Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ADULT CARDIAC
Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation
Matthew L. Williams, MD, Mani A. Daneshmand, MD, James G. Jollis, MD,
John R. Horton, MS, Linda K. Shaw, MS, Madhav Swaminathan, MD, Robert D. Davis, MD,
Donald D. Glower, MD, Peter K. Smith, MD, and Carmelo A. Milano, MD
Divisions of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Cardiovascular Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, and Duke Clinical Research
Institute, Durham, North Carolina
Background. Undersized ring annuloplasty and surgi- Results. For the group of 222 patients, echocardio-
cal revascularization are commonly used to correct ischemic graphic follow-up was available for 68% (149 patients).
mitral regurgitation (MR), but published series have failed At follow-up, 1.3% had severe MR and 9.4% had moder-
to demonstrate a benefit compared with revascularization ate MR; 54% of patients (66 of 123) were found to have
alone. We hypothesized that surgical revascularization gradients of 5 mm or greater across the mitral valve, with
and annuloplasty lead to a durable repair, but may also 11% demonstrating gradients of 8 mm or more. Cox
lead to increased mitral gradients that could limit the proportional hazards models failed to show adverse
benefit of the repair technique. effects of increasing mitral gradient on outcomes ana-
Methods. Data were collected for 222 consecutive lyzed: survival hazard ratio ⴝ 0.95 (95% confidence inter-
patients who underwent combined revascularization val: 0.82 to 1.11, p ⴝ 0.527) and survival/heart failure
and repair for ischemic MR between 1999 and 2006. hospitalization hazard ratio ⴝ 1.04 (95% confidence in-
The most recent transthoracic echocardiogram avail- terval: 0.93 to 1.17, p ⴝ 0.488).
able for each patient (namely, the study that occurred Conclusions. Undersized ring annuloplasty and revas-
at the latest date after surgery) was reviewed to define cularization can provide a durable correction of ischemic
the fate of ischemic MR. When present, the mean mitral regurgitation. This technique frequently increases
gradient across the mitral valve was measured. Cox the gradient across the mitral valve, but increasing mitral
regression modeling was then performed to determine gradient does not appear to adversely impact survival or
whether increasing gradients were associated with heart failure hospitalization.
decreased long-term survival or increased hospitaliza- (Ann Thorac Surg 2009;88:1197–201)
tion for heart failure. © 2009 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
In surgical patients with ischemic MR, the dominant Table 1. Patient Characteristics
(although not uniform) strategy at our institution has
Patients with Paired
been to undersize the valve with a complete, nonflexible All Patients Echocardiographic
annuloplasty ring. We hypothesized that this, along with Characteristic (n ⫽ 222) Data (n ⫽ 83)
revascularization, would lead to a durable repair and
ADULT CARDIAC
Table 2. Left Ventricular (LV) Diameters (n ⫽ 83) Possible explanations for this finding include differences
in patient population or the incomplete echocardio-
Diameter
graphic follow-up. More likely, though, this finding rep-
Preoperative LV end-diastolic diameter 5.5 cm (⫾ 0.8) resents a true decrease in recurrent MR secondary to the
Postoperative LV end-diastolic diameter 5.1 cm (⫾ 1.0) strategy of aggressive undersizing and the utilization of
ADULT CARDIAC
Delta ⫽ ⫺0.4 cm, p ⬍ 0.001 complete, rigid annuloplasty rings. It appears that this
Preoperative LV end-systolic diameter 4.3 cm (⫾ 1.0) technique does reduce the rate of recurrent MR, but at
Postoperative LV end-systolic diameter 4.2 cm (⫾ 1.2) the price of increased mitral gradients, as the majority of
Delta ⫽ ⫺0.1 cm, p ⫽ 0.08 those patients in whom it was measured demonstrated a
mean transmitral gradient of 5 mm Hg or more. This is a
higher proportion than has usually been reported in
series of repairs of ischemic MR or functional MR, even
review of the echocardiograms, 81% (13 of 16 patients) after aggressive undersizing [11], although one other group
with moderate or severe MR were determined to have has reported a mean mitral gradient of greater than 5 mm
progressive posterior leaflet tethering as the etiology for Hg afater restrictive annuloplasty for functional MR[12]. In
failure of repair. No patients underwent reoperation for addition, left ventricular diameters were decreased after
mitral regurgitation; 2 patients did go on to receive cardiac surgical revascularization and mitral annuloplasty. The
transplantation. modest decrease in left ventricular diameter may not be
Paired preoperative and postoperative transthoracic clinically significant, but increasing chamber size is as-
echocardiograms were available for 37% of patients (83 of sociated with worse outcome in patients with heart
222). Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter was signifi- failure and after myocardial infarction [13, 14].
cantly decreased relative to preoperative transthoracic Using proportional hazards models, we were unable to
echocardiogram; left ventricular end-systolic diameter demonstrate any adverse relationship between mitral
was decreased but did not reach statistical significance gradient and survival or the composite of survival and
(Table 2). Measurement of the transmitral gradient was hospitalization for heart failure. Although the number of
available for 123 patients; 54% of patients were found to patients analyzed was low (123 patients), this is a cohort
have mean gradients of 5 mm Hg or greater across the of patients with high event rates, and there appeared to
mitral valve, with 13% demonstrating gradients of 8 mm be no trend toward an adverse effect. This finding runs
Hg or more (average 5.0 ⫾ 2.2 mm Hg). Diabetes mellitus, counter to recent descriptions of the adverse effect of
preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump, increased age, patient-prosthesis mismatch at the mitral position [15, 16].
history of myocardial infarction, number of grafts, and
higher NHYA class were found to be significantly asso- Table 3. Adjusted Proportional Hazards Survival Survival/
ciated with increased mortality (p values ⬍ 0.05) in the Hospitalization for Heart Failure
multivariable proportional hazards model, following Wald Hazard Ratio p
stepwise selection of all candidate variables. Diabetes, Variable 2 (95% CI) Value
male, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, baseline
Adjusted proportional
ejection fraction, and preoperative intra-aortic balloon
hazards survival
pump were found be associated with increased risk for (n ⫽ 123)
the composite of death or heart failure rehospitalization. Mitral gradient 0.400 0.95 (0.82–1.11) 0.527
When mitral gradient was forced into these models, there Diabetes mellitus 10.047 3.10 (1.54–6.24) 0.002
was no indication of an association with either endpoint Preoperative IABP 6.408 3.56 (1.33–9.51) 0.011
(p values ⫽ 0.527 and 0.488, respectively; Table 3). No
Age 4.764 1.05 (1.10–1.09) 0.029
difference in these endpoints was observed when com-
History of myocardial 9.646 3.74 (1.63–8.59) 0.002
paring patients with follow-up echocardiogram to pa- infarction
tients without follow-up echocardiogram (Fig 1A, B). No Number of grafts 3.257 1.43 (0.97–2.12) 0.071
differences in the unadjusted plots were observed for NYHA class CHF 8.119 1.60 (1.16–2.20) 0.004
patients with a mitral gradient of 5 mm Hg compared
Adjusted proportional
with patients having a gradient of 5 mm Hg or less hazards
(death, p ⫽ 0.274; death/rehospitalization, p ⫽ 0.560; survival/hospitalization
Fig 2A, B). Actuarial survival of the entire cohort was 72% for heart failure
at 2 years and 55% at 5 years. (n ⫽ 123)
Mitral gradient 0.481 1.042 (0.93–1.17) 0.488
Diabetes mellitus 5.639 1.90 (1.12–3.21) 0.018
Comment Male 4.576 1.78 (1.05–3.02) 0.032
In this series of patients who underwent undersized ring COPD 3.541 1.73 (0.98–3.07) 0.060
annuloplasty and surgical revascularization for treatment Ejection fraction 6.990 0.97 (0.94–0.99) 0.008
of ischemic MR, a durable correction of the ischemic MR Preoperative IABP 22.057 5.81 (2.79–12.12) ⬍0.0001
was achieved. The rate of recurrent MR in this cohort of
CHF ⫽ congestive heart failure; CI ⫽ confidence interval; COPD ⫽
patients was less than that reported in other series with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; IABP ⫽ intra-aortic balloon
comparable rates of echocardiographic follow-up [5, 6]. pump; NYHA ⫽ New York Heart Association.
1200 WILLIAMS ET AL Ann Thorac Surg
RECURRENCE OF MR AFTER RING ANNULOPLASTY 2009;88:1197–201
geal echocardiography on long-term outcomes after coronary functional mitral stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:1692–
artery bypass grafting. Circulation 2005;112(Suppl 1):293– 8. 701.
2. Bolling SF, Deeb GM, Brunsting LA, et al. Early outcome of 9. Rapaport E. Natural history of aortic and mitral valve dis-
mitral valve reconstruction in patients with end-stage car- ease. Am J Cardiol 1975;35:221–7.
diomyopathy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;109:676 – 82. 10. Selzer A, Cohn KE. Natural history of mitral stenosis: a
3. Mihaljevic T, Lam BK, Rajeswaran J, et al. Impact of mitral review. Circulation 1972;45:878 –90.
ADULT CARDIAC
valve annuloplasty combined with revascularization in pa- 11. Tulner SA, Steendijk P, Klautz RJ, et al. Acute hemodynamic
tients with functional ischemic mitral regurgitation. J Am effects of restrictive mitral annuloplasty in patients with
Coll Cardiol 2007;49:2191–201. end-stage heart failure: analysis by pressure-volume rela-
4. Diodato MD, Moon MR, Pasque MK, et al. Repair of isch- tions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;130:33– 40.
emic mitral regurgitation does not increase mortality or 12. Walls MC, Cimino N, Bolling SF, et al. Persistent pulmonary
improve long-term survival in patients undergoing coronary
hypertension after mitral valve surgery: does surgical pro-
artery revascularization: a propensity analysis. Ann Thorac
cedure affect outcome? J Heart Valve Dis 2008;17:1–9.
Surg 2004;78:794 –9.
13. Lee TH, Hamilton MA, Stevenson LW, et al. Impact of left
5. Crabtree TD, Bailey MS, Moon MR, et al. Recurrent mitral
regurgitation and risk factors for early and late mortality ventricular cavity size on survival in advanced heart failure.
after mitral valve repair for functional ischemic mitral regur- Am J Cardiol 1993;72:672– 6.
gitation. Ann Thorac Surg 2008;85:1537– 42. 14. Pfeffer MA, Lamas GA, Vaughan DE, et al. Effect of captopril
6. McGee EC, Gillinov AM, Blackstone EH, et al. Recurrent on progressive ventricular dilatation after anterior myocar-
mitral regurgitation after annuloplasty for functional isch- dial infarction. N Engl J Med 1988;319:80 – 6.
emic mitral regurgitation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 15. Lam BK, Chan V, Hendry P, et al. The impact of patient-
128:916 –24. prosthesis mismatch on late outcomes after mitral valve
7. Spoor MT, Geltz A, Bolling SF. Flexible versus nonflexible replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;133:1464 –73.
mitral valve rings for congestive heart failure: differential 16. Li M, Dumesnil JG, Mathieu P, et al. Impact of valve
durability of repair. Circulation 2006;114(Suppl 1):67–71. prosthesis/patient mismatch on pulmonary arterial pressure
8. Magne J, Sénéchal M, Mathieu P, et al. Restrictive annu- after mitral valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:
loplasty for ischemic mitral regurgitation may induce 1034 – 40.
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) is pleased to ● E-mail senators and representatives about upcoming
announce a new member benefit—the STS Policy Action medical liability reform legislation
Center, a website that allows STS members to participate ● Track congressional campaigns in one’s district—and
in change in Washington, DC. This easy, interactive, become involved
hassle-free site allows members to: ● Research the proposed policies that help— or hurt—
one’s practice
● Personally contact legislators with one’s input on key ● Take action on behalf of cardiothoracic surgery
issues relevant to cardiothoracic surgery
● Write and send an editorial opinion to one’s local media This website is now available at www.sts.org/takeaction.
© 2009 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Ann Thorac Surg 2009;88:1201 • 0003-4975/09/$36.00
Published by Elsevier Inc