Professional Documents
Culture Documents
the law. What is legal? Where can I find the laws I need to know? How
do I make decisions about legal conduct that is ethically troublesome
to me? What if I have a disagreement with a customer, employee, or
shareholder? How and where can I resolve our differences?
This portion of the book explains what law is, where it can be found,
how it is applied, and how legal disputes are resolved. But beyond
the legal environment of a business, there are the ethical issues. Just
because what you are doing is legal does not mean it is ethical. And
why should a manager make ethical choices and behave honorably in
business? Law and ethics are inextricably intertwined. A commitment to
both is part of a sustainable business model.
1
Introduction to Law
ost people understand the law through personal experiences. Some are
M exposed to law through traffic tickets . Others encounter the law when a
problem arises with a landlord or lease. Many wonder about their rights when
search engines and other Internet compa nies gather information about them
w ithout their realizing such efforts were ongoing . Facing income reductions in
tou gh economic times, many wonder what their rights are when collectors call
or file suit. Their understanding of t he law may be limited by the anger they feel
about an annoying collection agent, their e-mail being scanned or a traffic tick-
et. However, without traffic laws, the roads would be a study in survival of the
fittest. The law is your source of assurance that you have rights when it comes
to collection agency actions. Each day businesses find and face legal and ethical
issues in everything from privacy rights on Facebook to proper documentation of
employees' citizenship.
The types of laws and the penalties for violating them vary from state to state
and from city to city, but, however much they vary, laws exist everywhere and
at every level of government. Indeed, law is a universal, necessary foundation of
an orderly society. Law helps maintain order, imposing on us certain minimum
standards of conduct. When we fall short of those standards, we risk penalties.
Law is made up of rules that control people's conduct and their interrelationships.
Traffic laws control not only our conduct when we are driving but also our rela-
tionships with other drivers using the roads. In some instances, traffic laws give
other drivers a right-of-way, and we are liable to them for any injuries we cause
by not following those laws.
This chapter offers an introduction to law. How is law defined? What types
of laws are there? What are the purposes and characteristics of law? Where are
laws found, and who enacts them?
UPDATE ~
For up-to-date legal news, go to
mariannejennings.com
This country's planted thick with
laws from coast to coast .. .
and if you cut them down .. .
d'you really think you could
stnnd upright in the winds that
would blow then?
A MAN FOR ALL SEASONS, Acr I
L
6 Part 1 Business: Its Legal, Ethical, and Judicial Er:wironment
money for these forms of infringement because the continued activity caused
the loss of their exclusive copyrights. The remedy that they sought and were
given were injunctions that, within certain parameters, ordered a halt to the
sites and programs that facilitated the unauthorized downloading of copy-
righted materials.
.
1 38
Law as the Great Compromiser
A final and important purpose of law is to act as the great compromiser. Few
people, groups, or businesses agree philosophically on how society, business, or
government should be run. Law serves to mesh different views into one united
view so that all parties are at least partially satisfied. When disputes occur, the
courts apply the law to the parties' situation in an attempt to strike a compromise
between two opposing views. The U.S. Supreme Court has provided compromises
for the rights of businesses to be involved in the political process and make dona-
tions to candidates (see Chapter 5). In the relationship between freedom of speech
and advertising regulation, the law serves as the mediator.
1-4b Consistency
Although the law must be flexible, it still must be predictable. Law cat.mot change
so suddenly that parties cannot rely on its existence or protection. Being able to
predict the outcome of a course of conduct allows a party to rely on a contract or
dissuades a party from the commission of a crime. For a contract, a judicial remedy
can be ordered for breach or non-performance; for a crime, a prescribed punish-
ment is the result.
1-4c Pervasiveness
The law must be pervasive and cover all necessary areas, but at the same time, it
cannot infringe on individual freedoms or become so complex that it is difficult
to enforce. For example, laws cover the formation, operation, and dissolution of
corporations. Laws govern corporate management decisions on expat1ding, devel-
oping, and changing the nature of the corporation. Laws also ensure that share-
holders' rights are protected. The corporation has great flexibility in management,
as long as it stays within these legal boundaries.
L
8 Part 1 Business: Its Legal, Ethical, and Judicial Environment
In the following case, the U.S. Supreme Court was a deeply divided court on
a statutory interpretation question, a question that touched on many of the pur-
poses of law. The majority and dissenting opinions show the struggle courts face
as they try to honor the law's dual purposes of keeping order while preserving
rights. Case 1.1 is briefed in Exhibit 1.1. A brief is a tool used by lawyers, law stu-
dents, and judges to help them summarize a case and focus on its facts and the key
points of the decision by the court. The Yates case answers the questions posed in
the "Consider ... " problem at the beginning of the chapter.
Yates v. U.S.
135 S.Ct. 1074 (2015)
Hurling Fish Overboard the Miss Katie: Obstruction of Justice?
,,.,....
On August 23, 2007, the Miss Katie, a commercial fish-
or case, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned
not more than 20 years, or both."
ing boat, was six days into an expedition in the Gulf of Yates was convicted but moved to dismiss the
Mexico. Her crew numbered three, including Yates, the charges, arguing that §1519's reference to "tangible
captain. Engaged in a routine offshore patrol to inspect object" means objects used to store information,
both recreational and commercial vessels, Officer John such as computer hard drives, not fish. The District
Jones of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Court denied Yates's motion, and a jury found him
Commission decided to board the Miss Katie to check guilty. The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the conviction,
on the vessel's compliance with fishing rules. Because concluding that §1519 applies to the destruction or
he had been deputized as a federal agent by the Nation- concealment of fish because, as objects having phys-
al Marine Fisheries Service, Officer Jones had authority ical form, fish fall within the dictionary definition
to enforce federal, as well as state, fishing laws. of "tangible object." Yates, who was sentenced to
Upon boarding the Miss Katie, Officer Jones 30 days in jail and three years of supervised proba-
noticed three red grouper that appeared to be under- tion as well as carrying a felony conviction for life,
sized hanging from a hook on the deck. At the time, appealed.
federal conservation regulations required immediate
release of red grouper less than 20 inches long. Offi- JUDICIAL OPINION
cer Jones instructed Yates to keep the undersized fish
GINSBURG, Justice
segregated from the rest of the catch until the ship
Although dictionary definitions of the words "tangi-
returned to port. After Jones departed, Yates instead
ble" and "object" bear consideration in determining
told a crew member to throw the undersized fish
the meaning of "tangible object" in §1519, they are not
overboard. For this offense, Yates was charged with
dispositive. Whether a statutory term is unambiguous
destroying, concealing, and covering up undersized
"is determined [not only] by reference to the language
fish to impede a federal investigation, in violation of
itself, [but also by] the specific context in which that
18 u.s.c. § 1519:
language is used, and the broader context of the statute
"Whoever knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, as a whole."
conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a false entry Section 1519's position within Title 18, Chapter 73,
in any record, document, or tangible object with the further signals that §1519 was not intended to serve as
intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investi- a cross-the-board ban on the destruction of physical
gation or proper administration of any matter with- evidence. Congress placed §1519 at the end of Chapter
in the jurisdiction of any department or agency of 73 following immediately after pre-existing specialized
the United States or any case filed under title 11, or provisions expressly aimed at corporate fraud and
in relation to or contemplation of any such matter financial audits.
CONTINUED
h
p
Chapter 1 Introduction to Law 9
The contemporaneou P.~s «g~ of §1512(~)(1 ), for it? The plurality offers a clue when it emphasizes
h'cl the disproportionate penalties §1519 imposes if the
1 prohibits a p rscm from alter[mg], destroy[mg],
w t"l:t[ing],
1
r c ncealfingJ a record, document, or law is read broadly. Section 1519, the plurality objects,
mu .' obj"ect . .. wtt• h tI1e ·intent to 1mpa1r
· · th o b'Ject ' would then "expose[ ] individuals to 20-year prison
ot hei b'I " c · ff" · I proceed-
. t .· n or availa 1 it 1or llS m cm o 1cm sentences for tampering with n11y physical object that
Ill eg1 1' J1 .
. " i a I o instruclwe. might have evidentiary value in n11y federal investiga-
'I ing,'Us of trad1l1011n
· · I tool so f statu tory .in rpretat1. n tion into n11y offense." That brings to the surface the
_1
·amine markers of c ngr · ·ional int nt within the real issue: overcriminalization and excessive punish-
~~ 1~anes-O. ley ~ct: nd 1519 ~t elf t~us c~ll for '.-eje~: ment in the U.S. Code.
tion of an aggressive m_t~rpretatlon of tang.1ble obJect. Now as to this stntute, I think the plurality some-
Having used trad1honal tools of statutory .mter- what-though only somewhat-exaggerates the mat-
pretation to ex<lmine mark r of congre ~ional intent ter. The plurality omits from its description of §1519 the
within the Sarbane -Oxl y Act and §1519 itself, wear requirement that a person act "knowingly" and with
persuaded that an aggre si e Int rpretation of "tan- "the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence" federal
gible object" mu t be r jected . lt i highly impr babl law enforcement. And in highlighting §1519's maxi-
that C ngre · would l111ve buried " general poliation mum penalty, the plurality glosses over the absence of
statute covering objects of any and every kind in a any prescribed minimum. (Let's not forget that Yates's
provision targeting fraud in f.in ancinl record-keep ing. sentence was not 20 years, but 30 days.) Congress
Rev rsed . presumably enacts laws with high maximums and no
minimums when it thinks the prohibited conduct may
AUTO, Justice, Concurring run the gamut from major to minor. That is assuredly
[T]hough the question is close, traditional tools of true of acts obstructing justice. Most district judges, as
1e statutory construction confirm that John Yates has the Congress knows, will recognize differences between
le better of the argument. Three features of 18 U.S.C. § such cases and prosecutions like this one, and will try
n, 1519 stand out to me: the statute's list of nouns, its list to make the punishment fit the crime. Still and all, I
ct of verbs, and its title. Although perhaps none of these tend to think, for the reasons the plurality gives, that
m features by itself would tip the case in favor of Yates, §1519 is a bad law-too broad and undifferentiated,
n, the three combined do so. Start with the nouns. Sec- with too-high maximum penalties, which give pros-
or tion 1519 refers to "any record, document, or tangible ecutors too much leverage and sentencers too much
·s- object." discretion. And I'd go further: In those ways, §1519 is
_)n [T]he term "tangible object" should refer to some- unfortunately not an outlier, but an emblem of a deeper
to thing similar to records or documents. A fish does not pathology in the federal criminal code.
>a- spring to mind-nor does an antelope, a colonial farm- But whatever the wisdom or folly of §1519, this
fe, house, a hydrofoil, or an oil derrick. All are "objects" Court does not get to rewrite the law. "Resolution of
that are "tangible." But who wouldn't raise an eyebrow the pros and cons of whether a statute should sweep
if a neighbor, when asked to identify something similar broadly or narrowly is for Congress." If judges dis-
to a "record" or "document," said "crocodile"? agree with Congress's choice, we are perfectly entitled
[My] analysis is influenced by §1519's title: to say so-in lectures, in law review articles, and even
gi- "Destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in in dicta. But we are not entitled to replace the statute
ng Federal investigations and bankruptcy." (Emphasis Congress enacted with an alternative of our own
"tot added.) This too points toward filekeeping, not fish. design.
JUS Titles can be useful devices to resolve "'doubt about I respectfully dissent.
1ge the meaning of a statute."' The title is especially valu-
hat able here because it reinforces what the text's nouns CASE QUESTIONS
ute and verbs independently suggest-that no matter how
1. Explain what Mr. Yates did and why.
other statutes might be read, this particular one does
73, not cover every noun in the universe with tangible 2. Describe the terms used in the statute at issue and
~as
form. the history of the statute.
ical 3. Why does the dissent think the majority made the
iter KAGAN, Justice Dissenting with Justices SCALIA, decision it did?
zed KENNEDY, AND THOMAS
md If none of the traditional tools of statutory interpre-
tation can produce today's result, then what accounts
UED
10 Part 1 Business: Its Legal, Ethical, and Judicial Environment
~
Evaluate the ethics of Mr. Yates in hurling the fish back after the federal agent told him to ,,'
retain them . ~
8
0
I
0
:9
take a long time for the e-mails to be delet· THINK: Before answ ering th is prob·
d Katakis went home. When he returne d lem, review the opinions in the Yates case .
e 'the office on M onday, Swanger noticed Recall the following.
toh t almost all 0f the e-mails on his Dell had 1. According to the majority, the statute
tb a n deleted from h'1s e-ma1·1·1n· box.
applies to the destruction of docu-
ee The government seized the computers ments or electronic records .
·ts investigation of an alleged bid-rigging a. The e-mails were electronic records .
;c~eme. When examining Swanger's Dell,
1
b. The e-mails w ere missing.
the government discovered t en fncrlminat·
2. The e-mails w ere relevant to the
Ing e-mails that implicated Kata kis. Katakis
bid-rigging investigation and charges .
was either a sender or recipient of all ten
e-ma ils. Swanger was also either the sender 3, The e-mai ls w ere not covered by the
or recipient of all ten e-mails . The e-mails DriveScrubber program that Kata ki s
were discovered in the deleted items folder installed.
in Swanger's e-mail. Metadata attached to APPLY: The e-mails are covered by the
the e-mails showed that Katakis had re- obstruction statute because the court care-
ceived and opened all of them. However, fully outlined what was included in and cov-
Katakis had deleted the e-mails, and the ered by the statute and electronic records
government expert believed that Katakis are part of the coverage.
had destroyed them using DriveScrubber. ANSWER: However, w hat is different
However, because the e-mails were part about this case from the Yates case is that
of an Exchange e-mail program, deleted the proof does not connect Katakis w ith de-
e-ma il s simply go into a deleted mail fo lder struction of the e-mails. There must be some
and are not subject to DriveScrubber over- form of a record, but there must also be
write. Still, the government never found the destruction, and the experts in the case in-
e-mails on the Katakis computer. Katakis dicated that DriveScrubber would not have
was charged with obstruction of justice automatically destroyed the e-mails because
for destroying electronic documents. What they were in an Exchange folder, not the
should the court do with the case? Based computer free space over which DriveScrub-
on what you learned in the Yates case, was ber writes. Circumstantial evidence does not
this obstruction of justice? U.S. v. Katakis, provide the connection betw een the missing
800 F3d 1017 (9th Cir. 2015). records and Katakis.The case w as dismissed.
One of the important lessons of the Yates approach is, in consultation with a lawyer, to
case is for those who run businesses to determine your rights and options. However,
:is understand that when inspectors or offi· undertaking the destruction of documents,
a cers find violations in their operations, the records, or fish only brings greater penalties.
rs worst thing to do is to attempt to conceal If the statutes are excessive or unfair, there
JS
the evidence. Concealment or obstruction is always the appeal of the sentence itself,
811 always reach felony levels. The fines and but the issue will be the fairness of the sen-
m imprisonment, as with §1519, can be as tence and not a felony conviction for the act
Id high as 20 years. Once caught, the best of obstruction .
12 Part 1 Business: Its Legal, Ethical, and Judicial Environment
cial contract that we mutually honor. In 1941, Pow1d wrote his famous credo,
0f
called "My p h"l
so h f Law.
1 osop y o
II
I think of law as i11 011e sc11se 11 Jriglily sµecinlized form of social co11trol i11 a developed
oliticaily orga11 iz1~d sociely--<'1 soc.in! co11tnil //1ra11gh t/1e systematic a11d orderly
~pp/icatio11 of the fore' uf 11c/1 n sociely. Moreover, if operates thro11gh a j11dicial process
and an ad111i11istmlivl' proce , w/1ic/111/so go /iy tlle 11a111e of law. .. .3
or repealed with th same eas · a can tatutes. Constitutions are the law of the peo-
ple and ar · changed n.ly by lengthier and more demanding procedures than those
ti ed to repeal statutes.
Con titution tend to protect general rights, uch as p ed-1, r ligion, and prop-
erty ( ee C hapter 5 for a mor complete dis ussion). They also provide a frame-
work fo r all other form of law . The basic rights ilnd protections afforded in them
cannot be abridged or d ni d by the oth r ources of law. In other wotds, a stat-
ute's boundaries are form d by con titutionally protected rights. Exhibit 1.2 is an
illustration of the ources of law; onstitutional Jaw i at the bas of the pyramid
diagram becc us of its invioJ, te statu .
'
Chapter 1 Introduction to Law 15
volume you need, the reference or cite has a section (§) number following it. This
section number is the particular statute referenced, and you must look for the vol-
ume of Title 15 that contains that section. For example, the first volume of Title 15
contains§§ 1-11. A full reference or cite to a United States Code statute looks like
this: 15 U.S.C. §77. When a U.S.C. cite is given, the law cited will be a federal law
passed by Congress.
executive Orders
Executive orders are laws of the executive branch of the federal goverrnnent and
deal with those matters under the direct control of that branch. For example, on his
second day in office, President Barack Obama issued an executive order prohibit-
ing the use of waterboarding in questioning military combatants who are in U.S.
custody. In 2015, President Obama issued an executive order that increased back-
ground checks on private gw1 sales, including those sales at gw1 shows.
federal Administrative Regulations
The federal government has administrative agencies that serve the functions of
promulgation of rules (called regulations) for developing specifics such as forms
and time requirements for carrying out the legislative enactments of Congress, in
addition to enforcing both the laws and regulations (see Chapter 6 for more details).
Examples of federal agencies include the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA),
the Equal Employment Opportw1ity Commission (EEOC), and the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC).
Federal regulations are fow1d in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), a set of
paperback volumes that is published once each year. A citation from the CFR has a
•eo- structure similar to that of a U.S.C. cite. For example, 12 C.F.R. §226 is volume 12 of
ose the CFR, and §226 is a section that deals with credit disclosure rights.
state legislatures. For example, most states have an agency to handle incorpora-
tions and the status of corporations in the state. Most states also have a tax agency
to handle income or sales taxes in the state.
xa-
1-7
Introduction to International Law
ncy
. iess is global. Companies headquartered in Japan have factories in the United
Bu~:s, and U.S. firms have fl.1Rm1felchu-u1g plants in South America and subcontrac-
Sta and suppliers in 01i.na. Trade and political barriers to economic development
.torslonger ex1.st. Busmesses
. must .be ad ept at tra d.mg across country b oun d anes,
.
tees 110
·id such tra d e requires
· an llild erstand tn.g
· of mternahona
· · 11 aw.
.ties
the
a:r lntern.Cltional law is not a neat body of law like contract law or the UCC. Rather,
'tis a combination of the law · of various countries, international trade customs,
ply.
ter-
~d international agreements. A..rticl 38(1 ) of the Statute of the International Court
ofJustice (fl court of the 1:fnlted Nation that countries co~1sent to.have resolve dis-
1ds.
putes) is a widely Jecogn1.zed statement of the sources of mternahonal law:
the
ers. (a) international conventions, whetlzer general or particular, establishing rules
Lges expressly recognized by the contesting states;
(b) international custom as evidence of a general practice accepted as law;
(c) the general principles of law recognized by civilized nations;
(d) judicial decisions and the teachings of the most highly qualified publicists of the
:on- various nations, as subsidiary means for the determination of rules of law.
hey
·s of 1-7a Custom
Every country has its boundaries for allowable behavior, and these boundaries are
unwritten but recognized laws. The standards of behavior are reflected in state-
ments made by businesspeople and government officials. Custom develops over
are time and through repeated conduct. For example, working conditions in factories
in a around the world have improved over the past 20 years not through changes in
icu- laws but through the business custom of inspections, monitors, and transparent
:ory disclosure of supply chain resources. Business custom is now one of assuming
ting responsibility for the conditions in factories that supply parts and labor for goods
lan- produced around the world.
ute. In addition to operations, businesses must develop a knowledge of and sen-
tu al sitivity to individual country customs related to negotiations and relationships.
For example, unlike the United States, most countries do not offer a warranty pro-
tection on goods and instead follow a philosophy of caveat emptor, "Let the buyer
beware." Other countries also do not recognize the extensive rules of insurance
and risk followed here with respect to the shipment of goods. Multinational firms
must make provisions for protection of shipments in those countries with differ-
ent standards. Differing laws can affect product content and quality. For example,
lead-based paint is not permitted for use on children's toys in the United States,
vays
but in China, at one point, lead-based paint was standard in toy production. A toy
rving
manufacturer must learn to specify legal standards for suppliers because custom
~-To
'the and laws in that country may find the suppliers assuming the same standards they
)USi- );!
use apply to production for businesses outside their country.
·c;
long .a' At one time, the customs of China with respect to intellectual property, most
"E particularly computer software, lagged behind those of Europe and the United
ions 'l
il
oout _g States. Chinese custom was to separate infringement into two categories: ordinary
and
~
g
acts and serious .acts. Ordinary infringement was not regarded as a legal issue and
~·eq~ires only that the party apologize, destroy the software, and not engage in
Jnfnngement again. Courts were rarely involved in ordinary infringement cases.
18 Part 1 Business: Its Legal, Ethical, and Judicial Environment
However, the U.S. government demanded more protection for its copyright hold-
ers by imposing trade sanctions, and China eventually agreed to revise its customs
and laws to afford protection. In this case, China's customs had to be changed to
provide protection similar to that afforded in other cow1tries.
1-7b Treaties
A treaty is an agreement between or among nations on a subject of international
law signed by the leaders of the nations and ratified by the nations' governing
bodies. In the United States, treaties are ratified by the Senate and are included in
the pyramid (Exhibit 1.2) as federal legislative enactments.
Treaties can be between two nations-bilateral treaties-or multilateral trea-
ties-those that are made among several nations. Other treaties, recognized by almost
all nations, are called general or universal treaties. Universal treaties are a reflection
of widely followed standards of behavior. For example, the Geneva Convention is a
universal treaty covering the treatment of prisoners of war. The Vienna Convention is
a universal treaty covering diplomatic relations. The Warsaw Convention is a treaty
that addresses issues of liability for injuries to passengers and property during inter-
national air travel. For more discussion on trade treaties, see Chapter 7.
>ld-
>ms
i to
Re: When Worldwide Soccer
Involves Bribery
1nal
The scandal eiupted around the world as multmat1onal task forces focus on activ-
ing ities and then together bring charges
carpal and law enforcement agents from
i in 1
~urope and the United States c:lescended against individuals In their own countri es.
on the offices of FIFA. the World Cup soc~er FIFA is an NGO (non-governmental
rea- organization. The agents were there to seize organization) that is still subject to the
1ost rec::ords and con1puters because of allega- standards that OECD nations have adopted
tion tions of an international bribery scandal In tor curbing bribery The result of the coop-
is a the organization that had existed for years eration m the mvest1gat1on 1s the md1ct-
1nis and funneled millions to indivldual leaders in ment of leaders, their resignations, and
~aty the organization. the end of the excessive payments that
Lter- The cese was representative of a new teams and cities vying for the World Cup
approach of co0peratlon among nati?ns were paying m exchange for FIFA favors
tor curbing bribery. money laundenng, and award of contracts
and securities fraud. Working together,
r on
~ach
~sin
rms
DWS 1-7g Uniform International Laws
zed
ve a Because trade barriers have been largely eliminated, contracts have been and are
yto being formed between and among businesses from virtually all nations. How-
ever, not all nations have the same approach to contracts. Indeed, some nations
have no contract laws or commercial codes. In an attempt to introduce uniformity
in international contract law, the United Nations developed its Contracts for the
International Sale of Goods (CISG), which has been adopted widely and allows
Jn al businesses to opt in or out of its application in adopting countries. Similar to the
(see UCC (see Chapter 11), the CISG has provisions on contract formation, perfor-
dor mance, and damages. More information on the CISG can be found in Chapters 7,
11, and 12.
·-------~
Chapter 1 Introduction to Law 21
Where are laws found and who enacts them? • Treaties-agreements between and among
Constitution-document that establishes structure nations regarding their political and commercial
• relationships
and authority of a government
Federal statutes-laws passed by Congress: the U.S . • Private law-party autonomy recognized in all
• nations
Code
• State statutes-laws passed by state legislatures, • International doctrines-widely accepted principles
including uniform laws on contracts and business of law followed in most countries
organizations • European Union-group of nations working
• Ordinances-local laws passed by cities, counties, collectively for uniform laws and barrier-free trade
and townships • Uniform laws-Contracts for the International Sale
of Goods (CISG)
What are the sources of international law?
• Customs-the standards of conduct and norms in a
country
1. Bryant Gunderson is a sole proprietor with a his record-breaking home run in San Francisco. When
successful bungee-jumping business. He is consid- he hit the home run, the ball went into the cheap
ering incorporating his business. What levels and seats. All agree that Alex Popov had his glove on the
sources of law would affect and govern the process of home-run ball. However, Patrick Hayashi ended up
incorporation? with the ball.
Mr. Popov filed suit alleging that Mr. Hayashi
2. Jeffrey Stalwart has just been arrested for ticket
assaulted Mr. Popov in order to get the ball. A substan-
scalping outside the Great Western Forum in Los
tial amount of videotape shows Mr. Popov's "glov-
Angeles. Jeffrey sold a ticket to a Taylor Swift con-
ing" of the ball. Mr. Popov says the ball belongs to him
cert to an intense fan for $1,200; the face value of the
because he held that ball in a "Sno-cone position" and
ticket was $48. Ticket scalping in Los Angeles is a mis-
others wrested it from his control.
demeanor. Will Jeffrey's court proceedings be civil
Mark McGwire's ball from his record-breaking
or criminal?
home run sold for $3 million. The battle for the Bonds
3. The U.S. Golf Association put a new rule (effective home-run ball carries high financial stakes. What areas
January 1, 2016) that prohibits players from anchoring of law will be involved in the judge's determination of
their putters to their chests. Tim Clark, a golfer from who gets the baseball? (Peter Page, "Ownership of His-
South Africa, who has won ten championships, anchors toric Baseball Is in Extra Innings," National Law fo11rnal,
his putter to his chest and reacted, "We are not going November 12, 2001.)
to roll over and just accept this. We have been put in a
6. They call them "floating bacchanals." Offshore from
position where we have to fight for our livelihoods." 7
Florida and California cities, sunseekers take their rafts
Explain what source of law is involved. How can the
and boats and tie them together as they share adult bev-
rule be challenged? Where would the golfers go to
erages, music, swimming, and the sun. However, after
court?
a day of floating, many involved in the floating com-
4. Define and contrast the following: munity are so drunk that they cannot get their rafts
a. Civil law and criminal law and boats back to shore. In addition, safety patrols have
b. Substantive law and procedural law difficulties gaining access to take action when there are
c. Common law and statutory law arguments. What level of law could be directed to con-
d. Private law and public law trol these types of activities? Where would those laws be
5. During the 2001 baseball season, Barry Bonds, promulgated?
a player with the San Francisco Giants, hit 73 home 7. Around 5:00 A.M. on January 1, 2004, Matthew
runs in one season, a new record that went beyond Schmucker, who was 18 at the time, was traveling alone
the 72 set by Mark McGwire in 2000. Mr. Bonds made in a horse and buggy near the intersection of Indiana
22 Part 1 Business : Its Legal, Ethical, and Judicial Environment
State Road 37 and Notestine Road in Harlan, Indiana. He 9. C!Clssify the following subject matters as substantive
WilS intoxicated at the time and failed to stop at an inter- or procedural laws:
section, thereby colliding with the side of a 2003 Dodge a. Traffic law on speeding
Stratus carrying David Candon and Monica Young, who b. Small claims court rules
is now paralyzed from the neck down as a result of the c. Evidence
accident. Schmucker was charged with being a minor d. Labor law
in possession of alcohol ilnd failing to stop at a through- e. Securities
way. Candon, Young, and their children, who were in the
10. The New York Attorney General began an investi-
car at the time of the auto/buggy collision, brought suit
gation of Monster Energy Drinks (Monster Beverage),
against Schmucker. Schmucker declared bankruptcy and
Pepsi's AMP (PepsiCo), and 5-Hour Energy Drinks
asked to be discharged from his obligations to Candon
(Living Essentials) to determine whether the compa-
and Young. Candon and Young argued that the injury
nies were adequately disclosing the amount of caf-
was a "willful and malicious injury by a vessel" under
feine in their drinks. The investigation focuses on the
the bankruptcy code and was thus a nondischargeable
fact that there are other ingredients in the drinks, such
debt. Schmucker said a horse and buggy is not a vessel.
as black tea extract and guarana, that are disclosed on
Discuss the role of the court in this case. What would
the labels of the drinks, but the labels don't disclose
the court look to in making its decision? What is the
that there may be additional caffeine in the additional
impact of the court's decision on the ability of the family
ingredients.
to recover for injuries? [Yo1t11K v Sc/111111cker, 409 B.R. 477
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has
(N .D. Ind. 2008)]
already issued a warning about combining these
8. Ms. Paris Hilton, a well-known celebrity with a ubiq- energy drinks with alcohol consumption because of
uitous presence on television and in People magazine, several resulting deaths. In addition, the Department of
had her driver's license suspended by the state of Cal- Health and Human Services (HHS) has issued a report
ifornia because of driving under the influence (DUI) or warning about the negative health impact of excessive
while intoxicated (DWI). She was then pulled over by caffeine consumption. The report documented data
officers for DUI while driving with a suspended license. from emergency room physicians about young people
Following a hearing on the second traffic stop, a judge requiring emergency room treatment because of con-
sentenced Ms. Hilton to 45 days in jail for failure to honor sumption of alcohol and energy drinks. Neither agency
the terms of her DUI probation, including driving while has, however, taken any action against the makers of
intoxicated. these drinks.
List all the types of laws that apply to Ms. Hilton in List all of the applicable layers of law involved in
her situation and also where the specific California laws this energy drink situation. What statutory interpreta-
would appear on the pyramid of the sources of law. If tions do you think there will have to be as a result of the
Ms. Hilton asked for a pardon or commutation of her investigation? (Nelson D. Schwarz, "New York State Is
sentence by the governor of California, would the law Investigating Energy Drink Makers," New York Times,
allow it? August 29, 2012, p. Bl.)
ive
Reprinted w ith p rrnission of Thomson Reutel's. 4. Douglas Jehl, "Head of Inquiry on Iraq Abuses Now in
r Wcncletl HolJrn~s, "t atu.ra l Lm ," 32 Harmrd Law
1 Spotlight," Nw York Times, May 11, 2004, Al, A12.
' orv
2· I ,, ,•Q (1918). C~1pyrig h 1 @ 1918 by Th Harvard Uiw
1
5. Id.
RflJ Clv , , .
RevieW Assl1aat1on. 6. Mark Scott, "The Bumps in Uber's Fast Lane," Nw York
sti- from My Pltihisoµliy of L1w by Roscoe Pound. © 19•11 W •st Times, July 8, 2015, p. Bl.
~e), ~·libJishing Corporation. Reprinted w-ith permission of West 7. Steve DiMeglio, "Golf Rule Could Go to Court," USA Today,
1ks Group. May 22, 2013, p. lC.
pa-
:af-
the
JCh
on
ose
inal
has
ese
!of
tof
>0rt
;ive
,ata
1ple
on-
ncy
s of
i in
eta-
the
:e Is
nes,
•
gal