Professional Documents
Culture Documents
syrup urine disease ( M S U D ) . Helv. Paedlat. Acta, 27. 449 (1972). Chim. Acta, 45: 433 (1973).
29. Schulman, J . D., Lustberg, T . J., Kennedy, J . L. Museles, M., and Seegmiller, 38. D~fferencesin the data for H G and SS from those In previous publications (16,
J. E.: A new varlant of maple syrup urine disease (branched chain ketoacidu- 37) are due t o a modified assay procedure. In contrast t o the prevlour study the
ria). Amer. J. Med., 49: 118 (1970). fetal calf serum was freed from amino acids by gel filtrat~on.
30. Scriver, C . R., Mackenzie, S.. Clow, C . L., and Delvin, E.: Thiamine-responsive 39. Radiochemical Centre. Amersham, England.
maplc syrup urine disease. Lancet, i- 310 (1972). 40. Calatornlc, Los Angeles, Calif.
31. Scriver, C . R., and Rosenberg, L. E.: Branched chain amino acids. In. Amino 41. Gibco, New York, N.Y.
Acid Metabolism and Its Disorders, p. 256 (Saunders, Philadelphia, 1973). 42. Serva, Heidelberg, Germany.
32. Seufert, D., Herlemann, E.-M., Albrecht, E.. and Seubert, W.: Purification and 43. The program for the mathematics1 analysis was written by Dr. Plesser,
properties of pyruvate carhoxylase from rat liver. Hoppe-Seyler's Z. Physiol. Max-Planck-lnstitut f i r Erniihrungs-physiologic. Dortmund, West Germany.
Chem., 352: 459 (1971). 44. This paper is part of the M.D. thesis of H . Wentrup.
33. Ullrich, J., and Donner, I . : Kinetlc evidence for two active sltes In cytoplasm~c 45. T h ~ sresearch was supported in part by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.
yeast pyruvate decarboxylase. Hoppe-Seyler's Z. Physiol. Chem., 351; 1026 46. For the supply of skin or fibroblasts of the patlents with M S U D we are indebted
(1970). to Dr. C . Colornbel, Lyon (CC). Dr. L. Elsas, Atlanta (KC). Dr. V. A.
34. Wendel, U.: Unpublished data. McKusick, Baltimore ( A R ) , Dr. H . J . Bremer, Diisseldorf (SL), Dr. P. Koepp,
35. Wendel, U.. Rudiger, H. W., Passarge. E., and Mikkelsen, M.: Maple syrup Hamburg (HG). Dr. W . Hagge and Dr. W. Roland, Stuttgart (SS). Dr. L.
urine disease: Rapid prenatal diagnos~sby enzyme assay. Humangenetik, 19. Schuchmann, Freiburg ( K Q ) . and Dr. U . Wiesmann, Bern (AG). The authors
127 (1973). thank Dr. U . Langenbeck for critical discussion and Dr. E. Passarge for
36. Wendel, U.. Wentrup. H . , and Riid~ger,H. W.: Unpublished data. support in preparing the manuscript.
37. Wendel. U., Wohler, W., Goedde, H . W.. Langenbeck, U., Passarge, E.. and 47. Requests for reprints should be addressed to: U . Wendel, M.D., University
Rudiger, H. W.: Rapid diagnosis of maple syrup urine disease (branched chain Children's Hospital, D-4000 Diisseldorf, Moorenstr. 5 , (West Germany).
ketoaciduria) by micro-enzyme assay in leukocytes and f~broblasts. Clin. 48. Accepted for publication April 28, 1975.
vening personality variables, and complexity of multivariate the testing of several hypotheses about pyritinol activity within
experimental designs, which have to be taken into account in this some subgroups.
area of research. This is no reason, however, to end the whole
discussion since drug testing includes not only testing for safety METHODS
with regard t o harmful side effects but also the decisive assessment
of the drug's effectiveness. The effectiveness of psychoactive drugs Each individual underwent two examinations w ~ t han interval of
can in most cases be tested only through attempts to quantify 6 months. In the meantime the children took the agent in a dosage
behavioral characteristics. This study is intended to be a contribu- of 300 mg/24 hr, or placebo. There was no possibility during the
tion to the discussion of this topic. tests for subjects or examiners to find out whether pyritinol or
Pyritinol-HC1 (34). whose chemical, pharmacokinetic, and met- placebo was given to a certain child, nor did the subjects know that
abolic characteristics have been described elsewhere (5, 1 1 , 15, not all of the participants received the same tablets.
21-23), is used frequently as a "psychoenergizer" by psychiatrists An often ignored problem, not only in experimental designs, but
and pediatricians. T h e producer's recommendations for pediatric also in medical outpatient treatment is the unreliability of patients
applications of the drug include indications such as speech or test subjects in taking the prescribed drug (19) and the difficulty
disorders, underachievement, social and emotional disorders, and in establishing suitable control methods. Even sophisticated objec-
developmental retardation. Clinical evidence seems to confirm tive methods, such as adding a chemical marker t o the test drug,
therapeutic effects within the above areas (10, 12, 14, 20, 24), which can be pointed out by a simple urine test, have led to
whereas a double-blind study with a small sample (n = 19) of arbitrary results (4). This kind of method as well as a biochemical
children with specific brain dysfunctions but with average "overall proof of pyritinol-HCI or its metab,olites in the urine were not
intelligence" (13) showed a tendency to increased activity com- feasible for the present study for several technical reasons. We,
bined with reduced "control functions" under the drug. O n the therefore, attempted to control and to optimize the reliability of
other hand, in a second double-blind study (27) on a sample of 2 1 drug intake through psychosocial interaction. The psychologist
pupils with attentional dysfunctions, the pyritinol group showed a who performed the cognitive testing took care in establishing a
significantly greater gainscore in some cognitive parameters in solid social contact with the mothers of the subjects. This contact
comparison with the placebo group. was maintained by periodic phone calls and in some cases by
Since pyritinol-HC1 is advertised and obviously in use for the personal discussions. In several cases the psychologist was con-
treatment of "developmental retardation" it is surprising that only sulted by the parents about educational and school problems.
two of the above mentioned studies (12, 24) deal explicitly with Moreover, the teachers of the subjects were informed about the
mentally retarded children. Moreover, both of them are based on aim of the study in the course of special meetings. A second
clinical observations without a control group and cannot, there- possibility for reliability control was provided by the condition that
fore, be taken into further consideration. after the first test session the mothers of the subjects received
Aware of the experiences with glutaminic acid and similar tablets only for half of the test period. They were instructed to
substances, none would expect that a drug could simply "correct" come for the second portion after 3 months. Only two cases did not
the learning difficulties of slow learners. However, it remained fulfill this condition and were therefore excluded.
necessary to test the probable effects of pyritinol-HCI on the Table 2 gives a survey of the 22 dependent cognitive parameters
cognitive functions of the members of such a population. measured before and after medication. This test battery was
compiled with the intention of getting a pattern of the cognitive
SUBJECTS
functions of an individual as complete and as differentiated as
possible with respect to test time. The classification criteria A to G
The test population consisted of 67 pupils from slow learner are to some extent oriented on the psychodiagnostic model of
classes, divided into a pyritinol group (n = 35) and a placebo group Mark (18). This design should allow for functional interpretations
(n = 32). of possible medication effects, since it is not likely that such effects
Slow learner classes within the Bernese school system are would include the whole area of cognition resulting, e.g.. in a
constituted of children who have proven to be unable t o follow the general I Q rise. The duration of a test session was about 3-4 hr
learning task of the elementary school, but whose learning abilities plus adequate recreation phases.
are superior to those of the members of retarded classes. At the With each test session a C B G and an EEG were performed.
time when these children are tested with respect to their pass over Before the first session each subject underwent a physical examina-
to the slow learner class, their IQs range, as a r ~ l e between
, 75 and tion.
90. Since the children of this population have attended slow learner
classes for several years, the actually observed I Q variation, as
RESULTS
shown in Table 1, is even greater and reaches the upper end of the
normal range. The test population also is not homogeneous with Statistical evaluation was required to eliminate common sources
respect to specific learning disabilities, such as organic brain of variation, such as placebo effects and learning effects due to test
disfunction or dyslexia; however, there is no systematic difference repetition, in order to isolate the critical variance due to treatment
between the pyritinol and placebo group. effects. The first computation therefore dealt with a comparison of
The children were allocated to each group by the clinic's the average gainscores (difference of test 2 - test 1) between the
pharmacy without communication to the experimenters about two groups by Student's t-test for independent samples.
group membership of the subjects. This allocation was performed As demonstrated by Figure I the differences between the two
with respect to body weight in order to avoid asymmetry of the two groups with respect to average gainscores show a random distribu-
groups on this variable. In consideration of the results of an earlier tion around the zero point. There is no statistically significant
study (1 3), hyperactive children were excluded. Also excluded were difference between the pyritinol and placebo groups with respect to
subjects under continuous medication (antiepileptica, etc.) and changes in average performance in the 22 dependent cognitive
subjects suspected of unieliability in taking the tablets. Informed variables.
consent of the parents was a strict condition for the participation of Recently this kind of approach (computing gainscores) was
a child in the study. Table 1 summarizes the main statistic data for subject to methodologic discussion (28). Therefore a second,
the test population. Although there is no relevant difference statistically somewhat more complicated, approach was at-
between the pyritinol and the placebo group with respect to age, tempted. Based on the results of the tests after treatment, a
body weight, and IQ, these parameters show considerable varia- two-factorial analysis of covariance was computed, using the
tion within the groups. As will be shown, this heterogeneity allows results of the first testing as covariates. Factor A dealt with I Q
PYRITINOL-HCL AND COGNITIVE FUNCTIONS 719
T a b l e I. Comparison o f two groups with respect to distribution o f age, body weight, and I Q
Age Age
Variances Mean
F value 1.03 0.940 31, 34 SD
Means SE
T 0.05 0.957 65 No.
Maximum
Minimum
Body wt Body wt
Variances Mean
F value SD
Means SE
T No.
Maximum
Minimum
IQ IQ
Variances Mean
F value 1.46 0.292 34, 3 1 SD
Means SE
T --0.63 0.528 65 No.
Maximum
Minimum
Table 3. Pyritinol and placebo group compared with respect to variances o f gainscores
Variances of gainscores