You are on page 1of 6

CASE REPORTS

J Oral Maxillofac Surg


65:517-522, 2007

Cherubism: Clinicoradiographic Features,


Treatment, and Long-Term Follow-Up
of 8 Cases
Edgard Carvalho Silva, DDS, PhD,*
Guilherme Costa Carvalho Silva, DDS,†
and Tainah Couto Vieira, DDS‡

Cherubism is a rare non-neoplastic hereditary disease quently, cherubism is accompanied by dental arch
related to genetic mutations characterized by bilateral and dental eruption abnormalities. Extragnathic skel-
bone enlargement of the jaws in childhood. Docu- etal involvement is rare. The rounded facies and oc-
mented long-term follow-up of a series of cases is casional upward cast of the eyes with exposure of the
presented. Four familial and 4 sporadic cases of sclerae below the pupil give the patient an appear-
cherubism have been treated and followed for a mean ance reminiscent of the cherubs portrayed in Renais-
of 18 years (range, 5 to 32 years). Four of the patients sance paintings. Affected children appear normal at
were subjected to cosmetic surgical correction justi- birth and are mentally normal. Jaw expansion is no-
fied by extreme size of the jaws, whereas the other 4 ticed within the first years of life, becoming progres-
underwent just biopsy or ectopic and impacted teeth sively larger until puberty. Lesion regression is ex-
removal. Fibro-osseous lesions spontaneously re- pected to occur spontaneously by the end of
gressed at different levels at variable time intervals. adolescence, resolving by middle age.1
Apparent radiographic osseous repair occurred rou- Radiographically, lesions appear as cystic multiloc-
tinely. In adult life, the patients exhibited normal ular radiolucencies, often beginning near the angle of
facial appearance, and radiographs showed almost the mandible and spreading to the mandibular ramus
complete involution of the lesions. Long-term fol- and body. Maxillary lesions may occur at the same
low-up of these patients is desirable to evaluate pro- time. Frequently, ectopic unerupted teeth are in-
gression or involution of the lesions. Apparently, sur- volved by lesions.1-13
gical intervention is unnecessary unless significant The histology is limited for diagnosis, showing fi-
functional, esthetic, or emotional disturbances de- brous hyperplasia and multinucleated giant cells.
velop. These features are similar to those other bone dis-
Cherubism, first described by Jones,1 is a benign, eases such as brown tumor of hyperparathyroidism,
self-limiting fibro-osseous disorder characterized by giant cell tumor, and central and peripheral giant cell
bilateral expansion of the mandible, maxilla, or both. granuloma.2-6,8-10,13
The lesions are usually symmetrical and painless. Fre- Cherubism is a familial disease1-9 in which the trait
is transmitted in an autosomal dominant fashion with
100% penetrance in males and 50% to 70% penetrance
Received from the School of Dentistry, Federal University of Minas in females.4 However, several isolated cases have
Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brasil. been reported in the literature.7,9,11-13 Novel muta-
*Emeritus and Titular Professor, Department of Oral Surgery and tions in the gene encoding the binding protein
Pathology. SH3BP2 on chromosome 4p16.3 have been reported
†Resident, Department of Oral Surgery and Pathology. to cause cherubism.14-16
‡Resident, Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics. Studies of cherubism with long-term follow-up
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr G. Carvalho presenting with clinicoradiographic documenta-
Silva: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Faculdade de Odonto- tion clearly demonstrating spontaneous resolution
logia, Departamento de Clínica, Patologia e Cirurgia, Av Antônio of bone lesions are extremely rare in the literature.
Carlos 6627, 31270-901, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil; e-mail: Here we report 8 cases of cherubism, 4 cases from
oguila@terra.com.br the same family and 4 nonfamilial sporadic cases,
© 2007 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons followed up for a mean of 18 years. We discuss
0278-2391/07/6503-0023$32.00/0 disease behavior, treatment approaches, and clini-
doi:10.1016/j.joms.2006.05.061 coradiographic aspects.

517
518 CHERUBISM

Report of Cases
CASE 1
Patient 1, a boy, presented with painless facial swelling at
age 6 years. Extraoral radiographs showed transparent mul-
tilocular lesions completely involving the maxilla and man-
dible. Maxillary sinuses were not visible. Medical and family
histories were unremarkable. With a clinicoradiographic di-
agnosis of cherubism, the patient was scheduled for regular FIGURE 2. Patient 2. A, At age 15 years, the patient showed
follow-up. By age 10, mandibular enlargement became more mandibular bilateral enlargement. B, A panoramic radiograph
noticeable; this persisted until age 12, when the lesions began showed the mandible filled with multilocular transparent lesions. C,
to decrease. At age 16, mandibular enlargement was minor, Mandibular occlusal radiographs showed evident bone filling in the
with swelling more noticeable in the maxilla; radiographs anterior region 1 year after the previous radiograph.
exhibited significant remission of radiolucent areas, and the Carvalho Silva et al. Cherubism. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007.
maxillary sinuses were clear. At age 25, the patient exhib-
ited slight swelling of the maxilla, and a panoramic radio-
graph showed multilocular lesions almost totally filled in
with bone (Fig 1). CASE 2
Patient 2, a girl, presented with bilateral painless swelling
of the mandible at age 15. Her medical and family histories
were unremarkable. Radiographs revealed multilocular ar-
eas involving the mandible. Biopsy findings confirmed a
diagnosis of cherubism. Treatment involved regular fol-
low-up visits. One year later, an occlusal radiograph showed
outstanding osseous repair in the anterior portion of
the mandible (Fig 2). Over the subsequent years, disease
regression was observed. The patient was lost to follow-up
at age 20.

CASE 3
Patient 3, a boy, exhibited discrete painless growth of the
face at age 6 years. A panoramic radiograph showed mul-
tilocular areas in mandibule and maxilla. No familial cases
were reported. Biopsy findings confirmed a diagnosis of
cherubism, and the patient was scheduled for regular fol-
low-up. By age 12, the patient’s condition began to regress.
At age 21, he returned for extraction of ectopic and une-
rupted teeth, at which time swelling was found to be
constricted to the maxilla. Two years later, his remaining
teeth required extraction. At this time, minor residual en-
largement in the maxilla was seen, and a radiograph showed
significant bone filling over the multilocular areas (Fig 3).

CASE 4
In patient 4, a boy, facial alteration was first noted at age 4
years and progressively developed asymptomatically. At age
12, the patient showed enlargement of the jaws, most notice-
able on the right side. Panoramic radiograph showed mul-
tilocular areas involving the jaws. Family history was
negative for cherubism. In the subsequent year, the pa-
tient underwent minor surgeries for removal of the upper
right second premolar and biopsy, which confirmed the
clinical diagnosis of cherubism. At age 14, a small corrective
approach was performed in the right body of the mandible,
FIGURE 1. Patient 1. A, At age 6 years, the patient exhibited facial simultaneously with extraction of the lower right second
bilateral enlargement, and a lateral radiograph showed multilocular premolar. At age 20, the patient had a harmonic face, and a
transparencies involving the jaws. The maxillary sinuses were not panoramic radiograph showed bone filling into radiolucent
visible. Increased facial enlargement was seen at age 10 years (B) areas (Fig 4).
and also at 11 years (C). D, At 16 years, minor expansion of the
mandibule and more maxillary enlargement were observed. A radio-
graph revealed clear maxillary sinuses and significant remission of the
CASE 5
radiolucent areas, with a thin mandibular border. E, At age 25, the In patient 5, facial swelling noted at age 10 years was
patient had only slight swelling of the maxilla, and a panoramic diagnosed as cherubism by a colleague. The patient was lost
radiograph showed the jaws almost totally filled in with bone. The from follow-up. According to the patient, at age 18, resec-
mandibular border was thicker and evident. tive surgery was performed in the right body of the mandi-
Carvalho Silva et al. Cherubism. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007. ble due to a misdiagnosis of ameloblastoma. At age 39, the
CARVALHO SILVA ET AL 519

patient had a normal face, and a panoramic radiograph


showed only residual mandibular radiolucencies (Fig 5).

CASE 6
Patient 6, the son of patient 5, was diagnosed with
cherubism at age 6 years due to cheek enlargement and
family history. A panoramic radiograph at age 9 showed
multilocular transparencies completely occupying the man-
dible and maxilla. At age 13, painless bilateral jaw expan-
sion was noted, and a radiograph showed remaining mul-
tilocular areas. Minor signs of osseous repair were observed
in the mandibular ramus. Three minor surgeries were exe-
cuted in the following 3 years for biopsy (which confirmed
the diagnosis), for extraction of displaced and impacted
teeth (upper right second molar and premolar; lower left
canine and first and third molars; lower right canine, second
premolar, and first and third molars), and in an attempt to
provide orthodontically assisted eruption of unerupted up-
FIGURE 4. Patient 4. A, At age 12, the patient exhibited facial
per left central incisor. At age 16, changes in cystic lesions
swelling, more pronounced on the right side. A radiograph showed a
were observed (Fig 6). few well-delimited multilocular lesions involving the mandible and
affecting only the tuberosities in the maxilla. A sclerotic area was seen
CASE 7 below the lower right first molar, along with root resorption in this tooth.
Patient 7, a sister of patient 5, exhibited bilateral painless B, At age 20, facial appearance was close to normal, and a pan-
oramic radiograph showed remission of transparent lesions in all but
facial expansion at age 8 years. At age 11, the facial growth
the anterior portion of the mandible. No maxillary involvement was
stopped, and corrective surgery was done in the left body of seen. Successful orthodontic treatment was carried out. Note the bone
the mandible. No further enlargement was observed until filling in the left coronoid process compared with the initial radiograph.
age 15, when residual jaw expansion began to regress. At
Carvalho Silva et al. Cherubism. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007.

age 40, the patient’s face was normal. A radiograph revealed


typical radiopacity of bone structures in the maxilla. In the
mandible, a radiograph showed residual multilocular trans-
parencies in the coronoid processes and in the mandibular
ascending rami, along with some sclerotic areas in the
mandibular body (Fig 7).

CASE 8
Patient 8, a daughter of patient 7, was diagnosed with
cherubism at age 5, based on painless facial enlargement
and family history. A lateral extraoral radiograph showed
multilocular radiolucencies in the jaws. Enlargement of the
jaws persisted until age 9. Histological examination of an
incisional biopsy specimen confirmed the diagnosis. At age
13, the patient demonstrated noticeable bilateral swelling of
the jaws, and a radiograph showed persistent complete
involvement of the jaws by the lesions, with a prominence
in the right mandibular body. Four years later, involvement
of the mandible and maxilla remained considerable, and

FIGURE 3. Patient 3. A, At age 6, the patient exhibited facial


enlargement. A panoramic radiograph showed multilocular radiolu-
cencies with diffuse jaw involvement. Note the large radiolucency in
the right mandibular body. B, At age 21, facial swelling was restricted
to the maxilla, and a radiograph revealed impaction of the inferior
anterior teeth, as well as teeth abnormalities. Regression of multilocular FIGURE 5. Patient 5. At age 39, facial appearance was normal. A
lesions was noticeable. C, At age 23, facial appearance was similar panoramic radiograph showed normal maxilla and sclerotic areas
to the previous condition, and a radiograph showed almost complete near the apex of the lower left second molar. At age 18, a hemiman-
regression of the lesions. Note the total bone filling in the large lesion dibulectomy was performed in the right side of the mandible due to an
observed at age 6 in the right body of the mandible. incorrect diagnosis of ameloblastoma.
Carvalho Silva et al. Cherubism. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007. Carvalho Silva et al. Cherubism. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007.
520 CHERUBISM

FIGURE 6. Patient 6. A, At age 9, a panoramic radiograph showed FIGURE 8. Patient 8. A, At age 5, a lateral radiograph showed
multilocular cystic lesions involving maxilla and mandibule. B, At age multilocular lesions occupying the jaws. B, At age 13, a panoramic
13, mandibular enlargement was evident, and a radiograph showed radiograph showed diffuse, transparent multilocular lesions in the
ectopic, unerupted teeth and complete filling of the mandible and jaws. Ectopic, impacted, and missing teeth, as well as root resorption
maxilla by multilocular transparent lesions. C, At 16 years, mandibular in the lower right first molar, were also observed. C, At age 17, facial
swelling was persistent, and a panoramic radiograph revealed fewer enlargement was more pronounced on the right side. A radiograph
but larger cystic lesions compared with previous findings. showed persistent multilocular lesions, with some discrete sclerotic
areas. D, At age 20, decreased facial enlargement on the right side
Carvalho Silva et al. Cherubism. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007.
was evident after corrective surgery. A radiograph still revealed mul-
tilocular lesions, however. Note the progression of bone filling in the
left angle of the mandible, compared with previous radiographs.
corrective surgery was executed in the right angle and body Carvalho Silva et al. Cherubism. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007.
of the mandible. Three years after the operation, diminished
right mandibular swelling was seen (Fig 8).

regulating mesenchymal interaction in craniofacial


Discussion morphogenesis. In an affected individual, increased
Several family studies from different countries have bone activity occurs between age 2.5 and 10 to 12
postulated that cherubism is a hereditary condi- years, due to up-regulation of Msx-1. Dysfunction of
tion,1-10 transmitted in an autosomal dominant pat- Msx-1 stops at the end of molar development, leading
tern.4 A molecular pathogenesis of cherubism has to remineralization of lesions.16
been proposed: SH3BP2 gene mutations cause dys- Isolated single cases of cherubism have been re-
regulation of the Msx-1 gene, which is involved in ported in the literature,7,9,11-13 most of them based on
historic reports of the affected family members, who
had not noticed any facial alteration in other relatives.
It is difficult to assess whether these cases represent
spontaneous mutations, because of cherubism’s vari-
able expression and its tendency to resolve. In addi-
tion, the autosomal recessive pattern was suggested
to occur in selected families.8 In our nonfamilial
cases, beyond the historic data provided by the pa-
tients’ parents, we observed close relatives for cheru-
bic features; however, we cannot affirm that these
FIGURE 7. Patient 7. At age 40, the face appears normal. A
panoramic radiograph revealed residual radiolucencies in the coro-
cases are examples of pure mutations.
noid processes and in the ascending rami, as well as sclerotic areas In general, cherubism does not affect other parts of
in the body of the mandible. the skeleton or osseous metabolism; the bone mark-
Carvalho Silva et al. Cherubism. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007. ers phosphorous, serum calcium, and alkaline phos-
CARVALHO SILVA ET AL 521

Table 1. PATIENTS’ GENDER, AGE AT DIAGNOSIS, TYPE OF INTERVENTION, AND FOLLOW-UP PERIOD

Follow-Up
Patient Gender Age (yrs) Classification Intervention (yrs)

1 (Fig 1) M 6 Grade 3 Biopsy and impacted teeth removal 19


2 (Fig 2) F 15 Grade 1 Biopsy 5
3 (Fig 3) M 6 Grade 3 Biopsy and impacted teeth removal 17
4 (Fig 4) M 4 Grade 2 Biopsy, impacted teeth removal, and minor corrective surgery 16
in the right body of the mandible
5 (Fig 5) F 10 Grade 3 Biopsy, impacted teeth removal, and resective surgery in the 29
right body of the mandible
6 (Fig 6) M 6 Grade 3 Biopsy and impacted teeth removal 10
7 (Fig 7) F 8 Grade 3 Biopsy, impacted teeth removal, and corrective surgery in the 32
right body of the mandible
8 (Fig 8) F 4 Grade 3 Biopsy, impacted teeth removal, and corrective surgery in the 16
right angle of the mandible
Carvalho Silva et al. Cherubism. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007.

phatase are usually at normal levels with respect to life, and the face alteration disappeared. This course
age.2,5,10,12,13,17,18 Significant ocular disturbances, was observed in all patients except patient 8, who at
such as proptosis, superior globe displacement, and age 20 still manifested clinicoradiographic features of
visual loss, may occur,19 although these were not cherubism. The remission of facial bone enlargement
observed in our cases. Patients 1, 6, and 8 showed seemed to occur later in the maxilla than in the
exposure of the inferior part of the sclerae, confirm- mandible. Radiographic follow-up showed that mul-
ing that this characteristic is occasional.4,7-9 Some tilocular radiolucent areas gradually filled in with os-
studies have suggested that cherubism may be asso- seous structure, sometimes within a short period, as
ciated with other genetic diseases, such as Noonan’s seen in patient 2. Sclerotic areas replaced radiolucent
syndrome20,21 and Ramon syndrome.22,23 An associa- multilocular regions even in the 2 familial cases (pa-
tion with gingival fibromatosis also has been postu- tients 5 and 7) in the fifth decade of life, in contrast to
lated.24 Aggressive manifestations of cherubism have the conclusion of another study7 asserting that scle-
been reported,6,12,25 including 1 extreme case that rotic areas have been described only in single cases.
progressed rapidly, resulting in death due to gastroin- The histological appearance was similar to that of
testinal and pulmonary infections.26 brown tumor of hyperparathyroidism, giant cell tu-
In cherubism, the initial facial alteration becomes mor, and central and peripheral giant cell granuloma,
apparent in the first years of life.1-5,7-11,13 We cannot consisting of proliferating vascular fibrous connective
precisely affirm when facial swelling was first noticed tissue with abundant multinucleated giant cells. In
in all of our patients, because they were first exam- adult patients, this tissue showed an increase of bone
ined at different ages, ranging from 4 to 15 years. In matrix in fibrous stroma.
the older patients, signs of cherubism likely were Seward and Hankey3 suggested a grading system for
present well before the patients came to us. cherubism that has been since modified by other
The clinical aspects and disease course observed in authors.6,7,9 According to the classical grading system
our patients were similar to those in previous stud- based on the radiographic location of the lesions, 6 of
ies,1-5,7-11 as were the histological features.1,2,4,5,8-11,13 our 8 patients were grade 3 (both jaws diffusely af-
All of the patients that we followed presented with fected); 1 patient (patient 2) was grade 1, with man-
painless bilateral lesions. Radiographically, these le- dibular but no maxillary involvement at the time of
sions appeared as multilocular cystic radiolucencies examination; and 1 patient (patient 4) was grade 2,
involving the jaws in all patients but patient 2, who with full mandibular involvement and maxillary in-
exhibited mandibular association but no maxillary volvement only in the tuberosities. Remission of signs
involvement. Because this patient was first seen at age of cherubism occurs most rapidly in grade 1 (lesions
15, we cannot verify that she never had any maxillary restricted to posterior regions of the mandible).7 We
alteration. Abnormal patterns of teeth eruption were found that the lesions regressed progressively even in
noted in all cases, as well as teeth agenesis and the the patients with grade 3, both those who underwent
presence of ectopic or retained teeth. On average, the surgery and those who did not, and in adulthood
disease manifested in childhood, stabilized by age 12 these patients had normal or close to normal facial
years, and began to regress during puberty. Bone and radiographic aspects, sometimes with minor re-
recontouring continued through the third decade of sidual marks.
522 CHERUBISM

Conventional surgical procedures for biopsy or im- 7. Von Wowern N: Cherubism: A 36-year long-term follow-up of 2
generations in different families and review of the literature.
pacted teeth removal were used in all cases (Table 1).
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 90:765, 2000
In the 4 patients who exhibited significant increase in 8. Kozakiewicz M, Perczynska-Partyka W, Kobos J: Cherubism:
the jaws, corrective osteoplasty was performed, pro- Clinical picture and treatment. Oral Dis 7:123, 2001
ducing marked reduction of facial deformities with no 9. Meng XM, Yu SF, Yu GY: Clinicopathologic study of 24 cases of
cherubism. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 34:350, 2005
recurrence. Consider the case of patient 5, who was 10. Southgate J, Sarma U, Townend JV, et al: Study of the cell
lost to follow-up and underwent a hemimandibulec- biology and biochemistry of cherubism. J Clin Pathol 51:831,
tomy due to an incorrect diagnosis of ameloblastoma 1998
11. Katz JO, Dunlap CL, Ennis RL: Cherubism: Report of a case
but even so exhibited remission of cherubic charac-
showing regression without treatment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg
teristics in adulthood. Traditionally, the general ap- 50:301, 1992
proach to treating cherubism was to follow patients, 12. Kaugars GE, Niamtu J 3rd, Svirsky JA: Cherubism: Diagnosis,
perform biopsies, remove ectopic and impacted treatment, and comparison with central giant cell granulomas
and giant cell tumors. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 73:369,
teeth, and provide surgical correction when appropri- 1992
ate.3-5,7-9,11,17 Liposuction has been proposed to re- 13. Ozkan Y, Varol A, Turker N, et al: Clinical and radiological
duce the mass of the lesion in particular cases.27 evaluation of cherubism: A sporadic case report and review of
the literature. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 67:1005, 2003
When discussing treatment, we must consider the 14. Mangion J, Rahman N, Edkins S, et al: The gene for cherubism
psychological problems associated with an unattrac- maps to chromosome 4p16.3. Am J Hum Genet 65:151, 1999
tive cherubic appearance in young patients. The 4 15. Ueki Y, Tiziani V, Santanna C, et al: Mutations in the gene
patients who underwent surgery for osseous contour- encoding c-Abl– binding protein SH3BP2 cause cherubism. Nat
Genet 28:125, 2001
ing had deformities caused by large bone expansion, 16. Lo B, Faiyaz-Ul-Haque M, Kennedy S, et al: Novel mutation in
mainly in the mandible. the gene encoding c-Abl– binding protein SH3BP2 causes
Findings showed that the multinucleated cells in cherubism. Am J Med Genet A 121:37, 2003
17. Hyckel P, Berndt A, Schleier P, et al: Cherubism: New hypoth-
cherubic lesions were osteoclasts from a structural eses on pathogenesis and therapeutic consequences. J Crani-
and biochemical standpoint,10 raising the possibility omaxillofac Surg 33:61, 2005
of treatment with calcitonin, reducing the need for 18. Hitomi G, Nishide N, Mitsui K: Cherubism: Diagnostic imaging
surgery in cases with significant expansion. Calcito- and review of the literature in Japan. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 81:623, 1996
nin has been used successfully for treatment of giant 19. Hawes MJ: Cherubism and its orbital manifestations. Ophthal
cell granuloma,28,29 and it has reduced bone absorp- Plast Reconstr Surg 5:133, 1989
tion of cherubic osteoclasts in vitro.10 Based on the 20. Dunlap C, Neville B, Vickers RA, et al: The Noonan syndrome/
cherubism association. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 67:698,
genetic mutations related to the disease,14-16 gene 1989
therapy is expected to play a role in future treatment. 21. Addante RR, Breen GH: Cherubism in a patient with Noonan’s
syndrome. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 54:210, 1996
22. Ramon Y, Berman W, Bubis JJ: Gingival fibromatosis combined
References with cherubism. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 24:435, 1967
23. de Pina-Neto JM, de Souza NV, Velludo MA, et al: Retinal
1. Jones WA: Familial multilocular cystic disease of the jaws. Am J
changes and tumorigenesis in Ramon syndrome: Follow-up of
Cancer 17:946, 1933
2. Jones WA, Gerrie J, Pritchard J: Cherubism: A familial fibrous a Brazilian family. Am J Med Genet 77:43, 1998
dysplasia of the jaws. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 5:292, 24. Benazza D, Elmouadden M, Benjalloun A, et al: Gingival fibro-
1952 matosis associated with cherubism. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxil-
3. Seward GR, Hankey GT: Cherubism. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral lofac 106:174, 2005
Pathol 10:925, 1957 25. Lannon DA, Earley MJ: Cherubism and its charlatans. Br J Plast
4. Peters WJ: Cherubism: A study of twenty cases from one family. Surg 54:708, 2001
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 47:307, 1979 26. Silva EC, de Souza PE, Barreto DC, et al: An extreme case of
5. Faircloth WJ Jr, Edwards RC, Farhood VW: Cherubism involv- cherubism. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 40:45, 2002
ing a mother and daughter: Case reports and review of the 27. Dubin B, Jackson IT: The use of liposuction to contour
literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49:535, 1991 cherubism. Plast Reconstr Surg 86:996, 1990
6. Motamedi MHK: Treatment of cherubism with locally aggres- 28. Harris M: Central giant cell granulomas of the jaws regress with
sive behavior presenting in adulthood: Report of four cases and calcitonin therapy. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 31:89, 1993
a proposed new grading system. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 56: 29. Pogrel MA: Calcitonin therapy for central giant cell granuloma.
1336, 1998 J Oral Maxillofac Surg 61:649, 2003

You might also like