Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Review
1
Baylor Heart and Vascular Institute, Dallas, TX 75226, USA
Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine
2
Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75226, USA
3
Baylor Jack and Jane Hamilton Heart and Vascular Hospital, Dallas, TX 75226, USA
DOI:10.31083/j.rcm.2020.03.131
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
There is emerging evidence to suggest that vitamin D defi- 19 patients (Biesalski, 2020). On the other hand, increasing ev-
ciency is associated with adverse outcomes in COVID-19 idence suggests that vitamin D supplementation prevents COVID-
patients. Conversely, vitamin D supplementation protects 19 infection-induced multi-organ damage (Aygun, 2020), coag-
against an initial alveolar diffuse damage of COVID-19 ulopathy (Ali, 2020), and mortality (Grant et al., 2020; Ilie et
becoming progressively worse. The mechanisms by which al., 2020). In addition, vitamin D supplementation is reported to
vitamin D deficiency exacerbates COVID-19 pneumonia reduce the risk and severity of COVID-19 (Hribar et al., 2020).
remain poorly understood. In this review we describe Therefore it has been postulated that daily supplementation with
the rationale of the putative role of endothelial dysfunc- moderate doses of vitamin D3 is safe treatment for COVID-19 pa-
tion in this event. Herein, we will briefly review (1) anti- tients (Zemb et al., 2020).
inflammatory and anti-thrombotic effects of vitamin D, (2) The mechanisms by which vitamin D deficiency leads to pro-
vitamin D receptor and vitamin D receptor ligand, (3) pro- gression from its characteristic lesions (diffuse alveolar damage
tective role of vitamin D against endothelial dysfunction, and airway inflammation) to the more complicated, clinically sig-
(4) risk of vitamin D deficiency, (5) vitamin D deficiency nificant lesions (COVID-19-asociated - vascular inflammation and
in association with endothelial dysfunction, (6) the charac- thrombosis) remain unclear. While multiple, interrelated mecha-
teristics of vitamin D relevant to COVID-19, (7) the role of nisms involving immune cells (T regulatory lymphocytes) and the
vitamin D on innate and adaptive response, (8) biomark- renin-angiotensin system (RAS) have been proposed (Ali, 2020;
ers of endothelial cell activation contributing to cytokine Aygun, 2020), direct proof to elucidate the role of endothelial dys-
storm, and (9) the bidirectional relationship between in- function in the pathogenesis of vitamin D deficiency are still lack-
flammation and homeostasis. Finally, we hypothesize that ing. Recently, a review suggests that endothelial dysfunction con-
endothelial dysfunction relevant to vitamin D deficiency re- tributes to COVID-19-assocated vascular inflammation and coag-
sults from decreased binding of the vitamin D receptor with ulopathy (Zhang et al., 2020), nevertheless; questions remain re-
its ligand on the vascular endothelium and that it may be garding the role of endothelial dysfunction in COVID-19 patients
immune-mediated via increased interferon 1 α. A possible with vitamin D deficiency. The answers to these questions would
sequence of events may be described as (1) angiotensin provide not only essential insights into the mechanisms of COVID-
II converting enzyme-related initial endothelial injury fol- 19 in patients with vitamin D deficiency, but also potential ther-
lowed by vitamin D receptor-related endothelial dysfunc- apeutic targets. Herein, we hypothesize endothelial dysfunction
tion, (2) endothelial lesions deteriorating to endothelialitis, may play a role in COVID-19 patients with vitamin D deficiency.
coagulopathy and thrombosis, and (3) vascular damage
exacerbating pulmonary pathology and making patients
2. Anti-inflammatory and anti-thrombotic
with vitamin D deficiency vulnerable to death.
effects of vitamin D
Keywords The classic role of vitamin D in calcium homeostasis and main-
Coagulation; COVID-19; cytokines; endothelial activation; endothelial tenance of bones is well recognized. Recent evidence suggests
dysfunction; inflammation; SARS-CoV-2, vitamin D; von Willebrand fac- that vitamin D also has anti-inflammatory and anti-thrombotic ef-
tor fects. Mohammad et al. (2019) describe the role of vitamin D in
inflammatory and coagulation pathways as well as its role in en-
1. Introduction dothelial activation. They discuss the close connection between
There is emerging evidence to suggest that vitamin D defi- vascular inflammation and thrombosis in the context of vitamin
ciency is associated with an increased risk of acquiring COVID- D. The anti-inflammatory effects of vitamin D have been demon-
19 infection (Meltzer et al., 2020), as well as developing COVID- strated by treating peripheral blood mononuclear cells from asth-
19-associated thrombosis (Weir et al., 2020). Moreover, vitamin matics with 1,25(OH)2D3 (Zhang et al., 2014). Doing so signis-
D deficiency was shown to be a fatal co-morbidity in COVID- ficantly inhibited IL-6 production, up-regulated the expression of
Rev. Cardiovasc. Med. 2020 vol. 21(3), 339–344
©2020 Zhang et al. Published by IMR Press.
mitogen-activated kinase phosphatase-1 (MKP-1), and enhanced 4. The role of vitamin D in endothelial
anti-inflammatory effects of corticosteroids in monocytes (Zhang dysfunction
et al., 2014). Further, treating humans at sufficient doses of vi- NF-κB activation induces pro-inflammatory genes and plays
tamin D (≥ 30 ng/ml of 25(OH)D3) significantly inhibited IL-6 a role in endothelial activation and endothelial apoptosis. Addi-
and tissue necrosis factor (TNF)-α production (Zhang et al., 2014). tionally, endothelial apoptosis is associated with NO and perox-
Another study reiterated that pretreatment with vitamin D inhib- ynitrite (Zhang et al., 2010). NO contributes to vascular home-
ited IL-6 and TNF-α production by human monocytes and showed ostasis by opposing the actions of endothelium-derived contract-
that the inhibition is mediated by MKP-1 (Zhang et al., 2012). ing factors, such as angiotensin II and endothelin-1. The combi-
Zhang and colleagues suggest that the upregulation of MKP-1 by nation of reduced bioavailability of NO and its plethora of prop-
vitamin D inhibits mitogen activated protein kinase p38 activation erties (vasodilative, antiplatelet, anti-proliferative, anti-adhesive,
and pro-inflammatory cytokine production in monocytes (Zhang permeability-decreasing, and anti-inflammatory), plays a role in
et al., 2012). endothelial dysfunction (Zhang et al., 2017). Oxidative stress is an-
The role of endothelium as a target of vitamin D is demon- other causative factor for vascular endothelial dysfunction (Zhang
strated by the direct effects of vitamin D on endothelial function et al., 2017). In this context, Kanikarla-Marie and Jain showed
(Yancy, 2020). An in vitro study using human umbilical vein en- that pre-treatment of HUVEC with 1,25(OH)2D3 inhibited reac-
dothelial cell (HUVECs) by Uberti et al. (2014) showed the protec- tive oxygen species, MCP-1, ICAM-1, and monocyte adherence.
tive effect of vitamin D on the endothelium. They demonstrated They suggest that vitamin D protects from endothelial dysfunc-
that vitamin D prevents endothelial cell death by modulating apop- tion by reducing oxidative stress and NF-κB activation (Kanikarla-
tosis and autophagy through several actions including inhibiting Marie and Jain, 2016). Further evidence in support of the role of
superoxide anion generation and inducing nitric oxygen (NO) pro- NF-κB was obtained from Stio et al. (2007), who reported that TX
duction. NO release induced by vitamin D during oxidative stress 527, a vitamin D analogue, exerts an immunosuppressive effect
(imbalance between pro-oxidants and anti-oxidants) protects cells on TNF-α production in patients with Crohn's disease and that it
from death. They showed that pretreatment of HUVECs with vi- may be mediated by NF-κB down-regulation. Kundu et al. (2017)
tamin D receptor (VDR) agonist, ZK191784, had a greater abil- confirmed that vitamin D inhibits NF-κB signaling in monocyte-
ity to reduce the apoptosis-related gene expression than vitamin derived dendritic cells following innate immune stimulation.
D treatment only (Uberti et al., 2014). Another in vitro study us- There is conflicting evidence about NF-κB activity between in
ing HUVECs by Teixeira et al. (2017) showed the protective ef- vitro and in vivo studies. Although in vitro studies suggest that
fects of 1,25(OH)2D3 (the most active metabolite of vitamin D) vitamin D reduces inflammation by NF-κB activity, clinical trials
on endothelial dysfunction induced by leptin. The effect is medi- showed no effect of vitamin D supplementation on inflammatory
ated by down-regulating vascular inflammatory mediators (MCP- markers or NF-κB activity in vivo in humans (Mousa et al., 2017).
1, VCAM-1, etc.) of antioxidant activity and inflammation, as well Recently, an updated systematic review with meta-analysis and
as decreasing nuclear factor- kB (NF-κB) subunit p65 to the nu- meta-regression concluded that vitamin D supplementation does
cleus. The protective effects of 1,25(OH)2D3 on the endothelium not improve endothelial dysfunction (Pincombe et al., 2019). At
are dependent on the VDR. the present time, it is difficult to reconcile the results between in
vitro and in vivo studies; however; the methodological differences
3. Vitamin D receptor and VDR ligand in outcome assessment are worth noting. In in vivo studies, the ef-
Vitamin D affects cellular proliferation, differentiation, apop- fects of vitamin D supplementation are solely based on indexes,
tosis, and angiogenesis by binding with VDR and regulating gene (e.g., flow-mediated dilation, pulse wave velocity, central aug-
expression (Uberti et al., 2014). VDR is expressed in the heart, mentation index), all of which lack solid support from biomark-
lungs, kidneys, and other organs. It is distributed throughout the ers of endothelial activation used in the clinical setting (Pincombe
body in endothelial cells, macrophages, dendritic cells, and lym- et al., 2019). Many biomarkers are released from activated and
phocytes (Mohammad et al., 2019; Teixeira et al., 2017). Using dysfunctional endothelial cells (Zhang et al., 2012), and are robust
immunohistochemistry, Wong et al. (2008) detected VDR in en- indexes for in vivo studies.
dothelial and vascular smooth muscle cells of the aortic ring of
rats. VDR activation reduces acute respiratory distress syndrome 5. Risk of vitamin D deficiency
severity in patients with COVID-19 (Virzì et al., 2018). Vitamin D deficiency increases expression and secretion of
The active form of vitamin D (1, 25(OH) 2D3) has a short half- pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, and has been shown
life (approximately 15 hours) compared to 25(OH) D3, which has a to increase the severity of respiratory viral infections. African-
much longer half-life (approximately 15 days). Both are moved to Americans experience inefficient absorption of ultraviolet light,
target organs and serve as natural ligands after binding to vitamin resulting in suboptimal intake of vitamin D (Wong et al., 2008).
D-binding protein (Mohammad et al., 2019). Antigen presenting In line with this, more than half of COVID-19 cases and ap-
cells (e.g., dendritic cells and macrophages) express enzymes that proximately 70% of COVID-19 deaths were attributed to African-
convert vitamin D (25(OH)D3) to its activated form, 1,25(OH)2D Americans in Chicago (Yancy, 2020).
(Mohammad et al., 2019). In this context, endothelial cells may Evidence suggests that vitamin D deficiency is related to in-
also serve as antigen presenting cells by expressing MHC class I creased risk for disease. Long term consequences of vitamin D
and II antigens on their surface (Virzì et al., 2018). Therefore, the deficiency are serious and include an increased risk of hyperten-
endothelium, along with other antigen presenting cells, plays a role sion, diabetes, congestive heart failure, and peripheral arterial dis-
in innate and adaptive immunity of vitamin D. ease, as well as myocardial infarction, stroke, and death (Martínez-
Miguel et al., 2014). Mildly insufficient vitamin D plasma lev-
lation), in which inflammation leads to activation of the hemo- has multilevel pro-coagulant activity (Zhang et al., 2012). In addi-
static system, which then influences inflammatory activity (Mar- tion to converting fibrinogen to fibrin, thrombin activates inflam-
getic, 2012). The concept may help explain the association of matory cells, causing increased production of inflammatory me-
COVID-19 with vascular inflammation and coagulation. Margetic diators and increased leukocyte adhesion and chemotaxis (Zhang
explains that the feedback loop between inflammation and coag- et al., 2014). Tissue factor, a mediator released from activated en-
ulation involves vascular endothelial cells, platelets, plasma co- dothelial cells, not only promotes coagulation (Zhang et al., 2012),
agulation cascade, physiologic anticoagulants and fibrinolytic ac- but also modulates inflammatory activity (Mohammad et al., 2019;
tivity and that under inflammatory conditions, pro-inflammatory Yancy, 2020). Consequently, tissue factor is one of the links be-
cytokines (e.g., TNF-a, IL-1, and IL-6) alert the hemostatic sys- tween inflammation and coagulation (and thus thrombosis) (Mo-
tem to make a change. Such changes include increasing platelet hammad et al., 2019). The two interrelated, but conceptually dis-
activation, impairing function of physiologic anti-coagulants, and tinct events may explain the co-existence of vascular inflammation
suppressing fibrinolytic activity. As a result, P-selectin, vWF, tis- and coagulation in COVID-19. Additionally, activated coagula-
sue factor, and plasminogen activating inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) become tion factors, Factor Xa (FXa) and Tissue Factor-Factor VIIa (TF-
elevated (Margetic, 2012). Endothelial dysfunction acts as a signal FVIIa) complex can directly stimulate cells involved in inflamma-
to switch the anti-coagulants towards the pro-coagulants. tory response and increase production of pro-inflammatory medi-
ators (Margetic, 2012).
Conversely, an activated hemostatic system, particularly the co-
agulant system, also modulates inflammatory activity. For exam-
ple, thrombin, a mediator released from activated endothelial cells