Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Key Words:
Peucedanum verticillare L. Koch ex DC
Preparative TLC
Column chromatography
RP HPLC
Furanocoumarins
Pyranocoumarins
Pteryxin
Epoxypteryxin
use of variety of adsorbents, binary and ternary mobile phases, were conditioned for approximately 10 min in mobile-phase
and combination of LC, TLC, and RP HPLC. vapor. The separated bands were scraped from the plates and
extracted with methanol–acetone.
Extracts of the individual compounds were purified by crystal-
lization from methanol and the homogeneity of the coumarins
2 Experimental was examined by analytical TLC. The isolated coumarins were
identified by analytical co-chromatography with standard sub-
stances. In this way five pure compounds from the fruits and
2.1 Plant Material five pure compounds from the roots were isolated in the crys-
The investigation was performed on dried and powdered fruits talline form. Other compounds were identified by HPLC, again
and roots (200 g) of Peucedanum verticillare L. Koch ex DC, by comparison with standards. The structures of isolated com-
collected, in August (fruits) and November (roots) 1999 and pounds were elucidated by spectroscopic methods (IR, UV, and
1H and 13C NMR) and mass spectrometry.
2000, in the Pharmacognostic Garden of the University Medical
Academy of Lublin (Poland).
2.5 RP HPLC
2.2 Extraction RP HPLC was performed with a Hewlett–Packard (Palo Alto,
The plant materials were dried at room temperature, powdered, USA) model 1100 liquid chromatograph with variable-wave-
macerated (24 h), and extracted exhaustively in a Soxhlet appa- length UV–visible diode-array detection (DAD) and with an
ratus with petroleum ether (Polish Reagents, Gliwice, Poland; HP 1050 liquid chromatograph with a UV–visible detector.
b.p. 60–70°C) and methanol (Polish Reagents; b.p. 78°C), each Both chromatographs were equipped with a 20-µL sample
time for 48 h. After routine extraction with petroleum ether the injector (Rheodyne, Cotati, CA, USA) and fitted with a
extract obtained was concentrated under reduced pressure and 250 mm × 4.6 mm i.d., dp = 5 µm, Hypersil AG 1315 A ODS
stored under refrigeration. A sediment of coumarins precipitated. (C18) column (Shandon, UK). All eluates containing furano- and
pyranocoumarins were separated by use of the 1100 chromato-
graph, with an acetonitrile gradient as mobile phase (Table 1).
2.3 Preparative Column Chromatography The dwell time was 28 min and 10 min was used for equilibra-
Glass columns filled with Florisil (60–100 mesh; Fluka) and sil- tion of the system. The compounds were detected at λ = 254 nm
ica gel 60 (230–400 mesh; E. Merck) suspended in petroleum and λ = 320 nm. The mobile phases used with the 1050 chro-
ether, and polyamide (0.05–0.16 mm) suspended in methanol matograph were MeOH 65% +1% CH3COOH (v/v) and
(100 g adsorbent per 200 mL solvent) were used. The coumarin 60% CH3CN. For both chromatographs the flow rate was
sediment was dissolved in dichloromethane and eluted with gra- 1.0 mL min –1.
dients of petroleum ether in dichloromethane, ethyl acetate in
dichloromethane, and methanol in water. Fractions (20 mL)
2.6 Melting Point Measurement
were collected and monitored by analytical TLC on silica gel
with n-heptane–dichloromethane–ethyl acetate, 40 + 50 + 10 Uncorrected melting points of the isolated crystalline coumarins
(v/v), as a mobile phase. Separated compounds were detected from fruits (A–F) and from roots were measured by use of a
under UV light at λ = 366 nm. The fractions obtained were com- Boetius-type microscope (Franz Kûstner, Dresden, Germany).
bined in accordance with their TLC similarities and selected for
further separation by preparative TLC.
3 Results and Discussion
2.4 Thin-Layer Chromatography
The multistep procedure used for extraction, isolation, and
Analytical and preparative thin-layer chromatography was per- purification of coumarins from the fruits and roots of
formed on 100 mm × 200 mm glass plates coated with 0.25 mm Peucedanum verticillare L. Koch ex DC. is illustrated schemat-
layers of silica gel 60 (E. Merck) or Florisil for TLC (Fluka) for
analytical TLC, or with 0.5 mm layers of silica gel 60 for Table 1
preparative TLC. Fractions from column LC separation richest
Acetonitrile gradient used as mobile phase for RP HPLC analysis.
in coumarin compounds were chromatographed by preparative
TLC; the mobile phases used were n-heptane–dichloro- Time [min] Acetonitrile [%] Water [%]
methane–ethyl acetate, 40 + 50 + 10 (v/v) (mobile phase I),
0 50 50
n-heptane–dichloromethane–ethyl acetate, 30 + 40 + 30 (v/v)
(mobile phase II), and n-heptane–diisopropyl ether–iso- 8 50 50
propanol, 80 + 20 + 12.5 (v/v) (mobile phase III). Thin-layer 25 70 30
chromatography was performed in horizontal Teflon DS cham-
28 50 50
bers (Chromdes, Lublin, Poland) [9–11, 17, 18]. The plates
Table 2
Table 3
Average (from replicate measurements) RF and tR values and colors of spots in analytical TLC.
silica layers is useful for chemotaxonomic studies of umbellif- [9] M. Waksmundzka-Hajnos and T. Wawrzynowicz, J. Planar Chro-
erous plants containing pyranocoumarins. It provides informa- matogr. 5 (1992) 169–174.
tion on the presence of the compounds and can be applied in [10] M. Waksmundzka-Hajnos, Chromatographic Disertation No 2,
screening studies of medicinal plants containing pyra- Medical University, Lublin, Poland, 1999.
nocoumarins. [11] M. Waksmundzka-Hajnos and T. Wawrzynowicz, J. Planar Chro-
matogr. 7 (1994) 58–62.
[12] T. Wawrzynowicz, M. Waksmundzka-Hajnos, and L.M. Bie-
References ganowska, Chromatographia 28 (1989) 161–166.
[1] R.D.H. Murray, J. Mendez, and S.A. Brown. The Natural [13] K. G³owniak, E. Soczewiñski, and T. Wawrzynowicz, Chem. Anal.
Coumarins: Occurrence, Chemistry and Biochemistry, Wiley, (Warsaw) 32 (1987) 797–811.
Chichester, 1982.
[14] K. G³owniak, Dissertation, Medical Academy, Lublin, Poland,
[2] K. G³owniak and A. Gawron, Appl. Biol. Commun.1/2 (1991) 1988.
85–90.
[15] H. Vuorela, K. Dallenbach-Tölke, S. Nyiredy, K. Hiltunen, and
[3] G. Hegi, Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa Band V Teil 2. Berlin, O. Sticher, Planta Med. 55(2) (1989) 181–184.
Hamburg, 1975.
[16] P. Härmälä, H. Vuorela, P. Lehtonen, and R. Hiltunen, J. Chro-
[4] W. Cisowski, Herba Pol. 30, 3–4 (1984) 159–163. matogr. 507 (1990) 367–380.
[5] J. Zieliñska-Jenczylik, A. Sypula, and W. Cisowski, Arch. [17] T.H. Dzido and E. Soczewiñski, J. Chromatogr. 561 (1990)
Immunol. Ther. Exp. Warsaw 32(5) (1984) 577–582. 461–466.
[6] K. G³owniak and L. Bieganowska, J. Chromatogr. 370 (1986) [18] L.M. Bieganowska and K. G³owniak, Chromatographia 25(1)
281–292. (1988) 11–16.
[7 ] K. G³owniak, T. Mroczek, A. Zab¿a, and T. Cierpicki, Pharm. Biol. [19] M. Takata, S. Shibata, and T. Okuayama, Planta Med. 56(3) (1990)
38(4) (2002) 308–312. 307–311.
[8] W. Cisowski, E. Pa³ka–Gudyka, M. Krauze-Maranowska, Z.A. Ms received: August 3, 2004
Królicki, and W. Cisowski, J. Planar Chromatogr. 4 (1991) 471–474. Accepted by SN: February 24, 2005