(ln l() N
dy 2y (6-11)

Now, taking logarithms oil both sides of Eq. (6-6), K lA9AR~~/n, alld
then differentiating this equation ,... ith respect toy under the assumption
..;
... that n is independent of y, .

..s... .
Cl,

~
d(1nI{) = .!. dA: +~! dR
(6-12)
dy A dy 3 R dy
0
d
Since dAjd'b' = T and R . A/ P, the above equation becomes
'0
c;
....'"
~

(5T _ dyd!.)
Q

~
co
.0
hO
~= ~(111 K) = J.- 2R (6-13)
.S dy 3A
?- s
'"tt:
<t .,.
l-
<J
Equating the right sides of Eqs. (6-11) and (0-13) and solving for N,

-
"CJ
'0 ...
0

.,'" N .:~ (5T - 2R ~:) (6-14)

:>
!:l This is the general equntion for the hydraulic exponent N. For a .
<3 trapezoidal channel section having a bottom width b (l.lld side slopes 1 on
,..;
<0
I
z, the expressions for A., T, P,. and R may be obf,aind frorn Table 2-1.
ci Substituting them in Eq. (6-14) and simplifying, the resulting equatioll1
I!i; is
N 10 1 + 2z(y/b) 8 (y/b)
'3 1 + z(y/b) --3' 1 + 2 ~1:=::+=z=~-(y-/-b) (6-15)

8
o
This equation indicntes that the value of N for the.tmpezoidal section is
a function of z and y/b. For values of z = 0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0,.2.5, 3.0,
and 4.0, a family of curves for N versus y/b can be constructed
(Fig. 0,,2). 2 These curves indic;lte that the value of N varies within a
range of 2.0 to 5.3.
j The curve for a circula.r section with N plotted against y/d Q, where do
lI is the diameter, is also shown in Fig. 6-2. This curve shows that the
I . I This equation (IJ was "Iso developed independently by Chuga.ev [2) through the

I N.
use of the Chez.y lormula. .
S Similar curves to tho'le in Fig. 6"2 for trapezoidal channels were constructed by
.Kirpich [3J and al~o prepared iudependently by Pa.vlovskil [4] alJd R~khml\noff (5).
d 0 0 d
0p/" puo q/" }OsanlOll
130 1
l>.

'A
- - -~-·--:---~~~----~-·-'------~~"--.,
---. ...-..-,-"..---.c~---.~=...~-=-,_....-:
~ -,.~-.,-.~.' ':"
....=_.. _... '-" .-.~~--- .""-~-.-"--"
 132 UNIFORM FLOW COMPUTATION OF UNIFORM FLOW 133
value of N. decreases rapidly as the depth of flow approaches the top' of and abscissa are interchanged. If a constant n value is assumed, Eq.
the channel. Further mathematical analysis has reveo.led that the (6-6) indicat~ that K IX he~ce, the~e curves for AR~~ should show
value of N will be equal t~ zem at Vida = 0.938 and will then become the same characteristics as if the curves were plotted for Ie From
negative at greater depths. The significance of this fact will be discussed (6-10), it can. be seen that the hydraulic exponent for the straight-
\ later. in this article and the next. line range of the plot is equal to twice the slope of the plotted straight
line. Thus, if any' two points with
6.0
5.0 >.4--1-_-1---1_-'- -.'---'-- coordinates (K1,Yl) and (K 2;Y2) are 150r,--,---",-,-,. , - - . , - - . , - . , - "

4.0 I-+--/----J
taken' from the straight line, the ap- 100

3,0 I~+-'-----J
proximata value or
N may be com-
puted by the following equation: 50

2.0 N' -- 'J log (!(dK~) (6-16)

1 .- ~ log (Yl/V2)

1,0 +
I
0.8

.0.6 i /
0.5
III K
§ I
./ The cutved'
0.<1
1 Ille
plot when 'h.

<; 0.3 I {)'•• Kll

I
I l
depth opprooches
crOllln
closed conduit
ot 0

:::
" 0.2
~I
~

0,;
0.06
0.06
0,q5
0.04
log Y ':I
0.0 3
Fw. 8-3. Graphica! determination of N by Fro. 6-4. Typicltl channel sections
logarithmic plotting. having appreciable variation ill N
0,02
2.0 2.5 4,0 4.5 5.0 5.5 value with respect ro depth. (After
I VOlues of N R. R. C}~ugaev [2].)
.1,
FIG. 6-2. Curves of N v.alues. When the cross section of a channel changes abruptly with respect to
depth, the hydraulic exponent will ohange accordingly .. Several typical
Fot channel sections other than the rectangular, tnpezoidal, nnd
sections are shown in 6-4. In such cases the logarithmic plot of N
'circular shapes, exact values of N filly be computed directly by Eq. (6-14),
against y rna.y appear as a broken line or an evident curve, For the
provided that the derivative dP/dy can be eVllluated. For most chan-.
nearly straight portions of the broken line or curve) the hydraulic expo-
'nels, except for channels with abrupt changes in cross-sectional form and
nents may be D.Ssumed constant.
for closed conduits with gradually closing top, a logarithmic plot of K as
When the depth of flow approaches the gradually closing crOWl1 of a
ordinate o,gainst tIle depth as abscissaJFig, 6-3) willappear approximately
closed conduit, the logarithmic plot will appear as a curve. The hydraulic.
as a straight line. This can also be seen from tll!') dimensionless curves
exponent in the range of the curved plot is equa,l to twice the slope of the
for ARH in Fig. 6-1, which are plotted similarly except that the ordinate
tangen't; to the curve at the given depth (Fig. 6-3). For practiaalpurposes,
 i34 UNIFORM FLOW
the curve may' be divided into 11 number of short segments', arid eachseg-
ment may be considered a straight line having,a constant slope orhydrau-
lie exponent.
I N ow take the circular section as an example, The dimensionl€&s
!
i
log:l.rithniie plot of ARH against depth is shown in Fig. 6-1. Assuming a
i, const,ant '('Llue of n, this curve will show the same characteristics as if the
J. depth were plotted against K. As the depth' increases, the curve deviates
i gradually from a straight line and finally reaches a prononnced curvature
COMPUTA.:!'ION 'OF UNIFORM FLOW 135
for example, hilS been shown to increase by as much as 28% from 1.00d n
to O.25dc, where it appears to be a maximum (see Fig. 6-5 and the dis-
cussion in Art, 5-8 regarding t.he as a factor affectiIlg n value).
This effect callses the actual maximum discharge and velocity to occur
. at depths of about O.97d o and O.94do, respectively. The corresponding.
curves of Q/Qo and ViTr Q are shown by the dashed lines in 6-5.
According to the assumption of constant n value, the velocity would be
the same for a half-full pipe ru; for a full pipe; whereas, if the n value is

I
I·
(
at Yldo = 0.938, where the value of A RH/dij~'J is a maximum. Since the
n value is assumed constant, t,his ratio yl d Q = 0.938' also corresponds to
the maximum value of the conveyance K. The slope of the tangent to
. Subscri:>t "d' indicolas the lull tlow condition
r----:r:....-.-,---,--.-----r-- . . r--r~-.-__.~._-r--~
the curve at this depth, according to the gl'aph in which the ordinate and I
abscissa a,re interchanged, is hQrizontal, and thus the hydmulic exponent
N is equal to zero. For depths with ratio greater than 'lild o = 0.938,
the curve shows a decrease in t.he value 'Of A RH!do'~ and, hence, a decrease
in the conveyance K if r:. is ai$Bumed constant. The slope of the tangent
to the. curve and with it the hydraulic exponent will thus beconie
negative.
6-4. Flow Characteristics in a Closed Conduit with Ope-.l~channel Flow.
Taking the circular section as an example, the dhnenslol1less curves for
ARHI AoRoH and R 3i l Roy" are shown by the full lines in Fig. 6-5. The
subscript zero indicates the full-flow condition. 'If the n value is assumed
constant or independent of the .depth variation, these" two curves will
represent the variation of the ratios of the discharge and velocity to
their corresponding full-flow values (Le., QI Qoand YITT 0)' Both the
discharge and velocity curves show maximum values, which occur at II
0.6 0.7 0,8 0.9
about Q,938d o and 0.81d o respectively. Mathematically, the depth for
the maximum discharge, or O.93ado) can be obtained oimply by equat.ing Votues of 0/0 0 , vivo • AR<iYAoRJI~, cnd R 1fYR~iJ

to zero the first derivative' of ARH with respect to y, since the discharge
computed by the Manning formula is proportional to ARH for consta,nt
nand S. Similarly, as the velocity by t,he Manning formula is pro-
portional to R*, the depth for the maximum velocity, or 0.81d o, can be
obtained by equating the first oerivative of R"" to zero. Flu;thermore,
the dimensionless curve of QIQo shows t.hat, when the depth is greater
than about 0.82do, it is possible to have t'l'IO different depths for the same
discharge, one !J.bove and one below the value of O.938d o. Similarly, the
cut've of V /1'0 shmvs that, when the depth is gn:&ter than the half-depth,
it is possible to have two different depths for the same velocity, one above
and one below the value of O.81do. . mum capacity as long as it maintaimr an open-challlHil flow 9n a uniform
The above discussion is based on the assumption that the roughness
. coefficient remains constant as the depth che.nges. Actually, the value of
n for average clean sewer· pipes and drain tiles, both. clay and concrete,
FIG. 6-5. P'low characteristics of a circula.r section. (Alter T. R. Camp, [27J 0/ Chap. 5.)
taken to vary with the depth, ru; shown, the veloc.ity at the half-depth is
only 0.8 the full velocity.
The discussion for the circular conduit applies also to any l:losed C011-
duit with a gradually closing top.. The exact depths for maximum
discharge and velocity, however, will depend 011 the shape and roughness
variation of the specific conduit section. Since the ma.x;imurn discharge
and velocity of a closed conduit of gradually closing top do not occur at
the full depth, this means that the conduit WillllOt. flow full at the maxi-
grade free from obstructions. For praetical purposes, however, it may
sometimes be assumed that the maximum discharge of a cir('.ular cOllduit
or similar ,closed conduit with gradually closing top does occur at the full

I
 136 UNIF,ORM FLOW
COMPU'l'ATION OF UNIFORM FLOW 137
depth, because the depth for maximum discharge is so close to the top
where ~l' Hi, ... ,R/'f are hydraulic radii of the subdivided areas. For
. that there is always.a possibility of slight backwater to increase this depth
simple c~!\.nnel sections, it may be assumed that
closer to and eventtu:IUy equal to the full depth. '
. 6-0. Flow in a Channel Section with Composite Roughness. In simple RI = R2 = . . . = RN = H .
chann81s, the roughness along the wetted perimeter may be distinctly
Raugnne88 of Ice-covered Channels. When a. channel is covered with
different fl'OJU part to PE1l't of the perimeter,but the mean velocity can
the wetted perimeter of the flcrw is greatly increased. . The bottom
stiil be computed by a uniform-fl,uw formula without actually subdividing
surface of the ice cover may be either as smooth as a finished concrete
the section.. For example, a rectangular channel built with a wooden
sUl1fa:ce or as rough as the natur&'l channel bed v,rhenclrifting ice blooks
bottom and glass walls must have different n values for the bottom and the
.exist. Tabb 6-1 gives the 11, values for drcdg;ed channels covered with
walls. In applying the Manning formula to ~uch channels, it is sometimes'
ice, as proposed by Lotter [13]. .
necessary to compute an equivalent n value for the entire perimeter and
use this equivalent value for the computation of the flow in the whole
section. .
. For the determination of the equivalent roughness, the water area is .lee condition Velooity of flaw, fps n Value
divided imnginatively into N parts of which the wetted pel'imeters P 2,
... , PN and the coefficients of roughness nl, n2, • . . ) nN are known. Smooth iee:
Withol\t drifting iee blookB 1.3-2.0 0.01D-0.012
Horton [6] <Lnd Einstein [7,8] assumed thateachpal't of the area has the
>2.0 0.014-0.017
same mean velocity, which at the same time i15 equal to the mean velocity With drifting ice blocks 1.3-2.0 0.OI6-0.01E
of the whole section i that is, VI = V ~ = . . . = V N = V. On the >2.0 .0.017-0.020
basis of this assumption, the equivalent. coefficient of roughness may be Rough ice with drifting ice blocks 0.023-0.025
obtained by the following equation:' .' .
Let nand n1 be the roughness coefficients for channds with and without
ice cover, respectively. By means of Eqs. (6-17) to (6-19)' it is possible
to compute the roughness coefficient 7l-1 of the ke cover. However, the
(6-17) coefficient thus computed may sometimes be a negative ,falue . , which is,
of course, unrealistic, .
There are many other assumptions for the determination of all equiva-
In order t.o develop a realistic approach to the problem, Pavlovskil [14)
lent l'Oughness.Pavlovski! (9] and also Muhlhofer [10] and Einstein
assumed that the total force resisting the noW' is equal to the sum of the
and Banks [111 assumed that the total force resisting the flow (that is
the flo~
resisting forces due.to the channel bed and' the ice cover. Thus, from
JCV'"PL; see Art. 5-4) :is equal to the sum of the forces
Art. 5-4,
developed in the subdivided 3reas.By this assumption, the equivalent
(5-20)
roughness coefficient L'3
where the subscript 1 refers to the channel bed and 2 to the ice cover.
Since Chezy's C = -vu;jR OJ' J( = W/C2, the above equation b~comes
(Plnl 2 + P2n2~ + ... + PN'1i~!)H P P1' P!
n P}i
(6-18)
i
C1 = +
C1 2 Czl (6-21)
,I Lotter [12] assumed that the total discharge 'of the flow is equal to thei II Let: the wetted perimeter P z = aPi or P = PI + P2 (1 + a)P1i
J sHm of the discharges of the subdivided areas. Thus, the equivalent then
roughness coefficient .is ! 1 a 1 a
PRH'
i = C12 C2 2 + (6-22)
n = ...-----'-.- (lH9~ Sin(:e,: by Eq. (5-7), C 1. 49R ,t'/n,
(1 + a),n2
(6-23)
RH!
 138 UNIFORM FLOW COMPUTATION OF UNIFORM FLOW 139 :i
It is further assumed that the total hydraulic radius R is made up of . channel section is equal to the total discbirge divided by the total water "1
two parts: t.he hydraulic radius Rl due to the channel bed and the area.
hydraulic l':1,dius R~ due to the ice cove'r; that is, that R '= Rl + R 2 • Owing to the differenr.es that exist among the velocities of the sub-
Now, let El = Rl/R2 a,nd E2 = nt/nz. Then Eq. (6-23) is reduced to sections, the velocity-distribution coefficients of the whole section are
different from those of the subsections. The values of these coefficients
(1 + a)~2 = 11,2
2
(1 + ~)H (E22 + aEif,) (6-24) may be computed as follows:
Let Vt, V2, : • • , vI! be the mean velocities in the subsect,ions; let
For the condition of maximum discharge, Pavlovskil. postulated that al .. a2, . . . 1 aN and fJI I fJ~, ... ,fJN be the velocity-distribution coef-

the relation !.LlUOJ;lg R I , R 2, and n is such that dnjd~i = O. Thus, from ficients for the corresponding subsections; let .6.A 1 , .6. A 2, • • " .6.AN be
Eq. (6-24), Ez z =aEI)', a.nd
n = - Tt2 (a'' (T' 0Z''S)2~
7 (6-25)*
VT+li
For wide channels, it may be a,ssumed that PI = P z, that is, that
a = 1. Thus, E22 = ~l~', and
Tt = ..72 (1 + ~2~l)% (6-27)
Fw. 6-6. A channel con8isting of one main section and two' side sedions.

the water areas of the corresponding subsections; let K l , [(2, . • '. , KN

The roughness coeffiCient for the ice cover is, therefore, be the con veyances of the corresponding subsections; let V be the mean
velocity of the to~al section; and let A be the total water area. From the
n~ = (1.68n n - nl~I)~l (6-28)
continuity equation Emd Eq. (6-3), the following can be written:
Now let the discharges wit-hand without ice covel' be Q and Ql1
respectively. Then, using the Manning formula and assuming R = RI/2,
VI = [(~ Sf. - 1(2 Sf~ _ 1(/'1 SH
.6.A. I V2 - Ll.,A z VN - .6.AN
where Rand R 1' are the hydraulic radii with and without ice cover,
respectively, the discharge of an ice-covered channel is
Q = VA = VI .6..4. 1 + Vz dA 2 + + VN dAN
0:: IC.r)
N , ,

Q = 0.63- Ql
nl
(6-29)
= {Kl + ](z + .. + ](N)S~~ Sfi
11, I

Channels of Compound Section. The cross section of a channel may be

composed of several distinct subsect.ions with each subsection different and
in roughness from th~ others. 'For example, an alluvial channel subject
to seasonal floods generally consists of a main cha.nnel and two side Incorporating the above expressions with Eqs. (2-4) and (2-5) and
channels (Fig. 6-6). The side channels a.re. usually found to be rougher simplifying, the velocity-distribution coefficients of the entire section are
than the main channel i so the mean velocity in the main channel ia N
greater than the mean velocities in the side channels. In such a case,
the Manriing formula may be applied separately toearih subsection in
I
1
(aNKNJjdA N')
1.
determining the mean velocity of the subsection. Theni the discharges a = ~-N~--~--~-
(6-30)
in the subsections can ,be computed. The totaL discharge is, therefore,
equal to the sum of th~se discharges. ' The mean velocity for the whole
0; [(NY/ A'
1
N
.. PavlovskiI [11] used the relation. C = R~/n instead of Eq. (5-7), obtaining
;
i l (f3N[(N
2
jdA N )

,~
"
(6-26) I
and (J = -J-'N'-~--~-- (6-31)

It was Belokon [lSj whQ us~d Eq. (5-7).

"

f (Il(NY/ A
~ I

i
!
X.I,
. .t .
 :' ' I of ~
/71

/r
140 UNI~ORM FLOW I
COMPUTA.TION OF UNIFORM FLOW
.

Example 6-1. ' Compute the velocity-distribution coefficients at a peak flow in a V.:=: LJ"'L ~ J../l
,',
'.rT"
[md simplifying,
natural stream channel consisting of a main sectioll and an overflow side section. The
data obtained at the peak flow stage are: 200 = 1.49 [Y(lO + Y)-J~~ O.0016H
y(10 +
y) 0.025 10 + y V5
Subsection A, ft' J P, ft I I
n value {J or 7,680 +:1,720y = [y(lO + !:::)J2.5
Main section.
1
. - . - - I · --,3-6-0-1\.
S
~5 11~0-.-O-3-5~JII-1-.-1-0-'--1-'0-4- Solving this equation for Y by trial and errol', V. = 3.36 ft. This is the normal depth.
-_.,
The corresponding arelL is An = 89.S ft' alld the normal velocity is V. = 400/89.8 =
Side section. .. .. .. .. 5,710 405 0.040 1. 11 1. 04 4.46 fps. From EXlLmple 4-2, it is known that the critical depth for the same discharge
in the channel is 2.15' ft. ,Since the normal depth is greater than the critica! depth,
Sol'u/'i01l:. The computations are given below. , the flow is subcritical.
Soh;/ion 2: The Trial~and-e,.~or Approach. Some engineel's prefer to solve this

S"b~"tio" AA
-I---!
I-~ R .. J. " K I /3K2/I!A I ",K'/I!.tl'
type of problem by trial and error. Using the given data, the right side of Eq. (6~S)
is 1IQ/1.49 ...;s = 167.7. Then, assume a value of y and compute the section fnctor
''AR%: Make several such trials until. the computed value of AR3; is very' closely equal
Main section. 5,360\22523.88.290.035 I. 892 X X X 10' 16-::;4 10'1".93 10" ......t.u-liiJ....7.; Lhen the a.ssumed ii-i~;~ th~-~l~sest trial :e. the.llormaCdepth:-·This tl'ial-and=
Si~::~~i~~.,:: ~:~~~I~~y~·15:~~ ~:~'~~
1.244 X 10' 12.82 X 10' B,56 X 1O" error computation is shown as follows:
I 3.136 X 10' i g. 76 X 10 8 I 32.49 X 10"

By Eqs. (6-30) a:nd (6-31), the.coefficients are

I I
y
-----1
J A
-~II
RH Am~ Remarks

32.49 X 10'0, 3.00 78.0 2.34 1.762 137.4 Y too sll~all

0'= (3.136 X 10')'/11,070' = 1.29 3.50
3.30 I
I 94.5
87.7
2.65
2.53 Ii
1.915
1.852 i
181.0
162.6
Y too large
9.76 X 10'
and
II I
{J = (3.136 X 10°)'/11,070 =1.10

6-6. Determination of the Normal Depth and Velocity. The normal

3.35
, 3.36 I 89.5
89.8
2.56
2.56
I
I
J .870
1.870 I
167.2
158.0 The closest

depth and velocity may be computed by a uniform-flow formula. In the

The normal depth is,therefore" Yn = 3.36 ft.
following COlnplltations, the M.anning formula is used with threedi.fferent
methods of solution.· ./ B. Graphical 111ethod. For channels of complicated cross sel}tion and
A. Algebraic Method. For geometl'ically simple channel sections, the variable flow conditions, a graphical solution of the problem is found to
un'Hol'm-ftow conditIon may be determined by an algebraic solution, as be convenient.. By this procedure, a curve of y against the section factor
i!lustrated by the following example: ' A RYJ is first constructed and the value of nQ/IA9 VS is computed,
Example 6-2. A trapezoidal channel (Fig, 2-2), with b = 20 ft, Z = 2,S. = 0.0016, According to Eq. (6-8), it is evident that the normal depth may be found
Ik"ld n = 0.025, carries a discharge of 400 cfs. ComIJ.!!te t~rmal 'depth and from the V-A R~1 curve where the coordinate of A RH equals the computed
velocity. ...
value ~f nQ/l:49 VS. When the discharge changes, new values of
Sol,lt/ion 1: The Analytical Approach. The hydraulic raclius and water area of the
given section are expressed in terms of the depth y as nQ/1.49 VS are then computed and the eorresponding new normal
, ! depths can be found from the same curve. '
R = y(lO + y)_ and A = y(20 + 2y)
10 + y vS Example 6-3. Determine the normal depth of flow in a 36-in. culvert (Example 4-3)
The velocity is laid 011 a slope of 0.0016, having n = '0.,015, and carrying a discharge of 20 cfs.
'100 ./ Sollllion. Construct a curve of y vs, Am, for the given culvert (Fig. 6-7). Com-
I y(20 + 2y) pute nQ/1.49 V8= O.DlS X 20/1.49 YO.0016 '" 5.04. From the y-Am; curve,
./ ." find the depth corresponding to the value of 5.04 for AR3!. This depth i~ the required
Substituting the given quantities and the ILbove expressions in the Manning formula norma.l depth, or y" = 2.16 ft. Since this depth is greater than tlie critical depth
, II • Besides the methods described here, there are other methods for the computation
determined in Example 4-3 under the same condition, the flow is subcritical.
The table in Appendix A for the geometric elements of a circular sect,ion may also
of uniform flo~, suc.h as the use of hydraulic tables., Popular tables for this purpose
be used for the solution of this problem. Since do = 3.0 ft and do" = 18.75, AR,;/
can be found in [16] to [20].
d.}; = 5.04/1S.75 = 0.269. From the table, lI/do = 0.72, or V = 0.72 X 3 = 2.Hl ft.
142 UNIFORM FLOW COMPUTATiON OF UNIFORl\I FLOW 143
C. Method of Design Chal·t. The design. chart for determining the b. Determine the critic.!tl slope a.nd the corresponding norma.l depth when the dis"
normal depth (Fig. 6-1) ~all be used with great expediency ...

In Exalllple 6-2, ARn =< '167.7. The v",[ue of AR~fi/M~ is 0.0569. I For this value,
charge is 400 cis. ' '
c.D~term!ne the critir.;a.1 slope at the n01'l:11al depth of 3.35 ft, a.nd compute the ~or­
respondmg dlscharge.
J
the uhnrt gives yllJ = 0.168, or 11" = 3.36 ft. So:1ttion.
' . (v.)
h From the given data it is found that R = 2.56 it and V '= 446 ' f ps..
In Example 6-3, AR15ldo~1 - 0.269. For this va.lue, the chart yla., = il.72, Su bstltutmg t ese va.lues; in the Manning formula and .~ol-dng for Sn,
or 11 = 0.72 X 3 = 2.16 ft.
A, Ad -
•••• C' -
1.49 256"'8
0.025 I"
. ~.,,'
6-7. Determination of the Normal and Critical When the dis-
or s. 0.0016
charge and roughness are given, the Manning formula can be used to
determine the slope of Ll. 'prismatic channel in which the flow is uniform
I
This is the slo~e that will maintain a unifO~'m flow i~ the gh'en channel at a depth oI ·'l.
at a given normal depth Yn; The slope thus determined is sometimes 3.36 ft and a discharge of 400 cfa (see Example 5.2),
culled specifically the normal slope Sn. b. From the given data t.he critl!:al depth is found to be 2.15 ft (see Example 4-2)
The corresp:ndin g. v:J.lues of R ~nd V are R 1.97 f~ and V 7.60 Ips. Substitutin~ !
the known ~ A.lues m the MnnnlIlg formula and solvmg for Sa, ' ,I
7.66 1. 97HB.l."
I
or S. 0.(1067
t
Th~s is the slope that will maintain a. unifornl and critical flow in the givell cha.nnel for
a dis~harge of 400 cfs. The depth of flow is 2.1& ft.
c. For the given normal depth of 3 .•36 it, it is found that R = 2.68 ft, Ii = 89.8 fV
D :" 2.~8 ft, and, by Eq. ~I-ll), the critical velocity V. 9.3'fps. Substi~
tutmg tne known values m the Manning formula and solving for 13 m ,

1.19'
9.3 = 0.025 2,56~~S",,~
or S.n = 0.0070
o
This is ~he slope that will maintain a uniform and critical flow in the given channel
at the glvp,n normal clepth of 3.36 ft. The disoharge is equal to 9.3 X
FlO. 6-7. A curve of !I vs. ARJ~ for n. circula.r section. 89.8 = 835 ds.
Example 6-6. petermine the limit slope of !I. rectangular channel (Fig. 6-8) with
By varyillg the slope of the c:hannel to a certail1 value, it is to b = 10 ft and n = Q.0l5.
change the normal depth and make the uniform flow occur in a cl'it,ical .S~ll'tion. .Since the limit slope is the :;mall~.st critical slope, its value' maybe deter-
state for the ghren dischatge and roughness. The slope thus obtained is mmed gra.phlc.\J.lly.rro~ a Cll::ve ~f.the critical slope plotted aga.inst discharge.
the critical slope 8., and the corresponding normal depth is equI11 to the ~or the determmatJOn of a cntlcal slope, the following two cOlldition~ should be
satisfied:
critical depth. The smallest critical slope for a channel of shape L The first condition, from Eq. (6-3), is
and roughness is called the l~:1nit slope SL.
Furthermore, by adjusting the slope and the discharge, a critical uni- .Q = K vB. (6-32)
form flow may be obtained at the given llorinal depth. ·slope thus or, 'when the Manning formula is used,
obtained is known as the critical slope at the given normal depth So...
,The folloH.'ing examples will illustraie the above discussion.
(6-33)
Example 6-4. A trapezoidal channel has a bO,ttoro w'idthof 20 H, side slopes of or, for the rectangular channel,
2:1, and u = 0.025.
a. Determine the normal slope at a normal depth of 3.S6 it whf:)n the discharge is I
400 cfs.
1 (f}-34)
i
I.

,t . i
'I
144 UN)FORM FLOW COMPUTATION OF UNJl<'ORM FLOW 145
:2. The second condition, from Eq. (4-3), is 1. The normal discharge Q
2. The mean velocity of flow V
(6-35)
Q =Z,...;g 3. The normal depth 'Ii
or, for the .ectangulul' chmnel, 4. The coefficient of roughness n ,
Q= 1O....;g y'" (6-36)
5. The channel slope S "
By using Eqs. (il-34) and (6-36) .iLnd eliminating 11, the relation between Q and S, B. The geometric elements that depend on the shape of the channel
can be established. This relation is expr;lssed, however, as an implicit function, and section,such as A, N, etc.
a direct solution is mathematically complic!l.ted, A practical solution of the problem
i~ to assume different values of ii, substitute 11 in Eq. (6-36) and solve for Q, and then When any four of the above six variab'lesare given, the remaining two
substitute lIll.!ld Q in Eq. (6-34). anti solve for So. Following this procedure, the rel!l.- unknowns can be determined by the two equations. The following are
tion between Q and S< was compute.d ..nd plotted as shown ilt Fig, 6-8. The plotted. some types of problems of uniform-ftow computa~ioll:
A. To compute the normal discharge. Inpractical applieD.tlons, this
comput.ation is required.for the determination of the capacity of a given
channel or for the construction of a synthetic rating curve of the channel.
B. To: determine the velocity of. flow. This computation has many
appli.cations. For example, .itis often required for the study of scouring
and silting effects in a given channel.
C. To compute the normal depth. This computation is required for
Supercrltlcal the determination of the of flow in a given channel.
flow D. To determine t.he channel roughness. This computation is used
to ascerta.in the roughness coefficient in a given channel; the .coefficient
thus determined may be used in other similar channels.
E. Ta compute the channel slope. This computation is required for
adjusting the slope 0(0, given channel.
2. :3 4 5 6 7 F. To determine the dimensions of the channel section. This com-
Slope in 10-3 Slape In 10- 3 putation is required mainly for design purposes .
(al . (b)
Table 6-2 lists the known and unknown variables involved in each of the
F!G~ t>-8. Curves of critica.! slope vs. discharge. six types of problems mentioned above. The kllown variables are indi-
cated by a check mark (v') and the unknowns required in the problem
curve MLN indicates a minimum value·of S, O.004Il.t L, which IS the required Iimii by a question mark (?). The unknmm.val'iables that can be determined
slope. ' , . : ' . from .the known variables are indicated by a dash The last
Assumil1g that the maximum expected depth of flow in the ch$.IlneLis 5 ft, a dlS-
cha.rge cUl:veOM (Fig. can be cOIl1itrueted according to Eq. (6-9). It becomes TABLE t>-2. SOME TYPES OF PROBLEMS OF UNn'ORM-FLOW COMPUTATiON
evident tha.t within the sha.ded area. betweEn the curves OM and MLN, a.ll expected
flows wHi b~ subcritical. On the right side of the Cllrves, the flows will be, super- I
critical. Since t1:,e point L is below the cUr'le 'OM, the limit slope is possible in the Geo-
Type of Dis- VeIoe- De th Rough-
p Slope metric
exj:lected flLnge of flow. . . prob- cha.rge ity ness . Exa.mple
. Similll.dy, the maximum expected depth of flow is !\.Ssumed to be 1.5 ft, and the 11 S ele-
lem Q V n ments
curves ar~shown in Fig. 6-8b. In this case, the point L is above the Cl.lCVe·01l1; there-. :
fore, the limit slope cannot be expected to occur in the realm under cQnsideratioll.
A ? - v v v I v Prob. 5-5, (Ex, 5-0
6-8. Problems of Uniform-flolw COII}putation. The computation of B - ,
? v v v v Prob. 5-5, (Ex. 5-1-)
uniform flow may be performed: by the use of two equations; the· con- c v - 1 v v v Example 6-2
D v v ? v 'I. Prob.5-6
tinuity i equation and a unifodn-flow. formula. When :the Manning E v' .- v v ? , v Example 6-4a
formulli. is used as the uniform-fl6w formula, the computati/;m will involve F v .- v v v; ? Example 7-2
the following six variables:' ."
145 UNIFORM FLOW
column of the tabie shows the example given in this book for each type
of problem. The examples shown. in parentheses are solved by the. use
of the Chl:z;y formula. It should be noted, however, that Table 0-2
does not include all types of problems. By varying combinations of
various known and unknown variables, more types of problems can be
formed. In design problems, the use of the best hydraulic· section and
of empirica.l rules is generally introduced (Art. 7-7) and thUl'J new types
of problems are created .
. 6l.9. Computation of Flood Discharge. In uniform-flow computation
it is understood, theoretically, that the energy slope Sf in the uniform-flow
formula is equal to the slope of the longitudinal water-surface profile and
also to the slope of the channel bottom (Art. 5-1). In natural streams,
however, these three slopes are only approximateiy equal. Owing to
inegular channel conditions, the energy line, wB,tel' surfa.ee, and channel
bottom cannot be strictly parallel to one another. If ·1;he change in
velocity within the channel reach is not appredable, the energy· slope
may be taken roughly equal to the bottom 01' t.he surfs.ce slope. On the
other hand, if the velocity varies appreciably from one end of the reach.
to the other, the ·energy slope should be taken as the difference between
the total heads nt the ends of the reach divided by the length of the
reach. Since the total head includes the velocity head, which is unknown,
a solution by successive approximation is necessary in the discharge
computa~ion.· . The corresponding 'discharge may, therefore, be computed by Eq. (6-3),
During flood stages, the velocity var~eS greatly,. and the velocity head
should be included in the total head for defining the energy slope. Fur-
thermore, flood flow is in fact varied and unstean'y, and use of a uniform-
flow formula for discharge computation is acceptable only when the
changes in flood stage and dischurge are relatively gradual.
The direct use of a uniform-fl.ow formula for the determination of flood
discharges is known as the slope-aJ'ea method. The flood discharge may
also be determined by another well-kno".,n method called the contracted-
opening method, in which the principle of energy is applied directly to a
contracted opening in the stream. Both methods l require information
about the high water marks that are detectable in the flomded reach.
Good locations for coll~cting such information may be found not only
on main streams but also on smaller tributaries; but they ml.\st be either
comparDtjvely regular valley channels free from bends and thus well
suited to the slope-area method or else contrll-cted openings wiyh sufficient
constriction to produce definite indrease in head and velocity and thus
suited t.o the contracted-opening method.
The foilowingis a description of the slope-area method. 2 The con-
I For a comprehensive description of the metholis, see [21]. : !
~ It shoul.d be noted tha.t the slope-area method actually deals with gradually var.ied
COMPUTATION OF UNIFORM :now 147
·l
tracted-opening method is related to rapidly varied flow and, therefore,
will be descri I:>ed later, in Art. 17-6. .
The Slope·-area Method. The following inform:ttion is necessary for the
slope-area methqd: the determination of the energy slope in the channel
reach; the measurement of the a vel'age cross-sectional area, and the le.ngth
of the reach; and the est.imation of the roughness coefficient applicable
to the channel reach, so that frictional losses can be calcu!il.ted. When
i
this information is obtained, the discharge can be computed by a uniform-
flow formula, such as l'vIa.nlling's. The procedure of computation is as
follows:
1. From the known values of A, R, and n, compute the conveyances
Ie, andKd,respeetively, of the Epstl'eam and dO\\'llstrealll sec~ion8 of the
reach.
2. Compute the average conveyance K of the reach as the geometric
mean of 1(u and F:.o,' or
(6-37)
3. Assuming zero velocity head, the energy slope is equal to the fall F
of water surface in the reach divided by the length L of the reach, or
F'
S =£ (6-38)
or
Q= K vB.
(6-3)
which gives the first approximation of the discluirge.
4. Assuming ~he disclul.rge p.qltal to thefil'st approximation, compute
the velocity heads at the upstream [1,nd downstream sections, or au V,,2j2g
and ad V d Z j2g. The energy slope is, therefore, equal to
s=!!:!.
L (6-39)
where
(6-40)
and kis a factor.' When the reach is (;ontracting (Vu < V d ), k = 1.0.
• When the reach is expanding (V" > V.), k = 0.5. The 50% decreru;e
in the value of Ie for an expanding reach is customarily assumed for the
recovery of the velocity head due to the expansion of the flow. The
corresponding discharge is then computed byEq, (6-3) u.'ling the revised
i
j
I flow, but it is believed that at this stage of reading the rcad~r should be able to follow
I the procedure.described here. This method shows how the uniform-flow formula can
be applied to gradually vllded flow and thus paves the way for a more cOinprehensive
I treatment on the subject of gradually varied flow in Part Ill.
i
J1,
 , ,
.~

148 UNIFORM FLOW COMPU'l'ATlON OF UNIFORlI'I FLOW 149

slope obtained by Eq. (6-39). This gives the secolid approximation of surface flo~ occurs mostly as a result of natural runoff, and is called oo'er-
the discharge. land flow.
5. Repeat step 4 for ~he third and fourth approximatiOJls, and so on Uniform flow may be turbulent or laminar, depending upon such factors
until the assumed and computed discharges agree. 11..'> discharge, slope, viscosity, and degree of surface roughness. If
6. Average t.he discharges computed for several reaches, weighting velocities and depths of flow are relatively small, the viscosity becomes a
them equally or as circumstances indicaie. domina.tiQg factor and the flow is laminar. In this case the Newton's
Example 6-6. Compute the flood discharge through a riv.er reich of 500 it ha.ving·
lD.w of viscosity applies. This law expresses the ~~at~.9l1_p~tween the
known values of the ws.t"r areas, conveyances, and energy e,oelficient8 of the upstream
and downstream end sections. The fall of water surface in the reach was found to be
.J,~,~Ofti~T!~
V?",,-~
~V~~~,~"
~ ..... 1,;:\.~j··
0.50 ft. ~" 'r- . ~,' '\\
Solution. ';rI.e. wl).ter areas, conveyances, and energy coefficients for the two elld .~ f' "'"(i"', r .' 1 ' . . •• . , .~~
w(Y"l~'Y)S ( _ • 'flop'li' 't~o .... \ ..,
sections of the' reach are: " Ii! . t~F"'~~101l ~ ;.:.; fr.
.( . _,(. J,;.iii:.
," Au = 11,070 K, = 3.034 X 10 6 au = 1:13"
i n7 .... , ~, ) ' ..,~
.' . ··'·1:':··~7
Ad = 10,990 K. = 3.103 X 10 6 O'd = 1.177 ,/ ,., AifC
~~1:;;t·
The a.verage K = Y3.034 X 10' X 3.103 X 10' = 3.070 X 10'.
FOI' the first approximl,tion, assume h, = 0.50 ft. Then S = 0.50/E,00 = 0.0010,
v'S = 0.0310, and Q = K VB = 3.070 X 10' X 0,0316 = 97,000 ds.
For the second approximation, assume Q = 97,000 cfs. Then the velocity heads at
the t\~O end sections are: .
V,,·._ 1'13 A (97,000/11,070)" = 1.354
«. 2(/ - ."" 2(/
V d ' _ 1177 (97,000/10,990): = 1,42,1 FHl. fr9. Uniform laminar open-channel flow.
ad 2g - . 29'
-0.070 .
dynamic viscm:ity i" and the shear stress r at a dist.ance y from the
Since l'u is less than V d, the flo," is contracting, and k = 1.0. Hence, h, = 0.500 -
bOlmdary surface (Fig. 6-9)" as follows:
0.070 = 0.430, S = 0.430/500 = 0.00086, "IS = 0.0~93, and Q = 3.070 X 10' X
0.0293 = 90,000 ds. du
Similarly, other approximations are made, as shown in Table 6-3. The estimated r = I> dy (6-41)
discharge is found to bl! 91,000 cfs.
For uniform laminar flow, the component of the gravitational force
TABLE 6-3. COMPUTATION OF F1.OOD DISCHARGE BY THE SLOPE-AREA METHOD
FOP. EXAMPLE 6-6 parallel to the flow in any laminar layer is balanced by the frictional
force. In other words, thc shear stress T per unit arel;\ of the flow along
Appr.oxi- IAs~umed Flo. ~ a~ ~l h, I S v'S 1Computed
'the laminar layer PP (Fig. 6-9) is equal to the effective component of the
matlon Q I 2g 2U Q gravitational force, that is, r = tV(Ym - y),c;. Since the unit weight
tV = pg and 1>/ P = v (Art. 1-3), T = gl>(Ym - y)S/v.

I
-~----I-!----- ,.,j
Thus, from Eq.
1st 0.500 . . . . . . , .. \°.50° °.0010000.0316 97,000 (6-41),
2d 97,000 0.500 1.354 1.424 0.430 1 0.000860 0.0293 90,000
3d 90,000 10.500 1.165 1.~25I0.44010.0d0880 0.0297 .91,200
dv = g8 (Ym - y) dy
. J'
4th 91,200 10.500 1.H.l5 1.258 0,437i 0.000874 0.0296\ 91,000
5th 91,000 1 0 . 500 1.190 11.253 1°.437\ 0.000874) 0.0296 91,000 Integrating and noting that v = 0 w;hen Y = 0,

6-10. Uniform Surface Flow. When water flows across a broad sur-
face, so-called S1J.1"!ace flow is produced. The depth of the flow may be so
v = g8 (YYm _
)I • .
t)
2
(8-42)

thin in comparison with the width of flow that the flow becomes a wide-' This is a quadratic equation indicating that' the velocity of uniform,
open-channel flow, known specifically as sheet flow. In a drainage basin ·laminar flow in a wide open channel has a parabolic distribution. Inte-
150 UNIFORM FLOW COMPUTATION OF UNIFORM FLOW 151
grate Eq. (6-42) from Y = O. to Y = Ym and divide the result by Yrn; the PROBLEMS
average velocity is
6-1. Detern:ine the normal discharges in channels ha.ving the following sections for
V = -1 10 °' vdy
11
(6-43) 'y = 6 ft, n = 0.015, and S = 0.0020: .
Y•• 0
a. A rectangular section 20 ft wide
and the di:;;charge per unit width is b. A triangular section with a. bottom angle equal to GO"
c. A trapezoidal sectiC'u with a bottom width of 20 It and side slopes of 1 on 2
(6-44) d. A cil'cular section 15 ft in diameter .
e. A parabolic section having a width of 16 ft at the depth of 4 ft .
where CL = gSj3v, a coefficient involving slope and viscosity.
Uniform surface flow becomes turbulent if the surface is rough and if 6-2. Prove the following equ1Ltion for the dischuge ina. tl'iangular highway gutter
(Fig. 6-10) having one side vertical, one 3ide sloped at 1 pn z'. MallTlilig's n, depth of
the depth of ftmv is sufficiently large to produce persisting' eddies. In
this case the sui'face roughness is a dominating factor, and the velocity
can readily be expressed by the Manning formula. Thus, the discharge
I
per unit width is
(6-45)
I
I
where y", is the average depth of flow and where CT = 1.49So·~/n, a \
coefficient involving slope and roughness,
The change of state of sheet flow from laminar to turbulent hn.s been
studied by ffi8.ny hydraulicians. The transitional region was found FIG. 6-10. A highway gut:ter section.
variously at R = 310 by JeffreY<i [22], from R = 300 to 330 by Hopf [23},
and from R = 548 to 773 by Horton [24J. However, Horton believed flow y, and longitudinal slope S:
that the Reynolds criterion is not satisfn.ctory for sheet flow over relatively
(G-48)
rough surfaces. He reasoned that, at the transition point, the velocities
for laminar and turbulent· flow are nearly equn.l, because this condition of where
equal velocities represents the minimum amount of energy capable of
. maintaining turbulent £low.. Thus, the flow cannot be turbulent if the . 6~3. Compute the discharge in the triangular highway gutte!' described in the pre-
velocity is less than cedmg problem when z = 24, n = 0.017, Y = 0.22.ft, and S = 0.03.
6-~. U~ing the Manning formula, determine the hydmulic exponent N for the [01-
(6-46)
lowing channel sections: Ca) a very narl'OW rectan(!;ls, Cb) a very wide rectangle, (c) a
Y~ry wide panbola for which the wetted perimeter i~ practically equal to the top

where Y", is the avewge depth of flow. Width, and (d) an equilateral triangle with a vertex at the bottom. .
6-5. UBing the Ch6zy formula,' ~how that the general equation for the hydmulic
As the natural ground surface is rarely even and uniform in slope, over-
exponent N is .
land flow is apt to cha!lgefrom lamim\'r to turbulent, and vice versa, within
a short di.'lta.rice. Consequently, the flow is mixed between the laminar N = 1:..
A
(3 T _ U dP)
dy
(/H9) .
and turbulent. For very rough surfaces or areas densely covered with
vegetation, the flow ill general is highly turbulent. Experiments have
indica.ted tha.t the discharge of overland flow per unit width of flow varies
6-6. Solve Prob. G-4 if the determination of the hydl'!l.)llic exponent is based on the
Chezy formula. Compare the results with those obtained in Frob. 614. 1,
with the aver~ge depth o~ flow as follows: I The G. K. formula shows that Chezy's C is a f~nction of the hydrauiic radius and

'where C is a coefficient a~d where the exponent
highly turbulent. flow and 3.0 for mixed flow.
hence of the depth ii. Thus, the Chezy formula has hot been found very convenient (
(6-47) for determination of the N value. Forcanal~ in earth and gravelly soil the N value
is generally found to havBan increase of 0.30 to 0.50 due to the v!l.ri!l.ti~n in Chezy's -\
:j: varies between 1.0 for C with respect to the depth. Thi~ i~crease, however, brings the N valuc closlJr to
. that bMcd on the Manl1ing formula.

:r ." ..... -, ,,-'~

 ;;1
'152 . UNIFORM FLOW C01-IPUTATION OF UNIFORM FLOW
r
6-7. Compute the l)ydraulic exponent N of the trapezoidal channel section (Fig.
2-2) having a normaldep.h of 6 ft, using (al Eq.(6-15), (b) Fig. 6-2, and (el the
II Q.. The cross sect·ion of the stream at 11 typical upstrel1m station in the uniform
Tea<:h is given hy the following cQordinates:
graphical method based on Eq. (6-16). i
6-11. Compute the hydraulic exponent N of a 36-in. circular conduit having a n~r­ I StrLUr:f(1. Elev. m.s.!. Sta/·ian Elev. m.s.l.
mal depth of 24 in. above the·invert, usi,ng (al Fig. B-2 and (b) the graphical method l Left b8lnk: 0+ 00 590.0 6. + 00 543.7
based on. Eq. (6-16). '
1+ 00 580.7 8 + 00 540.0
6-9. Using the Manning formula, show that the depths for a maXimum discharge 578.2 572.2
1+ 50 10 + 00
and velocity in a aircular conduit are, respectively, 0.938d. and O.Sld..· .
3+00 582.0 11 + 00 573.2
6-10_ On the basis of the Chezy formula, determine the respective depths for maxi- 4 +00 581.0 12 + 00 568.5
mum discharge and maximum velocity in a circular conduit. .
5 + 00 580.0 14 + 00 590.0
6-1~_ A~ what depths will the maximl.lin discharge and velocity occur in a square
cOlldUlt laId flat on one side? . '
b. The value of n for the main channel is estimated as 0.035, for the side channels
. 6-12. Prepare the curves of dis~harge: andveloeity variations with respect to the
0.050..
1l.S
depth in ll. square conduit laid on one side.
e. The nl1~ural slope of the stream is about 1 it/mile.
6-1S. A channel is assumed to have a constant hydraulic radius R for any dep'th of Construct a synthetilJ re..ting curve. It is suggested that th", wl1ter areas of the '.
flow. .Prove that the CrOss section of this channel can be defined by main channel and the side channels be seplJ.l·ated by the extended sides of the main
ch~.nnBl.
y = R[ln (x + vx' - R') - In R] (6-50) 6-18. Compute the discharge in I1n overfliJ~ved highway gutter (Fig. 5-10) having Il.
depth of flow of 3 in. and a longitudinRl slope of 0.03. The gutter is made of con-
where x = R when y = o. Draw the sketch of this section and discuss its properties. prete \vith n = 0.017 and has a t~iangular section with a vertical curb side, a sloped
(~IN;~: Frrm~ the giv~n condition, R = A(P =dA/dP "'" "dY/Vd:!"' + dy'. Solve side of z = 12, and a top width of T = 2 ft. The overflowed soil-aggregate pD.ve-
thIS mfferentlill equatlOn, and evaluate the mtegration constant by the condition that ment has a crosg slope of z. = 24 and n, = 0.020.
x = R when 11 = O. MathematicallY, the section is formed by two catenaries as 6-19~ For all equal amount of discharge, an ice-covered .channel should have
sides. For practical purposes, an. artificial bottom should he provided ~iilce the .theo- greater depth of fl(HV than an uncovered channel, lor two reasons: (1) thc wetted
~eti.cal section is bottomless. A.uniform-flow fOl'mulfl, such as the Manning formula, perimeter is greater in an ice-covered channel and thus results in greater resistance or
lIlfiIcates that the hydrfLlrlic radius is the sole shape parameter for the velocity. The less velocity. and (2) the thickness of the ice cover is greater than a depth of wa~er oi
adequacy of this indication can bo verified experimentally hy testin'l' a channel built equal weight, since the spGCific gra\'ity Qf i~e is about 0.917. Sbow that the increase
of tha section oi constant hydraulic radius. If the indication is tru:, then, once this . in depth due to resistanee in' an iue-covered wide open channel may be expressed by
cl~annel is designed for a safe velocity; it should I;>e nonscouring and nonsiit,ing bver a
WIde mnge of stages. In .earthen canals, however, the large variation in water sur-
face during the change of stage wouldetode the sides very easily.) . .
. I:>y = [1.31! (nn.)% - 1 ] Y (6-51 )
6-14. Verify Eqs. (6-17)to (8-19).
6~16. A rectangular testing channel is 2 ft, wid'e and laid on a slope of 0.1035%. where n, is the roughness coefficient of the channel with' ice cover. n is the roughness
When the channel bed and walls were made smooth· by neat cement, the measured coeflicient of the channel without ice cover, and y is the depth of flow in the channel
normal depth of flow was 1.36 ft fOT a discharge of 8.9 cfs. The same' channel was carrying the same discharge but without ice cover. .
then roughened by cemented sand grains, and thus the measured norrne,! depth became 6-20: Compute the conveyauce and velocity-distribution coefficients of a channel
1.31 ft for a discharge of 5.2 cfs. ser.tion 500 ft downstream f!"om the section described in Example !l-l. The survey
a. Determine tile discharge for a normal d~pth of 1.31 it if the bed were roughened data at the secti.on 'fol' the same flood are:
and the walls were kept smooth. , . ' .
b. Detel'mine the discharge for a normal depth of 1.31 it if the walIs were rOl.]ghened
and the bed were smooth. _ .' Subsection A., ft' P, ft n (3
c. The discll!ir~es for the conditions described-in a and b were actually measured and ----------- '"
found to be' G.50 'and 6.20 cis, respectively'. Determine the corresponding n; values, Main section ........ 5,320 205 0.035 1.12 1.05
and compare these values with those computed by Eqs. (6-17) to (6-19). ' . Side section .... 5,670 408, 0.040 1.10 1.0-1
6-16. A chann~l consists of a main section and two side section.s (Fig. 6-6) .. Com-
"':1
pute the total disbhfLrge, assuming that the main section and the two side sections are
separated Ca) by vertical division lines and (bl by extended sides of the main channel 6-21. Solve Example 6-2 by the G. K Form.ula,
Given: n· = 0.025 for the main channel. n = O.OBOfor the side channels, andS i= 0.001: 6-22. A rectangular channel with 20 ft width, S = 0.006, and n = 0.015, carries a
6-17. The hydrographic survey of a stream jndicates tha.t the hydraulic p¥operties discharge of 200 cfs. Compute the normal depth and velocity.
of the stream llre relatively unifOl'm for a length of over 2' miles. The data 0btained 6-23. Using the l\'Ianning formula, determine the norm!,1 depths in channels having
by the survey" are: ' the following sections when Q = 100 cfs, n = 0.015, and ,8 =' 0.0020:
 UNIFOll.iVI FL01-V
COMPUTA'l'lON OF UNIFOR1I1 FLOW 155
a. A rectangular section 20 H wide
D, A tril1ngulltr section with the bottom angle equal to 60~ REFERENCES
c, A ~rapezoidal section "'ith a bottom width of 20 ft and side slopes of 1 on Z
d, A circuliI' ~cction 15 H in diameter 1. Yen Te Chow: Integrating the eqltation of gradually varied flol\', paper 838,
e. A parabolic section having a wicl'th of 16 ft at the depth of 4 ft ProceediniJs, American ,"!ocietl! of Civii Engineers, voL 81, pp. 1-32, November, .
1955.
6-24. Solve Example 6-2hy the gr'aphkal method. 2. R. R. Chugaev: NekotorY(l voprosy neravnomemogo dvizheniia vody v otkrytykh
6-26. A re.ct'o.ngular channel 20 it wide has a. l'oughnells coefficient n = 0.015. prizmaticheskikh ruslakh (Abollt some questions concerning nonuniform flow of
a. Determine the normal slope at a normal "depth of 1.23 i~ when the discharge is w!).ter in open channels), /zv6stiia. l'Besoiuznogo Nauchno-Issierlov(Ltel'skoIlO [nstitllta. I·
200 cfs. . aidrotekhniki (Tri.lnsa:clioM, AU-Union Scientific Re6eard~ institl,/e of Hydraulic i
D. Determine the critical slope o.lIa the corresponding nonna.l depth ",hen the dis- Enyincerinp), L~ningl'!ld,·vol. 1, pp. 157-227, 1931.
charge is 200 cis. 3. Phillip Z. Kirpich: Dimeru;ionless cons~ants for hydr>l.ulic element·s of opell- I
c. Determine' the critic!,l slope at tbe normal depth of 1.23 ft, and 'lr>mpute the cha.nnel cro~s-sections, Civil Engineering, vol. 18, no, 10, p. 47, October, 1948. .
corresponding disch'al'ge. 4. N. N. PavlovskiI: "Gidra.vlicheskii Spravochnik" ("Handbook of Hydmulics"),
6-26. Show that the critic!!.l slope at n given norma.l depth !i4 may be expressed by Onti, Leningra.d and Moscow, 1937, p. 515.
5. A. N. Rakhmanoff: 0 post.roenii krivykh svobodnolpoverlthnosti V. prir-mat-
(6-52) icheskikh i tsilindriche.~kikh ruslakh pri usta.novivshemsia dyil!henii (On the con-
struction of curves 01 free surfaces in prismatic nnd cylindrical channels with
a.nd that thi~ slope for a wide cluumel is established flow), hvestiia V sesoiuznoyo Naudmo-Is:sledouaf.eI'.kO'lo bl.lititula
Gidrotekhllim (1'ranS(lctions, All-Union Scienli.fi.c ResC(Lrcfl InstituteDf Hydraulic
S = 14.5n> Engineering), Leningrad, vol. 3, pp. 75-114, 1ll31.
crt. lIH (6-53)
6. Robert E. Horton; Separate roughness coefficients for channel bottom and sides,
·6-27. Deterrnhie the limit slope of the channel described in Exa.mple 6-4, Jj7'dl""'.""di News-ltccord, vol. 111, no. 22, pp. 052-653, Nov. 30, 1933.
6-28. Construct the critical-slope curves of the cha.nnel described in Exampie 6-5 7, H. A. Einstein; Del' hydraulische odsr ProJil-Radius (The hydraulic (11' cross sec-
tion radius), Sch",ei$~rische Ba.uzeilv,1!g, ZUrich, vo!' 103, no. 8, pp. 89-91, Feb. 24,
for bottom widths b == 1 ft, 4 It, 2() ft, and "'.
6-29. Determine the criti·cal-slope. curvl',s oi the channel desi::ibed in Example 6-4 1934.
8. Ahmed M, Yassin: Mean roughness coefficient in open cho.nnels with different,
for side slopes z €I, 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, 5, and "'.
6-30. A cha.nnel reac)11,OOO ft loug h<L~ a fall of 0.35 ft in wa~er surfa.ce during It roughness of bed and side walls, Eid(jelll!,~.rische technische H oCMchllle Ziirich,
Mitieilungen ruts der Vcnu.chsa.nst(lltflIT Tfr(lsse!'oau una Erd:bau, No. 27, Verlag
flood. Compute ~he flood discharge through this reach, using the following data:
Leemann J ZUrich, 1954.
9. N.N . .Pavlovskii: K voprOStl 0 raschetnoI formule dlia ravnomernogo dvizheniia
Subsection A, ft' 11. Of ~ y yociotoka.hk s llcodnorodllymi stenkami (On a design formula. for uniform move·
men~ in channels with nonhomogeneous walls), Izul1s€iia VsesoiUZllogo Nau.cir.lIo-
Upstream: I 8sledovatel' skolJo Instiluta. Gidratekhnikt (T"(LMrtClions, ,111- Unio;~ Scienlifu;
Main channel. , . .......
~ ~ 4,250 0.038 1.10 1.0'1 Resear~h Inslill1le of Hyd1"altiic Erl9ineeril~g), Leningrad, vol. 3, pp. 157-164, 1931.
Side channel .... .. , ....... . 25,620 2,050 0.038 1.20 L08 10. L. MUhlhofer: Rauhigiteitsuntersuclmngen in einem Stollen mit betonierter Soble
Downstream: und unveddeidete~ Wand en (R(Jughne5S investigations in a shaft with concrete
channel ... , . ...... .. 5,760 320 0.042 1.10 1 ..04 bOUom and unlined wo.lis), Wass8rlcra!t u.na Wasserwir/,sdtafl, Munich, vol. 28,
Side channeL. ....... ... 25,610 l,gOo 0.038 1.18 1.06 no. 8, pp. 85-83, 1933. .
i ll. H. A. Einstein and R. B. Banks: Fluid resistance of composite roughness, Trans- .

6-:11. Prove Eq. (6-46), I,. actions, Am.erican Geophysical Union, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 603-6jO, August, 1950,
12. G. l{. Lott.er: SOQbrazheniia k gidravlicheokomu raschetu cusel s l'!>tlichnoI
6-32. Using Eqs. (1-5) and (6-43), determine the value of ]( in Eq. (1-8}. i
sherokhovatosliiu stenoI!: (Collsidera.tionson hydraulic design of channels wi~h
6-33. Compu~e the discharges ·per unit width of a ghect flow on a. surflLc€ with
0.01 and AS = 0.035 when the depth of flow is (a) 0.01 ft and (b) 0.004 ft. The
I different roughness of \ir8.1I8), /zu.estiia. V~e~oiu2nogo Nauchno-!ssledvvateJ,'skof/Q
11 !I Instiluta. ·Gid1'otekhniki (Transa.ctiqna, .till-Union Sde1\tijic Reseprch In.stilutc of
temperature of water is 6soF. . .' Hyd~at;lic En(Jineering), Leningrad, voL 9, pp. 238-241, 1933. .
6-34. Compare Horton's criteria. for sheet flow in Prob. 6-33 with those shOW\l by 13. G. It Lotter: Vliianie uslovii ledoobrazovaniia. i tolshchinY l'da naraschct deriva-
. ~he cha'tt of Fig. 1-3. " .... . tsionnykh ka.nruov (Influence of condi~ions of ice formation and thickness on the
6-35. Show that the velocity-distribution coeffici(mts for la.minar uniform flow in design of derivation ca-nlLls), IZTleiltiia. Vsesoiu.znogo Nav.chno-I:ssled()va.t~l'slco(jo.
wide open channels are a "" 1,.54 and ~ 1.20. .
6-36. Using the Blasius equation (1-6) for turbulent flow in open cha.nnels,
Ins/itu/a Gidrolekhltiki (Tra.nsactions, All-Union Scimtiji.c ReseO;rch 17Ultitute of
H1!d~G7j.lic Engineering), Leningrad, vol. 7, pp. 5&-80, 1932.
i
;ahow that the cOI'nsponding exponent, in Eq. (6-47) is:c = 1 77. 14. G. Ie LoLter; Metod akademilca N. N. Pavlovskogo dUo. ojJcedeleniia koeflitsienta
I
I"
.

"> ,,/.-:'
.'!
156 . UNIFORM FLOW
sherokhovl1tostl rusel·, pokrytyl,h I'dam (Method by Academy Member N. N.
Pavlovskil for der.crmination Df roughness coefficients of ice-{lovered channels),
I TllVest{ia V seso;wm<Jljo N auchno,J ssledava te/' skOlia I nstitttUJ. Gidr612khniki (T1'Q.ns-
actiO'flS, All-Union Scientific Research Institute of Hyd1'auiic E1I{)ineering), Lenin.-
gro.d, no. 29, I94L
15. P. N. Belokon: "Inzhenernaia gidravlika patoka pod i<;dia.nym pokrovom /I
("Engineering Hydraulics of a Current under Ice Cover "), Gosenergoizdat,
Moscow IlIld Leningrad, 1940.
IG. ·Horace William King, "Manning Formula Tables," vol. II, "Flow in Open
Channels," McGraw-Hill Book Compa!lY, Inc., New York, 1039.
17. "Hydraulic and Excavo.tion Tables," U.S. Burea.u of R.eclam:l.tiou, 10th s.d., 1950.
18. "Hydraulic Tables," U.S. Corps of Engineers, U.S. Government Printing Offiee,
Washington, D.C., 2d ed., 1944•.
19. Horaoe William King: .. Handbook of Hydraulics," 4th ed., revised by Ernest F,
Bra.ter, McGra.w-HiII Book Company, Inc., New York,.1954, sec, 7, table \lD.
20. P. A. Arghyropoulos: "Ce]cu\ de I'ecoulement en conduites sous pression ou a
sUl'fll.ce libre, d'upres Ill. fOl'mule de Manning-Strickler" ("Computation of Flow
in Conduits under Pressure or with Free Surface, Usiug Ml:lIlning-Strickler For-
mula"), Dunod, Paris, HISS.
21. IViLn E. HOllk: Calculation of flow in open channels, Miami Conserl.'ancy Districl,
Technical Report, Pt. I.V, Do.yton, Ohio, H118.
22. H. Jeffreys: Flow of water in an inclined channel of rectangular section, London,
Edinburgh and D"blin PIIi!osophical Magazine and Jou.rnal of Science, vol. 49, no.
. 293, pp. 793-807, May, 1925,
23. L. Hopf: Turbnlen:1; bei einem Flusse (Turbulence in a flow), Annalen der Physik.,
Halle aml Leipzig, vo!. 32, sec. 4, pp. 777-808, April-July, 1925.
24. Robert E. Hortun, H. R. Leach, a.nd R. Van Vliet: Laminar sheet ftow, TTans-
actions, A:merican GeophysicaJ Union, vol. 15, pt. 2, pp, 393-404, 1934.
CHAPTER 7
DESIGN OF CHANNELS FOR UNIFORM FLOW
Channels to be discussed in this chapter include nonerodible channels
erodible chann.els, and grassed channels. For erodible channels, the dis-
cussion will be limited mostly to those· which scour but do not silt (see
Preface).
A. NONERODIBLE CHANNELS
' 7-1. The Nonerodible Channel.' Most Hned channels a!ldbuilt-up
channels can withstand eroslonsatisfactorily and are therefore· considered
nonerodibZe. Unlined channels are generally erodible, except those exca-
vated in firm foundations, such as rock .bed. . In designing nonerodihle
channels, such' factors f:t:;, the maximum permissible velocity (Art. 7-9)
and the permissible tractive force (Art. 7-13) are not the criteria to be
considered, The designer simply computes t.hedimensions of the channel
by a uniform-flow formula and then decides the final dimensions on the
basis of hydraulic efficiency, or empirical rule of best pi'actica-
bility, and economy [1,21. The factors .to be considered in the design
are: the: kind of mat.erial forming the channel body,which determines
the roughness coefficient; the minimum permissible velocity, to avoid
deposition if the water carries silt or debris; the channel bottom slope
and side slopes; the freeboard i and the most efficient section, either
. hydraulically or empil'ically determined.
7-2. Nonerodible Material and Lining. l The nonel'odible materials
used to form the lining.of a channel and the body of a built-up channel
include concrete, stone masonry, steel, cast iron, timber, glass, plastic,
etc. The selection of the material depends mainly on the availability
and cost of thf; material, the method of construction, and the purpose for
which the channel is to be used.
The purpose of lining a channel is in most cases to prevent erosion, but
oacasionally it may be' to check seepage losses. In lined channels, the
ma:r;imum permissible velocity, i.e" the maximum that will not cause
erosion, can be ignored; provided that the water does not catty sand,
gravel, or stones. If there are to be very high velocities over a lining,
however, it should be remembered that there is a tendency for the rapidly
1 For detailed information on channel lining, aee [3).
. 157
./
 '~.
UNIFOR\I1 FLOW"
158 DESIGN OF CHANNELS FOR UNIFORM FLOW
. water to pick up lining blocks and push them out .~~ ??SlulOn. 159
movmg .. h Id be designed against such POSSibilItIes. a.now the pradicable Use of just about any type of lining or lining tl'eat-
Accordingly,
h M' the, Immg SOli, 'bi e VelO~l'ty
urn PerrnlSSI ' - . The mim:mum pel'missible ment now or in tho future ant.icipatcd by the Blireau.
v~locit'lJ
.
7 -3, T e mlm "t'n is the lowest velocity that Will not" 7-6. Freeboard. The freeboard of a channel is the vertical distance
velocity, ?L' I'.he ~onS'O" ~d ~ duc~ the growth of aquatic plant and mo~s. fi'Oill the top of the channel to the water surface nt the design condition.
start sedlmentatlOn an IJ1 t ' . d its e"act value cannot be er.sIly This distance shouid be sufficient to prevent wnves or fluctuations in
1'1 . I ' ty is very uncer aJl1 :Ln l\. h'
liS ve. OCI
d For water carrymg ' ' no ISlt load , or for desiltecl flow,, t IS water surface from overflowing the sides. This ftwtor becomes imp or-
fdetermme .
t . h s little si"'nI'fi canee excep, t for .its effert - onplant growth.h Gen- 'h . tant particularly in~he design of elevated flumes, for the Rume substruc-
. ac IIOJ a kino'' .a mean l ' t ' f 2 t 'Hps may be used safely w en" ture may be endangered by any overflow.
t>
ve OCI y 0 0 • . 't ef
era y spea "". , t' the channel is small, and a mean veloci y 0 There is no universally accepted rule for the'determination of free-
percentage of sIlt preseDillln.
not less than 2.5 fps W pi even,.
t a growth of vegetation that would
' board, since wave action or wat~t-8urface fluctuation in a channel ma.y
bi;: created by many uncontrollable causes. Pronounced Waves and
sedously decrease ::allihe
th ,. i'lg capaCity of the channel.
longitudinal bottom Glope of cha.nnel is
,
a fiu.ctuatioll of water surface are generally expected in channels where the
7,.4. Channel Slop , ra hv and the energy head required for velocity is so 11igh and the slope so steep th~t the flow becomes very
generally governed by the topog , P', h slope may ,depend also on the unstable, or on curves where high velocity and large deflection angle
h f! f ater In many cases, t e . ,
t e . ow 0f the w channe
, 1 F'" 'or exanlple , channels' used for W:Lter-dlstrl- r may cause appreciable superelevuted water surface on the convex side of
' pur~ose o. ' b se used in irrigation, water supply, y :au I~
h d
" a curve, or in chnrmels where the velocity of flow appt'oaches the critical
butlOn plll poses, such as t o , . h' , level at the pomto! state at which the water may flow at alternate depths and thus jump from
. . , d h droDower proJects reqUIre a Ign .
delivery;~J.l1
mll1Jl1g, y . a smaL1 b-I'
therefore, '~d eSI'rable in order to keep the los3 III
ope I::> the low stage to I;hc high stage at the least obstruction. Other natural
causes such as wind movement und tidal adion may also induce high
elevation to a minimfum' h 1 deIJend mainly on the kind of materiaL, waves and Tequire special considemtion in design.
The side slopes 0 a e anne . h .
" 7-1 give:, a genera1 I.d ea o
Table f the slopes
. suitable for use Wit 'l'fLrJOUS
' Free boards va.rying from less than 5 % to grea,ter tha.n 30 % of the depth
of flow are commonly used in design. For smooth, il1terior, semicircular
TABLE 7-1. ' sLOPES
SUl'rABLE SID;;; FO R CHANNELS BUILT IN V,UllOU.S I{INDS metal flumes on tangents, carrying water at velocities not, greater than
OF MATElRIALS . 80 % of the criticnl velocity with a maximum of 8 fp.'l, experience has
. 111 aterial Side slope indicated that a freeboard of 6 %. of the flume diameter shouid be used,
Rock .... ,.,.. . .. , ........ ', ... , * • • • • • • • • •
~ w ••••• Nearly vertic al For flumes on curves with high velocity or deflections, wave Ilction will
Muck and .peaL soils . .. ", .. . .... : .'........ , ... ~ ........ . ~:i: 1 be produced; so freeboard must he increll.sed to prevent water from slop-
Stiff clay or earth with, concrete Immg ... , , . ' , .......... . H':1 to 1:1 ping over,
"
Etlft.h ,Vlth Btone I"Wing, or earth
. for large eila,nnels ....... .
Firm clay or earth for small ditches ........... , , .......•
1:1
1%:1
'an
Freeboll.rd in unlined cann.'l OJ' lateral will nornu;.lly be governed by
Loose sa.ndy earth. , ....... , ... , .... , .... , , .. , ... , : . , .• 2:1 ~. considerations of canal size and locatiOJ1, storm-water inflow, and water-
Sandy I06.m 'or porous clay .. , . : .. : ... , ...... , . , .. , .... , 3:1 table fluctuations eaWled by checks, wiud action, soH characteristics,
percolation gradients, operating road requirements, and availability of
. . erodible material, however, a more accurate excavated material. According to the U,S. Bureau of Reelamation [4J,
. m~LterJal.
kinds of , f th For h'd b e checked
lopes SOUl " [wainst
"0 the criterion of the approximate range of freeboard frequently used extends from 1 ft
determll1atwn 0. . e S l i t (Art 7-10) or by the principle of tractive for smalliateral"/ with shallow depl;hs to 4 it in canals of 3,000 cfs or more
maximum permli5s1bb~~e. °f:c~ors to' be considered in determining slopes capacity with reheively large \vater depths. The Bureau recommends
force (Art. 7-14). ,~1. ~dition of seepage loss, climatic change, that preliminary estimates of the freeboard required under ordinary
are method of constru<..; lon, COl . . 'd 1 hould be made as conditions be made according to the following formula:
. t Generally speakmgj SI e s opes s
channel Size, .e c. d h
Id·b designed for high hydraulic efficiency
steep as practICable a~ s ou 1 e th US Bureau of Reclamation [4]
and st:Lbility. For 11l1ed can~~, e'~'5'1 slope for the usual sizes (7-1)
has been considering standarfdlzhl~lg ~n a .. that it is sufficiently flat to.
of canals. One advantage a t IS S ope IS , I
I
1;,
where F is the freeboard in ft, y is the depth of water in the canal in ft,
and C is ll. coefficient varying from 1.5 for a canal capacity of 20 cfs to
2.5 for a canal capacity of 3,000 cfs or more~ This approximation is
.\

II
 160 UNIFORM FLOW
DESIGN OF CH .... NNELS FOR UNIFORM FLOW 161
based upon average Bureau practice; it will not, however, serve for all
conditions. . be noted that a best hydraulic section is the section that gives the mini-
For lined canals or h1.teralS, the height of lining abo"';'e the water surface mum area for a given discharge but not necessarily the minimum exca-
I
will depend upon a number of factors: size of canal, velocity of water, v!1tion. The section of minimum excavation 'occurs only if 'the water
I, curvature of alignment, condition of st0rm- and drain-water inflow, surface is at. the level of the bank tops. Where the water surface is
I below the bank tops, as frequently occurs, channels narrower than those
fluctuations in water level due to operation of flow-regulating structures, .
and wind action. In a somewhat similar mannel', the height of bank. of the best hydraulic section will give minimum excavation. If the'
above the water surfitce will vary with size and location of canal, type. water surface overtops the banks and these il.l'e even,with the ground
of soil, amount of intercepted storm or drai.n water, etc. As a guide for. level, wider channels will provide minimum excavation,
lined-canal design, the U.S. Bureau of Replaination [3] has prepared TABI,E 7-2. BEST HYDRAULIC SECTIONS.

curves (Fi~. 7-1) for average freeboard and bank heights in .relation to
capacit.ies. AArea Wetted /' Hydraulic' Top Hydrau- Section
Cross se<;tion
II_~__·. perimeter
P
radius
il, _ _
width
R-I_ _
lie depth
T_I_D~ _ _Z_ _
. factor

I' I
Tmpezoid, half I .: .
of a hexagon I
Rectangle, half
,13 yl: 2 .../3 11
I
%,y %' v3" 11 '%y %y'"
of a square
Triangle, half of
I
I
2y l ,II 4y ! ~YI 2YI Y 2:\1',6
I 2 V2 11
I "~YI "I ~' ~y"
a :;quare y' I

Semicircle .) ~Y' i
,
72YI Try
2111 4-y -4 y'"
P,arabola, " I
T=2V2y 1% V'2 )%'V2 y'
HYt Y
20YI %YI % y'3y u
Hydro~tatic
catenary ! r
1. 39.58Sy' 2, 9836y 0.46784y 1. 917532yIo, 72795y 1.19093y ' ·&

Capacity. cIs
.' The pri~ciple of the best hydraulic section applies only to the desig.n
FIG. 7-1. Retommended freeboard and lleight of bank of lined channels. (U.S: Bureau of nonerodlble channels. For erodible channels, the principle of tractive
of Reclamation.) force must be used to determine an efficient section (Art, 7-15). . •
7-6. The Best Hydraulic Section. It is knO\vn that the conveyance of Example 7-1. Show that the best hydraulic trapezoidal 8ecti~n is one-half of a
hexagon,
ar chn.nnel section increases with increase in the hydraulic radius or wit.h
.decreD,se in the wetted perimeter, ]'rom a hydr~ulic viewpoint, there- Solutio ll . Table 2-1 gives the water area. and wetted perimeter of a tl'apezoid as

fore, the channel section having the least wetted peri!lleter for a given A = (b + zy)y and P = b + 2 VI + .' y
area has the maximum conveyance; such a section is known as the best whe~e y is th~ depth, b is the bottom width, and .: 1 is the side slope,'
hydrauNc section, The s~micircle hrLs the least perimeter among all sec- .. Flrst, conslder A and z, to b,e constant. : Differentiating the above two equations
,tions with the same area; hence it is the most hydraulically efficient. of with respect to y and solvmg Simultaneously for dP Idy, . .
all sections, .
dP b
• The geometric elements of six .best hydraulic sections are listed in dy = 2( v'f+Zi - z)
y
iTable 7-2, but these seytions may not always qe practical owing to I

'difficulties in constructioJ;! and in use of material. : In general, a channel f For a minim~m wetted perimeter, dP Idy ~ 0, or
t
:section should be designed for the best hydraulic. efficiency but should be I b = 2Y(VI ,+ ZZ - 2)
: modifi~d for practicability. From a practical point of view, it should I Substitl!ting this equation for b/n the previ~us two equations for A ELnd Pand solving

1
 11
UNl.F'ORMFLD'W
DESIGN OF CHANNELS FOR UNIFORM FLOW 163
1,62 .
where x. is the width-depth .ratio b/y and z is the horizontal projectkm
simu1t,a.neDusiy for: P, of t~e SIde slope corresponding to 1 ft vertical. Similarly, engineers in
p =z
IndIa
. . have
[61 I uS,ed an enlpirical formula: V = VA I 13 '='
0577 V: r7A h'ch
z tha.t makes P th~ least.
of Diifer:entiating P with respect to .ti, 'IV 1
Now, find tile va.lue IS equlva ent to x = 3 - z for trapezoidal sections' alld Ph'II'lP' , .
z, equcting dP Ida to zero, and sol viug for z, . . f7] El' . . , pme el1gJ.-:
ne61S t use q. (,7-3) WIth z 1.5, or z ~ 2.5, far earth canals,
z = ~3 ~ ta.n30· 35

This means that the section is a half he"agon,

30
7 .7. Determination of Section Dimensions. The determin8,tion of
section dimensions for nonerodible ch:u1l1eis includes the followin.g steps:
'-
1. Collect all necessary information, estimate n, and select S. .= 25

2. Comput~ the sectioll factor ARH by Eq. (6-8), 01' '"<>.

~
..
AR'i=~
20
(6-8) '0
<:
1.49 vIS, "
3. Substitute in Eq. (6-8) the expressions for A B,ud R obtained from == 15
,,,!

Table 2-1, and solve for the depth. If there are oth('J' unknowns, such "E
as band z of a trapezoidal section, then assume the values for these 2
0
unknowns and solve Eq. (6-8) for the depth. By assuming several values OJ

of the unknowns, a number of coltlbinations of section dimensions can :>

be obtained. The finaldimellsions are'decided on the basis of hydraulic
efficiency and practicability. For lined canals, the trapezoidal section is
'Commonly a.dop~ed, and the p.S. Bureau of Reclamation [3J has developed
Q!
10 100 ZOO 300400 600 IPOQ '1,000 '!,pOD
experience curves (Fig. 7-2) showing the ayerage relation of bottom. capodry ill cis
widths and water depths to canal ca.pacities. These curves can be used FUIG ' 7B-2. Experience cur:re.sshowing bottom, width and depth of lined· channels
as a guide in selecting proper section dimensions. • ( .S . .ureau of RG~aJltatum,,) . '
The determination of the depth for the computed value of AR7~ can
be simplified by use of the design chart (Fig. 6-1). Some engineers 6. Check the minimum permissible velocity if the watel' carries silt.
prefer a. solution by trial and erro!", similar to Solution 2 for Example 0-2 7. Add a proper freeboard to the depth of the channel .section.
of Art. 6-6. . b :~ample 7-Jl. A trf,pez~idal channel carrying 400 ds is ,built with nonerodible
4. If the best hydn.ulic section is required directly, substitute in
e", Zlavm g aBslope of 0.0016 and n =- 0.025. Proportion the section dimensions
Eq. (6-8) the expressions for A and R obtained from Table 7-2 and ,,0 !!t,on. Y' Eq. (6-8), .
sol verOr the depth. This best hydraulic section may be modified for
AR~1 = _0: _ ~ '" 167.7
025
practicability. 1.19 VO,OOIS
5 .. For the design of irrigation channels; the channel section is some~
ex~~!~I~t~ting A, = (b + zy)y = + zV)y!CIJ + 2 Vi + z' y) ~ove
times proportioned by empirical rules such as the simple rule given by·the
early U.S. Reolamatiau Service [51 for the full supply depth of water in
a,nd R (t,

-::::---'-":......:..~~;.--'
y)%
== 167.7
.
in the
[
feet .. (7-2)
y= 0.5 -vA
where A is the water area in ft2. For a trapezoidal section it can be
Assuming b "'" 20 it and z = 2 and simplifying,
shown that this rule may alsabe expressed by a simple formula 7,680 + 1,720y = (y(1O + y)Ju
x= 4- 2 (7-3) Y,= 3.36 It
\
I
 164 UNIFORM FLOW
DESIGN OJ!' CHANNELS FOR UNIFORM FLOW 165
It should be noted that thia solution is exactly the same as the computation of of Reclamation and is tentatively recommended for design of erodible
the normal depth given in Solution 1 of Example 6-2. Accordingly, the solutions by
channels. It should be noted that either method at the present stage will
trial il.nd error and by the graphical method described in Exo.mple 6-2 can also be
applied to the present prublem. serve only as a guide and -\vill not supplant experience and sound engi-
Similarly, assume other suitable values of band z, and compute the corresponding neering judgment.
depths. The final' decision on dimensions will depend on practical considerations. 7-9. The Maxim'urn Permissible Velocity. The max-im1tm permissible
If the 'values of band z are decided o.t the 'beginning of the compuio.tion, the depth will velocity, or the nonerodible velocity, is the greatest mean velocity that. will
be c,)mputed only once. r
not cause- erosion of the channel body. This velocity is very uncertain
Suppose that b =20 ft, 2 = 2, and y = 3.36 ft are the final vo.lues. Assign a free- L
board of 2 ft; the total depth of the channel is, therefore, 5.36 ft and the top width of and variable, and ,can be estimated only with experience and judgment.
the channel (not the width of the ,vater smface) is 41.4 ft: The water area is 89.S ft', In gencml, aId and well-seasoned channels will stand much higher veloci-
and the velocity is 4.46 fps, which is greater than the minimum permissible velocity
for inducing silt, if any. ' T.~llLE· 7-3. MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE VELOCITIES RECOMMENDED' BY FOR'rIEll
When the best hydraulic section is required, substitute A, = vl3y' and R = 0.5y, ,AND SCOBEY ANi. THE CORRESPONDlNG UNIT-TIIAC"l'IVE-FORCE VALUES
i' obtained' frem Table 7-2, in AR~~ = Hi7.7 !!p..d simplify; the depth is found to be CONVERTED BY THE U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION"
y = lUI it. Add 3 ft freeboard; the total depth is 9.1) ft. The corresponding: bottom (For straight channels of small slope, after aging)
width is 7.6ft, the top width of the dUlllnel is 18.7 ft, the water area is 75.2 ft', afld the
velocity is 5.32 fps. Since the, best hydraulic trapezoidal section is the half hexagon,
va/a. , ! Water trans-
t,he side slopes are 1 on Clear water _I porting col-
loidal silts
Material '7\
B. ERODIBLE CHANNELS WHICII SCOUR :BUT DO NOT SILT
v, I rD, V, TO,

7-8. Methods of Approach. The behavior of flow in an erodibl~ chan- fps ilb/ft2 fps Ib/ft'
nel is influenced by so many physical factors and by field conditions so --'1---------
complex and uncertain that precise design of such channels at the present· Fine sand, colloidal ... , .. , . , .. ,. " ""'1
Sandy loam, non colloidal. . .,. . . , , . . ..
i
0.020 1. 50 O. (127
0,020 1. 75 . 0,037 I
2,50 0.075
2.50 0,075
stage of Imowledge is beyond the realm of theory.! The uniform-flow '1
Silt loalll, nOllColloidal .. " ", ... .", ''', 0.020 2.00 0,048 3.00 0, n
formula, which is suitable fOr the design of stable nonerodible channels; Alluvial silts, noncolloidal. ......... 0.020 /2.00 0,048 3.50 0.15
,provides an insufficient condition for the design of erodi.ble channels. Ordinary firm loim,., ..... , ....... , .. 0.020 2.50 0.075 3.50 0.15
This is because the stability of erodible channels, which governs the Voleanicash" ...... " . . . . . . . . " .... 0.02012.50 0.075 3.50 0,15
design, is dependent mainly on the properties of the material forming the Stiff clay, very colloidal. , ...... " " , .... " 0.025 I 3.75 0.26 I
1
5.00 0.413
Alluvial silts, colloidal.. " " " ' ' ' ' " ' ' - ' 1 0,025 3.75 0.26 5.00 0.46
channel body, rat.her than only on the hydral..lllcs of the flow in the chan- ShalesandhardPl1ns .... : ......... ".: ... j 0.025 6.00 0.67 6.00 10.137
nel. Only after a stable section of the erodible channel is obt,ained can
the uniform-flow formula be llsed for ,computing the velocity of flow and ~~:~:tl:~m' ~~. ~~b'b'l~~ ";h~~ :~~~~~li~i~l~l: :~:~~~ i: ~~ ~:~~5 ~:~~ I g:~~
discharge. Graded siits to cobbles when colloida.l. , , . ,.1
0.0;10 4.00 0.43 5.50 i 0.80
I 0.67
I

Two methods of approach to the proper design of erodible channels iI Coa-rse gmvel, ~0IlC0I10idlll .......... , .. ; ... / 0.025 4.00 0.30 .16,00
CObblesandshmglE'3, ... , ................ 0.035 5,00 0,91 5.50 1.10
are described here: the method oj perrn1;sSible velocity and the method of i , • I
J
tractive f01·ce. The method of permissible velocity has been used exteu- . • The Fortier and Scobey values were recommended for use in 1926 by the Special
sively for the design of. earth canals in the United States to ensure freedom I! Committee on Irrigation Research of the American Society of Civil Engineers.
from scour. The method of tractive force hOes sometimes been used in
I Europe; it is now under comprehensive investigation by the U.S. Bureau
f
f ties tha.n new ones, becau$e the old cha.nnel bed is usually better stabi-
) i' lized, particularly with the deposition of colloidal matter. When other
I It has been noticed that certain channels are erodible whereas others v:ary similar i
conditions are the same, a deeper channel will convey water at a higher
in cha,nnel geometry, hydraulics, and soil physical properties are not. As a further f
step in investig~tioIl, the chemical properties of the material forming the channel J mean velocity without erosion than a shallower one. This is probably
body should be explored, It may be that an ion exchange between water and soil or t because the scouring is caused primarily by the bottom velocities and
hydration of the, material is providing a binder in some places and thus affecting the for the same mean velocity, the bottom velocities are greater in .the shal~
erosion. For a general discussion of the compiexity of this problem, see [81 and [91. IL lower channel.
!~
 ,
I

UNIFORM FLOW 167

[
LG6 DESIGN OF CHA.NNELS FOR UNIFORM FLOW

Attemp~1 were made early -to define a mean velocity that would cause 2
neither silting nor Scoill:ing. From the present-day viewpoint] how-
ever, it is dOHbtful whether such a velocity Mtually exists. In 1915, J
_Ir
j

!
,g 0.7

:
.2
'0 .)
~
~,

g 0.5f----j--·,--+-..·---/---';-',,\},c-:-+---f-1--i
'"
.~
0.4
,."
"iii
I
'"
:is I
j o~~,-=l==I=t:I=l=
0,.8
·t
()'5~H-++--t -{
O.4!-H-++-fflt-f--+
o.:;f--f-+-++-+H-H--t
Q.~ !-,-,-.---l...--'---r",-,--,--W.-..c
Cloy
:3
Per"r.issible va loci!i es. fps

FIG. 7-4, Curves showing' U.S.S,u, da.ta on permissible velocities for cohesive soils.
!
.suitable n values for various materials and the converted values for the
FIG. 7-3. U.S. and U.S.S.R. data on ]lermissible veloCities for no,nco,hesive soila, corresponding permissible tractive force, which
will be discussed later (Art. 7-13). In 1036, a
Etcheverry [2Gl published probably the first table of maximum meIl.n .u.~l'''''.<1iH magazine [28] published values of m[l.xi- I
velocities that are safe il:gaillllt e1'Osion. . In 1925, Fortier and Scobey [27J
pli bUshed the well-known to ble of "Permissible Canal Velocities 11 shown
mum permissible velocities (Figs. 7-3 and 7-4)
ahove which scour would be produced in noncohe-
I
ill Table 7-3. The values in thiE table are for lVell-seasoned channels of sive materiai of a wide range of pa.rticle sizes and
small sfopes and for depths of flow less .than 3 ft. The table also shows various kinds of cohesiVe soil It also gave the
variation of these velocities with channel dep!;h ~
1 The first famous fo,rmula for this nonsiiting and no,neroding vciocit,y fo,r silt-laden
water was published in 1895 by Kennedy [lOj. From a stl\dy o,f tne dischargo and (Fig. 7-5).
depth of 22 canals of the Upper Bari Doab irrig.!l.tion system in Punjab, India, the The maximum permissible velocities mentioned
Kennedy fOrImll", WD-S developed as . abo Ire are with reference to straight channels.
(7-4) For sinuous channels, the velocities should be
lowered in order to 'reduce scour. Percentages of
where V, is the nonsilting and noneroding mean velocity in fps; y is the depth of flow reduction suggested by Lane [29] are 5% for
in ft; C - 0.84, depending primarily or. the firmness of t,he material forming theqhan-
slightly sinuous canals, 13 % for moderately
nel body; and z "" 0.64, an exponent which varies only slightly. Ba.sed on later
studies by other engineers, the valu~s of C generally recommended are 0.,55 for sinuous canals, and 22 % for very sinuom; canals.
extremely fille soils such a.s tho,se found.in Egypt; 0.84 for fine light sand soils such
as those found in the Punjab, India; 0.92 for coarse light sandy soils; 1.01 for sandY
loamy silts; and 1.09 for coarse silt or hard-soil debris. For clear water, a "alue of
percentage val tieS, however, are veJ;'Y ap-
proximate, since no accurate data are available
at the. present time. Carreclion foctor
r
i
z = 0.,5 has been suggested. 7-10. Method of Permissible Velocity. Using FIG. 7-5. Curves showillg
For the design of canals carrying sediinent-laden water, the Kennedy formula is U.S.S.R. corrections of
now practically obsolete and is being replaced by methods based on Lacey's regime the maximum permissible velocity as a criterion] permissible velocity fo,r
theory [11-16], Einstein's bed-load function [17), a.nd Maddock-Leopold's principle the design procedure for a channel section, as- depth for both collesive -j
,,
of channel geometry [18J. There are voluminous writings on these methods. Com-
prehensive bibliographies can be found in [19] to [25]. . I

l
silmed to be trapezoidal, consists of the following and noncohesive mate-
steps:
rials.

I~
l~
 168 UNIFORM FLOW DESIGN o.F CHANNELS FOR UNIFORM l"L~W 169
I,
l 1. Fot' the given kind of material forming the channel body, estimate It should be noted that the unit .tractiv~ force in channels, except for
the roughness coefficir.nt n (Art. 5-7), side slope z (Table 1-1), and the wide open channels, is not uniformly distributed along the wetted perim-
maximum permissible velocity V (Table 7-3 and Figs. 7-3 to 7-5). ' et.er .. Many attempts have been made to determine the distribution of
2. Compute the hydraulic radius R by the Manning formula. the tractive force in a chann~l. Leighly [31] attempted to determine this
3. Compute the water area required by the given discharge and per- ,distribution in many trapezoidal and several rectangular and tl'iangular
missible velocity, or A = Q/V. ' . channels from: the published data on the velocity distribution in the
4. Compute the wetted perimeter, or P = A/R.
5. Using the expressions for A and P from Table 2-1, solve simul- 1.5
i
taneously for band y. The solution may be expedi~ed by the charts
given in Appendix B. '
6. Add a pl'0per freeboard, and modify the section for practicability.
. '

Example 7-3. ,Compute the bottom width and the 'depth of fiow ,of !l. trapezoidal
cha.nnel laid on a slope of 0.0016 and carrying 8. design dischfl.rge of 4{)O cfs. 'rhe
channel is to be excavated in earth containing noncolioidal coarse i1;rllvels and pebbles.
O:97QwyS
Solution. For the given conditions, the following rm!estimated: n 0.025, z = 2,
, and nlll:llili1um pe;l'missible velocity = 4.5 fps. :FIG. 7·6. Distrihution of tra.ctive force in !1 trapezoidai channel section.
Using the Manning formula, !wlve for R.
1.49 --
4.5 = 0.025 R~ ";0.0016
or R ." 2.60 ft
ThenA = 400/4.5 = 88.8 ft', a.nd P = AIR 88.8/2.60 = 34.2 ft. Now
A = (b + zy)y = (b + l!y)y ~ 88.8 ft'
and P = b + 2 v'l+ ii Y = (b + 2 y'S y) )\4.2 it
Solving the above two equations simultaneously, b 18.7 ft and y 3.46,ft.

'I -11. The Tractive Force. When water 'flows in' a channel, a. force is . Ii,
developed that acts in the direction of flow on the channal oea-:-"This l- fl--+--!--+---l- - -I I rmm]

!4-+-1-+--+=1t++i~
fm'cb, which is simply the pull of wilter on the wetted area, is known as the
tract~'ve force. l In It uniform flow the tra()tive forceis apparently equal to
the effective component of the gravity force acting on the body afwater,
parallel to the channel bottom and equal to wALS, where w is the unit
123'156789
o
o
:-.-JI:~
I 2 3 4 5 6 7 B 9 10
weight of wa.ter, A is the wetted area,' L is the length of the channel bh
bh
reach, and S is the slope (Art; 5-4). Thus, the a.verage value of the On bcttom of cl1annels
On sid s S 01 channels
tractive fOl'ce pel' unit wetted area, or the so-called tmit tractive f~rce
TO, is equal to wALS/PL = wRS, where P is the wetted perimeter and FIG. 7-7, Maximum unit tractive forces in terms of wyS. '
R is the hydraulic radius; that is .
. . [TV = w~· V q-5)
channels. U nfoi·tunately,. to deficiency of data, the results of his
study were not very conclusive. In the CS. Bureau of Reclamation,
In a wide open channel, the hydraulic radius is equal to the depth of flow . Olsen and Flol'ey[32] and other engineers ha,ve used the membrane
y; hence TO '" wyS. analogy and analytical and finite-difference methods for determining the
1 'l"his is also known as the shear force or the drab fOl·ce. The idea of tractive force distribution of tractive fOl:ce in trapezoidal, rectangular, and tria!1g ular
is gellorally believed 1.0 h!we been first :introdue~d intohydraulia litera.ture by du channels. A typical distribution .of tractive force in
a trapezoidal chan-
Boys in 1879 [po 149; of 30]. Howelrer, the principle of balancing this foroe wit~ the Itel reSUlting from the m~mbrane-analogy study is shown in Fig. 7-6.
channel resistance in 11 uniform flow was sta.ted 1;Iy Brahms earIy in 1754 (see Art. 5-4). The pattern of distribution varies with the shape pf the section but is

I
.Ii".
170 UNIFORM FLdw DESIGN OF QHANNELS FOR UNIFORM ;FLOW 171
. .

practically unaffected by the size of the section. Based on such studies, is equal to the force tending to cause the motioil. The resistance to
curves (Fig. 7-7) showing the maximum unit tractive forces on the sides motion of the particle is equal.to the normal force W, cos ¢ mUltiplied by
and bottom of various channel sections have been prepared for use in the coefficient of frictioil, or tan (J, where e is the angle of repose. Hence,
cu,ilal design. Generally speaking, for trapezoidal c.hannels of .the ilhapell
ordinarily used ill canals, the maximum tractive force on the bottom is (7 -(3)
close to the va.lue wyS, .and on the sides close to 0.76 wyS.
Solving for theullit tractive force T, tlmt causes impending motion on a
7 -12. Tractive-force Ratio. On a soil particle resting sm the sloping
sloping surface, .
side of a channel sect.ion (Fig. 7-8) in which water is flowing, two forces
.. W . / tan" tP
are acting: the tractive force aT, and the gnlvity cfol'ce component 'YV; sin ¢, T, = ,c!
cos rb tan II '\;1- tan' (1 (7-7)

,. Similo,rly, when motion of :1 pa.rticie on the level surface is impending

J owing to t.he iractive force an, the following is obtained fromEq. (7-6)
with <to = 0:
}v, tan fI = an (7-8)
Solving for the unit tractive force n that causes impending motion on a
level surface, .
lV, .
TL = -
a
tan e (7-9)

The ratio of T, to TL is called the tractive-force ratio; this is an important

ratio for design purposes. From Eqs. (7-7) and (7:'9), the ratio is

Simplifying, )
K =
T
~
J( =
= COli '"

/1 _
f
~ 1 - tan 2 0
~
tan 2 ¢
(7-10)
1
Si.ll '" (7-11)
'\; Sill" ~
PIG. 7-8 .. Analysis of forces ac.ting on a pa.rticle resting on the surface of a chn.nnel bed.

which tends to cause the particle to roll down the side slope. l The
symbols used are a = effective area of the particle, T, = u\lit tractive
force on the side of the channel, W, = submerged weight of the particle,
and", = angle of the side: slope. The resultant of these two fO;'ces, which
are at right angles to each other, is
VlV,2 Si112 '" + oh,2
When this force is large enough, the particle ~vill move.
By the principle of frictional motion in mechanics, it may be assumed
that, when mot.ion is impending, the resistance to mqtion of t.he particle
1 The concept of the three-dimensional analysis of the 'gravity and tractive forces
. diameter for various degrees of roughness. The diameter referred to
acti]lg on a particle resting on a slope at the Btate of impending motion was first given
by F'orchheimcr [33J. A complete analysis of a chann"l section using this .concept
Wa.'l first developed by Chia.-Hwa Fan [34J. The a.nalysis ,vas also developed inde-
pendently by' the U.S. Bur~a.u of Reclamation under the direction of E, W. Lane
It can be seen that this ratio is a fUllctioll only ~f the inclination of the
sloping side", and of the angle of repose of the material O. Fot cohesive
.
1
and fine noncohesive materials, the cohesi vc fOI'ces,even with com-
paratively clear .vater, become so great in propprtion to the gravity-
force component causing t.he particle to roll down that the gravity force
wn safely be neglected. Therefore, the angle of repose need be con-
sidered only for coarse noncohesive materials. According to the U.S.
Bureau of Reclamation's investigation, it was found in general t.hat the'
angle of repose increases with both size and anguiarity df the material.
For use in design, curves (Fig. 7-9) were prepnred by the Bureau, showing
values of the angle of repose for nOli cohesive material above 0.2 in. in
is the diameter of a particle than which 25% (by weight) of the material
is larger.
1 Equation (7-10) was presented by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation [35,361 and

[29,35]. Eq. (7-11) by Fan [341. The two equations are mathematically identical.
 172 UNIFORM FLOW
,i . DESIGN OF CHANNELS FOR UNIFORM FLOW 173
Panic 1e size in in clles
particle size for noncohesive material and upon compactness or v:o~ds
0.1 . 0.2 O.l 004 0.6 o.e 1.0
L-----.rL--; I , I I I I I I I I 2.0 3.0 4.0 ratio for cohesive materiaL Other' soil properties such as the plastIcIty
I
42 3/16 1/4 lIB 112 3/4 I H/2 index 1 or the chemical action may probably also be taken as indexes for
~- -T--[I
l ~j
I... I defining permissible tractive force more precisely. However, sufficient

r
• .....
data and information on these indexes are lacking_ The U.S. Bureau
40
I r // ---V~.' of Reclsmation has made 'a comprehensive study of the problem, using
data fol' coarse noneohesive material obtained from the Sall Luis Valley
8 ///
I V V / / V/
-;:;
,6 -1-- // , V V//V
""
N

~~i/I / VI/';I/I
~~"'/
o
.., :3 4 V L/
;VL

~
.---;----
Ii
2
.'"...." t7- ·Z
~'"
."
..,'" 0
~o $O~ V 1

~/
.; "
~
'"c.e
.If':
~<~I
I b'" if t1 !

I
Il I.;;:,~ 'ti
'"
'-
!, '0
.!? I \ I .I
.
'"c:
'2 6
f--- ... J~Ci
;;"'/ /
V."O- V 'b i---
/ .<1r-+~I+H Recommeoded value for
"-:; canals in coarse l
noncohe~ive material~
si.e 25% lorg er
24
~ ~0° .~~
L ,'") r
;
j ,

2. 2
V:o."':;"
20 I) I
.FIG. 7-9. An .. Jes of repose of nonconesive material. (U.S. Bureau of Rec/a.1l1alion.) 50 100

7-13.
• Permissible
• Tractive Force. The pe?'m-issible tract1've'01"ce
J is the
maXImum Ulllt trnctive force that will not cauge seriOlls erosion of the FIG. 7-10. Recommended permissible unit tr.active forces for canals in noncohesive
Ino.terial.(U.S. Burea:!' of Rec!amalit.m.)
material forming the channel bed 011 a level surface: This unit tractive
fol'c~ c"n. be determined by laboratory experiments, and the value thus canals [37), values converted from permissible velocities, given by Etche-,
obtamed IS known as the critical t1'uctiz,c JOT'ce. However, experience has verry and by Fortier and Scobey,' the U.S,S.R. values, etc. (Alt.7c9).
shown that actual canals L.'1 coarse nUl1Cohasive material C[l.n st!].nd sub- As a result, values of permissible tractive force recommended for canal
stantially higher va.lues than the critical tractive forces measured in the design were developed as follows:
laboratory. This is prohab!y because the water {md soil in £l.ctUtll canals
(J?nt~in slight amounts of conoidl1.1 and organic matter whiGh provide a 1 The pla~ticity index is 'the difference in .percent of moisture between plas~ic limit
and liq:uid llmit in Atterberg soil tests. This index has been investigo,ted by the U.8.
bmdlllg power and also because slight movement of soil particle" can be Bureau of Reclamaiioll as a soil characteristic that can be lL~ed to indics.te resistance
t.?lerated in P:a.~tical designs. without endangering channel stability. to SCour for cohesive materials. For cs.nal deSign. a plasticity illdex of 7 may be.
B.mce the permISSIble tractive force is the design criterion fOl' field. condi- '
tlOl1S, the permissible value may be taken less than the critical value.
I
-\
taken tentatively as the criticnl vll-Iue, with SCOill' OCCUrring for moder:.te 'tractive
forces below this value. However, acours a.re still observed in many cases where the
Tb,e determination of permissible. tractive force is now based upon
I index is above 7. Research'shows that determinat.ion of the plasticity index in (:00"
junction with consolidated-shear testa may possibly be necessary.

I
A
174 UNIFORM FLOW
For coarse noncohesive matel'ial, with sufficient factor of safety, the
Bureau recoIilluends tenta.tively a value of permissibletracti Ire force in
pounds per square foot equal to 0.4 times the diameter in iilches of a
particle than which 25 % (by weight) of the material is larger: This
.recommendation is shown by the straight line in the design c'hart (Fig.
7-10).
For .fine nOll cohesive material, the size specified is t.he median size, or
size sma.ller than 30% of the weight. Three design curves (Fig. 7-10)
\'0 E==E=E~j=R+q:B=t==+=a
.,
r\ Sondy cloys (sand < 50 %) _~
,..... Llilil! I I
Voids ratio
FIG. 7-11. Permissible unit tl'l1ctive forces for canals in cohesive material as converted
from the U.S.S.It. data on permissible velocities. . For a state of impending motion of the particles. on side slopes, 0.078y = 0.294, or
are tentatively recommended (1) for canals with high content of fine
sediment in the water, (2) for canals with 10',11 content affine sediment ill
the water, <lnd (3) for canals with clear water.
For cohesive materials, the data based on convei·sion. of permissible
velocities to UIJit tractive forces and given in Table 7-3 and Fig. 7-11 are
recommended as design references. ' unit tra,ctive force on the channel bottom (Fig. 7-7) is 0.97wyS = 0.97 X 62.4 X
The pel'missible tTactive forces mentioned above refer to straight chan-
nels. For sinuous channels, the values should be lowered in order to
reduce. scour. Approximate percentages of reduction, suggested by
Lane [29J, are 10% for slightly sinuous canals; 25% for moderately sInu-
ous canals, and 40% for very sinuous .canals.
DESIGN OF CHANNELS FOR UNIFORM FLOW 175
7 -14. Method of Tractive Force. The first step in the design of erodi-
ble channels by the method of tractive force consists in selecting a11
approximate channel section by experiene.e or from design tables,l collect- !
ing samples of the material fo;:ming the channel bed, and determining
the'required properties of the samples .. With these data, the designer
investigates the section by applying tractive-force analysis to ascertain
probable stability by reaches and to determine the minimum section that
appears stable. For channels in noncohesive materials the rolling-down
effect shouid be considered in addition to the effect. of the distribution of
tracth-e'forces; for channels in cohesive material the rolling-down effect is
negligible, and the effect of t.he distribution of tractive force alon:e is a
criterion sufficient for design. The final proportioning of the channel
section, ho\-vever, will depend on other nonhydl;aulic practical considera-
!;iops.· The analysis for tractive force is best described by the following
example:
Example 7-4. Design a trapezoidal channel laid on a slope of 0.0016 a.nd carrying
a discharge of 400 cfs. The cha.nnel is to be excavated in earth containing noncol-
lnidal coarse gravels and pebb['~s, 25 % of which is 1.25 in. or over in diameter, Man-
ning's n. = 0.025. .
SoLution. For trapezoidal channels, .the maximum unit tracth'e force OIl the slop-
illg sides is usually less th!>ll that Oil the (,ottom (Fig. 7-7); hence, the side force i~ the
controUing value .in the analysis. The design of the cha.nnel should therefore include
(It) the proportioning of the section dirnensioIlll for the maximum unit tractive force
on the sides. and (b) c.heckiilg the proportioned dimensions for the maximum unit
tJ:active force on the bottom, .
a. PTopol'lioning the. Section D!:men,~ions. Assuming side slopes of 2: I, or z = 2, 3,nd
a base-depth ratio bly ",. 5, the maximum unit tractive force on the sloping sides
(Fig. 7-7) is 0.775wi;s = 0.775 X 62.4 X 0.0016Y = 0.078y lb/ft'.
Considering a very rounded ma.terial 1.25 in. in diameter, the angle of repose (Fig.
7-9) is 8 = 33.5". 'Nith fJ = 33,5' and z ~ 2, or cJ> = 26.5", t,lle tractive-fol'ce ratio
by Eq. (7-11) is K = 0.587. For a size of 1.25 in., the permissible tractive force on
a level bottom is TL = 0.·1 X 1.25 = 0.5 lb/ft' (sam.e from Fig. 7-10), and the permis-
sible tractive force on the sides iST. ~- 0.587 X 0.5 = 0.294 lb 1ft'.
y = 3.77 ft. Accordingly; the bottom width is b = 3.77 X 5 = 18.85 ft. For this
trapezoidal section, A = 99.5 ft' and R = 2.79 ft. With n = 0.025 aud S = 0.00113,
the discharge by the Manning formula is 470 crs. Further computation will show
that, for z = 2 and bIy = 4.1, th" ~ection dimensions are y = 3.82 ft and b "" 15.66 ft
and that the discharge is 41"4 cfs, which is close to thO} design discharge ..
Alternative section dimensions may be obtained by as~uming other '(alues oI z or
side slopes. .
b. Checking the Proportjalled Dimensions. With z = 2 and bly = 4.1, the maximum
3.82 X 0.0016 = 0.370 [b/ft', less than 0.5 Ib/ft', which is the pel'mu;sible tractive
. force on the level boLtom.
I Typica.l average earth sections of irrigation ca.nals and laterals, constructed or
proPQsed by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamatiotl. and selected for the flows required on
the basis of econom.v and stability, are given in Fig. 5, paragraph 1.120, of [4].
 DESIGN OF CHANNELS FOR:UNIFORM FLOW
177
176 UNIFORM: FLOW
transfer (if tractive force has little effect on the results and can safely be
7-15. The Stable Hydraulic Section. The section of an erodible chan-
nel in which no erosion will occur, at a minimum water area for a given ignored. . . '. It· y
. According to assumption 5, the tractlve force actmg on any e em en ar.
dischilrge is called the stable hydraulic 8ection. Empirical pi'oJiles, such
n.rea AB OIl the sloping side (Fig. 7-12a) per unit length o~ the channell~
as the ellipse and the parabola, have been suggested as stable hydrauUc
equal to wyS dx, where w is the unit weight of water, Y is the depth 0
sections by many hydraulicians.. The U.S. Bureau of Reclama.tion [38]
has employed the principle of tractive force t o · a theoretically 'water· above AB, and S is. the
stable section for erodible channels carrying clear water in noncohGS'ive longitudinal slope. , . Since the area
.materials.· . AB is VCdX)2 + (dy)2, the unit
In designing trapezoidal sections, as described in.the preceding article, tmctive force is equal to
the tractive force is made eqnal to the permissible value over only a part t
pf the perimeter of the section, where the forces are close to maximum;
on most of the perimeter forces are less than the permissible value. rn tal V
other words, the impending instability occurs only over a small pr.rt of where rP is the slope angle of the
the perimeter. In developing a stable hydraulic section· for maximum tangent at AB. .
\
• 29.5'--·-----1
efficiency, it is necessary to satisfy the condition that impending motion The other assumpti(;ms stated
shall prevail everywhere on the channel bed. For material with a given above have been used previously to
angle of repOSE> and for r~ given discharge, this optimal section will provide develop the equation for the trac-
noi only the chl1Ilnel of minimum water area, but also the channel of . tive-forc~.ratio K (Art. 7-12). The
minimum top width, maximum mean velocity, and minimum excavation. unit tractive force all the level
In the maihematical·derivation of this section by the Bureau, the follow- bottom at the channel center is
'ing assumptions are made: .. . 1'L wYuS, where yo is the depth of
L The soil particle is held against thechanllel bed by the component of flow at the center. The corre-
r,he submerged weight of the particle acting normal to the bed. sponding unit tractive force on the
2. At ,and above the water, surface the side slope is. at the of sloping area ~B is,therefore, equal
repose of the material under the action of gravity. to wyoSIL , .
3. At the center of the channel the side slope is zero and the, III o~der to achieve impending
7-12. Andysis and desigll ?f sto.ble
force alone is sufficient to hold the .particles at the point of incipient mo~ion ·over the entire periphery of. FIG.
hydraulic secti0!1' (a) ~heoretLcl'l.l sec-
instability. the channel bed, the two forces tion {or given soil properties. and eh!l.l1ll:l
4. ·At points between the center and edge of the channel the particles mentioned in the above paragraphs . slope, providing Q - 220 cis; (b) mod~-
fred section for Q" 400 cfs; (c) modI-
are kept in a state ,of incipient motion by the resultant of the gravity should be equal; that is,. fied section for Q' 100 efs.
component of the particle's submerged weight acting on the side slope and wyS cos <p = wYoSK
the tractive force of the flowing water. Substituting Eq. (7-10) for K and tan-1 (dy/dx) fol' <p in the above equDt-
5. Thc tractive force act.ing on an area of the channel bed is equal to
the weight component of the water d,irectly above the area acting in the tion and simplifying,
direction of fiow. This weight component is equal to the weight times
the longitudinal slope of the channel. (dy)t
dx
+ (lL)£ tan
Yo •
2 (I = tan~ fJ

If assumption 15 is to hold there. can be no lateral transfer of tra.ctive ya' and :t = O. With this condition
force between adjacent currents moving at different velocities in the sec- . At the center of the channel, y
tion-a situation, however, that never actually occurs. Fortunately,
the mathematical analysis made by the Bureau I has shoWn that the actual pa.rticle is loea~d. This assumption gives ~ solution .that agrees very clqselY w~th
the solution bailed on assumption 5. Therefo.re, neglect of the trB?"fer 0,1 .tractwEl
Takiflg the effect of lateral tnl.litive force into accoUnt, an a.!ternative assumptioll
force in the a.~!l.lysis will give equally sn.tisfactory results, Bad wll:.h cOJ;lslderably
I
was ina.de by the' BUreau, which states that the tractive force acting on a particle is ·1
prop~rtiona.1 to the square of the ll1ean velocity in the channel at 'the point where the I less ,,'ork.· .
i
 .. ~
.178 UNIFORM .FLOW . DESIGN OF 'CHANNELSFOR UNIFORM: FLOW 179 I
. .
the solution of the above differential equation is 1 it by 180/11" or 57.3. The top width mllY be computed by Eq. (7-12) with if = 0, or
cos 0.128::; = O. Thus, 0.128::; = 11"/2 and x = 12.3 n.
Tli.e top width is T = 2::; =
tan
Y = Yo cos ( - - -8 x) (7-12) 24.6 ft.
, yo By Eq. (7-14), the mean velocity is V= (1.35 - 1.19 tau 33.5') 5.151' X 0.0016}'/
0.025 = 2.69 fps. By Eq. (7-15), the water Mea is A = 2.04 X 5.16'/tan 33.5° =
This equation shows that the shape of a stable hydra,ulic section under
82.2 fV. Hence the discharge is 220 cfs. Since the design discharge is 400 cfs, it is
the specified assumptions is a simple cosine curve. From the results of necessary to add a rectangular area at the middle (Fig. 7-12b). The width of the
the Bureau's mathematical anaiysis, the following properties of this stable rectangle may be computed by Eq. (7-17) as
section can be stated ~
I . ,,_ ·0.025{400 - 220) _
TO
(7 -13) I T - 1.49 X5.l6~~ X 0.00W1 - 4.9 ft
Yo o.97wS
1.35 - 1.19 tan 8 yo%Sl! TherefCJre the top width is 24.6 + 4.9 = 29.5 ft.
l' (7-14) ·11 If the channel is 'designed to carry 100 cis, it isnecesso.ry to remove !l. vertical area
n
ir.:im the middl~ (Fig. 7-12c). The top width of the removed a.rea may be computed
2.04Yo 2 by Eq. (7-1il).
A (7-15)
= tan e
where 70 is the permissible t.ractive force in IbjfV, V is the mean velocity
in. the section in fps, A is the water area in ft~, 8 is the angle of repose for
II T' = 0.96(1 - V 1 0,%20)X 21.6 = 7.7 ft
Therefore the top width is 24.6 - 7,7 = lB.\) ft.

the material or the slope angle of the section at the water edge of the
channel, T is the top width, and the rest of the symbols are hS previously
l C. GRASSED CHANNELS

defined. 7-16. The' Grassed Channel. Presence of grass or vegetation in

The discharge of the theoret,ical section is equal to Q '= FA. If the
channel lS to carry a discharge less than Q, it is necefisary to remove a I
vertical portion of the section at the channel center. S'upposc the dis- .
charge to be carried is Q', which is less than Q, and the top widths of the
designed section and the removed area are T and T f , respectively. The
value oLT' may be computed by
T' = 0.99 (1 - ~ T (7-16)
On the other hand, if the channel is to can'y more than the theoretical
section will carry, it is necessary to add a rectangular section at the center.
Suppose the. discharge to be carried is Q", which is greater than Q, and
the top width of the added rectangular area is Til. The value of T))
may be computed by
/I _ n(QI! - Q)
(7-17)
T - 1.49Yo~~SI~
Example 7-6. Determine the profile of the stable hydro.ulic section to replo.ce the
tra.pezoidal section of the channel described in Example 7-1.
SolUlian. For the given conditions, TO = 0.5 lb/ft l , S = 0.0016,. e.= 33.5°, a'J.d
n = 0.025. By Eq. (7-13), the center depth is Yo = 0.5/(0.97 X 62.'1 X 0.0016)
5.16 ft. From Eq. (7-12), the shape of the theoretical section is
. y = 5.16 cos 0.128z
which is plotted as shown in Fig. 7-12a.. It should be noted that the angle. of ~he
~o~inc function is expressed inradiansj it may be converted to degrees: by multLplymg
channels will result in considerable turbulence, which means loss of energy
and retardance of flow, For earLh channels used for carryin~ water on
I farm lands, however, a lining of grass is often found to be
ndvantageous
I and desirable. The grass will stabilize the body of the channel, consoli-
date the soil mass of the bed} and check .the erosion on the channel su1'-
\
face and the movement of soil particles along the channel bottom. The
U.S. Soil Conservation Service (39-411 has conducted a series of experi-
ments on channels lined with various kinds of grass (Fig. 7-13) .. The
. results thus obtained under different testing conditions and the procedure
suggested for the design of grassed channels will be described in. the
following articles.
7-17. The Retardance Coefficient. The Manning coefficient of rough-
ness for grassed channels is specifically known as the relardance coefficunt.
I
I
According to the investigation by the Soil Conservation Service, it was
found that Manning's n for just one kind of grass varied over a wide \
-1
I range depending on the depth of flow and the shape and slope of the
channel. Thus, the selection of a desJgn value for n would be nearly·
l impossible. Fortunately, it was discovered that the retardance coef-
ficient n holds a.certain relationship with the product of the mean velocity
or flow V and the hydraulic radius R. This relationship is charact~ristic
1
[ of the vegetation and practically independent of channel slope .and shape.
I! As a result, therefore, a number of experimental curves for n vers4S' VR
(Fig. 7-14) were developed for five different degrees of retardance:
very high, high, moderate} low, and very low. For very low retardance

. . ---'i
 180 UNIFORM FLOW
DESIGN OF CHANNELS FOR UNIFORM FLOW lSI

TAllLE 7-4. CLASSIFICATION OF DEGRE1!l OF RE'l'ARDANClll FOR VAIUOUS KINDS

OF GRAS/;*

Reta.rdo.nce . Cover Condit.ion

Weeprng love grl\SS ...•.•....• Excellent stand, tllll (av 30 in.)

A Very high
Yellow bluestero ischa.emuln ... Excellent sta.nd, trtll (av 36 in.)

:Kudzu ............. , ..... . Very den'sE. growth, unout

Bermuda: gra.ss ......... , .... . Good sta.nd, taU (av 12 in.)
Native grass mixtur~ (little blue-
stem, blue gramat a.nd othr:r
lon.g .l!.nd short Midwest
grtUlSes) . . . . . . . • .. . ., ... . Good stand, unmowed
B. High Weeping love gra.sS ........... . Good stand, ta.ll (av 24 in.)
Lespedeza ~ericea., ........... . Good sta.nd, not woody, tall
(av. 1 \J in.)
AHal£a ........ . Good st!tnd, uncut (av 11 in.)
Weeping l.)ve grass ...... ' ... . Good stll.nd. mowed (av 13 in.)
Kudzu...... . .......•.. Dense growth, unout
Illue granla ............•...... Good stand, uncut (av 13 in.)

Crab grass. . .. . .. .. .- Fair stand, uncut (10 to 48 in.)

Bermuda grass ............... .
Common Jespedezo. ... , ....... .
Grthss-leg'.1me mixture_ummer
C Moderr.te (orah1lrd grass, redtop, Italian
rye grass, and common le8-
pede:z.a) ..•....... , ....... .
Centipede gr3.5s . .' ........... .
Kentucky bluegrass .......... .
Good stand, mowed (~W 6 in.)
Good sta.nd, uncut (!loV 11 in.)
Good stand, uncut (6 to 8 in.)
dense cover (av 6 in.)
Good stand. headed (6 to 12 in.)

Bermuda grass .........•...... Good stand, cut ~o 2.5 in. height

Fm. 7-1~. CenLipede grassed channel. (Courtesy of W. O. Ree, U.S . .'igricultura! Comm·:lo let;pedeza ......... . Excellent stand, uncut (av 4.5
Research.Smn:ce.) .t A ) Before experiment; (B) after test a.t t1 flow equal to 15 cfs in.)
for 4~ mm; (C) dunng test at a flow equal to 30 cf.5; (D) at completion of the whole Buff.Jo grass.... . ........... . Goodstand, uncut (3 to 6 in.)
experiment.
Grass-legume wixture-fall, spring
D I.ow
. (orchard grass, redtop, ltaliar,
only the average ctll've is shown, together with the curves for low retard- rye grass, and common le5-
ance. The classification of degree' of l'etardance is based on the kind of pe·iez.ll.).. ..• . . . . . .. . . .... . Good stand, uncut (4.to .5 in:)
vegetation and the condition of growth, as described in Table 7-4. The Lespedeza. sericea, .... After cutting to 2 in. height.,
term" stand" used'in the tabie refers to the density of grass, or the count very good 'stand before clltling
of vegetation, which is sometimes expressed as the 'number of stems per
Bermuda gras.s....... . ....... Good stand,. cut to 1.5in.heighj.
square foot. The n- VR curves thus developed may also be applied to E Very low
Bermuda grass. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Burned stubble
other kinds of gmss, provided that their characteristics and degree of
I'etardance can be identlfied. For this purpose, Table 7-5 is provided as a ;. U.~. Soil Conservation [41J.
guide in the selection of the vegetal retu.rdance for diffetent conditions of
stand and average length of the grass. .

!
\
.l
 182 UNIFORill FLOW· DESIGN OF CHANNELS FOR UNIFORM FLOW 183

.sl---l--t--........f.--+-++-+-!-l-f---+
~1---4--4--.--+---+--~-~+++----r--+--~~~-+-+~~+---+--+---~

r:: H
.1 :

.09

.OS

.O~

.00

.O~ !

...
-.I

VR VR
(0) Curves for A or very high vegetal retardance.
(e) CurYe.s for C or modera~e vegetal retardancB.

i
.\,

VR
. (b) Curves for B or high vegetal reta.rdllnce.
(d) Curves for· D or low vegetal reta.rda.nce, a.nd a.n .e.vernge curve for E or very low
FIG. 7-14. Experimental n-VR curves. (U,S. Soil Conservation Service.) vegetal reta.rdll.nce.

l
'f
I
i
.1
 I

184 ~I
UNIFORM FLOW
1 DESIGN OF CHANN~LS FOR UNIFORM FLOW ~85

TABLE 7-5. GUIDE I,:! SELECTION OF VEGE'L'AL RE'l'ARDANCE*

I
! establishment, tht; grass will grow and the channel will be stabilized under
a condition of low degree of retardance. The channel will not reach its
Stand Avcrage length of grass, in. Degree of retarciance maximilm capacity until' the. grass 'cover is fully q,eveloped and well
established. Therefore, it is suggested that the hydrll:ulic design of a
>30 A . Very high gras:;ed channel ,consist of two stages. The first stage (A) is to design
11-;-24 B High the channel for stability, that is, to determine the channel dimensions
Good 8-10 C Moderete under the condition, of a lower degree of retardance. The second stage
2-6 D Low
<2 E Very low , TABLE 7-0. PERMISSIBLE VELOCITIES FOI! CHANNEI.S LINED WITH GRASS*

>30 B High
,
Foil' .
11-24
6-10
C
D
Moderate
Low Cover Slope IMlge,
%
I. Permissible velocity, fps

Erosion-resistant Easily eroded'

2-8 D Low
<2 E Very low ---- I soils soils

* U.S. Soil Conserv!!.tion Service [411. Bermuda grass 0-5

5-10
I 8
7
6
5
7-18. The Permissible.Velocity. The permissible velocity of Row in a >10 8 4
gl'assed channel is the velocity that will prevent severe erosion in the Buffalo g'rass, Kentucky bluegrass, 0-5 7 5
channel for a reasonable length of time.' Permissible velocities for differ- smooth brome, blue grama 5-10 6 4
ent veg.etal ?overs! ch~nnel slopes, and soil conditions, recommended on >10 5 3
the baSIS of mvestlgatlOn by the Soil Conservation Service, are shown in
Table 7-6. GrllSs mixture (}-5 5 4

7-19. Sel~ction of Gra~s. The selection of grass for the channel lining
, II Do not
5-10
use all
4 3
slopes steeper ~han _10~%_ _ __
depe.nds mawly on the clImate and soil in which the plant will grow and
surv.I~~ under ,the given conditions. From the hydraulic viewpoint, Lesp,edeza sericea, -w-e-ep-i-~~g-lo-v-e
I 0-5 I ,3.5 2.5.I
stablhu y . and other f~ctors should also. be considered. In general, a grass, ischaemuffi (yello.v blue- I Do not use on slopes steeper than 5 %, except lOr
higher dlsch:.l.l'ge requu'cs a stronger or better lining. On steep slopes stem), kudzu, aHalf!\., crabgrass side slopes in a combination channel
?unch grasses; such as alfalfa, lespedeza,and kudzu, will develop channel~
------
Annuals---used on mild slopes or as~ --~-=5---1 3 ,5 2.5 I
mg of the flow and" hence, are unsatisfactory for lining. For slopes temporary pr"tection until per- Use on slopes steeper than 5 % is not reCOffi-
greater than 5 %, only fine and uniformly distributed sod-forming grasses manent CQyel'S al'e established, mended
sueh as Bermuda grass,. Kentucky bluegrass, and smooth brome ar~ common lespedeza, Sudan grass
re~om~nended fOl' lining· where the main flow occurs. Because' of the
, I REMARKS. The values apply to average, uniform stands of each type of covel'.
obJec.tlOnable spreading nature of sod-forming grasses, the top portion of
! the. Sides and the berm may be planted with gras.:;es that do Ii.ot.spread
lIse velocities exceeding 5 fps onlr where good covers and proper maintenll.nce cll,n be
obtairied.' ,
easliy, such as weeping love gl'B,SS. 11'01' fust establishment of the lining, . * If.s. Soil Conse.rv!l.tion Service 1411.
Bermudagl'assand weeping love, grass fLl'e recommended. Sometirne~ (B) is to review the design for maximum capacity, that is', to determine
an~uals are used as temporary protectibn until permanent coveb by the increase in depth of flow necessary to maintain a maximum capacity
native gras~e~ are ~stablished. Silt deposition in channels may be con- under the conditiun of' a higher degree of retardance. For instance, if.
~rolled by Iml?g With bunch grasses, which will develop channeled flow common lespedeza is selected as the grass for lining, the comn-lOn lespedeza
lnCl'ease velOCity, and thus reduce silting.: , '
of low vegetal ret!l.rdar\.ce (greell~ average length 4.5 in.) is used for the
. 7-20. Proced?re of ~esign., After the !kind of grass for channel ]ining first stage in design. Then, in the second stag~, the cummon lespedeza
IS selected, the qegree of retardrmce can be determined from the condition of moderate vegetal retal'dance' (green, uncut,: average length 11 in.)
of the stem length and the density of growth. During the period of shou1.d be used. Finally, a proper freeboard is added to the computed'
 186 UNIFORM
I
DESIGN OF CHANNELS FOR UNIFORl!vl FLOW 187 1
depth of the channel, which will further increase the maximum design
capacity. The design procedure I is described as follows: Side slope Bottom width Depth Top width
A. Design Jor Stabilt·ty. Given the discharge, channel slope, and kind
of grass, the Ilrst stage of design may proceed in the following stiOlPs:
z:1 b, ft !I, it
....
T,ft
---~-
1
1. Assume a value. of n, and determine the corresponding values of VR 3;1 17.0 0.53 20.18
from the n- VR curve (Fig. 7-14). 6:1 12.5 0.62 19 94
Triangle ........... 10: 1. 0 1.00 20.00
2. Seler:t the permissible velocity from Table .7-6, and c()mpute the
value of R. Para.bola .......... o.n 2().00

3. Using the Manning formula, compute the value of

L49R%SH
n capacity of (1, fully developed lining. The procedure is as follows:.
and check this value against the value of V R obtained in step 1.
4. Make other trials until the computed value of V R is equal to the
IT R value obtained from the n- V R curve.
5. Compute the water area, or A Q/Y.
6. Since the correct values of.A and R have been obtained, the section
dimensions may be determined the procedure described in Art. 7-7,
The sections generally used for grassed channels are the trapezoid,'
po,rabola, and triangle, named in order of increasing depth required in
excavation. Owing to the norl11al action of channel deposition and
erosion, trapezoidal and tLiallgular sections, if selected but not well
maintained, will generally become para.bolic after a long period of service.
Example 7-6. Determine the section of a coannellined with grltSS miX~ure, laid
on erosion-resistant soil at a slope of 0,04, and carrying a discharge 0; 50 ds.
Solution. In designing for stability, the grass mixture that offers a low vegetal
retardance; j,e., that of the dormaut ~eaaon, is considered. Therefo~e, the corre~pond­
·jng n- 'V.n curve should be used in the c.omputation.
From TablCl 7-5, the permissible velocity for design is taken as 5 fps. Using the
n~l'R curve (Fig 7-14) for grn.s8 mixtute for fall, winter, and spring, the trial computa-
tions involved in tho design procedure !lore ¥ follows:
1.49R~5SH
Trial no. R
11.
B. Design j,'}r lI1a:rim~tm Capacity. The second sta,ge in design. is to
determine the additional dept.h necessary to sustam the maXImum
.
1. Assume Lne depth y, and compute the water area A and the hydraulIc
radius R. .
2. Comput.(J the velocity Y by Y = Q/ A and the value of V R.
3. From the n-V R curve of a higher degree of retardance for the
selected lining, detcrmiac the value of n.
4. Compute the velocity by the Manning formula, and check this
value of V against the value obtai!led in step 2.
5. Make trial computations unt.il the computed V in step 4 is equal to
the computed IT in step 2. ·It should be note~ that this velocity is a.lw.''\ys
les5 than the permissible velocH,y assumed 111 the first stage of deSign,
that is, in design for stability, since the cross section has heen enlarged in
the second of the design.
6. Add proper freeboard to the computed depth.
Example 7-7. Modify. the selected sections in Example. 7~6 for maxi,mum ca,pacity.
Soh,tion. For determining the proper depth for maXlnlum. capacIty of t.he pro-
. posed sections, the grass mixture of the growing. season, whIch offers a X?oderate
vegetalreta.rdallce, is considered in the computatlOn. TnI' n-VR curve (FIg. 7-14)
for grass mixhure in summer is therefore used. Other known da.ta are Q = 50 cfs and
S 0.04.. .
For the tl'apezoidal section with 3:1 side slope and b = 17.0 ft, the trial computa-
tions are given below:

1 ' L35
'Trial
noQ. !I' A R V l'R n I V
1.491mSH
-
2 0.34
11.
1
-
3 4.72 13,4 0.051
1 0.70 0.G3 3.73 2.35 4.2.2
4 2,50 2 0.60 11.3 0.54 4,42 2.39 0.050 3,96
3 0.65 l2.3. 0.58 4.07 2'.36 0.051 4.07
1
1
The correct va-lues for the determination of sections o.re.R = 0.50 It and A = 3% =
10 ft'. Several cha.nnel sections meeting these requirements are proposed as follows The correct depth is 0.55 ft. Adding a freeboa.rd of 0.2 tt,.the total depth is 0.85.ft.
(using charts in App~ridb:: D ) : ' ,
. For the trapezoidal ::;ection with a side slope of 6: 1 and b 12.5 ft, t~12 computat~on
For an eXl).mple .of the pra.ctical results in a total depth of 0.94 ft. Simila.rly, the tot!).l depth of the trlangula.r sectIOn
I of a. grassed channel, see £42J.
with a side slope of 10: 1 is found to be 1.33 ft,.

.1

..;.... -!~ " •

 DESIGN OF CHANNELS FOR UNIFORM FLOW 189
188 UNIFORM FLOW

For the parn.bolic :3ection of y =- 0.73 ft and T = 20 ft, the trial computn.tions are mostly in n.Uuvi!ll soil, ra~ging from light sand~ or silty [oams to adobe and having
as follows: an average particle size of 0.002b in. Review the hydraulic design of the channel
section.
7-12. Review the stability of the section dimensions obtaincd in Example 7-3 by
Trial
no.
---
y
I T A I R V
I- - -I- - -
VR n
1.49m1S~~

n
the method of trn.ctive force, !l.Ssuming that 25 % of the material forming the channel
bed is L2b in. or over in diameter.
7-13. Solve Example 7-4 for the following conditions, respectively:
.

I 0.80 I 21.0 11.2 0.52 4.406 2.32 0.051 3.78 (a) If the side slopes are. assumed as 1 on 1.5. .
(b) If the mateJin.1 forming the channel bed contains fine noncohesive particles,
2 0.90 22.2 13.3 0.60 3.76 2.25 0.051 4.15
I
3 0.85 21.6 12.2 0.57 4.10 2.34 0.051 4,03 50% of which are larger than 1 mmin diameter. The water is clear.
·1 0.85 21. 7 12.4 0.58 4.03 2.34 0.051 4.07 (e) If the m~.terial forming the channel bed is cohesive compact clay, having !L voids
I I I ratio eqllal to 0.5 ..
It should be noted that the computation for the parabolic section is simplifi<od by (d) Ii the channel is moderately sinuous.
the lI,se of t}leequation for R in Table 2-1 and by the foct that the depth is proportional 7-14. The conversion from the maximum permissible velocity to permissible trac-
to the squ,ue of the top width; that' is, T = 20 -Vy/O.73. Allowing!l freeboard of tive force (Table 7-3) is based on 0. flow depth 0'£ 3 ft _and an avernge channe.l section
0.20 ft, the total depth is 1.06 ft n.nd the top width is 24.1 ft. ha.ving a bottom width of 10 it and side slopes of L5: 1. For a.llllvial noncolloidal silts
.The final choice of the cllannel section and its dimensions ...... ill depe-nd on practicability and. clear-water floW, the m!lximum permissible velocity recommended by Fortier and
nnd on the circllmstances under which the problem is proposed.. ' . Scobey is 2.00 fps r.nd the n value is taken as 0.020. Compute the corresponding
permissible tractive foree.
7-15. Compute the maximum tractive force per unit area on the section of the All-
PROBLEMS American Canal described in Prob. 7-11. .
7-16. Determine the cross ser.I,ion and discharge of the st~ble hydraulic section of 0
7 -1. Show t~at the most efficient rectangular or triangular section is one-half of a .channel excavated in a' noncohesive IDr.terial ho.ving To = 0.1 lblft', S = 0.00040,
square.
. 7-2. Explain (a) that any section formed by a p'olygon which can be inscribed by
o "" .31", and n = 0.020. .
7-17. Determine the modffied profile for the channel section obtained in the preced-
!\ semicircle with the ccnter in the water surface will have its hydro,ulic radius equal
ing problem if the channel is tOCllUY (a) 75 cfs ILnd (b) 300 efg.
to one-half the radins of th~ inscribed circle, and (b) that such section will have the 7-18. Design a waterway lined with Bermudn. grass on- erosion-resistant soil and
best hydl'll.ulic effiuiency. . cn.rryillg a discharge of 200 cfs .. The n.vernge slope of the channel is 3 %. Use the
7 -3: Detenuine the best hydraulic section of the channel in Example 7-2 if the sec-
curve for modemte vegetn.l rel,ardance.
tion is (n) rectangular, (b) triangular, (e) cirl!ular, (d) parabolic, and (e) in the form of 7 -19. Determine the total depth for maximnm capacity of the channel section pro-
It hydraulic catenary. . . po,,,ed for the preceding problem. Allow 11 fre,eboard equal to 20% of the computed
7-4. Solve Example 7-2 by the empirical rule of Eqs. (7-2) and (7-3). depth. .
7 -6. Design a nonerodible channel carrying 200 cfs with n = 0.020 and S = 0,0020.
Use your own judgment and assumptions.
7-6. Based on the p.ractice of t1u~ U.S. Bureau or'Reclamation, det.ermine (0) the REFERENCES
freeboard of the channel designed in Example 'r-2 when the channel is unlined and
1. Victor L. Streetel': Economical conal cross section~, Transactions, American
(b) the heights of the lining and benk if the channel is lined. '
Society of Civil Engineers, vol.. 110, pp. 421-430, 1045.
7-7. Solve Example 7-3 if the material forming the channel body is fine silt having
2. I van E. Houle" Irrigation Engineering," vol. 2, "Projects, Condllits, und Struc-
an average particle size of 0.006 mm. Estimate the permissible velo,~ity with the aid
tures," John Wiley & Sons, Ill~., New York, 1956.
of (a) Fortier and Scobey's table, (b) U.S.S.R. data, and (e) the Kennedy formul~.
3. ",Linings for lrrigrttion Canals," U.S. Bureau of Reclamn.tion, Jl1ly, Hl52.
modified for clear ,vater. . .
4. Cll-nals !lnd related structures, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Design and Constnlc-
7-8. SOlVE Example 7-3 if the mn.terial forming the channel body is fairly compact
lion Manila!, Design Supplement No.3, Apr. 17, 1952; vol. X, 'pt, 2,. ghop. I,
heavy clayey soil with a voids ratio of l.0.
paragraphs 1.15, 1.8, and 1.18. . .
7 -9. Solve Example 7-3 if the channel has !l. pa.rabolic section.
5. B. A. Etcheverry: "Irrigation Practice and Engineering." vol. II, "Conveyance
7 -10. Design the section of a canal to carry a discharge of 200 cfs throllgh a land of
of Water," iVIcGmw-HiIl Book Company,Jnc., New York, 1st ed., 1915, p. 122.
erodible soils with n = 0.020 and S = 0.0020. Assume other necessary data and use
6. G\lilford L. Molesworth: "Pocket-book of Engineering Formulae (Useful Formulae
your o~vn jlldgment. .
and Memoranda) for Civil·and Mechanical Engineers," E. & F. N.Spon, London,
. 7-lt. 111e All-American Canal is desigr:ed to divert 15,155 cfs of desilted water from
the Colorado River to irrigate the Imperial Valley in southern Califpmia. This canal 7th ed., 1871, p. 175. '
7. Isidro D. Carino: A graphical solution for flow in earth channels, paper 1360,
, i is 80 millls long. . The typical maximum section has a bottom width of 160 ft, width
Proceedings, American Society of Civil Engineers, J oumal, Irrigation and Dra.ina.ge
at wo.t¢r surface of 232 it, water depth of 20.6 ft, minimum freeboard of 6 ft and bank
Division, voL 83, no. IR2, pp. 1-9, September, 1957. .
width of 27 to 30 ft. The terminal capacity is 2,600 cfs. The canal was 'excavated
190 UNIFORM FLOW
8. 'Pete W. Terrell [LIld Whitney M. Borland: Design of stable canals and channels in
erodible ma.terial, Transactions, AnLerican Society of Civa Engineers, vo!' 123, pp.
lOl-U5, 1D£i8. . 6, no. 1, pp. 1-22, Berkeley, 1 9 3 2 . ,
9. E. W. Lane: Stable channals in erodible material, Tmnsact·irms, American Society
of Cilia Engineel's, vol. lO2, pp. 123-142, 1937; and discussions.
10. Robert G. Kennedy: The prevention oI silting in irrigation canals, Proceedings,.
Inslit:l.tiolL c,f Civil Engineers, London, vol. 119, pp. 281-290, 1895.
11. Edward S. Lindley: Regime channels, Minutes of Proce,ed£ngs, Pun}ao Engtneering
Congress, Lah01'e, India, vol. 7, pp. 63-74, 1919.
12. Gerald Lacey: Stable channels in alluvium, Proceedings, Inst·itution of Civil
Engineers, London, vol. 229; pp. 2.'i9-384, HJ30.'
13. Gerald L"c"y: Regime flow in incoherent alluvium, Cenl,.al Board of h1'1:galion,
PlLblication No. 20, Simla, Iudia, 1940. . 35. E. W. Lane': Progrl:'ss report on results of studies on design of stable channels
14. Gerald Lacey: A general theory of flow in alluvium, Journal, Instit'ution of Civil
Engineers, Londan, vol. 27, pp. 16-47, 1946. '.
15. Thoinas Blench: "Bydrs-ulies of 'Sediment-bearing Cano.ls and Eivers," Evan~
'Industrie$, Ltd., Vancl)uver, B.C., Canada, 1951.
16. Thomas Blench: Regime theory for oclf-formeci sediment bearing'channels, Tmns-
actions, American Bociety oj Ciliil En.gineers, vol. 117, pp. 38.1-400, Hi52.
17. H. A. Einstein: The bed-load fUllction for sediment tran~Jlorta~ion in open channet
flows, U.S. Depa"bILent of Agriculture, Technical BuUelin No. 1025, 1950.
18. L. B. Leopold and Thomas Maddock, Jr.: The hy.draulic g~ometry of stream
cha.nnels and some physiographic implictttions, U.B:G'eological BUTVP,Y, Professional
Paper 252, 1953.
19. ,K W. Lane: Sta.ble channels in erodilJle material, Tra1tSdctio,is, American Society
of Civil Engineers, vol. 102,pp. 123~142, 1937. .'
20. Serge Leliavsky: "An Introductiqn to F1uvial Hydraulics," Constable & Co.,
Ltd., London, 1955.'
in
21. Instit\ltion Research Committee: Recent developments hydraulics, Proceedings,
In.stilution of Civil Enginp,cr.s, London, pt. III, vol. 4, pp. 990-1049, December,
1955.
22. Ning Chien :'The present status of research on sediment transport., Tl'anoactions,
A lILerican Society of Civil Engineers, va!. 121, pp. 833-868, 1956.
23. Ning Chien: Graphic design of olluvial channels, Transactions, Amer':can Society
of Cilia Enuineers, vol. 121, pp. 1267-1280, 1956. '
24~ Ning Chien: A concept of the regime theory, Transactions, American Society of
Civil Engineers, vol. 122, pp. 785-793, 1957.
25. Eno~ J. Carlson and Carl R. Miller; Research needs'in sediment hydraulics, paper
953, Procced£ngs, American Society of Civil Engineers, J oumal, Hydraulics D£visio1];,
vo!' 82, no. 11 Y2, pp. 1-33, April, 1956.
26. D. A. Etcheverry: "Irrigation Practice and Engineering," va!. II, McGraw-Hill
Book Company, Inc., New York, 1915.
27. S. Fortier and Jf. C. Scobey: Permissible cana.l ;relocities, Tran8~tions, AlILerican
Society of Cillil Engineers, vol. 89, pp. 940-956, 1926. ,
28. The maximum' permissible ,mean 'velocity in open channels, Gidrotekhnichesko·ie
Stroitel'stvo, (Hydrotechnical Constmction),I\{oscow, no. 5, pp.5-f, May, 1936.
29. Emory W. Lane: Design of stable channels, Transactions, Am.erican Society of
Civil' Engineers, vol. '120, pp. 1234-1260, 1955. .
30. P. du Boys: Etudes du regime du B,h6ne et l'action exercee par les eaux su~ un lit
~ fond de graviers indetiniment affouillable '(The Rhone and streams with movable
•bedsj, Annales rles ponts et Cha1L8S~eS, ser. 5, vo!. 18, pp. 141-195, 1879.
DESIGN OF CHANNELS FOR UNIFORM FLOW 191
31. J. B. Leighly; Toward a thaory of the morphologic significance of turbulence in the
flow of water in stream, Uni~ersily of Ca.17/orlliCL, Publications in GelJgraphy, vol.
.
32. O. J. Olsen and Q. L. Florey (compilers): Sedimentation studies in open channels:
Bo.und~y shear and velocity distribution by membrane 'ano,logy, ana.lytical and
fil11te-dlfference methods, reviewed by D. McHenry and It. E. Glovel' U.S.
Bu,rea.u of Reci.rultation, LabOl·atory. RepOl·t, No. Sp-34, Aug. 5, 1952. '
33. Ph.ili~p Forchhei~eT: "Hydraulik" ("Hydraulics "), Teubner Verlag:sgesellschaft,
Lelp,ag and Berlin, 1st ed., 1924, p. 495; 3d ed., 1930, p. 551.
34. Chi~-Hw~ Fan:.A study.oI stD,blc channel cross section (in Chinese), Hydraulic
En(]~neer.~1!!l, Chtne.se SoCtely of Hydraulic Enginse'rs vol. 15 no 1 pp 71-79
Nanking, 1947. ' ",. "
U.S. Bureau of [leclamation, Hyd'·(L!J.lic Laboraiot']J Repol·t, No. lIyrl-352 , J\1l1e'
1952. ' ,
36. A. C. ~~rter: Critica~ tractive fones on channel side ~lo]Jes, U.S. Bgrea.l! of .,\
Rcclmrt(lMTc, Hydrav.hc LaboratoJ'Y Report No. Hyd-3G6 (supersedes Hyd-295)
Feb. 18, 1953. '. . . ,
37. E. W. Lane ~tl1d E. J. CarIllOn: Some factors affecting the stn.bility of canals cou-
structed in coarse granular materials, Pr'oceedings of the Minnesota [nlernalional
IIydmulics Convention, Sept. 1-4, 1953, Joint Meeling of Inte1'1wtional As.sociation
for H ydt·l}.ulic Research and HydmldiC5 Divi.sion, American Bociety of Civil Eng,;rwers,
pp. 37-48, August, 1953. .
38. R. E. Gloyer and Q. L. Florey: Sta.ble channel profiles, U.S. But'eau of Re,clama- .j
,ti01l, HydTflHl'ic Laboratory Report No. Hyd-325, Sept. 27, 1951. The work was
started by R. G. Conard and revie.wed by E. \Y, Lane.
39. W ..0. Ree: Hy~raul.ic characteristics of veget.ation for vegetated waterways,
Agnculttlral .Enqmeenng, vol. 30, 110. 4, pp. 184-187 and 189, April, 1949. '
40. ~'. O. Ree and V. J. Palmer: Flow of water ill channels protected by vegetat.ive
lmmg, U.S. Boil Co,~seTVation. Service, Technical Bulletin No. 9lH February 1949.
41. Stillwater Outaool' Hydraulic Laboratory: Handbook of chandel desig;ri' for soil
an~ water conservation, U.S. Soil Conservation Service, SCS-TP-Gl, Marcll., 1947;
reVised, ,June, 1954. . .
42. V. D. Fredcnhagen and E. H. Doll: Gmssed waterways, Agricullural Enuineming,
vo!. 35, no. 6, pp. 417-419, June, 1954. .
I
·1
-\

1,

(
·1
I
 'l'HEORET1CAL CONCEPTS RELATED' TO 'UNIFORM FLOW 193
bution; (3) the depth of Row is indefmitely 1111'ge,so the depth of ftow cun
be considered constant as the water enters the channeL 1n th!'i,~ha!!neJl
the effect on the velocity di!J.trib!Jti®~t9. boun.1.::I£Y-XQ.hlghnes~ is
indicatedbythe- ii~~" IlHf,- Outside the surface represented by ABC,
. CHAPTER 8 --7'- th~ ;~I~city7 d'i;tribution is practically uniform. Near the channel sur-
face and within the region ABC, v~locjty"'y£l.ries l\.ccording_tQ_ 4isww.e
I THEORETICAL CONCEPTS OF BOUNDARY LAYER, iromthe channel surface. . The region inside ABC, though not distinc-
'ti;;;,i;k~~~~ boundary layer 1 and its thickness is deSignated by o.
lI SURFACE ROUGHNESS, VELOCITY DISTRIBUTION, Since the bouhdary layer is not dis-
AND INSTABILITY OF UNIFORM FLOW tinctive, jiB. thi<lkn.es.JLh~~_I?een de.-
i ....fu!ed arbitrn.rily in."yarioufi..~ays .
.~~_......:;.-> A common definition is that the lrei&-C,;11 _ '
._- ~ thickne;:;s 6 is the magnitude of the ':((5 w/,bu l( ~n
This chapter presents assorted theoretical concepts which have been normal distance from the boundary 1
developed in the mechanics of open-channel flow. These concepts, ;ll~ft1,ceat ,~hi()h th;Vclocity ;; is '
though not to be thoroughly discussed, may shed some light upon the equitnQ99%Of theli:rrd~~:
solution of many practical problems. -n:y Vo, ''I'hTcli.the velocity:'distribu-
8-1. The Boundary Layer. When watel' enters a channel, the velocity' 1ion-:-b~ur:ve1n the boundary Tayer
distributionncross the channel section, owing to the presence of boundary approaches
. g:<~---~-~
asy!llptoticall~(Fig.

The e,1lranCE ....--_~ The effect of the bounda.ry layer

condition is
hypolhelicol on the flow is equivale!lt to a ficti-
\ tious upward displacement of the
channel bottom toa virtual position
by an amOl1!l,t equal to the so-called
displllcementthiclmess 0* (Fig. 8-2),
which is defined as '
r- ~ . '
r",- "-
(8-1) FlO. 8-2 .. Distribution of velocitv over a
smooth channel Sur!l1c9{not in sC!lle). / '
where l' ill the velocity at any elis" / £-,.. .
.. _--"-" tance'li from the channel surfnce ,!!-nAvl-is the 'yJ;!lGtci~t~Jit~!toftE.E!.
FlO. ~L Development of the boundary layer in an open chl1nnel with an idea.l entrance _~9.1!.~l.g3lry.l~r.. The value of t.he displacement tl1ickness generally varies
condltlOn. . .
. from one-eighth to. one-tenth of the thickness of the boundary layer,
roughness, will vary with the distance over wllich the water t!'avels in depending on the magnitude of the Reynolds number.
the;. channel. (Fig. 8-1).1 If· the flow is uniform and stable and if' the At the beginning of the now in the channel (Fig. 8-1) the ftow iii entirely
i laminar and a laminar boundary layer is developed along the channel
channel is prismatic and of constant roughness, the veiocity rustdbution
i will eventually reach a definite pnttern. For simplicity of discussion the surface, .as shown by the curve AB.· The velocity distribution in th~
following m'e assumed; (1) th~ fiow enteX'ing the channel is lamil1al' and of layer is. approximately .parabolic. As. the water travels farther along in
uniform velocity distribution; (2) no restriction exists at the entrance that the channel; the ftow in the boundary byer will eventtmlly change to
will cause abrupt disturbanc~ of the water surface and the velocity distri- turbulent. (rhe point where the challge tn,kes place is indicated by B.
Downstre~m from B a tl1rb1dent boundary layer is developed, 'as shown
. ,1 For· the sake of simplicity, the two-dimensiona.l profile of:a. wide open channel
With exagger~ted verticll.l sc.ale isahown. I For a. compl'ehensive treatment of this shbject see !ll to [4].
192
;
C>
. I-I/:. .,. .If {J. ,(.r
-=- vI(.')j"~oJ.fCL 1'r"G<:.-' .tId .;)' l.tfol
_'
~-"
.t:d _ . i <¥ /i
V{~U_1. .d~ ~/.. /'/-t . . . ~7;1'.,A;..
 194
by BC. The velQcity distribution in this layer can be shown analytically
to be approximately log:1l'ithmic (Art. 8-4).
If the channel suds.ce is relatively smooth, the velocity close to the
channel surface is low; thus, a very thin stable film offiow known as the
la:minar sublayer will be develope-d on the surface. Within the laminar
sublayer the flow is kept laminar.l The top surface of th~ laminar sub-
~ ___ '-_~ layer corresponds to the transitional zone of flow from laminar to t.urbu-'
lent (Art. 1-3) and, hence, cannot be precisely defined.
'~-----Y- If the conditions for ul1iformflow exist throughout the channel, the
turbulen t boundary layer will be fully developed at section CD; thereafte!
the velocity distribution w~e patt.er.!!,:. In a laporutory
·cha.nnel, the laminar boundary layer AB _gan be elh?inated easily by
placing a..l."ou~hness el_e!l~e!l~
ary layer will be developed
el1t.!~lce: Thus, the turbulent bounC!=-
very beginning of the channel, an~ the
totallen&h of the :/lone for the full development of boundary la~l' c!tllbe
slloi'·tel1~~ SinGe the flow in ordinary chanl1els is usually turbui~nt:the
f9UO;:;;g articles will deal only with the turbulent boundary layer.
8-2. Concept of Surface Rough~ The concept of the existence ofa
laminar sublayer in the turbulent· boundary layer offers a picturesque
explanation of the behavior of surface roughness. When the surface
profile of a channel is enlarged (Fig. 8-3), it can be seen that the surface is
composed of irregular peaks ~l1d valleys. The ejJectiue height of the
i A refined concept of the Ia.minar subla.yer will consider that there exi~ts in the s\lb-
layer a small a.mount of eddy which dec~eases very ra.pidly to zero· at the boundary
surfll.ce. . ,
THEORETICAL CONCEPTS RELATJi!D TO UNIFORM FLOW· 195
irregularities forming the roughness elements is called the 1'oilgl!1i68.s
height! k. The ratio kl R of the roughlless height to the hydraulic radius
is known as tha relative roughne.ss.
--_~""''''' If the roughness height is less t,han a certain fraction of the thickness
j( -< So of the laminar sublayer, the s~rfa.ce irregularities will be so small that all
ronghness elements will be entIrely submerged in the laminar sublayer 1
(Fig. 8-3a).' Under this condition the roughness has no effect upon the
fio'w ou.tside the lam.inar sublayer, and the surface is said to be hydrau-
_._.;;;> liGally sn;ooth. A hydraulically smooth surface is said to be wuu!LiUh.e
aVer~iW.8Jl.....l1UrY:e (Fig. 8-3b). ---.
. In connection with flow in pipes or on flat plates at zero incidence,
Schlichting (see p. 454 of [ID . the following condition for a surface
to be hydraulically smooth:
V,k <5 or k < 51' (8-2)
)I
where V f a term known as the friction lJe/ocitu (Art. 8-4).
Using the Gh6zy formula. it can be shQ\rn~ above condition
that, for a surface to be hydraulically smooth, the roughness height must
be less than a critical rotlghne.ss expressed by
k. = 5C ; (8-3)
where C is CheZ~I's C, I' is th.e kinem(\tic viscosity, and l' is the mean
velocity. The above conditionis·giveri for r0l1ghi1ess obtained with sand
. having \'alue;s of C greater than 100, prob"bi,r. For the avcri1ge COll-
di~ion, Schlichtillggives kc = 100"/1', which corresponds to C '" 113.5.
ail approximD.tion, (8-3) U1:;ty be applied to channels.
If the roughness height is gl"eater tha~l th'l critical va111e..d~y EJi: .
(8-3) (Fig. 8-3c), the roughness elemeuts will have sufficient magnitude
~ angu!a.ritY..to extend...tht'lis~ffects beJ:::9l!.c!. the !l).mil~[1,r subl~r..i1ncl.
thus to disturb the flow in the chi1nne1. The surface is therefore said to
I
bC"ro1Lg/i:--in rough ch~i;,nJS, ~
the-~eI;;~ity distribution will depend 011 the
form and ~ize of the roughness projections, .!1l1d a stable laminar subli1yer
. can no longer be formed.
I It should be noted that the roughness height is mel'eLy a measure of the linear
dimension of the rQughness elcmeuts but is not necessarily eqoaL to t.he ac~ual, or ev~n
an average, height. For example. two roughness elements ll13.Y have diffctcllt linear
dirnr>,nsions, but, owing to the difference in shape and orientation, they may produce
identical roughness effect and, thlls, their roughncsscs will be clesignated by the same
roughness height.
2 The position from which the rOllghness hcight should he measured is IL disputable
mli\tter. It is a.'<StlInJad here tha.t k is measured from 1\ datUllI that li,,~ at. n distance of
O.5k below the average bottom of the channel.
, i
lI
 ~I THEORETICAL CONCEPTS RELATED TO ·UNIFORM. FLOW i97
196
I
UNIFORM FLOW
of abnormal turbulence. 1 °In 'such a flow,therefore, the ratio yl).will be
r->'I'h~ average roughness height for a given surface can be determined by
; an importn.nt correlating parameter.. .
expenment. Table g··1 gives
I,
~si-~m.ooth ~o~..2.ccurs when_ the roughness elements. are.~.Q.~...
averaged from manv
The con~ept, of l"~ughness in conduits was further advanced by' Morris
I
I
together tb.!--'l!i..~' ski.ms the _cre5t..§.2l..the_.e!e~nt£, . The
grooves between the elements will be filled with dead water contall1mg
[5]. Morns assumed that the flow over. a .i
rough surface is due largely tl) rough- !i
ness element. The o.f
!.~etermiM,
and

TA1l!.E 8-1. ApPROXIMATE VALUES OF ROUG.lNESS HE1(lHT It

. Mc.lerial k, it
B:ra.ss, copper, lead, glass ... ". , , , ,. 0.0001:"'0,0030
Wrought iron, steel. ...... ' ....... 0.0002-0.0080
Asphalted east iron, . . . . . . .. . 0.0004-0.0070
Galvanized iron ... ,., ........ '. 0.0005-0.0150
Cast iron ............ , .... " ...•.. 0.0008-0.0180
Wood stave ....... , ............. 0.0006-0.0030
Cement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 0.0013-0.0040
Concrete., ........... , ...... , .... 0.OU15-Q.0l00
Dra.in tile .......... ,.............. 0.0020-0.0100
Riveted steel. ..... , .............. 0.0030-0.0300
Natural river bed. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. 0.1000-3.0000

tudinal ~f the r~~ss el~.ments·is the roughness dimension of

(0)
~
paramount Importance in rough-conduit flow. Under this concept, flow
~~vel' IOtlgh surfa.ces can be classified into three basic types (Fig. : ---------
I 'L~olC!!:e.?::..~:01J.2hJ1.es.s flow, wake-interference flow, and quasi-smooth (01'
I slcimmt'ng) flow. '
.-'--;:;, ~ solated-roughne~~Jow. prevails when the roughness elements are so
far apart that the wake and VOl'tex a.t each element are completely
developed and dissipated before the next element is reached. The appar-
( c1
ent roughness would thereforere8ult from the form on the roughness
elements, represented primarily by the height of projection k of the FiG. 8-4. Sket.ches showing concept of three basic typ;;s of How: (a) iso~
lll.ted-roughness. !low; (b) walJ:e-interf~rence flow; (c) quasi-slnooth tlcw.
element, in addition to the friction drag 011 the waH surface between ele-
ments, ,which depends on the spacing of the elements. In such a flow, _~ stable eddies, creating a£:?~1}. Large projections Illoe
the. ratIO kl}.. may be taken as a significant correlating parameter influ- ~tisent from this pseudo wall, and the surfuce £!'cts hydrauli~l\.ll-y smooth.
encmg the apparent friction factor in the flow. . In such a flow, the ratio k/A (or .ill., where j is the groove width) will again
. , 1" Walee-interference flow :esults when the roughness elements are placed be a significant parameter. Quasi-smo.Q.thJiy.:.:Y.....ba~
. ,s~ clo~together tha.t the ~nd .YQrJj)x at each element wiUjnterfere factor than flow ovel' a true smootll surfa£ft because the eddies in the
WIth those developed !l:L~tJ resulting in intense and groove~me a certain. am~f~gy.
c.!?~pl~x."yor~i~ and tu~·bulen~g. hi such ~ flow, the height of The nbove concept ap'pears to be substantiated adequately by experi-
the e~em~nt is. rehlthr ely unimportant, but the spacing is obviously
1 Morris llsed the pipe radius instea.d of the depth in defining the parameter because
of major ImpOl·tance. Also, the average depth y of flow above the crests he was ',;oncerned primarily· with pipes instead of channels;
of the elements will control in part. the vertical ex tent of the surface region
 198 UNIFORM FLOW THEORETICAL CONCEPTS RELATED TO UNIFORM now .j
mental 'data from many· different sources. The· concept can also be . computing the varied-flow surface is used. In the case of tIle boundary-
extended to surfac€s of variable roughness by u5ing average values of the layer development of a uniform flow, the application of Bau61:'s method is
roughness dimensions that vary or by combining the friction factors for· just the same except that the water surface requires 110 computation, for
each flow type to give all over-all apparent friction factor of the flow. it is simply parallel to the ehanneLbottom.
8··3. Computation of Boundary Layer. For the development of a
turbulent bound~ry layer in wide channels, ·an-;:pprQximate but practical Example 8-1. Aooncret.e overflow spillway of indefinite length has a. surface slope
angle 11 = 53°8' (Fig. 8-5) and a roughness snch that k 0.005 ft. When the dis-
meth~2!L h~_~.E!:Q12Q~_Qy_Jl~lJ&t.f.§1, This method charge is 3130 cfs per foot of spillway width, compute the length for boundary-layer
waS' developed primarily for flo\v i.,1l; ~.han~els.oI large ~l'?.P.e, but it has dev!:')opment, the profile of the boundary layer, and the water surface,
been found applicable also to channels of small slope; provided the flow is Solution.. The computation is shown in Table 8-2; the headings are explained as \
. -.::- -.... ,-...... -- .--:'
~
"
follows:
,j
Col. 1. Arbitrarily assigned length of x in ft, !DeMured from 0
Col. 2.. Values of xlk, where k 0.005 ft
Col. 3. V",lues of lJ/:z, computed by Eq. (8-4)
Col. 4. Values of ~ in HI obtained by multiplying x by 8/x
CoL 5. Velocity head vo'/2g in ft, equal to x sin·e = 0.80x
Col. G. Velocity in fps corresponding to the velocity head in the preceding column
CoL 7. Potentia.l thickness of Row in it, equal to the dischal'f!;e 1160 cis/it divided
by the yelocity fl. .
Nomin.o\ limit of boundory'loye.r CoL 8. Actual thickness of Lhe flow in ft, equal to the potent.ia.l thickness plus the
displacem<:lntthickness, which is assumed w be 10 % of the thickness 0 of the boundary
la.ye!'
TA.BLE 8-2. BOtiNDARY-LAYER COMPUTATION

Dam
k = 0.005 it (J 53°8' q = 360 cfs/n

x/k li/x u. i /2g v. glv, y

( 4) I
F" •.

Fm. 8-5. Growth of bounda.ry layer over the surfac<:l of an overflow Rpillway. 50 1 X 10; 0.0073 0.36 40 50.S 7.09 7.13
100 2 X 10· 0.001313 0.136 SO 71.8 5.00 5.07
200 4 X 104 0.0060 1.20 160 101.5 3.~ 3.65
either accelerating or. uniform, and, if accelerating, th.~l£~~~idlr 400 8 X 10' 0.0055 2.20 320, 113.5 250 2.72
~~M t;-~l1!use boulldary~layer S~~~llS. . 600 L2 X (05 0.0052 3.12 480 175.8 2.04 2.35
- The st,udy of boundary-layer de.velopment by Bauer was made on con-
crete overflow spillways (Ii'ig. 8-5). In this case the transition from the The computed water surfa.ce a.nd t,he bounda.ry layer are plotted on logarithmic
la~illar to the turbulent boundary layer usually occurs far upstream paper (Fig. 8-6). The point of intersection of the two profiles indica.tes the location
from the zone under consideration; hence the laminar boundary layer can of the section where the bOlmdary layel: reache.s its maximum, or where it is fully
be ignored, fo'r it is all insignificant part of the .problem. From the developed. The lengtb of the development is shown to be approximately 460 ft.
It shOUld be noted that the simplified method of 'computing the water-surface
results of Bauer's investigation, the following equation may be written:'
profile of a varied flow is justified in this problem because the flow is relatively thin
l) _ 0.024. and the slope is very steep.. As the frictional loss in this case is :negligibly small, the
x - (x/k)o.13 potential energy of water is practics.lly entirely converted into the lunetic energy
expressed by the velocity head. For the computation of surfl:\Ce proj\Ies of varied
where 8 is the thickness of the turbulent boundary layer at distance x flow in general, various methods will be described in Part Ill. 1I
from 0 in the diiectionof flow (Fig, 8-5) and where k is the roughness To illustrate the effect of change in roughness upon the growth of a boundary layer,
the computation has been repea.ted using ~he8amc da.ta but with a rOl\gbness twice as
height, Bauer has shown the application of this method by the 'follow- large, The line marked with It 11 = 8, k = 0.01 itO (Fig. 8-6) is the result of this
ing ·example. It should be noted that the flow on the spillway surface computation. The change in water surface ispractic.!Llly negligible. It can be seen
to be described in this example is varied and that a sirtiplified method of tha.t the difference between the values of the development lengtll for the two cases is
!
I
I
I
.. I
<I
J
i
 200 UNIFORM FLOW
~I',
r THEORETICAL" COl-iCEPTS RELATBD TO 'UNIFORM FLOW 201.

10 J.QLth~n near the acEd surfac\l, ,Prandtl introduced two assump-

:FEfIi
9 ! I t
tions:' (1) that themixh}g 'length is proportional. to 'Ii, and (2) that the
shearing stress is constant; Since the shearing stress at the, channel Lbo..:\) . '
s
5 i'.r-., ,~ surface is equal to the unit tractive force (Art. 7-11), the second assump-
tion 'gives T = TO.:, From these two assumptions,Rq. (8-5) may be
. .
I,
~>'er..... ! ~u{j , .,~

wrItten

~
(8-6)
t- ~.,
/' r
"
"/.bf:
where K is a constant for the proportionality between L~nd }I:, The value
,\
I

I
JiV
.... of K has been ·determined py many experiments [8] to be about 0,40.
'+-
i , I
..
11ltegr'ating li<J. (8-6), ' t
c.( '1 .=::> I '" ~ "3'
OJ
I
oP~c:7 I~ In JL (8~7)
,,'
U

v = 2.5
~
i5
't>'
"..'" epV:l
O·
I Vp yo

1 "\<- '++ ·where Yn is a constant of integration.

o. 9 'b' I From Eq. (7-5) and w = pg; it. CD,n be shown that
//"'~ I
~I
O.
0,7
o.61--:- f-.
I
[/1/
'/ .~
I
r
I {j = vgRS Vr (8-8)

0.5 f--. /" V ,

0.4
,
v:
/
V,
.
i- '1- The quantity represented by V r has the dimensions of a velocity. Since
-----iY' it varies wi~h the boundary friction To, it is known as the ~n.i]i;;jii1i
or shea;' velocity. Thus, Eq. (8-7) may be written
0.3 c,. -L-J
40 50 60 70 80 100 200
I
300 400
I
600 BOO
I
P,y./('·UViJ.f- L~~:::) .~
. vr'
0:. tVl ~ (8-9)
DistallCe x, f j

FIG. 8-6. Solution of Example 8-1 for the growth of a boundary layer. Thili equation indicates ,that t~l:9,ci.~.J~he turbulel:t re~~~
logarithmic funotion of the distance .y. It is commonly known as the
about 30 ft, or a variation of less than 10%. This shows that an increase in rough- -. - . -~~-~ .. ~--~~

,ness has a tendency to speed up the boundary-layer growth or to',educe the develop- Prandtl-von Il..(irmdn· univeJ'sal-velocity-dist1-ibution Zaw. I
menL l e n g t h . ' , This la.w has been VCl,jti.ed by several experiments [10J.' The results
indica.te a striking i'imilarity betvveen observed and computed distribu-
. 8-~., Veloc!ty Distribution in Turbulent Flow. The velooity distribu- tions and, therefore, offer reasonable justification for use of this log;arith-
tiOn In a ulllform channel flow will become stable when the turbulent mic law in practical problems., '
",-_Q.9un~ar~ la!el' 1l3i'!!!.v ,develoE~d. In the turbulent boundary layer, When the sul'face is smooth, the constant yo in Eq. (8-9) has been found
the, clistnbu:lOn can be shown to be approximately logarithmic. "," to depend solely ,on the friction velocity and the kinematic viscosity;
The shearing stress at any point in a turbulent flow moving over a solid that is, '
surface has been given by Prandt.l [7] as my
(8-10)
Yo = Vr
, T = pl2 (::)2': (8-5)
where m is a constant equ~l to about % for smooth surfaces. 2 , For wavy
where p mass ~el1sity = wig, wh~re w i~ the unit weight of the fi.tiid
1 Von Karman .[9J also proved this law by II similarity hypothesis which assumes a
and g IS the gravitational acceleration ': linear shearing-stress distribution, the mixing length being proportiona.l to (dv /dy) /
l ':'" a characteristic length known as; ~he mixing length ,........ , (d~/dy·). !
dvldy velocity gradient at a normal distance y from the solid surfp,ce • Thill value is derived from Nikuradse's experimental data. 011 smooth pipes [111.

I
 20~ UNIFORM FLOW
!
i THEORETICAL CONCEPTS RELATED TO UNIFORM FLOW 203
.<

surfaces, the' value of m wHI depend on the shape of the wa.ve profiles. if: proportional to its vertica.l distarice Y from the boundary i that is,
Substituting Eq. (8-10) for Yo in Eq. (8-9). and simplifying,
B = P - 'YY (8-15)
v = 575V
. 9yVI
r log - v - for smooth surfaces . (8-11) where P is the wetted perimeter and l' is a function depending on the
shape of the section. Thus, the water area is equal to
This equation gives the velocity distribution in turbulent flOlv OVer 'k .
smooth surfaces. 11 = ( B d.y = Ph - 2: 11,2 (8-16)
When the surface is rough, the constant Yo is found to depend on the }o 2
roughness height ; that is, Substituting in Eq. (8-14) the value of v from Eq. (8-9), that of B from
(8-12) Eq. (8-15), n.nd that fO!' A from .Eq. (8-16) and then integra ling and
where the const.ant l m is equal to approximately ~Q' Substituting
Eq. (8-12) for YQ in Eq. (8-9) and simplifying,
30
v = 5.75YI log -!-
Co
for rough surfaces (8-13)

lli equation' gives th~ velocit.y difitribution in tru:l:mlellt flow ml£,r

~h surfaces. It should be noted. that thexoughness height k in this
equation is the mean dilolmeter of the sand grains used by.NikIJm.d.®; i'LG. 8·7. Channel ~ec~iol) to illustrate notation.
---~ .
it is Imow!LSpecifically as the Nikurad136 8and rough!.!§M.
It is to be noted that the constant.s nsed in the above velocity-distribu- simplifying, the following equat.ion is obtl~ined:
tion e@ations for smooth ®d rm~'faces were derived from data on
v= [li!!:. exp (-1 _1'h~)l

r
pipes. It is assumed, however, tha.t it is permissible to apply the llni- 2.5Vr In
. Yo R . 4A J
versal-Velocity-distribution h~w to other cases of turbulent flow, using the
constants determined from tests on circular pigcs.
8-0. Theoretical UnIfOrm-flow Equations. Using' the Prandtl-voll
• -. or -V = VI {5.75 log [m~ exp ( -1 -~~) + 5.75 lug n~~} 1 (8-17)

Karman universal-velocity-distribution law, KeulElgan (13)2 has derived . In thp, above equation t.he quantity represented by the first term on
equations for mean velocity of turbulent flow in open channels. . :I;<"o.r the right-hand side is a function of· the shape of t.he chn.nnel section.
the sake of clarity l;1.nd simplicity, Keulegan's derivation will be modified However, the variation of this quantity with different shapes of the
below. section is relatively small. F~r the sake of simlJlicity, the quantity may
By the cQntiuuit.y equation, the. total discharge through an ordinary be represflnted by an ov~r-all constant" 11 0• This constn.nt will include
channel section (Fig. 8-7) may be written not only the shupe function but also other uncertain factors, such as the
effect of free ~urfn.ce and the effe.ct of nonuniform distribution. of the
Q = FA =.
t V=k v dA
1.= O .
= lch vB dy ,
0 .
(8-14) tract,ive force at the boundary. Accordingly, Eq. (8-17) may be wribten
where h is the depth of water, A is the vlater area, B is the length of the
curve of equal velocity, and y is the vertical depth measured from the
V Yr (A
= 0 + 5.75 log mR)
Yo
(8-18)
boundary to the curve of equal velocity. Since the laminar sublayer is
relatively very thin, 00 can be assumed to he zero. It is further assumed
This is the general theoretical equation for the mean velocity of uniform
. flow in open channels.
It
that the maximum velocity is at the free surface and that the length B is
For. smooth channels, Yo mn:y be represented by Eq. (8-10). Also,
This' value is derived from Nikuradse's experimental data on Tough pipes [121.
1

[n Nikuradse's experjments, sand grains were cemented to the inner walls of pipes to * It is entirely feasible to simplify the derivation by assuming this constant at the
. simulate roughness. Such roughness is known as artificial T"Ougimess. very beginning. However, the procedure given here is aimed to give a logical demon-
2 Other references on this subject fLre [141 to r21J~ i ·stration of the basic principles involved.
I
f
lf .J
-I
",,,', ...... .
 205
204 UNIFORM FLOW THEORETICAL CONCEPTS RELATED TO UNIFORM FLOW

"d' ber Let" E<,qs. (8-1 g) and (8-20) be expressed

from ICeulegan's study "of Nikuradse's data [111,' Ao is found to be 3.25. functions 0 f t h e F. rou e num .
The theol'eticaluniform-fiow equation for smooth channels is, therefore, as follows:
I _ _ RY /) (8-2·1)
Y VJ (3.25 + 5.75 log R:/) "
= for smooth channels (8-19)
IT = VI "A, + ~.7u log--;- for smooth channels

l' = "I (AT + 5.7510g ¥ ) r o r rough channels (8-25)

Umng Bazin's data [22] for wavy surfaces, Keulegan obtained a value of
Ao = 1.3 for smallwood channels and -3.0 for large wood channe1s. .. , .' f'
In the above eouatlOns, A. and £l~ ale .mc 10
·t'"
ns of the }'roude number ..
. ft. The
For rough channels, yo may be expressed by Eq. (8-12). From Keule- 1· d t'
L f" ct~ of other mlllOI' ac OIS.
•
These constaill.s may al,;o ll,/; u e ne e Ie·" .'
gan's study of Bazin's data [22], the valu~ of Ao was found to have a wide
range, varying hom 3.23 to 18.92. Thus; a menu value of 6.25 for
Ao may be used. The theoretical uniform-fiow equation for Tough
channels is, therefore,

v= V, (6.25 + 5.75JOg~) for rough channels (8-20)

7
From the CMzy formula F = C ,IRS and from the definition' of 6
friction velocity 1', = ',fiRS, it cltn be shown that
5
v C (8-21) .;
VI = Yo 4
"c:c
3
Substituting this equation ahd the Reynolds Il'lmber R = RV / ~ in Eqs. 4:
(8-19) and (8-20), the following express:olls fo\' Chez}"s C are obtained: f
2

C -- 32"61
"
20.8R
ogc;- for smooth channels (8-22)
0
C = 32.6 log 12}!!: for rough (!hannels (8-2:3)
-I

After Keulegan's analytical study on laws of turbulent flow in channels, -2

Powell [16-18J experimented with small rect~tnglllar sills used as artificial
-3
roughness and arrived at Eq. (5-5) for Chezy's C. Similarly, Robinson 0.2 0.3 0.4
F
and Albertson [19] used baffle plates as artificial roughness and developed
another empirical formula of C for rough chaunels. :Moore, Rand, and FIG. 8-8. Rel~tions amoog A"" rL, and F.
Hama [3] £\lso conducted similar studie:3, using transverse-bar roughness . . . F' 88 by the
of various sizes. lotted data are found to be much scnttered(as shown III 'Ig" I - I "1
P . . t " l ' ffects "When t 1e c lu,nne
A further" study was made by Iwagaki [21] on experimental data shaded boundaries) probably OWlIlgo t le:;e e . I h
obtained from many sources. The results of the study have disclosed slope becomes too large, the flow will be unstab~e (Al:t. 8-8).. l~ suc
j that resistance to turbulent flow i;l open channels becomes obviously cases, the \u,ws of turbulent flow described in tIllS o.rtlCle are no onger
·f--.»arger than that in pipes with increase in the Froude number. Iwagaki valid." .. , R hess Coefficient.
~easonedthat this is due to the increa:led instability of the hee surface S-S. Theoretical Interpretation of M.an?m g s oug. n .. he theo-
at high Froude numbers. Using the data presented by Iwagaki, there- It should be interesting to study Mannmg s n by relo.tl~g l~ tfn\he pre-
fore, it is possible to introduce. the effect of free-surface instability into retical channel roughness for rough channels, as ~e(v8e ~~e Ma ning's n
Keulegan's equations by assuming that the constants in the equations are ceding article. Eliminating C from Eqs. (5-7) [1.n -~, n
-="
 206 UNIFORM FLOW THEOBETICAL CONCEPTS RELATED TO UNIFORM FLOW 207
may be expressed as follows: A. M etlwd of Velocity M easuremellt. With reference to the logarithmic

~ (~)k;6
law of velocity distribution expressed ih Eq. (8-13), it can be seen that
n
(R/k)'A
(8-26) the velocity distribution depends on the roughness height,- which may be
related to Manning's n by Eq. (8-26). : In other words, the roughne8s in
J
where (8-27)
21.9 log (12.2R/k) terms of Manning's n can be taken as a dominating fa,etor that affects
The plot. of t.his equation, (Fig. 8-9) indicates that, for a wide range of the velocity distribution. If the distribution is known, the value of
R/ k, the variation in </I(R/k) is small. As an approximation, ¢(R/k) may
Manning's nean, therefore, be determined, This concept has been
be assumed constant and equal to an aVel'!l,ge value. On the basis of used by Boyer (24} and others [25-28] in estimating the value of 11 from
actual observations made in S,vit;r.e!·land, Strickler [23J ar.rived. at a the vertical velocit,y distribution ill a stream,
formula which, when compared with Eq. (8-26), gives an average value l Let VQ.2 be the velocity at two-tenths the depth, that at a distance
of .p(R/Ie) = 0.0342. The roughness height used by Strickler is the O.8y from the bottom of a wide rough channel, where y is the depth of
flmv, By Eq. (8-13), the velocity may be expl'essed a.s
I , . 24y )
...---o~':-
;;.
S J feems in
No,lhweslern U.S.
Uo.t 5.75V r logT
,'" ~ (I ~ ..;,n.. _ _ _ _
II " '\. Sfricklerts
__ _

.
=
~
Similarly, let UO.s be the veloeity at eight-tenths the depth; t.hen

Yo.s = 5.75Yr log

R/l<.
Eliminating VI from the above two equations,
FIG. 8-9. Functiqn ",(Rlk)
I Y O._.~77~8~x~ __.1....,. 3~8_1
median sieve size of the material. Data [24J· collected from sever",] og'k = x
(8-28)
streams in the l1orth\ycstcl'll United States and from the 'Mississippi River
"there x !la.dvo.s.· Substi.tuting Eq. (8-28) ill Eq. (8-20), with R ~ y,
are also shown in. Fig. 8-9 for purposes of comparison,
and simplifying,
If </J(R/k) is assumed constant, Eq.(8-2i3) willler.d to the interesting
conclusion that Manning's n varies with the power of the
V 1.7&(:1: 0.95) + (8-29)
f='-~x-l
height. In other words, a thousandfold change in the linear
me~~,sure of the roughness height !'esults in about n. threefold change in n. From Eqs. (5-7) and (8-21), with R = .1(,
Thus, the roughness height as a measure of channel roughness is more
V
sensitive than Manningls n. Consequently, the effect of errors involved (8-30)
in estimating the roughness height for the determination of Mallning's n
by Eq. (8-26) is comparatively smalL Equating the right-hand siues of (8-29) and (8-30) and solving for 1'1.,
. Bakhmeteff and Feocloroff [Z5} have made a comparison of the Manning'
formula with the Prandtl-von Kirma,n formula [in a form corresponding (8-31)
to Eq. (8-26)), the G, K. formula, and the Bazin formula, Their results
indicated that the Manning formula in the form of Eq. (5-7) is the best This equation gives the va.lne for 1'1. for a wide rough channel with
suited to all formulas under consideration. logarithmIc velocity distribution. When this equation is applied to
8-7. Methods for Determining Manning's Roughness Coefficient. a.ctual streams, the value of it may be taken as the mean depth. A pli1t
Based on the theoretical velocity distribution in rough channels, two
·....;,.....-~approaehes for 's n have . ---- of this equ:1tion (n/y;f, vs. x) has been made to compare with a similar
curve developed by Boyer [24Jand also with actual observations taken
. from several streams in the northwestern United States and the Mis-
1 This constant has been converted to ft-Ib-sec units. The value of k is expressed
in ft. sissippi Rivet;. The. comparison leads to the belief that a general relation-
 208 , UNIFORM FLOW
THEORETICAL .CONC""FTS
'" RELATED TO UNIFORM FLOW 2U\:l
ship exists between Manningls n .and the velocity distribution. However,
more data, are neceSsary to! verify this theory more convincingly and to
d~linea.te the rela.tiol1!!hip that it can be used extensiv e1y for practical
so eooR~~~~~1!~flE~~~!~!~~f~~~~~~t~~
'.1,000
purposes. 600

j The simple measurement. of stream flow is llsually made by taking 400

\. velocity mf)asl,lrements in several vertical!! at 0.2 and 0.8 depths (Al-t.
2-6). The.')e measurements, which are averaged to give the meatl velocity
in. the vel'tical, can be used to estimate Manning's 1"1, by means of Eq.
(8-31). If this methqd can be shown to be satisfactory for practical
applications, it will Pl'ovidean easy way of determining roughness in
streams wherEJ velocity observations have been made. . .
r--~B. ~lethod of Rfl.u(Jhness lI;[eal1'!m'ment. In this method it is assumed
I that Eq. (8-27) for the function <p(Rlle) is acceptable. Thus, the value of
. Manning's r~ can be conlpllted by Eq: (8-26) When the roughness height is
known.
. . rl'1 20
This method can be' extended to strea.ms containing moving sediment
I'"
beds, A{lcording to Eiu..,tell1 and BrLrbal'ossa [29], the hydraulic radius R ~
for such stt'eams may be I1Ssumed to C011Sist of two parts: the hydraulic '0 10
radius RI due to surface roughness and the hydniulic radius R - R' due B
'"
'"
E
to roughness ce.l.lsed by moving sediment beds. For surface roughness, 0
6
:>
the roughness height is represented by k'5 in feet, which is the grain size 4
just coarser than G5 % of the materifl.1, as obtained from an average curve
of mechanical anatysi.~. This curve is to be prepal'ed from the material
sampled from the wetted perimeter within the chosen reach of the stream.
T1~e rongnness height for ~oving sediments is reprepented by the size
/,;s; in feet, which is the size just coar,sel' than 35 % of the sedim(:nt grain.
0.8 L -_ _ .;.._+-
This size is taken from a mechanical-analysis curve obtained from sedi.
ment samples collected within the reach of the stream. Following this 0.6 -l---l++-i4+t·~-+·-·".ci--f';
concept, Doland and Chow [30] hlJ;v:e shown that the function Ib(Rlk) for O. 4 L_·_-.l--~4--+-\-+-H+-~~:---'l--"r'":
the combined effect of the surfice roughne3B D.nd moving sediments is ,-l~4~'Il-~n:-1
0.0342 0.2.
(WIR)3~ (8-32)
~here the value of R'I R depends on the hydraulic radius R, the slope S, 0.1 L~__-l._-L-_L") .. L l.1..L.._ _..L..--.L~_'-.'.
and the grain sizes k65 and ka•• By computing values of (R/k G.)'/.! and 0.1 0.2. 0.4 0.6 0.81 2.
k361 RS, the value of R' / R Can be obtained from the semiempirical curves .
Values of
x35
'liS
of Fig. 8-10. These Curves are based on data taken from seven typic",l
rivers in the United Sto.tes. 1 When <f>(Rlk) is computed by Eq, (8-32), FIG. 8-10. Relationship het,+een (R/l.:iS)H anel 1.:3&/~B •.
the va1ue of n can be determined by Eq. (8-26), with k = k65. When
.
there is little moving sed'lment 'In th ~ .St' 1'eam , or R - R' = 0, it can
. . be
':Missouri River at Pierre and Ft. Randa.U, S.D., and Omaha, Nebl'.i Elkhorn seen that Eq. (8-32) is reduced t.o Strickler's co~stant .(Art. 8-~),
Rhier at Waterloo, Nebr.; Big Sioux River at Akron, Iowa; Nioprara Ri~er at Butte.
The method described above doeS not comudel' kmds of !IOu~hness
Nepl'.; Platte River at Ashl!l.nd, Nebr.; SBlina.~ River at San Lll,c"s and Paso Robles,
Calif.; and Nacimiento River.at Junction,' CElIif. . other than :surface roughness an d t h:e rong hness d ue "to moving-sedIment1

beds. Therefore, it is applicable on1y to problems 111 whlch the bUS1IY-

j
I

J
 ,
I\
210 UNIFORM FLOW
,,
I
THEORETICAL CONCEPTS RF.LATED TO UNIFORM FLOW 211
bank friction is negligible and in \vhich the active channel, even though
split by sand ba'rs and possibly by islands) is free of debris and vegetation. II providing the value of X,. For lack of such a formula, the Manning or
Chezy formula is used as an approximation only. Since the channel
8-8. Instability of Uniform Flow. Uniform floW' will become unstable 1 slope is us,tally large when instability of [Jaw develops, the Froude number

I
'when the velocity of How is very high or the channel ,slope is very steep. ill (8-35) should be computed by Eq. (3-13), which considers the slope
When this happens, the instability of the free surface is characterized by effect.
'the formation of a series of roll waves. This phenomenon was first
PROBLEMS
reported by Cornish [31J in 1910 when he observed it in open :channels in
the Alps. The roll Wave is a phenomenon of unsteady flow and its nature 8-1. Show that Eq, (8-0 is deriv~d from the condition that the presence oi'the
will be described ill Art. 19-9, boundary Lg,yer raises the bottom of the cha,nnel to a virtual distance equal to the dis-
Many attempts [32-45J ha.ve been made to develop a criterion for
instability of uniform flow. In 1945, Vedernikov [35], employing certain
approximations of Saint-Venaht, developed a criterion which may be
called the Vedemikov number V. Later, Craya (41} and Iwasa [43}
I pLa.cement I;hiclmetls.
8-2. A laboratory [·ecta.ngular channel 1.5 ftwide carries a unirorm flow of 0.34 cis
at p, depth of 0.15 ft and ll. slope of 0.0009. The roughness height of the channel sur-
f!>ce is 0,00215 ft. Plot the profiie of the turbulent boundary layer, 1).0(\ est.im!l.te the
length -of channeL required for a fun development of the boundary layer \vhich begins i,Il
studied the initiation of continuous tilliegrowth or decay of an infinitesi- tobe turbulent u.t the entrance.
1110.1 di5tUl'bo.nce wave 011 fluid surface, and developed similar criteria. 8-S. Determine whether the c.hannel'described in the preceding problem is hydrauli-
cally smooth or rough. '
The Vede1'llikov number may be expressed as 8-4, A trapezoidal channel (Fig. 2-2) with b ,.. 20 H, z 2, and S = 0.001 ca.rries
a uniform Row at a depth of 6 ft. Compute the unit tractive force :Lnd the
V = xyV fric~icm velocit,y developed in the channel, Wha.t are maximum friction veloci-
V",- V
ties on the sides and bottom of the dUlIInel?
where x = exponent of the hydraulic radius in the general uniform-flow 8-li. Snow t.1U1.t
formula Eq. (5-1). Thus, x = 2 for laminn.r flow (Art. 0-10), (8-36)
x OJ) 'for turbulent flow if the Chezy formuln. is and
x = H for turbulent flow if the Manning formula is used. where f is Darcy's friction factor and 11 is Mll.rming's roughness coefficient.
V = mell.n velocity , 8-6: Using Eq, (8-13) for expressing the theoretical velocity distributi.on in wide
V", = absolute velocity of disturbance waves in channel rough cha.nnels, (a) show that the I:iverag8 of the velocity of 0.2 depth alid the velocity
~ = a shape factor of channel section, defined by at 0.8 depth gives the velocity at 0.6 depth, and (b) compute the position of the mean
velocity below the free surface) and compare the result with that determined by the
rule of the U,S. Geological Survey (Art.. 2-6).,
dP
'Y=l-R-
dA.
(8-34) 8-1. A wide channel carries a uniform .flow a~ a depth of 5 in. on a slope of O.OOOL
1\
The channel surface is rough, having a value ork = 0.25 in. Compute and construct
where R is the hydraulic radius) P is the wetted perimeter, and A is the a curve showing ~he theoretical velocity distribution in the channel section. What
water area: Thus,"( -= 1 for very wide channels, and 'Y 0 for very are the mean velodty and its position? .
8-8. Determine the values of k in Probs. 5-9 and 5-10.
narrow· channels. 8-9. Eq, (8-13), show that the theoretico.l velocitJ:"-distribution coefficients
It will be shown that V", - V is equal to the celerity c of the waves in wide channels can be expressed as
(Art. 18-6») or to the critical velocity V.. Since ,the Froude number
F =- VIV., Eq. (8-33) may be reduced to <:t. ~ 1 + 3.' - 2.' (2-6)
1:
(1=1+.- (2-7)
V = xyF (8-35)
When the Vedernikov nuniber V is less than unity,any wave in the
where. 2.5V';V. Also show that ( = H.2/C ~ 0.883 Vi
= 9.5n/RH .. (v~r/V)
- 1 where C is Ch6zy's resistance factor,:j is Darcy's friction factor,:n is Man-
chalinel will be depl'essed!ll1d the flow can be stable.' But when V is ning's roughness coefficient, R is the hydraulic radius, VA( is the maximum velocity,
equal to or greater than unity 1 waNes will amplify so that stableflow will and V is the mea.n velocity.
become impossible, unsteady flow will preva.il, and roll waves will form. 8-10. Plot a curve showing the relationship between a a.nd {J defined (2-6)
and (2-7), respectively.
In, computing V for a turbulent ft.ow, it should be noted that a suitable
8-11. Comput,e the velocity-distribution coefficients. of the flow in the channel
uniferm-ftow formula for flow in chul1nels of large slope shoul(i be used in
I described in Prob. B-7.

r
1>;
r
 212
UNIFORM FLOW
THEORETICAL CONCEPTS RELATED TO 'UNIFORM j,'LOW 213
18-~~: A wide st.ream carries approximately uniform flow- at a depth of 12 ft Th , '

ve OCI les at 0.2 and 0.8 depths are found to be 1.85 o'nd 1 32 f ...e 13. Garbis H. Keulegan: Laws of turbulent flow in open channels, Research Paper RP
mate (a) the roughness coefficient (b) th I . . ps, respectIvely. Estl- 1151, Journal of Research, U.S. National Bureau of Standards, vol. 21, pp. 707-741,
' ' n, e mean ve oClty (e) the slope f tJ h I
an d ~d) tn8 dis,:harge PCI' unit width of the channel. ' , o l e C anne . Decemher, 1938.
8-LS In a wIde' t
. s ream IlaVing
' . moving . sediment bed the f I' " 1 • 14. Erik'Lindquist: 00 velocity formula.s for open channels and pipes, T"ansacl-ions
able: S = 0,003 k, = 050' d 1. , 0 . 0 " mg (ata are aVO,IJ- of the "World Power Conferer.ce, Sect'ional M feting, SfX!ndinavia; Stockholm, vol. 1,
J,"' • mm, an ,,,~ = 0040 mm TI e I d· r d'
al'ea al'e found to be It = 0.85! _ 1 8, d A _ _. I ,Iy lau lC ra IllS and li'ater pp. 177-234, 1933.
, • J ' . an - 2/3y - 797 where R d '
ano, A IS in [('.' Construct tl. e disc lIar t" ' an yare m ft 15. A. E. Dretting: A set of practical hydraulic formulae based on recent experimental
" . , ge-ra mg curve of the strean'
, b-14. Show that the Vedernilcov' number in wide channels is V ~ 2F '. research; comparison with older formulae, Appendi:r; 24, 2d !Jleeling, International
Row, V = O,67F fo), turbulent flol'v: 'f th "T " f ' for lammal' Association of Hydraulic Str'!J.ctuTes Research, Stockholm, Apr. 7-9, 1948, 20 pp.
1 • e ,',-annmg orm'll- IS us d dV 0
turbulent flolV if the Che~y formula is used. ,~e ,an = ,SF for ' 16. Ralph W.,Powell: Flow in a channel of definite roughness, T,ansaclions, American
8-11i. Using t.he Vedernikov' criterion expla'n tl ' . I"" • . . Society of Ci'j'il Engineers, vol. 111, pp. 531-566, 1946. '
f<t0tors Upon 1Iow instability. (a) th 'I' f I " I" genela e"ects ot the follOWing 17. Ralph "'. Powell: Resistance to !low in smooth channels, Transactions, American
I . e va I,e D x m the unIform flow f rmll lib) h
Slape of U.tb thannel cross section, (c) the viscosity ,of tho flu'd -(tl) thO a" t ,e Geophysical Union, voL 3D, no. 6, pp. 875-878, December, 1949.
clent, and (e) the channel slope. " I, e enel'gy codfi- 18. Ralph L, Powell: 'Resistance to flow in rough chs.nnels, Transact~ons, American
Geophysical Union, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. ,575-58:2, August, 1950.
REFERENCES 19. A . .fi.. Robinson and M. L. Albertson: Artificial roughness standard fOr OP€ll
~hannels, Transa,ctions, A.merica" Geophysical Union, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 881-888,
1. Hermann Schlichting: "Boundary Layer The r . " , , '
tv J Kestl'n 'f G. H'II B k C <JlY, transluted from t.he Germau December, 1952. "
J. , 1. C >IIl.W- I 00 ompany I K Y 20. Yuichi 11vagaki: OIl the laws of resistance' to turbuleut !'low in open smooth
Ltd:, Lor~don, and Verlag G. Braun, ICarlsrulle,n c . ew ork, Pergamon Press
l 955 channels, lI1emoil's oj the Faculty of Engineering, Kyoto University, Japan, vol. 15,
2. J. W. ~elieur: The boundary layer development in open channels a ' ,
Pro~e~dm!!s, .f1merican SOCiety of Civil Engineers Journal Engi" .'
D~!Jts!?n, voL 83, no. EM1, pp. 1-24, Janu!l.ry 1957. '
P
n.enng. ec antcs
/;e\ ll~:-;, no. 1, pp. 27-40, January, 1953.
21. Yuichi Iwagaki: On the law of resistance to turbulent flow in open rough channeia,
Proceedings of the,4lh Japan National Congress for Applied M echanies, pp. 229-233,
3. Franms n Hama' Bound I' h ' '.
, ,. : ary- ayer c aractenstll:s for smooth unu rOll h surf 1(l54.,
'Z1anSaclwlIs, 80c'lety of Naval Archiiects and 11[ an'ne I ; L • I ~~ aces, 22. H. Darcy and H. Bazin: Recherches hydrauliques:I, Recherches cxperimeotales
351, 1954. """,gmeers, VO , u"" pp. 333-
sur l"ecoulement de I'eau dans les canaux decouverts (Hydraulic research: I,.
4. Yoshiaki Iwasa: Boundary layer grow'h of oPen ch"nnel fl ", Experimentftl research on',the flow of water in open channels;, ],f emoires present~s
ct '[ 'b' .•. ~ OWS on a sn'iooth bed
;,n I s contl'l utlOn to practical application to chp.nnel ciesiO'n JI'{.n'~·r. 0 'I par divers savants a l'Acud~mie d~s Sciences, vol. 19, no. 1, Dunod, Paris, 1865,
r
J' aClilty a En' . }' U' . ", "'v. u 1, ,e
~ gtneenng" yoto ntvers~tll Japan vol XIX no III' 0')9 23. A. Si,rickler: Beitriige zurFrn.ge der Geschwindigk'eitsformel und der Rallh-
JUly, 1057. ' ,. " , . ,pp. J~ -254,
igkeits~!l.hlen fiir Strome, Kanale und geschlossene Leitungen (Some contributions
5. Henry M. Morris, Jr.: A new'conce t of fl " _' .
A. ,.' _, S · " . . P O I , m .ough condUIts, Tran,;rJ,cl'io1Ls to the problem of the velocity formula a,nd roughness factors for rivers, canals, !l.nd
, ~le"ca,. aClety of C~j,,1 En{}tneeTs, vol. 120 pp.373-398 19-- D; . "
VIctor L, Streeter Walt R d H H ,,1)0. .SCUSSlOns by closed conduits), Mitteilungen des ddgenossisehen Amtes 1iir Wasserwirtiieha1t,
:Bern, Switzel'land, no. 16, 1923.
Jr., pp. 399-'410. '.' er an, arry " Ambrose, and Henry M. Morris,
24, M,. C. Doyer: Estima.ting the Manning coefficient from ~_n average bed roughness
6. William J, Bauer: -Turbulent boundarv layer on 3teep slopes T " ' , in o[3en channels, Transactions, American Geophysical Union, voL 35, 00. 13, pp.
7 L . . 0 ~ .. y 0,tv:
A me"iC(nI S C'·, ( C' '1 E , -
ngmeeu, vol. 119, pp. 1212-1233, 1954.
, ransaC,1.OnS
' 957-9&1, December, 1954 .
. P udwIJ,:P:tandtl: Uher dIe ausgebildeie Turbulenz(On fully developed turbulen ) 25. Boris A. Bakhmeteff and Nicholas V. Feodoroff: Discussion on opeu cha.nnel flow,
TOCte mgs of the 2d Inte?natianal Congress Of Applied Mechan'''cs Z" 'h ~e , Transactio1'1s, Americcm Society of Civil Engineers, vol. 1'08, pp. 492-502, 1943.
62-74, 1926. ' ~ " Hone, pp.
213. M. P. OiBrien: The vertical distribution of velocity in wide rivers, Tra.nsactions,
8. pBoris Ap' Balchmeteff: "The Meahanies of Turbulent Flow" Princeton Un' 't American G~ophysical Union, voL 18, pt. 2, pp. 4137-470, 1937.
ress, rmceton, N.J., 1936, p.'06, ' Ivers! y
27. F, C. Scobey: The flow of water in il'rigation channels, U.S. Department of Ag,'i-
9. ;h~~d~r von I{~rm.!in: Mechanische Aehnlichkeit und Turbulenz (MeChanical culture, Professional Paper, BI"Uetin No. 194, 1915.
~ml:rlt,Y anSu t~h:bulence), Proceedings 01lhe 3d International Congress 01 AppHed 28, W. R Langbein: Determination qf Manning'S n from vertical-velocity curve,
,ec ames, toc,. aim, vol. 1, pp, 85-92,1930. : '
Transactions, American Geophysical Union, pt. II, pp. 618-620, July, 1940.
10. VItO A.Vanoni:, Velocity distribution in open channels Civil En' " 'I 29. Hans A. Einstein !lnd H. L. BarbuTossa: River channel roughness, Transactions,
no, 6, pp, 356-357 June HJ41 ' gtneertng, VO . 11,
J

11. J Nikur'adse' Ge 't .. ' . I: d Amen:can SocieLy of Civil Engineel's, vol. 117, pp. 1121-1132,1952'-
' f' " se zm~sslg.(elten el' tUl'bulenten Str5mung in glattC!l Rohren 30, James J. Doland and Ven Te Chow: Discussion of River channel roughness, by
(LaIVs 0 turbulent flow In -'Smooth p' ) V ., I
h It N ""6' B ' ~ Ipes, eretn ( e!ttscher I"geniel"'e, Porsclnm(JS- Hans A. Einstein and H. L. Ba.rbaross3., Trr;msaclions, American Sociely 01 Oivil
e o. "", erhn, 19,,2. . '
Engineers, yol. 117, I'p. 1134-1139, 1952.
12; J. ~i,kurlldse:'Str5mu~gsgesetze in rauhen R(\~ren (Laws of flow in rough i es 31. Vaughan Cornish: "iVaves 'of the Sea and Other Water Waves," The Open Court
Vele'n deutscher IngemeuTe, Forschungsheft No. 361, Berll'n, 1933. p p ),
Publishing Comp!l.ny, La Salle, Ill., and T. Fisher Unwin, Loudon, 1910.
214 UNIFORM FLOW
l,
32: Harold Jeffreys: The flow of water in an inclined channel of rectangular section, I
London, Edinburgh and Dublin Philosophical i1!agazine and Journal oj Science,
ser. G, YfJL 49, pp. 79:3-807, May, 1925. .
33. G. H. Keulegan and G. W. Patterson: A oriterion for instability of flow in steep
channels! T,'o,nsactions, American Geophysical .llnion, vol. 21, pt. II, pp. 594-&96, \
July, 1940.
·34_ Harold A. Thoms,s: The propagation 'of waves in steep prismatic conduits, Pro-
I PART III

ceedings oj Hydraulics ConJere1J.ce, Universit·y oj Iowa St'~dies in Engineering,

GRADUALLYVARffin FLOW.
Bulletin 20, pp. 21!l--229, 1940.
35. V. V. Vedernikov: Conditions at the front of a translation wave distributing a
f
steady motioll of a real fluid, Camptes renclHS (Doklady) de I' Acad~mie des Sciences Ii ~k'~ l
I
de t' U.l?.S.S., vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 239~242, 19i5. • I.

35. V. V. Vedernikoy: Characteristic featur!)~ of a liquid flow in an Open channel,

Comptes rendus (Dok.lady) de l'Accidemie desScience~ de l'U.R.S.S., vol. 52, pp. \ }.
207-210, 1946.
37. RalphW.Powell: Vedernikov's criterion for ultnHapicl flow, Transactions,
Ame,icanGeopilysical Union, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 882-886, December,1948. Discus-
sions by V. V. Vedernilwv a.nd Ralph W. Powell, voL 32, no. 4, pp. 503-507,

.Y!r~~ IJ<!Lf.. ~·J:7 !'Wut.(.f.'q'

August, 1951-
38. Robert F. Dressler: Ma.thematical solutions of the problems of roll waves in
inclined open <lhanneis, COlnmttnication.~ on PW'e a;nd Applied Mathomat'ics, vol. 2. /'''' e-c.. .
2, no. 2--3, pp. 149-194, 1949.
39. Robert F. Dressler: Stability of uniform flow and roll-wave formation, Proceedings J/;d?,:;st~cL;.. /t1rUd t(/I.L ~t0ly;f.ti-&-t:"i lyev.~('1
oj the Gmuily Waves SVm.posium, U.S. Na;tiona.l Burea;u of Standards, Circu.lar 521, r .(
1952, pp, 237-241. .
40. Francis F, Esr.offier: A graphical method for inVestigating the stability 9f flow in rP4/L <141oi.~t.A.p,c:-'1· /-w-{fUr C~N);Pbt'/i-Ce~) ,
opim channeJ.o:i or in closed conduits flowing partly full, Tramactions, American r
Gcophy.~ica.! Uni011;, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 583-58G,.1950. \
41. A. Ontya: The criterion for the possibility of roll wave formation, Proceedings oj
the G.ravity 'Waves Symposiu.m, U.S. National Bureau of Stan.dards, Circular 521,
L
i
1952, pp. 294-332. I·

42. Tojiro Ishihara, Yuichi Iwagaki, and Yasuo Ishihara: On the rollwave-trains
appearing in the water flolV on a steep slope surface, llfemoirs oj the FawUy oj 1[
Eng£neering, Kyoto University, Japan, vo:' XIV, no .. 2, pp. 83-91, March, 1952.
43. Yoshiaki Iwusa: The criterion for. instability of steady uniform Hows in open
channels, 111 c1Iloirs oj the Faculty oj Engineering, Kyolo University, Japan, ·vol-.
XVI, no. 6, pp. 264-275, March, 1954.
44. Chia-Shun Yih: Stability of parallel laminar flow with a free surface, Proceedings
oj th~ 2d U.S. National C01t(JreSJ oJ Applied lif echanic8, American Society of
Mechanical Engineers, 1954, pp. 623-528.
45. C. C. Lin: "The Theory of Hydrodynamic Stability," Cambridge University
.Press, Oambridge, England, 19.55 ..

!.

",

1
 .1 .' l/eerd k11 tZP~>YI ,~ti;_n7 CHAPTER 9

.)
J
!n~ for '/, Jir""tJy nt~;tv' ai"r£- c;(,,"" nel
. . •
THEORY AND ANALYSIS

, l/}~ctr~ a:lt/ -~~ ~~"7~7~~~1/2-prn#.J
11-.I~ [af,;d~..td on -Ilu hMCd'9- tJ7Ur/&-'n1 t!c# t.".-.ru;dfL-!
~l'il1·i;;~·~ &~"Rtff
lV1301HOd qn'gt.:;~
1 . 9-1. Basic Assumptions. The gradually varied flow to be discussed in
Part III of this book is the steady flow whose depth varies gradually
dong the length of the channel (Art. 1-2), This definition signifies two
conditions: (1) that the flow is stea,dy; t.hat is, that the hydraulic character-
istics of flow remain constant fqr the time interval under consideration;
and (2) that the streamlines are practicaily parallel; that is, that hydro-
static distribution of pressLlre prevails ovel' the channel section,
The development of the theory of gradually varied flow dates back to
the eighteenth .century. Mn.ny early hydraulicians L have contributed to
this development. The theories thus developedprac.tically all hinge on
the following basic assumption:
-----p A. The head loss at a section-is the same as for a Hnijo'(m flow having the
velocity and hydra111'icraciius of the section. .
According to this assumption, the u:r.iform-flow fonmila may be used to
evaZ1/ate the enngy slope of a gracl1wlly va-riecl flow at a giveTI. channel sect'ion,
and the corresponding coefficient of roughness developed primarily f01' wd-
.form flow is applicable to the va'ned flow. This as~umption has never been
precisely confirmed by either experiment 2 or theory, bnt errors arising
. from it are believed to be small compared with those ordinarily incurred
in the use of a u;1iform-flow formula and in the selection of the Toughness
coefficient. Over years of use this assumption has proved to be a reliable
basis for design. The assumption is undoubtedly more correct for varied
flow where the velocity increases than where _the velocity decreases,
. because in a flow of increasing velocity the head loss is caused almost.
entirely by frictional eff~g~, whereas in a flo,"v of decreasmg -velocity--
~here may.E(;l!~t.];~:s.c::~l~_e~_dy_.lo..~~-
I Bela.nger ll] is believed to be the outstanding contriblltor. Also El.mong early
contributors are Bernoulli, Bresse, Poncelet, Saint-Yenant, BOllssiuesq, El.lld others
[2] to [5]. _ .
2 Using the experimentlll data from the .Sunderland Technical College lind ICing's
College in England and from the University of lllinois, Bettes [G] has dClL'ived an j-R
relationship (Art. 1-3) for gradually variedftow in smooth open cblHlels, which WIIS
found to agree very closely with the relationship for uniform ftow obtained by Allen
[7]. Also, the computlltion of backwater curves based on this assumption ho.s been
verified satisfactorily by many experiments. These experimental verifications, though
not VEry rigorous, indicate the validity of the assumption for practical purposes.
217 .
 218 GRADUALLY VARIED FLOW 'l'HEORY AND ANALYSlS '

In addition to the above basiQ assumption, the following aSEum:ptions

will also be. used where further simplification is necessary in subsequent
discussions: .
B. The slope of the channel is small; so that:
1. The depth of flow is the same whether the vertical or normal (to
. the channel bottom) direction is used.
2. The pressure-correction fact,or cos IJ [applied to ·the depth of. the flow
section" Eq. (2-12)] is equal to unity .
I :)
. 3. No air entrainment occurs. 11'1 case of notable air entrainment, the
computation may be carried out assuming no entrainment and then
corrected approximately, at the end, using Eq. (2-15).
C. The channel is prismatic; that is, the channel has constant align-
ment and shape.
D. The velocity distribution in the channel section is fixed. Thus,
the velocity.-distribution coofficients are constant,.
E. The conveyance K (Art. 6-3) and section factor Z (Art. 4-3)
are expOl18ntial fUllctions of the depth of flow. .
F. The roughness coefficient is independent of the depth of flow and
constant throughout the channel reach under consideration.
9-2. Dynamic Equation of Gradually Varied Flow. Consider the
profile of gradually varied flow in the elementary length dx of an open
channel (fig. 9-1). The total head above the datum at the upstream
Ii
!

section 1 is
.
H = z + d cos e.+ a 2g
V2
(3-2)
T,
where Ii is the total hea,d in ft i z is the vertical distance of the channel ,4
bottom above the datum in ft; d is the depth of flow section in ft; (J is . "
FIG. 9-1. Derha.tion of the gradually-varied-fiaw equation. t
the bottom-slope angle; ex is the energy coefficient; and V is the mean
.. velocity of flow through the section in fps, and the slope of th~ ch~,l1nel bottom So = sin 0 = -dz/dx. Substituting
It is aSllUmed that 8 and ex are\ constant throughout the channel reach t,hese slopes in Eq. (9-1) and solving for ddjdx,
under consideration. Taking the bottom of the channel as th!3 x axis and
differentiating Eq. (3-2) with respect to the length :1.: of the w[.;ter-sUl'face dd So - Sf (9-2)
profile, which is measured along the x axis, the following equation is dx = cos () + Ctd(V~j2g)jdd '(
obtained: . (
dH dz + cos e-dd
-dx = -cl.t _ ..:.::.Jb:. Ct -dx +
d --
2g
(V2) (9-1) This is the general differential equation for gradually varied flow, referred
to hereafter as the'dY1iamicequa:t~Q'n;of gradually variedflow,or simply as
It shouldJ?e n(jte<Uliat the slope i~fined as the sine of the sl~le , the gradual/y-va7'ied:'Jtow eqttation. It represents'the slope of the water)
a1~~ssuEled po§.itive_if i~e8cena~n the direction of flow and surface with "espect /0 the bottom of the channel. The depth d is measured
negative if it aSC§Jl..ds. . Hence, 1 in Fig. 9-1, the energy slope Sf = -dH7dx, .= from the bottom of the channel, lJ.rld the channel bottom is taken as the
. , -'!""'--~
.. -....;;:.;...=~~---....:---'~
x axis. Thus, the slope of the water surfcLCe is equftl to the bottom slope r
l It should be notEld that the frictional loss dE is always a negative quantity itl the

'direction of flow (unless outside energy is added to the course of the flow) and that
So if ddjdx = 0, less than .so if dd/d.'C is positive, and greater than So 1
the change ill the bottom elevation dz is a negative quantity when the slope descends. if ddjdx is negative. In other words, the water surface is paranel to

r .f :.5
I . ""
54J<.~~
<1>

'I~
,
i Y'~>3'"

. :"; "., .
i i, ~ .

I .:; i . 221
220 . \ THEORY AND ANALYSIS
GRADUALLY VARIED. FLOW ,
. velocity and hydra1,llic radius of the section. When the Mann~ng formula
the cbannel bottom when. ddjdx. = 0, rising when dd/ dx is positive, and
. loweling when del/dx is negative. .. is used, the energy slope is
In the abovH equation, the slope angle 0 has been assumed constant or (9-8)
independent of x. Otherwise, a term -d sin (J(d8/dd), where (J is a func-
tion of X, wonh:l have been added to the denominator. For small .OJ When the Chezy formula is tiseo,
cos 8"" 1, d "" y, and cld/dx ~ dy/dx. Thus Eq: (9-2) becomes Vi
(9-9)
Sf = GZR
dy _ So - Sf
.;:rJ,x - 1 + ad(Tn/2Q)/dy (9-3)
In: a form, expressed in terms of the conveyance [(, the energy
(6-4), may be written
In most problems, the channel slope is smaH; accordingly, Eq. (9-3) will
be used in subsequent discussions.
(9-l0)
The term ex d(P/2g}/dy ill the varied-fiow equation represents the
change in velocity head. The coefficient a has been [;,ssumed to be con-
stant from section to section of the channel reach under consiciel·p.tioll. Suppose that a uniform flow of a discharge equal to Q occurs in the
Ot,hel'wise, the change in velopity head would have been expressed as section. ._'!h.~.}~!!~~~~()jJe ,vo.u1d ~~t)9.ual to the bot_tom slope, an~q ..
(I(Cl V2/2g)/dy, where IX is a function of x. Since V =Q/ il, Q is constant, (9-10) may be written
and dA/dy '1', the velo~ity-hf.)ad term may be developed as follows: (9-11)
1
d (V~) aQ2 dfi- 2 aQ2 dA aQ2T
a dy 21} = 2g--dy = - gA3 dy'= - gfP (9-4) where K" is the conveYf-llCe for uniform flO'w at a depth y". This Kn
\
should be distinguishedfro}n K in Eq. (9-10). The notation K represents
Since Z = VJP/T, the above may be written simply the numerical v!),lue of the conveyance at a depth yof the gradually
d (V2) aQl
varied flow. The value [(" is t~e conveyance computed for Q at the
a ely \ 2y = - gZ2 (9-5) depth yAas if the flow were r.onsideted uniform.
Dividing (0-10) by Eq. (9~1l),
Suppose that a critical flow of discharge equal to Q occurs at the section;
Eq. (4.4:) gives Sf Kn~
(9-12)
So = ](2
(9-6)
Substituting Eqs. (9-7) and (9-12) in Eq. (9-3),
where Z, is the section factor for cl',i~ical-fiow computation for discharge ., ~Y = So 1 - (Kn/IC)2 (9-13)
Q at depth Ye. The symbol Z, used herein should be carefully dis- dx . 1 - (Z,/Z)2
tinguished from the Z in Eq. (9-5). The symbol Z simply represents the This is anotber form of the gradually-varied-flow equation.
numerical value of VA3/T, which is computed for the discharge Q at a There are other popular forms of the gradually-varied-flow equation
depth equ~l to y of the gradually vUl'iedfiow. The value of Z. is the
that can readily be derivea, such as
section factor.; which is computed for Q at the depth v, as if the flow were
considered critical. Now, substituting Eq. (9-6)' for Q in Eq. (9-5) dy . 1 - (Kn/KF (9-14)
and simplifying, dx = So 1 - r(K,,/J()~

(9-7) where r So/ S,n, or the ratio of the channel slope to the critical slope at
the normal depth of discharge Q (Art. 6-7) ;
The term Sf inEq. (9-3) represents the energy slope. According to..the
'\ :first assumption in Art. 9-1; this slope at a channel section of thegr!ldually (9-15)
~al'ied flow is equal to the' energy slope of the uniform fiow that has t),e
 222 GRADUA.I,LY VARIED FLOW THEORY AND ANALYSIS 223
where Q is the given discharge of the gradually varied flow at the actual Since the values of K and Z increase 01' decrease continuously with
depth y; Qn is I;he nQrma.1·discharge at ~. depth equal to y; and Q. is the the depth y, the first case indicates y > y" and Y > Y.. As y > y"
cntic!1r discharg;;:t a depth equal t·o y; [\nd ' the flo'N must he subcritical. If Y > Yn > y" the sUDcritlcal flow must
occur in a mild channl!l (i.e., a channel of subcritical slope). On the other
;'
dy So - Q~/C2A2R
(9-16) hand, if y > y, > Yn, the subcritical flow must oceur in a steep channel
(IX = ,1 - aQ2/ gA2D
(i.e., a channel of supercritical slope). Similarly, the second case indi-
where D i~ the hydraulic depth, C is Chezy's resist~nce factor, and the cates Y < Yn and y < yo. The corresponding flow must be supercritical;
rest of the notation is as defined in this article. and it occurs i:n a mild channel if Yn > y, > !I and in a steep channel if
For wide rectangular channels, y, > Yn > y.
For a drawdowll curve, dy/d:!: is negative aild Eq. (9-13) gives two
1. When the Ma11n.ing formula is used, possible cases:

(9-17) 1. 1 - (K n /K)2 > 0 and 1 (Zc/Z)2 <0 .!

2. 1 .- (Kn/K)" <0 and 1 (Z./Z)" > 0

2. When the Chezy formula is used, The first case indicates that Yo > Y > Yn. and, thus, that the flow is super-
Ci:itical in a steep channeL 'Slffiiiarly, the second case indici,tes that
dy <:: 1 (Yn/V) 3
dx = '-0 1 _ (yjy)3
(9-18) ~ V > Yo, 9E.. that the flow is subcritical in a rild channel.
vVhen the water surface is parallel to the bottom of the channel,
9-3. Characteristics of Flow Profiles. The dynamic equation of dy/dx = 0, and Eq. (9-13) gives 1 - (1(',/ K)2 = 0, or Y == yn, which indi-
gradually varied flow developed in Art. 9-2 expresses the longitudinal cates a uniform now. Tbe flow is a unjform critical flow if y = Yn = Yo,
surface slope of the flow with respect, to the channel bottom. It can 8, Ulliform subcritjcal flow if y = y ... > Yet and a uniform sllpercritieaIflow
therefore be used to describe the characteristics of various flow profile.s if Yo > Yn = y. l·
or profiles of the water surface of the flow. F'or simplicity, the channel is 70-r purposes of discussion, cha.nnel slope may be classified as sv.stair.ing ,
considered prismat'ic, and Eq. (9-13) is used for discussion. , The values and nonsusta.ining. A sustaining slope is a chai1l1el slope that falls in
. of I( and Z in this eauatiori 1),re assumed to increase or decrease continu- the direction of flow. ,Hence, a sustaining slope is always positive and'
ously with the depth' y. This is true for all opeil-chanmil sections except may also be ,called a positive slope.' A sustaining or positive slope may be
for conduits with a gradually closing top. In such conduits, the value of critical, mild (sllbcritical), or steep (supel'critical). A nonsustaining
K, after reaching its maximum value, will decrease as t.he depth of flow slope may be either horizontal or adverse. A horizontal slope is a zero
approaches the top of the conduit (Art. 6~3). , ' slope. . An adverse slope is a negative slope that rises in the direction of
The flow profile represents the surface cUI'Ve of the flow. It 'will repre- flow. .
sent a backwater cUl've l (Art. 4-5) if the depth of flow increases in the In a channel of horizontal slope, Qt" So = ~ (9-11) gives Kn = 00
dil;ection of flow and a dmwdown curve (Art.4-5) if the depth decreases in . or ~ince K ... ~ = Q, Eq. (9-13) fo~ hOrizo\ltal channels may
the dil'ecti'on of flow. :Following the description in the preceding article, be written
it can be seen that the flow profile is a backwater curve if dy/dx is positive dy _ -(Q/K)~
and a dra-wdown curve if dy/d~: is negative. (9-19)
dx - 1 - (Zo/Z)2
For a backwater curve, dy/dx is positive; thus, Eq. (9-13) gives two
possible cases: Considering Un = 00, this equation indic,1tes two possible conditions:
~7'd' -<'I "ac-<'O' J,'OY-",", sQor:lo?
1. 1 - (K n/K)2 > 0 and 1 - (Z,/Z)2 > 0 1. Yn > y > Yo
2.1- (Kn/KP < 0 and 1- (Z./Z)~ <0
1 The term" backwater curve 11 i$ used primarily to indicate the longitudinal sur-

face curve of the water backed up above .0. dam or into a tributary by flood in the mll-in
T:~ ::s:c:;e:e:rese~L~b~~t~cal
dy/ilx is s 0\ ve.
flow with ~,draWs1oWl~\::::e~ :~~:e~o_yac._."
e second case represents a supercritical
r
stream. Ma.ny authors ha.ve extended its meaning to include all types of flow profiles. a ackwater curve, ~s shown as positive. ~.- ...
0:-----.

1
~I
 224 Gfu\DUALLY VARIED FLOW THEORY AND ANALYSIS 225
In a channel of adverse ~lope, or SD < 0, Eq: (9-11) indicates that, for
negative values of SD, K" :must be imaginary or [(Hi must be negative TAllLE 9-1. TYPES QF FLOW P ..QFILES. IN PRISMATIC CHANNlliLS

[8]. Consequently, Eq. (9-13) gives two possible cases:

I I 1. A 8ubcl'itical flow in which y > y~ Oha.nnel.
i Deaign:,tioil I Rela.t.io~ of,1) to VA and 'JI4
G.n~raJ typO I
,
I 2. A supercriticaJ flow in' which Y <Ye : ~.I<lJ'e·
TYP8 of fiow

I I
of c,u{"ve
Zone 1 Zone 2 Zon.a Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3
In the first case, dy/dx is negative, and .the flow profile is 3. drawdown 'i
Ij curve. In the second case, dy/dx is positiYH, ami the flow profile is a
None Non~
:
i None
j
backwater curve. Since Ie. is imaginary, the value of Yn cannot be
easily expressed. 1 In fact, a finite positive .value of Yn is physically
Horizontal
S, 0 H2 1'. > Y>,'J« Dra.wdown 'I Subcritieal
. impossible because a uniform flow call never occur in an adverse channel.: fill !In. > y~ >y 1:1 i SupercrhJcal
(Why'?)
'1> yn > y. I B ...kwnt;,r ! SubcrlU",,1
The above discussions are summal'ized ill Table 9-1 and in Figs. 9-2
Mild
-"12 >u> Drnwdo\itn Suberitir.t'l
and 0-4. Some special features of the theoretical flow profiles are' as' l) <1.. < B. lin

follo",'s: . NJ y" "> );. >!I Bllckwn.ter Supererltjoal

A. Discontinuit1{ in Flo'/j) ProjjJ.e. When Y. y., Eq, (9-13) indicates
tMt~-= co, that that the flow pl'(jfile will be vertical in crossing
1.'1
i
11> y,
- I/n Ba.ckwa~er Sub.ducal

j
Parallel to Uniform~
the critical-depth line. If the depth of flow is ch!mged suddenly from a Critical
en tlcnl
8,-8,>0
C2 1),:; := 11- 'lJ~ channel
low stage to ll. high stage in crossing the critical-depth line, a hydraulic bQttom
jump will occur, l'epresentinga discontinuity iIi the flow Profile. If the
depth changes from a high to low stage, then a hydraulic drop wi.ll occur.
C3 II, - y. > 11 Bll.ckwJlter Super-critical

It should be noted that, at or nep.l' the critical-depth line, the flow profile 81
1- I '11> 1I. > Yn Backwater Subcrit.icul

is bent to produce such great curvature that the parallel-flow assumption'

8.
Steep
> 8, > 0 82 ] y, >!I >y. ~
.- Sup.relitlcal
for ~he definition of gradually varied flow will. introduce large errors. 133 . I" 8 -lpexcri,ti.en.l
11• > 'lin> !I 1

. In fact, the flow may become so curvilinear or rapidly varied that the
theory and equations deve~oped in the preceding artiCle become inapplica-
ble. Therefore, Eq. (\)-13) cannot be used to describe or compute accu-
None
J.! 1i> (lIA)* > II' None

Adver•• A2 (lin)' >!I > Y, 8ubcriticnl

!'ai-ely the flow profile near the critical depth. . S, <0
A3 ! 11,,~) '* > lie >11 'D,
Supercritical
B. Behavior of Flat/) P1'Ofile at Specific Depths. For the subsequent
discussion, it is important to recognize the theoretical behavior of the fiow *11", in parenthe3es is uaumed a. positlve value.
profile at several specific depths. When y = <0; Eq. (9-13) shows that
dy/dx SD, that is, that .the flow surface is horizontal. When y = Yn;
it can be shown that the theoretical behayior of the flow profile at or near
Eq. (9-13) shows that dy/dx 0, that is, that the flow surface is paranel
y = 0 depends on the tYIJe of uniform-flow formula used in the computa-
to the bottom of the channel; th,is signifies unifonn flow, When Y YG,
,tion. For a wide rectangular channel, Eq. (9-17) represents the slope of
~ hydraulic jump or drop in flow profile may occur, as noted. When
flow profile ii the Manning formula is used. By this equation, it can be
Y = Yn = Y" the flow is uniform and criticaL .
shown that dy/dx becomes infinite. when y = O. This means that the
C. Points of Inflection on Flow Profile. When y 0, Eq. (9-13)
curve is vertical at the channel bottom. If the Chezy formula is used, it
seems to produce. an indeterminate form co /00 for dyjdx. However,
can be sh~wn that dy/dx == So(y.,,/y.)3 for y = O. This means that the
1 Some auth.ors l'egard Un as ~ega.tive [9]. Then the Ch.ellY formula. may be used for
curve \vill make a certain angle with the bottom. It is apparent that
explallation. By the Ch.':zy iormlila, K = CAR~' and K' ,= C'A.'R. ThUll, for So'
ilegative va.lue of K', Rand llJnce 1/n must be negative. The value Un hw; also been there shou;ld be a point of inflection pn the flow profile when y: < y. < Vii'
\lssumed to be positive [10J. In this case, the Chezy C is tak~n 1M! an imaginary Y!l.lue Mathematical investigations by Gunder [11] and Mouret. [12] have
in order t.o keep values of A aud.R inY!l.riably positiye. I ' ;revealed that this point of inflection is at [l, depth very close to the channel
226 GRADUA.LLY VARIED FLOW THEORY AND ANALYSIS 227
Downstream
pooll&>e i
lD

I
Yn
None
,
! r---------------,
-"
---
,'I, ,
.l 1 '
~'0;;W7_';w;wj&a0

Ml
--- -----
_ 2-
--- ------- --.
FIG. \1-3 ..Theoretical points of inflection on now profiles.
-----
bottom. 9-a).1 Similarly, Moui-et found that another point of
inflection exjsts on the flow profile when V"> y" > y, (Fig. 9-3).~
9-4. Classification' of Flow Profiles. 3 For the given discharge and
channel conditions t.he normal-depth and criticahiepth lines divide the
II space in aehannel into three Llones: .
,r.. ~.:....-·-----_._. <

I
Yh='ic~--- i Zone 1. The space ,,;bove the upper line
'~ ! Zone 2. The space between the two lines
Zone 3. Th;:; space below the lowel' line

Thus, the flow profiles may be classified into thirteen different; types
according to t,he nature of the channel slope and the zone in which the
flow surface lies. These types a.re designated as H2, H3; MI, M2, 1113;
CI, 02, C3; 81,S2, S3; and A2, A3;rvhere the letter is descriptive oithe
slope: H for h/)l'izontal, 11-/ for mild (sub-critical), 0 for critical, S for steep !
(supercritiCal), and A for adverse slope; and where the numeral represents
1
the zone number. Of the thirteen flow profiles, twelve are for graduJ1lly
_ , _ _ _ ..sL-
v~d Bow and one, 02, is for lltl.i£effll: fia w It should be noted that a
None continuous flow profile usually occurs only in one Llone. The general
"0.o ~ characteristics of th~e profiles are given in Table 9-1, and the shapes al~e
-----_ .. -- _______ "-1..--
\
f-----~-------i~--
Vi
r------- shown in 9-2 and 9-4. Since the profiles near the critical depth and
E 1c
~ Y Yo
l.:-~
Yo I~ 7/%! "
the channel bottom co.nnot be accurat~ly defined by the theory of gradu-
;!1·1~ . .
0-W//////////''''''#~
L~T/lP/7/.i/~ I 1 It is believed that the question of
points of inflection was first discussed by
Merten (13).
FIG; 9-2. Classification of' flow profiles. of gradually vari!)d flow. • This point of inflection occurs because the profile must have !J. horizont.al slope in
crossing the tra.nsitional profile and then bend forward tangent to the downstream
pool level (Art. 9-6). .
, It is beliP.ived that a comprehensive description a.nd c!llSsification of diff~re.n t flow
profiles were first given by Boudin [14].
 r
228 GRADUALLY VARIED FLOW ~l THEORY AND ANALYSIS' 229
ally varied flow, they are shown with short dashed or dotted lines, (0)
Various flow profiles are discussed below.
A, M P1'ofiles. SQ < Se and Yll >Y•. J
The -"11 pt'ofile the most well.. known backwater curve; it is
the most important of all .How profiles from the practical point of view.
ThiS profile oeem's when the downstream end of a long mild channel is
submerged in a l'eseryoir to a; greater depth than the normal depth of the
flow in the channeL This flow profile lies ill zone L The upstream end
of the curve is tangent to the normal-depth line, since dyldx = 0 as
y = y,,; and the downstream end is tangent to the horizontal pool surface,
Rince dy/dx = Sn as y c:Q. Typieal examplea of the 1111 profile are the
profile behind a dam in a natural river (Fig, 9-4a) and the profile ill a /"
/
/

canal joining two reservoirs (Fig, 9-4b). .

An MZ profile occms when the bottom of the channel at the down-
stream und is submerged in a reservoir toa dept.h less than the normal
depth. The upstream end of the flow profile is tangent to the normal-
depth line, sinae dyld:r: = 0 as Y Yn. If the amount of submergence
at the downstream end is less than the critical depth, the flow profile will
terminate abruptly, with its end tangent to a: vertical line at a depth equaJ
to the criticald~pth, .since dyJdx = <0 for y = y.. This means the.
creation of a hydraulic drop. If the depth of submergence at the down-
.stream end is than the critical depth, then as much of the profile
will form as Jies above the water 'surface in the reservoir. Examples are
the profile at the upstream side of a sudden enlargement of a callul cross
Stctioll (Fig. 9-4c) and the profile in a cana'! leading to a reservoir, where dy!d •• +
--...._~~ C'_
the pool level is shown both above and below the critical-depth line
(F'ig. 9-4d). --- --:~

The 11£3 profile starts theoretically from the upstream channel bottom,
at either a vertical-angle slope or all acute angle, depending on the t.ype
of uniform-flow formula used (Art. 9-3), fl,lld terminates with a hydraulic
jump ut the downstream end. This type of profile usually occurs when a
supercritical flow enters a mild channel. The beginning of the profile,
although it cannot be defined precisely by the theory, depends on the
initial velocity of the water. The higher the velocity, the farther
downstream the profile will begin. 'The theoretical upstream end of the
profile will intersect the channel bottom. At this end y = 0, thus the
velocity would become infinite. Therefore, the theoretical upstream end
of an M3 profile can never exist physically. Examples of the M3 profil.e
are the profile in a stream below a sluice (Fig. 9-4(3) and the profile after
the change in bottom slope from steep to mild (Fig. 9-4f) .
.B. S Profiles. So > S. and y" < Yo_
The Sl profile·begins with a jump' at the upstream and becomes tangent
to the horizontal pool level at the downstream end. Examples are the
 THEORY A~D ANALYSm 231
230 GRADUALLY VARIED FLOW

profiles of flow behind a dam·in a steep channel (Fig. 9:-4g) and in a steep Following the principle used in the preceding paragraphs, it can be
canal emptying into a pool of high elevation (Fig. 9-4h). demonstrated that four types of How profiles are possible for a given slope
The 82 profile is a drawdown curve. It· is usually very short and rather [15-19J. Figure 9-5b, c, and d shows these fol' mild and st.eep
like a transition between a hydraulic drop and uniform flow, since it 8lopes. The positions of the depths y" and y,,.' are assumed constant in
starts upsti·eo.m with a vertical slope at the critical depth and is tangent
to the normal-depth line at the downstream end. Examples are the
profiles formed on the downstream side of an enlargement of channel
section. (Fig. 9-41.) and on the steep-slope side as the channel slope
changes from steep to (Fig.
The S3profile is also of the tra!Jsitional type, formed between an
issuing supercriticoJ flow .and the normal-depth line to which the profile is \
tangent. Examples are the profife on the steep-slope side as the channel I
slope changes from steep to milder steep (Fig. 9-4k), and that below a
sluic~ with the depth of the entering flow less than the normal depth on a·
steep slope 9-4l).
C. C P1·ofilcs. So and y ... = y•.
These profiles the transition conditioi15 between Ai and S
profiles. Assuming a wide rectangular channel,Eq. (9-17) shows that
C1 and C3 pl'ofiles Iwe curved and that the Clprofile is asymptotic to a
horizon tal line (Fig. 9-4m and n). When hha Ghezy fot'mula i~ used J
Eq. (9-18) will show that the two profiles are horizontal lines. The C2
p7'ofile the case of uniform critical flow.
D. H P1·ofili3s. 8 0 0 andy" = 00 •
. These are the limit.ing cases of ]..f profiles when the channel bottom
becomes horizontal. The H2 o,nd H3 profile3 correspond to the 1lf2.and
11{3 profiles, but no H1 profile can actually be est,ablished, since y ... is
,;1. infinite. Examples of H profiles are shown i!l Fig. 9-40' and p.
E. A Profiles. S~ < o. .'
d The A 1 profile is impossible, since the value of y. is not reaL The /12
and A3 profiles are similar to the H2 and H3 profiles, respectively. In
general, A profiles occur infrequently. Examples are shown in Fig.
9-4q and r.
F. Profiles in Conduits with a Gradually Closing Tflp. .For nny conduit
with a gradually closing top, the normal discharge will increase as the
depth of flow increases. It will increase first to the value of full discharge
at a depth yo' less' than the full depth yo. Thereafter, the discharO'e
will reach a m!)'ximum value Q,m at a depth Yn *. Further increase in
depth of flow will decrease the discharge eventually to the full discharge
at the moment when the flow surface touches the top of the conduit. FIG. 9-5. Flow profiles in a closed condui~.
9-5a .shows the variation of normal discharge in such a conduit.
fll the case of a circular conduit, the depth Yo'·"" O.82yo and y" * = O.938yo these figures .. It shuuld be noted that the critical depth in Fig. 9-5d is .
where yo is the diumeter of the conduit (Art. 6-4). Within the region of greater than .the normal. depths y,.' and Y.., but that its corresponding
IJ ya' and y = Yo, there a.re two possible normal depths for a given dis- . lower normal depth is less than Yfo' and Yn. Consequently, the corre-
charge, namely, the lower normal depth y" and the upper or conjugate , sponding critical slope should be less th!l.l1 the normal slope, and the
itorrnal depth y ,.'. . channel slope is considered mild.
 (
[

232 GltADUALLY VARIED FLOW

~l THEORY AND A.NALYSIS· 233
,
I
~
~l ____ _
..

(a) ~--_.'_.::::=:-

M;ld slOn / ~----~-'--'-'--" I

em)

~
-"....

Cr'
---
... ~---
CI

///~~~~-~~~-:.
;
----.... -"-.
(q} ...~ .... -- -~ ..--~"-.----~
- - -.-~.--~-
- .:':'.:::.:..-::

~'
. ~e , JlicG/
Milder slope Slo,oe '! '::""~~\\':~
Mild. slope

I
I I (n)

(s)

Depending on
-.:.... Cl' aownst ream
~.
___ ."_-/:.~_.~~~~~~i.~~.
(P)

Critic . C"\
"'-" ~---:);- --1~~'--
01 s~ /. '\:\ .. - '0
Depending 'lIl OPe I Adverse. slope I " 1/1171777Tmn,.,!._
downstrecm LEGEND , I

MI
Dependinc;; on
downstream ,._:~mp t2. con~?: Thlck lines indicate water surJoce
~ (tJ ",,~y ~".---
~
(f) ---'---:::::.-_ _----:.---- "';'1:.~.:;:- .. ---- Jump FIG. 9·6 (Continued).
,~"
~
Sfs e ' :3
• P ./oPe ,se s\O?e
(>.a~e . Typical examples shown in Fig. 9-4 shduld be helpful in determining the
FIG. 9-6. Profiles of gradually varied flow in a long prismatic channel with 11 hreak in' type of flow profile in a given problem.
bottom slope. B. Prismatic Cha.nnel with Ii Change in Slope. This channel is equiva-
lent to a pair of connected prismatic channels of the same cross section but
9":5. Analysis of Flow Profile. Flow'"profile analysis is a proQedure with differen~ slopes. Twenty typica.l flow profiles in a long prismatic
used to predict the general shape of the flow profile. It enables the channel with a break in'slope are shown in Fig. 9-(3, These profiles are· '
engineer to leatn beforehand the possible flow profiles that may occur in self-explanatory. Howevel;, some special features should be mentioned;
a given chann~l la.yout. This procedur~ constitutes a very significant 1.' The profile near or at the critical depth caml0t be predicted precisely
part of all problems inchannel design for gradually varied flow. i:ly the theory of gradu.~lly varied flow, since·theflow is generally rapidly
A. Pi'ismatia Channel with Constant Slope. The flow profile in ~ long varied. . ,
prismatic channel with a constant slope:has been described in Ar~. 9·4. 2. In passing a critical line, the flow profile should, theoretically, have 0.
234 GRADUALLY VARIED FLOW
vertical slope. Since the flow is usually rapidly varied when the
critical linej the actual slope of the profile cannot be predicted precisely
by the theory. For the same reason, the critical depth may not occur
exactly a.bove '~he break of the ehannel bottom and may be different
from the depth shown in the figure.
3. In some cases (Fig. 9-6g and l), the hydraulic jump may occur either
in the upatl'eam channel or in the downstream channel, depel1~il1g upon
the relative steepness of the two slopes. 1 In case {I, for instance, the jump
will occur in tHe dowllstream channel if the normal depth i~ this channel
is comparatively smalL When the slope of the downstream channel
decreases and,. accordingly, the normal depth increases, the jump will
move upstream, eventually into the upstream channel. The exact
f
location of the jump will be disclissed in Art. 15-7.
4. If the upstream channel has an adverse slope (Fig. 9-Bq to t), the
discharge is fixed not by upst.ream channel conditions but by the eleva-
tion of the upstream pool level, which is the horizontal asymptote of the
)12 profile. The procedure of analysis is .to assume a discharge and to
determine to which case q to t the profile should belong. Then, compute
the flow profile in the upstream direction and determine the pool level.
H the computed level does not agree with the given pool level, then repeat
the computation with another assumed discharge until the computed level
agrees with the given leveL
5. Typical profiles (Fig. !H3) are illustrated for long channels in ,vhich
a uniform flow can be established far upstream and downstream.
C. Prismatic Chann,el with Seueral Changes in Slope. ;For such channels
the general procedure of analysis is as follows:
1. Plot the channel profile with all exaggerated vertical scale.
2. Compute y.,. for each reach, and plot the normal-depth line, shown
by dashed lines, throughout the entire channeL '
3. Compute y. for each reach, and plot the critical-depth line, shown by
. strea.m reaches is apparent, but the determination of their exact positions requires
dotted lines, throughout tile channeL
. 4. Locate all possible control sections. At the control section,2 :flow
must pass through a control depth which may be the critica,l depth;
the normal depth, or any other known depth. There are three types of
cont.rol section:
a. UPSTREAM CONTROL SIWTION. This occurs in any steep reach at the
upstl'eam end, since the flow in a steep channel has to pass through th$
critical section at the upstream end and then follow .either the Sl or S2
profile. Thecritical depth therefore, the control depth (see also Art.
. may occur at any section in the channel and its position cannot be deter-
1 Also depending on
nels. In this discussion
relative roughness and shape of the two connecting chan-'
factors arc assumed constant.
• The term "control section" used here has a. broad meaning. It refers to any'
section at which the depth of flow is known or can be controlled to !l. required sta.ge.
-s.:~
THEORY AND ANALYSIS 235
4-5). If the downstream water surface is very high, it may raise the flow
surface at the upstream control. When several st.eep reaches occur in
succession, the control section is at the upstream end of the uppermost
reach. Upstream control also occurs in long mild reaches, because the
lVIl or lIlZ curves will approach the normal depth at the upstream end.
b. DOWNSTREAM CONTROL SECTION. This occurs at the downstream
end in any long steep reach, because the flow will approach th.e normal
dep~h at the downstream end. If the downstream end of a mild channel
terminates at a free overfall, the control Section 'may be assumed at the
brink where the depth is crit.icaL r
C. ARTIFICIAL CONTROL SECTION. This occms at a control structure,
sur.h as a v;eil', dam, or sluice gate, at which the control depth either is
known or can be determined.
5. Starting D,t the control depth at each control section, trace in each
reach a continuous profile. The position of the profile in each reach can
be corre~tly located with respect to the normal~ and critical-depth lines. ,I
For this purpose, typical profiles described previously (Art. 94) should
be found useful.
B. When flo'''' is super critical in the upsi:.ream portion of a reach but
subcriticaI in the c1ownst,ream portion, the flow profile has to pass the
critical depth soniewhere in the reach. In crossing the critical-depth line,
a hydraulic jump is usually crsl:'.ted in raising the wat,et surfa<;e from a low
depth to its depth. The exact location of the jump will be dis-
cussed later (Art. 15-7).
"""""ntu,,, 9-1. Th":l normal and critical depths of the flow in a channel have been
W'"'!,,'""_'" !Lnd ~,re shown in Fig. 9-7,Sketch ~he possible flow profiles.
First loeste the possible control sections, such n.s tho~e for upstream con-
trol U.C., downstream control D.C .. and artificial con~rol A.C. The artlficil.t.l con"
trol in this e:<ample is a sluice which b~ks up waler to form an 81 profile on the
'upstream side. The formation of the hydraulic jumps in th~ rnidtlle and down-
further con~idera.tion. In the iowennost reach, for jn.s~ance, the J'{2 .and ].(3 profiles
should be computed first. Then, aompute the curve represellting the sequent dep~h
of the M3 profile. ,The intersection of the sequent-depth curve and the lYf2 profile
gives the approximate position of ~he jump. A more exact value for the position of
the jump ma.y be obt,ained by correcting the posit.ion for the length of the jump.
Various types of flow profile are sketched irl the ugure.
D, Nonprismatic Channels and Chan'n,els wilh Spat£ally Varied Flow.
In nonprismatic channels and channels with spatially varied flow, the
analJfsis of flow becomes complicated by the fact that the control section
mined easily. Consider three different channel slopes for three types of
:low: (1) continuous flow in aprisrnatic channel (Fig. g...ga), (2) spatially
\
1 Actua.lIy the computed critical depth is somewhat behind the brink (Ar~. 3-4).
236 GRADUALLY VARIED FLOW THEORY AND ANALYSIS' 237
varied flow of increasing discharge in a prismatic channel (Fig. 9-8b),
a.
E
and (3) continuous flow in a nonprismatic channel having a constant'slope
.a but varying cross section (Fig. 9-8b). All channels have a free overfall.
M2
a. In the first .type of flow, the flow changes from sub critical to super-
--- ... _- E
.:!. critical as the channel slope varies from mild to steep. Accordingly,
Mild slope Z
the critical control section will be transferred from the downstream end
to the upstream end. It should be· noted tht1t the t,ransfer of the critical
control section occurs almost instant.aneously .. At the instant of transi":
tion/ the crit.ical flow takes place throughout the entire length of the
chan.nel (middle view of Fig: 9-8a), and any section in the reach is,
therefora, a critical sflction ..
In the see-ond and third types of flow, the transition of the state of flow
will take 'place gradually from section to section as the critical control
FIG. 9-7, Analysis of flow profile for .Exa.mple 9-1. U.C. = upstream control; section moves upstream, At any moment. during the' time of transition'
D.C. = downstream control; A.C. = artificia,1. control. (middle view of Fig. 9-8b), the flow downstream from the control section
is supercritical, and the flow upstream is subcritical. The determination
of the control section will be described in the next article.
9-6. Method of Singular Point. . The preQeding analysis of flow
Critical pl'ofiles was given primarily for prismatic cha,nuels. For a comprehensive
control sedion Critlcol
treatment of flow profiles, in either prisrnatic or nonprismatic channels
I control section
I [;ubCritical flow I'. with constant or variable slope, use has been made of advanced mathe-

~
matical approaches. 2 One a,pproach is the use of the theory of the singu-
lar point .. This theory was developed by Poincare [22] but ,vas first

~t Critical'
applied to flow studies in cha.nnels of variable slope by Masse [23]. The
method based on this theory has been further discussed. and extended by
!S b control section Jaeger [241, De Marchi [25], Hom-rna [26,27J,Escoffier [28], Iwasa [29],
, U [s Upercrj~.
critlca/
flow and others.
f',O, • flow 1ICoi
. For simplicity of discussion, channels with small slopes will be con-
1------- ------l
sidered. Let the numerator and denominator of Eq. (9-15) be repre-
CrJ t i co I
%
'C;:~~~".-L
conirol section Critlcol
.~~ sented by two functions, or .
Critical I Steep ~ "
I control section dy = Sol.- (Q/Q,,)2 = F 1(3:,y) or (9~20)
leD'.~_:~_
I
l Superr:rir'
flo", cal I
dx 1 - (Q/Q.)2 F2(X,y)
---- ....... ~,
Then, set each of these functions equal to zero, or
~~

(9-21)

(a) (b) and (9-22)

FI~. 9-8. Location of critica.l c'ontrot section. (a) Flow in a prismatic channel;
(b1 flow ill a nOllprismatic channel or spatially varied flow.
The solution of Eq, (9-21) Fi = 0 will giveQ = Q" or y = y". Hence,
1 At this ~oment, the normal depth coincides with the critical depth, bec.oming a
sO-C!tlled transitional depth (Art. 9-6).
2 See another method of anillysis by Merten [20,211.
238 GRA.DUALLY VARIED FLOW THEORY aND ANALYSIS 239

Fl = 0 represents t.he normal-depth' line in a prismatic channel. In Eq. (9-20) gives dy/dx 3 D; that is, a flow profile must be hori:z.ontal'in
nonprif:lmatic channels, Fl 0 I'esults in a fictitious normal-flow profile. l crossing the transitional profile. Since the transitional profile is defined
It is fictitious because U1~iform flow in nonprismatic channels is unrealistic. by the condition that Qn Qr, its position is fixed by the channel charac-
Similarly, Eq. (9-22), P 2 0, represents the critical-flow profile. Since, teristics but, unlike the normal and critical profiles, it is independent of
Q< is independent of the channel slope, the concept of the critical-flow change in discharge.
profile is valid in channels, of variable slope. At ~his stage of the discussion, the reader must try to see clearly the
differences between the transitional, normal, and critical profiles_
At the singular point, y Y.j thl;l,t is, the fiow profile passes through the·
Yl A ,C B ' ' critical depth. Hence, there exists a critit.:al section.
I
I "
'j I: The slope of the water surface at the singular point is equal to the
---~--- l . ~I limi~ing value of the indeterminate formd.y/d';l; = % if this form is COll-
l-... _______ '" . ~~.-1- -~--;:::;:.::;:::;-
_.~ •.:__:,.' ..
v"ergent. By the differential calc·J.lus, this limiting va.lue can be cvnJuated
~~... ---... - . . --:-.. ~ ........ . :. . .~-- ...!........ ,*""".". ' / If' If"
@.,-'-- -----"-'1'-"" ~;,' ,. __ Reoillo w profile passing by
'/ j / \ / ' " " ,throJgh Pond osymptotic 10
;'I.L
,
tLLZ \'\ /,
1/,'
"
F,·O
--Flow p(o/ile pcssinq th(ouoh P (d )Y (9-23)
l , / . b\;t nc~ asymptotic fa F. =11' .
<
dx ,
: ' I 't I - - - -F,:Oor . quos,-normal
profile
' ' flow
, The above discussion can be illustrated by a simple example. Consider
I ----F2:O Of critical-flow profile
a wide rectangular channel 9-9) in which the flow changes from sub-
---Transitional profile . critical to supercriticaI according to the change in slope from a subcritical
------otherf!ow profiles SI in reach I to a supercritical 3 3 in reach III. . The slope in the inter-
mediate reach II is variable and may be expressed by SD = 3 1 + U';I; in
r
which U is a coefficient.. Somewllere in reach II, at which So = 3:,
a
,1
critical section exists. This section can be determined by the simul-
II taneous solution of FI 0 and F~= O. Graphically, this section lies at
the intersection of the curves FlO and F 2 = O. The cl'itical depth
can be shown to be
\
(9-24)
FIG. 9-9. Study of flaw profile ill 8. ohannel of variable slope.

Considering a unit width of the channel, the critical depth is constant

In prismatic channels"F l = 0 &'ud F2 0 represent two pa:rallel lines.
t~roughout the length of the channel; hence, the profile F2 = () is equi-
Ii1 nonpJjsmatic channels, however, the two profiles may intersect, say
dIStant from the channel bottom. In reach I the flow is subcritical'
at point P (Fig. 9-9). At point P, Eq. (9~20) dy/dx %, an
indeterminate form. Such a point is known in matheraal;ics as a sinfjllla1' . hence, the profile PI ashould be above F~ O. In reach III the flo\;
is supercritical, and the profile FI 0 should be below F\ ~ O. The flow
point. profile under consideration is shown by the heavy full curve in the shaded
When Qn ;; Q., Yn= Y<, which is a depth known as the tra.nsitional
depth. 2 The curve representing this depth is called the lransitt'onal profile. area between PI = 0 and F2 0 in Fig. 9-9,
A flow passing through this profile at the singular point will change its Since t,he transitional profile is defined by Qn = Q" its equation can
be shown to be
state from sub critical to supercritical or vice verJ'la. In fact, the' transi-
tional profile must pass through the singular point, since at this point y (9-25)
Qn = Q. = Q or y,. = y. = y. At other places where Q~ = Qo = Q,

I OsHed by Masse [231 qtw,si-norma! flow.

I At the critical section, where 3 1 + ax = t~e above equation bec'omes
Eq. (9-24).
to uniform ch!l.nnel~,
, Also known as the chq.r.acterntic dept)" whleh was first applied
by Mouret [12J und later was discussed' by Lazard [301. I To determine the slop~ of .the water surface at the singular point in the

[
 I
~I
240 GRADUALLY VARIED FLOW
I THEORY AND ANALYSIS 241
prese~t e~ample by Eq, (9-23), the followingequntion can be obtained I Iu3 these operations are carried out, the jump GH is forced upst.ream until
(using Manning's formula): its height is finally reduced to zero, In this way the profile CP D is
realized. SUCh a pI'olile, hm'v'ever, is unstable, because a. very slight
1J: ·(~§o)
2
dY) 108 0 (d Y) = 0 (9-26) increase in level in the profile P D will entail a change'from the profile CP
( dx • dx , 3 dx c
to the proille AP and the space between the two will be filled with water.
This equation has two roots opposite in sign. The negative root will A general solution of the condition dy/dx FdF2= % for any kind
define a flow profile through the singular point P, wi.th depth of channel can be aohieved mathematically by the method of singular
decreasing in the direction of flow. Since the r_ow in the present probJeCljl point [31]. The result will produce four types of flow profile that can be
changes frorn. 8ubcl'itical tosupercl'itical; this flow profile is evidently the .developed theoret,ically around the singular point.l The four types are
profile of the flow under consideration. At x = ± this profile is
C() , • known as the saddle) noda.l, spiral, and vorlex. types, as shown in Fig. 9-11,
ttsymptotic to the profile of the quasi-normal flow, or FI = O. The other
root of Eq, (9-26) "till define a. flow profile also passing through P but not y
asymptoti'c to £1\ = O. Other profiles, which do not pass through
will intersect the transitlona.! profile with a horizontal slope, pass through
Pi = 0 with a hydraulic jump, and become asymptotic to the two profiles
that pass through P.
The flow profile through P but not asymptotic to PI =0 is
not the profile of the flow under consideration. However, such a
profile may become real under some other circumstances. In 9-10,

n . Saddle Spiroi

FIG. 9-10. ·Illustration of flow pro.5.les defined by a. singular point.

for example, I P represents a singular point; APB is'the profile
through P and asymptotic to 0; OP D is the profile passing through
P but not. asymptotic to F 1 = 0; llnd EFG and HI al'e other profiles not
passing through p, The upstream gate has been adjusted to the
sti.percri.tical profile EFG and the downstream gate toi give the subcritical
profile H I. The tmnsitionfrom one to the other takes place by means of
the hydraulic jump GH. upstream gate is now raised slowly to
a
cl).usethe profile EF to app~oach OP as limit. As tpis is done, the pool
. is adjusted to keep the discharge constant, Simultaineously, the down-
stream gate is !ow61'ed to cause the profile HI to apPlioach PD as a limit.
: I This exa.mple wiw:! suggested .by Mr, F. F. Escoffier of the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers. For simplicity, the.curv6 for Fl = 0 is not shown)n Fig. 9-10.
Nodal Vort ••
FIG .. 9-11. Flow profiles around El. .~ingula.r point, P =0 singular point; F flow
profile passing through P and asymptotic, to F, == 0; F' = flow profile passing throl.\gh
P but not asymptotic to F • ... 0; f ... o~her flow profiles; F, = quasi-norma.l flow
profile; F.= oritical-flow profile; and T ... llrallsitiomu profile.· ,
where the profiles are plotted with the ordinate Y representing the distance
above a horizontal datum and the abscissa X representing the distance
along the "datum. .
I . The p0s4ble flow profiles pre$ent~d in the example of Fig, 9-9 are
of the saddle type. In this case, the flow profile that passe~ through
P and is a~ymptotic to FI 0 indicat 9ll eo continuous How: changing
I
~
I For further discussion, see [23]ll.nd [28].

I
 ,
242 GRADUALLY, VARIED FLOW
l
Ii
THEORY AND ANALYSIS 243 .J
from sub critical to supercritical in a channel with slightly convex bed For purposes of dis,cussion, take the ,case of the backwater behind a
(8 1 < Se < Sa). dam as an example. When So < BL (Fig. 9-12a), it is appal~ent that the
In the nodal type, the,flow profile that passes through P a!ld is asymp- flow is always subcritical and that the corresponding b'ackwater profile
totic to F1 '= 0 indicates a continuous flow changing from super critical is of the' M1 type. When So > SL, the condition depends as follows on
to subcritical in f1 channel with slightly concave bed (8 1 > Se > S3). ,
1
the relation of Bo to lh.
J
In the spiral type, the flow profile that pa.sseg through P and is asymp-
totic to Fl ;"" 0 indicates a discontinuous flow 1 changing from supercritical II
to subcritical in a channel with sligMly concave bed (8 1 > Se > 8 a). I

In the vortex type, the, flow profile that passes through the singular
poiut is the point itself and has no hydmulic significance. A general
solution for the transitional profile in all four typ~ h<LS been given by I
, Escoffier [28J.
9-7. The Transitional Depth. A little more may be said about the
transitional depth,2 which has belm defined as the depth at which Q.. = Qc,
!In = Ye, and the slope of the flow profile is horizontal, or dy/dx = B,. -' (

Equate the right side of Eq. (9-13) to 8 0 and simplify t.he equation; then
(oj
I
_---"1 -=-..--T,'- __ _
..
"-- 1
-.. - __ a
(9-27)
\
~ )
Let K" = Q/V8o,K = L49AR%/n, Z, = Q/VU, and Z = A·,fIT.
Then, the above equation becomes " ' S //,
s UncriticO/.S/o pe

2.22RY.iSo = n~gD (9-28)

This is a theoretical condition for the establishment of the transitional

depth.: It indicates that the transitional depth depends only 011 the
channel geometry, roughness, and slope. This equation contains no dis-
charge; therefore, t.he tranllitiOlial depth is independent of the actual
discharge.
It is logical to say that there is a certain discharge Qt that occurs at the
, (d)
transitional depth Yl./· This discharge may be called the transitional
discharge. According to the definition of the tranl?itional depth, the
transitional discharge shoilld be a normal discharge and also a critical
discharge. Referring to the critical-slope curve discussed in Example
fi---' PAl

5-5 (Figs. 5-8 and 9-12), the transitional discharge can be represented by
a point on the curve. It is evideilt from the curve that, for a given slope
B~, whit::h is greater than the limit slope BLI there are two possible critical
discharges, say, Q., and Qb, both of which are transitional discharges.
FIG. 9-12. Flow pro.files expla.ined by a critical-slope curve.
The actUal discharge is designated by Q and the corresponding critical
slope by Be. '
I A. When the slope is close to the limit slope. In this case, the condition
, IHere .the 'upstream normal flow changes to tbe downstream normal flow at an will depend further on the magnitude of the actual discharge Q with
abrupt tr'ansition formed by a hydraul~{l jump. respect to the smaller and larger transitional discharges Qo and Qb,
, • See [f2], [II)], [28] to [30]. and [32] .• respectively. '
1:

I
.1·,
 0,,) .1
'",,
244 GRADUALLY VARIED FLOW THEORY AND ANALYSIS 245
\"- If Q < Q. (Fig. 9-12b), tIlen So < Se and Ye < y" < Ya < Vb. Since 9-7. f?ketch the possible flow profiles in the channels sbown in Fig. 9-13.
."
j
So < Sc, the flow is sub critical, and the profile should be of the 1VI1 typ~ .
However, the profile will contain two points Ta. and Tb at which the slope
is horizont.aL Bet-';veen these two points a p(')int of inflection apparently
exists. The depths at the two poihts are transitional depths Ya. and y~.
If Qa < Q < Qb (Fig. 9-12c), then So > S,and y. < Yn -< y. < Yb.
I" Since So > Sc, the flow profiles are of the S type. However, there will
i be a point Tb where the slope is horizontal on the Sl profile and a point
T a where the slope is horizontal on the 83 profile.
If Q. < Qb '< Q (Fig. 9-12d), then So < S, and Y. <Yb < Yo < Yn.
The transitional depths will intersect only the M3 profile, and the back-
water profile will be of the ordinary M1 type.
B. When the slope is fo.r r;.way from the limit slope. In ihis case, Q.
and Ya are relatively very smail, and their existence is practically insig-
t' nif]cant. If Q > Qb, the flow will be sub critical and the profile will be
of the M 1 type. If Q < Qb, the flow will be supercritical and the profile
.will be of the S1 type.
C. When Ihe. slope is very large. In this case, the large transitional
i-
. I
discharge Qb is considered to exceed the maximum expected discharge
(see Fig. 6-8). Thus, the flow is supercritical and the profile is of the
S1 type. The highest point of theS1 profile is very close to the down-
stream end.
The above discussion was developed for the case in which the point L of
the limit slope is below the curve of maximum expected discharge (Fig. LEGEND:
-------~- Criticol-c\eplh line
6-8a) and in which the channel sections !1re rectangulal' or trapezoidal or - - - -Noqnal-deplh line
similar to such forms. If the point L is above tbe curve of maximum
FIG. 9-13. Channels for Prob. 9-7. The vertical scale is exaggerated.
expected discharge (Fig. 6-8b), the larger l;ransitional depth of the flow
J will be greater than the maximum expected depth, or Yb > Ym, and the
larger transi~ional discharge will be greater than the maximum expeeted EI.1274

discharge, or Qb > Qm. The foregoing discussion, however, remains EIJ272

:s2
valid as long as the actual discharge Q does not exceed Qm. If Q exceeds EI.f270
Qm, the discussion has no practical meaning. Similariy, the flow profiles
remain t,he same, but the useful part of the profiles will be where the
--x-jEU266
depths al'e less than y",. .. v
[=
PROBLEMS (""I'/;":~:;::( I
9-1. Show that the wnter-surface slope S" of a gradually varied flow is equaJ to the
slim of the energy slope S and the slope d~e to velocity change d(", V'/2g)/dx.
.-+----j.500'----~.t<I.--- ''''11'//''7777,,---,1

9 c 2. Show that the gradually-varied-fiow equation is'reduced to a uniform-flow FIG. 9-14. A channel profile for Prob. 9-8.
I formula if du/dx ... 0,
I 9-3. Prove Eq.' (9·14).
9-4. Prove Eq.: (9-15), 9-8. A rectangular channel (Fig. 9-14), 20 It wide, consists of three reaches of
9-5. Prove Eq. (9-16). different slopes. The channel has a. roughness coefficient n = 0.015 a.nd carries a
discharge of 500 cfs. Determine:
9-6. Prove Eqs. (9-17) and (9-18).
a. tbe norma.l flnd critical depths in ea.cb reacb
I
,:1
)
"
 246 GRADUALLY VARIED ~'LO"'Y
b. the possible (low profiles
c. .the distance ;~ troln the outlet of the channel to the poiht where the backwater
curvs terminate~. The .backwat,er curve is assumed. to be a horizontal line.
9-9. Prove Eqs. (9-24) to (9-26).
9-10. A change in slope from 0.0016 to 0.0064 occurs in a wide rectangula.r channel.
(Fig. IHI). The length of the transition is 10 ft, and the slope in .the transition rea.ch
is So = 0.0016 + 0.00048::, where x is the distance measured from the beginning of
the change. 'The channel carries a discharge of 100 crs per unit width. Assume that
a = 1 a.nd n ~ 0.02.
a. Determine the control section.
b. Computethe slope of tho flow profile nt the contrqi section.
c. Con~truct the tro.nsftional, normal, and critic!>l proliles ..
d. Construct the renl and some other possible flow pI·oliles.
9-11. Show' that the gradually-varied_flow cq\!ation for flow in a rechar.gular chan-
nel of va.riabli!. width b may be (lli:pressed as
S. - Sf + (",Q'ylgA~) (dbldz) (9-29)
= 1 - ",Q'b/gAJ ...._........
All notation has been previously defined.
REFERENCES
1. J. B. Belanger: sur Ill. solutionnumiirique de quelques problemes relatifs
au mouvement. permanent des eallli: courantes" ("Essay on the Numerical Solu-
tion of Some Problems Reletiv~ to the Steady Flow of Water"), Cn.rilian-Goe\lry,
Pa.ris, 1828. . 18. R. Silber: Sur Ill. forme deJl courbes des remous en gal erie COl~verte (On backwater
2. J. A. Ch. Bresse: "'Cours de mecJl.nique appliquee," 2e po.rtie, Hydraulique
("Course in Applied l\'Iechanics," pt. 2, Hydraulics), Ma.1let-Bachelier, Paris,
1860.
3. Boris A. Bikhmeteff: "Hydraulics 'of Open Channels," appendix I, Historicnl and
bibliographical notes, McGraw-Hill Book Cr)mpany, Inc., 'New York, 1932,
pp.299-301.
4~ Charles Jaeger: Steady flow ill open channels: The problem of Boussinesq,
J Ot,rnal, lnetitution of Civil Engineers,. London, vol. 29-S0,.pp. 338-348, November,
1947-0ctober, 1948. . 21. L. J. Tison: "Cou:s d'hydrauliquc" ("Hydraulics"), Uriversite de Gand,
5. Charles Jaeger: "Engineering Fluid M.echanics," translated from ~he Germa.n lly
P. O. Wolf, Blackie & Son, Ltd., Glasgow, H,56, pp. 93-97.
6. F. Bettes: Non-uniform flow in channels, Civil Engineering and Public Works
Review, London, vol. 52, no. 609, pp. 323-324, March, 1957; no. 610, pp. 434-436,
April, 1957. . 23. Pierre Masse: Ressaut et ligne d'eau dans les cours d'eau apente.variable (Hydrau-
7.•(-Allen: Streamline and turbulent flow in open channels, The.Lond(}tl, Edinburgh
and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal 0;
Science, ser. 7, vol. 17, pp.
1081-1112, June, 1934.
S. Hunter Rouse and Merit P. White: Discussion on Varied flow in open channels
of adverse slope, by Arthur E. Ma.tzke,. Trallsadion.s, American Society of Civil
Engineers, voL 102, pp. 671-676, 1937.
9. ShermanM. Woodwa.rd and Chesley J. Posey: "Hydraulics of Steady Flow in
Open Channels," John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1941, p. 70.
10. Ivan M. Nelidov; Discussion on S~face curves for steady nonuniform flow, by
Robert B. Jansen, Tra.nsa.ctions, American Society of Civil Engineers, vol. 117, pp.
1098~1l02, 1952. . Istiluto di Idrau!ica 8 COllt1"urioni ldrrJuliche, Milano, Memorie es!udi No. 82, 1950.
: ',~-
THEORY AND ANALYSIS 247
11. Dwight F. Gunder: Profile curves for open-chruloel flow, Transadions, American
Socieey IJj Ci.-il Engineer", vol: lOB, pp. 481-488, 1943.
12. G. Mouret: "Hydraulique: Cours de rneca.nique appliquee" (It HydJ:aulies:
Course tn Applied Mechanics "), L'Ecole Nationalc des Ponts et Chaussees, Paris,
1922-1923, pp. 447-458; revised lIB "Hydraulique giinerale" ("General Hydrau-
lics"), cours de 1'Ecole NatiQnii.le des Ponts et CtwLusseesi Paris, 1927-1928.
13. A. Merten: Recherches 'sur Ill. forme des axes hydra.uHques dans un !it prisma.tique
(Studies on the form of fiow profiles ill. a. prismatic channel), Anna!e.~ de jl.:l18socic:-
Ucm de. In(16nieuTS Bortis des ~cole8 8pec.iales de Gand, Ghent, Belgium, '101.5, ser. 3,
1906.
14. M. 'Boudin: De I'axe hydraulique des coms d'eau contenus dans un lit prisma.tique
et des dispositifs reaiisll.nt, en p~!l.tique, Bes formes diverses (The flow profiles of ......
'
w.ater ill a prisma.tic ch!1nnel' and actuI'1.1 "dispositions ill various forms), A nnales
des trcwaux pu.bliqucs de Belgique, Bru~s!'<l!;, vol. 20, pp. 397-555, 1861-1802.
15. Pierre Koch: JuStification de l'etucle rationnelle du remous dans les aqueducs de
forme circulaire, ovoide <iu IIna.logue (Justification of the ra.tional study of back-
water in oinmln.r conduits of ovoid or similar shape), Annall13 d.s P(}tl/s e/ cJlIluGs,les,
pp. 153-202, Sep~ember-October, 19~3. .
16. L. Gherardelli: SuU'equaziOlle del mota permanente ill alvei prismatici (On the
cqua.tion for steady flow in prismatic channels), L' Enerllia eleUrioo, Milano, vol
28, no. 4, pp. 185-189,April, 19tH.
17. Gianni Formica: Nota sui profili di dgurgito delle correnti permanent! gradual-
mente variate· defluerrti in galleria cilindriche (Not.e on ba,ckwater curves of
gradually v1l.riedsteady flow in cylilldrico.! closed conduits), L'Energia eleltrica,
Milano, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 480-491; August, 1952; repdnted as Istiluto di Idraulica
e CostrU~ioni idrauliche, ilfi!ano, Mp'lrIorie II studi No. 97, 14 pp.
curves in closed condui.t), cxtrait· des Comples rendu.s des s~ance$ de I' Aoo.demie
.des Sciences, vol. 235,pp. 2377-2379, June 22, 1953.
19. R. Silb~r: ":fl]tude et truce des ecoulements permanents en canaux et rivieres"
("Study and Outline of Steady Flow in Open Chnnne~s"), Dunod, Paris, 1954.
20. A. Merten: Thoof<lmes fondamentaux d'hydrnulique fiuvia.1e (Fundamenta.l
theorems of fluvial hYdraulics), Annales ,de I' A8sociation des Inglnieurs sOTtis
des Ecofes Speciales de Gand, Ghent, Belgium, ser. 5, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 200-210,
1912.
Ghent, Belgium, 1953, pt, n, pp. 170-182;
22. H. Poincare: Memoire sur les courbes definies par uno equation differentielle
(Memoir on the curves defined by a differentia.l equation), Journal de malM-
matiqul!3 pures et appliq1J.~es, Paris, vol. 7, pp. 375-422, 188L
lic jump and flow profile in channels (If variable slope), Revue gencrale de l'hydrau-
!ique, Paris, vol. 4, no. 19, pp. 1-11, January, and no. 20, pp. 61-64, April, 1938.
24. 'Charles J!1.eger: Erweiterung der Boussinesqschen Theorie del! Ahlliisses iu offenen
Gerinnen und der Abflilsse ilber abgerundete Wehre (Extension of the Boussinesq
theory of flow in open channels and over a round-crested weir), Wasserkraft und
W~serwirischafl, Munich, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 83-86, Apr. 15, 1940. (
25. Giulio De Marchi: Sui cambiamento di regime di una correnti Iineare a pelo
libero in Ull alvea. di sezione cost·n.nte (On the transition beLweell 5upercritical and
.~ I
sub critical conditions in free-surface gradually varied flpw in a cylindrical che.nnel),
L'Enerflia e!ettrica, Milano, vol. 27, no. 0, pp.125-132, March, 1950; reprinted as
 248 GRADUAl;.LY VARIED FLOW

26. l4asashi Horn-fill.: "General Hydraulics" (in Ja.panese), vol.'l of "Applied

Hydraulics," cdiLcd by Masashi Hom-mil. and Tojiro Ishihara, Mal'uzen, Tokyo,
Bi58, pp. '108-11 I.
\ 27. Masa.hi Hom-ma and Sukeyuki Shima: On the flow'in a. g~adually' diverged open
I ! channel" The Japan Science RevifIW, Series I, Tokyo, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 253-260, CHAPTER 10
I 1952.
28. Francis F. ,Escoffier: Transition profiles in nonuniform cha.nnels, Transactions, METHODS OF COMPUTATION
American Sociqty of Civil Engineers, vol. 123, pp. 43-56, 1958.
r 29. Yoshiaki lwasa, Hydraulic signifi~ance of tl'B,nsitional be,haviours' of flows in
channel transi~imls and controls, M8mdirs ,of Ihe Faculty oj Enftineering, Kyolo
\
Uni~e1'$ity, Japan, vol. XX, no. 4, pp. 237-276, October, 1958.
30. Achille La~ard: Contribution. A I'etude theorique du mouvement graduellement The computation of gradually-varjed-ftow pl'ofile7 involves ba.sical~y
vo.rit! en hydraulique (Contribution to the theoretical study of gradually varied the oolution of the dynamic equation of gradually vaned flow. The mam
fiow in hydraulics), Annllies des ponls el c.hausseeil, vol. 117, 110. 2, pp. 185-219, obTec Ive o. e com u..,itl.lOn lSO - 8 "ermme the shape of the flow profile.
March-April, 1947.
31. Theodore von Karman and Maurice A. Biot: "MatltelU!l.tical Methods in Engi-
Br~a y elassif1ed; tl1ere are three methods of comput!ttioIli namel I;h.
neering," McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1940, pp. 150-158. graphical-integration method, the direGt-integra~ion met cd, and the step.
32. :E. Crausse: "Hydraulique de.~ (lllnallX en regime permanenV' method. The development and
("Hydraulics of Open Channels with Stea.dy Flow Regime"), Editions Enolles, :proce({ure of several typical meth~
l"aris, 1951. .
ods will be described iri this
i chapter.
!
, 1
10-1. The Graphical-integra-
tion Method. Tpjs method is to
integrate the dynamic equation of
gradually varied fiow bya graph-
ical procedure. Consider two
· channel sections (Fig. lO-la) at
· distanpcs Xl and X2, respectively, (a)
i from· a chosen origin and with
f·
corresponding depths nf flow Vl
and Yz. The distance along the
channel floor is

Xl
.
= ['". dx =.lY'dX-dy dy
-,'" y.
(10-1)
o~~-~~~~~~~~~----~Y

Assume several values of y, and (b)

compute the corresponding V!11ues FIG. 10-1. Principle of the gl'.!Iphical-inte-

· .bf dx/dy, which is the teciprocal gration method. .
of the right-side member of a grad- .
. ually-varied-flow equation, say Eq. (9-13). A ,Curve of y against dx/dy is
, then constructsd (Fig. lO~lb). Accbrding to Eq. (10-1), it is apparent that
I the value a!. x is equal to the shaded area formed by the curve, the y axis,
and the ordinates of dx/ dy corresponding to Yl and' Y2. This area call
be measured and the value of x determined.
249
 I
.'-'"
!
,I

250 GRADUALLY VARIED FLOW'

1
I MlllTaODS OF COMPUTATION 251
(
This method has broad applicatIon. It applies to flow prismatic as in . K = L49AR% = .::.:..c.:....;;..,~~~__2~.~32_3 = 20,800 .
n !
. well as nonprismatic channels of any a.nd slope. The procedure is
straightforward and easy to follow. It may, however, become very 290.2.
laborious when applied to actual problems. A relatively simple example 1 - (74.0/290.2)1 . = 760
1 - (10,000/20,800)' \,
will be given as an illustra.tion.
Example 10-1... A trapezoidal channel hnving b "" 20 ft,'z = 2, So = 0.0016, and' Yalues of yare thon agr:.inst the cor~tlspondi~g values ofax/dy (Fig. 10-2).
n "" 0.025 carries !l. discha.rge of 400 cfs. Compute. the backwater profile created by The inore~nents in area AA are planimetered and listed in the table. According to
a dam which backs up the water to a depth Ilf 5 n imm'3diately behind the cam. The Eq. (10-1), the cumulative v-a.luea of !lA should give the len6th ;r; of the flow profile.
upstream end of the profile is assumed at a depth equal to 1% greater than the normal Finally, the backwater profile is obtained by plottingy against x (Fig. 10-3),
depth. The energy coefficient 0/ "" 1.10.
Solution. Following the solutions of Examples 4-2 and 6-2, the critical and nonnal
depths are found to be·y, ",; 2.22 ft and y.. 3.35 it, respeotively. Since y. is.$reater
than y. and the flow startswitb. a depth greater than Yn, the flow profile is of the 21(1
"OOT I
I \ .
type. The section factor Z, = 400/VIJ/" 74.0 an:! the conveyance 1{n = 400/
,/0.0016 = 10,000. .
For simplicity; the channel bottom at t.he sitE' of ~ho dam is chosen :l.S the origin and
the ~c va.lue in the upstreltm direction is t!l.ken as positive. The C'lmp11tation of dx/dy
by means of Eq. (1l-13) is given in. Ta.ble 10-1 fOf various values of 11 varying from 5 it
"ot - \
j

T<l.BLE 10-1. COMPUTATION OF THE FLOW PE!OFlLEl FOR EXAMPLE

GJiAPRICAL INTEGRATION
10-1 Br- 6,000r
Q 400 cfs n = 0.025 So = 0.0016 y, 2.22 ft !/n = 3.36 ft. . 0/ = 1.10
I
"

v T A R R~;, l( Z d:t:/dy AA x 5.000[-

-
5.00 40.00 150.00 3.54 2.323 i 20,800 290.2 760 I
4.80 ag.20 142.08 3.43 2.274 11t,230 270.4 79:! 155 155
d, I
4.60 38.40 I
134.32 i 3.31 2.221 17,770 251.5 836 1(;3I 318
d)'
4.000~
I

4.40 37.60 \
125.72 3.19 2.167 16,360 . 232.3 913 ' 175 493 i

'MO~
4.20 36.80'119.28 3.08 2.117 15,050 214.5 1,000 191 684
4.00 36.00 i
112.00 2.96 2.052 13,750,197.5 1,140 214 8913
35.20 i
3.80
3.70
3.60
34.801
34.40
104.88
101.38
S7.92
2.84
2.77
2.71
2.006 12,550 181. 0
1.972 11,910 . 173.0
1.944 11,350 1155.0
I
1,430 257 1,155
1,750 l!,\} 1,314
2,260 201 1,515
3.55 34.20 96..21 2.68 1.929 11,060! 161 1 2,770 126 1,64.1
3.50 ! 34.00 \14.50 2.65 1. 915 10,800 157.3 3.480 /156 1,797 I
3.47 1 33 ,88 93.48 2.63 1.904 10,600 155.2 4,520 120. 1,917
3.4\1,
3.42
33.76 92.45
33.68. gl.aO
2.61
2.60
1.894 10,440 153.0
1.890 10,340 151,7
5,990 i 158 2,075
7,930 139 2,214
200i I
I
3.40 33.60 91.12 2.59 1.886 10,230 150.0 10,760 187 2,401 1 I
3,36 33.44 89.78 2.56 1.872 10,000 147,0 I II
',OOor . 151011
to 1 % greater than Ii. or 3.40 ft. For insta.nce; when !I 5.00 ft, the values in other IINI::!I ",I
t:::1 ~I ~!
columns of the table are
T 40.00 ft
A "" 150.00 fP
o !
0
(\J
<.0
r'l
11 II
I I I
4
I I
I -
..
5 Y
t<i r<i
R '" 3.54'ft
rm 2.323 . FIG. 10~2. A curve of y vs. dx/dy.

\
1
 ;:;.,
252 GRADUALLY VARIED FLOW METHODS OF COMPUTATION 253 ..

T,uiLE 10-2.EXISTING METHODS OF IN1.'EGRATING THE

G&A.DUALLY-VARIED-l'LOW EQUATION

Effect or
Ye6.r of
Type 01 change iu Veloeity Mnu mptions rOr· Refer--
puhll- InvOBtigo.tor
cba"nel kinetic formula . hydra.ulio expon.ents. 'cnce
catioo
energy

1848 Dupui. Broad'tee. Ignored Ohby N - 3, M = 3 tiJ

tangle
1850 Bresse Broad rso· . Oon.idered eM.y JV"", 3. fyf = 3 i2J
tangle
1875 Gr... hof Br?ad ree- Con.id,..."d ebhy· N = 3, ftf - 3 [31

l!;il!(! R1iblm~nn I '"ngl.

Brond ,... ••
tan;:le
Ignored Cb~.y N-3,M=3 l~]

1896 Tolkrult~ I Broad para· Considered Cilhy N = 4, M - 4 lSI

bola
1900 Masoni Common Tee"' C"".idered CM.y N=a.1I1=3 (5]
'"ng)e
1912 Bakhmetefl All eh"pea Con.idero.d CMz:!, .It:; c: UH Ii,S)
(1932) by.teps
1914 Senafl'nnak. Broad reo- 19:nored C1l{)·nBo.~ N ~ 3.5. M = II I~J
Ehrenberger ~angle 23.7~'1IFJ.TlIS~~HI!J N = 3.552. M n= 3
FIG, 10-3, An .llf1 flow profile computed by the graphical-integration method,

It should be noted tllll.t, when the depth approaches the no~mal depth, the incre-
1921 BIltic16 I
I
Approximate
trApezoid
Ignored
22'.1~'1I:·uSil>lJ
CMzy
N = 3. HI, M: = 3
[{:t .- ol"

•
A,.1R. where
0:::

- is a varilll}le and
[IOJ

dll/dz = eonet
mental area varies so greatly with the change in y value that it becomes difficult to KotallY Broad reo- Conaidered C'1lQ ,?3"lj N - 3.;1. 1>f -.8 1111
pirmimeter. In such Il. c.tl.Se, the area. may be computed by assuming it is a trapezoid.
For instnnce, the incremental area between y '" 3.42 a.nd 3.40 is t,,1 - (7,930 +
1928

1930 Seboldiaeh
I
tangle
IIras.d r~e· Ignored CB m 8' N=2+2m.~1-3 (12]
10,7(0)(3.'12 3.40)/2 187. . . tangle
1938 Mononobe AU.hape. 1 COlloli'idered OIl~S'" P 1£ UI;OD"\ A.!c tt tf°M:t lIS1
10-2. Method of Direct Integration. The differential equation of 1947 Le. Ail Conoidered Manning K: tt :rv~ AI cc lI CO I.l,at [14.15]
1~51} VQn 6egll'Olrn All Considered Manning K.: ct lI'~1 Z2 1% 1JJl [16]
gradually varied flow cannot be expressed explicitly in terms or y for all 1954 Keifur-Clm Ci.rc~lnr. but Con.idered M .. nning None (17)
.he method
types of chn.nne! cross section; hence, a direct nnd exact integration of th., mAY be ex·
e~llation is practically impossible. M..fl.PY. ~~~.!;l,!IlpJ.s. Jt~YJL_hrum_ma.dlL tanded t.o
other 3hB.pea
_i;l.~r to solY~t..~.~~ig.g,!Cl.r a few special cases or to introduce as~­
_.Ji2ns~.:"!l.l:l~~..~.!!~~tioll ame~a bl~jQJnath~ma.ticaLintegrati.o.n.
Table_~~~2.~iv:~s_::\...~~.~~~X ..~xi~Hrlg methods of dii'eJ:;i.integ.I:aJ:.i.c>n, .. / the integration is carried out by short-range steps and with the aid of a
arranged chronologically.'" Although the list is incomplete, it provides !l varied-flow function.
generarJile}iofUie deveTopment of the dil'ect-in tegration method. Note In an attempt to improve Bakhmeteff's method, Mononobe [13] intro-
that most of the early methods were developed fOl~ channels of a specific duced two asllumptions for hydraulic exponents. By these assumptions
cross section but that later solutions, since Bakhmeteff, were designed for the effects 9f velocity change and friction head are taken into account'
channels of all shapes, Most early methods use Chazy's formula, whereas integrally without the necessity of dividing the channel length 'into short
later .methods use Manning's formula. . reaches. Thus, the Mononobe method affords a more direct and accurate
In .the Bakhmeteff me~hod [8] the channel length under consideration computation procedure wherebyresuH.s, can be obtained without recourse.
is divided into short reaches, The change in the critical slope within the
small; l'o.nge of the va.rying depth in each reach is assumed constant,1 and in kinetic energy to
the friction slope, or r in Eq. (9-14), i3 a.ssUI;ned cOMbnt in each
rea.ch. Since an increa.se or decrease in depth will cha.nge both these fa.ctors in the
, I In the Bakhme(eff method, Eq. (9-14.) is used. The coefficient r in this equa.tion sa.me direction, their ratio is relatively stable a.nd can-be IloBsumed constant for prall-
1S a.ssumed cOlUltllnt in the reach. Thus, it ca.n be shown tha.t the ra.tio of the change tical purpose!!.
254 GRADUALLY VARIED FLO"," METHODS OF COMPUTATION 255
to successive st.eps.· In applying this method to practical problems, it fCv,J) ';", . f" 1 dv
where J (10-7)
has been found !.ha,t the first assumption (see Table 10-2) is not very satis- )0 - V
factory in many cases. Another drawback of this method perhaps lies in
This is a varied-flow function like F(u,N), except that the variables u and
the difficulty of using the accompanying. charts, ."hich are not sufficiently \
N are ;'eplaced by v and J, respectively.l
accurate for pl'actical purposes. I.
. Using the notation for va,ried-flow functions, Eq. (10-'1) may be writt.en
Later, Lee Tl4] and Von Seggern [16] suggested new assumptions which
result in more satisfactory solutions. Von Seggern introduced a new
x = t [ 11 - F(u,N) + G:)
, 'M J 1
N Fev,J). + canst (l0-8)
varied-flow hmction in [t,dclition to the fUllction used by Bakhmeteff j
hence, aD additional table for the new functicn is necessary in his method. or x = A[u - F(u,N) + BF(u,J)] + const ( 10-9)
In Lee's method, however, no new. function is required. where
The method [18] described here IS the outcome of a study of many
existing methods.' By this method, the hydraulic exponents arE; expressed A =~:, B - _ (y,)M
- J
-, 1t = 't, J =
N . .-
y"N Yn. N - M+ 1
in terms of the depth of flow. From Eqs. (6-10) and (4-6), /{,,2 = Gly"N,
/(2 = G,yN, Z.2= C2y,M, and Z2 = C2 y M, where G, and C2 are coefficient,s. and where F(u,N) and F(v,J) are varied-flow functions.
If the;3e expressions are substituted in Eq. (9-13), thegradually-v.aried- .' By Eq. (10-9), the length of flow profile between tVTO consecutive sec-
tions 1 and 2 is equai to
. 'j
flow. equation becomes
(10-2) L = x~ - Xl
= A! (u, - u,) - [F(u2,N) - F(1I:"N)] + B[F(U2,J) - FCli"J)] I
-I
\
Let u = yly,,; the above'equation may be expressed fOl' dx as (10-10)

dx ~ ~: [ 1 - 1 ~ ltN + (~:)'{ 1U~-:;N ] dtt (10-3)

This equation can be integrated for the length ,; of the fio,v profile. Since
the change in depth of a. gradually varied flow is generaIJy small, the
hydraulic exponents may be assumed constant within the range of the
limits of integration. II:_. ?-~I1~e ..U!.e _hY'dra~lic eXQonentL1l<re
not}ceably deE~ld§}nt O}l ~jn the limits _Q,f ~l.vell rea:.c::h, the reach
where the subscripts 1 and 2 refer to sections 1 and 2, respectively.
Equation (10-10) contf~illS variedLflow functions, and its solution can
be simpiified'by the use of the varied-flaw-function table, which is given in
Appendix D.2 This table gives values. of F(u,N) for N ranging from 2.. 2
to 9.8. Replacing values of u and N by cOlTesponc!lng values of v and J,
this table also gives values of F(v,J).
1 This transformation W:l.S also performed independently by Levdlg]. 1,. "

shoul<i Qe....§l!.b,dividlill. foy )ntegrf),ti::m; tl:!.el} .th~ J.IYcir al1lic e~p.o12~!lls Ln_ , .The prep:l.ration of ~uch a table wr,s undertaken !LId performed for the first ;time
dUrIng 1914-1915 by Lhe Hasearch Board of the then Russian Reclamation Service
e~gl:j~e~J~~9_h may be assu~~consta.nt. IntegratingEq. (10-3),
under the direction of Boris A .. Bakhmeteff, then Profes:;;')r of General and Advancc'd .

x= sy"o[u - )0f" 1d~t N+ (1I,)'1f ("1·UN- UN duJ + canst

- 1~. . Yn }o - u
(10-4)
Hydraulics at Polytechnic Institute Emperor Pet.er the Great, St. Petersburg, Russi:l..
It was s8.id that the work had involved a long and tedious procedure [8]. In the tur-
moil of the Russian Revolution in 1917, the table so computed becaIne umwailabl e;
The first integral on the right side of the abo,re equation is designated by so the task·of computing was done over :l.ga.in by Professor Kholodovsky and partly
F(u,N), or ' by Dr. Pestrecov. The reeomputed table was more precise and complete, covering a
range of N from 2.8 to 5.4. This table was published in 1932 [8l When Bakhmeteff
F(u,N) =
,
fu ~
)0 1 -:- UN
(10-5) becELme Professor of Civil Engineering at Columbia University. In the meantime, ._. (

in the U.S.S.R. iIi 1928, the unavailable table,oopied in hand-written form, had been
which is known as the varied-flow- function. published in a second edition of [71 with values of N equal to 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.25,3.5,3.75, 1
4.0, 4.5, 5.0, and 5.5. Methods of computing the varied-flow-function tahle a.re
The second integl'al in Eq. (10-4) may also be expressed in the form of . explained in pp. 303-305 of Bakhmeteff's book [8J. An error in printillg should be
the varied-flow function. Let v = U N1J and J = N I(N - Ai 1); this + noted in that. book; that is, a nega.tive sign shoulci be placed in front of the ent.ire
integral can be transformed into right-side member of the equation printed neat the bottom of p. 305. Table D-1
given in Ap'pendix D is an extension of Bakhmeteff's table to almost triple its original
fv. U N- M .' J f' dv .J 5iz!). It was prepared by the author in 195~1954 for teaching purposes at the Uni-
)0 1 - UN du = N )0 1 - vJ = N F,v,J) ( 10-6)
versity of Illinois, and was published in 1955 [18].

\
./

.. ''1'.-- I
I
L
METHODS OF COMPUTATiON 257
256 GRADUALLY, VAllIED FLOW , ,

~.,,-..:~ In computing, a flow profile, f,!rst the flow in the channel is analyzed b
Example 10-3. Water flows from under a sluice into a trapezoidal channel having
= 20 ft, z =2, So = 0.0036, '" = 1.10, andn ,= 0.025. The sluice gate is regulated
J (Art. 9-5), and tho channel ,is divided into a numherofreaches. Then,
the length of each reach if! computed, by Eq. (10-10) from knmV'll or TABLE 10-3. COMPU'i·.uroN o~ TliE FI..OW PROFILE FOR EXAMPLE 10-3 BY TIiE
( assumed \lepths 8.tthe ends of the reach. Tile procedure of computation DIRECT-INTEGRATION MET,BOD

I is as follows: Q =,400 cis n = O.O~- 0.0036 '" - 1.1Q y; 2.22 fty. = 2.57 ft
----

, '1. Compute the normal depth y" and critical ,depth Yo from the given 1_
data Q and So (see Arts. 6-6 and 4-4). ' ' y
-'-~!
I 11 F(1_,N) , F(v,J) x L
~--

2. Determine the hydraulic exponents Nand M for an estimated : 0.962 20:6 0

2.22 0.831 0.792 0.979
average depth of flow in' th~ reach uuder considerl1tion (see Arts. ~3 and 2.14 0.800 0.755 0.917 0.888 20'40 2
4-3). It is assumed that the channel sectivn under consideration has 1.B7 0,700 0.638 ' 0.756 0.699 188 IB
approximately constant hydraulic exponents. 0.6')0 0.525 0.627 0.552 161 45
1.60
3. Compute J by J = N/(N - M + 1). 0,500 0.420 0.511 0.431 134 72
1.33
0.400 0.;315 U.404 0.319 102 10i
4. Computc values of U = Y/Vn and ,1> = uN/J at two end sections of 1.07
0.300 0,219 O.3D1 0.219 71 135
0.80
the reach. 0.53 0.200 0.132 0.200 0.132 43 i63
5. From the varied-flow-function table in Appendix D, find values of 0,27 0.100 0.055 0.100 0.055 18 1BB
0 200
F(u,N) a.nd F(1),J),
,6. Compute the length of the reach by Eq. (10-10);
0.00 0.000
I 0.000 0.000 0.000

The above procedure is illustrated by the following examples: to dischllrge 400 cfs with a depth equal to 0.55 It at the vena contr~ta: C~mpute the
flow profile. If a hydraulic i ump occurs at the downstream end, suartmg Wlt~ a depth
Example'1O-2. ,i,rith reference to the chs,1l11EJI described ill Example 10-1, compute of 1.6 ft, determine the di,stancl; 'from the vena contro.cta to the foot, of the Jump,
the length oC the backwater profile extending frorn the dam site to an upstream .'3BC- SQlulion. From the given data, li. = 2.67 ft and y. = 2.22 ft .. Smce y.. > y" the
tion where the depth of flow is 1 % grea.ter than the normal depth. channelsiope is mild. As the depth of flow issUing from the slUIce !!;ate ls.1ess than
Sohaion. The given data are Q = 400 cis, b = 20 ft, Z = 2, So = 0.0016, a = LID, the critical depth, the flow profile is of the M3 type. . T '
and. n = 0.025. , Considering aflilverage depth of 1.61 Ct, the hydrauhc exponents are I\ 0= 3.43 and
1. FOlIo'wing Example 6-2, y,.= 3.36 £to Following Exa.mple 4-2 with a = 1.10, M = 3.17. Thus, J .. 2.72, N IJ = 1.26, lind (Ycly~)MJ IN = 0,442,. ' : .
y, = 2.22 ft. i Table 10-3 'shows t.he computation of the flow profile. For convenUl[lce m mter-
'2. The depth at the downstream end of the backwater profile is Y2 =,5 ft: At the
l
\
upstream end, the depth is Yl = 1.01 X 3.36 = 3.40 ft. The average depth may be
to.ken as 4.20 ft'3.nd ylb = 0.21. From Figs. 6-2 and 4-2, the corresponding hydraulic
exponents are fonnd to be N = 3.65 and 'llf = 3.43,
3. The vnJue of J = 3,65/(3~65 - 3.43' + 1) = 2.90. - -..:..-. - - ---..: ___ !!.D~L.
4. For each section, values of H and v are computed, as given in the second and third
columns of the following table: - ... - .... -
~-­
--- --- ---
. I
I
I
'Y 'U I v : }i'(''',N) F(v,J)

l.488 -1-.6-'2-5- ---0~ -1-~0-'-2-13-

5.00
3.40 },012 : I 1 . 0,1.5 I 1 025 I [.293
DiL ... 0.476 • -0.B77 1'- -1,080
, ,

5, The .varied-flow funct.ions k(lI,N) und F(v,J) are obtainbd from the table in
Ap~(lndix D ancl given in the fourth and fifth colmnns of the o.~ove table.
6, In Eq. (l0-9), A = y,./So =: 2,100 and B = (voly,,)MJ IN F 0.197. The length
of the backwater profile is" thereCbre,' i .
L = 2,100[0.476 - (-+0.877) + 0.Hl7 X (-LOBO)) ;" 2,395 ft
l
I
1

\
 258 GRADUALLY VARIED FLOW METHODS OF COMPUTATION 259
polating values af F(u,N) from the varieti-flOlv,function.tablervalues of u are assigned As the depth of flow varies from 5.00 to 3,4,0 ft, an average value of'y = 4.20 ft
at regular inter',:[LI:<. Values of x are thereby computed by Eq • .00-8), in which the may be assumed for the evaluation of Chezy's C. For a wide' rectnngular channel,
const-ant is assun1cd equal to zero. The last column gives the length of the profile Eq. (5-7) gives C = 75.13. Since y. = 3.36 ft a.nd So = 0.00113, A = 2,100 and B =
measured from t.he section untler considera.tion to the downstream enu, where the 0.715, Eq. (10-17) gives .
profile terminates theoreticlLily at the critical ciepth. x == 2,100[u - 0.7151"(n,3)] + const (10-19)
. The computed flow profile is 'plotted as shown in Fig. 10-4. The a~tual profile
betwee.n the bluic(!-gate opening and the computed profile is uncertain and,hence, is Assuming a constant of zero in Eq. (10-19), the computation of x is as follows:
. fitted in by eyc. The distance from the gate opening to thllsection oi the vena con-
tmcta is known as thecontraciion distance. For a sharp-edged sluice gate, this distance
has been assumeu equnl to approximately the hl:igl:t of the gate opening (Art. 15-7).
y I F(t':3~1 X
-------I---~---I .
If a hydraulic jump starts off at It depth of 1.6 ft, the distance from the jump to the
5.00 1.488 ) 0.260 \2,720
vena contracts. would be about 130 ft, as shown.
Example 10-4, Determine the profile of flow in a wide rectangular channel, using 3.40' 1.012 t 1. 360 . 80
---'----
the Chezy formula.
Solution. Fol' a wide rectangular channel, Fig. 4:-2 gives M = 3 and Eq. (6-49) The length of thB backwater curve is, therefore, equal to 2,720 - 80 = 2,640 ft,
gives N = 3. Thus, J = 3, v, = tI, and Eq. (l0-8) becomes about 10 % larger than the values determined by the previoLls methods. .

x = ~ [ tI - (1 "-:,::) 1"(u,3) ] + const . (10-11)

Channels of Nonsustaining Slopes. When the n,bove procedure is
applied to cImnneJ:; of adverse slopes, the slope of the channel bottom may
where 1"(1<,3) can be found i'rom the varied-llolI·-function t.able in Appendix D. Mathe- be taken as negative. Thus, Eq. (9-3) becomes
matically, 1"(u,3) is integrable, or .
dy -S~ - s
(10-20)
F(u,3) = )0
(u
1
du
-113 -
_ 1-:1'
7, n
11' + g +1
(u - 1)'
_ _1_
V'§ cOu
.H,2l~
-Y3
+1 (10-12) dx = 1 + 0'. d(V2j2g)/dy
The corresponding equation for the flow profile can be shown to be
This integra.tion Wi,S lirst performed by Dresse [2]. A determination of the flow pro-
file by this solution is,therefore, \videly known as the Ere.sse method. x = - y" [~ - j(U ~ _ (y,)M r"u N-MduJ + const (10-21)
The critical and no~mal depths in· a wide re~tangular ohannel m ...y be expressed, S~ (l I + 1tN Yr.,}o 1 + UN .
respect·ively, by .
. 31qi where the varied~fiow functions for adverse slope~ are
Ye = '\J-g (10-1:3)
ra . d1t
and
.317 (10-14) F(u,N)_s, = j.~ 1 + UN (10-22)
Yn = "C'So

where q is the dischargl'\ per unit width of the channel. Thus, and F(v,J)_s, =
r a u lf - N
}o 1 + uN du =
J r
v d!,'
N }o 1 -+ vJ (10-23)
3
G'So
u,Y!f and J = N/ (N'- 111 + 1). --For evaluating these func-
Ye
YR3 = -g- (10-15) where v
tions a t.able [18jl has. been prepared which is Table D-2 in Appendix D.
Substituting this·expression for Y;/Yn', Eq. (10"11) may also be written \
Accordingly, the length of flow profile betwe~n two sectiqns 1 and 2 may
'- 1
x =
.
~0 T
L
u - (1 - C'So) 1"(",3) -I +const
g _
(10-16) be·expressed by Eq, (10-10), where A = -'y,,/So, B = -(y,jYn)MJjN,
and the varied-flow functions are replaced by those for' adverseslo pes.
or x = ,.f[u - B1"(tt,3)] + const (1U-17)
Example 1.0-6. Derive an expression for the flo;w pl'ofile ina horizontal channel.
where 11 =y,,/S, and B = 1 - C·So/g. z.... Solution. For horizontal channels, So .= 0, and'the differential equation is
The lengdh of flow profile between twoconsecutivc sections of dcp'ths?l' and y, is
~,.,
..... '1< dy -(Q/K)'
L = A.{(u. - UI) - B[F(u.,3) - 1"(uI,3)J) (10-18) (9-19)
c7t/. d2 = 1 - (Z,/Z)' (

Example 10-0. Solve El(ample 10-2 by the Bresse method.

Solillion. , The Bresse method is derived primarily for an infinitely \Vide rectangu-
Since the critical slope S,.is defined as the 'slope that will produce a discharge Q :at Il.
.!
lar channel. . When this metho9. is applied to channels of other cross-sectiona.l shapes, I Tables of varieq.-flow functions for adverse slopes. with limited range af the
the solution is therefore very approximate. . hydraulic exponent N hiwe also been prepai'ed by Matzke [20J and others [2IJ.
j \
I - \
I

!.,
 METHODS OF COMPUTATION
261
260 GRADUALLY VARIED FLOW

normal
!IS depth equal ' to the critical. depth !I' (Art• 6-7) , the d'ISC1~arge may be
' expressed
, for the range of Yl to Y2; let Me be the M vaille at the critical depth Ye;
and let M be the average M value for tpe range Yl to Y7. Thus, Eq.
Q = K, VB, ' (10-24) (9-13) may be written
1
r
Substituting Eq. (10-24) i(l Eq. (9-19) and letting (K.jK)' = ( /)1'1 (Z,/Z)'
(yJy)Dl, and p = y/y" . " . y, y ,
=
\
~:!! '" S pM-N , (10-25)
dx '1 - pM Let 1t = y/y"Nn/N and, hence, ,dy = y,/J,IN duo Then, Eq. (10-27) may'
Integratinll a.lld solving for z,
_ y, (
X - R N _ M
pN-.lf+1
+1 -
'
N
pH+-\)
+ 1 + ~onst (10-26)
berBduced to

dx
__ y"N"IN
__
So
r1 ___
'
1_,
1 - UN
-;- (y/1'IM)M
--
y"N .. !N
-1t~r-,I!
- - du
1 - 'UN j
l (10-28)
This equation can be llsed for the computation of the length of fJ/)·v fil' h'
zontal cha.nneL ' . ~ , pro e In a Orl-
Following a procedure of integration and transformation simibr to that
, Channels with
• l'a'I'iablc Hydrauli-vETponen'"
. It sh ou~ld, b e llotec1 t h at
". applied to the solution of Eq. (10-3),
, the assumptIOn of COllstnnt hvdraulic exponent<:
... ~ l'n I-he • legomg d'ISCUS-
. J . v £0' •
x = ~
y N"IN [ 1. - F(u,N) + (y,M'IM)H J '] ,
~>.fN N F(v,J) + c.onst
(10-29)
N
'"
o

log K
l N"2tonli
------~:-~
18 ,.,/
where u = Vly"N,,{N, V = u NIJ , J = N /(N - M +
1), and F(u,N) and
F(;),J) are varied-flow functions. If the hydraulic exponents are con-
sbant, or N" = N and Me = 111, Eq. (10-29) obviously becomes Eq.

r I I (10·8).
The length of the flow profile between two consecutive sections of
I I I
I I I depths Yl and Yz can be computed by Eq. (10-10), except where A
log Kn I I I YnN.fN ISo and B = (YeM,IM IYnN.IN)!':J IN.
I I ChanrLeis with Gradually Closing Crown. For channels with gradually
I I
log Ze
! I closing ero\vn, the hydraulic exponents are variable near the crown, and
I the m'ethod proposed r.bove may be used. For more accurat_e results,
,8
el I !I
I however, the integration of the dynamic equation maybe performed by
I I I I
I
I
,.,"
I
I_
I
I
I
I
N
. log Y '-----.l.:-c--J_--LL"'-
>. .>..>.'»
log y
a procedure of numericp.l integration. Such a procedure has been
applied to circular c,onduits hy Keifer and Chu [17].
". "'''''''
0> 0>". 01 CJIo OJ. OJ. Let Qo be the discharge of a circular conduit, flowing full at a depth
2 !2E£ . ..2 2. .2 52
equal to the diameter do of the conduit and having the energy gradient
~~~'r;u~i~'e~;~~::~~~~iC plots of depth against Z and lIf, respectively, for vari[,ble equal to the bottom slope So, and let Ko be the corresponding conveyance.
)
Thus, (10-30)
sion ~s sa~isfactory in most rectangular and trapezoidal channels. -As
~escnbe~ mArts. 4-3. and 5-3, the hydraulic exponents may vary appre-
For a uuiform flow in the circular conduit with a discharge equal to Q
ciably with res~ect to the depth of flow ~vhen the channel section has
abr~pt changes m cross-sectional geometry or is topped with a gradually of the actual flow, Eq.(9-11) gives
closmg crown. In s~ch cases, the channelhmgth should be divided "into Q = Knv'So (10-3'1)
a number of reaches III each of which the hydraulic exponents appenr to
be constant. ' ' From the above two equations the following may be developed:
Referring to Fig. 10-5, it is assu~ed th:;Lt the hydro.ulic exponents in
the range o~ depth from YI to Y2 of a reach ~re practicaJlyconstant. Let
N n be the N value at the normal depth y,,;'let N be the average N value i
1

\
262 GRADUA"LI,Y VARIED FLOW METHODS OF COMPUTATION 263
,
where (ICo/KF is evidently a function of y/d o and, hence, can be repre- applications. The direct step method I is a simple step method applicable
sented by fl(u/do). to prio:matic channels.
Ji'r"omEqs. (\)-4) and (9-7), the following may be written: Figure 1O-6illustrates a short" channel reach of length I1x. Equating
the total heads at the two end sec-
ZC)2 0:(.221' aQ2 T /d o " aQ! (Y) (10-3.'3) tions 1 and 2, the following may be
(Z = 'qA3 =""Ci7 q(A/d o2)l = -([;Sf. C4
written:
where (1'/ d o)/ g(A/d 0 2 ) Sis appa,rently afunction of y/d o and, hence, can be
represented by hey/do).
Substituting Eqs. (10-32) and (10-33) in Eq. (9-13) and simplifying,
(10-40)
(10-34)

(10-41)
x _ do [ (v/do dey/do)
- So}o 1 - (Q/QoFh(y/d o) where E is the specific energy or,
aQ2 (v/e., Ia(y/do) d(u/d o) ] ass1_unillg cr.l = a2 = a,
-~)o 1 - (Q/QoFfl(y/d o) + const (10-35)
or V2
E=y+cr.- (10-42)
x = - do
So
.(x _aQ:~
do'
y.) +"const (10-36)
2q

In the above equations, y is the depth

FIG. 10-6. A channel reach
vation of step methods.
fOl" the deri-

where
T (y Q) .(Ii/d. -dey/do)
."
. (10-37) " of flow, 'V is the mean velocity, cr. is the energy coefficient, So is the bot-
X FI do' Qo =}o
= 1 - (Q/QoFh(y/d o) tom slope, and S,is the friction slope. The average value ofB! is denoted
and Y = F? (X, R) = o
-f.(u/do) dey/do}
(v/d (10-38)
oy Sr. When the Manning formula is used, the friction slope is
- do Qo )0 1 - (Q/Qo)2!t(y/uo) expressed by

These are the varied-flow functions for circular conduits, depending all (9-8)
y/d o and Q/Qo. They can be evaluated by a procedure of numerical
integration, say Simpson's rule. A table of these functions for positive The direct step method is based on Eq. (10-41), as may be illustrated
slopes, I prepared by Keifer and Chu, is given in Appelldix E. by the IDliowingexo..mple. .
The length of flow profile between two consecutive section3. of depth "Vl Example 10-7. Compute the flow profile required in Example 10-1 by the direct
and Ya, respectively, in a circular conduit may be expressed as step method. .
Solution. With the data given in Example 10-1, the step computations are carried
(10-39) out as shown in Table 10-4. The ,,&lues in each column of the table are expln.ined
as foll<JW5:
where A = -do/So and B = cr.Q2/d o• 5
, Col. 1. Depth of flow in ft, arbitrarily assigned from 5.00 to 3.40 ft
10-3. The Direct Step Method. In general, a step method is chal"ac- Col. 2. Water o.rea in ft' corresponding to the depth 11 in col. 1
terized by dividing the channel into short reaches:and carrying the com- Col. 3. Hydrn.ulic radius in ft corresponding to 11 in col. 1 .
putation step by step from one end of the reach to the other. There is a Col. 4. Four-thirds power of the hydrauli~ rn.dius
Col. 5. Mean Velocity in fps obtained by dividing 400. cis by the water area in
great variety of step methods. Som.e methods o..ppear superior to others col. 2
in certain n~spects, but no one method has been found to be the best in all CoL 6. Velocity head in it
If So = 0, then Q, = 0, Q/Q, = "", and the varied-flow fund-ions hecome mean-
" ,
; Col. 7. Specific energy in ft obt,ained by n.dding the velocity head in col. 6 to the
1
t depth of flow iI) col. 1 ~. : '
ingless. If S, is negative, Eq. (10-30) shows .that Qo> is negat,ive. Since the actual
discharge Q must be positive, (Q/Q.)2 bee"omes" negative. Thus, the integration 1 First suggested by the Polish engineer Charnomskil (22] in 1914 and then by

procedure must be done for negative values of (Q/Qo)l in the two varied-flow functions. i Husted [23J in 1924.
!
£.
,
f", >, \
, ,~- .: -,
.. --/
 METHODS OF COMPUTATION 265
Col. 8. Change of sp.ecifi~ energy in ft, equal to the difference between the E value
in col. 7 and that of the previous step
CoL 9. Friction slope computed by Eq. (9-8) with n "" 0.025 and with V as given
in c'o1. 5 and R~i.in col. 4
Cbl. 10. Aver~ge friction slope between the steps, equal to t.he arithmetic mean of
the friction slope just computed ill col. 9 and tha.t of the previous step
Col. 11. Differe,nce between the b0ttom slope 0.0016 and the average friction slope
1 - CoL 12, Length of the reach in ft between the consecutive steps, computed by
(
Eq. (10-41) or by dividing the value of b.E ic col. 8 by the vahle in col. 11 .
f Col. 13. Distance from the section under consideration to the dam site. This is
equal to the cUlmllativ~ sum of th~ values in coL 12 computed for pr\lvious steps.
Th~ fiow profile thus computed is practically identical with that obtained by graph-
i~l integration (Fig. 10-3). .
.,.,... 'Example 10-8. A 72'-in. reinforced-concrete pipe culvert, 250 ft long, is raid. on a
slope of 0.02 with a free outlet. Comput,e the flow profile if. the. culv;;l't dischs.rges
232 ds, n = 0.012, and" = LO.
Sol'utian . . ,Fronl tl:e data, V' = 4.35 it and Yn = 2.60 ft .. Since y, > y", the chr.n-
nel slope i~ steep. As shown in Fig. 10-7, the control section is at the e.ntrance; water
will enter the culvert at the critical depth !lnd .thereafter flow: at a depth less than 'Y,
but grer.ter than y •• . The flow profile is of the 82 type.
Table 10-5 shows the computat,ion of. the fio\v profile, which is self-explanatory.
The computed profile is plotted Il.S shown in Fig. 10-7. Plotted also in the figure is
the energy line indicating the variation of energ:' along the culvert. The comp\,tll.-
tion has be~.n car~ied to exceed the length of the eulvert, so. that the depth of flow at
1 ~ ;g ~ ;g I.(') -..:tt 0 ~ e,p 00· r-... ...-I C"I .D C'l the outlet can be interpolated. This depth is fOHnd to be 2.81 ft, and the correspond-
~ 21 NMl!"Jt-...~;:S~~~~8~g~c::.
~ r--: u:cr: ~ c ~ 00 00 00 J:-..l"-..;! ~
'""""! ing outlet velocity is 19,4 fp3. It should be noted that, if the. pipe were fiowing full
~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~J at the outl'et, the outlet veloCity would be only 10 fps.

~
~
<01 !:::;:E~~~~g;$~::g~...-IN(QC'-) t
'~r ~•~• •
~!:::, ~•~
• ~ ~, .
~ ~ MO'~ ~~ ~ I Note that, in either tpe direct step method or thE'l standard step method
which w:ill be described in the next article, the step computation should
! ./1
C'I') M::'t;l ~ ~

_ I 000000000000000 _ be carried upstream if the flow is suhcritical and downstrea.m if the flow is
supercritical. Step computations carried in the .wrong direction 'tend
~ €I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~ ~ ~ g;; ~
• • • • • • ".
C'\tNC'lMC"t')C"t')MM~~~''';~j;'';~
• '- ... C"I;I M gj "/
'"
inevitably to make the result diverge from the correct flow profile .
10-4. The Standard S!~Jl_~et~9d. Thill method is applicable also to
nonprismatic channels. In nonpril'lmatic channels, the hydraulic ele-
Jl:'""'i
3/ ments are no longer independent of the distance along the channel. In
natural channels, it is generally necessary to conduet a field survey to
I conect the data required at all sections considered in the computation.
!
rt; ;;01 The computation is carried on by steps from station to station where the
~I
hydraulic charactel'i3t~cs have berm determined.. In such c'ases the dis-
I
tance between stations is given, and the procedure is to determine the
J
'<!
--.1
~'
depth of flow at the stations. Such a procedure is usually carried out by
~I
trifl.l and error.
I In explaining t.his niethod it is convenient to' refer the position of the
J --.1I
) ." .~ water s\:rface to a hQrizontal datum. In Fig. 10-6, the water-surface
~I , elevations above the, datum at the two end sections are

{, I 264
Zl = So t.x + Yl + ~2 (10-4:3)

..
 METHODS OF COMPUTATION 267

IJ) C'J 0 ~ 0 1""""1 cno:.

and (10.,.44)
o l .... ""dI 1""""10':1 LO 0 0
cqr..oCtlO)"'IfIO
1""""1 1""""1 NM
The friction loss is
(10-45)
CO"'lflCON~I""""ICOO
H
<1 O(O<Ot-t-<:OlQO
.-tcr:,t-l,Q"'d'I<!:l where the friction siope S/ is taken as the average of the slopes at the two
end sections, or as Sf.
O':IM"'lflt-O"lCCflr-
o:JcqO~LO-tK:.Otn
tn Lf') "'IfI C"I C"J to ~ r-
Substituting the above expressions in Eq. (10-40), the following may
~""""'I""""II""""IOOOO
00000000 be writt.en: .
00000000 V 12 )12 2
Zl +
al -2-- = Z2 + 0:2 -2 + 11,1 + h.
g g .
(10-46)
v
where h. is added for the eddy loss. which ma,Lbe appreciable III nOI1-
..NiBma~ic~. No rational met,hod of evaluatin edd' loss is avail-
able. r~~epends mainly on the velocit,y head change a.n . lllay
be expressed as 11 part Of It, or k(~aV2!2!l) where k is a coefficient. For
000000000 -graduzHy COl1vel'gmg and-dive-rgll1g reaches,!, = 0 to 0.1 andO.2, respec-
tively. For abrupt expansions and con}.r.actions, k is about 0.5. For
prismatic ~uTai'Chailiiels) the eddYloss is practically ~'Ie = O.
0')00<1:><0<0000'"
1""""I0l~U"J"'IfIC'-I~t­
OON~t-M"l~
•• * •• ••
00000000 For convenience of computation, h. may sometimes be cOll03idered part of
the friction loss and Manning's 11. may be properly increased.in computing
_!}l> I~.~PI h~.i~£9 in the cor,nputatiol1.
OO,.......(cnl.O-.;.t-tOtO~

~ ~ ~ ~,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ The total heads at two eUd sections are

<0 t..OcO (0 t-t"-o 0000 00

jC'~ 00 1'""'1 0':1 11"; 1""""1 t-' to to Q

;"'..... "'1'1 ~
j ('>
1""""1 0
c.o 1""""1 C"J O. '<"' t- 1""""1
0 ~
.qt 0 f.O CO ...-I
(10-47)
~ ",,,lN~~.q;.;;t.OcO .. " (
; \
·and (10-48) J
1100 <'> <0 "" ..., \I') <0 0 ....,
.... ~O)OC"lC:OCf.lt-C*:loC()
,r- ,....;....; N ~ ~ 00 ~ c;) to
I 1""""11""""1.1""""1'_. 1""""1 - -,1""""11""""1 Therefore, Eq. (10-46) becomes
I io,-,tI"",",,,,r-<o<o<o1
+ hI + h.
I""~, COtn t-t-tO.-t loON 0')
) ....... Oo>oor-,.:><O\I') HI = H 2 (10-49)
A: C'1 C'l 0:-1 ,.... ..... ..... .... .... ....
This is the basic equation that defines the procedure of the standard step
(
00 method.
"" t-COCOO
°°
--I
I
t:'- C'~
A:
0'>
t- t;- t- ::g~g~~ <'l

..... .... .... .... ..... '"

..... .... .... ..... The standard step method is best suited to computations for natural

~I
~ ~
\OMtnHMC'O~t:OO
OlI""""l~t-O':I....-l~Ot-

. . .; ~ r--:
.
~ ~ M~ C-l I
...£l1annels. 4Jl.£is!!latic channel, howevelJ.~ill be used in trw following
'example in order to ~ the iI1ustration and to' aUows_oml?J!.risoll with
reSiiItSobtained by the other methods that have b.een: described. For
jN N 1'""'1 1""""1 ....-l'.I""""1....-l .-t'....-l

~
'1"""0000000<:'1'"'
M cq, en co CI'J 0 00 c.c l'-o
,"'IfI "dt r:v'l cr:, C1:I.~ C\l N C'l
I apphcatiOilto natural channels, .an example will be shown later (Art.
lO-G}.
Example 10-9. Compute the flow profile required in Example 10-1 by the standard
str.p method. As~ume that statiollS along the channel are j1x~d at the distances
I'"
QC'lOmo\l')oaor-<b
"r-r-<1:>,","'\t)~"""<j'
~ ~ ........ . determined in the solution of Example 10-7. The elevation at, the dmnsite is 600
m.B.!.
000000000

Z56
I
I
" ..f
,
 268 GRADUALLY VARIED FLOW

Solution. The step computations are arrauged in tabular form, as shown in Table,
10-6. Values in each column of the table are explained as follows:
CoL 1. Sectionidcnbiiied by stiJ,tion n'lmber such as "station 1 + 55:" The
location of the stations is fixed at the disto:nces det~rmi!led in Exampie 10-7 in order . 0 0 0 09°.0 a 0 0 0 000
to compa.re t.he procedure with that of th~, direct step method.
Col. 2. ,Vfl.ter-surface elevation at the station. A trial value is first entered in
this column; this will be verified or rejected on the basis of the computations made 'in :. f6 ~ '[3;.~'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~
0 0- 0 N C'l C'1.1""""1 C'1 N N
I""'"'f _ -I 1""""1

the remnining columns of the table. For the first step, this elevation .must be given :00000000000000
'or assunled. Since the elevation of the darn site is 600 m.s.1. nnd the height of the
dam is 5 ft, the first entry is 605.00 m.sJ. When the trial value in the second step 1
has been verified, it becomes the basis for the verifieation of the trial valu~ in the i
1I1lxt step,and so on. i
CoL 3, Depth of flow in ft, conesponding to the water-s'll'fll.ce elevation in col. 2.
+
l
!
For instunce, the depth of flow at station 1 55 is equal to \Vater-surface elevatioh
minus ehvation at the dam site'minus (distance.from the clam site times bed slope),
or 605.048 - GOO.OOO - 155 X 0.0016 = 4.80 ft. '
CoL 4, Water area corresponding to y in coL 3 r
CoL 5. Mean velocity equ!l.l to the given discharge 400 cf" divided by the wa.ttoi'
area'in col. 4
CoL Ii. Velocity head in ft, corresponding to the velocity in col. 5
Cnl. 7, Total head computed by Eq. (10-47), equal to the sum of Z in col. 2 and ~!::;~~~~g~f2~~~~t;::;~
the velocity head in col. 6 . u-; L~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M M ~ M ~ M M M
Col. 8. Hydraulic mdius in ft, corresponding to 1J in coL 3 C'f':l 1""""1' m co u:; ~ t- ..... IX) Lr.J C'o':: ..... 0
-.::tt 0')
It)~M'''''OOl;:Qt-t-~t.D~tO~U'::I
Col. 9. Four-thirds power of the hydraulic radius
M~MMe..)~~NNC'1~C'i"l~~
Col. 10. FYiction slop~ computed by Eq. (9-8), with n = O.O~5, l' from col. 5,
and R~~ ]rom coL 9 C"l ~ ..... 1- a:: ~ C"l ~ 10 C"t c::: a a
C'l 00 co tn r- ~ co tf) 00 ~ I..Q ~ ",,:1'1 -*. M
a . . ;tt
CoL 11. Average friction slope through the re~.ch between the sections in each' ........ ......-I C-l M ...q-. (!:I co o-C"t ~ to co 0 C'\ lO

step, approximately equal to the arithmetic mean of the fdctloll slope just comp';lted
~ E It:I u-.) lfJ tn L.":J. IQ lfJ <0 c.o to lO lO r- 1- r-
0000000 00 '=100000
(O(()tD~ot.O(QtOtO~tOtOt.D~tO
i.n col. 10 and that of the'previous.step .
Col. 12. Length of the reach between'the sectioll.S, equal to the difference ill sta- ---~-----------------------
t-cot-c.oV":l~O-e::tl~CO[-......-I~~C"'-\

i
."
tion numbers between the st-ations ""
:;;- ~~;;;~~~~~t2~~;3~~~
) CoL 13. Friction loss in the reach, equal to t,he product of the values in cols, ] j i:>- is ......-I -f ......-I ~ .......-4 C~ ~ ~ (.'-1 C'l cr" C"";) M C"";) C"";)

II 000000000000000
and 12, ----
C") a.: ~ ....,.. C"t ~ co Lt':l O"J M 00 ~ r- co
Col. l~. Eddy loss in the reach, equal to zero l-
~ ~ t- U') L"':) t- !"""'4 ~ co lfJ M t- C"l U") co
~ co O"l ....... , eo"J: lfJ co OJ a ......-I ,,1 ~ ~ CC (r"
Col. 15. Ele\·ation of the total head in ft, This is computed by Eq. (10-49), that
~C'1NM~e...JMer)~~~.qt....;tt~~
is, by adding the values of hI and h, in cols. 13 and 14 to the eleva~ion at the lower end
of the reach, which is found in col, 15 of tli __ previous reach. If the vallie so ohtained -0 co C'l N ctJ 0 00 00 C'-1 .....-I 0 00 11";1·0 C'l
o 0 C'f':l t- C"l 0
00 M C1 ~ H;l ~ ~ co ~
does not ng'ree closely with that entered in col. 7, Il. new trial value of the water-surbee oc-i...;~~~~.....;r...:cr;~MN~"";
I elevation is assumed, Ilnd so on, until agreement is obtained. The value that le.1ds ' t....,~.;1JC'I.....-I....,oIoocn~O":IC":IO":ImCJ)
~......-I......-I_"""-f~......-I

,I to agreement is the c!!rrect 'water-surfuce elevation, The computatiDn may then

proceed to the next step. The computed now profiie is practically identical with that 8~g~~g~f;~!2g~;:~~
obtained by the gl'aphical-integmtion method shown in Fig. 10-3. u-)~~";~~:MMMM~~MMMM

10-5. Computation of a Family of Flow Profiles. In previous articles

methods were described for, determining a single fio,;' profile. Fre- lSI' £!
quentl:)', several flow profiles,or a family offiO\v P1'0 files, are desired fOl'
g :g~' c; ~ 8'~ ~ g ~ f::: ~ ~ ~ ~
various cOnditiolls of stage and discharge. An example of this type of
pro~lem is the determination of the economical height.of a dam, where
a
'';;
J + + + + + + ,+ + + + + + + + +
the initial elevation is indeterminate and, hence, a number of flow profiles
,,$
ell ~I o ..... M ~ to 00'::: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;i ~
!
may have to be computed for the same discharge with different assumed 269
.[

I
270 . GRADUALLY VARiED FLOW
initial elevations. AnothEll' example is the tracing of flow profiJes in a
tributary :;;trm1m for different stagp-s and discharges in the main river, or
in a river with a tidal estuary for different tidal elevations, or in ll, cana'!
t,wo reservoirs for changing reservoir elevations and 1lariable
The following are some time-saving methods which may
help in the computation of a family of flow profiles.
A. C'um'Js of Geo'l11£tric Elements. When 11 number of flow profiles are
desired fOI' different stage and discharge conditions, it is best to construct
curves showing the geometric and hydraulic elements (Figs. 10-8. and
0.05 0.1 0.5 1.0
Veloci~y need, ft
FIG. 1O~8. Plot 'of velocity head aga.inst water-surface eleva.tion.
10-9) required in the colnputatiol1. Considerable time can be saved itl.
the computation by interpolating values fnim these cur'Tes, provided the
curves are not extended needlessly beyond the expected range of the
water-surface elevation.
When the discharge of flow in a channel varies, the velocity hea.d and
friction slope will change, and the water-surface elevation will be affected.
Thus, for general use in the computation, the velocity head in logarithmic
scale can be plotted against the water-surface elevation (Fig. 10-8), and
the friction slope in logarithmic scale can be plotted against the wateL"-
surface. elevation (Fig. 10-9). From cOllsideration of the Manning for-
mula and the continuity of flow, it call be shown that the velocity head
METHODS OF COMPUTATION 271
and the friction slope vary with the square of the discharge. Therefore,
after the curves for one value of Q, say 400 cIs, in Figs. 10-8 and 10-9 have
been computed, CUI'ves for othol' discharges, say 200 and 800 cfs, may be
obtained t'ithel' by shifti!lg the curves horizontally (Fig. 10-8) or by shift-
the abscissas (Fig. 10-g). The distance by which either the curve or
the abscissa should be shifted is determined by the square of the ratio of
the !lew to the original discharge: .
-l
-j
l
5
Friction slope for Q" 400 cis
FIG. 1O-1l. Plot of friction slope IJ.gainst water-surffICe elevation.
B. The Leach Diagram. When a hrge number cif flow profiles is
required for the same discharge but diifel'ent stages, a diagram develop~d
by Leach [24J may be used to advantage. Such a diagram (Fig. 10-10)
may be prepared after a few flow profiles within an expected range have
been computed by any method. In the diagram, each curve represents
the rehttionship between the water-surface elevations at thebeginnillg
and end sections of a reach. For instance, when the elevation at section 1
is plotted against the elevation at section 2 for the first reach 1-2, then
 272 GRADUALLY VARIED FLO'lT
,/"
l<
MlllTHODS OF COl\:fPUTATION 273

the cur~e fOl'. renc? 1...2 as shown in the figure is obtained. For simplify- !r n V1
2 2

the IdentdieatlOu of the curves, elevations at sections of oddnurnber '8 1 = 2.22Rl~~ (10-53)

are . represente~ ,by abs~i8sas and those at sections of even number by ! and
~ n2 V 22
~2 = 2.22R2~i (10-54)
ordinates: . ':Vltn the ,dlagram thus prepo.red, the flow profile for any
a,ssumed 1mbal elevatlOll can be determined, Taking the initial eleva-
tion as 605.00 and fonowing the dotted line in the direction of the 'arrows I
I
81 ( Q)2
1(1
(1O~55)

the corresponding water-surfaue elevations Il(; subsequent sections can b~

obtained easily, The diagram is const,ructed for a discharge of 400 cfs.
a.ud ,82 =
"
(!l)2.
1(2
For any other discharge under investigation a diffe;'ent diagmffi must be
prepared. It can be seen that functions F(Zl) and F(Z2) are proportional directly
to the squares of.the veIQc1ti~s or of the discharge Q, For any other dis-
GQar Qs, the corresponding values of these functions can be obtained by,

~ J
muit.iplying the functions by a factor (Q./ QF.
The Ezra method gives a graphical solution of Eq. (10-50). There are

.i 607~
u
,
two major parts of this solution:
L COMPUTATION ,o!..ND CONST1H)'C'l'ION OF Z + F(Z) CURVES. For each
:; chosen section in a charulel under consideration, several values of \Vi:J.ter-
C surface elevation are selected, and necessary geometric elements A and R
,2 606 ,- for each of these water-surface elevatiofL'> are determined ,and tabula~ed,
'This procedure is the same as in the standard step method.
.'"
Q

For given values of Q and n, values of C/ P /2g and SI are determined at

" each section for each of the selected elevations. In artificial prismatir.
"
~ 505 channels, the friCtion slope Sf 1l10,y be computed by Eqs, (10-53) and
...
,"
I
(10-54). In irregular r..hannels, the v(,lull of 1C is determined first and the
'" value of Sf is then computed by Eqs. (1()"'55) and (10-56). This will be
'0
if: shown in Example 10-12. '
606404~----c*~----~!~____~I~____~ For each section, t,he corresponding vl1llleS of F(Z) are then computBd
606 607 608
W'ater-3urfoce ele".crion ot !iclioo$ 1~~. 5, ere. " by (la-51) and (10-52). It should b€! noted that two values, F(Zl) ,
FIG. 10-10. The Le!Lc~ diagram for flOW-pl'ofile computatlon when a large numbel' of
and F(Z~), should be computed for each section. In computing F(Zl) of
flow profiles are reqUIred for the same discharge. the section, the value of ..6.x is the value ..6.Xd measured downstream from
that section, In computing F(Z2), the value of..6.x is the value ..6.x,. meas-
ured upstream from that section. In the computation, this rule ensures
C. The E'l:m lIfet!.wd. The Ler;.ch diagm,m is recommended if flow pro-
files Iorthe same dlScharge are required fOl' val'ious initial st!Lgcs. When
that values, of ax willbe common to sections at both ends of any reach,
since it will be shown that the same value of ..6.x is used on both sides of
flow profiles for various discharges are desired for different initial stages, a (10-50), In other words, at each section Zl = Z7 = Z.,
method developed by Ezra; (25) may be used. Similar method':! have also Now, fol." each section' with Z = ZI = Z21 values of ZI + F(Zl) and
been developed by others (26-281. '
Z2 + FCZ2) are computed, and curves of Z1 + F(Z'l) and Z2 + FCZ2) l1re
• ~ul:lstituting Eq. (10-45) in Eq. (10-46), the following equation may be
wntten: ',' I. plotted against Z for each section (Fig. 10-14).
, 2. DE'rEP.MINATlON OF WATER-SVRllACE, ELEVATIONS. The effect of
(10-50) eddy losses may be included in the value of the roughness coelficient n, as
'o/here described in Art. 10-4; thus, the term h. in Eq. (10-50) isi zero. The
(10-51) resulting ~alue of Z2 + F(Z2) for a \:l.ownstream section is the:refore equal
!l.nd to Z 1 + F(Zl) for the next upstream section of the same reach, and vice
(10-52) versa..

274' GRADUALLY VARIED FLOW
, For subcritical flow, the flow profile is determined in an upstream direc-
tion. Star!.hlg with a given initial water-surface elevation at a down-
:;;tream sectioll, the value of Zz + F(Z2) ClLn be obtained from the appro-
priate Z2 + F(Z3) curve. Entering the curve of ZI F(Zl) for the next
upstream section with this value, the corresponding, water-surface eleva-
tion is determined directly, This procedure is J'Elpeated from section to
section, tracing the desired flow profile.
For supercritical flow, the flow profile is traced in a downstream direc-
tion. Starting with the value of .?I + Ji'(Zl) at the initial section and
taking this value to the Zz + F:(Zlz) cw've for the next downstream sec-
tion, the corresponding water-surface elevation is determined.
If eddy losses are not included in the roughhess, the term h. may be
expressed as k{O'V2/2g), where k is a coe.fficient described in Art. 10-4.
Accordingly, the procedure of computation should be modified.
is
First of all, it necessary to plot curves of k(a V1j2g) the eleva-
tion Z for eil,ch section. .
For subcritical .flow, water-surface elevations for two consecutive sec-
tions are determined in an upstream direction by the procedure described
previously for h.. O. Values of k(aV2/2g) may, therefore, be obtained
from the plotted k(a V2/2!7) curves for these elevations .. The difference
ka:{VN2g. T'~2/2!l),or he'in the reach, is then added to the value of
Z2 + for the lower one of the two sections. The resulting value is
taken to the + F (Z 1) cun'e for the hight'll' of the t.wo sections, and the
corresponding corrected water-surface elevation is determined.
For supercritical .flow, the procedure is similar. However, the flow
profile should be traced in a dowllstreant direction, and the correction for
eddy losses should be deducted from the value of ZI + F(ZI) before this
value is taken to the Z2 + F(Zz) curve.
The application of the Ezra method will be illustrated by examples ill
Art. 10-8.
10-6. The Standard Step Method for Natural Chll1lnels. For flow in
most natural channels at a normal stage, the flow profile in short reaches
is very close to that of a uniform flow, but slightly modified by local
channel irregularities .. For apparently gradually varied flow, an approxi-
mate solution may be obtained by either the di!'ect-integration method or
the direct step method, assuming a prismatic chp.,nnel having the average
geometric and hydraulic characteristics of the natural channel. For a
practical and precise Bolu tiol1, however, the standard 'step method is
recommended. . I
The standard step method has many obvious advantages in application
to natural cfU'.llllels. When the velocity head is small, ~he step method
can be carried even in t e wrong direction wH~ resulting in serio~
~rr~rs, al~ is always advisa Ie 0 ca;ry the computation upstream
~~---.-:--
- 1
"
METHODS OF COMPUTATION 275
. jf. the flow is subcritical and downstream if it is supercrit~ The wa,ter- )
surface elevation of the iiiltJ.al section, where a flow-profile computation , I
should start, may not be knovm ina natural stream; use of the step
computation in this connection offers a special advant:1ge. If the step
computation is started at an assumed elevation that is incorrect for the --·1
l
given discharge, the resulting flow profile will become mOl'e nearly correct
after every step, provided the computation is carried in the right direct,ion,
Thel'efore, if no elevatiol1 is known within or near the reach under con-
sider~tion, an arbitrary eleyation may be assumed at a distant section far
enNlgh away, above or below as the ca'se may be, from the initial sect.ion.
By t,he time the step computation has been carded to the inith,lsection,
the elevations will be correct. A check may be made by performing the
same computation with another as,'lumed elevation at the dista,ntsection.
The comput.ed elevation at elle initial section is the correct elevation if
the second computed value agrees with the first value. The two values
.. ~
usuall;v ag~ee if the distance from the distant section to the initial section I
is sufficient.
In computing a flow profile, th~ following information is generally
required: .. i
1: The discharge for ",ihich the flow profile is desired,
2. The water-surface elevation at tho control section. If this is not
available, the qomplltt,tion may sta.rt from an assumed elevation at a sec-
tiOl) far enougli a~.vay from the initial se(ltion through whieh the profile is
decircd. .
I 3. The geometric elements at various channel sections along the reach
for all depths or flow within the range expected. These dat.a ma.y be
obtained by a hydrographic surveyor from a contour map of the channel
bottom, A convenient method of recording these data is shown in Table
10-7.' In the table, the cross sections are identified by number and river
mileage in conformity with the map in Fig. 10-11. Other dat.a include
the reach length between sections, channel width, wetted perimeter, and
water area. The column for remarks is provided to indicate the limiting
features of the cross section, such as the side slopes, making it pos~ible to (
estimate the water area and wetted perimeter within a moderate range of -, !
wat.er-sUl~face 'elevation. .
If flow profiles for different discharges are contemplated, it will be con-
, ! venient to construct curves of the geometric elements (Fig. 10-12) and to
i interpolate their values at different elevations.
4. The channel roughness and eddy losses at various sections, In
flow-profile computation, it has been fOlll1d that the smaller the :value of
Manning's n, the longer will be the profile, and vice versa, Hence, a
smallest possible n value should be selected in the computation if knowl-
edge of the longest possible flow profile is required. This knowledge is
 !
tj
! METHODS OF COMPUTATION 277

TABLE 10-7. TAIJULJ'.1'ION OF DATA FOR. MlSsounr AND KANSAS RrvEns AT

KANSAS CITY, Mo.-"
<0
'-

'Q 'Q .:;""

::
"
""t::
I'il
"0 E "
.E '0.,> Missnuri Ri\~3r

'o"
:> ">
0 E-
.0 -" 0
0
'"
~
\:.)
Channel
"
.!!~
"E~
~
e ... .. ...'""" 2
1,060
.". 1 745 . 3 Left ovor· 178
"<l
~c: ~,~ b~nk
cor r:Q
",,,
o·~

b
Chfll\nel 1.200
,,0 '""'~~ '-'
84.5
:0; ::: ~ c: 745.5 Left 0+·61 1 +W B9 92
:3 DVc.r ..
]~ .E:>:- " bnr.. k
l- I- <5
~ Ch.a.nnel 1 + SO Hi t ' 2 1,520 1.550 38,aOO DaL<k 1 Oil "'
I I
I .I t: 4 H:'L9 Channel 2 +IH 23 + 72 2.0S0 ~'. ltO 48,50(;: Lev •• 1 on;l
I J
a i BUllk 1 on
~t o~
I ~
<Il l,il00
"~f
I I >::
f I q il 37S.U5" 7.16.2 Lef~ over- 720 7l!.D 3,020 Levee 1 on 4
:<
..., bank
Cl Channel 2,040 2.080 47,SOO Bank 1 on 1
.:I
Z I, S8il
w
<:> ..,
f;
6 378,95 746.2 Loft. eyer·
I
720 720 3,020 Le"'eg-l on <1;
W >- br.nk
..J
~ Ch3une~ 2,080' 47,300 Bauk 1 on 1
~
~ 880 8.27G Levee 1 .00·4
01. 1.320 3~.700 Levee 1 on 3
~
.
'-
"0
>::
I{ansfls Riv~r

""E ol 54() Le\·c. 1 0:1 3

"
c:
'C
";::
;:;
but.h slue3
0
c:
0 ,~'" 840 Lovee IonS
"
,~ ~ bo~h sides

u 0
... It,·!iS50utL RivQr
:;: '-
i., 0- lD ovet- :12 + 80 4,4 + 10n3
"
OJ
;. '"
0
ol
E b.nk
Channel 44 + 50 5.7'+40 1.29()f 1,310 34,600
'"
...J U X
OJ Dike 57 + 40 62 -I- 29 460, 490 5,700 Levce 1 on-4
"t:l

1 <=: 2,430

t
>-< ·Fllirfax 384.00 '750.3 Left over- 5GO 640 5,010 1 levee ,ur·
,...;
,.... Bridge b~nk' {iLea. 3 pier

t
slIrtt\eas
0
,.... Chllnn~1 1,400

"
r£; RigMover- · ...... 1 125
bank

11 3SS.57

i
.. U.S. Army Corps of Engin.er~ (291.
t See Fig. 10.. 11 for location or iltu~1':l. seot.ions.
216 .1 1: Distance tlP,ttcam from l1i!etion O.

1
 • I

j
278 GRADUALLY VARIED. FLOW

important in cert.ain engineering problems, such as the determination of :!: 0

~
.,
r
the bu,ekwatel' effect due to a dam. .
.,;
." .,
.,
..-!::- - - . -- ....
On the other hand, ,,,hen knowledge of a'shortest possible flow profile is c:0 0

required, a largest possible n value should be used, for example, in the

;; ;e
problem of improving a ehannef for navigation. Since the navigable ,,; ,,;
depth should be greater. than a oertain minimum value, the shortest c:;-
M
o
co
"":. ~
possible profile will indicate the lowest depth of Howat a given channel .... --~-

section. The eddy losses may be estimated separately and included in

the computation:· Some~imes, however, it is convenient to raise the
'"!;
0
0
;:;
'"0
c:0
value of n and thus cover the effeet of the losses. ---;;;- --Oil '"
0
.....
'"8'" 0
0
0

Example 10-10. Compute the flow profil;; in the Missouri River near Kansas City,
0
,,; '"
0
--0-
Mo., for a. design discharge of 431,000 ds. The plan indicating the locations of the ~
cross sections is shown in Fig. 10-11. The geometric elements of these cross sections '"
a.re shown in Table 10-7 for given water-surf!t.Ce elevations .. For other elevaLions, the -_....'"'"- -'
geometric elements are to be estimated from such data. l .
...
0

j
0
Solution. The computat.ions are tabulated as sho',vn in Table lO~p. The column ~
headings in the table are explained below: '"o.
0 .!! '"t";... ..'"
~

Col. 1. . Section number in conformity with the plan of Fig. 1O~1l "
0 --",- iii '"
00 8 .;::
Col. 2. Subsections, for which M.C. designates the main channel section and L.O. II 0 '"
~

designates the left overbank section 0> '"M ~~

~
gj "
0

§§§ .~
Col. 3. River mileage above the mouth of Missoud River Ii
~
0>
Col. 4. Water-surface elevation. The initial elevatiol1.of 752.25 at. seotion 1 was X xx X :;;"
...'"
h'

estimated from the rating curve of the Kansas City gaging station on the Hannibal
Bridge at Missouri River mile 3.77.58.
~ ">
p;j
<OM '"
<1l0"O:;
~ ;:!
:6
.."'""
. Col. 5. Water area. For instance, section 1 is subdivide'd into le;:t-overbank and :l
main-channel areas. At elevation 752.25, the area is determined for each subdivided "
.£
p..
area from Table 10-7 or from a curve prepared as shown in Fig. 10-12.

-0-
'"
'":
""'"
~"'I~
000

::::
<0 "" I
I
......
--;0-
",
(
'"
.,;
'"
",.
J
~I
...!::-
",.
A in 1,000 fi2 ",.

FIG. 10-12. A and R vs. \'liater-surface elevation for channel section No.1 of Missouri
Riyel" at Kansas Cit:!;, ¥o. (U.S. Army Corps oj Engineer•. )
d
~
~l
o· .0
~..:l
1.5.
·0
~,j
1 The plan and data used in this example were obtaine.d from [291. Some numerical·
;:
values, however, have been modified to suit the present purpose.
I'" I"" t
-I
 METHODS OF COMPUTATION 281
280 GRADUALLY VAlli,ED FLOW

Col. '6. Wetted pcdmeter. :For elevation 752~2p a.t section 1, the wetted perimeter , The friction slope Sf in a short reach of length Linay be expressed as
is determined from' Table 10-7 or from Fig. 10-12.
Col. 7,' Hydmulic radius, obtained by dividing the area in col. 5 by the wetted - F
S, - ,
+ h~2L - hvI (10-57)
perimeter in col. 6. , '
Col. 8. Two-thirds power. of the hydraulic radius in col. 7.
'where F is the fall in water surface and h'J2 -' h~1 is the change in velocity.
Col. 9. The value of Manning's n. It is assumed ~hat the general rosses due to
contraction, expansion, find bend are included in the friction losses coniputed from head. If hvi - hVI is zero~r negligible" then S, = F /L, and the normal
the selected n values. ' disch[J,rge of a uniform flow by the Manning formi.tla is
Col. 10. The conveynnce K = 1.49 A R* /n
Col. lL The value of I(} / A'
Col. 12. Energy coefficient for nonuniform velo~ity distribution. From col. 5 to
Q = l.~~ _4RH (J)'Il (10-58)
col. 12, the procedure of computation is the same as that described in Art. 6-5. Tne
coefficients for the .subdiviLh,d channel sections are assumed equal to unity. For a gradually vlLl:ied :flow with backwater effect having a' discharge Qz
CoL 13. Mean velocity, which is e~luar to the section discharge of 431,000 ds and a corresponding F r in the same re!wh, it may be assumed ,that ft. form
divided by the water area in col. 5. Above section 5, the dischaJ;'ge is divided between'
the Missouri River (350,000 cfs) and the 1{ansas River (81,000 ds). The velocities
similar to Bq. (10-58) may be written, i.e., that
shoold be computed for the divided discharge.s accordingly. The division of discharg;e
is balled on a hydl'ologic study of the drainage basins of the two rivers.
Col. 14. Velocity head '
.Q~ = 1;9 AR>1 (~ys (10-59)

Col. 15. Total head, whi~h is equal t.o the sum of thc elevation in col. 4 and the
velocity head in col. 14
Col. lB. Friction slope, which is equal to (Q/ K)'. The 1C v!Llue is the total
value for the section under consideration. Thus, for section 1, S, = [431,000/
(290.1 X 100)]' = 0.000220.
Col. i7. Average friction slope through the reach between the two sections, that'
is, the arithmetic mf!fLn of the friction slope just computed in coL to and that for the
previous step
Col. IS. Length of the reach between the sections, that is, the difference in river
miles between the sections as converted into ft
Col. 19. Friction loss in the reach, th!lt is, the product of the slope in col. 17 and
the reach !ength in col. 18 ' The stLlge-fall-discharge relationship f.or 11 selected reach may be deter-
Col. 20. Eddy. loss in the reach. The general losses are included in the friction
loss cOlIlputed in ,col. 19. However, at the entrance of the KansaB River to the Mi,~.
souri River, an additional eddy loss at the C1mfillence is expected. This is estimated
at, 10% of the increase in velocity head,or 0.10 X (1).63 - 0.13) = 0.05 ft.
CoL 21. Total head, which is obtained by t1.dding the SUIll of the losses hl in col.
19 e.nd h, in col. 20 to the total head in the same column for the previous section. If
the value so obtained does not agree closely with that entered in col. 15, the water-
surf!lce elevation in col. 4 should be assumed again until a fair agreement is reached.
For the computation ot' water-surface elevations at sccHons1K, 21(, 6, and 7, see
Art. 11-10.
10-7. The Stage-fall-discharge Method for Natural Channels. When
flow profiles of a stream in its natural state, without backwater effect, are
available for a number of discharges, thestage-fall-discharge method ~ay
be used; this method has the advantages of simplicity and economy [29.].
Similar rnethods'have been 'n.lso developed' by others [30-34].1
1 Reference (30) describes the so-called Grimm Tllethod. It requires a trial computa-
tion which, however, can be avoided by using nomQgraphs, !lIl suggested by Stron.
be.rg [311. ' of resistance'modulus by PavlovskiI [21, p. 1151.
where the velocity- h ea d ch n.nges' d ue t 0 back"'ater
n
effect are also
neglected. From Eqs. (10-58) u.nd (10-59) I
'1." (~)Z (10-60)
L'r = Q/v'F
, ~vhere Q/ y'F is called the discharge for 1-ft fal!.1 !his equationC8,l: be
used ill the flow-profile eomputntion if the stage-fall-discharge relatlOn-
shtp for uniform flow in the reach is known.
mined froni. records of observed stages and discharges Cfable 10-9). The
stages or water-surface elevations at the beginning section _of the reach
are plotted as ol'dinates, and corresponding values of Q/y'F are plotted
as ~bscissas, resulting in a sta.(je-ve1"!:;us~Q/....IF C'urve (Fig. 10-13). When
any water-surface elevation ~\t the_beginning section of the reach fS given,
the corresPQnding value of Q/ v'F can be read from the curve, and the
fall for a dischrLrge Q. be computed by Eq. (10-60). The computed fall,
when added to the water-surface elevation at the beginning section of the
-reach gives the water-surface elevation at the end section of the reac.h,
whicl~ is also the water-surfaee elevation at the beginning section of the
next reach. The procedure is repeated for each reach until the complete
,required flow profile is ob,tained.
: The stage-versus-Q/v'F curve is generally cOl~structed as an average
'curve for varying river conditions; such as rising and falling of stage,
,lIn a similar method devel~ped by Rakhmanoff [341 a term F /Q' is. us 7d in lieu of
Q/ ~F. This term has the nature of /J. resistance factor and therdore IS given !I IIame
 282 GRADUALLY VARIED FLOW METHODS OF COMPUTATION 283

fluctuating stream bed, and effects of wind, aquatic growth, ice, .and over- ·Col. 4.0bserveddischarges,at.the, A ..8J3. Btidgej i!lds
Col. 5. Discharge per I-ft faIl, or Q/ y'F, where Q:is,th'e discha.rge in col. 4 and F
bank flow .. Owing to these varying conditions, the plotted points 20re
is tilE; fa.ll in col. 3 .
often scattered; and a smooth line, giving consideration to the varying Using water-surfa.ce cle\'ations at section 1 as listed in col. 1 of the ta.ble and the
conditions, should be drawn through the points, representing the average CQl:responding values of Q/ ..\/ifi in
col. 5, construct 0. sta.ge-versus-Q; vF curve
condition of the-channel. Where sufficient measurements are available, (~'ig. 10-13).
data of doubtful accuracy should be rejected. In general, the more
recent meaSurements should be given greate: weight, as reflecting recent
channel changes. Other factors that should be considered in construct- 755 752,25 \ ··1- '
ing the curve are the relative accuracy of individual discharge measure-
ments; the ,flow condition during the measurements, whether rising, ~ 750 ---I-~-lf--,-~-
falling, or stationary; conditions affecting the stage-fall-discharge relation-
ship, such as the changes in channel roughness, levee bteaks, and shifts of
cha,nnel controls; and the existence of substantial local inflow between the crt
: 745 ,
I~ i
~i----~
stations.
The stage-yersus-Q/VF curve may qe extrapolated !].bove or below t.he
range of the observed data by extending the curve at its ends in accord-
!
~; 740r--r-
I II I

ance with the general trend of the curvature. Howe-.:er, any abrupt
change in hydraulic elements of the channel section will produce a, eor-
responding change in the curvature of the curve. In this case, a correc.-
'0 ..,
'0 735

L~
tion for the change, if known, should be made in extrapolating the curve. .12
c

This method is used most advantageously when a number of discharges 0;

>

-[- w-
~
corresponding to known stages, or vice versa, a.re desired in a stream. '" 730
By making proper allowance for variable conditions, satisfactory results
ca.n be obtained for reaches of large rivers 50 to 100 miles from the measur- "":."'g"
ing station. The data required by the methOd are often .les;:! expensive ~
. 725 I
the,n those required by the standard step method. However, this advan- 0
3; o I I I 1
,I
-r~! h
tage.is usually.offset by the inaccuracy of the-results, because the effecl of I I I
the change in velocity head 1s ignored in the present method. For this' 720
reason, the stage-fall discharge method is more· satisfactory for problems
. iriwhich the velocity is well below critical end decreases in the down-
stream direction. 715
0
1 50 100
I
ISO
I
200 250
I _ _I
300 .,,350
".,
".,
I 1

E:x:amplelO-ll. Compute the water-sudace elevation at section 1 of the Missouri Values OfQ/IFinl.o00 lJ~its
River problem in Example 10-10 by the sto.ge-fall-discharga method. The reach from
section 1 to section 5 istakea as the first reach. The water-surface elevations are FIG. 10-13. The stage-vs.-Q(V'F curve for Example 10-11.
available from stage records for gages located at sections 1 and 5. The discharges
have been observed at the A.S.B. Bridge located about 3,000 ft downstream from sec-
For a we.ter-surfaceelevation of 752.25, a value of Q/ -../F =33~,OOO i5 obtained by
tion 1. These data are tabulated in Table 10-9.' .
Solution. The data arid cornputa tions for the sta.ge versus discharge for a I-it-fall!
extrapolation. By Eq.
(10-60), the fall between sections 1 ancH is equal to (431,000/
355,000)' = 1.65 ft. Ad'ding- this va.lue. to the elevation at section 1, th~ required
curve are given in Table 10-9, which contains the following headings:
water-sufface elevation at section 5 is 753.90. This is about half a foot lower than
Col. 1. Recorded water-surface elevations at section 1
the elevation. compu~ed by the standa.rd step method; the difference results primarily
Col. 2. Recorded wo.ter-surface elevations at section 5
Col. 3-. Fa.ll in ft, which is equal to the differ~nce between elevations entered in
from the neglect of velocity-head changes in the present-method. " \
The computation may be continued for subsequent· reaches. A tabulation,. as
cols. 2 and 1
5hown in Table 10-10, is suggested for the computation if a. complete flow profile is
1 This example is taken from [291 with modifications. requil·ed. .

e.;.-,···
 284 GRADUALLY VARIED FLOW METHODS OF COMPUTATION 285
If .d~ired, the ,,:,ater-surface elevati~m; at the intermediate sections 2 to 4 rna be
obtaln~d by breakmg up the reach 1-5 Into four short reaches The profile 1 .~ effects of velocity-head changes and eddy losses, is required, the Ezra
at th . t d' . • e eva,.lons method described in Art. 10-5 should provide more satisfactory results.
e III, erme la/,,", sectlOns may be obtained by in'erpel-t'
, 1- , }
" Th.e stage-versus-
Ion.
Q/
. v F curves can be drawn for each section and the cbmputat'o b . d
B

fol' the subdivided reaches. ' . I n can e carne out

Example 10·12. Determine the w!),ter-surface elevations a.t sections 1 to 5 of the
Missouri River at lCa-nsas City, M.a., as described in Example 10-10. The da.ta
TAllLE 10-9., DATA, AND COMPUTATIONS FOR S·rAGE-vs.-Q/YF CURVE USED required for the computation by the Ezra method are given in Table 10-7. The dis-
IN EXA~IPLE 10-11 charge is 431,000 cis. The initia.l water-surface elevation at section 1 is 752,25. It
(Missouri River at E:ansas City, Mo., sections 1 to 5) is assumed that eddy losses are included in the friction losses.
S:)/u.t-ior.. The first step is to compute value of Z + F(Z) from the given data.
Water-surface elevation, m,s.l.11 The computation'is tabulated in Table 10-11 with the following column headings:
, FII,11 , D'ISCh al'ge, Q Col. 1.' Channel-section number
ft cfs Col. 2. River mileage
Section 1 Section 5 VF
(1) (2) I (3) I (4) !~5)
CoL 3. Length of reach in ft. The upper value f>:Cd is the length of the down-
stream reach from the selected section, and the lower va.lue Llx. is the length of the
724.8 725,7 upstream reach. ,'
0.9 33,600 35,40',) CoL 4. '\Vater-surfa.ce elevations. Three elevations are given for each section.
725',3 726.2 0.0 36,100 38,000 Generally, at least, three elevations are seiected for eaah section to provide at least
729.13 730.2 O.G 66,100 85,30U three points for plotting each Z + F(Z) curve.

I
727.4 728.3 0.9 69,500 7'6,200 Cols.5 to 14. These columns correspond exactly to those in Table 10-8 for the
727.8 728.8 1.0 76,000 76,UOO standard step method. The values in the top row for each elevlltion al'e for the mllio
730.2 731.2 1.0 97,200 97,200 cha!lnel, and those in the bottom row arc for the left-overbank section.
730.8 731.7 0.9 105,000 111,000 CoL,15. }'rictioii slope, which is equal to (Q/[()~, where Q = 431,000 cis and lC is
731.3 732.3 1.0 113,000 113,000 from col. 10
734.6 735.6 1 0 141,000 141,000 Col. 16. Value of .-8 , ClXd/2, where S. is the 'value from col. 15 and ClXd is the
735.8 736.7 0,9 157,000 165,000 upper value in col. 3
736,6 737.7 1.1 104,000 156,000 Col. 17. Value of S, t..x./2, where S. is the value from col. 15 and C.x" is the, lower
745,0 746.6 1.6 326,000 ' 258,000 value in col. 3 '
722.2 723.1 0.8 22,900 25,600 Col. 18. Value of F(Z,), which is equal to the sum of the value in coL 14. and the
724.6 725 6 1.0 45,400 45,·100 value in col. 16 _
725.0 726.0 1.0 49,900 49,9UO ('..01. 19. Valu~ of F(Z2), which is equal to the sum of the va.hl"- in col. 14 and the
725.3 726.4 1.1 52,300
I '19,800 value in col. 17
Col. 20. Sum of the values of Z in col. ·1 and F(Z,) in coL 18
Col. 21. Sum of t.he values of Z in col. 4 and F(Z,) in col. Ii)
10-10. ConiPUTA'I'I~N THE 10_11 BY
TA.BLE OF FLOW P'ROFILE FOil. EXAMPLE
THE ST,lGE-FA.LL-nrSCHARGE II-fETHOD
The second stP.p is to plot curves of Z + F (Z) against Z for each oross section, using ,
(Missouri River at Kansas City Mo' ~ections 1 to 5 f) values from cols. 4, 20, and 21 of Tl1ble lCl-11. The resultiug curves are shown in
.' ".' , '., = 431,000 ds) Fig. 10-14. .
Sea.
no.
River
mile
I
Length of
reach
~rater-silrface
elevation
I Q/-./F F. =~-2
The third step is to determine the water-surface elevations from the Z +
curves. At section I, for a.n initial water-surfaae elevation of 752:25, the value of
~. + F(Z~) is found from t.he appropriate curve· (Fig. 10-14) to be 754.14. Taking
F(Z)

(Q/ -./F)
i this value to the Z, + F(Z ,) curve for the next upstream section 2, the corresponding
1 377.58 ..... 752.25
r 335,000 1.65 water-slUiace elevation is found to be 752.72. Contiuuing the procedure for other
1.65 sections, the values are trD.Ced in the direction shown by thc dashed line in Fig, 10·14.

. "
5 378.65
......
5,655
. ....
753,90 I
.... ' ..
To be continued if desired' ...
The rcsults of the IV ater-surfac,e-elevation determinat.ion are tabulated in Table 10-12.
They are in very close agreement with those obtained by the standard step method,
Example 10-13.. Solve the problent in Example 10-12 for a discharge of 500,000 ds,
The corresponding initial wuter-surface elevatior. &t section 1 was estimated from the
10.,8. The ~zra Method for Natural Channels.' If flow profiles for a rating CUrve to be 752.30,
numbel' of discharges or stages are desired, the stage-fall.discharge Solution. The values of F(Z ,) and F(Z2) for Q = 500,000 cfs may be obtailled by
metho~ can be use.d most advantageously for a simple and economical but mUltip1ying the corresponding values in Table 10-11 by (500,000/431,000)' = 1.34.'
T~,1e values thus obt~jned are tabulated in.cols. 3 and 4 of Table 10-13, respectivel}',
approXlrnate solutlOn. However) if a precise computation, including the
and the values of ZI + F(Z.) and Z, + F(Z.) in cols. 5 and 6, t:,espectively.
 TA.BLE 10-11. COMPllT.AT10N OF Zl + F(Z!) ANn Z2 +F(Z,) FOR E:u.MPLE 10-12
(Missouri River at Kl\llsas City. Mo.; Q - 431,000 cfs)

A p R I R% ". K Ie'
A' +F(Z.)

0.12 .... 11,&3 753.93

0.11 .... 11.80 754.80

I'
~
co
0>
I~i !;;;:~• . 3:~c-.-_-.t I. f
0.10 ... ~ 1.71 7.55.71

0.13 1.46 1.70 753.46 753.7il

J

-0.151 (l.l~ 1.39 1.65 154..39 754.66

1.3111.55 755.31 755.M

-~'.~,--

;;<

TAllLE 10-11. COMPUTATION OF Zl + F(Z,) AND z. + jt'(Z.) FOR l:i:::CHtI'LR 10-12 (conli'n"lJ.ed)

8ee.
no, + F(Z.l

0.24
1.111 1,45\ 753.11 753."'5

0.21 l.oJ 1.341 754.04 754.34

. "" -0.08 0.. ~g 1.00 1.27 75S.00 755: 27

.t co
-l
i -O.Hi O.1.~ 0.5J 0;90 M2.61 752 ..90'

-0.15 0.12 0.5·, 0.83 753.5u 753.g3

-·0.13 0.11 0,~4 0.78 751.54 754.78

0.62 752,62

In~.LJII)<.orovl:t'U!;~I""·.1 H'OUI,,·u;onr'" x
7,900 7411,10.6 4.B3,O.Q50 11
I
0.58 ... 1 753.58

0.54

,.....---.
 288 GRADUALLY VARIED FLOW
METHODS OF COMPUTATION 289
10-12. FO~ 10-12
TABLE 10-13. COMPUTATION OF Z + F(Z) ~'OR EXAMli'LE 10-13
TABLE COMPUTATIOl\ OF THE FLOW PROFILE EXAMPLE DY
THE EZRA METHOD
. (Missouri River at.Kansas City, Mo., Q = 500,000 cfs)
(Missouri River at ICan~as City, Mo., Q = 431,000 cfs)

-~
I
I
Sec. River 'ffater-surface Z F(Z,) F(Z.) z. + F(Z,) z. + F(Z.)
no. mile Z, + f(Z.) z, + F(Z,) elevation Z, It
no.
(2) (3) . (4) (5) (6)
• 377 58 . . . .. . 754.. [4 752.25 752 2.59 754.59
2 377.78 754.14 754.41 . 752 72
3 377.9,1 753 2.41 755.41
754.41 754.68 753.38
4 378.33 754 2.29 75G.20
754.G8 754.93 . 7154.15
5 378.65 754.93 764.43 2 752 1. 96 2.36 753.{16 75 1L36
75:1 1. 86 2.22 754.8G 755.22
754 1. 78 2.08 755.78 756.08

;:: 3 752 1,49 1.94 753.49 753: 94

.:o 753 lAO 1.80 754.40 754.80
:;:: 754. 1.34 1. 70 755.31, 755.70
.~
OJ
0; 754.43
., 4 752 0.82 1. 21 752.82 753 21
'-' 75~5~=====
~ 754 753 0.75 1.11 753.75 754.11
"'", 754 0.73 1.05 754.73 755.05
~
OJ
5 752 0.83 752.83
~ 753
753 0.78 7fi3.78
754 0.73 75<1.73

75ZL-____~_____L_ _~~L-~
756 The Z + F(Z) curves a.re then plotted (Fig. 10-15). These can o,lso be'obto.ined by
755 754 753 .754 755 756 a simple graphical metbod. In Fig. 10-14, straight lines Z = Z may be drawn along
Zl+F(Zll,ft Z2+F{Z21.ft
with the Z + b'(Z) c;urves. For example, referring to the curve for section 2, the
FIG. 10-14. 'Curves of Z + F(Z) for Example 10-12. intercept AB between the line Z "" Z and the curve for Z+ F(Z) is "qual t{) F[Z) for
Q = 431,000 cfs at the water-surface elevation of 754.00. This intercept A. B multi-
--,-----~----~--756,,----_.----_..------._--~ plied by 1.34 gives the wrresponding intercept A'B' in Fig. 10-15 for the same eleva-
tion but different discharge. In this manner, the point Bf Bud, hence, the Z F(Z) +
curves for Q = 560,000 cfs can be plotted. From these curves, the required water-
surface' elevations are determined, as shown in Table 10-11.

TADLE 10-14. COI.'iPUTATION OF THE FLOW PROFILl:l FOR EXAMPLE 10-13 BY

THE EZRA METHOD, EDrn LOSSES BEING INCLUDED IN 'I'HE
FRICTION LOSSES
(Missouri. River at I(an5fis City, Mo., Q = 500,000 ds)

Sec. River
Z. + F(Zd z. + F(Z,) I Water-surface
no. mileage elevation Z; ft
.1 li77 .58. I 754.83 752.30
~

'2 377.78 754.83 1

755.20 752.97
755 756. 3 377.94 755.20 755.56 753.84
4 378.33 755.56 755.83 754.80
FIG. 10-15. Curves of Z + F(Z) for Example 10-13; 5 378.65 755.83 755.18
 ,290 GRADUALLY VARIED FLOW
",,-,jI"'N-,jI
Example 10-14. Solve th(, problem in Example 10-12 by treating the eddy losses Nt-~~~

separately. It is assumed that the values of the roughness coeffident n do not ~ C"l Cr') -.;fI ...q.I
llJU")I.{)UJtI"J
t-t---t.... t-t-
include the effect of eddy losses and that the latter is to be computed ILS 50 % of the
change in velocity head when the velocity head is decreasing downstream or as 10 %
of the increase in velocity head when it is increlLsing downstream.
Solution.. Curves of Z + F(Z) constructed for Example 10-12 (Fig. 10-H) are \fJ~OOOM
C"Ir-~..-I-::t'
also applicable to this solution. The computation for the determination of t.he wD,ter-
NNM-,jI ....
surface elevation is tabulated in Table 10-15, in which the numbers in parentheses 4"Jto l..() L.r:! lO
l- t- t- t- t-

*;::;r::-~G~
755 -.- ........ -C'lM
I '-""-"~

i-f;)r O.f.,Vz/2g For O.5aV z/2g

- tOt-lQ"ItI

__
+ ..-I'd'tt-G
-,j<",-,j<-,jI
r~

, -"-------., N' It;!1.()1J)'U')

t- t- t-.t-
I ~

~
l-
I +
N'
,,< .;; - - ; - - .-;:N~.n.--::-,;<..--:......
::;-I
754 I
.8
c
a.,,.
·11"
c
~ ;8
u
(/)
c
u
'"
(/)
t
c
0

"
VJ
c
.9-
u.,
rJl ~\,I
-00'00
· 0000

0;

:g'"
~
.'.,
Il'l
'0
C
C1
'0
vl~ NI~
'" 753 ~ c 5 c0
:fi~~ :r;
'" ",,,
(J)(/)Ul U) "

-
I-
752
o "
"
~ \
]~
• <,0"
......
t'- LC
~t-O>
~

0.2 0.4 0.6 o.a ""..,. .... -.1'

• tL.,l IJ) If) It)
~c.:.
ka VZ /2 9 t-t-t---r--
g+ .-----,...........
FIG. 10-16. Eddy-loss correction to be applied to Z, + F(Z.). o~ C'l
• . C"')

:8~£3~
OJ......-t

.. ..
-- <QoI C'-l -' C',?
..-I~t-C'J
indicate the order of the computation steps. The curves ~f 0.5,. V'/2g and 0.1,. Y'/2g ~ -.!'..,;t-,jl-,jl
~:I,CJlQtClJ)
are then plotted (Fig. 10-16). The:;e 'curves are used to correct for eddy losses, as .,.; r.. t- t-.. t- t-
explained previously (Art. 10-5). ' , ......,
+ ..-~ ~~
Starting at section 1 with a water-surface elevation of 752.25 (see step "1 in Table
10-15), the ,value of Z. + F(Z,) is found from the Z, + F(Z,) curve for section 1 as
S ": ~;;a ~
~
I----~~--=-=-=--I ~
754.14 (see step'2). The corresponding values of 0.5,. Y'/2g and 0.10: Y'/2g are found e:5~~~:g ~
from Fig. 10-18 to be 0.89 (see step 3) and 0.18 (see step 4), respectively. Taking the t-~l-or-cooo a
value of 754.14 to the Z, + F(ZI) curVEl for the next upstream section 2 (see step 6), ~~~~f.; JS
I----~-----------l~
the corresp6nding water-surface elevation is 752.72 (sEle' step 7), and: the value of " .,,; 0
0.5",Y'/217 is 0.78 (see step 9) and that of 0.laY2/217 is 0.16 (see step 10). Since the lJ.la
291

~.
 293
METHODS OF COMPUTATION
292 GR.4.DUALLY VARIED FLOW
c. The dire~t step method .
) velocity is in~ren.sing downstream (or decreasing upstrenm), the eddy- los8 is 0.18 - d. The standard step method
\ 0.16 = 0.02 (see sLep 11). In order to include the effect of this eddy los5, add 0.02 to " . he section properties described in Example
754.14 (see step 2) which was previously found to be the value of .2. + F(Z.) a.t sec- 10-9. If the sl~pe of a challn~l ha~I~~; 001G on the upstrean1 sidl', to 0.01G9 011 the
tion 1. The resultIng v!l.lue is 754.16 (see step 13). Referring to the Z, + F(Z,) 10-1 has a break 10 grade changlllg hOI • th downstream side from the l;rcak to tt
BI
Curve for section 2 with this value, the "'ater-surface elevation is found to be 752.74 downstrenmside, compll:e the. flo~ ~ro ~he ontheenorInal depth. Use:
(see step 14). . section where the depth IS 1 % glea er an .
Repeating thll !l.bove procedure a.nd correcting for the eddy losses accordingly, the
,vater-surfllce elevations at all sections over the reach nre obtained. The gr[1.phical-integra t iol1 Ineti10d
a. . d
b. The direct-integr!l.tion metno.
c. The direct step Inethod
PROBLEMS d. The standard step method
. . h' ectioiJ roperties described in Exa.mple·
10-1. Show that the flow 'pro file in a wide horizon tal channel. may be axpressed ns 10-tO. If the slope of p- ch~nnel..h~vm~ to;6~ on th~ upstream side, to 0.00 tG on t,\le
10-l hll.S " bre~.k ln grade c!U\,lglll., hOffi · the downstream side frOIll the b:'eak to"
\. :c = "'uC' (v - '!y"
~) + const (10-61)
fii
downstream Sl. d e, com pute the flow pro f; on h el is !UlSLlllled uniform. U ~<l;
I criticnl section. The flow in the upstreo.m c ann .,.. . .
\
"there C is Chezy's resistance fa'ctor.

I
a. The,graphical-integration method
10-2. Show that the condition for the existence of a point of inflllction on the flow b. The direct-integration method
profile may be expressed as c. The direct step method.
d. The standard step method
(l0-G2)
10-11. Solve Example 10-3 if S, = O.OOlo,using:

The grE1phical-integration method

10-3. Complete the computation of the flow profile in Example 10-2. ,
10-~. Complete the computation of the flow profile in Example 10-5, nnd compare
\ (t.

o. The direct-integration method

the result with that of Prob. 10-3. I c. The direct step method
10-a. Show Lhat the .flow profile in a frictionless rectangular channel ma.y be d. The standard Ilt,~.p method
expressed' as 10-12. Solve Examp:"- 10-3 if S.
\ = 0.OlG9,using:
:c = _V,
2,1).
r_ 2 - 3M:
Y
+ (it:)3]
v + const ,(10-63) i
a. The gra.phical-integration method
b. The direct-integra.tion method
10-6. Solve Example 10-1 by assuming a =; 1~O, and exnmine the effect of the vahle \ c. The Llirect step method .
of c< on the shape or, the flow profile. Use: d. The stancl.ard step met,hod
!
a. The gro.phical-integratioll method·
\ 10-13. Solve Example 10-3 if So = a, ustng:
b. 'Tlte direct-iutegration method
c. The direct step nwthod i, a. The
gmphical-i·ntegr!l.tion method
d. 'The standard step method b. The
direct-integratioll method
c. The
direct step method
.10-7. Compute the flQw profile in the chl\unel described in Example 10-1 if S. = d. stand~rd step method
The " ,
0.0159 .. Assume that the profile starts Ilt the dam site at a depth of 5 ft and terminates , . ' P b 10-8 is horizontal, compute the flow profil"
upstre~m at a .critical depth. Use: ' 10-14. If the cha.nnel cescnbed III rO. t' 'h'~ the depth of ~0\V is 10 n. U~c:
from the control section to an upstreu.m sec lon'~ e o l , , •
a. The graphical-integration method
b. ,The direc t-in tegration method a. The gmphicai-integr.ation method
c. The direct step method b. The direct-integration method
d. The standard step method c. The direct step method
d. The sta.ndard step method
10-f)' A free fail instead of the dam controls the depth at the downstream end of the
channel described in Example 10-1. Compute the flow profile from the control to an 10.16. Solve Prob. 10-14 if So = -0.0016:
upstream section where the depth of flow is 1 % less. than the normal depth, using: 10-16. Solve Example 10-8 if a = 1.10. of numerical integration, using the
10-17. Solve Example. 10-8 by .the method
.a. The graphical-integration method' varied-flow-function table (AppendiX D) .
.0.' The direct-integration method

1
 294 GRl..DUALLY VARIED FLOW
10-18. A prisma.tic trapezc;ida.1 earth spillway with 3: 1 side discharging.
1,500 cfs. The bottom of tlie spillway is horizontal and is 200 ft long a.nd 75 it \i'ide
in the reach between a downstrea.m critical control section and the upstream reser.
voir. Manning's n is estimated to be 0.035. Using any method given in this chapter,
determine:
a. The flow profile between the reservoir a.nd the control section
b. The friction loss through this spillway measured in it
c. The elevatio11 of the pool level in the reservoir
10-19. A prismatic tntpe20idal earth spillway with '3: 1 side slopes and a bottom
width of 75 Jt is discharging 1,500 cfs. The spillway h!ls Il horizontal bottom upstream
from a. critical control section for a distance of 90 ft Itnd an advene slope of 10: 1 foro.n
upstream distance of 100 n. from the reservoir. Manning's 'II. is ,0.035. Using any
. method given in this chapter, determine:
a. The flow profile in t.he spillway
,b. The energy line in the spillway
10-20. Solve the problem in Ex::o.mple 10-10 by the standard step method, io~ a
design discharge of 500,000 ds.
10-21. Carry out 'the computation in Example 10-11 by brep.king up reach 1-5 into
,\\
four short reaches at tho intermediate sections.
., ,
10-22. SOlve the problem in Example 10-11 by the stage-fall~discharge method for
a design discharge of SOO,OOD cis.
10-23. Solve Example 10-1 by the stage-fall-discharge method.
10-24. Solve Example 10-1 by the Ezra method.
10-25. Solve Example lO-i'by the Ezra method if Q = 500 cIs.
REFERENCES
1. A. J. E. J. Dupuit: "Etudes tht\oriques at pratiques sur Ie mouvement des eaux"
("Theoretical and Pmctical Studies on Flow of Wo.ter)J), Paris, 2d ed., 1863'.
2. J. A. Ch. Dresse: "Cours de mecat:.ique appliquee," 2e j;:artie, Hydraulique,
(tr Course in Applied Mechanics," pt. 2, Hydraulics}, Mallet-Bachelier, Paris, 1860.
3. F. Grashof, "Theoretische Maschinenlehre" ("TheoreGic~,l Course on MD.·'
chines"), Leipzig, 1875, '(01. 1.
4. M. Ruhlmann: "Hydromechanik" (" Hydromechanics "), LeipZig, 1st ed., 1857 ;
Hahnsche Buchlumdlung, Hanover, 2<1 ed., 1880.
5. G, Tolkmitt: "Grundlagen der Waaserbaukunst" ("F'llndamentals of Hydrau-
Hc Engineering"), Ernst & Sohn, Berlin, 189S.
6. U. Masoni; "Corso .di Idraulica Teoriea e Pratica" (" Course of Theoretical o.nd
pro.ctica.\ Hydraulics"), 2d .;d., Naples, 1900.
7. Boris A. Bakhmeteff: "0 Nern.vnomernom Dvizhenii Zhidkosti v' Otkrytom
Rusle" ("Vo.ried F10w in Open Channels "l, St. Petersburg, Russia, 11112.
8. Boris A. Bakhmeteff: "Hydraulics of. Open Channels," McGraw-Hill Book Com-
pany, Inc., New York, 1932.
9. Philipp Forchheimer: "Hydmulik" (" Hydraulics"), 1st ed.} Teubner Vcrlags.
gesellschaft., Leiptig and Berlin, 1914.
10. E. Baticle: Nouvelle methode pour la d6termination des combes deremous (New
method for the determination of. backwater curves), Le Genie civil, vol,71l; no. 23,
Dec. 3, pp. 4.88-492, 1921; no 24, Dec. 10, pp. 515-516,1921.
1,
~.
METHODS OF COMPUTATION 295
ll. Josef Kazeny: Berechnung der Senkungskurve in regclmassigen braiten Gerinnen
(Computation of surface curve in uniform broad channels), Wasserkrafltmd
IVasseT'lUirtschafl, Munich, vol. 23, no. 16, pp. 232-234, Aug. 15, 1928.
12. Armin Schoklits!:h: "Wasserbau" ("Hydra.ulic Structures"l, tmnslated from the
Germ2.n by Samuel Shulits, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New
York, 1.934, vol. 1, p. 105.
13. NagahQ MonoDobe: Baclt-water and dnJp-doWD curves for uniform channels,
Tra11.s(!clioM, American Society of Cilri! E71gineer., vol. 103, pp. 950-989, 1938.
14. Ming Lee: Steady gradually va.ried flow in. uniform channels on mild stopes, Ph.D.
thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana, 1947.
15. Ming Lee, Harold E. Babbitt, and E. Robert Baumann: Gradually varied flow ill
uniform channels on mild slopes, University of IUinoUl, Engineering Ex-peri'lnenl
Statio'!), Bulletin Se7ifUl No. 404, vol. 50, no. 28, November, 1952.
16. M. E. Ven Seggern: Integra.ting the equation of nonuniform flow, Transactions,
American Society of Civil Engineer~, yol. 115, pp. 71-88, 1950.
17. Clint J. Keifer and Henry IIsien Chu; Backwater functioIls by numerical integrll--
tion, Transac&·'or.a, American Sodelv of Civil Engineers, vol. 120, pp. 429-442, 1955.·
18. Ven Te Cho~': Integrating the equn.Liol1 of gradually varied flow, paper 838,
ProceedillflS, American Society of Civil Engineers, voL 81, pp. 1-32, November,
1955. Discussions by Clint J. Keifer a.nd Henry Hsien Clm, Robert Y. D. Chuu,
iV[3.Sashi Hom-rolL, Allan N,,::wman, anel Kolupo.ila, pa.per 955, Journal,
Hydmulics Division, vol. 82, no. HY2, April, 1956; corrections on p. GO.
Discu'isions by R. Silvester and Alfred pa.per lOlD, vo\. 82, no. HY3,
pp. 13-21, June, H)56. Closing disoussioll by Buthor, paper 1177, vol. 83,
no. HYl, pp. 9-22, February, 1957.
19. I. I. Levi: GidraV'licheskie pokaz!1teli rusla i i1th prilozhenie k teorH nerl).vw.merno·
go dvizheniia zhidkosti v otl,rytykh kanalakh i r\lslllkh (The hydraulic exponents
of channel;:; and their application to the theory of nonuniform flow in open chan- .1
nell, 'Vestnik lrrigat.sii (Herald of Irrigation), Tashkent, U.S.S,R., no'. 2, pp. 35-49,
1925.
20. Ar~hur E. MatzkfJ: Varied flow in open cha.nnelsof adverse slope, TnL7l,.saclioM,
Ame"ica'il Society.of Civii Ell!Jineers, vol. 102, pp. 651-660, 1937.
-j
21. M. D. Chertousov; "Gidravlikll.: SpetsiahlyI Kurs" ("Hydraulics: Special
Co Ill'se i,), Gosenergoizd3.t, Moscow, 1957.
22. V, J. CharnomskiI: Zadachi na ustallovivsheiesi" neravnomerlloie tecbenie vody
v otkrytykh ruslakh s priamolineinym i trapetsoidalnym pOJlerechnym secheniem
(Problems on stea.dy nonuniform flow of water in open channel> with straight,-
lined trapezoidal cross dec~ion), Trudy Va.J·shauskago Polittkhni.ch~kago lnslitu.l.a,
Warsaw, 1914. . .
23. Alva G. Husted: New method of computi\lg bo.ckwater and drop-down curves,
En(rineering News-Record, vol. 92, no. 17, pp. 719-722, Apr. 24, 1924.
24. H.R. L"o.ch: New metl10ds for the ~olution of backwa.ter problenL~, Engineering
News-Recul'd, voL 82, no. 16, pp. 768-770, April, 1919.
25. Arthur A. Ezra: A direct step method for computing. water-surface profiles,
Transactions, American Society of Civil vol. 119, pp. 453-462, 1954.
26. Fra.ncis F. :&Scoffier: Graphic ·calcula.tion of ba.ckwater eliminates solution by trial,
Engineering News-Record, vol. 136, no. 26, p. 71, June 27, H)46.
27. N. Raytchine a.nd P. Chatelain: Determina.tion graphique de 11\. ligne d'eau et .j
calcul des remous (Graphical determination of backwater curves), La Houil.le i
blo.ncke, Grenoble, 5th yr., no. 3, pp. 373-379, May-June, 11l50.. I
28. Josef Frank: Graphische Berechn'lng von Wasserspiegel-Linien (Graphicll.l calcu-
 I·
I

296
GRADUAT,LY VARIED FLOW . ~t
]ation of water flow profile ) S h ' ,; , : I
Ii
65-71, Aug. 5, 1!J33. s, c we1Zen/iche Bauzeitung, Zi\\-jch, vol. 102, no. 6, pp ..
29. Hydrologic and hydraulic analysis' Com t · r
channels, U:S, A rmy Corp~ of En'gine/?7'S p~atlOn 0: backwater curves in river
CDnsinlction,.pt. CXIV ehap. 9 M 19~2 nqmeenng klanual for Civil lYorks
30 C I -" " 1Iy, D. , i
. . . urJmm;.Baclcwll~er slopes above dams E ' . . rI
no. 23, p. 902, June 7, 1928
31 . I . H. Stemberg:
' .
Thc nomograph as a aJ'd . .
. ' nqmeermg News-Record, vol. 100,
.
I' CHAPTER 11
I
. E7!.{Jineeririn vol 9 110 6' pp 365· 36 (ln J In. computing backwa~l' curves· Civil
. .""'" -;- ulle 1939 ' PRACTICAL PROBLEMS !
32. Sherman M. Woodward and Che~ter 'J Po' '. ,:
Open Channela," .John Wiley & Sons I~c
33. L. E. Jones: The QIy'Fteoh' .'
;;Y: ....
y Hydraulics of Steady Flow in
., ,e\~ ork,1941;'PP.103_107.
t

2d M 1'd western Conference

,. E .
. - mque in open c.nnnnel hydrau'·· P
of Fluid.M h " T· .
. de a7IJ~, he 01lto Stale. U'
d'
lIes, rocee 111fT;; ·of the
. E .
I
I
., lny xper'ment Stal'io."-, B'ullet;n 119· 8. , ',nwers1ty, ngmeer· 11-1. Delivery of a Canal for Subcritical Flow. When a cana.l con-
34; A. N. Rakhmanoff: 0 po<troenii I" '" k' h PP , 1-87, Septemuel', 1952. nects two reservoirs .. having varyill;g levels, the discharge of the can'al
. ' ,n\ y svobodnoI p()v~rkb t' dl'
ny'kh Vo d oto k OV pri ustanoV'ivshemsi d.' h .. 0 ' - "nOS.1 I:J. estestven_
i f a viZ, enn ( n the can,t t' f under variou~ conditions of reservoir level is called the del1'uery of the
. ree sur ace [or natural streams at ste d fl ) I .. ' rue Ion a curves of
11lBtituta (Transactions; SCienlHic In8~itl
35. J. Chabert: "Calcul des
0; R ztstn~ Nauchno-1I1dia r atsionnogo
: b . d' U.e OJ ee amaI20n); no. 21, 1930. .
canal; this problem was discussed by Bakhmeteff [lJ. Bakhmeteff has
treated this subject for prism:3,tic canals with subcritical flow under thr,ee
C n cour os e remous'~ ("Cal' 1 f
nrves"), ,£.ditiuns EYl'oUes, Paris 1955 " cu.". IOns of ,Backwater general cases. The Cl1SI3S are clMsified according to the condition of
of Bow-profile computation i I d" . Th.ls reference gives several methods
. . . , nc u lllg some whICh are not diacussecl. in this book. three v2.l'iables, namely,the depth of flow Yl at the upst~eam end of the
canal, the depth of flow Y2 at the dovvnstream end, and the discharge Q
of the canal.
A. Case of Constant Yl. This is the caSE in which th~ water level at the
upstream end oUhe canal does not change (li'ig. 1l~1). The depth Yl is

FIG. 11-1. Delivery of a canal with subcriticl!.l flow IJ.nd C0l15tIJ.Ilt YI,
. . ,

assumed to remaincon~tant, owing to a constant pool level A i while Y2,

determLned by level B,fiuctuates. Also shown in Fig. 11-1 are the flow
profiles for various conditions of Y2 and the corresponding dischat'ges Q.
The relationship betwe~n Yz and Q is shown by a eo-called del1'very cW've
Q = f(Y2). Several flow conditions may be desci'ibed as follows:
1. UNIFORM FLOW. "Yhen Yz = YI = ij", the ~ow is uniform, with Its
smface represented bya straight line an parallel to the channel bottom.
The corresponding normal discharge Q" is indicated on the ddivery curve.
297
 l
\
PRACTICAL PROBLEMS 299
298 GRADUALLY VARIED FLOW

The value of thi~ discharge is Qn = /(" v' So, where I{,. is the conveyance
of the cross section with the depth Yz equal to YI and where So is the
bottom slope.
,
~
I
r I
-1
2. FLOW OF MAXIMUM DISCHARGE. When Y2 is equal, to the critical ,. 1, z Deli,ery cu"~: o;/(yzl
! ---'-------:--------,---1----- .--~-
I "1
~,=
depth Yo of.section 2, the discharge will reach its ma.ximum possible value,
since Y2 cannot be le~s than Yo and tlw head is at its mfLximum. If t.he I. d MZ"p'orile 'I
. conslonll 0""':'" \
downstream pool level B falls below the depth Ye, a free overfall at that I ! ~- -. -----..--- N
depth will occur. This discharge, as indica.ted on the delivery curve, is J _ -t ~ J .
~, ~--T-i-- ----------I c
equal to the critical discharge at section 2, or Q, = z .. vg, where Zo is the
k' I ~%~ !
section factor of cross section 2. -----.:....
-.-- l
-.__ l ,/_ _ ,_UJ__01 :
I
0
For the determination of the maximum discharge, a trial computation ---__ ' - , r-- 0 '0"'°< -~
is required. The procedure is first to take a series of discharges, beginning
from Q" and going upward. Then, making Yz = Ya in each case, deter-
---..,. 0

FIG. 11-2. Delivery of [1, cane.l, the lellgth of which exceeds the length df tbe falling
mine the corresponding YI. The discharge that makes YI equal to the ID~~ .
given d'epth at the upstream end is the Qm ... required ..
3. FLOW OF .l1.fl PROFILE. When Y2 > 11", the flow profile is of the 1];I1 .1
. shorter. Therefore, for practical purposes, it may be assumed tha\ the
type. The upper limit of this curve is a horizontal level, indicated by maximum. possible discharge in a long canal or 0, canal of not-tao-small SoOpl!
az; at this condition the discharge is zero, since the head, or difference
. is eqtwl 10 the normal discharge. .' .
between the pool levels, is zero. For Y2 > Y., the fiow will l:everse its B Case of Constant yz. This is the case In whICh t.he watel le~el at
direction .. The lower limit of the 1111 profile is, apparently, the uniform- 'the 'downstr'eam end of the canal, or the depth Y2, is const~nt, whlle ¥l
flow surface an. For any intermediate flow between these two limits, the fluctuates. The corresponding delivery curve Q = fCYI) IS shown III
depth Yz and thp. corresponding discharge can be determined by a trial
flow-profile computation. The procedure is first to assume a. discharge Fig. 11-3.
less than Q,. and then to compnte the corresponding depth Yf. Conse-
quently, the delivery clirve can be plotted. :
4. FLOW OF 1112 PROFILE. When Y2 < y", the flow profile belongs tQ
the .1112 type. The lower limit is, evidently, the critical flo\y surface ac.
The Y2-Q relationship can he determined by the procedui'e described
above for the lIfl profile.
From the delivery curve, it becomes evident that the portiori NC of the
curve' is very steep, so that Qm.., exceeds Qn by only a very small amount.
It will be seen that this is true in most practical cases except for very Ehort
or very fiat canals. Referring to Fig. 11-2, it is assumed that the end
point d of the limiting 11{2 curve is loeated at a depth O.99Yn. If the
length L of the canal is greater than the length L' of the limiting J1'2 pro-
file,' then no change in Yz between Yeand Vn will affect the condition
upstream from the point dj that is, the discharge will rema'in the same.
As long as L > L', the maximum discharge QJD.x will be pra.cticaUy equal Fro. 11-3. Delivery of 3. canal with subcritical flow and constll-nt y,.
to Qn, that. is, the portion NCoi the corresponding delivery cllrvewil! be
practically vertical. The flow-profile equation indicates that the length 1. UNiFORM FLOW. When :111 = 'yz = Yr., the flow is u.niform, the flow
of the flow profile is :inversely proportiOlial to the bottom slope; the profile. nb is parallel to the channel bottom, and the dlschar~e Qn cor-
smaller the slope,the longer the profile, and vice versa. For this reason, responds to point N on the delivery curve. The value of Qn IS equal to
reducing the slope will have an effect similar to that of making the canal
)
'!'
r,
I ~I'
 ... PRACTICAL .PROBL'EMS
301
300 GIL'l.D1:ALLY VARIED FLOW
, _ ,_ . The Q-constant curve intersects this line at t?e point N
'- K" .where Ie, is the conveyance of cross section 1 with dept.h Y1 = Y2 1/1 - 'Y2 .- V,,· ~ which is the norml1,l depth for the given discharge Q..
and wher~ Su is the bottom slope. where Y1 V2 :- Yhn, wh'lch y is equal to the critical depth y. of
2. }I'.fow of Maximum DischaTge. When YI reaches a depth Yn< that cor-
at-
The curve 15 t e curve on
2 for
r g
agiven discharge and on which Y1 is the corresponc :n
1 ·

responds to a clitic111. discharge at section 2, the discharge becomes cdrosshse~ IOn L It is apparent that 112 cannot be less than Yo 0,£ sectIOll
tion
ept . a se,c .. . Q H"'l1ce the Q-constant curve termmates at
maximaL Any depth Yi > Yrn is out of consideration, because it would
2 for the given dIscharge, ~, ' t ' ,2 fthe discharge
sill1ply raise the flow profile mb to the position shown by the dashed line the point C 011 this curve that makes V2 = y. at sec 101. or
m'b' and, consequently, require an increase in the downstr~am depth ·Y2.
The~o.lue of (J •.• ~ is equal to the critical discharge at section 2, or Zc -iii,
Q.
where LIe is the section factor at section 2 for a depth to Y2.
3. FLOW OF M"l PROFILE. For Rny depth 1:/1 < Y", the flow profile
belongs to the Ml type, and the is less than Qn. The lmve"t
possible limit for YI is y.; at this condition the flow profile is horizontal and
the dL':!charge is zero.
4. FLOW OF 1\-12 PROFILE. For any depth Yl varying between Ymand
Yn, the flow profile. belongs to the 1112 type, and the discharge is less than
Q,,,"x b:llt greater than Q~.
C. Calle of Constant Q. This is the case in which the delivery of the
canal is constant,while the pool levels at the two extremities of the canal
fluctuate.
1. UNIFORM :now.. Referring to Fig. 11-4, various possible flow pro- .
files are sketched.. "Vhen YI = y., = y", the flow is uniform, and the
surface is a straight line ab pal-aIlel to the char~nel bottom. This normal
depth 11", cu.n be determined by the Manning formula for a con~tallt
discharge Q.
2: .FLOW OF 1111 PROF'ILE. For positions above ab, the flow profile
belon'gs to the 1\{1 type. The upper limit of the 1111 profile is a horizontal
line; at this. position 112 approaches Yl + SoL as a l~mit. As this c0nditiol1
ilS approached, the difference between pool levels and hence the head, or
velocity of flow; decrease, However, the water area increases as the
depths increase; whereas the discharge, as a product of them'e[j, and the
velocity, cnn still be kept consts.nt and equal toa given value. .
3. FLOW .OF .312 PROFILE. For positions below ab,the flow profile is of
the JlII2 type. The 10we.'3t possible position. of the JJ12 profile is a'b'; at
this position y~ is equal to the critical depth corresponding to the given
discharge Q. . . FlO, ll-? Delivery of l\. canal withsubcritical flow and constant Q.
The Q-constant Curve. The relationship behr~en the depths Y1 and 1'2
for const~nt Q can be plotted (J:"ig. 11-4). The resulting curve CN P is rr.
The Z line is a straight line drawn parallel to the lh~e fl;om a point on
known as the Q-constant curve. Several auxiliary e:urves have also been . . d' t S T from the orilrin O. ThIS hne represents the
the Y~ aXIs at a is ance I)J.J. c . fil H
constructed to make clearer cert,ain chamcteristic features of the Q-con- d
' . -
con ItlOn Y2 - Y l ,
+ SJ." or the upper limit of the lJtil pro e. enee,
t f 11 f m the left
stant curve. . , the Qcconstant curve apPl'oaches this line asymp 0 1(\a y 1'0
I The N line is a straight line drawn from the Qrigin of the coordinates when both YI arid Y2 become vel'Y large. . ,
Q
and inclh1ed at an angle of 45 with the coordinate axes. This line is the The coordinates Vl and Y2 of any point P on the Q-collstant curve 101 [l.
locus of the normal depth for all discharges. For any point on this line,

302 GRA.DUALLY VARIED FLOW
given discharge Q ·call. be .determined by a .flow-profile computation.
Geilerally, when points C and N and one or two other points are locatcd,
the Q-constant curve can be drawn in smoothly.
By plotting a series of Qcconstant curves for various discharges, sueb
as the claShed lines, a general chart can be obtained, representing. all
possible flow conditions in the given canal.
11-2. Delivery of a Canal for Supercritica\ Flow. When the slope of
the canal is steep, that i:o, greater than the critical slope, the flow in the
channel becomes supercritical (Fig. 11-5). In practical applicf.tions,
8teep canals are usually short, such as the raft and log chutes th~t are
used ~LS spillways. If t.he canal is too steep, so that an ultrarapid flo\\"
develops, then the flow is no longer steady. A study of unsteady How in
canals is beyond the scope of this chapter.
-. I
\
PRACTICAL PROBLEMs 303
3. As the tailwatel' level rises further, the jump will move upstream
maintailling its height a~~d form in the uniform-flow zone nb, until'
reaches point n. From there on, the jump will move upstrecun on the en
it -I
CUl've, gradually ciiminishing in height. The height, of the jump becomes
zero when it reaches the critical depth at e. In the meantime the flow
profile reaches its theoretical limit, cb l l of the SI profile.. Be~ond this
limit the incOiriing flow will be directly affected by t.he tailwater, and the
entrance acts as a submerged weir. III practical calculations, the'hol'i-
zontallil1e Cb'" may be +,aken as the practical limit of the tail water stage.
This wi\] avoid the compntation of bUlb" and will also provide a margin
of safety;
11-3. Problems Re.1ated to Canal Design. Knowledge abollt the
delivery vf a c<onal, as described in the preceding articles, has useful
.[

o
-
t ______! __ ~----'~z
i=.:::::.:::::::~ ~ _ I , t:.y
.
-=.--=
J
-·-,.ily'
_I

,
/'
c~~-·=tt- /-=~~~f-~:-=~'F r~\~:
-,_,,// / I~_ ----,.-.- ! ! 11>-

~
-- _' U Omin Ome.· 0
Conal bof!om of
jncrec!;ed slope Service discharge = Q

FIG. 11-5. Delivery of a cana.l with supercritieal flow. ~ .. [

/1. Dischm·ge. Asthe control section in a channel of supercritical flow
is at the upstream end, the delivery of the canal is fully govel'ned by the
critical discha.rge at section 1, which is simply equal to the discharge
through a weir:
B. Flow. PTr).file. The type of flow profile developed in a steep canal
depends on the tailwater situation.
1. When the taihmter level B IS less than the outlet depth at section
2, the flow in the canal is unaffected by the tailwater. The flow profile
passes .through the critical depth near point e from a convex to a· concave
shape and approaches the normal depth by mea,ns of a smooth drawdown
curve of the S2 type. As a yule, the drawdown curve en is comparatively
short, andYn is the lowest possible stage in the canal. In designing such
is
canals, the normal depth made equal to the depth required for passing
floating craft 01' for allowablescouririg effect.
2. When the tailwater level B is greater than the outlet depth, the
tail-water willl'aise the water level in the downstream portion of the canal
to form an SI profile between j and b' , producing a hydraulic jump at the
end j of the profile. However, the flow upstream from the jump will not
be affected by the tailwater.
FIG. J 1-6. Canal design for variable sel'vice discha.l'ge.
::.pplications in the hydraulic design of cana.ls. Several important prob-
lems related to such applications are described below.
A. Change £n Depth Due to Changing Delivery. In designing 11. canal,
it is often necessary for the engineer to anticipate t.he fluctuation ill depth
.[
of flow due to any possible change in delivery. This fluc(,uation in depth
can be estimated easily from the delivery curve of the canal for the given I
range of fluctuation in discharge.
In most cases, except where the canal is very short or where the bo~tom
of the canal is unusually fiat, the canal can be designed for a uniform-flow .)
condition, because 'the maximum discharge will be practically equal to
,i the normal discharge. The procedure of canal design for uniform flow
I h::),s been discussed in Chap. 7. The relationship between the depth and
,t discharge can be obtained easily on the basis of any uniform-flow formula.
I
II such as the Manning formula.
II When a canal is designed to deliver water from a reservoir of constant
I pool level to a service chanilel at the downstream end, the discharge in
th·e canal should meet the variable demand, when a,nd as required by the
I service channel (Fig. 11-6), This; wi~h a subcritical fiow, falls into the
1
-\

.•o:.~'
.[
I
'304 GRADUALLY VARIET,> Io'LOW P~ACTICAL PROBLEMS 305
• case of constiUlt Yl, A. in' Art. 11-1, in which the l~pstream depth is kept upstream-pool-level position A. The ditTerE)llCe fJ.y between YA and YI
constant while the dOWllstream depth fluctuates. The delivery curves in mny beset by judgment or may depend on 'the design of the entrance.
Fig. 11-6 will explain how the fiuetuation in the downstream end depth, , 3. FREE ENTRANCE; When water enters a mild-slope canal freely
caused by the variation in the service discharge demand, can be redlacec1. (Fig. 11-7d), the depth YI is related to the static pool level A by the law
The method is 'simply to increase the bottom slope of the canal. ,This of energy. The relation between the depths Yl and YA can be expressed by
, increases th~ normal diseharge, and the delivery curve will change in posi- , ,VAl
tion from ZNC to ZN'C'. It is apparent that, for the same range of Q",.~ YA '= Yt
,
+ h. + ayg (11-1)
to Qmi., the fiuclu:1tion in depth fJ.y' is reduced and becomes lestJ tha~ fJ.y.
where aY A 2/2g is the velocity head of the npproaching fiGw, which is
uSltaliya small quantity arid can be ignored. Hence,
Y... = Yl + h. (11-2)

For subcritical flow, the term h, is the head loss due to friction and may
be expressed in terms of thE) velocity head at section 1, that is,
TI i ~
h, = C'-2 (11-3)
g
(al
where. C. is a coefficient which has an average value of 1.25 for a well-
rounded entrance. l Solvili.g for TIl from the above equation,
1
VI
, -vc: v'2Yh.
=, ~- (11-4)

The delivery of the cana] is equal to

(b]
FIG, 11-7. Outlet and entrance conditions.
B. Outlet and Entrance Conditions. In the pl;eceding artides, the
delivery of the canal was related to the depths '!it and Y2 at the ends of the
canal; but the conditions that accompany the'inflow or outRow of the
water were not c.onsidered.
1.. OUTLET. "Yhen the canal empties into a reservoir, an amount of
kinetic energy equal to a V z2j2y, carried with the flowing water, is
expected tO'be restored as a potential energy. TIlUS, the pool level should
be higher by this amount than the depth at the outlet of the canal (Pig.
11-7a). This energy, however, is usually dissipated entirely in eddies
and whirls. In pl'fl.ctical computations it may be ignored, and Yz may
be taken equal to YB, If the o,utfiow is accompaiied by a hydraulic drop
(Fig. 11-7b) and if YB<Y2, the depth Y2 is equal to the critical depth y. of
section 2, irrespective Qf the pool-level position B.
2; REGULATED ENTRANCE. When the entranc~ is regulated by a sluice
Q = V 1 .4 1 =
.
Jc:
,~
Al ;;2(Jh. =
v~
. ~ Al 'V2g(-V.{ -'~ Yt) (11-5)
In most pract.ical problems, the depth YA, instead of YI, is given. For
example, in the C[l.se of the constant upstream depth, A iJ:l Art. 11-1, the
depth YA would he given as constant. For any given condition of YA,
the relation between Q and Yl can be established by Eq. lI1-5). A curve
representing this relRtion can therefore be constructed. By means of
this so-called inflow-discharge-rating c'Urt1e, the reiations.among YA,YI, o.nd
Q can pe detei-mined.
For supercriticalflow, the flow, at section 1 is criticaL, The problem is
simplified by the fact that the rf',lation between Yl and y.{ is practically
fixed, irrespective of the entrance friction loss.
C. Elimination of Hydraulic Jump in a Steep Canal . .. As pointed out
in Art. 11-2, when the tail water-pool level is higher .tho.n th~ critical depth
in ~ st~ep canal, a hydraulic jump will develop in the callal (Fig. 11-5).
Such a;hydraulic jump is objectionable and dangerous, par,t.icularly
, ,
when
1 Dat~ the losses in entrance structures may be found in some hydraulics text-
OIl

or some other device (Fig. 11-7t), the depth 1h is independent of the books, handbooks, or other literature [21.
306 GRADUALLY VARIED' FLOW
,
the canal is a raft chute or some other structure intended to transport a
floating raft from I,he upstreail1 reservoir to a downstr~am pobl. Bakh-
meteff [1] suggested that the design of a neutTalizinO' Teach (Fig. 11-8)
might be a solution. In this reach the bottom slope of the channel is
made equal to the critical slope. According toa corresponding case of
Cl profile in Fjg. 9-2, the tailwatcr lcvels will be approximately horizontal
lines l \-vhich intersect the surface of flow in the canal without causing any
disturbance. At the point of intersection, theoretically, there is a jump
o'f zero height.
s'
B
Tailwaler
Fro. 11-3. Elimination of hydraulic jump by Bakhmeteff's neutralizing reach.
11-4. Computation of Flow Profile in Nonprismatic Channels. The
theory and analysis of gradually varied flow ii1 nonprismatic channels has
been discussed previously (Art. 9-5). The integration of the differential
equation for the flow profile of such a :fl.ow is mathematically complicated.
If the control section is uncertain in a given problem, its position may be
determined by the method of singular point. For the computition of the
flow profile, the step method is recommended. The computation should
proceed upstream from the control section if the flow is sub critical and.
dOWllstremn from the control section if it is supercritical. The procedure
of computation is practically the sa,me as that applied to a prismatic
channel, as will be seen in the following example':
Example 11-1. A spillway channel, as shown in Fig. 11-9;has been designed tenta-
tively for La Tuna Canyon Debris Basin at Los Angeles County, Calif.' ' According
2
1 'When the Chez), formula is applied, the lines are theoretically horizontal.
The data for this example are taken from [3]. For additional information, the
following is extracted from this reference: The spillway was designed to pass the maxi-,
mum probable flood H),OOO cfs with the maximum water surface 5 ft below the top of
the dam. 1;'he wide inlet sill would provide maximum sill elevation for retention of
debris with ininimum height of dam. The invert slope was designed such that con-
trol, or critical depth for 19,000 cfs, would occur at the relatively narrow base width
of.55 ft at stati?n II + 22. Establishin control at t~is narrow w.idthwould mini-
9
mize the formatlOn of large waves produced by the rapidly convergmg walls. For a
design flood of 6,200 ds, waves would have:no adverse effect, because a relatively large
freeboard WQuid be availo.ble. The spillw~y transition was developed to' carry 19,000
cfs with 2.5 'ft of freeboard to st.ation 13 -+- 95. This station was considered to be a
l
I PRACTICAL PROBLEMS 307
I to this design, the channel starts with a 140-ft-wide rectangular concrete section.
i
The 140-ft ,base width extends from statio'n 10 -/- 00 to the sill at station 10 + 45.
! From station 10 + 45 to station II + 45 the walls converge on circular curves to a
i base width of 60 ft. From station 11 + 45 to st.ation 15 + 82.50 the walls convei'ge
II in a straigh t-line transition to a. base wid th of 25 ft. The channel below the transition
consists of a,'rect.angula,r concrete section with a constant width of 25 ft. Compute the
liow profile in, the spillway channel for' a design discharge of 6,200 ds. The control
j
for this discharge was designed to occur at theinlet sill station 10 + 45. Use ex ,= 1
and n = 0'.014 in the computation.
Solution. In t.his probiem the flow is supercritical, for the COIl trol sectib,n is placed
at the upstream stat.ion 10 + '15., The critical depth RI, this section is equal to Yo ;",
,'l' (6,2007140)'/32.2 = 3.93 ft. The critical depths at other stations may also be
computed. If the' computed depth happcns to be greater than the corresponding
-I
critical depth, the flow will be subcritical.
The coinputation of the flow profile is given in Tnble 11-1, with the fo!lcwing
headings: '
Col. 1. Station number
Col. 2. Length of reach in ft, w11ich is equal to the difference between the two
station llumbel's at the two ends of the reach
CoL 3. 'Width of the channel inft
Cols. 4 to 16. Same ns the st.eps from cols. 1 to 12 in Table 10-4, except t.hat an
extra column for So (Col. 14) is provided since So is not constant throughout the whole
channel length under consideration.
The computation is arranged in a forin similar to that used for' the direct step
method, but it is performed by trial and error. This procedure is introduced because
-I
an additional variable for the channel width is involved. In this computation,the
depth of flow y is assumed and entered in col. 4 at each step. The assumed depth is
considered correct when -,he resulting value of AX entm:ed in col. 16 agrees with t·be
length of reach in coL 2. It. shouid be noted that the depth of flow computed in this
eXD:mple has been car.ded'to more decimal places than would be necessary for practical
purposes.
The flow profile thus computed should be corrected for air entrainment for high-
velocity flow occurring at the downstream end of the channel.! 'When a high-velocity
supercritical flow occurs in a noriprismatic channel, it is likely that standing waves
would appear as a result of the lateral-boundary changes (Arts: 17-3 and 17-4).
11-5. Design of Transitions. The transition in a channel is a struct.ure
-I
designed to change the shape 01' cross-sectional H.rea of the flow. Under
normal desiglt and .installation conditions, practically all canals and flumes
require some type of tramition structure to and from the waterways.
The function of such a structure is to avoid excessive energy losses, to
-I
safe distance downstream from the dam for the release of spillway flo"/s. Do\vn-
stream of station 13 -/-' 95, the tr:l.!lsition and the channel were designed to carry the
design flood of 6,200 cis with a minimum freeboard of 1.5 ft. The channel alignment
below the transition would provide for transition spirals, and the channel invert would
be banked through all curved reaches to maintain uniform depth of flow.
1 A procedure for computing the flow profile in steep chutes with a correction: for
air entrainment has been proposed by L. S. Hall [4]. For a simple correction, :the
Douma formula, Eq. (2-15), may be usad.
 g.j?;~~=
~'-
0,1>'" '

SPILLWAY

~ .~
C1>
'~"
>

~I;
~~

~I;'
.~.'"
~
~I~ .
..ci
PROFl~£ \. SPILLWAY

FIG. 11-9. Tentative design of the spillwa.y for a, debris basin.

,-.

TA,llLE II-I. COMPUTA,'l'ION OF THlil FLOW PROFILE IN A NONl'RlSMATtC CHANNta, FOR i!:XA.MPLE 11-1
(La Tuna. Canyon spillway, Lo~ Angeles County} CaliL, Q 6,200 cfs)

Station
~~ I b
)j A I R l/}i V a:V'/2g So ., Sf i AX

(1) , ,(2!_~L

10 + 45 1 14U.0 :l.9~ 550.0 3.72 5.78 11.27 1.97

10 + 51 6.0 I I:~O.O 3.54 {50.0 3.36 5.04 13.48 2.82 6.. 36 0.4610.0032 O. 0026 I O. 0800 I 0.0774 5.9
10 + 5S I
7.0 120.0 3.48 417.5 3.29 4.90 114.85 3.42 0.90 0.54 0.0042 0.003°10.0800 0.0764 7:1
10 -I- 65 7.0 1l0,0 :1.58 393.9 3.36 5.04 15.75 3.S5 7.43 0.5:1 0.0043 0.0042 0.0800 00758 7.0
10+73 8.0 100.0 3.71 371.0 3.45 ,).22 10.71 4.33 8.04 .0.61 0.004.6 o .0045 [ 0.0800 0.0755 8.1
CJO 10 + 83 10.0 1)0.0 3.87 348.2 3 . .')0 5.44 17.80 4.92 8.n) 0.75 v.D052 0.0049 0.0800 0.0751 10.0
~ 10 + 95 12.0 80.0 4.0S 320.2 3.70 5.72 19.00 5.60 9.68 0.89 0.0056 0:0054 0.0800 . 0.0.746 11.9
11+10
11 + 22
15.0 I 70.0 4.35 304.5
12.0 . M.O 4.41 I 2~6.7
3.87
3.88
6.08
(UO
20.35
21.62
6:44
7.26
10.79
11.67
1.11 0.0060
0.88 0.00G8
0.0058 0.0800
0.0064 0.0800
0.0742
0.0736
15.0
12.0
11 + 45 2:J.0 60.0 4.28 1200.8 3.75 5.83 201.14 9.05 13.33 1. GO 0.0088 0.0078 0.0800 0.0722 23.0
12 + 01.5 62:5 55.0 .3 123 J71.1) 2.81 3.97 3(l.09 20.21 23.33 10.00 0.0290 O.OUl9 0.1788 0.1599 62.5
12 +70 62.5 50.0 2.855 142.8 2.57 3.52 43.41 29.27 32.13 I 8.80 0.0473 0.0381 O. li88 0.1407 62.5
13+ 10 40.0 46.8 2.817 1:1l.8 2.51 3AI 47.04 :34.38 37.20 5.07 0.0572 0.1788 0.1266 40.0
13 +'32.5 22 5 45.0 2.()58 133,1 2.61 3.60 46.61 33 .74 . 36.70 -O.GO 0.0532 0.0330 -0.0222 22.5
13 + 95 62.S 40.0 3.399 135.!l 2.!)1 . 4. 1G 45.62 32.32 35.72 -0.98 0.0442 0.0487 0.O~30 -0.0157 62.4
14 + 57.5 62.5 35.0 3.948 138.2 3.22[4.75 44..89 31.28 35.23 -0.'19 0,0374 0.0408 0.0330 -0.0078 62.8
15 + 20 62.5 [ 30.0 4.050 lag 5 3.55 5.42 44.45 30 09 3&.34 0.11 0.0322 0.0348 0.0330 0.0018 61 2
15 + 82.5 1 62.5 25.0 .5 05Z 141.3 3.89 I 6.11 43.87 I 2~.8B 35.53 019 0.0278 0.0300 0.03301 0.0030 G3.3
 - :1
:no GRADUALLY VARIED :FLOW PRACTICAL PROBLEMS 311
eliminate cross wn.ves and other turbulence, and to provide safety for the in terms of the change in velocity head between the entrance and exit
structure and waterway. "Yhen the transition is designed to keep stream- seetions of the structure.
lines smooth lind nearly 'parallel and to minimize standing waves, the For inle t; structures, the entrance velocity is less than the exit velocity;
theory of gradually varied fiow may be used in the design. The essence hence, the water surface must always drop at least a full difference
of such a design has been di~cu8sed earlier (Arts. 3-5 and 3-8) in connec- betvveen the velocity heads, plus a small oonversion loss known as the
tion with the applicf.ttioll of the ellergy and momentum principles. In . (
inlet lOllS. The drop Lly' in water surface for inlet structures may there-
'~his mticle, emphasis is on design practice. fore be expl'essed as
The form o{ transition may vary from straight-line headwalls normal
to the flow of water to very elaborate s!:,reamlin\3d warped structures. (11-6)
Straight-line headwalls are usually found Ratisfactory for small structures wher~ £'h. is t.he difference in velocity head and c, is a coefI1cietlt of inlet
or where head is not valuable. For. the sake of economy, the U.S. loss.
Department of Agriculture [5] has tested a cylinder-quadrant trnllsition For outlet struGtures, the velocity is reduced, at lea.st in part,in order
as a substitute for the expensive warped structure. The cylinder-
to lift the water surface. This rise in water surface, known as the --1
quadrant transition is essellti~Jly a pair of circular wings or vertical walls, recovery of velocity head, is usnaily s.ccompanied by a conversion loss known
tailgent to the flume sides n.nd curving through 'a qual'ter~urn to mClet the as the ouae/loss. The rise t:.y' in·water surfnce for outlet structures may.
....... !

. sidei'! of the canal. For the same 1'e<1.30n, the trend. of practice in the be I?xpressed as
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation [5J has been toward simplification, with the
(1l-7)
top edges of walls and the intersections between wa.rped walls and floors
, designed in straight lines. Further simplification of an ela.borate form
is permitted, however, only when a close control of water areas and
'oNhere co is a coefficient of outlet loss.
The average safe design values of Ci and Co that are recommended are as
-I I

velocities is unnecessary and when excessh:e wa. ve action or turbulence follows:

~ould not be developed. Type of Transition
The comnion types of transition are inlet and outlet transitions between Wal'ped typ'e, ......... . 0.10 . 0.20
canal and flume, inlet and outlet transitions between ca.nal and tunnel, Cylinder-quadrant type ........ _.. . 0.15 0.25
and inlet und outlet transitions between canal and inverted siphon. . It Simplified straight-liM type ....... . 0.20 0.30
should be noted tho,t appreciable change in depth of flow generally occnrs Straight. line type .. _.............. . 0,30 0.50
Square-ended type. . .... _....... . 0.30+ 0.75
in all t,ypes al tr'<)'llsition. If the change in depth or width is very rapid
the flow may become rapidly varied, and standing waves may occur. C. FI·€f;boQ.'l·d. ApproXImate rules for freeboard estimation for lined
11-6. Transitions betwee.n Canal and Flume or Tunnel. On the basis arId unlined canaLs (Art. 7-5) may be used. For depth of How over 12 ft,
of the performance of existing structures, the 'following features have beim the freeboard in tl':J.l1sitiol1 should be given special consideration.
found important in design. For more complete information, the reader Figures 11-10 and 11-11 show, re.'5pectively, typical designs for an inlet
should refer to [2], [6], a.nd [7J. transition from canal to flume and for an outlet transition from flume to
A. Proportioning. ·For a. well-designed transition the following rules canaL The design of the inlet transition \viJ( be described in EX2,mple
for proportioning should be considered: . 11-2. The design of the outlet transition may follow the same general
1. The optimum maximum angle between the channel axis and 11 line steps. However, the expanding flow in the outlet transition often pre-
connecting the channel sides between entrance and exit sections is 12.5". sents special hydra.uIio behavior that should not be overlooked. In all
2. Sharp· angles either ill the \vater surface or in the structure that expanding flow, the distribution of Yt;locity in the cross section can be
will induce extreme standing Waves and turbulence Should be avoidcd. extremely uneven; so the velocity-distribution coefficients ma.y become
B. LO/Mes. The energy loss in a transition consists of the friction loss appreciably gren.ter than 1.0, and their values should be calculnt.ed or
and the conversion loss. The friction loss may be estimated by means of properly assumed in the design. Furthermore, uneven distribution of
any uniform-flow formula, such as the Manning formula. This loss . ,'elocity may cause asymmetry of flow and thus develop SCOllr at places
usually has very little effect on the transition flow profile and may be of highly concentrated velocities. .Caution in this respect, therefore,
ignored in preliminary design. The conversion loss is genemlly expressed should be taken when the transition is designed in erodible channels.
,
i

J
'"
 ,r,
PRACTICAL l'ROBL:fj)M!; 313
312 GRADUALJ;.Y VARUJD FLOW
f
!

c
'~ 51.40~~~~-~--~~~-.~-.,~~~~--~f~~~~~-,~_J-
e
Q "'" 51.30
:;; 57.2 0 ~-f.---+-7"'-I~' '"
'"
."

I
o o cO o
I
:- -,
o
U"l
C
.n 0oJ '"
oJ
'"+
:+o T +, + + +
WATER SUR.FACE PROFILE
'"
+ 1'1
+

HYDRAULIC PROPERTIES
o on -L-J" Hume Canol
~ '" 0
5,0.0009 ,,'°,01 4 $'0,00039<'- "'0.018
+ '"
+ + + +
r'1
+
" "
+ +
ll'l
"'6.0 0.315 V'3,24 Ci'315,
WATER SURFACE PROFILE

HYDRAULIC PROPE RTIES

FJuma
5'0.0009 ,,-0.014
V'5.98 Q'314.5

PLAN

PLAN

I-
\
" CD

~~~~~~~~~~~~
iii< N
SECllON ON CENTER
'" W Top 01 bonk
line

SECTION ON CENTER LINE

SECTION D-O

FlO. ll-lL'Typica! design of au outlet transition. (After J. Hil14s [2].)

,Rip-fop if r~~ui,ed

(Alter J. Hinds [2].)

)
314 GRADUALLY VARIED FL01V PRACTICAL PROBLEiHS 315

D. Elimination of H ya7'auUc Jump. Existence of hydraulic jump in a . head from l' - 2.715 fpl! to 5.98 fps is equal to tlk. = 0.553 - 0,117 = 0.436 ft.
Neglecting the chnpllel frietjoll fol' the time being, the total drop in water surface is,
transition may beeomeobjectionable if it hindel's the flow !\.nd consumes thet'Afol'e, LlO X 0,436 0 ..480 ft. .
useful energy. When the transition leads [rom 'a supercritical flow to a For a. smooth Itnd continuous .flpw, the theoretical flow profile'may be u.sswlled 11.[ ,
sub critical flow, the, hydraulic jump may be avoided by carefully propor-, two equal pll.rn.bolas, !.IJ.ngent to ea.ch other o.t point B ,\nd hori~ollt,al, respectively.
tioning the transition dimensions (Example 3-4). a,!; A and C, Strictly spellking, the parabolas should be tangent to the water surfaces'
In an example illust.n~ted by Hinds [7], a transition- from a segmental in the canal and the flume, but !l. small deviation of these water surfaces from the
horiwnt.at is not important in ~he present example.
canal to a circular tunnel wus desigrled for flow from one subcritical flow A number of sections are then aele(;t~d a!.:mg the transition, where the /lOll' prolile
stage to anothej· (Fig. 11-12). In the libel'!11 altowance \v'as made will be computed and the stnlctund dimensions determined.
3~ Cc.mplilatio'll of the Flow Pmfilc Inch,diug Friction. The computation ]" shown in
~Qer9Y line
Table J 1-2 with the following heo.dings:
energy rne
Cd. 1. Number for stD-tioll1; eqtHI.l!y spaced every 5 ft aud lneiLsured in the
energy line
direct.ion of flow, '
d water .st.,foce
Col. 2. Drop in water surface. The tolal drop in \I'D-tel' surface from A to C,
neglecting friction, is OA80 ft. The drop from it to t.hemid-point B of the antisym-
mckicill reversed p~\,l'abola is made equal to half th-e drop, or 0.240 ft.
CoL 3. Change in velocity heo.d. Assuming thnt the conversion loss i~ distributed
Tunnel over th" entire l~ngth of the transitiQl). in proportion'{'o the change in velocit,y head,
vo.l:Jes of tll~, are obtaine.cr by dividing value.<; of t!.lf' in col. 1 by 1.10.
-I
Col. 4. Tot.[11 velocJ;,y heD-el, equal to the cumulative v?Jue of t!.h, ent~ring the
FIG. 11-12. A faulty transition design. (Af!,r J. Hind¥ [7].) preceding coiumn . , , '
Col. 5. Veloci(" in ips corresponding to .the velocity head in the preceding column I
I
for tramitions and friction losees, and a safe coefficient of roughness was Col. 6. Water area in ft~, equa.l to th~ d~"charg~ 314.5 cfs divided by tbe velocity I
used to determine the depth of flow in the tunnel. After construction, in the column
CoL 7. Half the' top width in ft, obtained from the cross sections or the sketched
however, the transition losses were found to be practically negligible; so plan 11-10). The piau m~}' be chos@ either ~rbitmrily or by trial untilsatis-
the actual normal depth of the floY! the tunnel entrance was factory reslll!;s !l.re obtained., The choice of a proper shape for the plan is a matttlr
cOl1sirler::.bly less than the assumed vahle. As a result, an objectionable of judgment ..
hydraulic jump was observed inside the tunnel. Actually, the transition' Col. 8. Half the bottom width in It, obtained f"om the, ~ketched plan
should have been proportioned to avoid the jump on the basis of negligible tV.)!. 9. The dt'pth of flow ill it, equal to A/CO.aT + 0.5/;)
Col. 10. Hydraulic nlrliu& in ft
t.ransition losses. Since the structure had already been constructed, the CoL 11. Til'.! friction slope, computed by Eq. (9-8) with n = 0.014 for all sections
hydraulic jump was iinally eliminated by bolting cross timbers to the in the tmnsition If
channel bottom, thus increasing the friction and bringing the normal Col. 12. The friction head, equal to 'the dist.a.nce between stationli, or 5 ft, multi-
depth up to above the critical depth. pliedby the avernge of the friction slope of the section and that of the preceding section
Col. 13. Cumulative frir:t.ion head in ft
Example 11-2.' It is required to design an inle:t st,ructure connecting an earth ca.na.l Col. J 4. The water-surface elevation, including the Ilffect of the ch~,l1ncl friction,
huving 8, bottom width of 18 it and side slopes of 2: 1, to It rectangular concret'l flume equal to 57.41 - 'Zhf. The flow profile thus obtained should be free from
12 it {} in. wide, The hydrauli9 propert.ies of the cana.l and the flume arc given (Fig. objectiona.ble irrllgularitics;' if not, the plan ma.y ')B t\:tered. It shOuld bG lloted,
11-10). The design discharge is 314.5 cis. hQwever, that, a slight change in th<! elevation of waier .;;udace at a. given POlot may
Solulion. The design procedure~ involves thll following steps: ' cause an r.ppreciable chltr.ge in the dimeMions of the skucture,
L Delermimr!ian of the LmgU; of the Tra:ll..'l1:tion. The length of the transition is COl. 15. The elevr.tion of the channel bottom, equa.l to Z - y
detllrmined so that B, straight line joining the. flow line !It the two ends of the transition 4, De(enlll:rmiion of Situct.Ul'd Dimerl$ions. After t,he arbitl'lirilr 6kf:tched plan
will ma.ke an angle of a.bout 12.5" with the 'axis of the strnetlll·e. This length in the for'the tral;sition.is fOl~nd to be satisfactory, th~ s,tructnral dinlensions may be dlJf.er-
design is found to be 50 ft: 1 .
mined ns given under the following headings of Tnble 11-2;
2. DeterminatiDn. of fhe Flow Profile Neglecting Frict.icn. For the type of stl'uctul'e CoL 16, The side slope z =' (Q.ST - 0.5b)/y
under contemplation, the inlet loss be safely assumed to be 10% of the change in Col. Ii. The elevation of tile top of lining. The l'ecommend<3d heigl'lt of lining
velocity head, or 0.1 ail-". ,The total in water surface is, thel'efOl'e, equul to L1 above the witter surface for a discharge of 314.5 cfs is o.bout 1 ft (Fig. 7-]). Draw a
ah. pillS the drop necessa~y to overcome channel fridiOn. The change in velocity strci.ight line above the computed water sui-face at an distance of approxi-
* Thi.~ example is taken :from [2J. ma.tely 1 ft. From this line the elevation ZL IS obtained.
 PRAC'l.'ICAL PROBLEMS 317
CoL 18. Height of lining; in It, equa.l to ZL -Zo
Col. 19. Computed value of half the width atthc top of the lining, equal to O.5W
ZHL + 0.50 .
Col. 20. O.5W to nearest 0.5 in.

11.:.7. Transitions between Canal and Inverted Siphon. Figure 11-13

shows a typical design of siphon inlet and outlet tra)1sitions between
canals !1Ild v.n inverted siphon. The method of deaign is similar to that
for the transitions between clmal and flume. Howe vel', the following
special features of design are recommended by the U.S. Bureall of
Reclamation [6]:
1. In the design of an inlet transition, it is generally desirable to hll.ve
the top of the 8iphon opening set slight.ly below the ,cpprQacliing normal
water surface. This practice will minimize possible reduction in siphon
capacit,y caused llyl;he introduction of ail' into the siphon. The depth
of stlbmerge~ce of the top of the siphon opening is ImolVn 11.8 the walel'
seal. The recommended value ~f the water seal is between a minimum
of L111hv and a maximum of 18 in. or 1.5 6h., whichever is greater. It
should be noted that use of the minimum value in a well-designed transi-
tion theoret.ically allows the flow barely to touch the top of the siphon
opening; whereas use of lal'ger values up to the maximum provides :\ senl
of water above the top of the opening. An u.deqllate nmount of seal
depends upon the slope ilnd size of the siphon barr~l. Generally, a large
and steep barrel requires l1 large seal. In the design illustrMed (Fig,
11-13) It seal of 18 in. is u3ed.
It shotlld also lie noted that the seal IT\ay make it impract.icable to
construct. the lower end of the tmnsition strictly in aCGo!'chnce wi th the
hydraulic computation. ,"Yhen this is the case, the computed bottom
elevation a short distance upstream from the inLet headwall nuty be
altered arbitrarily to meet the practical requirement. In the design
illustr"ted, computations ha'.:e beeI~ carried to the end of the transition;
beyond tl;lis the conduit flom is simply extended smoothly to connect
with the floor of the siphon ba,rreL
For long siphOlls, ul).der certahl conditions, the inlet may not necessarily
be sealed. Consequently, 11 hydraulic jump may occur in the siphon
barrel, and the resulting operating condition will be un'favorable.
2. After the seal is determined for the inlet structure, the velocity at
the headwall is computed, and the totai drop in water surfo;ce, neglecting
friction losses, is taken as 1.1 t.h.: A smooth flow profile is thEm assumed, .
tangent to the water sUl'fac~ in the canal at the beginning of the transit.ion
and passing through the point at the headwall set by the above computa-
OI.l?CIt:lO\,/')OI.t)0U10
OO __ (\l<:,-~c-;tf;l"';l'l""1t:I
tion. There areno data ll.vailable for determining the best form of the
+++++++++++ flow profile. In the illustrated design, a slmpJ:e parabola is assumed.
00000000'000

316
 PRACTICAL PROBLEMS 319
3. In the design of the crutlet structure, the theOl<etical rise in water
surface from the head wall to the enrl of the transition, .neglecting recovery
0.'
~
t
... h~
snould be equal to the total' cha.nge in velocity 'head LlI.,. The
fio'''' profile in the illustrated design is made as a simple parabola.
c,
'"(; 4. In the desig'n of the outlet structure, the bottom slope need riot be
- I
J t;:;
;:'
tangent to the slope of the closed conduit at ~he headwall as it was in the
a.
::>
0 ,-,
case of the iulet, unless the, siphon velocity is high and the transition
il3 steep,
0
Z
:.:: 9!.
0
c.. ~
11-8. Backwater Effect of ii Dam. It is often necessary to
~-;
U;
W the probable damage caused by backwater due to an obstacle in a
I-
UI
tr say a dam.. To study this problem, a so-cR.lIed back~vater !'!lwelol}~ wrve
U {
is usually found 1,0 be useful. This curve represents the locus of the
"
:§
r.I 0Z
'I:
t)
'..J
~
t;
::1, upstream end point of the backwat.er cttrve (1111 profile). Theore~icalJy --I
65
i=5:
speaking, the backwater curve extends indefinitely in the upstream direc-
.;
+0 <.l
WI-
>- C tion; hence, it has no npstreiln1 end point. For practical purposes, how-
(0 ' .9
.<;:l
Ii)
ever, the end point rilay be selected at the place where the rise in water
C!
;:! surfH.at) begins t.o cause dama.ge. This can be at a place where
..,
+'
the depth of flow is equal t.o a certain fraction of the normal depth,
'::l"
:;:; dependlng on the 112.ture of the problem, !1bout 1 % higher thun the
0
"0
nor111al depth, or y = ·1.01Yn. When!1 freeboard is allowed, the end
c
..,m point is at 11 place where the dept.h is equal to the normal depth plus the
,2;) freebon-rd.· .
e
It is apparent thi"~t the backw8.ter envelope cUl've starts at 11 point
where the stn.tic pool level in the reserv;oir at zero inftow intersects the
channel floor. As the inflow, to the reservoir increases, the end point of
the backwater curve may moYa either upstxea.m or downstre~;'l1l, depend-
ing upon many facto!'s, sueh as condition of the channel, shape of the
cross section, presence of flood plains, effect of tributaries, and possible
change iiI reservoir level. When the reservoir level is kept consto.nt and
when the channel is prismat.ic and has a simple cross section, it is most
likely that the end pl)lnt will move in a downstream direction as the dis-
charge is increased. Increase in channel roughness usually results in
dowllstre.un movement of the end point, since its effect is to reduce the
. length of the flow profile. The presence of flood plains has !l. similar -\
effect. In field studies, however, a.n approximate point of tangency of
the nonnal-clepth line to the backwater curve is often taken as the ena
point.. This point is determined simply by cye observation from the
druwing of flow profiles. The end point defined in this way generally
shows an upstream movement when discharge increaBes. Prior to a. study
of the backwater effect . thel'efore, the upstream limit of the bnckwi1ter
'effect should be properly defined in ol'der to meet the particular need of
th,~ given problem. l .
"\
I Sec. ISland [9) for further discussion.

1
318
 320 GRADUALLY VARIED FLOW PROELE:&!S 321
11-9. Flow Passing Islands. When flow in u stream is divided by a from the plotted c.urve at which the curve is Intersected by a.dashed line
long island (Fig. 11-14a), the division of flow between the two channels bisecting the coordinate axes. The dashed line represents the condition
may be determined \Viti). the aid of f1o-w~profi)ecomputations. that the two computed elevations are equaL In the meantime) the com-
In the case illustrated it is considered that the flmv throughout ·all puted elevation at point Afar chfml1el 1 is plotted against the discharge
channels is subcritic!Ll. The pl'Ocedure is to assume nrsta set of dis- Q1 (Fig. l1-l4e). From this curve the correct discharge Ql may be
charges Ql and Q2 for the divided flows such that the Sum ~f the dis- obtained for the correct elevation. The corresponding discharge in
charges is equal to total discharge Q.. Then, compute flow profiles channel 2 is, therefore, equal to Q2 Q Q1.
in the two ch:mnels each side of the i.;;land to u point A where the If the dividfld flows are supel'critie~\l, the control point will be at A;
flow is divided. Since the flow is subcritical, the computation should hence, division of flow will depend on the entranee condition of the divided
channels. During the normllJ-flow eonditioll, it may be assumed that nil
flows ~\re uniform, and division of flow may be roughly determined from
the following I'elations: Q1 1(1 vs;., Q2 = K2 -VS;, and Q = Q1 + Q2.
11-10. River Confluence. SVhen the flow-profile computation is
carried upstream through the confluence of r.· river and its bributary, it
(a) is neeessary to determiQ.e the water-surface elevations immedIately
uostream hom the confluence. The procedure for solving this problem
is' illustrated in 10-10 fOl'the confluence of the Missouri and
Kans&s Rivers. In this example, a dischi.rgeof 81,000 cfs from the
, Kansas River is combined with 350,000 cfs from the Missouri River to
, ,,
give'a total discharge of 431,000 cfs immediately below the confluence.
,,
Cross sections lK and {) are located immediatelyupstl'eam fromthe con-
fluence of the two streams (Fig. 1O-1l). In Tr.ble 10-8, the hydraulic
elements, ;'elocity heads, ancl total heads are computed separately at
the two sections. The velocit)~ head at cross section 5, is, compnted for 11
total discharge of 431,000 cfs. This value is divided between the cross
I· sections 6 and lK corresponding to th9 dischal'ges of 350,000 cfs f.l1d
i 81,000 cis, respectively. The friction slope at each cross section is com-
Wo!er-surface elevation at Discharge in chonnel No.1 puted fol' the discharge of 81,000 cfs at cross section IK and fOl' 350,000 ers
poinl A from compuletior. , Q
i at cross section ().The friction head loss hJ is then computed, using
tor channel Na.2
(bj id
thA average of the friction from cross sections 5 to lK in the
Kansas River and from cross sections 5 to 6 in the Missouri River.
FIG. ll-l·t Solution fOI' flow passing an island. At the confluence, eddy loss is usually high, In Example 10-10, this
is estimated as 10% of the increase in velocity head from cros~ section
proceed upstream from the d~wnst,eam point B Where the divided flows II{ to 5, or 0.10 ({l.G3 0.13) 0.05 ft. The total energy in cross section
unite again. The initinl water-surface elevation at puint B may be .5 is, therefore, equal tohJ+ h~ + H = 0.10 + 0.05+ 755.0,1: = 755.HJ.
determined from the curve at this statiori for a total discharge Q. Subtracting the velocity head' from this value gives 755.19 - 0.13 =
The computed water-snrh1ce elevation at point A tor channel 1 is then 755:06, which should be equal to the assumed watel'-sul'faceelevation ab
plotted against the sa,me for channel 2. A ct,U've may, therefore, be cross section lIe. ,
dl'a\vn (Fig. 11-14b) fo1' several assumed sets of :dischal'ges Ql and Q2 of Th~ above method should bli:flpplied to sub critical flow of relatively
different proportions. :Since the flow is divided ~t point A, the two com- low velocities l1Qt exceeding about 10 fps. At high velo'cities, the eddy
puted water-surface elevations at this point fOl~ the channels should be 10sses'al'e high, and the error il1~olved in the estimation may become quite
\;!qual if the assumed qivisiol1 of flow is correct.: Thus, the elevation at appreciable. -
point A corresponding to this correct division of flow may be obtained The problem of riYer confluence may be further illustrated by an exam~
322 GRADUALLY VARlED FLOW PRACTICAL PRDBLE.IS ,323

pIe given by Sto~;:m' [10], using the Junction of the Ohio and Mississippi flow condition is expected to develop; at thifi time the depth at the pla.ce
Rivel's (Fig. 11-15). The initial conditions of the uniform flows in the of flood initiation becomes Y2, but ~he depth far upstream in the Missis-
Upper l\::Ii.~ssippi, the 'Ohio, and the Lower Mississippi Rivers are, River remains Ynl. As a general rule, the backwater effect in a long
respectively, as follows: the normal depths, Ynr, Yn2, and tina; the channel sr,ream resulting from even fairly large discharges of its tribntaries aoes
slo'pes, SOl, S02, and Soa; and the roughness coefficients, nI, n2, and n" not vel"y far ,upstream. Therefore, the backwater curve in the I
Fwm these da,ta the normal Qnl, Qn2. and Q,,3 call be computed. Upper Mississippi Riyer should be l'elatively short. At the final steady- .. I
Now, ,a flood wave is assumed to initiate in the Ohio River at a place L flow condition, steady b:l(',kwater curves will be formed in the Ohio and
Upper Mississippi Rivers. Downstream in the Mississippi River, the
depth will change from Y1l3. to Ya, but the flow may beasslimed to
remain uniform.
initiation of flood
ThE:; flow involved ill the [I.bove-mentioned problem is considered to be
subcritical, which is the usual COl.'le and can be verified easily by a campu-
t,~tiol1 of the Froude numbers. At the final steady-flow condition, the
following conditions are evident: (1) the discha.rge in the Upper Missis-
sippi River remains the same, or Ql = Qnl; (2) the depths of the three
channels at the junction n.re all equal to Yi at x = 0; and (3) the Slim of
Upper Mississippi River Lower Mississippi River
the from the Ohio and Upper Mississippi Rivers is equal to
the discharge in the Lower Mississippi River, or QI + Q2 Q3. By
assuming a value of Vi> Q3 may be comp:lted un1t.hell
Point of
floDd

Since YiJ Q~, and Y2 ~are ilow known,. the leng!;h L 01 the backwater curve' ')\
can be computed. If the computed L agrees with the given L, the
assumed Yi is the correct value. Otherwise, new vulues of, Yi should, be
assumed unt.il a correct valLle is obtained. This is a trial-and-error
solution:. Ii solution may 0,180 be obtnin<3d:byassurning Q2 at the begin-
ning l1l1d ~heclr.ing finally for either Vi or L.

PROBLEMS

11-1. A rectangular channelS ft w'ide and 500 'ft long connects two reservoirs of
va,rylng surface levels (Fig. 11-16). Assuming 3. frictionless channel, construct the
Q-constant curves of Yl J(y~) for Q = 10, 50, 100, 150, a.nd 200 cfs, The loss at
t,he channel ent.rance is negligible,
FIG. 11-15. A junctiDn problem of the Ohio a.nd Mississippi Rivers,

~T
miles upstl;eam from the junction and to such that' the Ohio River rises
y.
rapidly at that point from the initialnormal depth Y,,'J. to a final maximum
depth Y2. The point of flood initiation is shown at:l; -L on the
coordinate axes, where:r; is the dista~1ce .measured from the junction along
1 ~T Ya

the channel. The wave of the flood thus originated will move down the
Ohio River to the junction and CI:eate new waves, which travel both
11
upstream and downstream in the JVlississippi River, and also a reflected
wave which travels back up the Ohio. After n certain time, a eteady- FIG. 11-16. Profile of It CMlld for Prof,.. 11-1.
 324 GRADUALLY VARIED FLO,"
11-2. Construct the Q-constuut curves of YA = f(vB) for Prob. 11-1, The entrance
discharge ,nt\y he eomputed by Q = 3bf]1.l where b is the channel width a.nd H is the
tot.a.l hettd.
11-3. A tmpe;;oidal channel connecting two reservoirs 2 miles Ilpart has b = 50 ft,
z = 2, fr = 1~ n = 0.025, and So =; 0.004. The upsireamdepth V, is mninto-ined
consLant !).;ld equal to 6 ft (Fig. 11-1). Construct the d'olivery curve Q = f(y.),
11-4. COllstruct the delivery curve Q = f(ytl for Prob. 11-3 if the downstream
depth:v~ i.; lTIaint(Lined constant and equal to 6 ft (Fig. 11-3).
11-0. Assuming a variable y, in Prob: 11-3, construct !l. curve of Y, against Q", .. for
0. range of diEcharge varyiag from 0 to 2,000 cfs.
il-6. Assuming v1l.riable depths !/t and y, in Prob. 11-3, construct the Q-constant
curves for·dischal·ges having tile normal depth equp.l to 2, 4, G, and 8 ft, respectively.
11-7. Sulve Prob. 11-3 if tht: reservoirs l\re 2,500 it ap:.i,rt.
II, 11-8. Solve Prob. lJ-4 if the reservoirs Me 2,500 ft c.part.
11-9. SolvePI·ob. 11-5 if the reservoirs !lre 2,500 ftapart.
11-10. Solve .Frob. 11-6 if the reservoirs are 2,500 it llpRI't,
11-11. Construct the delivery curn Q = f(YB) for Prob. 11-3 if the upsLream reser-
voil' depth Y II ia Dlaintained con~tant and equal tc B ft. The fzee ·entranoe is wtlll-
rounded, or C, - 1.25.
11-12. Construct tbe delivery curve Q = f(Y,J) for ·Prob. 11-4 if the downstream
resp.rvc-ir depth YB is maintained constant and equal to 6 ft. C, =1.25.
11-13. A rectangu~ar ra.ft. chute 20 ft widc, as descril::ed by Bllkhmeteff [lj, is to be
built between levels A. and B(Fig. 11-17). The design conditions ,,,'e:
L The'ta.ilwatm· fluctuates by 8 ft.
2. The depth ill Lhe steep reach is kept to a minimum nav'igl1ble depth ~f 2.5 ft.
:l. The (lvCl'nge velocity should not exceed 14.7 £p8.
4. The dischal'ge should be kept below 750 ers,
5. The roughness coefficient n = 0,03.
6. The entrance discho.rge is computed· by L\ weir formula Q _ 0.4 .yzg b·y", l.~.
...,.,,---l(.-8'
? ~----'-:-~
FIG. ll-17. A raft chute for PI·C'b. 11.13.
Determine the following items by the Manning formula and by any method of flow-
prolile'computation as described in this book:
a, Slope of the steep reach
b. The entrance depth y.
c, Length of the flow profile in the trnnsition teach
PRACTICAL PROBLEMS 325
d. Slope of the neutl':J.lizing reach
e. Length of the neutralizing reach
f. Length of the !'iteel' reach
11-14. COl'rect the flow profile computed in Example 11-1 for air entrainment,
Eq. (2-15).
11-15. Solve EX:ll.mple 11-1 for Q = 19,000 cfs.
11-16. A trapezoidal earth spillway with 3: 1 side slopes is 190 ft long from the
reservoir at Sta.. 0 + 00 to the downatream critical control ·seetiol'!. at Sta. 1 + 90.
Th~ bottom of the'spillway at Sta. 0 + 00 is 95 It wide and conV'erges unifol'luly t.~
a width of 75 ft c.t Sta. 1 + 00. The bottom width of 75 ft ill constant from Sta.
1 + GO to Sta. 1 + 90. The bottom slope of the spillw!l.Y between Sta. 0 +
00 and
Sta. 1 + 00 is ad verse, and is - 3 % between Stu. 0 + 00 and Sta. 0 + 8!J ane! - 20 %
between Sta. 0 + 80 and St.... 1 + 00. The bottom of the spillway is horillontal
between Sta. 1 + 00 and Sta. 1 + 90. Manning's n = 0.03.5. Determine: .
n. The flow p::-ofiles for discharges of 600, 800, 1,000, 1,200, 1,500, and 1,800 crs in
the spillway ,
/), Curve showing dis(.\harge \'5. elevation of pool level in the res,ervoir
c. Friction loss in spillway between the reservoir and the control sectioll ror I.l. dis-
charge of 1,500 cfs .
11-1"{. Revle\v the design of nil O\lt.let tl'll.l)sition from Ilume to canal (Fig. ll-ll).
The flume r..nd canal are the same as those described in Exnmple 11-2.
11-18. Review the design of ihe siphon inlet and outlet transitions (Fig. 11-13).
GiYen th.e hydraulic properties: A = 01.52 it', R = 2.89 ft., SQ = O.OOOS, nnd n =
0.0225 fa! the canals; and A = 38.48 ft2, R = 1.75 ft, So = 0.0012, and 11 "" 0.014 for
the circular siphon ba:reL
11-19. Compute and construct li bnckwater envelope curve for the backwater'
caused by a 5-ft dam in the channel described in Example 10-1,
n. Assuming the end point at a depth equal to 1.01Yn
b. Assuming the end poiilt~.t a depth equal to Yn plus a. frcl~board of 5 in.
11-20. A dil!charge of 1,000 cfs is divided between two rectangular channels exoa-
vated in rock. The chnnneis are later joined !J,gain (Fig. 11-14). Channel 1 is 10 ft
wide and 200 ft long. Channel 2 is 15 ft wide lend 150 ft long. The·bottom of chan-
nel2 is on the llverage 'about ::l ft lower than that of cho-llnel 1. Assuming n = 0.035
aml a tot'll drop of water surfa.ce between the dividing !lnd joinip.g poillts of the chan7
nels equal to 5 in., compute the divided uniform flows ..
11-21. Wi~h reference to the problem shown in Fig. 11-15, the following data are
assumed: Yr.' = Yn~ = 1/ .. 3 = 20 ft, SOL = So. = 0.5 ft/mile, S03 = 0.49 ft/mite,
n, = n •. = no o.oa, the widths of the Ohio and Upper Mississippi Rivers = 1,000
ft, the width of the I,ower l\{ississippi Riv~r = 2,000 fti II> = 40 ft, and L = 50 miles.
All rivers are assumed to have rectallgular channels. Determine the junction deptl\
and the flow profiles ill the rivers after the flood flow approaches a .stead); condition.
REFERENCES
1, Boris A. Bakhliletefi: "Hydraulics of Open Channels," McGraw-Hill Book
Compo.ny, Inc., New York, 1932, pp. 143-215.
326 GHADUALLY VARIED FLOW
2. Julhtrl Hinds: The hydraulic design of flume and siphon ~ransitions, TrcT.nsadions,
America" Society of 'Civil Engineers, vol. 92, pp. 1423-1459, .1928.
'3. "C;vil Works: Flood Con~rol in the Los Angeles Area," TIl[) Engineer School,
For~ Beh'oir, Virginia, 1950, E206.00 (4-50) ML, pp. 22-28 and plate 10.
4. L. S~alldi6h Hall: Open channel flow at high velocities, in Ent.rainment of air ill
flowing \\'flter: a symposium, Transactions, Ameriwn Sodetv oj C;~il Engillec",3,
vol. lOS, pp. 1394-1447, 1943.
5. Fred C. Scobey: The flow of water in flumes, U.S. DepC!1'lmenl oj Ag"ic7l!t1l7'e,
Techniml B1t/lelin No. 303, December, 1933.
G. Hrdraulic design d!\1;a, appendix I of CanalS and related structures, U.S. Bure(1.(L
oj Reclamalion, De~ign and Cons/rllction .liJ(l.n1Lal, Design Su.pplwtent No.3, 1952,
vol. X, pt,. 2, paragro.ph I-13. '
7. Julian Hinds: The hydraulic jump and erit,ical depth iu the design of hydraulic
S~r\)ctllres, Engineering Ncws-RsClJrd, vol. 85, no. 22, pp. 1034-1040, Nov. 25,
1920.
8. WallD.ce M. La.nsford and WilliD.1n D. Mitchell: An investigD.tion of t.he backwater
pro(ile for steady flow in pi'isnl:t~ic channels, University oj Illinois, En!1ineering
EXpcTl:lI1cnl Stalion, Bulletin Series No. 381, vol. 46, no. 51, lViD.1'ch, 1949.
1.1. Willi"'ffi D. Mitchell: Sf,age-fall-clisoharge reiatioils for steady flow in prisma~i~
ehfl.Tln<:.ls, U.S. Geolo!!ica.18urvey, Wa.ler Su.pply Paper 1164,1954.
10. J. J. St.oker: "Witter Waves," vol. IV of "Pure and Applied Mathemat.ics,"
Interseience Publishers, Inc., New York, 1957, pp. 45G-461.
'
CHAPTEIt 12
SPATIALLY VARIED FLOW
12-1. Basic Principles and Assumptions. Spatially (gradually) varied
flow, ~'s previously defined (Art. 1-2), has a nonuniform discharge result-
ing from the addition or diminution of water along tbe eourse of flow,
The added or diminished water will cause disturbance in the energy or
moment.um content of the flow., As ftres'ult, the hydraulic behavior of
a spatially va,rlcd flow is more complicated than that of a flow of constant
discharge. Furthermore, the hydraulic behavior of spatially varied flow,
with increasing dischai'ge is different in certain respects from that of
s'imilar flow with decreasing discharge, Therefore, the two types of
spatially varied flow will be discassed separately.
A. Flow with Increas~'ng Discharge. In this type of .spatially varied
flow, an appreciable portion of the energy loss is due to the turbulent
mixing of the added water and the water flowing in the channel. In
most caEes, this mixing is of relatively.high magnitude and uncertainty.
Because of the resulting high and uncertain losses, the momentum equa-
tion will be found more convenient than the energy equation in solving
this problem. From a practical vie~vpoint, the high energy loss seems
to mz.ke channels designed for such Bpn,til1lly variedflbw hydraulically
inefficient, but physicl1l circumstances sometimes make the lise of lltlch
structures desirable.
A substantially correct form of the fundamental differential equation
for spatially varied fiowwith increasing discha.rge was probably first
established by Hinds [1] for the design of lateral spillway channels. A
more complete equ:Ltlon, ho,vever, was developed by ,Favre [2,3], including
a friction term and a componentof.lriflow velocity in the direction of the
I1xis of the channel. The methodG developed by Hinds and Favre are
applicable to any channel, prismatic and nonprismatic, but the procedure
requires 8, step computation with successive approximations. For pris-
i
matic rectangular channels with ulliform 'illflow throughout the channel
i length, the differential equation of the flow has been \ntegm,ted by
Camp [4] and Li [5J. Li also treated prismat.ic channels of sloping walls.
Theoretical and experimental studies of the ,flow were also made by .j
De Marchi [6], Citril~i [7], Forchheimcir [8], Schoklit.'3ch [9], and others.
In practical applications, the theory has cOi'ered a variety of problems,
327
,
-I
I
! ,
'.
328 GRaDUALLY .vAniED FLOW
from the study of flow in roof gutters [lOJ to the design of wash-water
troughs in water-treatment plf1nts [11,12] and of side-channe1 spillways
on dams (Fig . .12-1).
B. Flow with Decreasing Discharge.. Fundamentally, type of
spatially varied flow may be treated as a flow diversion where the
diverted. watel; does not Ilffect the energy head. This concept has been
) present in the form of spiral flow, particularly in l::tteral spill way channels,
\ be easily evaluated, but will be included in computations if the momentum
1 3. The pressure in the flow is hydrostfl.tic; that is, the flow is parnlleL
i The flO\y at the o,utlet, however, may be curvilinear and deviate greatly
FIG. 12-1. The side-channel spiilway (·n the Arizona side of Hoover
upstream. (U.S. BUTeau of Reclamation.)
verified by both theory and experiment,. Therefore, the use of the energy
equation will be found more convenient in solving this problem.
The theory of spacially varied flow with decreasing was
probably employed first in the design of lateral spillways or side-spillway
wehs. This type of structure is usually a long notch installed along the
side of a cha.nnel for the purpose of diverting or spilling excess flow.
i channel in
Laboratory tests on such structures w~re first made by Engels tI3] and
by Coleman :and Smith [14J.I Forcl~heimer [15J has approac.\1ed th~
1 Engels's ex~eriments indi~f.lted a rising and those by Coiemnn and Smith, on the
contra.ry, a dropping flow profile along the spUlwa.y crest. This confusion \vas lEIter
expla.ined by De :!vI.arahi [16] as resulting from the f8.Ct thu.t flow was sllbcritical iil
Engels's but supercritical in Coleman and Smith's experiments.
SPATIALLY VARIED FLOW 329
problem' anll-Iytically by assuming the energy line to be parallel to the
spillway crest and to the channel bottom and also by assuming the flow
profile illong thl'l spillway crest to be linear. Theoretica.lly, De l\farchi
[16,17-J proved that the energy head alt.ng the spillway crest is essentially
constant and that the flow profile is curved, rising in sllbcl:itical flow and
dropping in supercritical flow. This theoretical investigation was fur~her
vedfied experimentally by Gentilini [18]. Theoretical and practical
studies of the floYI were also performed and advanced by Favre [2,19],
Nimmo [20], Noseda [21-23], Schmidt [24-26], Mostkow [27,281, Ackers
[29], Allen [30J, Collinge [31], Frazer [321, and many others,
In the derivation of the spa,tially-varit;d-flow equation in the next
::uticle, the followin,g assumptions will be made:
1. The flow is unidirectiona1.. Actually, there are cross currents
The effects of these cm'rents and of the accompanying turhulence cannot
'pl'illCiple is used. The lateral unevenness of the water surface, as a result
of cross currerlts, can be ignored.
2. The velocity distribution across -the channel section is constl:U1t and
uniform; that is, the velocity distribution coefficients are taken fiB unity.
Ho\\'ever, proper values of the coefficient£! may be introduced, if necessary.
from the parallel~fio"T assumption if a hydraul;c drop occurs. In such.
cases, proper values of the pressure-distribution coefficients may be
introduced, if necp,.<;sary ..
4. The slope of the channel is relatively small; flO its effects on the
pressure head and on the force on channel sections are negligible. . If the
slope is appreciable, corrections for these e~ects may be applied.
5. The Manning formula is used to evaluate the friction loss due to the
shear developed along the channel wall.
6. The effect of air entrainment is neglected. A correctioll, however,
may be applied to the computed result when necessary.
12-2. Dynamic Equation for Spatially Varied Flow. The discussion is
given sepo.rately for flow with increasing discharge and flow with decreas-
ing discharge. ..
A. Flow with Increasing Discharge. Refening to the lateral spillway
i2-2, the momentum passing section 1 p~r unit time is
1» QV
g
where w is the unit weight of water, Qis the discha.rge, and V is the veloc- ,
330 GRADU.'\LLY VARIED FLOW SPATIALLY VARIED FLOW 331
ity. Similarly, the momentum "' ..,""',' ... section 2 per unit time is , The total pressure on section 1 in the direction of flow is ,equal to the
ullit hydrostatic pressure at the centroid of the water area A multiplied
~{] (Q + dQ)(V + dV) by the area, which is equivalent to the moment of A about the free sur-
face multiplied by W, or
where dQ is the added discharge bet\veen sections 1 and 2. The momen- = wiA
tum change of the body of water between sect.iolls 1 and 2 is, therefore,
equal to ' where z is the depth of the centroid of A below the surface of Row.,
Similarly, the total pressure on section 2 is
~ (Q + dQ)(V + dV) - :!£ QV ~o [Q elV
g
+ (V + dV) dQJ
,
(J f!
P2 w(z + dy).t1 + ~ dA dy
Let W be th€ weight of the body of water between the sections. The
component of W in the direction of flow is where dy is the difference between the depths of the two sections 1 and 2.
Neglecting the term containing diffel',mtials of higher order,
W sin f) =
::
u;So(A + J1: dA) dx = w8 QA d,o;
-~.

w(z +dy)A
where slope So is equal to sin IJ and th.., term containing the product of
is dropped. The resultant hydrostatic pressure acting on the body of water between
sectiolls 1 and 2" is
p. - P z = - w A dy

Equating the momentllln change of the water body to' all t;he external
forces acting on the body,
w
' "
- [Q dV
(V
g '
+ + dY) dQ] = P1 - P2
.
+W sin f) FJ (12-1)

Neglecting dV dQ and substituting in thc above equation all expressions

for external forces expressed previously,

dy = 1(
"f! . V dV +. AV dQ ) + (Se - S,)dx (12-2)

Fro. 12-2. Analysis of spatially varied flow.

Since V = Q/A and V + dV (Q + dQ)/(A + dA), the above flqua-
tion becomes
The friction head between the two l3ect.ions is equal to the friction , _. V(2A dQ-A +Q dAAdA+ dA d'"-Q) +
ely - - {J 2 (So - Sf) dx ( 12-3)
slope SI mUltiplied by the length dx, or .
hf Sf ax Neglecting riA in the denominator and dA. dQ in the numerator; and
sjmplifying, .
where the friction slope may be represented by the Manning formula as dy Se Sf - 2QqjgA 2
(12-4)
dx 1 - Q~/gA~D (
I

where q. = dQ/dx, or the discharge per unit length of the channel, !Lnd D .1
The frictional force along the channel wall is equivalent to the pressure is the hydraulic depth, Ifnonunlform velocity distribution iu the
due to friction head multiplied by the average q,rea (see Art. 5-4) J or channel section is considered, an energy coefficient can. be introduced in
the equation, or .
Ff = w(A + Y2 dA,)Si dx = wASf dx dy So - Sf - 2aQq.lgA 2
dx, --1= aQ2/ qA2D (12-5)
where the product of the differentials is dropped,
.Jo
If.-
S/ne'
 GRADUALLY VARIED FLOW SPATIALLY. VARIED FLOW 333
This is the, dynamic equation for spatially varied flow with increasing Adding this term to the right side of Eq. (12-6) and differentiating) the
discharge. Theoretically spealdng, a momentum coefficient should be resulting equation will be identical wit.h Eq. (12-5).
used in the equation. However, the energy coefficient is' used because 12-3. Analysis of Flow Profile.. In discussing the analysis of the flow
: '
the friction slope Sf is evaluated by a formula for energy loss, such as the profile, a simple example will be given first.
i MaIming formula. l When q. = 0, this equation becomes the dYnlimic
I .Example 12~1. A horizontal rectangula.r lateral-splIlway chan,nel hus a free-overfall
equation for' gradually varied flow of constant discharge. outlet. The inflow is ulliformly distributed along the channel with a rate of fl. per
B. Flow with Decreasing Discharge. ,For t.hc analysis of this type of unit length of the channel. Derive the equation. of the . flow profile, ignoring the
spatially varied flow, the energy principle is directly applicable. Let z friction [ass.
.be the distance of toe bottom of the channel section above a horizontal Soltttion. In this problem the ru.te of inflow is '1. Q./L, where Q, is the dilscharge
datum (not shown ill I~i.g. 12-2); tIH') total energy at a channel sectiou is at the outlet an.d L is the channel length. ThUlS, dQ = <i.'dx and Q = <i,X. Let !The
/ the chaunel width; then A by and V Q/A = <i.x/by. Also, S. = S, = O.
I CiQ2 Substituting these expressions ill Eq, '12-4) and simplifying,
H = z + y + 2g112 (12-6)
(12-9)
Differentiating this equation with respect to' x,
This ill a linear differential equation of the first order.
dlI _ dz + dy + a (2Q dQ 2Q2 dA) (12-7) equation is
The genera! solution of this
dx - dx dx 2g A2 dx - AJ dx
gb'll'
x' - - - +1:11 (12-10)
Noting that dJI/dx = -Sf, dz/dx = -So) dQ/dx = q., and 2q.'

(dA) (ddxY) -_
~,! =
dx,dy
TdiY
dx
where I: is an integration con.taIlt which may be determined by the bOUl,da,y condi-
tions of the flow profile,
At the outlet, x = L lIud 11 Yo, Thus, Eq. (12-10) gives
the above equation may be reduced to b'y.3)
1(LZ + lJ2'1.
c (12-11)
r
! dy _ So - Sf - aQq.luA2 11. ~

dx- - 1 - CtQ2/gA~ (12-8) and Eq. (12-10) becomes

which is' the dynamic equation jorspat'ially varied flow with deer'easinu (
1 +_1
2F.1
).JL_
y. ('J!)3
y.
(12-12)
_ _-;,.. discharge. It should be noted that this equation differs from (12-5)
where F,' = (12-13) '.
only in the coefficient of the third term of the numerator.
Now it is interesting to know [33] that the momentum principle can
It is apparelit that F, is in the form of n Frqude number oi the flow at the outlet.
also be used for the derivation 'of Eq. (12~8). In 11. spatially varied flow, When free overfali occurs at the outlet, the :!low is critic",l; therefore, F, = L The
with decreasing discharge, no momentum is added to the water. Follow- equation of the flow pre file becomes
a ,procedure similar to the derivation of. Eq. (12-5), the term con-
11 (11)~
taining dQ may be dropped from Eq. (12-1); the resulting equation will v. -H -y.
%- (12-14)
be identical with Eq. (12-8).
_~ Likewise, the energy principle can also be used for the derivation of where depth y. is the critical depth at the outlet for Q,.
When the outlet is submerged, ~he depth Yo ill determined by the downstream aur-
Eq, (12-5). In applying this principle to spatially varied flow with fa.ce elevation, and Fa can be computed from tbe knowledge of y, and Q,. For each
incre~sing discharge, the energy due to the added discharge dQ per ele- value of ~/L, Eq. (12-14) wilIgive two real positive solutions. However, only values
mentmy lellgth d:r: should be added to the total energy the course of y/y. ;?; 1 are true solutions, because the energy in flow rous~ deal-ease a.s the. flow'
of the flow during the time interval dt. This kinetic energy per pound of proceeds dov.;uatream andy aallllot be less than'll •.
water is equal 'to The above example illustrates spatially varied flow in horizontal chan-
mass X velocity2 (w dQ dt)(a V2) nels of rectangular -cross section. Similar analyses can be made for
g X unit weight of water X volume IJw(A d:c) channels with parallel side walls having irregular bottoms and for chan-
1 This is merely a practical interpretation, which lul.s no theoretical basis. nels with sloping side walls. For channels with sloping bed, hbwevel', a

?, '
 SPATIALLY VARIED FLOW 335
334 . GRADUALLY VARIED FLOW
by the dashed line. , In region A, F. 1, and the flow condition is
general explicit '"rtuatio:1of thefhw profile such as Eq. (12-12) cannot be
governed by the upstream depth YU' In ot,her words, the water 8urfac~
obtained. If no hydraulic j\lmp occurs in the channel, the flow profile
l recedes in the downstream direction, and only the value of y" is of interest
cn.n be computed directly by the method of numerical integration
in determining the channel dimensions, Values of y,./Yo for region A
(Art. 12-4)) starting from a known control depth of flow. have been computed by numerical integration and have been plotted as
Li [5] hns performed an analysis of. spatially yaried flow in channels of
solid lines (Fig. 12-4). The computation was made on the condition
sloping bed ,by means of numerical integration. The results of, this
that y"jy, ~ 1 at x/L = 1-
n.nalysis can be, summarized in a general diagram (Fig. 12··3). For
It cnn be proved that, when dF/t1:x ;:> 0, G < %(1 + 2F.'). This is
channels wIth parallel side walls, the clbgra,rn i.~ shown in Fig. '12-4.
represented by the line dividing, regions A and B in the diagram
1
(Fig. 12-3),
I
(
I
i

G
Value of G

FIG. 12-3. Types of spatia.lly varied flow as determined by F, nnd G.' The diagram
is shown for [\, channel of an arbitntry sec~ion. Fvr rectangular channels, the line
dividing regions Band Cis G "" 1 + F.; for trio.ngular channels, it is G '" 2. The
dashed line in each channel is the critical-depch line.
This diagr8;m indicates the relo,tionship between the Fl'oude number F,
and the value of G SQL/y.. It consi.sts of fOUl" regions, representing
four conditions 01 flow.
Region A.This region l'spresent.s the condition where flow is sub7
critical throughout the channel and where the value of F increa.se!; as the
flow downstream; that is, dF / dx > O. The symbol F l'epresents
the Froude number of flow at a. section a distance x from the upstream
end of the channeL The value of F can be computed from Eq. (12-13)
by replacing F 0 with F and L with x. Since the flow is subcritical; the
depth of flow at any section is greater than the critical depth, as shown
, L The profile can a.lso be computed bra gra.phica.l method developed by Ca.mp ;4],
which requires trial adjustments~
FIG. lZ·4:-SO"luiioDs for channels with sloping bed and par:>ilel side walliJ. (After
W. H, Li [5].)' , .
Region B. This region: represents the condition' where the flow is
subcritical throughout the channel but where the value of F will first·
increase as the flow proceeds downstream, reaching a maximum 'value .
less than unity, an,d then decrease. It been found that the line di:vid-
regions Band C can be represented approximately by G = 1 + F •.
This line indicates all the cases in which the maximum value of F reaches
unity. '
Regicrn C. This region represents the condition at which there is
supercritical flow in the downstream portion of the channel and a hydrau-
lic i:ump in the channel. It h(l.s been found that super critical flow occurs
when G is greater than approximately 1 + F.. The hydraulic jump will
fo:-m only if the outlet is sufficiently submerged. As the jump occurs,
the control section will be shifted into, the channel, and the elevation

I~
 336 GRADUAIJLY VARIED FLOW
of the \,rater surface at the outlet will not affect the entire flow profile.
'The flow profile upstream from the
. jump cannot be determin!ld froni the
,( : value of YO) but it can be determined
\ from the critical depth yaand the
position of the critical section Xc. A
dimensionless flQ~" in the
sllpercritical reach ('[;~ig. 12-5, ill
which A" and A .!we water areas,
respectively, of the critical section
and the section a distance x from
the upstream end of the ch~nnel) has
been computed by numei'ica[ inte~
gratioll. This curve can be used to
FlO. 1,?-5. Dimensionless flow profile in
compute the flow profile below the
Btipercriti!\a~ reaches in a sp .. til1!ly-
varied-liow cht,nnel of sloping bed and critical section and. above the hy-
parallel walls, (After W. H. Li [5),) , draulic jump. . For a spatially vaxicd flow with de-
The positi'on of a critical section
SPA.TIALLY VA.RIED FLOW 337
'For an advanced theoretical analysis of spatially varied flow, the
method of singular point (Art. 9-6) may be
Example 12-2. Analyze the flow in iii rectangular ch:wuel .of .small slope with a
bottom mck (Fig. 12-6) and derive the equation of the ,flc\v profile.'
SoluiiOn. The flow in a channel with bottom rack is a case of spatially vaded flow
.with decreasing discharge. The ra.ck is usually made of parll.lJel bars 01' perforated
screen. There arC va.rious application;s of such 0. device. For exo.mple, the channel
may be' an "intake" to withdraw'w{l;ter
from, say, a mountain torrent, or a "skim-
, mer." to reduce the ,volume of wa~er re-
quired to transport, say, fish.
A~s;lming '" = 1 !l.nd 8 "" 0, the speoific
Bn"rg'y at any section of the channel (Fig.
12-6) is
V' Q'
E =. '11 +"
~g
= 11 + 2gb'11 2 (12-15)
creasing discharge, the specific energy
can be considflrcd constant aiong the
(0'

in the lateral-spillway channel can be determined by the method of singu- channeL' Thua, dE/dx = OJ or, from
lar point (Art. 9-6), Eq. (12-15),
Regio-n D. This region represents the flow,condition Fo.t which there is dll, Qy( -dQ/dx)
supercritical flow throughout the downstream portion of the channel but dx = !lb'y' Q1
(12-16)
where the depth of submergence at the ouMet is not enough to
create a hydraulic jump in the channeL Thus, the value of Fa is not where -'--dQ/d:!; is obvio'Jsly the discharge
withdrawn through a length dx of the
determined by the depth of su'bmergence. The dividing line between
rack. Equatil:m (12-16) is the general
regions C and D (Figs. 12-3. and 12-4) was obtained by numerical inte- dynamic equation for the flow under
gration on the condit,ion of a millimum depth of required consideration.
to prOdtlCe a hydraulic jump at the outlet. This Jnllllmum depth 'is The disc.harge through'the rack de- i~l

. equruto the depth neeeSS1J.ryto set the downstream pool level at a seq).lent pends upon the ei'fective head on the rack. FIG. 12-6. Channel with a bottom rack .
When the direction of liow through the (a.) Partin.! withdrawal; (b) complete
depth. A depth of submerge'nee greater than this. minimutn depth wlll
ra.ck openings i« nearly vertical (A, withdrawaL
force the jump to move upstream into the channel, and the oondition of below), the energy loss in the process is
flow Ifill be represented by region C. negligible' and, thus, the effEctive head on ro.ck is practically equal to the spe-
When the slope of the channel is extremely steep or when the value of cific ellergy E. Mostkow 128J found that this is true of racks such as those
G is very large, the flow ,vill become unsteady. The limiting value of G composed of parnllel bars. On the other hand, when the direction of flow through
that will keep the flow in a steady condition has not determined. the ra.ck openings makes ..n appreciable with the verticai (E), the flow will
impinge all thfl sides of the openings, in a loss of energy e.nd a change in
In the above a.nalysis, the' effect of friction has This direction of the flow from inclined eyentually to vertical. From experiments,
has been verified as justifiable for the design of wash-)vater troughs and :MostkQW found tha.t this is true of as those composed of a perforated
side-channel spillways. For effluent channels around 6ewnge-treatment screen and that tile corresponding energy is approximately equal to thE velocity
tanks. however, the effect of friction may increase t~e upskeam depth
1 There hav~ been many investigations o~ this problem.
Yu ~s :much as 10%.* ' Th.e actual iflaw phe-
nomenon is lather complicated, particularly *'hen the slope of the rack is tll.ken into
$LJ 15] has computed curves repre:;enting the increaSe of !/Y relmitof friction in consideratiqn. : For details, see [21J to [23J, [26j to, [28), and [34J to [381. '
horizontal channels. . • This assumption was found to agree with the experill}ents [21J.

),

I
 SPATIALLY VARIED FLOW
338 GRADUALLY VARIED FLOW
SUbstituting'Eq, (12-24) for ~dQldxand Eq, (12-18) for Q in Eq. (12-16) and
hea.d of the flow over the rack. It may, therefore, be Msumed that the effective
head on the racle is [lqual to the !!btic hee.d, or the depth of flow. over the rack. simpliiying,
dy 2ee ',/iJ[1?=-Tj)
A. }I'or VeNieal ,"'low lhrough Ih~ Rack. In this case the discharge through a length (12-25)
'1 ;h "'" 3y - 2E
ax of the rack may be expressed by
l
(12.17) Integra.l.ion of this aqUlltion gives the eq1!ation of the flow profile as l

where ~ is the ratio of the opening area to the total area of the rack surface and c is
I x = ~ [~i sin-I (1 - 2lt) - %~ "VE
-/!J. (1 1!_)] + 01 (12-2B)
! EO E E

~ }~ -J~ - % ~~ ( 1 .. ~) ] + ~2
the coefficient of discharge through tb:e
. From Eq. (12-15), the (Iischarge is or x = [ 1 (12-27)

Q by (12-18)
I
1
C05-

The integration eon.stants in the above equ:1.tion may be evaluated by the condition
I
Substituting Eq. (12-17) for -dQldx and Eq. (12-18) for Q ill Eq. (13-16)~nd that 11 - !II and x = O. Then, when 11 = 0, Eq. (12-26) wi!! give the length of the
rack required for!!. complete withdraw!l.1 of the main flow througll the I'l'l.Ck, or
simplifying,
(12-19)
-E
.c
[v ~1I1E
/1! - 'Ei!l) - ..,',.sm- (. 1
( 1 - - ~
'~
1 2Y ,)
E
+ (12-28)

tntegratioll of this equation gives tlle equation of the flow profile o.s A and B described above, the entraDce to t11";' reach of the rack
TM'J>Trjm"as (I. broad-crested weir. Thus, Q, = c'bE"', where " may h!l.ve
x= J1 (12-20) a.ll value of 2.80. Also, Eq. (12-13) gives Q, = bYt V2g(E 1h) and
<c .E Q. Thus, the discharge of. a partial withdrawal from the :nain
flow Q.. = Q, Q" or .
For !I = y, and x = 0, the integra.tion cOI~stant is determine<;i from Eq. (12-20) as
C = (E/ec)(ydB) \./1 - 1/dE. Thus,'
(12-29)
x = ~ (!L!
.,; .E E
y (12-21)
For a complete withdrawal of the main flow through the rRck, it is evident that
Wilen y = 0, Eq. (12-21) gives the length of the rack I'equire,d for e. complete with~ Q", Q, = c'bE,·6, from which .E = (Q,/e'b),', Thu8, E may be computed if the
incoming discharge Q" b. and c' are given. ,
(\iawal of the main flow through the rack. or .
'The v~lue c of the coefficient of dischll.rge throug;h tho mcl. cpenillgs actually varies
considerably along the rack. For fJx"mple, typical values dcf,ennined experimentally
E
EC
(!L!E (12-22) were found Lo vary from 0.435, for a grade of 1 on 5, to 0.497, for a horizonkl.l slope of
the racks of parallel bars; and from 0.750, for Il. grade of 1 on 5, to 0.800. for a hori-
By Eq. '(12-18), the above equa.tion may be reduced to zontal slope of the racks of perforated scrsnns [271. III general, the value is higher for
racks of screens than 'for racks of parallel bars. The value is higher for
(12-23) horizontal racks than for inclined racks. The local value increases as the; ftow depth
L, on the rack increases if the bars are parallel to the direction of the main flow bilt
decreases with the depth if the bars are in transverse direction, '
. where QI is the discharge through the ent.ranceto the reach of the rack and is also The n.nalysis of this problem may be further extended by considering t,he effects of
equal to the wit.hdrawal discharge Q" through the rack. the streamline curvature, the nonuniform velocity distribution, and the bottom slope,
B. For Incl:ined Flaw IArough Ill.e Rack. In this case the discharge through a. length and by classifying various types of the flow protil€s thus created. In general, there
dx of the mck may be expressed by are five types of flow profiles, which are similar to those to be described in the neXt
exampie,
_dQ_.eb (12-24) . It may to note that, when a critical state of Row exists OIl th·" upstream
ax side of the rack, the critical depth will occur u.t a. section somewhere upstrea11l frOl:n
1 This equS:tion may also be derived by:means of Eqs. and (i2-18). By
.cbz V'iiE, By ~ Equat~on (12--26) is given by Mostkow [27J and Eq, (J 2-27) by Noseda [2Il. THe
Eq. (12-17), ~he discharge through the ratck of
tw.,' equatIOns are·mc.tbematically idellticll.l. The relatitlnship between the integra- .
Eq. (12-18), Qw = Q,,.- Q = by, V2g(E -7 !II) - by Eq'tating these
two expressions for Q.., Eq. (12-21) is obtained.
tiol! constants ill 0 1 = Ot ,..EIS.c, +
'.
340 GRADUALLY VARIED FLOW SPATIALT,Y VARIED FLOW 341
the entrance section. This phenomenon is, therefore, similar to that of a free over- consta.nt, or S, = So. Since the channel is horizontal, So = Q. Thus, assuming
fall (Art. 3-4). The ratioYliV" of the entrance depth to the critical depth -decreases a = 1, Eq, (12-8) gives an equatiou identical with Eq. (12"16), or
\I'itll increase ill the value of • and of the rack slope. Typical average :atios vary
from 0.70 to 0.90, which correspond approximately to the valuGs of VilE frGm 0.47 dy Qy( -dQldx)
to 0,60. ' (12-16)
dx = .Ilb'y' ~ Q'
Example 12-3. Analyze the ftow through a side weir in a prismatic horizontal
rectangular channel.l The discharge over ailY given length of tho weir can be computed by a weir formula,
Solution. The tlow th;:cugh a side weir is a case of spatially varied flow wit.ll
decr~asing dischD.rg~ (Fig. 12-7). Ac- ~..!!!. = _ dQ "" cV2a (V - s)1.' (12-30)
cording to Frazer [32j, the foHowing five dx dx

_--'-'T~
typm; of flow profile can be produced:
where c is the discharge coefficient and s is the height. of the weir sillll.bove the bottom
of-th~ channel. The sill of the weir is pa,'allel to the bottom -of the channel. Equa-
- 'J'ype a. CritilJ~j conditions a.t or near
tiQn (12-18) also is applicable to the present problem. Tl1us, the discharge at -any
the entrailce with supercritical flow in the
weir section, the depth of fiow decreasing section is
along the weir (Fig. 12~7b) Q = by -/2U(B - 0 (12-18)
Type b. Depth of fiow greater than
critical at. the entrance with subcl'itic,ll where b is (·he width of _the channel and E b the specific energy.
flow in ttl''! weir section, the de-nth of flow With Eqs. (12-30) and (12-18), Eq. {12-16} becomes
increasing along the weir se~tion (Fig.
{OJ ay 2c-V(E - y)(y - s)3
12-7c)
Type c. Type a flow at the beginning ax = II 311 - 2E
(12-31)

of the weir selJtion \vith a hydraulic jump Integrating Eq. (12-31) nnd solving for ."
occurring in the w'Jir sect,ion, and type b
flow after the jump at a lower- specific-
energy level owing to jilin p losses (Fig.
x= ~c F (1)
E
+ canst (12-32)
(e)
12"7d)
(1) 2E - 3~ ..JE - y _ 3 sin-1 - IE - Ji
===tl ~----:-
'. YIJYJ=:=::::J~J2 .
7'ype d. Depth of flow less than criti-
cal at the entmnce with supercritical flow
where P
\E
=
E-s V-s'V y - s
(l2-33)

j --,-'--
in the \veir section, the depth of flow
decrell.Sing along t-he weir section (Fig.
12-7e)
'l'ype e. Type d flow at the entrance
section with a hydraUlic jump occurring
in the weir section and type b flow aiter
the jilmp a.t a lower specific-energy level
owing to jump losses (Fig. 12-7f)
F(y/E)'is a varied-flow function which WiLS first solved by De Marchi [16J.
12-4. Method of NumerIcal Integration. This method wj1J be applied
fir.st to fl, flow with increasing discharge and then to a flow with decreasing
discharge. .
A. Flow with Increasing Discharge. Considering the differentials as
finite increments, Eq. (12-1) may be written

The last two types of flow are possible ~ [Q 6.V + (V + t..Y) 6.Q] -w lo-"Y Ady + wSo !o~% A d:1;
if the approach fiow is 5upercriticaL Iu
a conventionai analysis, it is assumed
that tt,e velocity thro-ugh the side w~ir is
- wS, (Il.'l: A d:c
in general at right !Ingles to the weir.
. }o
This aSaumption is more satisfactory fo'r -wA 6.y + wSoA 6.x - wB,A 6.x (12-34)
FIG. 12-7, Variolls flow pl'ofilesalongaside subcritical flow than for supercritical
weir.
flow. In supercritical flow the velocity
,,,here A is the average area. Since the discharge varies. with the finite
will be high and the angle that the over- increment of the channel length, the average area may be taken as
flow' makes with the weir will be smidL Consequently, types d and e canno-t easily A = (Ql + Q%)/(V 1 + V 2). Also taking Q = QI and V + 6.V = Vz
be analyzed succe~sfully. Furthermore, the discharge in types d ~nd. e flow is con- and simplifying,
trolled upstream, where additional consideration in the analysis is required.
In the present problem the specific energy along the side weir may be assumed
1 For detailed studies of the side weir, see [241 to [271 and [2D I to [32].
 SPATlALLY VARIED FLOW 343
342 GRADUALLY VARIED FLOW

The dl'OP in water-surface elevation between sections 1 and 2 (Fig .. TABLE 12-1. COMPl.rTA'l'ION OF CRITICAL DEPTHS FOR EXAMPLE 12-4
12-2) may be expressed by

dy' = -dy + Sodx (12-36)

(~) (~) I (~) A:~T II :;
- - 2 - ---;;-)1--'-1-'-2·-jl--0'-.,..9-2- ---'-7-'-6-8- 1 - - -- - -
I (~; (7)
COllverting the differentials to finite increments, 1 69 1.52
4 48 1-l..1. 7 t 10.49 504 2.52
t;.y' ,." -l1y + So c.x (12-37) 6 I 78 I.' 16 2 44 12.52 978 3.33

Substituting Eq, (12-35) for l1y in Eq. (12-37) and introducing !l,n
8
10
112
150 I
18
20
'3.11
3.75.
14.15
1.5.53
1,585
2,330
4.01
4.63 --I
energy coefficient a for nonuniform velocity distributbn,' the drop in 12 192 224.36 16.75 3,216 5.22
water surface is 14 238 24 4.95 17.86 4,252 I 5.76
16 I
288 25 5.541 18'.88 5,440 6.29
&~'=O:~(I~~r~+Q~2)(6V+ ~:6Q)+Sf~.1; (12-38) 18 "342 28 5.11 II 19.82 5,780 6.82
20 I
400 30 6 67I 20 .71 8,284 I 7.31

This equation can be used to compute the flow profile of a spat,iully

22 462 32 7.22 21. 55 9, 960 I 7.81

varied flow with increasing discharge. On the right-hand side' of the

equaUon, the first term represents the effect of impact loss and the
24
26
28
528
598
572
II 34
36
38
7.76
8.31
8.84
22.34
23.12
23.84
11,800
13,820
16,020
8.29
8.77
9.25
----~------~--~~----~------~----- --~-------
second term represents the ·effect of friction. It is interesting to note
that, if c.Q and Sf are zero, or QI = Q2, then this equation ,vill be reduced TADLE 12-2. COMPUTATION FOR THE DETERMrNAT!9N OF THE CONTROL S::;:CTION
FOR EXAMPLE 12-4
to l1y' = a(V22 - V I 2)/2g, which is the energy equation for flow of con-
stant discharge, neglecting friction. The procedure of numerical inte-
gration is iaustn,.ted by the following example. . " ""I Q I'Q·+Q,ly, I v,'!V,+v, AQ oV 11·:1 R, hi A'l'l:lly'

Example 12-4. * A trn.pe~oidlLl lateral spillway channel 0100 fl long is designed to ,0 (2) (3) I (4) (5) (8) (7) (8) (9) (10) 1 (11) (12) (13) (14)
1
I
carry a varying discharge of 40 ·ds/ft. The cross section has a bottom width of 10 fl -:-:~~I-· ----.--------j-.---- --.--------
and sid~ slopes of H: L The longitudina.l slope of Lhe channel is 0.1505, starting at
0+ 10' 10 400 400 3.4 '10.01 10.'0 400110.0 .... 2.25 Q.03
an upstream bottom elevation of 73.70. Assuming n = 0.015 and a = 1, compute the 0+25 1.5 l,pOO 1,4GO 5.2 12.5 22.5 RuO 2.5 4.2.5 3.41 0.05 4.30 4.30 - )
flow profile for the design discharge. o T liO 20 2,000 3,000 9.2 ' 14.91 27.4 1,000 2.4 4.9l 4..i0 0.08 4.99 9.29
Soltdion. The Erst step is to determine the control section frQf\l which the Row 1 + 00 50 4,000 5,000 13.5 1 17.6 32.5 2,000 2.7 ·B.77. 5.63 0.16 6.93 16.22
profile c'omputation can start. The control section !nay be determined by the method 1 + 50 50 8,000 10,000 16.9119.31 36.9 2,000 1.7 5.21 5.53 0:16 5.37 21.59
2 + 00 50 8,000 14,000 1 19.7 20.61 39,\1 2000 1.3 4.33 7.23 0.15 4.48 26.07
of singular point. (Art. 9-6). In this example,. however, a method developed by
Hinds [11 is·.employed. The corr.putation is shown in Tables 12-1 and 12-2.
Table 12-1 shows the computation of critical velocities and discharges correspond~
2+50 50
3+00150
3' + 50 50
10,000
12.0001
14.000
18,000 '122 I 21.B:
22 ,000 242/22.4'[
26.000 25.2 23.2
42.2
44.0
45.6
2'00011.0 8.74 7.S3
2:000 0.813.30 8.H
12,000 0.8 3.04 882 '
0.15
0.15
0.15
3.90 29.97
3.45 33.43
3.1.9 3fi.52
I
ing to a number of arbitrarily ASsigned depths, shown in col. 1. The critical velocities 4+00 50 10.000 30,000 28.0 23.8 47.0 12,000'10.612.7319.25 0.15 2.88]39.50
1 1 1 1
in col. 5 correspond to the. critical velocity heads in col. 4. The hydraulic mdii are
also computed and reco.rded in this t~ble for use in computing friction lo;;~e.s. \
Co\. 5. Critical depth in it, interpolated from Table 12-1 corresponding to the dis- .·1
Table 12-2 shows the computation of the drop in'water surface necessary to ma.in- t
tain a flow at the critical depth throughout the full length of the channel. The charge in col. 3
column headings are explained as follows: . Col. 6. Critical velocity in fps, interpolated from Table 12-1 corresponding to the
discharge in col. 3
Col. 1. Distance of the station alO1'lg the channel, in ft
Col. 2. Increment of the distance .
Col. 7, Sum of the velocities in
the previous sta.tion and in the station under con··
sidera.tion
Col. 3. The inflow discharge, equal to x times 40 cfs/ft . Col. 8. Increment. of discharge tlQ = Q, - Ql
Col. 4. Sum of the discharges Ql of the previous station and Q, of the station under Col. 9. Increment of velocity t. V = V, - V,
consideration Col. 10. Drop in water suriace due to impact loss, or
1 The use of an energy coefficient instead of a momentum coefficient has the same

reason given in Art, 12-;J. (12-39)

... This example is taken from [11.

1
,i ,

J'

344 GRADUALLY VARIED FLOW'

Col. 1 L Criticl\\ hydraulic radius in ft, interpolated from Table 12-1 corrc;:;pond'- 0""U'.l"''''' .... 000::>""0> ....
~C'lC'40000 ~ C"l'~ ~ CJ)
ing to the di.schmge in col. 3
t-r-t-l.Ce'to ~<6u:ice>~
Col. 12. Friction loss, be.sed on :&t. (9-8) with n. 0.015, V from col. 6, and R
....... M (,,', \0 ~?"'"'
from coL (ll), Since this is ll. minor item. compared with tlie impact loss, it may be :::g:s~~g
ignored if desired. 000000
.. .
M 1""""! ........~ 0 0
..
oeoco
Col. 13.. 'The I,ctal drup in water surface 6y' Ay,: + h,
COOMC~OO 1..... ~'l..... C'\I N
CoL 14. Cumulative drop in water llurface C'3 ....... rl~O{,O
~~~~c:
~<.OtOtOu?-.i c,ot-t-t-C()

Thecumulati:"e drop in water surfaee is plot~ed as the heavy dashod line in Fig. 12-8, Ci)C:~"""'~(D ~~t"CeoOCJ
starting from !l.U a.rbitrary eleva.tion 120' ft from some station at x = 10 ft. The NQ ....... OOCO ~~ ....... .-;~
1_ t""' r- \1:1 C'l 0. "'t'tlCO<oCOID
critical depths from col. 5 of Table 12-2 are then ptotted from the dashed line?s ShO'Uil
by the dotted line.. It is a.pparent that this dotted line represents the bcttom of II ....... 1.C"OO\Qot'- a r:Q (0 O'J ':"')
co r- ~' ct) r..:::; en ....
lOC";It.OC'fllO
.
~~~L.)~c..i H
'

N¢'l~N-C-'1

Oischor~e In cfs.
00000
~_8~~~g_
....... N C"1 'C'1 c,~,

OM¢'tt-(H
100 en ~'0l'Q) 00
~ l"':'c-.i ~ C')
, 90 .... "'lOU'.lCO
I
L t!l
00000
I
~ 00000
L..":)... 0,..c:.
0_ 0_
,$ "'00,""
m ...... _N
jt\-~--~------~
oo(>?.;f:1
O~LOC"lt'-OO...-i
· .
l",",OOCi)t"--('I':>~r-
. . . . ~
'"
>. l'_, ~ - ' t-
~ ~
,.0
:;i'>o\;l'j"'I':TI lJ") N OiIct~r-­
....... - ....... M '1""""1
g ,....~NN

',B
000
-0
-0
a
a
0
~
.,.,'"

<oo.ncQU")04?
. N .......
e'8" I--<o-~-.-"'-,_-----1
C"?X>I-l""""'.MtOr-
¢I~ «: 'ZO t'- ..-! t- '-di
~- ~8:;;;;;
~C)C'1'C'-,C'll"""'i,....c ~ M~M~
DislonCi '.1:0ng c~onnel length In It
] 1----·----------------, ~ 1--------------:
;rome for EXllmple 12.4. g8g~~~~~
.....- Ol.OCf')"I:t'
F~G. 12-8. Computation of tlow :3 '.;s a
, .
t:;:; e '§
....c
r...: ~ L..j ~. c-i ~ ~ cO
,..... ............................ .,. . . ;....
~
1..... (,0 CD
1;'- CO ~
.,.... ~ ....... C'1
....-i

. fictitiolls channel in which the flow at the givl'..rt dis~ht\rge condition is critical at e~ery 1--'--1 J3 1-0--'-0-0-""-"'-,.....-00.--,.....--1 ::l.

section throughout the full length of the channe!. The c!l.I.Shed·line is. the correspond- t.Ol"--o:c:r;C'!~~
CO-..:ttM""t'O'l,....tC'1~
'"
W.
ing water surface. A tangent parallel to the bottom of the actual channel can be <:or-r-.~t-C).jooco

drawn to the dotte~ bottom line of the fictitious' critical-ftow channel. The point ·OOt-OOI'..Ot-~

of tangency, at Iyhich the two bottoms have the same slope, gh'es the location of,the ~~~~c:~~~
critical'section, which is found at Ste.. 1 + 64. It is evident that the slope required
"'t-t-r-LOC'<laO

to ma.inta.in critica.l flow to the left of this section i~ greater than the actulll slope ~and 000000
....... 1;'-¢'.1r-c-,1LC";l
that to 'the right it is)esa, which is the con<;lition ne'cessary for the formlLtion of.!l. con- O~~OO~M
~,""cQ¢'lN1"""f
trol. If more than qne point of tangency is possible, the one giving th'e lowest posi-
tion of the ta.ngent ,viii be likely to control., It is:also p08~ible to ha.ve two or more · '"
• to
control sections with'hydraulic jumps 'between. :
Having located th~ control section, the tlow-profife comput.ntion can be carried: ou,t '<"0
'" 0
OlQCO
tOC'l"""'O'
<f'
(Q
0000
tQ 0 L..":l 0

as shown in Table 12-3. The computation proceeds upstream from the control sec- ++ ++++ + ++++
C'lMM~
tion for the subcritical flow in the upper part Qf the channel and -downstrenm for, the 0000

345
 SPATIALLY VARIED FLOW 347
346 GRADUALLY VARIED FLOW

supel'l~ritical flow in the lower part of the channel. ' The procedure of computation ally, this method can be applied equally well to any type of varied-flow
is the same.as thnt explained for Table 12-2, except that the wllter-ourface drop /J.y' equation for flow in prismatic as well asnonprismatic channels.
in col. 4 is finally (Obtained when it agrees with the computed Ay' in col. 17. This is 12":6. Spatially Varied Surface Flow. An important type of surface
shown for the computation at SLa. 1 + 00. In cols. 3 and 5 are elevations of the chan- flow encountered frequently in engineering, problems dealsvrith runoff
nel bottom and the water surface, respectivelJ. 'The value of Ay~ between :z: = 1{l
and x = 0 cannot be computed, but it is arbitrarily fLssumed to be twice the velocity
from a plane surface as the result of rainhdL Apparently" this is a
head at X = 10 ft. The final flow profile is constructed as shown in Fig. 12-8. The problem in spatially varied flow with illcreasing discharge and can be
accuracy of the computatior.. will depend on the length and' number o(subdivisions treated as such; it may, however, be very complicated, becoming a three-
assum<ld. dimensional problem if the surface is CUl'vedin space, as in the case of
B. Flow 'with Decreasing Discharge. For spa,tially varied flow with
a road pavement that has a cambered transverse profile and a longi- -1
tudinal slope. The theory of SlHl,tially varied flow was first used in
decreasing discharge, an equation for numerical integration similar to
sudace flow by Keulegan[40], and the equation thus derived wa.'3 applied
Eq. (12-38) can be obtained. Referring to Fig. 12-2, the velocity and
disr:harge at section 1 are as.sumed as V and Q and at section 2 as 11 - t. V 1
and Q - t-.Q. The momentum lost because of diminished discharge
may be taken as w t-.Q (V - Q V /2)/1}. Adding this lost momentum to
the momentum at section 2, and following the procedure described for II
the flow with increasing discharge, the equation for numerical integration
can be shown to be

(12-40)

Owing to the variable velocity distribution in the channel cross section,

the value of the energy coefficient may be very high. According to
Schmidt [251, values up t.o 1.30 have been observed at the beginning of
the spillway, and even higher values were found at the end of the spillway
crest. By experimental study, Schmidt Was able to develop an adjust-
ment procedure to correct fOI' the effect of the nonuniform velocity
distribution.
The value,of 6.Q in Eq. (12-4:0) is the discharge over the spilhvayper
6.xof the crest length. :Nfany formula.'3 have been proposed for its deter-
mination. For practical. purposes, the formuh\ for. the regular weir of
similar crest shape may be used if the corresponding discharge coefficient
is reduced by 5 %.
12-5,' The Isoclinal Method, For a simple but approximate computa-
tion of a flow profile, a graphical method suggested by Werner [39J may
be used. By this method the spatiaIly-varied-fiowequation iIi any form
is plotted with y against z for different values of dy/dx aspararneters,
i'esulting in a numb'el' of isoclinal curves (Fig. 12-9). Starting from the
depth at the control sectioll C, aline is drawn with a slope (= 0.03) equal
to the average value of dy/d.'1; (= 0.05) indicated by the isoclinal curve
passing through the control depth and dy/dx (= 0.01) of the next isoclinal
curve, which the line interdects at P. Starting at P,' repeat the procedure
to determine P', and determine similarly other P9ints of intersection.
,The flow profile is the curve joining all the points of; intersection. Actu-
')
i
x, II
FIG. 12-9, Comput,2.tion of flow pro51e by the isoclinal method.
to experimental data by Izzard [41]. For flow on a Toad surface, a com-
prehensive analysis was performed by Iwagaki [42].
For practical purposes, all approximate equation for discharge of
\
surface flow is generally assumed, s11ch as
(12-41)
q = leY'"
whereq is the discharge per unit width of the flow, y is the depth of flow at
the point of outflow, aild k and, m are constants. At equilibrium condi-
tioll, the discharge q at a point x distance below the drainage divide is
q = xq* (12-42)
where q* is the constant inflow dne to rainfall excess, or s,upply rate, per
unit area. The rainfall excess is equal to rainfall minus infiltration and
other losses that will not become surface runoff. Combining the above

.'. .~ ..
i
Iy.

348 GRADUALLY VARIED FLOW SPATIALLY VARIED FLOW 349

two equations and simplifying,
y (12-43)
This is the eguation for the flow profile, which is generally applicable when
x is not too iarge. The value of k has to be determined experimentally
since it depends 011: the surfaoe charaoteristics, slope, type of flow, and
viscosity (in the.case of laminar flow). The value m depends on the type
of flow; it is approximately % fqr turbulent and 3 for laminar.
For tmbulent flow, the differential equation for the surface flow, from
Eq. (12-4), may be written .
dy
(12-44)
dx
'I"here F2 V 2 /gY. If the raindrop momentum is ignored it can be
shown that the coefficient 2 in the numeraotor will becom~ 1 [of. Eq. (12-8)].
For analytical studies, the profile of the surface flow can be computed by
the method of numerical integration. The control section of the flow
profile can be uetermined by the method of singular point or by a criterion
developed by Keulegan [43].
For laminar flow on a road surface, I wagaki [<12] has performed a.n
elaborate matherna~ical analysis, in which the continuity and momentum
equations are applied to n, three-dimensional element of the flow .. By
consielering a, general case in w.Uich the velocity D,nd depth of the flow do
not change in the longituuinal direction of the road surface. he was able
to derive a differential equation as follows: ' ·IJl'eferable;
ely Fl
(12-45)
ilx - F~
3. The depth is theoreticnJly constant when the transverse profile of
the road is a parabola with its vertex at the crown, that is, when n = 2.
When the road surface is formed by straight lines connecting the crown
and the' that is, when n 1, the depth becomes smaller near the
crown and greater toward the sides.
4 .. The effect of the longitudinal slope on mean velocity and friction
velocity is to increase the l11.ean velocity and the friction velocity of the
fl0W. This effect is greater near the crown of the road for larger nand
greater neal' the sides for smaller n.
~.~.------- L -----
;Fm. 12-10. Cross section of road for surface-flow analysis.
5. The effect of the longitudinal slope is practieally negligible \vhcn this
slope is very say, less than 0.002 under the normal condition of
H/L 0,02.
6. In order to minimize erosion due to raindrops on unpaved road
surf!:we, the -iongitl2dinal slope should be kept as small as possible.
To maintain a unifol'm gra.de of erosion, a cross section witl1 n = 1 is
PROBLEMS
12-1. A rectangular wash-water trough 20 it long a.nd 1.32 ft wid~ l)<1rries a dis-

where (r)"-l p
charge at· a slope of 0.065 to a. free-fall outlet. If the measured upstream depth is
0.34 ft, I)ompute the discharge by means of the chart in Fig. 12-4.
!. 12-2. An formula for calculating the discharge capacity of rapid sand-
6q.2X
and - --g;;2 filter wash-water tronghs,has been developed by Miller [Ill by asSuming a parabolic
flow profile at a maximum discharge. The formula is
The notation is given in 12-10. The transverse profile of the road Q "'"' 1.91b(y.. -+ L tan 8) (12-46)
surface is represented by y -H{x'/L)1t. Equation (~2-45) was then where b is lhe width of the rectangular channel in ft, y .. is the upstream depth in H,
applied to a numerical example, and fio,,, profiles were computed by the L is the channel length in ft, and IJ is the angle that the channel bottom makes with
isoclinal met.hod. From this investigation, the following conclusions the horizontal. Using this formula, compute the discharge required in Prob. 12-1.
were obtained: 12-3. A rectangular wash-water trough 30 ft long is required to ·cal'l'ya discharge
1. 'The flow profile is independent of the longitudinal slope of the road of 8 cfs, having a free fall at the outlet. Design the trough for the least o.mount of
material required fOT theconstl'uction·(neglecting the end wall and making the total
1 surface. wall and bottom wall of the channel a minimum). Assume:
I· 2. In case of natural runoff, the flow profile is approximately repre-
senteel by the .curve dy/dx· 0 except for the part neal' the crown of the a. A horizontal channel
I road. a. That the channel has a slope
j

350 GRA.DUALLY VARIED FLOW
12-4. Compute el;e flol\' profile in Prob. 12~1. Assume
a. A horizontal channel
b. A channel with slope equal to 0.0(35
12-5. Derive the equation of the flow profile in Example 12-2 if a is not equal to
unity.
12-6. A horizontal bottf)In rack made of perfor:ttcd screr.r, is. designed to divert
water from a channel . . Determine the length of the rack req1:lired to withdraw the
total main .fioll' of 26 ds from the channel. Given:. = 0.5, e = 0.8, c' = 2.80,
b = 3 ft, and y,/E = 0.60.
12-7. Solve tb.e preceding problem if the rack i~ Illade of pam!lel bars.
12-8. A side weir is ased to ciivert the excess of a storm flow of 75 cfs from >\ 'IS-in.-
diameter sewer. The sel'!er has a grade of 1 in 400,a iull·flow eapacity of is cis, and
an unrestricted outlet. The dry-weather flow is 5 cis. Detimnine (a) the height of
the weir sill, and (b) the lengt.h of the weir, assuming a = 1. It is ,.Iso assumed that
tile top width of the water s.re:t is const2.nt and equal to the diameter of the sewer; so
the equations derived for recta.ngular channals can be applied.
12-9. Solve the preceding problem if '" = 1.20.
12-10. By converting increments to differentials, show that Eq. (12-35) is ident.ical
with Eq. (12-4). . 11. C. N. Miller: An appro:o::irnate·formula for calculat.ing the design capacit.y of rapid
12-11. Determine the control section in EX!l.mple 12-4 by the method of .~ingular
point. . .
12-12. Demonstrate analytically tha.t Rinds's method for the determmatlOn of
control section is identical with the method of singular point.
12-13. C~mpllee the flow profile in the channel described in Example 12-4 carrying
a varying discharge of 50 cfs per foot of ch!l.nnellength. . 13. Hubert Engels: Mitteilungen (HIS dem Dresclener Flussbau-Laborat.oriUll1 (Report
12-14. Compute the flow profile in Example 12-4 by the isoc!inalmethod.
12-15. Verify Eq. (12-40).
12-16. Shol~ that the flow in a rectangular prismatic channel with a lateral spill-
way may be expressed by
,----zy
Q -= b \) (Hy' -- 1/3) ~ (12-47)
where b is the channel width, y is the depth, H is the constant energy head in th.e spill-
way section measured above tile channel bcittom, and a is the energy coefficient:
12-17. Artificial rainfall of a constant intensity "qual to 3.6 in./hr is applied on a
concrete pavement ha.ving a slope of 0.0'.1 and a roughness coeffkient n = 0.025.
Compute the flow profile, ignoring the raindrop momentum. Assume that:
a. The lower end of the pavement is a free-fall outlet.
b. Ther~ is a dam % in. nigh at a dista.nce of 5 ft from the lower end of the pavement.
REFERENCES
1. Julia.n Hinds: Side channel spillways: Hydraulic theory, economic factors, and
. e)cperiment.al determination' of losses, TTansactions, American Society of Civil
Enr;ineers, vol. 89, pp. 881-927, 1926.
2. H. Favre: "Contribution o.l'etude des courants liquides" ("Contribution to the
Study of Flow of Liquid "), Dunod, Paris, 1933. . . 18. B. Gentilini: Ricerche sperimentali sugli sfioratori longitudinali (Experimental
3. E. Meyer-Peter and Henry Favre: Analysis of Boulder Dam spillways made by
Swiss laboratory, Engineering Ne1J)s7Record, vol. 113, no. 17, pp. 520-522, Oct.
25, 1934.
-I
SP_~TrALLY VARIED FLOW 351
4. Thomas R. Camp: Lateral spillway channels, Tmnsactions, Am.eric<l.n Society of
Civil Engineers, vol. 105, pp. 6C6:-6i7, 1940.
5. Wen-Rsiung Li: Open channels with nonl1niform discharge, Transactions, Ameri-
can Society of Civil Engineers, vol. 120, pp. 255-274, 1955.
6. G. De Marchi: Canali con portatll progressivament.c crescente (Chs.nnels with
increasing discharg~), L' Energia dettriea, lIfilano, vol. 18, no. 6, Jlp. 351-360,
July,. 1941; reprinted as Is{.it,~to di ldra1LlicCL e Costruzioni ldrauliche, Alilano,
Memorie e stlLdi No. 45, 1941.
7. Duilio Citrini: Canali rettangola,ri con'portata e larghezza, gmdualmente variabili
(Rect.angular chaunels with gradually va.rying discharge and width), L'Elwrgia
elett)'ica, l11ilano, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 254-262, May, and no. 6, pp. 297-301, June,
Hl42; reprinted !IS lstiluto di Idmulicc e Costnlziorii ldmulicite, MilaM, lvlemorie
e stud·, No. 52, 1942. .
8. Philipp Forchheimer; "Grundriss cI~r Hydraulik" ('IOutlin~ of Hydra.ulics "),
Teubner Verlagsgesellschaft, Leipzig and Berlin, 1920, pp. 93-95.
9. Armin Scholditsch II Handbuch des Wasserbaues" ("Handbook of Hydmulic
Engineerir.g"), Springer-Verlag, Vienna, 1950, vol. 1, pp. 136-142.
10. K. Rilding; Bcij: Flow in roof gutters, Journal of Research, U.S. N ali[t/~al B1l1'eall
of.Standards, voL 12, no. 2, pp. J93-213, February, 1934.
sand filter wash watel- trottghs, app<mciix B in J. W. Elhns: "'Vater PurificnLiQn,"
McGraw-Hili. Book Company, Inc., New York, 1928.
12. M. F. Stein: The design of wash water trou~;hs for mpid sand filters, J01lTnal,
America.n }Vaier WOl'ks Association, voL 13, pp. 411-415. Discussion by Clifford
N . .[I.liller, pp. 415-417, 1925.
1
of the Dresden Hydraulic Laboratory), Zei(8chrift des Vereins dB!ltscker lnr;o7t1:-
citre, Berlin, vol. 6!,l, nn. 24, pp. 362-.:s65, Jun~ 15; no. 25, pp. 387-390, June 22;
!
no. 2(3, pp. 412-416, June 29,1918; tlnd vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 101-106, Jan. 31,1920,
also Forschllllgm,.beiten auf dam Gebiete des I 1!>JenieuTwe~ens, Berlin, nos. 200 and
201, 55 pp., 1917. 1I.
14. G. S. Coleman and D(~lilpstcr 'Smith: The discharging c~"pacity of side weirs,
lnstil.ution of Civil Engineers, LondO'll, Seleeied Engin~,;ring Papar~, No. G, 1923.
1.5. Philipp Forc·hheim.~r, "Hydraulik" ("Hydraulics"), Teubner Verla.gsgesdlschJ.ft,
Leipzig and -Bm'lin, 3d cd., 1930, pp. 406-409. .
16. G. De Marchi: Saggio di teona del funzionamento degli stramazzi lateraJi ·1
(Essay ·of the performance of lateral lVelrs), L' Enc,.gia electrica, 11:[ ilano, vol. 11,
no. 11, pp. 849-860; November, 1934; reprinted as I stitllto di ldraulica e Coslruzioni
ldrauliche, Milano, Mamorie e studi No. 11, 1934..
17. G. De. Marchi: Profili longitudinuli della superficie lib era delle correnti permanenti
lineari con port,a.ta progressivamente crescente 0 progressivumente decrescentf!
entro can ali dt sezione costante (Longitudinal flow profiles of linea.r steady flow
with increasing discharges or d"creasillg disclIarges in prisma.tic cha.nnels), Ri~erca
scieniifica. e ricostruzion.e, Rome, nos. 2 and 3, pp. 202-216, February-March,
1947. Also published as Des formes de la surface libre de courants permanents
avec debit progressivement croissant (ItI progressivement decroissr,nt dans Ull
canal de section constante, Revue g~ntrale de I' hydraulique, Paris, vol. 13, no. 38,
pp. 81-85, 1947.
researches on side weirs), L' Energia elctt1:ic~, .Milano, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 583-595,
September, 1938; reprinted as lsti/'4/0 di I draulica t; Costruzioni ldrauliche," :Milano,
Memorie e studi No. 65, 1938. .
1
I
I!
~-

3;)2 GRADUALI,Y v ARum FLOW SPATIALLY VARIED FLOW

19. H. Favre: Sur ip.s lois regissant Ie nlouvement des flu ides dans les conduites en J. Orth, E. Chardonnet, and G. 1'I~ynareli: Etude des gri1~es paul' pris~s d'eau cl.u
, charge avec }l.<lducLioll Io.terale (On the laws governiilg the flow in :CDnduits with 37. type "en dessous" (Study of bottonl'type W[I,ter-intake gmls), La Houdle blanche,
iaterai disciwrgej, Rev1,e '((niver-selle des mines, Liege, vol. 13, sel'. 8, no. 12, ,pp. G'renoble 9th Yf .. 110. 3, pp. 343-·351, June, 1954. , .
502-512, December, 1937. 38. Josef Fr~nk: Hydraulisch~ Untersucbungen. fUr das TiTOler Wehr (Hyc\J'aulic
20. W. H. R. Nimmo: Side spillwo.ys for regdating diversion canals, Tmnsactions, B.nalysis for the Tirol weir), DeT Bm!~llgenieuT, BerliIl, vol. 31, no. 3,pp. gO-lOl]
Amel'ica.n Society oj Ci..'il Engineers, vol. 92, pp. 156r-1584, 1928. 1956.' i b' I' I ' .
21. Giorgio Nosedo.: Operution and design of bottom int.ake Tl!.cks, P"oceed-ings of the 39. P. Wilh. Werner: Wasserspiegelberechullg von Kana~en el g elC lmagSlg?l'
6!h Genei'al 'Meet'iny, Intwno.tional A.ssociatio'n of Hydrl.LlI/·ic Hesea'rch, The Harjue Bewegung lind veranderlichcl' Wassennenge (ComputatIOn of .water surface Il1
i955, vol. 3, pp. Cl7-1 to Cl7-ll, 1955; repTinttd flS Ist'Unto di ldm'alica e Cosln!- channels wi.th steady flow aad variable discharge), Dte Bautechmk, Berilll, vol. 1[),
.ioni IdmuliciJ.e, Milario, 11femorie e stud'i No. 130, 1956. ' 110.23, pp. 251-252, May 30, 1941. ' , . " .
22. Giorg-io Noseda: Correnti perinanenti con port,.to. progressi'lamente dec\'escente, 40. G. H. l{euleg[l,u: Spatially variiLble discharge over a slopmg plane, 'lransacltons,
defluenti su gl'iglie eli fondo (Steady flow with graduallydecl'easing discharges on Arnorican Geophysical Union, pt. VI, pp. 955-959, 1944. . '.
bottom intake mcks), L' En~r(riu. eleU'ricu. r l"'filatl,(J, vol, 33, no. 1, pp. 41-51, January, 41. C. }'. Izzard: The surface-pn)file of overllJ.nd flow, Transaclwns, Amenca.n Geo-
10.56; reprilltecl as Istituto di Idmul'ica e Costr,,~'ion'i Idra1l/i"h6, 1I1'iiano, Memorie e physical Union, pt. VI, pp. (J59-968, 1944. . ' .,.
8t1l(/;i No. 132, Hl56. 42. Yuichi Iwagaki; Theory of flow on road Eurface, Jl;ie7ll0lrS of the Faculty OJ EngmcBr-
23. Giorgio, Noscda: Corrt!!'.ti permanenti eon portat<t prllgressivament,e decrescente, ing, Kyoto Ur..il,ersity, Japan, vol. 1~, no. 3, pp. 139-14:, JulY~ 1951. . ,
defiuellti su griglie di fondo: Riee:-c!1, sperimentale (Steady flow with gr!l.duo.Uy ~,3. Garbis H. '1Celliegan; Determination of critical depth III sp[l,tl.all y varw,b~e flow,
decl'eMing discharge on bottDm intake racks: Experims:nt!l.1 results), L'E?w·yia Proceedings of the !lid Midwestern. Conference of Fluid Mechamcs, The Ohto State
eieUriCll., !lIilano, vol. 33, no. (1, pp.565-588, June, 1956; Teprinted as ]:;!ituio di University, ETl.gineeTing Experiment Station, Bulletin 149, Septem.her, 1952, pp.
Id"a'ltb!ca e Cosln,~ioni IcZrauliche, Alilano, il-lemo1'ie e St'lldi !'lo. 13,J, 1950. 57-80.
24. Martin Schmidt: Zur Frage des Abflusses liber Streichwehre (Dlseharge \lver side
weirs), Tecfmische Un'ilJel'si~{;U Be1'l'in-CharlaUenb1Lrg, Ins/itut jiil', Wasse"bau,
Milteihmg 41, 19M.
25. 1\'h\1'tin Schmidt: Die Bel'echnung von Streichwehren (Computation of side
weirs), Die Wasserwir!schaft,Stuttgart, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 06-10,0, January, 1955.
26. Martin Schmidt: "Gerinnehydraulik" ("Open-channel Hydraulics"), VEB
Verlag Technik, Berlin, and Banverlag GMBH, Wiesbaden, 1957, pp. 188-19B.
27. M. A. Mostkow: "Handblch der Hnlraulik" (" Handbook of Hydraulics "), VEE
Verlag' Technik, Berlin, 1956, pp. 21)4-208 and 213-221.
28. Michel A. NIostkow: Sur Ie calcul dcs grilles de prise d'eaa (Theoretical study of
bottom type water in~ake), La Houille blanche, Grenoble, 12th yr., no. 4, pp. 570-
580, September, 1957.
29. Peter Ackers: A theoretical consideration of'aide weirs as storm-water overflows,
Proceedings, Instil.'l1tion of Civil Engineers, London, vol. 6, pp. 250-269, February,
1957. .
30. John WilEam Allen: The dis~harge of w~,ter over side weirs iIl cireular pipes, Pro-
ceedings, Inslitu'ion.of Civil Engineers, London, vol. 6, pp. 270-287, February, 1957.
31. Vincerit Knight Collinge,: The discharge c!l.pacity of side weirs] Proceedings, Insti-
tlltion oj Civil Engineers, London, vol. G, pp. 288-304, February: 1957.
32. Willil1Ln Frazer: Thc behavibur of side weirs in prismatic reCltangular chdnnels,
hoceedin(ls, Instit'lliion of G-ivil Engineers, London, vol. 6, pp. 305-328, February,
1957. ,
33. Ven Te Chow: Discussion of Flood ,protect-ion of canals by lateril spillways by
Harald Tults, paper 1077, Proceedings, American Society of C~vil' Engineel's,
Journal, HydTa11Zics Div'ision, vol. 83, no. H.Y2, pp. 47-49, April, 1957.
34. l!'. Gl1~ot: De Watervang met liggelld rooster (Channel with bottom grid), De
Inveniimr in Nederll;ndsch-Indie, no.:7, 1939.
35. M. B~uvard: Debit d'uIle grille pat en .dessous (Discharge passing through a
bottom griq), La Houille blanche, Grenoble, 8th yr., no. 2, pp. 290-291, May,1953.
,36. J. Kurjtzma~ll and M. Bouvard: Jt~ude theorique des grilles de pri,ses d'eau du
type ':'en dessous" (Theoretical study of bottom-type water-intake grids),
La H ottilie blanche, GreIloble, 9th yr., 'no, 5, pp. 569-574, September-Oc:tober, 1954.
 ~
>
"d
S
l:"'C
~
."

~
)-
~
>-:l
~
>-I
~ ~
t1
~
l.""l
0
~

._ _ L . ,
----
 ).
',.

CHAPTER 13

INTRODUCTION

13-1. Characteristics of the Flow. Rapidly varied flow has yery

pronouncedcurvaturB of the streamlines. The change in curvature mn.y
become so abrupt that the flow profiie isvh'tua.lly broken, resulting ill a
state of high turbulence i this is ro.pidly varied flow of discontinuous pro-
file, of which the hydn\ulic jump is an example.
rvi.ew of the contrast 'vith-g~aried flow, the following
characteristic features of rapidly varied flow should be noted:
1. The CUl'vatUl'e of the flow is so pronounced that the pressure dis-
tribution cannot be assumed to be hydrostatic,
2. The rapid varir.tion in flow regime often takes place in' a reln.t.ively
short Accordingly, the boundary fric:tion, which would play r.
primary role in a gradually varied flow, is comparat.ively small Lmd in most.
cases lU~"iS1UU''''''1""
3, \Vhen rapidly vllJ'ied. fiow occurs in a sudden~transition structure,
characteristics of the flow are basict\lly fixed by the boundary
of the st.ruct.ure as well as by the state of the flow,
When changes in wat.er ~uea occur in l'fI,pidly vD.ried flow I t.he
far ""'""Lr.,,·

. _. ___..::;;- O. 'Eieparation zones, eddies, a.nd rollers that may occur in rapidly
varied flow tend to complicate the flow pattern and to distort. the actual
velocity distribution in the stream. In such cases, the flow is actually
confined by one or more se.e..aration zones I:ather than by solid boundari!"""
13-2. Approach--tontheProbiern. Th~th~ that assumes a parallel
flow wit.h hydrostatic preSSUl'e distribution is known in classic hydraulics
I'
I as the Breslie theory;1 such .a theory is used for uniform flow and gradun.lly
varied flow. This theory, of course, does not n.pply to rapidly varied
floW', even wit.h continuous flow profile, For rapidly varied flow of con-
tinuous fiow' profile, cln.ssic hydraulics has shown that a mathematica.l
equation of the flow can be established on the hasis of an inviscid- (i.e.,
frictionless or nODviscous) n.nd potential-flow condition [1-4]. A direct
1 Thill is 50 called because of. the early contribution by Bresse to the solution of the
d,rnamic equutioll for gradually varied flow (see Exa.mple lO-4).
357
 I
358 RAPIDLY VARIED FLOW INTRODUCTION 359

solution of the mathematical equation will require further knowledge of·
the CUl'vatUI'C of the flow. In·the classic theorll of Boussinesq [5], the
curvature is assumed to illcr'ease ~arly from the channel bed to-.th.e
. cllt'ved flow 8Urrace~ and the problem IS sOlved by the moment.11ill prir_
~-Elt-he theory of Fawer [6], the curvature is assumed to vllry
exponentially with the distance from the channel bed to the free surface,
and the problem is solved by the energy principle. Modern approaches
to the solution of an inviscid potential flow often resort to a graphical
method ~r to a ilUmericnl method of approximation. A popular graphical
method is Row-!let £malysis [7,8}, which was first suggested by Prasi! [9]
and later genel'alizerl BarilIon [10]_ There are many numeTical
methods; of these the method of relaxat.ion [11) is hi~quently used.
The above-mentioned theories and methods of am,lysis for ra.pidly
varied flow with continuolls profile can be found in many hydmulics
textbooks an::! in the references listed here. Despite such developments,
a satisfact.ory general solution of this type of problem has not yet been
obta.ined. Practical hydraulicians, ther.efore, have long ago come to
l'ego.rd the various phenomena of mpidly varied flow as a number of iso-
lated cases, each requiring its own specific empirica;l treatment .. In the
following chapters, trpicai problems of rapidly varied flow are treated
mOl'e or less in this. way. In most cases, the experimental results are to
be used empirically. The physical aspects of the flow will be int.el'-
preted fJ.ualit~f;ivelYJ whenever possible, according to thl') principles of
energy, momentum, and geometry, and sometimes by dimensional.
analysis.
REI<'ERENCES
some permanent flows with curV'sd filaments), thesis, Universite de Lausanne,
Lausanne, Switzerland, 1937. . .
7. H. Alden Foster; Construction of the fiow net for hydraulic design, Transa.ctions,
America,n Soci-.ty of Civit Engineers, vol. 110, pp. 1237-1252, '1945 .
8. E. W. Lane, F. B. Campbell, and W. H.· Price: The flow' net and the electric
analogy, Civil Enqinael'in{/, pp. 510-514, October, 1934.
9. Fnmz Prasil: Uber FHlssigkeitshe\\'egungen in RotationshQhll'i!.umen (On fluid
motion in rotational vacuums), Schweuei-isc/le Buuzeitung, ZUrich, vol. 41, no. 18,
pp. 207,201); no. 21, 233-237; no., 22, 249-251; ·no. 25, 282-283; and flO. 213, 293-
295, May-June, 1903. ·Also, '''l'echo.ische Hydrodynarnik" ("Technical Hydro-
I
.i
dynamics "), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1913, p. 61; 2d ed., 1926, pp_ 2!il-:236.
10. E.G. Barillon: Note sur les ravons de courbure intervenant d&ns la construction
des reseaux hydrodynan~iqlles (Note on the radii of CUl'V'ature invol~ed in the COIl-
struction of hydrodynamic networks), R"uue ge.nerdZe de l'hydrauliqu.e, Paris, vol. 2;
no. 8, pp ••111-415, 1936.
11. John S. r.-IcNown, En-Yun Hsu, and Chio.-Shun Yih: Appli~tions of the relaXll.-
tion .technique in fluid mechanics, TTil1tsQ.c!i01tS, .'imerican Society of Ciliil Enqi-
nee"s, voL 120, pg. 650-669, 1955_
,i
J,

1. Charles Jaeger: "Engineering Fluid Mechanics," translated from the German by

P. O. \:\rolf, Bln,ckie & Son, Ltd., London and Glasgow, 1956, pp. 120-130.
2. Philipp Forchheimer:" Hydraulik" (" HydraUlics "), Teubner Yerlagsgesellschaft,
Leipzig and Berlin, 3d ed., H)30. Sectioll B2, pp, 230-237, is on Boussinesq's
backwater curve with uniform bo·ttom slope,. taking the curva.ture of the flow
filaments into consideration; sec. 83, pp. 237-242, is on Boussinesq's backwater
curve with varying bot,tom slope, surface with undulating bot.tom.
3. Prangoi:; Serre: Contribution a l'etude des ecoulelllents permanents et variables
dans les canaux (Contribution to the study of permanent and nonpermanent flows
in channels), La Honine ~:anche, Grenoble, 8th yr.; 110. 3, pp. 374-388,. June-July,
1953; no. 6, pp. 830-872, pecember, 1953. Differential equations for steady flow, -j
taking into account the effects of stream curvature} are developed a.nd a.pplied to
the determination of /low profiles.
4. Josef lCozeny: "Hydraulik" ("Hydraulics"), Springer-Verlag, VienllR,. 1953,
pp. 46-47 e.nd 229,
,5: J. Boussinesq: sur Ill. thi!orie des. saux courn.ntes (Essay on .the theory of
water flow), Mtmoi"es presenMs par di~'er8 savants d l' Academia dss Sciences, Paris,·
vol, 23, pp. 1-680, 1877; voL 24, no_ 2, 1878.
:6. C. Fawer: :Etude de quelques ecoulements pernHLnents a filets courbea (Study of
 f
~ t
1 FLOW OVER SPILLWAYS 351
j.
I whers 0' is the value of y at x = 0; apparently, C' is equal to the vertical
distance bet'l-y'een the highest point of the nappe and the elevation of the
crest. Eliminating t from the above two equations, dividing each term
CHAPTER 14 by the total head H above the cl'est,and expressing the resulting gellentl
( .equation for the lowel' surJace of the nappe in dimensionless .terms, .
,i

k = A (liY+ B ;
FLOW. OVER SPILLWAYS
+C (14-3)

where it = gH /21)0 2 C05 2 8, B = - tan 8, and C = c' / H. 8illce the hori-

14-1. The Sharp-crested Weir. The sharp-crested 'weir is not only a zontal velocity component is constant, the vertical of the nappe
measuring device for open-channel flow but a.lso the simplest form of over- l' m~.y be assumed constant. Adding a term D T / H to the,above equa-
How spillway. The characteristics of flow over a weir were recognized tion, the general equation for the upper surface of the nappe is
early in hydra.ulics fl.S the basis of design for the round-crested overflow
spillway; that is, the profile of the spillway was determined in conformity (14-4)
wi~h the shape of the. lower surface of the flmv nappe over a sharp-crested
weu·.
The above nappe equations are quadratic; hence, the nappe surfaces are
The shape of the flow nappe over ashal'p-Cl'ested weir can be inter- theoretically parabQlic. .
preted by the principle of the pl'ojectile(Fig. 14-1). According to this , Numerous tests on nappe over a vertical sharp-crested weir have been
made, On the b'asis of data of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation [1], of
Energy liM
Hinds, Creager, and Justin [2,3], and of Ippen [4], Blaisdell [5] has devel-
oped the following equations for the constants ill the general nappe
equations:

A. = -0425 + (l25 t (14-[»)

B 0.411 1.603

C 0.150 0.45 ~
D 0.57 - O.02(10mp exp (lOrn) (14-8)
FIG. 14-1. Derivation Of nappp. profiles over S!larp-,jr~stcd weir by the' principle of where m h;,/H - 0.208, and h. is the velocity head of the apPl'o,\ch
projectile.
Bow, For high w.;;irs, the velocity of appro[\,ch is relatively small and
principlo, it is assumed that the horizontal velocity co~por,ent of the flO\.y call be ignored. Thus, the constants become .4. -0.425, B 0.055 ,
is constant anu that the only fOl'ce acting on tlie nappe is gravity. In C 0.150, and D = 0.559. Experimental data hays, indicated that
! time t, a particle of water in the lower surfl1c~ of the nappe will travel a th~se equations ~re not valid when x/H is leS8 than ab011t 0,5 and that, for
) horizontH.l distance ;1;' from the face of the weir, equal to • h.IH > 0,2, additional data for verification are needed, For xl}! < 0.5,
x voi cos ( J . . (14-1) the preSS1ll'e within the nappe in the vicinity of the weir crest is actually
ab9ve atmospheric because qf the convergence of the streamlines. Con-
~"h~reu~ is the velo~ity at the point where Xi = 0, and IJ is the angle of sequently, forces other tha~ gravity a.t'e acting on ,the nappe, which
mChno.tlon of the velocity Vo with the horizontnl. In the same time t the makes the principle of the Pfojectile invalid. .
particle will t.ravel ~ vertical distance y equal'to )
/ . I It should be noted that tJie above theory anq. equations apply ollly if
Y = -voi sin !J + Yzgt + C'
2
(14-2) the approach flow is sub critical. For supercritical flow, or F > I, t.he·
360
 1
RAPIDLY V AllIED FLOW FLOW OYER ·SpiLLWAYS 363
nappe profile becomes essentially a function of the Fl'O(lde number rather nappe, however, usually occurs in overflow spillways and measul'ingweirs.
than a functiol\ of the boundary geometry as described above [4, p. 633) .. This means a. reduction of pressure beneath the nappe due to the removal
Many experimental formulas for the discharge over sharp-crested weir of air by the overfalling jet. This reduction of pressure will calise
have been developed.! Most such formulas can be expressed in the undesirable effects, such as (1) increase in pressure difference on the spill-
general form.2 way or weir itself, (2) change in the shape of the nappe for which the spill-
Q =. CLHl.i (14-9) way· crest is generally rle"igned, (::\) increase in
discharge, sometimes ac('.ompanied by fluctuation
where C is the discharge coefficient, L is the effective length of the weir or pulsation of the nappe, which may be very
crest, and H is the measured head above the crest, e.tcl1Uling the velocity obi ectionable if the weir or spillway is used fol'
I
!
head. The effective length of the weir may be computed by measuring purposes, and (4) unstable perfoi'rnance
L = L' - O.~NH (14-10) . of the hydraulic model. .
01'. the basis of experimental studies on spillways
where L' is the mea~ured length of the crest and N is the numbet· of con- with gates (Fig. 14;-2), Hickox [l1J developed the
tractions. For two end contractions, N = 2. For one end contraction, following equation giving the quantity of air re-
N == 1. When 110 contractions are present nt the two enus, N = O. quired for aeration in cubic feet per second per foot FIG. 14-2. EXlJerimental
According ~o a well-known weir formuia of Rehbock [10], the coefficient of length of weir; setup for studying fi.era.-
C in Eq. (14-9) is approximatety . tion below the n2.ppe.
(14-13) Dashed lines indica.te
H
C = 3.27 + 0.4011: (14-11) the condition of fun
aeration. (A/tel' G. H.
where H is the mea.~ured head in ftover the top of Hickox [Ill.)
",here h is the height of weir. IVIeasurements by Rouse [4, p: 532] indi- the gate ; p is the reduction of peessure in feet of
cate that this equation holds up to Hlh = 5 but can be extended to water to be maintained beneaththe nappe; and C is a coefficient depend-
H Ih = 10 with f~Lil' approximation. For If Ih greater than about 15, the ing on the ratio of the discharge beneath the gate to the discharge over \
.I
weir becomes a sill, and the discharge is controlled by a critical section . the top of the gate. The ratio is represented by a dimensionless value
immediately upstream from the sill. The critical depth of the section is
approxim.ately equal to H + h. By· the critical depth-discharge r,~la­ (14-14)
tiol1snip, it oan be shown that the coeffir.ient C is )

+ hH)!.6
where y is the height of the opening below the gate in it and H" is the head
C = (
5.68 1 (14-12) on t.he center of t.he gate in ft. for 1.1ngated weir or spillway, (f = O.

The transition between weir and sill (betw~en Hlh = 10 and 15), how-
The va.lues of C are as follows: . .\
'-1-.5-1 ..~1 2.5+
I
" I 0
ever, has not yet been clearly defined. .
Experiments have shown that the coefficient C' in Bq. (14-9) remains .-.-c-/ 0.077
0.5
0.135
\ 1 0
0.175.[0.202 I 0.220 0.225
approximately constant for sharp-Grested well'S under varying heads if
Intermediate values can be interpola.ted from a cUl've constructed with
the nappe is' aerated.
the above va.lues.
14-2. Aeration of the Nappe. In the preceding article the ovedalling
. 14-3. Crest Shape of Overflow Spillways. Early crest shapes were
nappe is considered aerated; that, is, the tIpper and lower napp'e surfaces
usually based On :i simple parabola designed to fi~ thE; trajectory or Hie
are subject to full atmospheric pressure. Insufficient aeliationbelow the
falling nappe, as already described in Art. 14-1. From 1886 .to 1888
IFor a genera) description of shnrp-crested-weir experiments and formulas, see [6J. Bazin [12] made the first comprehensive lahoni.tory investigation of nappe
For further studies. of the discha.rge characteristics of sha.rp-crested weirs, see [71
shapes. The,use of Bazin's data in design will produce a crest shape that
a.nd [81.
2 Th.e derivation of Il theoretical weir-discha.rge formula. ca.n tie found in ma.ny
coincides with the lower surface of an aerated nappe over a shmp:-crested
hydra.~lics textbooks. The first mathematica.! analysis on discharge of weirs was weir. Theoretically, the adoption of such a profile, generally kilown as
performed by Boussinesq [9]. the Bazin profile, should cause no negative pressures on the crest. Under

..
 FLOW OVER SPILLWAYS 365
364 RAPIDLY VARIED FLOW
For intermediate slopes, approximate va-lues of I( and n may be obt~ined
actual conditions, however, there exists friction due to roughnes.'!! on the.
by plotting the ,11bove values the correspqn~ing slopes a~ld ,mter-
( surfi1ce of the I;;pillw2,Y. Hence, negative on such a profile
polating from the plot the required values for any given slope wlthm the
cannot be avoided. The presence of negative pressures will lead to
danger of cavit<1tion dama,ge. In selecting a suitable profile, avoidance plotted range. . . .
\ The upstream face of the spillway crest may sometllnes be deslgned to
of negativ6 pressureS should be considered an object-ive, along with such
Eet back, as shown by the dnshed lines in The shape of the crest
other fadors as maximum hydl'aulic efficiency, pr~.cticability, stability,
1 n.nd economy. ConsequeJ1'~ly, the Bazin profile hus been variously modi-
fied, and many o~her profiles for design purposes have been proposed. l
From 1932 to 1948, ext.ensive experiments on the shape of the nappe
over a sharp-crested weir wete conducted by the U.S. Bureau of Recl:1ma-
tion. 2 On the basis of experimental data including B".zill'S, the Bureau
hn.s developed coordinates of nappe surfaces for vertical and various slope-
faced weirs. This information is indeed invaluable for accurate an[\,lys(3
and precise of SpillWity overflow sections .. For practical purposes,
how~ver, t,his infol'llll.lGion can bo usedrnore simply without essential loss
of ace\U'acy, thrQugh modifications that wiil be described below:
On the basis of the Bureau of Reclama.tion data, the U.S. Army Corps
I of Engineers hn.s rleveloped sever<11 sta.ndal'd shapes at its Watel'ways
I Experiment Station. Such . 14-3), designated as the WES
lltandal'd spillway shapes,3 can be by the following eq llntion:
y (14-15)
where X and Yare coordinatei.l of the crest profile with the origin ::It t,he
highest point of the crest, He is the design head e:cch~din(J the velocity head
of the [\,pproach flow, and IC and n nre parmneters depending 011 the slope
of the upstream face. The values of J( [,nd n fl.re given as follows:
Slope of ups/rem" fave K n
VerticaL ............ 2.000 1.850
3· on 1.. . . . . . . . . . . .. 1.936 1. 836
3011:2 ...........•.. 1.939 1.810
3 on :1. . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1. 873 1.776
~ EKamples of othel' well-known pmfile;; a;:8 (1) the CreG.ge,· profile [13) developed FIG. 14-3 .. The WES-standard spillway shapes. (U.S. A"my Engineel's Wa;~e1"lDa.ys
from a mathematica.l extension of Ba.iH's data, (2) the modified CnilJ.gcr profile [21 Experiment Slatioll.)
based on t"e U.S. Bmeau of Reclaniatioll dfJ,tn from Di!m-er tests [II, (3) the LClnB-
Davill projile [l4J Q!lsed on the U.S. Bure!L\\ of Reciall1aLicn data from Fort Collins will not be affected materially by such details, provided the modification
tesLs'[l] and the datn of Bazin [12] ,l,nd Scimel11i [15], t4) theSci·,.i;emi profile l151, (5)
with at least one-ha.lf the total head H. vertically below the origin
the SmetmtCl Ill)], (!l) the J)¢ Marchi profile [17J, and (7) ~he Escande profile. [18] ..
For" good of various well-known profiles, see \19]. of coordinates. This is because the vertical velocities are srrmll below
• See. [11. The main project WIlS sta.rted in 1936, nnd the test.s were conducted in depth and the con:esponding effect on nfl.ppe profile. is negligible.
the Bureau's Hydl·ll.ulic Laboratory in Denver, Colo. Earliee experiments conducted Discharge of the Overflow Spillway. The dl~charge over a
by the Burea.u were performed in H)32 at the Colorado Agricultural Experbllent Sta- spilllVay can be computed by an e~ttation in the fo:'m ~f Eq. (14-9), Ilor
tion,' Fort Collins, Colo. The former are usually referred to as the Den.ver tests, the
btter as the Port Collins tests.
spillways designed for the WES shapes, the equatlOn IS
'From [20],· Hydraulic Design Charts: Ill-I, WES 4-1-52; and· 111-7 to 111-9, . (14-16)
WES 2-54. The development of the WEB standard shapes is described. in [21].
366 RAPIDLY VA.RIED FLOW
whel:e H. is the total energy head on the crest in ft, 'inclUding the velCl()ity
head in the "pproach chani1el. Model tests of the spillways have shown
that the effect of the approach velocity is negligible whim the height II of
tho spillway is greater than 1.33H,!, where Hd is the design head excluding
the approach velocity head. Undel' this condition and with the design
1.3
1.04
FLOW OVER SPILLWAYS 367
to show the effect of the approach velocity on· the relationship between
H.!~ld and C/Cd for spi.lIways d€;si~l1ed for WES shapes having vertical
upstrea,m face. For spIllways havmg sloping upstream face, the value
of a can be c.arre.cted approximately for the effect of the upstream-face
slope ~y m?-itlplymg C ~y a correction factor obtained from the attached
chart 111 !lg. 14~4. ThIS correction was developed from the Bureau of
I
ReclamatIOn da.ta flJ.

1.03 1.2

.......
0 1.02 lot Hd " 17.7'

.E
u
EJ. 983.:.3i~~,.;..;....."._
c: 1.01 3.54
r r
.o:!
of-
v 8.95' '.6S
::'
15 1.00 23
u
r.... Axis of
0.99
crest

/ ....
0.98
0.2 0.4 O.S 1.0 1.2 Point of to;;;e.1CY
X=35.9' Y=:3-2.7'
0.6
Ha~veloclty head
Hdd design head e~clucinil Ha
0.5 H.: total head in~ll.dlng Ha
Ha 1 -- .
0.4 HdI_
E1.

0.\ 1---1--:7""'1
FIG. 14-5. Design of an overflow-sp.illway section: I
a
0.70 0 •.80 0,85 0.90 0.95 1.00 a~x:am~le 14-1: Detcr~ine the crest elevat.ion and the shape of an overJlow-spill.
C/Cd in which Cd 4,03 l~ .sect!O? havmg a. vertloal upstren.m face and a cres~ length of 250 ft The d ;
discharge 15 75 000 cfs Th t . , . as.gn
1 000 0 d h' . e ups ream water surface at design discharge is at El .
FIQ. 14-4: Hllad-discharge relation for WES-etandard spillway shapes. , . .an t 0 avera~e channel floor is at EI. 880.0 (Fig. 14-~) .
h' I · fl'l1
r 1'bl8 •;\sSltffiing
Sol,l!MIl.
d a 0 .
a 19l Over ow BpI way, the effect of approach vclocity is
n(:goalgx 2"Oa)n ~ d = 4,03. By the discharge equation, H.u = QICL = 75 0001
. head (that is, h/Hd greater thanL33 and H, Hd, for the approach
.velocity head is negligible) the coeffidentof discharge C has been found to
i
. 0 = /4,1 and H, = 17.8 f t . '
The approach velocity is V = 750001(250
I ' t h d' H' a. I .,' X ~
' 20) .
)
= 2.5 fps, and the COrrespond-
!
be Cd. = 4.03. ng :e OOlJ as. IS a ':" 2.5'/217 = 0.1 ft. Thus, .the design head is Hd _ 17.8
In low spillways with hiEd < 1.33, the approach velocity will have 0.1 - 17. ( it] and the height of the dam is h "" 120 17.7 = 1023 ft Th' h' ht'
IS greater thai 1 33H d' . . IS eIg ,
appreciable effect upon the discharge or the discharge coefficient and, ' ' I I . . d! an , ll~nce, tIle. effect of approach velocity is negligible. '
. B Th e ares!; e_evatlO n ls.at 1000.0 .~ 17.7 "= 982.3. . .
consequently, upon the 1U1PP';) profile.' A dimensionless plot (Fig. 14-4) y Eq. (14 15), tbe C,Est shape IS expressed by}' X 1•• s/23 C d' .~ f tl
based on the data of the Waterways Experiment Stl.).tion [20] cn,n be used shupe t d b hi . . oor Ina""s 0 1e
compu e y T, S equatIon tHe plotted as shown in Fig. 14-5.. The crest shupe
 368 RAPIDLY VARIED FLOW FLOW OVER SPILLWAYS 369
upstrCftm from the orir~in of ~!le coordinates is constructed accordin~ to the d.imensiorus head is greater thp.ll about twice the height oLthe spillway above the
recommended in the chart of Fig. 14-3. The design of the straight portion ,0£ th~ upstream bed.. Such spillways are often found in earth dams.
spillway sudacebdow the crest section depends ~n the stability requireme;ut and 011 In using the Br:dley curve, it is necesilary to' know the coofficient of
the features of the sti;Iing basin at the toe of the spl11w!l.Y. Aslope of 0.0: lis assumed
discharge for the design head. If this coefficient is unknowl1, but the
for the straight pOl·tioll of the downstream spillway surface.
spillway shape 18 given, 11 method 1 suggested by Buehlel' (23] may be used.
14-0. Rating of Overflow Spillways. ThE:; profile of an overflow B'T this method,' based on an equation derived by BrudeneU the
way can be designed fol' one head only. This head is the' design head, c~e:ffici6nt of discharge is computed by the ~q'.lation
which genel'ally procbuces s. lower nappe of flow that 8,grees closely with . . (He)V'12 (H-17)
. the spillway profile. The spillway, however, must a,lso operate under C = 3.97 JJ;,;
~ other heads, either lower or higher than the design head. For lower
where H, is all operating head and HDis the theoretical design head,
I heads the pressure on the crest will be. above atmosph~ric but still les:i!
including tho approach velocity hea-d, for a standard profile havh1g a
th.anl~ydl'ostat.ic. For higher heads, on the other hand, the pl'essu~e w~n
be lower than atmospheric, and it may become so low that separatlOn ~lr
flow will occur. Model experiments indicate, however, that the design
.S
head may be sufely exceeded by at
Vi
, . . 1.B least 50%; b~yond this, harmful cavi- :;:
u
I a;
tation may develop [4, p. 535J . -!'.
,6
For spillways designed for WES 3<
o
ru
shapes, the curves given in Fig. 14-4 .0
.,
I
I can be used to deten:nine the coeffi- '"co
I cient, of dischai'ge for heads otherthah -;;
'6
!.
,
, the design head. ThllS, a rating 40~---4-~-4-----i-~4-~-4----1

curve of the spillway can be

0.8 I, .--1-----
-t 17:~-~l-- cbll1puted.
::I'"
O,5,~ ~/ 1"0;: spillwo.ys designed for other HodlOplOi distance from the cr~st in U

OAI--~:':-:I~I 73'
''"" shapes, Bradley [22] has developed ~,
FiG. 14-7. Stand~rd spillwa.y :3hapes for different valuesof H D • (After B. Buehler [23J.)
universal curve (Fig. 14-6) showing
0.2~~~1 the relationship between FI ,/H D p.nd vertical upstl'eam face. it should be noted that II D is the theoretical
I •I C/C D • The term HD is the design design head of the standard profile for which the Brudenell eqtmtion was
015 0.80 O_BS 0.90 Q.95 1.·)0 !.O~ 1.1'; head including the approach velocity.
Volue of Ihe 'Olio clc o developed; therefore, it may not be equal to the actual design head used
head, and CD is the corresponding
I\ FlG. 14-6, Coeffident of discharge of . coefficient of dil:charge. The term
by Bradley or defined for other profiles.
The valtte of HD may be obtaiu.ed from a chart (Fig. 14-7) showing the
f overflow spillways for other than the He is the total head other thaD. the
design head: (t1fl~r J. N. Br,~dley . d standard profiles. The profile of the given spillway as.desiglled or built is
(22].) , design head, and C i~ ·the corre~pon - firfit drawn on a piece of transparent paper on the same sc:ale as the sto.nd7
. ing discharge coefficient this curve ard profiles. This paper lS laid over the chart; then the value of Ii D
i~ well supported by tests of some 50 overflow spillway crests .of variot~s associated with the standard profile that gives the best fit is selected. F01'
shapes and operating conditions. It can be used to coltlputeapproxl- a. given profile, the H D values that give the best fit may be different on the
the'mting Clll'ves of most overflow spillways. upstream and downstream sides. The higher of the two indicated v.alues
The dashe.d curve'in Fig .. 14-6, supported by date, from 29 exIsting spill- of lIo $ould be used. FQrexample, the profile of a spillway is shown by
ways, applies to spillwttys with overfal! suppressed. This is rile type ~f the dashed line on the chart.' The higher value of HD is approximately,
spillway the fiow over which is affected by downstream cha~mel condi- 45 ft, 0!l the upstream side, of the crest. ,
tions' it odcurs when the'downst:ream slope i~ flat and the approach depth 1 A method for the sawe purpose is also proposed by Bra.dley [22]; this Inechod DJs
is shdllow. The spillway in such a hase is usually so low that the design , the giveri profile to existi'ng profiles of known dischll.Cge coefficient.

I '
 1
370 RAPIDLY VARIED FLOW
1
FLOW OVER SPILL'\.I'AYS 371
Using the chart and Eq. (14-17), the rating curve of. a spillway of given COO.ft'O!NATE'~ Fan. U1>?ER N A.PPln W'J,:Tn No Pume •.
profile can be cumputed; ,
H IH; '0.50 11:1 IRa - 1.00 : HIll. c 1.33 '
According to comparisons with actu,al model tests, both the Bradley , X Ill. 1 }'iil, ,X/H.', Y/ X/lid Y/H.
and Buehler methods have been shown ~,o give highly'accurate
at all but very low heads. At low heads of 5 ft or so, the computed dis-
--=!.O
-O.ll
1- .4!lol-=t:or::. o.
0 -1. 0
-0.484:,1-0.81-0.9115 -0.8 -1.185
1:210
.-0,0 i-OA75 -0.6 -Q.893 -O.G -1.151
charge may be as low as 8% below the actual value. For pra.ctical pur- -0.4 '1-0.460 -0.4 -0.865 -0.4 -1.UO
pOSGS, however, both methods fire sufficiently accurate.
14-13. Upper Nappe Profile of Flow over Spillways. The shape of
-0.2
0.0
0.2
l
:-0.425: -O.21-0.S21i -0.2, ,1,,-'1.01;0
:-0. 3n 0.°,-0.7551 0.0:.,1-1.000
'-0.300, 0.2, -0.681. 0.2 '-0.019 l
upper nappe profile of flow over 8 spillway crest is significant in the desigu
0.4
0.6
o,s,'
-0.2001 0.'1,-0,580, 0.41-0.821
1-0.075 0,61-0,465; 0.6 -0.71)5 'I
of spillway abutment Ivalls and for the selection of pivot elevation ot, 1.0
0.015, 0.81-0.320[ 0.81",-0.569
0.258, LO -0.145 l.O'-OAlI
tainter The WES shapes for high overflow spilhlrays with vertical 1.2
1.4"
0.470
0.7051
1.2 0.055, 1. 2 0 >220
1"1
0.29{j 1.4 :"'0,002
1.-
upstream face have been investigated, using model by the U.S. 1.6, 0.972. 1.6 0 ..;!l3, 1.0 0.240
Army Engineers Waterways Experimant Sta.tiOll. Figure 14-8 shows the 1.8 i 1. 269[ L~~!~l:~ 0.5$1
• Baaed on CW 801 t •• 1rs for negligible v.looioy
shapes and coordinates X r;,nd Y of the upper nappe profile obtained from of a-pprnne h. .
such tests for negligible approach velocity, fo], conditions with and with- COO1lDINATEB FOR UpP£n NAPPE A~ CENTER Ll,i'iE
OF BAY W1Tii 'tYPE 2 I'lER5~
out piers, and for three different head ratios. The tenn Hd is the design
he!'.d excluding t.he velooity head, and H is the operating head other tha:n
the design head, also excluding the velocity head. Profiles for inter- -1.0 -1.230
mediate head mtios may be interpolated .. Owing to thecontrac~ion ,-O,g -.. 1.215 '
-1
-0,6 -1.194
effect of piers, !J. pronounced hump between X/Hu. -0.5 and 0 occurs -0.4 -1.15'<;
I

all the upper.nappe profile along piers when the discharge is high .. Upper -0.2 i-I. 122
0.0. -1.071
nappe profiles fill' three gate bays adjacent to abutments are in Fig. 0.2 i-1.015
0.4 ;-0.944
, 14-9, showing the abutment effects on the nappe profiles. 0,6[-0.847
It should be noted that the upper nappe surface is exposed to the ~:~ I, 3Sfj
atmosphere and,hence, subject to alteration due to wind and air CUlTents o
and the absorption of surroupding air. As s. result, the flow is aerated 1.2'r-
1.4 -0.102
1.6
.
0.172
and the surface becomes wavy and unstable. The upper-nappe-shape _ _.......:.._ _...L..._---'-_ _-L_I~.8 0.465

coordinates given in Figs. 14-8 and 14-9 only the ideal cases, '* BUild on C\Y 801 test::. f?r negligible velod~y
of a.PJ;n"'ou.ch.
where air plays little or no part. The upper nappe surface for slt'ping COORDlNATl!::S FOR Ul'PISE NAPPE Al.QNO PlERS.

upstream face should have a lower elevation than that for vertic.'1.1
.upstream face. Hence, the given coordinates may also be 1.lsed safely for
spillways with sloping upstream face for which the actual data are not yet

.J
-1
available. -0.6 -I 209
-0.4 1.218
14-7. Effect of Piers in Gated Spillways. Piers are needed to form -0.2 -1.244
the sides of the gates in gated spillways. The effect of the piers is to con- 0.0 -1.103
>

tract the flow and, hence, to alter the effective crest length of the lSpill-
0.21- 0g5O
0.4 -0.821
0.6 -0.689
ways. The effective length of OM bay ,of a ga.ted spillway may be 0.8 -0549
expressed as ' LO -0.SS9
1.2 -0.215
L = Lo - J(NH. (14-18) 1.4 0.011
0.208
where Lo is the clear span of the gate bay between piers; K is the pier con-
traction coefficient; N is the number of side contractions l equal to .2 for
1 These tests are d~signa.ted as II General Spillway Tests-OW 801." The informa-
tion given here is from [201, Hydraulic Design Charts 111-11 to 111-15 WES 9-54. FIG. 14..8. Upper. n!\ppe profiles of flow over WEB spillways with a.nd without piers.
(U.S. Army En[f<neer:; Waterway/! Expel'iment Slation.) ,
 -i.5

-10

.., -0.5
"x
)::-
a

0.51------+--++..

1.0

I Left abutment
'-11---- LEGEND

I Bay No" 1 I
- - - Left side of bonk
center line of b\"y
~===:::J~0.205 Hd
-"'«""'-

Right side of boy

Boy No.2 l.078 rid Profiles ore bosed on pine
flot model tests
. J.
,"
i Soy No.5
-i2=~3--t---- -
axis
OVERFLOW "SPILLWAY CREST
UPPER NAPPE PROFILES
1.0 1.5 2.0 APPROACH CHANNEL AND
ABUTMENT EFFECTS
FIG. ]4-9. Upper nappe profiles of flow over WES spillways showing appro!l.ch channel and abutment effects. (U.S. Army
Engineers WaterWIlYs Experiment 8to.lio:l1..)

x'C ..
o.5 1 .

'- "
r

0.5

BAY" NO. 2
1.0 L _ - L_ _L.....L_·L._ _" _ _-'-_---'J._---'"
1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0 " 0.5 LO 1.5 2.0
X/lid

LEGEND"
Left side of bonk
- - Center line atbay
Right side (>f boy
on pinE>

0.5 f---+---~f- oxis

OVERFLOWSPI"LLWAY CREST

i.a L..-:..-L_ _L...l._..-:.._..-:..L.;..._....l...._->.J_----' UPPER NAPPE PROFILES

-i.5 -LO -0.5 a 0.5 i.0 1.5 2.0 APPROACH CHANNEL AND
ABUTMENT EFFECTS
X/Hd
Fie. 14-9 (continued).
 374 RAPIDLY VARIED FLOW

each gate bay; and H. is the total head on the crest including the velocity
head. In comrl1lting the discharge through gated spillways,the effective (/)tJ>
~
<\l
f-f- :r:
length determined by the above equation should be l.lsed. The discharge (/)z
wl!!
a:u
I-
~ 'E.,..
<\l
cpefficient, however, is assumed the same in both gated and ungated (.J u:: z H
W
3"- Il:l
spillways. g~
--1

The pier contraction coefficient varies mainly with the shape and posi- "-u a:: '":;"
tl
a:z W ~
tion of the pier nose, the head condition, the approa.ch depth of flow, and wo Q.
>-
...
of-
u LI.. "
<!
the operation of the adja.cent gates. The approxim~,te J( value given by , Q « ,0 S::
we::
Creager and Justin [3, p. 120] r1lnges from 0.1 for thick, blunt noses to f-f- I-

0.04 for thin or pointed noses and is 0.035 for round noses. These values
«z u
e>O W
t
U LI.. ...."'"
apply to piers having a thickness equal to about one-third th8 head on, §E5 w i!'.
;r-
LI..

n. ~
the crest when all gates n,re open, When one gate is open n.nd the adja-
cent gates are closed, these values become roughly 2.5 times larger. ...~'

The U.S. ,Army Engineers Wat.erways Experiment Station has con- ~

ducted tests (General Spillway Test cW 801 [20]) on different forms of, 0
:::;
pier nose for spill ways of the liVES sha.pe. On the basis of these tests, a ~

round-nose pier is recommer.ded for general use with high heads. The
I,
[(value for the round-nose pier plotted against the ratio of He/ Hd with
variable distances upstream from the crest is shown in Fig. 14-10. The
effect of other nose shapes 011 the contraction coefficient is shown in Fig.
t
14-11. The he.ight of the test spillways was 6.67Hd, which had negligible
velocity of !l.pproach. Under the testing conditions, these da.ta are
applicable to high spillways and to the condition that ,the adjacent gates
are open. For low spillways with appreciable approach velocity, the
,i
I I I
,I
pier'contr[Lction coefficient fOl; the round-nose pier with various approach
J
,

depths is shown in Fig. 14-12. III .. he abs~nce of adequate data, pier con- i
traction coefficients for other nose shapes for low spillways may be I I

obtained by proportioning from the data for high SpillW8,yS (i.e., from
Fig. 14-11).
14-8. Pressure on .Overflow Spillways. If the spillway profile is
designed exactly in the shape of the lower nappe of a free overflow, the
pressure on the spillway crest under the design head should be theo-
retically nil. For practical reasons, however, such an ideal profile is
generally modified so that low pressures will develop under the design
t
head. As the spillway must be operated under heads other than the
design head, the pressure will increase under the lower heads and decrease
under the higher heads. Assuming a two-dimensional irrotational flow,
the pressure on the spillway crest may be accurately determinedanalyt-
icnny by a numerical method, 'graphically by flow-net analysis, or instru-
~~.~~~~J-J-J-~~~~~~.-L-L-L~O,,-L-L~ ~o~~-L~-L-L-L,~o3
mentally by an electronic analogy.l More exact determination of the i
pressure, however, will depend upon model tests. !I PH/'H 'poal{ uo!sap o. ~saJJ uo poa~ JO O!'O!,l

ISee references given in Art. 13c2, A pra.ctical procedure for the r!l\axation method
appFed to the problem under cDnsideration is given in [25]. '
,\ .
I
375
 "0

Z
:r:.~

-0
.c:
.,
0 Type I
Type"
C
.!?
1:1
.,'"

.
E
~

~ J
~I
<>
~ c
"" 0

1
"0

''""
.J:.
'0
0
"15
tr

'PIER NOSE SHAPES

Note: Pier nos~ loi:ct~d in somo plone as

upSt"eOr.1 face of spillway

HIGH GATED OVERFLOW C"lESTS

PIF.R CONTRACTION COEFFICIENTS
Coefficienl of pIer contraction, K
EFFECT OF NOSE SHAPE
FIG. 14-11. Coefficient of contrMtion for piers of various nose shapes in high d:l.ms with the 'nose located in the same vertical plane
as the WES 4-1-53,)
) 11-:;, ups~ream
face of the \VES spillway. (U,S. tinny Engineers, Wn.(erwa.yli ExpeMlrtCnl8talian ['2(lj, , Design Chart Hydt(~u1ic

----.---..~ .. "-.-,-.-

1,4

1.2- '5<II
.J:. Hd ~ design head
c
.ffi'
"
:L ~ 0.0
~ 1.0
:L
.t:f
0

"'c:
.J:.

'"
"iii O.S
i
i5 0.5
0
l' "~''"T'~'
\1\
.0,5 Hd rod.
'"
-0
u
'~ -1.0 0,2 Hd rod
qt=:r
r",-"
.2
1ii ~ , Axis of \-1 Type 2 pier
<.<>
-:j
-1
u
~
c:
0
0,6: ,g
Il:.
-1.5 r.'.
-2,0,
'reO Ij~
'0

-a,5L-LL
0
'"
.J:.
'0 I I ! \ I I I ! I
~
0 0.4 -' -1.5 -\.O -O,el O. 0,5 1.0 \.5 2..0
a:: Ratio of horizontal distonce to design head

0.2

LOW GATED QGEE CRESTS

PIER CONTRACTION COE.FFICIENTS

EFfECT OF APPROACH DEPTH

-0.05 0 0.05. 0.10
, Coefficient of pier contractIon, K

,
FIG., 14-12. Coefficient •
of contractIOn for t'] Ie TOUD d - Dose piel' in lbw dams. (u.s. A,rm!l EngineeT8 Waterways Experiment S!atiot~
[201, H!ldra1~lic Design Chart 122-2, WES 4-1-53.)
 j
FLOW OVER i:lPILLWAYS 379
378 RAPIDLY VARIED FLOW
.\
The pressure distributions on a spillway crest with and \vithout 0.6
piel's under three different head ratios, based on OW 801 tests uf WES
shapes [20], are shown in dimensionless plots (Fig. 14-13). Pressures for· 0.4 l
intermediate head ratios can be obtained by interpolation .. M
~
\ \'''' r----., >-...<.; KIKa" 0.50
/ \
'\ --

-t· 1'8 -
0.5 , 0.2
i'., J ~ »-.
I

1\
01
~ '" i
0.4
\ !.I ~Ii~
w .", H/Hd ;'.00 I
-b~50 ~:~ 0 \
l
0.3

.",1r 0.2 t
'" 0.1
~ 1~ r\V
- "- ~
.... r--
H!Hd·i.QO
-",

'<>-
!
I

/v
iO

-0.2
\
"./ i". ,./
H/Hd· I .33 r---." ,.".. r-.- ;-- r--- - c-:- -I~

·t- -\
(
....;-'" a o.s
-, I -0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6 1.0 1.2 1.4

j!i -o.~
,.0-.. ""'"

-0.2
r<-

-K --+- l--
i
Horlzonto! distonce
Dasign head

~----------1~T-YP-e-2--Pi-er-{-F-i9-.1-4-_-ln-----1-·-------J+.-
\Hd
(-1S....)

-0.3 V H!Hd"1.33
'-1-- 1--- --
.\

-0.4
r V f I
I ');.
hJ , I
-0.5
-0.2 o 0.2 0.4 0.6 o.S 1.0 12 l.4 I
Horizontal dislance (X)
Design head Hd
. i
_-t--__ ~ R~0.2 Hd
I 1'"\ 1 -\
R· 0.5 Hd I."
., . l' ~ ~

, I~
IV -\
I
Net.: Dota tJosed on CW 60! tests

i'~ -.I
FIG. 1'1-13. Cres~ pressur9l! on WES high overflow spillways (continu.ed). (b) Along
)5 center line of pier bay. (U.S. Army 1!l11.glneers Waterways Rxperiment Station [20],
HydrClulic Desiqn Chart 111-16/1; WES 3-55.) . . I

! wiD result in ovel'design of the spilhvay, particularly for high dams ..'
Nole: Dala based on CW 801 !esls
FIG.14-13. Crest pressures on WES high 'Jverflow spillways. Ca) No piers. (U.S.
Army Engineers H'ale)'u'ays Expe"imenl Slation [20], Hyd1'rJ.ulic Design Chart 111-16,
WES 9-54.)
Because of the conversion of static to kinetic. energy as the water flows.
over the spilhvay, the hydrostatic pressure on the upstream face of the
spillway crest is actually red\lced. This reduction in pressure is not
appreciabl'e, but, where the moment arm is lon·g; as in high: dams, the
effect on stability· may be worth considering. The usual method of
analysis by assuming straight-linepressllre distribution nea~ the crest.
[
Suc.h overdesign is an acceptcd procedure, providing an additional factor
of safety.! . .
The pr'essme teduction on the upstream face of a vertical weir has been
determined both theoretically and experimentally by Harris [26). On
the basis of OW 801. tests for ungatad WES-shape crests of vertical
upstream face and of U.S. Bureau of Reclamation tests of pressure on a
1 Actually, the effect on structural stability due to this pressure reduction COID- is
pensated to a large extent by the moment of the horizonto.l component of the nappe
pressure on the crest surfaqe.

I .. " '. - ..-,;

.-.~.' .,' ~,' ," .',' .', ..
 FLOW OVER SPILLWAYS
381
380 RAPIDLY VARIED FLOW

shul'p-crestecl wdI' under the design head, the resultant of the reduced
pr~~sure is f?~lnd t~ be approximately 12,9Hd 2 lb per unit length of the
spIlLway, actmg hOrIzontally at a distance of O.161Hd it below the top of
the crest. . . ,

I
Uj
1:)

'" 0 '"
Ol

~12
.0.
" c
li:./JJ '"
v; '"a:i'"
~ -0.'2

104

I Rotlo, Hr"
,f ! 3.2 ,L~ 3.4 3.5
Dischorge coefficient, C
FIe,;. 14-14.Cufl'es for determination of tIle discharge coefficient of drum gates.
(After J. N. Bradley [27].)

Note: dota based on CW . 801

F.!G: 14-13. Crest pressur.es on WES high ovel'fi~\\' spiHwo.ys (co/!t"'~lled). (c) Along
pletS. (U.S. Al'Il'Y Engmeers lVate1'7l1aYs Expel'tmellt Sin/ion {20] HI'dl'ClL:iic Dcsif!1l
Chm"t 111-16/2, WES 3-55.) . ' U
I .14-9. Drum Gates. The drum gate is a hinged g!1.te which floats in a
chamber and is buoyed into position by regulating the water level in the
chamber. Primarily, it is llsed to control the surface eiev!ltibn of the
water upstream. As a measllring device, the drum resembles a weir
with a curved upstream fa(;e over the major portion of its triLvel. The
rmgle e U;'ig. 14-14) is formed between. the horizontal and a .line drawn
tangent t.o the downstream lip of the. g!\te. This angle is considered posi-
tive when it is measured above the horizontnl ilnd when meas-
ured below the horiz.ontaL For positive values of 8, the gate acts as a
sharp-crested weir, the control poil'l.t i.~ the downstrea.m lip of the gate,
and the head is measured o.bove this point.· For negative values of 9,
the gate !lcts as ~ curved-crested weir, the control point is the highest·
point of the gate surface, and the head is measured above this po}nt.
 382 RAPIDLY VARIED FLOW
FLOW OVER SPILLWA·YS 383
Since the d!'um gate acts as a weir, the discharge through the gate may
be expressed as relatiOilship between the actual velocity and a theoretical value,l From
the result.s of this study, a chart (l~ig. 14-15) was prepared to show the
Q = CLH.!.6 (14-16)
a,ctual velocity at the toe of spillw3,Ys under various heads, fal1<" slopes
where C is the coefficient of discharge, L is the length of the gate, and H. is from 1 on 0,6 to 1 on 0,8, and the condition of avera,ge surface roughness,
the total head. Laboratory investigations have shown that the flow' ever It is felt that this.. chart is SUfficiently accurate for preliminary-design
this type of gate call be completely defined by H., &, C, the radius r of the
gate, and the depth of approach. The dept,h of approach. however, has 600~ I II 1 I f I I I II I i!
very little influence on the flow behavior when the appro!',ch depth, meas- 560 ! !
L I . I! ~ l-+-.~ r---
ured below the highest point of the gate, is equal to or greater than twice
the head on the gate.' This condition is well satisfied by most drum.:gate 520'
'i
J
I
I
T;----it- i Tr
I ;tL ~R,r I---
ow..fJ
I ~I x .:cr:- i -
installations, especially when the gate is in a raised llositiou, Therefore, -"" ,II I JI
.----:r- d- if
. o,r 1 '/
the coefficient C may be considered to be a function of He, fJ, and 1'. . II

8f
!
Bradley [27J has made a comprehensive stu.dy of the drum gate, using 440
il
I
i ,I
I I'
Ii
I
I .;::
NL1/-;
data obtained from 40 hydraulic models of existing drum-gate structures .a()n i! II ! tnlr--4.-.-17
I ! I
, of various sizes and scales. . The results of this study are showl1 by a ,I II
" if II J V
family of curves (Fig; 14-14) where C is plotted against fJ with the r,atio 360 II i /1 :I:
IV I
i' I 11 -01 I 1/ I
H.lr as a parameter. When H.lr .0, t~e ~ate becon:es a straIg~t -",,,l : '''ll~_ ... ' I /1 I
inclined weil~, and the cOI'l'espollding dashed Ime III the family of curves IS 'l ! I ~1: :r: I I , / '/ /
based on Bazin's data [12J. The curves extend dowmvard to f) =;0 -15°.
The discharge coefficients in the regi011 between.6 = -150 and the gate
280' -
# :'7.1/!i
1 f I ;;;
!
IiI/ I /
I If I/, -
.. I---

cOl1lpl~tely down clln be obtained by graphical i.ntetpolation of theratiI~g

240 --I-- ..: J.---. ~I:q !I / Y// I.

~'--.>L~.
-~.-

:>n()
N!...:......c.tn!+
-- -
T
curves of the gate, The comput.ation of the ratmg curve when the gate IS lit 1."1, -
completely down is the snme as that for a spillway with an ungated crest .~,
:.;,,-,:1: 1
,
~
(Art: 14-5). . ~r- II I z
14-10. Flow at the Toe of Overflow Spillways. The theoretIcal 12C :--- XI I 17
velocity of flow at the toe of an overflow spillway (Fig. 14-15) may be
f II / ; W' I . !
~
80
compllted by . ~
=--=:---:---=-- 40
V2g(Z, + H" - Yl) (14-19) ..
j' I 1 I ! I I
0 I-- ---1 i
where Z is the fall, or vertical distance in ft from the upstnam reservoir 0 10 20 30 40 50
I r I f
60 70 80 90 100 1/0 120 130 140 150 160 170
level to the floor at the toe; H .. is the upstream approach velocity head; Valocity (V), fps
and Yl is the depth of flow at the toe. Owif).g to the energy 10s8 involved
in the flow over the spillway, the actual velocity is always less than the
FIG. 14-15. Curves for detennination l)f velocity. at the toe of spillways with slope5
1 on 0.6 to 0.8, . I
theoretical value, The magnitUde of the actual velocity depends mainly
on the head on the spillway crest, the fall, the slope of the spillway surface,
pUrpi)SeS, although it can be refined by addition~l experimental informa-
and the spillway-surface rouglll1css. 1 By reasoning ~d experi~ellts it is tion which may become available in t.he future. . - \
sho\"n that the deviation of the actual velocity from ItS theoretical vahle
Experiments by Bauer [30J indicate that friction losses in accelerating
beconles larger when the head is smaller and the fall is greater.
the fiow down .the face of a spillway may be considerably less than the
On the basis of experience, theoretical analysis, and a limited amount
. normal friction loss in fl0W with well-developed turbulence. Therefore,
'of experimental information obtained from prototype tests oil Shasta and
the friction loss is not significant on steep slopes; but it woulcJ. become
Grand Coulee dams, the U.s. Bureau of Reclamation [29) has studied the
impcrta.nt if the slope were small, For this reason, the chart in Fig.
I Bile [28J lor fUrther 'information,
I The theoretical velocity defined by the Bureau is V, =. V2(!(Z ...:. O.SH) .
 FI,QW OVER SPILLWa.YS 385
384 RAPIDLY VARIED FLOW

14-15 i,~ not !1pplicable to slopes finttcl'than 1 on 0.6. For fb,tter slopes, . 14~12. Submerged Overflow Spillways. Spillways and weirs are sllid
the problem nmy be analyzed by the method described in Art. 11-4. to b~ slJbmerged ,vhen the tail water is higher than the crest.. As sub-
At the end of the sloping spill W[\y surf&ce, the flow cho.nges its direction flow. is usually unstable , having considerable disturb::mce
. rather abruptly and therebjr produces appreciable centrifugal pressures. immediately do\vnst;eam, such a spillway or weir is unsatlsf3.Cltory for
In order to create a smooth transition of the flow [Lnd to prevent the
impact of the falling watar from scouring the foundation, the surface at
the spillway toe is usm'l.lly designed as a cUl'ved bucket [31]. To be
thoroughly effective the bucket should be t[~ngel1t to the foundation or
neady so. The radius R of the bucket, measured in feet, may be esti-
mated approximately by the following empirical formula:
R 10(VH.4H+!&,;{Z.6H+EiJ (14-2u)
where V is the velocity in fps of the flow :1t the toe fl.l1d 11 is the head in ft,
exclucHng approach velocity head, on the spillway crest. The design
.bucket pressure and the maximum side-wall pressure sh,mld be equal to
the centrifugal pressure plus the hydrostatic pressure corresponding to
the tai!water depth. The centrifugal pressure may be compnted by
Eq. (2-8) for known radius of the bucket and velocity of the flow .at the
toe. Determination of the bucket pressure, however, can be made more
~.ccurately by flow-net analysis or by the relaxation method, or, still more
precisely, by rnodel tests. The results of such determination un ve indi-
cated that theclIect of the bucket ·curve on pressure actually extends
even beyond the ends of the curve. .
The flow leaving the toe of a high overflow spillway is a high-velocity
jet, containing a Hnge amount of energy capable of causillg heavy scour-
ing. Unless the· downstream approach is resistant to such scouring,
measures to D.void the danger of scouring should be takeli. in the design .
. Popular methods :11'C design of a ski-jump spillway, utilization of sub-
merged taiIwater as a bl'ake, and use of a hydraulic jurr.:p as an energy
dissipator. ..
14-11. The Ski-jump Spillway.. In this type of spillway the toe is
"'''';;1.",.'''''' in the form of a large specially shaped lip or bucket 'which
of
throws the whole jet flow into the air. P,nt of the energy in the jet is
dissipated in the air, but in any case the in.lIs back into the river
channel a.t a. safe distance from the dam. This was fin,t proposed
Fl~. 14-16. The ski-jump spillways of l' Aigle Dam.
-
(CDuT/esy 0/ P. Danel, Els.
by Coyne [32,33]. Figure 14-15 shows a typical ski-jump spillway. : In
NE YRPI C.)
this design, the spillway-bottom slab is also the roof of the power house
which is built against. the downstream side of the dam. The slab is accurato flow meMurements. Studies on submerged Iound-~rested w~irs
heavily reinforced in order to ta\l:e the lon.ds due largely to are useful however, for they will furnish iuformationneeded m the de~.llgn
the centrifugal pI'essure of the jet acting ori the spillway toe. l of low ov~rfiow dams which may be occasionally subject to submergence.
1 See [34] to [36] for fmther information. \Vell.known ski.jump spillways are ;Extensi ve studies on au bmel'ged round-crested weirs have be~n per-
ill5tailed in Ca:;telo do Bode Dam in Portugal; !lond the Mar~ges, Bart, l' Ag1e, Saint- formed by the U.S. Bureau 9f Reclamation [l,37J.I In these studies: ~he
.fj;tiel'lne-Cantales, ll.\ld Cltastang Dams in France. Each of the last three dami has tlow is classified into four distinct types according to the fiow condItIOn
two ski.jump spillways. 'The jets from the two spillways mllY meet and collide in the
o.ir, thus dissipating a large amount of energy. 1 Other well-known studies are reported in [38] to [401.
 '"
b \
.,,
\
\
\
VI \
("

...
*"b
\I \
I
no
:::00
II _ I \~ \
I

\Jll
rrln1 I
Ul"l1
<II -I:;) I,
'"i"::: Ul~
n1 . @-o, ---..
I I
--
I
-~
I'
I
..
2. b --~

~ -1
(J)
~

~
-T. ~~:d
+d hd

Y-'>-i---I~-+--·-+·-.."..l1.5~
.He
0.201
,1 I •

~.-~~*--""~"<"l'<"""']~""",,,='" -- 1.1;> 0.562 I---+-.:'"~~~~;;j:;;:;=""'--¥~-t---r-c::;~ 2.14 0.513

-",~----"""- - , l.:i2. 0.796

I---,'+<~-~"""-"'''i''--~'"""",..... .. ::-;:.~ 1.53
, .

2.14 1.75

o 2 :3 4 5 6 4 5 6
X/He
(0)

0.049
0.OS3
0.142

2.14 0.$55

-1.0

3 4 5 6 4 5 6

.tv) (d)

FIG. 1~-18.
Typical pressure (dashed lines) and surface (solid lines) profiles for flow over submerged overflow dams. (Selected
from U.S. Bureau of Reclamation data [1J.) (a) Supercriticn.[ flow; (b) flow involving hydraulic jump; (e) ftow with!l. drowned
hydraulic jump; (d) flow a.pproaching complete submergence.
388 UAPlD!wY VAlUED FLOW
prevalent on the dowl1strel1m apron; (1) snpel'critical flow, (2) su bcritical
flow involving hydraulic jump, (3) flow accompanied by a drowned jump
with diving jet, and (4) flow approaching complete submergence.
Submergence of spillway or weir will reduce the coeflicient of discharge
of the corresponding ullsubmerged flow. The BUl'eA.u of Reclamation's
test results on this reduction, expressed in percenta.ge of the discharge
coefficient for unsubmerged flow (Fig. 14-4), have been presented in a
chart for the four types of flow mentioned abov€;. This chart in a slightly
modified form (Fig. 14-17) was further checked against other datal by the
u Army Engineers Waterways Experiment StatiOll. 2 It was found thltt
the, chart is also applicable to t·he determination of coefficients for WES
,shapes under submerged conditions.
In the chart (Fig. 14-17) h,J is the drop from the upper pool to the tail··
water elevation, H, is the total hend above the crest, and d is the tailwil.ter
depth. The genera.! pattern of the curves shows that, for low 'ratios
(h.J + d)/ H" the flow is of type 1, or supercritical, and that the r(~duction
in coefficient is affected essentially by this ratio o.ndis practically inde-
pendent of hd/l-I.. The cr-oss section BE in the upper right-hand corner
of the chart shows the variation of (hd + d)/H, at hdill, = 0.78. For
large 'm.lues oi (h,l + d)/H., on the other hand, the reduction in coefficient
is [1ffected esseu~ia.lly by the ratio ad/H,. Under this condition. for values
of hatH, less than 0.10, the flow is of type 4, the jet is on the surface, and
no Jump occurs. For values of hd/H. greater than 0.10, tho flow of
type 3, or accompanied by a drowned jump with diving jet. The cross
section AA shows the variations of ha/H. at (h. + d)/H, near 5.0. Sub-
criticr.l liow, or flow of type 2, occurs in, the indicated on the cimrt.
Other regions for transitior1D,l flow conditiollS are also shown.
The typical pressure and surfa.ce proiiles for, submerged spillway flow
are shown for different values of (hrl + d)/li. and A4/H. for folU' types of
flow (Fig. 1<1-18). These were selected from the data of the Bureau of
Reclanul.tion. They aTe useful in the design of spiJlwaysfor stability.
PROBLEMS
H-1. A vertic[L1 sharp-crested weir, 20 ft high and 60 ft long, is built as a.n overflow
spillway without eud contractions. When the head is 20 ft above the crest of the
weir and the nappe i$ completely aerated, compute (a) the nappe profiles, and (/» the
hydrostatic load acting on the weir.
l!!-2. During te~ts on the o.er!ltioJl of the spillway described in the preceding prob-
lem, negative presSure~ under tlie nappe of 9.7 it of wCltel' were observed. Compute
the increase ill the t,otalload on the weir. How much air, measured in cubic feet per
1 Dat,;). given iI, [41] to [4.-1J.
2 From (::JOJ, Hydraulic Design Chart 111-4, WEB 4-1-53.
FLOW OYER SPILLWAYS 389
secoD~, will be required fo,' aeration beneath the nappe to (1 pressure reduction of
2 it? Compute the load 0'.1 the weir after this aeratiol1.
14-3. If the channel floor is at El. 975.0 instead of E1. 880.0, and other data remain
the s3-me, determine the spillway section required ill Example 14-1. A trial-and-
erro, procedure is required for the determination of the value of C.
14-4. If the upstream fa.ce has a slope of 3 on 2 instead of veriic!J.I and other data
remain the s",ne, determine the spillway section required in, Example 14-l.
14-5. Determine the rating curve of tlHil spillwl!.y developed ill Exarnple 14-1.
14-6, AD o,-erflow spilhvay of unknown profile designed br a total hC!l.d of 14.5 ft
has a crest length of 64 ft and a coefficient of discharge equal to 3,48. Determine the
rl>ting curve' by the Beadle.)', curVe. '
14-7. If t,he spillway in the preceding problem has a profile shown by the dashed
line in Fig. 1,*-7, detennJne the rating curve.
14-B. CompuU! ~he upperm.ppe profile of the fiow over the spillway designed ill
EXl1mple 11-1, assuming"'!):!:! piers. '
14-9. Determine'the wall lIcigh',s for the overflow-dam seetion designed in Exam-
ple 14-1, assuming six b!l.Ys formed by WES round-nose piers and a maximum oper-
ating head 35% higher than the design head. ' ,
14-10. Determine the discharge over the spillway section designed in Example 1"-1
if the spillway has six bays formed by WES round-nose piers. ,
14-11. Detecmine the pleasure on the crest of the spillwn.y designed in Example
14-1, fOJ: operating head equal to 0.5u, 1.00, and 1.33 times the design head; assume
(a) no piers and (b) six bays fOl'med by WES round-nose piers.
H~12., A drum gate (F:ig, 14-11)) 50 ftlong alld 20ft in.radius is installed on top of!l.
high overflow spillway., Determine the rating curve of the gate: i.e., discharge VB.
is
FIG: 14-10. The drum gate for P~ob. 14-12,
elevation of the hlgh~st point of the gate suna.oe. The position of t.he highest point
'of the gate surface and the value of (J may be determined graphically.
14-13. Estima.te the depth a.nd velocity of flow and also the radius of the bucket
a.t the toe of the spillway dp,signec.l in Example 14-1.
14-14. Determine th., discharge of the spiihvay designed ill, Prob. 14-3 if the tail-
water elevation is at El. 990. Would a hydraulic jump be possible at the toe of the
spillway?
RE;FERENCES
t 1. Studies of crests for overfall da!llll, BO'l,lder Canyon Praject Final Reparl$, pt: VI,
U.S. B~Lreat' of ReclamatiDn, Hydraulic Inve.tigalions, Bulletin 3, 1948.
2. Juliall Rin.ds, William P. Creager, alld Joel D. Justin: "Engineedng for Dams,"
I John Wiley & Sons, Il1c., New 'York, 1945, voL 2, pp. 358-361.
I
 Ji
i
,f.
390 RAPIDLY YARTED FI,-OW
.3. William P. Crea.ger and.Jor.l D. Justin: "Hydroelectric Handbook," 2d·ed., John
Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1\)50, pp. 362-363.
4. A. T. IppeJJ: Channel transitions n.nd controls, chap. VIII in Hunter ROllse 20.
(editor): "Engineering Hydraulics:" Joh!'. vViley. & Sons, Inc., New York, 1950,
pp. 49G-588. ' . . . . . Yicksburg, Miss., 1952; revised in subsequellt years.
5. Fred W. Blaisdell: Equ!\tion of the free-fallIng nappe, Proceedtngs, American 21.
Society of Civil Enginee1'S, vol. 80, separate no. 482, 16 pp., August, 1954.
6. Horace William I\:ing, "Handbook uf HydrE:.ulics," revised by Ernest F. Brater,
'Hh ed., McGraw-Hill.Book Company, Inc., Hlf,'!, sec. 4, pp. 1:-67; 22.
7. Carl E. lCindsvaterancl Rolla.nd W. Carter: Discharge characteristics of rectan-
gular thin-plate "'eirs, .paper 1453, PI'ocecdings, A. merican Society of C1:vil Enoi- 23.
neers, Journal, Hyd"aulic~ D·iviGion, vol. 8a, no. Hye, pt. 1, pp. 1-'36, December,
1957.
8. P. K. E:andaswamy and Hunter Rouse: Characteristics of fl.)w over terminal weirs
n.nd sills, paper 1345, Proceedings, American Society of Civil Engineers, J ollrnal,
Hudl'aulics Division, vol. 83, nQ. HY4, pp. 1-13, August, 19.57. 25.
9. J. -Y. BQussinesq: "Theorie approchee de l'ecoulemellt de l'eau sur un d8\'el'.~oi;: en
mince paroi at sans contraction latentle" ("Theoretical Approach to the Flow over
a Knife-edge Weir wit.hout Side Contraction n), Paris, 1907.
10. Th. Rehbock: Discussion on Precise weir measurements, by Emest W. Schoder 26.
and Kenneth B. TlJrner, Transactions, American Society of Civil Engineers, vol. 93,
pp. 1143-1162, 1929. . . 27.
11. G. H. Hickox: Aeration of spillways, Transa.dions, Am"'ican Society of Civil Eng·i-
neers, vol. 109, pp. 537-556, 1944. 28.
12. H. E. Bazin: Experiences nonveiles sur l'ecoulement en deversoir (Recent expcri-
m·ents on the !low of water over weirs), lIIemo·ires et documents, Annc!le, des pants at
chaussees, seL 6, vol. 16, 2d half-yr., pp. 393-148, 1888; .~er. 6, vol. 19, 1st half-yr.,
29.
pD. 9~82, 1890; ser. 7, 1'01. 2, 2d haH-yr., pp. 445-520, 1891; ser; 7, vol. 7, 1st
h~lf-Yl'" pp. 249-357, 1894; ser. 7, ,rol. 12, 2c1 half-yr., ?p. 645-731, 1896; and ser.
7 vol. 15, 2d quarter-yr., pp. l51-264, 1898. English translation of the first part 30.
h~ Arthur Marichal and John C. Traut'~ine, Jr., Proceedingl, EngiMel'8' Club of
Philadelph.ia, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 259-310, 1890; VDJ. 9, no. 3, pp. 231-244, 1892j and 31.
voL 10, no. 2, pp. 121-164, 1893. Ba.zin's data were reprinted almost eutirely
by G. W. Rafter in Report on special water'-Supply investigation, CongresS1;onaZ
Documents 41*6 and 4147, WlI.Shington, D.C., pp. 571-950, lQOOj o.nd Hydro[ogy 32.
of the State of New York, 'l'few York Sta-/e 1l1~se141n, B1(.lletin 85, Albany, N.Y.,
1905. . the British Section of the Societe des Ingeuieurs Civils de France, Loudon, Nov.
13. William P: Cre·ager: "Engineering for Masonry Dams," John Wiley & SOllS, Inc.,
New York, 1929, p, 106.. • vol. 164, no. 4274, pp. 613-614, Dec. 26, 1947.
14. Calvin Victor Davis (editor-in-chief): "Handbook oi Applied Hydraulics," 2d ed., 33.
McGra"'-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York, 1952, pp. 259-263; Sec. 7, Spill-
ways and Streambed Protect jon Work~! by Emory W. Lane and Calviu V. Davis,
pp. 253-289. . . . 34.
15. Ettore S.cimemi: Sullo. forma delle vene tracimanti (The form of flow over :weirs),
U Ene?'gia eleUrica, Milano, vol. 7, no~ 4, pp. 293-305, April, 1930.
16. J. Smetana: Etude de la surface d'ecoulement des grands barrages (Study of flow
profile of hrge dams), Revue generaLe ·del'hydrauliqlle, Paris, vol. 14, no. 46, pp. 35.
185-194, July, 1948; vol. 15, no. 49, pp. 19-32, January, 1949.
17. Giu'lio De Mn.rchi: Riccrche sperimentali .sulle dighe tracimanti (Experimental
study on overflow dams), Annalide?: lavori pubblid, Rome, vol. 7, 1928.
lB. L. Escande: "Barrages" ("Dams"), Hermann & Cie., Paris, 1937 .. 3S.
19. Anton Grzywienski: Anti-~vacuum profiles for spillways of large dams, Transa~-
FLOW OVER SPILLWAYS 391
l
tions of the 4th Congress on Lal·gs Dams, vol. 2, Pl'. 105-124, International Commis-
sion on Large Darns of the World Power Cbnfcrence, New Delhi, India., January, I
1951.
"Corps of Engineers Hydraulic D'"sign Criteria," prepared for OlIiGe of the. Chief
of Engineers, U.S. Army Corps or Engineers, Wat.erways Experiment Station,
John C. Harrold: Discuss-ion on Equn.&i.on of the free-falling nappe, by Freel W.
Blaisdell, P:-oceeding~, American Socie(~ of CivaEngineB1's, vol. 80, sp.para&e no.
624, pp. 16-19, August, 1955.
J. N. BradlEY: Discharge cQefficients for irregular overfall spillwaYB, U.S. BIL1'CaU
oj Recla.mation, Engincering Monograph No.9, March, 1952.
Boo Buehler: Discussio'l on Rating curvp.3 for flow over drum ga&es, by Joseph N.
Bl'adley, Tran.~ac1.ions, American Society oj Civil Engineers, vol. 119, pp. 421-428,
1954.
Ross N. Brudenell: Flow o.er rouurled crests, Engincering Ne1ll8-Rec01'd, "oJ. 115,
no. 3, p .. 95, July 18, 1935.
M. K, GanguE and S. K. Roy: On the st.1.ndardization of the relaxation tl'eatment
of systematic pressure comput[l.tions for overflow spillway discharges, liTigation
and Power, '1'h~ Journal. of ihe Central Board'of Irrigation and Power, vol. 9, 110. 2,
pp. 187'--209, New Delhi,India, April; 1952. .
Charies 'V. Harris; An analysis of the weiI' coefficient for suppressed weirs, Uni-
ven":t!! of W(Jahington, Engineering Expm:"!enl Station, Bulletin 22, ·]:.923.
Joseph: N. Bradley; Rating curves for 110w over drum gates, Tmnsa;;Cilms, Amer-
ican SoCiety of Ciua Engineel's, vol. 119, pp. 403-420, 1954.
H.obert B. JansGn: Flow characteriRtics on the ogee spillway, paper 1452, P"oceed- .
ings, American Society of Civil EnOl:neers, JOIL1'1lal, Hydmulics Diviiion, vol. 83, .-i
I
no. HYS, pt. 1, pp. 1-11, December, 19.57.
\
Research study Qn soilling basins, energy dissipators, and associated appurtp.-
no.nce~, U.S. Bu.refJ.u of Reclama.tion, Hydraldic Report, No. Hyd-3fl9, June 1, 1955,
pp.41-43.
William J. Bauer.: Turbulent boundery la.ye\' on steep slopes, Trcnsaction.l, Amer-
ican Society of. Civil Engineel·s, vol. 1U), pp, 1212-1233, 1954.·
J. H. Douma: Discussion on De5ign of side walls ia chutes and spillways, by D. n.
Gumensky, Tranlluclio1lS, American Society of Civil Engineil1·s. vol. 119, pp. 364-
368, 1954.·
A. Coyne: Latest development of do.ms and hydro-electric power stations in
France, paper read before a joint meeting of the Insti&ution of Civil Engineers and
25,194i. Editorial review entitled Development of dams in France, Engineering,
.
A. COYM; Barrages-usines de I' Aigle at de Ss.in t-:f;tienne-Can tales (Dams and
hydr.oplants of Aigle and Saint-Etienne-Cantales), Trava1~x, Paris, vol. 34, no. 185,
pp. 194-215, March, 1950. .
R..Mo.itre and S. Obolensky: Etude de quelque~ caracteri,;tiques de l'ecoulement
dans Ill. partie aval des evacu!l.teurs de surface (Study of some flow oharacteristics
in the downstream part of spillways), La Houille blanche, Grenoble, 9th year,
no. 4, pp. 481-511, July-August, 1954.
F. Auroy: Les eV2.cuateurs de crue.s Uti barrage de Chastang ,(The spillways. of
Chastang Dam), Transactions of the 4th Conqresson Large Dams, vol. II, pp. 661-
f·8G, International Commission on Large Dams of the World Power Conference,
New Delhi, January, 1951. .
E. A. Elevatorski: Trajectory bucke~-type energy dissipators, paper. 1553, Pro-
 I
J,

392 RAPIDLY VARIED FLOW

ceedings, 'Arnerica.n Society of Civil Enrr.ineers, J oul'nal, POlljf!;'l' DiVi8jon. voL 84"
no. POl, pp. 1,,17, Febru:::ry, 1\)5B.
37. J. N. Bradley] Studies of flo'\v characteristics, discharge a.nd pressure relo.tive to
submerged dams, U.S, Bm'ec.u of Redamalion, Hydm,tiic LabonJ./.lyry Repor! 1-82
HH5. " '
38. Report of the Board' of Engineers on Deep Waterways, U.S. Board of Engineers,
pt. 1, p. 291, 1900, "
~~\). R. E. Horton: Weir experiments, coefficients and formnl!\S, U.S, Geologica.! S1:11!8y.
W(ltel"S'llP1I1V CLnd 111''i~'Q.lion Paper 200, 1907. ' '
40. Glen Nelson COltl The ~ubmerged weir as a measuring device, Univers'ity of Wis-
En!/ineeri"g Blation, Bulietin 67, pp. 48-75, 1928,
41. II. J. characteristics of I'lllbn:terged spillways, Master's thesis,
Colorado Agl'ic.tll~ul'a1 a.nd Mechanical College, Fort. OolliIlS, December, 1951. ,
42. i\I. Bar Shan;)'] Pressure distribution on downstream face of a. submerged weir,
Master's thesis, Sta.te University of Iowa, Iowa City, June, 1950.
43. Spillwa.y and lock a.pproach, Jim Woodruff Apalachicola River, Flol'idp":
Model investigation, U.S, Army Engineers lVaierway;s Experiment S'(.!lio~ :i'cch-
, nual Memera1Ull/lI. 2-340, Mal', 1952. , . I
44, Morgantown spillWay, Speciaf tests; lIl).published report, U.S. Army Engineers
Wliterwaye Experiment Station, Vicksburg, lVIis"., 19:'*9.
) =For a, compreltsnsive review of the studies 011 hydraulic jump, see [,25], For a
1 mathematical trea.tment of the sllbject, see (251.'
I M3
CHAPTER 15
JUMP AND ITS USE AS
ENERGY IHSSIP ATOR
15-1. The Hydra1!1ic Jump. The hydraulic jump was first ;,o"D"f'i",~
experimentaU}' by Bidone [1,2], an Italian, in 1818. 1 This led [3]
(1828) to distinguish between mild (subcritical) ::md (supercl'itical) .
slopes, since he had observed that in steep channels hydraulic jump is fre~
quently produced by a. b!l.lTier in. originally uniform flow.
abundant studies 'were made and the. results were quoted by many
writers. Outstanding contributors to OUI' present knowledge about the
hydraulic jump a,reBresse (1860) [4], Darcy.a,nd Bazin (18fi5) [5], Ferri':'
day and Merriman (1894) [5], Gibson (1913) [7], Kennison (1916) [8].
Woodward and Riegel-Beebe (191'7) [9], 1(och and Carstanjen (1926) (lOJ,
Llndquist(1927) [I1J, Safranez (1927) [12], Einwachter '(1933) [13,14],
Smetana (Hl34) [15,16J, Bakhmeteff and Mat;1ke (1936) [17), Escande
(H)38) [18], Citrini (1939) [19], Nebbia (1940) [20], lCindsvatel: (1944)
(21], Blaisdell (1948) (22J, Forster and Skrinde (1950) [23], Rotlse, 8iM,
and Nagaratl'l.am (1958) [2'1J, and mallY others. 2
The theory of jump developed in early days is for hOl'izontalor slightly
inclined channels in which the weight of water 1."1 the jump has little effect
upon the jump beha:/ior and hence is ignored in ~he analysis. The results
thus obtained, however, applied to most cha.l1uels encountered in
engineering problems. For channels large slope, the weight effect of
water il). the jump may become so pronounced that. it must be i.nc,luclecl in
the analysis. .
Practical applications of the' hydraulic jump are many; it is used (1) to
dissipate enel'gy in water flowing over: dams, and o,ther hydraulic
structures mid thus prevent sCQuriug: downstream from the struotures
(Art. 15~8); ,(2) to recover head Dr raisethe water level all the dovvnstream
side of a measuring flume El.nd thus maintain high wate,l' level in the
~ The experit'nellt was made ill Paris in 181;8 and re'pul'ted the following year in [11,
The hydraulic jump is also known as a, sta:n.di1lg wave. In French, it is called Ie ressm,1
hlldra.tdique . . In German, ,it is der Wass6rsprung. III honor of Bidone, the; hycil'Alllic
.;jump in Italian is named il sail a di Bidone (the jtimp of Bidone).
,
394 RAPID!,Y V AEIED FLOW HYDRAUUC JUMP AND ITS USE AS ENERGY DISSIPATOR 395
channel fo).· irrigation or other water-distribution purposes; (3) to increase '15;..2. Jump in Horizontal-Rectangular Channels,l For supel:critical
weight on an a.pron and thus reduce uplift pressure under a masonrystruc- flow in a hodzo'utal rectangular ch~nnel, the energy of flow is dissipated 1
tul'e by raising ~he watel' depth on the apron; (4) to increase the· discharge' through frictional resistance [l,long the channel, resulting in a decrease in
of a sluice by holding back tail water, since the effective head will be velocity and an increase in depth i n · '
reduced if the tailwater is allowed to drown the jump;l (5) to indicate the direction of flow, A hydraulic ~"'"
jump will form in the chan:nel if the ~ .,.-... ..........--..~-.....-___
..",..---
Froude number Fl of the flow, the
flow depth. YI; and ado,vnstream :'i7~/'/I/m/ff&///;W/'///'//'/I7$)'/7#/
. , 1"1' 1-1.7 Undular jump
'depth 1/2 satisfy the equation

(3-21)

This equation may be represented by 0'/7/I/,Y//'/II//;/I./)?'/m/////,I,7/#"W~.a'7;';

the curve in Fig. 15-1. This c',lrve' F,'L7-2.5 Weak jump

. ~ 18 r---t-~--r- il has been ,-erified satisfactorily with

many experimental data and will be Oscilialiog je 1
~ 16~-4--+-~--+--~74'-
?---..
I/ found very useful in the analysis and Railer

~
14

12
t /
I
1--1----I'----+---+---1I<--t--r-t--r-

r---t---t---"-T--l-V+-+I---I-+-I---1---1.
I
, -I
I-
r--- design for hydraulic jumps. ~
';J-?~ ,,~&.
~: ;:~"";y ~ ,--" --
15 7 3. Types of Jump. Hydraulic W~%'?///ff),/m7/./,1?/,'l"///,I//I////&/Ih'
jumps on horizontal floor are of F,' 2.5, 4.5 Os.cillali~g jump

I 0 r-~I---r-" t-I/--fj+----+-+-t-~I_--I---f--l severai distinct t,ypes. According to

t.he studies of the U.S. Bureau of
8 I--+--+-j-Y---+--r Reclamation (34,35], these types can
.2= ~ (.j1+8F'-1\
Y, z ,
6 f--+-,--!-t'--,f--+----l \ be conveniently classified according
F{ V/-/9Y, ,J
4~~-+7L~--l--+--r-'--I---'-''--+--1
to the Froude nnillbel' F I of the in-
coming flow (Fig. 15-2), as follow's:
Il
V
2 17't- +----I--I---+--+--+---l---r---t-~"i For FJ = 1, the flow is critical, and
F,' 4.5-9.0 Steady jump

f
o i' _-,-,"_"
L-.--'-_-'--_-'- '---"--_~~"_'_~_L __~ hence no jump can form. I
o 2 4 5 B 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 For Fl = 1 to 1.7,· the water sur-
(
I
face showa undulations, and the jump
FIG. 15-1. Relation between FJ and y,jy,·for a hydraulic jump in a hQrizontal ~ectan- is called an undulm' J·Hmp •.
gular channer. . . For Fl = 1.7 to 2.5, a series of small
rollers develop on the surface of the .F IG. 15• -~. Q V .
anons types of hydraulic
special flow conditions, such as the eJiiistence of supercritical flow or the jump, but the downstream wa.ter sur- jump.
presence of a control section ::;0 that a gaging station may be located; face remains smooth. The velocity 1
(6) to m\x chemicals lIsed for water purification~ and so forth [28J; (7)" to
aerate water for city water supplies; and (8) to remove air po.ckets from
throughout is fairly uniform, and the energy loss is low. This jUIl'Ip
may be called a weak Jump. I
water-supply lines and thus prevent air locking [29J. For FI = 2.5 to 4.5, there is:J.ll oscillating jet enteririg the jump bottom
1 This principle hRS been applied by Saugey [27] to an interesting device known as
to surface and back again with no periodicity. Each oscillation produces
fall increaser. The device is intended to increase the effective head, in a 'yater-power
1 FOT hydraulic jumps in trape1:oidal channels, see [30J and [31J. For jumps :in
plant during periods of flood by holding b!\ck tail water from the outlet of the draft
closed conduits, see [29]- and [.32). For a general treatment of nonrectangular channels,
tube by a hydraulic jump. see [33J. .

"'·"--1-
 396 RAPIDLY VARIED FLOW HYDRAULIC JUMP AND ITS USE AS ,ENERGY DISSIPATOR 397
a~large wave ofirregul/1,r~period which, very commonly in canals, can ydEJ, is .the relative seqtwnt depth. All these ratios can be ,shcnvn to be
tra,:e! for mi!Gs doing unlimit.ed damage to earth banks and ripraps. dimensionless functions of F 1. For example,
TIlls Jump may be called Em. oscillating jump.
For Fl = 4.5 to 9.0, the downstream extremity of the surface roller hi ,II + 8F 12 3 (15-2)
and the pl)int at'which the high-veloci.ty jet tends to leave the flow occur El = +2
F12
at practically the same vertical section. The action and position of this Since the relative loss, efficiency, rel2_tive height, and relative initial.
jump are lea..o:;t sensitive to variation in tai1wate1' depth. The jump is ' and sequent depths of a hydraulic jump in a ·horizontal rectangular
well-balanced and the performance iS3.t its best. The energy dissipation' channel are functions of F 1, thcy c[',n be plotted, F 1, resulting in a
ranges from 45 to 70 This i llmp may be called a steady jmnp.
For F 1 = .9.0 and the high-velocity jet grabs intermittent slUgs
of \Vater rollmg down the front hce of the jump, generating Wlwes down-
strenm, and a rough surface can prevail. The jump action j,~ rougb but
effective since the energy dissipation may reach 85 %. This jump may
be called a .slronq j11mp.
!t should be noted that the ranges of the F'roude number given .above
for the various typea of junip are not clear-cut but overlap to a certain
extent depending on local conditions.

I 15~~1:. Basic Characteristics of :the Jump. Several bf1sic characteristics

of the hydraulic jump in horizontal rectangular channels are to be dis~
cussed below:
E'nergy Loss, . The loss of ellergy in the jump is equal to the LHJ.!"'! " "
in specific energies before and after the jump. It can be shown that the
loss is

(3-24) Veiues of ,Ft

The ratio 6.E/E 1 is kno,"-u as the relative loss. Fw. 15-3. Cha!:a.cteristic curves of hydnwlic jumps in horizontal rectangular channels.
Effic'ienc'!J·. The ratio of the specific energy after the jump .to tha.t
before t.he jump is defined as the efficiency of the iump. It can be shown set of characteristic curves (Fig. 15-3), 'With reference to these curves,
that the efficiency is the following interesting features ma.y be noted:
Ez (SF l 2 + 1)'1> - 4F 1z + 1 1. The maXinmltl relative height J'4/E1 is 0.507, which OCClll'S at
El = BF;2(2 + Fl2) Fl 27~ .
2. The m!:.ximum relaLive depth yz/E1 is 0.8, which occurs at vrf El = 0.4
This equation indicates that the efficiency of a jump is a dimensionless and F1 = 1.73. Experiments have shown that the tral1sition from an-
function, depending only on the Froude mnnber of the approaching flow. nndular jump to a direct jump takes place appro:dmateJy D.t'this point
The relative loss is equal to 1 Ed E 1 ; this also is a dimensionleas Fl = 1.73.
function of F 1. . .
3. When Fl 1, the flow is critical and YI Yz %E1 •
He1:ght of J1~mp.The difference between the depths after and before 4. When inol'eMes, the changes in all characteristic ratios become
the jump is the he£(!ht of the j11mp, or hi = Ya - Vl. Expressing each gradual.
term as a ratio with respect to. the initial specific energy, . The characteristic curves will provide the dcslgnel' with a general idea
about th~ range of conditions under which the structure is to be operated.
Yl
El FOl'instan'ce, in the design ofu sluice involving a jump below the
gate, such curves will show clearly the formation.of the. jump f~r diifel-el:t
where hi/El is the relativ8'he1'ghl, VdE 1 is the 1'elativeinitial depth, and gate openings under a given head. The above dlscusslOn applIes to hOrI-
 398 RAPIDLY VARIED FLOW
l HYDRAULIC JUMP AND ITS USE AS ENERGY DlSSIPATOR 3[}9

zontal rectangular channels. For horizontal nomectangular channels, r The experimental data Oil length of jump can be plotted conveniently
similar curve,~ may also be pl'epa,red. with the }<'roude number PI against a dimensionless ratio, L/(Y2 - yD,
The theol'e~ical curves for y2/ Eland hi/ E 1 have been verified experi- L/Yl, or L/yz. The plot of F 1 vs. L/y I is probn.bly the best, for the result-
mentally by Bakhmeteff and Matzke [17], who found that these curves, ing curve can be best defined by the data. ' For practical purposes, how-
give values of yl/ Eland hi / EI about 3 to 4 % greater than the experi- ever, the plot of Fl YS. L/Y2 is desirable, because the resulting Qurve.shows
mental values. I The characteristic curves were also checked with U.S. , regulariflY or a fairly :flat portion for the range of well-established jumps.
A curve of FI vs. L/Y2 (.Fig. 15-4) based on the experimellt11] data of six
7
I- I I i I I I I I ! I test flurries has been prepared by the Bureau of Reclamation. In com-
! I I I I I I ! I I paring this curve with the well-known Bakhmeteff-Matzke curve [17], pro-
I--

--
nounced disagreement was found. Investigation of 1;he matter has Jed
1 ,
6 ~

, , to the belief that this disagreement is due to the scale effect involved in ,(

1/
I-I-- ,
"I F:-:' !-.
r-
B8,khmeteff and Matzke's experimental data. This scale effect means
that the prototype ::I,etion wn.s nOG faithfully reproduced in the model.
I
L
5
II
, r--L=-i
ROII.r~
b-- I-- -+- =i -~~

I-
The curve shown in Fig. 15-4 was cleveloped primarily for jumps occur-
Y; yll ,..;'P~::- __-- Y2
VI~'''''''''-'''''''''''''
?:?r" /~/.'I'I// /. ~ /. .'1'.""
-r ,I- ring in rectangular cha.nnels, In the absence of' adequate data,' this
curve ma.y also be applied approximEl.tely to jumps formed in kapezoidal ·1
4
T
~tld\llor
1/ I I I I 1/ I" I I I ! I 1 channels.
15-6. The Surface Profile. Knowledge of the surface profile of a
li-'eolOS(;illtlliJiCj
j !
lUI'fIP4fTlP jlimp Sleady lump Sirang- jump
f.'
s,,'rlacp.·7
lurbulenr.e only
f..-Vlo.,,)'
----- f.. --- - ---- -- --- ---
8esl perto~rnOl1ce --A~''-P'Ob''--T -- £;-p-.n;';';~~i~19b~i;.-'-;;J
per lotm:Jnt;;e rough SudClce c:ofloilior.s
jump is desirable in designing the freeboard' for the retaining walls cif the
stilling basin where the jump takes place. It is important also for deter- I
3
o
T
2 3 6
I /I! I 9I I 10I I III I 12I , IJI I ,.I I I I I i I I l-C
IS 16 11. IS IS 20
mining: the pressure for use in structural design, because experiments have
F"V.!m, shown that the vertical pressure on the horizontal Hoor under a hydraulic' '. \

FIG. 15-4. Length in terms of sequent depth y, of jumps in l,lorizontal channels.

(Bt;!,sed all dala and rer.ommendations of u.s. Bl!rerwof BeclallwUon [34].)
jump is practically the same as would be illdicatedby the water-surface
~fi~, '
I
On the basis of their e,xperimelltal data, Bakhmeteff and Matzke [17J
Bureau of Reclamation data [34,35] obtained from six test flumes. Per- have found that, the EUrface' profile of a hydTaulic Jump can be rcpre-
fect agreement was found between the yJ/E 1 curve and the data. The sented by dimensi6nle:3s curves for various F 1 vaJues, as shown in Fig.
agreement between the E2/El or t.E/E l curve and the data was f!lirly 1,5-5. Moore [40] has developed simil8,r curves for jumps helow a fr'ee
good except for PI < 2. The experimental curve for t.E/E l recom- overfalL The profiles shown by lVIoore rise more rapidly at the beginning
mended by the Bureau is shown by the dashed line (Fig. 15-3). The than do Bakhmeteff and lVIatzke's proiile". It is believed that this is
agreement between the yziE l and h;/E1 curves and the data was good for because t.he nonhy?rostatic-pressllt'e distribut;ion in the jump wasIlot
high Fl values, but the scattered data failed to define the curve8 B.CCU- registered properly by the piezometri"c measurements for Bakhmeteff and
mtely forF l <:; :3. Matzke's data. Furthermore, Moore's length of jump was about 20%
15-5. Length of Jump. The length of a j-ump may be defined as the longer than that shown by the Bakhmeteff-Matzke curves. Since the
distance measured from the front face of the jump to a point on the surface jump in the latter case ...vas formed downstream from a regUlating sluice,
immediately dowIlstream from the roller. This length cannot be deter': lack of agreement may be caused by a difference in the velocity profile of
mined easily by theory, but it has been investigated experimentally by, the shooting flow entering the jump. '
many hydrauliciaus. 2 ' 15:"7, Location of Jump. Hydraulic, jump occurs in a supercritical
I 'It is possible that at least part of this discrepancy is due to, the scale effect of the flow when the depth changes abruptly to its sequent depth. Theo-
testing model (see next article). retically speaking, the jump will occur in a horizontal rectangular channel
, Among them Safranez at the Technical University of Berlin [36,37J, \Y6ycicki at if the initial and sequent depths and the approaching Fl'oude number
the Federal Institute of Technology in Ziirich, Swit~erland [381, Araviri in Russia [391,
8atisfy Eq, (3-21). This theoretical condition is generally used to locate
Bakhmeteff and Matzke at Columbia University [17), Moore at the California Insti-
tute of Technology 140}, a~d the engineers of the U.S. Bureau of Reclama.tion [34,35J. the position of a jump. For a closer estimate of the jump positi()ll, how-

'-"l
 400 RAPIDLY VARIED FLOW·. HYDRAULIC JUM? AND. ITS USE AS. ENERGy 'DISSIPATOR 401
A' •
ever, the length of the jump should be considered. The following will
illustrate the locaGion of a hydraulic jump in three typical cases (Fig.
--c"~
............. Fl.
15-6) :
Case A shows the jump below a regulating sluice in a mild channel.
The profiles A Band CD c.an easily be identified as of J\lI3 and M2 type,
respeet.ively. The methods of computing these profiles are discussed in
Chap. 10. The curve A'B is a plot of the depth sequent to AB. By

1'Ol~·~-n
0.9
-J
I
'i
F,o 1.98~
F,=2.92"
CIJse A

0.8· I F,=4.09, -,~:-...."-+nl)Y--1r---j

.., F , ' 5 .53 ~-A,"--:;,¥,-A"l'---+--+
0., F l ' 8.63

0.6

~ 0.5 i--j----l'l<---:>f7"-7''b''-- ~------.

0.4 i--j---,/C-I:t'7"-+''<--+---+

0.3 l------tl'--f7'-tr:;r-j---I----; --+--t-

Case B

.. 0.1 f.-...I"IA--+-~t-

1 3 4 5 7 8
x /h j
FIG. 15-,5. DimewSlouless snrface profiles of hydraulic jumps in hOl'izontnl channels ..
(Based on Bakhmeic.tf-Mal .• ke (lata [17J.)

the position of pI, the length of the jump can be estimated. By trial
Case C
and error, a horizontal intercept bet,ween the curves A'B and CD can be
found equal to the length of jump. For instance, the horizontal distance F1G. 15-6. Location of a hydraulic jump.
EF is equal to the length of the j'Jmp corresponding to the dept,hyz at F.
It becomes apparent thHt the jump will fOl'm between G r.nd F, Slllce .the ;
depth at F is sequent to the depth at G und the distll,nce EF measures the When there is a hydraulic jump below a sluice, the issuing flow from
the sluice will form 0. jet that possesses a vena. conti"acta, '1'he distance
length of the jump. It may be noted th~t, if the length of the jump were
not taken into account in the analysis,the jump would have been con- L, from the vena contract,!L to the sluice opening is usually short. Hegitrd-
. iug this distance, there is.a generally adopted rule which stc'l.tes that the
sidered to form at the upstream ]Joint F', resulting in an error represented
vena contracta is located approximately at a distance h from the sluice
by F'F. In case A, it can be s£en that, by. increasing the downstream , opening. l
{ water depth or raising the curve CD, t~e jump can be moved up~tream.
i J., The downstream depth may be raised to such a height that the ju~p will
1 This rule was first used by Agroskin [41J. It is baseq. on the assumptions that
eventually be ;drowned out.in front of t~e sluice. Decreasing the' down- ~ Row from a sluice correspond,S to one-half the flow from a. drclliar orifice and that the .,
1 stream depth PI' lowering CD will move the jump downstream.' . 'lena contracta in the flow fro'm lJ. cil'cular orifice is located approximately at a, distance
) The above discussion applies also to the lo!!ation of a jump fOI'med at I)f half an orifice diameter from the orifice, The rule of half orifice diameter was
the foot of a weir 01' overflow spillway, . originated by Weisbach [421.
 1
402 RA.PIDLY VARIED FLOW ,
.\
JUMP AND ITS 'USE AS ENERGY DISSIPATOR. 403
CIUl6 B shows the jump in a channel having a break in the bottom slope
tha.t changes from steep to mild. For simplicity, it. is assumed that the
flow is uniform in the channel except in the reach between the jump and
the break. The jump may occur in either the steep channel or the mild
II is
I

bR~
. ~~Cc»' -
I 5f-. <-

channel, depending on whether the downstream depth Y2 is greater or less i

than the depth y/ sequent to the upstream depth Yl. If the depth Y2 is
greater than'YI', the jump ,will Ocettr in the steep region, Then the
surface curve OC is of 81 type. The line A I P indicates the depth sequent
4 /:/' I

to the line AR. Now, determine a horizontal intercept IJ between A'P / /, !

, I --

and CO that is eq,ittl to the length of a jump.· n is apparent that a jump

HJ will the section containing J. If the depth Yz is lowered.
y I II i I

approximately to less than y/, the jump wili start to move into the mild if / I , i
i

channel: In this case, the jump can be located a.s described in case A,
Case C shows the jump behind an ove"fiowban'ier.' Theoretically, a 2~ !I !
I
I
I
I
i

jump will form if the depth at the barrier is greater than .the depth Yl' \/ \1
~E'~_
I

sequent to the approaching sllpercritical depth Ill. The loca.tion of the

jump is the same as that for case B if the jump oecur" in the sLeep region.
1
1/' '-,
"""-....
; ~ye
I
~..; -
Increasing; the height of the barrier will' mOYe the jump upstream. L .- . - .
r-- 1---"- I
eCf'el:\,Sln.g the heighb wiIi move the jump downstream. When the depth
at the barrier is less than the sequent depth y/, the barrier will be crossed
oV
o 1 2 4 ::; ~
I
i
'.1
100 6 B 9 10 Scale (Dr E
by a standing swell in the form of a single undular surface rise which will 200 ;)00 400 500 600 Scole (," F
not be followed by further undulations. 1"10. 15·7, The E curve and F curve for the determination of jump location. .\
Example 1.6-1. Lo;)ate the hydraulic jump in Examp.le 10-3 if the flow downstream I
from the jlllnp is uniform. . ~ ,
Solution. From the given data, the ,pecific-energy curve E = lJ + C!I. V~/2g and
the curve F = 13Q;1gA + fA. of the channel may be constructed as sbown
in '15-7, InComputing the spenific-force curve, the va.tue of fJ may be ~tima.ted
as 1.04 tor IX = l.10 [using Eqs. (2-6) and (2-7)).
Below the sluice, the M3 profile has been computed in Example 10-3, as ShOWll by
{
AGB in Fig. 15-8. Using the curves in Fig. 15-7 and following the method described
in Art. 3-7, the curve of sequent' depth A'F'B co~respondirig to tile curve of initial !
.• 1
depth AGE ClJ,n be determined,l The curve A'F'B a.nd the downstream flow p::-ofile
CF D (equa.! to the nOl'ma.l-depth line in this example) interSect at P'. The initial £----:'!£.I:.._
depth of flow at F' is then found from the M3 profile to be 1.70 ft. The (l/ll're-
sponding F = 1.52 and, from Fig. 15-4, Lly. = 3.6, The length of the jump is ~-- -----~ p-~-- - --
therefore equlJ,l to L = 3.6 X 2,67 = 9.0 ft. At this point there is an approxima-
tion involved, becs.use the length of jump should be based on F a.t E (instead of F/l,
which, however, is as yet unknown ..
In this example ,I> is equal to. the OOrmal depth of flow in ,the channel since the flow M3-proI1l.e

downstream.is uniform: If the How downstream is not unif,Qrm but gra.dually varied,
then the depth a.t the intersection F' of the downstream profile with the curve A'F'B
should be taken as 'iI" This i.;;. also an approxima.tion, because the aqtua.l depth lJ1
should be at F, the position of which is as yet unknown. .
. lOwing to the difference between," and 13, the computed critica.l depths indicated . I
;by the specific-energy and specific-force CU.J:VBs are not precisely identica.l. However,
the discrepancy is so small that it cnn be ignored. .
FIG. 15-8. Location of a hydraulic jump.
 405
404 RAPIDLY VARIED ']i'LOW ''''P AND ITS USE AS ENERGY DISSIPATOR
HYDRAULIC JU "'- ,
.After the lrmgth of jump is determined, a hOI'izonta,i intercept EF equal to 9.6 ft t.han Y2. This means that the tailwateI' depth in' ?l1se '1 is decreased .
iq found uetw",m the ourve A'fi"B and ·eF'D. The hydraulic jump will, therefore, As a result, the jump will recede downstream to a pomt ",-here ~q, (3~21)
occltr between G and fi', A.~ shown in Fig. 15-8, the jump appears to start at a dis-
. tance of about 140 it fronl the. vena oontracta. Since the location of the jump is
is again satisfied. This case must, if possible, be aVOlde~ lD deSign,
determined, the n.pPI:oximations menf;ioned above can be checked, and more exact because the jump, repelled from the . apr~n, will take place
determination can be made by repeating the procedure if desired. Such verification either on the ;oose rubble bed or, still m entIrely unprotected
seems unnecessary, \iowel'er, Oil account of the approxima.tions 'involved in the theory
aud other aspects of the prohlem, .

15-8. Jump as Dissipator. From iL practical viewpoint,

hydl'iLulic jump is a useful means of dissipating excess energy in l3uper-
critical flow. Its merit is in preventing possible erosion below overflow
spillway:?, chutes, and for it quickly reduces the velocity of the
flow on a· paved apl'on to a· point. where the flow becomes incfl.pable of
scouring the downstream channel bed, CjJSi! I: Yz
The hydraulic ju~p used for energy dissipation is usually confined
pa.rtly or entirely to a chunuel reach that is known as the stilling basin.
The bottom of the basin is p~wed to resist scouring, In practice, the
stilling basin is seldom designed to confine the entire length ofa free
hydraulic jump on the paved apron, because such a basin would be too
expensive. Consequently, necessoria!: to control the jump u·re usually
installed in the basin. The purpose of surh control. is to shorten
the range .within which the jump will take place and thus to reduce the
size and cost of the basin. The control has additional advantages,
for it improves the dissipation fLU1ction of the basin, stabilizes the jump
action, and in some C!lSeS increases the factor of safety. In designing a
stil:ing basin using hydraulio jump as energy dissipator, the following
practical features should COllflidered. 1
A. Jump Position. There are three alternative patterns (Fig. 15-9)
that allow a hydrnulic jump to form dr}wnstream from the source (such
source as an overflow ilpillway, a chute, or a sluice): ccse 3: yi ,. Yz
Case 1 represents the pattern iil which the tailwatel' depth Y2' is equal
. to the depth Y2 sequent to YI. In this case, the values of F\, y), a.nd FIG. 15-9. Effect of tauwllter depth on the formntion of a hydraulic j lInlp below a w"ir
. or sluice.
Y2' (=: Yl) will satisfy (3-21), and the jump will occur on a solid a.pron
immediately a.he~Ld of the depth y 1. For ;;eour-protection PlU'POS~s, this is
an ideal case, One big objection to this pattern, however, is tha.t a little chm1llel, resulting in severe erosion. .The remedy for the design is to use
difference between the·actual and assumed values of the relevanthydrau- a certain co~trol in the channel bottom, which will increase the tailwater
liD coefficients may cause the jump to move downstreani from its esti- depth and thus ensure a jump within t.he protected apron.
, Case 3 represents the pattern in which the tail \V£\.ter depth Y2' is greater
" :r;llltted position. Consequently, some device to control the position of
the jump is alw!1Ys necessary. than Ya. This means that the tailwater depth in case 1 is increased. As
Case 2 represents the in which the tailwater depth y{ is less a result, the jump will be forced upstream and may finally be drowned out
at the source, becoming a submerged jump. This is possibly the safest
l For sinlplicity, the lellgth of the' hydraulic jump will not be considered in the
case in desi~w, because the position of the jump can be most
present discussion. See [251, [341, (35), [4S), and" Hydraulic. Energy Dissipators," by
readily fixed .. Unfortunately, the design is no~ efficient, for little energy
E, A. Elevatorski, Mc'Graw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York, 1959, for further
iniormatioll 011 the design of stilling basins. will be dissIpated.'
 ., .
.•r

406 RAPIDLY VARIED FLOW HYDRAULIC JUMP AND ITS T!SE AS ENERGY DISSIPATOR 407
B. Tail'W((,ter Conditions. In the above discussion it is assumed that, jump will occur on the protected apron is to use sills to create a stilling
the tail water has a celtain fixed position, whether its depth YI' is equal to, basin (Art. 15-9).
less than, or greater than the sequent depth Yi. In most practical prob- Class 3 represents the cot'ditions in which the jump rating curve is
lems, however, the tai~water fil.!ctuates, owing to changes in discharge of always at a lower stage than the tail water rating curve. This means that
flow in the channel. In such cases, a tailwater rating curve is U!lUaHy case 3 in Fig. 1.5-9 occurs at all times (i.e., the tail water is higher than the
available to show the relation between the tailwatcl' stage Yz' and the sequent depth) and that the jump will move upstream and will probably
discharge Q. In a similar way, a jump rating curve may ~e constructed be drowned out at the Source. Consequently, little energy wilt be dis-
sipatr:!d. An effective method to ensure a jump is to build a sloping apron

.~<>ilL
y~;;equent de'plh,
above the channer·bed level (Art. 15-16). The slope of the apron can be
Coso. I Cose 2
such that proper conditions for a jump will be developed on the apron at
-'~rJU~"p
yi'toilwa:er depth
"'0 1 Clfin g aJl discharges. Another method is to provide a drop ill the channel floor.
~ \'
alJd thus to lower the tailwater depth (Art. 15-10).
Class 4 represents the conditions in 'which the jump rating curve is at a
~
'"m, '" "",'
toilwcler rating
: , /;
~ I
Tailwoter
roting higher stage than the tailwD,ter rating curve at low discharges but nt a
~ ~ . .
lower stage at high discharges, An effective method to ensure n jump is
Discharge Q Discharge Q
to provide a stilling basin for forming a jump at low discharges and to
combine with the basin a sloping apron for developing a satisfactory jump
at high discharges. . I
Cose :3 Cose 4 Cose 5 Class 5 represents the conditiona in which the jump rating curve is at a ·1
->-," lower stage than the tailwater rating curve fit low discharges but at a higher
'C
<:
'C
<:
stage at high discharges. An effective method to ensure a' jump is to
>.
N ":::' ":::' increase the tail water depth sufficiently high by providing a stilling pool,
thUd forming a jump at high dischatges.
'"'"co
~

'" '"
'" "'"
" ~ "
(;,
'" Disc horg e 0
'"
FIG. 15-10. Classification of tailwater conditions for the design of scour-protection
works.
to show the relation between the sequent depthY2 and the discharge Q;
Because of the difference in the relative positions of the two rating curves,
Leliavsky (43] has suggested that the design may be considered according
to five different classes of condi tions (shown respectively by fLVe cases in
Fig. 15-10): . avoided. In many cases use of this jump cannot be avoided but, in other
Class 1 represents all ideal conditions in which the two rating curves
always coincide. This means that case 1 in Fig. 15-9 exists at all times
and that a jump will form at the desired place on a protective apron at
all discharges. . Conditions of thisolass are mrely encountered naturally.
Class 2 represents the conditions in whic.h the jump rating curve is
always at a higher stagetha,n the taiIwater rating curve. ThiS means
that case 2 in Fig. 15-9 exists at all times (i.e., the tail water depth is
lower than the jump sequent depth) and that the jump will form at a
certain place far downstream. An effective method of ensuring that the
C. J'urnp Types. In~, view of the various types of hydraulic jump
Discharge Q
df;lf!cribed in Art. 15-3, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation [34,35J gives the
following practical considerations:
1. All types of jump are encountered in the design of stilling ba5ins.
. 2. The weak jump requires no baffles or special consideration. The
Ollly requirement necessal'Y is to provide the propel' length of a pool,
which is relatively short.. This can be determined from Fig. 15-4.
3. The oscillating jump,.frequently encountered in the design of canal
structnres, diversion dams, ::mcl eVen outlet 'Yorlcs, i.s difficult to handle.
If possible, jumps in the 2.5-to-4.5 Froude-number range shollid be
cases, aitering of dimensiot's ma'y bring the jump into the desirable range.
Baffle blocks 01' appurtenances are of little va:lue. Waves are the main
source of difficulty; hence specially designed wave suppressors may be
used to cope with them.
4. No particular difficulty is encountered in steady jumps. Arrange"
ments of baffles and sills to be discussed later will be found valuable as a
means of shortening the length of the stilling basin.
5. As the Fronde number inereases, the jump becomes more sensitive
to taihvater depth, For Froude numbel;s as low as 8, a tailwater depth
i
I
~.
 " SENERGY DISSIPATOR 409
EniDRA.ULIC . JUMP AND ITS USE A " ,
408 RAP'LDLY VARIED .FLOW . ..,. . ·scont~olled by the sill, however, cannot be
greater than the sequent depth is advisable to make certain that the jump exact pOSItIOn of the Jump. a d l t d this positio.n can be repre-
. d 1 f cally In the rno e s u YI . t
will stay on Hm apron. . cletermme ana Y .1 ,. X .d· The ratio is taken as constan
sented by the ra:10 between. an "uY2~iellt to ~nsure a complete jump.
in each tes~1 hav!llg a m~gn~tud~till~ basin should be made at lea~t
6. When the Froude number is than 10, a stilling basin using
as
the jump a dissipator may no longer be the most economical dissipatiun
In the deSIgn, the lengt .0 a ~ gh' er· the length of the basm
device. In this case, the difference between the initial and sequent
depths is great, and) generally spe&king, 8, very dj'lep basin with high equa" 1.w
.' X.'. }i'<lr economiC reasons, 0',1, ev I .

retaining wall is required. The cost of the basin may .not be

commensurate with the results obtained. A bucket of dissipator 1
may give comparable results at lower cost.
15-9. Control of Jump by Sills. The hydraulic jump can be controlled
or effected by sills of various designs, such as sharp-crested weir, brcad-
crested weir, and ~,brupt rise and drop in channel floor. The function of
the sill is to ensure the formation of a jump and to control its position
under all probable operating conditions. .
Interesting experiments [46J have shown that the forces acting on the
sill in a jump decrease rapidly to a minimum as the downstream end of
the jump is moved upstream to a position approximately over the silL
The force then increases slowly to a constunt ,;alue f.s the jump is moved
farther upstream. This change in force on the sill is probably due to a
change in the velocity distribut.ion from one end of the jump to the other,
since llonuniform distribution of velocity is· a characteristic of such
rapidly varied flow. As a result, the momentum in the nonuniform- 9
distribution section is greatly increased. Theoretically: speaking, the
control of hydraulic jump by s~lls can be analyzed by t.he momentum
. , F hIli !lnd Xly~ for ".",,_~. re"C~Ll weir.
theory; Because of lack of accurate of the velocity distribu-" FIG. 15-11. Experimental relal.lons among, t,
II.

tim!., however, the theoretical analysis cannot predIct the quantitative (A.jler Fm'Bte1' "'Id Bhinc/e [23J.1
result very closely. For useful design information one has to rely upon
• . T 'd d th t the high bottom velocities
~:!~~~~ ~:~i:S~:~:~:!~:;;:I v:lue ;ollsidered safe for the
e..~perimental studies.
. Dimensional a::mlysis shows that the relations the Froude. mtatyh' be down- .
a ee .
number Fl or F of the approachingflo\~) the height 12 of the stream channel condit.ion. . . . . of ex )el'imental data
approaching depth Vl, the depth Y2 upstream from the aill, the distance X A Control by Sharp-c1'e$ted Wetr. On the baSIS dI- 1 d ·d'a-
from the toe aLthe jump to the sill, and the downstream depth 1/3 may be . .., d Sk 'nde [231 have eve ope a h
an d th'Coretical analYSIS ' l' orst.er
. an . n (1) Froude numb ei'F 0 f
expressed as

:l
, (Fin- 15-11) showing the relatIOns D.mong· .' d h
glf.l.Dl o· , b tween the well' heIght h an t e
=, ~ ( F, ~, ~:) (15-3) the appr~achln~ ~ow, (2~ ~;) ~~:l~ati~ between the distance X fram
approachmg dept Yl, an. d th dep! tIl y upstream from the Well',
t?e
h' to the well: an e 2 "
This function can be determined quantitatively by model studies. The toe 0 f t e Jump. 1 . f the effec. of a (TivBJ;l weir for known
This pe~mrts an ana !~IS 0 ,.- "h t the norm.:'l.l tailwater
1 This isan \Ipturned bucket provided a.t the toe of !I. sp'illway to deflect the ov·er- anproach and tallwater condItions, pIovlded t a. 'st.t that iil pro-
flow up :through the tailw!l.ter. If tlle ta.i1water is high enough t:o submerge the • . ff t th discharge over t he, Well' Cle} <,
bl~cket, :Ii. roller wiU form downstrelj.m from the bucket and tend to mo~e bed materials
toward the dam. thus preventing Eel'io~!s scour at the toe of the dam:. Onthe other
:33
~~X:~ ~o;: +O~.;5~~ Or~inarilY, ul1su'bmerged conditions pteya~l ,over
h!lD.d,if ~he ta.ilwater is low, the overflow will be thrown up and alit so th!lt it will . 1 This condition was first observed by Bazin (see reference [12] of Chap. 14) find

strike a solid-rock channel, if any, at a safe distance below the dam; See [44), [45]1 . later demon:;trated theoreticn.l1.y by Bakhmetcfi [27]. , .
p.nd Arts; 1<1-10 and 1 4 - 1 1 , · . .
 )

410 RAPIDlJYVARIED FLOW
a wide l;allge of Thus, v.lvl in Eq. (15-3) can be dropped.
If submergence occurs, the jump is forced upstream with possible drown-
ing as a .result,
In the diagram, any point is represented by a pair of coordinat~s
(F,h/Vl)' If the point lies within t,he curves, hydniulic jump will occur,
with its relative position indicated by the corresponding interpolated
value of X/Y2. Points lying above and to the left of an interpolated curve
represent the conditions under which the weir is t,oo nigh, so that the
jump will be .forced upstream and possibly drowned at the sonrce.
Points lying to the right,of the curve repre'sent the c011ditiol1s under which
the weir is too low, so that the jump will be forced dO'wllstreal1l and
possibly washed out. Y{hen the weir is as low as this, it ma~r be crossed , i
HYDRAULIC JUMP AND ITS USE AS ENERGY DISSIPATOR 411
mental data, this curve may be usecL as. a guide in .proportioning
(l.stilling basin broad-c;rested weir as. jump control, provided
Yl < (2Y2 + h)/3.
A broad-cre.~ted weir has certain advantages in comparison with some
other types of control. It has greater structural stability than a sharp-
crested weir and usually requires lower cost of exc[1.vation than an abrupt
rise.
4

only by a single undular surface rise, forming a standing swell (Fig. 15-6).
For design purposes, it, is proposed that the curve X/Y2 = 5' in the
diagram be used. Laboratory expedence has shown that the highest
required weir does not necessarily occur under conditiollSOf maximum .F
.2
.S1
discharge [20]. Consequent.!}', the highest required weir should have the 1:;
largest required value of h within the expected l'3.l1ge of as ~ 2r---~+-----1-----~~~~--~-····~············---r----~-----1

determined from the diagram,

B. Control by Broad-crested Weir. For a br'Jad-crested weir, ift11e
downstream depth is lower than the critical depth OIl wp of the weir, that
is, if Ys < (2Y2 + h)/3, the tailwater iyillnot affect appreci~~bly the rela-·
tion between the head water elevation and the Thus, .the
discharge over a unit width of the weir can be written' 6 7 8 9
Values of F,

+ )
~.
q 0.433 (
~ 'H:;'
. Yz h
(15-4)
F'IG. 15-12. Analytical relations between F and
Forslar and Skdr.de [23J.)
"-hit for a broad-cre~ted weir. (A/tel'

·Since q = V IY1, H = Yz II, and F the above equation

can be reduced to C .. ControZ by Abrupt Rise. From the experimental data, Forster and
Skrinde (23J have developed a diagram (Fig, 15-13) showing the reh.ltions
2.667:F 2 (1
.
+ ya!
}tIy2.)
YI
(15-5) among F, Ya/Yl, and h/Yi of an abrupt rise for X 5(11 +
Ya). The con-
siste!lcy of the relations was verified by a theoretical using
When a hydmulic jump is effecte.d by the weir, YZiYl can be related to F the momentum theory, sImilar to that made for a broad-crested weir
through Eq. (3-21). Then, (15-5) becon1es (Example 3-2). This diagram the prediction of the performance
of a given abrupf, rise when Vi, illl Yz, YI, and 11. are known.
(15-6) In the diagram, a point (F,Y3/Yl) lying above the line Va "" Yz repre- .oj
sents the condition of Y3 > Yz in which the abrupt rise would serve only
This equation giv.es the relation between h/Yl and F and can be plotted to increa.se the dl'owllirlg effect, Fora point lying wit,hin the .experi-
. as the curve shown in Fig. 15-12. Forster :and Skrinde (23J have found mental range between the lines for Ya Y2 and Y3 y., the position of·
that this curve coinddes ·with the: experimental data for an abrupt the point relative to the. corresponding h/y, curve indicates the effe6t of .. \
rise with y~ = Yo for X = 5(h + Ya)., Despite the lack of furtherexperi- the abrupt rise on the flow pattern. Thus, if the point lies on the cor-
responding hllh curve, a jump will form with X = 5(h + Va). Irthe
l This is (3-17) except that 1" is replaced by 11" point lies 011 the left and above the curve, the rise. is too high, and the

J
 'USE' AS ENERGY DISSIPATOR
tH3
HYDRAULIC JUMP AND ITS
412 RAPIDLY VARIED FLOW
Jump troyels upslreom -
jump will be forced upstream and may finally be drowned. If the point
1 is at the right of the curve, the rise is too low, and the jump will be forced
I downsti'eam toward the' abrupt rise and mayfinnJly be wil.shed out.
If a point (F,Y3/Yl) lies in the diagram below the line Y3 = 1'" then the V1-
normal downstream flow is sl.lpercritical. A jump is followed by a critical
section cre..'Lted over the crest of the abrupt rise, so that the rise acts as a
weir, and the design diagram (Fig. 15-11) for the sharp-Cl'ested weir may be
. used.

v,
Y, ----+-

,
~.

l
\ Volue s of F 16~ .

FIG. 15-13. Experimental relations among F, YJ/V I, and 7t/y, for an abrupt rise. (AJter
Forster and Shhule [23].) i4n~~-l

For design purposes, the diagram (Fig. 15-13) can be used to determine 12 ~"'--+---+-----t-.--
the necessary length and depth of stilling basin when V 1, Yr, and Ya are
known. It is proposed that a point (F,1/3/Yl) be first defii,led for condi- ,;::- 10 f-.----+---j--.-
tions at or near maximum discharge and tha,t the corresponding value of ;,.
hjyl be determined by interpolation .. By repeating this procedure for
other discharges within the expected range of discharge, a largest required
value of h enD be obtained. This value should be used for the highest
required rise. A minimum height. of rise necessary to prevent the jump
from being washed out can also be thus determined.
15-10. Control of Jump by Abrupt Drop. The control of hydraulic
'"

i :1--~qL___;~..w~-~ -f ----+----t-------1

~"i-3-~.:--
jump by sills is useful if the downstream depth is smaller than the sequent
depth for a normal jump. If the downstremu depth is btrger than the
sequent depth for a normal jump, a drop in the channel flooi' must be
used in order to ensme a jump. This condition occurs generaUy at the
end of the expansion of R supel'critical flow.
.'
OO~~'~"--~--~2~-~~3 4L----::---;:s
5
7 8 9 10

For Il. given appro<lching Froude number, the do\vnstream depth of a F=vl/fol
drop may fali in any of the five regions as sh9Wl1 in Fig. 15-14tt. The , . I f
• 1 • I f ns among F Y';YL, and lI'Yl or an
lower limit of region 1 is the depth at which the jump will begin to travel FlO 15-14. Experin1antal and analytIcal Ie a10' .
Il:Dr~pt drop. . (After E. Y. Hsu [471.)
upstream. The uppe.r limit of region 5 is the 'depth at which the jump
 I
i
414 RAPIDLY VARIED FLOW.
I HYDRAULIC JUjI,lP AND ITS USE AS ENERGY DISSIPATOR
will begin to· tr:'L\'ci do "'llS cream , Evidently, the drop does not control
the jump in these two regions. The jum.p is stable and the drop is effec-
tive for its desired purpose only in regions 2 and 4. The intermediate
region 3 represents an undular state of flow without a breaking front.
By applying the continuity and momentum equations in an analysis
similar totlutt made for the broad-crested weir (Example 3-2), HSll [47J
has shown that, for region 2,
(15-7)
and, for region 4,
F2 = liYa/Y1 [( ~ + 1)2 _ (J0.)2l (15-8)
. 7't 1 - yJivl \ Y l 1 l 1 J
These equations have been verified by experimen lcs. 1 The rebtions
among F, Y./Yl, and h/Yl are shown in Fig. 15-14.
In Fig. 15-14, each curve for a given h/YI has two relatively straight
limbs connected by a short straight portion near the middle. The left-
side limb represents the condition corresponding t.o rl~gion 2 and the right~
side limb represents the condition corresponding to region 4. This dia-
gram may be used for design purposes to determine the relative height of
drop required to stabilize a jump for any given combination of discharge,
upstream depth, and downstream depth.
15-11. StillingBasins of Generalized Design. In important works or
works that involve a lflrge number of stilling basins, generalize.d desigll:>
for the basins are often necessary fol: economy a.nd to meet specific
requirements. 'These designs can be developed through years of experi-
ence and observations on existing structures, or by model investigatiolls,
or from both. The basins thus designed are usually provided with
special appurtenances, including chute-blocks, sills, and. baffle piers.
The chute blocks ~Lre used to form a serrated device at the entrr.nce to
the stilling basin. Their function is to furrow the incoming jet and. lift a
portion of it fr0111 the fioor, producing 11 shorter length of i ump thail would
be possible without them. These blocks also tend to stabilize the jump
and thus to improve its performance.
The sill , either dentated 2 or solid, is usually provided at the end of. the
,.
i
stilling basin. Its function is to reduce further the length of the Jump
and to control seoul'. For large basins that are designed for high inconl-
1 A simplified analysis and further experiments were also·made later by Moore and
Morgan [481.
, The dentnted sill or serrated baffle is also known as the· Rehbock sm; because it
was first patented by Prof. Theodor Rehbock after it was developed from experiments
made during 1924 to 1927 at the Technical University of KarLsruhe, Germany.
I\
,
i·
j
415
ing velocities, the sill is usually dent::Ltcd to perform the additional func-
tion of diffusing the residual portion of the high-velocity jet that may
reach the end of the basin.
Baffle piers are blocks pla,ced in intermediate positions across the basin·
floor. Their function is to dissipate energy mostly by impact action.
The baffle piers are very useful in small structures with low incoming
velocities. They are unsuitable,· however, where high velocities make
c!witation possibie. In certaiIl circumstances, they must be designed
to withstand impact from ice or floating debris.
There are many generalized designs of stilling basin that use a hydraulic
jump as the means of energy dissipation.! Three typical designs will be
described in the subsequent artides: -
1. The SAF basin. This is reCl)mmended for use on snutll scructUl'es
such as small spillways, outlet works and small canal structures whBre
FJ = 1.7 to 17. The reduction in ba~in length achieved through the use
of appurtenances designed for the basin is about 80% (70 to 90%).
2. The USBR basin II. This is recommended for use on large struc-
tures such a,s large spillways, la.rge canal stnlCtures, etc., for FJ > 4.5.
The jumwand-basin length is reduced about 33 % with the us~ of appur-
tenances.
3. The USBR basin IV. This is recommended for use with jumps of
FI = 2.5 to 4.5, which usually OCCll!' on canal structures and diversion
dams. This design reduces excessive waves created in imperfect jumps.
It should be noted that these designs are only typical examples and
t.hat caution should be used in
applying them to stilling basins under
.)
entirely different design conditions.
The principle of the stilling basin applies also t.o the design of a canal
drop (.01' canal fall), which is a sti'ucture built to secure the lowering of the
water surface of a canal and the safe destruction of the energy so liberated. j
The canal drop is sometimes designed with a contracted width like the I
Parshall flume. Such a drop is known as a fiumed drop, which can eco-
nomically be built together witha crossing bridge and used as a meter or a
regulator as well [50,60-63].
15-12. The SAF Stilling Basin. This basin (Fig. 15-15; SAF denol;es
"Saint Anthony FalLs") W2.S developed at the St. Anthony Falls Hydrau-
lic Laboratory, University of l\iinnesota, for use on sma.lJ ,drainage struc- \
tures such as those built by the U.S, Soil Conservation Service. The I
design rules summ[Lrized by the investigator Blaisdell [22,64] are as
follows: (
L The length LB of the stilling basin for Froude nuinbers between
FI = 1.7 and FI = 17 is determined by LB' = 4.5ydF1G.76.
1
1 For mOl'e info!'.mation see [9], [25J, [34], [35], [43J, and [49J to [,58J. For designs
developed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, see 1591.
 ·416 . RAPIDLY .vARIED FLOW
HYDRAULIC JUMP AND I'rs· USE AS ENERGY PrSSIPA'J,'OR 417
RECTANGuLAR STILLING Bil.SIN
HALF-PLAN
2. The height of the chute blocks ::md floor blocks is y 11 and the width
. and spachlg are approximately 0.731/1.
3. The distance from the upstream end of the stilling basin to the floor
blocks is L11/3. .
4. No floor block should· be placed closer to the side v;all than 3y/.8.
5. The floor blocks should, be pbced downstream from the VjJ"~""'''50
between the chute blocks.
6: The floor blocks should occupy between 4{J and 55$ of the stilling-
hasin width. .
, \ 7; The widths and of the floor blocks fOl'divel'ging stilling
I
j, basins should be increased in proportiOll to the increase in stilling-basin
I
width at the floor-block location.
8. The height of end sill is by c. O.07y 2, 'tV here y 2 is the theo-
retical sequent depth corresponding t,Q 1f1.
g~ The depth of tailwater abov6 the stilling-basin floor is given by
yl = (LlO - F 1 2/120)Y2, for 1.7 to 5.5; by YI' = O.85Y2, for
F1 = 5.5 to 11; and by 'Y2' = (LOO FN800)Y2, for F1 = 11 t'o 17.
l. 10. The height of the side wall 1lbove the maximum tailwater depth
to be expected during the life of the structure is given by z = Y2/3.
II. Wing walls should be equfll in height to the stilling-basin side walls,
The top of the wing wall should have i1 slope of 1 on 1.
12. The. wing wall should be placed at an angle of 45° to the outlet
center li.~1e.
i3. 'l1.e stilling-basin side wail~ may be parallel {as in 1} rectangular
stilling basin) 01' they may diverge as an extension of the transition sidl;)
walls (as in a trapezoid~l stilling basin).
14. A cutoff wall of nominal depth should be used at the end of the
CENTERLINe: SECTION
stilling basin. .
15. The effect Qf entirained air should be neglected in the design of the
stilling basin.
15-13. USER Stilling Basin II. From intensive studies of many
existing structures and laboratory illvestigations, various tYPElS of general-
ized design of stilling basin have been developed by theD.S, Bureau of
Reclamation [34,35}. L"SBR basin I is the basin· created by a· jump
occurring on a flat floor with no appurtenances. This can be designed
easily by following the principles descdbed in the' early D,l'ticles of this
chapter. However; such a basin is usually not very pructic!).! because of
TRAPEZOIDA;"
its expeI)sive length and its lack of control. USER basin IIi is designed
RECTAN GULA~ STiLLING BASIN
for a pu~pose similar to that of the SAF basill, but it has a higher factor
i DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION '
of safety, which is neceSS!1ry for Bureau use. The pel'forrhance of this
it
Fw.·15-15. Proportions of he SAF ba.sin. (U.S. Soil C~senlation Service [64J.) basin in~icates that the jump-and..:basilllength can be reduced about 60%
. with the appurtenances, as compared .vith 80 % for .the SAF basin.
Therefol'e, the SAF basin is shorter and more economical but, in cons&-
 <II. II -I
.5

'118 RAPIDLl VARIED FJ.,OW

i
.b.-
·.D2

VI -\
F "--
I~

(c I

1
(a]

28 I

26 1--..
A.7Q~
j; ",i
."'-:;;' !
i
1<9;.
17
/
24
V I 1 OJ/
i .
I'
I
I . /Sj/
22- / I'0/ .

20 ~. -- ' -:;c-=--
I
(J, +8F}-; L",
!
I I
ii-r-
;} / / 0'/
I?~
1'/ /[ i

18
I i
I / 0 I
/ .j
I \// i/// /,/
I I
~6

14
1/
I .£ ///
I
I
2 4 6 'S 10 12 14 16
'< Mi~fml,lm
12 11# . :'/.1
/
-W depth F,' Vj
./gD,

10
, 1/;, ~?~
'/
/ !
(dl 1
i
10/'/
II
8 :0 /,1
/_M

~'
6 ~
/
I
4 \~ .. ,- f-~ .. ;.........-
"/
2r-#"
o
0
)
·2
!
I
4 6
i
(3 iO 12
..• t----.

14 16 18 20
.l
-F ~ ~~
V,
1 .,.tgi),
(b)

FIG. 15-16. Design curves and proportions of USBR ba.sin II. (U.S. Bureau of
Reda.;nation [34].) fa} Definition of 5j·mbols; (b) minimum. tailwatet depths; (c)
i
length .of hydraulic jump; (c) n.pprotimate water surface and pressure profiles (conju-
gate depth = sequent depth); (e) recommended proportions.

FlO. 16--16 (Connn!(.ed).

419
I
I'
,
I
420 RAPIDLY VAlUED FLOW
quene!!',. has ~ lower safety factor. USER basin V is us6d where struc~
tU~'al er,onOlll,te8 dl~ti1.~e th6 lise .of a sloping a.Pl'Oll, usually on high~dam
s~dlways. ~ he ?nnclple of deSign for hydraulic on sloping apron
:Vlll ~e descl'lbed 111 Art.. ,lS-16. USBR basins II and IV will be described
III tillS and the next articles; respectively.
. USBR basin II was developed foJ' stilling basins in common use for
hlg~~dam a,~1(t eUl'th-dam spillways and for large canal structures. The
. ba,sln contall1S {:hute blocks at the upstream end and a dentated sillnel1r
the do:vl1stl'eo.m end. No baffle piers are used because the relatively high
velo?ltles the jUl,:\lP might canSe cavitation on· piel;". The
detailed and the data for COn1FJUtutiollS al'e shown in Fig. 1.5-16.
The rules recommended for the design are as follows:
1. .s~t apron eleva.tio~l to utilize full sequent tailwater depth, plus ~n
acl~led mctol' of sdety 1f needed. The dashed lines in Fig. 15-16b are
gmdes dn1wl: for vtl,dous ratios of actUttl tailwaterdepth .to sequent
depth. ,::itud1es of exis~il1g in:dicate that most of the b,usins wer<,
de~lgn~(l for sequent. tallwatel' depth or 1,,8s. HowBver, there is a. lilI:cit,
WhlCh.l~ ~overned by the curve labeled "Minin~um TW depth." TillS
curve IndICates the point at which the front oithe jump mo\'cS [l:\~Tay from
the chute blocks. In other words, any additional lowering of the tail-
. water depth would cause the ju:np to leave the 'basin; that would
pro~uce u "sweep-out." For design purposes, the b!l.Sin should not be
deSIgned for less than sequentclepth. For additional safety, in fact, the
Bureau recommends that f, minimum safety margin of 5 % of be added
to f,he sequent depth. .
2. Eosin II may be effec.tive dow::l to u Froude number of 4, but the
lowcr values should not be. t.aken for granted. For lower values,
W~:we supp!'esSlOll are recommended.
3. The length of basin can be obt~'l.ined from the length-of.-jump curve
III 15-16.::.. . . .
4. T~e height o~ chute blocks is equ!!.l to the depth Dl of flow ent.ering
the bl1S111. !he Width and spacing should,be approximately equal to D ;
l
however, tillS may be varied to eliminate the need for fractional blocks.
. A· s'pac~ eqll~l to O.5D l is prefemble along; eMh wall to reduce spray and
mamtam desJl'able pressul'e..'!. . is incipient is TW •• = 9.2 X 3.8 = 35.0 ft. Adding 8% to this figuro, the stilling
.5. The heighc of the . sill is equal to O.ZD~, and the rilaximum
wI~th and spacing recommended is approximately O.15D 2 • In this
deslgn a block is recommended adjn.cent to each side wall (Fig. 16-16e).
The slOPe of the continuous portion of the end sill is 2; 1. In the case of
1111rrow basi~" whic!.l would involve only a few dentates according to the
a.b?v~ rule,' It IS adVisable to reduce the width and th.e spacing; provided
thiS IS done pr'oportionally. Reducing the . .vidth and actually
ilYDRAULlC JU¥P AND ITS USE AS ENERGY DISSIPATOR
improves the peiorruance in narrow b!l.Sins; thus, the minimum width
and spacing of the dentates is governed only by structural conside~·ations.
6. It is not lleCeSS::l.rv to the chute blocks and the sill dentates.
In fact this practice is ~s1:ltl.llY inadvisable from' a construction standpoint.
7. The verification tests 011 basin II indicated no perceptible change in
the stilling-basin action with respect to the s!ope of the chute preceding
the basin. The slope of chute ":I1l'ied from 0.6: 1 to 2; 1 in these tests.
Actually, the slope Of the chute does have 9.n on the hydraulic jump
in sorile cases. l It is recommended tqat the sharp intersection between
chute and basin apron be replaced with a cltrve of reasonable i'adius
(R ~ '1,0,) when th'l slope of the chute. is 1; 1 or . Chute blocks
can be incorporated on the curved face as readily as on the plane surface".
On steep chutes the length of top surface on the chute blocks should be
made sufficiently loug to deflect the Jet.
The above rules ,,,ill result in a safe, cOl1servaUve stilLing basin for
with fall up to ZOO ft and. for flows up M 500 cfs per foot of
basin width, provided the jet entering the basin is I'easonably uniform
both in velocity and in depth. For g,Tet\ter falls; larger unit discharges, 01'
possible asymmetry, a model study of the specific design is recommended.
8. The approximate water-surface and pressure profiles of a jump in
the basin are shown mI5-1M.
Example 15-2. Pruportion a USBR llr.illing basin II for th.e overflow spillway
designed in Example 14-1. The tailwater elevation is at El. 920.0.
Solt,lion. Entering Fig. 14-15 with a h<;ad of 17.7 ft over the crest and !l. tot-al fall
of 120 ft. the velocity of fiow at the toe of the spillwa.y is 79 fps. Thus, the depth of
flow is 7;,000/(250 X 79) = 3.8 ft., !J.nd the Froude nuraber is 79/ v3.8v = 7.13.
Entering Fig. Hi-HliJ with f\ = 7.13, the solid line gives the ratio of '['IV depth to
Dl as 9.7 .. As TW depth and sequent ta.i1wawl' d~pth D. a!e identical in this case,
D.= 9.7 X 3.8 = 36.9 ft. The miniImnu tll.ihvater line for basin II on Fig. 15-11lb
shows that 2. margin 'of safety of about 4 % can be' expec~ed for the I).bove Fronde num-
ber. The elevation of th~ basin floor ia placed at EI. 8~3.1. j~hus, the tobl fall will
be 116.9 ft, but this will not change the flow velocity o.ppredr..bly.
Should it be desired to. provide a IDru:gin of safety of 80/0, the following procedure
ma.y be fol!owed. Consulting Fig. 15-16b, th6 li~8 for minimum TW depth for basin
II gives TW depth/D, = 9.2 for F, = 7.13. The tnilwater d~pth a.t which sweep-out
basin should be positioned again for a tail water depth of 35.0 X LOS 37.S ft 'or
l.OZ4D.. The ba.sin floor will be placed at EJ. 882.2.
1 The slope of the chute has little effect on the jump as long as the velocity distribu-
tion and depth of tiowa.re reasonably uniform on entering the jump.. If the chute is
long and fiat, the velocity maybe concentrated in one part of the flow section, result-
ing in an asymmetric8.1 jump with strollg side eddies. The operation of suell (l. .jump
is expensive and should be a.voided in ail stilling basins. Also, when the angle of
divergence of the chute is too la.rge for water tp follow properly, the jump will become
of
rough and uncertain its position.
 i
j
I
422 RAPIDLY VARIED FLOW HYDRAULIC JUMP AND ITS USE AS ENERGY DISSIPATon 423
The length of basin can be obtained by entering the curve in Fig. 15-16c with 15-15. The Straight Drop Spillway. The aerated free-fallillg nappe in
F, = 7.13. Tllll~, LID, = 4.16, or L = Lll = 4.Ui X 36.9 = 154 ft.
a stralght drop spillway (Fig. 15-18) will reverse its curvature and turn
The height" wid th, and spacing of the chute blocks as recommended are D I; thus the
dimension can be 3 £t 10 ill. The Might of the dentated sill is O.2D" or 7 ft 5 in., and smoot.hly into snperclitical flow on the apron. '. Consequently, a hydmulic
th~ wicl~h anc1 spacing of the dent,ates can be O.ISD" or 5 ft 6 in. jump may be formed downstream. Based on his own experimentai data

15-14. USER Stilling Basin IV. When F 1 =2.5 to 4.5, an, oscillating
jump WIll be produced in ,the stilling basin, generating a wave that is
difficult to dampen (Art. 15-3). USBR. basin IV (Fig. i5-H) is designed
to combat. this problem by eliminating the w~ve at its SOUl'ce. 1 This is
Imlmllllll//TIIlI//IlIII/I?/dIlIII/llwm
,..j---;---- L -..j

Fro.I5-IS. Flow geometry of a straight drop spillway.

and those of Moore [4.0J and Bakhmeteff and Feodoroff [65J, Rand [6l1J
found t.hat the flow geometry at straight drop spillways can, be described
by functions of the drop numL'61', which is defined as 1.,
o
Fractional space'
D=L
gh 3 (15-9)
- VI = mox.tooth 'Hid Ih OJ
o where q is the discharge per unit width of the crest of overfall, 9 i's the
; - 5 p oce,: 2.5w
acceleration of gravity, and h is the height of the drop. Tho functions
Top 'surface on 5° slope are
~d = 4.30Do.27 (15-10)
J
Vv
h = 1
_. OODc·.22 (15-11)
li'IG. 15-17. Pro,portions of USBR basin IV. (U.S. B1}.realt of Recla.ma.tr:on [34].)
~!l = 0.54Do.m (15-12)
achieved bv intensifying the roller, which a.ppears in the upper portion of ~2 = 1.66Do.27
. (15-13)
the jump "(Fig. 15-2), with directional jecs deflected from large chute ~

'blocks. The number of chute blocks shown iil Fig. 15-17 is the minimum
required to serve the purpose. For better hydraulic performance, it is
desil'fl.ble to construct the blocks narrower than indicated, preferably
O.75D 1 , and t.o set the tailwatel' depth 5 to 10% greater than the sequent
depth of the jump. The length of the basin is made equal to the length
of the jump in a horizontal stilling basin without appurtenances and,
chus can be determined from the curve in Fig. 15-4 (i.e., also equal to
the l~ngth of USBR basin I or L 1 )., Basin IV is applicable to rectangular
cross sections only.
liThe Bureau has also developed alt!lrnative designs to substitute for basin IV, such
II
ns the drop energy dissipator (Art.' 1&-15), wave suppressors, and the impact-type
energy dissipator [34,35].
where La is the drop length, that is, the distance from the drop waU to
the position of 'the depth YI; Y'P is the pool depth under the napp'e; VI
is the depth at the toe of the nappe or the beginning of the hydraulic
jump; and Y2 is the tailwater depth sequent to Yl. The position of the
! depth Vl can be approximately determined by the straight line ABC which
joins th.e point A on the apron at the position of Yl, the point B on the -1
\
I axis of the nappe at the height of pool depth, and the point C on the axis
I of the nappe lIt'the crest of the fall. The fact that these three points lie
on a straight line was also verified by experiment.
For a given height h and discharge q per unit width of the fall crest, '
,1
the sequent depth Y2 and the drop length La can be computed by Eqs.
(15-10) and (15-13). On the one hand, if the tailwater depth is less than

I
."
 424 425
UAPIDLY VARIED FIJOW ,HYDRAULIC J;UM:P AND ITS USE AS ~NERGY D1SSIPATOR .
I)
~f
r) Y2, the hydraulic jump will recede downstream. On the other hand, if
the tailwater depth is greater thanY2, the jump will be submerged. As
where Q is the total: dischnrge in cfs, W is th,e width
N is the number of spaces, g is the graV'itatiollnl: acceleratIOn, and YlIS the
a space !n ft,

the trtilwater level rises, the spillway crest may be finally submerged. depth of flow in th(~ canal upstream. . ' . .
The spillway will still be effective if the submergence does not reach the 15-16. Jump in Sloping Channels. In the ~nalYSls of ~y:l1'auhc ]~,mps
control depth Oil the spillway crest. The upper surface of the submerged in sloping channels or channels having ap?recla~le slope, It IS essentld.l to
nappe lllay be assumed as a straight line tangent ito the, upper surfn.ce of consider the weight of water in the jump; III honzontnl chann~ls ~he effect
the free nappe at the point w~lere the nappe plunges into the tailwater. of this weight is negligible. Thus, the~momentum form:llas lor Jlll~pS.O~
The upper surface of the free nappe may be represented by the general horizontal floor cmmut be applied straIghtforwardly to Jumps on ~'P~l!lb
equation given in Art. 14-l. floor As will be shoi,vn in this article, however, the momentum P~l!lCIP.\~
In the above discussiun it is assumed that the length of the spillway can be used todel'ive a~l equation analogous to E~. (3-21), :VlllCh WI
(J {)l"eBt is the same as the width of the approach channel. If '~he crest . . 'ical functio'l that has to be cleterDlll1ed
COIl t am an e m p l l " h expenmentally.
I de
\ length is less than the width of the approach challll81, the {)ontl'ltction at Enrly studies on hydraulic jumps in sloping c anne ~ wel'~ ~~a
) the ends of tlle Spillway notch will be so great that the ends of the nappe by Riegal and Beebe [9J and by Ellms [72,73], Later I1lVestlg~'LlOn~
;
may lane! beyond the stilljng~basin sidewalls and the eoncentration of were m:'de by Bakhmeteff and Matzke [74] nnd also by YameIl an
!) high velocities at the center of the outlet may cause additional scour in Kindsvnt.er [75J. . '. f
r ' the clownstrBam chnnnei. It is, therefore, important to design the IIydril.ulic jump in sloping ch11l1ne!s may occur I~l ::anous orms, ~s
npproach end properly by shaping the approach channel to reduce the shown III . F'jig. I'"J 10
-. Case
• 1 is a typical form , but It IS not common
. , III
effect of end contractions. ~se" ' 4 kn. own as drowned-out Jumps,
;

i pI.ac t'IC,al pI'oblems

, " C'" 2. to , . . t are
The straight drop spillway is commonly installed in small drainage I common forms anci usually appear simply as jets of w~ter plunglllg m. ,o.a
structlll'es by the U.S. Soil Conservation Service. The simplest Ioi'm of d'ownstream pool below the steep slop~. For pra;,tI~al PU~'poses, It~:
such a structure, known as the box inlet drop spillu1ay, is simply a rec- -I
I
believed that the solutions for the typIcal form 01 c_ase 1 a.nd fo: t
If tlmgular box open at the top !end at the downstream end [67-69]. Storm ! drownecl-ollt jumps nre mlltually, applicable. Case b shows the Jump
I) runoff is directed to, the box by dikes and head \Valls, enters over the' on' an adverse slope. This is a rare type of jump, and no adequate
upstream end and two sides, and leaves through .the open downstream end experimental data are ava.ilable !!.t the present moment. ' .
, lBading to t.. channel outlet. A generalized design has also been deve:oped For the analysis of the jlimp of case 1, a rectangulm~ channel of umt
by the.Service as a result of tests and anu.lyses at the St. Anthony lealls 'wi.dth is assuH),ed. Considering all effective forces paraLel to the channel
Hydraulic Laboratory [70,71]. bottom, the mOll'lentulll equation lllay be written
, By placing a gridiron or grate on top of the straight drop spillway,
the overfalling jet can be .separated into a number of long thin sheets of
water which fall nearly vertically into the channel below., Thus the
9!!!. ce 2Y2 - (3llll) = P l - P2 + lYsin e - Fj' (3-14)
g ,
energy in the jet can be dissipated without ~'esort to t.he Use of hydraulic
jump, n.nd. hence wave action can be l'educed if Fl = 2.5 to 4.5. This wh~re Q = lI1d 1 Tt2 = V 1d l /d 2, P l = O.5'Wd I 2 cos 0, P2 = O,5wd 2 2 cos (j,
scheme hai:l been adopted by t.he U.S. Buren.u of Reclamation [34,35Jfor F(, ·IS neg'I'IgI'bl e, 'a.n d (3 .\ and,~
(3 may , be taken
.. 2 s unity. . ,If the
. surface
developing a so-c!1.lled drop energy dissipator as a substitute design for profile of the jump is a straight line, the weIght of w.ater I~l the Jump can
USBR basin IV (Art. 15-14). In this desi5n, the grate may be com- be computed. The discrepancy between the straIght-lme and actual
posed of a 'series of beams, such as steel ,rails, channel irons, or timbers, profiles and the effect of slope may be cOl'l'ect,ecl by a factor Ie Thus,.
which form slots pamllel to the direction of flow. The width of the slots
is equal'to two-thirds the width of the beams. If the mils' are tilted (15-15)
dow·nward ~t nn angle of 30 or more, the grate is self-cleaning. On the
other hand,: if the grate is tilted upward, it can check the upstr~am water
Substituting Eq. (b-15)'ill Eq., (3-14), le,tting Fl = Y,/vgch; and.
level but IIfay pose a cleaning problem. The length ,of the grate slots
can be compllted by , 1 The workBtal'tedi~ 1936 by David L. Yarnell at the Iow!1Institute bf IIydralllip

n!;se:1rch, Iowa City, Iowa, was interrupted by his death in 1937,. ~he Y~rne~l datfl.
-
L a- 4.1Q were lent to the Tennessee Valley Aut,hority in 1939 for all extenSIV<llnvestlgatlOn by
WN V2gYl (15-14) l'Gndsvater.
 R,A.PlDLY VARIED FLOW HYDRAULIC JUMP .AND ITS USE AS ENF.RGY DlSSIP.:o\:rOR 427
426
Since d 1 = 111 cosO and d~ .= Yz cos fJ, Eq, (15-18) may also be written
simplifying,
(~y _ (ZGZ + 1) ~ + 2G2= 0 (15-10)
~ = HC vi-+ 8G2 - 1) (15-19)

G
(15-17)
Yl .'
'-I
where
. !
(
The above two equations ai'e analogous to Eq. (3-21). Since G = f(F1,f)),
these equations indicate that ddd~ l:md are functions of FI I,nd fJ •
I

TI 'e is a general belief [70J th,l,t J( and L/(dz - d 1 ) vary primarily with
leI d h tl at G is a function of F I and 0, or. G = f(F 1,8). .
F I o.n l ellee, h. 'Nith Eq. (3-20) for level-floor Jump" a
If Eq. (1.5-16) IS .' r'd t Following the solution
. '1 'ty between the two equatlollS :8 e\ 1 en . , -
SImI an ' ( - 16) . . .. ltlv
for Eq. (3-20), the solution of 10- ) IS appa.eI •
(15-18)
H(V1 + 8CP - 1)

Co se I

\6 17 Ie '9, 20

FIG. 15-20. Experiment!!.l relll.tions I::ietween F, lind lIz/Y, or d,/d J for jumps in sloping
cha,nnels. '

The depth ratio y2/Yl or d2/d 1 oan be shown as a fUllCt~Ol1 of FI and 00

(Le. sin 8) by t...~e chart in Fig. 15-20, which is ba.sed .on the experimental
case :} data of Hickox [77], Kindsvater [751, Bakhmeteff and Matzke [74J, and the
Case 2.
U.S. Bureau orReclamation [34,35}. Similarly, the relative length of
jump L/ih may also be shown as a lunction of Fl aU;:l 00 and represented j
by curves based on the experimental data .of the Bureau, of ,Reqiamatioll
"1
'-
(Fig, 15-21). The dashed lines indic:Lte the parts where the curves are
not well defined by the available data. The diagrams in Figs. 15-20
and 15-21, are based on limited' experimental data ;with considerable'
interpolation; nevertheless they provide useful il1io,rmation for practical
co •• 5
Cose 4 . purposes.
FIG,: 15-19. HydT2.ulic jumps in sloping channels. The following rules for designing a stillip.g basin with sloping apron
.J
I

\
I
 f
i)

428 RAPIDLY VARIED FL>OW HYDRA.UL>IC JUMP AND l'.rS USE A.S ];}NERGY DISSIPA.TOR 429
(USER basin V) nee extracted fromrecommendntionsmade by the IT.S. 6. The slc;rpe of the chute upstre:1mJrom a stilling basin has Uttleeffect
)
Bureau of Recla.l1u1tion [34,35J: on the jump u.s long as the distribution of velocity and depth of flow are
I 1. Determine an n.pron arra.ngement that will give the greatest reasonably uniform on entering the jump.
: ) , economy for the mtiximum dischn.rge condition. This is the governing 7. A snlall solid triangular sill with a sloping upstream surface, placed
factor and the only justifica.tion for using a sloping apron. at the end of the apron, isthe only appurtenanGe needed. This serves to
lift the flow as it leaves the apron and thus acts to conUol scour. Its
dimensioas are not critical; the most effective height i" between 0.05
and 0.10 of the vertical distance Qf the sequent tailwatel' elevation above
the bottom of&he toe of the jump, and the surface slope Chll be 3: 1 to 2: 1:
6

\ '
I 2l-+-I-;!'+-I-1-
. )
Section A'A
FIG. 15.,22. Oblique hydf/mJic jtlmp .
'0 . ;: :3 4 5 6 7 e 9 10 Ij 17 18 19 20
.,
F, • 1r,/:I9d, 15-17. The Oblique Jump. When a supercriticn,l flow is deflected
I
FlG. 15-21. Length in terms
Bw'el:l1< of Redwnalion [34J.)
or seq'.le~t depth of jumps ill eloping chllnll~ls. (U.S, II"
inward to the course of the flow by a verticalbounchtry (Fig. 15-22), the
depth of flow '111 will increase abruptly to a depth Yz along a wavefront
CD which extends out from the point of boundary discontinuity at a
2. Position the apron 80 that the front of the jump will form at the
upstre~llll
end of the slope for the maximum discharge a.nd tnihva~el'
I wave angle {3 that depends in magnitude on the angle of deflection (J of

condition.
3. The portion of the jump to be confined on the stilliilg basin is a
II
1 i uecision for the uesigner,. depending on the qUlllit.y of the rnatel'in.l in the
\, river bed and other conditions. The average ovel'-o.ll apron is about 130 %
f
of the length of jump for the U1:1xi::num discharge condition.
4. With the apron designed properly for the maximum discharge COll-
: dition, the next 8t~p is to be certain that the tailwater depth [1.ud basin
: length available for energy dissipation are sufficient for, say, one-quarter,
one-half, and three-quarters of capacity. .
!I
5. A hCll'izontnl apron will perform on par with the sloping apron for
high Proude numbers, if propel' tailwater is provided.
the boundary. This phenomenon resembles a normal hydraulic jump
but with the ohange in depth occurring along an oblique front; hence it
may be called an obl'iq(~1i hydra'l.#c j1tmp.l When 8 = 0., oblique jump
becomes the familiar nydraulic jump in which I;he wavefront is normal to
the direction of ftow, or (3 90.°,
Referring to the relationship of velocity vectors before the .iump in
Fig. 15-22, the velocity normal to the wavefront if:1 V"I VI sill fJ w11ere
.
V lis the velocity of flow before the jump. The Froude number normal to
1 For original infonnlltion see [781 and [79J. Tho oblique hydr!Lulic ju'mp or oblique.
sta.nding wave is also known as the shock wave, by analogy to the C:1.Se in :mpersoniv
flow of gases, The basic development of thi:5 subject was aacDmplisherl by Rouse and
White .[SDI.

t.
 '-1
I

HYDRAULIC JUMP AND ITS USE AS ENERGY DISSIPATOR 431

RAPIDLY VARIED FLOW

the wD,vefront before the jump is, therefore,

V"l
--= Y 1 sin (3 F . (3 (15-20)
F nl = = = -113111
~gYl ~gYI -
Considering a section A-A nOl'lnal tb the wavefront, it is seen that a nor-
mal hydraulic jump occurs in this section and that Eq. (3··21) call be
applied. Substituting Eq, (15-20) for Fl in Eq. (3-21), the ratio of the
sequent to initial depth is

1:!~ = 7Z( Vl+8F 1 2 sin~ - 1) ( 15-21)

Y,
This is the eqllation tlmt represents the condition for ~\:l oblique I
i
hydraulic jump to take place. I
Iteferring tQ Fig. 15-22, the ta,ngential velocit.ies before and after the I
,I
jump are VII = TT "i/t::m (3 and V 12 = V,,2/tan «(3 - 0). Since no Jl1ornen-
tum chfl,l1ge takes place patallel to the wavefront, these two velocities I
shou1d be equal, or
V"I tan-f3
'V~; = tan ({3 - 0)
(15-22) II -\ '-

By the condition of continuity 'VI V"I = Y! Y,,2, 'the above equation 08,n be
written _
Y2 tan f3 (15-23)
Y; = tB.n «(3 - 8)
Elimino,tingudUl from Eqs. (15-21) and (15-2:3), a relationship involv- ~. I
ing F 1; 0, and .13 is obtained: \

tan f3 (~1 + SF l ? t;;in (3 ....: 3)2

tfl,n 0 - ~-~~==~~~~~~
- 2tan 2 {3 VI+ +
8F l 2 sin 2 f3 -- 1
1 I
This equation should produce the value of t3 if F 1 and. e are g-iven. How- FIG. 15-23. Genera.! relations among Fl"e, /3, y,iy" CLnd F, for oblique hydraulic jumps.
ever, a direct solution of t.his equation for {3 in terms of Fl and e is practi- (Allel' A. T. lppen ~781.) _ - _
cally impossible. Ippen [78J has prepared a four-quadrant graph _(Fig.
1:'5-23) showing all relationships expressed by Eqs. (15-21), (15-23), and
(15-24). This gl'aph is 8elf-explanatory and can be used for the solut,ion
ordimtrychannel, because multiple oblique jumps due to reflections on
opposite ,-valls and intersections with other wavefronts will develop.
.-1
of an oblique hydraulic jump. Further discussion on this subject will be given in the sub5equent chapters. .- i
Since the oblique jump is a normal jump across the section A-A, the
energy 10:0:0 in the oblique j'ump can be computed by Eq. (3-24). In
1
PROBLEMS
practical problems involving an oblique jump, Y2!YI' is usually small.
15-1. Show that the {oilowing equation lIl[Lybe written for a hydraulic jump taking
Thus, the head loss may often be neglected in design. Like~. normal
place in a. horizontal trapezoidilJ channel (some of the notation is given in Table 2-1):
jump, if vdvi < 2 (or F"I < 1.7, according to Art. 15-3), the oblique
jump becomes undular. This' fact has been confirmed both experi- il r' + (2.51 + l)r' + (1.5t + l)(t + 1)1" + [D.W + (I - 3F l ')(1
- 3F,'(t
+ I)]r
+ 1)2 = 0 (15-25)
mentally and theoretically by It1pen [79J.
It should be noted that an oblique jump will rarely oectll' alone in an where ,. = y,/y" 1 = b/ZYl, and Fl =V,;VOy,.
1
L
...
"':'/:":;'"
 . . ,
432 RAPIDLY VARIED now HYDRAULIC JUMP AND ITS USE AS ENERGY DISSIPATOR 433
15-2. Sh()w I,hat t.heequation fOl" a hydraulic jump. in a pa.rabulic channel mo.y be 16-12. A canal fall 40 ft long and c3:i'rying 240 cis is designed to dissipate a head loss
written
, of 4 ft .. The channei of the fall has a.slope ofl on 5 and diverges fr.om a width of 8 ft
(15-2G) at the upstream end to 24 ft at th~ downstream end. Determine the loeation of the

L where r = Vo/lll and F', Ydv'ilih.

16-3. Verify Eqs. (15-0 and (15-2).
. 16-4. In Bidon~'s experiment it was found that, for V, = 5.59 fps and !II = 0.208 ft
m a rectnngularchannel J the sequent depth y, was 0.613 fi" Determine' (a:) ~he alter-
nate .depth, (b) the tbeoretic~.l sequent depthJ (I;) the energy ioss in the jump, .(d) t'he
relative loss, '(e) ·the efficiency of the jump, (f) the relr,tive height. of the i limp, (g) the
lengt.h of the jump, and (il) the type of jUlnp; . ' .
lIi~5. In a !'ec~augular channel with b = 20 'ft, n '= 0.03, B,nd So = 0.04, the depth
?I un.lform flow IS 3 ft. A low dam which keeps 7 it of water immediately behiud it
IS built at thee downstream end of the chanuel. If thtc backwater surface behind the
do.m is assumed horizontal, find the pussibility of developing a hydraulic jump in the
channel. ,If ~he jump will OCCllr, determine «(,:) the discharge over the spillway of the
,,
dam, (b) ,lie !ump heIght, (.G) the energy loss m the jlllnp, Cd) the efficiency of jump,
hydraulic jump, assuming a frictionless channel and ignoring the slope effect on the
jump. (HIN'l': Divide the channel into, say, four reaches, n.nd COlll'pute El and E, at
each section fol' f'>E = 4 ft.) .
15-13. Water flowing under a sluicc ga.te dischal'ges into a rectangular plain stilling
basin h.oNing the same wideh ~3 the gat.a. After t.he contra~tion of the jet the flow
has an average velocity of 8.0 ips and !1. depth of 6 ft. Determine (a) the s~quellt tail-
water d'lpth, (b) the length of the b~"sin required to confine the jump, (e) the effective-
ness of .the basin to dissipate energy (i.e., efficiency.of th'e jump), and (d) the type of
iump to be expectetl.
15-14. Design the stilling basin for EX'ample 15-2, using a jump control by (n)
sharp-crested weir, (b) broa.d-crested weir, and (e) abrupt l'ise.
15-15. Design the st.illing basin for Exu.mple 15-2, using a jump control by abrupt
drop.

I and (e) the ·dlstali~.e of the Jump from the dam.

16-6. Locate the hY,d.raulic jump in Example 15-1 if the ch9.nnel has a free-overfall
15-16. Proportion an SAF stilling basin for Example 15-2.
15-17. Construot the jump rating curve at the 'toe of the spillwo.y designed in
Example 14-1. .
01itlet.50Q it do\vnstream from the Y~na contracta.
·15-7.'\Vater flowing over a low spillway of bl'oael width passes on toa level con- . Hi-i8. Discuss the development of an energy-dissipatiDn structure at the toe of the
IOpillway under consider'lt·wn in the preceding problem, providecl tile tll.illl'ater rating
I crete apron at 12 £t below the spillw"y crest, The head over the SpillW!e}, crest is
8 ft, and the tailwn.ter depth is 10 ft. Determine the location of thc jump. Use' curve can be r~presented' by (al Q = 40y', (b) Q = 100y', (c) Q = 2y', Dad (d)
Q = 9tJOy"',
Eq. 0'1--9) with C = 3.61 for computing the discharge n,nd Eq. (14-19) for computing
tbe depth of Ho\\' at the spillway toe with a velocity coeffici<mt of 0.9 (i.e., the actunJ 15-19.. Design the energy-dissipation structure, if needed, for the different tailwater
/. velocity is equal to 0.9V 1). . . conditions givcn in the preceding problem.
( 16-8. A wide rectar,gular channel with n = 0.025 is laid with a change in slope from
steep ."I, = 0.01 to llliid Se = 0.002. The depth oLuniform flow in the mild channel
i is 5 ft. Determine the location of the hydraulic jump. .
:
I! !
lli-9. SolVe) the precflrling problem if the steep slope is 0.03.
15-10. Determine the iniLial and seqilent depths oJ a'hydraulic jump in" horizontal
channel 30' ft wide lmd carrying 30'0 cfs. The loss of energy in the jump is 5 ft .
. (HIN'!': The solntion requires. a trial-and-er'ror proeedlJl'p. slwh as.: First e...'5Ullle F 1 ;
! ~hen comput.e y';Yl by Eq, (3-21) altd Y, by Eq. (3-2c1); finally c!leck for Flo A gl'aph-'
!
I leal solutIOn using specifia-ellergi ancl specific-fo;,ce curves is also suitable.)
. 15-11. The canal fall (Fig. 15-24) ear!'ying 300 cis is Ie recklllgulal' channel having a
WIdth of 30' ft., slope oj' 1 on 5, all';. sufficient length. It. is designed to dissipate a head
FIG. 15-25. A ladder of caacf,des .

15-20. Poggi [81,82] has proposed ll. ladder of cascades; as shown in Fig. 15-25.
Design thi.s structure for the given datu.. 'fhe profile of the spillway crest is assuTIled
Er.ergy line of ,"YES shape. . .
·--::;;:------:-------------·r 15-21. Derive an equation of the upper sLlrface of the free n!~PJle over n. straight
1~
'" ,
777m7J7.7777~. . 5' drop spillway. (H1N'l': See Art. 14-1, and note tr.at h. . . J11 = ~.3.)
1
. . l' lli~22. A straight drop spillway is used io. a ditch to cffcet a drop of 6 ft in t.he ditch
I
I
-----~ grade!. The dit~h is 14 it wide ami carries a nniform flow of 330 cfs. The spillway
ha.s a crest length of 12.5 it and takes a hcad of 4 ft for the given discharge. The
normal depth of flow in the downstream ditcn is 4 ft, but uncler flood conditio!lll back-
! water from a stream may mise the tailwater so that its level is 1.5 ~t above the spillway
l; FIG. 15-24. A canal falL
crestl Proportion the struchlre aSiSuming [l.ny type of stilling b~sin. The upstrenm
I
a.pproach to the ~pillway is properly desiglled, and the velocity Head on the spillway
crest' may be i g n o r e d . ' ;
~oss of 5 ~t by hydraulic jump. Determine the position of the hydraulic jump assuro- 15-23. Solve Prob. 15-13 ifthe floor slope of the stilling basin:is 0.10.
mg negligible channel friction and ignoring the effect of cha-nnei sLope on the jump. ·15-24. Solve Prob. 15-11 if the sloping effect or the channel is'zonsidel'ed.
(HINT: Use the result obtained ill the preceding problem.) 15-25. Design the stilling basinfol" Example 15-2 'on an apron with a slope of 0.15.

434 RAPIDLY VARIED FLOW
15-26. In a flow 23'08 fps in velocity and 0.70 ft. deep, an oblique hydraulic jump is
produc.ed by [l. deflecting vertical wall making a 15° angle with the direct.ion of the
flow. Detet'mine (u) tha wave angle, (b) the sequent depth, and (0) the energy loss .
REFERENCES
L Giorgio Bidone: Obs.ervatiorl6 sur Ie hauteur du Iessaut hydralllique en 1818
(Observations on t·he he,ght of the hydraulic jump in i81S), a report presented at
the Dec. 12, 1819, meeting of the Royal Academy oi Science of Turin and
later incorporated as. a part qf [2], pp. 21-80.
2. Giorgio Bidone: Experiences sur Ie remous et la propagation des ondes (Experi-
ments on backwater and th'e propagation of w!1ves), illemorie deUa Realp-· Acca-
rle1711:a delle Scienze di Torino, Turin, vol. 25, pp. 21-112, 1820.
3. J. B. Belanger; "Essai sur Ill. solution r.mnerique de quelques problemes relatifs au
mouvemcnt permanent des eallX COli l'a.ntes " ("Essay on the Numericai Solution of
Some Prohlems Relati';e to the Steady Flow of Water"), Ce.rilian-Goeury, Paris,
1828.
4. J. A. Ch. Bresse: "COIU'S de mecanique appliquee," .2e partie, HydrauiiquB
(" Course in Applied Mechanics," pt. 2,' Hydraulics), rl'fa.llet-Bachelier, P"':'is,
1860. ' .
5. H. Dtlrcy and H. Bazin: Re~herche$ exp~ri!llentale's relatives aux remous et a la
propn.gatiop. des ondes (Experiment.al research 0v; l)ackwater and wave propa.ga-
t.ion), in vol. II. of "Recherches hydrauliques" ("Hydraulic Researches"),
A.c.ademie des Sciences, Paris, 1865.
13. rvlansfield l'vlcrriman: II A Treatise on Hydraulics," John Wiley & Sons, New York,
and Clul.pman'and Hall, London, 4th cd., 18\)4; 10tlr ed., 1916. Also see R.
Ferriday; The hydraulic jUn:lP, ETI(!in.cer'ing New8-Record, vol. 34, no. 2, p. 28,
July 11, 1895. . stIll!llg baSin, Tra.nsacltons, AllImcan Soc!el-y of Civil Enllineer8, vol. '113, pp. 483-
7. A. H. Gibson: The formation of stB.nding waves in an open strea.m; paper '4D81,
Minules of Proceedings of the In3iitlttionof Civil Engineers, London, vol. 197, pt.'
lII,pp. 233-242, 1913-14. . Transacttons, Amer1cun. Society of Civil Engineers, vol. 115, pp. 973-\)87, 1950.
8. E. R. Kenn'ison: The hydraulic jump in open channel flow at high velocitles,
Tmnsactions, Ameri::an Society of Civil Engl:neers, vol. 80, pp. 338-353, 19i5.
9. Sberman M. Woodward: Theory of thehydl'[lulic jump and backwater curves;
and Ross i\L Riegel and John C. Be.ebe: The hyifraulic jump as a means of dis-
sipating energy, Iffimni Conser1Jan.c!' Distdel; Technical Repor!, pt. [] L, Dayton,
Ohio, 1917, pp. 63-118. ' 26.J. O'IDe Mello Flores: Le re.ssaut (The hydraulic jump), La Houille blanch~,
10. A. ICochand M. Carstanjen: "Von der Bewegung des ,"Vassers und den dabei
auftretenden.KriHten" (" On Flow of Water anrl the Associated Forces"), Springer-
Verlag, Berlin, 1926.
11. E. G. W. Lindquist: Anordningal' ftir effektiv energieomvand1ing vid foten av
iiverfalls{\:1mmal' (Arrangements for effective energy dissipation at the toes of
dams), "Anniversary Volume," Royal Te.chnical University, Stockholm, Sweden,
1927. . .
12. I{urt Safranez; Wechselsprung und die Energievernichtung des Wassel's (Hydrau- .
lie jump !tnd energy dissipation of water), Del' BcJ.1tingenieur, Berlin, vol. 8, no. 49"
pp. '898-905; no. 50, p. !J26, 1927. \ no. 5, p. 270, May, 1934.
13. J.Einwachter: Berechnung der in der Wehrbreite gemessenen Liingenausdehnung
von Dechialzen (Computation' of expansion of rollers with respect t.o width of
weir) Wa.sserkraft und Wasserw}rlschafl, Munich, vol. 27, No. 14, pp. 157-159,
alld no. 21, pp. 245-249, 1932; vol. 23, no. 17, pp. 200-202, Hi33.
I
t
HYDRAULIC JUMP AND ITS USE AS ENERGYDISSIPATOR 435
r 14. J. Einwachter: Wassersprung- und Deckwltlzenlange (The length of the hydraulic
jump and of the surface roller), Wa38erkrafl wui Wasserwirtschaft, Munich, vol. 30,
no. 8,pp. 85-88, Apr. 17, 1935. .
15. J. Smetana: ExperimentaIni st.udie vodniho skoku (Experimental study' of
hydraulic ,jump), C. 2-143, 1933; and Experimentalni studie vodllfho skoku
vzcluteho (Experimental study of drowned hydraulic jump), ZPl'ri.uy lTe;'ejn~
I Slttzby Technick~, Czechoslovakia, 193";'. "
16. J. Smetana: Model'll typ~s of movable dams: Great.est. dimensions attained in each
t~'pe. Principles, of design of the fixed and movable parts of these dams and prin-
I ciples to be followed in their working, in order to reduce undeunining to a mini-
mum, paper 51, 16lh Tnlemalionll! COnllre$3 of Nwigation, Brussels, pt. III, 1935.
II 17. Bcris A. Bakhmeteff and Arthur K l\.Iatzke: The hydra,ulic jump in terms of
dynamic similr.,rity, T?'(I.nsact'ions, American Society of Cill.:l Enginears, vol. 101,
1 pp. 630-647, 1936, ' , .
13. L. Escancle; Etude theorique et experime~tale de I'ecoulement. par vanne de fond -I,
(Theoretical and experimental study offlow through sluice gates), Revue g~n~ral.~
de l'hydmldique, Paris, vol. 4, no. 19, pp. 25-29, no. 20, pp. 72-79, and no. 21, pp:
120-128,1938; vol. 5, no. 25, pp. 21-34, no. 26, pp. 65-77, and 110. ·28, pp,131-139,
1930. / . "
19. D. Citrin~; II saito di Bidone (The hydraulic jump), UEnergia eletlrica, Milano,
vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 441-465, June, and no. 7, pp. 517-527, July; 1939. Conr,ains a
resume of work done up to Hl39.
20. Guido Nebbia: S11i dissipatod a saitO di Bidone: Ricerca 5perimentale (On dis-
sipation by hydraulic jump: Experimental researches), L' Energ£a elellrica, 11/ilano,
-\
vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 325-356, June, 1940. .
21. CM] E. ICindsva.ter: 'rhe hydra.ulic jump in sioping channels, Tran$acliolls.
American Society of Civil Engineers, vol. 109, pp. 1107-1120, 1944.
22. Fl:e~ W. ~:Iaisdel1; D.evelopmen~ and hydra.ulic design, Saint Anthony Fall~
520, 1948. . .' '
23. John VIT, !orstel' an~ Raymond A. Skrinde; Control of the hydraulic jump by sills,
24. Hunt.er Rouse, T. T. Sia.o, and S. Nagaratnam: Turbulence characteristics of thll
hydraulic jump, paper 1528, Proceedings, American SoC::ety of Civil Engineers
J01l1'1lal, H.ydl·,w.lics Divi$ion., vol. 84, 00. HY1, pt. I, pp. 1-30, February, 1958.'
25. Til: st~Il.dmg wave or hydraulic jump, GO:Jernmen1. oj Tndia. Central Boal'd of
-j
hrtgai:.on and Power, Publication 7, Simla, India, 2d ed., Aug. 15, 1950. ,
Grenoole, 9th yr., 1'.0. 6, pp. 811-822, December, 1954.
i
27. Boris A. Bakhmcte/I; "Hydraulics of Open CI1[mnels," McGraw-Hili Book Com-
I po.ny, Inc., New York, 1932.
I
:r
28. A. G .. Levy and J. vi. Ellms: The hydraulic jump as a mixing device, Journal,
Amencan TValenuork.$ Association, no. 1, pp. 1-23, January, 1927.
29.~. ~. Kali.nske and James M. Robert,son: Closed conduit flow, in Entrainment of
,
'I all' In flowmg water: A symposium, Traltsactions, American Sociely of Civil Engi-
i
'neers, vol. 108, pp. 1435-1447, 1943. .
30. G. H. Hie-ltox: Graphical solution for hydraulb jump, Civil Engineering, vol. 4,
' ,
I
31. C . .T. Posey and P. S. Hs{ng: Hydraulic jump in trapezoidal cha.nnel!';, En[line(!'l'ing
News-Record, vol. 121, no. 25, pp. 797-798, Dp.c. 22, 1938. .
32. E. "y. Lane and C. E. Kindsvater: Hydraulic jump hi. enclosed conduits, Engi-
I neenng NeTvs-RecQrd, vol. 121, no. 26, pp. 815-817, Dec. 29,1938.. .
!I •
 ',',,'

436 RAPIDLY VARIED FLO'W

HYDRA.ULIC JUMP A.ND ITS USE A.S EN:E[tGY DISSIPATOR 437
33. J. C. SteHns: 'rhe hydraulic jump in stanMrd conduits. Civil En",,'ne' I
.0
3 , JlO. 1 n '7 0 .., v' annll, vo .
, Pl'. ;)1.15-56, etober, 1933, .50, Calvin Victor Davis (editor-in-chie£): "Handbonk of Applied Hydraulics," 2d eeL,
34. Research studics on s~illillg basin,q, energy dissipatol's, and associated appurte- l\'IGGn'w-HiIl Book Company, Inc" New Yol'l" 1~52, pp, 281-288 !,ud 813-846,
rUHH:es, U,~, B'((rea1t of R£ciamatiorl, Hydral£lic L(tuor(t/,ory Reprn-t No, Hl'd-399, 51. Civil and strllctural design, vol. 1 in "Design of TVA Projects," 'l'ennes888
June I, 195.:., . . Valley "lutho1'it1}, Technical Report 24, 11)52, pp, 41-60,
. 35, J, N. Bradley a~d A, J, Peterka: The Hydraulic design of stilling basins: Hydraulic 52. Armin Schoklitsch: "Hydraulic StrUiJtlire.>," tr!tnsla.t~'d frolll the German by
Jumps On a hOI'IZOlltal nprQn (Basin I), paper 1401; High d!lIliS, em'th and Samuel Shulits, American Society of Me0hunico.\ Engineers, New' York, 1937,
hll'ge can~d S~l'llctures (Basin II), paper 1402; Short stilling basins for . vol. 2, pp. \)13-926.
sLn~ctul'es, SIlUll! outlet works, aml sInnll spillw!l.Ys (Basih III), paper g03; 53. Armin Schoklitsch: "H::mdbuch des WaSSel'balleS" ("Handbook of HydraulirJ
b'SI~ and wO-ve SUppl'BSSIJI'S for canal structures, outlet wO!'ks, o.nd diversiOIl dams Erl(:;ineeriug"), Springer-Verlag, Vienna, 1952, 2, pp, 816-825.
~Basln IV!: ?404; Stilling basin with sloping apron (Basin V), paper H05; 54. C, Maxwell Stanley: Study of stil!ing··basin Tmnsacl·ions, i!mer'icm. Socie/y
,011l!l1l bl1sl!lS pipe or o:Jen channel ou~lets -no tailwatel' required (Easin VI) of Civil E'lyf,neers, vol. 99, pp. 490-523, 1934. .
pap~r, 1406, ProCttcdi'r;gs, A'llLel'ican Scciety of Cicil Engill.ee"s, JOUI'fl,(l', H'ldr(wUc; 55. JacDhE. Wal'lloclc: Spillways and energy dissipl1tol's, PmceBdings of J!yelrauh.cs
36, .i?1V~s·'~n,. ~Ol;~, no. HY5, pp. 1-2?, 1-14, 1-:2, 1-20, 1-32, llncll-11, 00tub~r, 1957. Confer'ence, 'Uni(leTsity of lawa, Studies in Eng~'nlle1'infl, Bulle/in 20, 1940, pp.
I,ll! C l.Oaha~ez. Untersuchltngeu uh":r de;) Wechselsprung (Researches relating tQ 142-15().
the l~y?rauhc JUlllp}, ,Del' BcmingenielL1', Berlil", yoL 10, no, 31, pp,64.9-651, 1£)20. 56. John R. FreeIr.an (editor): "HydrauU" Laboratory Practice," American Society
A brter SlI1llll1,ru:y l~ given 1:' D~n?ld p, Bames: Length of hydraltlic jump investi- of Mechanical Engineers, Ne\v York, 1929.
g~ted at Berim, CWll Enguzeenng, vol. 4, no .. 5, pp. 262-263, M~',y, 11)34, 57. Ahmed. Shukry.: The efficacy of fiool"siils uncleI' drowned hydraulic jumps,paper
37. l\.urt 1linge des Wassersprunges (Length of hydl'!l.ulic jUnto) Wasser- 1260, P1'oceed.ings, Ammcnn Society of CiLil Engii1.~eta, Journal, }J.r;elrtmlics
k~'(!Jt una IV~~e~;cirschaft, Munich, vol. 28, no, 2,]" pp, 271-282, 1933: ' D'ivision, vol. 83, no. HY3,. pp. 1-18, Jnne', 1957, .
38, 1\., Wo~e'~I(I. v, asserspnmg: Deckwalze und Ausfluss untel' eiuer Schi!tze (The 58. L. E,scande: L'Ewde sur modele l'Muit des OIIVl'!l.ges de rupture de charge (The
hydraulic Jump: Its top roll and discharge through a. sluice gn.te) Warsaw 1931. stlldr of en!Orgy dissipators with the aid of a,small-sca.le modell, Le Gdnio civil,
39, Y, I. Anwtn: Opredelenie dliny gidravlit;heskogo pl'yzhk!lo (The cl8termina'Liolt of vol. 115, no. 25, pp, 429-433, Dec. 16, H139.
th~ l~ngth of the h}'dr~ulic jump), I zvestiia 1'S€$O'hlZnl)!io N aHchno- Iss/edov"lel.lrogo 59. R. H. Berryhill: Stilling basin experiences of the Corpa of Engineers, .paper 121H,
~nstt:1i'a G'l;arotekhn,',kt (Tra~8IJctions, AIl-Un:iotl Scie'atiji,c ReMarch Insl'itl,te of Proceedings, A,merimn Soc'iety of CiliU Engi,,'.e.ers, Jo!mu,l, Hydmtlhcs Dirrisiolt,
.IyrllUl.<ltC lYU''.It"eel'~n!l), Lenmgl'll.d, vol. 15, pp, 48-57, 1035. . vol. 83, no. HY3, pp, I-Sa; June, 1957.
,10; W, L, Moore: Energy loss at t,he base of 8. free overfall Tr(1HSaction$ Amen:c"'l 60, B. S, Talwani a.nd S. T, Ghotauk..1.l': Design of canal [ails, I""iqalio'n and P01uer,
Society of Civil Engineer~, vol. 10.8, pp, 13\13-1360, 1943,' . ' . J o1<rnal of the Central Board of Irrigation. and Porcer, Simla, IalH", vol. 9, no, 2,
'11. L I. Agroskin, G, T. Dmitriev, a.nd F. I. Pilmlov: "Gidravlika'; ("Hydraulics") 2(1)-293, AP1'il,"Hl52. .
Go~energ()lzdat, Moscol". and Lellingrad, 11154, p, 337. . , 61. 11.. Sharma: "Irrigation Engir.~el'ing," RalOa Krishna, Lahore, Pllnjab, Iudia,
42, JulIUS \Vels!Jach: "Die Experimentalhydraulilc" (" Experimental Hvdraulics "', 1044, 24.5-285, .
Fl'eiberg, 1855, p. 52. ' . . " 62. A. M. Mont~,gu and others: Irrigat.ion' canal falls, Cenltal Boatel of l'rrigation,
43, Serge Ldiavsky: "Il'l'igatiOll and Hydraulio " Chapman & Hall, Ltd., Public.:ltion 10, Simla, India., 1935,
Lolld,:m, 1955, vol. 1. 03, Ivan E. Hotik: "Irrigatioll Engineering," John Wiley & Sons, Inc:, New York,
. 44. J. B, 'l'iffunj': Labol'atol'Y reseal'c.h applied to the hydraulic design of large dams 1956, vol. 2.
U.S. }Vatcl'way$ EXp€1'im.er,t Btati01!, Bulletin 32, 1948. ' 64. Fr<)d IV, Bhisdell: The SAF stilling basin, V,S, Soil CO'/!..se/'ualion Service, Reparl.
45. 1\1. ~' 1'1'!.cPhel'son and. M. E, IC~rr: A s,tudy of bucket-type energy dissipat.or SCS.'l'P-79, May, 1949,
:hElI ~~.~n$tlcs, Pmceel.luI.9s, Amencan SOC'J.ety of Civil Enyilleers, J oumal, Hydrtm.- 65. Boris '.'1.., Bakhmeteff and N. V. FeodofofI: Discussion ali Energy los.~ at the b2.ge of
ItCS Dwnton, paper 1266, vol. 83, no, 1-12, June, 1957, and correcti(:>ns, free QI'erfail, by Walter L, 'Moore, Tranzar,t·ions, Amp.rican Society of Civil Engi-
paper 110. llY4, pp. 57~i14.. August, . necr$, vol. 108, pp. 1364-l373, 1943.
46. Ralph 1\1. Dis311ssion on Control of the hydraulic jump by silla by Johu G6, Wa.tt~r Rand: Flow geometry at stmight drop spillwa.ys, paper 7tH, Proceedings,
W. ~'orstel' and Raymond A, Skrinde, Tro.rw).c{iom, A,merican Societ~ ;f
Ci~il American Bociety of Civil Engtneel8, vol. 81, pp. 1-13, September, 1U55.
En(!~lteeJ's, voL llS, pp, 1003-1006, 1950, : 57. Charles A. Donnelly: Desi;;:;n of an outlet fOI' hox' inlet drop spillwa.ys, U,S, sua
47, En-Yull' Hsu: Discussion on Control of the hydraulic jump by siils, by John '.V, Comet'jjet/·ion Service, Report SCS-TP-63, November, 19-17.
Forster Il.lld Raymond A. Skrinde,Ttu:rIsactions, American SoCiel'l/ of Ci'vi! En!!i- 138. Fred W. BIltisdell and Charles A. Donnelly; Capacity of box inlet drop spillwn.ys
\ .
vol. 115, pp, 988-991, '1950, . uuder free and submerged ./low conditions, Uni1lersity of J1fin1!.j:sota, SI. AntllOny
\ ·18. Walter·L, Moore a~d Carl W., Morgan: The hydr.tulic jump at o.ll. abrupt. drop, FaUs Hyd7'alilic Laboratory, Technical Paper 7, Janul,1.l'Y, 1951.
r pap:r,14<19, PrOCeed11lg8, Amencan Society of Civil Engineers, J 01<1''11(11, Hydraulics Gg. Fred W. Blaisdell and Chltrles A, DDnnelly: Hydra.ulic design of the bOl( inlet dmp
Dunmon, voL 83, no, RY6} pt. I, pp. 1-21, December 1957 spillway, Uni;;er,sity of lI1inrtesola, SI. Anthony Falls Hydraulic Laoon:uo'''Y,Ted!-
49. William .. P, Cl'(l'\ger, Joel D. Justin, and Julian Hinds': "En~ineering for Dams," n':cal Paper 8, Jl1.nua.ry, 11)51; also U.S. Soil Con~e""Mian Service, Report BCS·TP-
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1945, vol. I, pp. 73-89. 106, July, 1951. '
10, Charle. A. Donnelly and Fred W. Blaisdell: Straight drop spillway sLilling bo.sin,

I
I

438 RAPIDLY VARIED FLOW
Unive'l'sil!l of Minnesota, St. Anthony PaJJ..~ HydrauUc Laborcti.o1'lJ, Techniw[ Paper
15, Sel·. B, November, 1954. '
71. Fred W. Blaisdell and Charles A. Dovneily: The box inlet drop spillway !lnd its
outlet, Tnl1lsaclions, Amel'ican. SocictyoJ Civil Engilleel'S, vol. 121, pp. 955-986,
1\)56.
72, Il" W. ElIms: Computa.tion of tail-water depth of the hydraulic jump in sloping
flumes, paper Hyd. 50-5. Tl'anMcHon.s, A merict1n Society of 111 echa!,ic"l EngilLce7'll,
vol. 50, no, 3G, p,p, 1-6, S"ptember-Decembel', 1928. "
73. R. W. Ellms: Hydraulic jump in sloping and borizontallbmes,paper Hyd, 54-6,
Tmn~actiQns, klnerican Soddy of ilIechanlcru E'?lgineers, 1r OI. 54, nb. 22, PI1. 113-
n9, Nov. 30, 1932.' , '
74, B. A. Bakhmeteff and A. E. Mat~kB: The hydraulic jump in sloped channels,
po,per Hyd. 60-1, Tm1tSa.clions, Amel'iccm Sociely of M echanicai Engineer", vol.
60, DO. 2, pp. 111-118, February, 1938.
75. Cf1.l'l 11:. KinJsvo.t.er: The hydraulic jump in sloping channels, Transactions,
A'II!eric(U~ 8ode/y of Cl:vil Enginee.l·s, vol. 109, pp. 1107-1120, 1944.
76. J. C, S~evens: Discussi.:.n on The hydl'3.ulic jump in sloping cha.nnels, by Ca!'l E.
I{indsv:tter, Tl·ClllSa..;Uons,' A.llterican Society Civil Engineers, ~ol. 109, pp.
1125-1135, HH4. . .
77. G. It. Hickox: Discussion on The h}'clraulic jump in sloping channels, by Cad E.
Kindsvater, T)'a1t8r.L~ti{}n.s, Am,el'ican Society of Cioil Engineers, vol. 109, pp.
1141-1145, 1044. . .
1ft Arthur T. Ippen: Mechanics of 5upercl'iticII! flow, lSt paper of High-velocity flow
in open channels: A symposiulll, Transactions, American Society of Civil Engineers,
vol. 116, pp. 268-2Q5, H/Sl.
79. Arthur T. lppcn and Donald R. F. Harleman: 'Verificatio!l of theory for oblique
st.anding waves,-:l"·af1.Sac{.·ions, Ameriwn Society of CivU Engineers, I'D\. 121, pp,
r,78-094, 195(i. ~ ,
80. Hunter Rouse: "Fluid Mechanics for Hydraulic Engineers," McGra.w-HHl
Book Company, Inc.; New York, 1938.' , ' , . . In the study of subcritica1 flow, the spiral currents are of primary inter- .
81. Bruno Poggi: Sopra gli sco.ricatori a sca.la di stramazzi (On the flow in a ladder of
cascades), L' Ene1"gia elettric(l, Mila.no, val. 26, ao. 10, pp. 600-604, Od,ober, 1949.
82, Bruno Poggi: Lo scaricatori a scala di stramazzi (FiGW in a ladder of cascadtt,)'
L' EnergiCt eleUrica,ilfi/a.no, vol. 33, no. 1., pp. a3-40, January, 1956. This pa.per
describes the laboratory tests.
r\
II
'I
,.j
CHAPTER 16
\
FLOW IN CHANNELS OF NONLIN]!:AR ALIGNMENT
\
>1
16-1, Nature of the Flow. The presence of curveI'; or bends in aligi1-
Hlent is unavoidable in the design of open channels. Difficulties in design
often ariee because of the complexit,y of the flow around a curved path.
The streamlines of the flow are not only curvilinear but also interwoven,
J
resulting in spiral cmrellts and cross waves. Furthermore, the cent::-if-
ugal force acting on the flow around a bend produces, a unique feature
known as su.perelevation, that is,a rise ill the water surface at the outer
bank with an accompanying lowering at the inner bank. Also, the
velocity distribution in the channel sec~ions in the bend is very irregular
and the coefficients a and fJ are usuu.lly far greater than unity.
In ch!1nnels of nonlinear alignment" flows behave differently according
. to the state .of the flow. Generally spe:l.king, subcritical flow shows
smooth water surface and slight superelevation, ",haren,s supercriticr.l fio,w
exhibits characteristic cross-wave-disturbance patterns on the surface
and thus exaggerates the superelevation.
est. These currents are essentiaUy a friction phenomenon; hence their
analysis requires use of the Reynolds number as a pars,meter. ,
In the study of sl1percriticD.i flow, the formation of cross waves is of
major COMel'll. These waves represent the gravity effect of the free
surface upon the flow; hence their analysis willi'ely on the.use of Fronde - \
number as a basic parameter.
16-2. Spiral Flow, Spiral flo'w l'efersto movement of water particles
along a helical path in the general direction of the flow. Thus, in addi-
t.ion to the major velocity component normal to the channel cross section,
. there are transverBe velocity components on the cross section. These
trarisverse components will create so-called secondary flow in the plane of
the croas section.
Spiral fiow in curved channels was first observed by Thomson [IJ in
1876. Since then many studies have been .made [2-7J. It is believed (;
that. this phenomenon is due mainly to (1) friction on the channel walls, ~. \
which causes higher filarnental velocities near the center of 'the channel
th.3.!l near the walls; (2) centrifugal force, which deflects the particles of
water from straight-line motion; and (3) a vertical velocity distribution \
439 ~ J
 l<'LOW IN CHANNELS OF· NONLl:tP:£A.R ALIGNMEN'l' 441
440 RAPIDLY VARIED FLOW
From the experimental results obtained by'Shukry for subcl'itic:11 flow
which in the 'appl'or,ch chan~lel and thus initiates spiral motion in
l1round ~ liend in a rectanglllal' flome, ~he following are noted: •
the flow, The centrifugal force is responsible also for tl~e superelevl1-
1. S*u is compa~:(\tively. rtt low R of the approach flow, but cle-
tiOl1 in the flow surface, .
It is generally knowr, that, looking downstream, a chM1Uel curve to creases considenl.bly by illCl'ensing R. .
2. S~y decreases gradually with the increase of the radius-width ratio
the right causes a counterclockwise spiral, \Yherei),~.a cht:l,llnel curve to
rJb mid attains practically its minimum l11n.gnitude (I.e" the curve effect
the left causes. a clockwise spir~1L. If the curve is followed by a long
tnngent, the spiral flow developed 1\1 the curve will for somE: dis- [I,ppro!Lches the least amount) .a.t 7 c /b =: 3.0.
3. S%y decreases as the depth-width ratio. ulb increases.
tance dowllstream.
,1,. increases as the de\,iation (j of the curve becames large.
The actual pa.ttern of a spiral flow is cornplicatedand three-dimen-
For the range of 8/180 0 from 0.0 (straight channel) to 0.5, the inerease in
sionaL In order to record th:o actual flow pattel'll, it is desirable to use a
is ne::wly twice that for the ro,nge from 0.5 to-LO. . . .
specially designed instrument that can measure dil'cctlv the velocity
5. The kinetic energy of the btel~al currents ill a curve is reln.tively
components in different coordinate :lUch [is the pit~t. used
8m.all comfH1.red with the ellergy in the. longitudinal current.s ~1.ncl, conse-
by Shulery [2].
quently, ptays only a minor pM'~ in t he energy lo.ss du~ to. te~1Cl.resistu.nce.
Spiral flow exists in straight channels (Art. 2-4) £.3 :welt IlS in curved
Spirnl flow occurs in no,tural rivers as well as \11 artifiCIal channels
channels. In a curved channel, ho\vever, the spi!'f:.l flow lnduced by the
[5]. Howi?ver, it mfl.)' not exist at all ill a curved channel if th~ strength
centrifugal force is "Vary pronounced L1.nd irregulaF the bend. The
of the spiral motion is so weak that its. effect i~ pr[l.ctically elimll1utedby
co::nplicate~ pattern of flow is caused by thB interference of the spiral flow
the r,h::mnel friction. This is the case in mo.ny l1:1tuml rivers whel'e the
ongmated m the strR.ightapproach channel with that generated in the
ratio or depth to width is small (henc~, is llmall) and where the forces
curve. The strongest lateral currents usually o.ppC\UI' close to the outer·
teJ;l.cling t.o produce spiralHovv Me overcome by the complicated forces
1'[,\11 f1.t the mid-section of the cm"'le, where they h,w'3 n. general direction
toward the outside of the curve. Their direction rend position cha.nge· reflUlting from bed and btl.nk l'oughne'3ses [6,7J. .
16-3, Energy Loss. AccQrding to. IV!lHler [81, the energy line and flow
gradually through the second half of the curve until the exi.t is reached,
profile in a uniform cUl'v'ed chan.nel may be show'l1 as ill 16-1. Ca.se 1
where they approach the inside wall with upward inclination. .
illustrates the Imbc;'itical flow in a curve bet\veen two tnngentch::mriels.
In ordpl' to delilleate the magnitude and effect of the spilil\l flow in dif-
Without the curve. fio.w would occur :J.t the· nOl'nml depth y" correspond-
ferent curves under v(1.rying conditions of flow,Shukry [2] hn~ used a term
ing to the pal'ticuiar discharge. With the Clll've, the energy line at the
known as the slre:nglh a sp'iral flow. This term is defined as th.~ pe\'-
beginning A or the curve is raised by [1.11 amount hr. A major p[~rt. of
~ent!l.ge ratio of the mean kinetic energy of theJateral motion to the total
this energy is dissipated ovel' the length of the curve. The l'eml),\I1\llg
ldn8tic onergy of flow at a given cross section. It is to be noted that, the
part is can-jed over a distance L' in the down"tret\l11 channel BB', which
kinetic energy of flow depends Oll the sqtmre of the velocity. Re.fel'rin o·
is required for the How to revert to norma.\. The slope or the energy line
to the channel cross section represented the xy plane in Fig. 2-6, th~
between A [md B' is gre~btel' than the bottom slope S~, aud the energy
strength'of the spiral flow at this section is
line meets the energy line for the normal flo';'{ it B'. In oreler to I:aise.
(H;-I) the. energy line at the point A a.bove the Ilormal line, wuter must be
ba.cked up in the chal'in.'el upstream from A. Fi'om the specific-energy
where V,yis the men.n-vEllocity vector projected 011 the xy plD.neand F is curve of the flow in the Channel, it can be shown that a r1se of hJ in the
the mean velocity in the section. ; Thus, for a flow with all streamlines energy line requU'es a corresponding rise in water surface by an amount
parallel to the axis of the channel, SZY O. /::'y which is greater than hj. This rise in water surfa::e indicates that the
presence of a. bend in a channel of subcriticn.l flow has abackwater effect
The pitot sphere designed by ShukrYi has'five bl'llSS tubes encased ill a ·~asing stem.
~imilar to that of a weir or dam. For the computation of the backW!l,te~'
1
]~!l.eh ~ub~ has a small br!Lss to.pping n.t the top enn to pel'lilit a rUbber-tuhingconnec-
ttrlll Wit" !l pl'e:~$ul'e nlanOl11ete~'" At t!le bottcm end the tube is bent inside a sphere profile, the start,ipg point m.:t.y be set at A ~vith a depth eqtU11 to y" -t; /::,y.
(\nd then termmates a.t a.aertam hole lI1' the shell of the sphere, which thus ()ontRin~ The bD-ckwater profile is of the 1111 type, Wflich extends upstream frorn A
five l:oles.: The openings of the holes a:re strategically located on the'stlria.ce of the and is asymptoti'e to the norma.l-depth line. .
sphere so tha.t, by rotating the sphere and with c!Llibration, the dil'ecti~n II.nd ma.gni-
j. Case 2 illustrates 8upercriticaL flow in. the curved channel. It ca'n be
tude of 3. yeloclty vector of flow ca.ll be determined,
I
!
I .
 442 RAPIDLY VARIED FLOW FLOW IN CHANNELS OF NONLINEAIL ALIGl'It.1EN'f 443
seen that the ellel.'gy line is dropped by hi at B', corresponding to the
amount of encrgy dissipated in Iile curve and the downstream channel
-" 0.60 I--i"'''"+--+-+--+~+--t--j
BB', The wHtcr surface is raised from the normal depth, starting at A, '"
u
incrensing t,o t:.y at B' ,and then returning to normal afterwards. If the 6 O.5~
Vi
.~ 0'10
-o
c: 0.30 I---+,,-t~

~'" 0.2.0 \--_..L__"--_

i
.3 0.1 0 \---''---'~-,--.!f----r-..,..--''-r--1
I
I 2. :3 4 5 6 7 B 0.50 toO 1.50 . 200 2.50 I

ReyllOlds' number R (multipliec by 10') Radius-breath ratiQ !:b~

,!
. ., 050 r---1-''''''-1'''''"-,-'''-- ~-~-r--'->
-"

~ 0,40 ~
':;; I
'iii
! 0,30 !-I-I--~""
I ~ 0.20 f---+",..,f--
J. ~ I
, ~ 0.10 1___ 1-_,-1_.1... a----'-J...----I
15 (b) PalOmal.' R; !£=1.00 Clnd j~:0.50
u 0 L-~,__~~~b~,_~.__~o~~J'__~
023456780 0,25 0.50 0.75 1.00
4
Reynclds' number R (mult:plied by 10 ) Rotio of ongle of curval"r.

1.20

1,10
:
'\
1.00 1---
..:! 0.90
.,
g 0.80
! ~
1
~~ 0.70 , \
I ~
!, 'E 0.60 I
to
~l~"~
, l-J
'1/ I, ~;:; 0.50

Case :0 I u
a 0,40

FIG. 16-1. Energy line and flow pl'ofile around a curve.

II 0.30

0,20

water slll'f3.ce l'is~s above the critical-depth line, a hydraulic jump will be
~~~.
Case 3 illustrates 8upercritical flow when the normal depth is only
. .
( 0,10

2.
3 4 5 6 7 8 0.50
I
0.70
3.00
0.90
it
110 1.30
J
slightly below the critical depth. The wavy surface in the upsti'eam ReynOlds' numbe, R (multiplied by 104 ) Depth-brealh rolio t
channel is due tothe fact that the water surlace is raised above the critical FIG. 113-:2. Experimental parametric functions of the coefficient of curve resist.a.nce.
depth, so-that an unClular jump is produced. (Aft~r A. Shukry [2J.)
The total enel'gyloss due to curve resistance can be expressed in terms
 445
FLOW IN CHANNELS OF NONLINEAR ALIGNMENT
444 HAPIDLY VARIED FLOW

of the velocity head:

V2 (16-2)
fc 2g

where l' is the mean velocity in the section and Ie is the coeffiCient of
Clll've resistance. The coefficient fe varies cOl1sider(tbly with each of the
parameters R of the approach flow, ?'e/b, y/b, and 8/180°. Fumilies of
tal SURfACE LEVELS
curves for these parameters based all the experimellt,~ made by Shuki'Y
[21 (see [9] (tnd [lOJ for other studies) are shown in Fig. 16-2. The curves
CM be used to determine approxim[,tely the value of to in sm.ooth curved
channels. For allY given c(tse, fe is obtnined by first fixing its v(tlue with
respect to two variables and then adju~tillg with respect to the third and'
fourth vm·j(tbles.
Example 16-1. Given R = 55,500, "c/b = 1.30, y/b = 0.8, and 0/180° = 0.556.

~n ~
Determine j"
Sohltion. First, keeping y/b = 1.00 and 0/180° = 0.50, it is found that, for 701

~ ij<~/
.. ~~~-=-:-~-- ---=-~=:q. -
R = 55,500 and ",/b = 1.30,f,'~0.200 (Fig, 16-2c). Then, keeping l'clb = 1.00 and
8/180 0 = 0.50, it is found that, for R = 55,500 and y/b "" 1.00, j, = 0.230 and ~hnt,
for R = 55,500 and y/b 0.80, j, = 0,275 (Fig. 16, 2b), Adjusting the condit,ion of
~I ~'iJO-f-... L ~--
y/b = l.00 to that of u/b = Q,80, the conected coefficient = 0.200 X 0,275/0.230 = 0/ ~~-1Z----z=::J= ' 60--1-
,1
0.239.' Now, keeping y/b LOO and relb = 1.00, it is found that, for R = 55,500 and
8/180· = 0.556, j, = 0.245 (Fig, 16-2a), Similariy, adjus~ing t,lle condition of if.!I R~o,,~,; I
Ii ("'s$'O{) • \ I
5

8/180· 0.50 to that of 8/180° = 0.556, the finally' corrected coefficient = 0.239 X _~ _ ':I{\j-',!<:!
a 7~ (b) FORWARD VELOCITIES
:) 0.2'15/0.230 0.::\55, say, 0,26,
1 ,/~/ _~_Cer,terhr<eoffl\Jme ---PQ/:I':~~~~~~l~
:I The above procedure of interpolation is shown in Table 16-1.
I\ :~ \ 9 10 I ,~
TABLE 16-1. DETER~f1NA'rloN 01.' THE 'COEFFICIEN'r Ol' CURVE REsrSTANCE ~ ~\'\, s 20 ,07'0==?O-!~--___t:\oO~
. --
:.'!
BY L~TER['()LA'I'lON
~ -----7'J~
,f-~:"L-1_- -~-~ep
1_ -==--_-~~
'" " ..... .

/":. "-~ "'0 I"~;).')

Step y/b II/180° R r,/b
i j,
1
Remarks
i ) 0".: , --;;::'::::"_-:'::-,_ _ ______ :-__ _
. \

(1) 1. 00 0.50 55,500 1.30 i 0,200 : By Fig, 16-2c

(2) 1.00 . 0.50 55,500 1.00
1.00'
I
0,230 By Fig. 16-2b
FIG. 16-3.
. I' J d forward velo0ities in flow around
Contour lin~~ ~~, e'lual [~Y1aC;tU~:~: ~~els measured in cm (= 0,3937 ill.)
(3) 0.80 0.50 55,500 0.275 By Fig, 16-21>
a 180 be:l~. . (Ajt6'l' .... ::1L " y ~', ,: /b = 1.00; YA/b =; }.OO; and, with TT A =
0

(4) 0.80 0.50 55,500 1,2·0 0.239 :j3y interp"O!ation: (1)[(3)/(2)J and velOCItIes III em/sec (-R 0.~3;8315~S\"I'e~.e subscript ..1 refers to conditions at the
(5) 1.00 0.556 55,500: 1,00 0,245 By Fig, 16-Za 77.8 em/sec (= 3,55 fps), A - I , ",
(6) 0.80 0,556 55,500 1. 30 0.255 i By interpolatioll: (4)[(5)/(2)1 inlet-approach section of the bend,
I
throngh the separation poiut 3, For different bends ,under vm'~~us C~ll"
16-4. Superelevation. Studies on the supen;.hiVl1.tion in water surface;
d't" .. of flow the- point of maximum surface depresslOn cl and th~ pcmt
arO'lllld a curved chuimel are many [11-14J. From the experimental I lOn::; .' 1 t d (s given in To,ble 16-2, The positlOllS of
results obtained by Shukry (Fig, 16-3), it oan be seen thn.tthe path of the of separatlOll s ,v ere oc(t e , \ . . 1 9 1 IJ
the two points n,l'C given in tenils of the ratios of theIr ang es , d (tl1C d"
a
thread of maximum velocity in ourved channel deviates fr0111 it-snormal . d f th inlet of the bend to the total angle fJ of· the ben .
course at,
a section opstream from the bend. At point el, the puth almost measure rom e ' 1 1 ff t 1 b a i n g the
These positiolls were found to be only slig It y a ec ec y v r.Y h . ,
touches the inside wall of the chunl1el and the ,,'ater surface attains its t 'U/ b Hence fol' pmctieal pmposes, Table 16-2, ",hlO gIves
minimum level. Beyond point el, the path gradnally moves outward par~~e e l l ' f . /1. ~ 1 00 can also be applied to other values of y/b.
until it orosses the center line of the flume at the section that passes pOSItIOn va uea or y v - . , .
446 RAPIDLY vARIED FLOW
FLOW IN CHANNELl:! OF NONLINEAR ALIGNMENT 447
In using the table for interpolation, the procedure i.'> similar to that for The average forward velocity is
f. values (ExlUllple 16-1).
f' (C/r) dT = C T,
--1
TADLE 16-2. LOCATCONS OF PorN~'S OF MAXUlUiI<i SURl"ACE DEPRE8SCON V. ~~--- ~---ln-­
(POINT d IN FIG, i6-3) "-ND ,POINTS OF SEP .... RA1'ION (POIN'l' 8 IN _1~o - Ti ~·o -
To( ri
(16-5)
}'IG; 16-3) FOR VARYING PARAMETERS, EXCEPT THAT y/b = 1.00*
and the average depth of flow is
R = lD,500 ,i~ = 21,000 t~ = 31,500 I~ = ~2,500 IR = 73,500 . {" V dT " (E - CZ/2g1· 2 ) dl'
Parameter Ym =~-~- = :C.'.'~__~~_ _ __
9d/9
I
I (J,/6 .i 8d/ O [ e,/e I ed/B I 0,/8 1 so/a !8,/e 1·8 d /8 I 0;/& 'l'o - ri
C2
T-:;J - 1';. -)
r./b (A) 0/180° = 0.50, a constant
= E - --- (16-6)
2(JT ,1';

0.500 1.000 1. 000 [I. i

000 1.000 1. DOD 11. ILOOO I
I 000 1. DOD 11. 000 I 1. 000 I In the above equations 7'. and J'i are, ret;pectively, the outer and inner radii
-I
1.00
2.00 0.033 t 0.067
I
t' 0,100 t 0.133 t 10.333 t
I
0.111 0.250 0 180 0500 0250 1061110.30'1'880 0 ,,7 1. 000 of the curve. NO'N, the discharge i5

3.00 0.000
_____
t iO.OOO
1 _ _ ....
t 0 . 044. t 0.056 J t 1 0 . 167 t
1 1
.. .. 1 (16-7)
6/180° (B) I'c/b = 1.00, a cons~ant
If Q, 7'." !'" and E are given, the r::onstant C can be determined from Eq.
0.Z5
0.50
0.111
0.111
0,222
0,250
0.333
D.IS\)
0.667 0.3:131 0.6'37 o.400 I O. 7.lD 0.556 O. 8S9
0,500 0.250 0.611 0.306 0.889 0.6137 1.000
I (16-7). The velocity pond depth at any radius l' are then obtained by
Eqs. (16-3) and (16-4). Thus, the superelevation t.h of the water surface
-1'
0.75 0.1'18 0.333 0.185 0.445 0.296 0.556 0 .. 371 I 0.926 0.4'i.5 1. 000 can be shown to be
1.00 0.051l 0.778 0.111 0.778 o 167 0.805 0.278 I 0. 833 1 0.33311.000
I
, 1

(16-8) I'
.. Alter A. Shukry [Zi.
t No separation.
For the practical application of the above equations, the position of
I
point d is first deGermir.ed with th~ aid of Table 16-2. Thespecific
'The forward-velocity distribution and the water-surface profile at the
energy can be c.omputed at any section A in the approach challliel by
section of ma.xinllun surface depression may be estimated by the assump-
tion of a theor.etical free-vortex distribution of velocity. Th.is assump-
tion holds as long as the flo'w is ,mbrr'itical. (16-9)
By the law oj free-vortex' motion, I the following expression can be
where CIA is the energy coefnciept and II A. is the mean forward velocity.
written:
The specific energy at, the radial section passing through point d is
v. = -
c (16-3)
- l'

where L is the channel length between sectiCYl1 A and the section COll-
where v. is the forward ftlo.mentf.l velocity in the curve at a ra.dial di'stanc.e
~aining point. d; Sf is the friction slope, which may be either determined
l' from the center of curvature, and C is the so-called circ'ltlat1:on constant
experimentally or computed by the M~nni:ng formula; and h f is the. energy
in a free-vortex motion.
loss due to curve resistance, which may be determined a.'> showni in Ex-
Let E be the speGiEiq energy at a.ny section and y the depth of flow at a
ample .16-1. The coefficient 0.4 was found to be practically constant
distance l' from the center of curvature; then for any curve.
!J 2 .11le above m~thod was found to be. reasonably accurate as long as
Y
.
= E _..2-
2g (16-4)
the angle of the c1.irve was greater than 90° .. For smaller angles, Sl~ukry -\
assumed that C varies lineatly 'with e from rV.. at e = 0 to its full
1 For an elaborate ·ma.thematica.l ,analysis by the l.aW' of free-vortex motion see 1121.
v::dl1e at. 0 = 90°. Therefore, for an.y angle e less than 90°, the Clrcu-

,II
 448 RAPIDLY VARIED FLOW FLOW IN CHANNELS OF NONLINEAR ALIGN?tENT 449
(
lation constant can .be multiplied by a correction factor equal to ;;ection (Chap. 17), These wa ~res, fonniilg a disturbance pattern tha~ .
i can persist for a .consideral:>le distance downstream, are ci),u:;ed by the
o+ (1 turning effect of the cUl'ved walls, which does not act eqmtlly on all
stremnlines in the channel section. In a curved channel, the outer wall,
where iT.. is the xnean fonval'd velocity in [l, straight channal. which turns inward to t.he flow', will produce all. oblique h}'dmujc jump
Supereievation in CUl'vcd channels nuty also be detcl'l"nined less rmd a corresponding pnsitive disturbance lirie or positive wavefront l .
aCClU'ate but simpler formul!t8 which lire bilsed on the application of (Art. 15-17). The inner vIall, which
Newton's second bw of motion to the. <::6ntrifug:11 action in the Cl1l've. turns away from the flo\v, will de-
Assuming that all filamental velocities in the bend are equal to the mean velop a oblique expansion - t { .............,"--
velocity V, and tllat. all streamlines have a radius of curvature rc, the waue and a disturbance line
transverse water surface can be shown to be a straight line, and a simple or negative wavefront l (Example
formula for sllperelevation can be obtained: 16-2). The disturbance lines thus {aj

V z 2b produced by both outer and inner

(16-11 ) walls wii! be reflected back and forth
between walls and will interfere with
where b is the width of the channeL each other, resulting in a dis~'~l'b::Ll1ce
Applying Newton's second law to each streamline and then integrating pattern of cross waves.
the whole channel sectioll, Gras.~of [131 W(l.S able to show that the trailS" Similarly, in any channel of nOIl-
verse surface profile is a logarithmic curve and that the supel'elevation is linear alignment, cross waves may be {bl
, TT 2 formed in various pattel'lIs, such as
2.SD -~-' 10 0 ' ~ (16 .. 12) those shown in Fig. 16-4. It may be
g ';' 1';
nuted that the cross waves in Fig.
Woodward )4,151 l.l.ssumed th,tt the velocity is zero at the banks and 16..4b can be canceled, as shown in
has a 11l[Lximmu value at the center, varying in between according to Fig. 16-4c, making t.he line Art
. a parabolic curve .. Using Newton's seconcpaw, he obtained the fol1o\l'- coincident with the first positive
.ing formula for sllperelevation: wavefront AA'. For large deflec- FlO. 16-4. Rectangular channels of 1l01l-
tion angles of channel walls, the plism~tic alignment.
positive wavefront may be deter-
mined by the rnet.hiJd developed in Art. 15-17 fl,nd the negative wavefront
Of the above three simple superelevl1tion formulas, it has been found by the method to be described later in Example 16-2, For small deflec-
that Eq. (16.. 13) gives the best re!;lults, but Ilone of them is more accurate tion angles, such as the infinitesiiru?l increment of the deflection angle
than the free-vortex formula (16-8). in curved chn.nnels, the Cl'osswaves mo.y be determined by the method
16.. 5. Cross Waves. Cross waves· Ine usually found in supercriticaJ described below,
flow ill channels of lIonlinear aEgnment and channels with nonpi'ismatic . In studying the de\~elopment of these methods it should be noted that,
I Cross waves ill supercritical flow iJJ.wa~er are' aualogolls to the shock waves
for sm::dl deflection angles a·lld for large deflection that create
In supersonic ·t!01V of gase.~. This analogy was first noticed by Prandtl [16J, Hia- negative wavefl:on'ts, the specific energy across the wavefront can be
b~ucbinsky [17], and von Karman 1181 and then investigated experimeatally by ass limed constant since little energy dissipation is actually involved. For
PreisIVerlc [19J and others. These scientists, however, were iIiterestecl ill'imrtrHy ·in hrge deftectioil angles that create positive w~wefrOl~tsl however, the
applications of this ~tinciple to sttpersonic flow of gases. La,ter, comprehensive , .
$tudies of .the subject! in hydraulic applications ware made by Knapp, Ippen, ilnd I The disturbance line OJ' wave angle created by an oblique bYi<iralJlic itlrnp is con-
othel's [20-26). To facilitate the analysis of shocld wave in gases, B\lSemann [27J sidered positive in order to distingilish it from the negative distlirbance line c>f W!lve-
developed !l. gra.phical method known !\s the melhod of charactedstics, which was lall"r front d\IC to nn oblique expansion ,i-ave. The negative disturbJl,nce Iille Ilctjlally only
applied to hydraulic ;problems by Preiswerk, Ippen, and Knapp. For detfliled marks the beginning of a. distuxbance region; it is not a. distinctly, defined Iiuc like the
de$criptioll5 of this method, the reader should refer to [23J, [2·11, and [27]. positive one. i
I
I

45,0 RAPIDLY VARIED FLOW
specific energy cannot be assumed COl).s.tant because the wavefront is
built up to a :mbstantial height and so the oblique hydraulic jump across.
the front will consume a.n appreciable amount of .
Considering the supercritical flow in a curved channel of constant wi~th
'b and radius 7', (Fig. 16-5), the first small disturbance caused by the
a
FIG. 16-5. Cross-w~ve patt;mdor supercritico.l flow ina. llllrved channeL
curvature of the outer wa.ll starts at the beginning point. A and is propa-
gated along the line AB, which an initial wave angle /3 with the
tangent extended beyond point A; In the meantime, the initial dis-
tu~bance produced by the i~'ll1er wall is propagated along the line A'B.
The. two p'ropagation fronts meet at point B. . Upstream. from the bOWld-
. -- 1
,
FLO,\, IN CHANNE(,S OF:NONLINEAR ALIGNMENT 451
. ary line AB AI, the< flow is unaffected by.the curve and thus continues to .- ~I
!
move in its original direction; that is, parallel to the tipstre!un tangent.
Beyond point B, the two wA.vefronts AB and AlB affect each othel' and
are 110 propagated in straight lines but in the curved paths ED
and BC, TheOllt,cr COll.cave wall A C tends to deflect
the flow, .yhich would otherwise follow the tangential direction. Conse-
quently, the water surface is raised higher and higher around the outer
wall up to a maximum at C. After G the effect of the inner wall, which is -1
to lower the water surface, begins to operate., Thus, the water surface I
along the outer wall starts to drop. On Uie imler convex side, the flow
tends t~ depart from the wall, and the water surfa.ce is depressed lower I
i
rmd lower around AID until the point D is reached. After D the effect ·1
of the outer wall comes into pl!),y and the surface' begins to rise again.
The reflection oC disturbance waves from the outer B.nd inner walls will
not come j,o equilibrium 01' .stop when they meet near the center of the
channel. They will continlle to be reflected back and forth' across' the
Chal111el, crmsing lhe surface profiles the walls t,o h£1 ve a Beries of
maxima, and minima of surface elevation, approximately at f~ngles 0, j
30, 58, . , . , from the beginning of the curve. The e marks I
I
half the wavelength of the disturbance pattern. For practical purposes,
. it may be assumed that the points of maximum and minimum for each
phase (J occur on the same radial line; such as DC for the first maxi-
~um 'and minim um. 1 By geometry (Fig. 16-5), the cen tnd angle to the
first maximum can be shown to be
.. 2b
8 tal1-' (21", + 51 tan f3 (16-14)
where the wave ~\ngle f3 is approximately sin- 1 (V/gU/l') , as will be Sh0W11
below by Eq. (16-15). -\
In order to simplify the computation of the water-surface el"vation 2 \
the following major assumptions al'eto bfl made: (1) two-dimensional
flow, (2) constant velocity across the cross section, (3) horizontal channel,
(4) frictioilleas flow, and (5) vertical channel walls. Assumptions 3 and .. ·1
4 do not exclude the application of the results to sloping channels if the
slope compensates for the friction,
For the curved outer wa.lI, the changes in the angle of deflection and in
the depth are gradual and small and, thus, can be represented' byde and
1 Actuo.lly th~ locations of the first maximum and minimljm do not oceUl' exactly
on the ra,diaf line OC but slightly on the left side nnd right side of DC, respectively
(Fig, 16-5). 'However, the error involved in the l15surnption is negligible. This
assumption applies also to the locations of the subsequent maxima. lLnd minimn..
~ A det&iled study of the complete surface contours is possible by means of the
method of ch!l.t!l,cteristios (23]. .
.\
I
 .~
r'
(- .

. 452 r
RAPIDLY VARIED i"LO'" ~. FLOW IN CHANNELS 'OF NONLINEAH ALIGNMENT 453
ely, l:espectively. Assuming YI = 1/2 = y lor an obliq\.\e hydraulic jump [ depth Y I. Equ[1.tion (16-21) is, however, involved and inconvenient for
of infinitesimal height dy, Eq. (15-21) bccomes l . ' .
I prar.:tical usage, even with the aid of a graphical c.hal't such fl·S that
I
i
I develope.d by Ippell (23]. According to Knapp and Ippen [21-241,
1 V
Fl = F = -.-- = - - (16-1.5) adequate results may be, obtained by .the .much simpler equation
. sm ,6 . vfiiY
Substituting y for YI Rnd y + ely for Y2, Eq. (15"~3) may be reduced to
I y= -
V2
g
.
sin l
(
,6 +-)
8'
2
(16-22)

. Ii sec~ {f tan e
I
ay = ~--~----­
. tan f3 .:- tan e (16-16) This cqu[1.tion was developed as a result of actwd flow mensurements. 1
In using Eqs. (16-21) and (16-22), the angle eis positive for depths along
For a small angle, tr,ri e may be replaeed by de, and ,tilll (; in the denomi- . the outer' wall and negative for depths a.long the inner Wl~IL The depth
nator is negligible compar'ed wit.h tan (f. Thus, Eq. (l6-16) becomes at the first maximum heights of the cross-wave disturbance may be
obtained by using the value of 8 computed by Eq. (Hi-H).
11
ely = -.-~,-- de (16-17) In cross section GD (Fig. 1 (}-5), where the first maximum height of the
. 8m f3 eos fj
cross wuve occurs at the outer wall, the line ala represents the theoretical
By eombining Eqs. (16~15) tind (16-17), the following is obta.ined· position of t·he wat~r surfacein the channel cross section if the channel
were straight, line b' 6 the theoretical positioll of the water surface 011 the
V~
dy = --- tan (3 de (16-18) curVE: if the flo';" were subcritical, and line e'e the actual water surfacc on
g
the curve when the flow is supercriticaL It is evident that b is higher
. According to assumption 4. above, the specific energy may be COIl-' than a and b' is lower than a' by ail. amount equal to half the supe.rdevn-
fHdered constant. Since E = y + V2/2g, Y = v/2g(E ;- V). Sub- tion, or 6.h/2.By Eq. (16-11), this amount is Y?b/2TcY. According to
stituting this. expression for V in Eqs. (16-15) and (16-18) and then elimi- t.he experimental investigations made by Ippen and Kn[1.PP [21,231, e is
nating fj by Eq. (16-15), the following is obtained: higher than- a by an amount eqlml to_about 6.h, or highcr than b by about
(',.h/2. The positioll el is lower than b' by ['.bout t::.h/2. Similar conditions
ely '2(E - y) vY exist in other cro.3S sections where maximum height of water stll'face
de = v2E - 3y . (16-19)
occurs at the outer w8.1l.
I The exact solution of Eq. (16~19) for 9 gives In cros.'3 sectio:l FG, where the minimum cro~s-w(we height OCCll1:S at
I
I

_
8 -. ,/<.,'
-v u tan
-I I - -3y- - - bn- I - -1- -
,
\j 2E - 3y '.
31Y
''';3 '\ 2E - 3y
I + cons
t (16-20)*
the outer w<.111, thfj actual water 'surface is identical with 11.' a because the
. effect of the disturbance .cross wave is prnctically offset by ,the super-
., elevation. Simibrly, in other cross sections where the wave height is
Sillce 2E' = y(2 + Fi) (why?), Eq. (16-20) may be written minimum at the outer wall, t.he water 13urfILce aSSUlIles (\, position as if
the flQw were in a straight channel.
' .. ;, ',/3· 1 The distance .fiG along the wall represents a half wavelength, which
8 = '\/ Q tan- I --==
y F~ - 1
.- tuu- 1 - - - " ' - = + const
VF2 - 1 .
(16-21)
.,. sustains a central angle 8.. This length may be approximated by AG'
':<
This equation can be used to cll.lculilte the change in depth along th . ~ 1 On the basis of !l.Ssumption 4 and, hence, of the conservation o{ energy, the velocity

walls at the begiuning of the curve. The integration constant Clll1 be
determined by the condition that, for e = 0, the depth y is the initial
, This equation ill believed to be tl'Ue only for supercritical flow in wide rectan"ular
channels ... For bro~d ~ppli~atians, Erigelund and Munch-Petersen [28] have devel~ped
. Ii. generahzed equatIOn, which h!l5_been found in good agreement with experimental
d~ta covering considerable variation of the Froude number (even for F' eqtla\ to or
shghtly less than unity) uud of the clepth-,viclth ratio of the channel.
i
• 1'ile matliematicai derivation of the equation of this form was first made by von
Klirman [18]. ' .
!r
in any stl'eamline must chani!;e as the depth changes, since E='y + V'/2g must be
con,~tant. The flow E1,l'Ound the outer wall, boing the deepest, should be the slowest.
Actual measurements, however, indicate on the contrary tl\r.t the velocity around,the
autc,. w(Lllli~lllains constant or even increases slightly, whereas f\long the inner W:L1l
the velocitj"'decreases. It is believed th:.t this dispD.rity is due to varyhig effects of
the channel irictian, which actua.lly render ass~ll1ption 4 invalid. Consequently, it
is rell.soned that a constant velocity may be assumed. Equ:.tion (16-22) was, there-
fore, derived from the assumption of constant velocity, which rep!E1,ces assumption 4.
Since the author cannot discern here the rigor of the origirull mr.thematical derivatioll,
he would rather consider Eq. (16-22) to be empirical. .

I·
t
454 RAFID1JY VARIED FLOW FLOW IN 'CHANNELS 'OF' NONLINEAR ALIGNMENT 455
or b/tan f3 by that the angle AG' A' = (3. Thus, the wave- where FI a.nd F. are, respectively, the initi",ll1.nd fina.l Froude numbers of the flow.
length is 2b/tull fl. The rehtion among F t , F,; and th.e tot!1-l deflectioll angle ~, can be represented by Eq.
(16-21), In that equation, e '" 0 when F = Fl and 0 = 8, when F.= F.. Thus, if F,
Frain the above discussion, it may be concluded that the disturbance
aud 8, are give!l, F, can be determined. The angular mnge in which the depth change
wave p.l1ttel'll, which osoillntes about the plane represented by has a takes place may be determined by (11)-23). Since the depth cha,nge does not
wl:welength of2b/tl1n.6 and an amplitude of 112b/2TcU. This can involVe 'appreciable energy depths before and after the change ca.n be
be used to cstimn.te roughly the s~lpercritica[-flow profile ill simple curved rela.ted by 'assuming a constant er,ergy, 'Thus, the mtio of the final to ,the
chn.nlle[s. tnitia.! u(~pth can be shown to be
For disturbance continuing into thedowl1stream channel, the
·,·1
primal':\, wavelength is sti!! 2b/tan p. AI>, the curvature suddenly changes (

to straight alignment, a r,ew disturbl1l1ce pattern, starting with a m<J.xi-
mum height on the onter wall at the point of tangency, has a wo,velength
and magnitude equal to that of the original disturbance pa.ttern developed
in the curve. The l:esul'.;ing disturbance pattern in the tangent is the
sum of the original and new Th~ new disturbanGe pattern
may, therefore, be elimilmtecl by adopting curve lellgth~ of 28, 40, . . . ,
which will have a minimum wava height at the outer wall at the efld of the
curve, just to cllncel out the newly created maximum wave heif!;ht.
Example 18-2., Des()tibe ~he ehal'l1.ctBl'istics of all oblique expansion
channels of nonlinear A.llgnme::Jt.
W2N6
I .
In til" disturba,nce .region, the decreaS<! in deptil ma.y be considered to "'J';vlll1U~
, thrilugh !L sel'ie~ of infinitesimal st.eps or wavelets. The wave angle of eRch SU(lCeCa-
ing wa,vclet, depends UPOll the loco.l value of the continuously cha.nging Freud" num-
ber. Each wnvelct may be sllcee1h;lvely represented by '" line of COllst!l.nt dEoflth,
The first wfl.veier, is represented by the negatiVE! disturbance line. It lUay be noted
tha.t, in contrast to the negl\tive disturbance line, 0. positive disturba.nce line rcpre-'
sents a rnore OT less sudden increase in depth becBuse it sigltlfies !L hydraulic jump,
The ll\lga~ive disturbance line marks the beginning of It disturbance region devebpcd
by fin ,obEque expansion wave, whereas the positive disturbancll line represents the
entire (li~turbande caused by nn oblique hydraulic jump.'
in
16-6.' Design Considerations for Subcritical Flow. In general, curves
I
are unde3irable in open channels, because they will increase frictional
loss and letta to dllnger of serious locn.l erosion due to spiml flow. Reduc-
tion of spira; flow is the mlljor conce.rn in the design of curved ch:J.n~lels for
subcritical flow, For a proper proportioning of the curve, a ratio of
To/V = 3 is recolnmended, because it will give the least, radius at whichthe .
effect clUB to spired flow is minimi.zed (Art. 16-2).
In erodible ch!l.l1!lsls, the action of spiral flow will develop a
tion in the bed. The size of the cOllfiguration is minimal if 'l'r/b is 3.0 OF
larger. When bl111k protection is necess::I.ry, it is needed most on the
outer bank at the do\vnstream end of t.he curve and to a lesser degree
on the inner bank at the beginning of the CUl've. This is suggested in
accordance with the behavior of spiral flow.
In an alluvial bend it seems that the configuration of the channel cross

Mm?q#:;:J;;77/7:/7//?//t::::Lm7///.7//~7/A; ,
sectioll is defined more or less in accordance with certain l1a,turallaws.
This subject has been by many scientists and engiheers of
river hydraulics since [29]. According to the studies by
Seclloo A'-A i
I Ripley [30], the configuration at an. alluvial river bend (Fig. 16-7) may
Fw. 16-6. Oblique expa.n~ion wave, i
be represented the following empirical equation:
i! I
Sol-uliQn. The oblique expa.nsion wave occurs when the channel wllll is turned oute
ward from the flow at all o.ngle {Jc (Fig. 16·6). The depth of flow decreases in the fan- I I
Y = 6.35D ( ,\/0.437 x~ - 0.433) ( 1
- T2 Xl()
+ r; (16-25)
shaped region of the wave disturbo.nce delineated by wave angles (1, and {:J" measured
with'l'eference to tbe initial and final flow dirac.tians, respectively. By Eq. (16-15), where y is the ordiril1teot depth in ft, :1: is the abscissa in ft, Dis the
and (15-23) I hydraulic dept,h in ft, T is the top width in ft, r" is the mdius of curvature
on the concave side of't.he channel in ft, and J( is a coefficient equal to
t
I.,
 456 RAPIDLY VARIED FLOW
.17.52. The crigin of the cool'dillates for this equation is on the water
l>'Urface' at n pOlut equidistant. from the banks~ ~l1using :this equation
the foil.oviring I'emarks shoulcl' be noted: . . VZ
1. For],. less than 40 tiInes the square root of t,he water area, no further
deepening of the channel seems ttl result from the increased curvature;
hence, in such cases, the ivalue of riJ used in t.he equation should be
I 40 VA. Consequently, 'bends are const,!'llctive and stahle when r. is
I . greater them 40 wher~!l.S sharper bends are destructive, te,nding to
shift the channel.
2. For r. gren.ter thn.ll about 110 VA, the equation bacome.s il~ valid.
I
I
.r-
Center of Cur .... o1vre
FtG. 10-7. Empirical channel cro~s section at river bend.
3. The equation ma.y be npp!i¢d to cU'rved channels not occupying the
entire width of the wntenvay or to those at the river entrance created by a .
\ single curved jetty. In such cases, K 26.28 and the'value 1)f y thus
i compltted shouldbe in<.:reMecl 14%.
4. On a crossover bar when the c:hannel is neitheI' on a curve nor in II-
strnight .reach, the maximum depth is iI.bout 14.5 % less than the com-
puted value.
5. The eqtlatioll generally gives a 'width of channel at hydraulic depth
about 20 % greater thfUl the actlJf.1 width.
6. The equation is very approximate j nevertheless, in the absence of a,
better method for determining shap~ ofcrbss section at a river beild or at
a bend in a dredged c[mai, it will give satisfactory answers to many
i
practiGal problems. : . . I.
16-1. Design Considerations for Supercritical Flow. the major issue
in the ,design of curved channels for supel'critical flow is to elimil11'te or
reduce the superelevatioll and cross-wave disturbance pattern. Knapp
[24J h~s suggested the following:methods to achieve this objective:
A. Eanking. By banking is jrneant use of a. bottom cl'OSS slope that
,vill supply a l£\teral force to counteract the centrifuglll;:lCt~on of the flow.
The required cross slopeS, caA be computed by equati,ng the gravity
component [Llong the cross siop~ to the centrifugal force determined by
:FLOW. IN CHANNELS OF NONLINEAR ALIGNMENT 457
the radius r of the curve and the velocity Y; that is,
(16-26)
gr
In order~o avoid abrupt chailges in flow condition, banking should
be introduced gradually from zero to its full amount, starting at both
ends of the curve. rt should be noted that the slope thus computed is
good only fqr the velo('.it,y given. When the veloeity chiLnges, the com-
puted banking will be less effective under new flow condition:,. Hence,
banking; is most suitable in channels which ordiM,rily opern.te nt or neo,1'
o
FIG. 16-8. Ph\ll of sill insta:llativn in a curved ch3.nnel. (A.jlel' R. T. Knapp [24].)
the designed flQW coridition. Fac~ors against lnmking inc-lude co;;tly
. excavation and possible siiting or erosion ~;'long the inner w[ll1 dUl'in~ low
flows.
. B. Multiple Curved 11 anes. The !:;upel'elevation and disturbance
pa,ttern can be reduced by concentric vc.nes which divide the ehallllel
width into a series of ml.l'l'OW curved channels. This method is IVJt
generally practicfl.l, O-\ld it becomes impossible in channels ctl.lTYing debris
of sizes larger than the sllbdivided width.
O. Ea8e'TIumt Cv.T1)e~. ,The disturbance ir~ a simple cUl'ved oh"nne1 may
be reduced by employing a compound curve. The best design is a SImple
curve of radius To preceded nnd followed by a section of ::motlle!' simple
curve whose len<tth is b/tnn {3 and whose l'aclius is 2)'.. The r~sLllt-
, , '> b ,
ing compound curve will offel' 11 very desil'able solution for most cui'ved
channels of 8upercritical flow. Other types, of easement curve, such as
a spiral t.ransition curve, will inm'ease appreciitbly the cost of desigl~ and
const·ruction with only slight improvemellt in flow Ch~LI'n.cterii>tics ...
D. Diagonct! .StUs. Diagonal sills installed on the bottom of the
channel near the ends of the curve will prodLloe all effect correspondi'ng to
that of im easement . curve. An effective layout of the sills, shown III
Fig. '16-8, has been develQped expet:imentally. The optimum sill angie
 I
1I
I
458 RAPIDLY VARIED FLOW FLOW IN CHANNELS OF rWNJJINEAR ALIGNMEN'f 459
O! is 30°. The distance Lus may be estimated by
I ,I
REFERENCES
(16-27) I l· Jallles Tholnson: Oil the origin a.nd winding of rivers in allu,rial I,laius, with
I rema.rks on the flow around bends in pipes, Proceedings, Royal Society of L01!rf,on,
I
where K is 11 ooefficient;; FOt, noi'mo,} cases, the value of J( lies between vol. 25, pp. 5-8, Mar, 4, 1876.
2. Ahmed Shukl'Y: Flow arour:d bends in an open flume, T1·ansa.dionli, Ame1'ican
0.9 and 1.15. In accordance with the the length LU1 is
b
!
i
Society oj Civil Engineer.s, voL 115, pp. 751-779, 1950.
3. A. Hinderks:' NebenstrBmungen in gekrilmmten Kaniilen (Secondary flow in
0.30L' + (16-28) ,,I
l Gun'eel can!l.ls), Zeitschdfl. des rre1·~in.~ deldscher I ngenieuTe, Berlin, vol. 71, no. 5J,
i pp. iTi9-1783, Dec. 17, 1927.
where L' = b/tan p, that "is the half wftvelength of a channel disturb:?nce. 4. Bmllo Poggi: Col'l'enti veloci nei (lana-Ii in cm·va.(8wift flow in curved channels),
This method can be used as a remedial measure in channels L'Ell,ergia eleUrit;a, Mila/Ito, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 465-480, May, !f)5G.
which have been designed as simple circular curves or other un:=mtis- 5. F. L. Blue, Jr., J. K. Herbert, a.nd R. I,. Lancefield: FibII' around a river bend
inveRtigated, Cl:"n En!j1:neenng, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 258-260, May, 1934.
factory fOl'ms. The major disadvantages of this method are
G. Herbert D. Vogd Ilnd Paul W. Thompson: Flow in ril'erbends, Civil Engineerinll,
mail1tenal1.;e cost, pronounced distUl'bitnCe at low flows, and possible vol. 3, 110. 5, pp. 2613-263, May, 1933. .
cavitation at extreme high-velocity flows. The pronounced disturbll.nce 7. Herbert D. Vogel and Paul W, Thompson: Existence of helicoidal flow, Ci1iil
l1t low flows may cause uneasiness and distrust in an unexperienced EnfJ1.needll(J, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 370-371, July, 1\J34.
observer liS he may not be ea.'5ily convinced that the distul'bance will be 8. Robert Muller: Theoretische Grundl:J.gen del' Fluss- und Wildbachvcrbauungun
(Theoretical principles for mgulatioll of rivers and t{)rrent.s), Eixlgeniissi,che
greatly reduced at high d~sigl1 flows. .
Teclmi~che HClchsclntle; Z1ldch, jJ[itieii1,t~{le" de,. Ye.rsuchsanslalt fiLl' Was.,erbau
1.nd El'dbau, No.4, 1943.
PROBLEMS 9. SaHjiva. Puttu llaj\l.: Versuche i.iber den SCl'Omungswicierstll.nd gekrummter
offencl' Kaniile (St'.lcly on the flow resistance ill CllT\'cd open channels), lI{Ulei-
1~-1. A 120 bend with Ii bngen des Hyd1'f.mi::schlm [nstitu.ts del' Tec/',nischen H ochscknle Miinchin, no. 6, pp.
0
, 10 In. and 1', = 15 in. is designed to c.onnect two
etra.lght channele of the same width, ca.rrying 1.3 cis at a normal depth of i in. Deter- 45-60, Munich, 1933. English tTll.nslaticn by Cla.rence E. Bal'cMey, R.",is~allcc to
mine the bend loss. I fiow in curved open dmnnels, A1I!,~,':c(m ,society of Civil Engineers,
.{
16-2. Det~rm~ne the specific energy at the section containing, maximum sur-
o vol. 63, pt. 2, p. 49 after p. 1834, November, 1937.

n
race depreSSIOn In the bend given in the preceding problem. Assume 0: = 1.0 alld
0.01. .
! 10. C. H. Yen and J. W. Howe: Efferti'; of channel shape on.losse5 in a canal bend,
\ Civ';: EnrJineering, vol. 12, no. 1/ pp. 2.8-20/ 19':12,
, 16-S. Compute the WH.IA'.['-sr:r profile in the cross section containing maximum l 11. H. Wittma,!l and P. B6ss: "Wasser und in gckrihnmten
surface depression, as in the problem, using the law of free YortE'x.' FIuss-strecken" (" Vi' a.ter and Eed-load Movement, in Curved River Reaches "),
What is the snpel'elevation? Springer'''erlr.g, Bfll'lin, 1938.
16-4. Det.ermine the superelevation in the preceding problem by (a) Eq. (16-11}, 12. C. E. Mockmol'e: Flo\l' around hends ill stable channels, TnlllSact·':oTl.!, Amel'ican
(b) ;Eq. (1.5-12), and (e) Eg. (16-13). . Society of Civil Engineers, vol. 109, Tip. 5£13-618, 1944.
16-5: Verify Eq .. (16-14). 13. Armin' Schoklitsch: ".:Hydraulic Stmctul'es," trallslated from the German by
16~6. DeLermine the approximate flow profile ill the curved channel given in Prob. Samuel Shntitz, American SGciety of M'lchftnical Engine~rs, NEllV' York, 1937,
16-1 If the approach channel carries a supercriticl11 fio\I' at a depth of 0,5 in. vol. I, p. 151. .
.16-7. Design the curvad channel for. a rectangular flume to turn,lj.n angle of 50° . 14; Shenna.n ))..1. Woodward: Hydraulics of the Mi!l.rni Rood control project, ilIia.1ll,i
wIth t1 radms of 250.it.. The flume is'12 ft wide and built of smooth concrete. The Cons6"unncy Distr':ct, Tel'hn·ica.l Repi,,·t, Pt. V Il, Dayton, Ohio, 1920.
de.sign discharge is 350 cfs at a slope of 1 %. ' 15. Sherman M. Woodwa.rd and Charles J. PORCY, "Hydraulics of Steady Flow in
. 1~-8 .. Using Eq. (16-25), compute the channel cross 8ec~ion at a bend in the Missis- Open Channels," Jobn Wiley & Sons, Inc., Nt'w York, 1941, p. H2.
SIPPI Rl;erj where A. = 148,010 ft 2, T '"' 2,340 it, and 1. 18/300 ft. 16. L. Pral!·::hl: Abriss de,. StrQmungslehre ("Outline of the Theory of Flow"),
result WIth the actuat cross section, which is as follows: VieIVeg-Verlag, Brunswkk, Germany, 1031.
17. D. Riabouchinsky: Sur l'analogie hydraulique des mouvements d'un ffuidp. com-
x y x y y pressible (On hydralllic anl.Llogy of flaws of' a compressible Jiuid), Com.p/.es renaw,
1,170 0.00 ZOO 97.00 '-660 44.00 de I' Acad.!?nie des Scie1!ce~, vol. 195, pp. 998-999, 1932; vol. H)9, pp. 632-634, 1934.
1,000 36.00 74,00 18. Theodor yon Karman: Eill;; i)rai<tische Anwendung del' Ann.logie zwischen tJber-
800
600
88.00'
108.00
-200
-400
° 65.00
55.00
-800
-1,000
-1,170
38.00
24.00 naILlSt:l'o:mumll.: in Gasen und ilberkritischer Striimuug in offenen Gerinl1en (A
ap;pUI)MIOn of nna.logy between supersonic flow in ga,seil and supercritical
0.00
400 111.00 flow in open channels), Zei/,1lchlift flZ' (l'lI.gelUandle M(lth~matik un.d Mec/tnnik,
Berlin, voL 18, pp. :1.9-56, February, 1938.
-1
 460 RAPI~LY: VAlUED FLOW

19. El'Ils~ l'reiswerJc: Anwendung gllSdynamischer Methoclen auf Wassel~t\...

. f . 01 . , omUll"en
0
m.. t reler Jcrllli.ehe .(Application of the methods of ga.s dynamics to water fl"ow
dwith Ifree . surface),
.. E,dgenBssischB iechnische H ochsch~de
. 'Z~'rich , 'nf,t1e,'1
,. ,ungell aus
~?1\. nsttb~t ~~L1' Ae"odllnam'ik, No.7, 1938. Euglish translation by S. Rei~s as
l'iuttOnal Advtso,'y CommtUe~for Aeronmtlics, 'I'echnicaI1l1emoranda Nos 934 .d
935, M' arch, 19'1D. . ' • ar. CHAPTER 17
20. Arthur T. Ippen and Robert T. Knapp; A study of high velocity flow in curved
channels of rectangular cross section, 1"ransaclions, American Geophl sical U '. FLOW THROUGH NONPRISMATIC 'CHANNEL SECTIONS
vol. 17, pp. 516-521, 1936. Y mon,
21. Robert T. Kna~~alld Arthur T. Ipj:>en: Ol:rvilineur fiow of liquids with free
sur~.\l.ces at veloCitIes abov: that of wave propagation, Proceedings of the 6th Inter-
na/tonal (')on9 res s of Apphed Mecillznics, Cambridge, Mass., John Wile' & Sons
Inc., New York, pp. 531-536, H)38. . Y , Ru.pidly varied flow through nonprismatic sections! is found frequently
22. Arthur T. ~ppen: GM-wave Rnruogies in ope:l~challnel flow, Proceedings of the
in v<trious ,open-channel structures. In previous chapters, many exam-
2d Hydrm'/tcs Conference, June 1-1, 1 19./,2 St(tie [/niU'Ts't'· of I~w'a J S'Lolluozes
,. '!"L
.
'" -r:
E'ngtnee''',g, B1tl/etm 21, no, 400, pp. 248·-265, 1943.
oS ~:y
.... , .J '-' ples have heen discussed, such as the broad-crested weir (Example 3-2),
23. :~r~hur T. 1ppen: Mechanic.s of sllp~reritioal flow, 1st paper in High-Yelo~ity flow submerged sluice gate (Prob. 3-10), critical-flow flumes (Art. 4-6), channel
HI open channels: A symposIUm, T"unsar;iions, A.1nerican Society of Civil E'lUI~'nee-rs
outlet and entrance (Art. 11-3), sharp-crested 'weir (Art. 14-1), overflow
vol. 1] 6, pp. 268-295, 1951. • , spillways (Chap. i4), dl'um gates (Art. 14-9); stilling basins with various
24. R~bert T .. KnapJ): I?esign of channel Cu\,ves for slipercril-iC!l.1 flow, 2d paper in
controls (Arts. 15-9 to 15-15), etc. In this chapter, sevel'al significant
HIg~l-veloCity. flow In open channels: A ~ymposium, Tmn~'actions, A.mer.jean
I SOCIety of 0.0.1 Eng·ineers, vol. 116, pp. 2B6-325, 1951. .
25. ~rth~lr T. Ip~en and J?hn H. Dawso'l: Design of channel contractions, 3d paper
In ~IJgh-veloclty Ro.w m op~n chunnels: A symposium, T,-a·)tsaclions, American
cases 'which require. independent consideration will be. discussed.
The problem under consideration often involves an appreciable amount
of turbulence loss. In many cases, a p~actical solution of the problem
So.;teiy of Cw,l Engtneers, vol. 116, pp. 326-346, 1951. , can be achieved t.hrough the use of the continuity, energy, and momen-
Z6. Hllnte~' R.ouse, l!. V; Bhoota, and En-Yun HSll: Design of c]lannel expallsior.s, 4th
tum equations. This has been de'scribed in Arts. 3-6 to 3-8 i and a typic.al
paper 11111Jgh-ve.lo.clty f[~w in open channels: A symposium, Tranaactions, Amer- example is demonst.rat.ed in Example 3-2. Such a. method, however,
,can SocIety of C1Vl! E'Il{j!1lo,,'s, vol. J 16, pp. 347-3G3. 1051.
27. A. B:I~el~~nn: "?asd~r:.~,mik" ("<?asdynamies"), ';01. IV, pt. 1 of "Handbuch does not evaluate theoretically the' effects due to uncertain £adors. For
der Expellillentalphyslic, Al,adel111sche Verlagsgesellschait mbH LeiT,' 19'~ I a more exact solution that takes all factors into account, it is nec.essary
pp. 423-'140." , • Zig, '" to resort to model studies or actual observationSO'll existing structures:
28. Prank Engelulld aI).d Johs. Munch-Petersen: Steady llow in cont.l:actcd and
Then the theory Cl1n be used to set up all empirical equation 01' chart in
expanded, feet-angular channels, La H01!ille blanche, Grenoble, 8Lh yr., no. 4. pp. which the coefficients ani'to be del:ermined by experiments or from
464-474, August-September. 1953. . ,
29. J: BOllssin~sq: F.ss~i sur .ht th60i'ie des eaux coltrantes, (Essay on the theory of actual data. , .
17 -1. Sudden Transitions. Transitions with the change of cross-
,,,ater flow), illemmres VI'ese-ntes par dl'OC7'S savants (i I' Academic des Sciences, Paris
voL 23, sel'. 2, no. I, supplement 24, pp. 1-680, 1877. ' sectional dimensions occurring in a relatively short distance will induce
30. ~. ? Ripley: .Relo.Li~1I of depth LO cllrvaiul'e of channel'l, T1'a'ltsactions, .-i-merican rapic'ly vr.ried flo,y .. Such transitions (Fig. 17-1) .inchtde sudden con-
;~~~eIY of CWllBngmeers, vol. 90, pp. 207-:)38, 1927. Discussions on pp. 239- tractions and expansions vertically, lwrizonblly, or both.
Take the horizontal contraction (Fig. 17-2) as an example. 2 Applying
the momentum equation to sections 1~1, 2-2, and 3-3,

.Qw (P3Y. - .elV l ) = PI - P 2 - Pi - F/

g

By the continuity equation! Q = V\b1YI = Vsb,Ya. Fol' convenience

1 Gradu'ally varied flow through nonprismatic channel sections has been covered in

Arts. 3-5, 3-8, and 11-,1 to 11-7. .

• The following discussion is based 011 a.tre!Ltmeut given by Jaeger [J-3].
461

1
 J

462 RAPIDLY YARIED FLOW FLOW THROUGH NONPRISMATIC CHANNEL SE<"'TIONS 463
in the theoret.ieal discussion, it may be assumed t11at Ff = 0, lh = P3 = 1, Region 1. Flow is supercritical throughout the transition.
and Y2 = Va • . Under these conditions, Eq. (17-1) may be reduced to Region 2. Flow through the tra,nsition passes. from supercritical to
su bcritical.
F 2 _ (yJ/Vl)[ (VJ/Yl)2 - 1J (17 -2) Region 3. Flow is subcrit.ical thr"Otighout the transition.
1 - 2[(Ya/Yl) - 1/(b a/b 1)J Region 4. Flow through. t.he tra,l1sition passes from subcritical to
. where F 12 V 12 /gYl' This equation call be plotted as. shown in Fig. supercrit.icaL
17-3, using bl/b l as a parameter. The family of CUl'yes thus plotted are
!

Horizontal Horizontal
contrQction expor.sion

Vertical
expansion

.FIG. 17-1. Sudden tra:'lsitions. Fw. 17-2. Anl11ysis of a horizontal con-

I
traction.
\
similar hyperbolas of a higher order, having·the following cbaracteri:otics: I
1. The curves are considered only for positive values of F 1 and Ya/YI'
2. All hyperbolas pass through the points (Fl ;;= 0, Ya/YI = 0) and FIG. 17-3. Plot of Fli aga.inst 1)./1/1, using D.lol as a parameter fQ; the ana.!ysi;; of
(Fl = 0, Ya/VI 1) and are asymptotic to the yerticr.lline Ya/VI = bdh 1 sudden horizontal contractions (shown by the full curves) and expa.nsions (shown by
the dashed curves).
3. The special case of ba/b 1 =:= 1, indicai,ing the hydraulic jump in a
prismatic channel, is represented by the curve . 5. Theoretically spea.king, certain parts of the curves represent flOWE
thatc!1lmot actually occur, because they necessita.te an increase of 61\ergy,
Fl2 = 0.5 (~) i(Ya) + 111.1
Yl L Yt 01' a negative energy loss, which is contra.dictory to the fact that the flow
always loses energy in passing through a traUl)ition. The difference
(Why?). .
4. The upstream flow is supercdtical ill the regionaboye the horizontal I between the energies before a.nd after the transition is
line F 12 = 1 or F I = 1 and sub critical below t.his line... The downstream
flow is subcritical in the region below the curve Fl~ = (!Ja!Yl)3(ba/ b1) and
2
I
I IlE Yl+ -V2(1 - y. -V3
1
2
-
2
(17-3)
2g
supercritical above it. (Why?) Consequently, four regions in the
figure, representing four regimes, are created:
I
ar
IlE
Yl
1 + F12 - r~ +
2 1..l!1
-_.!L_-J
2(Y3hh)2(b /b a 1)2
(17-4)
 464
RAP IDLY VARIED FLOW
l<'LOW THllOtlGHNONPRISMA.TIC CHANNEL SEC'l'IONS 405
By applying this eq uatio!l to a certain part of the curves, the flow can . by Formica
' . [4], . I measured'
. !LS shOwn in Fig, 17-4. .Tl1e t YdP11cn(
were made _ '._ )
be found to be impossible if the computed value of /::,.E is negative.. It I (col1~rn.ctlon)
should be noted, however, that this discussion is intended to present a flow profiles and energy 1·'Illes f·
or . hall expansIOn
'fi encrn-y
h
are sown .
m 1"'(-5. " Th" enel'''Y
'" lines represent. . t e11kspeCI ill
c e the
b
theoretical t'malysisof the phen6menon and to develop a classification of ~\'hel'e the tl'(1nsltlOll t, 'es pc,
""V' Near the section
Y TI CI Vtj'/. .
the flow through sudden transitions. In real problems, the theoretically
impossible flow may become actdally possible becanse tbe iJ.ssumptions
,
I made in the ab~ve derivation may not be true under actual circumstances.! 35
I.
30

f-'-~
25

20
, em
15
®
~t '
10
+._._----
'I...-., ~-. . . 5
I 1

a
-0 ®
E. ~=·-·4
~
4
35

30

FIG: 17-4. VariolIs designs of sudden transitiolls -[01' (Afler G. [i'cwmir,a 25

[4.).) ChELnnel ;vidti! 355 mm for wider sections an,1 mm for r.a.rro\ver sections.
l"or' COli tractions, channel slopl} 0.00023 at wider sections and 0.00096 fit narrower
sectio11S; fo!' expansions; 0.00104 at narrower sections' and 0.00073 at wider sections. em

By i1 similar analysis, the following equation can be written for 11 hori-

zontal expansion, (assuming Y2 Yl):

(17-5)
-1 o
This eqtmtion is l'epresentei:! by the dashl"d curves in 'Fig. 17-3. Similar FlO. 17·5, Typica.l measured flow Il-nd energy lines througll ~udderl tr!)nsition~.
analyses also be made for vertical contractions and expansions. (/lftet G, Formica [41.) In the 1 Is-1 6.03532 cf., 1 m ~ 3.2Bl it, .and
1 em = 0.3937 in.
investigations on flow through sudden transitions will be
in the ncx~ three articles,
17-2. Sub critical Flow through Sudden Transitions. For sub critical velocity heu.d cannot be measured easily because of tdhea tUI1'~hule~t tcon~
"
dition: of flow; hence, the energy I'mes are
. strop
' IJr exten e. r ' . e vel". .ICll.,
h
flow through sudden transitions, e)cperiments' on varklUS designs l'lltel'Cept betweell the extended upstream and downstream h~els flIt t e

1 Under actual cil'cum~taneell, fh and ,e,.are not exact~y equa.l to 1.0, a.nd y~ could be
. .
transitional section represents~ t he energy 1oss flE'. The• astens
.' c S lOwn.
fo~ the sudden expansion iildidates the position of the energy lme assum-
.
YI > :liz > !ii. Thus, the. lJegative energy loss would ~ecome positive, and the thEm.!
reticallyimpoSSible flow: wouhl become ,actually possible. The loss !J.E is !L very . ,
small amollnt and callJ:e~dily be changed from negative to positive by I!. slight change
in the items ill Eq. (17~4). lng a == \7-6 shows the computed values of the energy co~B?-cient at
0:

different section."3 of the ~hannel for various designs of transItIOns. The

 rI
I
466 RAPIDLY VARIED FLO)V FLOW THROUGH NON PRISMATIC CHANNEL SEC"l'IONS 467
vhlues are apparently very close to unity immediately after the sudden channel, as in designs II to IV. The differences among these three
contractions hut are generally higher than unity after the .sudden expan- designs are evidently insignificant.
sions. This indicates that the flow in a sudden expansion is irregularly Again, the energy loss in a sudden expansion can be reduced by gradu-
I
diffused. a.lly enlarging the channel section or decreasing the angle of divergence I
!

--
1
1.1 0 r---r--r----'-~ 1.l0 .'
1.08
-+-~

--o--~
.- !.08
__

-
.,..r--
Q = 15.6 ts- I 91- i-®-···-,
I-Q.J--'~

a
1.06
'1.04
1.02
,J:''';F--
~~

"1',
l'>.'
---iJ--- '"
"'}-- - --¥..:....- V
>-~- ...
E
Bf--- -$---0 ----1.:.L_

~r ,
-4} ... -.<~~.L-..
,-
- '--

I
V f--

1.00
'y- ! -~
6'
'I ~ I.
'"
<J 5 ;-
LtO
1.08 --
!.to
1.08
,
,,
/'
/
4
I
V
:
---r taf~, ~
(06
0" 25
1.06
.
-". 0-25.2 3
a Il ~ .,..-:"'
\\ :-.. < I ,,/ {g;/
1.04 1.04
2 ;':1~"
~, ~ '-~, f" -~
---< I Q ....
,-.=,~

.......... ---~
1.02 .1.02 "lV'
1.00 tOO .--
0 -

o:~jt1irttJt~1
1.10
, 1.08
1.06 f--- 1--
, C'" 41
a
1.04
1.02 ~ ....... --:---=-
1.00

'::l~*lll-ttB
1.10

n,
I.oe
!.os F .0'" 49

'~~-~ iI
1.04
1.02
t--
1.00 1
~,~

0, A
""'----- B 1.003 .:j 5 0 0 bed • I 9 h
71-
c
Sf---
~
1:=· ---"1-f-
""""".-~"'" <f;~-~~ ~b-
--- .
•

/vp-
J--
1 f,t

I I
Sec1iqn 1
.IJf
,
r r" ·1
.~:====== [- L---- W-~ ~d
FIG. 17-6. Variation of the energy coefficient near sudden transitions. (After G. +~ ....c::. - ~: ~~ V-
,......
-',
....
Fo,mica [4J.) 113- 1 = 0.03532 cIs.
I

o
10
=
I~ 20 2S
~-

30 35
~
-w-
40 45· 50
.
55
q [1s"1
The head losses for various designs of trallsitions at different discharges
are shown iIi Fig. 17-7. It can be seen that in general the sudden con- FIG. 17-7. Head losses in'sudden transitions., (After G. Fc>rmica [4J.) 113-;1 == 0,03532 I
tractions have higher losses ,than the sudden expansions. In a sudden ers and 1 mm = 0.03937 in.
I
contraction the flow is first cOlltraoted and then expanded. A process of'
conversion from potential to kinetic energy is followedimmedia,tely by a (8 in Fig. 17-4), but this advantage may be nullified by such modifications
process of reconvBrsion from kinetic to potential energy. As a result, as those in designs 6 to 8. The lengt.\i of the gradual enlargement of the
much less energy than in a 'sudden expansion is recovered. However, expansion has a limit beyond which the. gain in efficiency becomes
the' energyloss in a sudden contraction of design I can be greatly reduced insignificant. .
by modifying the sharp-edged corners of the entrance of the reduced In closed conduits [5], the energy loss in a sudden contractio~ may be (
.'\
-"l

f.
 468
expressed by
RAPIDLY VARIED FLOW ,",r' FLOW THROUGH NONPRISMATlC CHANNEL SECTIONS

[6] h!1Ve found that straight contracticinsal'e always ~etter ~hancurv~~

4G9

. V3~'
E=K-' (17-G) contractions of equal length of contraction from the s~andpomt~f m~:I­
29 \
t mum height. Accordingly, they ha.ve pl'op?sed a procedure of des~on
and in a sudden expansion by , for straight contractions, which will be descnb~d below. For t.he deSign
E= (17-7)
wherel( and € are coefficients, and VI and V3 are the upstream and down-
stren.m velocities, respectively. By applying these equations to open

'VI
\ c'

AJ tOl

FIG. 17-,8. Cross wave,; in it curved tranaitil;m. (Cou?'iesy of A. T. Jppen.)

AI on 9 ce n Ie,.'.;,;Ii;,;."e=--_r-_ _ __
channels, Formica obtained the following average values of € for sudden Along wall r-~"----l t •
expansions: F------------,; 1hz I" h

~~~~Of,~e~igrL':"", .10,821 :,871 ~.681 :',~I :'27l~.291 :A51 :.4~- tel

Accorcling to the experimental data obtained by Formica, the' values of
K for sudden contractions seem to vary in a wide range, generally increas-
ing with the discharge. The approximate median value of J( for design I
is 0,10 and, for designs II to IV, 0.06.
17 -3. Contractions in Supercritical Flow. When supercritical flow is
introduced thro\lgh a contraction with symmetrical converging wa.lls,
cross waves similar to those developed in a curved channel (Art. 16-5) will
appear. The cross waves in a contraction, however, are symmetrical
with respect to the centerline of the' channel (Fig. 17-8). Theanalytical
study of the problem can be performed by the principles of the mechanics
of supercritical flow described in the preceding chapter.
From an experimental and analytical investigation, Ippeu and Dawson
FlO. 17-9. Designs of skajght-waU contractions. (After Ip~cn and Da,"'son ..[6].) . ~~)
Generai dis~ul'bance patterns; (b) minimum downstream distUl'bance, (e) .,chema Ie
profile.
of curved contractions, the cross-wave patt ern ID!'.}'b'.e determil-ed
'. experi-
.
mentally by model test or !'.na.1yt.ically by the method of charactenstlcs
(see first footnote to Art. 1 6 - 5 ) . ' .'
In supel'critical flow through a straight contraction (Flg, 17-ga) ,sym-
metrical shock wl1ves are developed at points A and At at .the entrance.
These waves extend across the channel at. wave angles {h, mter~ect ~t B
on the center li~le of t.he channel, and, finally, af~er some· modlfic~tlO~,
reach the opposite walls at C and Ci. In the regIOns A!'W and A BG ,
t,he flow proceeds through a new field characterized by the Froude number
F~. Note that, ot the end of the contraction, negative disturbances are
 r ";
I
\ '1
470 RAPIDLY YARI:EJD :FLOW FLOW THROUGH NONPRXSMATlC CHANNEL SECTIONS 471
1
I
created at points D and D" These disturbances will result in more com- I
velocity from a closed condBit, sluice gl1te, spillway, or steep chute.
plicated disturbances dOIVnstream. In a good contraction design, it is
I
If such an expansion is ll}ade to diverge too rapidly, the major part of the
possible to minimize the downstream distu:rballces. This can be done by 1 flow ,,,,ill
fail to follow the boundaries. Studies by Hom:-ma and Shima .
directing the shock waves to the opposite walls at D and D', thus car.- \ [7] indicate that separation of flow like that shown in 17-10 may
celhig off theoretically the newly created negative disturbances. As 11
result, the flow will be calm in the downstream channeL This is the situa-
tion shown in Fig. 17-9b. From the geomeky of this situation, the letlgth
I I
occur. The separll.tion surfaces shown by the dashed lines act as solid
boundaries within which the flow hail the characteristics to those
in a channel of decre!1sing width. If the divergence of the expansion is
of the contraction can be shown to be !
L (17-8)

By cOlltitluity of the flow, b1y1V\ = baY~V! Q,or

I
~ Eddies and '
circ.ulo1ion
~ = (~)%(Fa) (17-9) C _ ....,) LSePOrOliOn
h Yl, FI , I --- ---
,
--.,
surfoce
---
The above equations and either Fig. 15-23 or Eq. (15-24) can be use.d to 1
design a strn.ight contraction with minimum downstream disturbances. ,I
i
Generally speaking, high values of FI and low values of Ya!Yl will give a
long contra.ction. To reduce the length of the contraction, the advisable
va.lue of Y3/YL seems to be bGtween 2 and 3, provided that F J stays well
above the critical value. .
Example 1'1-1. Design a straight contraction con!1ecting two recta.ngular channels
12 ft and 6 ft wide. The discharge through the contra.ction is 200 cI3. The depth of .J
the ll,pproach Bow is 0.70 ft. .
Sa/uliano Since Q 200 crs and A = 12 X 0.70 - 8,4 fP, the velocity of the
approach flow jg VI 200/8.4 = Z3.8 ips. The Froude number Pi = 5.0l.
Assume y,/y, 2: and take b, = 12, b, = 6, and FI 5.01j Eq. (17-9) FIG. 17-10. Separation of How in an expa.nsion of rapid, divergence.
F3 = 3.54. This vI111.1.e should not be less than 1.0 or even too close to 1.
Now, assume a volue of 9, say, 15', and take Fl = 5.01; the diagram in Fig. 15-23 too gradual, waste of. structural material will result. Furthermore, if
gives y';V' = 2.60 and F. 2.S. .
A second determination using the same e = 15° and repla.cing F, by Fi 2.8 pro· local disturbances of gre'at wave height are produced by improper J
duces values of y,/y" ... 1.80 and F; 1.77 from Fig. 15-23 (corresponding to vliv, boundary geometry, either at the expansion or farther downstream, the I
and F" respectively, in the dia.gram). Howe.rer, these values do not neces3arily walls may fail to confine thc flow, Satisfactory desigl1 for the expansion
represent the actual flow condition in the required design, since,the flow condition is, therefore,of practical importance. .
downstream ffia,y be complica.ted by the negative disturbances origina.ting from the
points D and D'. .
The best \\ray to study a particular channel expansion i:6 by cut-and-
Multiply 11./1/1 by 1/./y%; the first trial va,lu(l of y';y, is equal to 2.50 X 1.80 4.68. try investigation through model tests. Using an analytical approacb,
Since this does not a.gree with the Il.Ssumed value (that is, 2.00), the procedure should strealb.lines and water-surface contours for any expansion can be con-
be repea.ted with lJ, new value of " until agreement is reached between the assm;ned 'structed directly by the method of chameteristics first footnote, Art.
y,/y, a.nd the value obtained by the trial. . ' , 16·5), provided that (1) the channel walls are vertical and the floor is
Alter several trials, the correct angle 9:is found to be 5°. With 9 = 5° and'F,
horizontal, (2) the energy loss due to boundary resistance is negligihle,
5.01, the diagram in Fig. 15-23 gives II1./Yl= 1.50 and y,/y, = 1.35. The 'value
of 1/3/1/1 = 1.50 X L35 = 2.03, which is close to the assumed value, and (3) the pl'essure is hydrostatically distributed. Owing to these
By Eq. (17-8), the length of the contraction is found to be 34.3 ft. limitations, the analytical method ca.n give only approximate results.
17-4. Expansions in Supercritical Flow.. Channel expansion in super-
critical flow occurs frequently at places where flow, emerges at high
I From both experimental and analytical studies, Rouse, Bhoota, and
Hsu [8J have obtained the following results, which may be found useful in
1 the preliminary design of ch!l.nnel expansions in supercritical flow:
J
L
!
h
472 RAPIDLY VARIED FLOW ;FLOW THROUGH NONPIUSMATLC' CHANNEr., SECTIONS . 473
. 1. The generalization of experimen1;al data for channel expansions value of b1iYl and for various valuesofF l l1re shown in Fig. 17-12. This
may be expl'e:::sed by the following relationship:. form of expansion boundary corresponds approximately to the shape of

. 1h
y
= f
I X
(b1F.' b;,
z) (17-10)
the streamlines that" corifine about 90 % of the flow. N cite that the
begi;ming of this expansion is sufficiently gl'O.dual to reduce the effect of
nonhydl'Ostatic pressure distribution to a minirriun1, so that the factor
where y is the depth of flow, Y1 is the depth of the approach flow F 1 is bdYI is no longer an essential vl1riri.ble. In thisiol'm, the general iliCrel1Se
the Froude number of the approach flow, b1 is the channel width, x'is the

1.5
1iIf.~0.90
00.801>0.40
i' "0.7000.30
I eO.60 1iI0.20
"'0.50 ()O. 1 0

1 " ----
-----

\1
\,
2.0
) " x 2.0
VOiues of D,F,-
FIG; 17-12. GeneraJized" sllTfac;~ contours for suphrcdtical flow t.hrough gra.t\utli
" ~rG. 17-11. Genel'!\lized surface contours fOI" superc.itica.l flow through a1rupt expan- expansion .. (tifler Rouse, BI~oola, and FIs"1< (8J.)
81OU. (A/leI' ROllse, Bhoota, and Hsu [8).)

)
longitudinal coordinate measured from the outlet section and z is the in the boundary angle is sufficient to eliminate the format.ion of cross

"~ lateral coordinate measured from the center line of the ch~nlleL ".
2. For abrup~ ex?ansions, a dimensionless diagram (Fig. 17-11) was
waves, yet not so great as to cause an undue change in depth across any
norm:]'l 3ection. " .
devel?~ed. Th~s dl~gram, gen~ralizing the experiment!!:L data in the The boundary represented by Eq.(17-ll), howev~l', will diverge

r
I
")
fllnctl~nal relatlOnshlp of Eq. (17-10)] may be used for the prelimina.ry
analyslS of an abrupt expansion. " .
3 .. From the .experiments, the most satisfactory boundary form for an
indefinitely. For practical purposes, the divergent wal1s of the ~xpan­
sion will usuallY be followed by parallei wn.lls with either an abrupt or a
gradual transition, As a result, positive disturbances dQwnstream may
efficlen~ expansIOn was found to be ." be produced. When practical circumstl1nces permit, such disturbances"
I, z
. b;. =
I( x
~ \b 1F 1
".
)~'
+ 72 (17-11) !I
can be eliminated by a hydmulic jU1"l.lP M or near the end of the ~xpan­
sioH. To avoid dangerous asymmetry oIthe flow at ~he end of the ¢xpan-
sion, the jump may be stabilized by a drop on the, channel fiool' (Art.
contou~Q 15-10).
I:
For" expansions designed fol' thiiS' form, the surface for a mean
I
"I
i
I
()
 FLOW THROUGH NONPIUSMATIC CIL-\.N}\/EL SECTIONS 475
474 RAPIDLY Y ARIED FLOW

4. The disturbance in the downstream chaimel may also be elimi- 17 -5. Constrictions. A constriction in an open channel cOl1stitutes a ,
nated if the transition mentioned r,bove is designed with a well-pl:opor- reach of sudden reduction in t,he channcl tross section. The effect of a
tioned reversal of the wall curvature. In snch a design, the positive and constriction on the 110w depends mainly oil theboundnry geometry, the
negative disturbances developed. by the reversid of the curvature may discharge, and the state of flow.' The phenomeilOll is USUltlly so compli- -I
cated that thc resulting fluw P;),t- I
offset each other so that the flow is restored to complete uniformity at 1
. the end of the transition. Figure 17-13 shows the boundary curves of tern is not readily subject to any Constric!ion

such a desigrl, derived by the method of characteristics. Although these analytical solution. A pradi(',al E" >' E~
solution is possible, however,
through systeml1tic experimental --I!
investigation.
The flow through a constriction
I
m:1Y be subcritical or sllpercriticaL
-I
~--"--~----'---~~~~~~--~~-4---££=3t'__~_~~5
When the flow is subcritic!I,I, the
constriction will induce a . pro-
I . b, • .
nounced backw8.ter effect t.hr.t ex-
~: = 25 I .. 1.1
tends a long disjjance· upstream
I----+-----+-a~b~+--+-~ = 2--+---/---
b, ---I' I -1...---1---.-1
(Fig. 17-14a and b), When the (b)
I flow is supercritical, the constric-
I tion will disturb only the ,vater
surface that is adj!1cent to the up_·

2 :3 ·4 5 6 7
_I 8 9
-=-_--L-_J
10 11 12
stream side of t.he constriction and
will not extend the effect farther i
.I
Values of _x_ upstream (Fig. 17-14c). If the .~
b, F, [c)
npstre!l,m water surface is dammed
F':ra: 17-13. Generalized boundary ~urve3 for channel expansion de~ermined by the up to a. depth greater than the criti-
.;
method of chamcteristics. (Aft~r Rouse, Bhoola; and Hsu [8].) b, = dowl!stream
channel width ..
cal depth, the surface tyill form. !LIl
En < E~
81 profile, extending upstream oni y
curves merely represent generalized conditions, they may be. used as for a short distance and then end-
guides in preliminary design in order to giye as little angularity of the ing with a hydraulic jump (Fig.
final flow as is consistent with the practical requirements of t.ransition 17-14d). . (d)

length. . A critical contl'Ol sec.tkm mayor

The U.S, Soil Conservation Service [9J has i,)jSO Hlade tests on suner-
critical flow t.hrough expansions in conjunction with the SAF stiiling
basin (Art. 15-12). The tests were made on transitions with straight
fla.ring side walls. and 1 % channel slope: The major findings of the tests
are:
1. A length of approach channel preceding the transition equal to
5YI is satisfactory, where YI is the approach depth of flow.
2.. rhe maximum permissible side-wall divergence is .1 in SF I if cross
waves of excessiv.e heigp.t are to be avoided. . .
3. The use of the expQ..Dsion ahead of a SAF stilling basin is economicl'Ll.
4. Design charts providing information on relative depth contours, and
flow. conditions within the transition were ,developed.
i
!
,
, 'I..
FIG. 17-14. Constriction in uniform-Holv
may not exist at, the constriction, chlLn~el (a, b) in subcrlt,ical flow; (e, d)
depending O~l the magnitude of the in sllpercritlc~,l flow.
energy E" of the nonmJ.! flmv in com- .
parison with the energy E/ of the oritical flow at the constriction. For
a short constriction, this situation is shown in Fig. 17-14. In the CaBe of
a long constriction, the constriction itself constitutes a channeL The
'control section" when it exist,s, may be at either the upstream or the down-
stream end of the constriction, depending on whether the slope of the
constricted channel is steep or mild. The entrance !1.ud ou~let of the
constriction then act as a contraction and an expansion, respectively.
The critical-flow flume (Art. 4-6) presents a unique case of channel con-
striction. The flow through the flume may be either free from or drowned
[
. -.{
 476 RAPIDLY VARIED FLOW FLOW THROUGH NONP1USlIIATlC CHANNEL SECTIONS

by the tailwater. A critical section exists at or near the neck of the flume
only when the flow is free.
Illvestigations on the subject of flow through constrictions are many, I .UC~'VW"
but most of them have dealt with subcritical flow. The contracted-opening
method, I v, method fOT determining flood discharges which has been very
Section
(OJ _ _ _ B
T -~
(1) b (2) (3) Ccb (4)
popular with Americn,n engineers since 1918 or earlier, is based on the I I ~
application of the energy and continuity equations to the· fiow through a 'Ln"-- -~~ Live slreom bo~ndory
constriction in the waterw[1.Y. The first laboratory inv·estigation in the
United States is believed to have been m[1.de by Lane [ll}. This investi-
gation dealt with simple constrictions of flows having Froude numbers
slightly higher than those uSlmlly fOllnd in lll'.1;ural channels. In recent
________________ I It Eddy zone
~__~ ___________-L~__~--I--------------~
(0)

j. years, :.L ne.w development in the study of constrictions in subcritic<Li flow

Constriction
has been achieved by comprehensive fundamental research carried out at
the U.S. Geological Survey by IGndsvater, Carter, and Tracy [12-151.
The method they developed· pl"(:duces more exact results for yariolls gi ven
conditions and so will undoubtedly repbcB the conventional contl'acted-
opening method in .e~lgineering practice. The following two articles will
cover the essentials of this new development,
17-6. Snbcritical Flow through Constrictions. 1Vhen an [,rea constric-
tion is introduced to nn otherwise uniform, frictioll-controlled flow in 1).
Note: horizontal si;cle distorted
prismatic channel of mild slope (Fig, 17-15),2 a backlvater of llfl-type
profile is first developed upstream from the constriction. The upstream Oalum·
end point of the bnckwater curve is assumed to be at section 0. Near
(bl
the constriction at section 1 the central body of watel' begins to accelerate,
de\~elel'ation occurs along the outer boundaries, and separation zones nre
. Backwater profile
created in the corners adjacent to the constriction. An adequate approxi-
ms,tioll for the location of section 1 may be troken at a point one opening Normal profile
width b from the center of the opening. Between sections 0 and 1, the
flow.is gradually va.ried.
At the constr·iction, the flow is rapidly varied, characterized by marked ho'hj
acceleration in directions both norma] arid parallel to the stl-eamlines. hOn'hln
The 101<gitudin::t.l water surface drops mpicUy in this region. Within the j

coilstriction, the live stl'eam contracts to <\ width somewhat)essthan the /. " Channel boftom
nominal width of the opening, and the spnc8s bt:tween the live stream and
the constriction boundaries are separation zones occupied by eddying
Datum
I HOlik [lOJ credited S. M: Woodward with the ~evelopnlent of this method for use
(e)
by the Mi"mi Consen'ancy District, The othel· equn.lly important method reported
by Houk is tile slope-a.rea. method (Art. 6-9). FIG, 17-15. Definitioll sketch of flow through CDnatl·iction. (After l"}'(fey cmd Carter
, In Fig. i7-15, it is'shown that the flow through the constriction is subcritical, e.s [14],) ((~) PIau; (b) elevation; (c) elevlltioIl, ad'lpted to ltsstunptioll of zero friction
in Fig. 17-14a.. This is t.ile case usually encountered in practical problems, If th~ loss.
water surface drops below the· critical-depth line M the constriction, supercritical flow
will occtu·, as shown ill Fig. 17-14b. To reestablish subcritical flow downstream,
a hydraulic' jum{will be developed near the downstream side of the constriction.
The method described here, however, is not applicable to this case.
478 RAPiDLY VARIED FLOW FLOW TJ;mOUGH NONPRISMATIC CHANNEL SECTIONS 479
"'[tter. the water passes through the contraction, the contracted The discharge through section 3 is
f>tremn reMhes a minimum width at section 2, which corresponds to the
Q = Co;4JTT, (17-14) .
vena contracta in an orifice flow. After the vena contracta, the live
stre&111 begins to expand until it reaches downstrea.m section 4, where the where ila is the water ~l.l~ea at section 3. Soh'lng Eqs. (17-13) and (17-14)
uniform-flow is reestablished in the Jull-width channel. Between for the disclu,rge,
sections 3. and 4, the flow is gntdually varied, Over the whole reach I---·----------·~~;"

from sections 0 to 4: encomp:1ssed by the backwater "ffect of the C012- Q CA. ,\/2f) (6.1& - hi + al (17-15)
stricti on, the total energy loss .is the same as that for uniform flow. . 'I \ . .j
FOl' a simple analysis of the flow characteristics, the following con- where t.h = Til Ya and where C is all over-all coeificient of discharge,
ditions m!1-y be assumed: equn.l to
L The channel .ftOOl' is horizontal or nearly so. .
2. Laboratory observatiol1s have shown that the level of the water at (17-1G)
the vena contracta can be closely approximated by the leve! at sect.ion 3,
which is at the downstream face of the constrictioll. H611Ce, the depth This is a t-he(lretical expression. For prac,tical uses, the value of C ma.y
Y2 can be taken as Ya. . . . . be expressed by a dime.nsionless flJI1ction and evaluated experimentally,
3., A coefficient of dischr.rge is intl'ciduced in the a.naIJ~sis to include By a dimellllioiutl ahalysis oi the essenthl,t geometric and hydraulic
the over-all effect of contraction, eddy loss, nonuniform distribution of factol's that govel'u the flow, it can be shown that C is expressible £l.'3 a
velocity, and nonh)rdrostatic distribution of pressure. The related nota- function of, the or
tiOll to be used in the analysis is defined as follo,,'s:
hd = eddy loss due to turbulence el1gend,~red in the upstream C = f[m, Fl> rIb, r'V/b, 6, <tt, (Ya + Yb)/2b, x/b, i':, t/(y'J + 6.h),j, Ljb]
separation tones. It assumed that this loss can be is (17-11)
exuri8SE;ea in terms of the velocity head at section 3,01' The hydraulic factors contained in this fUllction represent the following i
r
-I
h. = k.(Y:NZg) various physical eff~cts: '.
1. The effect of channel cont-ruction is represented by the contraction
where /'" is a coefficient. , ral,7:o ni. This ratio is eq lIal to 1 - Kb! K Il , in which [(IJ is the conveyance
0<1 and 0'3 = energy coefficients at sections 1 and 3, respectively: I of the tUlcontracted ariproach section r at normal dischal'ge and [(b isthe
aI' alld a..' = pressm:e coeffici"~nts at 13ecl;ions 1 and 3, reSpec.tlVe y. conveyance of the contracted section: 3 which has the SHme normal depth
It is assumed that the deviation from hydrostatic dis- and roughneils chn.l'acteristics as the approach :section. For a recta,ngu-
tribu tioil of pressure can be in teni1s -of the lar approach section of width B and a recta.ngular contracted section of
velocity head at section 3, Thus, I
width b, this ratio is?n = 1 - biB, AC01tV8yanc.7J 1'al'io (J may be defined I
OI/Y' = kl'(y~2/2g) + Yl as 1 -?n. Thus ~ 1 or 7n=O when there is no constriction. ,
2. The effect of Froude n~mber is rep.res~nted by the Froude number
where k 1> is a coefficient responsible for the nonhydro- . at section 3, or F3 Q/(As V"iYa). It is necessary to assume a di.scharge Il
static pressure distribution. for the initial computation of the value F 3. The final value of F 1 can be r,
Cc = coefficient of contraction at section 3: determined by successive approximations. If the value of F 3 is f{reater
Applying the energy equation to sections 1 and 3 17-15c), the than 0.8, nearly critical or supercritical velocities may occur in section 3; . !
following can be writte~1: then the method described here is ina,pplicable. . I
.1
1112 , 11 3 2 ;, 3. The effect of entmnce rounding of theabutmellt is represented
0'1 -
2g
+ al VI Oil -2
g
+ +
0'3 Yl h, + hi by rib, where r is the radius Of rounding of the entrallC~ corner of abut-
where hi is the frictional loss. Then, assuming a\' 1, aaty, = ments for vertical-faced constrictions.
/c,,(vN2g) + YJ, and h, k.(T'N2g) , 4. The effect of chamfers of the abutment is represented by TV/b and
tl , where W is th~ length of wing wall measured ill a direction normal to
(17-13)1 section 3 and where' 8 is the acute angle between a wing wall and the plane
of constriction. .
 i
480 RAPIDLY VA.RIED FLOW

Jt _
I
J

.,'"'"
.J::.
",-

.~ ~
"'0
-~
o
-'"
c~

.~.g
uc
=-10
~-
.,~

u"
"
'u

Ca)

o o
~
~ - -: :3 o
;0
:.::

N
~'---"--r-, --'"'.~~ d
:T

1.2

Li
(b)
r

b
tt (0 -~

I
j
io
tD tl)

f' I
~!' "0,

\
""
"
c::

"0o.
'0 f---'+-'\--"l-

l-----+--+-!f-.--,
~

n II <D
e:0
."
';;

~~~
I-
1
I,
,',
5! v,

I
11 , )
3!

~~j'il
J
<t '0
e:0

!
"II i

[ -~ 3:1
1 ,
1 '" o
I •

(e)
FIG. 17-16. Disclul.rge coefficient for constriction of type I opening, vertical embank-
ments (E = 0) and vertical abutments. (U.S. Geol(J!lfe~1 Survey [12J.) (a) Base .
' curve for Coefficient of discharge; (b) vl1l'ia.tion of discharge coefficient with Fl'oude
nll.mbru·j (cJ "Il;liation of discharge coefficient with entrance rounding.
481
 482 RAPIDLY VARIED FLOW FLOW THROUGH NONPRISMATIC CHANNEL SECTIONS 483
'5. The eff8()t of angularity of cOIlst~iction is represented. by <p, the acute
angle between the plane of the constriction and a line normal to the thread
cif the stream.
6. The effect of side depths at abutmGnts is represented by (Va + Yb)/2b,
where Ya and y. are water depths at the toe of each abutment.
7. The effect of side slope of the a.butment is represented by xlb and E.
The value of :1.: is the horizontal distance from the point of intersection of
the abutment and embankment slopes to a point on the upstream
embankment thfl,t ha~ the same elevation as the water surface at section 1.
The value E, representing the embankment slope, is a ratio of horizontal
to vertical distance. .
8. The effect of eccentricity of constriction is represented bye, which is "
D

e.qual to the ratio K.I K b• The conveyance of the whole approach section ~ o.ao j-----'-----'----+---+---=--..;...:...,=c-=?---=+-==l---l,...,i
Stone-erd conditions
may be subdivided into the conveyance of the corresponding contracted :6

IT
X=-+Yb

~-.
~
o
. section and two conveyances of the side sec:tions. The two conveyances ~'O.~O <? '0'
'0 0.70
.!! FJ ' 0.2 1o 0.7 • '1.00
of the side sections ai·c designated by Ko and Kb and the conveyance of
the corresponding contracted section by IC- Thus, the total conveyance ~u
_t_,o
~~ +LI'
j ;0
I
+
KII = K: Kb + ICc, And the ratio ICa.! [(0 is a measure of the eccen- ·u
0.60
0 10 20 3D
I
qo 50 60 70 90 100
tricity of the ('.onstriction. (a) m;lPer c:-t'nt af channel cont"roction I
9. The effect of submergence of any possible bridge across the con- I
striction is represented by t/(ys + tlh), where t is the vertical distance
betweeli 'vater level at section(l and the lowest horizontal member of a
partially submerged bridge, and flh = hI - ha (Fig. 17-23b). 1
·.1
10. The effect of bridge piles and piers is represented by j and Lib.
The va.Iue} is equal to A,/As, where A; is the vertical tl'ansyerse area of
the submerged piers or piles at the contraction and Aa is the water area of .
section 3. The value L is the length of the abutment in the direction of
the thread of the stream, variously defined for different types of openings.
For purposes of practiclJ.l application, the value of C may be expressecl .'
as tOO
<1>'0'

10'
--_._-
(17-18)
-25'- ----
0.90
where C' is the standard value of the coefficient of discharge correspond..:" _2Q.·_
ing to a standard condition of all effects mentioned above; and where the Ko/>

1{'s are coefficients that can be used to adj ust the v:alue of C;' to a given 0.80 \i~
--,-
nonstandard condition of the Fronde number, entrance rounding, cham-
fE?r, angularity, side depths, side slope, bridge submergence, and bridge
piles and piers, respectively. From the laboratory in,restigationby the
d.70
0
41"-~---~i
10 20
-I
I
30 40 50 so
U.S. Geological Survey [12], a set of curves we~e developed for the deter- (e) m: Per cel'lt of c.honnel controclion

mination of these coefficients for four different types of constriction
(Figs. 17-16 to 17-23). . .
When a waterway is coritmcted by bridge piers or piles alone, it may
be al3sumed that C' = I, and C is a.djusted by Ki only. To determine
F~G. 17-17. Discha.l'ge coefficient. for co;\strictiou of ty pe II opening, ~mbankmellts
WIth 1: l ~lope (E = l). and vertical abutl'lent..,. (U.S. Geological SW'vey [12].)
.i (a.) Base curve for coeffiCIent of discharge; (b) variation of dischnrge coefficient with
i (y. + Yb)!2b ratio; (c) variation of discharge coefficient with angularity.
{

J
 484 RAPIDLY Y ARiED FLOW },'LOW THROUGH NONPIUSIIUTIC CHANNEL SECTIONS 485
1
I

/TI = P·H cetM of c.!-.on/lle.l cant:oeliol1

(a)
m=Per cen1 of chonl'\el contraction
(((.)

0.05
K,~0.90

0.800:--"---'10--.--'20
30 50 60 70 90 100
m" Per cant of c.l';onnt:1 c.onftoelion

(b)

'T~~~~ ---+-'--+----+-=.4
0.90 -
----1----1----, (b)

K¢ -~Q.'- ----- I-----\~--

0.80

40 80
rn= Per cerri ot channel Conln::lcflon

(e) 1
,--."..,,_ _---'--c-_-'--_ J
F~G. 17-18. Discha.rge coefficient fOl" constriotion of type II opening, embankment.~ 0.06 0.10 0.12 0.14
With 2:1 slope (E = 2) and vertical abutments. (U.S. G?oiogiealSlI1'vey [12].) (a) {=Rotio or x tcwidth of opening
Base curve for coefficient of dischl1.rge; (6) ·vl1.riation 'of c!ischaro'e coefficient with
(y. -I- y,)/2b rafio; (el vMia.tioll of discharge coefficient wit.h angLI1:1rity. (e)
FIG. 17-19. Discha.rge coefficient for constriction of type III opening, embankmerrts
and obutments with 1: 1 slope (E = 1). (U.S. Geolorrica1 Survey [12J.) (a) Base .
curve for coefficient of discharge; (b) variation of discharge coefficient with angula.rity;
(I) variation of discharge coefficient with x/b ratio.

)-
 486 nAP~DLY VARIED FLOW FLOW THIWUGH NONPRISMATIC CHANNEL SECTION'S 487

~
~
'0
>
"0
l;
~

~ 0.90 I----'~"
.
~
~ 0.80 I--_~_-I-. ___-'-_~"",,-!..::::,.,,,,,,_
'il

lO.70
~

"
..'"~ 50 60 70 60 90 ioe m" Per eel'l at chon,,1 con1r~ction
rn£P~r cf)'nt ~l channel tontrct:tion
(a)
(a)

11'\' Per ctJn1 ;,t chonr.et con1rClcfion m ~ Per cent af chollne:1 conlrocfion
(bJ (b)
1.15

1.10
I
Kw
1.05 ,
i
I
;. ,r
\.00
0
\
~:r Rafio of x 10 wi_oth 01 opening

(c) I
I
B:rAI"'f~ Ie of wing Wl)1I

(c)

FIG. 17-20. Discharge coefficient for constriction of type III opening, embankments
I ,:IG. 17:21. Discharge coefficient for cOllstridion of type IV opening, embankments
and abutments with 2:1 slope (Iff = 2). (U.S. Geological Surull11 [12J.) (a) Base .nth L L. ~lope (Iff ~ 1) and vertical abutments with wing wa!ls. (U.S. Geological
curve for coefficient of discharge; (b) variation of dIscharge coefficient with angularity; ! Sw-ve:y. [12J.). (a) Base curve for coefficient of dillchslge' (b) variation of dlschargo
! ~oeffiClalit wIth ll.IJ.gularity; (c) variation of coefficient \.yith wing-wall angle.
(el variation of discharge coefficient with x/b raj,io.
l
.!
 FLOW THROUGH NONPRISMA'rrc CHANNBLS.ECTIONS 489

1.00_=~=c

f
f
!
t K ,
,.00\-----:;0",--.. ---r[---11
I

! osoo 0:, 0.2 0.; 0.4 .

(a)

(b)
• (a)
t.OO'
0/>- O'
--'10'0·-----
I PI~E:S t:";WdZl
Q C 0 j!.~
--20'------ o 0 0 A3

0.90
___ ~rr
~

OI'OO~~~~'
K~
O.BO
g~ J
4"i---~-
. ~l ~<-'--l .i!
0,90 0.90 ',DO
",-
~---
0.70
0 ·10 ~O . 30 60 70 . 60
m:l. Plllr cent of ~hanne:1 contraction
(bj m=Pcr cent of c:honnel con/toction
(c)

P'ERS

=
=
~
j·o
1.00 l-----,~-.,..-'--'-..,---r===+===F=33;:::;1
I I 0.05 I '1 I '
~lo.H5:::::i::::I:o:.lo:+±I-::-:-:-::::::±I===:J~=-_.-L-r
20 30 4Q 50
i
so 60 70 100
.80
m~PI!" cenl of channel confraction

(d)
KO 1.• 10 FIG. 17-~3. IC, K"and K,. curves for constrictions of types I to IV openings. (U.S.
Geolov'iGu! St,rvey [12J.) (a) Varia~ion of discharge coeff.cient with eccentrici~y; (b)
. variation of discharge coefficient with degree of submergence of bridge; (e) variation
I.003).,O~.-::::;J35'"'.,..---,4-:f;O"·:---.-:4f;5;;;·---;;5';;;O'·--,;'5"5.--7
• 60 , of discharge coefficient with area of bridge piles; (d) variation of discharge coefflCieut
e·Ao~l. 01 wing ... 11 with area of bridge piers.
(d)
K; from the diagraro(Fig. l7-23c), enter the hOl'izontuj scale at the propel'
FIG. 17-22. Dischtlrge coefficient for constrict.ion of type IV opening, embankments value of m, then move verticidly to the vaiue of Lib, horizontully'to the
wiUc 2: 1 slope (E' = 2) and vertical abutments with wing. walls. (U.S. Geological
Sw'vey [121J (a) Base CUl've for coefficient of discharge; (b) variation of discharge line marked j = 0.10, vertically to the vulue of j, and horizontally to the
coefficient wIth angLIl.arity; (e) variation of,discharge eoelficiellt with' Froude number; value of f{j. If j happens to be greater than O.lCl, an approximate compu-
(d) variation of discIlarge coefficient with 'wing-wall angle.' . tation may be made ~y taking C = C' for the given m and omitting Kj •
488
 490 RAPIDLY VARIED FLO!\"
FLOW THROUGH NO:!lfPRISiHATlC CHANN'BL SECT£ONS .
It is that ~rtaiIi combinations of the empirical coefficients
stage .to the backwater stage at section I iskrlOwn as the backwater of lhe
applied to C' may appear to yield a value of C greater than 1.0. In sllch
c(Jnslriction. The'distance Lilt is the difference in water-surface elevation
cases, howBvei·, a value of C 1.0 should be used. .
between secti.ons 1 and 3. From Eq. (17-15) the value of tJ.h can be.
Tile friction-loss term h, in the dif;lcharge equation, Eq. (17-15), repre- shown to be
sent.s the total loss of head due to .friction between sections 1 and 3. V 2 .
This loss is equal to the sum of the loss in the approach reach of lellgth ~l 2~ + hI (17-21)
La from section 1 to the upstream side of the contracted opening and the
lo~s ill the contracted reach of length L. The total head-friction' loss The rat.io h*/ tAh is called the backwater l'atio, which is known to be a
.may be cpmptited by. function of the cluH1l1el roughness, percentage of chamiel contraction,

L"(VI~d(3Y +L(I~3Y (17-19)

where [(land J(. are the total conveyances of sections 1 and 3, respec-
tively. Substitut!'l . (17-15) the above expression for hI, and
Q/ A! for l'l; the may ·be expressed as

Q = 8.02CA a
(17-20)
This equation can be llsed for computing the required discharge.
ExaI~ple 17-2. Compute the flood disch~rge through a. highwa.y bridge opening in
a practically ·sl.l'aight and uniform reach of a river. An appioar.h section 300 ft
upst.ream from the bridge ha.s the characteristics described in E:,ampl~ 6-1. At t~e
ccin~ra~ted section, the bridge spans over ·the main channel and the slde channel 15
entirel)' blocked up by the highway embankment. The constriction thus created is
30 it long and 180 ft wide and has a type J opening (Fig. 17-16). The a\"erage water
surrace at the contracted section wa.s found to be 5· ft below that at the approach sec-
tion. It is assumed that both the main and ~ide channel sections are approxim(t.~ely
rectlJ.ngu1~I'. Thus, the dimensions are 180 ft wide by 29.8 ft deep for the m(t.in ch:;,n-
!leI and 390.4 It wide by 14.6 it deep fcr the side channel.
Solution. From the datil in Exa.mpl<! 6-1, the contraction ratio 1n = 1.24 X 10'1
(3.14 X 10') = 0.40. ,Vit.h this"alue of :m and Lib = 39180 = 0.17, the chart in
Fig, 17-16a gives C' 0.76 fOl" a constriction with type I opening. The ac\j.u5tment
coefficient for the ecce'lltricity of the opening is K. = 0.96, and other coeffiolents a.r~
equal to LO, a.ssuming F, 0.15. Hence, C = O:7G X O.fHj = 0.73. .
For the contracted section,Al = 180 >( 2-1.8 = 4,460 ft', p, = 180-+ 2 X 24.8 ='
229.G ft, n, = 1;)..5 ft, 11. == 0_035, and thus J(, = 1.38 X 10".
Other required da.tB are C'l = 1.29, At = 11,070 fV, Xl = 3.14 X 10', t!.h;= 5 ft,
L = 30 ft, and "" 300 it. By Eq. (17-20) 1 Q = 60,000 cfs.
The above computation is based on the sta,tPard condition that F, = 0.5.: Now,
F, = 0.470, so it is to :repeat the computation for e.djustment oC F,. By
successIve l!.pproximations, final Q is found to be. 59,500 cfs. In the case.of typ.e
II and nI openings, C is not a significa.nt f~tncti6n of F l ; hence, no successive a.pproxl-
Inations a.re necessa.ry 'ft'r the determination of ,Q.
17-7. Backwater Effect due to Constri4tion. In Fig. 17-15 the increase
hl* (designated also by h*) in: water surface from the normal
0.040
Manning's un"
0.050 0060 0.070 .J
FIG. 17-24. The effect Qf cha.nue! roughness on the backwat,er ratio for basic-type (
constrictiolls. (;iji8" Tracy and CarieI' [141.)
I
and constriction geometry. By means of the continuity, energy, and
momentum principles, it is possible to obtain an approximate solntiOI1
for the backwater ratio 011 the assumption that normal boundary fdction
losses are zero, .. A more practical solution of the problem, however, may.
be rea,chad by laboratory investigation. .
TracY and Carter [14J hn.ve made a laboratory investigation at the
Georgia Institute oi Technology and the University of
Illinois 011 the
backwater effect due to. vertical-faced constrictions with squnrs-edged
ahutments. The experime!ltaJ data can be pl6tted.as shown in Fig. 17-24
. to indicate the relationship among backwater ratio, Mannii1g's 'n, and
contractiol1 ratio '17'., It can be seen that the channel roughness is rela-
tively' unimpol'tn,nt us a factor iIi determining the backwater ratio. In
.fact, the limit of change jn the backwater ratio due to roucrliness is
·practically reached at an n of about 0.050. The laborat,ory i~vestiga­
tion also reveals that the influence of cross-sectional shape on backwater
·ratio is included in the c6ntraction ratio.

492 RAPIDLY VARIED l"LOW
The backw[\,t(-~r I':1tio in Fig. 17-24 is for constriction of basic type., that
is fol' a vertica.l-raced cor,striction ,v-ith square abutments. The back-
w~lter mtio for other types of constriction may be obtained by multiply-
ing the backwater ratio by an adjustment factor lea. This factor has
been found to be a function of the contraction ratio m and the ratio
CIC"",;" Cb "" ~lncl C are, respectively, the discharge coefficients for the
V73--~--'--'---~I---'
..I 0 \~~_I .
\ "I . . . . . ~ 'il73
1--,.... V73
0.9
o.s
0.6
FIG. 17-25. The effe(:t of constriction geometry on the backwater ratio. (After
Tracy and Ca"leT [14]-)
b1Lsic type and for other types of constriction that CM be determined by
the method described in the preceding article. The value of Cb.", can
be Clbtained directly from Fig. 17-16a and b. Based on experimental
data, the relationship among lea, m, and CIC b .", is shown in Fig. 17-25.
Example 17-3. A stream ,discharging 50,000 cfs at flood stage flows through a
symmetrical constriction having a type I opening which reduces the normal width of
the w~terway from 400 to 350 ft. If the average -normal depth of flow in the uncoil-
tracted sectiun is 20 ft, what will be the height of the backwater caused by the con-
. strictLoll? The opening of the constriction is 30 ft long. The coefficient of rough-
ness of the channel is n = 0.035 and "'1 = l.10.
So/-ution. T.he contraction ratio 1)1 = 5%00 =0.125. With n = 0.035; the
chart in Fig; 17-24 gives h*,/e:.h = 0.26. With L/b = 3%50 = 0.086 and F, = 0.5,
the chart in. Fig. 17-16a gives C' = C = 0.85.
FLOW THROUGH NONPRISMATIC CHANNEL SEC'l'IONS 493.
Taking an approach sect-ion 350 ft ~lpstream from the constriction, the friction slope
between~his section and the contracted section ma.y be estimated by the Manning
equation S, =Q~n2j2.22rl'Rj,~. Now Q = 50,000 cf~, n = 0.035, A = 400 X 20 =
8;000 ft', and-R = 18.2 ft,; hence, Sf = 0.000-!48. The frictional loss h! = O.000-!48 X
350 = 0.16.
AsBuming h~ = 0.20, e:.h = 0.20/0.26 = 0.77. \Vith As = 350 X 19.'13 = 6,800
·ft' and C = 0.87, V a'j2gC' = 1.1l. By Eq. (17-21), uh = 1.11 - 0.59 + 0,16 =
;. 0.68. This vaiue is less than the t.ri:J.i value 0.77. The computation is to be repeated
1 until agreemeat is reached. Before this' is done, however, the value of C should be
adjust~d lor F,. Now Fa = 50,000/(6,800 X --v'32.2 X 19.'13) = 0.29. Using
Fig. 17-16b, C = 0.87 X 0_955 = 0_83, Thus, Va2/2gC' = 1.22 and e:./i = 0.79.
This is close enough to 0.77; hence,a r6peat.ed cumputation for successive approxima-
tion is not required.
17 -8. Flow through Culverts. A culvert is a unique type of constric-
tion, and its entrance is a speciallcirid of contraction. The culven a'cts ",<os
an open channel as long as the flow is partly full. The characteristics of
the flow are very complicated because the flow is controlled by many v8.ri-
ables, including the inlet geometry, slope, size, roughness, r,pproach and
tailwater- conditions, etc. Hence, an adequate determination of the flow
through a culvert should be made by laboratory or field investigations.
Yarnell, Nagler, and vVood ward [16] were notable pioneers who, made
more than 3,000 tests on flow througli different pipe and box culverts.
Later on, round smooth pipe culverts were tested by Mavis [17], corru-
gated and concrete pipe culverts by Straub and Morris [18-20] and by
Straub, Anderson, and 130\\i el'S [21,22], and standard box culverts by
Shoemaker and CbytGn [23]. In addition, a comprehensive experi-
mental inve'stigation of the hydraulic behavior of commonly used pipe
culverts has been conducted at the U.S. Bureau of St::l,lldards, as reportr::d
by French [24-26]. .
A culvert will flow full when the outlet is submerged or when the outlet
is not submerged buttb.e headw[,ter is high and the barrel is long. Accord-
ing to laboratory investigations, the eJ1trance of an Ol'ciinary culvert will-
not be submerged if the headwater is less than a certain critical value,
designated by H*, while the outlet is not submerged. The value of H*
varies fr0111. 1.2 to 1.5 times the height of the culvert, depending on the
entrance geometry, barrel charn.cteristics, and approach condition.
For a. preliminary analysis, the upper limit H* = L5d maybe used, where
d is the culved height, because computations have shown that, where sub-
mergence ,vas uncertain, greater accuracy could be obtained by assuming
that the entrance was not submerged;
Laboratory investigations also indicate that a culvert, usually vhth a
square edge at the top of the entrance, will not fiow full even if the
entr:1nce is below headwater level when the outlet is not submerged.
Under these conditions, the flow entering the culvert will contract to a
i depth less than the height or-the culvel't barrel- in a manner very simila.r
I
l
J:
~.
~.
 RAPiDLY. VARIED FLO,y
494 r,-rr-rr-'---"'--~---' "''" ~ <l
to the contrac.tion of Row in the form of a jet under a sluice gate. Thii': I .::l

high-veloc.il,y let will continue through the barrel length, but its velocil;Y ""
.~

will be reduced slowly as head is gradually lost by friction. If the culvert. f-- ~ ~
is not sufficiently long to allow the expanding depth of flow below the
'"
0
<if
I%i
~
::::;
contraction to rise and fill the barrel, the culvel·t will never flow fulL 1, ~Io

o I \
'" ..JIO
1\'\ \
"'- I',",~)J)\
\

\ '"~~ l\\~ ~
8 ~

~~~'"
I l ,.....'"

""r::: t::;::
{'

r-=: ~
F§ oj

0.06 \ ~(j'c' .0

.,
+-11
II t: !
I----
Ii····I-- I

\
:::.:::....l--Ul
f---
..c:cD
;::J
...
'" 0
0

.; 0.05
a. ~ +-t--+-j-L
I I
o.o~_ f-- t!
i
1 <t o
o ..c:
.~
0
., II /' v 1 , ~
q '"od '"o <D
o q '"0- :;::
I
i
00 d c5 .,00 d
...,
-3
"., I -' if>
0.04
O) I I !
I >

.~~
T ,
-t+-
r-<

J
I---- 11 .I I
'17 ;::J

"
<J

0.03 I---- I--

I
\ I
'.(Shorl)
0.02
1 o
bJ)
0;
..s
Type). V
I ~Type
(lon9_) ~t- 1--1
2 _,
o f-- 1 d !,
'" "d
Q

Vi~
0.02 I-- .~b
I
oj
\ 0.01 f-.-- "
....!o L'J \
I
,/ ) '" I\: \ !
0.01
f 0
~ \ \ \
1 1- -.-
I
I / .' +--
:II/,.V L...-\--i I
30 ...Jjo
l ~ J\ \
pt~o~\O
Jg~\
0 20 ,

0 10 I
L
D r "'0 \
f--+--
FIG. 17-26. Criteria for hydraulically short and long box ane! pipe culv~rts with con-
crete barrels :J.nd squ&re, rounded, or beveled flush entrances from a vertical headwall, ~i(b~~"~ \.\ S! ,s...
~" ",-" ~~
either with or without wing walls. (U.S. Geological 81J.rvey 1271·)
, f::: t::= r--:::
I-- ..'"
:~
C,J
Snch a culvert is considered hydra1Glically short. Other\vise, the culvert, '"
hydrau~ican!l
;
is long, for it will flow full like a pipe. ' . I
'Whether a cu\vert is hydraulically short or long cannot be determined I o
by the length of the barrel alone. It depends on other ch~racteristics,
Ul o lD <t o
j
·0
d od
~
o
OJ
q
o g 00
0. '"
g
'C/) if>
such as slope, size, entrance geometry, headwater, entmnce and outlet 'I
conditionA, etc. A culvert may become hydraulically short, that is, it \
may flow part.ly full, even wheli ttJ.e headwtLter is greater than its cr)tical
value. For this situation, Carter [27] has prepared charts (Figs; 17-26
and 17.:.27) which may be used to distinguish roughly bel',ween a hydrau-

~
I t
495

.• '! -,:-." -. ~.~ .. ',. _. -',_. -- - - -".

 ->.:':."

RAPIDLY VARIED FLOW

FLOW THROUGH NONPRISMATIC CHANNEL SECTIONS
497
lically short and 11. hydraulically long culvert;. Under suitable conditions, Type
n hydrttulica!ly short culvert with submerged entran~e may prime itself
automatically ,md thus flow full. AGcordi:1g to the laboratory (1) Outlet submerged
H >d
tiotls by Li and Patterson [28], this self-priming ,~ctiol1 is due to a rise of 1/, >d
the water up to t.he t.op of the culyert caused in most c\\ses by a Full ftOlV

Jump, the backwater eff0ct of the outlet, 01' a st,lndilig surface Wiwe
developed i.nside the barreL .
For Pl'!lctiooal plll'po:>es, cuivert flow 111£\)' he clf\,ssified irlto six as
shown in Fig. 17-28. The ic1enti5cfltion of en~h type may be explained (2) Outlet uIlBubmerged
accQrding to the followi'ng outline. H>H" .
y; < d
A. Ontlct submerged .... . , .... ,.,. Type 1 l?ull now
B. Outlet' unsubmcl'ged
1. Headwater greater than the critical value
a. Culvert hydraulically long .............. . ....... . Type 2
b. Culvert hydraulicdly short ,. , .. (;1) OuClet uns~bmeq~ed
" .Type 3 If> H·
2. Hcud\vater less than the critical value y,.< d
a. Tuilwater higher than the cl'itici11 dept.h, . , ... , , .....Type 4 Pa~tly fun

b. Tailwater lower than t.he critical depth

i, Slope subcritical. , .. , ............ , ....... ~ .... Type 5
ii. Slope sllpel'cl'itimll. ...... : . . . . . .. . .......... Type 6
(4) Outlet unllubmerged
If the outlot. is the cllivert wi1lflow full iike 8. pipe, and the If < H·
flow will be of type 1. . If the outlet is not submerged, the headwrtter y, > 1h
may be either 01' less tlmn the cl'itic:11 vn,!ue': When the headwater Subcl'itic£ll Bow
ii; greater than the critical the cuh<ert lllay ,be either hydraulically
short. 01' long; these call be differentiated by l)1e&,I1S of the charts in Figs'.
17-2ij and 17-27. The fiow is of type 2 if the culvert is hydraulically
long and of type 3 if it, is hydraulically short. When the headwater is (5) Outlet unsubmei'g;erl
less thrHl tQe cl'iticul value, the t.nil tI,i.ter may be either·higher or lower H <H* .
th::m the critical deptb of the flow at the cuI vert outlet. For highel' tuil- lit < y,
SuiJcl'itical flo,,'
watei' , the flow is of type 4. 11'01' lower tuilwater thefiow is of type 5 if
j Control at outlet
the culvert slupe is subcriticnl and of type () if the slope is super(,l'iticaL
III the above cln.38ification, there is an exception in that type 1 f1O\v
can OCClll' with tl1ilwnter slightly highel' than t,he cl'iticOJ depth or with (6) Outlet ,'nsllbmeq;ed
tail water .higher than the top of the outlet if the .bed slope is very steep. H < U'
The first, two ty pes of flow are pipe fiow, and the other types r..re open- 'Yr < Ye.
Supercritica,[ flow
channel flow, For type 3 How, the culvert act:! llke an orifice. The Control at entra.nce
coefficient of discharge .varies approximately from 0,45 to 0.75. }rOI'
type 4, 5, and 6 flows, the entmnce is not sealed by WiLter and it acts like
a weir. The discha~g:e coefficient v[l)'ies r..pproximn.tely from 0.75 to FIG. 17-28. Types of mtl'rert flow.
0.95, depending on the entrance geometry and headwr..t~l'
As shown in Fig. 17-2$, type 4 fiow is subcriticu.l throughout
length. Type.5 flow is subcritical and, hence, the contl;ol section is at i
t
i

I
"
 498
j
II
RAPIDLY VARIED FLOW
FLOW THROUGH NONPRISMA'l'IC CHANNEL SECTIONs 499
may be obtained by means of the charts in Figs. 17-29 and 17-30 for box l
culverts and circular culverts, respectively. Both charts supply informa-
tion only fOl' (l1llvert.s having square-edged entrance.s. For culverts
.. having rOllnded entrances under average conditions, the value of H/d
may be roughly estimated the following expressions, in whIch Hid
'"
'u
refers to the l'!1,tio of headwater to barrel height for culvert with square-
'0 edged entra.nce:

'"
X Type I HId, < 1.0 10 < Hid < 1.5 Hid> 1.5
Circutar, .. .. , O.87Hld 0.87 H/d
Box, .. " .. .... 1.09 + O.WHlll
2 :3 '+ 5 10 20 30 4050 ' 1.00Illd 0;36 + 0.64l!ld 0.02 + OA6H fa
OischoJge in cis per II oj width.a/b J.
h d t.e on 00" 'ulver~~ with square-edgGd en- 17 -9. Obstructions. An obstruction in open-channel flow present:) a
FlO. 17-29,
tl'llnces, ~harG
flowmg
,
folr
p!l.r~ y
efstlll'rna~lBng
.
I. aJe
de:.,.. \d~I,a.'of U.S.AB:reat,
,
~f Public Roads [29].)
U. phenomenon very similar to that of a COllstrictioll, since both have the
effect .of contracting the crOSS-Sec-
tional area of the flow. Howe'ver,
the constriction reduces the craSi!
section to a single opening, whereas
the obstraction cJ:l'lates at leapt ·two I
opeilings. The Df contrac-
.5 100 r--t-'-Jj,..-
..; tion offered by [I constriction is
usually higher than that by an
: 50 f--+--lrl-t-+-t-;--y: obstruction. '
g 40f--t--lrl-t-+-t-r-iTT
'i; J 0 I----t---'H...,..
The types of'obstruction com-
monly encountered in engineering
problems include piers, pile
trestles, tra.sh racks, piers and
abutments on top of ovedlow spill-
ways, etc. 111vestioO'ations of these
problems areuumerous in hydraulic, Fla. all oblltru;:;~ion.
17-31. Definition sketch showing
How through
literature. ~
00
N< t") ':t \i') The flow through an obskuctionmay be sub critical or. sllpercritical.
Discna rg e io cis, 0 The energy equation fOl; the l'eacll between the contracted section 2 and
section 3 below th.e contraction (Fig.1i-31) is
Fl 17-?O Chart for estimating headwater on circuln.r cu~vert,sl )Wlth square-edged
v'f
entrl).nces. l'
owmg " full . (Ba~ed
pa"ly . on data of F. T. Mav.s [17 . ' VZ2' . '
G.,
E ( V2 +
(/ ,
= Y!1
,
2) (17-22)
Type G How is supercritio~l and, hence, the control seotion or
the outlet. ~Y2(2 + F21) = YJ(2 + F32) (17-23)
is aAtth1e ~ntrfanche. flows
na YSlS 0 t ese
may follow the p' rocedure described in Art,S.
'" " d t '1 d
1 The data for box culverts were prepared by analogy from experience with circUlar
pipes and are beli~ved to be conservative; tht\t is, they will give h!l!\.d as high as is
11:1 to 11-3. The U.S. Geolo:gical S].1rvey, [27J has deve~oped a e al e. likely to occur uncier adverse conditions.

proce
'd that may be used for the hydraulic computatIon of a culvert
. teIsotU"IOn 0 f the problem
design ureFor' practical purposes, an apprOXlma
. 2For important'referen<;es on the subject or' flo\v through bridge pi<lTS and pile
~restjes.
see '[301 t<i [52]. On trash racks, see [531 to [611. On piers andltbutments
on top of SPiUW3.yS, see Art. 14-7, [43]. and [62] to [65).
I
,~." ..
 £i00 RAPWLY V AnIED. FLOW TRROUCH NONPRISMATIC CHANNEL SECTIONS 501
ivhen: F2 = V 2 /Vgyz, Fa c= V3/";{jY~, and e the percentage ingly, the flo'll is subcriticnl iUhe value of Fa faUs on the left side of the
of energy recovery, sinceel1ergy loss will occur between the sections. By. plotted curve 9£ an itSsumed energy loss andslipercritical if F J f<ill" on
the continuity of flow, . the tight side of the curve. . .
V2b~Y2 = Y1Bay. 17 -10. Flow between Bridge For flow between bridge piers,
or ·.F22U2Y2~ = Fa 2 Y3 J:. (17-25) . Yarnell [42] has ID£J.de an extensive stl:dy of the rclaterllit;ero.ture and
• when') (f bdB3. Eliminating 1/2 and:!i3 from Eqs. (17i23) and (17-25), conducted a large number oi tests on different kinds of pier commonly
used in American practice: He found that· the bridge-pIer formulas
2· _ e1Fa2(2 --1- F~2)3
most COli-un only used in the United States were d' AubuissOll'S [30],
U - • FzZ(2 + Fa2)l (17-26)
Naglel;'s [33], Weisbach's [31l, and Rehbock's [35-37]. The Weisbach
,;\7h6n the flow at section 2 is critical, F, 1. The v1111.1e of F 3 that furmull1 was considered theoretica.lly unsound l because of the discordant
results obtained b:;r YarnelL In connection with the use of the Rehbock
formula, the Bow passing through the obstruction is classified a8 least,
moderate, llnd complete turbulelit. Yarnell indicated that this clo.ssificil.-
, 1
tion might be u:;eful but that classification us subcl'itical and super-
[ critical is more logicaL Least and complete tUl'blllent flow· were found
I
to conespond to subcritical and supercl'itical flow, respectively, and
moderate turbulent flow was found to be in the neighborhood of or equal
I to critical flow. }"or least and moderate tui'bulent flow,. the Nagler
\ formula seemed to fit Yamell's experimental dD-ta better than the
d' Aubuisson formula. For complete turbulent flOiV, the d' Aubuissol1
formula seemed to fit the data better. In general, however, neither
formula applies too well at high velocities.
The ~Naglel' ,formula is

(17-28)

where Ie" is a coefficient depending on the degrae of channel contraction

and on the characteristics of the obstruction, Ii is .m adjustment factor
intended to reduce the depth y. to Y2, and (J is a coefficient wl1ich corrects
FIG. 17...aZ. Criterion for subcritical and mpercrit'cai flows through an iJbstructiQll, for the velocity of approach. The notation used in the formul!\ is shown
in Fig. 17-31. The backwater is represented by h'l or h". The of
f) varies, approaching zero a~ the contraction effect approaches zero and
satisfies this condition is called the limiting value and is designated by
F aL, Thus, for I, the above equation becomes . becoming high whe11 the· fiow is shooting and turbulent, but it can:
Ol'dinai'ily be tn.ken as 0.3. The value of f3 varies with the cOll\;eYlll1ce
2
u~ = 27E 1F,L (17-27) ratio, as showp in Fig.17-33.. .. ~
(2 + Fn 2)3 In deriving the d'Aubnisson formula, the energy equation is t.pplied
~ . to the approach channel section 1 alld to the cOlltraded section 2 (Fig.
For: a given IT, therefol'e, the flow through/ the obstru~tiol1 is critical if . ' .

Fa T F aL . Examination of Eq. (17-26) indicates thatithe flow through ~ The "'Yei~ba.ch formuLa. is based UPOll t.he ~ssumpti6n that the flow ente:ring the
thei obstruction is 8ubcritical if < FaL and supel'critical if Fa > F aL • contracted mll.)' b.e ca.lculated as the Burn o( two portions, the lower p\,-rt, flow·
Eqt\ation (17-27) is plotted ~s shown ill 17-32 fori E 1 (no energy ing thrDugh I.l. orifice a.nd Lite upper part flowin~ over a weir •. Ap~arelltly,
. this assumption and has no theoretical basis. Houk [10] and Bhbeucley
losS), € = 0:95 (5 % energy lo~s), and E OJ) (10% energy loss). Accord-
[3'2J also have it unWll.rril.L1ted and cOlltrary toestnblished hydra.ulk t!teory.
 II
I
I
I 503
RAPIDLY VARIED FLOW FTJOV.r THROUGH NONPRfSMATIC CHANNEL SECTIONS.
502
17-31) or, 1wing the l)Ota.tion in the figure, experimental data, Yarnell derived the coefficients for these formulas.
Based on this information, the following values of [(N alid Ie] are recom-
, V 22 h
+ YI = CJ!z 2i + Y2 + I
(17-29) mended for practical use"

where Yl = Y2 +
10 2, l,he velocity-distribution coefficients ell and a~ are Conveyance ra~io u

assumed 'equal to 1.0, and the friction loss hI is Msrimed zero. Taking
Type of pier 0.9 0.8 .0.7 0.6 0,5
I---;--I·······:······:---l-,-~,--l---:--'- "'-
-1
SqU&re noses and tails .......... .
"1- 1.8
Semicircular noses and tails .... .
90" triangular noses and tails.
..
"' 1.6
::>
f......-.. -I------l~"--.+-.-I-­ Twin-r,yiinder
out
with or with-
,.'. O.
~ 1.4 ___...!i--........:.-_+_-+

1.21----1----+
3, For flow of low yeladty and least turbulence, the more efficient
shapes arfJ len.'S-shaped nose and '"ail, lens-sh~"ped nose and sell1icircular
00 02 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
tail, semicirClilar nose. and lens-shaped tail, co'llyex no'se and tail, and
Caoveyonce rotio
semicircuhll" nose and, taiL 1 However, the data are 110t sufficient to
FIG. 17-33. Va.lues of f3 in ~he N.:lgler bridge-pier formula. differentiate RlnOllg these shapes for high of contraction.
4. Twin-cylinder piers either with or without connecting diaphragms,
is a coefficient of contraction, and simplifying, piers with 90" triangular noses and tails, a.nd piers with rec;::ssed webs
(17-30) are less efficient hydraulically them those just mentioned, and piers with
Q
sqnare noses and t?ils are least efficient,
el' Aubuisson made no distinction between the depths Yz and Yz, but 5. Application of batter to the ends of slightly increases their
assumed Yz = Y3. Accordingly, the d'Aubuisson formula is hydraulic efficiency, that is, raises the KN and values.
6. the length of a pier from 4 times the widt.h to 13 time;::
Q K,l b2Ya "/2gji~ + VIi. (17-31)
. the width has compal'atively little effect on its 'hydraulic efficiency, II!
where K.{ depends mainly on the degree of channel cOl'ltraction and OIl. some cases the efficiency .is t.hus increased anti in other case.~ decreased.
the shape and orientation of the obstl'l1c&ion. The assumption Y2 Ya The optimunl length-width ratio probably varies with velocity a.ndis
implies that the backwater h* = ha = hz in Fig. 17-31. Accordingly, generaUybetwe:en 4 and 7. On the average, the values of KN and ](A
the backwater ratio has a va:ueof 1.0. This),,; of course, not always will increase about 3 to 5 % for the increase of the ratio from 4 to 13.
true, although in many cases there is very little difference between Y2 7. Placing the piers at an angle with the current has an insignificant
and Yl' For this reason, the d'Aubuisson formula is genel'ally recognized effect on the alUount of backwater if~the angle is than 10°. Placing
0

to be empirical and approximate. the piers at 20 or more m<t.terially increases the n.mo\lnt. of backwater;
The following' are extracted from the results of Yarnell's investigation the increaee depends upon the quantity of flow, the dept.h, and the degree
on bridge. piers of variolls shapes and sizes: of channel contraction. In general, the values of and ](A willdecrfmse
L 'The height of the back~vl),ter due to bridge piers varies directly with about 7 at 20°.
the depth of the unobstructed channeL In order' to utilize the results of Lhe and to fa~iIitate .
. 2. The Nagler, d' Aubuisson, and Rehbock formulas give' approxi- lens-shaped nDse or tail is fDl'lned by two convex C~ll'ves tangent to the si;:lcs
mately correct results for ordinary velocities when the proper coefficients of pier l),nd of radills twice the pier width. Th", convex nose 01' I,ail is ionned:by two
al'e used, but they do not. hold for extremely high velocities. From his curves ('illlgent t-o the sides of pier find circum$criberl on i'\n cquila.tenl triangle.

\
I
 FLOW THROUGH NONPRISMATIC CHANNEL SECTIONS 505
504 RAPIDLY ·VARIED FLOW

hydraulic compu1",t;ion for practical applications, Yarnell has developed ,2.4 1'-

empirical fotmul:.l.s and graphical solutions for the 'bridge-pier problem.

The chr..rt in Fig. 17-3<1, designed by Yarnell but slightly modified for
2.2 i ._- I
I
, the preSeJlt purpose, supplies a quick solution for subcritical flow through
bridge piers. With the appropriate values of u and V 3 } the value of x
2.0 r--- r--
-'Vi
Vf;-
, 1.8 r--- r-- -
, can be obtained from the left part of the chart. Then enter this value I
and the proper values of F,2 and shape factor 1{ on the right part of the 1.6 I I I c:::::J~
chatt, and read the backwater h.... The shapes shown, on the chart II I
h" 1.4 / vi r- -.
I
Yo
1.2 - , .... - f- - l! e==)-
C=>"-l I
1.0 I --_. --+---- -
I lYi[ll
0.8

0.6
I I I ',ti't1 '-0==0 I

1-I'<H-lr'r--j 1. 5 h"-ft 0.4 i I. ~

I 0,2
J4f",
-~. ~ f11J
L r- ---

o k. ':'=
0.6
I 3 4 5
, ,

FIG. 17-35. Chart for determining baclC\\,ater of supercritical fiow through bridge
piers. (After D. L. Yarnell 142].) .

F:IG. 17-34. Chart for determining backwater of subcritical flow through bridge pier~.~
(Aile)' D. L. Yarnell [42].)

are square noses and tails, 90" triangular noses and tails, twin-cylinder
piers with and without connecting diaphragm, and semicircular noses and 1.2 -.-
tails. If the backwater is given am). it is required to determine the dis-
I I I
.'
l/f<==)
charge, it will be necessary to as:mme a value of V 3 and to carry out the Length -width --- ---e:"L.
computation by trial and error until a aolution ia obta.ined.
The chart in Fig. 17-35 gives a graphical solution for supercritlcal - - c..._
rolio =13
'\7"-
-'
/-'
--
.... - -- -- -- -
--'
;,. :7' --
flow through bridge piers. With ,the propel' va.lue of (1', determine the
~ f/
/"
,- /
- . ----
limiting value F3L from Eq. (17-27) or Fig. 17-32. Then enter Fa/FoL .
y- Length-wIdth
c::::::J
. on the chart and read h*/y~ for the given pier shape. Tliis value multi-
plied by Ya gives the backwater h *. If Yl, v!, bz, B 3 , and the pier shape
are known and it is required to determine ;the dischar:ge, h* /Ya may be
computed from h*/V! = (YI ~ Va)/Y3; Fa/F3L may betaken from the
---
'··"l- .

2
-'-- --- ----

chart; u = bdB3;'and F3L may be obtained from Fig. 17-2701' Fig. 17~32. F./F 3L
The vaiue of F3 can then be calculated, and from it V3 and then Q, FIG, 17-36. Effect of increase in l~ngth of bridge pier. (Based'Qn data of D. L. Yarnell
[421.)
Yarnell's graphical solutions apply to piers with length-width ratio
 , '
506 RAPIDLY VARIED FLOW FLOW THROUGH NONPRISMA'l.'IC CHANNEL SECTIONS 507
equal to 4. For ratios of, 7 and 13, the effect of increasing length on where {3 is a coefficient having the :values listed below:
backwater is I:Ihown in Fig; 17-36, which is plotted \vith Yarnell's data.
It seems that tM bZ,ckwater caused by the long piers is greater when Form of rack beLt' Value of (3
the pier ends are semicircular than when they are square. It is pl'obahle Square nose and tail, Lis = 5. _., ....... , ' ..... '" 2.42
that an, abrupt entrance in the case of square pier ends tends to'decrease Squ!1rtl nose and semicircul<U' t,ail, Lis =' 5..... ..,. 1.83 -1
friction losses for (t short distance downstream because of its effect on the Semiciroular nose and tail, Lis = 5. .............. 1.67 I
RO'.Jod ... , . .. .: ........ ,.".... ,., ...... '.... 1,79
velocity distribution, since the velocity along the walls is reduced. The Airfoil ... _. . . . . . . . .. . ..... "................... 0,76
effect of bridge piers present ill a constriction has been considel;'ed in
Alt. 17-6 and in Fig. 17-23d. Spangler [55] has extended t.he experiment and determined the value of f3 .1
17-11. Flow through Pile Trestles. Yarnell's investigation [41] indi- for IX = 30 0 , ,45 0 , and 60 0 ,
ca.tes that the N{tgler formula may be suitably applied to subcrltical Ac.cording to F'ellenius [54], an empirical formula for c can be given
flo w passing a pile trestle a,net the d' Au buissoll formula to superc.ritical as follows:

+ Ii )2 sm=
. {j
flow passing a pile trestle. The following coefficients are recommen.ded
' S
for use in these formulas: C = Ji. ( S (17 -3L~)
Type of t"e811e
where the coefficient Ji. and exponent x have the followil1g values:
.j
Single-track 5-pile trestle ben t
Parallel to curren t. . . .. . .. . ............. , 0.90 0.96
At to" angle with current ......... '.' ..... . 0.90 Form of rack bar T'alue of /J. V(tlue "fx
At 20° angle with current .............. , .. 0.89
At 30° angle with current ................ . 0.87
Square nose and tail
With sharp corners, Lis ~10 ...... , .................... 7.1 1.0 I
Double-track JO-pile trestle bent ............ . 0.82 0.88 With sharp corners, Lis = 12 .......... , ...... _....... 6.2 1.0
Two sillgle-track 5-pile trestle b'~nts: ..... , . , . 0.79 0.86 ,\Vith slightly rounded corners, Lis = 8 to 11. .......... 6.1 LO
Semioircular nose and tail, Lis = 7 ......•........•.. .... 5. I) i.5
The amount of channel cont.raction is to, be t.aken as the average
diameter cif the piles plus the thickness of t,he sway bracing, disregarding In general, ~c = 1.0 for bars having sharp 01' slightly rounded corners and
the angle at -which the bent is set with the current. ' x = 1.5 for ba!'s having rounded corners. For cross-connected and
'The effect of trestle piles present in a constriction has been considered clipped rack bars, the value of Ji. should be increa.'led by about 22.5 %.
in Art. 17-5 and in Fig. 17-23c. Scimemi [56] and Kozeny [50] have provided values of c, /3, and Ji., and
17 -12. Flow th~ough Trash Racks. For flow through trash racks, the other data for racks iustalled in several hydropower plants .
.designer is primurily concel;ned with the amollnt of head loss due to the 17 -13. Unqerfiow Gates. Certain control gates ir, cana.ls may be called
resistance of the rack. This may be expressed in terms of the velocity unde7'ftow gates 1 frcim the f act that. water passes underneath the struct ure.
head of the approach flow, or Common examples are the sluice gate, Tain~er gate (or radial gate) I
, V2
h, = c2g- (17-32) and rolling gate (Fig. 17-37). In d.esigning such gates the hydraulic
engineer is most interested in two major .features: the 'head-discharge
where V is the velocity of approach ahead of the rack and ,1vhere c is a relationship and the preSSUl'e distribution over the gate surfaces for
coefficient depending on the cross-sectional form, thickness IS, length L various positions of the gate ~nd forms of the gate lip. The form of the
of the l'ack bEll', clear distance b between bars, angie /J of il1cliuation of the lip will .not only affect the velol:ity and pressure distributions and the
bar from the horizontal, and angle a between the direction of flow and the energy loss in flow through the gate opening, but may also develop very
length of the bal'. disturbing vibrations that should be avoided during gate operation. As
;On the basis of the experimental data for rack bars of various forms
a~d with a = 0, Kirschmel' :[52 ,53] has set up the following
, formula for c: I 1 In contr~t ~o the underfk..r gate is the ,ovet'flow gate through which the water flows
over the stl1fctur~. The drum gate (Art., 14-9) is an exa'mple of au overflow gate_
, Hydraulically speaking, the overflow gate ,acts like! a weir as much as the underflow
,,c = {3 (S)H
Jj sin 0 (17-33) gate act~ like an orifice. There are also designs for which the water flows above ,and
I. below the struct·ure at the same time (Fig. 17-37).

-- .-:<
I
 RAPIDLY VARIEh FLOW FLOW THROUGH NONPRISMATIC CHANNl!lL SECTIONS .
508
the design of the lip varies considerably, independent investigation of the For the vertical sluice gate, l experimentally determined curves repre-
lip for a. particul[1r design is usually necessary. I .
senting the value of a have been prepared by Hflnry [68], aFl Shown in
By the energy equation, it can be shown that the discharge through an •. Fig. 17-38; The dashed line. A represents the result obtained by Eq.
(17.:.35) on the basis of t11e energy principle; the dashed line B is obtained
underflow gate may be expressed as .
through the use of the. momentum principle. The value of :IfQ is the
Q= aLh~-IJ-:(-Y1-+-a-';~'7. ~-;:::-) (17-35) Froude number of the flow through the gate· opening. .
Similat· curves fo.r the Tainter gate (Fig. 17-39) were prepared by Toch
where a is the coefficient of discharge, L is the length of the gate, h is [69] on the basis of an experimental study" induding the pivot height as a

+Qt.

O.4l--I-+'<:""'1I---.J,c...,.61~';""'F-~F-;~I=--l
c
Sluice gate Sluice gate with combined
oyer- and underflow

0.1 !--f----jJ-l--ll----jF:=.:I-/!='"'

Z / .'1,
Tointer gote ~

FIG. 17-37. Underflow gates. FIG. 17-38. Discharge coeffil.llentJor vertical sluice gate. (_4/Iel' H. R. Henry [68].)

the height of the gate opening, Yl is tbe upstream· depth of flow, and :variable i~addition. to o~her variables that ,:vere used by Metzler [70]
ex. V 12/ 2g is the velocity head of the approach flow. The outflow of the
m an earl~er analYSIS. 'Ihe U.S. Army Engmeera Waterways Experi-
gate may be either free or submerged, depending on the tailwater depth. ment ~tatlOn [74] has ~lso prepared design charts for use in the design
For submerged flow, Yl in the above equation should be replaced by the of Tamter gates, partlcularly for those installed on spillway. crests of
effective head, or the difference between the upstream and downstream .WES-standard shapes (Art. 14-3). . . .
depths. . . . In the case of a sluice gate with combined overflow and underflow
For the .purpose of experimental.studies, the ~elocity-h~ad term m (Fig. 17-37), the overflow discharge Qu is a function of II only, but the
Eq. (17-35) may be omitted, and its effect may be mcluded m ~hecoeffi- underflow discharge QL is a function of yo + AYQ as well as Yl. If AYo 0
cient a. Thus, and if the lower (under~ow) jet is free, the total discharge Q = Qu + QL
Q = aLh, V'2i1h (17-36)
is independent of the ~ailwater depth Y2. IfAYo is greater than zero
where a is ~ coefficient depending 04
the geometry of the str~cture and the lo:ver jet is drowned. The problem ·may be ~olved by the continuit;
on the upstream and downstream de~ths. The form of this e~uation is equatIOn and the momentum equation betweenicross sections 0 and 2.
I

.. the same for both free and submerg~d flows; . 1 For other studies, see [39J and [71]. For a theoretical:analysis of the flowthrough
~.
.'
1 For studi~s on ~uice-gate lips of variods designs, see [66J .a.nd [67] . a sharp-edged sluice gate, see [72] and [73]. .
510 RAPIDLY VARIED FLOW
FLOW' THROUGH NONPRISMA'l'W CHANNEL SEiCT'IONS.
511
Under norma.l conditions, y~ is a function of Q. Both yo + "b.Yo and Q£
are unknown but must satisfy an energy equa.tion similar to Eq. (17-35).
The use of the momentum equation will automatically include any fric-
tion losses. The pair of equations may be solved by trial and error or
graphically, The result thus obtained has been found to agree with an
experimental finding derived by Escande [2,711.

(a)

"

I
I

(hl

-----'--~--------4~

.I '
-
•
. .FlO. 17-39. DischArge coefficient Ior Tainter gate. (After A. Tock [69).) (el
FIG. 17-40. Determination of pressures for Tainter gate.
The pressure on the surface of the gate can! be determined accuratel~ , ,
either from flow-net analysis or oy actual measurement on model or
o?tained by graphical determina.tion from the pressure-distribution
prototype. 17-40a shows the nO,fmal pressure ol1,th~ s1..u:face o.f a;
diagram .. A less accurate but. simpler method of determining these
Tainter gate (a simil?-r pattern of hOrlZontal-pressure dlst.rlbutlOn eXIsts
pressur~s IS to assume that the h~rizol1tal pressure on the gate surface is
on a sluice gate), the1horizontal pressure on the gate openmg and on the
hy~rostatically distributed and tpat the vertical pressure is equal to the
upstream and downstream cross section.s, and the vertical pressure on th~
;ve.lght of the water replaced by the gate structure above its surface
channel bed. The normal pressure on the gate surface may be repre-:
t,FIg. 17-40c). The horizontal force may also be determined by the
sented by its horizontal a.nd vertical components PH andF v, as shown in
mo~.entum relationship. However, this determination will not give the
Fig. 17-40b. The magnitude and positions of these forces may be
pOSItIon of the force. Sin\:e all water pressures are normal to the gate
 512 RAPIDLY Y ARIED FLOW
surface, the res1lltant of the 'pressures must pass through the trunnion'
axis O.
The outflow from the gate uswiJly constitutes 11 high-velocity jet,
capable of eroding the downstream channel bed. l The erosion thus
developed may be avoided by means of a stilling basin (Art. HHl). If
no preventive measures are provided, the erosion D:1ay result in a deep
seoUl' hole, the formation of which will depend' on the type of the jet.
I According to the studies of Escande [71] on fiow through a. channel drop
J
downstream from [l, sluioe gate/ four types' of jet are possible: (1) sub-
merged How with rising j Elt, ,(2) submerged flow with diving jet, (3) free
flow with rising jet, and (4) free flow with diving jet. Generally speak-
ing, the diving jet will induce less pressure on the vertical surface of the
drop than the rising i et and will usually develop a scour hole with its
deepest point closer to the drop than the rising jet. In submerged Bow,
the depth of scour ,hole depends on the tall water depth, whereas in free
flow the downstream conditions have little or no effeot upon the depth of
scouring.
17 -14. Channel Junctions. Flow ,through a channel junction is a
phenomenon that involves numerous variables, such as the number of
the adjoining channels, the angles of intersection, the shape and, slope
of the channels, the'directions and discharges of flow, the rounding of the
corners at the junction, etc. The problem IS so complicated that only·
a. few simple and specific cases have been studied. The conclusions
of such studies indicatE;. that gene1'8.l1zation of the problem is not possible
or even desirable. When the application of hydraulic theory t.o the
problem encounters limitations, !L model study will give the best solution
fOl' the How characteristics involved.
For stcbc1"itical flow passing through the channels at a junction, Ta.ylor
[80] has investigated the specifiC cases sholvn in Fig. 17-41. The channels
. are horizontal and of equal width.' In the case 9f combining flow, the
following assumptions were made: (1) the flow is from channels 1 and 2
into channel 3; (2) channels 1 and 3 lie in a straight line; (3) the flow is
parallel to the chn.nnel w<lJls, and the velocity is uniformly distributed
immediately above and below t.he junction; (4) ordinary wall friction is
. negligible in compn.rison,with other forces involved; and (5) the depths
in channels 1 and 2 ate equal immediately above the junction. With
1 The erosion of channel bed due to jet is a subject beyond the scope of this book.
For detailed informatiDn see [1] to [3] and [75] to [77].
I
1
2 Other examples of jets below hydraulic stnictures in channels have been found and
studied by Camichel [78]. The erosion due to iet through a bridge opening may cause
I a deep scour hole generruly known as the bl1le hole. An experimental study of such a
problem has been reported by Hickenlooper, Guillou, and Chow [79J.
FLOW THROUGH NONPRISMATIC CHANNEL SECTIONS 513
these assumptions and by the application of the momentum ,equation
to the junction in the direction of 1 to 3, Taylor was able to obtain the
following equation: l ' .
i
r .k2 = n.~(ni - 1)
i 4nll ![2n. - nl(l + cos 0) + ny - 1] (17-37)
where k2 = ~22/2gY2' nq =:
Q2/Q3, ny = Ya/Yb, V 2 is the velocit,y in
~han~el 2, Y: IS the depth 0, flow in channel 2, Ya is the depth above the,
JunctIOn, Yb IS the depth below the junction, and 8 is the angle between
the. merghig chann~ls. Taking n. as. a parameter, k2 may be plotted
agamst nv for any gIven 8.
(oj (b]
FIG. 17-41. Simple channel junctions (a) combining flow; (b) dividing flow.
Equation (17-37) was verified by experiments on junctions with () = 45°
and 135°. It was found that the agreement between theory and experi-
ment was good, for 0 = 45°. ,There was no agreement' however for
() = ,135°. It ii? believed that this was because the veloci~y distrib~tiol1
below the junction was distorted and the flow did not remain parallel
t? the chann~l wal~s. The expedmental data showed clearly that assump-
tlOn 5 above 1s valId, regardless of the angle of intersection of the channels.
In t~e case Of d2~viding flow the problem c::mnot easily be analyzed
theoretlC~Il~'. The application of the momentum principle is difficult
be.cause. It 1.nvolves some unknown quantities, and assumptions which
might slmphf! :he determination of these quantities, such as assumption 5
for the, combll1lng flow, are not available. Basically, the division of the
flow "1111 depend upon the backwater effects of the two branch channels
and ~he dynamic conditions existing at the junction. If the divided
flow IS to be combined again at a certain point downstream a solution
of the problem described in Art. 11-9 may be applied. '
In applyirig the momentum equation to the problem the hydrostatic pressure
1
exer.~ed by the flow in chann.el 2 is ~ol1nt.erac.ted by the pr~ssure on the opposite wall,
prov lded the water surface m the JunctIOn IS esser,tially flat. Thus, the only force
the flow from channel 2 can contribute to the flow in the straight channel· 1-3 is its
mom~ntum component in the direction of 1 to 3.
 514 RAPIDLY VARIED FLOW
FLOW THROUGH NONPRISMATlC CHANNEL SECTIONS &;15 )

1.35 ---
the division of flow of a given discharge QJ. First assume QI; then

1.30 I !Lo Q2 = Qa - QI. The corresponding depths YI and Y2 can be obtained

from the rating curves of channels 1 and 2. For Yl/Y2, the ratio Ya/Y2
1

1.25 / can be determined from Fig. 17-42.. By assuming other values of QII
the correspoildirlg ratios YZ/Y2 c<,n be obtained. Thus, Qz/Qa is plotted
I
1
~r~
~ 1.20
.
'I
/ against Ya/Y2, as shown by the curve. A in Fig. 17-43. The intersection
C)f this curve with the ka curves now
E
.<::
2/ gives all possible combinatior.s of the

il
Q. US 0.20
I ,--
B .1
'"
Cl
;7
variables, among which one value of
k3 ·would correspond to the flow of,
Vi .

rn
1.10
say, 500 cfs entering the junction:: I !
AiT . Tbe llext step is to plot the ill terSected
0.16
1-----
1.05

1.00
~W~cP
.,
k3 values against the corresponding
Ya. For the example shown by the .., 0.12
-
M lh
1.00 t10 1.20
Depth rolio, ~
Yz

FIG. 17-42. RelaLionship between depths in a 90" flow division.

1.30 line A in Fig. 17-43, ka = 0.10,
Ya/Y2 ~ 1.067! and Q2/Qa = 0.677 or
Q2 = 0.677 QJ. From the ratiag curve
o
~
"
~ 0.08 '\
!I
~ .

V3z~
(Afler E. H. TaylO1' of channel 2, the V2 corresponding 'to
[80J.) ,
the ·Q2 just computed can be· found ~kl=2Y
I 9 l
:--

and, hence,. Ya= l.067Y2. The plot 0.04

of k, ~,gainst lis can be constructed, II
as shmvl1 by the curve B in Fig.
17-44. The proper value of k. must o
4 6 8 10
satisfy not only curve B but also the
"i~ 1.20!1--~-l---t-~ V?IUes of YJ
solid. curve showing the relationship
.§ FIG. 17-44. Factor k, D.S a funccion of
. Ii'! 1.1 51----l------I---j-----
ka = V 3~ /2gY3~ The ill tersection of Ya. (Afler E. If. Taylm' [80).)
.t: the two curves gives the required
.,
.Ii
o ti Oll---'--l----+---t values of lea and Y3. With this le" the corresponding value of Q2/ Q3 may
be determined from Fig. 17-43, and the divided discharges Ql and Q2 can
be determined accordihgly. .
1.05
For 8upercritical flow passing through the channels at a jUllcLiQll, the
flow condition is more complicated .. Studies of a few cases of combining
flow of the general arrangement :~hown in Fig. I7- n have been made by
E

Quantity rolio, ~ 2
3
FIG. 17·43. Characteristics 9{ a. 90· flo~v division. (Afl~r E. H. TaY'loT [80J.)
For the specific junction showll in Fig. 17-41b, Taylor has made an
experimental approach to the problem as follows: . _.
For any given value of 8, it is possible to correlate the (hmenSlOnle~s
ratios Q2/Qa, Y3/Y~, yt/Y2, and ka = V.;2/2gYa, all derived from the expel'l-
mentally determined data. For g:= 900, such correlation curves ~re
shown in Figs. 17-42 and 17-43. These curves can be used to determme
thel;.T.S. Soil Conservation Service [81]. In such cases, a hydraulic
jump m~.y forin in one or both of the inlet channels, depending lIpon the
junction design, the discharges, velocities, and related flow conditions
intheadjoinillg channels. Thus, a large increase in the height of the 1
side walls in the vicinity of the j unction may be necessary. When the
prihclple of momentum is applied to sllch a problem, it is necessary to
know the position of the jump or the depth of ~ow at the uj:oEtl'eam edge
of the junction in order to compute the momentum contributed by the.
inlet· flows. If the flow passing through the junction is supercriticaI.
without the formation of any hydraulic jump upstream, the flow condi-

t
,J
 .,
. 1516
)
tiol1 will be coniplicnted by the development of cross waves similar to
) those discussi:d in Art. 1~-5. These wayes will propagate for aconsider-
. able distullce downstream before being damped by the channel.friction.
Hence, side wt1lls higher than those normally provided are requ"ired not
only nM:' the junction but also for ll. considerable distance downstream.
PROBLEMS
1'1-1. Verify Eq. (17-5), and interpl'et the dashed curves in Fig. 17-3 that represent
this equation. ' . .
17-Z.. Formica's data. for sudden expansions, plot a Cllrve showing the relac
tiollship betwe(ln •.aucl the angle of divergenc-e fI, and then aiscuss this rela.tionship.
17-3. COnllmte. the wave angles fJ, anG fl. of th? contruction designe.t in Example
17-1, and s\;:e~(·h the position of the shock wf,vefronts.
17 -4. a straight 'contmction to redu~e the width of \I. rectanguiar channel
fl'Olll Q. to 3 The channel carrips a discharge of 4;33 ds with an approach velocity
of 7.2 fl)S. ASSUl1l11 11;/11i 3.00.
17-5. Compute: the wiivenng!es of the design inProb. 17-4, and sketch the posi-
'tlQIl Q! Ill\) sll(ld: wiwefront..'.
17-8. ))c>lign the c-ontracl.ion in EXIIlJ1ple 17-1, !l.Ssllmbg 'Ya/Y, = 3.00.
17-7. A c.hnnllcl 6 ftwide (;afries a discharge of 100 cfs at a velocity of 20 fpS.
COIl~tl'Uct th.l surface contour of the !low through a sq<lare-f'dged abl'Upt expansion
of the !'hr.rllloL
17":8. If tho dmnnel described in the preceding problem has a gradual expansion
,l'
( wil h its bOllTHlnril>3 ropresented by Eq. (l7-ll), constl'uct the slIrface contour of the
How ill the (·1:jllHltiiou.
17 -9. !II 11 ke n preliminary design 'of a curved e.xpansjO!l for the channel in Prob. 17-7
with Iho !lid of the ,Ihnellsion\ess boundary c·urves detetmiHed by the method of
!,hnral'tcri~ti('l! (Fij!;. 17-13). AsslIm() hi/II = 3. ' .
17-10..Solve EXam1)le 17-.2 fol' tlw following addition"t'conditions: (a) the center
lille. Of-thfJ bridge and highwn.y emballkmellt makes an angle of 70" with the directioll
of flow, (I,) the ~i1t.m!lCe is rounded fol' rib = 0.10, [lnd (e) the bridge has a pier 30 ft
loug nnd 10 rt wide at I,hl) middle of the waterway opening.
17-11. Dctermine the flood disdlllrge through 11 bridge conBtrintion having a type
III opel1illg with (;mb~lIlm1ont Ilnd abutment slope 2:1. The COl1strietion 30 rt long
r(!.dtl(·t~ t'le nonnal wid th of w!lterWt1)' from' <JuG it to 200 ft... The brid~e has thre~
picr~, ctwh 30 it long ami !l ft wide. The average de.pths of water at the :Lpprofl.cb
scctiQl~ 200 ft upstream from the brid;;e and at. the contracted section are 20.5 and
H)'3 ft, rn~lllwtivalJ'. The upstreilln t.op edge of the embankmen~ is 1 ft above the
w!lf(:l"St,l'fl1ce elevation lit the approndl section. The value of n = 0.035.
17 -12: Solve the j)l'cl'cdillg problem if the bottom oi the bridge is 3 ft below the
top of 1.lie t.'!lll\mnkment. The bridge deck; however, is not overflowed.
17-18. A box ctllvert 8 X 8 X 60 ft is Inid Qn Il. slope of Ho. It has square--edged'
ent.l·fllwe Ilncl Yl!rt.icnl he..'\dwlIlIs. The headwater and tail\\'ater eleva.tions are S.OZ ft
above the inv(:rt of the entrq.nce and 13 ft above the invert· of the outlet, respectively.
Dd.orn1ine' (a) the' . the culvert, (b) the type o~ flow through the culvert,
Itnd (c) the normnl depth .flow in the ba.rreL The vruu~ of n = 0.015.
17-14. Solve the precedin~ problem if the headwater i~ 13 It above the invert of
the en trance.
1'1-15. 8'01ve Prob. 17·13 if the culvert is circular, having a diameter of 8 ft.
I
J
(
F,LOW THROUGH NONPRISlIfATIC CHANNEL SEC'1'IONS 517
17~le. the preceding problem if the headwater is 13 ft above the inv'ert of
the entrance jl.nd the barml is: rough, having n = 0.025. '. .
17-17. A llighway bridge 350 ftloIlg h!iS six piers with semicircular nos~s and tails,
ea.ch 8 It wide and equl'.lly spaced. At the peak of a flood, the backwat~r was found
to l:!e 0.30 it for the seven openings. The average depth of flow immediately down-
:stream from the opening was 8 ft, Compute the flood discharge, (a) by the Na.gler
formula, (b) by the d'Aubuiss.oIl formula, and (Il) by the Yarnell charts.
17-1.8. A. bridge has four piers wit4 semicircular noses and ta.ils, each 40 ft long by
10 ft During a flood peak of 45,000 cfs, the total width of the strealIl was
390 It, and the depth at a. downstream section was 19.4 ft. Estimate the
backwater. ' . .
17-1.9. Soive the preceding probleIll by the USGS method d~8Cribed in Art. 17-7.
The chaonel roughness coefficient is ,It 0.03. Unavailable .data.are to be reasoIl-
abl)' a.s5umed. .
17-20. If the bridge in Prob. 17-17 ill exposed to a flood discharge of 35,000 C[6,
<:5timate the backvrater. The rating cur"" of the chanIlel gives a normal depth of
. 8.5 it for this UllScmLrg'e.
17-21. A pile-trestle I',dlroad bridge 840 ft long is supported by bents,
each 2 ft wide and spaced 11 n center to center. At the peak of a flood, the ayerage
ha.ckwat,er V{as found to be 0.15 ft. The aver1:1ge depth of flow immediately down-
stream from t.he trestle W3S 6 ft. Estimate the bnc.kwater.
1'l~22. Verify Eq. (17-37).
REFERENCES
1. Charles Jaeger: Der Mischungsvorgang bei plt'tzlichem QuerschnittsUbergang
(The mixing process in sudden transitions), lVasserkTaft 'l.!nd Was'lenoirtsckafl,
Mllnich,voi. 31, no: 24, pp. gOo-SOD, 193B.
Z. Charles J a.eger: "Er,gineering Fluid M¢chanics," translated from the German. by
P. O. Wolf, Blackie & Son, Ltd" London and Glasgow, HI5S, l>p. 157-169.
3. Charles Jaeger: De I'impulsion totnJe et de ses rapports avec l'enel'gie tot.ale
d'un courant liqui<:le A. sUr:lace libre (The total :impulse and it..~ relations with the
total energy of a. iree-surface liquid flow), Relme ytnJral.e de ~;hydratlh'q!le, Paris,
vol. 13, no. 39, pp. 143-151, 1947.
4. Gianni Formica: Esperienze preliminari sulle perdite di carico Dei can ali, dovute a
cambiamenti di sezione (Preliminary test on head losses in channels due to C!OSS-
sectional changes), L'Energia eleltricll,iIfila.no, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 554-568, July,
1955; reprinted as lstitu.tQ di I dr{Lulica e Coslruzioni I dmulichc, Milano, :nie'lr!crie e
~t'!.ldi No. 124, 19'55.
5. R. L. Daugherty and A. C. Ingeraoll: "Fluid Mechanics," McGraw-Hill Book
Company, Inc., New York, 1954, pp.19O-HI3. .
6. Arthtlr T. Ippen and John H. Dawson:: Design of channel contractions, 3d paper
in High-velocity flow in open channels: A symposium, Transactions, American
Sociel.y·of Ciflil Engineers, vol. 116, pp. 326-346, 1951. .
7. Mtl.S.a!lhl;Hom-ma and Sukeyuki Shima: On the flolV in a gradu!illy dIverged open
channel,: The Japa.n Scienc~ Series yoL 2, no. 3, pp. 253-·260, 1952.
8. Hlmter ;Rouse, B. V. Bhoota., Design of channel' expansions,
4th pap~r in High-velocity flow in op:en channels: A symposillm, Transactions,
Amt<riea~ Society of Civil Engi';'ws, vdL 116, pp. 326-346, 1951.;
9. Fred W; Blaisdell: Flo\v through diverging open channel transitions at super-

518 RAPIDLY VARIED FLOW
critical,-elocities, U.S. l!oil COnse~1Jation Se71rice, ProgreS$ Rept SCS-TP-76, April,
1949.
10. Ivan-E. lluuk: Calculation of flow in open channels, Miami COnSe,.vlmcy District,
Techniml Report, Pt. [V, Dayton, Ohio, 1918. "
11. E. W. Lane: Experiments On the flow of water through cont,ro.etions In an open
channel, Transaction$, American Sociel!! of Civil Engineers, voL 83, pp. 1l49-1208~
1919-1920. , Frelburg, Germa.ny, 1855.
12. Carl E.IGndsvo.~er, Rolland W. Carter, and H. J. Tracy: Computation of peak
discharge at contractions, U.S. Geological ,'lurvey, Circulol' No. 284, 1953.
13. C~J,fl E. I'l:illdsvater and'Rolland W. Carter: Tranquil Jlow through open-channel
aonstric-tion", Transactions, American SQci~ly of Civil Engineers, Vl)[. 120, pp.
955-980, 1955.
14. Hubert J. Tracy and Rolland W. Carter: Backwater effects of open-channel
constrictions, ,['ransad,ions, American Society of Ciuil Engineers, vol. 120, pp.
993-1006, 1955.
15. Tate Dalrymple: Measuring floods, in Floorls, val. III of Symposia Darcy, IntM'-
national Association of Scien(ific Hydralou!!, Pttblicatio1! No. 42, 1!J56, pp. 38(1-<1.04.
16. David L. Yarnell, Floyd,A. Na.gler, l1ll,d Sherman M. Woodward: Flow of w[j,~el'
~hrough culvel'~s, University of [o1Oa, StudifJ~ in Engineering, Bulletin 1, 1926.
. 17. l!~. T. Mavis: The hydraulics of culverts/ The Pennsyl,'ania Stale College, ElIgineer-
'£ng Experim6,tl Station, Bulletin 56, Oct. 1, 1942.
'18. LorenZ' G. Straub and Heruy M, Morris: Hydraulic data comparison of concrete
and corrugated metal culYert' pipes, Unillil1'sily of Minnesota, St. Anthony Falls
Hydraulics Laboratory, Technical Paper 3, SeTie~ B, July, 1950. • .
19. Lorenz G. Straub 'and Henry Morris: Hydnl.l.lhc tests ou concrete culver. pipes,
University of Minnesota, St. Anthony Falls Hydraulics Laboratory, Technical Paper
ND. 4, Seri,w B, July, 1 9 5 0 . ' "
20. Lorenz G. Stra.ub and Henry Morris: Hydra1.llic tests on corrugated metal culvert
pipes, Univer~ily of }/in'Lesota, St. Anthony Falls Hydra'.J.lics Laboratory, Technical
Pa.per No.5, SeriBs B, July, 1950. ' .
21. L0renz G. Straub, Al...-in G. AndBrson, :md Chades E. Bowers: Effect of Inl~t
design on capacity of culverts on steep slopes, U nive"sity of M innesoLa, St. A n{ hony
Falls Hydraulics Laboratory, Project Report No. 37, August, 1953.
22. Lorenz G. S~ra.ub, Alvin G. Anderson, an.d Charles E. Bowers: Importance of
inlet design on culvert capacity I in CuI-vert hydraulics, Highway Research Boa:rd,
Research. Reporll;i-B, Washington, D.C., 1953, pp. 53-67. . .
23; Roy H. Shoemaker, Jr., and Leslie A. Clayton: Model studms of ta.perEd Inlets
for box culverts, in Culvert hydraulics, iIighway Resecrch Bilard, Research Rep!lTt'
15-B, Washington, D.C., 1953, pp. 1,-45; ,
24. John L. French: Fi~st progress report on r.ydraulics of short pipes: Hydr(l.ulic
characteristics of commonly lLSe,d pipe entnmces, U.S. National Bweau of Stand-
(J;rds, Report 4444, Dec. 28, 1955. ' ' . ,
25. John L. French: Second progress report on hydraulics of culverts: Pressure and
r~sistance characteiilStics of a model pipe culvert, U.S. National Bureau of Stand-
ai'ds, Report 4911, Oct. 29, 1956. ' .
26. John L ..French: Third progress report on hydraulics of culvert.s:'Effect of approach
channel characteristics on model pipe culvert operation', U.S. National Bureau Of
Standards, R.cport 5306, June 3, 1957. " '
27. R. W. Ca.rter: Coinputa~ion of peak discha.rge at culverts, U.S. Gealogical Survey,
Circular 376, 1957."
. ' ., '.
a.
28. Wen-Hsiullg Li and Calvin Patterson: Free outlets and self-pnmlng action of
I
! FLOW THROUGH NONP1USMATIO CHANNEL SECTIONS 519
culverts, paper 1009, Proceedings, Ame1'icfm Society of Civil Engineers,'Joll.rnal,
Hyd"cmlics Division, no. HY3, pp. 1-22, J~me, 19M.
29. Hydraulb cha.rt, No. 1043, U.S. Bureau of Plwlic Roads, Hydmlllic Chcr.rts, March,
1951." . ' .
30. J. F. d'Aubuisson de Voisins: "Trait.! d'hydraulique" (" Trea.tise on Hydraulics "),
2d ed.,.Pitois, Lenaut & Cie, Paris, 1840.
31. Juli.1I3 Wei~bach: "Die ExperimentE.lhydraltiik H ("Experimental Hydraulics"),
.
32. ,T. F. Bubendey.: Stau an Briicken un.d Durchlassen (B!J.ckwatel' of bridges and cul-
verts), art. 25, chap. 3, pt. 3, yol. 1, in "Handbuch der Ingenieurwissenschll.ften "
4th ed., W. Engelmann, Leipdg, 1911, pp. 707-773. '
33. FiQyd A, Nagler: Obstruction of bridge piers to the flow of water, 1'1'an,sactions,
American S,'cietyaf Civil Engineers, vol. 82, pp. 334-395, 1918.
34. H .. D. l{rey: Berechntlug des Statle5 infolge von Quenschnittverengungen (Calcu-
latIOn of backwater due to cross-sectional contraction), Zentralblat{der Bauver-
wa/tung, Berlin, vol. 39, no. 79, pp. 47-2-475, Sept. 27, H)19.
35. '~h. Rehbodc·. Zur Frage des BrUckenstaue8 {On the problem or b!'idgecous~ric­
tIon), Zeniralbla.t! der Bauvenoa.Utmg, Derlin, vol. 3g, no, 37, pp. 197-200, 1919. .oj
3,!t Th. Rehbock: Verfa,hren zur Bestimmung des Briickenstaues bei rein stromenden
, I
Wasserdurchfluss (A method of determining the backwater at bridges for dis-
tinctly streaming flow), a volume published to celebrate the dedication of the
new building of ~he DIvision of Engineering Structures of the Technical Institute
of Ka:rlsruhe, Ge;mll.ny, Nov. 26, 1921, pp. 7-13; a.lso if' Der BauingenieuT, Berlin,
vol. 2, no. 22, pp. 603-609, 1921.
37. Th; Rehbock: BrUckenstau und Walzenbildung (Bad(water and eddies Iltbddges)
Der BattingQnieur, Berlin, vol. 2, no. 13, pp. 3<11--347, 1921. '
38. Paul BOss:" Berechnung der Wasserspiegellage bairn Wechsel des Fliessz\l~tandes"
(" C?mputa.tion of W~t.er Surface with Ohanges in Flow Type "), Springer-Verlag,
Berhn, 1919, Il,nd VDI-Verlag, Berlin, 1927.
39. Alexa.nder Koeh and Ma.'{ Carstanjen: tt Von del' Btnnlgung des Wo..."SBl'S und den
da.bei auftreten,den Kriiften" (" Moysment of Water and Associated Force
Phenonlena"), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1926', pp. 179-185.
40. Giulio De Marchi, "Idraulica." ("HydrILulics"), Ulrico Hoepli, Milan, 1930,
vol. I, pp. 401-404.
41. David, L. Yarnell: Pile trestles Mchannel obstructions, U.S. Departmenl ol '
Agricult-u.Te, Technical Bulletin No. 429, July, 1934.
42. David L. Yarnell: Bridge piers as channel obstwctions [T.S. Depr:lrtmenl of
AgriC'ltUur 6, Technical BuUetin No. 442, November, 1934. '
43. L: Escande al;ld G., Saba.~he: Sur l'emploi des prolils aerodynamiqtles pour les
pIles de ba;rages deversolrs, de barrages mobiles et les piles des ponts (Use of
~erOdyn~llC profiles for mov",blp. dams aod bridge piers), Re!lU.~ ¢nemle ds
I hydrauhqne, Paris, vol. 2, no. 10, pp. 546-5li5, 1936. '
44. Leopold Escande: Recherches sur l'ecoulement de l'eau entre les piles des ponts
(Researches on the flow of water through the piers of bridges), pt. A, and Remll.rque
sur Ie cll.icul du remous provoqlle par un pont (Remark on the calculation of the
backwater caused·by a bridge), pt. B, Le. G~nie civil, vol. U5, no. 6, pp. 113-117,'
A~g. 5; no. 7, pp. 138-140, Aug. 12; and llO; 13, Pl" 259-260, Sept. 13, 1939.
45. Leopold Esnande: ~xperience.s sur l'ecoulement entre piles de ponts (Experihtents
on flow through piers of bridges), Compte.; renduil de l' Acad.emie. des Sciences
vol. 209, pp: 14-16, July 3 1939. ' ,
·16. Leopold Escande: Sur l'e~oulement entre piles de ponts (On the flow through

520 RAPIDLY "VA.RIED FLOW
piers of bridges), Com.ptell rCIu:i.ItS d.e l' Acadpmie des Sciences, vol. 108, pp. 1970-
197:/;, JIlne 19, l ! l 3 ! J . . .
47. Leopold Esco.nde: Recherches sur l'ecoulement de l'eau entre .pll~. de ponts
(Resellrcl.es on the How of w:J.ter through piers of bridges), I;e G~nte C'tmt, voL 115,
no. 5, pp. 113-117, Aug. 5; and no,. 7, p~. 1~8-1.40, Aug. 12. 1;39. '.
48. Etienne Crausse: Sur un phenomene d oscl\latlOn du plarr d eau provo que pa.
I\~coulement autour d'obstllcles en form de piies de ponts (On the phenomenon
of oscillation of watel' surface caused by flow a.round obstacles in the form ot
bridge piers), CDmp!es rendus £I;: l' Academie des.8ciences, voL 209, pp. 197-199,
Julv 24,. 1939. .
49. Otto St~eck: "Gmnd- und Wa.sserbau" (il Foundation lLnd Hydraulic Engmeer-
ing") Spriuger-Verlag. Berlin, 1950, vol. 2, pp. 420,,434.
50. J o~ef ' Ko~eny: "HydrauHk j' (" Hydraulics"), Springer-Verlag, Vienna, 195jl,
Pll. 546-549.
51, l)hili-pp Forchheimer: "Hydrt'!.'ulik" ("Hydraulics"), 3d ed., Teubner yer-
lagsg;~sellsch!lft, Leipzig and Berlin, Hl30, pp. 519-522 on backwater a~ bru:!g-e
piers and pp. 522-:524 on ioss of head at trash. ri1cks. .
52. Armin Schoklitsch: "Handbuch des Wasaerbaues" ("Handbook of Hydrauhc
Engineering"), Springer-Verlag, Vienna, 1950, vol. 1, pp. 122-124 on backwater
oJ bridge piers and pp. 125-127 on loss of head :J.t trash racks.· . 69.
53. Otto Kirschmer: Unters\\chungen liber den Gefallsverlust an Rechen (Studles on
the head loss through a rack), Mitteilungen des hydraulischen I nst-Uuts der tech-
nisc/llm HocMclmle JltIilnchen, no. 1, pp. 21--41, Mllliic~l, 1926.. . New York, 1950, pp. 540-541-.
54. W. ~'ellellius: Undel'sokinglll' betroffande faUf5riuster 1 skyddsgrmder vld vatten-
kraftanlOggninp;er (Studies of heu.d·loss through racks in power pla.nts), Tran$-
aclirms, Hyr/"alliic Institute of the Royal Technical University of Stockholm, no. 5,
1927. . .
55 .. J. 'Spangler: Untersuchungen tiber den Vel'lust all Rechen beischr!i.g~ Z~stromullg
(Studies on the head tollS through a ra.l!k inclined to stream flow). r.bttel{un~en d~s
hydr~lllichen I nstituts 4er technischen H ochschttle M tincher., no. 2, pp. 46-60,
Munich, 1928. . .. • .
56. E. Scimemi: Jlilievi sperimentali sui funxionan:.ento idraulico del grandl. Impla~tl
industriali ('Experimental studies on the hydmulic function of large mdustrHl.l
plants, L' Energia ele/lrica, MilanI), vel. 10, no. 9, pp.7Q5-723, Sep~ernber; no. 11,
pp. B97.-924, November, 1933.
57. Armin Schoklit.sch: "Hydraulic Structures," translated from the German by
Samuel Shulits, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, 1937,
. vol. II, pp. 891-892. . . . . .
58. Leopold Escande: Expression de Ie. perte de charge a. la traversee des gnlles
(E:<:pressionof the head loss in water through grills), Com:ptu rendlls de I' AcCl-
d~mie des Sciences va!. 218, pp. 179-181, Jan. 31,1944.
59. Leopold Escande;' 1!:turle experirnentalii de 'Ia perte de charge Ji. In. .tllra)verCsee des
, I grilles (Experiment!!.1 studies of head lo~s m water through gn s, ,ompws
rer,dlls de l'Acad~",ie des Sciences, vol. 218"pp. 266-268, Feb. 14, 1944.
j 60. Leopold EsCl1nde: Etude theoriq,ue, et experimentl1le ?e.
la perte de charge de
l'eal.l i Ie. traversee d'une grille (Theoretical and expemnentl1l study of tho head
loss in waLer through 0.. grill), Le G~rlie civil, vol. 122, no.. Z3, pp. 188-190,
Dec. 1; and flO. 24, pp. ·197-HJ8, Dec. 15, 1945.
61. David H. Kent: l\lodt"ls of hydra.'alic stnlctures, pt. I, Water Power, London,
vol. 7, no. S, pp. 301-307, August, 1955.. Gives head losses through tailrace fish
screens. '11 d
62. FI~yd A. Nagl~r and Albion Davis:.Experiments on discharge over Spl ways an
J
t, FLOW THROUGH NONPRISMATlC CHANNEl, SECl'IONS
models, Keokuk Da.m, Transactions, American' Society of Civil Engtneers, vol. 94,
521
pp.77F820, 1930.
63. Louis G. Puis: Spillway discharge capacity of Wilson Dam, Transactions, Amer-
ican Society of Civil Engineers, vol. 95, pp. 316-329, 1931.
64. E. Camichel, L. Escande, and G. SalJl;.th~~ Sur la similitude des barrages a COD.-
tractions latel'~les (On the similitude of dams with lateral contractions), Compte.
rendus de l' AcaMrnie deJl Sciences, voL 194, pp. 807:-809, Mar. 7, 1932.
65. E. Camichel, L. Escande, and P. Dupin: RemarqUB!l sur certains phenom~nes de
contractions laterales dans Ire barrages (Not~son cert.ain phenomena of late.ral
contractions ill 'dams), 90mples rendus de l' Acad6mie de.t Sciences, vol. 197,
pp. 722-725, Oct. 9, 1933.
66. O. Mueller: Schwingungsuntersuchungen an unher:;trornten Weh,en (Vihration
studies on underflow weirs), Mitteilungen aer preussischen Vel'suchsanstall fur
WM3erbau und Schiffba.u, no. 13, Berlin, 1933.'
6;. J. B. Tiffany: Laboratory research applied to the hydraulic design of large d&.ms,
U.S.A.rmy Enflin~r8 Waterways Ezperi-m;enl Station, 'Bulletin 32, 194!f
Harold R. Henry: Discussion of Diffusion of submerged jets, by M. L. Albel·tson,
Y. B. Dai , R. A. Jensen, and Hunter Rouse, Tra1l.8(JctiQ:/I.I!, American Society of .
Civil Enaineers, vol. 115, pp. 63i-69-i. 1950.
Arthur Tach; Discharge chara.cteristics of Tainter gates, Transactions, A'lL61'ican
Society of Civil Engineers. yoL 120, pp. 290-300, 1955. .
70. Hunter Rouse (editor): "Engineering Hydraulics," John Wiley &; Sons, Inc.,
71. Leopold Escande:lttude theoriq,ue et experimentale de l'e~o\llement pal' vanne de
fond (Theoretical and experimental study of fiow through sluice gates), Revue
g~n~rale de l'hydraulique. Paris, vol. 4, No. 19, I)P. 2.5-29, no. 20, pp. 72-79, and
00.21, pp. 120-128, 1938; vol. .5, no. 25, pp. 21-34, no, 26, pp. 65-77 and 131-139,
1~~ ..
72. Georg Pager: 'tlber'den Strijm~ngsvorga.ng an einer unterstromten scharfkantigen
PlanschUtzll (The flow characteristics at an underflow sluice gate), Zeitschrift fur
angewtl.ndtil Mathema.#k und Jiechanik, Berlin, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 259-269, October.
1937. .
73. T. Brook Benja.min: On the flow in channels whf'n rigid obstacles are. placed in Lhe
stream, Jlm'mal of Fluid Mechanics, L<mdorl, vol. I, p~. 2, pp. 227-248, July, 195(t
H. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: T"inter gates or. spillway I.lrests--Discharge coeffi-
cients, Hydraulic Design Charts 311-1 to 311-5, WES 3-56, in "Corps of Engi-
!leers Hydr6.ulic Design Criteria," prepared for th<l Office of the Chief of Engineers
U.S. Army Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, r,·Iiss., 1952:
and revised in subsequent years.
75. Na~jr Ahmad: Mechanism of erosion below hydraulic works, Pr()c~6dings of Ihe
I Minnesota Interno.:ional Hydra.ulics Convention, J (lint meeting i;f fnlsNi.,liional
Associat·ion of Hydro.ulic Research and Hydmu.lics Di~i8i()n of the American Socieiy
of Ci'L'il Enaineen, pp. 133...:143, A1lgust. 19.53. '
76. Doddiah Doddill.h, Mauric~ L. Albertson, and Robert Thomas: Scour from jets,
I!
Proceedings of the l;linnesota Ini.ErnatiDnal"Hydra.1.I.Iic,\ Convention, Jai.71t meeting of
Intematio1'..al Association of Hydraulic Resea.rch and Hydraulic6 Division of the
A.merican Society of Civil Engineers, pp. 161-169.. August, 1953.
77. Armin' Schoklitscb: "Stauraumverlandung und Kolkahwehr" ("The Silting of
•
Reser,(oirs and Scour Prevention"), Springer-Verlag, Vienna, 1935.
78. C. M. Camichel: Contribution a l'etud!l des veines liquides: Les indet.erminations
et les solutions multiples dB.l:Jsleurs rapports avec I'hydra.uliq,ue fiuviale (Contribu,
tion to·the theory of liquid jets: Indete.--minn.cies and multiple solutions in relation

522 RAPIDLY VARIED FLOW
to fI~vi!l.1 hydraulics); Revue generllle de l'hydral!lique, Pll.ris, vol. 1, !lO. 5, 'pp. 235-
242, and no. fI, pp. 293-2g9, 1935. . .
79. Irby J. Hiclccnlooper, John C. Guillou, and Ven Te Chow: HydraulIc stu~les of ~
highway bridge, University of lilinoi.s, Civil Engineerinfl Stl.die~, H ydraHhc Engt-
neering Be·ties No.4, June, 1957. . '
80. Edward H. Taylor: Flow characteristics at rectangular open-channel Junctions,
Transactions American 8od~!y of Civil ,Engineers, voL 109, pp. 893-003, 1014.
81. Charles E. Bowers: Studies of open-channel junctions, pt. V of Hydraulic mode!
studies for Whiting Field Nl1vll.l Air Station, lI>lilton, Florida, Univ6rlli!y OJ
Minnesota, Sl. Anth~my Falls Hydraulic Laboratory, Technical Paper No. 6j Serie3
B, Januaty, 1950.
I
I
l
I.
. PART V
UNSTEADY FLOW
The unsteady-flow problem most commol1Iy encountered in open
channels deals with translatory waves. The translatory wave is a gravity
wave that propagates in an open chal1l1el and results in appre<::iable.
displacement of the water particles in a direction parallel to the flow. l
In actual open-chi.mne] flow, the water particleslllay also oscillate. How-
ever, the effect of oscillation is insigllificant in the problems to be dis-
} cussed in this book. .
I . For purposes of analytical discussion, unsteady flow is classified into
i
!
two types, namely, gradually varied ;md rapidly varied ullsteady flow.
I
In the first type the curvature of the wave profile is mild, and the change
! in depth is graduaL The vertical component of the acceleration of the
i water particles is negligible in comparison wich the tota! acceieratiol1,
I
J
whereas the effect of channel friction is usually appreciable and should
be taken Into account in &\1 accurate 'analysis. In the second type the
curvature of the wa.ve profile is very large and so the surface of the profile
may become virtually discontinuous. 'rhe vertical acceleratioll com-
ponent, therefore, plays an important part in the phenOInenOI1, whereas
the effect of channel friction is practically negligible in comparison with
the dynamic effect of the flow, Common examples of gradually varied
unsteady flow are Hood waves and waves due to slow operation of COll-
trolling,structures, such as .the and sluices in ship locks. Exa.mples
of rapidly varied unsteady flow are surges of various kinds caused by
quick operation of controlling structures.
Gradually varied unsteady flow will be discussed in Chaps. 18 and 20,
and rapidly varied unsteady fiow in Chap. 19. 2 For extensive iniorml1-
tion on unsteudy flow in open channels, see [5J to [20J.
1 Another basic type of gra.vity wave is the oscillatory wave, in which the W8.ter
particles oscillate in an orbit Il.bout a mean position but do not display appreciable
displac~ent In the direction of wa.ve propagation.
2 Other kinds of waves !lod tides in open ohannels a.re beyond the scope of the
present work. For comprehensive inform!l.tion or-water wa.ves, see [IJ to [3!. For
references on tidal hydraulics, the reader should refer to the extensive bibliographies
prepared by t!;.e Committee on Tidal Hydraulics, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers [4J.
523 . ... \
 CHAPTER 18
GRADUALLY VARIED UNSTEADY FLOW

1
18-1. Continu;ity of Unsteady Flew. The law of continuity, for
unstea,.dy flow may be established by considering the conservation of
m~ss in an infinitesimal space betw~en tWQohannel sections (Fig. 18-1).
In unsteady flow, the discharge changes with dista.nce at a rate fJQ/ax,

loilio1
wafer
surface

FIG. 18-1. Concimdty of 'Uustea.dy flow.

and the depth changes with time at a rate ay/at. r~e change in dis-
charge through space in the time dt is (aQ/ax) d$ dt. The corresponding
change in ch['.nnel storage in space is T dx (ay/iJt) dt = dx, (aA/at) dt.
Since water is incompressiblel-~~!?Il!::!~lus thech@J~'l
in stomge should be zero; that is,

(~~) Liz dt + T dx (~~) dt = (!~) dx dt + dx (~1) dt = 0

SImplifying,
fJQ + 7' ay = 0 (I8-1) J
ax at
or aQ + aA = 0 (18-2) , ../
ax at
At a given section, Q V A; thus Eq. (lS-I) becomes

fJ{VA) + T ay = 0 (18-3) ."",.-

ax, at
525
 j j inJ I ~6P ~c 'c/'d'v:mt-rt9 ·
! ·1
526 UNS'rEADY FLOW
GRADUAr,LY VARIl!JD UNSTEADY FLOW 527
or A aV + V ~~ + T ay= a small, that ~he ac~e].eration is in the direction of x,' and that its vertical
ax ax at (1&-»'/ II
c?mponel1~ IS neghglble, Thus, the work done by this force through a
Since the hydraulic -depth D
may be written
= A/T and aA =. T ay, the above equa.tion
. I
distance d:between .the· two channei· seotions shown in the figure is
(w/g)(a V/at) dx. ThIS amount of work is equal to the energy los,
/' i
(18-5) , due t? acceleration. Dividing by W,' the loss iil head is expressed b;
(1/ghav/3t) dx.

The above equations are all forms of the cont~'nuity equation j07' unsteady , The over-all challge in head in the infinitesimal leilgth dx may bA
flow in open channels. For. f1 rectl1ugubr channel of infinite width, treated exactly as in steady flow, except, that an additional loss dUe t~
Eq. (18-I) may be written
~~d' _ _-->I
iJq • ay _ 0 ,Acc!!!lerot1on Irne.s.Jope :$0
ax T at - (18-6)
1-' -r""~ ===--=.. - - -::"....
I hiha,qaT dX
I <IV
Q::!..~ [n~y~:::::::::-==-~
where q is the- discharge per unit width. This expression Wfl,S first, 29 e J1 oPe ,--':-z-I h,'S,dx
.:l- I Sf/'---'-
introduced by Saint-Venant. [21).
When the channel is to feed laterally with ::t. supplementary di.,chnrg.;)
.r WOle, '

of q' pel' unit length, for instance, into an area that is being flooded over a )' i . ,¥:+d(af-qZ) 1
1
dike, Eq. (18-2) may be written ' I ~.
~ISodl
Channel b

aQ
ao;
+ aA + q' = 0 (18-'1) ....L.,_ - - '_'"
z
"" • ed. Slope,s
a ---l
y+dy
-i
L L' __ y~u~~o':.:. __ ~"--.l
CJt 1 I ~ i
z+dz
'If the channel consists of a deep main section and an extensive, shallow .
side section, it l1HW be assumed that., whereas the discharge in the main
FIG. 18-2. Simplified represent,ation of energy in unsteady flow.
section is relatively very high, the side section cOli tributes only to storage
but not to discharge. Thus, Eq. (18-2) may be written
J,-----"'.... acceleration must be included. The total loss inhead will.consist of two J
aQ + aA + aA' 0 (18-8) parts: the loss due to friction hI = Sf &..and the loss due to accel r t' ~

.J
=
ax at·. at h -(lIr)(ri2tTrrl.1'+)d":" 1'h . . ealOn
-~__._Lf!~~ e Ime mdicating the loss due to acceleratim'C'
where A' is the water area of the side' section. This equation also shown as. th~ accelemNon line; its slope is Sa = (I/ql (;IV iat):="J3., t~S
energy pnllelple, the foHowing may be writt~~-'_._ - e
applies to the case of a ohannel containing groins; the water oircllIates
between the groins to guide the fiow in the main channel but not to D'V2 V 2
/L,M"'Rrr...~SH1tribute discharge.
2 + y + 2i =z+ dz +y+ dy +~ + (
d D'V2
)
+!:. a v d.
d. +S .

gat x ~
~ 18-2. Dynamic Equation for Unsteady Flow. For simplicity,! , . 2g 2g
----. (18-9)
:(f;<() .+l1tJ/y' unsteady flow will be treated like two~dill1ensional steady flow except Simplifying,
- - - - - that an additional variable for the time element will be used. This time
variable takes into account the variation in velocity of flow and accord-
d (+ +. 2{j-
.2 V
D'V2)
= -...'I, d:I; -
1 aV'" .
gat dx (18-10)
-I
ingly brings to the fore the aoceleration, ,'thich produces force and
causes additional enel~gy losses in the flow. 2 !he left side of thi~ equation represents the change in total head. The
With reference to Fig. 18-2, the force due to acceleration J V! at acting ":vo terms o~ the l'lght. are the head losses due to friction and accelera-
on a unit weight w of water is equal to (wig) avjt1t; that is, force = tion, respectively. ThIS equation states that the change in tot-'ll head
roass X acceleration. , It is assumed that the slope of the channel is i I Sin~e there are two inde end t .:., ' .
velocity head are' each comp~sed:~ ~::I;a~:ss. ~h:~~.\th:ChaIlges in depth an~in
1For rigorous analyses~of unsteady flow, see [5J, [6], [9J, [111, !l5] and [20J. and d(",P/2g) = [aCo: V '12g)/ax] dx + [a(o:V;/2 )/ ~]' y (ay/ax) tirc + (By/a,) dl
2The acceleration is positive for an increasing velocity of flow and negative for a ' does not vary with tim. az/a~ _ d-/d d g at dt. As the channel bottom
decreasing velocity of flo'Y. ' ., ~ - ~ x an az/at = 0 Fo th k' f ' 1"
these mathematical details 'tt d f . r· e sa e 0 simp IClty,
. are oml e rom the present analysis.

.. -.-,": " ~ - ,I
I
 528 . UNSTJ':ADT FLOW GRA.DUALLTVAIUED UNSTEA.DY FLOW 529
I- in gra.dually varied unsteady flow depellds Oil the effects of friction and Q2. The depth of the wavefront is gradually varied from the upstreani
i acceleration. In gradually varied sten.dy flow, the chn.nge in head section to the downstream section. During a time interval t, the wave-
depends entirely on friction, provided eddy loss is negligible. front moves forward a di~tallce equal to V",t. The wave velo'city is
Dividing through by dx in Eq. (18-10) and utilizing parti<'ll diffel'entials, greater than either of th~ mean velocities V 1 and Vi' in the uniform-flow
regions. When the wavefront passell ~ver the flow in the channel, it
-'--:-= + Sf a +.i.
x
(0:2g.
V2) + .!g aatv = 0 (18-11.) takes in a steady discharge (Y", - V 1) A i at the front. Since the
"rave configuration is of stable form and coilstant volume, the front
or
av + ---
+ o:TT -::- 1 &Y Jz
+ -~ + Sf. = (I (18-12) leaves behind an equal st.eady discharge Qo = (V,. - V 2)A 2 to the
g a.1: IL8L-- 0;1-
ThL'S is the geneml dynamic (J(pwtivn 101' gr'adnally tlaried unsteady flow.
The friction slope in the equation can be evaluated by the Manning
formula, the Chezy formula, or any other suitable uniform-flow furmula.
For prisnmtic channels, i.e., for -dZ/CJX = So, Eq. (18-12) may be
written
(18-13)

The continuity and dynamic equations for gradually varied unsteady , FIG. 18-3, Monoclinal rising wave.
flow were first published by Saint-Yel1:1.ut [21,22J. The validity of these
equations has been verified by. many observations and experiments. upstream side. The steady dischlLrge Qo which flows through the wave-
_-~How~.!~12-?wing to their !!l.!~th~m!l:~~cal ~<:lln:pJ,:,.xity., e:.Xfl:.<;~ ~ntegra!ioll of front in' the upstream clirE.'ction is called the OV/3T7"un. Equating the
the equatio!!!L-i:::1!ra!lt..icalll':.. jIIJ.RQ~ibJe~ ~~~,-~ct~I:!~Ll!Pm!Qatiolls, ~ values of the steady discharge,
~~utiOl:"?~ th'U~.ID.l~ti.Q!!E!J!!~Y.~.Ql)t!tiiled by approximate sten IIJ.ethod§ Q. = (Vw ( 18-H:)
or by methods based on siIIJ.plifying assuIIJ.ptions .
. 18-3. Monoclinal Rlsing Wave. A special caSe of uilsteady now Solving for V w, (18-15)
which is nearly possible in prismatic Ch2..1111els is uniformly pTogrei1~ve
This type of flow has a stable ,"?ove profile that will not change in Since in uniform-flow
as .it moves dowl1 the channel: According to this definition, may be written
uniformly progressive flow has the following notable features: (1) the
(18-16)
successive positions of the wavefront at different times are parallel; (2)
the velocity of the wavefront, or celerity, is greater than the mean water
velocity at any section of the wave; and (3) the wave configuration travels The above equations can be used for the computation of the velocity
downstream with a constantvelocl}ty, but the mean water velocity in the of the monoclinal wave. Equation (18-15) shows that, if there is
no initial flow, that if Vl 0 and = 0, then V",= V z• If there is
cross section may vary from section to section as the hydraulic radius
and surface slope change. Of va,dons forms of wave configuration in initial flow, then V w is always than either TTl or V 2. Thiil is
I, -r }ih~.m01!f'clinal riS'in~will pc taken as a
true because the wave must move more rapidly than the water particles
I the following discussion, because such a wave can be ; ------?>-if it is to make up the volume of the wave configuration at any time.
~ In natural channels, the velocity of an assumed mOlloclinal rising
approximated to most flood mwes in ria.tural channeLs il.nd because it is
subject to simple mathematical treatment. . flood wa.ve may be d~termined by the so~called Kleitz-Seddan principle.
! The 111onoclillal rising wave (Fig. 18-3) is il. translatory wave of stable
Equation (18-16) indicates that the velocity of a monoclinalhsing wave
\ is a function of the water .area' and the discharge relationship for the
.form, that is, a uniformly progressive wave, that travelsdowl1 the channel
at constant velocity V w from an upstream region of uniform flow having 1 channel. Figure 18-4 shows a curve representing such a relationship.
'lhI V 1, and Ql to a downstream region of uniform flow having YZl Va, and
For ordinary channel sections in which. the velocity increases as the water
 530 UNSTEADY FLOW GRADUALLY vAln~D UNSTEADY FLOW .531
area increases, this curve is concave upward. In the figure, tan lh = maximllmwave velocity.and the water velucity. in a prismatic channel.
QdAl = 17 1 , tall O2 = QdAz = V 2 , and tan Ow = (Ql - Q2)/(A 1 - On the basis of the Manning formula, the raLio can be shown to be 1.67,
A 2) = 17",= the slope of the line P 1P 2 • Since the curVe is concave 1.33, and 1.44, for wide rectangular, triangular, and wide parabolic
upward, it can be seen that VUI must be. greater than either V lor V 2. For cha.nnels, respectively. On the basis of the Chez;y formula, the corre-
a maximum V,., the slope of the line P1P z must be a maximum. This sponding ratios are 1.50, 1.25, and 1.33.
occurs when QI = Q2 or when the point P 2 approaches the point PI and Equations (18-17) and (18-18) apply only to small rises in flood stage,
where the wavefront has such slight slope and rise that the term dQ/dy
I
Q can appropriately be taken from the rating curve for uniform flow.
The principle o£ the above method was originally developeu, mathe- -I
0, -------- PI matically by Kleitz [27], but was discovered from actual observations by
,./ I
/17 I
/1 'j I
I, I
Seddon [28] in a strIdy of gage heights on the Mississippi and Missouri
Ri'!ers. Wilkinson [29J has described the application of the method
./ /1 L-t-Um,ting position of ~ Pz I to the Clinch· and Lower Tennessee Rivers. He conoluded that the
// I !. I I wave velocity in such natural channels can be well approximated by this
/ I ! I method. ~ He found that mid-points of rise or fall stages were best
/ I ! 1 suited for determining the velocity of an observed wave.
/
_L_
I
...,. I Pz "
!
I I
,
tori (max VJ
I 18-4. Dynamic Equation.for Uniformly Progressive Flow. In a, time
interval dt, the w!),vefront of a uniformly progressive flow (Fig. 18-3)
')A \
will travel a distance V", dt. It can be shown that,as the wave advallces, ·1
i
the velocity of flow decreases with distance at a rate -ov/ax. There-
fore, the change in velocity in dt is dV = - V,. dt (aV lax) . . Using partial (
differentials, av/at = -VwcaV/CIx). .
FIG. 18-4.. Graphical interpretation of water area, discharge, allti velocity relations in
IDonodinal rising wave. . .
An equ:atiOll similar to Eq. (18-14) can be l.vritten for the general case
of uniformly progressive flow; that. is, Q. = (V", - Tf)A. Differentiat-
I
ing thiR equation with respect to x, av/ax =' CQo/AD)(ay/Clx).
the slope of the secant P 1P 2 approaches the slope of the tangent at point Substituting the above expressions for ov/at and all'/ih:, respectively,
PI as a limit. Therefore, in Eq; (18-13), assuming a = 1, and simplifying, By/aJ: IO!' the flow in a
dQ prismatic channel is
(V"')m~~ = dA (18-17)
ay = 8 0 - Sf j
(18-19)
Since dA = T dy, the above equation becomes
dX 1 - Q.Z/gA2D I
Since Sf = Q2/K2 = YZA2/K2 = (V",A - Qo)2/K2, Eq. (18-19) be-
(18-18) comes
By 8 0 . - (VtDA - Q.P/J(2
(18-20) .
where dQ/dy is the slope of the rating curve of the channel. If the top ~ ax= l-QNgA2D
!
width of the channel section is known, the maximum velocity can be
computed by this equation. Likewise, if the maximum velocity is
i This is the dynamic eq·ttation for uniformly progn;ssive ftowin a p.1'ili-
! malic channel. Since the flow is unsteadY;-Uiepositfon of the wave
known, the average width of the channel can be determined. The term • prOftl€ischanging constantly, but the shape of the profile at ariy instant
d!)Jdy at a given stage rna;: be computed from the mean slope of the 1I remains the same. Equation (18-20), therefore, describes a "snapshot ':'
..!-ating_curves at gaging stations in the reach under col1sicieratiojl. The
maximum velocity 17,. can. be determined from the distance and time of i view of the profile at any instant. For wide rectangularchannels J
the equation can he further simplified and becomes mathematically
the wave travel between th!:.l stations. - . -
integrable. It should be noted that ay/ax represents the insta.ntaneous
• Equation(18-18) may also be used to determine the ratio bet'iveen the surface slope of the wave profile. At a. given instant of time, this is
 532 UNSTEADY FLOW
GRADUALLY YA.RdllD UNSTEADY FLew 533
the same as the permanent slope dy / dx and hence: may also be expressed
by the latter. . In the equation, the normal discharge Q" can be determined from the
There
. is an lLpparent
. similarity
.' betwee~ (18' -'10)
., and th e 'd' .
yna.mIC rating cui've at the station, and other quantities can be measured in the
e~ll~tr~n for steLl,dy varied flow [say, (9-16) with a = I}. This field. A similar. equation has been developed empirically by Jones [30J
slllilanty can, be exp:ained as follows. Imagine that an observer on the and is used widely for correcting the normal discharge to obtain the true
~ha.unel ban1l: ,IS l'~nnm.glljter the uniformly progressive flow of Fig. 18-3 discharge in a river when the stage is changing. In the Jones formula,
In the same dn'ectwn and at the same velocity, V., as the "mvefront. H~ however, the wave velocity .in Eq. (18-24) is l;eplaced by the surface
will see 11 picture of a stead v flow velocity, .which is much easier to determine but lower than the hue wave
like that ill Fig. 18-5; the "water velocity. A more exact equation than Eq, (18-24) may be obtained from
surfa~e will appeilr statioD.ary .to Eq, (18-21) by letting dy/dx -j/V" and solving for Q. However, the
him,and the flow will. show a derivation and the resulting form of the equation are too complicated for
discharge Qc and a veloc- practi.!l1l purposes.
ity ,Vw Y nt every point along 18-5. Wave Profile of Uniformly Progressive Flow. The wave profile
the channel. Therefore, if Qo is of uniformly flow can be easily der~ved for wide rect~1ng1.llar
FIG. 18-5. View appearil\g to the observar .regarded as a steady dischaq,~e,
channels by using the Chezy formula. For the unit width of a wide
who follows the wavefront of a uniformly the steady-v!l.ried-flow equation rectangular channel, A R D = y. By the Chezy formula, ](2 =
progreJ;slve flow, 02y3. Substituting these expressions in Eq. (18-20), the slope at any
can be applied directly 'to this
. . uniformly progressive flow except point on the wave profile at a given instant of time may be expressed as
t.~at the dIscharge used for computmg the frictional slope should be set (V",y - Q.)2/0as o
equal to .VwA ~ Qo. This discharge is responsible for the frictional loss. = So 1"
y
y3 - QNg
(18-25)
The dlscha~ge [~t any section of a uniformly progressive flow is Q =
VlOA - Q.. ~ hl1s, Q. Vwi! - Q, ll.nd Eq. (18~20) beco:Q:les Whendy/dx O,theaboveequationgivesy 3 - (V",y - Q.)2/02S 0 0
This is a cubic equation in y; the nature orits three roots may be deter-
mined by a discriminant ~.l The equation ',~ill give three different real
(18-21)
roots if ~ > 0; three real roots, two of them alike, if ~ = 0; and one real
~f the velocity i~ very low, so that the second te~ of the denominator root and two imaginary roots if ~ < O. It can be shown that t.he third
v:hlCh covers the velocity-head. effect, can be neglected, the above eaua~
tlOn may be written •
. case will produce no possible wave profiles and that the second is a special
case of the first. For A > OJ the cubic equation may be written
(y -: Yl)(Y y~)(y - Va) = 0, where the two positive roots Yl and Y2
dy
. (18-22) are, respectively, the final and initial ncrm.aldepths to which the wave
dx
profiles are asymptotic~ The third root can be found to be v. = Q~2/
02S oYlY 'l.. Since Y3 is. not asymptotic to any real branch of the wave
profile, it has no physical significance.
Q = Q" (18-23) When dyjdz = r;o, Eq. (18-25) gives y = vQ,,2/u = !Ie. This is
called the OI.lBn'Un critical depth, or the critical depth corresponding to a
, L~t j represen~ the ratf'l of rise in the water surfJ).ce at a given channel steady discharge equal to the overrun. Therefore, the wave profile. is
,sectIOn,: 1?en, J = V,,:dy/dx, or dy/dx -JJT1... Substitutin this vertical !at the overrun-critical-depth line. .
expressIon 111 Eq. (18-23), . g Substituting y.3for Q,zjg and (y.- Yl)(Y - Y2)(y '- Ya) for the numer-
i ator in Eq. (18-25) and solving for x,

,
:Q = Q",
'" 1
(18-24) I
,

X '7 -
So
1 f ,

":
;

,;3 - y 3
< dy
(y - Yt)(Y - yz)(y - Ya) .
I

,
+ 0 1 !: (18-26)
This equation can be used t~ compute approximatblY the true discharge . !
of .an unsteady flow at 13. given station, provided the velocity is low. 1 The equa.tion can be written in. the form y' + cIY~ + elY +' Ila == O. 'l:'hen,
11 = 18c'f'c. 4Cl"C, + C)IC~I - 4c 2' '-'27c ....
534 UNSTEADY FLOW GRADUALLY VARIED UNSTEADY FL01V 535
where C l is an integration constant. With the given values of V w , Qo, voir into a dry 'wide rectangular channel. Use I,he Manning formula for expressing
the velocity of uniform :t!o\v. ,
So, a.nd C, thi$ equation represents a number of possible wave pro1iles.
Solution. In this case the wavefront moves in a steeply inclined wall of water whose
For a monoclinal rising wave having an initial stageYl and a. final stage profile is apparently uncilanging as long 'as 'the channel conditions remain fixed and
Y2, the possible profiles are shown ill Fig. 18-6 for Yc < Y2 and Yc > 1/2. the source .of supply is constant. Therefore, this can be considered a special case of
Theoretically, in the case Yc < Y2, the wavefront extends an infinite uniformly progressive flow, known specifics-lly as t.he roll wave in which A! 0 -I
distance downstream, since the wave profile is asymptotic to the down-: Vz = 0, Q" = 0, and V .. "" v', c -,/ii~s;. Subs~itutin:g the ~:alues of Qo alld of
V wand K = CA "/11 ill Eq. (18-20),
stream stage. This may seem unreasonable, because the wave actually
starts at a finite time and tra.vels with a finite velocity. The explanation
is that the wave profile descdhed above will become stable only after
dy
Ja: == S. (
1 (18-21)
.1r
LetYl ;, Y" which is the norm!!.l depth at the crest of the W/l,ve, where the flow is
pr:l.ctically uniform. Solve Eq. (18-27) for dx; then

1 ) d (18-28)
1 V/Y. Y

, . Choose the tip of the wavefront, whe.·e x = 0 and y = 0, as the origin; and integrate
. the above equation; the length of the wave profile from the wavefront to the s~cti()n of
de;>th '!/ is
x = .!.
S. }O
r (1 _ =---,1'---,-~)'"
1/
1 V/'.}.
dy (18-29) .

FIG. 18-6. Profiles of uniformly progressive Row (11:) when y,

, 1-
< Yz or 17.. < 172 + V01hi Integrating,
(b) Ivhen Y. > Y2 or V", > Va + V OYz. y.,
x = S;!z + In (l z)] (IS-30)

the wave attain,s equilibrium. The first traces of the wave are trans-
mitted downstream by dynamic propaga.tion at a velocity V 2 + v'YiJ'lJ
which is much greater than the fin1ll wave velocity V". By this actiol1
the downstream end of an actual wave will approach the theoretic:),}
asymptotic form vel'y rapidly. If the velocity. V,. is greater than
+
V 2 Vfiiiz, it is evidently impossible for the wavefront to extend an
infinite distance downstream. This is the case 'when Yc > Y2. The
downstream end of the wave is terminated with an abrupt front which in
theory should cross the overrun-critical-depth line vertically .. The
front is essentially a rapidly varied ullstea,dy flo,;', known specifically as
the hydraulic bOr'e (Art. 19-2).
Example 18-1. Determine the wave profile of the nood generated by the failure of
a dam. 1 The failUre causes a sudden release of the. impOunding water from i!.s reser-
I This is the so-called dam-break problem, which is well-known in hydra,ulics. In
1892, Ritter [31) offered· the first solu~loll of the problem, using thea.pproximate
Saint-Venimt equation but ignoring the effects of the frictional and turbulence resist·
ance to the unsteady flow. Consequently, this unrealistic classical solution was not
8upportedby the experimental findings and more practics.l analyses had to be sought.
In 19B, Forchheimel" [5, pp. 267-271\ presented a ~ummary of most of the previous
work on this problem, including attem pts to include the'resistance effects.
Toward the end of World War n, Re[32) was instructed by the Allied Command
to study the problem in anticipation of possible destructiQn of the large da.ms on the
Rhine :River at the German-Swiss frontier. By a finite-difference graphical calcula-
tion of the char>'Lcturislic equations (Art. 20-2) developed by Craya (33], Re was able
to compute the fiov.' t.o be expeded from the destruction of 11 do.m for one specific
~ and of Chezy's resistance fa,rtQr. -rul~lud;:r the p;es;;nce
of some water initially below the dam, cau~ing the formation of a bore in his problem.
In 1952, Levin [341 described I!. solu~ion of the problem by a graphical method~ In
the S!l.rtle year, Dressler [35] presented a solution in which the resistance effect was
evaluat€d by the Chezy formula.. This solution gives good agreement with observed
data exceptin the region near the tip of the wavefront. Accordingly, it is believed
that the Chezy formula may not be adequate for application to bighly unsteady flow
or to t,he condition of turblJlence in the tip region. In 1953, Dressler and Whitham
[36J improved the solution by a more rigorous analysis of the, flQW at the tip region.
Dressler J36) &lso developed a method of analyzing the flow during the very small
time interval after motion begins. , .
Experimental data of the darn-breaking problem are few, notably the early Ilxpcri-
ment,s made by SSholditsh [37] and Egui:3.zaroff [SS] and the later coues by the U.S.
National Bureau of Standa.rds [36). . ,
A problem similar ~o that of dam breaking deals with the flow due to sudden lifting
of Ii'. sluice gate. A theoretical analysis of the wave profiles t)lUS developed was made
by Pohle [39) in 1950, assuming a. velocity potential flow in Lagrangian coordinates.
Experiments on this problem aiso were made at the National Bureau of Standards.
A compB,risOD. of the theories and experiments on both problems WllS preSented by
I?ressler [36J ill 1954. A comprehensive treatment of the dam-breaking problem along
hnes worked out by Pohle was giver. by Stoker [5, pp. 513-522j in 1951.

I.
 536 UNSTEADY FLOW GRADUALLY VARIED UNS'l'EADY FLOW 537
where z = V/V". This. equation Fepresents the required profile of the ron
wave due Example 18~3. Determine the wa.ve velocity and prome of a uniformly progressive
10 failure of the If the upstream supply of flow is limited, the profile 'of the
d;lIll.1 flow in a. wide open channel if YI = 25 ft, Y. = 10 ft, Qhezy's C = 100, and So =
wl1ve prnpB.gating ujlstream will be deseribed in Example 19-5, 0.0004.
Example 18-2. Determine the profile of the monoclinal rising wave in a wide Solu.tion. By the Chazy formula a.nd Eq. (18-15), V., = 12.45 fps. By Eq.
recta.ngular channel. The wave is lI.S~umed to move with a constant velocity with (18-14), Q, = 61.25 cis per unit width. Since the discriminant e. is positive, the
the nl!l.ximum stage unchanged over a long' period of time. . numerator of Eq. (18-25) has three rea! roots, which are Vi = 25, y. = 10, and
a
So/tllion; J'or unit width of the wide rectangular channel, Al = 111 and A, ~ y •. y, = 61.25 i /(100·X 0.0004 X 25 X 10) = 3.76. Tht; overrun critical depth y" =
Using the Chezy formula, V, = C Vy 1S0 !Lnd V, = C vY;S~. Substituting these ..y61.25~/32.2 = 4.89 ft. Since y. < Y" no hydraulic bore will be formed. Sub-
expressiCins in Eq, (18-15) and simplifying, stituting all known values in Eq. (18-26), .

where
Vw = )T,G
G = 1 - (Yl/y.)~2
(18-31)
:1)=
1
0.0004
f y' - 116.7 d
(y _ 25)(y _ lO)(y _ 3.76) . Y + C1 (18-40)
1 - yJ/y. (18-32)
Expmssed in partial fractions,
By Eq, (18-15), replacing Al and V l by A and V, respectively, for any given section

V" =
A,V,--AV
Ax - A (18-33)
x = _1_
0.0001
f (1 -
.
48.68 _ 9.437 _ 0.4~9'1)
25 - Y y -10 Y - 3.76
dy + C1 (18-41)
. i
I
! By integration,
Eliminating V w from Eqs. (18-31) and (18 e33) and solving for V,
i 1 [ (25 - y) ••.•• ] '
Gz
V= ( G - - - - V. 1) (18-34)
i x = 0.0004 Y + In (y _ 10)9.431(y _ 3.76)',<19' T CI (18-42)
\
Taking the origin at x= 0, y = 24, Eq. (18-42) gives C1 = 5,840, ThB wave profile
where Z = y/y" The wave profile under consideration is long and flat; hence, the by t.hi.s equat,ion is plott.ed as shown in Fig. 18-6a.
mean velocity V will change very slowly with respect to both time t and distance x,
Thus, aT';ax = 0 and DV IB/ = O. From Eq. (18-13), using ciifferentials, 18-6. Wave Propagation. Before further discussions of unsteady
dy flow, it seems pertinent to discuss the propagation oj gravity., wa~
dx = So - Sf (18-35)
~___--",,-;,-Channe}s. For this purpose, a single form of gravity wave, known as the'
Since V = C vYS; and V. = C Vy,S" Eq. (18-34) givRs ". c' solitary wave, will be deacribed. .
The solitarywav8 was first observed a.!!QjpvesiiK~ted experimentally
S, = ~
C'y
= S,z (G _ g -z !)' (18-36) by Russell [41].1 It has a simple form (Fig. 18-7), consisting wholly of
. an elevation without any associated trough or depression what.ever. The
Substituting this equntion fGr Sf in Eq. (18-35), wave lies entirely abOVe the normal water SlU'face and moves smoothly
G - 1)' and quietly without; turbulence at any place along its profile. In a
dy
dx =
So ( .
So - ~- G - -z 08-37) ~_>lrictionless ~ann~.!~e wave can travel an infinite distance without
or dx=Y2{I+
So
(GZ,-G+l)"
(% ..,.. 1)[.' - \G' - l)z (G _ 1)'J +
}d.U
(18-38) change of shape or velocity, but in an actual channel the height of the
By integration, wave is gradually reduced by the effects of friction, Such a wave can be
produced in E. laboratory by a sudden horizontal displacement of the gate
_ v, { I ln (G -- 1)'(2G + 1) . in the channel (Fig. 18-7) or by other means .•,In natu!:.,e, such waves
x-S; z+3_za (l-z) 2(3-2G) -In{.'-(G'-I)z+(G--,I)·j
.have been generated by earthquakes and have been obserye~ to tra;:;l
I' _ (G- 1)'[(2G' + I)(G + 1) -4J In 2z - (G' - 1) - (G - 1) V(G + 1)" - 4} across oceens.~=q
+ I)' - 4 - (G2 - 1) + (G - i) v(G + 1)'
I + G,
2(3 - 20) V(G 2. - ;I
(18-39)"
Consider a solitary wave, traveling to the right in a rectangular
chatrilel, with celerity.c (Fig. 18-7a). An observer on the shore running
where z = vlv" 11> is the depth at high stage, V is the depth at any section along the along with the wave crest at a velocity equal to the (',elerity will see a

I wave profile, G i~ defined .by Eq. (18·32), Yl is the depth at low stage, and C1 is a con-
stant tha.t call be det.ernuned from the condition that x = 0 when Y = (YI
1 For a. refined· solution of this problem, see [36J.
+
y.)/2,. I It was fu'st discovered by Russell in 1834. The mathemn.t,ical analysis of the
solitary wave was originally wo,kec! out jndependently by Boussinesq [42J and
Rayleigh [43]. A complete account of the analysis can be found in Lamb [3, pp. 423-
* Derivation of this equation was originally given by Moots [40]. ·126].

I
 I
--I
538 UNSTEADY FLOW GRADUALLY. VAlUED UNSTEADY FLOW 539
pictul'e of steady flow (Fig. 18-7b) in which the wave appears to stand the celerity of a solitary wave in a rectangular channel is
still while the flow moves at a velocity equal to c in magnitude. Neglect-
ing friction and assuming a small slope and a = 1 at all sections, the C =Vg(y + h) (18-48)
energy equation between the tlormal section of the flow and the section According to a Gompleteanalysis described byLamb [3, pp. 423-426J,
a more accurate equation for gravity waves in general, but stlll assuming
small heights, is
foX t h 21ry j
c \j21r an T (18-49) ..l
1
~ y ~.
>;7////9///)#/9/////)///
where A is the wavelength from crest to crest. This equ.,tion is generally
(b) known as the c.elerity equation in honor of its originator [47j. In
FIG. 18-7. Generation of asotitary WaNe. (a) Unsteadj- flow; (b) the flow that
appears steady to un observer following the wave crest.

at the wave crest may be written

c2
Y+2g=y+h+
CZ ( Y )2
y+h (18-43)
Solving for r,
c (18-44)
FlG. 18·8. Wave patterns createq. by disturbances, (a) Still water, V = 0; (b) sub·-
where h is the wltve height above the normal water surface. For waves c.ritical flow, V < c; (t;) critical flow; V = c; (d) Bupercritical flow, V > c.
of moderate height, Eq. (18-44) may be approximfl,ted by
deep water, where y is large comp!u'ed with A,the above equation becomes
c= ~gy (1 + ~:) = vgY(l + :~) (18-45) c. -./g;.,/'Er. For small-wave heights, Ais large compared with hand
tanh (21rY/A) may be· replaced by 21rY/)... Thus, Eq. (18-49) becomes
This equation is commonly known as the Saint- Venant celerity equation Eq. (lS-46).
in honor of its originator [44J. For waves of small height, h is negligible. The equation for celerity, either Eq. (18-46) or (18-47), may be used.
TIlliS, for studying the propagation of gravity waves. If a pebble is dropped
c = Vgy into still the wave pattern can be represented by the concentric
circles shown in Fig. 18~Sa. The waves travel away from the source
This is the equation for the propaga.tion of small waves in rectangular
of the disturbance in all directions with a velocity or celerity equal to c.
channels. It is commonly known as the Lagrange celeriiy equation after
If the water is fio.w-ing, the wave pattern produced by a disturbance will
Lagrange [45J, who first derived it.·
be displn.cedin the direction of flow. When the velocity V of the water
Similarly, it can be shown that the celerity of small waves in llon-
is less than the celerity, the wave pattern is as shown in Fig. 18-8b. ",
rectangular cha1111els is·.
Since the velocity of flow is less than the celerity, it is possible for the
c (18-47) wave to t.ravel upstream at a velocity equal to 1
where D is the hydraulic depth and is equal to A/T.
V tD "'" C -. V (18-50)
.In the above analysis, neither the centrifugal-force effect of the wave
curvature nor the vertical component of the acceleration of the water The wave traveling downstream is in the direction of ·fiow. Its velocity
particles is considered. According to field observ:ations mMe by Russell is ~ncreased to
[41] and experiments made by Bazin [46\, a more suitable equn.tioll fa!' 17.. c 17 + (IS-51)·
 540 UNSTEA.DY FLOW GRADUALLY YARIEDUNSTEADY IFLOW 541

Note that thb celerity represented byEq. (18-47) is identical with the ods suggested by Thomas [15] will be discussed. briefly. They are th~
critical velocity of the flo;~. (1-10)].; The fiow under consider-\Ltion is, . method oJ finite incre"!-e.h~ (called the complete method by Thomas) and
therefore, subcl'iticaL '¥) . . '-themethOd o{tl'ial and e;;O'I'. . '
When the velocity of the water is equal to the celerity, the wavefronts . By the method of finite increments, a reotangular channel is diyided
in the l+pstream direction ILre stationary, or V", = 0, and' those in the into reaches of
finite length L:.:t, The time interval under consideration
downstream direction have a velocity equal to V w' = 2c. This wa.ve
pattern is showl{ in Fig. lS~8c. The flow is, app~relltlYl criticaL.
When the velocity of the water'is greater than the cel<;1rity, the waves
will travel downstream only. This wave pattern is show11111 Fig. 18-8d.
The flo"r is, apparently, supercriticaL The lines tangent to the wa.ve-
fronts lie at an angle to the original direction of flow. The angle fJ is the
wave angle, and its magnitude is given by (16-15), 01' .

Sill fJ = ~_ v~ ~ ~ (18-52)

where Fist.he Fl'oude number.

The celel'ity c must be olearlydistinguished from the ab80lute waye
velocityY",. The celerity is the velocity of a wave relatiYe to the yelocity FIG. 18-9. Definition sketch for the method of finite increments, The subscript 1 is
for upstree,m section at initial state; 2 il> fOI' upstream I!e()ti~o oiter At; 3 is for down-
of flow. When the wave is propagated tln'ough still water, the celerity stream section at initW state; and 4 is for downstream section !lfter tJ.t,
is identical with the absolute velocitJr.. In open ch!>l1nels, the absolute
wave velocity is the Velocity of the wave relative to a certiLin fixed For a given reach, various elements are designated in Fig. IS-9.
is L:.t.
section of the channel. Mathemntically, a general equation may be
The follo\"ting notation, is used to adapt the unsteady-flow equations to
written, expressing the absolute wa ve'velodty as the vectorial sum of the
celerity and the undisturbed velocity 11 of the water through which the the use of finite increm~nts:
Wl\ve is propagated; this i.s
A = '~~--=-~_,::" ..C--_:
A4 = -;r
2:A
v'" = V + c (18-53)
These Yectol'S are, as 8. general rule, parallel to the channel axis; so Eq. T = Tl + Tz +4 Ts +. T4 = ~T
4
18~53 mny be reduced to a simple algebraic sum
R = Rl + Rz + R. + R4 = 2:R
v... = y±c (1S-54) , 4 4
where the vekJCities are considered positive in the downstream direction V = VI + V + VI + V\
2 =2:V
. 4 4
and negative in the upstream direction. The initial flow ·of water in the'
channel is assumed to be ill the downstream direction. Expressing the partial differentials by finite iucrements,
In discllssing the direction of progression of wayes in channels, three
principal case~ may be recognized: (1); positively prO{JT6s8ive flow: if the
ay .!. (us - VI + Yt - Y2) = YI + Y2 - Ya - V4 .
ax 2 L:.x L:.x / - -~&E~-
disturbance progresses dOIVllstream, (2) negatively progressive flow if the
disturbance progresses upstream, and (3) mixed progressive flow if the dis- av =! (Va -Vl + ~=-~t) VI + Vz - Va -~
~ 2 ~ ~ 2~
turbance or disturbances progress both! upstream and downstl'ea6. and
will meet and colllbine. • I fJQ = aCAl') =
fJx ax 2
i!
(AlVa - A 1 Y 1
L:.x
+ A4V4 -. AZV2)
, L:.x /
18-7. Solutii:ln of the Unsteady-flow Ejquations. Owing to complexity
of flow conditi~nsJ the general unstes.dy-flow equations defy exact mathe- A1V I +A 2V 2 - AiVs - A,V, .
. matical solution. For demol1stI'atiYe p1u'poses, two approximate meth- . 2L:.x
 542 UNSTEADY FLOW
GBADUALLY YARIED UNSTEADY FLOW 543
uy = !2 (Y2 -
iU f:,.t
Yl -I- Y4 -
t:d.
y~) = It should be noted that the above procedure" does not include the
velocity-head and acceleration-head terms. If these terms were to be
aV =! (172 - VI +V 4 - 173) included, the procedure woald become so tedious as to be almost pro-
2 6.t fit hibitive for practical purposes.
Substituting these expressions in Eq. (18-1) and solying for 17 4, One of the most important problems in gradually varied unsteady
flow is the routing of a flood wave through a channel. Many practical
Y4 =,
llxT.T(YI- Y2 + Y3 - Y4)/46.t
A,
+ A1V1 + A 2'V z - AaVJ
. .
(18-55) solutions of this problem have been developed, Because of its unique
nature, the problem with its pr<J,otical solutions will be dis.oussed sep- ·f
Substituting Sj = V2/C 2R and the above expressions in (18-13) arately in Chap. 20.
and simplifying, 18-8. Spatially Varied Unsteady Surface Flow. The general differen-
1
(1:17)2 1h + y~ - y~ - Y4 _ a:::Z~~'-..'..~~__,,-__.:': tial equation for spatially va.ried unsteady flow can be obtained by intro-
So ;:=: 4C2 T.R - 2llx ducing a term for acceleration effect into the equation for spatially varied
steady flow. According to Art. 18-2, such a term is (l/(l) (aY/at) dx.
(18-56) Including this term in Eq. (12-2) and using partial differentials,
In a given proble~, tIle quantities Yl, A 1,Vl , Yl, A. 2 , 172 , Y3, AJ,.and Vz
are known from the initial conditions and from the compuk'~lOns on
ay = - ~ (V 817 + ~ (JQ) + (S~ - Sf) ox ! all. ilx (18-58)
previous reaches. The unknown quantities Y4 and 17<\ can be o.btained
by solving Eqs. (18-55) and. (18-56) simultaneously. Repeatmg :he 0
or So - SI = ay
ax
+.!
g
(v iW + Av aQ + a~)
ox at
(18-59)
computation for subsequent reaches, the complete prohle and veloc1ty
variation of the flow can be determined. It is clear, however, that the This is the reqniredequatioll. However, a solution of this equation is
solution by the method of finite increments is extraordinarily ~aborious. extremely difficult even by finite-increment approximations,
In the trial-aud-error method, the wave profile through the given reach One important practical problem dealing with spatiully varied unsteady
is first sketched arbitrarily and then revised if the sketched profile f~ils surfaoe flow is the determination of the unsteady runoff of the overland
to satisfy all necessary conditions. The procedure for the computatlOn flow reaulting from r.ainfall. t The riischarge of the runoff with
of a positively progressive flow is as follows: .... . the time since the rainfall began; thel'efofe, the flow is unsteady. If the
. L For a given reach, draw the wave profile at the 11lltialmstant and rate of rainfall is kept constant, a. time of equilibrium will eventually be
sketeh the wave profile at the final instant by extending the known wave reached. At this time, the discharge is equa.l to the rate of rainfall
proS.l,,,: fromtlle upstl'eam reach. The extended profile is shown by the and. the runoff becomes 8~eady. When rainfall ceases, the runoff recedes
dashed line in Fig. 18-9. and the discharge tapers off accordingly. In the recession the
2. Measure the depths Yl, Y2, YJ, and Y4 and the surfa,ce siopes Sl, S2, runoff becomes unsteady again. For practical purposes two empirical
S anc1 S at the sections and instants under consideration. methods have been developed, one for turbulent flow and the other for
3,
3. Compute•
the water areas A l , A z, A~, and A4! the hy dra~ l'lC ra d" 11 laminar flow. The empirical relations used in these methods were
R 1, R 2, R.! and R" the velocities V l ! 17 2, 17" and 17 4 , fl,nd the discharges obtained from experiments co";'ering a wide ra:nge of varintion in condi-
tions. Hence, they give only an a,pproximate answer to the problem.
Ql, Q2> Q" al'ld Q4. . .• +' .
4. Substitute the above quantities il?-to the contInUIty equaulOn. A. Laminar Flow. The variation of the runoff discharge with time is
Using finite increments, Eq. (18-2) gives u8uallyrepl'esented by a hydro(lraph, which is Il. curve. by plotting
the ,discharge against the time. 2 From H011lyses of the' hydrographs
CQI + Q2 - Qa - Q4) III = (-.4.1 + A2 - A. + A4) llx (18-57) reSUlting from simulated rainfall 0f constant rate, Izzard 152J fouIld that
If this equation is not satisfied by the given vldues, revise.the ske~che.d the form of the rising hydrograph can be represented .by a sJngle dimen-
. profile and repeat the work until a satisfactor}' check in thiS equatIOn 1S t For advanced studies of this problem, the reader should refer to the works of
obtained. • . Iwagaki [48-51j. .
5. Continue the procedure from reach to reach, proceeding downstream, • A hydrograph may also be a durve of the stage or velocity of the flow plotted
agairjst the time (Art. 20-2).
 544 uNs-rE .... Dy FLOW GRADUALLY VARIED UNSTEADY FLOW 545

1.0 equilibrium (the area below the curve). Therefore, the equi-
I ~

~~+ /'" librium time t. is expressed by

0.9
V 2D. (I8-61 )
0.8 - '---
t. = 60q.
0.7
V .~
'- D
0.6 ,- L- I -
= ddention in fV, that is, the volume of water in surface flow on a
strip of unit width at the time t since the rainfall began
~

.....
0'
0.5
/ D. = detention in f1;3 at equilibrium
It was found empirically that this could be expressed in general
~
CT

0.4 I--- / J by
0.3 I --- '---+~
I D.= KLq.~3 (I 8-(2)

0.2
,/ I Actually, the exponent was found to vary from about 0.2 for

fJ
very smooth pavement to nearly 0.4 for turf. The value of J(
0.1
/ _. depends on the rainfall intensity i, the slope of i3urfnce 8, and a
V
o ..,/ I roughness facto!: c; that is,
o 0.1. 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
~

v.6 01 0.8 0.9 to

-. J( =' O.OOO7i+ c (18-63)
tn. . S~'i
I FIG. 18-10. Dimensioniess hydrograph of overland flow. (After C. F. Izzard [52].)
This equation was developed for slope not steeper than about
r 0.04. The roughness factor c was evaluated as follows:
sionless curve, as shown in Fig. 18-10. The notation involved is:
Type of surface Value of c
q discharge of surface flow, in cfs per ft of width, at time t since
=
Very smooth !'sphalt pavement .............. 0.0070
the rainfall began Tar and aand pevement. . . . . . . . .. .......... 0.0075
q. = discharge of surface flow, in cfs pel' ft of width, at equilibrium Crushed-slate roofing p!'per. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 0.0082
At the equilibrium condition, the rate of supply of the rainfall Concrete pavement, normal condition. . . . .. .. 0.0120
is equal to the outflow discharge. If i is the rainfall intensity in Tar-and-gravel pavement. ... ; . . . .. .......... 0.0170
Closely clipped sod. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ........ 0.0460
in./hr and L is the length of surface flow in ft, then Dense bluegrass turf. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 0.0600
iL
q. = 43,200 (18-60) . When rainfall C8ases, the runoff decreases. The time t, from the
beginning of the recession hydrograph to the point where qlq. = r is
It should be noted that bhe equilibrium condition is reached
asymptotically. t = DoF'(r) (18-64)
T 50q.
t = time in min since the rainfall ~egali
t, = t.ime of equilibriUlil, in min where Do is the detention corresponding to D. after the cease of rainfall,
Since the equilibrium condition is approached asymptotically, ,\'I'hich is the detention when i = 0; and where
the time t. must be det8rmined arbitrarily. In Fig. 18-10, t. (18-65)
F(r) = 0.5(r% - 1)
must be determined arbitrarily. In Fig. 18-10, t. is defined as
the time when q reaches 0.97q,; that is,ql.q. = 0.97. It ";as Equation (18-64) is derived mathematically from the finding that deten-
- found empirically that the volume of water, represented by D. in tion on th'e recession curve is proportional to the one-third power of the
W, in the surface flow on a strip of unit width at equilibrium discharge, Le.,
= (~)~
(the area above the curve) is substantially equal to the volume
of water that has been discharged in the time required to reach
!!...
Do q.
= r14
545 UNSTEADY FLOW GRADUALLY VARIED UNSTEADY FLOW 547
Using the dimensionless hydrograph and the above equations, it is pos- are recommended:
sible to construct II hydrogmph for surface runoff due to a rainfall of
Type of ~1!rfaGe
given intensity and duration: It is understood that the experiments Value of G i
conducted for deriving the dimensionless hydrograph and the above Smooth pavement ........................ ;........ 0.02
Bare, packed soil, free of stone ..... ,. . ................... 0.10
empirical equations were made under the condition that the flow was Poor grass covar, or mt,dera.tely rough bare surface......... . 0.20
lamiilar at all times. Thel'efol'e,the method is most suitable for laminar Average grass cover. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.40 ;/
flow and, according to Izzard, should be limited to cases where the prod- Dense grn.ss cover. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... .................... 0.80
uct of the rainfall intensity in inches per hour and the length of surface
flow in feet. is Jess than 500 .. The Horton equatioll is most suitable for turbulent flow with high
. B. Tt~rbu.lent Flow. With reference to the type of flow ranging from
discharge, The use of this equo'tion will produce a hydrograph for the
fully turbulent to laminar, Horton [53J has developed' the following i /ConJinuous
equation for the discharge of a spatioJly varied tlDsteady surface flow I!' rainfall excess or i in/hr
due to a uniform rate of rainfall excess or supply rate: .

where q
.
=

Ij =
q = .
utanh"' lmm-
+1 t ]
(uK) lim 60 (18-66)

discharge at .the lower end of an elementary strip, in cfs/acre

or in./hr .
rate of rainfall excess or supply rate, in in./hr. The rainfall
excess is the net amount of rainfall that becomes direct rUD-
tr • t
./

. J

off, since a portion of the total rainfall is lost by evaporatiOn, I

infiltration, etc .
.m = an exponent depending on the state of flow; m = 3.00 for
laminar flow and % for fully turbulent flow. • t
t = time from the beginning of supply, in min
K = a constant depending on characteristics of the drainage sur-
~
I.
'IF'<:ro,,
face; it is expressed by ,/>:in/hr

- 1,020 VS
K - .IcL (18-67)

where S is the surface slope in the direction of flow j I is the • t

factor of turbulence, that is, 0.75(3.0 - m); c is the roughness
factor;. and L is the length of the eleniental'Y strip of t'lIrfed,
bare, or paved surface, in ft.
. According to Horton, Eq. (18-66) is strictly rational for 75.% turbulent
flow, or m = 2.00. The equation has been used in drainage design of
airfields [54:1. For average airfield surfaces, 75% turbulence may be
assumed, and the Horton equation may be written
.q = u tanh 2 r' (cL)0.50. 8°·25 ]
0.~22t Ij (18~68)
In connection with the use of this j:)quatioil, the following values of c
FIG. 18-11. Derivation of hydrograph for a rainfall of tinite duration.
overland flow due to 11 uniform rate of rainfall lasting indefinitely. How-
ever, the hydrograph for rainfall of finite 9,uration t can be easily derived .
In Fig. 18-11, the top figure shows t,he hydrograph for rainfall of infinite
'. duration, and the middle figure shows an offset hydrograph for which the
same rainfall starts at a. time of t later. The difference between these
two hydrographs will, evidently, produce the bottom figure, which is the
hydrograph for rainfall of 'duration t. .
E:umple 18-4. A smooth aspbalt highway pavement is 72 ft long and has a slope
of 0.005. Determine the hydrograph at the downstream end of the pavement when a
;
minfall of 1.8!l in./hI' is applied for 10 miD..

I
 UNSTEADY FLOW GRADUALLY VAIU);;P UNSTEADY FLOW 549
, '
increru;e in discharge, aiter which the curve drops rapidly. This inorease in discharge
TABLE 18·1. Com'UTA't'ION OF TR.lll HYDROGRAI'H OF A.N OvERLAND FLOW
is due to the fact that during rainfall the amount of'detention on the; payement is
grea ter than the amount required to cause }he snme discharge after rainfall has ceased.
For i = OJ Eq. (18-6.3) gives K == 0.041 and Eq, (18-62) gives D~ = 0.434 ft·. The
excess detention is, therefore, 0.515 0.434 = 0.081 ft·, discharging at'a rate equal
1 0,0002 to or greater than q, ~ 0.00315 da. The length of time ~ required to discharge the
I >, 2'.00 ' 0,367 0,30 0,0010 ;,xcess is, therefore, 0.081/0:00315 26 aee or 0.43 min. Accordingly, the begin-
2.50 0,458 0,48 0,0015 ning point of the actual ourve is 10 + 0.43 = 10.43 min; at this time /]
3.00 0.550 0.65 0.0021 0.00316 cfs and the detention 0,434, ft'. The recession time Of the hydrograph
4.00· 0.733 CQ5 0.0027 (Fig. 18-12) caJl eMily bl) computed by Eq. (18-64).
5,00
5.45
0.917
,1.000
°0.97
,[)4 0.0030
0.0031
6.00 1.00 0.0032 PROBLEMS
7.00 1.00 0.0032
8.00 1.00 0.0032 18-1. Assuming that the flow condition does not change with time, derive from
9.00 1.00 0.0032 Eqs. (I8-1) and (18-13) the continuity and dynamic equations for gradually yaried
10.00 LOO 0.0032 steady flow in prismatic channels.· ,
10.43 1.00 0.0032 18-2. Show that the overrun of a mon:lclinal rising wave may be e)(pres~ed 118
1O.9l 0.60 0.21 i 0.48 0.0019
11 40 0.40 0.42 0.97 0,0013 Q. (18-69)
11 ,86 0.30 0.02 1.43 0.0009
12,64 .
020 0.£'0 2,21 0.0006
,

14.57 18-3. Show that the overrun Md velocity of a Inonocliual rising Waye iu a wide
0.10 1.80 4.14 0,0003
rectangular challnel of uDit width may be expressed, respectively, 8.8

Solulion. The given dat,a. are L = 72 ft, S = 0.005, i 1.89 in.,/hr, and the total (18-7Q)
10 lnin. Since 1.89 X 72 < 500, the Izzard method I\,pplies. For smooth asphalt
pavement, C = 0.007.
and (18-71)
,By tbe equations oHhe Izzard method, th" constants are c0l!'puted as g, = 0.00315,
K = 0.Oi8:', D, = 0.515, and t; = 5.'15. The comput.ati()ll of the rising curve pf the
hydrograph is shown ill Table 18-1 and in ]"1g. 18-12, The value of qlg. for the corre- where 'C is the Chezy resistance factor.
sponding value of tit, is obtained from the dimensionless hycirograph (Fig. 18-10). 18-4. On the 333-mile reach of the lVlisBouri River below Kansas City, Seddon
At.t = i, = 5.45 min, the discharge q= 0.97'1. = 0.0031 cf~ per unit width of the found that an average rating curve and ve!.ocity in miles per day can be expressed as
pavenlen~. IIen"eforth, the discharge is assumed to reach the full value of q. up to Q. = 0.15(1.17y + 19)' and V" = 70 + 3.27y, respectively. Show tha.t the average
t = lOmm. ' top width of the channel in this reach can be elCprCSlled as T = 5.62(y + 16.3PI
When the minbll ee:J.ses at 10 min, it will be noted that there is a. momenta.ry , ,(y + 21.4), and construct the' average shape of .the channel section. '
18-5. On the basis of the Manning formula., determine the ratio of the maximum
0.004
wave velocity to the water velocity of a mOMclin!l.1 rising wave in (a) a wi~e rectangu-
lar channels (b) a triangular channel, and (e) a wide parabolic channel. '
.,
Q,E
., ,.
....
..
'- r:;

.. 0.003
:v
1 I !
ii
;18-6. Solve the above problem on the ba.sis of the Ch';zy formula.
18-7. 'Using the Manning formula, derive an expression for the wave profile of the
-u

.E'O
0"-
I

VI II I I
I
'I
I
, I
Hood due to failure of a d a m . , ' .
18-8. Given So ~ 0.0004 and Yn ~ 25 ft, plot the profile of the roll w~ve derived
'II 0.002 jn Example 18-1. '
~~
0'0
.c ,-
u,]t
~~ .~ 0.001 II i
I
\.
!
I 18-9. Solve the above problem, using the'iestllt of Prob. 18-7 for thCl
and comp",re the result with that obtained above. .
profile,

18-10. Flot :the wave profile derived in Ex~mple 1$-2, when Vi = 10 ft, it. "'" 25 ft,
V: i Nt
Dr:;

I I "-
'"
0 'L
0 2:
!
4 6 6 .10 12 4 16 I and S. "" O.OOp4.·. , . i
18-11. SolVl! Example 18-3 for Y. - 0, 2, 5, aod 15 ft, and shoW that the surface'
slope of the vni.ve configuration decreases wi~h the decrease of the initial stage Y2.
la-l~. Solve Example 18-3 if S. = 0.004. :
FtCl. 18-12. Hydrograph of ,an overland floW.
! 18-13. Solve ExAmple 18-3 if S. = 0.06. i

I
I
55,0 UNSTEADY FLOW
IS-14. The initinl and final depths of a. monoclinal flood wave are .10 ft and 25 ft,
respectively. Given C = 100 and S. ='0.0004, determine the percentage inel'eases
in the true'dischHrgc over the normal discharge at depths of 15 and 20 ft.
18-15. Compute the Reyn<:>lds number of the discharge from the pavement
described in EXllmple 18-4, aud show that the 1I.0\V laminar. The discharge immedi-
ately a.fter the rainfnll ceasE'S is assumed to increase momentarfly about 10 %.
18-1S. Solve Example 18-4 if the rainfall is 3.78 in./hr.
1B-17. Solve E:<ample 18-4 if the rainfall is 1.89 in./br for the first 2 min and then
inl:'/"ea.ses to 3,78 in.jhr for the remaining 8 min. In solVIng this problem, it is nelles-
sary 'to convert the first 2 min to il. time., say to, such that rainfs!! at 3.78 in./hr lasting
/0 min would have built up the same absolute volume of <letention !J.S was built up in
Z min at 1.89 in./ill'. The computation of the hydrograpb alter 2 min deals simply
wittl a const.ant rainfall int,ensity of 3.78 in./hr lasting I, + 8 min.
18-1B. In an airfield, .0. strip of turfed area is 510 ft long and has a slope of O.g %.
Construl:'t the hydrograph of the overland flow on the are" due to ll. rainfall excess of
4.35 in,jhr lasting 10 min. For turfed area, assume c = 0.32 in the Hort<J/l equation.
REFERENCES
1. J. J. Stoker: "Water Waves," vol. IV of "Pure and Applied' M:athematics,"
Interscience Publishers, Inc., New York, 1957.
2. G, H, Keulegan; Wave motioil, chap. XI of "Engineering Hydraulics/' edited by
Hunter Rouse, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1850, pp. 711-768.
3. Sir Horace Lamb: "Hydrodynamics," 6th ed., Dever Publications, New York,
1932. For tidal waves, see chap. VIII, pp, 250-3(}Z; for surface waves, see chap.
IX, pp. 3(}i3-475, , avec application aUx cruea des rivieres et A I'introduction des marees dans leur !its
4. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: Bibliography on tidul hydraulics, CommiJ,lee on.
Tic/.{).! 'IIlIdmulics, RepQrCNo. 2, Februa.ry, 19M; Su.pplement No.1, June, 1955;
Supple.men/. No.2, May, 1957j and Supplement No.3, May, 1959.
5. Philipp ForchheiUler: "Hydraulil, " (" Hydr!l.ulics "), 3d cd., Teubner Verlagsp;esell-
Bchaft; Leipzig; and Berlin, 1930, . wave in a tidal river), Besondcrc MifJ.e~7:ungen, J ah.,.buch Jur die GelOtisserklmde
o. Charles Jaeger: "Er.gineering Fluid Mechanics," translated fr?1l1 the Germ&n by
P. O. Wolf, Blackie & Son, Ltd., London and Glasgow, 1956,
7. Takeo Kinosita: Hydrodynamical study on the ftood flow, in Floods, vol. III of
Symposia Darcy, Intemal{onal Association of Scientific Hydrology, Publica~ion No,
42, 1956, pp. 56-63. . , ' . ,
8. N. J, Dahl: On non-permanent flow in open canals, Proceedings of the 61h General
Meeting, Ini.ern.alional ASli/ociatiiJnjor Hydniltlic Researc'h, The Hague 1855ivoL 4,
pp. D19-1 to DI9-1B, 1955, • 26, Carlo Drioli: Esperienoe sui mota perturbato nei canali industriali (Experiment
9. Fr!l.no;ois Serre: Contribution a I'et·o.de des econlements perm~"nents etvarial:lles
dans les ca.na.ux (Contribtltion to the study of permanent and nonpermanent flows
in channels), La Houille blanche, Grenoble, 8th yr., no. 3, pp, 374-38B, June-July;
a.nd no. 6, pp. 830-872, December, 1953.
10. J. C. SchOnfeld: Distortion of long waves. Equilibrium a.nd stability, Assemolee
gtnera!e de Bnae!!es. 1951, Inte1'1l.11J.ional AssociaHon of Scientific Hydrology,
Publication No. 30, 1951, vol. 4, pp. 140,:,157. .
by Hunter Rouse, John Wiley &. Sons,Inc., New York, 1950, pp. :635-710.
'
11. Bruc.e R. Gilcrest: Flood routing, ·chap. X in "Engineering Hydr,a.ulics," edited
12. Giulio, Supino: SUf I'amortissement:des iI!tumescences dans les canaux: (On the
damping of translatory waves in channels), R;wue ge-Mrole de I'h:ydraulique,
vol. 18, no, 57; pp. 144.,.147, 1950.
GRADUALLY VARIED UNSTEADY FLOW 551
13. D. N. Dietz: A new method for calculating the conduct of translation w>tves in
prismaticcannls, PhI/sica, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. '177--1\)5, February, 1941.
14. Giulio Supino: Sur la propagation des ondes dans les Cll.naUl( (Or,. the propaga.tion
of waves in channels), Revua !len~"'ale de l'hydra:uliquB, Paris, vol. 5, no. 29, pp.
260-262, 1939. ' , .
15. Ha.rold A. Thomas: The hydraulics of flood movements in rivers, Carnegie Inslitute
of Tecknology, Engineering B1Lllelin, 1934; reprinted in 1936 and 1937.
16, L. Cagniard: Hydrodynamiqt1e fiuviale: Regimes variables (Fluvial hydrQdy- "1
naIllic~: Variable regimes), ReVILe gtnerale de I 'hlldrG'U.iiql1e, Paris, vol. 3, no. 15,
May-June, 1937,
17, M:;.sse: D~ {ntumescenl~es dans lea torrents (Tra.nslatory W!l.ves in torrents),
Revue iJdnerale de l'hydrGu1iqlle, Puris, vol. 3, no. 18, pp. 305-305, 1937.
18. Ph. Deymi{j: Propa.gaLion d'une intumescence allongee (Propagation of a grn.du-
aUy varied translatory wave), RevM genb:ale iie l'hydrauliq!Le, Pal:.is, vol. 1-2, no. 3,
pp. 138-142,1935-1936,
19. Pierre Masse: L'amortisMment de." intumescences (The damping of tmnsla.torr 'f
waves), Revue gen~T!ll.e de l'hydrauliq!L6, Paris, voL 1-2, no. 6, pp: 300-308, 1935- .1
1936.
20. Josef Frank: "Nichtstationare Vo;·ga.itge in den Zuleitungs- und Ableitungs-
ka.n1i.len von WIl.Bserkraftwerken" (".unst.eady Flow in Heo.draces ",od Tailral;es ,I
of Hydropower Plants"), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1957. I
21. A. J. C, Barre de Sa.int-Venant; "E:tudes th.eoriques et
roent'des eaux courantes" ("Theoretical a.nd Practical
Paris, 1848.
22. A. J, C. Barre de Saint-Venont: Theorie du mouvlmlent non perma.nent des eaux,
. (Theory of the nonpermanent movement of waters with o.pplication to the fl~ods
of rivers and to the introduction of the tides within their beds), Comple.i rend1LS -I
des seanc(lS de I' Acad6mie des Sciences, vol. 73, pp. 147-154 and 237-240, 1871.
23. H; Reineke: Die Berechnung der Tidewelle im Tideflusse (Compmation of tida.i
·1
Narddeutschlands, Berlin, vol. 3, no. 4, 1921.
24. J. Frank and J. SchUller: "Scliwingungen in den Zuleitungl'- und Abldtung.i- ' ~'II
kaniilen von Wa.sserkm.fta.nlagen" (" Oscilla.tions in Her.draces and Tailra.ces of
Hydropower Pla.nts"), Sprir-ger-Verlag, Berlin, 1 9 3 8 . ' '
25. H. Favre: "lttude theorique et experimentale des ondes de translation' dans.les
canauJ( deco\lverts" ("Theoretical and Experimental S!.udy of Translatorv Wa.ves
in Open Cbannels"), Dunod, Paris, 1\J35. . • .
on in industrial canals), U ElI erg ia. eleitrica, }I;[ilano, voL 14,110.4, pp. 285-
305, appeng,ice, pp. 306-311,Apdl, 1937.
27. M. IGeitz: Note sur la tluiorie du rnOUvement non permanent des liquides et sur
applicati?u a la propagation des crues des rivieres (Note on the theory of unste~dy
I How of liquids and on application tC' flood propaga.tion in rivers), Anna.les des
'fonts at chauss.es, ser. 5, vol. 16, 2e semestre, pp. 133-196, 1877.
I 28. James A., Seddon: River hydraulica, Transactions, A meriron Sociely oj Civil
E111linecrs, vol. 43, pp. 179-229, 1900,
29. J. H. Wilkinspn: Translatory waves in natural channels,
Socidy oj Civil EnginCer8, voL 110, pp. 1203-1225, 1945.
American.
'
I 30. Benjamin E. Jones: A method for COITBctio.g river discharge for !J. changing stage
U.S. Geological Survey, Wat;:r Supply Paper 375 (e), 1916, pp. 117-130. " ./
I
11 I
552 UNSTEADY FLOW
GRADUALLY YARIED UNSTEADY .FLOW
1
(,
553
31. A. Ritter: Die FortpfianzlIng der Wa.sserwellen (Propagation?f waves), Zeitschrift
clc.~ Verm:ms, d,'u/,scher Ingenieure, vol. 36, no. 33, pp. 947-954, Aug. 13, 1892.
!! Boussinesq, dans sa tiu\orie du mouvement gj'aduellement varie des Iluic\es
(Experiments on wave,propagation in torrential flow and their confirmation or
32. R. Re: Etu~le du lacher instantane d'une ret.enue d'eau dans un canal 'par la
the BOllssinesq equations for gradually varied flow), Comptes rendus des s~ances de
jJ met'hocle graphique (Study of the instantaneous relea,se of water in a reservoir to
1\ canai by the graphical method), La HOl,ille blanche, Grenobl~, 1st yr., no. 3,
pp.181-~187, NIay, 1946. ' .
I' Academie des Sciences, vol. 100,pp. 1492-1494., June 15, 1885.
47. Sir George Biddle Airy: Tides and waves, "Encyclopaedia Metropolitana,"
London, 1845, pp_ 24F396.
83. A Craya: Calcul graphique des regimes variables dans les canaux (Graphical 48. Yuichi Iwagaki: Theory of flow on road surface, Memoirs of Ihe Faculty of Engi-
calculation of variable flow:-regimes in open channels), La Houille blanche, Gre-
neering, '[(yoto University, Japan, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 13g-147, July, 1951.
'noble, 1st yr., no. 1, pp. 1\)-38, November, 1945; no. 2, pp. 117-130" March, 1946. 49. Y. Iwagaki and T. Sueishi: Approximate method for culoula.tion of llost.eac\y flo\\"
34. Leon Le;"in: Mouvement non permanent sur les COUrs d'eau a la suite de rupture
in open channels with lateral flow, Proceedings, 4th Japan National Congressfo'}"
de bllrrage (Unsteadyfic.w in channels following, the rupture of dam), Revlle Applied ivlechanics, pp. 235-240, March, 1954.
glne.rale de l'hydrmdiqlle, Paris, vol. 18, no. 72, pp. 297-315, November-December, 50. Yuicni hvagaki and Tomit,aro Sueishi: On the unsteady flow in open channels with
1952.
uniforIn lateral inflow (in Japanese), Proceedings, fapan Society of Cillil Engineers,
35. Robert F. Dressler: Bydraulic resistance effect upon th~ dam-break functions,
Tokyo, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 575-583, November, 1954. .
paper 2356, Jotmwl of Research, U.S. National BW'ea,t: of Slandard.~, vol. 49, DO. 3, 5J. Y,uichi Iwagaki and Takuma TakasM: On the effects of rainfall and drainage
pp. 217-225, September, 1952.
basin charactel'iBtics on runoff .fela~ion (in Japanese), Proceedings, 5th Anniversary
36. Robert F. Dressler: Comparison of theories a.nd' experiments for the hydl"Jl.ulic
of the Establishment of the Disaster Prevention ResearcH InsW"te, EYoto University,
d~m-hrep_k wave, Asse11lbl~e g~n~raIB de Rome, 1954, International A.~_qociat(on (If
I{yoto,Japan, pp. 1,91-200, November, 1956.
Scientific Hydrology, Plibliroii011. No~ 38, voL 3, pp. 319-328, 1954. 52. Carl F. Izzard: Hy.draulics of runoff from developed surfaces, Proceedings of the
37. A. Schoklitsch,: Uber Dambruchwellen (On ,"aves produced by broken dams),
iJ6th Annllal Meeting of the Highway Research Board, vol. 26, pp. 129-146, Decem-
SI{:Z1mgsberu:hte, l1f athematisch-nat'lrwissenschaftliche Klasse, Akademie der J,Vis- ber, 1946.
senschajlen'in Wien, vol. 126, pt. !la, pp. 1489-1514, Vienna, H1l7. 53. Robert E. Horton: The interpretation and application of runoff plot experiments
38. 1. B. Eguiazaroff: Regulation of the water level in the reaches of canalized rivers
with reference to soil erosion problems, Proceedings, Soil Science Society of Am.erica,
and regulation of the flow b.elow the last lock dam according to whether the water vol. 3, pp. 840-349, 1938.
power is or is not lIsed, Report no, 8, in Inland Navigation, 2d question, sec. 1, 54. Gail A. Hathaway: Design of drainage facilities, in Military airfields: A sympo.
16th 1IltemMionai Cong1'ess of NaviGation, Brussels, 1935.
sium, Transactions, American Socie.ty of Civil Engineer!!, vol. HO, pp.' 697-733
39. Frederick V, Pohle,: Motion of wave due t,Q breaking of E< dam and related prob- 1945.
lems, paper No.8 in Symposium on gravity waves, U.S. National Bureau of
SIa:lldal'di;, Circular 521, 1952, pp. 47-53 ..
40. EllIler E. Moots: A study in flood waves, University of Iowa, Studies in Engi-
neering, Bulletin 14, 1938. '
41. J. Scott Russell: Heoort on waves, R~ort of the British Association for the Advallce-
meni of Science, 1844, liP: 311-3g0. .
42. J. V. Boussinesq: Sur Ie mouvement permanent va.rie de.l'eau dans les. tuyaux ~e
conduite et dans les canb.UX decouverts (On the steady varied flow of water In
conduits and open channels), Comptes rendlls des s~ances de I' AcadMnie des Sciences,
vol. 73, pp. 101-105, 1871.
43. Lord Rayleigh: On waves, The London, Edinburgh and Dublin Ph.:losophical
M[!~adne and Jot/rnai of SC1:ence, ser. 5, vol. 1, pp. 257-279, April, 1876.
44. A. J. C. Barre de Saint-Venant: D~mon5traliori elementaire de Ill. formule de
l. ") propagation d'une onde ou d'une intumescence dans un cana.l prismatique; e~
remarques sur les propagatiollS du son et ,de la lumiere, sur les ressauts,: ainsi que
SlIT Ill. distinctiori des rivieres et d~s torrents (Elementary demonstratIOn of the
propagation formula for a wave or a translat.ory wave iii. a prismatic channel; and
remarks on the propagation of sound and light, on hydraulic jumps, and also on
the'distinction between rivers ,and torrents), Comptes rendus des sB(lnCes de l' Aca-
d~mic d~1i Scienceli, vol. 71, pp. 186-195, July 18, 1870.
45. Joseph L. de Lagrange: "Mecanique analytique" (" A~alytical Mechanics"),
Paris, 1788, pt. 2, sec. II, art. 2, p. 192. , '
46. H. BiJ.zin: Experiences sur la'propagation des ondes Ie long d'un cours d'eau tor-
)
rentueux, et confirmation par ces experiences des formules donnees par M.
 RA.PIDLY V.ARIED UNSTEADY FLOW
555
Solying Eq. (18-15) for V 2,

172 = V I :"':l + V"u:.t12 - V",A 1

(19-4)
CHAPTER 19 A2
Substituting the above expression fot V 2 in Eq. (19-3) and reducing,
RAPIDLY VARIED UNSTEADY FLOW
vr
( v .. -
(19-5)

or V",
19-1. Uniformly ProgressIve . Flow. If th
. e front of a :rnonocliniil G . , (19-6)
h O~ ~n abrupt change iil curvature or a sudden change. 111
wave ''''' '"' Th' ff t be p"O or
. depth the flow in the front is rapidly varied, . . IS ~ ec m~y h • ~ (19-7)
duced' for example by a sudden increase in gate opelllng at tee anne
,
entrance, as sh OVYll' 111
"F"19. 19-1, The< velocity of the mass of W<J.ter This is a genera! equation expressing the absolute w,ave velocity of the
flow as shown in Fig. 19-1. Mathematically speaking, the sign i;l frOll t
of the square-root term in the n,bove equations may also be
t f However, since the w"we is mo,ring downstream in the directioll of the

~GO" 1.,. _~_. . .". *-_- ",=-_

initial flow, its velocity must be greater than the velocity of the !llitilw
flow. In othel' words, V", - V j should be positive. Therefore, only the
• '-2_-+1T"
.... plus sign is considere9. practical. .
If the initial velocity VI = 0, that is, if the WlI.ve travels in still water,
II ---
U . WAi'h then the square-root term in the above equations 18 equal to the absolute
W/////m)W#407»;;;: velocity of the wave. In allY case, this term, being equal to V 11} VI,
-

FIG. 19-1. Rapidly .varied uniformly progressive flow. represents the velocity of the wave with respect to the velocity of the
initial flow. It is, therefore, t,he celerity; that .
between the gate and the ...vavefl'Ont is increased from 1'"1 to V z, an~,the
.
mOPlentum is increased. accord'lllgIy. By J.Newton's second law of"'t motion.
t' . c=
(19-8)
the 'unbalanced force required to change the momentum p~ ~m Hl1e
is the product of the mass and the ill velocity per um une, or For rectangular chanuels, fit
Thus, Eq. (19-8) becomes
F ~ (V", V 2 )A 21V(V 2 - V 1) (19-1)
(J
c (19·9)
where 10 is the unit weight of water. 'l'hi'l Ullbalanced force is equal
to the difference between the hydrostatic pressures on the areas A2 and Al
·~,l
It ca.n be shown that, fOl"\VaVes of moderate height, Eq. (19-9) becomes
at sections 2 and 1,reapectively; that is, ' Eq. (i8-45), FQr very small waves, Eq, (19-9) becomes Eq. (18-46),
For very small waves in llourectangulal' channels, Eq,' (1£)-8) beconles
F = wA~y~ wA1Yl (19-2) Eq. (18-47).
where fj: and iiI are the centroida.l depths of the areas. Equating the In a.ll cases, (19-7) may be written
above values of F and simplifying, ' . i
J
(19-10)
. Al _ ) which is identical with Eq. (18~51).
(V.. - V 2 )(V 2 - V 1)= ( ih - A2 Yl g
55~
(19-3)
I Theoretically, there are four typ~s of rapidly varied ullsteady flow

J
 I

556 UNSTEADY FLOW RANDLY VARIEDUNS'l'EA.DY FLOW 557

, ,

(Fig. 19-2): type A, having an advancing wavefront moving downstream; top waves will retreat faster than the bottom ones. The result is that
type B, having nil advancing l"avefro!lt moving upstream; type C, having , the wavefront becomes sloping and eventul111y flattens out.
a retreating wavefront moving' downstream; and type D, having a Owing to the presence of channel friction, however, the wave profile
retreating wavefront moving upstream. Type A has just been described. of art advancing front n.ctmilly changes. This. effect may not be notice-
1"01' type B, it can be shovtn that able in relatively short artificial chQ.unels of small friction effect, but
it is significant ill long reaches of natural channels, where ~riction is
v'" = c - Y1 (19-11)
considerable. • .
which is identical with Jiiq. (18-50). It can also be shown that Eq.. 19-2. The Moving Hydraulic Jump. When a rapidly vfl.l'ied unsteady
I"I (19-10) applies to type C and Eq. (19-11) to type D. It is theoretically How involves a change in stage from subcl'itical to supercritical, a so-called
moving hydl'(J,1tlic jump will result. An observer on the bank. running
~
I
Y, --Vt
I
'I,_Y, r
I
r-=F:::[
Y, -V, I
n.long with the wave crest. at the same velocity as the. wave will see a
stationary hydraulic jump. This is illustrated by the figures at t.he
bottom in Fig. 19-2 for four types of flow. All equations derived in the
;;"?'~ml////;;/I';"-//h-:--"';:r-;'-/,/,- J»/;;7///74//~r/h'l/}"
Type A-Advl)l"lci"2 dcwfI- 'l"ype B-Ad'lol():.citlQ up- T:tpe C-Rerr.cnJlQ dawit- l'ype O-fL!1t!II:;HJ:"q u?,- preceding article apply also to these flows. However, another method of
sttifam !P(U:!IVl1I !\'lr'l:lJn (p:1sHive siteD .." (!\egoli,,: shearn :,,e201iy~
1utQe} sun;~e: slug2) SUf08: deriving the equation may be described below_. .
For a stationary hydraulic jump, (3-21) can be reduced to

(19-12)
, ,

The right side of the equation is equr,l to the celerity expressed by Eq.
(19-9). Applying this equation tothe steady hydraulic jump of type A
in Fig. 19-2, as seen by the observer, V 1 should be replaced by V.. - 'f\;
Tipe B 7,!pe C Typ~ D
that
FIG. 19-2. li'ol11' tYlJes of rapidly varied uiliformly progressive flow. (Top) Unsteady
flows; (bottom)' the corresponding flows that' appear stea.dy to an observer following (19-13)
the wavefront~

possible for the velo\}ities V 1 and V 2 to be opposite in direction. In that or V .. = (19-14)

co,se, a velocity is considered negative if its direction is opposite to th£\L
shown in 19-2. This is identical with Eq. (l9-1O). Applying the same procedure to
The absolute velocity ll", of the wave may alsob9 expressed by Eq. type Bilow,
(18-15). Since thi8 equation is derived on the basis of the principle of
continuity, it applies to both graduilly and mpidly varied monoclinal gY2 (Yl
2Yl
+ 1;2) - VI = C- V1 (19-15)
rising waves.
It should be noted that the wave ;profile is stable for s.n advancing This equation is identical with (19-11).
front and uristable for a retreating front. The wavefront can be assumed It can be seen that type C and type Dflows are, not actually possible,
to be.made bp of a large number of very small waves placed one on top because fL stable jump cannot be formed if the flow is from high stage
of the othel:. Since the wave on top has greater depth thl1uthe one .to low stage. For this reason, neither type C .nor type D can have a
below it, it has grelltel' velocity, according to (18-46), abd moves stable steep front like th!:l.t of a hydraulic jump.
faste~·. III the case of the advancing£ront, the top waves will, therefore, The term "moving hydraulic jump" is usually used synonymously
overtake th~ bottom waves in the forward direction. The teildency is with "surge" and "hydraulic bore." However," surge" more often
for the wav!:ls to combine and to form eventually a single large wave- refers to a moving hydraulic jump due to abru~t decrease or increase in
front which :i8 steep o,nd stable. In the case of the retreating front, the flow, such as. that caused by the sudden closirig or opening of a gate.
558 UNSTEADY .FLOW RAPIDLY VARIED UNSTEADY FLOW 559
"Hydraulic bore" usually refers to a moving hydraulic jump due to at a speed of 50 mph or more. The discharge was estimated at about
tidal effects; it possesses a sharp and. steep advancing front.l 200,000 ds.
When the moving hydraulic jump is specifically noted as a surge, it is :Type B usually occurs in tidal rivers. Typical examples' are the Hang-
furthe.rclassified into two kinds, namely, the positive surge and the nega- chow bore at Raining on the Chien Tang River, China (Fig. 19-3); the - r
tive surge. 2 The positive surge elevo.tes the water surface, advancing bore on the Seyern River near Gloucester,' England; anel the 'bores 011
either upstre2im or downstream with a stable front (Fig. 19-2, types A rivers connecting the Bay of Fundy, Nova Scotia. In' power caI'mls
I'.
and B). The negative surge depresses the water surface, retreating serving hydraulic turbines, type B flow, known as rejection surge, will .
oecm' as a result of suddell dzcrease in power output. .

. ~
..,
., , '-ocus of Wove front
.~ .

~ \~
~ --=
~
~ \\;:-"r";:------
V- .
-r~-==
l , /// ,.//~V1 --.. ....--... ---l .
---l.
~~
.
1 /~ . . --.
j . ~
'///-7.:;:
",
I
1
;j
Type A - Qdvancing downstream
B-
Type up~adVancing
(

\
1
~
j ~-
-
~
~ --..... V ...... -
~
Locus of wave frant
w
~ ~ .. ~ v2 ---.... -- .
1 Vw ___~ __ ~_
~up'stre~
.//~~ Vz~ '
! . ;;,-..
"h~-07-~ .~

I
~
. . / '/
. ~~
FIG. 19·3. Hangchow bore at Haining em the Chie?- Tang Rinr;. China.. The wave· Type C-retreating downstream '
Type D-retrealing
tront was about 16 it h,igh, traveling at high velocIty, Seven mm after It could first
be distinguished on the horizon the wave had passed. The water rellched a final !
I FIG. 19-4. Rapidly va.ried flow i~ inclined channels. (Afte,· M. D. Chedousov [11].)
height. of about 28 ft within 30 min. The width of the river at the place of obser'mtion
was about 1 mile. (Caurle.~y of Mead and Hunt, I n c . ) . .
I Type C generally results irom .a sudden decrease in supply of flow.
either upstreo.m or downstream with an unstable front (Fig. 19-2, types upstream, such as that I;aused by the closing of a head gate in a canal or at
the tailrace of a hydro plant.
C and D ) . ' .
For the types of moving hydraulic jump illustmted in Fig. 19~2, typical . Type. D, kl:ow'~ as demand S"..trge, Occurs in power canals servi ng
examples can be quoted. For type A, examples are the fo.ffious J ohns- ~ydmuhc tllrbmes If the demand at the lower end of the canal is suddenly
Increased. .
town flood of 1889, caused by the failure of an eart,h dam at the South
Fork Reservoir in Pennsylvo.niu [6-8]; the Heppner flood, due to a cloud- In Fig: 19-2, tl;Ie initial. and final stages of a po.ssing surge ~tre assumed
burst storm on Willpw Creek, Oregon, in 1903 [9]; and the flood due to to ?~ ~lllform .. Such surges OCcur frequently io channels of sma.ll slope.
I
the failure of St. Francis Dam near Los Angeles, Catif., in 1928 [10]. . In lIl,chned channels, the four types of sur"e will Occur as shown in Fig
In the J ohnstowll c~ei. the flood was led bya bore which was initially
19-4 [111. '" . J
125 to 150 fthigh at the da.m and which was reduced to 30 to 40 ft as it .19-3. Positive Surges. Positive surges .have an advancing front
rushed down the 15, miles' of the narrow, windi.ng va.lley to Johnstown With t?e profile of a moving hydra.ulic jump. When the height of the
surge ~s sn:al~, the surge 'appears undular like an unduhi.r jump. When
'1For a theoretical an~ experimental investigation' of the bore, see [lj.and [2J. the hel~ht IS Increasing, the unClubtion will eventually disappe.'l.r and the
• See [3] to [51 for aniIytical and experimental studies. surge Will have a sharp and steep front.

..-. _. -..·_ . . ·_···. _···--.. -- . 1

!
I (
I

560 UNSTEADY FLOW RAPIDLY YARIED UNSTEADY FLOW 561 .

\ Consider the positive surge of type A (Fig, 19-2); the absolute wave Also, from Eq. (19-18),
I velocity can be expressed byEq. (18-15). For a rectangular channel, the
velocity is V (19-21)

(19-15) ThllS, the height of the surge is

YI Y1

I
Eliminating 1'", from Eqs. (19-14) and (19-16) and simplifying, h c( 21/1 ) V (19-22)
{/ ,Yi + Y2
,I
\ , )
2 (Yi+ Y2)g (19-17) i If the height of the surge is small relative to the depth of flow, Eqs.
Y2 2YIV;--
I (19-21) and (19-22) may be approximated, .
This equation represents the relationship among the initial and final
velqcities and depths of the surge .. Similarly; it can be shown that'
I respectlvely, by

Eq. (19-17) applies also to surge of type B (lfig. 19-2). Note that, if l' = ~g (19-23)
Eq. (H)~17) is used to determine Yi or Y2, it must be solved by trial ::tnd 1 c
error. and h=~V (19-24)
g
MUltiplying Eq. (19-17) by the square of Eq. (19-9) lma simplifying,
it CMl be shown that
I B. 111eeting of Two Surges. When two
surges meet that are opposite in direction,
(01

(Hl-IS) . the result is the generation of two new

surges tra.veling in the reversed dil'ections.
where h =Y2 - Yl) or the height of surge, and where c is the celerity. This is illustrated in 19-5 with all
On the right side of the equa.tioll, the positive applies to type B notation indicated.
surge a.nd the negative sign to type A surge. Applying Eq .. (19-17) to the left-side
When the height of surge is smn,ll compared with the depth of flow, new surge with l' ~ V, Y2 ;", V, aIid VI
111 "'" Y2. Thus, Eq.(19-18) may be written replaced by V 1, (P)

± c (19-1\)) (YI - yP (VI +

y)g (19-25) Fw.19-5. Meeting of two surges.
(al Before thE' meeting; (b) after
2Y1Y
the meeting.
In order to avoid the l.:o.nfusiol1 of the sign convention, the use of Applying Eq. (Hl-17) to the right-side
Eqs. (19-18) und (19-10) may be simplified by ignoring the negative sign new surge with V 2 V, V 1 = - VI', Y2 = y, ILnd YI = Y/,
011 their righL sides and remembering that. hand c are always assumed to .
be positive quantitie13. Accordingly, VI - 172 should always be positive. ( ll 1'+ V)2 = (y' - y)~ (y{ + y)g (19-2G)
1 2y{v
If V 2 < 1711 then 'VI V 2 must be replaced by V 2 - l T i • U' VI and V 2
are in opposite directions, then their sum V 1 + V 2 must be used illstead . Solving the above two equations simultaneously, the unknowns l' and y .
of their difference. . can be determined. The absolute wave velocities of the new surges
.Several typical ct1.Ses of the al11Llysis of positive surges are given !l.S can be determined from Eq. (19-16). Thus,"
follows:
A. Surge due to Sudden Stoppage of Flow. If wate~ flowing in a channel V,. = (19-27)
with a velocity V is checked instantaneously, a surge of type B will be 11 VI
produced .. In this case, V 1 = V and 1'2 = 0; 50(19-17) gives and V,.'
Vl~Yl/ + Vy (19-28)
Y- yr'
(19-20) When the height of the surges is small relative to the. depth of flow,
 RAPIDLY Y ARIEl) . UNSTEA.DY FLOW 563
562 UNSTEADY FLOW i
Eq. (19-19) may be applied. Thus, which is similar in form to Eq. (19-30). By geometric continuity,

(19-29) By hydraulic continuity,

The positive sign applies to the right-side surge and the negative sign
(19-33) -[
to the left-side surge: Solving the above four equationssiwultaneously, the unknowns V 2 ,
C. Surge Cro:>:>ing a Step. In surge analysis [. step on the channel' 1/z, V 21 , and Y2' can be determined, The wave velocities can, therefore,
floor may be real or fictitious. The ficti- be determined by Eq. (19-16).
FricUorl; tious step is, usually assumed to simulate When the height of surges 1" small relative to the depth gf flow,
borrier
the effect of channel slope.. The lliethod (19-19) applies. Thus, Eqs. (19-30) and (19-31) may be written
Pro ..'d ed for I:
{rlc'ion effect ! of analysis, however, is the same in both
.......--_......:\l.,I-,t~ cases. (19-34)
IY, ~VI
T!
I V;_ y;
In previous discussions, the slQpe of
cha.nnels has been assumed small. For and (19-35)

,)//7/7777//7/tl
Ne9ligible .
l
l:-3'//?/)'T.r7I'/7/
{oj
#
channels of large slope, the ana.lytlis of
surge moyement will be illustrated by
Example 19-2. In simplified calculations,
where c and c' are the celerities of the right-side and len-side suI'ges,
respectl vely.
difference in the effect of slope ma.y be treated by con-
veloeily head j.J
verting the slope into a series of steps. Example HI-1. A steady flow s.t 6.80 fps and 42.90 It deep is suddenly stopped at
Vw~ In this way the c,lmnnel length is divided the downstream end of the 9,700 ft reach oJ a. frictionless rectangular channel. Deter-
t-;~ J il.· ,,'t ~. into a number of reache.3. In ea.ch reach, mine the surge thus produced.
I VZ_Y.ZI'y'-.+-V Y' Solulion. A reflected suq;e advancing upstrea.m is produced. The velocity at the
~' - VI ! .( v; __ ( the fioor is considered horiwntal, and the
downstream end evidently cha.nges from V I = 6.80 fps to V. = O. By. Eq. (19-17) or
actual drop in floor elevation due to slope (19-20), with Yl = 42.90 ft, the depth or the oovallcing surge y" CllJl be computed as
.:h7?777d771d i I effect. is represented by a step (Fig. 19-6) 51.09 f t . · ' ,
f!);'7//7T/?/hzhw:
placed either in the middle or at one end Note that Eq. (W-I7) or (19-20) must be solved by trialllnd error. A simplified
IO! procedure is to use Eq. (18-46) together with Eq. (19-24). Thus, Eq. (I8-4cG) g1\'e;;
of the reach. The height F of'the step is
FIG. 10-6. Arrival of surge at a equal to the slope of the' channel multi- c = V32.2 X 42.g 37.2 ips, and then Eq. (19-24) gives h = :17.2 X G.80/32.2 =
step rmd friction barrier. (a) 7.85 it, which makes 1b = 42.90 + 7.85 = 50.75 it. This value may be used as the
Before the arriva.l; (b 1 after the plied by the length of the reach. This best estimate /Dr the trial-a.nd-error solution oJ Eq. (l9-17) or (19-20).
arrivaL. ' simplified calculation is usually used in By Eq. (19-10), the wave velocity V..; 35.6 fps. The time requir~d for tb.e wave- )
analyses in which the effect of channel front to arrive at the upstrea.m end of the reach is 9,700/35.6
is 35.6 + 6.8 ... 42.4 Ips.
272 sep_ The celerity r
friction is also considered (Art. 19-5).
When a surge arrives :J.t a step, the result is to produce two new surges, Example 19-2. A gradually va.ried steady flow is decreased a.t the lower end of an
inclined rectangular channel by the sudden parti'a.l closing of a gate. Describe!!.
one traveling upstream and the at-her downstream. Figure 19-6 illus-
method for determining the. surge thus produced (also. see Art. 19-5)_ "
trates the an'ivaI of a surge at the step and the condition immediately Solulian. Referring to Fig. 19-7, the channel has a slope S. and carries a steady dis-
after arrival. Applying Eq. (19-17) to the left-side Ilew surge, charge Q. The depth y and velocity V of the steady flow at any. section, say nn, can
be computed. .
_ . . ) (Ut + Y2)g For the determination of the surge due to sudden decrease 01 flow at section '00, a
(Vi -'- V 2 P = (Yt- Y2 2"':'=--::::2-'-=-"':"'::" (19-30)
, YtY2 step computation may be eI)1ployed.' The channel is divided in~· 9.- number. of
reaches, each ha.ving a length equal to t.:r.. The computation may start at section
Applying (19-17) to the right-side new surge, 00 and. then proceed by steps from reach to rea.ch. Consider the step computation
from section n'n' to section nn. The flow condition at section 11,'.,.' is assumed to
. (19-31) ha ve been determined, and it is now requifed to determine the l3urge height h. and
velocity .v...at section nn '

I
i
! I;
1
1-
554
'~ 'l,
"
. i

UNSTllJADy FLOW
ILIi.PIDLY VARIED UNSTEADY FLOW 565
The dischn:rge t\lrotlgh the surge front is
r Then, compute the values of Yv by Eqs. (19-31) and (19-42), respectjve\y. If the
I two values of V .. so computed do not agree,assume another 11. and repeat the computa-
tion, until the two values of V", agree ~nd hence the correct values of Ii. and V'" Me
wllere b is the width of the channel.
By Eq. (Hl-15), using Eq. (18-45) for c,
I obtained. To start Lhe step computation at section 00, Eq,. (19-36) may be used to
replace Eq. (19-42), since in Eq.(19-36} the va.lue of AQn at section 00 is equal to IlQ.
Example 19-3. A step with F= 2.38 It is located at the upstrea.m end of the reach
-y (1~37j considered in Example 19-1. Determine the flow condition immediately after the:

) where 11 is the depth iUld l' is the velocity of flow at section nn. If the surge height
I
I
sru.ge arrives at the barrier. The flow upstream from the reach llUder consideration
has fl, sk;ady velocity of 7.00 fps'in the downstream direction shd a depth of 41.65 ft.
Solt,tUm. At the step the sur'ge produced in Example 19-1 is spli't into two com-
is re\ll.Uvely small, say h.;fi, a.I!I, the above eqtnltion may be replaced by , :

(19-38)
I, : ponent surges, one tra.veling fa,rther upstream and. the other, II- fe-fleeted surge, travel-
,ing dowllstream. For the surge tra.veling upstream, Eq. (19-30) gi\'es

The time required for the smgc to move from section n'1l."to nn. mILY be <:lxpressed as II (7.00 V:)2 = (41.65 ")' (41.65 + !{,Jg
y- 83.30yz
(I(l-39) i By Ee:. (19-32), lh' = y, + 2.3&. Thus, for the surge traveling downstream, ,Eq.
where (19-31) gives
1
)
\
Let W represent the sh£.,ded !1.re~1 (Fig. 19-7), \vhich is
(19~40)

a. measure of the increase in

t (0 - Y , ')'-
-
(48 71
-
)2 (53.47 + Yl)g
- y", 102.l8(YJ + 2.38) (19-44)

By continuity of fiOlY, Eq. (Hi-33) gives

~ Ys!l~ = V,'(Yt + 2.38) (19-45)
I
I
Equtl.tions (19-43) to (19-45} may be solved simultaneously by trial and error.
~~~~ZXZ'<~~lola' Assumin[ 'V, = 0.52 fps, Eq. (19-43) gives Y2 '.19.34 ft a.nd Eq. (l9-44) gives V,' =:
0.50 'ips. Equation (19-45) serves as 3. check. Thus, 0.52 X 411.34 "" 0.50 X 51.72.
I If Eq. (19-45) is not satisfied, other vruues of V, should be tried and the computa-
I tion repeated until the condition of flow continuity a.t the step is lIVe!l" established.
It $holl1d be noted that, in this ex"mple, the water-surface elevations on the two
sides of :the step are not equa.lllnder steady-flow conditio,ns; the difference is 41.65 +
I
,I
2.38 42.90 1.13 ft. This difference is due to the friction effect and can be treated
in combinatio!l with the slope effect in surge analyses (see Art. 19-5).
The effect of friction in a rllILch may be assumed to be concentrated at a. fictitious
element knowu as the friction bGJ'1'ier. This element ma.y be positioned conveniently
a.t the section where a. ~tep is provided for the slope effect. On both sides of the bar-
rier the water surfa.ces are kept horizonta.l, but the depths of flow are not equa.\ j eflch
represents the avera.ge dep~h of s~ady flow in its reach. The depth of steady flow
may be determined by a lIow-profilecomputatioll on the basis of,a. given channel
FiG. 19-7, Positive surge moving ,tpstream in an inclined channel. roughnlll!s. When the surge arrives at the barrier, thefailter water on one side of the
barrier will bump into the slower water on the other side. The result is to shoot
chanl\el storage due to advance of the S1lrge in time Ilt, Thus, up a. little water spout, which immediately separates tho flo,,, into two new surges,
traveling in reversed directions. At, the barrier there rema.ins ;. little standing
, W '" t;Q AI (19-4.1) wave. rrhi.~ accounts for the diffe'reI)ce between the two velocity, heads that now
where t.Q is th~ reduction i'[j discha.rge clue to partial closing of the grlte. exist on either side of the barrier. In, general, this difference is so small that it ca.n
El i~linating 1'.. and' At the abo"e thre~ equations, the velocity of surge may be' neglected. '
be written ' Example 1'\1-4. Derive a.n showing the approximate a~nount of energy
of 0. surge.
V,,_ 2 A~ Ax _ l',/ (19-42) SolutlilJn. Consider an element of a
surge h~Ying length in the direction of the
channel'equal to unity; the potential of the surge is equal to the work done by
1:1 ~he CQmp~ta.tion, first aSSume h. Th~s, W may he
determined by geometry, Efting lip the mass of water wkT to a height h/2, or
,assnm\ug !I. horu;ontal water surface in the channel after the passing' of the surge.
(19-46)
666 UNSTEADY FLOW RAPIDLY VARIJ<JD UNSTEADY FLOW 567
where w is the UlliL weight of water, T is the top width, and h is the surge height~ of y. By the momentum principle, the corresponding change in hydro-
The kinetic energy of the element is evidently equal to ' static pressure should be equal to the force required to change the
KE. = wV 'YT' momentum of the vertical element between y and y + dy. Considering
•2 g (19-47)
a unit width of the channel and assuming PI = /32 = 1,
where y is the depth of water snd V is the velodty of flow. By Eq. (1,9-23) or Eq.
(HI-19), !liS the case may be, the shove equation, may be reduced to '
W
Z y2 -
W
2' (y
W
+ dy)2 = g (y + }f dy) (V + V ...l dV
.
(19-51) J
l{.E. = 'Ulh'gi(£ Simplifying the above equation and neglecting the differeritial terms
2c' (19-48)
of higher order, - r
I
Assuming R surge of small height,
. . V V
c=-../iY dy = - ~~--=-.dV (19-52)
and the above equation becomes . g f
(19-49) As described previously (Art.· Hl-l), the whole wavefront ~all be I
. I

The total energy of surge per unitJength is, therefore, assumed to be made up of a large number of very small waves placed
E P.E, + ILE. = wh'T (19-50) , f

r
=
-=- ___ ~w~_ .
19-4:. Negative Surges. Negative surges are. not stable in form, ",
.1
because the upper portions of the wa.ve travel faster than the lower por- dy 1 ~ Y w

tions (Art. 19-1). If the initial profile of, the surge is assumed to have a V2 [
Y2 --- ' ; l:! VW1 -<--' -,

Assump.d
t j , I I... VI- YI

-:,,---
Assumed Assumed surge profile
)//.1,/'//'yhhw/7/,//?//mJ/?,.;;:v/.?7
profile profile immed,otely
ofter 2.1 sec one: t sec ofter creation . ,?X?i/,-//?7-0?V/.?7/,T/.//.//?
- ~,- FIG. 19-9, Analysis of a negfl.t,ive surge.
. ~ -- -=- - - --
one on top of the other. The velocity of the small wave a.t tho point
under consideration may be expressed ar'.()ording to Eq. (19-11) as
Vw = vgy - V (19-53)
FIG, 19-8. Propagation of II. llegative surge due tr, sudden lift of a sluice gate.
Similarly, the velocity at the wave crest is
steep front, it will soon flatten out as the surge moves through the V .. 2 = ...}gY2 - Vz (19-54)
channel (Fig. 19-8). If the height of the surge is modemte or small and, at the wave trough,
compared with the depth of flow, the equations derived for a positive (19-55)
surge can be applied to determine approximatdy the propagation of the
negative surge. If the height of the surge is relatively large, a more When the surge is not ,too high, a straight-line relation between V"'l
elaborate analysis is necessary as follows: and V",2 may be assumed. Thus, the mean velocity of the wave may be
Figure'19-9 shows a type D surge (Fig. 19-2) of relatively large height, considered to be .
retreating in an upstl'eam direction. The surge is caused by the sudden (19-56)
lifting of a sluice gate. The wave velocity of the surge actually varies
from point to point. For example, V .. is the wave velocity at a point Now, eliminating V", between Eqs. (19-52) and (19-53),
on the surface of the wave where the depth is y and the velocity of Jlow
through the section is V. During a time interval dt, the change in y is dy. !!JL dV,
(19-57)
The valu~ of dy is positive for an in,crease of y and negative for a decrease --/y - ...}Y

...... !'--: .. ; .. -.
 569
RAPIDLY VAlUED UNSTEADY FLOW
568 . UNSTEADY FLOW . a ower canal This information is
result of iL sudden rejection of load l~ f P stabli6hi~1g the height of wall
Integrating this equaiion from Y2 to Y and from V 2 to V, and solving . d'n the design of the cana or e
for V, . requrre 1
nece6So,ry to prevent overflow. d" f teady flow hl a power canaL
v (19-58) Figure 19-11a shoWS ,th~ C?n,ltlOn a ~ nputed, When the load
From Eq. (19-53), The flow profile and the fnctlOll loss can e COl
tr", = 3 -0iY - 2 vgy; -V2 (19-59)
Velocity . Profile of
Thus, the wave velocity at the trough of the w:w.e is ----2.r .heod I
/ the origiMI
steod Y flow
I
I
", V",t = :; .ygy-; - 2 'VgY2 - V 2 (19-60) Reservoir. V . - . ;
To power
i --... .......Jr,..
~; Iplont
I Let l be the time elapsed since the surge was created or, in thif! easel ~ - .../~
since the sluice gat.e 'was opened. At t = 0, the wavelength A O. , tal . .
\
After t sec, the wavelength is equal to
, \
I. A = (Vw2 - V~'I)t (19-61) ,
---.. ;C~:.=lW/&~~
The analysis oan be applied sin:ilarly to a ne2:atlV'e of ---~-~--h-l-e- -------jd
. type C. v.+ )(
I
I
E:tample 19-5. Show that the equation of the wa.ve profile, reSUlting from the
( failure of. a drun is in the form of [bj

x = 2t v'iiii. - 31 -vIiii .
\ Sur,)" prl)f lie wnen the wo'!e
where::t: is the distance measured from the da.m site, y is the depth of the wa.ve profile, I front reaches the reservolf I
lit is the depth of the impounding wa.ter, and t is the time a.fter the dam broke.
I
Solu/ian. SiuGe the impoundiug wa.ter velocity, or V. = 0,. the. wave
velocity by .Eq. (19-59) is Y", = 3 2 -vgy Since V 18 is in the negative direc- Vmax--""'" V=0-+1
tion of z, x = - V"I, which gives Eq. (19-62). 1
/ /
, /. I
/
tel
~cenler line of
I Ihe dam
_--.=-....I ·
I,
v.=o Yz
I
.....
J

L.-!I
Surge profile when tne w'!ve
front reoches the ,.servo,.:!
. r--------~ ---=-=- --:-1l ' I
) I ":.. ~-l.v I ,Rolf wove
-- I
l'

\1·U,Q9
Maximum .tage
01 th'l rejection

Jm 'it:, I 'I ::.:-

~
...,. V.... i =2.,..I9Y2, !
I
~~
l"XG. 19-10. Wa.ve profile due to dam failure. ~ (;;""
Equation (19·(i2) represents a. par~bQla with:vertical axis and vertex on the' cha.nnel FIG. 19-11'. Development of rejection ~urge in friction!!.I. channel.
bottom, as shown in Fig. 19-10. At the site of the dam, x = 0 and the depthy.
4y./9, Qwing to the channel friction, the actual profile takes the form iudiCl!.ted
\ !
. . . ' on sur' e advancing upstream is produced, :
is suddenly thrown off, a reJectl d' g t sual observations, the water
by the dashed line. . This profile has a rounded ,front at the downstream end, forming a
bore (see Example 18-1). At the upstream end, the theoretical profile thus developed as shown in Fig. 19~1lb. Aceol' 0 +~s approximately level. Thus, m1.
has been checked satisfMtorlly with experiments by Schoklitsch[121. . surface ab downstream from the wave ro~" the water surface throughout
'19-5. Surge in Power Canals. Engineers are interested in the deter-
when the wavefront reaches the re(s;:volf
the entire canal becomes level Ig.
11C
). However, a steadily
i9_
mination of the maximum stage of water that could be developed. 8J.I a.
570 UNSTEADY JrLOW RAPIDLY VARIED UNSTEADY FLOW 571
increasing volume of water must pass through the wavefront to fill the stream. When one surge traveling tlpstream meets another surge
space corresponding to abc. Because of this action and the effect of traveling downstream,. two new surges will emerge. The, computl).tion
friction, the wavefront is being greatly reduced in height and velocity for the new surges has heen described in Art. 19-3B.
on its way to the reservoir. Furthermore, as the surge reaches the The surges will continue to tra vel, split, and emerge. The computation
reservoir, the velocity of ft.ow in the canal must show a progressive
increase from a maximum at the reservoir to zero at the downstream end
where there is no outlet for relief. As a result, water will be built up "'" -
- ...... ~. -1'>1I
to a maximum stage at the downstream end, as shown in Fig. 19-11d, ~7);/J) /777.1»)17) 77))..'7"I/?;P>?/./ 1I'l//7777//Ml/mmr/.J//?7 I '
sometime soon after the arrival of the surge front at the resenroir. f.-- 9,700' .1.
9,700'-----4---- 9,700'---+J..-:.- 9,700'-----1
(al I", ·~8.aoo' I
For the determination of the maximum stage produced by the rejec-
ci'"
-.
I""l

' ';':.;;''
1'1 I"'l
tion surge,l Johnson [14,15J has applied an analytical method 2 to the
design of the supply canal of the Queenston-Chippewa plant in the
vicinity of Niagara Falls . . In this example (Fig, 19-12a), the entire
~ ;-,--fr~-~-'--IF----~-· --ir=-----~-~r
length of the canal is divided into four rea.ches each 9,700 ft long.
1 . ~I ~I ~I I
At the very beginning, t = 0, the flow is steady, and the flow proftle (b J I, V~7.4~ __ '::~_0_....:N"",!~_7_.0_0_ _N:,;.,,;..,._ _6_.8_0_ _ -l
can be computed. The drop in water-surface elevation in each reach is
indicated at the division section between reaches, for exampte, 1.13 ft '"
for reach 4in }I'ig. 19-12b (see Example 19-3). The water surface in each
reach is assumed leveL Note that the friction in each reach at the steady-
flow condition is considered in the computation of the flow profile. The
I
::.11
slope effect of the channel is represented by a drop on the channel floor ';1
at the division sec Lion between the reaches, for example, 2.38 ft for reach 4
(Art. 19-30). The water depths ill feet are represented by the figures '"
wriHen vertically. The velocities in feet per second are r.epresented by oon 27<' sec

the figures written horizontally. In reach 4, for example,. the depth is

42.90 ft and the velocity is 6.80 fps. "'I
"!,
I .,.
.oj

~!, ~I
When the load is suddenly thrown off, a surge is developed at the "'I. 7.20 N 7.00 '!l 0
--~--'''''~I~.---~~-~--~,--~~--~
1
ao a
dowllstream end Qf the canal (Fig. 19-12c). The computation of this .n ..., ;;;
; '"ci
<D .....
"'
C N 10
oJ
Velocify
recoIJe ry /1~ .1.
"'
". oJ 0
.D

l-
ci ci ci ci .
initial surge has been shown in Example 19-1. 0 <:$
- .- _.- _. f 7. 65.mox,. rrH
,.., 0 ., ..., -1
After 272 sec have passed since the surge was produced, the surge u1
oJ
oJ
on 0
'" '"IX! "!'" - 0
...'"
~
'",..;
'"
N
I,B51 sec
'"ci "!
.
<1>
arrives at the barrier at the upstream end of reach 4 (}I'ig. 19-12d). The S·~ .,.,..; on, N .;,..,
.,. r-. III
"j
" "':
" '" "'
water depth throughout reach 4 is 51.09 ft; and the velocity of flow is
on
,.., .,
I .f--I.. "!! ..j... ,,!I I -1..... "11
'" 1
zero. At the barrier, the surge is soon split int.o two component surges, I~) \...-,1 I ":1." ,I, "'I. ,I. "J......::!i.-----=---->i
4.SZ45,087 5.11.0 4.899 5,{24 4.545 4.350 4.3710.<40· 0.230
one traveling upstream and the. other downstream. The computation
for these surges has been given in Example 19-3. FIG. 19-12. Analysis ";f reject.iQ:J.surge by the Johnson method~
The component surge traveling downstream will soon reach the down-
stream end of the canaL After it reaches the end, it will be reflected. will {ollow' accordingly until th8 maximum stage is obtained l1.t the down-
The reflected surge will travel upstream again. stream end of the canaL In the example given by Johnson, the maxi-
The component surge traveling upstream will soon re:ach another mum stage is found to be 7.65 ft above the reservoir pool level (Fig ..
friction barrier farther upstream. At the barrier it will split into two 19-12e), This will be reached 1,851 sec after the load is rejected.
components, one traveling farther upstream and one traveling down- It is apparent that the Johnson method is very laborious. The pro- - \
1 See [131 for another method. c.edute becomes very involved as the computation conHnues, for numer-
% ·lohnson gave credit to P, Wahlman for this method,
OWl surges will be produced an.d propagated. The surge in a canal can

I
1 \
 572 U~STEApy FLOW
l also be studied by hydraulic models' and electronic computers, which are
I sometimes found much eltsier though more expensive.
The analysi8 of. surge is important also in the design of ventilated tail-
l'ace tunnels for underground hydropower stations. In E'Uch cases,
demand surge is usually developed as n result of asuddell increase in the
lond output [16,17].
Rejection surges ~n powel: c!111f1.ls can be controlled by two commonly
used deviee::;; longitudinal weirs along the canal and tiiting gates
on top of the spillway, either aut.omatic or turhine-opemted; The
theory for longitudinal side weirs hM been developed by Drioli [18],
Schmidt [191, and Citrini [20,21J. Citril1i's theory is based on the method
of characteristics and hM been verified satisfactorily by GBlltilini [22],
Pel1~ti [23], and De M(1.\,chi De Marchi hm;·!\.lso reported experi-
meuts on the use of the tilting gn.te as a control device.
For a comprehensive discllssion of un~teady flow, the reader should
refe!' to the trenti~e by Frank [20J.
19-6. Surge .1n Navigation Canals. Surges may occur in navigation
canals as a· result of lock operations, tmffic disturbrt.nces, tidal a.ctions, or
other causes. Under severe conditions they will affect the canal tl·n.ffic
critically either by depressing the wll.ter level and thereby reducing the
effective channel depth 01' by raising the water level and thus encroach-
ing upon the freeboard. They will also impose sudden impact load upon
vessels, cD.lml structures, and mn.chinery operating miter gates}
In 1110st lHIVign.tiol1 canals, ,')urges are small and insigIiifical1t.
Neverthele~s, some consideration of the surge problem is desirable in
can..l desigll, particularly if the traffic is to be heavy and if .the canal is .
long and controlled high head In this article, surges due to
lock operatio!ls are mainly Surges due to traffic disturbances
are e~~cluded, fol' they are significant only for the consideration of vessel
power requirements. due to tidal actions a.re beyond the scope
of this book, since they cOllstitute an important topic il1 tidal hydraulics.
Surges may (1.180 OCCIII' in lock chambe~'s; this, however, is usually .regarded
as a special problem in lock design [15, pp. 1I:JO-213J.
There are several methods of controlling surges in navigation canals
among them the following:· . ,
1. Increasing equalization time. surge height is, in gmiel'al, pro-
pOl,tional to its discharge rate 01' inversely proportional to the time of
lock: equalization. Thus, the surge height can be reduced to any desired
degree by nppropri,tte increase in ~qualization time. In all existing
cnnfll, this cp.n be done by throttling the inlet ports, and, in a new design,
: : I
l For !tn analysi:; of surges deve]opedby partially or fully opening a !:niter gate,
see [27]. . 1 Simllar methods with further approximations are used by tIle U.S. Army Corps 'fJf
RAPIDLY YARlED UNSTEADY FLOW 573
by providing inlet ports or low capacity. This method is simple' and
inexpensive but hss'the disadvantage of delaying the traffic. ,
2. Increasing channel dimensions. . An increase in channel depth WIll
iricretl.se the celerity and reduce the surge height. An increase in channel
width will decrease the surge height without change in celerity. In
either case, the. velucity of flow and hence the collision ha,7iard are reduced.
3. Lateral reservoirs. These reservoirs are connected to the lock as
well as to the canal with control valves, and are installed at the upstream
as well as the downstream lateral sides of the lock. In filling. the lock,
water is taken' in from the upstream reservoir, which is later to be filled
tip ,'gnin to its original level by ta.king in wa.ter slowly from the upstream
cll.nat In emptying the lock, water is released to the downstream reser-
voir, which is then to be emptied down to its original level by releasing
water gradually to the d')WJ1strcam canal. In essence, the effect of the
hiaral reservoirs is to reduce the time of lock equalization without
developing severe surges in Lila canal. . .
4. Channel expansions. Sudden. expansions are provided in the callal
011 the ,upstream &.ud downstream sides of the lock. Such exp,1.l1siollS
will produce negative reflections,which can cancel the traveling Burges
partially. ,
The method of analysis of surges in navigatioq canals can best be
illustrated by a numerical example} In navigation canals: surges of
large height cannot be tolerated nor can the occurrence of high velocities.
Thus the analysis can be greatly simplified 1n many pI';Jblems by assuming
possible surges of height aua flow of negligible velocity effects. Since
the generation, propagation, and reflect. ion of surges are essentially
dynllmic and gravit!1.tion111 phenomena, the liiurges can also be studied by
model tests based on the Froude In.w. .
.
Example 19-6. A surge is prod~ced in a navigation canal by em{ltying the lock
chamber. The discharge out of the chamber is shown 8.5 iJ. function of time in Fig.
19-13£1. The equaliza.tion time is 11) min. The canal has a l·~tangular section 200 It
wide and'a mean wa.ter depth of 15 ft. The slope of tbe canal is assumed horizontal.
Determine the surge profile. .
. Solution. The computation for the determination of the Burge profile is shown in
Table 19-1. In the analysis, t.he discharge is assumed to be reieased at inter'/a\s of
time. In each interval a surge of small height is produced and will travel downstream
at a, speed computed by.the formulas derived in t,he previous articles. Thus, the
resulting surge configuration is formed by acoumulating the fronts of the incremental
surges. The columna in the table lire explained as follows: .
CoL 1. Time in see since the discharge sta.rted. The interva.l of time is deter-
mined arbitrarily. accurate determination, a small interval should be used. ,
CoL 2. Discharge in cis per ft-of channel width, equal to the total discharge show,n
by the hydrograph (Fig; 19-130) at the corresponding time divided by 2QO It
" ! ' , , i
Engineem [28]. : .
574 UNSTEADY FLOW RAPIDLY VARIED UNSTEADY FLOW 575
Col. 3. Initial velocity of flow in fps before the incremen.tal surge arrives, equal to maximum height of the surge is found to be about 2 ft, which is'generally required in
V. (col. 4) of the previous step <design for the determination of the freeboard and tho water pressure against the chan-
Col. 4. Final v(~l()city of flow in fps after tbe incremental passes, <equal <to net walls. The surge height at the en.d of the equalization. time should be zero_ The
the discharge value in col. 2 divided by the nn.al depth Y. (col. 7) the previous step. value -0.01 as complJted is dlls to the approximation of< the slide-rule computation..
This is an approximation, because y~ of the iueremental under consideration is
unknown as yet. 12.000

II
<

TABLE 19-1. COMPUTATION OF SURGE PROFILE IN A NAVIGA'l'ION CANAL 10,000 I . ,

.l:'!
L '"'
~~
.,
8.000
J
(11) (12) !r 6.000
'5U>
o o 0 a 15.00 0 15.00 22.0 22.0 o 600 113,200 4POO
30 12.5 0 0.83 15.00 0.57 1I:L57 22.4 22.4 0_57 I 570 12,800
0
i
j
60 25.0 0.83 1.(10 15.57 0.54 15.11 22<8 23.6 1.11 540 12,700 -r-~

i
·1
90 37.5 1.50 2.33 16.11 0 52 16<63 23.2 ~4.8 1.63 510 12,500
120 50.0 2<33 3.01 16.63 0.4917.12 23<5 25.8 2.12 480 12,400 4 5 6
150 46.9 3.01 2.74 17.12 -0.20 16.92 23_3 26.3 1. 92 450 11 ,800 Time i., min
180 43.8 2.74 2.5916.92 --0.11 16.8123.326,0 1. 81 420 10,900 {a)
210 <40.6 1 2.592.4216.81 -0.12 Hi,fi9 23_225.8 1.69 390 10,100
240 37.52.422.2416.69 -0.1315.5623.1 1 25.5 9,200
270 34.4 2.24 2.08 16.56 -0.11 16.45 23.0,'25.2
1. 56 360
1.45 330 8,300
I' - - I
I
j
300 31.3 2.08 1.90 16.45 -0.13 16.02 2:L'9 25.0 1. 32 300 7,500 I
I
330 28.1 1.90 1.72 16.32 -0.13 16<Hj 2~L8 24.7 L 19 270 6,700 .!: 2 -.:;;..;;- -T
------
-- --
360 25.0 1.72 J .55 16_19 -0.12 16.07· 22.8 24.5 1.07 240 5;900
420 18.8 1.55 1.17 16.07 -0.27 15<80 22.6 24.2 0<80 180 4,400 ;-
480 12<5 L17 0.79 15.80 -0.27 15.53.22.4 23<6 0.53 120 2,800 .J...-- ...... ---
540 6.3079 0.41 15.53 -0.26 15<27122<0< 22.8 0.27 60 1,400
600 0 0.411015<17 -0.28 14.99 O. 0 -0.01 a o V \
1 __~__~.....
____~ _~ __~_ _ _~ .L-__~__ , Ii
o ~~ ! <-<

Col. 5. Initial depth in ft, equal to the final depth y, of the previous step
Col. 6. Height of the incrementa.! surge in ft, computed by Eq. (19-19) or
(19-63)
As an approxima.tion, tlie value c (col. 8} of the previous step is used in this equation.
Aiter l = 150 sec, V, becomes less tha.n V 2 ; tha.·t 15, the nega.tive incremen.tal surge
occurs. Thus, the computed his TI".''''.I''''_
Col. 7. Final depth of flow in ft, equal to the iniLi"l depth in col. 5 plus the height
of the incrementa! surge in col. 6
Co\. 8. Celerity in Ips, co}nputed by Eq. (19-9)
Col. 9. Absolute velocity of surge in fps, computed by Eq. (19-16)
Col. 10. Cumulative. va.lue of the height of in.cremimtal5urge (coL 5)
Col. 11. Travel time in sec until the discharge stops, equal to the equa.li~ation time
(600 sec) minus the time in col. 1 since the discharge started
Col. 12. Trovel in ft for ea.ch increment.aLsurge until the discharge stops,
equal to the product of the time in col. 11 and the absolute velocity in col. 9
Plotting the travel distance against the cumulative height of the incremental
the whole configuration of the surge is shown in Fig. 19-13b. This is
in the downstrea.m caDal after a period equal to the equalizatiou time is
5,000
I .la, 00 0
}.
j
o <'
D1stom:e in ft
lb)
FIG. HI-IS. Analysis of surge in. a navigation eanllJ. (.. ) Hydrogra.ph; (b) surge
profile.
19-7. Surge through Channel Transitions. When a surge arrives at
a channel transition, it will usually split into two component surges, Oile
traveling forward and the other backwB.rd. A typical case of a positive
surge passillg through a channel contraction has been described in Art.
Hl-3C. In this articie, however, more general but simplified cases are
presented.
Figure 19-14 shows four cases in which the positive and negative surges
are passing through channel contractions and expansions. In each case
an incoming surge of height hI and celerity Cl is split into !l. forward surg~
of height h2 and celerity C2 and a backward or refiecte~ surge of height
hs and celerity Ca. For simplicity, the sur-gas are assumed of small

.(
 j
I
i!

576 UNSTEA.DY FLOW

RA.PIDLY VARIED UNSTEADY FLOW 577
height, so th<tt, simplified equations can. be written. Furthermore, it is
assumed that 1.hf3 water is initially at rest and that no energy losses occur
Solving Eqs. (19-66) and (19-68) for h2 and h",
at the tra:nsition. .
(19-69)
I I By continuity of flow, the ~0tal amount of water passing through the
transition should be constant. Therefore,
and (19-70)
T Ih1Cl = T 2h 2 c2 + T 3haca (19-64)
The ratio of the reflected height to the initial height of a surge is
where Til T z, and Ta are top widths of the surges. '
kn.own a~ the reflection coefficient (Jr_ Letting T2 = nT 1 and using Eq.

(19-71)
I
1I
I
, As a further approximation, 1:1 "" c.; so
I
?WT/T/ffffO?7il "
(19-72)
, 7-1"77. .7;;'-:7,///;;.»??/~
( oj
Ii>l 'rhe relationship between 11 and C is shown below:

Reflection
Width rfl.tio Reflection Chaullel condition
coefficient

n 0 Cr 1 Positive A dead-end barrier

n <1 Or > 0 Partial positive Contraction
n 1 Or - 0 None No tmnsition
fa?WJ;·//.i7//h//Y"';;'l
~Q...:''''a'7?/rr:/.''""z'''''/;;'''''/$, '
11. >1 Or < 0 Partial negative Expansion
n= «> Or -1 Negative Entrance to a lake or sea
(el

FIG. 19-14. Surge through channel transitions. (a) surge through n. ~on­ In the case of positive reflection, a positive surge is reflected as, a
tro:ction; (0) positive surge through all enlll.rgemllnt; (0) negative surge through n con-
traction; (d) negative surge through an enlargement. positive surge and a negative surge as e. negative surge. In the case of
negative reflection, a positive surge is reflected as a negative surge, and
vice versa.
By the principle of conservation of energy, the total amount of energy
rema.ins the same after the split of the incoming surge. With the aid of ' Example 19-7. III a navigation canal, forebays are const:ucted betw'een the lO,ck
(19-50), the relationship of energy among the surges during a common and thecanala in order to provide adequate, Il.Ct.'OtnIDodo.hon, for the traffic (FIg.,
r
J
time interval may be written as follows: 19-15). The depth of wat.er in the downstream forebay and canal is 9 ft. The widt~a
of the iorebay and caDal are 300 ft and 150 ft, res:pectively. Determine the a.pproxl-
mate flow condition when a surge, produced by a sudden relense of 1,800 cis of water
(19-65)
from the lock, arriveB 'a.t, the transition between the for-sbay and the ,ca.nal.
For the case of a positive surge passing through a contraction (Fig. Solu.tion. 'I'he initial surge has a celerity approxima.tely equal to c. ....;gg-
19-14a),Cl "'" Ca and TI = Ta. Thus, Eqs. (19-64) and (19-65) become 17.0 fps and a height hI 0= ilQ,/c,T, = 1,800/(17.0 X 300) .'"' 0.353 ft. 'I'?e. c~lerity
in .the canal is-approximately,equal to, t., since the depth 13 the same as It IS ill the
T1(h i - hS)Ci = T 2h2c2 (19-66) forebllY. By Eq. (19-69), .
TI(h 12 h3 2)Cl = T2hz 2C2 (19-67)
h2 '"" ""~~'---"
L, = .2 X 300 X
?OO + 150
0.353
"
= 0.471 it
From Eqs. (19-66) and (Hl-57) or by geometry,
ThuB, h. h. h. - O.11B ft. The reflectioll coefficient is 0.118/0.353 .: 0.334.
(19-68) By Eq. (19-71), Or 0.333.
578 UNST'EADY FLOW
RAPIDLY VARIED UNSTEADY FLOW 579
The disc}targe entering the canal is I:1Q, =c,T.h. = 17.0 X 150 X 0.471 = 1;200
ds . . The reflected discharg;: is D.Q, = 1,800 - 1,200 = 600 ds. the two adjoining channels 'with celerities (:2 and /;3, respectively. Assum-
ing that surge heights are small compared with the depth of water ill
Forebay .--_F_o_re_b_o-'-y_ _ _ _ _ _ __
the chaunels, thB celerities can be computed by Eq. (18-'16). In the
meantime, a reflected surge will travel along channel I at a celerity
-.-~--~---+I----~~--..:~S-j~:-n~-c~ hpproximately equal to Cl. Figure 19-16b shows the condition at the -1
junction immediately after the arrival of the incoming surge.
FIG. 19-15. Analysis of surge through the trunsitio!l bet·ween forebay and canal. (Afler
J. Kozeny [31J.) _I
II V3=O·
h v31r-c, h3=O
-.J
Now, if the tmnsition between the callul and the lock is assumed gndual, as shown
in Fig. 19-15, the computation can be mude by letting h. = 11., +
dh, and c.T, =
Ch·~nnel II
V4 Channel m
cIT, + d(c,T,). Accordingly, Eq. (19-69) may be written
Woter orea=A2
-f= ·
Weier arHo=A,
CI
(10-73) hi
Channel [ ~
Int,egrating and simplifying the above equation, Woler orec=A, Chonnel I
(a) Woler area = Al
log (h, vC;:r;.) = const, (19-74)
(b)
Similarly, it can be shoi>l'n that FIG. 19-16. SUrge at channel junction. ·(a) Before arrival of surge; (b) ufter B.i:rival.
of surge.
log (h, Vc';;r.) = canst (19-75)

From the above two equations, Since the surge heights are assumed small compared with the depths of
flow in the channelS, Eqs.(19-1 9) and (19-2'1) can be applied. Thus, the
(19-76) following equations ca.n be written for channels I, II, and III, respectively:

With T,lT. = 2, the above equation gives hol"l = 1.414_ . Thus. h, = 1.41411., = For channel I hi - h = ~ (17 4 - V 1) (19-77)
0.499 It and h, = 0.146 ft. The corresponding C, = 0.413, I:1Q, = 1,~70 cis, nnd g
t.Q, = 530 cis. . For channel I .~ V1
This p.xample illustrates t.he application of the theory of surges to the hydraulic
hi = (19-78)
9
st.udy of ship lock and forebay. Such applications have been described by many
hydrnulicians, among t,hem Dantscher [29,30] and !{o~eny [31J. For channel II h = ~ V2 (19-79)
9
19-8. Surge at Channel Junctions. When a surge arrives at a channel For channel III h ..:..
- -C3 V3 (19-80)
junction, it will split into· several surges, each entering· a connecting 9
channeL A simple case, shown in Fig. 19-16, may be used to explain the By the law of continuity of flow, it is required that the .quantity of
phenomenon. . . water fioYving into the junction be equal to that flowing out of the junc-
Figure 19-16a shows that a surge in channel I is approaching the tion, or
junction of three rectangular channels. The surge has a height hi and
A,V 4 = A.V•. + A3V3 (19-81J*
celerity CI.· Channel I has a water area A I and depth of fiowYI. Since
there are ~o surges in channels II and III, h2 = hs = O. The initial Solving the above equations simultaneously .for h,
velocities in the channels are taken as zero merely for the sake of simplic-
ity, although any velocities could be assumed. h = ~!lAi (19-82)
. let.
When the incoming surge reaches. the· junction, its height is reduced
because of the increased surface area presented to the surge by the two where I = A1 + A2 + A3 (19-83)
C1 C2 (:3
additional channels. Surges of reduced height h will then travel through
'" V. has a direction opposite to c,.
580 ,
UNSTEADY ,FLOW
.
If ::\11 incoming surge of height h2 nppr:oaches the junction from channel
II, then it can heshown that
(19-84)
Similarly, if fin incoming surge of height h3 approaches the junction
from chn.nnel III, then
h (19-85)
By the above principle, it is possible tp analyze surges in a complicated
channel network,' Such it methtld has been developed by Swain [32,33]
for all approximate det.ermina.tion of surge flowa in an interconnected
system of estuarine channels in response to tidal variations. In this
method, the friction barrier is assumed to he located at the midc,ile of a
chanl1el reach. The surges are assumed to have small heights compared
with the depth of flow, so that simplified equations can be applied .. To
further expedite the computation, it is desirable to have coincidental
arrival of surges at a barrier or junction at some given instant. This is
made possible by the use of a procedure that iuvolves a modification of
the true length of the channel reaches. The analytic method developed
by Swain was a.ctually applied to a problem for the determination of
flows in intercollnected eatuo.rine channels in the Delta area of California
ea.st of Suisun Bay. The same problem was studied by the U,S. Bureau
of Reciamation using ;an elaborate hydraulic model [34-36] and an elec-
tronic anriJog model [37J. The results of the SWj:1.in method were checked i
satisfactorily ..
1.9-9. Pulsating Flow. "When the slope of a channel becomes very
steep, supercritical flow of uniform depth in the channel will brel1k into
a train of. traveling wo.ves or pulses, known as pulsating flow. Such an
unsteady flow occurs in various situations and in each situation it has
specific significance. When it occurs in inclined flumes and spillw:1Ys,
the increased height of t.he flow requires additional freeboard to prevent.
spillage, and ,the concentrated mo.ss of the wavefrol1ts calls for additional
structural safety factors against transient pressures and stresses. In
hydraulic models, pr~sence of the flow often interferes with similarity
conditions. On farm, lands and unstabilized toads, the high scouring:
capacity of the flow causes surface erosions. In chemical processes, the
effect of the flow will increase the mass-transfer rate between gas and
liquid diffusion reactiqns. ' I. . •
There have beeuni.llllerou8 'studies on the phenomenon of pulsating;
flow. Most of them/ ihowever, were made printarily in connection with I
the investigation of the mechanism of instabilit~ of flow (Art. 8-8). An·
analytical and experimental study of pulsati~g flow which has long
RAPIDLY VARlED UNSTEADY 'FLOW 581
intere,sted hydraulic engineers Was made by Thomas [38]. In this study
pUlsating flow was described as a flow consisting of two parts, a roughly
tumbling head and a smooth' tail sectiOll. The results of the study
indicate that, for puLSating fio'" to occur in a wide rectangular channel,
the channel slope must be more than 4' times the critical slope or the
velocity more than twice the critical velocity. Another investigation
was by Mayer [39J, 'Who found that pulsating flow can be classified
into two distinct types, namely, r~ll waves arid slug flow.
According to Mayer, rpll waves are char!1cterized by transverse ridge<!
of high vorticity. The regions .between the crests are quiescent. The
wa ves are initiated by finite as .well as infinitesimal disturbances in the
laminar boundary layer. The process can be enhr,nced by eJ.."ternal
caUOles, such as addition of water by rain, release of air bttbbles in the
upstream pool, roughening the chs-nnel entrance, or contact of the flow
surface with disturbing air currents. For roll waves to form, however,
the surface velocity of the undisturbed flow must be le,~s than the wave
velocity, and the channel slope must be supercriticaL This require-
ment will ensure the breaking of waves at their downstream ends aild
thus allow a froutward steepening of wave configuration and subsequent
increase of capillary effects. This process is primarily responsible for
the formation' of roll waves. In lV1a,yer's experiment, no roll waves were
observed on slopes of less than 3% and in 110 case was the Reynolds
number in excess of 420.
. Slug flows are characterized by surges of turbulent l'idges with wave
separated by highly agitated regions. In model channels, they are
originated randomly at the side walls and in tha channel o.s spotty bursts
of turbulence, exhibiting characteristics similal' to moving oblique
hydraulic jumps. .They are the resl\lt of transitioll from' 8upercritical
laminar to subcritic!.1.1 turbulent state of flow.. For flows to form, tp,e
surface velocity must be gre~"ter than the wave yelocity. This will
ensure the steepeningllnd breaking of wayes at their upstream ends and
thereby result in the development of moving hydraulic jumps. In
Mayer's experiment, no slug waves wexe formed OIl slopes less than about
2%. The range of Reynolds numbel' for slug flows was approximately
1,000 to 4,000. For Reynolds number greater than 4,000, the flow was
thoroughly turbulent.
Considering a parabolic distribution of the velocity of a uniform flow
in all inclined channel, the surface velocity by Eq. (6-42) for
Y y", is gSy",2/Z V • The ave1'age velocity of the flow ls given by Eq.
(6-43) nr. V = (fSy",2/3v. The surface velocity is, therefore, equal to
1.5 times the average velocity,: or 1.5V. .I
According to the previous description, a ('011 wave' Cal). be formeci
when the surface velocity is equal to or less than the absolute wave
 582 UNSTEADY FLOW
RAPIDLY VARIED UNSTEADY FLOW 583
velocity, that when lS-12. Referring to shotv that the crest velocity V ... = .,;gy;,
that
L5V ~ V +c (19-86) the trough velocity Vw! thl3.t the velocity of flow through the !lam site
or Vic ~ 2 n9-87) is % vYY., and that the through the dam site is %7 yg !l,li.
19-13. Contmuet.he oi the example illustrated in Fig. 19-12, Bnd
Since Vic is equal to the Froude number and since roll waves can be determine the flow conditions a.t 420, 504,552, 743, and 767 sec, \€spectively, after the
formed only on supercritical slopes) the range of Froude numbei' for the load was suddenly thrown off.
formation of roll waves is 1 & F & 2. Solving (6-43) for S, it can be 19-14. Soive Example 19-6 if the equllJi2'ation time is (a) S min and (b) 12 min ..
The dil!charge from the lock increase.• linearl)"from 0 to 10,000 cfs for the first 20% of
8how'n that 8 = 3F2/R. Thus, the range of slope for the formation of the time and then decrease$ linearly to 0 for the remaining part of the· time. Study
roll waves is 3/R :::2 S ~ 12/R. the effect due to cbange in eqllalizati'm time.
Slug flow can be·formed when the surface velocity is great.er than the 19-16. Solve EX!l.J11ple 19-7 if the discharge is 1,000 cis.
wave velocity. Theoretically, the formation of slug flow will . 19-16. Three horizontal frictionlE'lis channels '}, 6, and S ft wide meet 'at a jnnction.
occur when F > 2 and S > 12/R. The W!l.ter in the channels has an initicl statiana.ry depth of 10 ft. When an incom-
ing surge 0.4 ft bigh approaches the junction fro~ the narroWI..'St ci]!l.nnel ddermine
the flovi condition after the surge enters thl:! junction. Compute the relle~ticn lloeffi-
cient of the junction. .
PROBLEMS

19-1. Prove (19-11).

19-2. Prove Eg. (19-15). .
19-3. Assuming the energy loss in thp. moving hydraulic jump t.o be negligible,
Koch an'd l27J have derived the following equation ior the wave velooity
or.a. surge;
(19-88)
where the positive sign is for type.A and C surges and the negative sign is for type B
and D SUrges (Fig. 19-2). Verify this equation. . through an open horizontal channel: II, The formation of hydraulic jump, Pl'O-
19-!!. Assuming atl initial depth of 20 ft, an initia.l velocity of 15 fps, a.nd a rectan-
gttlar channel cross section, compute the velocity and overrun of thE'. bore shown in
. Fig: 19·3 and estimate the distance trs.vel>ad by the bore in 7 min.
19-5. Compute the height", depths, and wave velocities of the two component
surges produced in Example 19-3. . S. Robert E. Horton: Channel waves subject chiefly to mOmenhlfl1 crmtnl, U.S.
19-6. A positive surge 0.63 fthigh and 51.72 ft deep is moving ill still water 5l.0a.
ft deep with a wave velocity of 41.70 fps toward the daRd end of a channeL Deeer-
mine the height and wave velocity of the reflected S'Irge after the original surge hits
the dead end.
19-'1'. Solve Example 19-1 if the original steady flow has a velocity of 10 fps and a
depth of SO ft .
. 19-8. Solve Example 19-3, if the step has a height of F = 3 ft.
19-9. Two positive surges 3 and 2 ft in height, rc~pe~tively, move in opposite
directions toward each other in a frictionless borizontal channel where the water is
initially stationary at a depth of 30 ft .. The high surge has a wave velocity of 30 fps
and the low surge a wave velocity of 20 fps. Determine the flow condition after the
surges meet.
. 19-10. Solve Example 19-1 if the chanuel has a slope of 0.01. The initial steady
flow is assumed uniform.
19-11. Show that the celerity Iorrn4la in the form of Eq. (18-45) applies only to
positive surges and that the corresponding celerity formula. for negative surges is
(19-89)
REFERENCES
1. J. C. Schonfeld: Theoretioal considerations on an experimental bore, Proceedings
of the 8lh General Meeling, Intematicmal Association for Hydm11lic Resear,it, The
Hague 1955, vol. I, pp. AlS-1 to AlS-12, H155.
2. T. B. BenjalOin o,lld M. J. Light-hi!!; On .cnoidal waves and bores, P1'oceedillgs,
Royal Society of 224, no. 1159, pp. 448-460, July 22, 1954.
3. A. M. mnllie and J. C. Orkney; Experiments on flow of water from !l. reservoir
cOO<iings, Royal Society cf L~n(lon, ser. A, vol. 230, no. H81, pp. 237''''246, J1me .21,
1955.
4.•T. A. Sandover and O. C. Zienkiewicz: Experiments on surge wa.ves, TVater
London, vol. 9, no, 11, pp. 'H8-.>!24, No,'ember, 1957.
80il COn;;er~Gtion. Service, SCS-TP-16, May, 193&. .
6. The JohnstQwn disaster, E1?gineen·ng News, yol. 21, no. 23, pp. 517-518, J,me 8,
1889.
7. A. L. A. Himmehvright: The Johnstown flood, Harper':; vol. lU7, pp.
443-4,55, September, 1933.
8. Richard O'Connor: "Johnstown; The. Day the Dam Broke," J. B, Lippincott
Company, Phila.deJphia., 1957.
9. The Heppner dis[l.ster, Enr;{neerin.g News, voL 50, ilo. 3, pp. July 1I'J, 1903.
10, Commission finds failure of St. Francis Dam due to defedive foundaiion, Engi-'
"eering NP.1IJR-Record, voL 100, no. 14, pp. 553-S55, Apr. 5, 11)28 .
.11. M. D. Chertousov: "Cidmvlika: SpetsiulnYl ICurs" ("Hydraulics: Special
Course"), Gosenergoizdat, Moscow, 1957, pp. 437-453.
12. A. Schoklitsch: Uber DambnHlhweUen. (On waves produced by broken dams),
Sitzunllsbe"ichte, J1{att.ematisch-naI1ITwisseIl3chajtliche Klasse, Akade1nie der Wissen-
schaflen in. Wien, v·o1. 126, pt. lIn, pp. 1489-1514, Vienna, lI1l7.
13. E. T .. Haws: Surges and waVes in open channels, }Vater Power, vol. 6, n~?- 11,
pp; 419-422, November, 1954. .
14. R. D. Johnson: The correlatiQn.of momentum and energy changes in steady flow
with varying velocity 8.lld the applicat.ion of the former to problems of unstea.dy

584 UNSTEADY FLOW
flow or surges in open channels, Hydro-Electlic Conferen'ce, 1922, Engineers and
Engineering, The Engineers Club of Philadelphia, pp .. 234-240, July, 1922.
15. George n. llidl: "Hydraulic Trnnsients," McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.,
New York, 1951, pp, 217-224,
16. Charles .Jaeger: "Engineering Fluid Mechanics," translated from the German
by p, O. Wolf, Blackie & Son, Ltd., Lon'don and Glasgow, 1956, pp. 381-392.
17. G. Bll.tn: Utilisation des valeurs rMllites dans Ie dOlnaine des regimes'tran.sitpires
des Cil.naux ouvcrts et leur application dans Ie cas des gllieries utilisees en reser-
voirs d'eclusees (Use bf reduced values in the translatory regions of open channels
and their application in the case of tunnels used as storage re3ervoi~s), Proceedings
of the 6th {ieneral Meel·j.ng, Intemational AssQciation for Hydraulic Resp-arch, The
Hagl<e 1955, pp. D8-1 to D8-1O, 1955.
18. Carlo Drioli: Esperien2e sui moto perturbl1to nei canali industriali (Experiment
1 on surge in indu3Lriai canals), L' Energia eleUrica', lJfilano, vol. 14, no. 4,' pt. 1; pp.
\ 285-311, ,April; no. 5, pt. II, pp. 382-402, May, 1937.
19. Mart.in Schmidt: Zur Frage des Abftusses tiber Streichwehre (Discharge over
side IVeir), Teclmische Unit'ersiUU Ber[in-Charlollenburg, Ins/i!ltt fur H'asserbau,
Milleil1mg 41, 1954.
ZOo Duiiio Citrini: Sull'attenlll'l2ione di un'onda positiva ad c·pera di une sfioratore
latcl'u.ie (On the damping of a positive wave effected by a side weir), L'Enenjia
eietlrica, ,lifilmio, voL 26, no. 10, pp. 589-599, October, 19,H); reprinted as Isll:lllto
di ldr(wl,:ca e CostnLZioni ldrauliche, lIfilano, Memorie e sttLdi No. 76, 1949.
Zl. Duilio Citrini: Sull'efficaci~. di uno sfioratore laterale nelle manovre df arresto
cO\llplet,o (On the effectiveness of a side weir In the unsteady motion following full
rejectir,n of load), UEnergia eleUl'ica, Mi[ano, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 77-80; February,
UJ50; reprinted as IstitHto di Idrmilica e Custl'Uzioni Idrauliche, Milano, l'1,femorie
e studi No.7\), 1950.
22. B. Gentiliui: L'azione di uno 3fioratore bterale sull'onda positivll ascendente in un
cllM.le (The effect of n side weir on a positive ascending wave in a canal), l! El1.ergia
eletlTica; lIfila;n.o, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1-10, January, 1950; reprinted as Iatituto di
IdJ"a'lllica e Costl"1l?iont Idrmlliche, Milano, lJfemorie e studi No. 78, HJ50. . Reclamation for U.S. Army Cofps of Engineers, July, 1944.
'23, Sa.vio Penati: Azion.e di uno sfioratore, [0 ventoln sull'onda positivB. provocata
cla.ll'arr<Jsto delle macchine nel canale adduttore di un impiante idroeleLtrico (On
,he action of a side weir, controlled by a tilting gate, upon the positive translation
waye genera.ted in the canal of a pOlver plant by the sudden cloGing of the tur-
bines), l/ Energia elettl·ica., Milano, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. n3-741, October, 195'!;
reprinted as Istitulo di Id"lJ.ulica e Cosll'uzioni Idrauliche, ]'''[ilano, MemoTie e
,huli No. 115, 1954. On new model tests for the Torilavent(l Power Plant.
24.. Giulio De,M~.rchi: Ac.tion of side weirs and tilting gates on translation-waves in
canals, Proceedings of the ,Minnesota International Hydraulics Conference, Joint
lIfeetillg of International Association for Hvdraulic Research and HydTaulics.
Divisio"~ of the American 'Bodet!! of C'ivil Engineers, pp. 537-545, August, 1953;
reprinted M Istittlto ili Idraulica e, Costl'uzioni Idrauliche, 'Milano, Memorie e stluii
No. 104, 1953, .
25. Giulio De Marchi: A~ione di une sfioratore a ventola sull'oc.da positiv.a provocata
dall'arresto delia mac chine nel canale adduttore di un impianto idroelettrico
(On the: action of a side weiF, controlled py a tilting gate, upon the positive trans-
lation wave generated in the canal of a power plant by the sudden closing of the
turbines), L' Energia elet/rica, Milano, vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 12-20, December, 1953;
reprinted as btit,.to di ldraulica e Coslruzioni Idrauliche, Milano, lIfemorie e
,tudi No, 110, 1953. On model tests for the Tornavento power plant.
l
l'
!:
RAPIDLY VARIED UNSTEADY FLOW 585.
26. Josef Frank: "Nichtstationiire Vorgange in den Zuleitungs- und Ableitungs-
t. kaniiien 'von Wasserkraftwerken" ("Unsteady Flow in Headraces and Taiimces
I
of Hydropower Plants"), Springer-Verlag, Bcrlin, June, 1957.
iI, 27. Alexander Koch and Max CllrstanjeLl: "Von der Bewegung des Wassers und dabei
II auftretenden I{riiften" (" Movement of Water and Associated Forces"), Springer-
I Verlag, Berlin, 1926, pp. 132-150.
I
1
28. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: Hydraulic design: Surges in canals, Civil Works
Construction, Engineering j{amtal, March, 1949, pt. CXVI, chap. 6, 13 pp.
29. Kll.Sper Dantscher: Wfillderwellen in Schiffahrtskan1ilen (Tra,·eling waves in
navigation cp_naIR), Wasserkraft 1md Wasserwirtschafl, Munich, voL 35, no. 7,
pp. 145-147, July 15, 1940. .
3Q. Kasper Dantscher: Die Wanderwelle in Schiffahrtskanal (The traveling wave in a
navigation canal), Wasserkraft und lVasserwi?·tschaft, Munich, vol. 35, no. IO,
pp. 226-229, Oct. 15, 19'10. . .,
31, Josef Koteny, "Hydraulik" ("Hydraulics"), Springer-Verlag, Vienna, 1953,
pp. 263-265. .
32. Francis E, Swain: Determinat.ion of flolYs in interconnected estullrine (:hannels,
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, 2'echnical lYIemora71dt"'~ 640, February, 1951. .
."
33. Francis E. 'Swain: DctcrmintLtion of flows in intercoIlnected estuarine channels
produc~d by the wmbined effects of tidal fluctuatioM and gravity flows, Trans-
actions, Anw'ican Ge1tphysi~al Union, voL 32, no.' 5, pp. G53-672, Oct.ober, 1951.
34. D. J. Hebert and F. C. Lowe:. Progress report on model studies of the Sr.cramento-
San Joaquin Ddta, Central Valley Project, California, U.S. B"reau of Reclamation,
HvdralLlic Laboratory Report No. Hyd-142, Apr. 10, H)44.
35. D. J. Hebert and J. E. "Warnock: Skeleton outline of a plan for developing t.he
Delta-Mendota Irrigation Water Supply and Salt-Water Repulsion In the
Sacmmento-San Joaquin Delta Region, 'Central VaHey Project, U.S. B1LrealL of
Reclamation, Hyd-rUliliee Laboratory Report No. Hyd-145, July 10, 1944.
36. Cherry Creek Dam arid Reservoir: Report or'model Gtudies, spillway and stillin::o;
bn.sin, Hydraulic LaboratDry lteport No. Hyd-146, prepared by U.S. Bureau bf
37. R. E. Glover, D. J. Hebert, and C. R. D9.um: Application of an hydraulic problem,
in Electrical am.logics D.nd electronic computers: A symposium, T'ran8act'ions,
American,Society oj Civil Engineers, 'vbL, UB, pp. JOIO-·101G, 1953.
38. Harold A. - Thomas: The propagation of waves iIi steep prismatic conduits,
Proceedings of Hydraulic Conference, State University of IOlVa; St1tdies in Engineer-
ing, Blllletin 20, March, 1£1'10, pp. 214-229.
39. Paui G. H. Mayer: A study of roll waves and sIng flows in inclined open channels,
doctor"l thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.,' S~ptember, 11)57.
 FLOOD ROUTING 587
in problems other than that of deterrilining t.he progress of a flood down
·a long .river.· For example, when a flood comes through a junction, back-
water IS usually produced. When a flood is regulated by a dam, surges
CHAPTER 20 are generally evolved. The backwater effect and the effect· of surges in
these ,Pl'Oblems can be a.ccurately evaluated only by the basic hydraulic
FLOOD ROUTING equatIons employed in the hydraulic method, but not by the hydrologic
method.
20-2. Method of Characteristics. A strict hydraulic method of flood
routing has been shown to be extremeJy complicated and difficult.
2£1-1. Routing of Flood.. It may be asaumed that the configuration of However, various simplified methods developed for practical
a flood wave moving through a shortregu1ar channel reach where
I
f purposes. Nhny of these methods belong to the general method of
the. cha,nnel resistance is relatively low will remain unchanged. The \ characterist'ic8, which is based on the solution of a set of characteristic
flood movement can. be treated simply as.a uniformly progressive flow, f equations of unsteady flow. Outstallding contributions to the develop-
I
as discussed in Chap. 18. If, however, the channel is irregular and the ment of such methods h::we been made by Massau [4,5], Henry [6J,
resistance is high, the wave configuration will.be modified appreciably Bergeron [7,8], Khristiftnovich [9}. Levin [10], Cl'aya [Ill, Arkhangelski!
as it moves through the reach. The qetermination of this modification of [12], }~olsters [13)141, StokeI' [15-17], Putman [181, Lamoen [19], Dmitriev
a flood flow is knO'\'lD as flood routing. [20], Es?offier [21!, ~ansford [22), Lin [23], Uchida [24], Nougf\fo [25~28L
AsdesClibed in Art. 18-7, Thomas has two hydraulic methods Iwagakl. and Suelshl [29-31}, Isaacson, Stoker, and Troesch [32,33J, nnd
for the solution of unsteady-flow equations. methods can be used ma~lY others. The method developed by Lin will be described in this (
.. I
for the purpose of flood routing. However, they are too laborious for artICle,
actual applications. More practical methods on· hydraulic prin- Acc,ording to Mas;s[1.u, the following equatiolls for unstea.dy flow may
ciples will be described in the following two articles.! I be wntten: _ .
In engineering hydrology, flood routing is au important technique ill J)fh,J~~ 4~J? ------7' ay + F alT + ~ af!
necessary for the complete solution of a flood-control problem and for the ' IF a;r; 9 a.); 9 at So S, (20-1)
s3,tisfactory operg,tion of a flood-p.rediction service. For such purpose!,>, C £j.;}1:-~ D aTf
O'n iC-r)I.UJ + Tf +
flood routing is recognized as a pl'ocedure required in order to determille / a.1; 0 (20-2)
the hydl'ograph at oue point on a stream from the known hydrogrllph ! !I

at an upstream point. Modern E,lectronir. machines can easily rOllLe a

ay d.-r;
ike
+. i!..!L
at!J
d- t d
(20-3)
flood directly from its sources. Accordingly, the meaning of flood routing
aT'd'"- ...L aT! dt dY (20-4)
has been extended to include the routing of the movement of water from • iI!
ra,iilfall to runoff. The routing technique applies both to channel reaches
and to reservoirs. In the latter case, it is called reservoir routing. When In the above equations) ay/ax is the slope of water surfllce, ay/at is the
it is used to determine the combined flood at a dO'i\'nstream point due to chan:~e of .depth of flo,v with respect to time, aT' lax is the cho,nge of
floods in several upstream tributaries and in the main stream, the tech- velOCity wl~h respe?t to distance, avfat is the of velocity with
nique is known as flood synthesis. respect to tllne, SO IS the cfll:l.l1l1el slope, .91 is the friction slope, dy is the
The hydraulic method of flood routing is distinguished from the hydro- totlll change of depth, and dV is the total change of velocity. Note
logic method by the fact that the hydraulic method is based on the solu- that Eq. (20-1) is a dynamic 'equation repl'e'3entiug assuming
tion of the basic differential equations for unsteady flow in open channels a: = 1 and that Eq. (20-2) is the continuity equation identical with
whereas the hydrologic method makes no direct use of these equationil ~q. (18-5). lfsyation (20-3) indicates thllt the totnl change ill depth
but a.pproximl1tes in some sense to their solutions. The hydrologic ISequal to the sum, of the partial changes in depth due to distance a.tid
method is in general simpler but fails to give entirely satisfactory results ~hne) re~pe~tively. Similarly) Eq. (20-4) indicates that the total change
10 velOCIty IS equal to the sum of the partial changes in velocity due to
I For other hydra.ulie methods of flood routing) see [I] to [3j. distance and time, respectively.
586 .
 588 UNSTEAD-r FLOW
FLOOD ROUTING 589
Solving the above four equations ilimultaneously for ay/ax, I' represented by the slopes of lines constructed on. the xt plane. When the'
flow is subcriticaJ,1 as it is in most streams, that is, when V < c, the
-D(So - S) + Dd~ _ £"dy +..!:dydx
I slope of the line ·up, a positive quantity, represe~lts V cof Eq. (20-8),+
J g dt
------~~~--~
gdt (J dt dt
(20-5) 8.nd the slope of the line dp, a negative quantIty, represents V - c of
.~ (dX)2 _ 2 V dx + V 2
_ D
Eq. (20-10). These lines up anddp al'e hereafter re:e.rred to as r.har~cter­
g ,dt g dt g
..1.S<ZC
" s• It is evident that point tt represents
.
the pOSItIOn of the
'II upstl
. eamt
It may be assumed that a flood wa.ve is composed Of a great number of section from \vhich' an infinitesimal sUI~ge, once developed, WI arnve a
infinitesimal surges. Thepl'opagation of ~he flood wave may be treated
as the propagation of the surges. These surges are formed as a result of
disturbances caused by the flood, and each surge has IJ. discontinuous
surface profile. At the point of discontinuity, the water surface breaks
and the slope By/a;!; has two values. Since the two surface slopes do not
bear any definitc reln.tionship to each otIler, the vaiue ofay/ax must be'
indeterminate; or, mathematically, ay/ax = %. When the denom-
inator of Eq. (20-5) is set t.o zero,
d:t = eV ± c) dl (20-6)
where c = ...jgD. For wide channels, c = v' gy. When the numerator
is set to zero and Eq. (20-6) is used,

d(V ± 2c) =g(So - Sf) dt (20-7)

The above equations are known as the eqttations of chamcteristics. The
method for deriving these equations was first given by Massau [4J.
(aJ [b]
Later, IMassD.l1 [5J developed atrial-und-enor procedure for 9.pplying
these equations to problems of unsteady flow. Owing to the laborious- FIG. 20·l. Graphical: representation of, :vav~ prop~gation for sub critical flow. (a)
ness of the procedure, the method had not been very popular until later Flow condition at inflow; (b) Row condItIOn In channel. .
investigators, among them Lin, simplified the procedure through gmph-
ical and other approaches. section p after the time interval 6t. Similarly, point d represents the
}'he equations of characteristic§) !.lliJ,Y.be wrjt~ position of the downstrea~ section fwm which a surge once developed
will arrive at section p after At. . '
clx _ TT
dt - r
+ C (20-8) The flow conditions at the upstream and downstream sectIOns are to be
indicated by the subscripts 'U and d, l'es~ectively. In~egrating Eq. (20-9)
deY + 2c) = g(So - Sf) dt (20-9) from time t to t +
ilt, which interval is the time reqUired f~r the :'[l.ve to
dx = V - c (20-10) travel from the upstre9iID section to the section ull;del' conSIderatIOn, .
dt
dev - 2c) = g(Sa - Sf) dt
I
(20-11) V + 2c = V" + 2c + gSa M
u - g it
(1+-'>.1
S, dt (20,12
)

It CD.n be seen that Eqs. (20-8) and. (20-10) D.l'e identical with Eq. (18-54),
For a smail value of t:.t
expressiI1g the velocity of wave ·prcipagation. These equations can be
+2 Sf) At-
represellted graphically on an ;rt plane, as sh01vn iIi Fig. 20-1. . For a finite
time increment ilt, the point p represents the position of the channel
section; under: consideration at timet +
ilt, and the pOInts u and d
J I
I+A1
S, dt =
(S,,,,

represeJilt, respectively, the posi~ions of c~rtain upstrean\. and down- 1 Theoretica.lly,th~

method of cha.ract.eristics is similarly to ap~lica.blc: su~ercritical
flow .. However, the possibility of disturba.nce due to formatIOn of standmg waves
stream ;sections at time t. The. velocity of wave propagatio.n can be would have to be taken· into acrioun~ [23].
590 UN,sl'lllilY FLOW . F.LOOD ROUTING 591
So Eq. (20-12) may be writt,en For units .in miles and hours, the equation becomes
V + 2c = G + K
u (20-13) V = . /39,5008 0 Ilt - ]( cH
(20-25)
where (J", = V + 2c" + K"
u (20-14) .\1 1,"t1O,000n 2 tlt
Ie {J(So-2Sf") Ilt- (20-15) Equation (20-24) or (20-25) contains three variables c, V, and IC; So and
C:..t are known.For this equation, two auxiliary plots may be constmcted:
and (20-16) (1) a plot of c against TT using f{ as a parameter, which is called "the

Similarly, the following equation may be obtained by integrating

Eq: (20-11) over the interval required for the wave to travel from the x in ini
'200
dm"l11strea.m sectioll to the section under oonsideration:.
I '. A
I
(20-17) I.
where (20~18)

and (20-10) c'P

'/
I .I
. \
Eliminating from Eqs. (20-13) and (20-17) and solving far c,
I i
J(
~O.D I
~~5'
jhrL~q i
(20-20) -i
1'<::--.,J:-'-7p",-+..:.,w.'-b-.~l--+.---'j' 16.6 mi ....... J

This equation can be used for computing c at the time t + Ilt if the
upstream !l.ud downstream flow cOllditions at the time t are given.
1
Eliminating c from Eqs, (20-13) and (20-17) and solving for l' - .I
V _ J( = Gu + G~ (20-21)
2
or, from Eq. (20-20),
Y-K= + 2c (20-22)
Using the Manning formula, Sf = n!V2/2.22R~~. Substituting this
expression for 31 ill Eq. (20-16) and solving for V,
o Ilt -- Ie R"~ Fw 2(~:la.. Routill[l; by the method of chamctcristic.~: the ;ri plane.
v '\I'flG.IS
7.25n~ .
(20-23) j

From Eqs. (20-22) and (20-23J, the values of Y and IC can be deter- plot of c vs. V for K" (Fig. 20-2e), and (2) ~L plot ofT! - J{ against V
I
I.

mined. , using c as a parameter, which is called "the plot of T1 ]( ·vs. V for.

The solution for c and V, however, can be simplified by a graphical c" (Fig. 20-2j) , The use of these two plots "vill
simplify the problem, .
procedure. Taking the wide channel as an example, R = y. c~!g. which is to solve for c and Yat time t + Ilt if the flow conditions c and V
Thus, Eq. (20-23) becomes at the upstream and downstream sections at time t are given.
In illustrating the application of the gmphical procedure, it is assunred
v \j
/16.1So III - J( 1>
742nz Ilt '. c
(20-24) (1) that the channel is
infinitely long and very wide, (2) that t.he initial
flow is uniform and steady, IJ,.nd (3) that the time interval Ilt is COlllltant.
The units in t-his equation are expressed in terms of feet ane. seconds. The data required for the solution include the initial flow condition, the

-1
 592 UNS'l>EADY FLOW FLOOD ROUTING 593

inflow hydrograph I with the stage y as

a function of time t the
channel roughness, the cha.nnel slope, Ulld the length of the channel to be.
routed. The whole procedure is to be developed by steps at equal time

x in rnl

Fl.G. 20~2c. Routing by the method of characteristics: the Vx pla.ne.

:::
.5
I
. • I·
. ~ l I

t- +3200 I

x in rni
FrG. 20-2b> Routing by thifmethod of chara.cteristics: the ex plane.

intervals. For any step, the procedure is as follows: J(1n mi

A. Preliminary Com1mtation FIG. 20-2d. Routing by the method of chara.cteristics: the 'Ii:!' plane.

1. Compute the initial velocity V" and depth y" by the Mannillg
formula, and the initial celerity by c,.
2. Using Eq. (20~24) or (20-25) construct plot of C VB. V for J(
(Fig. 20-2(3) and the plot of V - K VB. V for c 30-2f).
, 3. Construct the referen.ce lines OB and AB 20-1 and Fig. 20-2a).
, Fo~ oth~ types of hydrogra~h, for example, in the form of the discharge q ~ f(t),
a modification of the procedure IS neCeS5ll.ry. For a detcdled disC\I~~iQnl :;;ee [23].
The slopes of these lines are equal to V .. + e" and y" c.., respectively.
Point 0 may be placed at any position on the z .axis.
4. Construct the inflow hydrograph with c plotted Ilgo.inst t (Fig.
20-2g). Since the given hydrograph is in the form of y J(t) , it is
necessary to convertyto c by the relation c = vgy.
5. Obtain the values of c for various t from the hydrograph constructed
 594 UNSTEADY FLOW FLOOD ROU'l'lNG 595
ill the preceding step, and plot them 011 the ex plane at x = 0 (Fig. 20-2b). through the time I (Fig. 20-'10.), the values of Cd and Vd are equal to the
ALso, plot the vahle of V,. on the Vx plane at x = 0 (Fig. 20-2c). values of c and V 2,t time t. I
3. From theploi.J of C VB. V for J( (Fig .. 20-2e), find the rca corresponding ·-1
B. Computation JOT Flow Condition at the Inflow to Va and Cd, al1d then compute Gd by Eq. (20-18) .
1. Draw a trial characteristic p'd' (Fig. 20-10.) with a stope in tb~ genera.l . 4. Compute Y I{ by Eq. (20-22) with the value of c obtained froin
. direction of AB.· From the inflow hydrograph (Fig. 20-2g) , it can be the inflow hydrograph (Fig. 20-2(1).

i I j'
I I
~
I ,I I I

I I
~

····--'4· .. .
2.5 3 3.5 4.5 5
v in mph

3.5
Vir mph
FIG. 20-2e. Routing by the metllod of (;haracteristics: the
seen whether the value of c is increasing 01; decreasing at a given time.
Accordingly, the slope of the trial characteristic should be either :Ratter
01' steeper tha.n that of the previous step.
.2. The values of c and V at time t are assumed to have been determined
and plotted against X, as shO~Vll in Fig. 20-2b andc. Accordingly, at the
point where the trial characteristic intersects the horizontal line passing
FIG. 20-2f. Routing by the method of characteristic.s: the 'V - J( vs. l' fore plot.
5. Determine t' from the plot of V - J( VB. V for c (Fig. 20-2f).
C VB. V for K plot. 6. Since the values of c and II are known, check the slope of the tri~tl
characteristic. The slope of this characteristic should be equal to the
+
average of the slopes at its ends, or [(TT - c) (Vd - cd)]/2. If neces-
sary, repeat the' procedure with a new trial characteristic until a. satis- .
factory check is obtained.
I
C. Computation oj Flow Condil.ion in the Channel
1. Construct two trial characteristics up and pd at point p and il). the
general directions of DB and AB, respectively (Fig. 20-1b). To start

-"~ ..,', -: "- -

---,--~'"-,~ "-,"
.",,;.' ..
 59B UNSTEADY FLOW
FLOOD ROUTING 597
the computation, the point p may be so located that the pointu is at
x = 0 on the horizontal line passing through the time t. 9. Extend the procedure step by step to the desired lengths of time
2. From the 0: and Vx planes of the previous computations (Figs. .and channel. '
20-2b Il.nd 20-2c), determine eu and V" at x" and Cd and Vcl at Xd (Fig. 10. From the ex plane, a hydrogl'aph at any section of the channel
20-1b). CUll tle constructed. Constructing a vertical line through the' given x~
the line will intersect the curves of the e;t; plane, giving values of e at
22 -
different t. The value of e may then be converted to y by the relatidn
! y ::: e2 /g.
'--
Example 20-1. An infinitely long and wide channel carri~s an initial uniform flow
2I /""
I - of 50 cfs per foot of width.' If a hydrogrnph l'epresented by y = 21.5 - 8.4 cos
Givert
inflow,,- \ -- I---~--
"(1l't/48) ft is imposed on the upstream end of the channel, route the flood through the
first 50 miles for a pp.riod of 24 hr. Given 11 = 0.03 and So = 1/5,280.
'i
c,
Sohdion. The computation follows the procedure described above.
2 01----
-
/ \ A. Preliminarycomputalion
= =
9 1 1. By the Manning formula, 'Un = 13.1 ft. Thus, Vn
mph, and c. = v13.1V = 20:~ fps = 14.0 mph.
50/13.1 3.82 fps = 2.60

/ \ 2. Using the mile-hour units, At '= 3 hr, 11 = 0.03, and So = 1/5,280. Equation
(20-25) gives '
f
\ -L
.J:
0.
E 8----,- l -
.!; (20-20)
... / I

By this equal.ion, the auxiliftry plots (Fig. 20-2e and fJ are computed ,as shown in
- --

1\
Table 20-1, p. 600.
I- f. --- I----- -
3. On the xl plane (Fig. 20-2a) construct the reference lines OB and AB, the slopes
of which are 2.60 + 14.0 = 16.6 mph nnd 2.60 - 14.0 = -H.4 mph, respectively.
16 I : I , 4. ,construct the inflow hydrogr'1ph (Fig. 20-2g) by the foJlowi~lg equation:
,f--1:~ompvted
outflow \ c = Vgy = -V0!21.5 - 8.4 cos (~'1/48)1 fps .
1
15 \ -- = 3.87 v21.5.- 8.4 cos (1r1/48) mph (20-27)

/. / ~, ---,
5. By Eg. (20.27), compute the values oi C Il.t the upstream curl of the channel (at
x = 0) for ,t = 0,3, . '. _ ,24 hr, and plot them in Fig, 20·2b. Also, plot the value of

14
o
1£V 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
V = 2.60 mph for x = 0 and t = 0 in Fig. 20-2c. .
R. ComputatioT! Jar flow condiliQn at inflo·w. The step of computation from t = 12
.

to t = 18 hr ~vill be t.n.ken for illustration, assuming that the values of c and V along
j in hr
the channel at t = 12 hr have been determined in a previous step. The following'
l"IG. 20-2g. Routing by the method of charactE:ristics: thehydrograpns. procedure rlescribes the determination of c and V at the inflow at t = 18 hr.
1. Draw a trb.l characteristic at point 100 in thp. generlLl dirp.ction of AB (Fig.
20-Za). The slope of this characteristin should be somewhat flatter than 'that of the
3. Determine Ku and Kd from the plot of C VI:I. V for K (Figs. 20-2e). previou." step, that is, flatter th~n the slope of the chllructeristic!at 12a, because the
4. Compute all. andGd by Eqs. (20-14) and (20-18), respectively. inflo\~ hydrograph CFig. 20-2g) indicntes that c is increasing during the interval from
5. Compute C byEq. (20-20). t = 12 to 15 hr. The downstream end of this 6ho.racteristic is at t: = 12 hr and Xd =
36 miles. .
6.' Compute V - K by Eq. (20'::21). ,
r 2. With Xd '"' 36 miles and t = 12 hr, find Cd = 14.38 and V~ = 2.72 from Figs.
r 7. 'Determine V frotn the plot of V - K vs. V for e(Fig. 20-2f). I .20-2Q and c. Theae value" are ent~red in eols. 9 !lnd 8, respectively, of Table 20-2.
8. With the flow donditioris determined at a sufficient number of I·
C
I 3. IWEth Cd = 14.38 and V. = 2:72, ,find Kd = -0.04 from Fig. 20-2e, and enter
I
points along the chan~el, construct the plots of·!V and e vs. x at the time I the value in col. 10 of Table 20-2. By Eq. (20·18), Gd = 2.72 - 2 X 14.38 - 0.64, =
t + !:It on the exand Vx planes (Figs. 20-2b and ~0-2e). -26:68, as shown in col. 12 of Table 20-2. '
I 1 This example is adapted from [231.
 FLOOD ROUT1NG 599 )
598 UNSTEADY FLOW
file do not change. In other words, the flow mfl.y be considered \)niformly progressive
4. From tbe inflow bydrograph (Fig. 2()..2g), c= 15.84 for t = 15. By'Eq. (20-22),
V - K, = -26.68 + :.! X 15.84= 5.00, a.~ shown in col. 13 of Table 20-2.
5. With V - K = 5.00 ande = 15.84, find V = 3.19 from Fig. 20-2f and enter
aiterthe flow conditions at points a and.b are determined .. This may be explained
in Fig. 20-3 as below.
I
Oil thE; ex plane, draw a hor'izolltalline passing through the / = 9 hr curve at x = O.
tbe value in col. 2 of Tobie 20-2.
This line intersects the t = 12 hr curve at x = 13 miles, Similarly, a horizontal Jine
6.Tbe slope of the charoct,eristic should be (2.72 - 14.38 + 3.19 ~ 15.84)/2 = "j
-12.16, which gives Xd = 12.16 X 3 = 3.6.48 miles. This value is dose to x~ = 36 ,
miles for the trial characteristic. If f,he agreement is not dose, a new trial character- A
istic must be drown and the computation repeated.
C. Computation for jInw condition in the channel
1. Draw two trial cha.racteristics at 15& in the general directions of OB and AB.
7 !
Note that tile characteristic in the direction of OB starts from the point 12a. Thus,
x. = 0, x = 52 miles, and x~ = 86 miles.
2. From Figs. 20-2& and 0, find c. = 15.22 and V. = 2.96 nt x" = 0, and Cd = 14.02
and V ~ = 2.59 at x" = 86 miles. Enter thes"l values in cols. 5 to .3 of Table 20-2. . \
3. From Fig. 20-2e, find Ku = -1.08, as shown in col. 7 of Table 20-2, for t:u =
15.22 and Vu = 2.96; and also [{~ = 0, as shown in col. 10, for Cd = 14.02 and
1'd = 2.59.
4. By Eq. (20-14), G. = 2.95 + 2 X 15.22 - 1.08 = 32.32, as shown in col. 11
of 'Table 20-2. By Eq. (20-18), Gd = 2.59 - 2 X 14.02 -
col. 12 of Table 20-2.
° = -25.45, as shown in

5. By Eq. (20-20), c = (32.32 + 25.45)/4 = 14.44, as 'shown in col. 3 01 Table 20-2.

6. By E<\.. (20-21), l' - K = (32.32 - 25.45)/2 = 3.44, as shown in col. i3 of
Table 20-2.
·1
7. From Fig. 20-21, find V = 2.75, as shown in col. 2 of Table 20-2, for c = 14A4
and V - K = 3.44.
8. Use the values' of c and V to check the slopes of the trial characteristi~s. Thus,
x = (2.75 + 14.44) X 3 = 51.57 miles and Xd = -(2.75 - 14.44) X 3 + 51.5'7 =
86.64 miles. The trial slopes are satisfactory. Otherwise, new charactc:ristics should
be drawn and the computation repeated. x
9. Proceed with the computation step by step, as shown in Table '20-2.
10. Draw a vertical line at x = 50 miles on the ex plane (Fig. 20-2b). The linll
intersects the curves, giving yalues of c at various times. Plotting these values of c
against time, II. hYdrograph at x = 50 miles for a period of 24 hr is obtained, as shown
in Fig. 20-2tp. This hydro graph call be converted to y = J(t) by means of the relation
y = c'/g. .
It may be noted that, after the Bow conditions at points (l and b for each time.inter-
val are' determined, part of the curves on the ex plane and Vx plane for ~he first 50
miles or so can be tmced in approximately and then revised or refined by further
determination of more points, such ·as c and d, in the channel. It can be seen that the , FIG. 20-3. Simplified procedure for Example 20.,1.
graphical procedure offers a practical solution of Massa.u's equations; Nevertheless,
the computation involved is stilt complicated and requires practice for routine applica-
tions. For accura.te solutions, the time interval .c.l should be reduced, all graphs Oil the Vx plane is drawn through the t =9 hr curve ttt x = O.This lineinterseds
should be prepared on large scales, and the computation should be carried out to the t = 12 hr curve also at x = 13 miles. It is, therefore, evident. that values of c 1
sufficient significant figures. For Table 20-2, the computation was done on a slide and V at the points U = 9 hr, x = 0) and (/ = 12 hr, x = 13 miles) rue equaL This l.
rille, since the example was given only for illustrative purposes. The values in cols. evidence may simplifY the further s'Leps of the routing computation. The dashed
7 and 10 were roughly estimated from the curves; they are not accurate even tD the characteristics ee' and ce" at 15c may be dmwn parallel to the chamcteristks b&' and
decimal places showD. For accurate computation of K, Eqs. (20-15) and (20-19) bb", respectively, at 12&. The upstrettm poiIlt c' of the'cha,racteristic ee' is placed at
should h~ve been used. ; x = 13 miles ort the 12-hr line. Thus, the values of c and V at 15c are equal to those
In this particular example of a long uniform channel with init.ially uniform flow, !:.t 1Zh. Similarly, the vaiues of e and V at points 9b, 12c, and 15d are all equal and
it may be assumed that the values of c ~nd V ata particuli1r section of the wave pro- cttn be determined in the same way, As a result, the computation of the ';fllues of c

-':".:
 ) {)01
.600 . UNSTEADY FLOW \ FLOOD ROU1!ING

Ohio; (2) movement of the 1947 flood through the confluence of the Ohio
1J.~1:l ~ is need~ only at point (J, at the inflow a.nd at point 11 in the channel for each
tIme mt~rvaL The va.lues of C IUld.V a.t ot~er points in the channel can be detcrmin.;d and Mi;ssissippi rivers at Cairo, Ill.; and (3) movement of the 1948 and
by the SimplIfied procedure shown by the dashed linea in Fig. 20-2a. 1 1950 flood waves in the 184-mile long and na.rrow Kentucky Reservoir
on the Lower Teunessee River. The second problem is the same as that
i
I) TABLE 20-1. COMPUTATION FOR THE AUXILlI\RY PLOTS IN ExAMPLE .2O-i \ described in Art. 11-10 and Fig. 11-] 5 except that the flow is treated as
I C =~31~!-'-'[-C-=-1-6,-,-I-c-=-1-8,-,I-c----2-0-,--~""-2-2-, unsteady in the present problem. .The computations ·for floW profiles
were thus made for times t = 0, 2.5,4, 10, and <:tJ hI', after the beginning
K \ = . .,..7 di = 40,3 cH = 47.2 c~; = 54.3 c~~ = 61.6
of the flood 50 miles up the Ohio River (see Fig. 11-15). The flow profiles
3810 -- -
____ '_~ V [: - xl V Iv - K V F - F K 1(,
for t = 00 are identical with those computed for steady flow.
Solutioll of practical problems by the numerico.l method is generally
1.0,1 0.0750 2.53, 1.53 ;-;;-3j2.0;13.54 Z.54 ---1---- very tedious. In order to speed up the computation work, the Corps
])
I\ 0.01 0.0166 2.58 2.58 3.093.09 3.62! 3.62 has employed an electronic digito.l computer, such as the Remington-
-0.5'1' 0.0776 1
262,3.12 3.13 3.63 3.66 4.16 Rand UNIVAC I (Universal Automatic Computer I). For small quan-
L' )
-1.0 0.078,1 2.64,3.64 3.16 4.16 3.70 4.70 5.83 tities of work, however, the Corps has found tha.t a po,rt of the compu-
-~.51' 0.0192 j2.61' 4.17 3.20 4.70 3.74 5.24 5.80 &.38
tn.tion can be performed less expensively and more efficiently by 3.
I' -~.O 0o.'OO~O~~g 2.701'4.70 \3.Z3 5.23 3.78 5.78 4.34 6.34 6.93
r) -2.5 u \2.73 5.23 '3.26j 5.76 3.82 6.32 14 .39 6.89 7 All portable computer, such as the Burroughs EIOl desk-size computer;
I,
-3.01 00816 2.75 5.75 3 29 6.29 13.851 6.85\4.4317.43 5.0S 8.03 the use of larger machines is justifiable only for very involved problems.
) 1 I 20-3. Method of Diffu.sion Analogy. An approximate hydraulic
1
1 TABLE 20-2 .. STEP COMl'UTATIC>l'i'SOF FLOOD ROUTING :BY THE METHOD approach to the problem of flood routing in natural channels has been
j) OF CHARACTERISTICS deyeloped us-illg the ciD.ssicn.l stc.tisticl).l theory of flow diffusion [35].
According to this theory, IL differential equation may be written for the
c K V I 1 'K I I
) • . .' C. i y IT d Cd Kd 1 Gu Gd V K diffusion of an unsteady flow of particles as follows:
~ ~~I~!~ ~~Ii!.!l_~, __--,--
I'

, i (8)
(20-28)
\ [
) 3tl
6a .69IH.31-0,48 .... I.... .I. ... '.
.6114.07 -0.11' .... '". ,,' ...... 2 5814 00 O !
:5914:02 0
'?
1..... 1: ; : . : : 2.72
17
)
Bb .6014.02 -0.012.6J l,r.07 -0. 58H.aO: 0 30'64'1'--24'4? 9.
where Nis the number of p:1l'ticles, t is the tim9, x is the dista.nce, and
\}(1 2,8614.71 -0.59," ", ... , ....... 26214.05 -0391 .. : .. ":'25:8;1 2.61
~b ~.611406-0.1026\)[14.31-0.48~.5814.00 0 130.83-25.42 ;:;~ K is a coefficient known l),S ditrw~·b}ity. When the pl1rtides are flOWi11g
) 12a 1~.9615.22-1.081 .... 1 .......... 2.67114,16 -0 75j in a direction along the X axis, this equation gives the particle distribu-
ai'59 "T?5':~
26

i" ... 1".. .

12b 2.68H. 251-0.402.86iI4.71-0.692.581,'LOO. O' 4.04 ti()U in the dii'ection of flow as a function of time and position. This theory
) l5a 3.19115.841-1. 81] .... 2 .1214 .38 -0.64 , 681 1::::~6' 3.08 is commonly applied to problems of heat tl'il.l1sier r3B]; there Eq.(20-28)
1511 2.7514.44 -0.69 . 2.9615.22 -l.08,2.S9!14.02[ 0 f<:t2'S'Z _; . _
~5.4() I 5,00
I' ..... -0:;433:081-
represents Fourier's ge-ne'rallGw of heat conduction, ih which N desigllates

i
18a33S'1651-191 ,) 1"" I 3.44
j...... )2.831<1,68- 19°1·
temperature and K is known as thermal d~tJusiuity [37].
. : . ! ' 2773 5.29
) 18b 2.~2[14. 72! -0.833.1915,85 -1. 8112 ,(;,2',14.08 -2578 .
1
21a3.,,\) 17.211-2.341;' ... ..,.... . 2 . 9315.02 -1.40 ..... -28: 51 53.6593 In natural streams, the disturbances of flow caused by local channel
)
2'.1a )3:7917: .90 -Z.49 · .......
24b 30815551-1. 493. 59117
"I' ....
21b2.9815.231·-l.06\.'I.SS',.16.511-1.912.68114.22 -'0.6513449 -26

.~1
3.08115.55 -1.50\ .. : .. -21l
-2.3412.7014.32 -0.6035. 67 -:26:54,
'~~l ::;~
4 .'0 4 irregularities have definite magnitUde at any time and position. They
are mixed, dissipated, and diffused as the flow moves along the channel.
In ll.pplying the theory of flow diffusion to the flow of water, it may be
\. ) 1 1
assumed that the diffusion of the dist,urbanc~s is analogous to the diffusion
Similar numericahnethods for the solut'ion of the differential equations of the particles. If the over-all effect of the disturbances on flow is
')
of unsteady flow [Eqs. (20-1) to (20-4)J were developed by Stoker [16 171 represented by the variation in the flow depth y, Eq, (20-28) may be
fLnd . by ~saacs~n, Stoker, and Troesch [32,33]. The methods ~ere written
) applIed wlth satlsfa.ctmy results to three actual.problems presented by the
U.S. A:my Corps of Engi~eers. [34): (1) movement of the 1945 flood in the
(20-29)
) 375-mll~
. reach of the Ohio River from Wheeling ' W .Va . , to C'mcmna
. t'II
1
1

I )

)
 " J:.,.j-...:...........

602 UNSTEADY FLOW FLOOD ROUTING 603

In natural stres,ms the local irregularities provide irregular storage,
and the above equation reflects the rate of change in channel storage
due to irregularities. Including this item in Eq. (18-1) for continuity
of flow in p~ismatic channels, the continuity equation for flow in natural
channels may be written
The propagation of this unit flood may be determined by Eq. (20-33).
As a numerical example, using V_,,=70 em/sec; J( = 10 7 cm 2 /sec;
tit = 5 hr; and x ,= 2.2, 14, 21, and. 32km, Hayamihas computed the
:..!
propagation of the unit ffood, as shown in Fig. 20-'1. It can be seen that,

(20-30)

It is assumed further that the channel is relatively wide and that the
flow on the average is uniform and steady. Thus', the discharge per
unit width of channel may be represented by the Ch~zy iormula1
q = C . ./8 0 Vi, (20-31)
Substi~uting this equs.tion for q in Eq. (20-30) and simplifying,
---.~ '0.\
ay t,. r-/ayH -.:. a2y
at +(~~e . :- K ax': (20-32) , \

This is the basic differential eqt;¢{ion for flood }1:ow in nat7);ral streams. It
can be seen that the coefficient of ayi~/ax in this equation depends on the "-j
~ l'esistance and slopt and that the coeffIcient of a2 y/ax 2 depends
on the channel iW'Igularities .
.:.. __ This equation was orig'inally developed by Hayami [381 through an
r
'I elaborate mathematical derivation.. A similar method of routing based
on diffusion analogy was also presented by Appleby [39]. The value of
diffusivity K in ordinary streams was estima.ted in the range from 10 6 to
10 7 cm 2 /sec. In large rivers, such as the Mississippi River: in the United
States and the Yangtse River in China., the value of K would be of the
order of lOS cm 2/sec.
. A solution of Eq. (20-32) by Hayami results in the following equation
for the propagation of a flood wave: " 1
,/

. ~y - Yn = 1 _~' r,./2VJ[i rV",~; _ X2 _ (VwX)'2] d' K (20-33)

Yo -y'; Jo exp l2K 4KX.i Elcpsed time I in hr Elapsed lime I in hr

where y is the depth at a point a distance x from the upstream end of the
reach under consideration, y~ is the normal depth of flow at the same
point before the flood arrives, yo is the depth at the upstream end, t is the
time, J( is the diffusiv:ity, V", = 1.5V, V is the mean velocity, and X is the
variable.
A fictitious wave having a constant depth and lasting a llilit time
interval tit may be assumed(Fig. 20-4). This wave is called a unit flood.
1 The Manning formuIa may also be used. In this case, the second term on the
left side of Eq. (20-32) would be written (1.49 v'Sc/n)ay~s/ax.
(a) (b)
FIG. 20-4.. Propl>gl>tion of Cal a solitary unit lluud Md. Cb) two successive unit Boods.
(After S. Hal/ami [38].)
as the wave propagates dowllstream, its shape gri\.dual1y becomes asym-
metrical and fi:J;ttens out.
In routing an actual fiood, the hydrograph of the fiood may be divided
into a number of unit flood hydrognt.phs (Fig. 20-5). All hydrographs
are plotted with the time against the sta.ge. The propagation of each
unit flood can be computed by Eq. (20-33). By the principle of super-

"'-~'

I,
.. '~' .. .. '. '. ",",' ..
 )
604 UN:;lTEADY FLOW
FLOOD ROUT~NG 605
position, the propaga.ted height of the given flood:is equal to the sum
where ilS/ilUs the change in storage during a period t::.t, I is the !lver~~ge
of the propa.gntod heights of all the unit :floods. This method has been
inflow during tit, and 0 is the lwerage o1itilow during t::.t. The value of
used to compute the propagation of a unit fioodartificiaUy produced
AS!t::.t is positive when the storage is increasing and nega.tive when the
in the Yedo Rivet· ill Japan; the theoretical computations were found ill
storage is decreasing. , This equation constitutes the basis. for a ~ydro­
good agree,mellt with the observations. In order to simplify and expe-
logic procedure of routing in which ilt is known as the nmhng PBNQd.
dite the I'outing pr9cedure by this
method, electronic' analog com- The rate of storage can be plotted against time, as shown in 2O-6b,
puters have been developed on !ai from which it can be seen that the, storage iB increasing before the time
'(;l,t which the inflow equals theoutflovr and decreasing after that time.
I \ the basis of (20-32) and applied
The cumulative 'area below the curve (shaded :l1rea in the
to several rivers in Japan with
satisfactory results [40-44J. figure) represents the volume of storage at !l. time t after the beginning
of the flood. By plotting this volume
against the time, a storage-volume
curve can be obtained, as shown in /
Fig. 20-6c. This curve hilS a pev.k
representing the maximum volume of
1
(G) storage that occurs at the time when
the inflow equal:> the outflow.
If the storage is plotted against the
outflow discharge, the resulting curve
will generally take the form of a loop,
such as that illustrated in F'ig. 20-7. Siorage
li.1' Time lime
As shown ill this figure, the stornge for FIG. 20-7. The storage-outflow reb.-
Fro. 20-5. Dividing hydrograph into unit-' I I a giv~n discharge on the rising (or tionship.
flood h'ydrographs.
, t I I [e, falling) part of the flood, wave will be , '
I I I , "
"'! I I greater than (or less than) the sl;orage c'orrespollding to the condition of

ll~
20-4. Principle of Hydrologic
steady fiow. The storage-outflow relationship for the condition of steady
Routing. When a :flood wave flow is represented by the dashed curve, which is approxinlately !l.t the
passes throngh a channel reach, average position of the two limbs ot: the loop. '
the inflow and outflow hydrographs The'storage in a channel reach for ullstendy flow depends prim!j.l'ily
f o Time ...
I'
at the upstream aJ:).d downstream on the inflow and outflow discharges and on th~ geometric and hydrauli.:;
,
, ends of the reach, respectively, are }7'IG. 20-6. Relationships among inflow,
outflow, and storage in a. channel reach , characteristics of the channel and its control features. It can be assumed
as shown ill 20-6a. ASS1.lrn- due to a passing flood. '
that the upstl'eam and downstream end sections of the reach have the
ing it. negiigible amount of loss
same mean discharge.and storage relationships with respect to the depth:
01' gain of \:V~1.ter.in the course of flbw through the reach,the total
of flowy. Then the following equations may be written:
areas: under the hyclrogruphs are equal,. since the volume of the
flood :water is unchanged. In: natUl'al the channel resistance I = fly'!! (20-35)
und storage capacity are high; ,consequently the flood-wave character- 0 ay" (20-36)
istics will be considetably modified. As shown ill Fig, 20-6a, the :t and Si d:. by,:, (20-37)
floodpell,k is attenuated and: delayed. The difference between the S. bym (20·38)
ord' s of ,the inflow and outflow hydrogr!l.phs, represented by the
rsh '
t , areas in the figure, is ~qual to the rat.e of storage 'of water in
the re~ch i thn.t is, i '
where a a.nd n~ express the depth-discharge characteristics of the s~ctions,.
band m express the mean depth-storage characteristics of the reaph, and
ilS = I 0 3, and are the storages referring to the depths at the upstre(l.m and
ilt downstream end sections respectively. Eliminating y from Eqs. (20-35)
606 UNSTEADY FLOW
and (20~37) and from Eqs. (20-36) and (20-38),
a(i)""n
E,= (20-39)
and Eo b(~)""n (20-40)
Let X be a dimensionless factor ~hatdefines the relative weights
given to inflow and outflow in the determination of the storage volume
within the reach. Then, the storage at any given time may be expressed
as'
S = XE. +(1 (20-41)
When the stages in a reach are determined by the control at its down-
stream eud, for example, at the spillwa.y of a level-pool reservoir, the
storage is a 80113 function of the outflow; therefore, X = O. If the stora,ge
due to backwater effect at the upstream end of the reservoir is significant.,
X will be greater than zero. In uniform channels, equal weight is given
to illflo\,. and outflow, and X 0.5.
Substituting Eqs. (20-39) and (20~40) for E, and S.; respectively, in .
Eq. (20-41) and simplifying,
S K[X I~ + (1 - X)O-'] (20-42)
where K bla"'''' alid x min. In prismatic rectangular channels,
discharge varies with the five-thirds power of the dept.h on the basis
of the Manning formula, and storage varies with the first power. Since
n = % and m I, the exponent x == 0.6. In natural channeJs, m may
be considerably greater than unity and hence :t; is larger than 0.6. Mady,
hydrologic routing procedures have been developed on the general basis
of Eq. (20-42). For simplicity and for practical purposes, x is commonly
assumed to be unity.
The hydrologic approach to the problem of flood routing is based 011 the
storage-discharge relationship described above. It is assumed that.
dynarniceffects of flow are negligible and that storage is a single-\'alued
function of discharge. This assumption implies that the flow is changing
slowly with time. Effects of 'abnormal surface slope in modifying dis-
charge and in changing channel storage are, therefore, neglected.
This procedure is approximately correct for ordinary st.reams with
",vas later developed by Kohler [74], which requires on6 chart'for de~ermin-
small slopes. .When storage is plotted against discharge, the resulting
loop is usually narro\v and an average curve may be fitted ill to represent
.the storage a.s a single-valued function of the discharge. If the loop is
wide, it can be reduced to a single-line relationship by an adjustIi:lent
such as tha.t emploY,cd in the Muskingum method [45]. In this method
routing. For accurate prediction of stages on very flat rivers, a method of
the adjustment is made possible by varying the values of K and X in
stage routing was suggested by RA.y and l'vlondschein [76].
Eq. (20-42). .
FLOOD ROGTING 607
. In streams having steep slopes, the . dynamic effects of flow are pro~
nounced and call1lOt be neglected. Consequently, for such streams the
hydrologic method of flood routing maybe found unsatisfactory.
20-5.' Methods of Hydrologic Routing. Numerous hydrologic methods
of flood routing h.we been developed. Descriptions of these method4J
can be found in the literature on engineering hydrology [45-50]. In this
article, therefore, the important methods will be mentioned only by
name and references will he provided for furt.her study. A simple
hydrologic method, however, "rill be described in the next article.
In general, hydrologic methods of, flood routing may be classified
into h'TO groups: t.he analytical audthe instrumental.
There are many analytical methods of routing. For routing through
reservoirs, the well:.known Rippl ma,ss curve [51] is widely llsed [52-54].
Other graphical m~thods of routing have also been developed, sllch as the
method of Sorensen (55 i 561. For routing through rivers, the storage-
discharge relationship is simplified in the methods developed by Meyer
[57j, PuIs [47,58,59J, Wilson [60], Oheng [61], Johnstone and Cross [54),
Knappell, Stratton, and Davis [56J, and Chow {52]. Semigraphical pro-
cedures include the methods of Goodrich fo3J, Rutter, Graves, and Snyder
[64J, Wisler and Brater [65J, and Steinberg [66J. Other simplified meth~
ods use a nomograph, as suggested by Linsley [67], a str~ght. slide rule
as suggested by Posey [68,69], and circular computers as suggested by
Shepley and Walton [70J. A simplified method of successive average was
developed by Tatum [48,71]. One rather popular and satisfactory
method, known as the Mt~I;!";in{}um method was developed by :!I.1:cCarthy
[46,72]. In this method, Eq. (20-42) is used as the working equatioll,
assuming x L; that is,
S = [([Xl + (1 _. X)OI (20-43)
where K and X are to be determined from the channel chamctel'istics
under study.
In flood forecasting or control and operation of multiple-purpose river
projects, the stage of flood is a major concern and a procedure for :;~a(Je
routing is needed; For this purpose, a method involving the use of
multiple-line charts was pl'QPosed by Lane [73]. An improved procedure
iug the normal relationship bet, ween gages in the main river and auxiliary
charts, one for each tributary. These charts can be used to determine
corrections to be applied to the predicted normal stage.. The .U.S.
Mississippi River Commission [75] has used the Puis method of stage
In connection with the design of levees for flood control, the routing
 608 UNSTEADY FLOW
r 1
techniqu~ shoulci be extended to solve the problem of so-called ftow-Unl:
computation. This problem is to estimate the maximum elevation of the
water surface at all points along the leveed channel during the passage of
a design floou. Once this elevation is determined, the height of the
levees is given by adding a suitable freeboard. For such purposes, a
( simple method of calculation was developed by: W. M. Mulholland (46].
!
i
FIG. 20·8. Eleatronic f1ood·ronting a.nalog.
Bureau.)
In order to speed up routing operations, instrumental routing becomes
necessary. For this purpose, two kinds of routing machines have been
developed: the mechanical and the elec.tronic.
r
\
Mechanical routing 'machines are usually designed for reservoir rout-
ing. The U.S. A~'my Corps of Engineers has constructed two types: an
integrating machine designed by Tarpley (77J and a rolling-type flood
router by Harkness [78; 45, pp. 674':"676].
r Electronic routing machines are electronic analog and digital com- .
puters. The principle of the electronic analog is to utilize the analogy
between the flow of current in an electric circuit and the flow of water
in a channel or river system. In other words, an electri.c circuit can be
constructed with its circuit equation analogous to the. routing equation.
ROUTING 609
The U.S. Weathe.r Bureau [79-81,48] has developed an electronic
analog, shown in Fig. 20-8. This machine automatically produces the
outflow hydrograph while the operator traces the inflow hydrograph
with a stylUS. Resistances in the electric circuit. can be adjusted to
simulate the conditions for each reach of the river, as determined from
past floods. The model illustrated ill the figure has two inflow positions,
FiG. ~U-!l. uEDA tiood computer. (Courtesy of E. E. AbboU, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers.)
allowing processing of two sources of inflow affecting the final outflow
downstream .. More positions can be added, if necessary. In other
words, the machine also does flood synthesis. The use of such a m[~chille
has a decided advan:tage over analytical methods in that it solves the
routing equation in differential rather than incremental form. Incre-
menta) form is often unavoidable in analytical methods. . Furthermore,
the entire hydrograph can be routed more rapidly than by analytical
computatioll. .
Similarly, the U.S. Army Corps of uses n GEDA (Goodyear
Electronic Dif;Ierential Analyzer, 20-9) in preliminary studies of flood
projects and in touting flood through reservoirs.
20-6. A Simple Hydrologic Method of Routing. The method to be
described here is approximate but simple and suitable for practical
 610 UNSTEADY FLOW FLOOD ROUTING 611
purposes. Likp. most hydroiogic methods of routing, this method is Substituting these expressions in Eq. (20-34) and simplifying,
based on the following assumptions: .1
L The channel is divided into a number of reaches. Each reach is
relatively short and has practically constant physical characteristics.
. 8t
2 tJ.t - 0 1 +I +I
J 2
S2
= 2 l:!.t +a 2 (20-44)
J
The flood is then routed successively from reach to reach. In general, the
shortest practical reaoh is the section between the two nea.rest gaging
If I I, I 2, O~, and O2 are expressed in cis, 8 1 and 8 2 in acre-ft, and tJ.t in -,1
stations.
2. The discharge data are given at equal time intervals or routing
periods. Within this period the increase or decrease of inflow and out-
flow is assumed to vary linearly. A short routing period is preferable
. but will multiply the labor of computation. tt
UlUl
+ +
3. The inflow and outflow are both taken as a measure of storage in -0
the reach. This assumption is almost true if a: flood is being routed
through a le\Tel-pool reservoir where the variation in storage between the
falling and rising stages of the flood wave is not appreciable, In the case
of a stream, the length of a reach for routing must not be too long or
these variations will be exaggerated. .Theoreticaliy, the length of the
reach should not exceed the product of the routing period and the average
velocity of the flow in the reach (why?), although it has been found
in many cases that reaches considerably longer are permissible [54,pp. S-<>-
-s -\
173-1'75J.
FIG. 20-10. Characteristic cun'es for flood FIG. 20-11. Const.ruction of the average
4. The flow in the reach, local accretions from ungaged tributary flows, routing. S curve from a wide S-curve loop.
ground water, rainfall or any form of precipitation, and local decrements
due to evaporation or seepage are ignored if the amounts are small. If days, noting that 1 cfs = 2 afd (acl'e-feet per day) approximat.ely, then
the amounts are large, they are either added to or deducted from the Eq. (20-44) beco:rnes
inflow as the case may be.
In routing a flood from the first routing period to the second routing (20-45)
period, let
When tJ.t = 1 d.ay, as it is in most cascs, the above equation becomes
I1 and 0 1 = instantaneous inflow and outflow, respectively, at the end
of the first routing period or at the beginning of the second (20-46)
touting period . . This equation constitutes the basis of the present method. If tit is not
8 1 . = storage in the reach at the beginning of the second routing equal to 1 day, then the values of Sri tJ.t and 82/l:!.t should be used in place
period of Sl and S2, respectively, for the computation and construction of the
S 2 = storage in the reach at the end of the first routing period curves in the procedure to be described a..') follows:
or at the begi~ning of the second routing period A. Construction of Characteristic Curves. These curves are constructed
At = routing period on a plane of S vs. 0 + S (Fig. 20-10). The abscissa represents the
storage in acre-ft, and t.he ordinate represents the sum of the outflow
Then I = ~ + [2) = average inflow during l:!.t in cfs and the storage in acre-ft. The curves can be constructed given
2 . any· two of thesetbree items: informat.ion on inflow, information on,out~
o= (0 1 +
2.
O = average outflow· during l:!.t
2
)
.
flow, and storage data of a historical flood in the reach under consider-
ation. The third item can be calculated from the two given items by
~S = 8 2 - 81 = change iin storage during At Eq. (20-34).
).
612 UNSTEADY FLOW!
l
I
i
FIIOOD ROUTING 613

. 1. Draw the 450" liM, starting at the origin at a slope of 45°. which corresponds to point A in the previous 0Yllle. Successive values of
outflow can be obtained, and the outflow hydrograph can be constructed.
,2. Plot S agaillst,O +
S, obtaining the S curve.
The above procedure for d~terroining the outflow can be proved as
. As described previously. (Alt. 20~4), the plot of st,orage against out-
follows: Extend CD and EF horizontally toward the left to meet the
flow will form ., loop, and so will the plot of S against 0 + S. If the
loop of the S curve is not wide, an eye-fitted aVemge curve may be drawn . ordinate axis at H ,and G, respectively. Then, from Fig. 20-10,
to represcnt [l. line::ll; relationship between S o.nd 0 + S. If the width of HD . HA -- CA + CD"", 8 1 - 0 1 + II + 12
the loop is fairly wide, the average S curVe ml'.y be constructed as:shown GE = GF + FE ,= 8 2 + FE
in Fig. 20-11. In this figure, a curve ofS against 1 + S also in t,he fonn and HD =GE
of a loop is plotted on the left side of the ordinate axis and the 8 curve in Therefore, S~ - 0 1 + 11 + I .. = 8 2 + FE (20-47) .
loop fo!'m i~ plotted on the right side of the axis. On both sides' of the
CoropfLring this equation with Eq. (20-46), it is evident that FE must be
ordinate axis, vertical lines are constructed at thc equ.al ~bsci8sas' cor-
responding to. a certain storage 8'. The lines intersect the loops at equai to O2•
poiuts A, B, A', and B'. The points Aand A' are on the limbs of ~he Example 2a-~. The infiow and out.flow'data of a historic!!.l flood for a channel
rising stage of the loops, and B rmd B' are on the limbs of falling stage. rench are given in cols. 1, 2, lind 5 or Table 20-3. Determine the !>utflow hydrograph
Draw stl'o.ightlines AA' and BE', which intersect at C. Draw a hori- of a flood whose inflow dlJ.t/l. are given ill cols. 1 !!.nd 'e: of Table 20-4.
zonto.llille irOlil C to the right to lTIf::et t.he verticul interc(~pt AB at point
TABLE 20-3. COMP1:.'TJ\.~ION 01' CaAB.ACTEFtIS't'IC CURVES
C', C'is the r.equil'cd point on the nyerage S curve corresponding to the
"(All quantities ill thou3ands)
given stomge 3'. It can be shown that the ordinate of C; repl'esen~s
the sum of S'and a certain discha.rge Q whose value is the average for (5) (6) (7) (8) (9)
(1) (2) (4)
the rising and fulling of the flood stage.
3. Construct the image curve (1 curve in Fig. 20-10) whose abscissa Inflow (}utfiow Storage
is equal to 8 t 0 1• Tlus is an image of the 45° line reflected hori-
zontully on the left side of the curve. The curve may be constructed Adj, Ay, Given, Av, Ch!mge>: Accum,
easily by making the hOl'izontal intercept between the curve and the's ds aid cis aid !lfd !I.e-it
curve equal to the horizonto.lintercept be~\v~en the 8 cur~e and the
45° line. . I, 8,
\ I, I, +;,
Ot
o. 0 1 +0, S. - S, S,
I B. Determination of the Outflow. This is based on the char:l.cteristic
curvtjs (Fig. 20-10) and the inflow hydrogl'nph of the flood to be routed. 27.5 46.0
!I.-larch 23 23.6 22,8 18.5
The routing period is taken as 1 day. 24 59.5 57.4 80.2 29.5 48.0 32,2 59.7 89.2
1. The initial outflow at the beginning of the first routing period must 25 161.1. 158.5· 215.9 94.5 124,0 9l.9 151.6 246.1
be known or assumed. Not.e that, if the value is assumed, the error 25 279.2 269.6 428.1 211.2 305.7 122.4 274.0 485:2
involved in assuming th~ vruue will not be magnified enough to produce 27 277.7 .268.2 53i.:S 270.8i 482.0 55.8 329.8 600.6
28 195.9 189,2 457.4 229.3 500.1 -42.7 287.1 516.4
appreciable effect on the result. -79.2' 207.9 376A
29 133.9 129.4 318,6 168.5! 397.8
2. Locate [l. horizonto.lintercept AB equal to the initial outflow 30 96.1 92.8 222.2 119.7 288.2 -66.0 141.9 261.6
.between the 45 0 line and the S curve. 31 i'L5 71.9 164.1 9E;'.8 216.5 -51.8 90.1 1813.9
3. Extend AB towo.I'd the left to meet the 1 curve at C. i
i April 1 58.9 56.s1, 128.7 64.5 16l.3 -32.6, 57.5 122.0
4. Extend AB to,vard the" right to point D, making CD = 1 1 + Iz. I 2 45.1 101.9 50.2 114.7 -12.8 44.7 94.9

I 3 -37.3 82.4 40.0 90.2 -7.8 36.9 76.9

5. Draw the vertioalline DE from D upward, to meet the 45° line at E. 74.0 -3.9 33.0 67.0
4 32.8 70.1 34.0 i
6. Draw the horizontnlline EF from E to the left to meet the S curve 5 29.6 62.'4 30.4 {i4.4 -2.0 31.0 61.4
~~ . . 28.0 58.4 -2.2 28.8 56.8
6 26.6 56.:2
.7. Measure the length of EF, which is eqU9l1 to the outflow at the end 24.1 50.~ 26.2 54.2 -3.5 25.3 51.5
of the routIng period, or Oz. . ' ; ,512.1
8. Continue the cycle of the above steps :by sta.rting from point F,
l
I1.

I
I
 -"I
614 U-\'lSTElADY FLOW
FLOOD ROUTING 615
Solution. The computation for ·characteristic curves is 8hl?wn in Table 20-3. In
600

~,
col. 2 the inflow Gt\tn ttre made up.of three parts: the daily inflow at the upstream end
of th;' reB.ch, either gaged or routed from the upstream reach i the daily inflow from
gaged or routed tributaries entering the reach; and the loca.J. inflow contributed by
ungaged tributa.ries and la.nd nreas draining directly into the stream. The local 500 ~;
inBow Inay be evaluated directly from the distribution of rainfal! of the storm over
the area draining directly into the reach. As the total outflow of a flood ispresuumbly
equal to the total inflow, the sums of the values in cols. 2 and 5 should agree with 400 .1
TARLE 20-4. COMPU,!?,TION OF TilE OUTFLOW: HYDROGRAPf!:. <fI
(Ali quantities in thousands) .t 300
0
,I
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

Inflow Outflow

Date Given, A'll, Given, Adj,

(day) cfs dd ds cfs

II 0, 01
I, I, + I, 0, 01 S

FIG. 20-12. Characteristic curves of Examplc·20-2. "~ i

1st 20.0 .. ..~ 20.3 20.3 !

2d 113.2 133.2 65.0 134.8

3(1 180.0 293.2 129.0 128.8
4th 71.0 2S1.0 126.0 125.8
Sth 40.S 111.S 70.0 59.8·
6th 32.(} 72.5 40.0 39.8
7th 2S.0
.
07.0 29.0
i
~
~8.8
8th 22,5 47.S 24.0 23.8
9th 20.0 42.5 21.0 2{;L8
10th 19.0 39.0 19.5 19.3
lith 17.5 36.5 18.9 18.7
Total ... 562.7 560.7

each other. As is usually the case, however, the sums here are not equal to each other.
Assuming that the outRoy, values are closer to the tr)le values tha,n the inflow values,
the inflow is adjusted by multiplying the values in col. Ii by the ratio 1,512.1/1,566.3 -
0.9654. The adiusted inflow values are listed in col. 3. The a.verage inflow and out-
flow in afd a.re equal to I j + I z a.nd 0, + 6" respectively, where I" I" 01, and O. Dole
are in efs. Value~ of I I + I, and 0, + 02 are given in cola. 4 and 6, respectively.
FIG, 2~-13. Inflow and outflow bydrographs for Example 20-2.
The' difference between t,he values in eols. 4 and 6 is equal to the change in storage
listed in ~ol. 7, liinee (II + I.J (0, + 0,) = S, - S, = AS. A positive value in col.
7 indicates that the storage is increasing; a negative value indicates that the storage
The computat,ion of the outflow from the inflow of Il. given flood is shown in Table
is decreasing. Column 8 gives the cumula.tive stora.ge oomputed from the va.lues ill 20-4. In cols. 1 and 2 are inflow data. Column 3 gives the average inHow inafd, or
col. 7.' The first entry in col. 8, i·.e., 27.5, rep:resents the storege in the reach on II + I 2• In coL 4, the initial outtlow is gi ven as 20.3. Other values of outflow are
March 23 just before the flood began, which should be given or estimated. The sum obtained from the characteristic curves in accordance with the procedure described
of thevlLlues in cols. 5 a.nd 8, or 0, + S" is ent.ered in col. 9. From the values in previously. The outflow values, except for the given initial outflow, are ad;usted
ools. 8: and 9, the cha.racheristic curveS are constructed, a.a shown in Fig. 20-12. and entered io col. 5 so that the total inflow agrees with the total outRow. The
 t
616 UNSTEADY FLOW i 'FLOOD ROUTING 617
inflow .and out.f1ow hydrographs of the given flood are constructed as shown in Fig. ! change in stage at Sta. B of the flood under investigation as a. result of the proposed
20-13 from the vtl.lues of cois. I, 2, and 3. pla.u, Assuming that the discha.rge is a single-valued f unction of the ataga.
(

PROBLEMS "REFERENCES

ZO~l. Extend the routing of the flood in Example 20-1 to a period of (a) 36 hr !l.nii 1. N. J. Dahl; On non-permanent flow ill open cana.ls, Proceedings of the 6th Gene,-al
(b) 120 hr, Meeling, International Asso,ia.lionJor Hydraulic Resea.rch, The Ha.gue 1956; vol. 4,
20-2. Route the following hypothetical solitary flood through the channel reach pp. D19-1 to D19·16, 1955.
described,in Example 20-1: 2. T8.keo IGnosita: Hydrodynamicn.i study on the flood flow, in Floods, voJ. III of
SYTnposia Darcy, International A~sQciaHon o.J Scientific Hyd"ology, PubliCa/ian
Ti'me since flo.od began, hr Celerity, cfs No. 42, 1956, pp. &5-63. "
o 14.0 3. ,D. N. Dietz; A new method for calculating the conduct of translation waves in
3 15.0 prismatic canals, Physica, ~·ol. 8, no. 2, pp. 177-195, Febru/l.Yy, 1941.
6 15,,j 4. Junius Massau: Appendice au M:emoire sur l'integration graphique (Appendix: to
9 15.9 Memoir on graphical integration), Annales de I' Association des Ingd'lli~u1's sDrti~
12 '14.0 des Eco.les Speciales de Ganc, voL 12, pp. 185-444, Ghent, BalgiuIll, 1889. '
5. Junius l'Ihssau: Memoire sur l'integration graph,ique des equations aux derivees
The flow conditions before and after the flood wave Me uniform/having a celerity partie lies (Graphical integration of partial differential equations "lith special
of 14.0 cfs. . ' applications to unstelLdy Bow in open channels), Annale8- de l' Association .des
20-3. Verify the un'it-flood computation sho\vn in Fig, 20-4. [-ngJnieurs sortis des Ecoles Speciale;; de Grmd; vol. 23, pp. 95-214, Ghent, Belgium,
20-i. In a level-pool reservoir in which discharge is not controlled, the pl!ak outflow 1900.
must occur where the' outflo,w hydrograph intercepts the inflow hydrograph; that is, 6. MlJ.rc Hemy: Propagation des intumescences dans un canal rectangulaire'-( Propa-
P' in Fig. 28-6 must be at L Why? ' gation of, translatory waves in a rectangular channei), RellUe g~n()I'ale de l'hydrall-
20-li. In the development of a flood-control project for e. river bEtsin, the largest Zi'lue, Paris, vol. 4, no. 19, pp. 17-24; no. 20, pp. 65-71, 1938.
flood on recol'd is investiga.ted. The discho.rges of this flood at an upstrea.m station 7: Louis Bergeron: Methode graphique generaie de calcul des propagatiolls d'ondes
A llnd a downst.rc!t1U station B were observed, as shown in the accornpnnying table. ·planes (General graphical method of computation of the propagations of plane
waves), Memc)1:res, Societ~ dell Ingenieurs Civiis de la Fra.nce, pp. 407-497, July-
August, 1937, ,
Inflow at Stl', A from - Outflow at Sta. B Discharges held 8. Louis Bergeron: Methode graphiqllIJ pour te calcul dell ondes de tro.ns~ation·
"out at Sta. A, (Graphical method for the complttation of translatory waves), Sw;~te Fran.~aise
Date
Main, I 'Iributo.ries, Local, Discha.rge, Gage ht, due to proposed des Mecaniciens, Bulletin No, 7, Paris, 1953.
cfs cis cia ds ft reservoirs, cf. 9. S. A. Kh1'istianovich: Neustanovh'sheiesia dvizhenie v kanalakh i rekokh (Un-
-------" steady "motion in channels a.nd rivers), in "Nekotoryie Voprosy Mekhani\d
;[llly 29 13,600 1,900 3,000 20,800 14.4 0 SploahnoI Srady" ("Several Questions on the Mecha.nics of ContinuouH' Media"),
30 20,100 46,300 63,800 33,000 19.6 60,000 Academy of Sciences, U.S.S.R., 1938, pp. 13-154.
31 106,000" 50,100 72,lQO 80,800 35.1 149,000 10, J..eon Levin: Methode graphique de calcul du mouven1ent Iion permanent dans'
Aug. 1 92,800 I5,900 21,100 110,000 43.0 96,400 lescanailJ( a ecoulement libra (Grapbic method of computation of unsLeady Bow
:2 49,600 0,200 8,900 112,000 43.5 46.100 in open channels), Le Gtnie civil, vol. 119, no. 11-12, pp. 109-113, Ma.rch 12-14,
3 22,700 2,900 6,200 lIZ,OOO 43,4 17,900 1942.
4 11,000 2,200 4,100 '102,000 41.1 2,000 11. A. Craya: Ca,lcul graphique des regimes variables dans les canaux (Graphical
5 8,050 2,10.0 3,100 68,200 31.5 2,100 computa.tion of varia.ble regimes of flow in channels), La Hou.ille blall,che, Grenoble,
6 13,800 3,200 5,200 26,100 16.8 3,200 new series, lilt yr., no. I, pp. 19-38, Novembel', 1945, and no, 2, pp. 111-130,
7 19,000 5,300 8,100 20,800 14.4 4,800 March, 1946. '
1, 8 14,500 3;200 3,800 21,700 14,8 2,200 12. V. A. Arli:hangels!dl: "Raschety NcustaDovivshegosia Dvizheniia. y Otkrytykh
I

Vodotokakh" ("Cnlculation of Unsteady Flow in Open Channels"), Academy

The total inflow at Sta.. Ais equal to the sum of discha.rges from riIn.in stream, tribu-
, taries, and local areas a.djacent to the reach. The storage in the reach between StaG.
( A and B" at to,; beginning of the flood )5 estimated at 50,000 acre-ft.,
I For the purpose of flood control, a system of reservoirs is proposed on the tribu-
taries above Sta. A. It is found that the effect of the reservoirs is to hold out dis-
charges from the flow at 8ta. A, ~ shown in the 11l.5t column of the table. Predict the
of Sciences, U.S.S.R., 1947. .
13, H. Holsters: Le Ca.lcul du Illouvement non perma.nent dans les rivieres par Is.
methode dite des "Iignes cl'influence" (The computation of unsLeady fiow in
rivers by the so-called "influence-lines" method), Revu.e generale de l'hydra!tl'i2tIB,
Paris, vol. 13, no. 37, pp. 36-39, no. 38, pp. 93-94, no. 39, pp. 121-130, no. 40, pp.
20Z-206, and [l0. 41, pp.,237-245, 1947. .
618 UNSTEADY FLOW
14.. H. Holsters: Le Calcul du mouvement non permanent dans les rivie .."s par la
methode dite des "Iignes d'influence" (Calculation of nonpermanent flow in rivers
by t.he method kflown as "influence lines"), La Houill~ blanche, Grenoble, 8th yr.,
no. 4., pp. 49fi-5U9, August-September,1~.53. .
15. J. J. StokE>r: The formation of breaker,,; and bores, New York Univer.lily, Com-
nmnications on Applied ltfathemalics, vo!. I, no. I, pp. 1-87, January, 1948.
16. J .•r. Stoker: Nunierical solution of flood prediction and river regulation prob-
lems, I: Derivativ'n of ·hasic theory and formulation of numeriea! methods of
attack, New York University, Institute or Mathematical Sciences, Report No.
IMM-200,1953 . .
17. J. J. Stoker: II ';Vater waves," vol. IV of "Pure and Applied Mathematics," Inter-
science Publishers, Inc., New York,1957. . .
18. Henri J. Putman: Unst,ead:r flow ill open channels, Transactionll, Amer·ican Geo-
physical Union, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 227--232, April, 1948. Discussion by Pin-Nam
Lin, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 302-306, April, 1949.
19. J. Lamoen: Tides and current velocities in.1 s%-lev~1 canal, E71!linceri:I(I, vol. 168,
no. 4.357, pp. 97-99, July 29, 1949.
20. G. J. Dmitriev: Vychislenie kharakt~ristik cst[l.noviTfshegosia pJavllo izmenia-
iushchegosia dvizheniio. v prizmaticheskikh ruslnkh (Computat,i'Jil of characterist'cs
of a steady gradually varying movement in prismatic channels), Comptes rend".
(Dokludy) de l'AC(1d~mie de~ Scienceli de l'U.R.S.S., Akademiia NatLk S.S.S.R.,
Leningrad, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 825-827, 194.9.
21. Francis F. Escoffier: A graphical method for investigating the stability of flow in
op~n cbannels or in closed conduits flowing part.ly full, Transactions, America11
Geophysical Union, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 583-586, August, 1950.
22. G. D. Ransford: Contribution to first order theory of translation waves, La
Houille blanclw, Grenoble, 6th yr., no. 6, pp. 761-763, September-October,
1951.; .
23. Pin-Nam Lin: Numerical analysis of continuousunsteady flow in open channels,
'l'ransCtctions, Americ.an Geophysical Union, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 227-234., April,
1952. Discussions by J. C. Schonfeld and Fin.. Nam Lin, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 7n-
nl5, October, 1953.
2'1. Shigeo Uchida: On the analysis of flood wave in a reservoir by the method of
c1111.racteristic"s, Proceedings oj the Ed Japan National Congress for Applied lIfechan~
ics, pp. 271-276, 1952.
25. J. N ougaro: Recherches experimenta.les sur les iritumescenoes dans les canaux
decouverts (Experimental researches on translatory wave" in open channels)
SociJt~ Fm1<~aise des M~caniCiens, Bulldin·No. 9, Paris, pp. 23-35, 1953.
26. J. Nougaro: 'Theoretical and experimental studies o.f the propagation of the trans-
I~"tion waves in open channels, Proceedings. oj.the Minnesota International Hydra11r
lics Convention, Joint 'Meeting of International Associationfor Hydraulic Reliearch
and Hydraulic,s Diuision oj American Society of Civil Engineers, pp. 555-559,
August, 1953.
27. Jean NotlgarD: Etude theorique et experimentale de la propagation des intu-
mescences dans les canaux decouvert.<; (Theoretir.al and experimenta.l study of the
propaga.Uon of translation waves ill open chaunels), PtJblications scientifique.~ et
techniques d1J Ministere de PAir, France, No. 284, 1953.
28. J. Nougaro: Methode graphique pour Ie caJcul de 1iJ, propagation des intumescences
dans les canaux cle~()uverts (Graphical method for the computation of the propa-
gation of translatory waves in open channels), Proceedings of the 6th General Meet-
ing, International Association jor Hydraulic Research, The HaglLe 1965, vol. 4,
pp. D5-1 to D5-15, 1955.
FLOOD ROUTING G19
29. Yu,ichi Iwagaki and Tomitaro Sueishi: On the unsteady.flow in open cha.nnels with
uniform lateral inflow (in' Japanese), P1'Occcdings, Japan Soci'-tll oj Civil Engineers"
vol. 29, no. H, Tokyo, November, 1954. J
30. Yui,~hi Iwagaki: Fund~.mental studies on the runoff analysis by charaderistics,
Kyoto University; Disaster Prevention Research 1 nstilule, Bulletin No. 10, Kyoto,
l
r Japan, December, 1955. . ./ 4
31- Tomitaro Sueishi: On the run-orr analyds by the method of characterist.ics (in "1
Ja.panese), Transactions. Japan Society of C7:"il Engirwers, no. 29, pp. 74-87,
Tokyo, December, 1055.
32. E. J. Isaacson, J. J. Stoker, and B. A. 'Troesch: Numeric.al ~oIution of flood pre-
diction and river regula Lion problems: Report 2, Numerical solution of flood
problems in simplified model" of the Ohio River and the junction of the Ohio and
·1
Mississippi Rivers, New Y orlc Uni,'er.su1l, I nslitule of lVIathcIII.atica/ SC'iences,
Report No. I11JjI-I-205, 1954.
as. E. J. Isaa:cson, J. J. Stoker, acd B. A. Troesch: NUIIlerical solution .of flood pre-
diction and river regulation problems: Report 3, Restllts of thr, numericll.J predic-
tion of the 1945 and 194.8 floods in the Ohio River, of the 194.7 flood tin'ough tIle
junction of the OIJio 2"nd Mississippi Rivers, and of the floods of 1950 and 194.8
through l(eutuGky Reservoir, IV ew Y orlc University, Inst,:tute of Mathell1(!tica.L
Science~, Report No.IMM-NYU-235, 1956. '1
34. Edward A. Lawler and Fra.lLlr V. Druml: Hydraulic 'problem solution on electronic
computers, paper 1515, Proceeding", American Society of Civil Engineers, J o!!rnal,
l-Faterways and Harbors Division, vol. 8~, no. \VW1, pp. 1-38, January, 1958.
35. Georg Joos: "Theoreticai Physics," 2d ed., Hafner Publishing Company, N~w
York, 1950, pp. 590-594.
36. Shib-I Pai: "Viscous Flow Theorl',"yol. II, "Turbulent Flow," D. Van Nostrand
Company, Iuc., P,inGetcll, N.J., 1%7, pp. 1/9'::183 and 186-187.
37. Alfred Schack: "Industrial Heat TransJer," translaLed from the 'German by
Hans Goldscilmidt and Everett P. Partridge, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York,
1933, p. 29.
38. Shoitiro Hayami: On the propagation of flood WD.ves, Kyoio Unive.,·sity, Disa.~ter
P)'evention Research lnsl/}ute, Bulletin 1, Kyoto, Japan, Deeember, 1951.
39. F. V. Appleby: Runoff dyno"mics: A hee,t conduction 2"na!ogue of stora.ge flow in
channel networks, A.s.scmbUe G~n~rale de Rom~, 1954, InternationaL Association of
8cientifi·c Hyd1'oloflY, Publicat·ion No. 38, yol. 3, pp.338-3<18, 1954.
40. 'fojiro Ishihara, Shoitiro Hayami, and Shigenori Hayarni: On the electronic
analog computer [or flood routing, Proceedings of the Japan A.cadem!l, ·/O!. 30,
no. 9, pp. 891-895, Tokyo, 1954.
41. Tojiro Ishihara and Yasuo Ishihar!i: On the elect,ronic analog computer for !lood
routing (in Japanese), Transactions, Japan Society of Civil Engineers, no. 24,
pp. <a-57, Tokyo, April, 1955. .
42. Tojiro 'Ishiharo; and Yasuo Ishihara: Electronic analog computer for !lood flows
in the Yodo River (in JapaneBe), Proceedings, Japa.n Society of Civil En!lineers,
vol. 4.1, no. 8, pp. 21-24, Tokyo, August, 1956 .
43. 'rojiro Ishihara: Applicaticin of electronic analog computer for flood routing to
actual rivers (in Japanese), Transactions, Japan Society of Civil Engineers, no .. 4:),
pp. 4.3-47, Tokyo, ]Tebrua,ry, 1957.
1
44. Tojiro Ishihara, Shoiti!'o Hayami, and Shigenori Hayami: Electl'onic analog
comput,er for flood flows, Proceedin!ls of the Regional Technical Conference on Wa~er
Resources Development in ·Asl:a. and the Far East, United Nation.~ Economic Com-
rnwsion jar Asia and the Far East, Flood Control Series No.9, Bangkok, 1956,
pp. 170-174.
 620 , UNSTlj:ADY FLOW
45. B. R: Gilcrest: Flood routing, chap. X of "Engineering Hydraulics," edited by
Hunter Ronse, John Wil.,y & Sons, Inc., New York, 1950, pp. 635-710.
46. Flood rou'lillg, chap. Vof "Flood Control," The Engineer School, FaIt Belvoir,
Virginia, H)40, pp. 127-177. ' " Engilteerin{f, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 201}-210, l\1aYi 1944.
47. Flood routing, cbap. 6.10 of pt. 6, Flood Hydrology, vol. IV, Water Studies, '
U.S. Blcrea1' of Reda?/tillion Manual, Dec. 30, 1947:
48. Ray K: LinskW, Jr., Max A.Kohler, Joseph L. H. Pa;ulhus: II Applied Hydrology,"
, McGraw-Hill Dook Company, Inc., New York, 1940, chap. HI, Stream routing,
; pp. 485-541.
49.: Ven Te Chow: Hydrologic studies of floods in the United States, in Floods, voL In '
, 'of Symposia Darcy, Inter1lational Assaciation of Scientific Hydrology, Pllblical.ion
No. 42, HJ56, pp. 134-170.
50. Flood routing, art. 3.17 of sec. 4, Hydrology, U.S. Boil Conseroalion Service,
!
I,
Enginee,ing Handbook, Supplement A, 1957, pp. 1-28.
51. W. Rippl: The capacity of stora.ge-reservoir for water-supply, Mim.iell of Pro-
ceedinf/.s, Instilution of Civil Eng'ineers, London, vol. 71; pp. 270-2';8, 1883.
·52. Armin Schoklitsch: H Hydxaulic Structures," translated from the Gernlan by
Samuel Shulit.s, American .society of Mechanical Engineers, NeW' YOl'k, 1937,
vol. 1, pp. 65-67. , H. I'vb;..: A. Kohler: A forecu.:;ting technique for routing m\d cOll\hlllll\g flow'ln t.eflHS
53. H. Ii:. Barrows: "\Vater Power Engineering," 3d ed., McGraw-Hill Book Com-
I ,
pany, Inc., New York, 1943, pp. 199-201.
54. Don'Johnstone and William P. Cross: "Elements of Applied Hydrology," The
Ronald Press Company, New York, 1949, pp. 1Ii3-167.
55. Kenneth E. Sorensen: Graphical solution of hydraulic problem:!, TraTMIactions,
American Society of Ct'vil Engineers, vol. 118, pp. 61-77, H)53,
56. Calvin Victor Davis (editor-in-chief): "Handbook of Applied Hydr!lulic~,"
McGnnv-Hill Book CompallY, Inc., New York, 2d ed., 1952.. Sec. 1, IUvcr
:regulation by reservoirs, by Theodore T. Kna.ppen, James H. Stratton, and
Calvill V. Davis, pp. 1-21; and appendix B, Graphical aids to hydraulic computa-
tions: by Kenneth E. Soren!?en, pp: 1229-1248.
57. Otto H. Meyer: Simplified flood routing, Civil Enginecn'ng, vol. 11, no, 5, pp,
·306-307, May, 1941.
58. Louis O. Puis; Flood regulation of the Tennessee River, House DOCU1l2eni, !lo. 185,
70th CongresS, 1Gt Session, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.,
1928, pt. 2, appendix B: . ,
59. Stanley S. Butler: "Engineering Hydrology," Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood
Cliffs, N.J., 1957, pp. 208-212.
60. Walter T. Wilson: A gr!l.phical flood-routing method, Transac:l.ilYnf, American
Geophysical Un'ion, V!;ll. 22, pt. III; pp. 893-897, Hi41.
61. l\. M. Cheng: A graphical solution fOI' flood rGuhing problems, Civil Engineering,
I vol. 16, 110. 3, pp. 126-128, March, 1946.
I
62. Ven'fe Chow: A practical procedure of fio(ld routing, Civil Engineering and
Pt,bLic Works Review, London, vol. 4~, no. 542, pp. 586-588, A\lgllst; 1951; reprinted
I· as Universit1! of Illinois, Civil Enr/ineering Studies, Hydra.ulic Engineering Beries
I No.1, Urbana, Ill" Nov. 1, 1951.
63. R 'D. Goodrich: Rapid calculation of reservoir discharge, Civil Engineering,
voL i, no: 5, pp, 417-418, February, 1931.
, 64. ~~m~'i!~t~:~ia~' o~'cio;ti~di:e~~~, ~;OI~·I:'y::r ~7~~;9~, r~~~~, Transactions,
65. C, 0;
Wisler and E. F, Brater: Aidirect method of flood routing,. TransactiDns,
AmeHcan Society of Civil Engineer~, voL 107, pp. 1519-1529, 1942.
FLOOD ROUTIN,G 621
6(1. L B. Steinl;>erg! A method of flood routillg, Civil Enyineering, vol. 8; no. 7! pp.
476-477, July, T938. ... .
67. R. K. Linsley: Use of nomogl'l!.r5i1s in solving strea.mflow routing problems, Oiilil
68; C. J. PQsey: SIicle rule forl'olltillg floods throug!l stomge reservoirs or In.kes,
Engineering News-Rec(wd, vol. Hi, pp. 580-581, Apr, 25, 1935.
69. Sherlll11.n .11£. Woodwa.rd ami Chesley J. Posey: "Hydraulics .of Steady Flow in
Open Cha.n:neis" John 'Wiley & Sons, Inc" New York, 1941, pp. 133.,.145.
70. J. M, Shepley ~nd C. B. "Val ton: Solving reservoir problems with cirel,l!!.r point-
by-point COlllput~r, Civil E'I!lineel'ing, vol. lZ, no. 3, Pl'. 154-155, IVlarch, 1942:
71. F. E.Tatum: A SiUlplificd method of !Outing flood flows through natum! va.lley
stora.ge, unpublished m~mo"mdum, U.S. Engineer's .office, Rock lsland, IlL,
1IIa.y 29, 1940, .
72. O. T .. MoCr,rthy: The unit hydrogrrtph and flood routing, unpublished manll-
script, presented at a conferCHlce of the North AtlAntic Division, U.s. Army,
Corps of Enginee!'s, June 24, 1938. .
73. E. W. Lane: Predicting stages for the Lower Mis.sissippi, Civil Engineering, vol. 7;
.no. 2, pp. 122-125, February, 1937. ' '. :'.
of stage, Tra.nsactions, American Geophysical Union, voL 25, pt, VI, pp. 1030-1o:J5,
H!44. .
75. Ralph E. King: Stage predictions for flood contra! opero.tions, T,'Msactiolts,
American Society a/Civil Engineers, \'01. 117, pp. 600-GIl8, H)52.
76. William E. Ray and Herman F. Mondllchein: A method of fnrecn.stillg stage.~ on
Jl~t rivers, Tran..sa.cli01l.s, Ame1'ica.1! GeophyS'ical Union, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 698-707,
October, 1957. . .
77. J. F. TllXpleY, Jr.: A new integrilting machine, MiWary E71ginee,·, voL 32, no. 181,
pp. 39-43,1 \)39. .. : . . •
78. Frank B. Harkness: HarkMss flood rout~l':, SpecificatIOns of construction and
operat.ion, Pa.t~nt File No, 2,550,692, U.S: Patent Ot1i;:e, Washington, D.C.,
May 1, i951. . . .
7\l. R. ic Linsley, L, W. Foskett, and M. fl.. Kohler: Electronic device speeds flood
forecasting, Ellyintering News-Record, vol; 141, no. 2?, pp. 64-66.< Dec. 23, 194~,
80. R K Linsley, L. W. Foskett, and 1--,1. A. Kohler: Use "i electronical ant!.loe;:r lfl
flood wave analysis, Comptes rerUius et rapports, de. l'AssembMe G~ne'rale d'Oslo,
19-28 aiJid 194.8, International Association of Scientific Hydro/agy, Publication No
29, 11)48, vol. I, pp. 221-227.
81. M. A. I{o,hler,: Application of electronic flow routing 1l1l;l.log, Transactions,
American Society 01 C~'vil Engineers, vol. 118, pp. 1028-/045, 1953.
I APPENDIXES
l

'; j

I
I

1
I ,I
I1
[

1I :j
I
,I
.1
I

I
;1
;1.

r,

',"j .
 ApPElND~X: A. GJilOMETRIC ELEMENTS FOR CmCULAR CilANNEL Sli:CTlONS
do dialJleter R hydulUlic radius
y depth of How T "'. top width
A = wuter area D "" hydraulic clepth
p wetter perimeter Z = A ~. = section factor for
critio:d-flow comp u ta.tion

.Y.. A P R T D Z
d. d o1 d. cIo d. d, d,'"
\ 001 00013 O. 0.0066 0.1990 O.OO6~ 0.0001

I
I
0.02
0.03
O.O'!;
0.0037
O.OOLIO
0.0105
02838
0.3<!S2
0.4027
0.0132
0.01!)7
0;OZ5Z
0.2800
0.3412
0.::'!)1\)
0.0134
0.0202
o 0268
0.000-1
O.OUIO
0.0017
0.0002
0.0005
0.OU09
0.05 o 0147 O. '15lO 0.0326 0.4359 0.0;;36 0.0027 0.0015

0.06 0.0192 O.494::J 0.0389 0.4.750 0.0·106 0.0039 0.0022

0.07 0.024:3 0.5355 0.0451 o 5103 O.(H74 0.0053 O.OO;H
0.08 0.0294 0.5735 0.0513 0.542(; O.01i42 0.0069 0.00·10
0.09 0.0350 0.6094 0.OS74 0.5724 0.0612 0.0087 0.1]052
i
0.10 0.0409 0.0435 0.0635 0.6000 0.0682 0.0107 0.00()5

o.n 0.0470 0.6761 0.0695 0.6258 0.0752 0.0129 0.0079

0.12 0.0534 0.7075 0.075-1 0.6499. 0.0822 0.0153 0,001)5
0.13 0.0<300 0.7377 0.081a 0.6n6 0.0892· O.Oli\) ·o.oua
0.14 0.OGG8 0.7670 0.0871 0.61;)40 O.O<J64 0,0217 0.0131
0.15 0.0739 0.79M 0.0929 0.7141 0.1034 0.0238 0.0152

0.15 0.0811 0.8230 0.0985 0.7332 0.1106 o 0270 0.0173

0.17 O.OSB5 0.8500 0.1042 0.7513 0.1178 0.030* O.OHJ()
0.18 0.0961 0.8763 0.1097 0.7GS-t 0.1252 0.0;339 0.0220
0.10 0.1039 0.9020 0.1152 0.7846 0.1324 0.0378 0.0247
\ 0.20 0.1118 0.9273 0.1206 0.1398 0.0418 0.0273
\
0.8000
I- 0.21 0.Wl9 0.9521 0.1259 0.8146 0.1472 0.0460 0.0301
0.22 0.1281 0.976 .. 0.1:312 0.8285 0.154[\ . 0 0503 0.0333
0.23 0.1365 1.0003 0.1364 o 8-H7 0.1622 0.0549 0.0.359
o 24 0.1449 1.0239 o~ 1416 0.8542 0.1096 0.0597 o 0394
0.25 0, HiSS .1.0472 0.14136 0.86(10 0.1774 0.0646 0.0427

\
, 0.2() 0.1623 1. 0701 0.15\6 0.8773 0.1850 0.0697 0.0464
0.27 0.1711 1.0928 0.1566 0.8879 0.1925 0.0751 0.0"97
r 0.28
O.2D
0.1800
0.1890
1.1152
1.1373
0.1614
Q.1662
0.8980
0.9075
0.2004
0.2084
0.0805
0.0862
0.0536
o 0571
0.30 0.1982 L 1593 i 0.1709 0.9165 0.2162 0.09Z1 00610
625
 ~I
l
626 APPENDIXES
APPENDLX A 627
ApPENDIX A. GEOMETllIC ELEMENTS FOR CIRCULA.R
CHANNEL SECTlO~S (C01Itinued) AI'I.'EN.DrX A. GEOMETRIC EI,EMENTS FOR CmCULAll
CHA.NNEL SECTIONS (conlinued)

.'!!.. A P R T D Z A.R~~
I A P R T D z
d, do' .do da d. d. do" s :i I!
--- d. do' d. d. d~
I
0:31 0.2074 0.1755 0.2242 i ---'--I·---___~I·-~-~·· - ; - - - - 1 - - - - - -
1.1810 0.9250 0.0981 0.0650
0.32 0.2167 1.2025 0.1801 0.9330 I) :232:l 0.1044 o.OMn 0.66 ! 0.54()9 1.8965 0.289£1 0.9174 0.5804 0.4188 0.2407
0.33 0.2260 1.2239 0.1848 0.9404 O.240.f 0.1107 0.0736 0.67 0.5594 1.9177 0.2917 0.9404 0.5948 0.4309 0.2460
J 0,2.510
0.34 0.2355 1.2451 O. ]891 0.9474 0.2486 0.1112 0.0776 0.68 0.5687 1. 9391 0.2935 0.9330 .0.6096 0.4437
0.35 0.2450 1.2661 0.1935 0.9539 0.2568 0.1241 0.0820 0.69
0.70 !
! 0.5780
o 5872
1.9606
1.9823
0.2950
0.2962
o 9250
0:9165
0.6250
0.6408
0.45136
o -lG94
o 2560
o 2DU8
0.36 0.2546 1.2870 0.1978 0.9600 0.2652 0.1310 0.0864 I
0.37
0.38
0.2642
0.2739
1.3078
1.3284 I
I
0.2020
0.2061
0.9656
0.9708
I 0.273(3
0.2822
(),1381
0,1>153 j 0.0909
0.0955
0.71
0.72
0.5964
0.6054
0.6143
2.0042
2.0254
2.0438
0.21)73
0,2£184
0.2095
0.9075
0.8980
0.8870
0.6572
0.6742
0.6918
0.4831
0.·jJJG4
0.5100
O.2IJ.5:j
0.2702
0.2751
0.39 0,2836 1.3490 0.2102 0.9755 0.2908 0.1528 0.1020 0.73 \
0.40 0.2934 1.3694 Q.2142 0.9798 0.2994 0.11303 0,1050 .0.74 I 0.6231 2.07H 0.3006 '0..87i3 0.7104 05248 0.27H4
I 0.75 0.6318 2.01)44 0.3017 o 86GO 0.7296 o 531l:!. 0.2840
0.41 0.3032 1.3898
.'
0.2181 0.9837 0.3082 0.1682 0.1100
0.42 0.3132 1. 4101 0.2220 0.9871 0.3172 0.1761 0: 1147 0.76 0.6404 2.1176 I) 3025 0.8542 o 1498 0.5540 0.2888
0.43 0.3229 1.4303 0.2257 0.9902 9·3262 0.1844 .0.1196 0.77 0.6489 2.1412 0.3032 0.8417 o 7710 o..'5G!)5 0.2930
o 2060
0.44
. 0.45
0.3328
0.3428
1.4505
1.4706
0.22(H
0.2331
0.9928
0.9950
0.3352
0.3446
0.1927
0.2011 I
i
0.1245
0.1298
0.78
0.79
0.80
0.6573
0.6655
0.6736
2 1652
2.1895
2.2143
0.3037
0.3040
0..3042
0.8285
0.8146
08000
0.7934
0.8170
08420
0,5850
0.6011
0.G177
0.3008
0.3045
0.46
0.47
I 0.3527
0.3627
1. t907
1.5108
0.2366
0.2400
0.9968
0.9982
0.3538
0.3634
0.2098
0.2186
0.1348
0.1401 0.81 0.68~5 2.2395 0.3044 0.7846 0.8686 !
0.G347 0.3082
0..48 0.3727 1.5308 0.243'1 0.9992 0.3730 0.2275 0.1452 0.82 0.6893 2.2653 0.3043 0,7684 0.8970 0.6524 O.aJl8
0.49
0.50
0.3827
0.3927
1.5508
1.5708
0.2467
0.2500
0.9998
1.0000
0.3828
0.3928
0.2366 . 0.1505
0.2459 0.1558
0.83
0.34
0.6969
0.7043
2.29l()
2.3186 I 0.3041
03038
0.7513
0.7332
0.9276
0.9606
0.6707
0.6897
0.3151
0.3182
0.85 0.7115 2.3462 0.3033 0.7141 0.9964 0.7098 0.3212
I
0.51
0.52
O. '1027
0.4127
1. 5908
1.6108
0.2531
0.2561
0.9998
0.9992
I 0.4028
0.4130
0.2553
0.2650
0.1610
0.1664 0.86 0.7186 2.3746 0.3026 0.6940 1.0354 0.7:307 0.3240
0..53 0.4227 1.6308 0.2591 0:9982 0.4234 0.2748 0.1715 0.87 0.7254 2 4038 0.3017 0.6726 1.0784 0.7528 0.3204
0.54 0.4327 1.6509 0.2620 0.9968 0.4340 0.2848 0,1772 0.38 0.7320 2.4341 0.3008 0.ti49\l 1. 12fH 0.7754. 0.3286
0.55 0.4426 I 1. 6710 0,2649 0.9950 0.4448 O.2!H9 0.1825 0.89 0.7380 2.4655 0.2996 0.15258 1.1800 0.8016 0.3307
0.90 0.7445 2.4981 0.2980 O.GOOO 1 2408 0.8285 0.3324
0.56 0.4526 1.6911 0.2676 0.9928 0.4558 0.3051 0.1878
0.57 0.4625 1.7113 0.2703 0.9902 0.4670 0.3158 0.1933 0.91 0.7504 2.5322 0.2963 0.5724 L3UO 0.8586 0.3336
0.58 0.-1723 1.73~5 0.2728 o 9871 0.4786 0.3263 0.1987 0.92 0.7560 2.5681 0.21)44 0.5426 1.3932 0.8917 0,:334.5
0.59 0.4822 1. 7518 0.2753 0.9837 0.4902 0.3373 0.204'1 0.93 0.7612 2.6061 0.2922 0.5103 1.4918 0.9202 0.3350 - 1
0.60 0.4920 1.7722 0.2776 0.9798 0.5022 0.3484 0.2092 0.9:1 0.7662 :2 .6467 0.28913 0.4750 1.6130 0.9725 0.3353
0.95 0.7707 26906 O.28(l4 0.4359 1.7682 1,0242 0.3349
0.61 0.5018 1.7926 0.2797 0.9755 0.5144 0.3560 0.2146 I
0.62 0.5115 1.8132 0.2818 0.9708 0.5270 0.3710 0.2199 0.96 0.7749 2.7389 0.2830 0.391\) 1.9770 1.0888 0.3.'34:0
0.63 0.52t2 1.8338 a 2839 0.95513 0.5398 0.3830 0.2252 0.97 0.7785 2.7934 0.2787 0.3412 2.2820 1.1752 0.3322
0.64 0.5308 1.8546 0.2860 0.9600 0.5530 0.3945 0.2302 0.98 0.78t6 2.8578 0.2735 0.2800 2.7916 1.3050 0.3291
I 0.7841 2 9412 0.2665 1.5554 0.3248
0.65 0.5404 .1.8755 0.2881
l
0.9539 0.5666 . 0,4p66 0.2358 0.99
1.00 0.7854 3,1416 0.2500
0.1990
0.0000
3.9400
'" "" 0.3117 -I
Ii

II
!'
,i
"
l Apl'ENDL" B. GEOMETRIC ELE~'[ENTS FOR TRAPEZOIDAL, TRUNGULAR, AND
II PA1lAl:IOLIC CHANN.I!a, SllCT40NS
(The lise of the chari,s" l'<:quil'es no e:1:plnlk'ltion.)
I
I
I
I
r * Repl'odnced with the pet'mis~ion Qf the U.S, Agriculturai Research Service,
through the ~,ourtesy of Mr, W~ 0, Ree, from" Handbook of Cha.nnel Design for Soil
Mld 'Vater COli.s<:l'vation," prepal'ed by StillwMer Outdoor Hyclraulic Lnboratory,
1
II n.S. Soil Conservntion Service, Sc...ct.TP-Gl, March, 1047, Md revised June, 1954.
!
!
I, I
\
'I
1
I
1
, .

I y;

r 629
~/~

..
0:

::!
'-6

'"""o '"
", ~

FIG. B-l. Geometric elements of trupc"oidlll dlr>rmels with 1; 1 side slopes.

:t:
0:

'"
"
'is
l?

'" "
~
....
C»
E
"0
>-
:L

4 S S 7 8910 0.2 0.3

A,;!Q. A, liz

FIG. B-2. Hydraulic eJemc,ots or tJ'tLpezoidllJ channel:; with n If 1 side slopes.

...

,
'. ~
...-L-..
 -
....
0::

.2
."
2
.,.
to;)
'-'"

Areo, A, 1,2

FIG. B-3. Hydraulic elements oftrapozoidal channels with 2:1 side slopo!!.

-0::
.;
"
'0
l2'
"".w .2
"3
w 0
.f5
".,
J::

Areo,A, tlZ
FlO. B-4. Hydraulic element.s of t.rapezoidal channels wit.h 2~i: 1 side slopes.
 -
t-
.!! l!w:",--+--+.--J-j-+-i
g O.')~~--!-,-+-1---1--1-4-
-g, 0.8 r--r--+-+-++-b
:c 0.7 I
0.6 ---\.---i--.".j"~";::

0.5· §----i-'7"'g-,,4--+-7"i"-

a ~ 10 . 15
Area, A • 0 2

FIG. B-5. Hydraulic elements of trapezoidal channels with 3: 1 side slopes.

;:::
Ii.
.;
"
15
B
.;1
~ :;
Ql
<!
'"J:
>.

. FIG. B-6. Hydraulic elements of tr!l.pezoidal channels with 4: 1 side slopes,

(-'~-
(

-'--
 ~(--

FIG. B-7. Hydraulic etemehts.of trapezoidal channels with 5:1 sid" siol?es.

,.

-
....
rl
.;
a
-0
~
(.3
c..
e.-> 30
-1
t
:r:

..____ .---,~u.w

15
Afea,A, HZ

FIG. B-3, Hydranlic elements of trapezoidal cbannels with 6:1 side slopes.
 '! ""'"''!''''!''''l'''
2.5i=---,...·+-----,-;---~+_H_+-··--!- -..i~1--r-::7F7""+__::.:r'9-::l_-

:1'

-
" 1--
a:
'"::>
'i5
0>
e
<;;:J .!'!
:;
'" 0
.;;;>..
::c

:';

.~,

.,
'.'J

FIG. B-O. Hydmulic elements of trillnguli1r chltnnels.

B-IO. Hydraulic elements of parabolic ch.annels.

i,
I:
I
I .........
Oai'l!'
..., 1.0
»:;1(;>
m:::;,,",
T
.s:::: ApPENDIX D. TABLE OF THE VARIED-FLO'\',' FUNCT40NS·
, iTi .......
gOO::;
'"
4)-
>=
;0..,>-:>
.0.-0
F(u,N) = IoU 1 :t·
UN
AND F(iJ.,N)_s. IoU
'"
~"'V~
..,;t 0'-
....
'";.. TABLE D-l. THE VARIE\)-FLOW FUN(!TION FOR POSITtv,E SLO>'ES, F{1t,N)
1 I
T .;: ~ i:!
.,. e
I
b.J
-:
,
I
:::> .. "0
2.2 2A 2..6 2.8 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.6 4.0
..:I
b
I
\ ~ -"" §
:;:; ... - t ......
n: I
1 <1)-.~
o~.,.
en
. 0.00 0.000 0.000
0.020 0.020
0.000
0.020
0,000
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.020
0.020 0.020 0.020 o 020
0.000 0.000
0
r=., \ 0-::;:- 0.02 0.020 0.020
'E Ei' 0.04 0.0·1.0 0.040 0.040 0.0,10
O.OrlO 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.0,10 0.0;10
I
1
\

"Z , (LI CJ ~ 0.06 0.060 U.03O 0.060 0.D60

0.060 0.060 0.060 0.060 0.060 0.060
I
00 :s d
0.08 0.080 0.080 0.080 0.080
0.080 0.080 0.080 0.080 0.080 0.080
Z \
..:::0:21
z liej ';\·~/('Ot9'i\1
. '" 0 _ 0.100 0,100
-<
i""I"'lN'T'T'TITm=J"'1'~'rT'l'l'l'ITI'"'1""r'"":rrITlTT'JT"""F!"'T'l
\
... rl 0.10 o. 100! 0.100 0.100. 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100
:;E
:> ~ g; ~ ~ i3 88
o' dd dd
gad ~ §.... N r q '0 (0£. ~ ~ ~
.~
1lJ
~ t..?
.....
!\)oIE-<
~
0.12
0.14
0.120 0.120.
0.140 0.1·10
0.120 0.120 0.120 • 0.120 0.120 0.120
0.140 i 0.140 0.140 0.140 0.140 0.140
0.120 0.120
0.140 0.140
'"E-<
:r:
0'
~~I
ro
0.16 0.161 0.161 O.UlD 0.160 0.160 0.160 0.160 O.HIO 0.160 0.160
-"00 0.18 0.181 0.181 0.181 0.180 0.180 o 180 o 180 0.180 0.1800.180
~
0 i.'!~m_
;::l
0.202 0.201
u.20 0.201 0.201 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.20010.200
Z
0 '0 ..0>
.....-.Q
::l 0._
-
~-
'"
,p.22 0.223 0.222 0.221 0.221 0.221 0.220 0.220 0.220 0.220' 0.220
"ro >- 0.2-1 0.244 0.243 0.242 • 0.241 0.241 o 241 0.2·10 0.240
E::
:::
;:;
o.
>0
a:::.:
1
'"
';:: ~ ~
~.2m
~ <=l
0.26
0.28
0.26.'5 0.263
0.286 0.284
0.2tl2 0.262 0.261 0.261 0.261 0.260
0.283 0.28:& .0.282' 0.281 0.281 0.281
0.240 0.240
0.260 0.260
0.280 0.280
ro .5
u ~ rri .~.,3 O.SO 0.307 0.305 0.304 0.303 i 0.302 0.302 0.301 0.301 0.301 0.300
• '"
;;; :!
f:l <1l >-oJ 0.32 0.329 0.326 0.325 0.324 0.323 0.322 0.322 0.321 0.321 0.321
p<. P '" 0.34 0.351 0.:148 0.34.6 0.344 0.343 0;343 0.342 0.342 0.341 0.341
~ ~
~
'" ..,
G;
0: c: 0.3? 0.372 0.369 0.367 () .3613 0.364 0.363 0.3133 0.362 0.362 0.361
::a" ~8
u. t..O:';l'JIJOw
0
t: rrp rT""T"Tn-r'll; it l'i n I
.,. ....
jl I '1"""'"'1 ....°A_ 0.38 0.395 0.2·93 0.38g 0.387 0.385 0.3&<1 ·0.383 0.383 0.382 0.382
0 <oW ~tf'!
'"<:5 _II> "' N
c: 0'0 0.40 0.418 0.414 0.411 0.40810.407 00405 0 0.403 0.403 00402
d~ ~ J'~ ~
cici 00 0 0
Z d d o .... Cf.l 0 .. 42 0.442 0.431 0.433 0.430 0.428 OA26 0 10.424 0.423 0.423
I
:
.-
.~~;
0 .
0.44 0.465. 0.460 0.456 a 452! 0,450 0.448 o A:16 • 0.445' 0.444 i 0.443
d I So. 0 0.489 0.'183 0,479 0.475 I OA72 0.470 0.468 i 0.466 OA650·H14
i:iA ? .. ° -
., ..0 »
CL.~ ~
0 0.514 0.507 0.502 0.497 I 0.494 0.492 0.489 GA88 !
o .486 0 .485
. a
..
z
iii
I
I
T
I

~;;::
.., _ 0~
~ 0.539 0.531
0,565 0.557
0.592 0.582
0.525 0.52110.517 0.514 0.511 0.509
0.550 0.54410.540 0.536 0.5:34 0.531
0.574 0.568 0.563 0.559 0.558 0.554
0.508 0.506
0.529 0.528
,,
P<
--: , .a 0.551 0.550
11"' :&sj 0.619 0.608
0,648 0.635
0.599 0.593 [ 0.587 0.583 0.579 0,576
0.626 0.618[ 0.612 0 . 607 o 603 o 599
0.574 0.572
.-
.~.t:
0
It· 0.596 0.594
'- ,, I 1

, "CO
g ~ f!
-::l 0,676 0.663 0.653 0.644 0.637 0.631 0.627 0.623 0.620 0.617
,T :)~"O
10.691 0.678 0.667 0.657 0.650 0.6H 0.1339 0.835 0.631 0.628
'J.» 0.7061 0.692 0.680 0.671 0.663 0.657 0.651 0.847 0.643'0.640
::;cilI: 0.722. 0.707 0.694 0.68'1 0.6713 0.609 0.1364 0.659 0.655 0,652
a. • ... 0.738 0.722 0.709 0.698, 0.690 0.683 0.677 0.67'2 0.667 0.664
'" ~ 0
.. . .g..,
~
.. ::I
0.65 0.754 0.737
0.66 0.771 0.753
0.724 0.712 0.703 0.696 0.689 0.684
0.738 0.727 0.717 0.709 0.703 0.697
0.680 0.676
0.692 0.688
::20 0.67. 0.787 0.769 0.754 0.742.0.731 0.723 0.716 0.710 0,70,,) 0.701
0.68 °
o 69 0.822 804 0.785
0.804[
0.769] 0.75710.746 0.737 a 729 0.723
0.785 0.772 0.761 0.751 0.743 0.731
0.718 0:71.3
0.731 0.726
J.
I
\
* The table of the varied-flow fUlletion fOI' i)ositive slopes F(II,N) is 1'\}pl'oduced
from Ven Te Cho\v, Inteljratin' g the equntion of gradually n.ded fiow, PToceedin(lo,
A JIIerican Society of Cil,ii I~!li"eej's, vol. 81, paper no. 838, pp. 1-32, Novembel', 1955.
Tpe ta.ble of the varied-flow [tinction for negative slOpes F{1L,N) -8, isrepl'oduced from
the author's closing discussion of this pU.per in roceedings, voL 83, JOli1'llut of
Hyd1'auUC8 Di.vision, no. HYl, paper no. 1177, pp. 9-22, February, 1957.
640 641
 APPENDIX D 643
642 APPENDIXES
TABLE D-l. THE VARIED-FLOW FUNCTION Foa POSITIVE SLOPES, F(11,N) (conlin'l!ed)
TABLE D-l. T.Hf: VARIED-F!,OW FUNCTION FQ!l. POSITIVE SLOPES, F(u,N) (continued)'

2.4 2.6 1 2.8 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 I 4.0

~",1 2.2 i 2.4 , 2.6 I 2.8 1!~3.2 '.3.4 ... 3.6 (3.8 4.0
-T.13 -11.138 [0:950 I 0.805/ 0.692 0.602 0.5290,468 OA17 0 .'374'
1
1.14 11.10710.9210.7800 (l69 0.5810.50910.450 OAOO 0.358
0.819 0.802 0.787 0.775 0.766 0.757 0.750 0.744 0.769 1.15 1.078 0.892 0.756/0.64710.561 1),490 0.432 0.384 0.343
0.836 0.819 0.804 0.791 0.7810.772 0.764 0.758 0.752 l.It' 1.052 0.870 0.734 0.627 0.54.2 0.473 i 0.417 0.369 0.329
o.85S 0.B3r} 0.820 0.807 0.796 0.786 0.779 0.772 0.766 1.17 1.027 0.850 0.713 '0.608 0.525 0.458 ' OA02 0.356 0.317
0.874 0.854 0.837 0.823 0.811 0.802 0.793 0.786 0.780
Oy892 I 0.868 0.854 0.840 0.827 0.817 0.808 o 800 o 794 1.13 1.003 0.825 0.694 0,591 0.509 0.443 0.388 0.343 0.305 .~
),
0.7 5 0.940 0.913 0.890 0.872 0.857 0.844·
1
0.833 0.823 0.815 J 0,808
1.19 0.981 0.810 0.676 0,574 0,494 0.4.29 0.37510.331 0 ,
1.20 0.950 0.787 0.659 0.559 0.480 0.'1016 1 0.363 0.320 O.
0.7 6 0,961,0933 0.909 0.890 0.874 0.861 0.849 0.839 0.830 0.823 1.22 0.922 0.755 0.628 0.531 0.454 .0.392' 0.341 0.299 O.
0.7 7 0.98510.954 0.930 0,909 0.892 0.B78 O.SGG 0.855 0.846 0.838 1.24 0.1387 0725 0.600 0.505 OA31 0.371 0.322 ,O.28[ O. .0219
1.007 0.976 (I.gSO,0.929 0.911 0.896 0.883 0.872 0.863 0.854
0.7 8
0.7 9 1.031 0.998 0.971 0.949 0.930 0.914 0.901 0.889 0.879 0.870 1.26
1.23
1,0.85S 0.692 0.1574 0.482 0.410
0.827 0.666 0.551 0.461 0.391
0.351 0.304 0.2135
0.334 0.28810.250
I 0.23310.205
0.219\ O. HJ3
0.80 LOli6 1.022 0.994 0.970 0.950 0.934 0.919 0.907 0.895 0.887 1.30 0.80°10.644 0.530 . 0.44'20.373 0.3180.274 0.2:37 0.207 0.11l1
0.8 1 1.083 1.046 1.017 0.992 0.971 0.954 0.938 0.925 0.914 0.904 1.32 0.775 0.625 0.510 0.424 0.35i 0.3lH' 0.260,0.225 0.191i 0.171
0.8 2 l.UO 1.072 1.041 1.015 0.g93 0 .. 974 0.958 0.945 0.932 0.922 1.34 1
0.752,0.6050.4920.4080.342 0.290 0.24810.214 0.185 0.162
0.8 3 1.139 1.099 1.067 1.039 1. OHi 0.9£16 0:979 0.965 0.952 0940 '\
0.8 4
0.8 5
1.171 1.129
1,201 1.157
1.094
1.121;
1.064
1. 091
1.040
1.065
l.OW
1.043 .1,024
1.001 0.985
1.007
0.9:12
° 993
0.960
0.980
1.36
1.33
0.731 0.588 0.475 0.393 0.329 0.278 0.237,0.20'1 0.176 0.153
0.711 0.567 0.459 0.378 0.31(\ 0.266 0.2ZG 0.19,1 0.167 0.145
1.'10,0.6920.5480.4440.3650.304 O.25G 0.21701850.1590.138
I I
0.8 6 1.238 1.192 1.153 1.119 1.092 1.0G8 1.048 1.031 1.015 1.002
1.272 1. 223 1.182 1.149 1,120 1,095 1.074 1.055 1.039 1.025 1.42 0.674 0.533 0.431 0353 0.293 0.246 0.208. 0.177 0.1521.°.131
0.87 1.44. 0.658 0.517 0.417 0.341 0.282 ·0.23(j 01\l9 0.169 '0.145 0.125
0.8 8 1.314 1.262 1.228 1.181 1.151 1.124 1.10[ 1.081 1.064 1.049
0.8 9 1.357 1.302 1.255 1. 216 1.183 1 155 1.131 1.110 1.091 1.075 1.46 0.64210.5050.4050.3300.273'0.2270.19: 0.1()2 0.139 0119
1:48 0627,0.4930.3940.3200.2630.2190.1840.1560.1330.113
0.9 0 1.401 1.343 1.294 1.253 1.218 1.189 1.163 1.140 1.120 1,103 l.50 0.613 0.480 0.383 0.310 0.2.";5 0.211 0.177! 0.149 0.127 0.108
0.9 1 1.452 1.389 1.338 1.29'1 1.257 1 225 1.197 1.173 1.152 1.133 1.55 0.580 0.451 0.358 0.288 0.2.15 0 194 0.1(31 0.135 0.114 0.097
0.9 2 1.505 1.'138 1.351 1.340 1.300 1.266 1.236 1.210 1.187 1. 166 L60 0.5510.425 0.335 0.269 0.218 0.1790.148 0.123 0.103 0.087
0.9 3
0.9 4
1.564
1. 615
1 . '1\l3 1. 435 11.391
1.5G8 1. 501 1.4.49
1.348
1.403
1.311
1.363
1.279
1.328
1.251
1.297
1.22G
1.270
1.204
1.246 1.65 0.52.5 0.402 0.3160.2510.2030.165 0.136 0.1130.0940.079
I
1.296 1.70 0.501 0.381 0.298 0.236 0.189 0.153 0.125 0.103 0.086 0.072
1.467 1.423 1.385 1.352 1.322
0.9
O.g60
(](J 11.737
1.652
1. 741
1. 833
1.582
1.665 i
1.518
1.601 1.,515 1.497 1.45411.41711.385 1.355
1.75
1.80
0.480 0.362 0.282 0.222 0 177 0.H3 Q.1l6 0.095 0.079 0.06,5
0.400 0.34Q 0.267 0.209 a. lOG I 0.13:3 ° 103 0.088 O. 072 0.050
0.9 70· 1.969 1.866
09 75 2.055 1.945
1. 780
1.853
11.707
1.773
1.644
1.707
1.590
1.6'19
1.543 1.501 1.461
1.598 1.554 1.514
1.431
1.47\1 L85 0.442 0.332 0.254 0.198 0.15610.125 0.100 0.082 0'.057 O.OSS
• 1
I
0.9 80 2.164 2.045 1.946 i L855 1.783 1.720 1eGGG 1.617 1.575 1.536 1.90 0.425,0.;3150.2420.1880.1470.1170.094 0.07G 0.002 0.050 i
0.9 85 2.294 2.165 2.056! 1.959 1.880 1.812 !
1.752 1. 699 1. 652 LIn 0
1.873 1. 814! 1. 761 1.714
1.95
2.00
0.40? 0.304 0.231 0178 0.139 °.110 0.088 0.070 0.057 0.046
0.3D5 0.292 0.2210.[090.1320.10·10.0820.01)80.0530.043
0.9 90 2.477 2.333 2.212 2.106 2.017 UNO 210 0.3!Hi 0.27.'3 a 202 0.154 0.119 1i 0.092 (J.on 0.058 0.0~6 0.037
0.9 95 2.792 2.621 2:478 2.355 2.250 2.159 2 . 07!) 2 008 11. 945 1. 889 2.20 0.34B 0.253 0.1813 0.141 0.107! 0.083 0.0511 OOSI 0.040 0,032
0.9 99 3.523 3.292 3.097 2.931 2.788 2.6133 2. 554 1 2 .4.57,2.370 2 293
co 2.3 0.325 0.235 0.173 0.120 0.09810.075 00.58 0.0.t5 0.035 0.028
LO 00 " I ~
00 00 0:>
'" "" '" 1 '"
LO 01 3.317 I 2.931 2.640 2.399 2.184 2.008 i
I 856' 1. 725 1.610. 1 1.S08 2.4
2.5
0.308 0.220 0100 0.1:1\10.0890.058
0.2920.2070.1500.110 0.082 0.062
0.052
0.0.,!7
0.040 0.031 0.024
0.035 0,028 0.022
LO05 2.587 2.266 2.022 1.818 1.649 1.50[l 1.384 1. 279 i 1. 188 1.107
1.0 10 2.273 1.977 1.757
1.602
1.572
1.428
1.419
1.286
1.291
1.16G
1. 182 1. 089 11.007 0.936
1.065 0.978 0.902 0.836
2.6 10.277 0.197 0 140 0.102 0.07G 0.0.57
2.70.264 0.188 01310.005 0.0700.05'3
0.043
0.030
0.03:~ 0.025 0.019
0.029 0.022 0.017
1.0 15 2.090 1.807
LO 20 1.961 1.711 ·1:493 1.327 1.191 1.078 0.982 . 0.900 ! 0.828 0.766 2.8 0.2520.1760.124 0.08(10.01350.0-180.0360.0270.0200.015
0.955 0.86610.79010.725 0.668 2.9 [0.241 O.WG 0.11.7 0.083 (J.050 0.044.0.03:3 0.024 0.018 0.014
1.0 3 1.779 1.531 1.340 1.186 1.060 3.0 ;,0.230 0.159 0.1l0,1 0.078 0.056 0.0.J.1' 0.0::\0 0.022 0,{)17 0.012
1.0 4 1.651 1.410 1.232 1;086 3.967 0.868 0.78510.714 0.653 0.600
1.010 0.896 0.802 0.723 0.656 0.598 0.548 3.5 0.1900.1260.085'1°.0590.0410.(21) 0.0210.015 0.01l 0.008
1.0 5 1.552 1.334 1.150 4.0 0.1610.104 0.0690.0460.0310.022 0.015 0.010 0.007 0.005
LO 6 1:472 1 250 1.082 0.948, 0.838 O.HS 0:672 0.608 0.553 0.50G
LO 7 1.404 1.195 1.026 0.896 0.790 0.703 0.630 0.569 0.516 0.471 4.5 0.1390.0870.0571°.037.0025 O.Oli 0.01110.008 0.005 0.004
1.08 1.346 1.139 0.978 0.851 0.749 0.565 0.595 Q.535 0.485 0,441 5.0 0.122' 0.076 0.048 0.03110.020 0.013 O.oun 0.006 O.OOt,· 0003
0.713 0.631 0.563 0.506 0.457 0.415 6.0 0.098 O. aGO 0.0313 0 022 0 . 014. 0.009 O. naG IJ. 004 o. 002 0.002
1.09 1.295 1.089 0.935 0.812 7.0 0.081'0,048 0.028,0.017 0.010 0.006 0.004 O. 002 0.002 0.001
1.1 0 • 1.250 1.050 0.897 0.777 0.681 0.601 0.536 0.480 0.433 0.392
0.575 U.511 0.457 0.411 0.372 8.0 .0.OGg 0.040 0.022 0.013 0.008 0.005 0.003.0.002 0'001 ' 0.001
1.1 1 · 1.209 1.014 0.864 0·741; 0.652
1.1 2 0.981 0.833 0.718 0.626 0.551 0.488 0.436 0.392 0.354 9.0 10.060 0.034 0.01910.01110.006 0..004 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.000 'Ii
• 1.172 10.0 10.0530028 0.016 O.OO!) 0.005 0.003 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.000
20.0 0.0'23 0,018,0.011 i 0.0(10 0.002 0.00110.0011/1.000 0.000 1 0.000
.J.
 (J44 APPENDIXES APPENDIX· D 645

TAlILlll D-1. T,H!l YARH!n-nOW FONCTIOH 1'0& POSITfVE SLOPES, F(lt,N) (contintled) TADLE D-l. THE VARIED-FLOW FUNCTION FpR POSITfVE SLOPES, F(It,N) (cohtimled)

4.2 Vi 5.0 6.2 G.B 5.0 .5.4 5.8 6.2 G.G 7.0' i 7.4 .7.8
7.8

0.00 0.000 0.000 a 000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 ·0.80 0.878 10.865 !0.854 0.845 0.8.38 o . 832 . 0.828 0.823 0.820 0.818
0.02 O.O:W 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 fJ.020 0.81 0.895\ 0.881.0.869 0.860 0.852 0.84(l 0.841 0.836 0.833 0.830
O. [1·1 O.O.fU 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.0,10 0.040 o 040 0.040 0.040 0.82 0.913 0.897 0.885 0.875 \ 0.866 0.8GO 0.854 0.850 0.846 0.842
0.00 O. OM O.OUO O.OGO 0.000 0:000 0.060 (i.OGO O.OGO O.OGO 0.0.60 0.83 0.931.0.914\ 0.901 0.890. 0.S81 0.874 0.8138 0.8133 0.859\ 0.85.5
, 0.08 0.080 0,080 0.080 0,080 0.080 0.U80 0.080 0.080 0.080 0.949 0.932 0.918 0.906.0.897 0,889 0.882. 0.877 0.872 0.8118
I 0.10 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100
0.080
0.100
0.84
0.85 0,969 0.950 0.935
1
0.923 0.912 0.905 0.893 0.891 0.887 0.88~
0.12 0.120 0.120 0,120 0.120 0.120 0.120 0.120 0.120 O. J20 0.120 0.86 0.990 0.970 0.95-1 0.940 \ 0.030 0.921 0.913 0.90(l 0.901 0.896
O.H 0 1 0.140 0.140 0.140 O.UO 0.1'10 0.140 0.140 0.140 1,012 0.990 0.973 0.95!) (1.9-17 0.937 0.929 0.922 0.91() 0.911
0.1'·!0 0.87 0.932 0.927
0 III . ..10
1 0.160
O. HiD 0.160, O. 160 O. HlO O. HlO 0.160 O,lliO O.WO O.WO 0.88 1.035 1.012 0.99-4 0.97810.966 0.955 0.1146 0.938
0.18 0.180 0.180 0.lS0 0 180 0.180 0.180 0.180 0,180 o 180 0.180 .0.89 1.060 1.035 1.015 0.999 0 986 0.974 0.964 0.956 0.949 0.943
\).2f) . 0.200 0.200 0.:)1)0 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.90, 1. 08711.060 1.039 1. 021 11.007 0.994 0.984 0.9711 0.967 o £lUO
0.2'2 0.220 U.220 0.220 0.220 0.2.20 0.220 0.220 0.220 0.220 0.220 0.91 1.116 1.088 1.064 1.045 1.029 1.016 1.003 0.905 0.986 1 0.979
0.2-l 0.240 0.240 o 'HO 0.2'10 0.240 0,240 0,2!O 0.2-10 0.2'10 0.240 '0.92 .1.148 1.117 1.092 1.072 i 1.054 1.039 1,027 1.016 1.006 0.999
o.'ili 0.260 o 260 o.30d O.2liO O.2no 0.360 0.260 0.260 0.260 0,2~0 '0.93 1.184 1.151 1.123 1.1?11 1. 081 1.065 1.050 1.040 1.029 1.021
0.28 0.280 0.280 0.21,;0 0.280 o ::80 0.280 0.280 0.230 0.280 0.380 0.9t 1.225 1 188 1.158' 1. li;14 l:1l3 1.095 1.080 1.066 I 1.054 1.0H

0.30 (I,son 0300 D .300 0.300 0.300 0,300 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300' 0.950 1.272 1.232 1.172 1 1.148 1.128
1.199 l.Ul 1.09.7 1.084 L073
0,32 0321 0.320 0.320 0.320 0.320 0.320 0.320 0,320 0.320 0.320 0.060 . 1.329 1.285 1.21711.188 1 1(;7
1.248 1.149 1.133 1,119 1.106
0.34 0.341' 0.3-l0 0.340 0.3-10 0.340 0.340 0,340 0.340 0.340 0.340 o .970 \1. 402\1. 351 1.275 i 1.246 1.319
1.310 1.197 1.179 1.162 1 148
0.31; O.3lil! 0.301 0.360 0.360 10.360 0.360 0.3GO 0.3GO 0,3130 D.3nO 0.975 1, 447 1 1 ,393 1. 31111. 280 ' 1.250
1.34.8 1.227 1.207 1.190 1.173
0.38 U.:j81 0.381 i 0 .. 381 0.380' 0.380 0.380 0.380 0380 0.380 0,380 0.980 . 1.502 1.443 1.354 I 1.339 1.2881
1.395 1.262 1.241 1.221 ".201
U,4ll OA02.0AOI OAOI 0.400 0.400 b 400 a.lOa 0.·100 OAOO 0.-100 ·0.985 1.573 1.508! 1.454 1.409 I 1.372 1.337 1.309 1.2B4 1.23S 1.243
0.42 o , 422 ' 0.421 0 .421 0,421 0.-120 0 ... 20 0,.,120 0.-120 0,'120 0.420 0.990 1.6711.593\1.537 1.487 1 4'14 1.404 1.313 1.3<1& 1.319 1.297
0.4-1
OAl)
0,'18
o H31 0.442 OA41 0.441 O,Hl 0.4'11 0.440 o 4-10 0.440 ' 0.4'10
0..163 I tL -!()2
0,402 OAill OAU1Io.401 0.460 O,-!liO O,·lGO ·0.4()O
O. 482 0.481 0.481 0.-181 oA80 0.480 0.480 0.480
o , ~ 84 . U. 483
0.995
0.999
1.000
I
1.838 1.751 1.678 1.617 1,565 1.519
,.!," "!,02 '2.~02 1.917 1. 8,15 1.780
",
""
..,
1.479
1,725
eo

0.803
1.451
1.678
00

0'.746
1.416 l.3SS
1.635 1 596
'"
0.697
"
0.651
0.50 . 0.505 \ 0,504 0.503 0,502 0.501. 0.501 0.501 0.500 0,500 0,500 1.001 1.417 1.264 1.138 1.033 0.951 0.870
0.52 .,,_1,. 0 . 5')5'
0")- ~ I . -,
05')'\ 0.522 0.522: 0.521 0.521 0.521 0.520 0.520 1.00f! 1. 036 0.915 0.817 0.737 0.669 0.612
0.551 0.502
0.553
0.459
0.526
0,422
0.481
0.389
0.447
0.360
0.5·1 o 5!8· 0.5·16 a.5·!.! 0.5'1;; 0.5-12j 0.542 0.541 O.SH 0.541 0 541 1.010 0,873 0.766.0.681 0.610
0.778 Q.68010,602 0.537 0.483'0."1-4.0 0.S\19 0.366 0.33() 0.310
g:~~~1 g:~~~
0.50 0.570 0.56·1 0.5G;; 0.562 0.562- 0.5Gl o .5ul C5GI L015
0.58 0.5U:l o 585 0,583 0.583 0.582 0.582 0.581 0.581 1.02 0.111 I
o li20 0.54.6 0.'186 0.436 0.394 0.358 Q.327 0.300 0.271)

i
, I
0.60
0.01
0.(114 I
o . till 0 ..!lOS O.GOG o . (l05 a. (;04 0,1303 0.G02 O.GO:'! 0.601
U. (21) 0, uz:'! U.OW 0.617 O.tH5 0.1114 0.fi13 0.IH2 0.612Io.till
L03
1.04
O.filS 0.535 0,469 0.415 0 370 0.333
O.&M 0.477 i 0.415 1 0.365 0.324\ 0.290
0.300 I 0. 272 1 0.249
0.262 0.236 0.214-
0,228
0.105
1 05(H 0.432 0.374 10.328,0.239 0.259 0.231 0.:2080.189 0.174-
O.GZ 0.637 0.63:1 0 mw O.G28 0.G26 0,625 0,(\24 U.623 O.G22 0 022 1.05
O.llS 0,G4U U,6-14 O.!Hl 0.038 o 133G 10.635 0,G34 0.633 0.G32 0.(',32 1.06 0.164 0,395 0.342 0.298' 0.262 0.233 0.209 0.187 0,170 0.154.
0.64 o.Uti! 0.U5G 0.G52 o 649 0.G·l7 0:{l46 0.645 0.644 0643 10.642 1.07 0.431 0,3GO 0.315 0.273 0.239 i 0.212 O.H}! 0.168 0.151 0.136
().65
0.G6
0.673 O.OG7 O. till3 O. llt30 0,6580.656 0.655 0.654 0.()5S o .65:~
0.G85 0.67\) 1 0.G75 0.(l72 0.66!! I 0.6U7 0.GOU.0.665 O.(l().j, 0,663
1.08
1.09
0.4.03
0 379
0.3-11
0.319
Q,';!g2
0.272
0.252'
0.234
I
o . 220 O. 194
0.204 0.179 i
0.172
0.158
0 153
0.140
0.137
0.125 '
0,123
0.112
0.G7 0.G()7 o .Gll! 0: 08U 0.683 0.680 10.678 0.G76: 0.675 0.674 Q.6n. L 10 1 0.357
. 0.299 0.254 0.218 0.18910.165. 0.146 0.129 0.114 0.102
(j .u3 0.70n O.7113· O,60S 0.694 0.6\)1 G.GSl) 0.Hil7 :0.686 0.68i) 0,6!H 1.11 0.338 0.282 0.239 0.204 O. 17G 1 0,] 5,1 0.135 0.119 0.105 0.094
O.ti9 0.122 o 715\ 0.710 0.70G 0.703 0.700 0.698 0.m.l6 0.695 O.G\)'1 1.12 0.321 0.267 0.225 0.192 0.IG5·0.143 0.125 0.1l0 0.097 0.086
0.711 0.735 0.7'21 0.722 0.71710.714 0.712 0.710 0.708 0,706 0.705 1.13. 0.305 0.253! 0.212 0.18'1 0.155 0.135 0.111' 0.102' 0.090 0,080
0.71 0.7'18 O.HO 0.7'34 0.729 I o.nu I. 0.721 0.719 0.717
0.723 0.716 1.14 0.291 0.240 0.201 0.170 0.H6 0.126 0.109 0.095' 0.084 0,074
o.n 0.761 0.752 0.7-1u 0.741 0.737 0.73-10.732 0.730 0.728 0.727 1.15 0'.278 0.229 0.191 0.161 0.137 O.l1S 0.102 0.089 0.078 0,068
o.n 0.774 0.765 0.759 0.753 0.749 0.H6 0.743 0.741 0.'/39 0.737 1.16 0,26D 0.218 0.181 0.153 0.130 0.111 0.096 0.084 0.072 0.064
0.74 0.788 0.779 0.711 0.7GG 0.761 ·0.757 0.75-4.1°·752 0.750 o 748 1.17 0.255 0.208 0.173 0.145 i 0,123 0.105 0,090 0.078 0.068 0,060
0.75 0.802 0.702 0.784 0.778 o 773 0.769 O.'((lB 1 0.763 i 0.761 0.759 I 1.18' 0,244 0.1!)\} 0.165 0.1113 0.099 0.085 0.073 0,063 D.OSS
0.059 0.051
0.7il
U.77
o 817
O.8:n
O.soo 10.798
0.7!Jl.
0.820 0.811 0.80-1\
0.786 0.782 o. Fa I 0.775 • 0.773
0,798 0.794 01.\J~10'Z87jO.784
0.771
0.782
1.19.
1.20
0.235
0.226
0,1111
0.183
0.157
0.150
0.110
0.W5
0.094
0.OB8
0.080
0.076
0.068
0.064 0.056 0.048

r 0.78
0.71)
0.847
10.8\l2
0.834 0.825 0.817
0.849 0 a-39 0.831
0.811 0.806 o . 80_ 0 ' 199 0 ,796
0.824 0.819 0.a1sI0.811 0.808.
O. 71B
0.805
1
1.22
1. 24
0.209
0.195
0.168
0.155
0.138
0.127
0.095
0.08ti
0.080
0.072
0.M8
0.060
0.057
0
0.049
0.044
0.042
0.038

,)
 APPENDIX: D 647
646
TABLE D-L THE VARIED-FLOW FUNC'TION Fon POSITIVE SLOfES,F(u,N) (continued)
TABLE D-L THE V,\It1lm-FLOW FUNCTION FOR POSITfVE SLOPES, F(u.,N) (continued) ---

,~Z I 4.2 1 4.6 I 5.0 I' 5.45.~ 6.2 6.6 7.0' 7.4 I 7.8 ~
----1----
8.2 S.6 9.0 9.4
----
9.8

1.26 -'0.182 ,0.145

1.28 1
0.1l71~.095
0.079
0.170,0.1350.1080.0880.072
~O;
0.0550.0460.03910.033
0.060 0.050 o.on 0.03510.030
0.00
0.02
0.000
0.·)20
0.040
I
0.000
0.020
0.040
0.000
0.020
0.040
0.000
0.020
0.040
0.000
o 020
0.040
0.04
1.30 .0.160 0.126 0.100 0.081 0.066 0.0~4 0.045 0.037 0:031 0.026 0.06 0.060 o 060 O.OGO .. 0.060 0.060
1. 32 0.150 0.118 0.093 0.075 0.061 (). O:JO 0.041 0.034 0.028 0.024 0.08 0.080 0.080 0.080 0.080 0.080
1.340.142 0.110 0.087 0.069 10.056 0.045 0.037 0.030 0.025 0.021
0.10 0.100 O.lDO 0.100 0.100 0.100
1.36 0.134 0.103 0.081 0.064 0.052 0.042 0.034.0.028 fl.023 0.019 [l.12
o 14
0.120 0.120 0.120 0.120. 0.120
t
1.38
1.40
] .42
0.127
0.120
0.114
0.097
0.092
0.OS7
0.076
0.071
0.067
0 060
0.056
0.052
0.048
0.044
0.041
0.038
0.036
0.033
0.032 0.026
0.028 0.023
0.026 0:021
0.021
0.0]9
0.017
1
0.017
10.016
0.014
0.16
O.lS
0.140
0.160
0.180
O.UO
0.160
0.180
0.140
O.HiO
0.180
I 0.140
0.160
0.180
0.140
0.160
0.180 0-

1.44
1.46
1.48
1.50
O.lOS
0.103
0.098
0.093
0.082
0.077
0.073
0.069
0.063
0.059 0.046
0.056 0.043
0.05310.040
0049 0.038
0.036
0.033
0.031
0.030
0.028
0.026
0.024
0.024 0.019
0.022
0 ..021
1).020
0.018
0.017
0.015
0.016 0.013
0.014 I 0.012
0.01310.010
0.012 0.009
0.20
0.22
O.U
0.26
0.200
0.220
0.240
0.260
0.200
0.220
0.240
0.260
0.200
0.'220
0.240
0.260
0.200
0.220
0.2'10
0.260
0.200
0.220
0.240
0.260
.l
1.55 0.083 0.061 0.046 0.035 0.026 0.020 0.016 0.012 I
O.OlD 0.008 0.28 0.280 0.280 0.280 0.280 0.280
1.60
1.65
1.70
1.75
0.074
0.067
0.060
0.054
0.054
0.048
0.0·13
0.038
0.040 0.030
0.03,5
0.031
0.027
0.026
0.023
0.020
0.023
0.019
0.016
0.014
0.017
I 0.014
0.012
0.010
0.013
0.011
0.009
0,008
0.010
O.OOS
0.007
0.006
0.008 0.006
0.006
0.00.5
0.004
0.005
a 004
0.003
0.30
0.3~
0.34
0.300
0.320
0.340
0.300
0.320
0.340
0.300
0.320
0.340
0.300
0.320
0.340
0.360
II 0.300
0.320
0.340
0.360
l
1 0.36 0.360 0.360 0.360
1.80 0.049 0.034 0.024 0.017 0.012 0.009 0.007 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.38 0.380 0.380 0.380 0.380 0.380
1.85 O. 045 0.031 0.022 0.015 0.011 O. 008 a .00B O. 004 0.003 0.002
0.40 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400 1 DADO
1.90 0.041 0.02S 0.0200.014 0 . 010 0.007 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.002 0 .. 42 0.420 O. '120 0.420 0.420 0.420
1. 95
2.00
O. 038 O. 026 a . a 18 O. a 12
0.035 0.023 0.016 0.011
a .008
0.007
0.006
0.005
O. 004
0.004
O. 003
0.003
0.002 0.002
0.002 0.001
0.44
0.46
0.440
0.460
0.440
0.400
0.44.0
0.460
0.440
0.460 I 0.440
0.460
2.10 0.0300.0190.0130.009 0.006 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.0010.001 OA8 0.480 0.480 0,480 0.4CiO 0,480
2.20 0.025 O. Oll) 0.011 o. 007 0.00.5 0.004 O. 002 a .001 0.001 0.001
0 . .50 '0.500 0.500 0.500 o 500 0.500
2.3 0.022 0.014 0 009 0.0060.004'1 0 . 003 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.52 0.520 0.520 0.520 0.520 0.520
2.4 0.019 0.012 0.008 0.005 0.00:3 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.54 0.540 0.540 0.540 0.540 0 . .')40
2.5 0.017 0.010 0.006 0.004 o.ooa 1
0.002 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.56 0.561 o ..'iB0 0.560 0.560 O.5uO
2.6
2.7
0.015
0.Ot3
0.009
0.008
0.005 0.003 0.002
0.005.0.003 0.002
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
o.oeo
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.58
0.60
0.581
0.601
0.581
0.1301
0.580
O.GOI
1 0.580
0.600
0.580
0.600
.!
2.8 10.012'0.0070.00410.002 0.001 0.001 o.oor 0.0000.000 0.000 0.61 0.611 0.611 0.611 0.6J1 . O.GlD
2.9 0.0100.0060.00410.0020.0010.0010.0000.000 0.0000.000 0.62 0.621 0.621 0.621 0.621 0.621
3.0 10.009, 0.005 0.003 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.63 0.632 0.631 0.631 0.631 0.631 r
3.50.006 0.003 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.64 0.6'12 0.641 0.641 0.641 0.611 1
4~0 ,0.004 0.002 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 I
0.65 0.652 0.652 0.651 0.651 0.651 ;
4.5 0.003 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.66 0.662 0.662 0.662 0.661 0.661
5.0 0.0020.0010.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0:000 0:000 0.000 0.000 0.67 0.673 0.672 0.672 0.672 0.671
6.0 0.0010.0000.0000.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.68 0.683 0.683 0.682 I 0.682 0.681
7.0 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 I 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.69 0.694 0.693 0.692 0.092 0.692.
8.0 o. dO~ 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 o. 000 0.000 0.000
0.70 0.704 0.704 0.703 0.702 0.702
'il.0 a . 000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 . 000 0 .000 o. 000 I 0.000 o. 000 0: 000 0.71 0.715 o 714 0.713 0.il3 0.712
10.0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0000.000) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.72 0.726 0.725 0.724 0.723 0.723
20.0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 .. 000 0.73 0.736 0.735 0.734 0.734 0.733
1 0.74 0.747 0.746 0.745 0.744. 0.744
0.75 0.758 0.75i 0.756 0.755 0.754
0.76 0.769 0.768 0.767 0.766 0.765
0.77 0.780' 0 .. 779 0.778 0.777 0.776
0.78 0.792 0.790 0.789 0.788 0.787 / 1
0.79 0.804 0.802 I 0.800 I 0.799 0.798 .,I

-~-~ ~.-~ -.I-~-.--~-

 i 648 APPENDIXES
APPENDIX D 649
r
F(>II ,N) (COl1iin.l~ell)
I TABLE D-l. THE VAlUED-now 'FO'NCTION FOR POSITIVE SLOPES, F{1!,N) (continued) .
0.8
8.2 8.6 I. 9.0 9.4 9,8
, 0.80 a 815 0:813 0.811 0.810 0.808
--- -------~- ---
:' 0.81 0.827 0.825 0.823 0.8:,\2 0.820 I.ZG 0.028 0.02-1 0.021 0.018 0.016
0.S2 0.8:l\) 0 8;j7 0.8:35 0.8:l3 0.8:31 1.28 0.025 0.021 0.018 0.016 O.OH
083 0 852 0.S4\) O.S4/ 0.8·15 0.8H l.30 0.022 O.OH) 0.016 0,014 0.012
0.84 O.SUS 0.80:.! 0.8LiO 0.858 u.85iJ 1.32 0.020. 0 .. 017 0.014 0.012 0.010
1.3-1 0,018 0.015 0.012 0.010 0.009
0.85 0.878 0.875 O. 0.870 0,S08
J
0,80 0.SU2 a 389 O. 0,883 0,881 1.36
1.38
0.016
0,014
0.013 0.011 0.009 0.008
0,37 rUJ07 0,\)U3 O,!)OO 0, sn:' 0,012 0.010 0,008 0.007
j 0.88 a 921 0,918 0.0i4 0.011
0.894
O,DOS lAO 0.013 0.011 D.OO? 0.007 O.OOG
II o.S!) 0,937 0,\)33 O,('):l~) 0.925 O.ll:.!:.! 1 42 0.011 0.009 0.008 0,006 0.005
1,4,4 0.\)10 0.008 0.007 0.00(3 0.005
I o,no
{UJI
O.!)2
0 (,)54
0, !r72·
O.lllll
0.\)4\)
0 (.)()7
0 980
0.9·14
0.801
.0.USO
0.0·10
0.057
0,1),15
0.93;"
%3
°0,070
1.'16
1.48·
O.OO!)
0.009
0.008
0,007
0.00(3
0.005
0.005
0.004
O.OOt
0.004
() II:! 1,012. 1.()OU G,I);)\) 0 Ufi·l O. ~'Sli 1.50 0.008 O.OUO 0.005 0.00", 0.003
O.H·I I.U:Hi 1,0211 1.02:2 LOlli 1 >UlO 1.55 O.OOG 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.003
! 1. GO .0.005 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.002
,I °0.\)50
!J!i!)
0,\);0
1.002
1.0117
1.130
105:;
1.085
1.1:£.1
I>OH
1.074
i 112
1 . 0·10
1.0Li3
1.100
LO:>::!
1.053
1.087
1 65
1.70
0.004
0003
0.003
0,002
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.001
I '(J,Hi5 I 157 I 147 1 1:3-1 1. 122 1. 108 1.7.5 0.002 0,002 0.002 0,001 0,001
(I. \l80 I 187 1.175 1 lUO 1.150 1.132 1.80 0.002 0.001 0.00] 0,001 0,001
1.85 0.002 0.001 I 0.00] 0,001 0,001
0.\i85 I 2:2-1 1.210 1. 1. 1.165
0.\)\11) 1 275 1 :WO 1 1 1,208 1. 90 O,OOI 0.001 ! 0.001 0,001 0.000
n,D!).) 1,3133 L:H2 1 1.3U2 I 280 1.95 O.OOl 0.001 0.00] 0.000 0,000
O,ntH! 1.5UO 1.530 1. 1.470 IA47 2,00 0.001 O.OOl 0.000 0.000 0.000
(- 1.O!H)
'" "" co
""
2.10 0.001 0.000 0.000 0,000 0.000
'" 2,;20 0.000 0.000 0.000 0,000 0.000
) 1.001 0(\14 0.&77 o,S·W 0.519 0.494
2,3 0,000
I' 1.005 0 -1:.'0 o .3ll1 O.:lliS 0,350 0,:,3] 0.000 0.000 0,000 0.000
:2 4
t, 1. U10
:1.(jJ5
0.::137
0.:'>8U
0.313
O.:W!J
0.2!14
0
o.:ns
o 2:37
0.262
(I :223 2,5
0.000
0.000
0.000
0,000
0.000
0,000
0.000
0:000
0.000
0.000
I.U:20 0,257 O. :.>:;17 O. O::?UU 0 190 2,1\ 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
I/. 2.7 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
1.03 0,2U 0.1
, J 0-1 O.ln
0.1~5
0, !li5 O.
O. liD
0,14:3
O.tSu
O,(:H 2.8 0.000 0.000 0,000 0.000 0.000
1,05 0 158 0: l-l3 U. 0.12-1: 0.lI5 2.9 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
LOU 0.140 0.]'17 0, IlL! (J.IOU 0.OD8 3.0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0,000 0.000
1.07 0.J:.l3 0.11:'> 0.10:.' 0.0\1·1 0.086 3.5 0.000 0.000 0.000 0,000 0.000

!
I 108
1.1J!1
0.111
0, 1111
0. J(j I
O.O!)1
0,0()3
0.08:2
O.
0
0,077
O.OLiv
4.0
4.5
0.000
0.000
0.000
0,000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1.10 0. Uti:.' 0.08;3 O,UU 0 Oli7 0.OW2 5,0 0.000 0.000 0.000 U.OOO 0.000
! 1.][ 0.084 0.U75 0,()()7 6.0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
O.OliO 0.055
I 1.12 li.077 O.OUU 00li2 O,USS 0050 7.0
8.0
o.obO
. 0.000
0,000
0.000
. 0.000
0:000
0.000
0,000
0.000
J 1. 13 0,000
n.07l 0.OU:3 0.051) 0.050 0,045
'j 1.11 O,OUS 0,058. 0,05:.' O,O·H) IJ.O U.OOO 0.000 0.000 0.000 0,000
,,' 0.041
I 1. 15' 0 001 O.Oi>4 0.0·18 0,043 0.0:38 10.0 0,000 0.000 0,000 0,000 0.000
! 1.16 Q,OS!i 0.050 0.0.J5 0,040 0,035 20.0 O.OOU 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
1.17 0.052 a.u·w
I
I 1.18
1.19
0.048
O.!H5
0.042
0,0;~9
0.0-11
0,037
0,1)30
0,0;33
0.0;;2
0.029
j, o 0;;4 O,O:jO 0.027
1.20 O.OH 0.037 0,032 U,023 0.025
1 ,).) 0,037 0.032 0.0:'>8 0,024 0,021
"j 1.24 0.032 O.0::!8 0.024 0.0:.n 0 018
f
r,
,..\
 '.
''''1
II 650 APPENDIXES APPENDIX D 651

TAlJr.E D-2. Tlll'l V A.RIED~Ft,OW FUNCTION FOR, NEGATIVE Sr.OPES, F(u.,N)_8~

TABLE D-2.,THE VAl:'l.IED-FLOW.FuNCTION YOH Nn:ClATlvESLOrE~,ji'(tt,N)_gQ (continued)
'I ~N I 1 .-~-
~~l~~--=- ~:~I~I~I~~I~I~!~~J~
1 I
3.8
,. 2.2 2,4 2:6
:1
0.00 ! 0 0(\0,0.000 I 0.000 0.000 0 .GOO : 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 I 0.000 I \ 0.80 0,074 0.685 0.095 0.703 0.741
1:'J
0,02
0.04 I
0,020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.0:l0, 0.020 0.020 10.020 0.020 0.020
10.040 1I 0.040! 0.040 0.040 0 01010.040 0.040' 0.040 0.040 0.040
I
I
! 0.8!
0.82
0.680
0.686
0.H91
° 698
.701
0.707
0.710
0.717
0.749
0.755
i,
0.06
0.08 ! 0.060 0.060 0.060 0.060 0.060,0 01'10 0.01')0 0.060 0.060 0.060
i
O. OBO 0.080 0.080 I 0.080 0.080 0 080 0.080 0.080 0.080 0,080 0.83
O.S-!
0.692
0698
o 703
0.709
0.713
o . 719
0.722
! 0.729
j
0.762
0.769

0:i20io:~2010:~~lO
o.mm! 0.100 10.100 II 0, 100 0,100 I (J,100 0 100 0 00 0 00
0,119 10,11910.120 1,°,120 0,12°10120
0,1::1910,139 0.140 i 0 140 0,140 ,) 1'10 0.140 0,1400',140 0 140
8:igg 0.85
0.81\
0.704
0.710
0.715
0.721
0.72510.735
0.731 0.741
0,744 0.752
0.750 0.758
0.765
0.771
0.770 0.775
0.777 0.782
0.87 0.715 0.727 0.7381'0:747 O.7oG 0.764 0.777 0,783 i 0.788
0,158'0,159 0.15910,160 0,160,0.160 0,160 0,1(0)°,1601,0.160 0.721 .0.733 0.74310.753 0.762 0.770 0.783 0.789! 0,7~J4
0.1780,1790.1790,1800.1801°.1800,1800.1800.18010,180 0.B8
0.89 0.727 0.739 0,749Io.i58 0.7671o.77G 0.789 0, 7'..l51 O.BOO
!' 01197 0, HIB 0,199 0.199 0.200' 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.200
0.216 0,217,0.218 0.219 0,219! 0.220 0.220 0.2201°.220 0.220 0.90 0.732 0.744 0.754j 0.i6,t 0.781 0.789 0.795 0.8010.807
0.787 0.795 0.801 0.807 0.812
'1'·

,
:

,
0.234 0.236 '0,237 0.238 0.239 0.240 0240 0240 0240 0240 I 0.91
0.92
0,738
0.743
0.750
0.754
0.7£10 0.770
0.766 0.776 0.7!)3 0,800 0.807 0.81310.818
0.253 0.255110.256 0.257 0.258 0.259' .
0.259 0.260 .
10,260 .
0.260

r 0.93 0.7,19 0.761 0.77210 782 0.709 0 807 0.812 0.818 0.823
0,272,0.274'( 0 275 0.276 0,277 0.278 0.278 0.279 0.280 0.280 0.n4 0.767 o 777 0.787 ° 824 0.829
0.94 0.804 \ 0.813 0.818
0.30 0.29110.2930.29410.295 0.2[)5IO,297 0,298 0.298,0.299 0.299 0.801 0.80li 0,819 0.823 0.829 0.835
0,32 0.308,0.311. 0.313 J 0.31410.31610.317 0,318 0.318! 0,319 0,3Hl 0.950 0.759 C),H2 0.783 0,793
O.gGO o. 7ii41 0,777 0.788 0.798 0.807 0.815 0.824 0.829 0,835 0.841
0.34 .0.326 0.329 10.331 0.333 0.33510.337 0.333 0.3381' 0,339 0.339 0.793 0.803 0.812 0.820! 0,82(j 0,834 0.840 o 84G
0.36 0.344 ,O.347! 0.350 0.36210.354 0.356 0.357 0.357 0.358 0.358 0,970 0.770 0.782
1 0,975 0,772,0.785 0.796 0.805 0.814 0.822,0,828 0,836 0.84:J (),848
0.38 0.362,0.355 0.3GS 0.371 0.373 0.374 0.375 0.376,0.377 0.377
!
0.980 0,775 0 , i87 0.79S 0.803 0.81810.825 0,830 0.839 0,845 0,851 I
I
0,40
0.42
0,44
0.38010,384 0.387,0.3901°.392
0.397 '°.401.0.405,0.407 0.409
0.414 10,419 0.423; 0,426,0.429
0.393
0.394 0.39510.3'J6
0./J,11
0.412'1'0.41310A14
0.430
0 432,0.433 \ 0.434
O.39G
0.4U
0.435 0.990 0.780 0.793I
0,985 0.777! 0.790 0.801 0,811
0.804 0.814
0.820 O.827i08~3IO,841
° 822 0 830 0 8.~7 0.844
0.847 0,853
0.850,0.856
0.46
0.48
0.431,0.437 0.440 0.44410.447
0.447,0.453 0.458 OAfH 0.464 I 0.449
0,451' 0.452 0.453
00467 0.469 0.471 0.472
0.154
0,47:,
0.995 0.782 0.7!l5
1.000 0.785 0.797
1.005 0.788 0.799
0.806 0.816
0.808 0.818
0.810 0.820
0.82408:)210.84010.847
0.826 0.834 0.842\ 0.849
0.829 0.837 0.845 0.862
0.75:) j 0,859
0.85(; 0.852
0.858 i 0.864
0.50
0.52
0..163 j' OA70 0.475 0.479 0.432 0.485 0.437
0 479 0.485 0.491 0.494,0.499 0.502
0.48910,491
0.5OS 0.507 0.509
0.402
0.511 1.010
1.015
I
0,790 O.80~
0.793,0.80",
0.812
0.815
0.822
0.824
0,831 0,840 0.847 0,855
0,833 0.843 0,850,0.808
0.861 . 0.867
0.80 4 10.870
0.54 0.494 0.501 0.507 0.512\ 0,516 0.520 0,522 0.525 0.527 0.529
1.020 0,795 0,807 0.818 0.828 0.837 0.84.; 0.8~3IO.8~0 0,8GG i 0.872
0.56 0.509 .0.5H 0.523\ 0.523 0.533 0.537 0.54.0 10.543 0.545 D.5,n 0.822 0.832 0.841 o . 850 0.8.)7 i O. 8/)4 0,871 0.877
0.58 . 0.524 0.533 0,539 0.54.5' 0.550 0.554 0.558 0.561 0.563 0.567 1.03 0,800 0.811
1.04 O.80li 10,816 0.829 0.837 0.845 0.855 0:8621°,870 0877 0.883
0.60
0.81
0.62
0.540
0.547
0 .•554
0.548 1,0.555
0 556 10 55S
0.553 0.571
0.5Gl
0 .'569
0,513
0.566 0.571 0.575
0 575 0 579 0 583
o 583 0,578 0.51B
0,578,0.581
0 58710 58<:1
0:595 0.598
0.583
- 00.6059g LOS
1.00
I
0.810 0.821 0.831 0.841
0.815 0.825 0.837 0.846
0.851 o 859 0.86710.874
0.855 I) .8640.871,0.879 I
0,881 0.887
0.88.5 0.8!B
0.63 0.562 0.571 0.679 0.585 0,590 0,595 0,599 0.603 0.607 0.60, 1.07 0.S19 0.831 0.841 0.851 0.860 0.869! 0.8761 0.88:) o .S89 0.896
0.64 0.569 0.579 0.586 0.592 0.598 0.602 0,607 I
O.61I 0.615 0.618 1.08
1.09
0.824 0.836 0.846 0.856
0.828 10.840 0.851 0.860
0.805
0.870
0.873 0.880 i 0.887
0.877 0.885 io .892
0.893 0,900
0.898 0.904
0.65
0.66
0,67
0.576
0.583
0.590
0.585 0:592
0.593 0.600
0.599 0.607
0.599,
0,607.
0,614
0.605 0.610 0.615
0.613 0:618 0.622
0.621 0.626 0,631
0.519' 0.623
o 626 0.630
0.635 0.039
0,626
0.63
0.643
1.10
1.11
0.883 0,845 10 855 0:865
0.837 10 84.9 ° 8GO 0.870
0.874
0.878
I
0.881 0.890 0.897
O. 886 0,894, (UIOO
I 0,903 0.908
0.907 a.BI2
0.68 0,597 0.607 0.e15 0.622 0.628 0.634 0,639 0.643 0.647 0.651 1.12 o. 8!~ ! 0.8541 0.864 0.873 0.882 o , 891 U. 897 i 0 904 0,910 0.916
0.69 0.603 0.613 0.621 0.629 0.635 0,641 0.646 0.651 0.655 0.659 1.13 o . 8 _Ii , 0, 858 0.868 0.878 0.886 0.895 0.9021°,908 0.n4. 0.919
1.14 0.851 0.861,0.872 0,,881 0,8gb O. 899 I O. 905 0.912 0.918 0.923
0,855 o 866 i o.876 0.886
0.70 O.GW 0.620 0.629 0.537 0.644 0.649 0.5M 0,659 0.653 0.667
0,71
0.72
0.617
0.624
0.627 0,636
0.634 0.1l43
0.544
0.651
o 6.51
0.658
0.657
0.664
0.661
0.669
0.666 0.671
0,674 0,679
0.674
0.682
1.15
1 16 I
0.859 0.870 0.880 0.890
0.895
0,899
0, 903 1 0 ,910,0.916
0.90710.91410.920
0.911 0.917,0.923
0,
0
b.
0.928'
0.931
0.73
0.74
0.630
0.637
0.641 0.650
0,648 0.657
0.659
0,665
0.665
0.672
0.672
0.679
0.677
0.684.
0.682 o 687
0.689 0.694
0.691
0.698
1 17
1.18
1.19
0.804 0.8740.884.0.893
0.868 0.8781 Q.888 0.897
0.872 0.882 0.892 0.901
0,902
0.906
0.910
0.915. 0.92110.927
0,918 0.925 0.931
O.
0
0,9:H
0.939
0.942
II
0.75 0.643 0.655 0.664 0.671 0.679 0.686 0.691 I O.G96 0.701 0,705 0.921 0.928 0.9,14
0.76 0.649 0.661 0.670 0.679 0,687 0.693 0.G09 0.704 0.709 0.713 1.20 0.876 0.886 0.896 0,.904, 0.913 0.940 0.945
0.77 0.656 0.667 0.677 0.G85 0.693 0.700 0.705 0.711 0.715 0.719 ·1.22 0.880 0.891. 0.900 0.909 0.917 0,929 0,932 o.o:>s 0.944 0.949
0.78 0.662 0,673 0.683 0.G92 0.700 0.707 0.713 0.718 0.723 0.727 1.24 0.888 0.898 0.908 0.917 0.925 0.935 0.940 0.945 0.950 0.. 955 .... :1
0.79 0.fi68 0.680 0.689 0.698 0.705 0.713 0.719 0.724 0.729 0.733 1.26
1.28
0,.900 0910 0.919 0.927
0.908 0.91i 0.920 0,.934
0.9;:!')
0.945
0.942
0 .. 948
0.948
0.954
0.954
0.%0
0,900 0.9fl4
0.965 0.970 ,

i
- J
\
652 APPENDLXES APPENDIX D /353

TABLE D-2.' .Till': VARIED-FLOW FUNCTlOT,

. FOR NEG'\'TIVESLOI'E~
-. F(11 N)'-SCI (c-
;;1'", i' .1)
'VtJ..ln'lleI.L, TABLE D-2. THE VARIEn~FLOW FUNcnON ,'OR N li:OATIYE SLOPES, F(1I,N) _s, (continued)

2.4 2.6 : 3.8 ~ 4.0 ; 4.2 4.5 : 5.0 5.5

0.\)15
o.\J:n
0.941
0.948
O. \130 O. OJ!) i {j. 9JS O. U55
0.9·18
0.\).55
0.9(52
0.055
0,\)61
0.907
0.9Gl
0.\)(\7
U. \J7:~
0.066
() UTi
0 :978
° \J8~
0.981
0:
\J7G
0.1175
a 0
0: ~~6
0.00
0.02
0.04·
0.000
0.0"20
0.040
0.000
0.020
0.040
0.000
0,020
0.040
r 0.000
0.020
0.0'10
0.000
0.020
0.040
0.9:17 0.9461°.954 0·9Ul 0.90B ° IliaU.iJ79 0.,983 0.987 0.\)91 0.06 0.060 0.060 0.060 0.060 0.060
10.IN.! 0.952, O.ouo I. 0.967, O.D74 0.979 0.985 O.US9, 0.993 0.996 0.08 0:080 0.080 r 0.080 0.080 0.080
1.~0 I O.!l'i' j 0.950 O. 90ll ' 0.073' O. 97D 0.984 i O. 08D , 0 AlD31 0 097 1. 000 0.10 0,100 0.100 0.100 o 100 0.100
L~2 ,0.957 0.OG5 0.072 0.979 0 084 0.1)89' O.!)!)5' 0.9\)8 1.001 1.004 0,12 0.120 0.120 0.120 0,120 0.120
l.H I G. Iln4 I 0.072 0, l!7!) 0,984 o. Hno \unlS 1. 000 1.003 1. OOll 1. OO!) 0:14 0.140 0.140 0.1;10 0.140 0.140
lAG ,0.tlm','O.!!77 0.983 0989, • ., ( . ,
0.995 1,000 1.00-' 100-11 01U 1. 0)
1:- O,HI 0.160 0.160 O.HIO 0.160 0.160

I
LIS 0.07710.98310.989 0.9\H 0.900 1.005 1.008 1.011 LOl·1 1.0Ui 0.18. 0.180 0.180 o.180~· 0.180 0.180 .
1.50 °O·98~ 0'\)0 90 0093
I
1.001' 1.005 1.000 LOI2 I 1.015.1.017 1.019 0.20 !
0.200 0.200 0,200 0.200 0.200
1.55 .!Hlt L 02 1.007 1.012' 1.0IG 1.020 1.022 1.0241' 1.020 1.028 0.22 0.220 0.220 0.220 0.220 0.220
1.60 I
l.(;5
1. 70
1.012 1.017 1.0'20
1.020 ,1.029 1.032
1.03011.042 1.0-14
1.024)' 1.027 1.030,1.032
1.035 1.037 LO''''
,,<I 1 _0'1
1 0-15.1.047 1.048 1.049
"
1.0:H 1.035
1 " a41 /1 . (042
1.049 1.049
1.035
1. 042
1.0-18
0.2-i I' 0.240
0.26 ! 0.260
I
0.28 , 0.280 I
0.240
0.260
0.280
.0.240
0.260
0.280
0.2':10
0.260
0.280
'0.240
0.260
0.280·
L75 105211.05311054
• 1055
1.056 i L05i 1.0r.fj
v 1 • A·"
iJu 1 . 0-5
<:I I. 053 0,30 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300
LilO L O(J14 1 . AU""I1.0li4 1.064
1,.005 1.0U5 L064 1 00') 11 ono ' 058 0.32 0.320 0.320 0.320 . 0.320 0.320
L85 1.075 1.074 1.074 1.073 I'.072 1.071 1.0li9 . - .} •. 0.34 0.339 0.340 0.340 0.340 0.340
LDO L08G 1.085' 1.08-1' 1.082 LOllI. 107£' 1.077 Lg~! i i:2~~ i:g~~ 0.36' 0.359 0.360 0.3130 0,360 0.360
l.U5 1.0n7 1.0!)5 i 1.092 1.090 1.087 1.085 1.081 1.0791 1.075 Lon 0.38 0,378 0.379 0.380 0.380 0.380
2,00 1.107 1.103 1.100 1.096 '1.0031090 l.085 1.08211'.073111,075 0.40 0.397 0.398 0.398 0.400 0.400
2.10
U~~ ~: ~;~ i: g~ U~g U~~ U8& ~:?g~ Lgg~ U~g, ~ .g~~' 0,42 0.417 0.418 0.418 0,419 ·0.420
L.W i 0.44 0.436 0.437 0.437 0.439 0.440

II
1
:L:1 I. Hll LIS0 1.141 113:1: 1.124 1.117 1.110 1 103 1. Oil'; 1.0~0 0,46 0.455 0.'156 0.457 0.458 . 0.459
2.~ L17li 1.1O:l 1.152 L142' 1.133 1.124 L11G 1.109 1101 l.OO'! 0.48 0.474. 0 .. 475 0,476 0.478 o 479
:Ui Ll!JO 1.175 1.162 l.ISt} 1.140 1.1;~I 1.121 1.113 1,105 1.098 0.50 OA03 0.494 0.495 0.497 0.498
2.6
r~?j i'}~~ i'~~~ U~~ idt~ Ln~ i:i~g U~g
0,512
'l.7
~.8
1

1.228 1.208 1.189 1.173 1'158 Ll.:J.li 1.132

i'Ub
1.1'2:2 1 112 1.103
Ugg 0.52
0.54
0.56 0.549
0:513
0'.531 ' 0.532
0.550
0.515
0.S33
0.552
' 0.517
0536
0.555
0.518
0.537
0.558
2 9
1 1,2:;0 1.210 1.10G 1:178 1.162 1..150 1.. 137 1.125 1.115 1,106 0.58 0.567 0.569 0.570 0.574 0,576
:5.1) 1.2·j!) 1.224 1.203 1.184 1 HiS L15-1 1.140 1.128, L117 1.107 0.60 0.585 0.587 0.589 0.593 0.595
;l.5 L 2!J:l 1.200 1.232 1, 206 1 185 LllJ7 l.151 l.138 I I 125 1.113 0.61 0.594 0.596 0.598 0,602 0,604
4.0 L32U 1.286 1.251 1. 22:) 1 11>8 L i7U 1.158 1. 142 1.129 1 117 0.62 0.603 0,605 0.607 0.611 , 0;013
4.5 1.352 1308 1.270 L:2:l5 I.?O~ 11.18;3 LHi2 l.HGl.131 1.119 0.63 , 0.IH2. 0.615 0.61G 0.020 . 0.622
5.0 1.37.. 1,325128:1 1,245 1.212 1, 188 I.HlG L 149 1.1:14 1.121 0.6·1 0.620 0.623 0.G25 0,629 0.631
!:i.0 1,.,/001.3-121202 1,252 i.221 L195 1.136 1.1:12 0.65 0.629 0.632 0.634 0.638 0.640
7.0 ~ . ~3~ 11. ~G~ I· LlO::l I. 200 . 1. 225 1. 1gO L l:s0 1.122 0.66 0.637 0.640 . 0.643 0.647 0.650
8,0 ...·1 .,,7:, 1.313 1,261\ 1 22[) 1.201 1.137 1.122 0.67 0.646 0.649 . 0.652 0.656 0.659
\J.O L·iG! laS4 1.:119 1269 1 2:n 1.20;~ 1.137 IT'? 0.66 0.65.4 0.657 0.660 0.665 0.668
10.0 1-171 1.3!),! 1.324 1.27:2 1.233 1.203 1.137 1:122 0.69. 0.662 0.665 0.668 0,674 0.677
0.70 0.670 0,673 0.677 0.682 0.686
0.71 0.678 0.681 0.685 - 0.690 0.fi94
0.72 0.686 0.689 0.694 0,G99 0.703
0.73 0.694 0.698 0.702 0.707 0.712
0.74 0.702 0,705 0.710 0,716 0.720
0,75 0,.709 0.712 0.717 0.724 0.728
0.70 0.717 0.720 0.725 .0.731 0.7;36
0.77 0,724 0.727 0.733 0.739 0.744
Q.78 0;.731 0.735 0.14,0 0.747 0.752
0.79 °i,738 0,742 0.748 0.754 0.760
 .~
654 APPENDIXES . APPENDIX D 655
--)

TABLE D-2. THE VAnJE1)-FLOW FUNC'TJON FOil NEGATIVE SLOPES, F(IL,N)_s. (continued) TABLE D-2. THE.y ARlED-·FLOW FU;XCTlON FOn NEGATIVE SLOPES, F(H,N)~.), (rOllil:nrwl)
J
~~I 4.0 4.2
I
I
4.5 5.0 5.5
~-I
.~ 4.0 I 4.2 .Uj
I- -5.0- - - -5.5- -
I
0.80 0.746 0.750 0.755 0.762 0.768 1.30 0.979 I 0.978 U.nS5 I U.991 0.994
0.81 0.753 0.757 0.702 0.770 0.770 1.32 U.985 I 0.98G U,OllO i 0.995 0.997
0.82
0.83
0.760
0,766
0,764
0.771
0.709
O.i7G
0.777
0,784
0,78:3
o 79Q
1.34
1.36
U.09U
0.9\)4 I
0.9\12
0.!1\)6
. 0,\195
U ()!)9
I
U.999
1.002
I,U01
1. 005
0,84, . 0,773 0,778 0.783 U.791 0.798 1.38 ./).998 1.00U ! 1 ,00:3 ,1,00C 1.008
I
0,85
0,86
0.87
0.780
0,78G
0,793
0.784
0.791
0,797
0.790
0,797
0.803
0.798
0.804
U.811
0.805
0.812
0.819
1.40
1.42
1.44
1.001 I 1,004
1.005 I 1,008
I,U09 1 J ,013
1.006
1.010
1,014
1.000
I.U12
I.U16
J .Ull
1.014
1,0IG
i
0.88 0,799 0.803 0.810 0.818 0,826 1.46 1.014 1.016 1.017 1, U18 1.018
0,89 0.805 0,810 0.816 0.825 U.8;{2 1.48 1.016 1,01\) 1,020 1.020 1,020 I

0,90 0.811 0,816 0,822 0.831 0.839 1.50 1,020 I

1. U21 . J .022 1.U22 1.022 . !
0.91 0,817 0,821 0.828 0.837 0.845 ,\ 1.55 1,02!) 1.029 J ,020 I,U28 1.028 .1
0.92 0.823 0,828 0.834 0.. 844 0.851 l. 60 1. U:35 1. U:35 [,0:34 J .032 1, (J:3U
0,1l3 0.829 0,833 0.8.J.0 0,850 . 0.857 1.65 1.041 J.04U 1.039 I I.U:)6 I,U:H
0.94 0.835 0.8.,10 0.84G 0.856 0.8G4 1.70. 1047 1,04<'; 1, U43 I 1.0:30 I.U:37
0,950, 0.840 0.845 0.852 . O.8Cl 0.8!}!)
0.875 I
1. 75 1.0S2 1. 051 1.047 1.042 1.0:39 -t
0.960
0,970
0.975
0,846
0.851
0.854
0.8G1
0.8G6
0.859
0.857
0.863
0.86G
0.8137
0,1)72
0.875
0.881
0.883
.1
1.80
1.85
1.90
1.057
1.061
1. UOS
1.05G
1 U,59
1. 0(j0 '
I.U51
1,054 I
1.045
i .1l·17
1.U57 ! 1.0 ..llJ
I.U41
1.04:3
.1.045
0.980
0.985
0,990
0.995
1.000
[J,8S7
0.859
0,861
0.86,1
.0.SIl7
0.861
U.863
0.867
0.8G9
0.873
0.8G8
0.870
0,873
0.876
0.879
0,878
0.880
0.883
0.885
0.887
0.886
0.8S9
0.891
0,894
0.897
II
i
1. 95
2.00
2.10
2,20
2,3
1.008
1,071
1.07G
1. DSa
1,084
1 UG4
1,068
1, U71
I . U7:3
1,079
1.05\1

1.065
1.0G8
I
1051 .
1.0(12 I 1.053
I.U5G
1,058
1.U46
1.(]47
i.O-!!l
1.050
1.051
-\
LU71 I.U60
0,890 0.899
1.005
1.010
1.015
0.870.
0,873
0.875
0,874
0.878
0.880
0,881
o 884
0.886
O.SfH
0.89G
0.90'2
0.904
2.4
2.5
2.6
1.087
1.)00
1.U92
1.081
1.083-
1.085
1,073
1.075
1.076
1,001
1.062
1 OG:3
1,0.";2
1.053
1.054
..l
1.020 0.877 0.883 0.8S9 0.898 0.907 2,7 1. Ug-! 1,087 1.077 1,063 1. U5-!
1.03 0.882 0.887 0.893 0.902 0.911 2.8 1. DOG 1.0SS 1.078 I.UG'l I,U5! •_J)
1.04 0.888 0.893 0.898 0.907 0.916 2.9 1, U!)8 1 08f) 1. Ui\) 1.U65 1.U55
1.05 a.892 0.897 0.903 0.911 o 920 3.U I,OY9 1.U!)O 1.080 1.0GS. 1.055
1.0G· 0.896 0.. 901 0.907 0,915 0.924 3.5 1.10:3 1. UIl:3 1.082 1.06(1 1,055
1.07 0.901 0.906 0.911 0.919 0,928 4.U 1.10G 1 Ulli 1.U84 1.067 I.05!l
1.08
1.09
0.905
0.909
0,910
0.914
0.91G
0.920
0,923
0,927
0,932
0.936 j
J
4.5
5,0
1.108
1,110
1.0DS
J ,oun
1,085
1.085
1,067
1.068
J, USG
1 05G )\
. 1.10 0.913 0.918 0.923 0.931 0.94.0 (} 0 1,1U 1.100 1.085 1.068 ,(J5G
1.11 0.917 0,921 0,927 0,935 0.941 7 0 1.111 1.100 1,086 1.068 ,()51i
1.12 0.921 0.926 0,931 0.939 0.948 8,0 1.111 1.100 1.086 . 1 OG8 05li
1.13
1.14
0,925
0.928
0.929
0'.933
0.935
0.938
0.943
0,947
0.951
0.954 1 9,0
10,0
1.111
I. III
1 100
1,100
1.086
1.U86
I.OG8
1.068
J 05(;
I.U5!i ._' !
1.15 0,932 o 936 0.942 0,950 0.957
1.16 0.936 0.041 0.945 0.953 0.9GO.
1.17 0.~3g 0.944 0,948 C.957 0.903
l.18 0,943 0.947 0.951 0.%0 0.965
.1. 1f) 0,947 0.950 0.954 6 9G3 0.968
- 1. 20 0.950 0.953 0,958 ~

·O.96G '0.970
1. 22
1.24
i,2G
1. 28
0,95G
0,952
0,9!l8
0,974
0.057
0.91l2
0.971
0,9,77
0,964
0,970
0.975
O,I)Sl
0.972
0.077
U.ll82
0.987
0.1)76
0,981
0.986
O.Y\JO
I,
I
i
 ,
\
I
I
ApPENDIX E. TAllLE OF THE VARIED-FLOW FUNCTIO"lS :FOR
CIRCULAR SEOTION,,*

* Prepared and suppli<>d for publication through the courtcsy of Mr. C. J. Keif()l'
and Mr. H. H. Chu 'of the Department of Public Works, City of Chicago. The step
'lines in the' table show the location of n,ormal depth. They should not be crossed
by interpolation.

I 657
 TABl.E E-1. V"aIED-FLOW FUNC'rlON X

it.'
.~

0:59 °';1421°'5516'060191068791°'825211 375110 3181Io.2119;O IIi(H,O.I2S0'O'I01~0.09031'O.0179 0.0712,006541°.06351° 061S;0 OW1t053910.01S5,O.0309;0.033fO.0287iO

1 0248
0.58
O.!17
0.56
10.6472 0.5935 ° °
0.5641 o.al54jo 0902 0 1>1961--;0 2781;°,185110 13920.1113 0 0916 a am Q ,006S 0,058.lI0 0535,0 0492 °.048010.0468,0.0459;0.0410,0, om'0,o308 O.
°
0.53040 57311° 5328,0 7213,0 g9g010 510G 0,25M 0.1829 0.1410,0.11450 09700.08170 07080.00480 0593,0 0580 0.05\)4 0 :l551 10.O'192.0.0H4 0.0307,0,0308 02iW 00220
6~00,O 1809 Lom 3514'0 2110'0, \6931°.125.1 {) 10220.0875;0 0139 0 06420.0593,0 0542,0,0529'0.0514'0 050-11°,0450 0406'0 033. O. 1rn,IO• 0510
0223'0 0193
. 0.55 ° 1
0.583010.0388 0.7246 n.31lo,ruo 4438 0.2260,D.l593 0 1225,0.009010,08t9 0.0711 l0 0804 05281°,04811°.0441'°.04370,°"" 0.OH710.0374,O 0339'0,0581
1
0.6023 o.f!I:lHIO 76401l.oof!l:l 0.31 H jlU8U5 0 1380 0.1080 {) 08820,01350,0640'0,0545 o.o·m 0 0,1420.010010.03911°.03871'° Ol80i,l.OlI0 0.0~09'0,0251
0,0204'0 0177
O.0l1l7 l\O 0163
0.(\.1
0.53 0,02271069260.81-1£ 1.825 0,2·1,,7,0 Hl!l1 O.12113 0.09(,-1 1007860.0657 00512'004920.04330.0400 0.0369 0,0360 0.03510.0345 0309 O. ° 0.0171 0.0148
O.5~
0.51 0.66S~.0 702:!,~ 0 2112 °.1641,0. H8710 092310 01480 00340,05260 04580,04000,03530.0321 0 03030.02950,02880.0283 0025.0,
°
0,6446,0 7~U:O.S817'03ll(iO:O, ID71!O.131S 10.1051 0,0844 °.0701 0.0589 0.051"10 04 H 0 03911°.03611°.0334 03270 0318\°.031310.02811°.
1
.01800 01500.0136
.01630,01421°.0123
0.50'
OAD
o 6947,0 80891
1
10 21060.1335 0 102010.081\ 0 06630.05570.0412
1 1
°
0 0.10 ° 03590.03181°.02960.0214 0 02670.0060 025110,02300.02
O. 12~~,O 8717 0 3J2u,O.1707!0, lIS 110 089~IO,0714 1),05871°,04960 042°1°,0310,0 0:,23 0.0230 0.D2M {) 02470.024°1°.02350 023110,0203 0.01
0149001290.0112
.013·1 O.Olli 0,0102
0.7591,0.97670 2380!0. HHIO.101410.07nllo.OS25 0 05210.04420.0377 0.03311° 0200 ° 025710 02390.02210.0217 0.021110 020&10 0\87 I) 01 ,OI2~ (} OHIO 0 0002

..
O.~g
O.H
0.~6 °
o 6118'1°.2033 o. 1115 10060 015°10.05970 013710 OlOB 0.0347 (l 03001°.0205 (I 02320 02000
°
o S0l51"i9S6-i;o IS3I,O.1136,O.OSHiO 06830.05540,04010 03910.0337002960 02590 02301 02130 0200 O.OI~2 0 01900 0I860.0I68Io.0IM,0,
01920.0[78'0 0113 0 017Q 0.0 01510 01380
.0100 0 00~5Io.ooa3
.00991° 0085 (1,00'15
0,95150.2069;0 12150 085810 06.5;6.0522.0 04~910 03610 0308 00261 (1,0235 0 020710 OlaM 0171 Q 016010.015.<10,01521° 0 00S9 (I 007710.00~7
1 1
0.~5 .01351° 012110
\3 l67110.159~IO.I014 0 o73510.(!5fii}io.045110 0317003190,0273002371°,021000,84001511001520 DHH1.0139 0, 0136 (10 00800 00u9 o.0061
0.44
0.43
1
0 2650[V 1215;0 os,; 0.0332.0 04~lfO'O 100 °,03:120 0281 0.02400 0210 ° 01860 01640 01460 01350 0127 0 OI~3 0.01211° 0
1O.I~17 0 1042 O.U7~' 0 05UO .iH3G Q.0150 10.0201 0 02~7 0.0212 ° 01S60 01640 01450.01300 0121 0 0 °
.01210,01!00
,01OS 0 °
1
0071 0 0062 005..
0.~2
OAI. °
o. 13981 036~,O. .o,68,a.0'l7'ljo.o30510 02550.02170 0lS1 0.011\.! Q,QIH a.olnla 01150 01070.0
.00OB 0
.0095 o.
.00050
OOgSIO'
0014 0 006:! 0 00550 0048
00650 0050 0 004 0 0043
0.40
0,39
0.38
0.37
0.36
o H07,O.Gna.o
0.O&l5;O.06!}l;"
0.07330 Gro90
O.0205:~ 04JO:0.
04(l·/'O 0324,0,02660,02230,01011° 016510 OIH 0 012H 01131°.01010.0004 O.
.0;,8:0.0281;0 02310.01950.01670,01,130 01261°,01110.00990 00890.0082 0.007S O.
0299;00243;0.0"01,0 0170 O.OHSlI.OI26 0 01100.00970,0087 0.00780.0072 00680
,02,To.nwo.O!iIIO,01i70,OI26IO,0IlOO 00%0,00850,00160
10 0503 " Ol63IQ,027S,o.i)22110 0131!0 015°10 01280 OIlO lJ il(l96 0 0084 0.007.1 0.00661°.0059 0,0055 0
1
°
0 00840
0.00740
0.00650
1 00580.00030.00000 0068000510.
.00500 00500,
00750
0067 O.
,00580.
.00510.
1
,OMS 0 C.Q50 000.3 0.0038
0 00010.00" 0 003& a 0033
000151° 00390,003{1) D029
0.OU400 00340 OQ2910 0026
OOH O,OOH 0 0035000300.00260.0023
<:n 0.35 0.OH9.0 0307,O.023Z·V.O!89jO 0155,0.01300.0110 9 00950,0032 0,0012 0.00640 00570.00520.00470,
1 0014 0,00·13 O. 00380.003510 0020 0 00260 00220.0020
<:rt
<0 0.3.
0.33 I
0.O~5!!,O.025O;Q.o:ml G.016! 0 OI3?,0.0I1! 0.0094 0 !l!!S21t1.0U1110 0062 a.oosso 00500.004500041 \I
o.,L9" 0 Q:).'fi,O 0170,0 0131,o.omlo.00!l. O,OOSl 0 0010 fi. 006! 0 005.10.0043 0 oo.~ 0.0038 0 003610
.00360.00310
0023 a 0032 O.
MS.J 0003°10 Uil26 il 00220,00190.0017
.0029 0.00'18 O.OO~210,OOl~ 0 0017 0.0015
0.32 :0.0214 0.0183 1°.01<4;0 QI16,0,0096,O 0981 () ~'O69 0.0000 0 00520.0046 0.0041 0 0036jO,0033 0.003110 ,00:1;( 0 0021\0 00250.0022 ij,OOWIO 00\110 DOli \) 0013
0.31 'O.020:l;1/ O[&!lo.om;O.0098 0.0082'10,006910. 00511 0 0051 0 00.(50,00390.003510,Q031 O. 0025 O. .00231°.00230.0021 0 0019 (),OOl6 0: OOIl 0 OiH~ o· OOll
~.30 0.Ol59,O Ol~3,O 0102;0.0083'1°.0068,0.005810 00,9 Q 00'3,i!. .0033 0.OU39 0 002Hl .0020 0.00100.00180 00160 0014 0 0012'0 OOW 0 0009
0.20 0.0139,0 OI071Q.OO,~5 0 00690 0051 10.0049'\0.00.!! 1fi.OOS6'O.OO: C'Wl 0.00251° G!l220 .0017 0.00160,0015 0 00l~ O.OOI~'O.OOIOlo 0009 0:0008
0.28 o OilS Q.OOSOIO,OOll 0.005710 0048 IO.00·n 0.0035 0.0000 0 0.1 00230
\0.000400373 Q.0058,O,0048 a 004010 003-10.
00310,001910.
1 ODIM .0014 0 00Hlo.0012 0 0011 0.001010 00080.00070.000(\
0,27 00250.VO 00190 00!610 0012'0.00120.00120.001000010 0 IJ008 0.0007000050,0005
O.2G 0.0077,0.0060 0 OO~910 0039\0.0032,0 0028 O. .00210 00 OOloIO.OOHjO, 0013 O. OOH)j;:;.OOIO 0,0010 0 00090.00080.00070 OU05'0 00050 0004
O.lUi
0.g4
10.OOfi2,~ 00.8 ° 00391°.00320.00271°.0023.0
Q.0050,0.00391O 00320 00261\).0022 o.OO!SI Q
001711.,,3 001300012 n oml 0.
.('214 0 OOlZIJ 0011 {I 0010 00009 O.
.OOOE 0 @08\0 00081°.00070000.0.0008 o.OOiJ510 000400004
0(1)11° 000610.00080 0006 O. .00051°.0005 (l 0004 0 00030.0003
o 0040,0,00310 00250,00210.0017 O.OO;S 0
0.23
0, 2~ .
0.21
° I
o 00321 00250 002010 00181~.OOH 0 0012 v
.DUll 0 OOW 000090.0008:0 000'/0
0.:>19 000081) 0001 (I
0.00250 0019000160001300011 0 000!l 10 ifJilS 0 OOO~ 0 ilOOSjo 0005 D.
00050
0904 0
°
.00060.00050.00050 0005 O. ,000.0.00040,00030 OOuS o.a002
.0005,,°.0004 000110 OOU1[o 0004 00030.000310 000> 000020 0002
OOO~ 000030.0003000030,00030.00030.00020.0002 U 00020,0001
0.20
°
0.0019!0,001510.0012jO 0010,0.
°
<) 000110 OOOB (} 0005 °0005'1°.00040
0005 G0050 000. 0 OOO~ O.
00030
1
.00030.000310.00031000021° 00020.0002 (} 00021° 00020000100001
0.19
O.IH
°
00151\),0012,0 00091° 00080
o OOll,O ooo9jO 00010 OIloa!o
0,0008 oooa 0 00050
1 !TOOtlo 00030
.00040 1 9003
1
°. ,00030
,00020 0002
00020 0002'0 00020.00020,0002 ° 00021°.0001 0
,0
0.000210.000zl 0001 °,0001 °,0001 0.0001 0 00010
00010 0001 0.0001
00010 0001 0 0001
0.17
O.li 1 OOO{'O 0004 j Q,tlOO3 0 0003,0.0002 10 {.Q02.0 00010 00010 0001 I) 0001 0 0001000010.0001 O.OOO! ° 0001,0 000] 0
1 00010 0001

0.15
0000° <> 000510 0001 0
° 1
o 0004 00030 0003 1O.
0003.0.
° °
00020 0002IQ.OOOllO 0001 0001000011°.00011°
.0002 10.0002 .000110 0001 0001100001 O.DOC! 000010 0001 ° 0001
0001
0 00011°,00011° 0001 00001\0.000100001[0,0001
0.0001 0 000110 0001 0 0001
I
O.I~
0,13
0.12
1
°
0.00030.0002 (I 00020 .0001 1{L0001 00010 00010 1 0001 0001\0 0001,0 0001\
0.00021 0002 0 000110 0001 .0001 °.0001'0.000 1 0,0001'1° 0001 1
!l 0001 °.00010 0001000010.0001 I 1
1 1 I'
i

'I
1
1
'I
\

~,000\g.oooirUOII0
I '
Q,l1
°
1 1
10 0
1
IQ ;0 i
o 10 10 \0
10 '0 10 10 10 10 0 10 10
."----'---'---
]0

( '. \_--',
 TAELE E-2. V .... RTED-FLO~I; FUNC'1'ION' Y

~'_~I~i 0.
50
1 0.5., I0;60 1.~I~·7°.I~I~'I~~I.~1 0.0' I~ .Qa~ J.071~J 1.091~11.15 ~:~I:.:~J~:1~:~j~.
l.OO '00 0 00 0 0 O. 0 0 '100 ;--.' O.ll2~50.46i!OO.30i!Ol(j.2IQ2;O.13530.11280.01l51:0.06i!OO.05520.0482
0.99 jO.OOillO.Oool;O.OOOI 0.0001;0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 1°.00010.0002,0.0003 0.000.'0.0005:0 lo----IO.OZ:H 10,4622!O.30a. 10. 009210.1380'0.1126'0.084910 1 0480
0.98 0.0003,0.0003,0 .0003:0.00030.0003;0.0003;0.0004 0.0005'0.0006,0.000.7;0 ..Q009'a.aa13:0.0010 Q0050:0.0180'0 4572,0.30080.0077'0.1374 O. 1120:0.0B46i': :0419
0.97 O. O.0005rOOOS;O.oo06,O.0006,O.000710 0008;0.0009 1°.0010 O.OO]3.0.0016:0oo22Ioooa~,00004 ~O"508 0.2974'0.20560.1366 1l.1l13 O'()8~1 O. .0418
0.96 ,0. O.OOOB 0.000810.0009/°.0010,0.001110.001210.001410.001510.0019 O.00~4'O.0033 0.00;;3 0.01320 I
i004.28'0.289g 0,2025 0.13M 0.110510.088°1°.0671 '10' .0~77
0,95
O,g,
0.93
10.
0,00150.0015 0.0016,0.00170.0019,0.0021 10.0023,0.
0.001/}jll.ooI910.oo20I0.0022 0.0024,0.0026 0.0028 0.
°,
.0012Io.00J2,0.0013 0.0014,0.0016 °.001710.0019 O.OO!UiO.0025' 0.0033:0,0045:0.007510.01711°'.0523:.°.429610.278510.1985 O. J339 0.10931°' 0830·0.066S O.
.0028 0.0034 0.0013 0.006°1 Il!lS8 o {l213 0.08241°.3563:0.250°1°.1919 0'1321 0.1019 O.callS 0.0663 O.
.0036,0.00430.0054 0.00750.0122,0. U358 0.l!560.2932,O.2220,0.IS38 0.1300 a.lOGS 0 OB16 () 0659 O.
.0474
.lJ.l70
0168
0.92
0. ~l
. 0.90
1
°.
0 0023,0.0024,0.00260.00270.0029 0.00320.0036:0.
O.0028t002910· 0030,°.0033 0036;0.00890.0042:0. 1
.0045,0.00530.0067.0.0093;0.0150.0.0310,0. 16H :O.2465,O.20I4'O.1736!1);!278 0.1001 0:
.0054 1°.0064,0.0081,0. OJ 12 j O. 0181,0.0368 ~iO. 21641°.18611°.16561°.1252.0.103410.
0.0034.0.00350.0036,0.00390.0042'000450 0000 0.0056,0.00630.00760.0096 0.0132;0.02J5·I)043610 2500.0 19400.1729,0.1577 0.12240.1028 0.
:06&20,05400: 0466
. OM8 0.05;17
.0641 0.
0.0462
.0458
0. 89 2OO39iO.OOlO,Q.0~12IO.004510:001aJo.0053 O.005s!0.OOG5,o.007,!0.0088,o,0114,o.OJ51'lo.G25s1o.QS22:0. 2070,0. 1793!0.1638·0. 15120.11981°.1000 0.07 .0634 O. 0456
0.1l8 U.lIDH !L0046 O. 00480.0052 0.0056iO.ooGI 0.006710.0076,0.00860. OJ03,O.Cl32,0.1UllJ O.O.03jU0848Io.1S52,O.13B5·O.I5fiO;o. 11470.1168,0. fl7 0627 () .0452
I : liT
0.81
0.86
0.85
0,00510.00530.0055
1 1°.0059,0.0084 0.
0.00531°.006°1°.00031°.00671°.00721°
0.0004 O. .0071,0.O~76 0.0081;0.
°.
.0017,(1.00860.0099:0, 01l8.0.01S',U.Q21a,O.036Z,O.0S33 :0.1715;0.157:1:0.1478,0.13941°.1139\0.
,ooS7,O.0097 IO.0112,0. 0]35,0. 011n,O. 02H 10.04il8:0.1193 :0, 1604,°.1492 1413 °.1344 O.1Il2·0.
.0098 O.OllO 0.0127,0.0153 0.02000.028:1.0.0534 10.2360 0.1514,0.1422 0. 1356.0.
1 1 J29710.1085 0.0931'0,01
:06190:'
.01 .0613 0.11515 O. 04H
.06010 0510'0 0439
.OHa

0.8l 0.0071:0, .0079,0. oORlla.Gogo O. .0110.0.,0123;0 m4~,O.017(0.02JO 0.0325:0.066,1°.)919;0. H39,O. 1366;0. 130ij 0.1251 10 1058:0 (Y.)l3io.0729 OJ)598 0:05(1.1'0 0435
'" 0.83 0.007·9,0. ,00S8,0.. 009'1°.0101\0.01 .0122,0.0138,O.0]61'0.or96 0.0262 0.03171° 0849: 0.1135 °.1376 O. 1313,O.125~;O .1213 0.1034'0.0898 O. .0590 O.OliOO 0.0430
'" . 0.82' 0.0087;O.1lOO2,O.1loo1;O.OI040.0112,1I.0I .01360 01640.01800.0221'0.0299 0.0445 ~0,]594 0.13211t1.1206·O.1218·~.1l78. 0.10081°.
1 o583Io.0j94 O,0421i
o O.BI 0.00961°.0101 iO.O:O'io.01l5 O.Ql24.0.0136·O.01~O·O 017Jio.00020.02W'00342 0053010.201510.1500;0.1272 0.1223'O.lJ?S'O. 1HIO,0985 O. :0576'0.,0488!0,0.20
O. B!l 0.OI06,O.0l12;O,OI18,0.012U!O.0l36'O,0118!O.0IUG:O.OI900,WZS'0.02S~10. 03S9'0.06491:0.1806'0.],SM.1230!O. !185:0.1l-l3!O.II1C!0,OS63:0. . 01ill5l0.0568lo.0182 0.041&
0.79 0.0111 iO.0123;.0. OI30.0.0139iO.OI49l0.01M;O.OIM,O,0202,0.03S2 0.0310'<1.0·]500.0880 0.16SSI0.1363)0.1 191,0. J 150,0.1112 0.1080:0.0941 '0 . 11614 10. 0559 O.O.l?6'0.QHO
0. 78 0.012alo.OI34!O.0I4210.0152iO.0l64,0.011010.000110,023~,0,0282.0.0358,0,0;242:,1003 0, ]S15,0. 1310,0. 1153,O.Ill5,O. JIk"lllo.1052 1 0.0019 0. . 0663.0.11552,0. 0459;0.0~05
0.77
0.76 °. °
0.014fl,O,OH1,ILOI5.liO.OIM;il.01S!i,O 019~.O.022~ 0.02600.03140.01080.062510,2182,0. H61.0.1260.0.1lJ? 108;0.1052,0.1004 O.QS99 0.
I
.0652'0.0544 0.04!i2 C.Ul99
0.0l5G,O.OI09io.01l18{OlBlo.Olsalo.0216,O.0217,O.0211!!,0.0349,0.Ol03·1I.0768 0, 1871 1 139l,il.1l17 10.lOSS 0.I056 0,1021,°.10000.08810.0184 0.0642;0.0537 0.0~55'0. 0396
1
l
0.75 O.0103,O.0I72jO.0114,O.ill97!O.0216,O,0238 ,0Z73 JO 03IS,0.0393,o,om o. 1l11!O. 171010. la3610.117710.]05710. 1026:0. 100fl O 00750.0$611°.0168 0.0631 !0.03'18 0.044911°.0389
0.74 O.0l17,O.Ol88,O.!l2OO.002!O,O.0236,O.0260 .0300 0 0352.0. OHO 0.063811.8457,0. 1590,0 12SS O.1I43.0.IU32 O. woa 0.O<J78 i O. .0844-0.0755 0.0620'0. .OH:J 0.0384
0.73 O.0192.0.02llJ;O.U2J7.0.1)2.33,O.0257,O. .0330 0.0383,0.O~OO O. 07B8 0 ~192,O.I504 0.12H 0.11100 . 1004'0 , 097G'O.OYlij 0,
I I .0826/°.07400.0,](110. .043710.0S1Q
C.72 0.0200.0.0218 il.0'l84,O.02S2·O.0278,O. .035110.0429,0,0571'0, IOHlo.l05o,o.I437lo.120o O.1078!0.0980~O.09S;:0.003210. .080S 0.0727 0.050010. .0430 G. 0315
0; n· .0100 0.048.5 ° 0676.!l~ 0.179°,°.13781°.116°1°.10491°.09561°.09321°.0009,0.
O. 70
0.69
o,o:m,o.023T6.<lZM,O.0374!O.0306,O.
0.0240'O.O~M .02150.0300 0.0333:0.
0.0250;0.0214 .11298,0 0326;0.0362'0.
1
°
.OHS 0.0S4s;0.nS]710.2500.0, 1050,0.1325,0.113° .1022;0.0932;0.0909,0.088210.
.0494;n.OG3J o. J0301.o. 2105,0, 15.471°,1280,0.]099 10.0095;0. O~1210 ,0890,0. 0870~0.
.0792,0,0713 0.0500 0.0198 .0424'Q,035P
.0776'0.0099 il.0580'O.04Sil 0.011S'0.0363
.016010,088110. (lti';OI(LO.j8! fo.om 10.0358
0.68 0.0280'10' .03211°,0852 O. .05560.07.44 0.1741,0.19200.1465,0.1235 °,1066 n.0969 O.OBOI O,0867 0.0g,n,'0. :074610.00730.05601,°.0173 0,0404:0.0354
0.~7 I 1
0.68
0,65
0.0301 0.0324,0.0350 O.
0.0324 1°.0349 1°.0378'0.
a.03OO,o.0319jO,Om;0.
.05060.0633'0
1 OllSO' 0.3650,0.1706'0. Hoa:O.1I97
0.0563 0.0724;°.11000.2320 0.1600·0.13D2 0.1161 11
1
.05241°.0646 0.0849,0. 2250]O.2015;O.15U5Io.130410, !l210.
°. O. .094M.0869 0.0848 0.0831
.092.1;0.0851!0.0830·0.0813 O.
. .00020 ..0832,0.081210.0.910.
O. .07291'0,0660il 0&50 0.0454 0.0398'0.0318
.0714 0.0648 0:054010'0458IO.039ZI0.03~3
.06990.05350.0530/0.0449 0.0388 JO 033B
0.64 (l,0311.0.a-l03,o.OH4 0.0495,0,0576 0.0715;0 oo7B 0.3200 O.18EZ 0.1519,0.1253:0.]094 .09500.oB8110 {lSI3'O.0194 0.0118 0.076] 0.06841°.0622 (I ()500 00142'0.0379'0.0332
0.63 0;0410.0. OHa 0.0488 O.05S~ 0.0850:0.0B24,0 12U '0. 2590'0.1763'0. 1400,0.1223,0.1 .093710.0851!.).0193,0.0775Io.015910 ON~lO.0671 0.0600 O:05lOIO:lJ.l32Io.0372'0. ons
0.62 O.O~38,0.OHB.O 0531,0.0600,0 07?] ,U 0ll3••~O 23 Il,0.1680,0.lloo,O. 1189,0. .0916 0.OR40,O.G777lo.0159Io.0H610.0729 O. 0658'0 ,0599 0.0500'0.0426 0.0367 °.0322
0.61 0,0415,0. 01>19,0. OS7.B 0. 0Il66.0.081fi,O.1I091., 0:a4116,O.2120.0. ld06,0. 13l8,O .llf,2, 0.10091°.08921°.0820 0.0159,0.0142,0.0128.0.0713 0.064810058GIO.o<oolo.O.J18 0.0360,0,0317 1
O.OSII 0.OSS9 0.0627 O.07Jr, 0.0915 0. 1376'0.2700 O. 197Jj 0.1545,0 130B.O.ll20 n.0982,0.0870,O.0S!illil.0'T~3;O 0721,0:0712'0.0697 0.0629 O.057~IO'048!lo.04ll ,0.0353 0.1)$10
0.60
0.59 °.
O.05M,0.OGOBO 0Ga/.0 08"..2,0.1080, 0 2"610 2,.10.0 1865.°.1490,0.1207 1 IOS5:0.0959,O.OR60,0 ..o182. 0.0725,O.0?!O,0.0597Io.0082.0.0618:0 ..o56Z:{t.O.17I,O.0402,O.0348.0.0304

0.58
0.S7
0.56
0.55
0.54
0.53
0.52·
0;51
0.50
O.iS
0,48
047
04.
o.j,
0.41
0.43
0.42
0.41
0,40
0.39
0.38
0.37
0.36
0.35
0.31
0.33
0.32
0.31
0.30
0'.29
0.28
0.27
O.Z6
0.25
0.21
0.23
0.22
.0.21
O.W
0.19
0.19
0.17
~. 0• .16",.
0.15
0.1I
0.13
0.12
0.11
0.10
0.05
0,.00
 I
~I

.)
NAME INDEX

Abbot, H. I,., 94n., 126 Betnmlili, D., 40, 21711..

Ackers, P. i 32.9, 352 BerryhiH, R. H., 437
Aridison,.H., 85 Bettes, P., 17, 217n., 246
Agroskin, 1. 1., 401n., 436. Bhoot.a, B. V., 460, 471-474,517
Ahm:lcl, N., 521 Biclone, G., 393, 434
Airy, G. B., 553 Binnie, A. M., .583
Albertson, .M. L., 204, 213, 521 Biot, M. A., 248
Allen,J, 17, 217n., 246 Bla,i~l(lell, F. \V., 361, 390, 393, 415, 435,
Allen, J. W., 329, 352 437-438, 517
l\.mbTGSe, H. H., 212 Blasius, H., 17
Anderson, A. G., 493, 518 mench, T., xn., 12G, 190
Appleby, F. V.,.602, 619 Blue, F. L., Jr., 4.59
Atavin, V. I., 398n., 436 Borland, W. M., 190
Arghyropoulos, P. A., lSi} Boss; P., 42n., !ll, 459, 519 .. \
ArkhangelskiI, V. A., XlI., 587, 617 Boudin, M., 227, 247 I
Auroy, F.,g91 BQ1Jssinesq, J., 27, 37, 5in., ill, 217n.,
Averianov, S. F., 36 358, ::\62n., 300, 455, 460, 537n.,
552-553

Babbitt, H. R, 36, 295

Bovard, M., 352
Bowers, C. E., 493, 518, 522
. '. )
Bakhmetelf,·R A., vii, x, 1311.., 18, 37, Bowlus, F. D., 78, 85
61, 20G, 212-213, 246, 252-255, 294, Boyer" M. C., 207, 213
297, 306, 324"':325, 393, 398-400, Brad!~y, J. N., 36S-3G9, 381-382, 391-
409""., 423,425, 427, 435, 437-438 392,436 . .
BalloJfet, A., 74n., 85 Brf.thms, A., 94, 125, 1G8"..
.Banks, R. B., 136, 155 Braine, C. D. C:, 82, 'S5
Barbarossa., H. L., 208, 213 Bmter, E. P., 17, 37, G1, 85, 127, 156,
Bardsley, C. E., 17, 459 390, G07, 6Z0
Barillon, R G., 358-359 Bresse, J. A. C., 54n~, GOn., 61, 217n.,
Barker, C. L., 61 246, 253, 258, 294, 357n.. 393, 434
Barrows, H. Ie, 620 Bre~t.ing, A. E., 213 .
B~ta, G., 584' Brudenell, ROo N., 3G9, 391
Baticle, E., 253, 294 Bubendey, J. F., 501n., 519 I
Baller, W. J., 198-199,212,383,391 Buchler, B., 36\), 391 . , -1
BaUIl1;LnD, E. R., 295 . Buscmann, A., H8n., 460'
Bazill, H. E., 17,61,94-95,99,126,213, Butler, S. S., 620
353-364, 390, 393, 409, 43-1, 538, 552 -. 'I
Beebe, J. C., 393, 425, 434
Beij, K. H., 351 Ca.gniard; L., 551 .(
Belanger, J. B., 30n., 37, 49n., 59n., en-michel, C. M., 512, 521
61':'62, 217n., 246, 393, 434 Co.michel, E., 521
Belok(ln, P. N., 138n., 156
Benjamin, T. B., 521, 583
Ca.mp, T. R, 106, 127, 135, 327, 334n.,
351
<1l
Bennett, J., 16 Cfl.mpbell, F. B., 359
Bergeron, L., 587, 617 Cariiio, 1. D., 189
Bermel, K. ,T., 85 ClLrison, E. J., 190-191 (
663 '
'~
\

.. ', ': ~.:','.

 664 NAME INDEX NAME INDEX
665
Carscanjen, M., 3D3, 434, 519, 582, 585 De Marchi, G., xi, 14n., 84, 231 247 Hirnmelwright, A. L. A., 583
Foskett, L. W., 621
Co.rter, A. C., 191 327-328,. 341, 351,390, 519, 572, 58l H. A., 359 Hinderks, A., 459
Carter, R. W., :)!l(l, 476-477. 491-482 De Mello Flores, J. 0., 435 Hinds, J., 312-314., 318, 320-327, 342,
J., 295, 353, 551, 512, 585
494, 518 " . de Prany, G., 93n. Frazer, 'Y., 329, 34G, 352 350, 361, 389, 436
Chabert, J., 296 Deymie, Ph., 551 Fredenhagen, V. B., 191 Holsters, H., 587, 617-618
Chardonnet, 353 Dietz, D. N., 551, 611 Hom-mo., M., 16, 18, 237, 248, 295, 471,
Freeman, J: R., 37, 431
Charnomsldl, J., 26311., 295 Dmitriev, G. 436 581 618 . 517
Doddiah', D., ., " Prencb, J. L., 493, 518
Chll.telain,P., 295 Hopf, ISO, 156
Cheng, H. M., 601, 620· Doeringsfeld, H. A., 61 HOI.ton, E., 5371.., 61, 108, 127, 136,
I 150, 155-156,392,546, 553, 583
Chertousov, M. D., vii·n.] 295, 559, 583 Doland, J. J., 208, 213 Gang1,lillet, E., 94, 125
I. CMzy, A., 93
Chien,
Chow, V.
180
xr;., xii, 83, 126-l21, 155,
Doll, E. H., 191
Donnelly, C. A", 437-438
Douma, J. H., 38, 391
G!1n~uli,
Garot, r., 352
M. le, 391
Houk, 1. E., 125, 156, 189, 437, 47011.,
50171.., 518
Howe, J. "V., 459
Gauckler, Ph., 99n., 126
208 295, 352, 521n., 522, (J07, Dressler, R. F., 214, 5:351t., 552 Gentiiilii, B., 329,351, 572, 584 P. 8., 435
620: Drioli, C., 551, 572, f,I3'l fuu, Y., 359, 413-414, 436, 460, 471-
. Gh.:ll'!l.l'delli, L., 247
Chu, H. H., 253, 261-262, 2\J5, li57 Druml, F. V., 619 Ghotankll.f, S. T.,. 431 414, 517
ChugMY, R. R., xi, BOn., 83, 131n., 1:~3, du Boys, P., 168"., 190 Gibb, H. M., 36 Humphreys, A.. A., 9471.., 120
155 Dupin, P., 521 ' Gibson, A. H., 37, 393, 434 Husted, A. G., 28311., 295
Chun, Y. D., 295 Dupuit, A. J. E. J., 253, 294 Gilcrest, B. R., 550, 620
Citrini, D., 14n., 8'1, 327, 351, 393, 435, . Durand, W. F., 17 Glover, R. E" 191, 585
572, 584 Goldschmidt, H., 619 Ince, S., 61
Clayton, L. A;, 49:3, 518 Goodrich, R. D., 607, 620 Ingersoll, A. C., 511
. Coleman, G. S., ~J28, a51 Eddy, H. P., 36 Gotaas, H. B., 85 Inglis, O. C., 74n., 84
Collinge, V. K, 329, 353 Ehrenberger, R, 38, 253 . ·Ippen, A. T., xi, 361, 390,431,438, <l48n.,
Gl1lshof, F., 253, 294, 448
Conard, R. G., 1.91 Einstein, H. A., 136, 155, 166n., 190 208 453,460,408-469, 517
Graves, Q. B., 607, 620
I COile, V. M., 75n., 85 21;3 ' ,
Grimm, C. I., 296 Isaacson, E. J., 581, 600, 619
Contessini, F., 74n., 84 . Einwachter, 393, 434-435 Groyer, N, C., 31 IshihMa, T., xi, 214, 248
COl'bett, D.1V1., 8.1 Eiseniohr, W. 37 'Qrzywienski, A., 390 Ishilmr!l, Y., 214
Coriolie, G., 21, :37 Eisner, F., 11, Iwagaki, Y., 16-18, 201-205, 213, 347-
GUil101.1, J. C., 51'211., 522
Cornish, 210, 213 Elevatorski, E. A., 391, -J04n. 3.i8, 353, 55.3, 587, 6] 9
Gumensky, D .. B., 391
Cotton, J. 85 EUms, J. W., 435 Y., 210, 212, 2L4, 231, 24.8
Gunder, D. F., 225, 247 O. F., 347, 353,543-544,546,553
Cowan, W. Ellms,R. W., 438
Cox, G. N., Engel, F. Y.A. 1271., 18, 74n., 84
;- Coyne, A., 384, 391 Engels, 328, Hagen, G. H. L., 93n., 9911., 125
CrElusse, :E., viin., 62,248, 520 Engelund, 452n., 4130 C., :xi, 5571.., 61-62, 83, 231, 246-
\' HaU, L. S., 38, 30111.., 326
Craya, A., :no, 214, 53511., 552. 587, 617 EquiazaroIf, B., 535n., 552 Ha.n·,a, F. R, 204, 212 358,461, 517, 550, 584
Creager, W. P., 361, 374, 389-::WO, 436 Escnnde, L., 3DO, 393, 435, 437, 510, 512 Harkness, F. B., 608, 621 A. H., 1 -!on., 84
Cross, W. P., 007, ()20 519-521 ' Harleman, D. R. F., 438 Jansen, B., 246, 391
01'0111', F. 85 Escaffier, F. F., 214, 231. 2-10 242 248 Harms, F., IS Jeffrey", Ii., 150, 156, 214
Crump, E. 74n., 84 295, 587, 618 .", Jegorow, S. A., 16, IS'
Harrington, A. 'iV., 37
Cunningham, A. J. C., 991 •. , 126 Etcheverry, B. A., 160, 113, 189, 1\10 Ho.l'I·$, C. W., 379, 391 Jensen, R. A., 521
Euler, L., 40 Harrison, A.S., 295 John$o!l, C. F" lOOn., 127
Ezra, A. A" 272,'295 Harrold, J. C., 3Ul Johnson, J. 'N., 2H, 31
! Dahl, N.
Dai, Y. B.,
550, 617 . HMumi, M., 3211. Johnson, RD., 510-571, 583
Johnstone, D., 607, 620
Hathaway, G. A., 553
Dalrymple, T., 518 Fan, C. 170n.-171n., 191 Haws, E. T., 583 Jones, B. E., 533, 551
Dimel, P., 385 Favre, H., 329, 350, 352, 551 Hayarni, Shigel1ari, 619 Jones, L. E., 296
Dalltscher, 578, 585 Fawer C f,[ayami, Sboitiro, 602-603, 619 G.,61i)
Darcy, H., 811., Hi, lISn., lZiJ, 213 30;;\ 434 FeJlenlus;\V., Hebert, D. J., 585
3. D., 361, 374, 389-390, 4.36
.d' Aubui~soil de Voisins, J. F.: i'in.; 16, Feodorofi, N. V., Hem)', H. R., 509, 521
501, 519 . Ferriday, R., 393, Henry, M., 587, 611
Daugherty, R. L., 517 Florey, Q. L., W\), 191 Herbert, J. IL, 459 Kalinske, A. ·A., 435
Damn, C. It, 585 Forchheimer, Ph., ,125, 110n., 191, 294, Hering, E., 125 Ko.ndaswa.rny, P. IL, :)HO
Davis, A., 520 3;'-7-328,351,358,520, 534n.) 550 . Herschel, C., 9310., 125 Klrr, M. H., 436
Davis, C. V., 3~O, 431, 601, (120 Formica, G., 2,1,7,464-468, 516-511 L J., 51211., 522 I{eifer, O. J.,
Dawson. J. H., 460,. 4(38--!6!), 511 Forster, J. IN., 393, 409-41'2, 435-435 31,363,390,427,435,438 I(eIl.Iledy, R. G.,
Delleur, J. W., 212 Fortier, S., 166, 173, 190 Kennison, K. R, 393,
 666 NA.ME.INDEX 667
NAME INDEX
Kent, D. H., 520 Linford, A., 74"., 84 RI1.n1ser, O. E., 115, 12i
ICestin, J., 212 Linsley, R. re, 607, 620-621 Nebbia,
n,ltnd, W" 204, 212, 423, 437
ICeulegan, G. le, 9, 17, 98, ;':'..1;6-;<,'..10. Lotter, G. K, 136-137, 155 Neliclo v, I.
Nelson, H. C., Raus{ord, G. D., 587, 618
213-214, 34"r-:;'l8, 353, 550 Lowe, F. C., 585
NeWnl(lll, 21)5 Ray, W. E., 1307, G21
Khllfagi, A., 7411.., 84 LudWig, .J. H., 85 R.ayleigh, Lord, 537n., 552
Kholodovsky, Professor, 255n. Ludwig, R. G., 85 Newmark, M., ::i
Nikuradse, J., 9, 17, 201n., 202, 212, 214 Raytchine, N., 2v5
Khristianovich, S. A., 587, 617 Re, K, 5:34,11..-53511.,55'1
Kindsvater, C. E., 18, 390, 393, '425, Nimmo, W. H. R, :3:2\), 352
NDsedl.l., G., 339,.., 352 R.ee, W. 0.;8.), 180, 1\)1,-13211,640
427, 435; 438, 476, 518 McCar~hy, G. 1'., 507; :321
No ugar'J , J., 618 .Renboek, Th., 13n., 18, 2!Jr.., 37, 362,
King, H. W., 17, 37, 53n., Gl, 85, 108n., McHenry, D., 191
3I)O,.4'14n., 501, 51\)
, 127, 156, 390, 621 McNown, J. 8., 359
Reineke, R., 5.51
Kinosita, 1'.; 550, 617 J:l'fcPhel'son, M. B., '.4313
Obolensky, S., 391 Rtliss, S., 400
Kil'pich, P. Z., 131n., 155 Maddook, T., Jr., 166n., 190 Riabouchinsky, 44.871., 459
Klrschiner, 0., xi, 10, 12, 17, 506, 520 Maitre, R, 391 O'llri.en, III. P., 2$), 37, 213
O'Connor, 583 Rich, G. 584
IUeitz, M., 531, 551 Manning, R, 98, 99n., 126 Riegel, R. 39:3, 425, 434
KMPP, R. 1'., 4'lBn., 4053, '156-457, 460 Marichu.l, A., 61, 390 elser" O ..T., 101
Qrklley, J,. C., Rip Ie:;', H. 0., 4SG, 400
lfuappen, T. T., 607, 620 Masoni, U., 253, 293
Orth, J., 35.3 Rippl, \V., G20
Koch, A" 393, 434, 582, 585 MllSSl!.U, J., 587-588, 617
Owen, W. M., 17 Ritter, A" 552
Koch, P., 247, 519 Ma.sse, P., 237-238, 247, 551 Robertson, J. xi, 14, 17-18, 435
Kohler, M. A., 607-60'S, 620-621 Masse, R., 551 . 213
Robinson, A. R.,
Koloseus, H. J.,,392 Matzke, A. E., 246, 259n., 295, 393, 398-
Pa,ger, G., 521 RohwAr, C., 85
ICo]upaila, 8., xi-xii, '28, 37, ,295 400, 425, 427, 43.'>, 438 ROllse, H., xi, 14,..15, 18, Gl, 24u, 302,
Koieny, J., 11, 18, 253,294, 358, 507, Mavis, F. 1'., 80, 85,493, 49S, 518 Pai, S. I., 619
Palmer, H. K., 78, 85 380, 30S, '42B, 4:l5, 4:38, 460;. 471-
520, 578, 585 Mayer, P. G. R, 581, 585 517,521,550
. f{rey, H. D., 519 ' Merriman, M., 393, 434 Palmer, V. J., If)!
Pannell, J. R., 16 Roy, S. 391
Kuntzmann, J., 352 Mertell, A" 22 7 , 22711", 247
Pr,rshall, R L., is, 8,5 RUhlman,
Kutter, W. R., 94, 125 Metcalf, L., 36
Part,ridge, E.P., 6ID Russell, J. 8.,
l{viatl{ovskii, V ~ 8., ?,8n. Metzler, D. E., 508
Patterson, O. C., .,H)(J, 518 Rut.ter, E. J., 607,
Meyer, O. H., 607, 620
Meyer-Feter, E., 350 Patterson, G. lV., 214
Lacey, G., 166n., 190 Meyers, J. S., lOS, 127 Pall 1hll!;, J. L. H., lI2!]
Pavlovskil, N. N., viin., lOOn., J26, Sabatlu), G., 519, 521
l,agrange, J. L. de, 538, ,552 l;I1eynardi, G., 353
laIn., 155,15(i, 281 Snfrallell, IL, 393, 398, 434, 436
Lamb, H., 537n., 539, 550 Miller, C. N., 349, 351 , Saint:'ifeno,llt, A.. J. C, l~fI.rr'; de, 210,
Lamoen, J., 537, 618 ' Miller, C. R., 190 Penati,8"
Perrollet, J. 217,.., 52l', 551-552
Lallcenelcl, R. L., 459 Mitchell,W. D., 326.
Pest,r~cov, Dr., Sandover, J. A., '
Lane, E. W., lOS, 127, 17On., 174, 190-· !\'IockmoI'B, C. K, 459
191, 359, 3~)0, 435, 476, 517,607,621 Molesworth, G. L., 189 ,PeterkA., A. J., -1,36 Sao, T. T" 393, 'i3S
Langbein, W. B., 213 . Pickels, G. W., 126 Saugey, 30411.
Mondsch'lin, H. F., 007,621
Lansford, W. M., 9, 17,326 Pikafov, F. I., ·1::16 Schn;;k, A., G19
MOllonobe, N., 253, 295
Poggi, R, 43:3, 438, 459 Sc!mffernak, Y., 253
Lauffer, H" 38 Montagn, A. M.R., 437 ,
Pohle, F. V., 5:3511" 5.'52 Schlichting, H., 195, 212
Lawler, E. A., 619 Moore, W. L., 204, 398-399, 41411.., 423,
436-437 . Poinctl,re, H" 237, 247 S(;hmiclt" M., "iilt., 329, 346,352,572,584
Lazard, A., 238n., 248
Poncelet,J, V., 217-n. Schneckenberg, E. C., 02, 125, 127
Leach, H. R., 156, 271, 295 Moots, E. E., 53611.., 552
Lee, M., 253-254, 295 Morgan, O. W., 4l4n., 438 Posey, O. J., vii, 1il"., 18, '2413, 2gB, 4::15, Sci1nepper, D., 127
Leighly, J. R, 169, Hll 45!J, (JU7, ll2I . Schoder, E. 'Y., 28n., 37, 390
Monis, H. iii., Jr., 12, 18, 196, 197n., Schoklisch, A., 253, 295, 327, a51, 437,
LeJiavsky, 8., xn., 190, 406n., 436 212, 193, 518 Powell, R. W., 95, 126, 204, 213-21'1
PrandtJ, L., 0,12, Ii, 200-201, 212, 448n., 459, 520-521, 5:35n:,· 552, 568, 583,
Leopold, L. B., 16611.., 190 MostkolV, l\LA., 61, 32\l, 337, 33911..,352 620 '
Levi, 1. 1., 255n., 295 Mouret, G., 225, 227, 238n., 247 459 '
Levin, L., 53~n;, 552, 587, 617 Prnsil, F., 358-359 Schonfeld, J. 550, 583, 613
Mueller, 0., 521
Levy, A. G., 4.15 Muhlhofer, L., 136, 155 Preiswerk, 4-1,811.., 460 Schuller, J.,
Li, W. H., 327, 334-336, 351, 496, 518 M\llholland, W. M., 608 Price, W. II., Schultz, E. A., 105,127
PuIs, L. G., 521, 607, 620 Schnemi, E., 3(Hn., 390, 507, 520
Lighthill, M. J., 583 MiUler, R., 441, 459
Pllt.man, H. J., 587, G18 Scobey, F. C., lOa, 115, 126-127, 16G,
Lin, C. C., 214 Munch-Petersen, J., 452-n., 4()O
, 173, 190, 213, 3'J6
Lin, P.N' f 587-588, 618 : ,'l
Lindley, E. 8., 190 . Seddon, J. A., 5~1, 551 ~

Lindquist, E. G. W., 28n., 37, lOOn., 125, Na.garatn~, S., 393, 435 Rafter, (J. W., 53n., 390 Serre, F., 358, 550
213, 393, 434 Nagler, F. A., 493, 501, 518-520· Raju, S.P" 17, ..IS!) Simny, M. B., 3n
Rakhlllanoff, A. N., 131n., 155, Z81n., 296 Shl1rn1a, K. R., 437
I
J
\
I
I
 668 NAME INDEX
Shchapov, N. M., 37 Troesch, B. A., 587, 600; 619
Shepley, J. 607, 621 Tulta, H., 352
Shima, 8., '171, 517 Turner, K, B., 28n., 37
Jr., 493, 518
37, 431, 440-441, ','
45!J uGhlda, S., 587,618
Shulit.s, Samuel, 437, 459, 520, 620
Silber, R, ·"iin., SUBJECT INDEX )
Sil1:icrm:'..!l, E., 17 Vanoni, V. A., 2'12
It., 295 Van Vliet, R., 156
Skdnde, A. J 393, 409-412, 435-436 : Verlernlkov, V. V., 210, 2'14
Smetana, J., 390,.393, 435 Villemon te, J. R, 85 A profiles, 230 Bounda.ry layer, laminar, 193
Smith, D., 328, 351 Vl2.di~:avljevitch, Z., 125 Abrupt drop for jump control, 412-414 on overflow spillwll.Ys, 199-200
Snyder, F. F., 607, 620 Vogel,H. D., 459 Abrilpt riEe for jump control, 411'-412 rougluless effect on, 200
Sorcrtllen, K E., 607, 620 von I(d,rrrdn, Th., 9, 17,37, 201n., 212, ' Accaleratioll line, .S27 .. turbulent, 193
Spangler, .1., 501, 520 248, 448n., 4.',)2n., 459 };.dverse slope, 223, 259-260 of uniform :flow, 89
Stanley, C. M., 437 Von Seggern, 1\1. E., 253-254" 295 Aeration of nappe, 352-363 Boussinesq coefficient, 27
Stall~on, T. E., Hi Air entrainment, :-13-36 Boussinesq number, 13n.
Stain, M. F.,35l Airy celerity equation, 539 Boussinesq theory, 358
Steinberg, L E., 2SOn., '296, 607, 621 lVah!man, P., 570n. }Jl-American Canal, 188-189 Box inlet drop spillway, 424
Stevens, J. C., 13n., 18, 78, 82-Sa, 85, 'WaltOll, C. B., 607, 621 Alluvial riVer bends, 455-456 Bresse met,hod, 258
.436, 438 Warnock, J. K, 437, 585 Alternate depth, 41, 551', Bresse theory, 357
Stokei, J. J., xn., 325, 53511.., 550,587, Weaver, R. M., 436 ' Angle of repose, 171-172 Bridge piers, 482, 489, 501-50G
600, 618-019 ' Wcisbach, J' I Sn., 16,40, 401n.,436, 501, Artificial roughness; 202n. Bridge piles, 482, 489
StmtWll, J. H., 607, 620 519 Atterberg soil test, 173n. Bridges, submergence of, 482, 489 )
Stmub, L. G., 17, 4!}3, 518 , ,;ells, E. A" Jr., 85 Broad-crested weir!;, 52-53, 80
Streck, 0., 520 , Werner, P. W., 346, 353 for jump control, 410-H1
St-reeter, V. L., 189, 212 White, M. 246, 429 Backwater, of bridge piers, 501-506 tests, BalJill, 53n.
Strickler, A., 99n., 126, 206, 213 ,:llhitham, O. 535n. of cOllstriction, 490-493 Cornell, !lSn.
Sueishi, T., 587, 619 Wien, \V'I 18 of dam, 319. Michigan, 53n.
Supino, G., 550-551 Wilcox, E. 10671.., 127 effect of, 72 MinnesQta and Wa.shington, 53n.
Swain, F. E., 5aO, 585 Wilkinson, J. 531,551 endpoint, 319 .
Wilm, H. G., Backwater curve, 71, 222n.
Wilson, W: T., 607, 620 Backwater envelope carve, 319 C profiles, 230
,TD.k!lS~o, T., 553 Wisler, C. 0., 607, 620 Backwater mtio, 491 Canal drop, 415
Talwani, B. S., 437 Wittman, R., 459 Baffle piers, 415 Canal faU, 415, 432
T>\fpley, J. F., Jr., 608, 1)21 Wolf, P.O., 61, 83, 246,.358, 517, 550, Banking, 4513 19
Tatum, F. E., 607, 621 , 584 Bazin da.ta, for broad-crestcd weir, 53n. delivery of, 297-306
,Taylor, E. H., 512-515, 522 Woodburn, J. G" 61 for channel roughness, 11, 95, 99n. navig!l.tion, 572-S75
Terrell, P. \V., 190 Woodw9.rd, S. M., vii, Won., 121, 246, for overflow spillWays, 363-36'4 outlet. a.nd entrance, 30'1-306
Thomas, H. A., 214, 541, 551', 581, 585 2ge, 393, '134, 448, 459, 493, 518, 621 for rough channels, 204 Ca.pillary 'I'I'aVI!, 12
Thomas, R, 521 ' , W6ycioki, K, 3gSn., 436 for sharp-crested weirs, :;163, 382, 390 Cascaoos, ladder of, 433
'l'holllp~on, P.W., 459 for wavy surfaces, 204 Celerity, 13, 538-540, 582
Thomsoll, J., 439, 459 Bazin formula, 95 Channel li:'lignment;lOii'(106-109
1:iffany, J. B., 436, 521 Yarnell, D. L., 106n., 127, 425, 493, 501- ' Bazin pro file, 363 Channel contrachiO!\, 41-49, 258; 468-
Tison, L. J., xi, 61, 247 i 50.6, 518-519 , , Ba~in'f! rr., 95 410,479,
Toch, A., 509-510, 521 Yassin, A. M" 155 Bed load, 106 Channel expansion, 57-59
Toebl!!l, C., 92, 125 Yen, C. H., 459 Bed-Iond fUnction, 166n. Channel geometry, 20-24
Tolkmitt, G., 253, 294 Yih, C. S., 214, 359 Bends in alluvia.I rivers, 455-456 principle of, 16611..
Tracy, H, J., 53n., 61, 476-477, 491-492, Bernoulli Emergy equation, ,40 Cha-anel irregUlarities, 103
51B • Best hydraulic section, 160:"162 Channel junctions, 321-323, 512-516
Trautwine, J. C.,i Jr., 61, 126; 390 Zie~kiewicz, O. C., 583 Blllaius equation, 8 : Cha.nnel sections, 20
Blasius-Prandtl-voll Kd.rman curve, 10 best hydro.tllic, 160-162
Blue hole, 5121l.. circular (see Circular channels)
Bottom ro.ck, flow through,: 337-340 of constant: critical flow, 82
Bounda.ry layer, computation, 198-200 of eonstant'hydraulic udius, 152
development, 192-193 geometric elementa, 22-24
669
 667
uoo NAME.INDEX NAME INDEX
Kent, ·D. H., 520 , Linford, A~, 74n., 84 RIl.IUBer,C. E., 115, 127
Lmsley, R K, 607, 620-521 Nebbin, G., 74n., 84,393,435 Ra.nd, W:, 204, 212,423,437
Kestitl, J., 2'12
Keulega.n, G. 17, '98, 202-205 L-otwr, G. Ie., 136-137 155 Nelidov, t. M., 246 Ra.nsford, G. D., 587,618
,\
I
~,

213-214, 353, 550 ' Lowe, F. C., 585 ' Nelson, H. 0., 17-18 Ray, W. E., 607, ()21
Kl;aJagl, A.. , 74n., 8", Ludwig, J. H., 85 Newman, A., 295 Ra.yleigh, Lord, 537n., 552
Ludwig, R. G., 85 Newmark, N. J\'1., xi Rayt.chine, N., 295
Kho.lo~ovsk!, Professor, 2oon.
Nikma.dse, J., 9, 17, 201n., 202, 212, 214 Re, It., 534n:-535n., 552
, K~nstl!LnoVlch, S. A., 587, 1317 NImmo, W. H. R, :129,352
Kmdsvntel', C. E. 18 390 ~9q Ree, W. 0.,' 85, 180, 191, 629, MO
. 427, 435, 438, 476, lilS " , u, 425, Nosed!!., G., 329, 339n., 352 Rellbock, Th., 13n., 18, 2911.., 37, 362,
McCart.hy, G. T., 607, 621
McHenry, D., Ull Nougnro, J., 587, 618 ' 390, 414n., 50J. 519
mng, H. iN., 17, 37, 53n. 61 85 108
. 1~7, 156, 300, 621 ' , , n., McNowD, J. S.,359 Reineke, H., 551
Kllloslta, T., 550 617 McPhersoIl, M. E., 436 Reiss, 8., 460
Qbolensky, 8., 391
19,rpich, P. Z'J 13171., 155 Ma~di)ck, T., Jr., 156n. 190 Rinbouchinsky) 44an., 459
MlUtre, R.,' 391 O'Brien, M. P., 29, 37, 213
I
I\'lr~chtner, 0" xi, 10, 12 17 60(\ 520 I Ric11, G. R., 584
Cleltm, M., 5in, 551 ' , O'Connor, n.., 583 Riegel, R. M., 393, 425, 434
I Mf1n.ning, R., 98, 09n., 126
Olsen, O. J., 169, lin
~napp, R. T., 448",.,453,456-457 460 Manchal, A., 61 390
Orkney, J. C., 583
Ripley, H, C., 455, 460
T nappeu, T. T., 607, 620 ' Masoni, U., 253; 293 ' Rippl, W., 6'20
KOch, A., 393, 434, 582 585 Massau, J., 587-588 617 Orlh; J., 353 Ritter, A" 53471.., 552 ,
Koch, p" 247 519 ' Ma.!;Se,P., 237-:t:~$,'247 551 Ow,;;n, W. M.; 17 Rcbertsoll, J. M" xi, 14, 17-18, 435
Kohler, M. A~, 607-608, 520-621 Ma.sse, R., 551 ' Robinson, A. R., 204, 213
Kolcseus, H. J., 392 ' Mat~koeo' A. E., 246, 25911., ::W5 393 398- Rohwer, C" 85
I{ol~paila; S., xi-xii, 28, 37, 295 . • .425, 427, 435, 438 ' , F'ager, G., 521 Rouse, H., Ai, 14-15, 18, 61, 246, 3132,
·1{ozeuy, J., 11, 18, 258 294 358 ~O~I, MMav1s, F~ T., 80, 85, 493, 498 518 rai, S. {HI) 390, 393, 429, 435, 4.38,,460, 47i-
520, 578, 585 ," ,u a.y~r, P. G. H., 581,585' .
, P!1.Imer, Ie., 78, 85 474,517,521,550
I{rey, R. D., 51\) Mernman, M., 393, 434 ' P",lmer, J., 191 Roy, S. K., 391
Pannell, J. 'R., t6 R\ihlmlln, M., 253, 294
li:untzmann, J" 352 Ivie!:ten, A" 227, 237n.., 247
Farshall, R. L., 75, 85 Russell, J. S., 537-538, 552
l{u~t;el', W. R., 94, 125 Metcalf, L., 36
Metzler, D. E., 509 Part.ridge, E. P., Gi\) Rutter, E . .I., 607, 620
Kv!atkovskii; V. S.,28n.
p,lttersOll, C. C., 496, S18
Meyer, O. R, 607, 620
Meyer-Peter, E., 3'50 I'ltttel'SOll, O. W., 214
Laoey, G., 166fl., 190 Paulhus, J. L, fl., 520 Sa.bathe, G., 519, 521
Meyers, J. 8., 105 127 P~vlovski\, N. N., viit<, lOOn., 12(\,
J. L. de, 538, 552 Meynardi, G., 353 Sn.frn.nez, K, 31)3, 398, 434, 436
13h;., 136-138, 155,. 156,281 Saint-Veuant, A. J. C. Burre de, 210,
537n., 539, 550 Miller, C. N., 349, 351
L a.moen, 587 618 Miller, O. R. 190 Panati, 8" 572, 584 2171>., 525, 528; 551-;552
Laucetield, L'., 459 ' Mitcheli, W. 'D.; 326 Perronllt,' J. R., 93n. Sandover, J. A., 583 :
,Lane, E. W., 105, 127, 17011.; 174; 19(}-: ?1ockmore, C. E., 459 Pest.recov, Dr., 255n. Sao, T. T., 393, 435
.Peterka, A. J., 436
L 10~1 359, 390, 435, 476'517607 6zi ::'vloleswol'th, G. L., 189 Pickels, G. W., 126
Sn.ugey, 39411.
II>ngbelO, IV. B., 21;) , , , . ~1Qnc\snhein, H. F., G07, 621 Scha.ck, A., 619
Lansford, W. M., 9, 17 326 Mononobe, N., 253, 295 Pikalov, F. I., 436 Schaiiernak, F., 253 ,
P;jggi, B., 433, 438, 459 Schlichting, H., 195, 212
Lauffer, H., 38 ' IVIQntll.gu, A. M. R., 437
Poble, F. V., 535n., 552 Schmidt, .11>1.; viin., 329, 346, 352, 512, 584
La.wler, E. A' J 619 Moore, W. L., 204, 398-399 414n ""3
La.zard, A., 238n., 248 436-437 . . , -= , Poincare, H., 237, 247 Schr.eckcnberg, E. C., 92, 125, 127
poncelet, J. V., 21711,. Schnepper, D., 127
Leaoh, H. R, 156, 271, 295 ;)'1oots, E. 536n., 552 ,Pose)', C J, vii, 13n., 18, 246, 296, 435,'
Le e, M' J 253-254 295 Morg.a.n, C. 4141'1.., 436 Schoder, E.W., 28n., 37, 390
Lei~hly, J. B., 16:9, 191 ' Mor~~2,~93~5'1t' 12, 18, 196, 197n."
459, 607, fi21
Powell, R. W., 95, 126, 204,213- 2 14'
Schoklisch, A.) 2-53, 205, 327, 35], 437,
Lelia. vsky, S., An., 190 406n.. 436 PrandLl, L., 9, 12, 17,200-201,212, 448n.,
459, 520-521, 53Sn., 552, 568, 583,
Leo~old, L. B., 166n., 'l!lO .. Mostkow, M.
M t G
(ll 329 337 339
'" n. 352
620
LeVI, I. 1., 255n., 295 oure,., 227 238n 2:17 ' 459 SohOnfeld, J. C., 550, 58q, 618
Levin, L., 535n., 552, 587 617 Mueller, 0.) ,'" ' Prasil, F:., 358-359 SchuHer, J., 551 :
Preiswerk, E" 448n., 460 Schultz, E. A., 105, 127 :
Levy, A. G., 435 " MUhlhofer, L., 13G, 155
L~, W..R, 327, 334-336, 351 4.96 518 :Mulho\!and, W. M., 508
Price, W. H., 359 ./ Scimemi, E., 364,~., 390, 507, 520
P;.<ls, L. G., 521, 607, 620 Scobey, F; C., 103, 115, 126-127, 166,
Lighthill, M. J., 583 " MtiUer, R., 441, 45\)
Putman, H. J., 587, 618 173, 190, 213, 326
Lin, C. C., 214 M~mch-Petersen, J., 452n., 460
L~n, P. N., 587-588, 618 Seddon, J. A., 531, 551
t;ndle y , E. S." 190 Serre, F., 358, 550
Rafter, G. W., 53n., 300 Sho.ny, M. n., 392
mdquisc, E. G. W., 28n. 37 lOOn 125 Nll.ga.ra.tn~m, S.,'393, 435 Ra,lu', S.P., 17, 4ii\)
213, 393, 434 ",'" Nagler, F. A., 493, SOl, 518-520 Sha.rm:J., K. R., 437
Ra.khmanoff, A. N., 131n., 155, 281n., 296

670 SUBJECT INDEX
Channel section.s, hydrostatic catenary,
. 22, 35, 161
for irrigation c&nr.IR, 175n.
lill tearia, 22 . flow measurement in, 82-83
parabolic (sec l'ambolic channels)
rectangula.r (see Rectangular channels)
semi-elliptical, of high order, :ZOn.
tr~.pezoidal (see Tra.pezoidal channels)
tria.ngular (see Triangular channels)
yelocity distribution in, 24.-26
-vertical, 20
Channel si~e Rnd shape, 104, 106-109
Channel slope (see. Slope)
Channels, of adverse slope, 223; 25\)-260
oi compcllud sections, 138-140
curved, energy loss in, 441
erodible,IM-119
types, ix
wHh grn.dually closing crown, 67-6!1,
131-135,230-231, 261-252
. grassed, 179-188
h.orizontnl (see HQrizontal chanilels)
ice-covered, 137-138, 153
of luge slope, 33
lining, 157-158, 160
mild,223
of negative slope (~ee adV8l1le, above)
.open, IS, 26-27, 258
prismatic and nonprimnatic, 20
steep, 223
with vadnnle hydraulic exponents,
260-261
of variable slope, 238
(See also Channel·sect.ions; Circular
. channels; NOJ;lerodible channel:;;
Nonprismatic channels; Pnrabolic
chanuels; Rect.ll.ngula.r channels;
Rough channels; Slope; Trape-
ze,id"J ch,1nnels; Trill.ugular chan-
nels)
Charo.cteristic depth, 238n,
. Characteristic length, for Froude uum-
bert 13 .
for Reynolds numher, 7-8
for turbnlent mixing, 200
Characteristics, 589
Chez}' formda, 93-94
Ch6zy's C, 93-9&
formulas for, BfLzin, 95
G; Ie, 94 "
Mannillg, 100
Pavlovski( 100
Powell,95
for smooth and rough cha.nnels, 204
Chezy's resistance fn.cto·r (soe CMzy's C')
Chute, 19, 324
Chute blocks, 414
'';-.
SUBJECT INDEX 671
Circular channels, best'hydraulic section
161 . ' Continuity equation, 5 Culverts, hydraulically long, 494
of unsteady flow, 525-526 hydraulicnJly short, 494
Continuous flow, Ci" Curve resistance, coefficient of) 444
geometric elemeuts, 21,23 625-627
hydra.ulic exponent ivl, 67' Contracted--opening method, V6, 476 Curved vanes, 457
hydraulic exponentN) 132 Con traction, coeffll:iellt Of, 374-377 Curvllillear flow, 31-34
Contraction distance, 258
Manning's n in, 106, 134-135 . "
Contractiun ratio, 479·
roughness vari!ltion in, 106, 135
values, of AR'~/do~~, 130 Contractions, -17-49, 468-470 Dam-break problem, 534-536, 568
Qf Z/d ou , ti5 . Control, of !low; 70-74, 237· Darcy's friction factor, 211
of hydnmlic jump, 408-414 Darcy-Weishach formula, 8, 124
(See also Circular conduits)
Control scction, 70, 234-237 d' AubuissOll formula., 502
Circular cocduits, depth, of maximum
in laterru spillway chl>nnels, 342 Deliyery of canal, 297-306
134-135, 152
Conversion lcss, 310 for constant discharge, 300-302
of maximum velocity, 1:34-135, 152 Convex flow, 30-31 for constant downstream dellth, 299-
flow (IT-(JS, lZftn.,
Conveya;lCe, 128 300
132-136
flow profiles in, 230··231 Conyeyancfl ratio, 479 for constant upstream depth, 297~299
Co,iolis coefficient, 27 for super critical flow, 302-303
r<:nlghnllSB coefficient in, 106, 135
varied-fiow fUnction, 202 Cowo.n's method for Manning's n, 106- Delh-ery curve, 297
Circalatioll (1onsto.nt, 44G 109 Demand surge, 559
Creager prums) 364n. De Marchi profile, 354n.
Coefficient, Be llssinesq, 27
of contraction, 374-377 modified, 36411.. Denver tests, 364n .
CorioIis, 27 Critic!!.l depth,41 Depth, alternate, 41, 5511..
in circular sec tion, 82 characteristic, 238n,
of curve resistance, -1+1
curves for computation, 65 conj uga.te, 418
of discharge, for bottom rucks, 339
overrun, 533 conjugate normal, 231
through constrictions, 478-492
for overtio\\' spillway", 366
in rectangular sections, 81-82 critic!>l (see Critical depth)
Critical discharge, 64 of flow, 22
for sharp-crested weirs, 302, 3GB-369
. through rectangular sections, 66 of flow lIec tion, 22
for submerged overflow spillwo.ys,
386 through sections of various shapes, 81 initial, 46
of drag, 94n. Criticru flow, ~pplicl1.tion of energy prin- normal, 91, 129
ciple,4'2n. . in circUlar conduits, 230-231
of energy (see En~rgy coefficient)
of energy loss, 468 appliaution of theorem of momentum, determination of, 140-142
of frictioa, 171 54n, sequent, 46, 5511.., 307
of pl'es;;;lI'e distribution, 32, 50 computlltion (RM CriticpJ·flow compu- transitional, 23711.., 23B, 242-244
of retarciance, 179 tat.ion) Diffusivity, 501
of roughness) 92 criterifL, 42-43, 55, 59-60, 63 Direct-integration method, 252-262
BIl.'liin's 111, 95 definition, '13, 43, 55 Direct jurop, 45, 397
in circular cOlldtJits) 106, 135 Critical-flow oomputation, 63-70 Direct st,epmetn.od, 262-265
hydraulic exponent. for, 66'--68 Discharge, coefficient of (see Coefficient
Horton table for, 108
Kutter!s n, 04 section fa"tor of, 64 of discharge)
Manning's n (see Manning's n) Critical-flow flnme, 74 through cOllStrictions, 476-490
for closed conduits, 82-83 critica.l, 64; 68, 81
Cohesive material, pijl'missible tracth'e
fome for, 165, 174 - San Dim!l.S, 78 through culverts, 493-499
perlllissible velocity for, 165 Critical-flow profiles, 23&-241 through gates, 508
Critical roughnes;;, 195 in·ice-covered channels, 137-138
Comple.t€ method for lillstclLdy flow, M1
Corr;plete turbulence, 12 Critical sectio n, 63 'maximum, in canals, 299
Critieal slope, 53 normal, 129
Composite roughness, l:JG-140
Conc!Lve flow, 30-31 . at ·given normal depth, 142, 154 for 1-ft fa.ll, 281
Confluence of rivers, 321-323 Critical-slope cur"e, 243 through piel's) 501.,.506
Conjugate depth, 418 Critical state of flow, 13 through pile trestles, 5D6
Conjugate normal depth) 231 Critical tractive force, 172 service, 303
Critical velocity, 13 transitiona.l, 242
ConsolidlLted-shear test, ~ 73n.
.Constant critical flow, channel of, 82 Cross waves, 448, 468 through trash rll.cks, 506-507
Const!).nt hydratilic radius ehannel, 152 Cui verts, 20 . Discharge rating curve, 70
Constrictions, 475-476 flow through, 493-499 for inflow to canals, 805
flow proJiles in, 265-266 Discontinuo\lB flow, 5
backwa.ter due to, 490-493 , .'
flow types in, 496-499 Displacemeat thickness, 193
672. SUBJECT INDEX SUBJECT INDEX 673
Diatribution (see Pressure distribution) Ezra method, 272-274 Flow, torrential, 13 Freeboard, 159-160, 311
Disturbance lines, 449, 454-455 for natural channels, 284:-292 tranquil, 13. Friction·, coefficient of, 171
Douma formulu" 36 turbulent (see Turbulent flow) Friction barrier, 562, 565
Drag, coeffieit)ut of, 94n. uniform (see Uniform flow) Friction factor, 8~ 13 ..
Drag force, 168n. . . foR relationship, 8-13 Ullstcac\y (see Unsteady Bow) Friction loss in transitions, 319
Drain tiles, 1'0ughness variation in, 135 for roughchannelll, 11-13 unsteady varied, 6, 7, 523 Friction velocity, 195, 201
Drawdown curve, 71 for !IIIlooth channels, 9-10 varied,6 Frictionless rectangUlar chaJlnels, 292
Drop, 20 Factor, of flow resistance, 91 wake-interference, 12n.) 196 Froude number, 13, 43
Drop energy dissipator, 42Zn., 424-425 ;;hape,210 Flow control, 70-74, 237 Function, bed-load, 166n.
Diop number, 423 . Fall increaser, 394n. Flow-line computll.tion, 608 varied-flow, 254

I
Drop spillways, 423-425 F&.w<)r tbeory, 358 Fl'),;,{ measurement, 72--81
Drowned-out hydraulic jumps, 425 Fish skimmer, 337 }I'low-net analysis, 358, 374, 384
Drum gates, 380-382, 507n. Flip b.ucket, overflow spillways, 85-36 Flow pro liles, analysis, 232-237 G. K. formula, 94
Dynamic equatioo, of gradually varied Flood discharge, cllmputation, 146-148, in channels; of adverse slope, 259-260 graphical solution, 95
flow, 218-222 476-490 with gradualli closing crown, 230- Ganguillet and Kutter formula (see
for spatially varied flow, 332 Flood plain, roughness of, 104, 113 231, 261-262 G. K. formuia)
for uniformly progressive flow; 531 Flood routing, 586 of variable hydraulic exponents, 261 Gates, drum, 380-382, 507n.
lor unsteady flow, 526-528 Flood synthesis, 586 or variab1e slope, 238 overflow,S07n.
Dynamic viScosity, 8 Flo,", concave, 30-31 cla::sification of, 226-232 radial (Tainter) I 507-5ill
continuous, 5 .in closed oonduits, 230-231 rolling, 507-508 .
convex, 30-31 critical, 238-241 sluice ($8e Sluice gates)
Easement curve, 457 critical (see CritiellJ flow) dillcontin'Jity in, 224 Tainter (rndial), 507-512
Eddy loss, 267 curvilinear, 31 in Idctionless rectanguial' cha.nnels, underflow, 507-512
Efficiency of hydraulic jump, 896 depth,2Z 292 . Gauckler formula, 99\'1.
Einstein's bed-load function, 161m. discontinuous, 5 in horizontal channels, 259-260 GEDA fiood computer, 609
End point of backwater, 319 . gradually varied, 6-7 in nonprisIDll.tic channels, 235-237, Geometric el1~ment8, ·01 channel section,
Energy, minimum, tbeorem of, 42 grl\dually varied unsteady, 7 306-309 22 .
in nonprisnllLtic channels, 40-49 instability oi, 204 point of inflection in, 224-227, 292 of circular section, 21, 23, 625-627
in open-channel fiow, 39-40 isolated-roughness, 12n., 196 along side weir, 340-341 curves of, 270-271 .
specific, 41 lamirlll.r,7 o(spa.tially varied fiow, 235-237, of parabolic channels, 639
in surges, 565-(;66 opeu-chanuel (see Open-channel liow) 333-331 . of paraboli<: sections, 21
Energy coefficient, 21 overland,544 transitional, 238 of rectangular sections, 21
in spatially varied flow, 345 parallel, 30, 33 types, 241 rounded-cornered, 21
at sudden transitions, 465-466 passing islands, 320-321 nodal, .• of trapezoidal section, 21
Energy dissipators, bucket-type, 408 pipe, 4 sp.ddle, 241 of triangular section, 21
drop-type, 42211.., 42·4-425 progressive, 540, 555-557 spiral, 241 round-bottom, ·21
hydraulic jump for, 404-408 pulsating, 580 vortex, 241 Gra.dient., energy, 40
impaot-tYpe, 422n,. quasi-normal, 23811.. typical examples, 229 velocity, 200
Energy equation, B!;'rnoulli, 40 quasi-smootb, 12n., 196 in wide horizontal channels, 292 Gradual hydre.u!ic jump, 45
Energy grade line, 3 rapid, 13 Flow~resistll.Llce fa.ctor, 91 Gradually varied now, (}
Energy gradient, slope of, 40 rapidly varied, 6 Flumed drop, 415 basic assumptions, 217-218
Energy line, 3 rapidly. varied unsteady, 7 Flumes, 19 dynamic equatIon of, 218-222
Energy loss, coefficient of, 46.8 regimes of, 14:-16 Parshall, 72--81 for wide rectangular channeLs, 222
in hydraulic jump, 60 rough-surfMe, 196-198 Force, drag, 168n. Gra.du!l.lly-varied~Row equation, 219-222
(See also Losses) sec?ndary, 12, 439 plu:! momentum, 54/1.. in tapered· channels, 246
Energy reoovelY through obstructions, shooting, 13 shear, 168n.. Gradually varied unsteady flow, 7
50U skimn:>lng, 196 specific, 53-56 Gra.phical-integration method, 249-252
Entrance to cano.ls, 304-305 slug, 581 of stream, 5<1n. Grassed channels, 179-188
Equations of characteristics, 588 spatially varied (see Spatio.lIy varied tracth-e (.ee Tractive force) centipede, 180 .
Eqttivo.lent n value, 136 flow) Force coefficient, 50 design, examples, 186-188
Erodible channels, 164-179 .spiral, 25-26, 439-440 Fort Collins test,g, 364n. for maximum capa.city, 181-188
types, ix state of, 7-14 Foriier-Scobey table of permissible for stability, 186-187
Erosion below gates, 512 steady, 5 velocities, 165-166 design procedure, 184:-188
Escailde profile, 364n. • steady uniform, 5 Fourier's law, 601 n-VR curves, 182-183
Expansion in chanllel, 57-59 streaming, 13 Free overfall, 44 permillsfule velocity, 184-185
Expansion wave, oblique, 449, <f54 , . subcritical, t3 Free surface, 3 retardance, cJ.a;ssmca tiOD, 181
Expansions, 470-414 . supercritical, 13 Free vortex, 446 selection, 184
 !I'
I ,
6'74 SUBJEC'l' INDEX
Grassed chllJlnels, se'leei;ion of graSS' 184
Gravity effect on flow,]3
Gravity wave, 13 ' in sloping cllann.els, 425-429
Grimm method, 280n.
H pro files, 230
H.llgen formulo.,' 99n.
Hangchow bore, 558
Heppner flood, 558
High stage, 41 , weak,39S
Highway gutter, flow in, 151
Horizontal channels, flow profiles in, 259-
260
varied floW in, 333-337
slope, 223
Hor~on equation, 546
Horton'table for roughness coefficient,
108
bore, 534, 557-558
depth, 13, 23
arop, 43-44
gradual,45
Hydraulic exponent lYI, 66-68
, graphical determination, 68
Hydraulic e:~p()nent N, 131
g;raphical determination, 133
variation with depth, 132-134
,Hydraulic exponents, of circular con-
duits, 67, 132
for critical-ilow computation (see:
, Hydraulic exponcll.t M)
for uniform-flow computation (se~
Hydraulic exponent N)
Hydraulic gr!l.de line 3
Hydraulic jump, 45-'46
applications, 393-394
characteristi~s, 396-398
control, 408-414
[, abrupt drop for, 412-414
a.brupt rise for, 411-412
direct, 45, 391
r drowned-01.\t, 425
efficiency, 396
i elimination of, in canals, 305-306,
at transitions, 57-59, 3l4.
a,s dissipatvI, 404--408
energy in, 60
gradual,45
height, 396
initial depth, 45
length, 398-399
I loc~tion, 390-404
( moving, 557
ob)ique, 429-431
oscjllating, 395
in pllZe.bollc chiJ.llnels, 432
Hydraulic jump, relatIve loss, 396
" sequent depth, 46
steady, 3f/5-396
strong) 395-396
submerged below sluice, 60
surface profiles, 399
in trapezoiual channels 431
types, 395-396, 407-408
undular, 45, 395
: dis,~harge in, 350
Rydro.ulic ra.dius, 23
Hydra.ulic routing, 586
Hydrogra.ph, 543, .592
Hydrologic routing, 586, 804
Hydrostatic catena.q, 22, 35, 161
Ioe-covered channels, 137-138, 153
Impact-type energy dissipator, 422n.
Inflow-discharge-rating curve 305'
Initial depth, 46 ' LocD-l phenomenon, 6, 43-'Hi
relative, 396
Inlet loss, 311
Instability of flow, 204, 210
Inverted sipholl, 317-319
Irrigation canals. 175n.
Islands in rivers; 320-321
lsoclinal method, 346-347
Isola.ted-roughneilll flow, 12n., 196
Jaeger theorem, 5571.: '
Johnson method, 570-572
Johnstown flood, ,558
Jonfl5 formula, 533
Junction problems, 321-323, 512-516
for surges, 578-580
I(o.nsll.S River, flow-prof.ie' computntJon,
276-292 ' international adoption, lOOn.,
junction problem, 321
Kennedy fornnlla, 16671.:'
:Kinematic vLqcosity, 7-8
Kinetic.fiow factor, 13n.
Kineticity, l3n.
Kir~chmer data for rough channels, 11
KIeltz-Seddon principle, 529
Kutter's'l1" 94 ' of drain tiles, 135
dimensions oi, 9871..
Lacey's regime theory)166n.'
Ladder of cascades, 43'3
Lagrange celerity equation, 538
Laminar boundary layer, 193
'
SUBJECT INDEx
Lamiu!Lr flow, 7
criterion, 7-8, 150
unst,eady, spatially vaded, 543
Lnminar suble.yer, 194
Laminar surf!!.Ce flow, spatially varied,
348:"349, 543 ' theorem, 59n.
uniform, 149-150
Laue-Davis profile, 364n.
Later8.1 spillway channels, 342-346
Lateral tra.ctive force, 176
Leach diagram, 271-272
Length, cn!>racteristic, 7-8, 13
mixing, 200
Limit, liquid, 173n.
{lla~tic, 17371.,
Limit slope, 142,243-244 ,
Lining of channels, 151-158, 160
Lintearia, 22
Liquid limit, 173n.
Losses, energy; in channels, 21871..,
due, to conversion, 310
to eddy, 267
at inlet, 311
at outlet, 311'
in pipes, 8
o.t transitions, 310-311
Low stage, 41
Lowel' normal depth, 231
Lucite, 10811.., 110
M profiles, 228
M value (see Hydraulic exponent At)
Maddock-Leopold's principle of nhannel
geometry, l66n.
Manning; formula, 93
exponent for, 99n.--l00n.
. for friction factor I, 124
nomog;ra'Pruc solution, 840
lVhnning's n, 99
in circular conduits, 106, 134-135
composite roughness, 135-·140
determinatipn oC, 101-123, 206-210
Cowan'll method for, 106,.,109
dimensions, 9an.-!l9n.
equivalent value, 136
faciors afieqting, 101-1m~
on flood plains, 104;
for friction factor I. 124
for ice-covered channels, 137-138
for Panama Canal, 105-106
photographs of channels for, 114-123
relation to roughness height, 206
675
Manning's 11-, for sewers, 106, i35
table ior, 108-114 .
theoretical interpretation, 205
Maximunl discharge, in c8.nals,299
in circula.r conduits, 134-136
Maximum permissible velocity, 157, 165-
167 '
Maximum velocity, 24-25
Meandering, 106-109:
Method, of characteristics, 44811., 587
of diffusion analogy, 601
of dired integration, 252-262
of finite increments, 541
of numerical integration, 261-262, 3 111-
34G
of permissible velocity} 1[14, 167-168
of rela.Xll.tion, 358, 37411.., 384
of singula.r 'Point, 237-242
of tr!l.ctive force, 164, 175
of tria.l and error for unsteD-dy flow,
5i1
Mild channels, 223
Mild slope, 63
Minimum-energy th!:!ocem, 42
l\'linimum penniEsible velocity, 158
Mississippi River, Ba.~in'll1'1, 97
Chezy's C, 97
. diffusi vi ty, 602
gagings,94
junction problem, 322-323
Rutter's n, 97
Ma.nning',s n, 105
roughness datil., 206-207
Missouri River, ftQw~prQlile computa.tion,
27&:-292
junction problem, 321
Mixed progressive flow, 540
Mixing lengtll, 200
Momentum of o!len.channel no,,', 49-53
Momentum coefficient, 27
Momentum flux of stream, 54?t.
Momentum principle, 49; 56-59
Monaclin::.! rising. wave, 528
Moving hydraulic jump, 557
Muskingum method, 60(J-(\07
N value ($ee Bydnl.lilic exponent N)
n-VR curves, 180, 182-183 .
~a.gler formula, 501
~appe, over spillways, 370-37?, 387
: over weirs, 361 '
Na.ppe aera.tion, 362-363
Naviga.tion canals, 572-575
Negative slope, 223.
Negative surges, 566-568
676 SUBJECT INDEX
Negatively progressive flow, 540
NeutceJizing reach, 306
Nikuradse sand roughness, 202
Nikuradse's dfl,!.tt for smooth and rough
pipes, 20l~204
Nodal flow pro.fi1es, 241
N oncohesi ve material, angle of'repose,
171-172
tractive force, 173-174
Nonerodible channels, 157
design, by best hydraulic section, 161
by width-depth r!ltio, 162-163
Nonerodible velocity, 165
Nopprisroa.tic chll.l:mels, 20
application of momentum principle,
5&-59
energy in, 46-49
flow profiles in, 235-237, 306-309
gradually-varied-flow equation, 246
Nonsilting and noneroding velocity, 166
Nonsilting velocity, 158
Nonsustaining slope, 223, 259
Normsl depth, 91, 129
in circular conduits, 230-231
coill ugate, 231
for comput,a.tion, 130
aeterml,oatao·n of, 140-1'42
lower, 231
upper, 231
Normal discharge, 129
Normal slop'l, 142
Number, Boussinesq, 13n.
Froude, 13, 43
Reynokls,7
Vedernikov, 210
Weber, ix
Oblique expansion wave, 449; 45,1,
Oblique hydraulic jump, 429-431
Obstructions, 104, 106-109, 499--501
Ohio River junction problem, 322-323
Open channel, 19
wide, 26-27
Open-channeHiow,3
energy lu, 39-4{)
momentulD in, 49-53
state, 7-14.
t.ypes, 4-7
Open-flow tunnel, 20
Oscilla.ting jump,.396
Oscillating wave, 523n,
Outlet and entrance of canals} 304-306
Outlet loss,
Overliow 507n,
O"erf!ow spillwa.ys (see Spillwa.ys)
Overland £low, 14, 149, 544
Overrun, 529
Overrun critica.l depth, 533
Panama. Canal, for, 105
Parabolic channels, 188
best hydraulic section, Hll
geometric elements, 63£1
of high order, ZOn.
hydraulic jump in, 432
Parall"l flow, 30
pressure distriou tio!! in, 33
Parsha.ll flume, 72-81 .
PavlC'vskii forlllula., 100,
Permissible maXimu.lTI veloc.itie:o, 1657166'
Permissible traetiv!,\ force, 165, 172~174
(SeE, also Tractiva force)
Permissible velpcities, ror cohesive ma- '
terial, 165--167
corrections for dElpth and sinuosity,
167 ' wide, '25-27
in grassed channels, 184-185
maximum, 157, 165-167
method of, 167-168
minimu..-u, 158
U.S.S.R. data, 166-167
Piers, baffle, 415
bridge, 501-1506
in gated spillways, 370-380
Pile trestles, 506 '
Pipe flow, 3
PitO& sphere, 440
Plastic limit, 173n.
Plasticity index, 173n.
Positive slope, 223
Posi',ive surge, 559--566
Positively progressive flo,;\', 540
Powell formula, 95
Powell's f,.98
Power canals, 568-572
Prandtl-von Karman curve, 12
PrandtI-von IC&rmAn equation, 9
Prandtl-von Ka.rman universal-velocity- ':'
distribution la.w, 201
Pressure on gates, 510-512
Pressure coefficient, 32
Pressure distribution, 30-34
coefficieuts, 32, 50
in curvilinear fiow, 34
effect of slope on, 32-34
hydrostatic 1e.w of, 30'-32
in parallel How, 33
Pressure-dlstribu tion ooefficien ts, 32, 50
Pressure-head correction, 31
Prismatic channel, 20
Progressive flow, 540, 554-557
Puisa.ting flow, 580 ' "',0 size a.nd shape, 104, 106-109
, SUBJECT INDEX' 677
".
Q-constant curve, 300 . Roughness, chlJ.Ilnel, of i~e-()Qvered
Quasi-normal flow, 238n. channels, 137-138
Quasi-smooth flow, 121>., 196 isolated, 196 .
relative, 195
size measure, 11
'Radial (Tainter) ga,te, 507-512 surface (see Smface roughness)
Raft chute, 324 varia.tion in sewers, 135 '
Rapid flow, 13 'Roughness coefficient (see Coefficien t, of
Ra.pidly varied flow, 6 roughness) ,
Roughness factor for overland flow, 545
ch,\r!Lcteristics, 357
Rapidly varied unsteady How, 7 Roughness height, 195-196
related to Manning's n, 206
r
{
Recovary of velocity head, 311
RectAngular chJlnnels, best hydra,ulic Routing, hydraulic, 586'
section, 61 hydrologic, 586, 604
frictionless, flow profile in, 2!l2 Routing period, 605
geometric el~ments, 21 Rugosity coefficient, 92n.
hydra,ulic exponents, 66-67, 132
round--corneri:d, 20-21
values, or. AR;;/dD'~, 130 B pro Jiles, 228-·230
of Z/rlG u , 65 S~ddle How'proJiles, 241
SAF stilling basin, 4) 5-417
Reflection ooefficient, 577 Saint-Venant celerity equation, 5S8
Regime theory, 165'n.. San Dimas flume, 78 .
Regimes of flow, 14-16 Scale ratio, model, 16
Rebbock 41411. Scimemi profile, 364n.
Rehhock formula, 352 Scouring, 103-104, 406-407,512
Rejection 559 Secondary flow, 12, 439
Relative of hydraulic jump, 396 Section factor, for critical-flow compu-
Rclative loss of hydraulic jump, 396 tation, 23, 64 ,
Relative roughness, 195 f'Jr uniform-flow computa.tion, 23, 128
Reserroir rou ting, 586 Separation of flow, 471
Resistanc<;l modulus, 28h, Sequent depth, 46, 55n.
Retarciv.ncc, coefficient of, 179 relative, 397
degree of, 181
Reynolds number, 7
critical, 8-9
Sen-ice die charge in eana.ls, 303
Sewers, roughnBSs vll.riation in, 135
Shape factor, 210
I \
,I
.)
Rippl mass curve, 607 Sharp-orested weirs, 360-362
River hydraulics, lS Bazin da.ta. ior, 36B, 382, 3QO
Road surface. flow on, 348-349 for jump control, 40Q-410
Roll waves, 210, 535, 581 Shear foree, 168n.
discovery, 210 Sheaf velocity, 201
' Rolling gates, 507--508 Sheet flo,;\', 14, 148 )
Rough cb&nnels, Bazht's data, 11, 204 Shock wave, 4Z9n., 448n.
~ j-R relationship, 11
Kirschmer's data, 11
Shooting flow, 13
Side-channel spillways, 328
[
Vanvick's data., 11-12 Side slopes of channel, 158-159
velocity distribution in, 202 Side weirs, 340-341
Rough pipes, Nikuradse's data., 202n. Sills, in curved channels, 457
R(JUgh-surface flow, 196-198 I(lr jump control, 408-409, 414
Roughness, channel, artificial, 202n, Silting, 103-104 '
Bll.zin data fot, 11, 95, ggn. , Singular point, 238
composite, 136-140 Ski-jump spillways, 384--385
critica.l} 195 Skimming flow, 196
aue, to alignment, 103, 106-109 SIQpe, cha.nnel, adverse, 223
to bed load, 106 change in, 232-234
to irregularities, 103 critical, 63, 142, 154
definition, 4011.., 94n.
"

II
678 SUBJECT INDE.'4
Slope, channel, effect on pressure dis- SimJECT INDlllX 679
tributiou J 32-34 Spillways, overflow, boundary layer on
199-200· , Sllpercritjcru slope, 63 , Transitions, gradual, 47-49, 51-59,310-
horizontal, 223 '
. bu.cket a.t toe, 36, 384 Supercritieal state of flow, 13 : 319 '
large, 33
crest shapes, 363-365 Superelevlltion, 439 ' , sudden, 461-468
limit, 142, 243-244
mild, 63 design ot1l9ction, 367-358 Surface curve, 222 surges through, 575-578
design head, 368--369 Surface flow, .spatially varied, 347-349 Transitory zone of uniform flow, 90
negative, 223
discharge of, 365-370 spatially varied unsteady, 543 Tl'!l.nsla.tory l'rave, 523 .
non sustaining, 223, 259 flip bucket, 35-36 '
norm(J.l, 142 uniform, 148-150 ,. 'rrll.p3~oidli.1 channels, best hydraulic
flow at toe, 382-384 Surface irr.eg\ll!1rities, 106-109' ~ilctioll, 161-162
, '.~

positive, 223
Fort Collins teats, 364n. Surface roughness, 101-102 geometric elements, '21, G2D-G~i7
side, 158--159 gated, 370-374
sIllall, 33 ,~oncept, 104 hydraulic expDnent M, 66-67
subcritical, 63 na.ppe profiles on, 370-373,,387 explanatio1l; 194 hydraulic exponent N, 131-132
,preiJaure on, 374, 378-380, <387 hydraulically rongh, 1-95 hydraulic jumps in, 431
Sli percri tico.i, 63
rating, 3G8-S70 . nydraulic!l.lly smOGtll, 195 values, of AR'Sldo'i, 130
sustaining; 223
submerged, 385-388 wa.vy, 195 of Z/dou, 65
variable, 238 sidc-cha.nnel, 328
zero, 223 Surface tensiou, 7, TrllSh racks, 506-507
ski-jump, 384-385 Surge. 5S7 Trin.ngular channels, 20
of channel bottom, 4() Spiral flow, 25-26, 439,
for 'energy gradient, 40 demand,559 best hydraulic seotion, 161
strength, 440 energy in, 565-566 geometric elements, 21, 639
of ellergy line, 40 Spiral flow 2-11
ill uniform ilow, 40 at junctions, 578-580' l'ollnded:bottom, 20-'21
Stahle hydraulic section, 1'76-179 in navigation caT.lnls, 572-575 Turbulence, cDmp!ete, 12
of water surface, 40 Stage, 22
Slope-area method 146-148 negative, 566-568 Turbulent boundary layer, 193
high and low, 41 positive, 559-566 Turbulent flow, 7
Slug flow, 581' "
Stage-fa.ll-discharge methOd, 280-284 in power ca.nals, 563-572 criterioll, 7-8, 150
,Sluice gates, 507-510
contraction dista.oce after, 258 Stage-verslls-Q/Wcurve, 281 rejection, 559 mllan velocity, 20J-205
How profile 24.0 257 Stage routing, 607 t.hrough transitions, 575-578 unsteady spatially varied, 546
submerged jump afte-~, 60 Stand of grass, 180 Suspended load, 106 velooity distribution, 200-202
Standard step method, 2tl5-268 Sustaining slope,223 Turbulent surface flow, spatia!!y varied,
vena contracta I:lelow, 401
Smetana profile, 364n. for natural ch9Jlneis 271-280 348
Standing swell, '402 ' uniform, 150
Smooth pipes, Nikuradse data for 20ln.
204 ' I
Standing \1'8."6, 393n. Tables, geometric elements of circular
Stanton diagram, 8 conduits, 625-627
Solitary wave, 537-538
St!1.te of flow, laminr..r, 1 permissible velocities, 165, 1S5 tntrarapid velocit.y, 89
Spatially varied flow, 5
sub critical. 13 roughness coefficient n, 109-i13 Underflow gates, 507-512
afiillysis of flow profiles, 235-237 llupercritic'9-1. 13 varied-flnw function!!, 255,259, 641- Undular jump, 45, 395
through bottom rack 337-340 transitional,' 7 661 Uniform flow, 5
with dscreasing discharge, 328-329, tlIrbulcnt, 7 Tainter gate, 507-1H2 computation, 128-150
332-333, 346 I
Steady flow, 5 Theorem, of maximum discharge, 5%. establishment, 88-91
dynamic equation for 332 Steady jump, 395-396 of minimunl energy, 42 que.lificnticins, 88
in horizontal cha.nnel~, 333-337 Steady uniform flow, 5 II Thermal diffusivity, 601 instabili ty, 210
with increasing .discharge, 327-332, Steep cbanneld, 223 Tidal hydraulics, ii, 5231'1.< steady, 5
341-:-142
StolP method, direct, 262-265 L TOIl- width" 22 theoretical equation for, 202-205
method of numerical integration 341-
345 .. ' stlludard, 265-268, 274-280
St,ilIing basin, 401 , t To,:nintill.l flow, 13
Total force nf stream, 54n.
transito ry oon e, 90
unstea.dy,5
-
through side weirs, 340-341 generalized design, 414-411) Tractive force, 168 Uniform-flow equations, theoretical,
surfllCe flow, 347-349 SAF, 415-417 , critical, 172 202-205 '

I
types of, 334 distribul;ion, 169 Uniform-flow forrhula.s, 91
with sloping apron, 427-429
unsteady surfaoe, ,543 USBR,415, 417-422, 427-429 : lateral, 176 Uniform surfaoe flow, 148-150
Spatially-varied-flow eqlu~tion 332 Streaming flow, '13 ' . method of design for, 175 criterion, 150
Spncific energy, 41 ' Strength of spiral flow 440 p~rmissible, 165, 172-174 Uuiformly progressive ftolt,
Specific-energy curve 41-42 Strickler formula, 99n.', 206 unit, 168, }(i9, 173 dyna.mic equation, 531
Specific force, 53-56 ' . Strickler's. constant, 20(3, Tr~ctive-forc"l ratio, 170-171 wave pro£ile, 533-537 . j
Specific-force curve, 54 Strong jump, 3g5-396 Tra.nqui! flow, 13 . Uniformly progressive WlIve, 528,,·· .!
Spillway channel, 306-309 342-346 Subcritical slope, 63 Tra.nsition loss, 3LO-311 ' Unit flood, 602
Spillways, box inlet '424 Subcriticll.l sta.te of flow, 13 Tlranaitional depth, 2;!7n., 238, 2'!2-244' Unlt tractive force, 168
straight, ' , distribution, 169
, ;~

Sublltyel', laminM 194 Transitional discharge, 242

overflow, Bn.zin data fOf, 363-364 8lldClen tni.nsition~, 461-468 Trllnsil;ional pro.file, 238 maximum, 169
Transitionailitate of flow, 7 permissible, 173

f·
I,
680 SUllJECT INDEX

UNIVAC, 601 . Viscosity, dynamic, 8

Univemal-velocity-distribution lq,w, 201 effect on flow, 7
Unsteady How, 5-6, 523 . kinematic, 7-8
continuity, 525-526 of water, 8
dynamic equation, 526-528 Vortex flow profiles, 241
rll.pidly varied, 1
Unstendy uniform flow, 5
Unsteady varied flow, 6, 1, 523 Wake-interference flow, 12n., 196
Upper normal depth, 2:31 Wash-water troughs, 34.9
U8BR stilling basins, 415, 411-422,427- Water area, 22 .
429 Wat.!r seal, 317
Wave angle, 429
Wave pro Olea, uniformly progressive
Varjerl flow, 1) flml', 533-537
gradually I 6' Wave suppressors, 422n.
gradua.lly unsteady, 7, 523 Wa.ves, capillary, 12 .
rapidly, 6 graVity, 13 . ,1
rapidly unstell.dy, 7, 523
spatially, 5, 327
monoclinal rising, 528
. oblique expansion, 449, 454.
,
Varied-flow fUllction, 254 oscillatory, 523n.
for adverse slopes, 259 propagation, 13, 537
far circula.r conduits, 262 roll, 210, 535, 581·
tables, 255, 259, 641-561 . shock, 42\1n., 448n.
Varwick'a data for rough channe18, 11- solitary, 531-538
12 translatory, 523
Vedemikov number, 210 uniformly progressive, 528
Vegetll.l retardance, 171l, 184 Weak jump, 395
Vegeta.tion roughness, 102-103, 106-109 Weber nu.mber, Ix
Velocity, critical, 13 Weirs, broad-crested (see Broad-<:rested
friction, 195, 201 weirs)
measurement, 21 sharp-<:rested, 360-362
nonerodible, 165 Villemonte sill for, 80
nonsilting. 158 Weisbach formula, 501
and non eroding, 166 WEB Ge~al Spillway Tests-CW 801,
shear, 201 . . ~64, 37011.. , 374
uLtmrnpid, 89 WES st~ndard spillway shapes, 364-
Velooity distribution, 24-26 '365
t,urbulent.flow, 200-202 iQietteo-perimeter, 22
Velocity-distribution coefficients, 21':"30 Wide horizonta,l channels, 292
for compound sections, 139-140 Wide open cbapnel, 2f1-27 .
equations lor, 211 critical a.nd normal depths in, 258
Velocity-distribution law, 201 Width-depth ratio, 162-163
Velocity gradient, 200
Velocity-head ratio, .l3n.
Vebcity-head recovery, 311 Ya.ngtze River, diffusivity, 602
Vena contracta below sluiee, 401
Venturi flUme, 14 .
Vrilemonte weir sill, 80 Zero :slope, 223