You are on page 1of 2

Journal of the American Society of Hypertension 10(10) (2016) 753–754

Editor’s Page

‘‘I have asked my friend and Special Section editor Michael Bloch to write this month’s editorial on a topic that is dear to
his heart.’’
Daniel Levy, Editor-in-Chief

Worldwide prevalence of hypertension exceeds 1.3


billion
Michael J. Bloch, MD, FACP, FASH, FSVM, FNLA
Associate Professor, Department of Medicine, University of Nevada School of Medicine, Reno, NV, USA; and
Medical Director, Department of Vascular Care, Renown Institute for Heart and Vascular Health, Reno, NV, USA

Using available population-based observational studies, (24.9%–29.0%), and control (8.4%–7.7%) from 2000
Mills et al1 give us a sweeping view of the global burden to 2010.
of hypertension, the leading preventable cause of death The large and increasing disparities in the global burden
worldwide. While the methodology of each of the indi- of inadequately treated hypertension demand urgent atten-
vidual studies included in this systematic analysis is tion and perhaps a change in tactics. The World Heart
inconsistent and much of the data from certain parts of Federation has set a lofty goal of improving hypertension
the globe are somewhat limited, the broad conclusions control rates globally by 25% by the year 2025.2 This
of this paper are striking. The authors estimate that in goal also demands a substantial reduction in global dispar-
2010, the worldwide prevalence of hypertension was ities in the burden of hypertension.
1.39 billion persons, representing 31% of all adults. Obviously, healthcare delivery faces numerous and var-
This represented a 5.2% increase in the global prevalence ied obstacles in many low/middle–income countries,
between 2000 and 2010. including limited resources. If we are mostly concerned
These data also highlight increasing disparities in with an absolute decrease in the risk of heart disease and
hypertension prevalence between high-income and low/ stroke, perhaps a modest change in tactics would be help-
middle–income countries. From 2000 to 2010, the preva- ful. Ensuring strict blood pressure control is generally a
lence of hypertension decreased by 2.6% in high-income resource intensive project—even high-income countries
countries, but increased by 7.7% in low/middle–income have suboptimal control rates. Perhaps, in low/middle–
countries. Almost three times as many people with hyper- income countries, interventions that focus on increasing
tension live in low/middle–income countries (1.04 billion) blood pressure screening and education (awareness) with
than in high-income countries (694 million). immediate treatment of those found to have hypertension
In terms of the overall burden of hypertension, the dispa- (including promoting long-term adherence) rather than pri-
rate trends in prevalence between high-income and low/ marily focusing on control may be an achievable interim
middle–income countries is magnified by disparities in step. If a majority of people with hypertension worldwide
awareness, treatment, and control rates. From 2000 to were identified and treated with low-dose fixed combina-
2010, high-income countries saw substantial improvements tion antihypertensive medications, the burden of subsequent
in awareness (58.2%–67.0%), treatment (44.5%–55.6%), cardiovascular events would almost certainly decrease,
and control (17.9%–28.4%). While these rates still demon- regardless of the absolute achieved blood pressure. Addi-
strate substantial room for improvement, they are far supe- tionally, any population-based improvements in sodium
rior to the rates seen in low/middle–income countries where intake, exercise habits, and avoidance of weight gain would
there has been little improvement and perhaps some wors- help to slow the increase in hypertension prevalence in low/
ening in the rates of awareness (32.3%–37.9%), treatment middle–income countries.

E-mail: michael@bluesprucemed.com

1933-1711/$ - see front matter Ó 2016 American Society of Hypertension. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jash.2016.08.006
754 M.J. Bloch / Journal of the American Society of Hypertension 10(10) (2016) 753–754

Whatever the solution, these data make abundantly clear prevalence and control: a systematic analysis of popula-
that while we may be making gains against the burden of tion based studies from 90 countries. Circulation 2016;
hypertension in the United States and other high-income 134:441–50.
countries, we are currently losing the battle globally. 2. Adler AJ, Prabhakaran D, Bovet P, Kazi DS,
Mancia G, Mungal-Singh V, et al. Reducing
References cardiovascular mortality through prevention and man-
agement of raised blood pressure: a World
1. Mills KT, Bundy JD, Kelly TN, Reed JE, Kearney PM, Heart Federation Road Map. Glob Heart 2015;10:
Reynolds K, et al. Global disparities of hypertension 111–22.

You might also like