Professional Documents
Culture Documents
D
7 Short-title: Lipid profiles, postmenopausal women and follow-up.
TE
9 Fabrício E. Rossi1, Tiego A. Diniz1, Ana Claudia S. Fortaleza1, Lucas M. Neves2, Malena R. Picolo3,
11
1
12 Institute of Bioscience, University Estadual Paulista, Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil.
EP
13
2
14 School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
15
3
16 Department of Physiotherapy, University Estadual Paulista, Presidente Prudente, São Paulo, Brazil.
C
17
4
18 Department of Physical Education, University Estadual Paulista, Presidente Prudente, São Paulo,
C
19 Brazil.
20
A
5
21 Exercise and Immunometabolism Research Group, Department of Physical Education, University
23
24
25
26
27
28 Corresponding Author
29 Fabrício E. Rossi. Department of Physical Education. Paulista State University "Júlio Mesquita
30 Filho". Roberto Simonsen Street. nº 305 – Education Center. Presidente Prudente. 19060-900. São
33
D
34 ABSTRACT
35 The aim of this study was to compare the effects of aerobic and concurrent training (aerobic plus
TE
36 strength training) on the lipid profiles of normotriacylglycerolemic and hypertriacylglycerolemic
37 postmenopausal women and to verify whether the benefits of aerobic and concurrent training were
38 sustained after 1 year. Total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c), low-density
41 Aerobic Training (AT), Concurrent Training (CT) and a Control Group (CG). For CT group,
43 daily caloric consumption and free-living physical activity were evaluated by dietary
C
44 questionnaires and accelerometer respectively and fat mass by DXA. In 16 weeks, CT was
C
47 p=0.012) and reducing the atherogenic index in normotriacylglycerolemic (pre= 3.6±0.9 mg/dL x
48 post= 3.0±0.6 mg/dL; p=0.003) and hypertriacylglycerolemic (pre= 5.2±1.1 mg/dL x post= 4.7±1.2
49 mg/dL; p=0.018) postmenopausal women. In addition, the effects were sustained at the 1-year follow-
52 significant differences between groups. Furthermore, these benefits are sustained at the 1-year follow-
55 INTRODUCTION
58 dyslipidemia, metabolic syndrome (28) and cardiovascular diseases, such as atherosclerosis, which are
59 all leading causes of death worldwide (31). Associated with the menopausal period, physical inactivity
60 can be an aggravating factor, since the reduction in levels of physical activity also results in decreased
D
61 fat-free mass, increased fat mass and trunk fat (3), increased risk of cardiovascular disease (12) and
62 postmenopausal breast cancer (21). Moreover, chronic systemic inflammation is associated with
TE
63 physical inactivity independent of obesity (8), thus, different training models have been used in an
65 While previous meta-analytic research with aerobic exercise has reported significant
66 improvements in lipids and lipoproteins among women (16), the effects of strength training have been
EP
67 unclear (2). Combined aerobic plus strength training in the same session of training (concurrent
68 training) is an interesting option for regulating lipid profiles, since endurance training has anti-
69 inflammatory effects, and increases cardiovascular fitness and oxidation of lipids in skeletal muscle
70 and the liver, while strength training has anticatabolic effects, and increases the oxidation of
C
73 compared different kinds of training and different intensities, they emphasized that although
74 concurrent training is proposed for improvements in cardiovascular and functional fitness in older
A
75 adults, the influence of concurrent training on blood lipids are restricted, and its effect on the lipid
77 addition, it is not known whether these positive outcomes acquired after the aerobic and concurrent
78 training program in this high-risk population are maintained for the long-term (beyond 6 months and 1
79 year).
80
81 Thus, the objectives of the present study were: 1) to verify whether aerobic and concurrent
86
D
87 METHODS
88 Subjects
TE
89 This controlled clinical trial study was carried out from February to July of 2013, with follow-
90 up conducted in January and August of 2014, at the University Estadual Paulista (FCT / UNESP),
91 Presidente Prudente, SP, Brazil. The project was approved by the Ethics Research Group of the
92 University (Protocol 64/2011). Subjects were invited to participate in the study via television and
EP
93 newspaper advertising. Prospective participants contacted the researchers by phone and an
94 appointment was made in order to conduct a more detailed interview. The inclusion and exclusion
95 criteria were: 1) being in menopause [Menopausal status was based on self-report: had no menstrual
C
96 cycle for one or more years] (27) and blood measures taken for Follicle-Stimulating Hormone
98 Normotriacylglycerolemic (Triacylglycerol<150 mg/dL) (33); 4) no smoking and alcohol for the past
99 6 months; 5) not having participated in any systematic physical exercise for at least six months prior to
A
100 the study; 6) not receiving treatment for hormone replacement; and 7) not presenting any physical
101 limitations or health problems that could prevent the completion of the assessments and exercise
102 interventions.
103 Out of a total of 90 women who participated in the first screening, only 46 met all the
104 inclusion and exclusion criteria and agreed to participate in the study protocol. Participants were
105 randomized into three study groups, using simple randomization techniques for allocation, which
106 ensures that trial participants have an equal chance of being allocated to a treatment group
107 (39): a concurrent training group (CT, n= 16) and an aerobic training group (AT, n= 15), both of
108 which performed 16-weeks of training, and a control group (CG, n= 15) which went 16-weeks without
109 regular physical exercise. To verify whether aerobic plus strength training would promote the same
111 women (Triacylglycerol≥150 mg/dL, n=14) (33) that complied similar inclusion criteria than
112 Normotriacylglycerolemic women. During the 16-weeks of training, five from the CG group (a
D
113 dropout rate of 33.3%) dropped out of the study and two women from the AT group (a dropout rate of
114 13.3%) and were excluded from the final analysis. The reasons for dropouts included personal or
TE
115 family problems and unspecified reasons. After the intervention, subjects were encouraged to maintain
116 their habits but not having participating in any systematic aerobic and strength training program and
117 the researchers contacted the participants by phone after six months and then 1 year after the end of
118 training. After the six-month and 1 year follow-up the participants were evaluated again:
EP
119 Normotriacylglycerolemic-CT (n=16), Hypertriacylglycerolemic-CT (n=14) and
121
C
122 Procedures
124 After an overnight fast, venous blood samples were collected to measure total fasting cholesterol
C
125 (Chol), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) and Triacylglycerol (TAG) using the colorimetric
126 technique and dry chemicals, with equipment manufactured by Johnson and Johnson, Vitros 250 model.
A
127 The Friedewald et al. (10) formula was used to calculate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
128 concentration (LDL-c). The atherogenic index was calculated by dividing the total cholesterol by the
129 high-density lipoprotein (Chol/HDL-c). The participants who were above the TAG≥150 mg/dL were
132
133
134 Body weight, fat mass, dietary intake and free-living physical activity assessment
135 Body weight was measured using an electronic scale (Filizola PL 50, Filizzola Ltda., Brazil),
136 with a precision of 0.1 kg. Fat mass (Kg) was estimated using a Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry
137 (DXA) scanner, version 4.7 (General Electric Healthcare, Lunar DPX-NT; UK, England). Twenty-
138 four hourly dietary questionnaires were administered on three nonconsecutive days (one weekend and
139 two weekdays). The participants were instructed by a nutritionist as to how to complete the dietary
D
140 questionnaires. Data were analyzed by the same nutritionist using NutWin software, version 1.5 (A
141 Program for Assisting Nutrition by the Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil. 2002).
TE
142 Physical activity level was measured by accelerometers (ActiGraph GT3X. Pensacola. FL)
143 and self-report physical activity [i.e. Have you been doing exercise: aerobic (walking, jogging,
144 cycling, hydroginastic or resistance training, Yes or No?). The raw measurement from the
145 accelerometer was determined in counts (arbitrary measure; the greater the number of counts, the
EP
146 higher the level of physical activity) and an epoch length of 60 seconds was used. This epoch is
147 related to low intensity and long duration patterns of PA (42), which is the standard for monitoring
148 free-living adults. Accelerometers were placed on the subjects’ waists using an elastic band. The
C
149 participants used the equipment for eight days during all waking hours, except when bathing or
150 engaging in aquatic activities, such as swimming, and at the end, each participant accumulated a
C
151 minimum of 10 hours of valid activity recordings per day for at least five days, including at
152 least one weekend day (6). ActiLife5 software (ActiGraph, Pensacola, FL) was used to
A
155 (MVPA). We determined MVPA minutes per week by applying a range of cut-points as
156 provided by Freedson et al. (9) and thresholds were: Light physical activity was defined as
157 <1952 counts/min [<3.00 metabolic equivalents (METs)], moderate physical activity was
158 defined as 1952–5724 counts/min (3.00–5.99 METs), vigorous physical activity was defined
159 as 5725–9498 counts/min (6.00–8.99 METs), and very vigorous physical activity was defined
160 as ≥9499 counts/min (≥9 METs) counts per minute. Moreover, we categorized the sample
163
165 The intensities of aerobic training were established using the critical velocity protocol (15).
D
166 The studied group traveled three distances (400, 800 and 1200 m) on a running track on separate,
167 nonconsecutive days, and the participants were instructed to cover the distance in the shortest possible
TE
168 time, which was recorded using a digital stopwatch (model S810i; Polar Electro, Kempele, Finland).
169 The critical velocity was assumed by the angular coefficient of linear regression straight line between
170 the distances (meters) and the respective times (seconds) obtained in each repetition (15, 32). Before
171 the beginning of the training, the participants performed 2 weeks of familiarization. The training
EP
172 volume was equivalent to 50 minutes/day at 100% of critical velocity. After 4 weeks, the procedures
173 of critical velocity were repeated to determine and adjust the intensities of training (32).
175 Aerobic plus strength training was performed for about 60 minutes per day, consisting of 30
176 minutes of strength training and 30 minutes of aerobic training, including 10 minutes of warm-up
C
177 before each session and stretching at the end of the training session. The strength training program
178 consisted of nine exercises: 45 degree leg press, leg extension, leg curl, bench press, seated row, arm
A
179 curl, triceps extension (Ipiranga®, São Paulo/Brazil), side elevation with dumbbells and abdominal
180 exercises. The strength training program consisted of four progressive phases [phase 1 (1st to 4th
181 week, 15 repetitions, three sets per exercise, 60 sec between sets); phase 2 (5th to 8th week, 12
182 repetitions, three sets per exercise, 60 sec between sets); phase 3 (9th to 12th week, 10 repetitions,
183 three sets per exercise, 60 sec between sets) and phase 4 (13th to 16th week, eight repetitions, three
184 sets per exercise, 60 sec between sets)]. The series was executed until momentary exhaustion, (i.e.
185 when the participants performed the training with repetitions varying from 12 to 15 RM, they were
186 always encouraged to execute at least 12 and no more than 15 repetitions) (32, 36). In the case of the
187 participants executing more repetitions, the load was increased in order to keep in the training zone
190 We performed a power analysis of this study based on the observation from a previous
191 study that verified a reduction in trunk fat of 0.9 Kg and standard deviation of 0.6 after 16
D
192 weeks of aerobic training and detraining in patients with metabolic syndrome (22). With 80%
193 power and an alpha level of 0.05 and using PS software (ver 3.1.2, Dupont and Plummer,
TE
194 http://biostat.mc.vanderbilt.edu/wiki/Main/PowerSampleSize), it was estimated that we would
195 need eight subjects per group. Considering a dropout rate of 15-20%, we over-recruited the
198 similarity of groups at baseline, the one-way ANOVA was used. The comparison between groups
199 during the follow-up and between Normotriacylglycerolemic and Hypertriacylglycerolemic was
200 conducted by a two-way repeated measure ANOVA (group x time). When a significant difference was
C
201 observed, a Tukey post hoc test was conducted. For all measured variables, the estimated sphericity
202 was verified according to Mauchly’s W test and the Greenhouse–Geisser correction was used when
C
203 necessary. Also, a dependent t-test was used (t-test for normo- group and t-test for hyper-
204 group). Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. The data was analyzed using the Statistical Package
A
205 for Social Sciences 17.0 (SPSS Inc. Chicago. IL. USA).
206 RESULTS
207 Table 1 presents values in mean±standard deviation of the general characteristics and
208 comparisons between the groups. There were no statistical baseline differences for all the analyzed
209 variables. There was a statistically significantly difference only after 16 weeks of training compared to
210 the baseline in both experimental groups for fat mass (p= 0.016), however, there was no statistical
211 difference between groups (p= 0.285) and in interaction (p=0.772). For lean mass, there was increased
212 statistically significantly in CT group (p=0.028) but there was no statistical difference between groups
213 (p= 0.992) and interaction (p=0.509). As regards dietary intake were no observed differences across
214 time (p=0.155) and interaction (p=0.111). As regards the free-living physical activity presented in
215 counts per minute, there were no differences across time (p=0.313) or in interaction (p=0.556) and the
216 participants maintained physically active during all study [MVPA= ≥150 min/week: baseline (CT=
217 218.3±125.1 vs AT= 268.2±225.6), post-training (CT= 300.8±113.3 vs AT= 281.0±208.9), after 6
D
218 months (CT= 174.7±81.8 vs AT= 236.6±220.9) and 1 year(CT= 219.0±32.5 vs AT= 201.4±125.0)]
219 without difference across time (p=0.321) and no difference between groups (p=0.635)..
TE
220
222
223 Table 2 presents the comparisons between normotriacylglycerolemic subjects before and after
EP
224 the program. There was a statistically significant increase in the HDL-c and a decrease for the
225 atherogenic index in concurrent training (p<0.05). It can be observed that the CT groups presented a
226 statistically significant HDL-c increase and a reduction for the Chol/HDL with differences compared
227 to the CG. However, there were no statistical differences between the intervention groups for any of
C
229
C
231
A
233 Hypertriacylglycerolemic subjects before and after the concurrent training program. In both groups,
234 there was a statistically significant increase in the HDL-c and a decrease for the atherogenic index
236 Table 4 presents the comparisons of the effects of aerobic and concurrent training on glucose
237 and lipid profiles among normotriacylglycerolemic postmenopausal women at the 6-month and 1-year
238 follow-up.
239 When performing the comparison of the lipid profile between the aerobic and concurrent
240 training groups after 6 months and 1 year of follow-up, there was an increase in the atherogenic index
241 only for the CT group after one year of ending training, however, there were not differences between
243
D
245
TE
247
250 month and 1-year follow-up after the concurrent training program.
EP
251 There was decreased HDL-c after 6 months and an increased atherogenic index after 1 year
252 among the Hypertriacylglycerolemic women. Although there was not a statistically significant
253 difference between groups, there was a marginal difference in the atherogenic index.
C
254
256
257 DISCUSSION
A
258 The main finding of this study is that 16-weeks of concurrent training promoted increased lean
259 mass, HDL-c and reduced the atherogenic index in normotriacylglycerolemic and
261 was that the anti-atherogenic status was sustained after the 1-year follow-up in
262 Hypertriacylglycerolemic postmenopausal women. The lean mass was maintained higher after 1
263 year follow-up in CT group when compared to baseline, however without statistic difference,
264 and this increase could be the mechanism by which the anti-atherogenic status was
265 maintained. While the treatments or strategies used to improve lipid profiles have attempted to
266 encourage improvements in cardiometabolic health, the literature suggests that a healthy diet, weight
267 loss, exercise and physical activity are keys to preventing and treating the development of this disease
268 (4). Moreover, the training adaptations are specific to the type of stimulus.
269 Aerobic training resulted in metabolic and morphological changes, including fast-to-slow
270 fiber-type transformation, mitochondrial biogenesis, as well as increasing the activity of aerobic
D
271 enzymes and substrate metabolism and increasing the oxidation of lipids in muscle and liver (7). On
272 the other hand, strength training stimulates synthesis of proteins responsible for muscle hypertrophy
TE
273 by increasing the recruitment of satellite cells, motor unit activations and high-energy phosphate
274 availability and force muscle (7). Thus, concomitant with this adaptation, the mechanisms are distinct
275 between models. Previous randomized controlled trials addressing the effects of aerobic (5), strength
276 training (20) and combined training (29,35) on lipid and lipoprotein outcomes have reported
EP
277 conflicting findings as regards to total cholesterol, HDL-c, the ratio of total cholesterol to HDL-c
278 (Chol/HDL-c), LDL-c and TAG. However, the exercise guidelines recommend participation in both
279 aerobic and strength training programs for the greatest benefit to lipid profiles (14).
280 It is known that the period of menopause increases metabolic syndrome risk by a factor of 1.6
C
281 (28). The remodeling of adipose tissue that occurs in this population (derived from a high-fat-diet and
282 physical inactivity), results from adipocyte hypertrophy, impairment of vascularization (hypoxia),
C
283 infiltration of immune system cells and an increase of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α. IL-6)
284 (38). High triacylglycerol plasma implies a peripheral insulin resistance due to its accumulation, which
A
285 inhibits insulin activation of its cell surface receptor, as well as downstream signaling molecules such
286 as insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS-1) and Protein Kinase B/Akt (24). This could have an impact on
287 postmenopausal women, who have a greater propensity to develop chronic inflammation and insulin
289
290
291 The British Regional Heart Study reported an inverse relationship between HDL-c and
292 incidence of coronary heart disease. A 1-mg/dL increment in HDL-c was associated with a significant
293 coronary heart disease risk decrement of 2% in men and 3% in women. Furthermore, a 1-mg/dL
294 increment in HDL-c was associated with a significant decrease (3.7% in men and 4.7% in women) in
295 cardiovascular disease mortality rates (11). The reduction in HDL-c and increase in LDL-c increased
296 the risk of developing cardiovascular diseases, since LDL-c is more susceptible to oxidation and
D
297 greater accumulation in the arterial wall (17). Exercise increases the activity of lecithin-cholesterol
298 acyltransferase (L-CAT), the enzyme responsible for transferring cholesterol ester to HDL, which
TE
299 reduces the activity of plasmatic cholesterol ester transfer protein (CETP), the enzyme responsible for
300 transferring the ester of HDL to other lipoproteins (34). Once we verified that concurrent training was
301 effective in increasing HDL-c and reducing the atherogenic index in Normotriacylglycerolemic
302 women, we aimed to verify whether aerobic plus strength training would promote the same benefits in
EP
303 Hypertriacylglycerolemic postmenopausal women and our results showed that in both groups there
304 was a statistically significant increase in HDL-c and a decrease in the atherogenic index.
305 Petibois et al. (30) had demonstrated that the beneficial outcomes of regular exercise were
306 diminished or disappeared within a few weeks or months after cessation of training. In our study,
C
307 when conducting a comparison between aerobic and concurrent training on lipid profiles at the 6-
308 month and 1 year follow-up, there were no differences between AT and CT groups. However, there
C
309 was a decrease in HDL-c after 6 months and an increased atherogenic index after 1 year in
311 There are few studies regarding the effects of detraining on blood lipids in postmenopausal
312 women. However, Gupta et al. (13) showed that when compared to sedentary individuals, trained
313 athletes demonstrated enhanced reverse cholesterol transport. More studies are needed to better
314 understand the mechanisms involved in the reverse transport of cholesterol among trained individuals.
315 On the other hand, a significant decrease of 18% in HDL-c after 1 month of detraining has been
316 reported in elderly people who previously participated in a long-term (9-month) aerobic training
317 program (23) and the lipid profile in patients with coronary artery disease indicated a tendency toward
318 the pre-training values 3 months after the cessation of exercise (41), demonstrating yet again the
320 The limitations of this study need to be considered when interpreting the finding. The follow-
321 up time may have been insufficient for verifying differences between groups; and there were no
322 Hypertriacylglycerolemic-AT group. On the other hand, no differences were observed during the
323 follow-up as regards body weight, fat mass, dietary intake and free-living physical activity in both
D
324 aerobic and concurrent training. In addition, futures studies could use a physical activity
325 questionnaire at all points of data collection (pre, post, 6 months, 1 year) may help give a
TE
326 better idea of participant's physical activity levels at all phases of data collection, especially 6
328 In conclusion, the present investigation demonstrated that concurrent training promoted an
329 anti-atherogenic status in Normo- and Hypertriacylglycerolemic postmenopausal women but without
EP
330 significant differences between those groups that were subjected to only aerobic training. Furthermore,
331 these effects were sustained after 1 year, as determined by the follow-up, only among
333
335 In the present study, our data suggests that concurrent training induces important adaptations
336 to cholesterol metabolism primarily by increasing HDL-c and decreasing the atherogenic index,
A
338 term and concurrent training could be an important non-pharmacological treatment and prevention
339 of disease for these subjects. Although the participants of this study have maintained
340 hypertriacylglycerolemia after 16-weeks of the concurrent training program, there was an increase of
341 5.6 mg/dL in HDL-c (12.5%) and this effect was sustained, unchanged, for 1 year, which was
342 statistically significant as regards the body weight and fat mass during the follow-up.
343
346
347 REFERENCES
348 1. Abildgaard, J, Henstridge, DC, Pedersen, AT, Langley, KG, Scheele, C, Pedersen, BK, and
349 Lindegaard, B. In vitro palmitate treatment of myotubes from postmenopausal women leads to
D
350 ceramide accumulation, inflammation and affected insulin signaling. PLoS One 9: e101555,
351 2014.
TE
352
353 2. Bouchard, DR, Soucy, L, Sénéchal, M, Dionne, IJ, and Brochu, M. Impact of resistance
354 training with or without caloric restriction on physical capacity in obese older
EP
355 women. Menopause 16: 66-72, 2009.
356
357 3. Buonani, C, Rosa, CSDC, Diniz, TA, Christofaro, DGD, Monteiro, HL, Rossi, FE, and Freitas
358 Júnior, IF. Physical activity and body composition in menopausal women. Revista Brasileira
C
360
C
361 4. Churilla, JR, and Fitzhugh, EC. Relationship between leisure-time physical activity and
362 metabolic syndrome using varying definitions: 1999-2004 NHANES. Diabetes and Vascular
A
364
365 5. Church, TS, Martin, CK, Thompson, AM, Earnest, CP, Mikus, CR, and Blair, SN. Changes in
366 weight, waist circumference and compensatory responses with different doses of exercise
367 among sedentary, overweight postmenopausal women. PloS one 4: e4515, 2009.
368
369 6. Diniz, TA, Fortaleza, ACS, Buonani, C, Rossi, FE, Neves, LM, Lira, FS, and Freitas-Junior,
370 IF. Relationship between moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, abdominal fat and
373
374 7. Egan, B, and Zierath, JR. Exercise metabolism and the molecular regulation of skeletal muscle
D
375 adaptation. Cell metabolism 17: 162-184, 2013.
376
TE
377 8. Fischer, CP, Berntsen, A, Perstrup, LB, Eskildsen, P, and Pedersen, BK. Plasma levels of
378 interleukin‐6 and C‐reactive protein are associated with physical inactivity independent of
EP
379 obesity. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports 17: 580-587, 2007.
380
C
381 9. Freedson, PS, Melanson, E and Sirard, J. Calibration of the Computer Science and
382 Applications, Inc. accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 30: 777-781, 1998.
C
383
384 10. Friedewald, WT, Levy, RI, and Fredrickson, DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-
A
387
388 11. Gordon, DJ, Probstfield, JL, Garrison, RJ, Neaton, JD, Castelli, WP, Knoke, JD, ...and
389 Tyroler, HA. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol and cardiovascular disease. Four
391
392 12. Gudmundsdottir, SL, Flanders, WD, and Augestad, LB. Physical activity and cardiovascular
393 risk factors at menopause: The Nord-Trøndelag health study. Climacteric 16: 438-446, 2013.
394
395 13. Gupta, AK, Ross, EA, Myers, JN, and Kashyap, ML. Increased reverse cholesterol transport
397
D
398 14. Haskell, WL. The influence of exercise training on plasma lipids and lipoproteins in health
TE
400
401 15. Hill, DW. The critical power concept. A review. 1 Sports Med 16: 237-254, 1993.
402
403 16. Kelley, GA, Kelley, KS, and Tran, ZV. Aerobic exercise and lipids and lipoproteins in
EP
404 women: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of women's health 13: 1148-
406
407 17. Krauss, RM. Dietary and genetic probes of atherogenic dyslipidemia. Arteriosclerosis,
C
409
C
410 Kueht, ML, McFarlin, BK, and Lee, RE. Severely Obese Have Greater LPS‐stimulated TNF‐α Production
A
411 Than Normal Weight African‐American Women. Obesity 17: 447-451, 2009.
412
413
414 18. Lira, FS, Neto, JCR, and Seelaender, M. Exercise training as treatment in cancer cachexia
416
417 19. Maesta, N, Nahas, EA, Nahas-Neto, J, Orsatti, FL, Fernandes, CE, Traiman, P, and Burini,
418 RC. Effects of soy protein and resistance exercise on body composition and blood lipids in
D
420
421 20. Monninkhof, EM, Elias, SG, Vlems, FA, van der Tweel, I, Schuit, AJ, Voskuil, DW, and van
TE
422 Leeuwen, FE. Physical activity and breast cancer: a systematic review. Epidemiology, 18:
424
425 21. Mora-Rodriguez, R, Ortega, JF, Hamouti, N, Fernandez-Elias, VE, Canete, Garcia-Prieto, J,
EP
426 Guadalupe-Grau, A, et al. Time-course effects of aerobic interval training and detraining in
427 patients with metabolic syndrome. Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases:
429 22. Motoyama, M, Sunami, Y, Kinoshita, F, Irie, T, Sasaki, J, Arakawa, K, ... and Shindo, M. The
C
430 effects of long-term low intensity aerobic training and detraining on serum lipid and
431 lipoprotein concentrations in elderly men and women. European journal of applied physiology
C
433
A
434 23. Muoio, DM. Intramuscular triacylglycerol and insulin resistance: guilty as charged or wrongly
435 accused?. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids 1801:
437
438 24. Murphy, E. Estrogen signaling and cardiovascular disease.Circulation Research 109: 687-696,
439 2011.
440
441 26. Nelson, ME, Rejeski, WJ, Blair, SN, Duncan, PW, Judge, JO, King, AC, ... and Castaneda-
442 Sceppa, C. Physical activity and public health in older adults: recommendation from the
443 American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Circulation, 116:
445
446 27. Organization WH. Investigaciones sobre la menopausia en los años noventa. 1996.
D
447
448 28. Park, YW, Zhu, S, Palaniappan, L, Heshka, S, Carnethon, MR, and Heymsfield, SB. The
TE
449 metabolic syndrome: prevalence and associated risk factor findings in the US population from the
450 Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994. Archives of internal
452
EP
453 29. Park, SM, Kwak, YS, and Ji, JG. The Effects of Combined Exercise on Health-Related
454 Fitness, Endotoxin, and Immune Function of Postmenopausal Women with Abdominal
456
C
457 30. Petibois, C, Cassaigne, A, Gin, H, and Déléris, G. Lipid profile disorders induced by long-
458 term cessation of physical activity in previously highly endurance-trained subjects. The Journal
C
460
A
461 31. Rosamond, W, Flegal, K, Furie, K, Go, A, Greenlund, K, Haase, N, et al. Heart disease and
462 stroke statistics--2008 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics
463 Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 117: e25-146, 2008.
464
465 32. Rossi, F. E., Fortaleza, A. C., Neves, L. M., Buonani, C., Picolo, M. R., Diniz, T. A., ... &
466 Junior, I. F. F. Combined Training (Aerobic Plus Strength) Potentiates a Reduction in Body Fat
467 but Demonstrates No Difference on the Lipid Profile in Postmenopausal Women When
468 Compared With Aerobic Training With a Similar Training Load. The Journal of Strength &
470
471 33. Santos, RD. II Brazilian Guidelines for dyslipidemia and prevention of atherosclerosis
472 guideline of the Department of Atherosclerosis of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology. Arquivos
D
474
475 34. Seip, RL, Moulin, P, Cocke, T, Tall, A, Kohrt, WM, Mankowitz K, ...and Schonfeld, G.
TE
476 Exercise training decreases plasma cholesteryl ester transfer protein. Arteriosclerosis,
478
479 35. Seo, DI, So, WY, Ha, S, Yoo, EJ, Kim, D, Singh, H., ...and Kim, E. Effects of 12 weeks of
EP
480 combined exercise training on visfatin and metabolic syndrome factors in obese middle-aged
481 women. Journal of sports science & medicine 10: 222, 2011.
482
483 36. da Silva, CM, Gurjão, ALD, Ferreira, L, Gobbi, LTB, and Gobbi, S. Effect of resistance
C
484 training, prescribed by zone of maximum repetitions, on the muscular strength and body
487
A
488 37. Stricker R, Eberhart R, Chevailler MC, Quinn F, Bischof P, Stricker R. Establishment of
489 detailed reference values for luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, estradiol, and
490 progesterone during different phases of the menstrual cycle on the Abbott ARCHITECT
492
493 38. Suganami, T, and Ogawa, Y. Adipose tissue macrophages: their role in adipose tissue
495
498
499 40. Tambalis, KD, Panagiotakos, DB, Kavouras, SA, and Sidossis, LS. Responses of blood
500 lipids to aerobic, resistance, and combined aerobic with resistance exercise training: a
D
501 systematic review of current evidence. Angiology 2008.
502
TE
503 41. Tokmakidis, SP, and Volaklis, KA. Training and Detraining Effects of a Combined‐strength
EP
504 and Aerobic Exercise Program on Blood Lipids in Patients With Coronary Artery
505 Disease. Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention 23: 193-200, 2003.
506
C
507 42. Trost, SG, McIver, KL, and Pate, RR. Conducting accelerometer-based activity assessments
508 in field-based research. Medicine and science in sports and exercise 37: S531, 2005.
C
509
512
514 Data are express as mean and standard-deviation (SD). a= Tukey’s post-hoc test with p-value< 0.05
516
517 Table 2: Characteristics of the lipid profile in normotriacylglycerolemic subjects before and after
519 Data are express as mean and standard-deviation (SD). *= statistically significant difference (p<0.05).
520 LDL-c (mg/dL) = low-density lipoprotein; HDL-c (mg/dL)= high-density lipoprotein; Chol/HDL
522
D
523 Table 3: Characteristics of the lipid profile in normotriacylglycerolemic and hypertriacylglycerolemic
TE
525 Data are express as mean and standard-deviation (SD). *= statistically significant difference (p<0.05).
526 TAG (mg/dL)= Triacylglycerol; LDL-c (mg/dL) = low-density lipoprotein; HDL-c (mg/dL) = high-
529 Table 4: Comparison of the effects of aerobic and concurrent training on glucose and lipid profiles
530 among normotriacylglycerolemic postmenopausal women at the 6-month and 1-year follow-up.
531
C
532 Data are express as mean and standard-deviation (SD). ∆ in order = post-training minus pre; After 6
533 months minus post-training and after 1 year minus after 6 months. a= Tukey’s post-hoc test with p-
C
534 value< 0.05 compared to post-training. LDL-c (mg/dL) = low-density lipoprotein; HDL-c (mg/dL)=
536
538 Hypertriacylglycerolemic postmenopausal women at the 6-month and 1-year follow-up after the
540
541 Data are express as mean and standard-deviation (SD). Normotriacylglycerolemic = Triacylglycerol <
542 150 mg/dL; hypertriacylglycerolemic = Triacylglycerol ≥150 mg/dL. ∆ in order = post-training minus
543 pre; After 6 months minus post-training and after 1 year minus after 6 months. a= Tukey’s post-hoc
544 test with p-value< 0.05 compared to post-training. LDL-c (mg/dL) = low-density lipoprotein; HDL-c
546
D
TE
EP
C
C
A
D
Pre 28.4±10.9 30.1±5.1 24.0±4.5
TE
Post 6-month - 29.4±6.7 23.1±4.8
(counts/minute)
Data are express as mean and standard-deviation (SD). a= Tukey’s post-hoc test with p-value< 0.05
compared to Pre-moment.
(n= 10) (Change 0-16 (n= 13) (Change 0-16 (n=16) (Ch
weeks) weeks)
Mean±SD Mean±SD Mean±SD
D
Pre Post Pre Post Post Post
6±10.1 91.9±15.3 0.3±8.3 92.5 ± 25.9 88.1 ± 15.7 -4.3±14.0 86.9 ±12.4 86.1 ± 10.4 -0
TE
.0±27.7 120.9±32.7 8.9±24.1 91.0 ± 28.2 107.7 ± 41.0 16.7±27.0 91.3 ± 31.9 85.5 ± 39.7 -5
.1±35.3 195.4±27.0 12.3±30.4 199.4 ± 38.6 194.2 ± 37.6 -5.1±18.1 192.5 ± 29.9 190.1 ± 36.7 -2
.1±8.6 49.0±7.0 -0.1±6.2 57.6 ± 13.3 60.1 ± 13.4 2.5±7.2 57.1 ± 17.3 64.3 ± 16.1* 7
.4±29.8 121.8±23.5 10.4±25.0 123.6 ± 37.3 111.9 ± 31.3 -11.7±20.5 117.2 ± 23.3 106.5 ± 30.1 -1
EP
8±0.7 4.0±0.54 0.24±0.43 3.6 ± 0.9 3.3 ± 0.8 -0.25±0.5 3.6 ± 0.9 3.0 ± 0.6* -0
Data are express as mean and standard-deviation (SD). *= statistically significant difference (p<0.05). a=
Tukey’s post-hoc test with p-value< 0.05 compared to post-training. LDL-c (mg/dL) = low-density
Mean±SD Mean±SD
D
Pre Post Pre Post
Chol 192.5 ± 29.9 190.1± 36.7 -2.4 ± 30.5 225.6 ± 24.5 222.9 ± 24.7 -2.7 ± 18.3 0.971
TE
HDL-c 57.1 ± 17.3 64.3 ± 16.1* 7.2 ± 11.1 44.7 ± 9.6 50.3 ± 15.3* 5.6 ± 7.2 0.645
LDL-c 117.2 ± 37.3 106.5 ± 31.3 -10.7±26.6 143.4± 28.2 138.1± 25.1 -5.2 ± 19.0 0.528
Chol/HDL 3.6 ± 0.9 3.0 ± 0.6* -0.5 ± 0.6 5.2 ± 1.1 4.7 ± 1.2* -0.5 ± 0.7 0.962
Data are express as mean and standard-deviation (SD). *= statistically significant difference (p<0.05).
EP
TAG (mg/dL)= Triacylglycerol; LDL-c (mg/dL) = low-density lipoprotein; HDL-c (mg/dL) = high-
D
After 6 months 85.7±11.7 -1.87 ± 9.5 86.88±14.6 0.75 ± 11.6 0.439
After 1 year 81.9±5.3 -6.25 ± 8.4 80.63±7.6 -6.2 ± 9.7
TAG (mg/dL)
TE
Pre 76.6±15.1 91.3±31.9
Post-training 86.1±32.6 9.50 ± 30.6 85.5±39.7 -5.8 ± 30.7
After 6 months 87.2±30.4 1.13 ± 37.9 87.6±33.8 2.1 ± 39.0 0.084
After 1 year 83.0±26.4 -4.2 ± 37.6 75.5±27.4 -12.1 ± 32.8
Chol (mg/dL)
EP
Pre 187.1±31.3 192.5±29.9
Post-training 176.9±28.9 -10.2 ± 14.8 190.1±36.7 -2.4 ± 30.5
After 6 months 176.7±24.6 -0.12 ± 19.6 184.9±28.4 -5.2 ± 18.2 0.880
After 1 year 189.2±28.3 12.5 ± 16.3 193.0±31.4 8.0 ± 18.9
HDL-c (mg/dL)
C
months minus post-training and after 1 year minus after 6 months. a= Tukey’s post-hoc test with p-value<
D
TE
EP
C
C
A
Hypertriacylglycerolemic postmenopausal women at the 6-month and 1-year follow-up after the
D
Pre 192.5±29.9 225.6±24.5
Post-training 190.1±36.7 -2.4 ± 30.5 222.9±24.7 -2.7± 18.3
After 6 months 184.9±28.4 -5.2 ± 18.2 214.9±29.2 -8.1 ± 24.2 0.079
TE
After 1 year 193.0±31.4 8.1 ± 18.9 207.7±33.1 -7.1 ± 32.9
HDL-c (mg/dL)
Pre 57.1±17.3 44.7±9.6
Post-training 64.3±16.1 7.2 ± 11.1 50.3±15.3 5.6 ± 7.2
a
After 6 months 59.2±17.9 -5.1 ± 7.6 47.8±10.0 -2.5 ± 7.5 0.794
EP
After 1 year 60.0±17.2 0.75 ± 8.9 48.7±10.1 0.93± 7.2
LDL-c (mg/dL)
Pre 117.2±23.3 143.4±28.2
Post-training 106.5±30.1 -10.7 ± 26.6 138.1±25.1 -5.2 ± 19.0
After 6 months 108.1±16.9 1.6 ± 22.3 134.4±30.0 -3.7 ± 21.7 0.098
After 1 year 117.9±22.8 9.7 ± 17.8 127.9±29.8 -6.5 ± 31.2
C
Chol/HDL (mg/dL)
Pre 3.6±0.9 5.2±1.1
Post-training 3.0±0.6 -0.53 ± 0.6 4.7±1.2 -0.52 ± 0.7
C
a
After 6 months 3.3±0.6 0.24 ± 0.5 4.6±1.0 -0.07 ± 0.7 0.064
a
After 1 year 3.4±0.9 0.14 ± 0.6 4.4±1.0 -0.25 ± 0.9
Data are express as mean and standard-deviation (SD). Normotriacylglycerolemic = Triacylglycerol <
A
pre; After 6 months minus post-training and after 1 year minus after 6 months. a= Tukey’s post-hoc test
with p-value< 0.05 compared to post-training. LDL-c (mg/dL) = low-density lipoprotein; HDL-c