STG MB SOFFIT

FORMWORK
 C
B
0.800 0.800
1.800 5.111 1.800 8.645 2.000 9.044 2.600

Ø100,t=4.5 MS Pipe
@800mm (B/W) 1.250 1.250
Ø38,t=2.3 MS Pipe
@800mm (B/W)

( +) 0.200
( +) 0.200
( +) 0.200 ( -) 2.200
1.600

P2 P2
0.800

2.100
C-1 C-2 C-3 C-4
Beam 1.500 Beam

2.050
2.850
5.250 0.450

4.450
11.500

( +) 0.00

6.852
Beam

Beam

Beam

Beam

7.300
P1
A

P4
( +) 0.00

Beam

2.100
C-1 C-2 C-3 C-4
0.800

Beam
P3 P3

( +) 0.300

31.000

0.800 0.800
LAYOUT OF PIPE FOR MIDDLE BEAM ( T.O.C + 6.30)

REV NO: DATE DESCRIPTION

RE -1 0 -11- 0 0 STG MIDDLE BEAM STAGGING PLAN SECTION DETAILS

PRO ECT : LOCATION : PRO ECT MANAGEMENT BY : DRAWING TITLE: DESIGNED BY: SINAMM ENGINEERING LIMITED. APPROVED BY:
718 MW COMBINED CYCLE POWER PROJECT, MEGHNAGHAT, BANGLADESH STG MB PLATFORM DETAILS CHECKED BY:
MEGHNAGHAT, BANGLADESH
SHEET NO. : DRAWN BY:
DOC. NO. : SINAMM/STG/MB/PLAT FORM-01
01 SINAMM ENGINEERING LIMITED
 0.800 0.800
31.000
( +) 6.30m

SEE DETAILS-1 SEE DETAILS-1

( +) 5.30m Beam Beam Beam Beam

EL( +) 0.00m

25mm thick 100mm MS Pipe 800mm

100mm MS Pipe 800mm wooden plank P1 C/C (Both Direction)
C/C (Both Direction) P
EL( -) 1.90m

25mm thick 100mm MS Pipe 800mm

SECTION A-A 100mm MS Pipe 800mm
C/C (Both Direction)
38mm Horizontal pipe
Shall be Bracing in both
wooden plank C/C (Both Direction) Ø38,t=2.3 MS Pipe
@800mm (B/W)
direction of pipe

REV NO: DATE DESCRIPTION

RE -1 0 -11- 0 0 STG MIDDLE BEAM STAGGING PLAN SECTION DETAILS

PRO ECT : LOCATION : PRO ECT MANAGEMENT BY : DRAWING TITLE: DESIGNED BY: SINAMM ENGINEERING LIMITED. APPROVED BY:
718 MW COMBINED CYCLE POWER PROJECT, MEGHNAGHAT, BANGLADESH SECTION -A-A CHECKED BY:
MEGHNAGHAT, BANGLADESH
SHEET NO. : DRAWN BY:
DOC. NO. : SINAMM/STG/MB/PLAT FORM-01
0 SINAMM ENGINEERING LIMITED
 0.800 0.800 0.800 0.800
11.500 11.500
Ø38,t=2.3 MS Pipe Ø38,t=2.3 MS Pipe
( +) 6.30m
@800mm (B/W)
( +) 6.30m @800mm (B/W) ( +) 6.30m

( +) 5.30m Beam Beam ( +) 5.30m Beam Beam ( +) 5.30m

EL( +) 0.00m EL( +) 0.00m

38mm Horizontal pipe

100mm MS Pipe 800mm
Shall be Bracing in both P 25mm thick 100mm MS Pipe 8000mm
C/C (Both Direction)
wooden plank C/C (Both Direction)
direction of pipe
EL( -) 1.90m EL( -) 1.90m

100mm MS Pipe 800mm 25mm thick

38mm Horizontal pipe
C/C (Both Direction) EL( -) 2.200m 100mm MS Pipe 800mm wooden plank
Shall be Bracing in both
C/C (Both Direction) direction of pipe

SECTION B-B SECTION C-C

REV NO: DATE DESCRIPTION

RE -1 0 -11- 0 0 STG MIDDLE BEAM STAGGING PLAN & SECTION DETAILS

PRO ECT : LOCATION : PRO ECT MANAGEMENT BY : DRAWING TITLE: DESIGNED BY: SINAMM ENGINEERING LIMITED. APPROVED BY:
718 MW COMBINED CYCLE POWER PROJECT, MEGHNAGHAT, BANGLADESH SECTION -B-B & C-C CHECKED BY:
MEGHNAGHAT, BANGLADESH
SHEET NO. : DRAWN BY:
DOC. NO. : SINAMM/STG/MB/PLAT FORM-01
0 SINAMM ENGINEERING LIMITED
 EL( +) 6.30m

0.300
0.600

1.000
Middle Beam

0.300
EL( +) 5.30m

0.600
1.200
100mmx50mm
C-channel

0.300
0.600 0.600 0.600

1.200

0.600

EL( +) 0.00m
REV NO: DATE DESCRIPTION

RE -1 0 -11- 0 0 STG MIDDLE BEAM STAGGING PLAN & SECTION DETAILS

SECTION Z-Z

PRO ECT :
718 MW COMBINED CYCLE POWER PROJECT,
MEGHNAGHAT, BANGLADESH
LOCATION : PRO ECT MANAGEMENT BY : DRAWING TITLE: DESIGNED BY: SINAMM ENGINEERING LIMITED. APPROVED BY:
MEGHNAGHAT, BANGLADESH STG OUT SIDE MIDDLE BEAM SHUTTER SUPPORT PLAN & SECTION CHECKED BY:
SHEET NO. : DRAWN BY:
DOC. NO. : SINAMM/STG/MB/PLAT FORM-01
0 SINAMM ENGINEERING LIMITED
 ( +) 6.30m ( +) 6.30m

( +) 5.30m ( +) 5.30m
4mm Thick MS Sheet or 4mm Thick MS Sheet or
(12mm Ply + 38mm Shutter) (12mm Ply + 38mm Shutter)
C-Channel @ 225 C/C C-Channel @ 225 C/C
[-100X50X5 [-100X50X5

( Double C-CHANNEL @800 CTC ) H.Beam @ 800 C/C (H.Beam @ 800 C/C ) C-CHANNEL @800 CTC
[-100X50X5 200X100X5.5X8 800 200X100X5.5X8 [-100X50X5
(ONEWAY) (ONEWAY)
U- HEAD 800 U- HEAD

150
U- HEAD U- HEAD

200

600
600

MS Pipe @ 800 C/C

MS Pipe @ 800 C/C
D=100 x t=4.5
D=100 x t=4.5
(BOTHWAY)
MS Pipe @ 800 C/C MS Pipe @ 800 C/C (BOTHWAY)
D=100 x t=4.5 D=100 x t=4.5
(BOTHWAY) (BOTHWAY)
Bracing Pipe
@1.200 C/C

Bracing Pipe
@1.200 C/C
HORIZONTAL BRACING
D=38 x t=2.3
HORIZONTAL BRACING
D=38 x t=2.3

25mm thick
wooden plank
( +) 0.00m ( +) 0.00m

SECTION X-X
25mm thick Pipe Bottom Plate
( +) 1.900m wooden plank t=10, SQ300X300
Wooden Plank,
t=25, B=400

SECTION Y-Y

REV NO: DATE DESCRIPTION

RE -1 0 -11- 0 0 STG MIDDLE BEAM STAGGING PLAN & SECTION DETAILS

PRO ECT : LOCATION : PRO ECT MANAGEMENT BY : DRAWING TITLE: DESIGNED BY: SINAMM ENGINEERING LIMITED. APPROVED BY:
718 MW COMBINED CYCLE POWER PROJECT, MEGHNAGHAT, BANGLADESH SECTION -X-X & Y-Y CHECKED BY:
MEGHNAGHAT, BANGLADESH
SHEET NO. : DRAWN BY:
DOC. NO. : SINAMM/STG/MB/PLAT FORM-01
0 SINAMM ENGINEERING LIMITED
 MS Pipe Flat bar
D=100 x t=4.5 t=3mmx38mm
HORIZONTAL BRACING HORIZONTAL BRACING
Clump D=38 x t=2.3 D=38 x t=2.3

HORIZONTAL BRACING
D=38 x t=2.3
PLAN

(TYPE-1) Clump(Type-1) t=5 MS Plate

MS Pipe
Nut Bolt D=100 x t=4.5 MS Pipe
C-100X50X5 t=6 Site Tack Welding
D=100 x t=4.5 @ One Point
Clump
H.Beam
200X100X5.5X8
VERTICAL MS PIPE & HORIZONTAL
BRACHING PIPE JOINT DETAILS VERTICAL MS PIPE & HORIZONTAL
SIDE VIEW BRACHING PIPE JOINT DETAILS
FRONT VIEW

200
Pipe Top Plate
t=10, SQ300X300
(TYPE-2) Flat bar/Angle NOTE: Type-1 &Type-2 Clump Shall be used Alternated

DETAILS -1
t=10 MS Plate
SQ 300x300
6
75 (E60XX)
I-200x100x5,5x8 6
4xt=5 Stiffener

75

6
(E60XX)
6 6
(E60XX) Nut Bolt
6
D=100 x t=4.5 4xt=5 Stiffener
MS Pipe 4xt=5 Stiffener
4xt=5 Stiffener D=100 x t=4.5
MS Pipe

2xt=10 MS Plate
SQ 300x300
4T16x60 A325 BOLT

t=10 MS Plate
t=10 MS Plate SQ 300x300
SQ 300x300

75
4xt=5 Stiffener
BOTTOM & TOP PLAN DETAILS
BOTTOM & TOP PLAN DETAILS
75 JOINT DETAILS

t=10 MS Plate
SQ 300x300 REV NO: DATE DESCRIPTION
VERTICAL MS PIPE & I-BEAM DETAILS
DIA 100 MS PIPE DETAILS REV-1 09-11-2020 STG MIDDLE BEAM STAGGING PLAN & SECTION DETAILS

PROJECT : LOCATION : PROJECT MANAGEMENT BY : DRAWING TITLE: DESIGNED BY: SINAMM ENGINEERING LIMITED. APPROVED BY:
718 MW COMBINED CYCLE POWER PROJECT, MEGHNAGHAT, BANGLADESH SECTION DETAILS CHEC ED BY:
MEGHNAGHAT, BANGLADESH
SHEET NO. : DRAWN BY:
DOC. NO. : SINAMM STG MB PLAT ORM-01
06 SINAMM ENGINEERING LIMITED
 STAGING AND SHUTTERING DETAILS FOR STG MIDDLE BEAM
Ref. Drawing no:
1. 19FW-00UMA00-C04-0032-R0 Steam Turbine Foundation Plan
2. 19FW-00UMA00-C04-0033-R0 Steam Turbine Foundation Plan
3. 19FW-00UMA00-C04-0034-R0 Steam Turbine Foundation Plan
4. 19FW-00UMA00-C04-0035-R0 Steam Turbine Foundation Plan

Data :
i. f'c = 30 MPa [APPENDIX-A]
ii. fy =
410 MPa [APPENDIX-A]
[APPENDIX-B : Table 6.2.1: Unit Weight of Basic
iii. Wc = 25 kN/m3
Materials, BNBC-20154]

Let, Steel Ratio for 30MPa = 4350 psi = 2.17%; Wc=22.8+(0.63*2.17) = 24.17 ≈ 25 kN/m3 [APPENXIX-C : Min. & Max Steel Ratio as per ACI Code]

(APPENDIX-B : Table 6.2.1: Unit Weight of Basic

iv. Wst = 77 kN/m3
Materials, BNBC-2015)

v. Fy = 250 Mpa [APPENDIX-D : Steel Material, ASTM A36]

vi. E = 200,000 Mpa

Design Method = ASD

Compact & Non-Compact Check : [APPENDIX-E : Shape Classification as Per AISC]

1. C-CHANNEL - 100X50X5
λ= b/tf = 10.00
λp= 0.38√(E/Fy) = 10.75
λr= 1.0√(E/Fy) = 28.28
So, Flange is Compact

λ= h/tw = 18.00
λp= 3.76√(E/Fy) = 106.35
λr= 5.70√(E/Fy) = 161.22
So, Web is Compact

2. I-BEAM - 200X100X5.5X8
λ= b/2tf = 6.25
λp= 0.38√(E/Fy) = 10.75
λr= 1.0√(E/Fy) = 28.28
So, Flange is Compact

λ= h/tw = 33.45
λp= 3.76√(E/Fy) = 106.35
λr= 5.70√(E/Fy) = 161.22
So, Web is Compact

3. MS PIPE-D100, T=4.5
λ= D/t = 22.22
λr= 0.11(E/Fy) = 80.00
So, Non-slender effect.

4. MS PIPE-D38, T=2.3
λ= D/t = 16.52
λr= 0.11(E/Fy) = 80.00
So, Non-slender effect.
 STAGING AND SHUTTERING DETAILS FOR STG MIDDLE BEAM
2. Stagging & Formwork for EL (+) 6.6

i. Beam Depth = 1000 mm

Load Calculation :

i. DL 12mm Marine Plyboard +

a) RCC Slab wt.= 25.00 kN/m2 (=25*2050/1000) 1.98mm MS Sheet
b) Self wt. of 12mm Plyboard (650 kg/cum)= 0.08 kN/m2 (=12*650*9.81/1000)
c) Self wt. Steel Shutter = 0.35 kN/m2
Total, WDL = 25.42 kN/m2
Total, WDL = 25.42 kN/m

ii. HL
Horizontal Load is to be considered larger one of the following criteria
a) 2% of W DL = 0.508 kN/m
b) 1.5kN/m of slab edge = 1.50 kN/m (Control)
<38x38x4 262 262 <38x38x4
Total, WHL = 1.50 kN/m
--38x3
iii. LL
a) Live Load = 2.5 kN/m2 [APPENDIX-1, ACI-347 FORMWORK DESIGN GUIDELINE]
Total, WLL= 2.5 kN/m2
Total, WLL= 2.50 kN/m

Let, strength reduction for reused material and Beam Side Formwork and other non-considerable load factor = 125% of W' T
(as per professional experience)
Total Load :
W'T=WDL +WLL + WHL = 29.42 kN/m
WT=WDL +WLL + WHL = 36.78 kN/m [29.42*1.25]
Let, Panel Size, a= 1000 mm
b=L= 262 mm
Panel ratio, α= 0.26 =short span/long span
All edges Condition= Pinned Support
P= 36.78 kN/m2
MS sheet, tst= 1.98 mm
Plyboaard, tply= 12.00 mm
Plyboard,Fy/ply= 42.00 MPa (Along the Face Grain)
25.00 MPa (Across the Face Grain)
APPENDIX-2 : IS 710 : 2010
Plyboard, E1/ply= 7,500.00 MPa (Along the Face Grain)
Plyboard, E2/ply= 4,000.00 MPa (Across the Face Grain)
Steel, Fy/st = 250.00 MPa
Steel, Est= 200,000.00 MPa
∆(all) = b/180 [APPENDIX-3 : BNBC-2015, Table : 6.1.2 Deflection Limits]

Moment Capacity Check :

2
M= WTL /10 [= 36.78*0.262*0.262/10)
= 0.252 kN-m = 252,477.21 N -mm
2
Z= bt /6 [=1000*(12^2+1.98^2)/6]
3
= 24,653.40 mm

M/Z= 10.24 MPa < 42 *0.67 = 28.14 MPa

25 *0.67 = 16.75 MPa Hence OK
I= 1.45E+05 mm^4 [=1000*(12^3+1.98^3)/12)

Now Calculate Combined Modulus of Elasticity, E c

1/E1c = Vply/E1/ply + Vst/ Est Vply = Aply / Ac
= 0.858/7500 + 0.142/200000 = (1*12/1000) / (1*13.98/1000) 12mm Plyboard
= 1.15E-04 = 0.858 1.98mm MS Sheet
E1c 8,683.77 Mpa Vst = Ast / Ac
= (1*1.98/1000) / (1*13.98/1000)
= 0.142

1/E2c = Vply/E2/ply + Vst/ Est

= 0.858/4000 + 0.142/200000
= 2.15E-04
E2c = 4,646.62 Mpa (control)
 STAGING AND SHUTTERING DETAILS FOR STG MIDDLE BEAM
2. Stagging & Formwork for EL (+) 6.6

Bending Stress Check :

0.75xPxL2 (a) [APPENDIX-4]
σ(max) =
t2 (1+1.61 α3)
= 12.540 MPa =(0.75*36.78*262^2)/(1.98^2+12^2)*(1+1.61*0.262^3)
σ(all) = 16.75 MPa Hence OK

Deflection Check :
0.1422xPxL4 (b) [APPENDIX-4]
∆P/(max)=
E2c(t3ply+t3st) (1+2.21 α3)
= 0.04 mm =(0.1422*36.78*262^4)/(4646.62*(12^3+1.98^3)*(1+2.21*0.262^3))
∆(all)= 1.46 mm Hence OK
 2B. C-Channel Design :

Size = [ 100x50x5mm @ 0.096 kN/m

Spacing = 800 mm C/C

C-Channel @ 225
Considering,
Span Length, L = 800 mm (I-Beam C/C Distance)
Load Area= 225 X 800 mm
800 800 I-Beaml
Load Calculation :
i. DL
a) RCC Slab wt. = 25.00 kN/m2 = 5.63 kN/m (=250*0.225)
b) Self wt. of 12mm Plyboard+38mm Shutter = 0.42 kN/m2 = 0.10 kN/m
d) Self wt. of C-channel= - - = 0.096 kN/m
Total, WDL= = 5.82 kN/m

ii. LL
Live Load = 2.5 kN/m2 = 0.56 kN/m (=2.5*0.225)
Total, WLL = 0.56 kN/m

Total Load :
W'T=WDL + WLL = 6.38 kN/m
WT=WDL+WLL 7.97 kN/m (=9.87*1.25)

Section Property Check:

M= WTL²/8 [=7.97*0.35*0.800/8]
= 0.638 kN-m = 637,902.01 N-mm

Sx/req= M/0.6*Fy [=637902.01/(0.60*250)]

= 4,252.68 mm3 < 28,658.00 mm3
Hence OK
 Ix= 1.43E+06 mm4
Deflection Check :
∆WT= 5WTL4/384EIx (=5*7.97*800^4)/(384*200,000*1.43*E+06)
= 0.1484 mm

∆(all)= L/180 [=800/180]

= 4.44 mm Hence OK

Shear Check :

h/tw = 18 [=90/5]

Va = WTL/2 [=7.97*800/2]
= 3,189.51 N

Aw= htw Web Thickness ,tw 5 mm

= 450.00 mm2 Web Height, h 90 mm

fa = Va / Aw
= 7.09 MPa

Fa = 0.4 F y
= 100.00 MPa Hence OK

Lateral-Torsional Buckling Check :

Lp = 1.1*12.66*sqrt(200000/250)
393.86 mm

Lr = pi()*12.66*sqrt(200000/(0.70*250))
1344.48 mm

Since Lp < Lr Hence there is no lateral tortional buckling.

bfc 50
hc 90
tw 5
tfc 5
aw hctw/bfc*tfc
= 1.8

rt bfc/sqrt(12*(1+aw/6)
= 12.66
 2C. I-Beam Design : (BACK TO BACK C-CHANNEL)

Size = (200x100x5.5x8mm @ 0.282 kN/m

Spacing = 800 mm C/C

C-Channel 225mm C/C Point Load

Load Calculation :

Span Length, L = 800 mm (Pipes C/C Distance) I-Beam

Load Area= 800 x 800 mm

800 800 Pipes

i. DL
a) Self wt. of I beam= = 0.282 kN/m (UDL)

b) DL of C-Chaneel = 5.817 kN/m = 5.817 kN (Point Load)

ii. LL
a) Live Load of C-Channel = 0.56 kN/m = 0.56 kN (Point Load)

Total Load :
W'UDL 0.28 kN/m
P'T=PDL+PLL 6.38 kN

WUDL 0.35 kN/m (=0.28*1.25)

PT=PDL+PLL 7.97 kN (=6.38*1.25) (Point load act @ 225mm C/C along length of I-Beam)

Section Property Check:

M= 3.22 kN-m (Refer to Next Page)
M= 3,220,000.00 N-mm

Sreq= M/0.6*Fy = 21,466.67 mm³ < 75216.00 mm3

Hence OK
 Ix= 3.82E+06 mm4
Deflection Check :
∆T= 5WUDL L4/384EIx+Pa(3L2-4a2)/24EIx
= 0.1249 mm (=(5*0.35*800^4)/(384*200000*1.76E07) +
(7.94*800*200*(3*800^2-4*200^2)/(24*200000*3.82E06))

∆(all)= L/180
= 4.44 mm (=800/180) Hence OK

Shear Check :

Va = 12.10 kN (APPENDIX4 : From S.F.D)

= 9,680.00 N

Aw= htw Web Thickness ,t w 5.5 mm

2
= 1,012.00 mm Web Height, h 184 mm

fa = Va / Aw
= 9.57 MPa

Fa = 0.4 Fy
= 100.00 MPa Hence OK
Lateral-Torsional Buckling Check :

Lb = 800 mm [unsupported length]

Lp = 1.1*26.23*sqrt(200000/250)
816.22 mm

Lr = pi()*26.23*sqrt(200000/(0.70*250))
2786.20 mm

Since Lp < Lr Hence there is no lateral tortional buckling.

bfc 100
hc 184
tw 5.5
tfc 8
aw hctw/bfc*tfc
= 1.265

rt bfc/sqrt(12*(1+aw/6)
= 26.23
2D. Bracing Pipe (Horizontal / Diagonal) Design :
Size =
D= 38 mm O/O
t= 2.3 mm
4
I= 41,265.90 mm
Self wt. of Pipe= 2.030 kg/m = 0.2 kN/m

Load Calculation :
Vertical Load for a single Pipe = 12.10 kN (Load from MS Pipes)
Vertical Load for 3 Pipes Togather, Pr = 60.50 kN [Let 5 Pipes will be Braced Togather]
Lateral Load for Vertical Load, Prb = 0.4% Pr [APPENDIX-5 : AISC A-6 for Relative Bracing]
= 0.24 kN …....................... (i)

Lateral Load due to Concrete Dumping, Wind and others Factor wil be greater of the following two criteria
a) 2% of Toal Dead Load on Slab Form 5 Pipes with x-bracing
b) 1.5kN/m at edge of Slab Form

Now Calculate Total Dead Load of TB = Toal wt. of Concrete of STG Middle Beam x 125%
= 23.63 kN [=MB SIZE=9.0*2.1*1*125%]
2% of Toal Deal Load= 0.02 kN/m [=14572.94/164.698*2%] [Beam Perimeter =9*2+2.1*2=22.20rm]
So Take = 1.50 kN/m

Pipes to Pipes Distance = 800 mm C/C

Load on a Single Pipes = 1.20 kN …......................(ii)

Total Lateral Laod :

Horizontal Bracing
(i) + (ii) = P1 = 1.44 kN

Input Data
MS Pipe
Vertical Pipe Height from LVL+5.3 to LVL+9.9, h1 = 6871.00 mm = 22.54 ft
Bent Width, L= 1600.00 mm = 5.25 ft [=800x2=1600mm]
Lateral Story Load, P1 = 1.44 kN = 0.32 Kip
Left & Right Column, LC1=LR1 = 6871.00 mm = 22.54 ft [=D=100, t=4.5, A= 2.13 in2]
Beam, HB1 = 1600.00 mm = 5.25 ft
[=D=38, t=1.2, A=0.22]
Bracing Beam, DB1 = 7054.83 mm = 23.15 ft
Mod. Of Elasticity, E= 200.00 Gpa = 29000.00 ksi

[Design refers to Next Page]

5
 "XBRACING.xls" Program
Version 1.2

X-Braced Bent Analysis for Lateral Loads

For 1-Story Bent
Assuming Fully Braced, Tension-Only System
Job Name: MEG 718MW CCPP Subject: Z3-TB BRACING
Job Number: STG/MB&TB/FORM-01 Originator: SINAMM Checker: SCT

Forces and Reactions: L= 5.25 ft.

Lateral Story Loads (Bent Width)
P1 = 0.32 k 0.32 k

Story Height -1.43 k

0.00 k

1.39 k
h1 = 22.54 ft. Brace Angle1=76.89 L1=23.15 ft. Ht = 22.54 ft.
(Total Bent Height)
P(bot) = 0.00 k 0.32 k = VL

Member Force Sign Convention:

+ = Compression 5.25 ft.
- = Tension
Vertical Reaction Sign Convention:
Upward = Compression RL = 1.39 k RR = 1.39 k
Downward = Tension (Uplift) Bent Elevation

Input Data for Drift Analysis:

Member Data Nomenclature:

Designation Length Area LC = Left Column Segment
(ft.) (in.^2) RC = Right Column Segment
Left Col. LC1 22.54 2.13 HB = Horizontal Beam
Right Col. RC1 22.54 2.13 DB = Diagonal Brace
Beam HB1 5.25 0.22
Brace DB1 23.15 0.22 Note: Column segments, beams,
and braces are numbered from
Mod. of Elasticity, E = 29000 ksi bottom to top, same as stories.

Results: Note: Results are for joints at left side of bent, with all members (segments) assumed pinned at both ends.

Drift Analysis
Story Total Drift Drift Ratio
Number Dt (in.) (Total)
Story 1 0.3033 Ht / 892

11 of 14 29-11-20 4:04 PM
 Capacity of Bracing Pipe
Size =
D= 38 mm O/O
t= 2.3 mm
4
I= 41,265.90 mm
Rgx = 12.65 mm
Self wt. of Pipe= 10.41 kg/m = 0.102 kN/m

Load Calculation :

Load on Horizontal Pipe = 0.32 k = 1.4405 kN Unbraced Length = = 5.25 ft = 1600.41 mm

Tension/Compression, Load on Diagonal Bracing Pipe = 1.43 k = 6.3517 kN Unbraced Length = = 23.15 ft = 7057.93 mm

Let Diagonal Pipe is in Critical Condition

Pu = 6.35 kN

Load Capacity Check :

Unbraced Condition :
k= 1
Leff = 7054.83 mm
kLeff/Rgx = 557.69 > 200 NG

Mid- Braced Condition :

k= 1
Leff = 3527.42 mm [=7054.83/2] Two Bracing Pipes Connection Point
kLeff/Rgx = 278.85 > 200 NG

Two- Braced Condition :

k= 1
Leff = 2351.61 mm [=7054.83/3]
kLeff/Rgx = 185.90 < 200 NG
2
π EI
Critical Load on Props, Pcr = 2
(kLeff)
= 14.71 kN = 1,500.45 kg

F.S.= 2.32 >2.5 Hence OK

Three- Braced Condition :

k= 1
Leff = 1763.71 mm [=7054.83/4]
kLeff/Rgx = 139.42 < 200 NG

2
π EI
Critical Load on Props, Pcr = 2
(kLeff)
= 26.16 kN = 2,667.47 kg

F.S.= 4.12 >2.5 Hence OK

Pu
Bulking Displacement Check : Pn = Ωc =1.6 (AISC Specficiation)
Buckling Displacement, ∂s= 1/1-((P u/(1.67xPcr)))< 1.5
= 1.37 < 1.5 Hence OK
 1E. MS Pipe Design (Vertical) :
Size =
D= 100 mm O/O
t= 4.5 mm
4
I= 1,542,570.00 mm
Rgx = 33.80 mm
Self wt. of Pipe= 10.41 kg/m = 0.102 kN/m

Load Calculation :
MS Pipe Length (unbraced) = 6871.00 mm
Load Area= 800 x 800 mm

i. Max. Reaction from I-Beam = 45.89 kN

ii. Vertical Reaction from Horizontal Load =1.34 kip = 5.96 kN
Total Axial Load on Pipe = 51.85 kN = 5,287.45 kg

Load Capacity Check :

Unbraced Condition :
k= 1
Leff = 6871 mm
kLeff/Rgx = 203.28 > 200 NG

Mid-braced Condition :
k= 1
Leff = 3435.5 mm [6871/2]
kLeff/Rgx = 101.64 < 200 Hence OK

2
π EI
Critical Load on Props, P cr = 2
(kLeff)
= 257.72 kN = 26,280.08 kg

F.S.= 4.97 > 2.50 Hence OK

Bulking Displacement Check : Ωc =1.6 (AISC Specficiation)

Buckling Displacement, ∂s= 1/1-((P u/(1.67xPcr)))< 1.5
= 1.14 < 1.5 Hence OK

Note: As per design, Mid-braced Pipe Length is adequate for Vertical Loading Condition.

Combined Bending & Axial Compression Check :

Input :
Column Length = 11.27 ft [3435.5mm]
Column Section = HSS4.0x0.188 [D=100mm=4", t= 4.5mm=0.188"]
Column Yield Stress = 36 ksi [250 Mpa]
Axial Load = 11.41 Kip [54.91 kN]
Lateral Load = 0.32 Kip [1.39kN]
= 0.06 kip/ft [equivalent UDL Load = 0.31/11.27*2]
Tube / Pipe Column Design Based on AISC-ASD 9th

INPUT DATA & DESIGN SUMMARY

COLUMN SECTION (Tube or Pipe) HSS4.000X0.188
Pipe A rx ry Sx Sy x y
2.09 1.35 1.35 1.92 1.92 3.83 3.83

COLUMN YIELD STRESS Fy = 36 ksi

DIMENSIONS H = 11.27 ft

AXIAL LOAD P = 11.41 kips

STRONG AXIS BENDING ? (1=Yes, 0=No) => 1 yes, strong axis, x-x, bending.
BENDING LOAD w= = 0.056 k / ft (Lateral Load = 1.44 kN = 0.32 kip
= 0.056 kip/ft)
THE DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.

ANALYSIS
CHECK COMBINED COMPRESSION AND BENDING CAPACITY

ìfa fb fa
ï + , for £ 0.15
ïFa Fb Fa
ï æ fa Cm f b ö
ï ç + ÷
í ç F a æç1 - f a ö÷ F b ÷ fa
= 0.83 < 4/3 [Satisfactory]
ï L arg er of ç è
'
Fe ø ÷ , for > 0.15 (AISC-ASD, H1, page 5-54)
ï ç ÷ Fa
ï ç f a f ÷
ï + b
ç 0.6 F y F b ÷
ï
î è ø
Where fa = P/ A = 5.5 ksi
Es = 29000 ksi
KL x = 11.2713255 ft, for x-x axial load. KL y = 11.271 ft, for y-y axial load.
(KL / r)max = 100 < 200 [Satisfactory]
2 0.5
C c = (2 p E s / F y ) = 126

ì é ( kl / r ) ú 2ù
ï ê1 - Fy
ï ê 2C c2 ú kl
ï ë û , for £ Cc
ï 5 3 ( kl / r ) ( kl / r )3 r 13.0 ksi, (AISC-ASD, E2, page 5-42)
Fa =í + - =
ï3 8C c 8C 3c
ï 2 > fa [Satisfactory]
ï 12p E kl
2
, for > Cc
ï 23 ( kl / r ) r
î
Cm = 1.0
M max = 0.89 ft-kips, at middle of column
f b = M max / S = 5.5871 ksi
F b = 0.6 F y = 21.6 ksi, (AISC-ASD, F3, page 5-48) > 3/4 f b [Satisfactory]
12p 2E
F 'e = 2
= 14.96 ksi
23( kl / r )

CHECK LATERAL DEFLECTION

5w H 4
D Mid = = 0.18 in
384 EI
< L / 180 = 0.75 in [Satisfactory]
Loads on Buildings and Structures Chapter 2

2.2 DEAD LOADS

2.2.1 General
The minimum design dead load for buildings and portions thereof shall be determined in accordance with the
provisions of this Section. In addition, design of the overall structure and its primary load-resisting systems shall
conform to the general design provisions given in Chapter 1.
2.2.2 Definition
Dead Load is the vertical load due to the weight of permanent structural and non-structural components and
attachments of a building such as walls, floors, ceilings, permanent partitions and fixed service equipment etc.
2.2.3 Assessment of Dead Load
Dead load for a structural member shall be assessed based on the forces due to:

· weight of the member itself,

· weight of all materials of construction incorporated into the building to be supported permanently by the
member,
· weight of permanent partitions,
· weight of fixed service equipment, and
· net effect of prestressing.
2.2.4 Weight of Materials and Constructions
In estimating dead loads, the actual weights of materials and constructions shall be used, provided that in the
absence of definite information, the weights given in Tables 6.2.1 and 6.2.2 shall be assumed for the purposes of
design.
Table 6.2.1: Unit Weight of Basic Materials
Material Unit Weight Material Unit Weight
(kN/m3) (kN/m3)
Aluminium 27.0 Granite, Basalt 26.4

Asphalt 21.2 Iron - cast 70.7

Brass 83.6 - wrought 75.4

Bronze 87.7 Lead 111.0

Brick 18.9 Limestone 24.5

Cement 14.7 Marble 26.4

Coal, loose 8.8 Sand, dry 15.7

Concrete - stone aggregate (unreinforced) 22.8* Sandstone 22.6

- brick aggregate (unreinforced) 20.4* Slate 28.3

Copper 86.4 Steel 77.0

Cork, normal 1.7 Stainless Steel 78.75

Cork, compressed 3.7 Timber 5.9-11.0

Glass, window (soda-lime) 25.5 Zinc 70.0

* for reinforced concrete, add 0.63 kN/m3 for each 1% by volume of main reinforcement

Bangladesh National Building Code 2015 6-35

347-6
• Insufficient allowance for eccentric loading due to
placement sequences;
• Failure to investigate bearing stresses in members in
contact with shores or struts;
• Failure to provide proper lateral bracing or lacing of
shoring;
• Failure to investigate the slenderness ratio of compres-
sion members;
• Inadequate provisions to tie corners of intersecting
cantilevered forms together;
• Failure to account for loads imposed on form hardware
anchorages during closure of form panel gaps when
aligning formwork; and
• Failure to account for elastic shortening during post-
tensioning.
2.1.5 Formwork drawings and calculations—Before
constructing forms, the formwork engineer/contractor may
be required to submit detailed drawings, design calculations,
or both of proposed formwork for review and approval by
the engineer/architect or approving agency. If such drawings
are not approved by the engineer/architect or approving
agency, the formwork engineer/contractor should make such
changes as may be required before the start of construction
of the formwork.
The review, approval, or both of the formwork drawings
does not relieve the contractor of the responsibility for
adequately constructing and maintaining the forms so that
they will function properly. If reviewed by persons other
than those employed by the contractor, the review or
approval indicates that no exception is taken by the reviewer
to the assumed design loadings in combination with design
stresses shown; the proposed construction methods; the
placement rates, equipment, and sequences; the proposed
form materials; and the overall scheme of formwork. All
major design values and loading conditions should be shown
on formwork drawings. These include assumed values of
live load; the compressive strength of concrete for formwork
removal and for application of construction loads; rate of
placement, minimum temperature, height, and drop of
concrete; weight of moving equipment that can be operated
on formwork; foundation pressure; design stresses; camber
diagrams; and other pertinent information, if applicable.
In addition to specifying types of materials, sizes, lengths,
and connection details, formwork drawings should provide
for applicable details, such as:
• Procedures, sequence, and criteria for removal of
forms, shores, and reshores;
• Design allowance for construction loads on new slabs
when such allowance will affect the development of shor-
ing, reshoring schemes, or both (refer to Sections 2.5 and
3.8 for shoring and reshoring of multistory structures);
• Anchors, form ties, shores, lateral bracing, and horizontal
lacing;
• Field adjustment of forms;
• Waterstops, keyways, and inserts;
• Working scaffolds and runways;
• Weepholes or vibrator holes, where required;
• Screeds and grade strips;
ACI STANDARD
• Location of external vibrator mountings;
• Crush plates or wrecking plates where stripping can
damage concrete;
• Removal of spreaders or temporary blocking;
• Cleanout holes and inspection openings;
• Construction joints, contraction joints, and expansion
joints in accordance with contract documents (also
refer to ACI 301);
• Sequence of concrete placement and minimum elapsed
time between adjacent placements;
• Chamfer strips or grade strips for exposed corners and
construction joints;
• Camber;
• Mudsills or other foundation provisions for formwork;
• Special provisions, such as safety, fire, drainage, and
protection from ice and debris at water crossings;
• Formwork coatings;
• Notes to formwork erector showing size and location of
conduits and pipes projecting through formwork; and
• Temporary openings or attachments for climbing crane
or other material handling equipment.
2.2—Loads
2.2.1 Vertical loads—Vertical loads consist of dead and
live loads. The weight of formwork plus the weight of the
reinforcement and freshly placed concrete is dead load. The
live load includes the weight of the workers, equipment,
material storage, runways, and impact.
Vertical loads assumed for shoring and reshoring design
for multistory construction should include all loads trans-
mitted from the floors above as dictated by the proposed
construction schedule. Refer to Section 2.5.
The formwork should be designed for a live load of not
less than 50 lb/ft2 (2.4 kPa) of horizontal projection. When
motorized carts are used, the live load should not be less than
75 lb/ft2 (3.6 kPa).
The design load for combined dead and live loads should
not be less than 100 lb/ft2 (4.8 kPa) or 125 lb/ft2 (6.0 kPa) if
motorized carts are used.
2.2.2 Lateral pressure of concrete—Unless the conditions
of Section 2.2.2.1 or 2.2.2.2 are met, formwork should be
designed for the lateral pressure of the newly placed concrete
given in Eq. (2.1a) or (2.1b). Minimum values given for
other pressure formulas do not apply to Eq. (2.1a) and (2.1b).
p = wh (lb/ft 2) (2.1a)
p = ρgh (kPa) (2.1b)
where
p = lateral pressure, lb/ft2 (kPa);
w = unit weight of concrete, lb/ft3;
ρ = density of concrete, kg/m3;
g = gravitational constant, 9.81 N/kg; and
h = depth of fluid or plastic concrete from top of place-
ment to point of consideration in form, ft (m).
The set characteristics of a mixture should be understood,
and using the rate of placement, the level of fluid concrete
 IS 710 : 2010

into shorter intervals by keeping the samples in room and Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981
temperature at 27 ± 2°C in water (in case of boiling) and Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act,
or in air (in case of drying). The sample shall have an 1977 along with the authorization, if required under
average and minimum individual modulus of elasticity the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 while applying
and modulus of rupture no t less than the values for ECO-Mark appropriate with enforced Rules and
specified in Table 4. Regulations of forest department.
Table 3 Minimum Values for MOE and MOR 10.2 Specific Requirements
(Clause 9.1.6)
The plywood shall conform to the specific requirements
Sl Requirement Along the Across the given for ECO-Mark under relevant clauses of the
No. Face Grain Face Grain
(1) (2) (3) (4) standard.
i) MOE, N/mm 2: NOTE — The man ufacturer shall provide documentary
a) Average 70500 40000 evidence by way of certificate or declaration to Bureau of Indian
b) Minimum 60700 30600 Standards, while applying for ECO-Mark.
individual
ii) MOR, N/mm2: 11 MARKING
a) Average 50 30
b) Minimum 45 27 11.1 Each plywood board shall be legibly and indelibly
individua marked or stamped with the following particulars along
with such other marks as the purchaser may stipulate
9.1.8 Retention of Preservative at the time of placing order:
When tested as per IS 2753 (Parts 1 and 2) the plywood a) Manufacturer’s name, initials or recognized
shall have a retention of preservative as specified trade-mark, if any;
in 5.3. b) Year of manufacture;
c) Abbreviations indicating the species of timber
Table 4 Minimum Values for MOE and MOR used in each ply, as indicated in col 4 of
(Wet Bending Strength) Tables 1 and 2;
(Clause 9.1.7)
d) Batch number; and
Sl Requirement Along the Face Across the e) Criteria for which the plywood has been
No. Grain Face Grain
(1) (2) (3) (4)
labelled as ECO-Mark.

i) MOE, N/mm2: 11.2 BIS Certification Marking

a) Average 30750 20000
b) Minimum 30400 10800 The product may also be marked with the Standard
individual Mark.
ii) MOR, N/mm 2:
a) Average 25 15 11.2.1 The use of the Standard Mark is governed by
b) Minimum 22 13 the provisions of Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 1986
individual
and the Rules and Regulations made thereunder. The
details of conditions under which the licence for the
10 ADDITI ONAL REQUIREM ENTS FOR use of Standard Mark may be granted to manufacturers
ECO-MARK or producers may be obtained from the Bureau of
Indian Standards.
10.1 General Requirements
10.1.1 The plywood shall conform to the requirements 12 TENDER SAMPLE
of quality specified in this standard. Where samples are required to be tendered, three
10.1.2 The manuf acturer shall produce to BIS samples, each not less than 90 mm × 60 mm in size
environmental consent clearance from the concerned shall be submitted by the supplier, and these samples,
State Pollution Control Board as per the provisions of if the tender is accepted, shall constitute the standard
Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 as regards the type of timber, quality and finish.

5
IS 710 : 2010
9.1.1 Moisture Content
The moisture content of test pieces cut from each board
selected as under 9.1 shall not exceed 15 percent nor
be less than 5 percent when determined by the method
described in IS 1734 (Part 1).
9.1.2 Glue Adhesion in Dry State
9.1.2.1 Glue shear strength
When tested for glue adhesion by the method described
in IS 1734 (Part 4) the average failing load shall be not
less than 1 350 N and no individual value shall be less
than 1 100 N.
9.1.2.2 Adhesion of plies
The adhesion of plies shall be tested by forcibly
se pa rating the layers. The ven eers s ha ll of fer
appreciable resistance to separation and the fractured
samples shall show some adherent fibres distributed
more or less uniformly. Adhesion may also be tested
by knife test method described in IS 1734 (Part 5).
NOTE — In case, a definite result is not obtainable by the
method described in IS 1734 (Part 4), the result of knife test
described in IS 1734 (Part 5) shall be considered as decisive.
In case of even number of plies where the grains of central
plies follow the same direction the result as obtained from knife
test shall be considered final.
9.1.3 Water Resistance Test
The specimens shall be subjected to any one of the
tests specified in 9.1.3.1 and 9.1.3.2. The test specimen
for carrying out test as per 9.1.3.1.1, shall be as
specified in IS 1734 (Part 5). Six test pieces each
approximately 250 mm × 100 mm, shall be cut from
any position in the board such that the grain of the
face veneer is parallel to the length of the piece for
carrying out test as per 9.1.3.1.2.
9.1.3.1 The specimens shall be kept submerged in a
pan of boiling water for a period of 72 h. The period
of 72 h of boiling may be a continuous period or an
aggregate of smaller periods of boiling, if the test piece
is left in cold water between these smaller periods.
These test pieces shall then be removed from the boiling
water and cooled down to room temperature by
plunging them in cold water. These test specimens,
while still in wet condition, shall be subjected to tests
described under 9.1.3.1.1 and 9.1.3.1.2.
9.1.3.1.1 Glue shear strength
When tested for glue shear strength by the method
described in IS 1734 (Part 4), the average failing load
shall be not less than 1 000 N and no individual value
shall be less than 800 N.
9.1.3.1.2 Adhesion of plies
The adhesion of plies shall be tested by forcibly
4
se pa rat ing the lay ers. The veneers s hall o ffer
appreciable resistance to separation and the fractured
sample shall show some adherent fibres distributed
more or less uniformly. Adhesion may also be tested
by knife test method described in IS 1734 (Part 5).
NOTE — In case a definite result is not obtainable by the
method described in IS 1734 (Part 4), the result of knife test
described in IS 1734 (Part 5) shall be considered as decisive.
In case of even number of plies where the grains of central
plies follow the same direction the result as obtained from knife
test shall be considered final.
9.1.3.2 The specimens shall be subjected to constant
steam pressure for a definite duration inside a vacuum
steam pressure test apparatus as described in Annex C
and thereafter subjected to tests as per 9.1.3.1.1
and 9.1.3.1.2.
9.1.4 Tensile Strength
The tensile strength when determined by the method
described in IS 1734 (Part 9) shall comply with the
following values:
a) Tensile strength shall be no t l ess th an
42.0 N/mm2 in the direction parallel to grain
direction of the face veneers,
b) Tensile strength shall be not less than
25.0 N/mm2 in the direction of right angles
to the grain direction of the face veneers, and
c) Sum of the tensile strength in both directions
shall be not less than 84.5 N/mm 2.
If the plywood contains scarf joints, half the specimen
subjected to testing shall contain the joint.
9.1.5 Mycological Test
The test for resistance to micro-organism shall be
carried out by the method described in IS 1734 (Part 7).
When tested the test piece shall show no appreciable
signs of separation at the edges of the veneers and shall
comply with the requirements specified in 9.1.3.
9.1.6 Static Bending Strength
Three test specimens taken in each direction from the
sample of plywood, when tested in accordance with
IS 1734 (Part 11) shall have an average and a minimum
individual value of modulus of elasticity and modulus
of rupture not less than the values specified in Table 3.
9.1.7 Wet Bending Strength
Three test specimen taken in accordance with IS 1734
(Part 11) and from each direction of a sample of
plywood, shall be subjected to cyclic test for 3 cycles,
each cycle consisting of 4 h boiling in water and 16 h
drying in an oven at 65 ± 2°C or of 72 h of boiling.
The samples shall be then kept in water at 27 ± 2°C
for 1 h and thereafter tested as per IS 1734 (Part 11).
The duration of boiling/drying in oven may be split
Definitions and General Requirements Chapter 1

1.2.5� Serviceability

Structural framing systems and components shall be designed with adequate stiffness to have deflections,
vibration, or any other deformations within the serviceability limit of building or structure. The deflections of
structural members shall not exceed the more restrictive of the limitations provided in Chapters 2 through 13 or
that permitted by Table 6.1.2 or the notes that follow. For wind and earthquake loading, story drift and sway shall
be limited in accordance with the provisions of Sec 1.5.6. In checking the serviceability, the load combinations and
provisions of Sec 2.7.5 shall be followed.
Table 6.1.2: Deflection Limits a, b, c, h (Except earthquake load)
Construction +
Roof members:e
Supporting plaster ceiling /360 /360 /240
Supporting non-plaster ceiling /240 /240 /180
Not supporting ceiling /180 /180 /120
Floor members /360 - /240
Exterior walls and interior partitions
With brittle finishes - /240
With flexible finishes - /120

Farm buildings - /180

Greenhouses - /120
Where, , , and stands for span of the member under consideration, live load, wind load and dead load respectively.
Notes:
a.�For structural roofing and siding made of formed metal sheets, the total load deflection shall not exceed /60. For secondary
roof structural members supporting formed metal roofing, the live load deflection shall not exceed /150. For secondary
wall members supporting formed metal siding, the design wind load deflection shall not exceed /90. For roofs, this
exception only applies when the metal sheets have no roof covering.
b.�Interior partitions not exceeding 2 m in height and flexible, folding and portable partitions are not governed by the provisions
of this Section.
c.�For cantilever members, shall be taken as twice the length of the cantilever.
d.�For wood structural members having a moisture content of less than 16% at time of installation and used under dry
conditions, the deflection resulting from + 0.5 is permitted to be substituted for the deflection resulting from + .
e.�The above deflections do not ensure against ponding. Roofs that do not have sufficient slope or camber to assure adequate
drainage shall be investigated for ponding. See Sec 1.6.5 for rain and ponding requirements.
f.� The wind load is permitted to be taken as 0.7 times the “component and cladding” loads for the purpose of determining
deflection limits herein.
g.�Deflection due to dead load shall include both instantaneous and long term effects.
h.�For aluminum structural members or aluminum panels used in skylights and sloped glazing framing, roofs or walls of sunroom
additions or patio covers, not supporting edge of glass or aluminum sandwich panels, the total load deflection shall not
exceed /60. For continuous aluminum structural members supporting edge of glass, the total load deflection shall not
exceed /175 for each glass lite or /60 for the entire length of the member, whichever is more stringent. For aluminum
sandwich panels used in roofs or walls of sunroom additions or patio covers, the total load deflection shall not exceed /120.

1.2.6� Rationality

Structural systems and components thereof shall be analyzed, designed and constructed based on rational
methods which shall include, but not be limited to the provisions of Sec 1.2.7.

1.2.7� Analysis

Analysis of the structural systems shall be made for determining the load effects on the resisting elements and
connections, based on well-established principles of mechanics taking equilibrium, geometric compatibility and
both short and long term properties of the construction materials into account and incorporating the following:

Bangladesh National Building Code 2015 6-5

 BY

rner

F. ARC WELDING FOUNDATION

CLEVELAND