Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Overview
and Genetic Resources,
Traditional Knowledge
and Traditional Cultural
Expressions
2015
© World Intellectual Property Organization, 2015.
Certain rights reserved. WIPO authorizes the partial reproduction, translation and dissemination
of this publication for non-commercial and non-profit scientific, educational or research purposes,
provided that WIPO and the publication are properly identified and acknowledged. Permission to
substantially reproduce, disseminate and/or translate this publication, or compile or create deriva-
tive works therefrom, in any form, whether for commercial/for profit or nonprofit purposes, must be
requested in writing. For this purpose, WIPO may be contacted at www.wipo.int under “Contact us.”
Certain images used in this publication have been obtained from commercially available databases
to which WIPO subscribes.
Disclaimer:
This publication does not necessarily represent the views of WIPO or any of its Member States. This
publication is not a substitute for legal advice. Its purpose is limited to providing basic information.
Cover Images:
Medicinal plant, Bhutan/Fei Jiao
Photographer documenting cultural heritage, Jamaica/Brigitte Vézina
Traditional Jewelry, Oman/Brigitte Vézina
Zambian dancers/Wend Wendland
Intellectual Property
Overview
and Genetic Resources,
Traditional Knowledge
and Traditional Cultural
Expressions
2015
Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions
Contents
2
Overview
List of Boxes
3
Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions
4
Overview
5
Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions
The objective of this booklet is to offer gen- However, this booklet does not delve into
eral and basic information on the interface all the specific issues that can emerge
between intellectual property (IP) and when addressing the IP protection of
traditional knowledge (TK), traditional TK, TCEs and the relationship of IP with
cultural expressions (TCEs), and genetic GRs; it is complemented by a series of
resources (GRs). It briefly addresses the “Briefs” (indicated in italics throughout
most important questions that arise when this booklet) that tackle in greater detail
considering the role that IP principles the following areas, among others:
and systems can play in protecting TK
and TCEs from misappropriation, and in • Traditional Knowledge and
generating and equitably sharing benefits Intellectual Property
from their commercialization, and the • Intellectual Property and the
role of IP in access to and benefit-sharing Documentation of Traditional
in GRs. Knowledge
• Policy Options for National Systems
It covers such issues as: • The WIPO Intergovernmental
Committee on Intellectual Property
• What are TK, TCEs and GRs? and Genetic Resources, Traditional
• Why provide IP protection to TK, Knowledge and Folklore (IGC)
TCEs and GRs? • Intellectual Property and the
• What does “protection” mean? Protection and Promotion of
• Who should benefit from the IP Handicrafts
protection of TK and TCEs? • Intellectual Property and Arts
• And many others… Festivals
• Customary Law and the Protection
of Traditional Knowledge and
Traditional Cultural Expressions
• Traditional Medical Knowledge
• Traditional Knowledge and
Alternative Dispute Resolution
6
Overview
7
Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions
8
Overview
Background
to the Need for
the Protection
of Traditional
Knowledge,
Traditional Cultural
Expressions, and
Genetic Resources
9
Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions
10
Overview
11
Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions
TK and GRs are discussed in the area of biological diversity, where several important inter-
national instruments exist. These include the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and
the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing
of Benefits Arising from their Utilization, the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources
for Food and Agriculture of the Food and Agriculture Organization, the International Union for
the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV), and the 1994 UN Convention to Combat
Desertification (UNCCD).
TK, TCEs and GRs are also raised in the context of the World Trade Organization (WTO)
Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS). While the
TRIPS Agreement has no specific provisions on the issue of TK, the Doha Declaration, in
2001, instructed the TRIPS Council to examine the protection of TK and TCEs. Furthermore,
discussions on the relationship between the TRIPS Agreement and the CBD are taking place
within the TRIPS Council since the built-in review of Article 27.3 (b) in 1999.
The protection of TCEs raises issues related to the preservation and safeguarding of cul-
tural heritage, notably within the ambit of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and
Cultural Organization (UNESCO) World Heritage Convention (1972) and Convention for
the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage (2003). It also forms part of the context of
the promotion of cultural diversity and of the UNESCO Convention on the Protection and
Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions (2005).
TCE protection is discussed in such contexts as the respect for cultural rights, the promotion
of artistic development and cultural exchange and the promotion of tradition-based creativity
and innovation as ingredients of sustainable economic development.
12
Overview
13
Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions
14
Overview
TCEs are, succinctly, the forms in which TCEs may be either tangible, intangible,
traditional culture is expressed. They can or, most usually, a combination of the
be, for example, dances, songs, handicraft, two. Indeed, in any material object, there
designs, ceremonies, tales or many other is often a symbolic or religious element
artistic or cultural expressions. from which it cannot be separated. An
example would be a woven rug (a tangi-
TCEs are seen as integral to the cultural ble expression) that expresses elements
and social identities and heritage of indig- of a traditional story (an intangible ex-
enous and local communities, reflecting pression).
core values and beliefs.
Although “expressions of folklore” was
TCEs are handed down from one gen- the term used most commonly in in-
eration to another, and are maintained, ternational discussions and is found in
used or developed by their holders. They many national laws, some communities
are constantly evolving, developing and have expressed reservations about the
being recreated. negative connotations associated with
the word “folklore.” WIPO nowadays uses
the term “traditional cultural expressions”
(or simply “TCEs”). Where it is used, “ex-
pressions of folklore” is understood as a
synonym of TCEs.
15
Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions
16
Overview
Musical expressions: songs and in- The adjective “traditional” qualifies a form
strumental music of knowledge or an expression which has
a traditional link with a community: it is
Expressions by actions: dances, plays, developed, sustained and passed on
artistic forms of rituals, etc.; whether or within a community, sometimes through
not reduced to a material form specific customary systems of transmis-
sion. In short, it is the relationship with
Tangible expressions: drawings, paint- the community that makes knowledge
ings, carvings, jewelry, metalware, textiles, or expressions “traditional.”
designs, carpets, sculptures, pottery,
terracotta, crafts, mosaic, needlework, For example, the essential characteristics
basket weaving, woodwork, costumes; of “traditional” creations are that they
musical instruments, architectural forms, contain motifs, a style or other items
etc. that are characteristic of and identify a
tradition and a community that still bears
and practices it. They are often regarded
as “belonging” to the community.
17
Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions
18
Orchid ©iStock.com/alxpin
19
Overview
Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions
20
Overview
21
Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions
22
Overview
©iStock.com/bruwellphotography
23
Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions
24
Overview
The principle of PIC concerning access to GRs is one of the cornerstones of the CBD (See
Article 15, which recognizes that States have sovereign rights over their GRs). Given the
close relationship between GRs and some forms of TK, this same principle is also used
in a number of national laws concerning access to and use of TK, as well as use of TCEs
in some cases.
According to the principle of PIC, holders should be fully consulted before their knowledge/
expression/genetic resource is accessed or used by third parties and an agreement should
be reached on appropriate terms; they should also be fully informed about the consequenc-
es of the intended use. The agreed scope of use may be set out in contracts, licenses or
agreements, which may specify how benefits arising from the exploitation should be shared.
In WIPO discussions, many argue that use of protected subject matter ought to be subject to
PIC especially for sacred and secret materials. However, others fear that granting exclusive
control over traditional cultures could stifle innovation, diminish the public domain and be
difficult to implement in practice.
The idea of an equitable balancing of interests is common to many legal systems. In IP law,
this is often phrased in terms of a balancing of the interests of right holders and the general
public. According to this principle, the TK/TCEs/GRs holders receive an equitable share of
the benefits that arise from the use of the TK/TCEs/GRs, which may be expressed in terms
of a compensatory payment, or other non-monetary benefits. (See the Bonn Guidelines
on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of the Benefits Arising
from their Utilization, www.cbd.int/abs/bonn/). An entitlement to equitable benefit-sharing
may be particularly appropriate in situations where exclusive property rights are considered
inappropriate.
WIPO has gathered examples of model WIPO also has draft guidelines on IP
IP clauses which may be considered for clauses in access and benefit-shar-
inclusion in contractual agreements when ing agreements (Intellectual Property
mutually agreed terms are being negotiat- Guidelines for Access and Equitable Benefit-
ed. WIPO regularly updates, on its website, Sharing), a set of Case studies related to
an online database of relevant contractual IP and GRs (WIPO Pub. No. 769) and a
practices (Database of Biodiversity-related Technical study on the disclosure require-
Access and Benefit-sharing Agreements). ment proposal (WIPO Pub. No. 786).
25
Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions
26
Overview
27
Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions
28
Overview
29
Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions
30
Overview
31
Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions
Article 15.4 of the Berne Convention for such as may be enjoyed by a traditional
the Protection of Literary and Artistic community in the production of hand-
Works (1886) provides a mechanism for the icrafts, artworks and other traditional
international protection of unpublished products. Hence, some indigenous and
and anonymous works, including TCEs. traditional signs and symbols can be
protected as trademarks.
Copyright can also provide protection
against insulting, derogatory, offensive, One of the kinds of appropriations that
demeaning or degrading use of a work, communities often complain about is the
an issue that is often of concern in re- use of false and misleading claims as to
lation to TCEs which embody spiritual authenticity and/or origin. For example, a
qualities and the very cultural identity cheaply made souvenir item may carry a
of a community. Preventing such misuse, label falsely indicating that it is “authentic”
and promoting respect for cultural and or originates from a particular commu-
spiritual values, may be the principal goal nity. Certification marks can be used to
of protection for some. safeguard the authenticity and quality of
authentic indigenous arts. For instance,
Distinctive Signs, Designs and the registered certification mark “Toi Iho”
Unfair Competition was launched in 2002 in New Zealand to
promote and market authentic, quality
Laws for the protection of marks, GIs, Maori arts and crafts.
and industrial designs, as well as unfair
competition law may offer direct or indi-
rect protection to TCEs. These branches
of IP aim at the protection of established
reputation, distinctiveness and goodwill,
32
Overview
The Indian Arts and Crafts Act, 1990, of Mr. Cun Fablao, a designer from the
the United States of America protects Yunnan Province, China, received in-
Native American artisans by assuring the dustrial design protection for his tradi-
authenticity of Indian artifacts under the tion-based silver-plated tea-set
authority of an Indian Arts and Crafts
Board. The Act, a ‘truth-in-marketing’ law,
prevents the marketing of products as
‘Indian made’ when the products are not
made by Indians as defined by the Act.
33
Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions
In South India the medicinal knowledge of the Kani tribes led to the development of a sports
drug named Jeevani, an anti-stress and anti-fatigue agent, based on the herbal medicinal
plant arogyapacha. Indian scientists at the Tropical Botanic Garden and Research Institute
used the tribal know-how to develop the drug. The knowledge was divulged by three tribal
members, while the customary rights to the practice and transfer of certain traditional me-
dicinal knowledge within the Kani tribes are held by tribal healers, known as Plathis. The
scientists isolated 12 active compounds from arogyapacha, developed the drug Jeevani,
and filed two patent applications on the drug. The technology was then licensed to the Arya
Vaidya Pharmacy, Ltd., an Indian pharmaceutical
manufacturer pursuing the commercialization of
Ayurvedic herbal formulations. A trust fund was
established to share the benefits arising from the
commercialization of the TK-based drug.
34
Overview
35
Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions
36
Overview
37
Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions
38
Brigitte Vézina
39
Overview
Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions
©iStock.com/jerom400
40
Overview
41
Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions
42
Overview
The Work of
WIPO in the Field
of Traditional
Knowledge,
Traditional Cultural
Expressions and
Genetic Resources
43
Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions
44
Overview
All meeting reports and relevant docu- As part of this program, upon request,
ments of the IGC are available online: www. and within its budgetary limits, WIPO
wipo.int/tk/en/igc. Background Brief 2 The organizes workshops and seminars,
WIPO Intergovernmental Committee on develops information material as well
Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, as other types of resources, including
Traditional Knowledge and Folklore may information databases, and provides
also be consulted for more information legislative advice, education and train-
and an overview of the negotiation process. ing. WIPO’s work includes assistance to
develop and strengthen national and
regional systems for the protection of TK
(policies, laws, information systems and
practical tools). WIPO also offers training,
such as the Cultural Documentation
and IP Management Training Program.
Furthermore, WIPO has a distance learn-
ing program on IP and TK, TCEs and GRs,
in cooperation with the WIPO Academy.
45
Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions
46
Overview
47
Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions
48
Overview
Further Reading
49
Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions
This booklet draws from many documents, Further WIPO materials include:
studies and other materials prepared and
consulted within the context of WIPO’s Background Brief 1: Traditional Know-
work, and all of which are available from ledge and Intellectual Property
WIPO at: www.wipo.int/tk/en/ and, par- www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/tk/en/
ticularly, www.wipo.int/tk/en/resources/. resources/pdf/tk_brief1.pdf
Many of those resources are referenced
in italics throughout this booklet. Background Brief 2:The Intergovernmental
Committee
www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/tk/en/
resources/pdf/tk_brief2.pdf
50
Overview
Consolidated Analysis of the Legal Intellectual Property and Folk, Arts and
Protection of Traditional Cultural Cultural Festivals—Practical Guide
Expressions/Expressions of Folklore www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_
www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/tk/785/ pub_1043.pdf
wipo_pub_785.pdf
Intellectual Property and the Safeguarding
Customary Law, Traditional Knowledge of Traditional Cultures—Legal Issues and
and Intellectual Property: Outline of Policy Options for Museums, Libraries
Issues and Archives
www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/tk/en/ www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/tk/1023/
resources/pdf/overview_customary_law.pdf wipo_pub_1023.pdf
51
Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions
52
Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions
54