Professional Documents
Culture Documents
@ Fagbokforlaget 20214
Snøhetta Arkitektur og Landskap AS was started in 1987 by two architects and four landscape
architects, under the direction of Kjetil Trædal Thorsen. The founders stressed that architecture should
be holistic - that architecture, landscape architecture and interior architecture should not be carried out
separately, but in interaction right from the start of a new building. In 1989 the company changed its
name to Snøhetta, led by Kjetil Trædal Thorsen along with the American Craig Dykers. The company
achieved its international breakthrough when it was decided in 1989 to participate in the competition
for the design of the modern library in Alexandria. Snøhettas solution, a circular, oblique building with
a water mirror outside and a large, airy main hall, won the competition, resulting in great attention
overseas and ensured Snøhetta access to a variety of new projects and architectural competitions.
1
Figure 15.2: Exterior, Bibliotheca Alexandrina
In 2014, Snøhetta had 140 employees - 100 in Oslo and 40 in New York - in the specialties of
The firm has designed a number of signal buildings, such as the Opera in Oslo, Lillehammer Art
Museum, September 11, Manhattan Museum, redesign of Times Square Manhattan, the opera in
Busan, South Korea, and many others. Common to the buildings is a modern one style - often an
organic form inspired by nature - design driven by function and focus on natural location and
interaction with the surroundings. Several of Snøhtta's projects are however, smaller buildings, such as
a Rema 1000 convenience store on Kroppanmarka outside Trondheim, which combines a modern look
with advanced energy-saving solutions 1 (for example, that the waste heat from the freezers was used
to hold the loading ramp ice-free in winter) which combined reduced energy use by more than 25%.
Another
example was Tubaloon, an inflatable stage designed for Kongsberg Jazz Festival.
2
Figure 15.3: Tubaloon, Kongsberg
Snøhetta's customers included public and private organizations worldwide, and came to Snøhetta
The company did not have its own sales department. The assignments often came through being
invited to competitions, direct inquiries (e.g., from potential customers who had seen one of Snøhetta's
signal projects like the Opera house in Oslo), and through partners who had an extensive network
3
Figure 15.4: Rema 1000, Koppanmarka
The company was very keen to understand the customer's situation and to have a continuous
interaction with the customer to come up with a good solution. The company therefore involved
customer directly in the design process, by being present and physically participating in the design of
prototypes and concepts on Snøhetta's premises. This process - internally called transposition - aimed
for the architects to put themselves in the customer's place, and the customers in the architects. They
could also invite others into this conversation - philosophers, sociologists, industry experts - to get a
good supply of ideas. They did not just put together multidisciplinary teams, people were intentionally
given tasks outside their own field – graphic designers created architect drawings, architects created
graphic designs - to create ideas without being bound by traditions and perceptions of what was
possible.
Such a focus on creating concepts together with the customer could provide both competitive
advantages and disadvantages. On the one hand, the company got a very good understanding of what
the customer wanted by not giving preconceived opinions: Snøhetta winning part of the decoration of
the 9/11 Memorial Park in Manhattan, a mission which was crucial to the company's growth and
development in the US, was believed to be partly because they had, among other things, included a
crisis psychologist on the team and had not designed something in advance. On the other hand, you
4
could - even for a company with Snøhetta’s international reputation - risk being excluded from some
the customers. Customers and designers usually started with a discussion around concept,
then with paper and ink, before moving into one of several workshops where one cut out details in
plastic, textile, wood and other materials, both for modeling buildings and designing visual
impressions such as company logos and more. The company had invested heavily in technologies that
supported this process: laser cutters that could cut precisely into different materials, an industrial robot
that could shape larger works, and several 3D printers that could create models by layered deposition
of plastic or metals. One also had a warehouse with many kinds of materials, to be able to demonstrate
Snøhetta grew organically - one hired people one by one, not through the acquisition of
businesses. Recruitment was based on what kind of expertise one needed, professional
skills, but also team spirit and social competence. The company did not have room for “single stars”
and did not have to advertise open positions - on the contrary, many architects and designers
approached the firm to inquire about jobs. The company had a very egalitarian management structure,
5
Figure 15.5 Interior Snøhetta Oslo
In 2014, Snøhetta had two physical locations: In a former harbor shed on Vippetangen below
Akershus Fortress in Oslo and on Broadway farthest south in Manhattan in New York, just off the
In both locations, almost all employees were in one room. Everyone had their own worktable,
arranged in rows like the reading room of a library, and basically the same type of computer and other
equipment, whether you were a designer, architect or accountant. Each year, every single employee
was assigned a new workplace, assigned by lottery. The idea was that everyone should be able to work
with everyone, without getting groupings based on professional specialization. Much work was done
Snøhetta had at times uneven earnings. The owners have never paid any dividends -
6
to the extent it had a surplus, it was reinvested in the company, in premises, in technology and in
various common measures. The company was owned by Ketil Trædal Thorsen in Oslo and Craig
The company had sevral projects all over the world, but also a high-risk profile: For example, a major
project in Saudi Arabia in 2008 where the customer complained over problems with the building, put
the equity at risk. The dispute went to trial and represented a threat to the company until 2013. From
2011 onwards, the finances improved, and the company largely made a profit.
In 2009, the company created its own design department, focused on the design of company logos and
other physical designs. Design projects are smaller than building projects, takes less time, and the
consequences are more reversible. Important in the buildup of this department was that they got DnB,
Norway's largest bank, as an account early on, allowing Snøhetta to not only create a new company
logo, but design the entire bank's physical identity, from letterhead to web pages and buildings.
The design department's bold style and insistence on designing together with the customer resulted in
a number of assignments, but also some discussions and engagement: For some public or publicly
owned customers, such as Avinor (the state airport) and the Telemark County Council, Snøhetta's
advanced design and high bills – resulted in a number of newspaper articles about whether public
7
DnBs logo, designed by Sønhetta.
An ongoing discussion involving all employees (in groups and as a plenary discussion) was the
question of what kind of projects to look for, and - too big individual projects - what kind of
assignments to undertake. The company wanted to work with exciting design and architecture
projects, where profitability was also crucial in addition to the academic challenges.
One example was the opera house in Oslo, designed as a glacier with a marble roof the audience could
walk on. The building quickly became an important tourist attraction and meeting place for the city,
and many potential customers made the trip to Oslo to get inspired. One delegation from the city of
Busan in South Korea saw the Opera and was inspired by the building, and gave Snøhetta commission
to build an opera house in the city. One ended up with a concept which continued several of the
qualities of the Opera in Oslo, while the Opera in Busan is different from the Opera in Oslo, both in
8
Figure 15.6 Opera house, Oslo
9
Appendix 1: Income Statement
10
Appendix 2: Balance sheet
11
12