This play analysis document summarizes Alice Birch's 2014 play "Revolt. She said. Revolt again." by providing key details about the play's structure, themes, and elements. The play consists of abstract, nonlinear scenes that challenge gender norms and rules of behavior. It features fluid language and blurred lines between actors and characters to further an impressionistic, countercultural message about revolutionizing established facets of life. Significant lighting and sound effects are used to punctuate pivotal moments in the play's nonlinear narrative.
This play analysis document summarizes Alice Birch's 2014 play "Revolt. She said. Revolt again." by providing key details about the play's structure, themes, and elements. The play consists of abstract, nonlinear scenes that challenge gender norms and rules of behavior. It features fluid language and blurred lines between actors and characters to further an impressionistic, countercultural message about revolutionizing established facets of life. Significant lighting and sound effects are used to punctuate pivotal moments in the play's nonlinear narrative.
This play analysis document summarizes Alice Birch's 2014 play "Revolt. She said. Revolt again." by providing key details about the play's structure, themes, and elements. The play consists of abstract, nonlinear scenes that challenge gender norms and rules of behavior. It features fluid language and blurred lines between actors and characters to further an impressionistic, countercultural message about revolutionizing established facets of life. Significant lighting and sound effects are used to punctuate pivotal moments in the play's nonlinear narrative.
TITLE: Revolt. She said. Revolt again. PLAYWRIGHT: Alice Birch
DATE: 2014, Midsummer MIS-EN-SCENE: 20 WORD SUMMARY:
Mischief Festival. There is no physical set. This asks the audience to have a Birch constructs a series of abstract scenes which serve to break rules, more abstract understanding of the play, making the central behave poorly, and make viewers themes more poignant. Actors always stay onstage, reacting question gender norms. to the main scene or otherwise continuing their lives.
PLOT: The play really doesn’t NOTES: CONFLICT:
follow much of a plot structure, “my choice my choice my choice my choice…” (Act 3) Gender roles and norms are more so jumping between rules to If this play were to be given a set, how would that be consistently challenged break and bend at will. detrimental? Could levels be used effectively here? throughout Birch’s scenes. Having scenes with a prescribed number of gendered “characters” but leaving them without names makes a play very difficult to follow. Nameless, often gender-fluid figures are interesting to me. They allow a further freedom than “established” characters cannot provide. KEY ELEMENTS BEYOND SPOKEN LANGUAGE: There are no stage directions in this play, making this question KEY LIGHTING CHARACTERS: N/A. There are no “main characters.” very tricky to answer. ELEMENTS: While the play doesn’t use many lighting effects, the end of Act 3 uses a quick and dramatic shift in lighting to punctuate the end of a significant monologue/the entire act. KEY COSTUME STRUCTURE: KEY PROP ELEMENTS: ELEMENTS: The play consists of many abstract scenes, often entitled N/A. There are no props. N/A. Costumes are not “Revolutionize the X,” where X is a facet of life (language, mentioned in this play. marriage, work, etc.). Each scene hyper-focuses on its facet and tries to break gender-based rules seemingly whenever possible. As the play continues, the line between actor and character blurs, purposefully and impressively grounding the play. LANGUAGE: IMAGERY: SOUND: Fluid, conversational, and Grandma and Dinah, the man quickly appearing and leaving Like “key lighting elements,” occasionally sexual language Grandma and Dinah’s table, the monologue at the end of while the play doesn’t use many heightens the countercultural act 3, the four women at the very end of the show’s sound effects, the end of Act 3 angle which the play takes. conversation. uses a loud noise to punctuate the end of a significant monologue/the entire act. MESSAGE: Just because rules exist doesn’t mean they can’t - or shouldn’t - be broken. Everything can be revolutionized if you ask the right questions.