Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NavascuØs
J. Matute
J. Soleto
M. A. García Casillas
E. Hernµndez
O. Sµnchez-París
E. Molina
E. De Tomµs
J. Cerdµ
R. Romero
Paediatric Trauma in Spain: J. C. De Agustín
F. Aguilar
A Report from the HUGM Trauma Registry J. Vµzquez
Original Article
Affiliation
Division of Paediatric Surgery, Hospital Infantil ªGregorio Maraæonº, Madrid, Spain
Presented at the 5th European Congress of Paediatric Surgery ± Tours, May 21 ± 25, 2003
Correspondence
Dr. J. A. NavascuØs del Río ´ Servicio de Cirugía Pediµtrica ´ H.G.U. Gregorio Maraæón ´ c/Doctor Castelo, 49 ´
28009 Madrid ´ Spain ´ E-mail: juannavascues@terra.es
Received: January 15, 2004 ´ Accepted after Revision: March 18, 2004
Bibliography
Eur J Pediatr Surg 2005; 15: 30 ± 37 ´ Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart ´ New York ´
DOI 10.1055/s-2004-821213 ´
ISSN 0939-7248
soins prØ-hospitaliers, le transport, lØvaluation complte à lad- gn tipo de operación quirrgica u ortopØdica bajo anestesia ge-
mission, les indices de sØvØritØ, les diagnostics, les lØsions, les neral en 1522 pacientes (57,8 %). La duración media de estancia
traitements rØalisØs, la morbiditØ, la mortalitØ. RØsultats: Les ac- fue de 4,4 días (rango 1 a 214 días). Fueron detectadas secuelas
cidents sont plus frØquents chez les garcËons que chez les filles en 36,4 % de los pacientes de mµs de 3 aæos. La mortalidad global
(68,5% contre 31,5%). Lâge prØdominant est le groupe 12/15 ans fue del 0,5% (n = 13) de los que 12,8% eran del grupo con un ISS
(36,8 %). Il y a une grande frØquence daccidents dans la rue ³ 15. Conclusiones: El anµlisis de los datos de nuestro registro
(37,2 %) plus quà la maison (19,4%) ou à lØcole (13,8 %). Le plus ha ayudado a definir las características de la población de trauma
frØquent des mØcanismes est la chute (35,6%) suivi par les acci- pediµtrico en nuestro medio, a monitorizar el tratamiento del
dents de la circulation (23,7 %). A ladmission, 14,7 % des enfants trauma en diferentes niveles de cuidados y a desarrollar progra-
ont un Paediatric Traumatisme Score (P.T.S.) £ 8 (n = 388). 3,8% mas de prevención. TambiØn nos ha permitido comparar los re-
Øtaient comme des patients sØvres se prØsentant avec un Injury sultados con los de otros centros en tØrminos de morbilidad y
Severity Score (I.S.S.) ³ 15 (n = 101). 4,2% de ces enfants nØcessi- mortalidad con la intención de identificar y corregir las deficien-
taient des soins intensifs. Les plus frØquentes des lØsions Øtaient cias del sistema sanitario en este aspecto.
celles du systme locomoteur (58,1%) et les traumatisme crâ-
Original Article
niens (34,9 %). Quelques interventions chirurgicales ou orthopØ- Palabras clave
diques Øtaient rØalisØes sous anesthØsie gØnØrale chez 1522 pa- Trauma pediµtrico ´ epidemiología ´ registro
tients (57,8%). La durØe moyenne de sØjour Øtait de 4,4 jours
(moyenne 1 ± 214 jours). Des sØquelles, de quelque forme que ce
soit, Øtaient dØtectØes chez 36,4 % de ces patients au-delà de 3 Zusammenfassung
ans dâge. La mortalitØ globale Øtait de 0,5 % (n = 13), elle Øtait de
12,8% dans le groupe des patients avec un I.S.S. ³ 15. Conclu- Die vorliegende Arbeit versucht, die Charakteristika der trauma-
sions: Lanalyse des ØlØments enregistrØs dans notre registre a tischen Versorgung von Patienten in Spanien anlässlich eines
NavascuØs JA et al. Paediatric Trauma in Spain ¼ Eur J Pediatr Surg 2005; 15: 30 ± 37
Introduction
500
450
Trauma is the primary cause of mortality in infancy [4, 8,18] and,
400
despite this, there are few epidemiological studies on this sub-
Number of patients
350
ject in our country. Those which do exist are almost always of a Boys
retrospective design and do not consider such important aspects 300
as the adoption of preventive measures, the quality of pre-hospi- 250
tal management or the sequelae, amongst others. In 1995, we in- 200
itiated a Paediatric Trauma Programme in our Centre, with three 150
principal aims: to improve the quality of care of the injured child, 100
Girls
to optimise the training of health personnel in this field and to 50
define the many aspects related to the production of accidents 0
0–1 2–3 4–5 6–7 8–9 10–11 12–13 14–15
in infancy. Achieving this final objective will, in turn, enable us
Years
to introduce preventive measures, adjust the health resources
Original Article
appropriately and monitor the quality of the health care in each Fig. 1 Sex distribution in each of the age groups.
of the care levels. The tool used for this purpose is the Paediatric
Trauma Register, a computerised database which is updated on a
daily basis and which includes all the children admitted to our
600
Centre after suffering some type of injury [6, 9 ± 17].
554
500
The objective of the present paper is to present the results of the
analysis of this Register in order to progress a little further in our 400
100
Each register was made up of 108 variables which included the
identity of the patient, type, site, and mechanism of the accident, 0
pre-hospital management, transport, complete evaluation on ad- 0–1 2–3 4–5 6–7 8–9 10–11 12–13 14–15
mission, indices of injury severity, diagnostic tests, lesions, treat- Years
ments performed, and morbidity and mortality. The indices of Fig. 2 Relative frequency of each sex in each of the aetiological
32 severity we used were the Glasgow Coma Scale [20], the Paediat- mechanisms.
ric Trauma Score [21] and the Injury Severity Score [3]. The eval-
uation of the sequelae was based on the Injury Impairment Scale
[23], though only in children over 3 years of age due to the diffi- There was a higher frequency of accidents in the street (37.2 %)
culty of performing this evaluation in younger patients. than at home (19.4 %) or at school (13.8 %) (Fig. 4). If we analyse
the sites where the accidents occurred in each one of the age
The data of the Paediatric Trauma Registry in our Centre between groups, we can observe that in the youngest group this is princi-
January 1995 and April 2002 have been analysed; during this pally at home whereas, as age increases, accidents in the street
period, 2633 children who were admitted to our Centre after suf- and, to a lesser extent, at school, become the most frequent sites
fering some type of injury were included in the Registry. (Fig. 5).
NavascuØs JA et al. Paediatric Trauma in Spain ¼ Eur J Pediatr Surg 2005; 15: 30 ± 37
Fig. 3 Distribution of the children in the
100 different age groups.
90
80
70
60
Percent
50
40
30
20
10
0
Auto- Motor- Run- Bicycle Fall Fall from Assault Sports Others
mobile cycle over height
Original Article
Boys Girls
With regard to the severity of the injury, 14.7 % (n = 388) of the Home
children had a Paediatric Trauma Score (P.T.S.) £ 8 (Fig. 8) and of Others 506
Sports center
50
40
30
20
10
0
0–3 4–7 8–11 12–15
(n =407) (n =556) (n =701) (n =969)
Years
NavascuØs JA et al. Paediatric Trauma in Spain ¼ Eur J Pediatr Surg 2005; 15: 30 ± 37
Others out in 68.3% (n = 28). None of the 641 children transferred was
Sports 506 Automobile correctly immobilised with a paediatric immobilisation system.
Assault 356 155
40 Motorcycle
Fall 102 After arrival at the hospital, advanced life support was performed
from height Running-over in 26 children, usually involving endotracheal intubation. Nine of
168 204 the children intubated had a Glasgow £ 8 and had not been intu-
bated previously. With regard to basic life support measures, ve-
Bicycle nous lines were inserted in 349 children; of these, 155 had been
164
Fall attended previously without this being performed. Following our
938 Emergency Department protocol, all the children who had suf-
Fig. 6 Aetiology of the accidents. fered a high energy trauma, those who had lost consciousness
and those with a P.T.S. £ 8 were immobilised with a paediatric
immobilisation system and a cervical collar and lateral immobil-
attended by health staff before their arrival at our Centre. If we isers were applied. The diagnostic tests included plain x-rays in
Original Article
analyse the management of the children who fulfilled the criteria 2351 children (89.3 %), blood tests in 496 (18.8 %), CT scan in 142
of severity, we find that a venous access for fluid replacement (5.4 %), and abdominal ultrasound in 97 (3.7 %). The most fre-
was inserted in 51.6 % (n = 80). In 77 cases this was a single pe- quent lesions were of the locomotor system (58.1%) and head in-
ripheral venous line, in 2 cases two lines were inserted, and in juries (34.9 %) (Fig. 11), and multiple injuries were diagnosed in
one case an intra-osseous access was used. Medication was ad- 749 children (28.4 %).
ministered to 36.1% (n = 56), nasogastric intubation was per-
formed in 14.2 % (n = 22), and bladder catheterisation in 10.3 % 1522 patients (57.8 %) underwent some type of surgical or ortho-
(n = 16). Of the 41 children in a state of coma during transfer paedic procedure under general anaesthesia. 4.2 % of the children
34 height
50 Sports
Assault
40
Others
30
20
10
0
0–3 4–7 8–11 12–15
(n =407) (n =556) (n =701) (n =969)
Years
1400 1200
1218 1189
1128
1200 1000
1031
1000
800
800
600
600
400
400 315
200 161
200
38 52
9 13 14 17 15 16
0 0
£0 1–2 3–4 5–6 7–8 9–10 11–12 £0 1–2 3–4 5–6 7–8 9–10 11–12
P.T.S. I.S.S.
Fig. 8 Paediatric Trauma Score of the patients. Fig. 9 Injury Severity Score.
NavascuØs JA et al. Paediatric Trauma in Spain ¼ Eur J Pediatr Surg 2005; 15: 30 ± 37
Fig. 10 Severity of the different aetiologi-
cal mechanisms as a function of the I.S.S.,
18.1 length of stay and percentage of admissions
to the intensive care unit. ICU: intensive care
unit; I.S.S.: average Injury Severity Score;
L.O.S.: average length of stay.
14 11.7 10.8 10.6 10.7
12 8.8
8.5 6.7
10 7.2 6.9 7.1
2.5
6 1
8 8 0.3
7.2
3.9 % ICU
6 5.6
4.4 4.4
4 3.6 3.3 I.S.S.
3.2
2
L.O.S.
Original Article
0
Automobile Run-over Fall Assault
length of stay was 4.2 days (range 1 ± 59 days). The global mean
1600
length of stay was 4.4 days (range 1 ± 214 days). 1530
NavascuØs JA et al. Paediatric Trauma in Spain ¼ Eur J Pediatr Surg 2005; 15: 30 ± 37
Fig. 12 Incidence of sequelae grouped
100 according to the P.T.S.
*All children with P.T.S. < 0 death
90
80
70
Impairments (%)
60
50
40
30
20
10
*
Original Article
0
<0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
P.T.S.
jury Severity Score (I.S.S.) ³ 15, and 110 required admission to the It is unimaginable that in our country a child with sepsis could be
intensive care unit, indicating an overtriage of 72 ± 74%. How- treated only with occasional antibiotics or that a child with a ma-
NavascuØs JA et al. Paediatric Trauma in Spain ¼ Eur J Pediatr Surg 2005; 15: 30 ± 37
References 13
NavascuØs JA. Utilidad de un Registro de Trauma. In: Valverde A (ed).
Libro de ponencias del XX Congreso Espaæol extraordinario de Pedia-
1
American Association for Automotive Medicine. The Abbreviated In- tría. Tomo I. Mµlaga: Martínez, 1998: 162 ± 171
14
jury Scale ± 1990 Revision. Des Plaines, Ill: AAAM, 1990 NavascuØs JA, Vµzquez J. Accidentes en la infancia: los Sistemas de
2
Aprahamian C, Cattey RP, Walker AP et al. Pediatric Trauma Score: Trauma. Rev Esp Pediatr 1999; 55: 111 ± 116
15
predictor of hospital resource use? Arch Surg 1990; 125: 1128 ± 1131 NavascuØs JA, Romero R, Soleto J et al. Anµlisis crítico de la asistencia
3
Baker SP, ONeill B, Haddon W et al. The Injury Severity Score: A meth- prehospital al niæo traumatizado. Rev Cir Inf 2000; 10: 81 ± 86
16
od for describing patients with multiple injury and evaluating emer- NavascuØs JA, Romero R, Soleto J et al. First Spanish Pediatric Trauma
gency care. J Trauma 1974; 14: 187 ± 196 Registry: analysis of 1500 cases. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2000; 10: 310 ± 318
17
4
Beaver BL, Haller JA. Epidemiología del traumatismo. In: Ashcraft KW, NavascuØs JA, Soleto J, Sµnchez R et al. Impacto de los programas de
Holder TM (eds). Cirugía Pediµtrica (Traducido de la 2ã edición en in- formación en la asistencia al niæo traumatizado. Cir Pediatr 2003
18
glØs de Pediatric Sugery). Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company, Ramenofsky ML. Valoración y manejo tempranos del traumatismo. In:
1993: 108 ± 115 Ashcraft KW, Holder TM (eds). Cirugía Pediµtrica (Traducido de la 2ã
5
Cales R, Trunkey D. Preventable trauma deaths. A review of trauma edición en inglØs de Pediatric Sugery). Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders
care systems development. JAMA 1985; 254: 1059 Company, 1993: 116 ± 127
19
6
De Tomµs E, NavascuØs JA, Soleto J et al. Factores relacionados con la Ramenofsky ML, Ramenofsky MB, Jurkovich GJ et al. The predictive
severidad en el niæo politraumatizado. Cir Pediatr 2003 validity of the Pediatric Trauma Score. J Trauma 1988; 28: 1038 ± 1042
Original Article
20
7
Dykes E, Spence L, Young J. Preventable pediatric trauma deaths in a Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired conscious-
metropolitan region. J Pediatr Surg 1989; 24: 107 ± 110 ness. Lancet 1974; 2: 81 ± 84
21
8
Iæón AE. Trauma en pediatría. Rev Cir Inf 1994; 4: 5 ± 7 Tepas JJ, Mollitt DL, Talbert JL et al. The Pediatric Trauma Score as a
9
NavascuØs JA, Soleto J, Cerdµ J et al. Estudio epidemiológico de los ac- predictor of injury severity in the injured child. J Pediatr Surg 1987;
cidentes en la infancia: Primer Registro de Trauma Pediµtrico. An Esp 22: 14 ± 18
22
Pediatr 1997; 47: 369 ± 372 Tepas JJ, Ramenofsky ML, Mollitt DL et al. The Pediatric Trauma Score
10
NavascuØs JA, Vµzquez J, Soleto J et al. Registro de Trauma Pediµtrico: as a predictor of injury severity: an objective assessment. J Trauma
anµlisis preliminar. Rev Cir Inf 1997; 7: 211 ± 220 1988; 28: 425 ± 429
23
11
NavascuØs JA, Soleto J, Cerdµ J et al. Registro de Trauma Pediµtrico: ex- Waller JA, Skelly JM, Davis JH. The Injury Impairment Scale as a mea-
periencia a lo largo de un aæo. Cir Esp 1996; 60: 285 sure of disability. J Trauma 1995; 39: 949 ± 954
37
NavascuØs JA et al. Paediatric Trauma in Spain ¼ Eur J Pediatr Surg 2005; 15: 30 ± 37