Student Peer Evaluation
Evaluated student’s name
Category for Evaluation
Quality of Work:
Consider the degree to
which the student team
member provides work
that is accurate and
complete.
Timeliness of Work:
Consider the student
team member's
timeliness of work.
Task Support:
Consider the amount of
task support the student
team member gives to
other team members.
Interaction:
Consider how the
student team member
relates and
communicates to other
team members.
Attendance:
Consider the student
team member's
attendance at the group
meetings. (This includes
in class meetings.)
Responsibility:
Consider the ability of
the student team
member to carry out a
chosen or assigned task,
the degree to which the
1 2
Produces unacceptable Occasionally produces
work, fails to meet work that meets
minimum group or minimum group or
project requirements. project requirements.
Fails to meet deadlines Occasionally misses
set by group. deadlines set by group.
Gives no task support to Sometimes gives task
other members. support to other
members.
Behavior is detrimental Behavior is inconsistent
to group. and occasionally distracts
group meetings.
Failed to attend the Attended 1%-32% of the
group meetings. group meetings.
Is unwilling to carry out Sometimes carries out
assigned tasks. assigned tasks but never
volunteers to do a task.
1
Possible Scores
3 4 5
Meets minimum group Regularly produces work Produces work that
or project requirements. that meets minimum consistently exceeds
requirements and established group or
sometimes exceeds project requirements.
project or group
requirements.
Regularly meets Consistently meets Consistently completes
deadlines set by group. deadlines set by group work ahead of schedule.
and occasionally
completes work ahead of
schedule.
Occasionally provides Consistently provides Consistently gives more
task support to other task support to other task support than
group members. group members. expected.
Regularly projects Consistently Consistently
appropriate team demonstrates demonstrates exemplary
behavior including: appropriate team team behavior.
listening to others, and behavior.
allowing his/her ideas to
be criticized.
Attended 33%-65% of Attended 66%-99% of Attended 100% of the
the group meetings. the group meetings. group meetings.
Carries out assigned Consistently carries out Consistently carries out
tasks but never assigned tasks and assigned tasks and
volunteers to do a task. occasionally volunteers always volunteers for
for other tasks. other tasks.
student can be relied
upon to complete a task.
Involvement: Fails to participate in Sometimes participates Takes part in group Regularly participates in Consistently exceeds
Consider the extent to group discussions and in group discussions and discussions and shares group discussion and group expectations for
which the student team fails to share relevant rarely contributes relevant information. sometimes exceeds participation and
member participates in material. relevant material for the expectations. consistently contributes
the exchange of project. relevant material to
information (does project.
outside research, brings
outside knowledge to
group).
Leadership: Does not display Displays minimal Occasionally assumes Regularly displays good Consistently
Consider how the team leadership skills. leadership skills in team. leadership role. leadership skills. demonstrates exemplary
member engages in leadership skills.
leadership activities.
Overall Performance Performance Performance fails to Performance meets all Performance meets all Performance consistently
Rating: significantly fails to meet meet some group group requirements. group requirements exceeds all group
Consider the overall group requirements. requirements. consistently and requirements.
performance of the sometimes exceeds
student team member requirements.
while in the group.
TOTAL

2
 Student Peer Evaluation

Guidelines:

✓ Disregard your general impressions and concentrate on one factor at a time.

✓ Study carefully the definition given for each factor and the specifications for each category.

✓ Call to mind instances that are typical of the student's work and behavior. Do not be influenced by
unusual cases that are not typical.

✓ Determine the category that best describes the student's accomplishments in that area and enter the
number on the separate performance rating form on the third page. Only submit the third page.

✓ If a factor has not been observed during the rating period, enter NA for not applicable. In the comments
section, explain why this factor has not been observed.

✓ Comments should be used to support your ratings where applicable.

✓ Make sure to include yourself when filling out the evaluation form on the third page.

3
 Student Team Peer Evaluation
Your name:________________________________ Date_____________________________________

Instructions:
➢ Fill out the evaluation form listed below for all of your group members. Make sure to include yourself.
➢ For each of the 9 categories listed on the first page of this document, enter the appropriate score (1 to 5 or NA).
Repeat this for each group member.
➢ List all of the tasks you completed for the project. In other words, what specifically did you contribute to the team
effort?
➢ As needed, enter comments about group members below the form. Use the back of this sheet or additional sheets as
necessary. (If you use the back, please indicate this on the bottom of the front page.)
➢ Only submit this page and any additional comment pages to your TA during your final lab.

Timeliness of work
Quality of work

Responsibility
Task support

Performance
Involvement
Attendance

Leadership
Interaction

Overall
Group Members Names

List below the specific tasks you completed for the project:

General Comments:

4
5