You are on page 1of 29

1

Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research Publish Ahead of Print


DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001732
1

3 CONCURRENT TRAINING PROMOTED SUSTAINED ANTI-ATHEROGENIC BENEFITS

4 IN THE FASTING PLASMA TRIACYLGLYCEROLEMIA OF POSTMENOPAUSAL

5 WOMEN AT 1-YEAR FOLLOW-UP.

D
7 Short-title: Lipid profiles, postmenopausal women and follow-up.

TE
9 Fabrício E. Rossi1, Tiego A. Diniz1, Ana Claudia S. Fortaleza1, Lucas M. Neves2, Malena R. Picolo3,

10 Paula A. Monteiro1, Camila Buonani4, Fábio S. Lira5, Ismael F. Freitas Jr4.

11
1
12 Institute of Bioscience, University Estadual Paulista, Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil.
EP
13
2
14 School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

15
3
16 Department of Physiotherapy, University Estadual Paulista, Presidente Prudente, São Paulo, Brazil.
C

17
4
18 Department of Physical Education, University Estadual Paulista, Presidente Prudente, São Paulo,
C

19 Brazil.

20
A

5
21 Exercise and Immunometabolism Research Group, Department of Physical Education, University

22 Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Presidente Prudente, SP, Brazil

23

24

25

26

27

Copyright ª 2016 National Strength and Conditioning Association


2

28 Corresponding Author

29 Fabrício E. Rossi. Department of Physical Education. Paulista State University "Júlio Mesquita

30 Filho". Roberto Simonsen Street. nº 305 – Education Center. Presidente Prudente. 19060-900. São

31 Paulo. Brazil. Telephone: 55 18 32295828 Fax. 55 18 3221 4391. e-mail: rossifabricio@yahoo.com.br

32 (This e-mail address can be published).

33

D
34 ABSTRACT

35 The aim of this study was to compare the effects of aerobic and concurrent training (aerobic plus

TE
36 strength training) on the lipid profiles of normotriacylglycerolemic and hypertriacylglycerolemic

37 postmenopausal women and to verify whether the benefits of aerobic and concurrent training were

38 sustained after 1 year. Total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c), low-density

39 lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c), Triacylglycerol (TAG) and glucose were assessed in 46


EP
40 normotriacylglycerolemic (TAG<150 mg/dL) postmenopausal women divided into three groups:

41 Aerobic Training (AT), Concurrent Training (CT) and a Control Group (CG). For CT group,

42 hypertriacylglycerolemic postmenopausal women were recruited (TAG≥150 mg/dL, n=14). Total

43 daily caloric consumption and free-living physical activity were evaluated by dietary
C

44 questionnaires and accelerometer respectively and fat mass by DXA. In 16 weeks, CT was
C

45 effective in increasing HDL-c (normotriacylglycerolemic: pre=57.1±17.3 mg/dL x post= 64.3±16.1

46 mg/dL; p=0.020 and hypertriacylglycerolemic: pre=44.7±9.6 mg/dL x post=50.3±15.3 mg/dL;


A

47 p=0.012) and reducing the atherogenic index in normotriacylglycerolemic (pre= 3.6±0.9 mg/dL x

48 post= 3.0±0.6 mg/dL; p=0.003) and hypertriacylglycerolemic (pre= 5.2±1.1 mg/dL x post= 4.7±1.2

49 mg/dL; p=0.018) postmenopausal women. In addition, the effects were sustained at the 1-year follow-

50 up only among the hypertriacylglycerolemic postmenopausal women. The anti-atherogenic status in

51 normo and hypertriacylglycerolemic postmenopausal women was changed by CT but without

52 significant differences between groups. Furthermore, these benefits are sustained at the 1-year follow-

53 up among the hypertriacylglycerolemic subjects.

54 Keywords: strength training; endurance training; follow-up; menopause.

Copyright ª 2016 National Strength and Conditioning Association


3

55 INTRODUCTION

56 The period of menopause is followed by a decrease in estrogen concentrations (25) and

57 contributes to the development of morbidities such as type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension,

58 dyslipidemia, metabolic syndrome (28) and cardiovascular diseases, such as atherosclerosis, which are

59 all leading causes of death worldwide (31). Associated with the menopausal period, physical inactivity

60 can be an aggravating factor, since the reduction in levels of physical activity also results in decreased

D
61 fat-free mass, increased fat mass and trunk fat (3), increased risk of cardiovascular disease (12) and

62 postmenopausal breast cancer (21). Moreover, chronic systemic inflammation is associated with

TE
63 physical inactivity independent of obesity (8), thus, different training models have been used in an

64 attempt to minimize the effects of menopause.

65 While previous meta-analytic research with aerobic exercise has reported significant

66 improvements in lipids and lipoproteins among women (16), the effects of strength training have been
EP
67 unclear (2). Combined aerobic plus strength training in the same session of training (concurrent

68 training) is an interesting option for regulating lipid profiles, since endurance training has anti-

69 inflammatory effects, and increases cardiovascular fitness and oxidation of lipids in skeletal muscle

70 and the liver, while strength training has anticatabolic effects, and increases the oxidation of
C

71 carbohydrates in skeletal muscle and increasing muscle anabolism (19,29).

72 Furthermore, as shown in a systematic review conducted by Tambalis et al. (40) which


C

73 compared different kinds of training and different intensities, they emphasized that although

74 concurrent training is proposed for improvements in cardiovascular and functional fitness in older
A

75 adults, the influence of concurrent training on blood lipids are restricted, and its effect on the lipid

76 profiles between normotriacylglycerolemic and hypertriacylglycerolemic women may be different. In

77 addition, it is not known whether these positive outcomes acquired after the aerobic and concurrent

78 training program in this high-risk population are maintained for the long-term (beyond 6 months and 1

79 year).

80

Copyright ª 2016 National Strength and Conditioning Association


4

81 Thus, the objectives of the present study were: 1) to verify whether aerobic and concurrent

82 training promotes different benefits on the lipid profiles of Normotriacylglycerolemic and

83 hypertriacylglycerolemic postmenopausal women and 2) to verify whether the benefits of

84 concurrent training on the lipid profile in Normotriacylglycerolemic and Hypertriacylglycerolemic

85 postmenopausal women are sustained at the 1-year follow-up.

86

D
87 METHODS

88 Subjects

TE
89 This controlled clinical trial study was carried out from February to July of 2013, with follow-

90 up conducted in January and August of 2014, at the University Estadual Paulista (FCT / UNESP),

91 Presidente Prudente, SP, Brazil. The project was approved by the Ethics Research Group of the

92 University (Protocol 64/2011). Subjects were invited to participate in the study via television and
EP
93 newspaper advertising. Prospective participants contacted the researchers by phone and an

94 appointment was made in order to conduct a more detailed interview. The inclusion and exclusion

95 criteria were: 1) being in menopause [Menopausal status was based on self-report: had no menstrual
C

96 cycle for one or more years] (27) and blood measures taken for Follicle-Stimulating Hormone

97 (FSH≥26.72 mUI/ml) (37); 2) not taking medication for diabetes or dyslipidaemia; 3)


C

98 Normotriacylglycerolemic (Triacylglycerol<150 mg/dL) (33); 4) no smoking and alcohol for the past

99 6 months; 5) not having participated in any systematic physical exercise for at least six months prior to
A

100 the study; 6) not receiving treatment for hormone replacement; and 7) not presenting any physical

101 limitations or health problems that could prevent the completion of the assessments and exercise

102 interventions.

103 Out of a total of 90 women who participated in the first screening, only 46 met all the

104 inclusion and exclusion criteria and agreed to participate in the study protocol. Participants were

105 randomized into three study groups, using simple randomization techniques for allocation, which

106 ensures that trial participants have an equal chance of being allocated to a treatment group

Copyright ª 2016 National Strength and Conditioning Association


5

107 (39): a concurrent training group (CT, n= 16) and an aerobic training group (AT, n= 15), both of

108 which performed 16-weeks of training, and a control group (CG, n= 15) which went 16-weeks without

109 regular physical exercise. To verify whether aerobic plus strength training would promote the same

110 benefits in Hypertriacylglycerolemic postmenopausal women, we recruited Hypertriacylglycerolemic

111 women (Triacylglycerol≥150 mg/dL, n=14) (33) that complied similar inclusion criteria than

112 Normotriacylglycerolemic women. During the 16-weeks of training, five from the CG group (a

D
113 dropout rate of 33.3%) dropped out of the study and two women from the AT group (a dropout rate of

114 13.3%) and were excluded from the final analysis. The reasons for dropouts included personal or

TE
115 family problems and unspecified reasons. After the intervention, subjects were encouraged to maintain

116 their habits but not having participating in any systematic aerobic and strength training program and

117 the researchers contacted the participants by phone after six months and then 1 year after the end of

118 training. After the six-month and 1 year follow-up the participants were evaluated again:
EP
119 Normotriacylglycerolemic-CT (n=16), Hypertriacylglycerolemic-CT (n=14) and

120 Normotriacylglycerolemic-AT (n= 8) (Figure 1).

121
C

122 Procedures

123 Blood Samples

124 After an overnight fast, venous blood samples were collected to measure total fasting cholesterol
C

125 (Chol), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) and Triacylglycerol (TAG) using the colorimetric

126 technique and dry chemicals, with equipment manufactured by Johnson and Johnson, Vitros 250 model.
A

127 The Friedewald et al. (10) formula was used to calculate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

128 concentration (LDL-c). The atherogenic index was calculated by dividing the total cholesterol by the

129 high-density lipoprotein (Chol/HDL-c). The participants who were above the TAG≥150 mg/dL were

130 classified as Hypertriacylglycerolemic and TAG<150 mg/dL were classified as

131 Normotriacylglycerolemic (33).

132

133

Copyright ª 2016 National Strength and Conditioning Association


6

134 Body weight, fat mass, dietary intake and free-living physical activity assessment

135 Body weight was measured using an electronic scale (Filizola PL 50, Filizzola Ltda., Brazil),

136 with a precision of 0.1 kg. Fat mass (Kg) was estimated using a Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry

137 (DXA) scanner, version 4.7 (General Electric Healthcare, Lunar DPX-NT; UK, England). Twenty-

138 four hourly dietary questionnaires were administered on three nonconsecutive days (one weekend and

139 two weekdays). The participants were instructed by a nutritionist as to how to complete the dietary

D
140 questionnaires. Data were analyzed by the same nutritionist using NutWin software, version 1.5 (A

141 Program for Assisting Nutrition by the Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil. 2002).

TE
142 Physical activity level was measured by accelerometers (ActiGraph GT3X. Pensacola. FL)

143 and self-report physical activity [i.e. Have you been doing exercise: aerobic (walking, jogging,

144 cycling, hydroginastic or resistance training, Yes or No?). The raw measurement from the

145 accelerometer was determined in counts (arbitrary measure; the greater the number of counts, the
EP
146 higher the level of physical activity) and an epoch length of 60 seconds was used. This epoch is

147 related to low intensity and long duration patterns of PA (42), which is the standard for monitoring

148 free-living adults. Accelerometers were placed on the subjects’ waists using an elastic band. The
C

149 participants used the equipment for eight days during all waking hours, except when bathing or

150 engaging in aquatic activities, such as swimming, and at the end, each participant accumulated a
C

151 minimum of 10 hours of valid activity recordings per day for at least five days, including at

152 least one weekend day (6). ActiLife5 software (ActiGraph, Pensacola, FL) was used to
A

153 initialize the accelerometers and process the accelerometer data.

154 The assessment of PA was analyzed as a combination of moderate plus vigorous PA

155 (MVPA). We determined MVPA minutes per week by applying a range of cut-points as

156 provided by Freedson et al. (9) and thresholds were: Light physical activity was defined as

157 <1952 counts/min [<3.00 metabolic equivalents (METs)], moderate physical activity was

158 defined as 1952–5724 counts/min (3.00–5.99 METs), vigorous physical activity was defined

159 as 5725–9498 counts/min (6.00–8.99 METs), and very vigorous physical activity was defined

Copyright ª 2016 National Strength and Conditioning Association


7

160 as ≥9499 counts/min (≥9 METs) counts per minute. Moreover, we categorized the sample

161 according to American College of Sports Medicine physical activity recommendations

162 (physically active women ≥ 150 MVPA minutes) (26).

163

164 Aerobic Training procedures

165 The intensities of aerobic training were established using the critical velocity protocol (15).

D
166 The studied group traveled three distances (400, 800 and 1200 m) on a running track on separate,

167 nonconsecutive days, and the participants were instructed to cover the distance in the shortest possible

TE
168 time, which was recorded using a digital stopwatch (model S810i; Polar Electro, Kempele, Finland).

169 The critical velocity was assumed by the angular coefficient of linear regression straight line between

170 the distances (meters) and the respective times (seconds) obtained in each repetition (15, 32). Before

171 the beginning of the training, the participants performed 2 weeks of familiarization. The training
EP
172 volume was equivalent to 50 minutes/day at 100% of critical velocity. After 4 weeks, the procedures

173 of critical velocity were repeated to determine and adjust the intensities of training (32).

174 Concurrent training procedures


C

175 Aerobic plus strength training was performed for about 60 minutes per day, consisting of 30

176 minutes of strength training and 30 minutes of aerobic training, including 10 minutes of warm-up
C

177 before each session and stretching at the end of the training session. The strength training program

178 consisted of nine exercises: 45 degree leg press, leg extension, leg curl, bench press, seated row, arm
A

179 curl, triceps extension (Ipiranga®, São Paulo/Brazil), side elevation with dumbbells and abdominal

180 exercises. The strength training program consisted of four progressive phases [phase 1 (1st to 4th

181 week, 15 repetitions, three sets per exercise, 60 sec between sets); phase 2 (5th to 8th week, 12

182 repetitions, three sets per exercise, 60 sec between sets); phase 3 (9th to 12th week, 10 repetitions,

183 three sets per exercise, 60 sec between sets) and phase 4 (13th to 16th week, eight repetitions, three

184 sets per exercise, 60 sec between sets)]. The series was executed until momentary exhaustion, (i.e.

185 when the participants performed the training with repetitions varying from 12 to 15 RM, they were

Copyright ª 2016 National Strength and Conditioning Association


8

186 always encouraged to execute at least 12 and no more than 15 repetitions) (32, 36). In the case of the

187 participants executing more repetitions, the load was increased in order to keep in the training zone

188 (32, 36).

189 Statistical Analysis

190 We performed a power analysis of this study based on the observation from a previous

191 study that verified a reduction in trunk fat of 0.9 Kg and standard deviation of 0.6 after 16

D
192 weeks of aerobic training and detraining in patients with metabolic syndrome (22). With 80%

193 power and an alpha level of 0.05 and using PS software (ver 3.1.2, Dupont and Plummer,

TE
194 http://biostat.mc.vanderbilt.edu/wiki/Main/PowerSampleSize), it was estimated that we would

195 need eight subjects per group. Considering a dropout rate of 15-20%, we over-recruited the

196 number of subjects.


EP
197 The Levene test estimate was used to analyze homogeneity in the data and to identify

198 similarity of groups at baseline, the one-way ANOVA was used. The comparison between groups

199 during the follow-up and between Normotriacylglycerolemic and Hypertriacylglycerolemic was

200 conducted by a two-way repeated measure ANOVA (group x time). When a significant difference was
C

201 observed, a Tukey post hoc test was conducted. For all measured variables, the estimated sphericity

202 was verified according to Mauchly’s W test and the Greenhouse–Geisser correction was used when
C

203 necessary. Also, a dependent t-test was used (t-test for normo- group and t-test for hyper-

204 group). Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. The data was analyzed using the Statistical Package
A

205 for Social Sciences 17.0 (SPSS Inc. Chicago. IL. USA).

206 RESULTS

207 Table 1 presents values in mean±standard deviation of the general characteristics and

208 comparisons between the groups. There were no statistical baseline differences for all the analyzed

209 variables. There was a statistically significantly difference only after 16 weeks of training compared to

210 the baseline in both experimental groups for fat mass (p= 0.016), however, there was no statistical

211 difference between groups (p= 0.285) and in interaction (p=0.772). For lean mass, there was increased

Copyright ª 2016 National Strength and Conditioning Association


9

212 statistically significantly in CT group (p=0.028) but there was no statistical difference between groups

213 (p= 0.992) and interaction (p=0.509). As regards dietary intake were no observed differences across

214 time (p=0.155) and interaction (p=0.111). As regards the free-living physical activity presented in

215 counts per minute, there were no differences across time (p=0.313) or in interaction (p=0.556) and the

216 participants maintained physically active during all study [MVPA= ≥150 min/week: baseline (CT=

217 218.3±125.1 vs AT= 268.2±225.6), post-training (CT= 300.8±113.3 vs AT= 281.0±208.9), after 6

D
218 months (CT= 174.7±81.8 vs AT= 236.6±220.9) and 1 year(CT= 219.0±32.5 vs AT= 201.4±125.0)]

219 without difference across time (p=0.321) and no difference between groups (p=0.635)..

TE
220

221 **Insert table 1**

222

223 Table 2 presents the comparisons between normotriacylglycerolemic subjects before and after
EP
224 the program. There was a statistically significant increase in the HDL-c and a decrease for the

225 atherogenic index in concurrent training (p<0.05). It can be observed that the CT groups presented a

226 statistically significant HDL-c increase and a reduction for the Chol/HDL with differences compared

227 to the CG. However, there were no statistical differences between the intervention groups for any of
C

228 the variables analyzed.

229
C

230 **Insert table 2**

231
A

232 Table 3 presents the comparisons between normotriacylglycerolemic and

233 Hypertriacylglycerolemic subjects before and after the concurrent training program. In both groups,

234 there was a statistically significant increase in the HDL-c and a decrease for the atherogenic index

235 again (p<0.05).

236 Table 4 presents the comparisons of the effects of aerobic and concurrent training on glucose

237 and lipid profiles among normotriacylglycerolemic postmenopausal women at the 6-month and 1-year

238 follow-up.

Copyright ª 2016 National Strength and Conditioning Association


10

239 When performing the comparison of the lipid profile between the aerobic and concurrent

240 training groups after 6 months and 1 year of follow-up, there was an increase in the atherogenic index

241 only for the CT group after one year of ending training, however, there were not differences between

242 the AT and CT groups.

243

244 **Insert table 3**

D
245

246 **Insert table 4**

TE
247

248 Table 5 presents the comparison between the lipid profiles of

249 normotriacylglycerolemic and Hypertriacylglycerolemic postmenopausal women at the 6-

250 month and 1-year follow-up after the concurrent training program.
EP
251 There was decreased HDL-c after 6 months and an increased atherogenic index after 1 year

252 among the Hypertriacylglycerolemic women. Although there was not a statistically significant

253 difference between groups, there was a marginal difference in the atherogenic index.
C

254

255 **Insert table 5**


C

256

257 DISCUSSION
A

258 The main finding of this study is that 16-weeks of concurrent training promoted increased lean

259 mass, HDL-c and reduced the atherogenic index in normotriacylglycerolemic and

260 Hypertriacylglycerolemic postmenopausal women. In addition, the advantage of concurrent training

261 was that the anti-atherogenic status was sustained after the 1-year follow-up in

262 Hypertriacylglycerolemic postmenopausal women. The lean mass was maintained higher after 1

263 year follow-up in CT group when compared to baseline, however without statistic difference,

264 and this increase could be the mechanism by which the anti-atherogenic status was

Copyright ª 2016 National Strength and Conditioning Association


11

265 maintained. While the treatments or strategies used to improve lipid profiles have attempted to

266 encourage improvements in cardiometabolic health, the literature suggests that a healthy diet, weight

267 loss, exercise and physical activity are keys to preventing and treating the development of this disease

268 (4). Moreover, the training adaptations are specific to the type of stimulus.

269 Aerobic training resulted in metabolic and morphological changes, including fast-to-slow

270 fiber-type transformation, mitochondrial biogenesis, as well as increasing the activity of aerobic

D
271 enzymes and substrate metabolism and increasing the oxidation of lipids in muscle and liver (7). On

272 the other hand, strength training stimulates synthesis of proteins responsible for muscle hypertrophy

TE
273 by increasing the recruitment of satellite cells, motor unit activations and high-energy phosphate

274 availability and force muscle (7). Thus, concomitant with this adaptation, the mechanisms are distinct

275 between models. Previous randomized controlled trials addressing the effects of aerobic (5), strength

276 training (20) and combined training (29,35) on lipid and lipoprotein outcomes have reported
EP
277 conflicting findings as regards to total cholesterol, HDL-c, the ratio of total cholesterol to HDL-c

278 (Chol/HDL-c), LDL-c and TAG. However, the exercise guidelines recommend participation in both

279 aerobic and strength training programs for the greatest benefit to lipid profiles (14).

280 It is known that the period of menopause increases metabolic syndrome risk by a factor of 1.6
C

281 (28). The remodeling of adipose tissue that occurs in this population (derived from a high-fat-diet and

282 physical inactivity), results from adipocyte hypertrophy, impairment of vascularization (hypoxia),
C

283 infiltration of immune system cells and an increase of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α. IL-6)

284 (38). High triacylglycerol plasma implies a peripheral insulin resistance due to its accumulation, which
A

285 inhibits insulin activation of its cell surface receptor, as well as downstream signaling molecules such

286 as insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS-1) and Protein Kinase B/Akt (24). This could have an impact on

287 postmenopausal women, who have a greater propensity to develop chronic inflammation and insulin

288 resistance (1).

289

290

Copyright ª 2016 National Strength and Conditioning Association


12

291 The British Regional Heart Study reported an inverse relationship between HDL-c and

292 incidence of coronary heart disease. A 1-mg/dL increment in HDL-c was associated with a significant

293 coronary heart disease risk decrement of 2% in men and 3% in women. Furthermore, a 1-mg/dL

294 increment in HDL-c was associated with a significant decrease (3.7% in men and 4.7% in women) in

295 cardiovascular disease mortality rates (11). The reduction in HDL-c and increase in LDL-c increased

296 the risk of developing cardiovascular diseases, since LDL-c is more susceptible to oxidation and

D
297 greater accumulation in the arterial wall (17). Exercise increases the activity of lecithin-cholesterol

298 acyltransferase (L-CAT), the enzyme responsible for transferring cholesterol ester to HDL, which

TE
299 reduces the activity of plasmatic cholesterol ester transfer protein (CETP), the enzyme responsible for

300 transferring the ester of HDL to other lipoproteins (34). Once we verified that concurrent training was

301 effective in increasing HDL-c and reducing the atherogenic index in Normotriacylglycerolemic

302 women, we aimed to verify whether aerobic plus strength training would promote the same benefits in
EP
303 Hypertriacylglycerolemic postmenopausal women and our results showed that in both groups there

304 was a statistically significant increase in HDL-c and a decrease in the atherogenic index.

305 Petibois et al. (30) had demonstrated that the beneficial outcomes of regular exercise were

306 diminished or disappeared within a few weeks or months after cessation of training. In our study,
C

307 when conducting a comparison between aerobic and concurrent training on lipid profiles at the 6-

308 month and 1 year follow-up, there were no differences between AT and CT groups. However, there
C

309 was a decrease in HDL-c after 6 months and an increased atherogenic index after 1 year in

310 Normotriacylglycerolemic women.


A

311 There are few studies regarding the effects of detraining on blood lipids in postmenopausal

312 women. However, Gupta et al. (13) showed that when compared to sedentary individuals, trained

313 athletes demonstrated enhanced reverse cholesterol transport. More studies are needed to better

314 understand the mechanisms involved in the reverse transport of cholesterol among trained individuals.

315 On the other hand, a significant decrease of 18% in HDL-c after 1 month of detraining has been

316 reported in elderly people who previously participated in a long-term (9-month) aerobic training

317 program (23) and the lipid profile in patients with coronary artery disease indicated a tendency toward

Copyright ª 2016 National Strength and Conditioning Association


13

318 the pre-training values 3 months after the cessation of exercise (41), demonstrating yet again the

319 importance of our training program.

320 The limitations of this study need to be considered when interpreting the finding. The follow-

321 up time may have been insufficient for verifying differences between groups; and there were no

322 Hypertriacylglycerolemic-AT group. On the other hand, no differences were observed during the

323 follow-up as regards body weight, fat mass, dietary intake and free-living physical activity in both

D
324 aerobic and concurrent training. In addition, futures studies could use a physical activity

325 questionnaire at all points of data collection (pre, post, 6 months, 1 year) may help give a

TE
326 better idea of participant's physical activity levels at all phases of data collection, especially 6

327 months and 1 year.

328 In conclusion, the present investigation demonstrated that concurrent training promoted an

329 anti-atherogenic status in Normo- and Hypertriacylglycerolemic postmenopausal women but without
EP
330 significant differences between those groups that were subjected to only aerobic training. Furthermore,

331 these effects were sustained after 1 year, as determined by the follow-up, only among

332 Hypertriacylglycerolemic women.


C

333

334 PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS


C

335 In the present study, our data suggests that concurrent training induces important adaptations

336 to cholesterol metabolism primarily by increasing HDL-c and decreasing the atherogenic index,
A

337 resulting in a metabolic adjustment in Hypertriacylglycerolemic postmenopausal women in the long

338 term and concurrent training could be an important non-pharmacological treatment and prevention

339 of disease for these subjects. Although the participants of this study have maintained

340 hypertriacylglycerolemia after 16-weeks of the concurrent training program, there was an increase of

341 5.6 mg/dL in HDL-c (12.5%) and this effect was sustained, unchanged, for 1 year, which was

342 statistically significant as regards the body weight and fat mass during the follow-up.

343

Copyright ª 2016 National Strength and Conditioning Association


14

344 Conflict of interest:

345 The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

346

347 REFERENCES

348 1. Abildgaard, J, Henstridge, DC, Pedersen, AT, Langley, KG, Scheele, C, Pedersen, BK, and

349 Lindegaard, B. In vitro palmitate treatment of myotubes from postmenopausal women leads to

D
350 ceramide accumulation, inflammation and affected insulin signaling. PLoS One 9: e101555,

351 2014.

TE
352

353 2. Bouchard, DR, Soucy, L, Sénéchal, M, Dionne, IJ, and Brochu, M. Impact of resistance

354 training with or without caloric restriction on physical capacity in obese older
EP
355 women. Menopause 16: 66-72, 2009.

356

357 3. Buonani, C, Rosa, CSDC, Diniz, TA, Christofaro, DGD, Monteiro, HL, Rossi, FE, and Freitas

358 Júnior, IF. Physical activity and body composition in menopausal women. Revista Brasileira
C

359 de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia 35: 153-158, 2013.

360
C

361 4. Churilla, JR, and Fitzhugh, EC. Relationship between leisure-time physical activity and

362 metabolic syndrome using varying definitions: 1999-2004 NHANES. Diabetes and Vascular
A

363 Disease Research 6: 100-109, 2009.

364

365 5. Church, TS, Martin, CK, Thompson, AM, Earnest, CP, Mikus, CR, and Blair, SN. Changes in

366 weight, waist circumference and compensatory responses with different doses of exercise

367 among sedentary, overweight postmenopausal women. PloS one 4: e4515, 2009.

368

Copyright ª 2016 National Strength and Conditioning Association


15

369 6. Diniz, TA, Fortaleza, ACS, Buonani, C, Rossi, FE, Neves, LM, Lira, FS, and Freitas-Junior,

370 IF. Relationship between moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, abdominal fat and

371 immunometabolic markers in postmenopausal women. European Journal of Obstetrics &

372 Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 194: 178-182, 2015.

373

374 7. Egan, B, and Zierath, JR. Exercise metabolism and the molecular regulation of skeletal muscle

D
375 adaptation. Cell metabolism 17: 162-184, 2013.

376

TE
377 8. Fischer, CP, Berntsen, A, Perstrup, LB, Eskildsen, P, and Pedersen, BK. Plasma levels of

378 interleukin‐6 and C‐reactive protein are associated with physical inactivity independent of
EP
379 obesity. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports 17: 580-587, 2007.

380
C

381 9. Freedson, PS, Melanson, E and Sirard, J. Calibration of the Computer Science and

382 Applications, Inc. accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 30: 777-781, 1998.
C

383

384 10. Friedewald, WT, Levy, RI, and Fredrickson, DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-
A

385 density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative

386 ultracentrifuge. Clinical chemistry 18: 499-502, 1972.

387

388 11. Gordon, DJ, Probstfield, JL, Garrison, RJ, Neaton, JD, Castelli, WP, Knoke, JD, ...and

389 Tyroler, HA. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol and cardiovascular disease. Four

390 prospective American studies.Circulation 79: 8-15, 1989.

391

Copyright ª 2016 National Strength and Conditioning Association


16

392 12. Gudmundsdottir, SL, Flanders, WD, and Augestad, LB. Physical activity and cardiovascular

393 risk factors at menopause: The Nord-Trøndelag health study. Climacteric 16: 438-446, 2013.

394

395 13. Gupta, AK, Ross, EA, Myers, JN, and Kashyap, ML. Increased reverse cholesterol transport

396 in athletes. Metabolism 42: 684-690, 1993.

397

D
398 14. Haskell, WL. The influence of exercise training on plasma lipids and lipoproteins in health

399 and disease. Acta Medica Scandinavica 220: 25-37. 1986.

TE
400

401 15. Hill, DW. The critical power concept. A review. 1 Sports Med 16: 237-254, 1993.

402

403 16. Kelley, GA, Kelley, KS, and Tran, ZV. Aerobic exercise and lipids and lipoproteins in
EP
404 women: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of women's health 13: 1148-

405 1164, 2004.

406

407 17. Krauss, RM. Dietary and genetic probes of atherogenic dyslipidemia. Arteriosclerosis,
C

408 thrombosis, and vascular biology 25: 2265-2272, 2005.

409
C

410 Kueht, ML, McFarlin, BK, and Lee, RE. Severely Obese Have Greater LPS‐stimulated TNF‐α Production
A

411 Than Normal Weight African‐American Women. Obesity 17: 447-451, 2009.

412

413

Copyright ª 2016 National Strength and Conditioning Association


17

414 18. Lira, FS, Neto, JCR, and Seelaender, M. Exercise training as treatment in cancer cachexia

415 1. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism 39: 679-686, 2014.

416

417 19. Maesta, N, Nahas, EA, Nahas-Neto, J, Orsatti, FL, Fernandes, CE, Traiman, P, and Burini,

418 RC. Effects of soy protein and resistance exercise on body composition and blood lipids in

419 postmenopausal women. Maturitas 56: 350-358, 2007.

D
420

421 20. Monninkhof, EM, Elias, SG, Vlems, FA, van der Tweel, I, Schuit, AJ, Voskuil, DW, and van

TE
422 Leeuwen, FE. Physical activity and breast cancer: a systematic review. Epidemiology, 18:

423 137-157, 2007.

424

425 21. Mora-Rodriguez, R, Ortega, JF, Hamouti, N, Fernandez-Elias, VE, Canete, Garcia-Prieto, J,
EP
426 Guadalupe-Grau, A, et al. Time-course effects of aerobic interval training and detraining in

427 patients with metabolic syndrome. Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases:

428 NMCD. 24:792-8, 2014.

429 22. Motoyama, M, Sunami, Y, Kinoshita, F, Irie, T, Sasaki, J, Arakawa, K, ... and Shindo, M. The
C

430 effects of long-term low intensity aerobic training and detraining on serum lipid and

431 lipoprotein concentrations in elderly men and women. European journal of applied physiology
C

432 and occupational physiology 70: 126-131, 1995.

433
A

434 23. Muoio, DM. Intramuscular triacylglycerol and insulin resistance: guilty as charged or wrongly

435 accused?. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids 1801:

436 281-288, 2010.

437

438 24. Murphy, E. Estrogen signaling and cardiovascular disease.Circulation Research 109: 687-696,

439 2011.

440

Copyright ª 2016 National Strength and Conditioning Association


18

441 26. Nelson, ME, Rejeski, WJ, Blair, SN, Duncan, PW, Judge, JO, King, AC, ... and Castaneda-

442 Sceppa, C. Physical activity and public health in older adults: recommendation from the

443 American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Circulation, 116:

444 1094, 2007.

445

446 27. Organization WH. Investigaciones sobre la menopausia en los años noventa. 1996.

D
447

448 28. Park, YW, Zhu, S, Palaniappan, L, Heshka, S, Carnethon, MR, and Heymsfield, SB. The

TE
449 metabolic syndrome: prevalence and associated risk factor findings in the US population from the

450 Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994. Archives of internal

451 medicine 163: 427-436, 2003.

452
EP
453 29. Park, SM, Kwak, YS, and Ji, JG. The Effects of Combined Exercise on Health-Related

454 Fitness, Endotoxin, and Immune Function of Postmenopausal Women with Abdominal

455 Obesity. Journal of Immunology Research 2015, 2015.

456
C

457 30. Petibois, C, Cassaigne, A, Gin, H, and Déléris, G. Lipid profile disorders induced by long-

458 term cessation of physical activity in previously highly endurance-trained subjects. The Journal
C

459 of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 89(7), 3377-3384, 2004.

460
A

461 31. Rosamond, W, Flegal, K, Furie, K, Go, A, Greenlund, K, Haase, N, et al. Heart disease and

462 stroke statistics--2008 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics

463 Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 117: e25-146, 2008.

464

465 32. Rossi, F. E., Fortaleza, A. C., Neves, L. M., Buonani, C., Picolo, M. R., Diniz, T. A., ... &

466 Junior, I. F. F. Combined Training (Aerobic Plus Strength) Potentiates a Reduction in Body Fat

467 but Demonstrates No Difference on the Lipid Profile in Postmenopausal Women When

Copyright ª 2016 National Strength and Conditioning Association


19

468 Compared With Aerobic Training With a Similar Training Load. The Journal of Strength &

469 Conditioning Research, 30: 226-234, 2016.

470

471 33. Santos, RD. II Brazilian Guidelines for dyslipidemia and prevention of atherosclerosis

472 guideline of the Department of Atherosclerosis of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology. Arquivos

473 Brasileiros de Cardiologia 77: 1-48, 2001.

D
474

475 34. Seip, RL, Moulin, P, Cocke, T, Tall, A, Kohrt, WM, Mankowitz K, ...and Schonfeld, G.

TE
476 Exercise training decreases plasma cholesteryl ester transfer protein. Arteriosclerosis,

477 Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology 13:1359-1367, 1993.

478

479 35. Seo, DI, So, WY, Ha, S, Yoo, EJ, Kim, D, Singh, H., ...and Kim, E. Effects of 12 weeks of
EP
480 combined exercise training on visfatin and metabolic syndrome factors in obese middle-aged

481 women. Journal of sports science & medicine 10: 222, 2011.

482

483 36. da Silva, CM, Gurjão, ALD, Ferreira, L, Gobbi, LTB, and Gobbi, S. Effect of resistance
C

484 training, prescribed by zone of maximum repetitions, on the muscular strength and body

485 composition in older women. Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human


C

486 Performance, 8: 39-45, 2006.

487
A

488 37. Stricker R, Eberhart R, Chevailler MC, Quinn F, Bischof P, Stricker R. Establishment of

489 detailed reference values for luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, estradiol, and

490 progesterone during different phases of the menstrual cycle on the Abbott ARCHITECT

491 analyzer. Clin Chem Lab Med 2006;44:883-7.

492

493 38. Suganami, T, and Ogawa, Y. Adipose tissue macrophages: their role in adipose tissue

494 remodeling. Journal of leukocyte biology 88: 33-39, 2010.

Copyright ª 2016 National Strength and Conditioning Association


20

495

496 39. Suresh, K. An overview of randomization techniques: An unbiased assessment of outcome

497 in clinical research. J Hum Reprod Sci. 4: 8-11, 2011..

498

499 40. Tambalis, KD, Panagiotakos, DB, Kavouras, SA, and Sidossis, LS. Responses of blood

500 lipids to aerobic, resistance, and combined aerobic with resistance exercise training: a

D
501 systematic review of current evidence. Angiology 2008.

502

TE
503 41. Tokmakidis, SP, and Volaklis, KA. Training and Detraining Effects of a Combined‐strength
EP
504 and Aerobic Exercise Program on Blood Lipids in Patients With Coronary Artery

505 Disease. Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention 23: 193-200, 2003.

506
C

507 42. Trost, SG, McIver, KL, and Pate, RR. Conducting accelerometer-based activity assessments

508 in field-based research. Medicine and science in sports and exercise 37: S531, 2005.
C

509

510 FIGURE CAPTIONS


A

511 Figure 1. The trial profile of this study.

512

513 Table 1 – General characteristics and comparison between the groups.

514 Data are express as mean and standard-deviation (SD). a= Tukey’s post-hoc test with p-value< 0.05

515 compared to Pre-moment.

516

Copyright ª 2016 National Strength and Conditioning Association


21

517 Table 2: Characteristics of the lipid profile in normotriacylglycerolemic subjects before and after

518 training program.

519 Data are express as mean and standard-deviation (SD). *= statistically significant difference (p<0.05).

520 LDL-c (mg/dL) = low-density lipoprotein; HDL-c (mg/dL)= high-density lipoprotein; Chol/HDL

521 (mg/dL)= atherogenic index.

522

D
523 Table 3: Characteristics of the lipid profile in normotriacylglycerolemic and hypertriacylglycerolemic

524 subjects before and after concurrent training.

TE
525 Data are express as mean and standard-deviation (SD). *= statistically significant difference (p<0.05).

526 TAG (mg/dL)= Triacylglycerol; LDL-c (mg/dL) = low-density lipoprotein; HDL-c (mg/dL) = high-

527 density lipoprotein; Chol/HDL (mg/dL) = atherogenic index.


EP
528

529 Table 4: Comparison of the effects of aerobic and concurrent training on glucose and lipid profiles

530 among normotriacylglycerolemic postmenopausal women at the 6-month and 1-year follow-up.

531
C

532 Data are express as mean and standard-deviation (SD). ∆ in order = post-training minus pre; After 6

533 months minus post-training and after 1 year minus after 6 months. a= Tukey’s post-hoc test with p-
C

534 value< 0.05 compared to post-training. LDL-c (mg/dL) = low-density lipoprotein; HDL-c (mg/dL)=

535 high-density lipoprotein; Chol/HDL (mg/dL)= atherogenic index.


A

536

537 Table 5: Comparison between the lipid profiles of normotriacylglycerolemic and

538 Hypertriacylglycerolemic postmenopausal women at the 6-month and 1-year follow-up after the

539 concurrent training program.

540

Copyright ª 2016 National Strength and Conditioning Association


22

541 Data are express as mean and standard-deviation (SD). Normotriacylglycerolemic = Triacylglycerol <

542 150 mg/dL; hypertriacylglycerolemic = Triacylglycerol ≥150 mg/dL. ∆ in order = post-training minus

543 pre; After 6 months minus post-training and after 1 year minus after 6 months. a= Tukey’s post-hoc

544 test with p-value< 0.05 compared to post-training. LDL-c (mg/dL) = low-density lipoprotein; HDL-c

545 (mg/dL)= high-density lipoprotein; Chol/HDL (mg/dL)= atherogenic index.

546

D
TE
EP
C
C
A

Copyright ª 2016 National Strength and Conditioning Association


Table 1 – General characteristics and comparison between the groups.

CG (n= 10) AT (n= 13) CT (n=16)


Variables
Mean±SD Mean±SD Mean±SD

FSH (mUI/ml) 62.5 ± 19.4 62.6 ± 18.4 69.2 ± 25.6

Age (years) 63.4±7.5 61.8±7.9 61.4±5.0

Body weight (Kg) 64.0±14.7 66.4±7.6 59.7± 6.8

Fat mass (Kg)

D
Pre 28.4±10.9 30.1±5.1 24.0±4.5

Post 29.1±10.6 28.8±4.5 a 23.1±5.3 a

TE
Post 6-month - 29.4±6.7 23.1±4.8

Post 1-year - 28.8±4.7 22.7±5.4

Lean Mass (Kg)

Pre 33.5±4.2 34.0±3.3 33.7±4.0


EP
Post 33.8±4.8 34.4±3.3 34.8±4.0 a

Post 6-month - 34.2±3.0 33.7±4.3

Post 1-year - 34.4±3.1 34.0±3.9

Dietary intake (Kcal)


C

Pre 1922±127 1520±376 1738±455

Post 2007±259 1566±334 1647±454


C

Post 6-month - 1902±560 1737±413

Post 1-year - 1543±320 1850±501

Physical activity level


A

(counts/minute)

Pre 297.2±117.6 455.2±217.3 354.8±96.0

Post 311.7±123.1 439.3±174.5 387.2±127.4

Post 6-month - 424.6±175.0 332.1±79.7

Post 1-year - 396.2±123.9 436.5±313.8

Data are express as mean and standard-deviation (SD). a= Tukey’s post-hoc test with p-value< 0.05
compared to Pre-moment.

Copyright ª 2016 National Strength and Conditioning Association


Table 2: Characteristics of the lipid profile in normotriacylglycerolemic subjects before
and after training program.

Control Group ∆ Aerobic Training ∆ Concurrent Training

(n= 10) (Change 0-16 (n= 13) (Change 0-16 (n=16) (Ch
weeks) weeks)
Mean±SD Mean±SD Mean±SD

D
Pre Post Pre Post Post Post

6±10.1 91.9±15.3 0.3±8.3 92.5 ± 25.9 88.1 ± 15.7 -4.3±14.0 86.9 ±12.4 86.1 ± 10.4 -0

TE
.0±27.7 120.9±32.7 8.9±24.1 91.0 ± 28.2 107.7 ± 41.0 16.7±27.0 91.3 ± 31.9 85.5 ± 39.7 -5

.1±35.3 195.4±27.0 12.3±30.4 199.4 ± 38.6 194.2 ± 37.6 -5.1±18.1 192.5 ± 29.9 190.1 ± 36.7 -2

.1±8.6 49.0±7.0 -0.1±6.2 57.6 ± 13.3 60.1 ± 13.4 2.5±7.2 57.1 ± 17.3 64.3 ± 16.1* 7

.4±29.8 121.8±23.5 10.4±25.0 123.6 ± 37.3 111.9 ± 31.3 -11.7±20.5 117.2 ± 23.3 106.5 ± 30.1 -1
EP
8±0.7 4.0±0.54 0.24±0.43 3.6 ± 0.9 3.3 ± 0.8 -0.25±0.5 3.6 ± 0.9 3.0 ± 0.6* -0
Data are express as mean and standard-deviation (SD). *= statistically significant difference (p<0.05). a=

Tukey’s post-hoc test with p-value< 0.05 compared to post-training. LDL-c (mg/dL) = low-density

lipoprotein; HDL-c (mg/dL)= high-density lipoprotein; Chol/HDL (mg/dL)= atherogenic index.


C
C
A

Copyright ª 2016 National Strength and Conditioning Association


Table 3: Characteristics of the lipid profile in normotriacylglycerolemic and

hypertriacylglycerolemic subjects before and after concurrent training.

Concurrent Traininig Concurrent Training


Between
normotriacylglycerolemic ∆ hypertriacylglycerolemic ∆ groups
(TAG<150) (TAG≥150)
Variables (Change 0- (Change 0-16 p-value
(n= 16) 16 weeks) (n=14) weeks)

Mean±SD Mean±SD

D
Pre Post Pre Post

Chol 192.5 ± 29.9 190.1± 36.7 -2.4 ± 30.5 225.6 ± 24.5 222.9 ± 24.7 -2.7 ± 18.3 0.971

TE
HDL-c 57.1 ± 17.3 64.3 ± 16.1* 7.2 ± 11.1 44.7 ± 9.6 50.3 ± 15.3* 5.6 ± 7.2 0.645

LDL-c 117.2 ± 37.3 106.5 ± 31.3 -10.7±26.6 143.4± 28.2 138.1± 25.1 -5.2 ± 19.0 0.528

Chol/HDL 3.6 ± 0.9 3.0 ± 0.6* -0.5 ± 0.6 5.2 ± 1.1 4.7 ± 1.2* -0.5 ± 0.7 0.962

Data are express as mean and standard-deviation (SD). *= statistically significant difference (p<0.05).
EP
TAG (mg/dL)= Triacylglycerol; LDL-c (mg/dL) = low-density lipoprotein; HDL-c (mg/dL) = high-

density lipoprotein; Chol/HDL (mg/dL) = atherogenic index.


C
C
A

Copyright ª 2016 National Strength and Conditioning Association


Table 4: Comparison of the effects of aerobic and concurrent training on glucose and lipid profiles

among normotriacylglycerolemic postmenopausal women at the 6-month and 1-year follow-up.

Aerobic Training Concurrent Training Time


Moment (n= 8) (n=16) x
Mean±SD Mean±SD Group
Glucose (mg/dL) ∆ ∆
Pre 93.9±31.5 86.9±12.4
Post-training 87.6±20.2 -6.25 ± 11.9 86.13±10.4 -0.75 ± 10.3

D
After 6 months 85.7±11.7 -1.87 ± 9.5 86.88±14.6 0.75 ± 11.6 0.439
After 1 year 81.9±5.3 -6.25 ± 8.4 80.63±7.6 -6.2 ± 9.7
TAG (mg/dL)

TE
Pre 76.6±15.1 91.3±31.9
Post-training 86.1±32.6 9.50 ± 30.6 85.5±39.7 -5.8 ± 30.7
After 6 months 87.2±30.4 1.13 ± 37.9 87.6±33.8 2.1 ± 39.0 0.084
After 1 year 83.0±26.4 -4.2 ± 37.6 75.5±27.4 -12.1 ± 32.8
Chol (mg/dL)
EP
Pre 187.1±31.3 192.5±29.9
Post-training 176.9±28.9 -10.2 ± 14.8 190.1±36.7 -2.4 ± 30.5
After 6 months 176.7±24.6 -0.12 ± 19.6 184.9±28.4 -5.2 ± 18.2 0.880
After 1 year 189.2±28.3 12.5 ± 16.3 193.0±31.4 8.0 ± 18.9
HDL-c (mg/dL)
C

Pre 58.9±11.6 57.1±17.3


Post-training 60.4±13.5 1.5 ± 6.4 64.3±16.1 7.2 ± 11.1
After 6 months 60.1±6.0 -0.25 ± 9.7 59.2±17.9 -5.1 ± 7.6 0.945
C

After 1 year 61.4±12.8 1.2 ± 8.5 60.0±17.2 0.75 ± 8.9


LDL-c (mg/dL)
Pre 112.9±34.4 117.2±23.3
A

Post-training 99.4±27.9 -13.5 ± 19.2 106.5±30.1 -10.7 ± 26.6


After 6 months 99.1±28.9 -0.25 ± 17.4 108.1±16.9 1.62 ± 22.3 0.821
After 1 year 111.4±31.2 12.2 ± 17.3 117.9±22.8 9.7 ± 17.8
Chol/HDL (mg/dL)
Pre 3.3±0.9 3.6±0.9
Post-training 3.0±0.8 -0.23 ± 0.4 3.0±0.6 -0.53 ± 0.6
After 6 months 3.0±0.6 -0.07 ± 0.3 3.3±0.6 0.24 ± 0.5a 0.803
a
After 1 year 3.2±1.0 0.24 ± 0.4 3.4±0.9 0.14 ± 0.6
Data are express as mean and standard-deviation (SD). ∆ in order = post-training minus pre; After 6

months minus post-training and after 1 year minus after 6 months. a= Tukey’s post-hoc test with p-value<

Copyright ª 2016 National Strength and Conditioning Association


0.05 compared to post-training. LDL-c (mg/dL) = low-density lipoprotein; HDL-c (mg/dL)= high-

density lipoprotein; Chol/HDL (mg/dL)= atherogenic index.

D
TE
EP
C
C
A

Copyright ª 2016 National Strength and Conditioning Association


Table 5: Comparison between the lipid profiles of normotriacylglycerolemic and

Hypertriacylglycerolemic postmenopausal women at the 6-month and 1-year follow-up after the

concurrent training program.

Normotriacylglycerolemic Hypertriacylglycerolemic Time


Moment (n= 16) (n=14) x
Mean±SD Mean±SD Group
Chol (mg/dL) ∆ ∆

D
Pre 192.5±29.9 225.6±24.5
Post-training 190.1±36.7 -2.4 ± 30.5 222.9±24.7 -2.7± 18.3
After 6 months 184.9±28.4 -5.2 ± 18.2 214.9±29.2 -8.1 ± 24.2 0.079

TE
After 1 year 193.0±31.4 8.1 ± 18.9 207.7±33.1 -7.1 ± 32.9
HDL-c (mg/dL)
Pre 57.1±17.3 44.7±9.6
Post-training 64.3±16.1 7.2 ± 11.1 50.3±15.3 5.6 ± 7.2
a
After 6 months 59.2±17.9 -5.1 ± 7.6 47.8±10.0 -2.5 ± 7.5 0.794
EP
After 1 year 60.0±17.2 0.75 ± 8.9 48.7±10.1 0.93± 7.2
LDL-c (mg/dL)
Pre 117.2±23.3 143.4±28.2
Post-training 106.5±30.1 -10.7 ± 26.6 138.1±25.1 -5.2 ± 19.0
After 6 months 108.1±16.9 1.6 ± 22.3 134.4±30.0 -3.7 ± 21.7 0.098
After 1 year 117.9±22.8 9.7 ± 17.8 127.9±29.8 -6.5 ± 31.2
C

Chol/HDL (mg/dL)
Pre 3.6±0.9 5.2±1.1
Post-training 3.0±0.6 -0.53 ± 0.6 4.7±1.2 -0.52 ± 0.7
C

a
After 6 months 3.3±0.6 0.24 ± 0.5 4.6±1.0 -0.07 ± 0.7 0.064
a
After 1 year 3.4±0.9 0.14 ± 0.6 4.4±1.0 -0.25 ± 0.9
Data are express as mean and standard-deviation (SD). Normotriacylglycerolemic = Triacylglycerol <
A

150 mg/dL; hypertriacylglycerolemic = Triacylglycerol ≥150 mg/dL. ∆ in order = post-training minus

pre; After 6 months minus post-training and after 1 year minus after 6 months. a= Tukey’s post-hoc test

with p-value< 0.05 compared to post-training. LDL-c (mg/dL) = low-density lipoprotein; HDL-c

(mg/dL)= high-density lipoprotein; Chol/HDL (mg/dL)= atherogenic index.

Copyright ª 2016 National Strength and Conditioning Association


D
TE
EP
C
C
A

Copyright ª 2016 National Strength and Conditioning Association

You might also like