Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Facts:
A year after his appointment as Chief Justice, Impeachment complaints were filed
against Renato Corona based on the alleged grounds of betrayal of public trust,
culpable violation of the Constitution, and graft and corruption. Subsequently, the
Senate declared Chief Justice Corona unfit to hold such a lofty position and removed
him from his office.
Years after the impeachment, the widow of the Chief Justice, Mrs. Corona, now prays
that she be allowed to reap the retirement benefits, other gratuities, and survivorship
pension. She believes that the late Chief Justice is entitled to these benefits, having
toiled for more than 20 years in public service until he was unseated.
Issue: whether retirement benefits, other gratuities, and survivorship pension should
be accorded to Mrs.Corona despite the late Chief Justice’s ouster. YES
Ruling:
The effects of a judgment on an impeachment complaint extends no further than to
removal from office and disqualification from holding any public office. Since a removal
by impeachment does not explicitly provide for forfeiture as a consequence thereof,
an impeached official, like former Chief Justice Corona, cannot be deprived of his
retirement benefits on the sole ground of his removal. Such forfeiture could have been
imposed upon criminal conviction which, however, was pre-empted by his death.