CHAPTER 1
Convention and Amoralism
Rec was probably writen around 3758, when Pato was
In is early fs (he was Born as a Athenian axsocrat
around 48 and did in 3474). Ris conventionally divided
into ten books, although there i no reson to think tat this
‘organization was Plato's own t delves from the arbitrary
length ofan ancient papyrus eater than fom aay engumer
tative rythm. ls coenman to gd the first book as some
thing ofan introduction, an the
book a something of
‘oda or endplcs, bt they ane both important dramatically
and doctialy. The central discussion of morality andl pl
tis, however, runs through Boks Io 1X Within here isa
substan subsidiary par, Books V 40 VIL which
other parts of philosophy sb well, tab the thea ob
knowledge, and the nature of rally (epetenalony and
‘Feaphay Thee Tie Gal bot are where
metaphysical temperate rises, They contain some of Pat's
most famous and ada docs
etence ofthe pilosopher- kings, andthe famous Mythofthe
Cave insofar Rpublichasa metaphysical heartland isis
here es.
‘Kites ad been eased by the Atnan demoecy Im
the ety acknowledged, inverted new unacnowladged
‘ant och tha he dra starts when Socrates pious goes
down othe pot of Press, just outside the cy of Athens,
Dy, however, at new festival, oan import gades.
There sala telig dramatic contrast withthe dale The
Sympsiu, which concerns the ace fthe sou and begins
wri orn up ode cy ther tan doen fom
fis blnol, hat ofthe uneasy relation Between ply and
citcom, between the customary usages ofthe ity and the
established.
‘Noon is this the fst etmoti, ut tsounds throughout
Raut, teoughout many of Pat's other Talogue, and
witha coe There nahin ving wall RS coNTOm-
“Galstandpint a Rnd of external anal some pant
eihever rues happen oben plae, moder To Pay Thesexi game o there something ore, capable of under
The ovenheling ple of custom in people's minds | 7
eee O
earthy at helen ages ar ares Pato wel aware ofthe atislins of going farther
ats wot heen and Pre than this Indeed ane ofthe most eloquent set species in
thing more? Init Protoss ID
CEMARGAEAMDD cit gives an evolutionary
stom, or ams in the sense Herdot is quoting
i pyc
ara jstby regarding iin hight ane
poet Pinda, embraces the rules of rN
P es of| showing how it enables men to cooperate and coordinate
“alarod by lear of eputsion and ambition freien popularity, oF for Siting in with the gn SED
and esenll expression of human nature ond human need
Ths the measure of wat severe ill ane
‘Our resporsivenes to the Law of fashion is mater of
‘OF against a course of action, Thin rxponsive
than, artigo Derwinisn adaptation, for huni life wih wil be moe
os aThe view that morality sin thisense the a Fashion is
ly the dominant contemporary view of etc, both
among pllowophers thinking of themselves as scientific In
‘outlook, and especially amongst paychologists and evoke
tionary thos Icon be rv in clifrent you BSEB
(ERBB secnc to haven sin the way wahoo the
opinion of other contemporaries. A particular vaiation of
the type would be the touchy ‘man of honn
I, who
consider Inlet. yarntionsmightstis parental pressure
and more lurid Freudias variations might speculate about
the psychological stresses involved in infancy as we eesist
having our wils moulded by ouside forces. Bu whichever
vay me elaborate it Plato regard with stwokcion and
This suspicion and hostility is shared, on different
grounds, CREED Te far iste tyranny
ust: the ting, conservative, unthinking presse of "the
the rule of eusom, Pindar il
IBBHBAD hate ci
‘ened King Nomes, and whose tyraty wat enforced bythe
working of tat spontaneous ever present pole by wham
the authosty af King Noma enforced in detail ~a pole
not the les omalpotent because they west no uniform, and
any no scogrize ite
Bat King Nomos hat his defenders. In catemporary times
mnmunitaras’ stress the inpict odor inherited
4
folkways. They may ike hee
thinker ond porlomenara EBD
pent century conservative
okt that
frecom from King Noms inter desire, nor posible?
Iti ot pone becuse we are the Kinds of aizal lead
htc We nly gain our sent hy
such aa scheme fc socety dreamed up onthe desing
iat I titel es key towork than one that has
thetestofime, nsenbly agra adapting tel the
rcunntanees of nn Weal id Pt 350 Ta oF
ISERERE Ne cannot sie with Burke, or he shims
centrally inthe business of eason, His an be
sen one of thinking morality tough fom ft priipes,
and of desing up schemeson the driving board
The opposition between the hope or 8 aon funda
tie for eth, anc content with nothing beyond a foun
dation incustom and convention, isone of pilosophy’ great
‘hd, Boe many ts pln and verignous to suppose
SSRIS spe our favors commninntt
ot
the digalie of ro the possibly
ato
nothing more than our ways. In modem philospy th
‘ea that rues, ncadng mora als smply ref the way
we happen to find it natura to go on, has been aided bycentury philosophy, WV. Quine and Ladig Withers
‘i wel with dhe ‘postmodernist’ pete of our mind 3
SS ee
ston and, nthe backend, power.
complacency etd nervous conservatisen, aging he cence
‘nd upheaval witested in the French Revolution. Plato
had «las comfortable historical bed to ie back up
was writing during along period of Athenion uphewal,
revolution, expesiment, war and eventual decline. No
‘wonder he thought thet things needed designing ona more
sccurte plan than anything provided by the doings of
‘ivory les certtin that the reign of King Nomis isnot
In Protegoras Socrates attempts fo rebut the view with
Book 1 of
Relic position sas were spre aut tw ich, con
erative, selfsatisied denen: ORT nein
“ore uniniersting swordplay over whether god man can
ver harm anybody 1 ako shows Soca’ iting ine
lecualsm: his tendency to think tat if you cannot define
; 2
ulfcent posure on each ert gnome, We ean
ological, to potion betwee Mh ule e360
ened when the conventonalis! positon is eefined in
erous Way QB conventions donot have tbe aceped
justas they ae There conberoom for crc and efletion
elf based on other aspects of convention and ctor
fala entaphor, we can san on some planks of our boa,
nd ropa others SS, conventions and customs serve
roses and those purposes asi their thority and even
provide a foundation only of diferent kind. CTS
SRTREAESRULS some move important dan others,
The goals of coordinating with others, of finding peaceful
lutions, of communicating, of fading ways of ignallng
lability and rst all enable recognizably human eto go
feeard, It isnt beling to the authority of promises, any
iy of gram
rine by oe nates Tey ae not arity, o ther is
‘imps and ony a he picture to sy that they ate. Ie
ot arbitrary that we need a convention to determine which
side ofthe rad to dive vpn
the ight
In Aristotle the stark opposition between reason and
cess moderated in another way. There is teedNate gives tthe puely animal material with which
aise nthe way weave imogined conforms aising, as
ve coordinate on things ke tual ron patterns thatenable
1 to cooperste It anscends ature bicase it generates @
sil system of norms which i itself distin from brte
2a i ial, laws eat by reason, shape cstom,
But they cannot exist without it ii Se SSE
faculty can exis apart fom the higher, bt the higher presup
‘SEEETRBREGMTHEDs we shal soe agin in chapter o
Pao’ tendency of mind ist severthe presupposition think
Ing, his zea anothers, ha season can float ce of
‘srthly and earthy constraint in ature and custom, By com
trast, he modem tendency io think ofthis reson en
terms of the poical and rhetorical, the give and take of
—————
and hab will make weigh with thove who find themscves
swayed by them (and then ge calla! good ronson! for ene
decison or anothe King Noms res ga
‘OF course, Pp remains right to sist on space fr eri
‘hn and since he thinks hat wehave many fewer needs and
very different natures than people normally suppose he wll
continue to distast the customs and conventions of any
actual tine se ple SSS SINE NOSE
not be allowed 1 al, for disordered commutes wil hay