Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/322178269
CITATIONS READS
7 138
3 authors:
B. Sunil V. G. Pahurkar
Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University
7 PUBLICATIONS 70 CITATIONS 28 PUBLICATIONS 232 CITATIONS
Gajanan Muley
Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University
134 PUBLICATIONS 993 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by B. Sunil on 03 February 2018.
Regular Articles
A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T
Keywords: The fabrication and study of cladding modified intrinsic fiber optic urea biosensor has been reported in the
Optical fiber present investigation. A simple cladding modification technique was used to construct the sensor by uncladding
Biosensor the small portion from optical fiber. Further bare core was decorated by supportive porous, chemically and
Polyaniline optically sensitive matrix material polyaniline (PANI) as an active cladding for enzyme residency. Enzyme-
Cladding modification
urease (Urs) was cross-linked on the active cladding region via glutaraldehyde solution. Confirmation of the
Urease
prepared PANI in proper form determined by ultraviolet-visible and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic
Cross-linking
techniques. X-ray diffraction technique was employed for nature and compatibility examination of PANI. Sensor
parameters such as sensitivity, selectivity, stability and lower detection limit have been analyzed by absorption
variation study in evanescent wave field. The response of prepared sensor was studied towards urea in the wide
concentration range 100 nM–100 mM and confirmed its lowest detection limit as 100 nM. The stability of sensor
was found 28 days with little variation in response. The fabricated sensor has not shown any response towards
interference species like glucose, ascorbic acid, L-alanine, L-arginine and their combination with urea solution
and hence found selective for urea solution only.
⁎
Corresponding author.
E-mail address: gajananmuley@sgbau.ac.in (G.G. Muley).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yofte.2017.11.002
Received 16 November 2016; Received in revised form 19 March 2017; Accepted 5 November 2017
1068-5200/ © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
S.N. Botewad et al. Optical Fiber Technology 40 (2018) 8–12
2. Experimental
Multimode optical fiber (40 cm long) of core/cladding dimensions Fig. 2 pictures the FT-IR spectrum of PANI along with its functional
530/500 μm (1030 μm) of plastic cladded silica core was used for sensor group frequencies and shows all the main characteristic peaks of PANI.
fabrication. The SMA905 connectors were connected to both the ends of The absorption peak at 713 cm−1 corresponds to the mono substitution
optical fiber using adhesive. Afterward both ends were furnished as of benzene ring and 1095 cm−1 stands for the CeH plane bending vi-
well as polished using the fine polish papers of 1200 and 0.3 μm bration [41]. The absorption peaks at 1237 and 1338 cm−1 may con-
roughness respectively. Furnishing and polishing helps for enhancing firms the CeN stretching of primary aromatic amines. The strong ab-
the light gathering capacity of optical fiber [30]. Further, 2 cm cladding sorption peak at 1720 cm−1 can be assigned to C]NH stretching. The
portion was removed from optical fiber with the help of stripper and peak at 1961 cm−1 may be attributed to the CeN bending and peak at
surgical blade. Bare core surface was gently cleaned with hydrofluoric 2103 cm−1 is of aromatic isonitrile N^C stretching. The absorption
acid (HF) and distilled water. The active cladding was achieved by peak at 2363 cm−1 may be due to aliphatic nitrile C^N stretching. The
smoothly depositing uniform layer of PANI and kept it to settle. absorption peaks at 2936 and 3067 cm−1 may corresponds to NeH
Synthesis of PANI was carried out by simple oxidative polymerization stretching with hydrogen bonded amino groups and free OeH
method using 0.2 M aniline monomer solution and 0.05 M FeCl3 oxi- stretching vibration respectively. The absorption peak at 3429 cm−1
dant solution in 30 min reaction time. After dried the modified portion, may be assigned to asymmetrical and symmetrical stretching vibrations
it cleans with double distilled water to prepare the hydrophobic base of NH2 group [42]. Thus, the FT-IR spectrum shows all expected
9
S.N. Botewad et al. Optical Fiber Technology 40 (2018) 8–12
Fig. 4a. Sensing response in terms of absorption for 100 nM–100 mM urea solutions.
Fig. 3. XRD pattern of PANI matrix. Fig. 4b. Variation in absorbance for various urea concentrations measured at ∼250 nm.
10
S.N. Botewad et al. Optical Fiber Technology 40 (2018) 8–12
Fig. 5. (a) Absorbance spectra of interfering species on UV-vis spectrophotometer, (b) response towards interfering species using sensor.
3.4.2. Selectivity
Fig. 5(a) and (b) shows the UV-vis absorbance spectra and se-
lectivity measurement of prepared FOIUB toward interfering species-
glucose, ascorbic acid, L-alanine, L-arginine and their combination with
urea prepared in pH 7.4 phosphate buffer solution [45] and each of
them has the concentration 1 mM. Fig. 5(a) shows all the interfering
species including urea are near about transparent in nature. Likewise,
from the absorbance spectra of FOIUB in Fig. 5(b), it was identified that
there was no any response of the sensor for glucose, ascorbic acid, L-
alanine, L-argenine and their combine solutions with urea. But the
sensor shows the huge response in case of urea solution centered at Fig. 6. Stability curve measurement for 100 mM urea solution.
∼250 nm. While a little change due other interfering species may be
due the change in refractive index of sensing element portion [46] and forth for the sensing, decrease in response may be possible due to the
in case of combine solution, the response shows the presence of urea in minute changes in conditions and due to regular addition and removal
it. Therefore it can be concluded that the sensor-FOIUB shows the of various concentrations of urea solutions every time in sensing cell.
variation in sensitivity in the form absorbance is not only due to the This time can also be increase by providing a more suitable/porous
change in refractive index of the solutions and it is due to the reaction material, changing enzyme immobilization method or other ambient
between enzyme-Urs and urea in local vicinity of sensing element. The conditions.
present sensor is selective towards urea and does not respond to the
other interfering species [44]. 4. Conclusions
3.4.3. Sensor stability In this study, optical biosensor has been successfully developed for
Fig. 6 shows the response of the FOIUB for the stability measure- urea detection using PANI as a supporting matrix. The sensor para-
ment towards same 1 mM urea solution throughout the experiment meters such as sensitivity, selectivity, stability and lower detection limit
prepared in phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.4). The sensing response of have been determined by using absorption measurement. The sensor
the sensor was taken continuously for 30 days with the interval of has shown variation in absorbance at ∼250 nm with various con-
2 days in the form of absorbance. After each measurement the sensor centrations of urea solution and found highly sensitive towards it. The
was kept at 4 °C and tried to maintain the same ambient conditions prepared sensor especially selective for urea only that was confirmed by
during measurement. It was found that the sensor has approximately comparing with interference species like glucose, ascorbic acid, L-ala-
same response for 28 days with slight decrease in every next measure- nine, L-arginine and their combine solution with urea. The stability
ment, if once prepared. It indicates that the present sensor can be stable study shows that the sensor is stable up to 28 days under appropriate
up to 28 days. The mechanism for deterioration on the performance of conditions. The prepared sensor shows lower detection limit up to
the sensor may be due to the loss or leaching of enzyme-Urs from 100 nM and precisely gives the best choice for practical approach.
modified portion of sensing element. Moreover, when the sensor put Therefore, the prepared sensor can be applied as a promising device for
11
S.N. Botewad et al. Optical Fiber Technology 40 (2018) 8–12
biomedical, agriculture, fishery industries, and milk industries for ac- [21] M. Gutierrez, S. Alegret, M. del Valle, Potentiometric bioelectronic tongue for the
analysis of urea and alkaline ions in clinical samples, Biosens. Bioelectron. 22
curate and specific urea determination due to its lower detection limit (2007) 2171–2178.
with wide range, specific selectivity, quick response and high sensi- [22] A.S. Jdanova, S. Poyard, A.P. Soldatkin, N. Jaffrezic-Renault, C. Martelet,
tivity. Conductometric urea sensor: use of additional membranes for the improvement of
its analytical characteristics, Anal. Chim. Acta 321 (1996) 35–40.
[23] W. Limbut, P. Thavarungkul, P. Kanatharana, P. Asawatreratanakul, C. Limsakul,
Acknowledgements B. Wongkittisuksa, Comparative study of controlled pore glass, silica gel and
Poraver for the immobilization of urease to determine urea in a flow injection
conductometric biosensor system, Biosens. Bioelectron. 19 (2004) 813–821.
The authors acknowledge financial support by Defense Research [24] Z. Yang, S. Si, H. Dai, C. Zhang, Piezoelectric urea biosensor based on im-
and Development Organization (DRDO), New Delhi, India (ERIP/ER/ mobilization of urease onto nano porous alumina membranes, Biosens. Bioelectron.
1003856/M/01/1293) and Head, Department of Physics, Dr. 22 (2007) 3283–3287.
[25] K. Reddy, R. Charan, P.K. Srivastava, P.M. Dey, A.M. Kayastha, Immobilization of
Babasaheb Ambedkar M. University, Aurangabad for extending FT-IR
pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) urease on DEAE-cellulose paper strips for urea estima-
facility. tion, Appl. Biotechnol. Biochem. 39 (2004) 323–327.
[26] A.L. Crumbliss, S.C. Perine, J. Stonehuerner, K.R. Tubergen, J. Zhao, R.W. Henkens,
References J.P. O'Daly, Colloidal gold as a biocompatible immobilization matrix suitable for
the fabrication of enzyme electrodes by electrodeposition, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 40
(1992) 483–490.
[1] M. Czauderna, J. Kowalczyk, Simple, selective, and sensitive measurement of urea [27] M. Krysteva, M.A. Hallak, Optical enzyme sensor for urea determination via im-
in body fluids of mammals by reversed-phase ultra-fast liquid chromatography, mobilized pH indicator and urease onto transparent membranes, Scientific World J.
Czech J. Anim. Sci. 57 (2012) 19–27. 3 (2003) 585–592.
[2] B. Gupta, S. Singh, S. Mohan, R. Prakash, Urea Biosensor based on Conducting [28] B. Kovacs, G. Nagy, R. Dombi, K. Toth, Optical biosensor for urea with improved
Polymer Transducers, in: P.A. Serra (Ed.), Biosensors, InTech, Rijeka, 2010, p. 302. response time, Biosens. Bioelectron. 18 (2003) 111–118.
[3] T. Ahuja, I.A. Mir, D. Kumar, Potentiometric urea biosensor based on BSA em- [29] H.C. Tsai, R.A. Doong, Simultaneous determination of pH, urea, acetylcholine and
bedded surface modified polypyrrole film, Sens. Actuators B 134 (2008) 140–145. heavy metals using array-based enzymatic optical biosensor, Biosens. Bioelectron.
[4] V. Bisht, T. Wataru, K. Keiichi, An amperometric urea biosensor based on covalent 20 (2005) 1796–1804.
immobilization of urease onto an electrochemically prepared copolymer poly (N-3- [30] V.G. Pahurkar, Y.S. Tamgadge, A.B. Gambhire, G.G. Muley, Glucose oxidase im-
aminopropyl pyrrole-co-pyrrole) film, Biomaterials 26 (2005) 3683–3690. mobilized PANI cladding modified fiber optic intrinsic biosensor for detection of
[5] L. Goeyens, N. Kindermans, M.A. Yusuf, M. Elskens, A room temperature procedure glucose, Sens. Actuators B 210 (2015) 362–368.
for the manual determination of urea in seawater, Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 47 [31] V. Perumal, U. Hashim, Advances in biosensors: Principle, architecture and appli-
(1998) 415–418. cations, J. Appl. Biomed. 12 (2014) 1–15.
[6] J. Carlsson, J. Bergstrom, The diurnal variation of urea in cow's milk and how milk [32] J. Yuan, M.S. thesis, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA (1997).
fat content, storage and preservation affects analysis by a flow injection technique, [33] M.A. El-Sherif, On-Fiber sensor and modulator, IEEE Trans. Instrumen. Measur. 38
Acta Vet Scand. 35 (1993) 67–77. (1989) 595–598.
[7] N. Birchfield, IRIS, Toxicological Review of Urea, Interagency Science Discussion [34] M.A. El-Sherif, J. Yuan, Development of a novel class of fiber optic sensors for
Draft (2011). environmental field measurements. In: International Conference on Agropoles and
[8] A.B. Peterson, K.R. French, E. Russek-Cohen, R.A. Kohn, Comparison of analytical Agro-industrial Technological Parks, Barretos, Sao Paulo, Brazil (1999).
methods and the influence of milk components on milk urea nitrogen recovery, J. [35] J. Yuan, M.A. El-Sherif, Fiber-optic chemical sensor using polyaniline as modified
Dairy Sci. 87 (2004) 1747–1750. cladding material, IEEE Sens. J. 3 (2003) 5–12.
[9] V. Venugopal, Biosensors in fish production and quality control, Biosens. [36] P.A. Savale, H.J. Kharat, K. Datta, P. Ghosh, M.D. Shirsat, Development of a POA/
Bioelectron. 17 (2002) 147–157. DBS/GOx Biosensor for the Determination of Glucose, Int. J. Polymer. Mater. 57
[10] A. Tiwari, S. Aryal, S. Pilla, S. Gong, An amperometric urea biosensor based on (2008) 730–744.
covalently immobilized urease on an electrode made of hyper branched polyester [37] M. Gerard, A. Chaubey, B.D. Malhotra, Application of conducting polymers to
functionalized gold nanoparticles, Talanta 78 (2009) 1401–1407. biosensors, Biosens. Bioelectron. 17 (2002) 345–359.
[11] H.J. Kharat, K. Datta, P. Ghosh, M.D. Shirsat, Development of an optical urea [38] S.N. Botewad, V.G. Pahurkar, G.G. Muley, Development and study the performance
biosensor using polypyrrole-polyvinyl sulphonate film, Sens. Trans. J. 101 (2009) of PBA cladding modified fiber optic intrinsic biosensor for urea detection, in: AIP
112–122. Conf. Proc, 2016.
[12] G. Dhawan, G. Sumana, B.D. Malhotra, Recent developments in urea biosensors, [39] N. Chandrakanthi, M.A. Careem, Preparation and characterization of fully oxidized
Biochem. Eng. J. 44 (2009) 42–52. form of polyaniline, Polym. Bull. 45 (2000) 113–120.
[13] M. Singh, N. Verma, A.K. Garg, N. Redhu, Urea biosensors, Sens Actuators B 134 [40] I. Yu. Sapurina, M.A. Shishov, New polymers for special applications, edited by
(2008) 345–351. Ailton De Souza Gomes, Intech (2012).
[14] M. Mascini, Potentiometry: enzyme electrodes, Encycl. Anal. Sci. (1995) [41] T. Jinsong, X. Jing, B. Wang, F. Wang, Infrared Spectra of Soluble Polyaniline,
4112–4118. Synth. Met. 24 (1988) 231–238.
[15] B. Adhikari, S. Majumdar, Polymers in sensor applications, Prog. Polym. Sci. 29 [42] Barabara Stuart, Infrared Spectroscopy: Fundamentals and Applications, John
(2004) 699–766. Wiley & Sons, New York, 2004.
[16] S.B. Adeloju, S.J. Shaw, G.G. Wallace, Pulsed-amperometric detection of urea in [43] A. Mostafaei, A. Zolriasatein, Synthesis and characterization of conducting poly-
blood samples on a conducting polypyrrole-urease biosensor, Anal. Chim. Acta 341 aniline nanocomposites containing ZnO nanorods, Prog. Nat. Sci. Mater. Int. 22 (4)
(1997) 155–160. (2012) 273–280.
[17] S.B. Adeloju, S.J. Shaw, G.G. Wallace, Polypyrrole-based amperometric flow in- [44] V.G. Pahurkar, Y.S. Tamgadge, A.B. Gambhire, G.G. Muley, Evanescent wave ab-
jection biosensor for urea, Anal. Chim. Acta 323 (1996) 107–113. sorption based polyaniline cladding modified fiber optic intrinsic biosensor for
[18] J.H. Jin, S.H. Paek, C.W. Lee, N.K. Min, S.I. Hong, Fabrication of amperometric urea glucose sensing application, Measur. 61 (2015) 9–15.
sensor based on nano-porous silicon technology, J. Korean Phy. Soc. 42 (2003) [45] Y. Zhengpeng, C. Zhang, Single-enzyme nanoparticles based urea biosensor, Sens.
735–738. Actuators B 188 (2013) 313–317.
[19] S. Ciurli, C. Marzadori, S. Benini, S. Deiana, C. Gessa, Urease from the soil bac- [46] V.G. Pahurkar, G.G. Muley, Sensitivity study of cladding modified with polyaniline
terium Bacillus pasteurii: immobilization on Ca-polygalacturonate, Soil Biol. immobilised glucose oxidase intrinsic fiber optic glucose biosensor, Int. J. Chem.
Biochem. 28 (1996) 811–817. Tech. Res. 6 (2014) 3325–3327.
[20] T.S. Godjevargova, A. Dimov, Immobilization of urease onto membranes of mod-
ified acrylonitrile copolymer, J. Membr. Sci. 135 (1997) 93–98.
12