Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Background. There are many kinds of prosthetic mitral Results. Operative mortality was 0.9%. At 5 years,
annuloplasty rings. We report results of our homemade survival and event-free survival rates were 92% and 80%,
annuloplasty rings. and freedom from thromboembolic complications and
Methods. Between January 1991 and January 1998, 107 reoperation were 95% and 93%, respectively. Ninety-
patients with mitral insufficiency underwent mitral valve three patients (97%) were in New York Heart Association
repair with homemade annuloplasty rings. Mitral insuf- functional class I, 3 patients (3%) were in class II.
ficiency was due to rheumatic disease in 71 patients, Echocardiography at follow-up showed satisfactory mi-
degenerative disease in 29, endocarditis in 3, and congen- tral valve function.
ital heart disease in 4 patients. A total of 67 patients were Conclusions. Midterm results of homemade annulo-
in New York Heart Association functional class III or IV plasty rings are comparable to commercial ones.
preoperatively. Midterm follow-up was available in 106 (Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:63– 6)
patients from 1 month to 6.6 years (average, 2.4 years). © 1999 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Fig 4. Event-free survival in rheumatic and degenerative disease. Fig 6. Reoperation-free survival in rheumatic and degenerative dis-
(DD ⫽ degenerative disease; N ⫽ number at risk; RHD ⫽ rheu- ease. (DD ⫽ degenerative disease; N ⫽ number at risk; RHD ⫽
matic heart disease; Total ⫽ all patients.) rheumatic heart disease; Total ⫽ all patients.)
causes of reoperation were restrictive valve motion in 3 Its shape can be adjusted manually to achieve the best
patients and ruptured chordae in 1 patient. Freedom competence during operation. In our experience, adjust-
from reoperation was 93% at 5 years (Fig 6). The reop- ment of ellipsoid shape of the ring gave the best compe-
eration rate was 1.6% per patient-year. tency. Postoperative echocardiography showed good re-
The patients’ functional class was significantly im- sults of the repair and mitral annulus was restored to
proved after operation. Ninety-three patients (97%) were normal size and shape.
in class I and 3 patients (3%) were in class II (p ⬍ 0.01). The predictability of the technique is demonstrated by
Results of echocardiography are shown in Table 2 and the low incidence of early reoperation (1.9% at 1 year).
Figure 7. No systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve Prosthetic ring dehiscence has not been seen in our
was observed. study. Some reports on the use of annuloplasty rings
showed incidences of ring dehiscence from negligible to
2.88% [2, 3, 6, 7].
Comment Patients’ survival in this study was 92% at 5 years,
The function of the annuloplasty ring is to restore dilated which was comparable to other series using commer-
mitral annulus. In this study we try to evaluate our cially available rings [1– 4, 6, 7]. The incidence of reop-
homemade PTFE ring. We do not construct the ring eration was 1.6% per patient-year with 93% freedom from
according to the length of anterior part of mitral annulus. reoperation at 5 years. Most reoperations were per-
Diameter of the handmade annuloplasty ring is fixed at formed in the rheumatic patients because the valves were
30 mm in the present series based on our experience of more fibrotic and the progressive rheumatic process. In
mitral valve replacement. The follow-up echocardiogra- our rheumatic patients, we found that there was an
phy could demonstrate that the orifice was quite ade- increasing degree of regurgitation during follow-up. This
quate. One advantage of this ring is that it is reshapable. study also confirms other reports that the patients with
EDV (mL) 306 ⫾ 153 182 ⫾ 108b 188 ⫾ 107b 182 ⫾ 79b
ESV (mL) 103 ⫾ 63 95 ⫾ 76 74 ⫾ 62b 69 ⫾ 34b
EF (%) 66 ⫾ 11 49 ⫾ 17b 61 ⫾ 11b 62 ⫾ 10
MVA-p (mm2) 364 ⫾ 169 286 ⫾ 100b 284 ⫾ 95b 207 ⫾ 41b
MVA-d (mm2) 241 ⫾ 91 235 ⫾ 68 203 ⫾ 54b 187 ⫾ 52b
MPG (mm Hg) 8.9 ⫾ 5.6 4.5 ⫾ 1.9b 6.1 ⫾ 2.6b 5.1 ⫾ 1.4b
a
Data are means ⫾ standard deviation. b
p ⬍ 0.01 versus preopera-
tive measurement.
EDV ⫽ end-diastolic volume; EF ⫽ ejection fraction; ESV ⫽ end-
systolic volume; MPG ⫽ mean pressure gradient across mitral valve;
Fig 5. Thromboembolism-free survival in rheumatic and degenera-
MVA-d ⫽ mitral valve area (Doppler); MVA-p ⫽ mitral valve area (planim-
tive disease. (DD ⫽ degenerative disease; N ⫽ number at risk; etry); n ⫽ number of patients; Postop ⫽ postoperative measurement;
RHD ⫽ rheumatic heart disease; Total ⫽ all patients.) Preop ⫽ preoperatie measurement.
66 WARINSIRIKUL ET AL Ann Thorac Surg
HOMEMADE MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RINGS 1999;68:63– 6