Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • (By Miya) On Tradition As Cyclical Eternity and Mo

    Uploaded by

    Tenshimaru
    57 views1 page
    The document discusses the differences between tradition and modernity. It states that tradition is cyclical eternity while modernity is unidirectional time progressing towards eventual equilibrium. It argues that any return to a past time period within modernity is actually a return to a form of modernism from that era, not a true tradition. The document also argues that Christianity does not allow for a true traditionalism and questions whether Christianity caused modernism or is just another facet of it, with roots in Sumerian culture. It describes the program of traditionalism as hyperborean spiritual reconstructivism.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    (by Miya) on Tradition as Cyclical Eternity and Mo

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document discusses the differences between tradition and modernity. It states that tradition is cyclical eternity while modernity is unidirectional time progressing towards eventual equilibrium. It argues that any return to a past time period within modernity is actually a return to a form of modernism from that era, not a true tradition. The document also argues that Christianity does not allow for a true traditionalism and questions whether Christianity caused modernism or is just another facet of it, with roots in Sumerian culture. It describes the program of traditionalism as hyperborean spiritual reconstructivism.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    57 views1 page

    (By Miya) On Tradition As Cyclical Eternity and Mo

    Uploaded by

    Tenshimaru
    The document discusses the differences between tradition and modernity. It states that tradition is cyclical eternity while modernity is unidirectional time progressing towards eventual equilibrium. It argues that any return to a past time period within modernity is actually a return to a form of modernism from that era, not a true tradition. The document also argues that Christianity does not allow for a true traditionalism and questions whether Christianity caused modernism or is just another facet of it, with roots in Sumerian culture. It describes the program of traditionalism as hyperborean spiritual reconstructivism.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    Nov 19th 2019

    Tradition as Cyclical Eternity,


    Modernity as Unidirectional Time
    By Miya Black Hearted Cyber Angel Baby
    Tradition is cyclical eternity, nothing less. Modernity is unidirectional time: unshackled in
    irreversible feedback loop towards eventual zero-state equilibrium. Any "return" on this timeline—
    be it 25, 150 or 2000 yrs ago—is not a return to tradition, but to X yrs old modernism.

    Speaking nothing of veracity of their saints; Abrahamism seeks sort of artificial permanence,
    constructed traditionalism, designed as memetic algorithm measured by propagation. Islam is
    only christian sect with any claim to success, having evidenced at least medium-term stability.

    There is no possible Christian Traditionalism; that Theseus' ship theology was unstable from day
    3. The only question re: Christianity and Traditionalism is if Christianity is root of modernism, as
    Nietzsche suggested, or just another facet of it, of the eternal Sumerian perhaps.

    Program of Traditionalism is hyperborean spiritual reconstructivism, period. They cry disruptor


    for revealing this: Christian alliance is strategic as stopgap against modernity's post-Christian
    nihilism; Thule Society forced into same charade. But I speak for truth, not politics.

    You might also like