Does 1-254 V Chiquita Brands - Response To Jurisdictional Question

USCA11 Case: 20-14238 Date Filed: 03/30/2021 Page: 1 of 52
Case No. 20-14238-RR
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
___________________________________________
Does 1 Through 254, et al. v.

Chiquita Brands International, et al.
___________________________________________
On Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Florida
No. 08-md-01916
(No. 11-80405-CIV-MARRA)
(The Honorable Kenneth A. Marra)
____________________________________________
RESPONSE TO JURISDICTIONAL QUESTION
OF
APPELLANTS DOES 1-254

____________________________________________
Paul Wolf, DC Bar #480285

P.O. Box 21840
Washington, D.C. 20009
Telephone (202) 431-6986
paulwolf@yahoo.com
Attorney for Plaintiff-
Appellants Does 1-254
Does 1-254 v. Chiquita Brands International, Inc. Case No. 20-14238-RR
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS
Counsel certifies that the following is a complete list of the trial judge(s), all
attorneys, persons, associations of persons, firms, partnerships, or corporations
(noted with its stock symbol if publicly listed) that have an interest in the outcome
of the particular case on appeal, including subsidiaries, conglomerates, affiliates,
and parent corporations, and other identifiable legal entities related to a party,
known to Appellants, are as follows:
1. Plaintiff-Appellants "Does 1-254," whose real names are:
Agudelo Castano, Margrieth Cecilia
Aguirre Braun, Irma Nury
Alzate de Escobar, Maria Leonilda
Anay Mosquera, Rosa
Anaya Dias, Lesvia Petrona
Angarita Gomez, Maria Estela
Arbelaez Marin, Alba Nidia
Arenas Gil, Ancizar Alexander
Arias Arias, Adriana Patricia
Arias de Moscoso, Luz Mariela
Arismendes, Blanca Libia
Arrieta Zumaque, Carmen
Page C-1 of C-39

Asprilla de Barrios, Maria Isabel
Asprilla Rivas, Ana Joaquina
Avendano Suarez, Maria Orfelina
Avila Payares, William Antonio
Balenzuela Escobar, Rosa Margarita
Barrientos Gomez, Maria Rocio
Bedoya Mosquera, Marlenis
Bedoya de Torres, Margarita
Bedoya Gomez, Alirio de Jesus
Bedoya Correa, Uverly
Benitez Varilla, Maria Judith
Benitez Sepulveda, Consuelo
Berrio de Usuga, Berta Oliva
Berrio, Marcelina
Blanquicet Gonzalez, Sara del Carmen
Bohorquez Borja, Omar de Jesus
Borja Arias, Aracely
Bram Cartagena, Mariela de Jesus
Burgos Genes, Gabriel
Burgos Villalobo, Esbil
Page C-2 of C-39

Cabadia de Aguilar, Sixta Tulia
Caceres Zumaque, Magdalena
Caicedo Mena, Gregoria
Camano Mora, Marve Luz
Campo Rodriguez, Maria Ines
Cano David, Ana Maria
Cano Sepulveda, Migdonia
Cantero Cordoba, Elizabeth
Cardona Goez, Rosalbina
Cardona Echavarria, Oliva
Castellanos Cogollo, Ramona del Carmen
Castellanos Yanos, Elizabeth
Castro Gomez, Alina Yaneth
Causil Almario, Arnoli
Chaverra de Cano, Teresita de Jesus
Chica Chica, Libia
Cordoba Chala, Alexandra
Correa Borja, Elida
Correa de Parra, Alba Rosa
Correa de Alvarez, Oliva
Page C-3 of C-39

Cortes Berrio, Eliza
Cossio Perea, Jesus Edwin
Cuesta Rivera, Elias Desiderio
Cuesta Salas, Jose Mercedes
David de Guzman, Maria de los Angeles
David Tuberquia, Alicia
David Vargas, Rosa Angela
Diaz, Luz Mery
Diaz Charrasquiel, Edith
Diaz, Eudilia
Doria de Palacio, Gloria
Duenas Alvarez, Sindy Patricia
Duran Causil, Berta Alicia
Durango Durango, Luzmila
Durango Torres, Deyamira
Durango, Maria de las Mercedes
Durango Villa, Abel Antonio
Echeverri Vahos, Rosa Maria
Escobar de Elorza, Nohemy
Escobar Borja, Rosa Elvira
Page C-4 of C-39

Florez Mestra, Everlides
Florez Ruiz, Luz Estella
Fuentes Lucas, Flor Maria
Galvan de Rodriguez, Edita del Carmen
Galvis, Guillermina Marina
Garcia Gonzales, Ana Delcy
Garcia, Gloria Ines
Gaviria, Maria Doris
Giraldo de Campo, Gloria Ines
Giraldo Sierra, Gildardo de Jesus
Giraldo de Giron, Ernestina
Goez, Julia de Jesus
Gonzalez Leon, Luz Neyer
Gonzalez Urango, Wilson
Graciano Graciano, Margarita
Guerra Garcia, Ana Isabel
Guerrero, Bertha Elisa
Guisao, Doraley
Guzman Vallesta, Diana Esperanza
Guzman de Guevara, Estebana del Pilar
Page C-5 of C-39

Guzman Higuita, Maria Evangelina
Henao de Gomez, Blanca Delia
Hernandez Hortua, Miladis del Socorro
Hernandez Arrieta, Berta
Hernandez Mena, Rosalia
Hernandez, Lira Margoth
Hernandez Reyes, Julia Dominga
Hernandez Jimenez, Henry Manuel
Herrera Sierra, Juana del Carmen
Higuita, Fidelina
Higuita Manco, Jesus Antonio
Higuita Duarte, Maria Rosangela
Higuita Osorio, Libia
Higuita Velez, Margarita Maria
Hinestroza Mosquera, Luz Nancy
Holguin Pineda, Alfonso Elias
Hoyos Martinez, Maria del Rosario
Hurtado Mosquera, Maria Lastenia
Jimenez de Rodriguez, Isabel Emilia
Jimenez de Goez, Mariela
Page C-6 of C-39

Jimenez Monterrosa, Macira del Rosario
Julio de Jimenez, Catalina
Julio Melendez, Carmen Alicia
Julio Moya, Maria Elodia
Lagares Lopez, Elida Rosa
Landetta Zapata Alba Iris
Lara Zuniga, Amparo
Lemoz Ruiz, Gilney
Lemus Castro, Idelicia
Licona Madera, Aminta Maria
Loaiza Aguirre, Lider Maria
Londono Torres, Ana Julia
Lopera Gonzalez, Adriana Maria
Lopez, Salustiana
Lopez de Agudelo, Maria Fidelina
Lopez Munoz, Olga Patricia
Luna Olivares, Luis Alfonso
Machado Quintana, Maria de la Concepcion
Machado Romero, Belarmina
Manco Manco, Bertoldina
Page C-7 of C-39

Marin Osorio, Lilia Amparo
Marin Restrepo Celsa Julia
Marmol Perez, Merlene Maria
Martinez Perez, Lina Maria
Mavisoy Cualindioy, Teresa
Mejia Gomez, Doris Maria
Mena Denis, Maria Nohemi
Mercado, Yadira Leon
Mestra Zurique, Eugenia
Miranda Ibanez, Libia Susana
Morales Macea, Marlene Isabel
Morales, Martha Isabel
Moreno Chaverra, Marlen
Moreno Palacio, Maria Beyanira
Mosquera Mosquera, Clara Elena
Mosquera Mosquera, Melba
Mosquera Ubaldo, Ciria
Mosquera Arroyo, Luz Marina
Mosquera, Yamileth
Mosquera Palomeque, Ernestina
Page C-8 of C-39

Mosquera Santos, Tomasa
Mosquera Palacios, Aura
Obrigon Mendoza, Franklin
Orozco de Montoya, Olivia
Osorio Rodriguez, Maria Sonia
Osorio Hernandez, Luz Nely
Osorio de Porras, Luty del Carmen
Osorio de Santiago, Maria Rosalina
Osorio Cardona, Beatriz Cecilia
Ospina Angarita, Maria Magdalena
Ospina Castellar, Edita
Oviedo David, Petrona
Palacio Moreno, Luz Belen
Palacios Perea, Maria Albanis
Palencia Paut, Margarita
Palencia Morales, Jose
Pastrana Duenas, Maria Leonor
Paternina Paez, Domingo de los Santos
Pena Usuga, Maria Edilma
Penagos Caro, Maria Josefa
Page C-9 of C-39

Penata Galarcio, Magaly Ines
Pereira Miranda, Manuela del Carmen
Perez Zapata, Patricia
Perez Hoyos, Blanca Cecilia
Persides Martinez, Maria
Piedrahita, Rosa Boliva
Pineda, Irma de Jesus
Polo Tuiran, Ana Delfina
Puerta Manco, Eunilse
Quintero Atehortua, Gloria Patricia
Ramires, Ana Felisa
Ramirez, Luz del Carmen
Ramirez Asprilla, Maritza
Ramirez Molina, Liliana del Socorro
Restrepo de Arias, Maria Oliva
Reyes Agudelo, Gloria Elena
Reyes Campo, Pedro
Rivas Asprilla, Onia Zenaida
Rivas Lozano, Sergia Marcia
Rodas Orozco, Mariela
Page C-10 of C-39

Rodriguez Posso, Luz Marina
Rodriguez Ramos, Eleodora
Romana Escobar, Ana Carmela
Romana Martinez, Saturnina
Romero Hernandez, Edonia Isabel
Rovira Quejada, Tarcila
Ruiz Mendoza, Cenith
Ruiz Vidal, Ana Lucia
Ruiz Salgado, Ana Rosa
Sanchez Menzel, Elsa Esther
Sanchez, Jorge Ivan
Sanchez Florez, Doralba
Sanchez Manco, Franca Eliana
Sanchez de Sanchez, Aura Carlina
Santana, Petronila
Sepulveda Borja, Jorgelina
Sepulveda de Holguin, Leovigilda
Serna Moreno, Debora
Serna de Rueda, Maria Eleva
Sierra de la Barrera, Rosmary
Page C-11 of C-39

Suarez Tavera, Gabriela
Suarez Solano, Baudilia del Carmen
Suarez Montiel, Adela Sofia
Tamayo de Guisao, Maria Ester
Torres Berrio, Wilson
Torres Cuesta, Mary Luz
Trejo Herrera, Maria Ester
Tuberquia Zapata, Jesus Emilio
Upegui de Perez, Luz Estella
Uribe Mesa, Piedad Cristina
Urrego Torres, Maria Lenuy
Urrego Guisao, Maria Epifania
Urrego Rodriguez, Emilsa
Vacca Usuga, Yeira Vanessa
Valderrama, Maria Teresa
Valderrama Marin, Pedro Emilio
Valencia Lopez, Ana Elvia
Valoyes Ramirez, Mercedes
Vanegas Montoya, Carlos Andres
Varelas Morelo, Maria Oliva
Page C-12 of C-39

Vasquez Marin, Mariela
Vasquez Julio, Nasary
Vega Murillo, Pedro
Vera Tuberquia, Martha C.
Vidales Palacio, Rosangelica
Viera Mendoza, Jonny
Zambrano Palencia, Senia
Zapata Borja, Romelia de Jesus
2. In addition, the plaintiffs bring their cases as personal representatives of the
estates of the deceased, whose names are
Agudelo Carvajal, Luis Arturo
Aguirre Vidales, Yolanda
Altamirando Cabadia, Jhon Fernando
Alvarez Quintero, Juan Gregorio
Alvarez Correa, Robier de Jesus
Alvarez Herrera, Doris del Carmen
Apricio Noblez, Alberto
Arbelaez Marin, Juan Carlos
Arenas, Tomas
Arguello Gonzalez, Adan
Page C-13 of C-39

Arias Restrepo, Francisco Javier
Arias Valle, Jesus Antonio
Arrieta Hernandez, Dinio Jose
Arrieta Yepes, Joaquin
Arroyo Bernal, Arnaldo Jose
Aula Velasquez, Mariano Manuel
Avendano Lopez, John Alberto
Barrios Asprilla, Alfonso
Bedoya Caycedo, Jerson
Bedoya Navarro, Joaquin Humberto
Bedoya Serna, Guillermo Sabad
Beltran Matote, Jaime
Blanco Lopez, Justiniano
Bohorquez, Raul
Bolivar Betancourt, Luis Alberto
Borja Arias, Jhon Fredy
Burgos Gene,s Edinson Antonio
Cabrera Correa, Anibal
Calle Penagos, Hector Alonso
Callejal Hoyos, Gabriel de Jesus
Page C-14 of C-39

Cano Herrera, Edwin Dario
Cano Chaverra, Joaquin Mario
Cantero Melendez, Edulfo
Cardenas Miranda, Israel
Cardona Echavarria, Edgar
Cardona Echavarria, Hector Jose
Cardona Ramirez, Jesus Maria
Cardona Alvarez, Geovanny
Caro Ramiro, Antonio
Castro Vargas, Demetrio
Centero Melendez, Edulfo
Chala Cuesta, Ana Sofia
Charrasquiel, Gregorio Alejandro
Cifuentes Durango, Horacio Antonio
Contreras Urrego, Nelson
Cortes Berrio, Jesus
Cossio Murillo, Francisco Herminio
Cossio, Alvaro
Cuadrado Gaspar, Abigail Antonio
Cuesta Cortez, Nelson
Page C-15 of C-39

Cuesta Garcia, Edgar
Cuesta Cuesta, Euclides
Cuesta Rios, Nestor
Cuesta Bejarano, Fidelio Antonio
Cuesta Arroyo, Rafael
Cuesto Murillo, Primitivo
David Campo, Mario de Jesus
David Velazquez, Rosa Elvira
De la Cruz Campo, Oscar Manuel
Denis, Pedro Mena
Diaz Hernandez, Giovanis
Diaz Domingo de los Santos, Paternina
Diaz Mosquera, Anselmo
Diaz Teheran, Jose
Dimas Chiquillo, Jose Irene
Durango, Jorge Ivan
Durango Cano, Gustavo Antonio
Durango Escobar, Fabio de Jesus
Echavarria Graciano, Pedro Julio
Echavarria, Aurora
Page C-16 of C-39

Echevarria Vahos, Luis Fernando
Elorza Romero, Luis Enrique
Escobar Alzate, Jesus Emilio
Galarcio Viloria, Candida Rosa
Galindo Cuadrado, Eudencio
Galindo Galeano, Gerardo Gabriel
Garces Flores, Wilton Antonio
Garcia Julio, Jose Luis
Garcia Angulo, Jose Angel
Gil de Arenas, Elizabeth
Giraldo Sierra, Omar de Jesus
Giraldo, Luis Alfredo
Giraldo Fernandez, Jesus Emilio
Goez Sepulveda, Ivan Antonio
Goez Jimenez, Hernan Dario
Goez Sepulveda, Juan Antonio
Gomez Alvarez, Jaime
Gomez Valencia, Beatriz
Gomez Henao, Rodrigo de Jesus
Gomez Velez, Leonardo
Page C-17 of C-39

Gomez Jimenez, Victor Javier
Gomez, Francisco Javier
Gonzalez Cuesta, Diego
Gonzalez Urango, Luisa Cristina
Gonzalez Sosa, Maria Georgina
Gonzalez Moralez, Livardo
Gonzalez Moralez, Merli
Graciano, Francisco Antonio
Guisao Lopez, Jose Wilson
Guisao Correa, Cruz Antonio
Guisao Tamayo, Jorge Elias
Guisao Tamayo, Wilmar de Jesus
Gutierrez Fernandez, Guillermo Leon
Gutierrez Vargas, Argelia Maria
Gutierrez Hernandez, Carlos Antonio
Guzman David, Yoni Jair
Guzman Betancur, Ricardo Antonio
Hernandez Bejarano, Orlando
Hernandez Mestra, Luis German
Higuita Giraldo, Leon Dario
Page C-18 of C-39

Higuita, Miguel Antonio
Hinestroza Hurtado, Angel Daniel
Hinestroza Mosquera, Robinson Humberto
Hinestroza Hurtado, Cesar Orlando
Holguin Sepulveda Leonardo
Holguin Sepulveda, Alfonso Elias
Holguin Sepulveda, Ramiro Arley
Hoyos Gaviria, Gonzalo
Hoyos Martinez, Polfino de Jesus
Hurtado Cordoba, Fausto
Ibanez Anaya, Toni Enrique
Lemos Rambay, Araldo
Lemus Cordoba, Manuel Eugenio
Licona Suarez, Fernando
Llanez Lopez, Evelio
Loaiza Arboleda, Joaquin Eduardo
Loaiza Aguirre, Luis Eduardo
Londono Valencia, Oscar de Jesus
Londono, Henry
Lopera Gaviria, Oscar de Jesus
Page C-19 of C-39

Lopez Muno,z Luis Felipe
Lopez Henao, Gilberto Antonio
Luna Barba, Luz Estella
Luna Rivas, Prudencio
Madariaga Madariag,a Hugo Feny
Maturona Guevara, Adolfo
Mejia Gomez, Jose Argiro
Mena, Miguel Angel
Mendoza Galvan, Idelfonso
Meza Martinez, Ismael
Mirando Arrieta, Hilario
Mona Marin, Jorge Humberto
Montenegro Ramos, Hernan Humberto
Montes Duran, Brian Manuel
Montoya Echavarria, Carlos Enrique
Montoya Garcia, Carlos
Moreno Duran, Aura Nely
Moscoso, Jesus Emilio
Mosquera Robledo, Oscar
Mosquera Velasquez, Fulbio Antonio
Page C-20 of C-39

Munera Pulgarin, Ignacio
Munoz Munera, Jose Ivan
Munoz Beltran, Javier Antonio
Murillo Lopez, Hector
Murillo Moreno, Manuel Emeterio
Narvaez Julio, Oscar Antonio
Nelly Zapata, Maria del Socorro
Obregon Moreno, Francisco Javier
Ochoa Gomez, Victoria Elena
Orejuela, Juan
Orjuela Arismendi, Pedro Alonso
Orlas Pena, Wiliton
Orozco Marin, Jesus Maria
Ospina Marimon, Marcelino
Palacio Pastrana, Reemberto
Palacio Pino, Felipe
Palacio Palacio, Romulo
Palacios Mosquera, Afronio
Palencia Diaz, Eliecer
Pareja Ruiz, Jhon Fredis
Page C-21 of C-39

Parra Correa, Albertina
Parra Garcia, Samuel
Parra Osorio, Cristobal
Paruja Trejos, Rubiela
Pautt, Marcelo Oviedo
Paz, Romana Parmelio
Perez Nisperuza, German
Perez Upagui, Victor Dairon
Piedrahita, Gilberto de Jesus
Pietro Lagares, Miguel Antonio
Pineda, Hernan Dario
Porhillo Santo, Sergio Eliecer
Porras Pedroza, Ramon
Quejada Duran, Clemente
Ramirez Loaisa, Ruben Dario
Rendon Loaza, Luis
Rendon, Abel Antonio
Rendon Rojas, Ismael
Reyes Agudelo, Luis Fernando
Reyes Fuentes, Freddy Jesus
Page C-22 of C-39

Rios Rios, Miguel Angel
Rivas, Arturo Murillo
Rivas Lara, Jose Alejandro
Rodriguez Cardalez, Gilberto
Rodriguez Jimenez, Eliud
Rodriguez Ramos, Jaime
Romana Escobar, Carlos Eliecer
Rueda Serna, Oscar Dario
Rueda Serna, Carlos Alberto
Ruiz Rueda, Jose Luis
Ruiz Valencia, Victor Manuel
Ruiz Palacios, Marino
Salas Rovira, Ausberto
Salinas Sanchez, Gerardo
Sanchez Polo, Savas
Sanchez, Dagoberto
Sanchez Manco, Francisco Javier
Sanchez Sanchez, Reynaldo Antonio
Sanchez Giraldo, Ramon Antonio
Santiago Almeciga, Paulino
Page C-23 of C-39

Sepulveda Manco, Ovilson
Sepulveda Manco, Nelson
Sierra, Rafael Alvaro
Solano Guevara, Luis Antonio
Soto Amaranto, Margarita
Suarez Marmol, Luis Manuel
Suarez Solano, Abel Andres
Tapia Marmolejo, Jaime
Tapias, Fabian Ignacio
Tapias Lopez, Jose Felix
Tordecilla Gonzalez, Carlos Augusto
Torres Bedoya, Edison
Torres Bedoya, Ivan Dario
Torres Guisao, Claver de Jesus
Torres Melendez, Eusino
Toscano de la Barrera, Tomas Antonio
Tuberquia Zapata, Reinaldo Antonio
Tuberquia Higuita, Maria Eugenia
Uribe Arboleda, Marco Antonio
Urrego Torres, Aldebaran
Page C-24 of C-39

Urrego Rodriguez, Bernardo
Usuga Berrio, Maria Eunice
Usuga Cano, Heinsen Hawer
Usuga Cano, Franco Anyey
Usuga, Jesus Maria
Vaca Echavarria, Jorge Enrique
Vaca Caraballo, Afranio
Valderrama Oquendo, Luis Fernando
Valencia Rodriguez, Miguel Angel
Valencia Lopez, Jhon Jairo
Vanegas Villa, Humberto
Vargas David, Luis Alexander
Vargas Bram, Libardo Antonio
Vasquez Benitez Cielo Maria
Vega Torres, Luis Alfonso
Velasquez Gomez, Eliodoro Antonio
Velasquez Restrepo, Wilson de Jesus
Velasquez, Prisiliano Jose
Viera Mendoza, Alvaro
Villa Hernandez, Yubany de Jesus
Page C-25 of C-39

Zapata Borja, Jorge Eliecer
Zuluaga Machado, Sigifredo
Zuluaga Garcia, Sigifredo
3. Additional interested parties are:
Agrícola Longaví Limitada
Agrícola Santa Marta Limitada
Agroindustria Santa Rosa de Lima, S.A.
Aguirre, Fernando
Alamo Land Company
Alsama, Ltd.
American Produce Company
Americana de Exportación S.A.
Anacar LDC
Arnold & Porter
Arnold Sansone, The Honorable Amanda
Arvelo, José E.
Associated Santa Maria Minerals
Avila, Rodriguez, Hernandez, Mena & Ferri, LLP
B C Systems, Inc.
Baird, Bruce
Page C-26 of C-39

Banco Santander International
Bandy, Kevin
Barbush Development Corp.
Bienes Del Rio, S.A.
Blank Rome LLP
BlackRock, Inc. (NYSE: BLK)
Blue Fish Holdings Establishment
Bocas Fruit Co. L.L.C.
In Re: Chiquita Brands Int’l., Inc.
Boies Schiller & Flexner, LLP, Fort Lauderdale
Boies Schiller & Flexner, LLP, Miami
Boies Schiller & Flexner, LLP, New York
Boies Schiller & Flexner, LLP, Orlando
Bronson, Ardith
Brundicorpi S.A.
Cadavid Londoño, Paula
Capital Bank
Carrillo, Arturo J.
C.C.A. Fruit Service Company Limited
CB Containers, Inc.
Page C-27 of C-39

Centro Global de Procesamiento Chiquita, S.R.L.
Charagres, Inc., S.A.
Childs, Robert
Chiquita (Canada) Inc.
Chiquita (Shanghai) Enterprise Management Consulting Co., Ltd.
Chiquita Banana Company B.V.
Chiquita Brands International Foundation
Chiquita Brands International Sàrl
Chiquita Brands International, Inc. (NYSE: CQB)
Chiquita Brands L.L.C.
Chiquita Central Europe, s.r.o.
Chiquita Compagnie des Bananes
Chiquita Deutschland GmbH
Chiquita Food Innovation B.V.
Chiquita for Charities
Chiquita Fresh B.V.B.A.
Chiquita Fresh España, S.A.
Chiquita Fresh North America L.L.C.
Chiquita Fruit Bar (Belgium) BVBA
Chiquita Fruit Bar (Germany) GmbH
Page C-28 of C-39

Chiquita Fruit Bar GmbH
Chiquita Frupac B.V.
Chiquita Hellas Anonimi Eteria Tropikon Ke Allon Frouton
Chiquita Hong Kong Limited
Chiquita International Services Group N.V.
Chiquita Italia, S.p.A.
Chiquita Logistic Services El Salvador Ltda.
Chiquita Logistic Services Guatemala, Limitada
Chiquita Logistic Services Honduras, S.de RL
Chiquita Melon Packers, Inc.
Chiquita Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V.
Chiquita Nature and Community Foundation
Chiquita Nordic Oy
Chiquita Norway As
Chiquita Poland Spolka Z ograniczona odpowiedzialnoscia
Chiquita Portugal Venda E Comercializaçao De Fruta,

Unipessoal Lda
Chiquita Relief Fund - We Care
Chiquita Shared Services
Chiquita Singapore Pte. Ltd.
Chiquita Slovakia, S.r.o.
Page C-29 of C-39

Chiquita Sweden AB
Chiquita Tropical Fruit Company B.V.
Chiquita UK Limited
ChiquitaStore.com L.L.C.
Chiriqui Land Company
CILPAC Establishment
Cioffi, Michael
Coast Citrus Distributors Holding Company
Cohen, Millstein, Sellers & Toll, PLLC
Collingsworth, Terrence P.
Collyer, The Honorable Rosemary M.
Compañía Agrícola de Nipe, S.A.
Compañía Agrícola de Rio Tinto
Compañía Agrícola del Guayas
Compañía Agrícola e Industrial Ecuaplantation, S.A.
Compañía Agrícola Sancti-Spiritus, S.A.
Compañía Bananera Atlántica Limitada
Compañía Bananera Guatemateca Independinte, S.A.
Compañía Bananera La Estrella, S.A.
Compañía Bananera Los Laureles, S.A.
Page C-30 of C-39

Compañía Bananera Monte Blanco, S.A.
Compañía Caronas, S.A.
Compañía Cubana de Navegación Costanera
Compañía Frutera América S.A.
Compañía La Cruz, S.A.
Compañía Mundimar, S.A.
Compañía Productos Agrícolas de Chiapas, S.A. de C.V.
Compañía Tropical de Seguros, S.A.
Conrad & Scherer LLP
Costa Frut S.A.C.
Covington & Burling LLP
Danone Chiquita Fruits SAS
Dante, Frank
Davies, Patrick
De La Calle Restrepo, José Miguel
De La Calle Londoño y Posada Abogados
DeLeon, John
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP
DLA Piper
Duraiswamy, Shankar
Page C-31 of C-39

Dyer, Karen C.
Earthrights, International, Inc.
Edwards Honeywell, The Honorable Charlene
Exportadora Chiquita - Chile Ltda.
Exportadora de Frutas Frescas Ltda.
Financiera Agro-Exportaciones Limitada
Financiera Bananera Limitada
FMR LLC
Fresh Express Incorporated
Fresh Holding C.V.
Fresh International Corp.
Friedheim, Cyrus
Frutas Elegantes, S. de R.L. de C.V.
Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia (FARC)
Fundación Para El Desarrollo de Comunidades Sostenibles en el

Valle de Sula
G & V Farms, LLC
G W F Management Services Ltd.
Garland, James
Girardi, Thomas V.
Glass, David M.
Page C-32 of C-39

Gonsalves, Marc
Gould, Kimberly
Gravante, Jr., Nicholas A.
GrayRobinson, PA
Great White Fleet Liner Services Ltd.
Great White Fleet Ltd.
Green, James K.
Gunster, Yoakley & Stewart, PA
Guralnick, Ronald S.
Hall, John
Heaton Holdings Ltd.
Heli Abel Torrado y Asociados
Hemisphere XII Investors Limited
Hills, Roderick, the Estate of
Hospital La Lima, S.A. de C.V.
Howes, Thomas
HSBC
Ilara Holdings, Inc.
Inversiones Huemul Limitada
James K. Green, P.A.
Page C-33 of C-39

Janis, Judith G.
Janis, Christopher T.
Janis, Greer C.
Janis, Michael I.
Janis, Jonathan N.
Jimenez Train, Magda M.
Jones, Foster, Johnston & Stubbs, P.A.
Jones, Stanton
Keiser, Charles
Kelly, The Honorable Timothy J.
King, William B.
Kistinger, Robert
Korvick, Tony
Lack, Walter J.
Lakatos, Alex C.
Law Firm of Jonathan C. Reiter
Law Offices of Chavez-DeLeon
Leon, The Honorable Richard J.
Losego, Clinton R.
Markman, Ligia
Page C-34 of C-39

Marra, The Honorable Kenneth A.
Martin, David
Martinez Resly, Jaclyn
Mayer Brown, LLP
McCawley, Sigrid S.
Mora, Martha Rosa
Mosier, Mark
Mozabanana, Lda.
Nixon, Jary Conrad
Ocean Bank
Olson, Robert
O'Melveny & Meyers
Ordman, John
Palmera Pineda, Juvenal Ovidio Ricardo
Parker Waichman LLP
Pescatore, Jr., the Estate of Frank Thomas
Pescatore, Jada
Pescatore, Jarrod
Pescatore, John
Pescatore, Jordan
Page C-35 of C-39

Pescatore, Josh
Pescatore, Olivia
Pescatore, Richard
Pescatore Harpster, Carol
Philips, Layn
Porter, Newton Patrick
Prías Cadavid Abogados
Prías, Juan Carlos
Priedheim, Alissa
Procesados IQF, S.A. de C.V.
Processed Fruit Ingredients, BVBA
Promotion et Developpement de la Culture Bananiere
Puerto Armuelles Fruit Co., Ltd.
Rapp, Cristopher
Reiter, Jonathan C.
Ronald Guralnick, P.A.
St. James Investments, Inc.
Scarola, Jack
Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
Seguridad Colosal, S.A.
Page C-36 of C-39

Servicios Chiquita Chile Limitada
Servicios de Logística Chiquita, S.A.
Servicios Logísticos Chiquita, S.R.L
Servicios Proem Limitada
Silbert, Earl
Simons, Marco
Skinner, William
Sperling, Jonathan
Spiers N.V.
Sprague, Ashley M.
Stansell, Keith
Stockton Hendrix, David
Stewart, Thomas
Stubbs, Sidney
Tela Railroad Company Ltd.
The Vanguard Group
TransFRESH Corporation
Tsacalis, William
UNIPO G.V., S.A.
United States of America
Page C-37 of C-39

V.F. Transportation, L.L.C.
Verdelli Farms, Inc.
Wachovia Bank
Western Commercial International Ltd.
Wichmann, William J.
Wiesner & Asociados Ltda. Abogados
Wiesner, Eduardo A.
Wilkins, Robert
Willkie Farr & Gallagher
Wolf, Paul
Wolosky, Lee S.
Zack, Stephen N
Zhejiang Chiquita-Haitong Food Company Limited
Zuleta, Alberto
Certification
I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge, the above is a complete
list of persons having an interest in this case.
/s/ Paul Wolf

________________________
Paul Wolf, D.C. Bar #480285
Attorney for Appellants Does 1-254
Page C-38 of C-39

November 25, 2020
Page C-39 of C-39

QUESTION PRESENTED
Whether the district court’s orders denying the Plaintiffs’ motion to establish
a constructive trust and denying their motion for reconsideration are final or
immediately appealable.
BRIEF ANSWER
Although the orders are not final, they are immediately appealable because
they deny injunctive relief. The case law in this Circuit uniformly holds that an
order freezing a party's assets is injunctive in nature, and immediately appealable
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292(a)(1). The Rule extends to orders "granting,
continuing, modifying, refusing or dissolving injunctions, or refusing to dissolve or
modify injunctions." Id. The collateral order doctrine provides further support for
jurisdiction, since the question whether the FARC's assets should be frozen
pending the outcome of the other cases in the MDL is separate from the merits of
any of the particular cases.
I. Does 1-254 properly characterized their motion for a constructive trust

as a motion for injunctive relief.
A. The Orders on appeal qualify under § 1292(a)(1) as injunctions

because they relate to existing causes of action and result in
irreparable harm, as two of the plaintiffs in the MDL are
dissipating the assets of the FARC terrorist group, leaving none
remaining to compensate other plaintiffs.
In Alabama v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 424 F.3d 1117 (11th Cir.
2005) the Court noted that an order may not qualify under § 1292(a)(1) as an
1
“injunction” despite how the parties or the district court characterizes it, and
explained when orders on injunctive relief may be reviewable. First, the motion
must be based upon an already existing cause of action. Id. at 1127. The plaintiff
must be able to articulate a basis for relief that would withstand scrutiny under
Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) (failure to state a claim). Id., citing Klay v. United
Healthgroup, Inc., 376 F.3d 1092, 1097 (11th Cir. 2004). An injunction is a
"remedy potentially available only after a plaintiff can make a showing that some
independent legal right is being infringed — if the plaintiff's rights have not been
violated, he is not entitled to any relief, injunctive or otherwise." Alabama, 424
F.3d at 1127. In addition, it is only when that legal right has been infringed by an
injury for which there is no adequate legal remedy, and which will result in
irreparable injury if the injunction does not issue. Id.
To obtain a permanent injunction, a party must show: (1) that he has
prevailed in establishing the violation of the right asserted in his complaint; (2)
there is no adequate remedy at law for the violation of this right; and (3)
irreparable harm will result if the court does not order injunctive relief. Id. at 1128.
The Court recognized, however, that if it doesn't act until trial, the party seeking
relief might be irreparably harmed, and the judicial process rendered futile by a
defendant's action or refusal to act during the pendency of the case. Id. at 1128.
Therefore, to protect a party "from irreparable harm and to preserve the court's
2
power to render a meaningful decision after a trial on the merits" a preliminary
injunction can issue, even though the right to permanent relief is still uncertain.
Alabama, 424 F.3d at 1128, quoting 11A Wright, Miller Kane, Federal Practice
and Procedure: Civil 2d § 2947. Accordingly, a district court may grant
preliminary injunctive relief when the moving party shows that: (1) it has a
substantial likelihood of success on the merits of the underlying case when the case
is ultimately tried; (2) irreparable injury during the pendency of the suit will be
suffered unless the injunction issues immediately; (3) the threatened injury to the
movant outweighs whatever damage the proposed injunction may cause the
opposing party; and (4) if issued, the injunction would not be adverse to the public
interest. Id. at 1128.
The Court in Alabama discussed several other aspects of injunctive relief
that are not at issue here. The interlocutory order on appeal must have the first two
elements of an injunction, that is, it must be: (1) a clearly defined and
understandable directive by the court to act or to refrain from a particular action;
and (2) enforceable through contempt, if disobeyed. Id. It must also provide some
or all of the substantive relief sought in the complaint. Id.
Finally, the Court noted that in the context of Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure, the Court has defined an injunction as "an equitable decree
compelling obedience under the threat of contempt." Alabama, 424 F.3d at 1127 n.
3
14, quoting Int'l Longshoremen's Ass'n, Local 1291 v. Phila. Marine Trade Ass'n,
389 U.S. 64, 75, 88 S.Ct. 201, 19 L.Ed.2d 236 (1967); Howard C. Joyce, A Treatise
on the Law Relating to Injunctions § 1, at 2-3 (1909) ("In a general sense, every
order of a court which commands or forbids is an injunction; but in its accepted
legal sense, an injunction is a judicial process or mandate operating in personam by
which, upon certain established principles of equity, a party is required to do or
refrain from doing a particular thing.")
In the instant case, the Order on Appeal is one denying the imposition of a
constructive trust over the FARC's assets, which is a type of injunctive relief. See
Order, Appx. at 1, DE 2684. The District Court referred to it as equitable relief.
"Without evidence that the res contains funds traceable to Chiquita, or somehow
represents the fruits of a benefit conferred by the Doe Plaintiffs on the
Stansell/Pescatore Plaintiffs for which compensation is equitably due, there is no
demonstrable basis for the equitable relief requested in this matter." Id. at 5-6,
Appx. at 5-6. This is where the District Court erred, because the funds need not be
traceable to Chiquita. See Does 1-254's Reply Brief at § III (B) (5), "The District
Court allowed the Pescatore case to proceed to trial with the FARC as a Fabre
defendant."
4
B. Orders freezing the assets of parties are commonly issued as

injunctions pursuant to Rules 64 and 65 of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure.
In Levi Strauss & Co. v. Sunrise Int'l Trading Co., 51 F.3d 982 (11th Cir.
1995), the district court issued a preliminary injunction enjoining Sunrise from
selling allegedly counterfeit Levi Strauss products, ordering Sunrise to surrender
any inventory or material with Levi Strauss' trademarks, and imposing an asset
freeze on Sunrise, limiting their spending to enumerated business expenses and a
$2000 per month living allowance. 51 F.3d at 984. The Court stated that it
reviews the grant of a preliminary injunction for abuse of discretion, giving no
deference to the district court's legal determinations. Id. at 985, citing Church v.
City of Huntsville, 30 F.3d 1332, 1341-42 (11th Cir. 1994). It similarly found that
"[w]e review asset freezes for abuse of discretion but do not defer to the district
court's legal analysis." Id. at 985-986, citing Rosen v. Cascade Int'l, Inc., 21 F.3d
1520, 1526 (11th Cir. 1994). The Court held that "[a] request for equitable relief
invokes the district court's inherent equitable powers to order preliminary relief,
including an asset freeze, in order to assure the availability of permanent relief,"
and "[a]s such, we conclude that the district court had the authority to freeze those
assets which could have been used to satisfy an equitable award of profits." Levi
Strauss, 51 F.3d at 987, citing Federal Trade Commission v. United States Oil and
Gas Corp., 748 F.2d 1431, 1433-34 (11th Cir. 1984) (district court may exercise its
5
full range of equitable powers, including a preliminary asset freeze, to ensure that
permanent equitable relief will be possible).1
In Rosen v. Cascade, Int'l, Inc., 21 F.3d 1520 (11th Cir. 1994), however, this
Court reversed and remanded a district court order issuing an injunction freezing
the assets of a defendant. Rosen was a securities fraud case involving alleged
misrepresentations of material facts in promotional materials. The district court
issued a preliminary injunction freezing all of the defendant's assets, allowing the
defendant to withdraw only $500 per month as living expenses, and other expenses
for emergencies upon a showing of necessity. Id. at 1525. This Court reversed the
injunction, noting that "this is not a restitution case or a dispute over a discrete
fund or res whose ownership is in doubt," id. at 1526, and that "the appellees'
strategy in this case is simply to tie up Moses' assets while the parties litigate the
defendants' liability for their alleged fraudulent misrepresentations and illegal stock
transactions." Id. It then held that "[i]t is axiomatic that equitable relief is only
available where there is no adequate remedy at law; cases in which the remedy
sought is the recovery of money damages do not fall within the jurisdiction of
1
The assets must normally be related to the underlying litigation, as they are here.
However, the Court observed that district courts have authority in extraordinary
cases to freeze assets to preserve non equitable money damages, citing In re Estate
of Ferdinand Marcos Human Rights Litigation, 25 F.3d 1467 (9th Cir. 1994)
(noting that the First, Second, Third, Fourth, Seventh, Eighth, Tenth, and District
of Columbia Circuits have reached similar conclusions), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 934
(1995). Levi Strauss, 51 F.3d at 987 n. 5.
6
equity. Based upon this fundamental principle of equity jurisprudence, we have
explained, "'the general federal rule of equity is that a court may not reach a
defendant's assets unrelated to the underlying litigation and freeze them so that
they may be preserved to satisfy a potential money judgment.'" Id. at 1527.
The Rosen Court analyzed a Supreme Court case, De Beers Consol. Mines,
Ltd. v. United States, 325 U.S. 212 (1945), which it found "indeed explicitly
permits the injunction sought by the plaintiffs," 21 F.3d at 1527, but that the proper
interpretation of De Beers is that it bars the injunctive relief of freezing [all of]
Moses' assets. Id. The Supreme Court explained that, although "[a] preliminary
injunction is always appropriate to grant intermediate relief of the same character
as that which may be granted finally, ... [t]he injunction in question is not of this
character" because "[i]t is not an injunction in the cause, ... deals with a matter
lying wholly outside the issues in the suit," and "deals with property which in no
circumstances can be dealt with in any final injunction that may be entered." 325
U.S. at 220. The Court distinguished the case from "cases in which an
interlocutory injunction was granted with respect to a fund or property which
would have been the subject of the provisions of any final decree in the cause." Id.
The Rosen and De Beers cases are distinguishable from the instant case because
Does 1-254 do not seek an injunction over all of Stansell and Pescatore's assets,
only those traceable to the terrorist activities of the FARC.
7
The Rosen Court later explained that "Rule 64 commands that the proper
pretrial remedy to ensure that a fund will be available with which to satisfy a
money judgment, a writ of attachment, is available according to the provisions of
the forum state's law. But "[w]here the state attachment statute does not authorize
prejudgment attachment in a given case, a district court is not authorized ... to
attempt to accomplish the same result by issuing a preliminary injunction." Id. at
1531. In the instant case, there is no conflict with the Florida attachment statute,
which is found in Chapter 76 of the Florida Statutes. See Does 1-254's Reply Brief
at § III (B). Three of the grounds listed are that the purported debtor resides out of
state, or is moving, or has moved property out of the state. § 76.04 (2, 3 & 4), Fla.
Stat.
Most of the plaintiffs who have taken the proceeds of the FARC's criminal
activities reside outside of Florida. The Pescatore case was brought by ten legal
heirs, five of whom live in Alabama, and the other five in New Jersey. Appx. at
381, 392. The Stansell case was brought by eight legal heirs residing in Florida,
Connecticut, Alabama, New York, and Virginia. Appx. at 418-419. Since these
plaintiffs have already collected $20 million dollars, there is no doubt that the
property at issue has been moved outside of the state of Florida.2
2
An additional basis to establish a constructive trust may exist when the res of the
trust was obtained by fraud. See Mitsubishi Int'l. v. Cardinal Textile Sales, 14 F.3d
1507, 1518 (11th Cir. 1994) "Because a constructive trust is deemed to arise at the
time of a fraudulent misappropriation, Mitsubishi contends that it was entitled to an
8
II. The Collateral Order Doctrine provides an alternative theory for the
Court's Jurisdiction over the appeal.
The Collateral Order Doctrine provides an alternative basis for appellate
jurisdiction. In their Notice of Appeal, in addition to citing 1292(a)(1), which
provides for jurisdiction over orders denying injunctive relief, Does 1-254 also
argued that "the outcome of Plaintiffs' cases would be conclusively determined by
default judgments against the FARC, and would moot them because they would be
set-off against Chiquita's joint and several or co-conspirator liability; the issue of
establishing a constructive trust over the FARC's assets is collateral to the merits of
the underlying murders; and the matter will be effectively unreviewable if
immediate appeal isn't allowed, because otherwise, the plaintiffs in the cases of two
Americans killed by the FARC will dissipate the first $300 million dollars of the
immediate injunction preventing the dissipation of those assets — including

payment of appellees' counsel fees — as well as the opportunity to seek
disgorgement of any transferred funds. This position, however, fails to recognize
that constructive trusts are not automatically impressed whenever one party owes
another money, and it apparently overlooks the essence of the remedy — that
constructive trusts are inherently equitable in nature and that equitable relief is
available only in the absence of an adequate remedy at law." Id. at 1518. Here,
obtaining ex parte, default judgments in dismissed cases, in courts without
jurisdiction, and without providing notice to the MDL court, could be construed as
fraudulent. The Court didn't impose the trust in Mitsubishi because there was an
adequate remedy at law, and because of contract law arguments that do not apply in
the instant case. Id. at 1518-1521. In Mitsubishi, Georgia state law also provided
for prejudgment attachment when the property or a party is out of state. Id. at
1522.
9
FARC's assets, and have already taken $20 million. Lauro Lines s.r.l. v. Chasser,
490 U.S. 495 (1989)." See Notice of Appeal, DE 2738. 3
In Plaintiff A v. Schair, 744 F.3d 1247, 1252–53 (11th Cir. 2014) the Court
explained that an order is immediately appealable under the collateral order
doctrine if it: (1) conclusively determines the disputed question; (2) resolves an
important issue completely separate from and collateral to the merits of the action;
and (3) would be effectively unreviewable on appeal from the final judgment). In
Schair, the district court stayed a civil case pending the outcome of a criminal
investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice into the same conduct alleged in
the plaintiffs' complaint. After the investigation ended, the district court granted
the plaintiffs' motion to lift the stay in the civil action. The Court found that for the
collateral order doctrine to apply, "the collateral issues raised in the interlocutory
appeal must be 'too important to be denied review and too independent of the cause
itself to require that appellate consideration be deferred until the whole case is
adjudicated.'” Id. at 1253, quoting Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S.
541, 546 (1949). It then found that an order lifting the stay of discovery failed to
satisfy the second prong of the test, since it was not separate from the merits of the
3
In the instant case, the Appellees have conflated the issues of jurisdiction and
standing. Standing is based on Does 1-254's injuries by the FARC, and the
dissipation of assets traceable to the FARC, and is argued in the Appellants
Principal and Reply Briefs. Whether the Court has jurisdiction over the District
Court's Order is completely separate from the question whether the Appellants
have standing.
10
action, and there was no public interest to be weighed that could override the
second prong. Id. at 1254-1255.
In the instant case, the disputed legal issue is whether the ex parte, default
judgments in MDL transferor courts lacking jurisdiction are void and
unenforceable, as a matter of law. The default award of $300 million dollars is
separate from the merits of the actions because the Stansell and Pescatore cases
had already been dismissed with prejudice, which could not have occurred without
consideration of the merits. The issue that is separate from, and collateral to the
merits of the action, pertains to the availability of a remedy. The Order is
effectively unreviewable on appeal because Pescatore and Stansell have already
taken and dissipated more than $20 million dollars, which appear to be all of the
FARC's assets that have been identified.
Conclusion
Orders freezing a party's assets, or denying this relief, are injunctive and
immediately appealable under 28 U.S.C. 1292(a)(1). The only limitation is that the
assets must be traceable to the litigation, as they are here. They are authorized by §
76.04 of the Florida Revised Statutes, since most of the Stansell and Pescatore
plaintiffs do not reside in Florida, and have probably transferred the property out of
state. The collateral order doctrine also appears to support this view, but need not
be relied on, since the basis under 28 U.S.C. 1292(a)(1) is so clear.
11
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Paul Wolf

______________________
Paul Wolf, DC Bar #480285
Attorney for Appellants
P.O. Box 21840
Washington, D.C. 20009
(202) 431-6986
Fax: n/a
paulwolf@yahoo.com
March 30, 2021
Certificate of Service
I hereby certify, that on this 30th of March, 2021, I filed the foregoing
Response with the Clerk of the Court using the Court's Electronic Case Filing
(ECF) system, which will send notices to all counsel entering appearances in this
case.
/s/ Paul Wolf

_______________
Paul Wolf
Certificate of Compliance
Pursuant to FRAP 27 and 32(g)(1), I hereby certify that this motion complies
with the type-limitation of 5,200 words, and contains 2606 words, excluding the
cover and certifications. The Court didn't set any other word limit for responding to
its jurisdictional question.
/s/ Paul Wolf

_______________
Paul Wolf
12

Does 1-254 V Chiquita Brands - Response To Jurisdictional Question

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Does 1-254 V Chiquita Brands - Response To Jurisdictional Question

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

USCA11 Case: 20-14238 Date Filed: 03/30/2021 Page: 1 of 52

Case No. 20-14238-RR

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Does 1 Through 254, et al. v.

On Appeal from the United States District Court

RESPONSE TO JURISDICTIONAL QUESTION

APPELLANTS DOES 1-254

Paul Wolf, DC Bar #480285

CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS

attorneys, persons, associations of persons, firms, partnerships, or corporations

of the particular case on appeal, including subsidiaries, conglomerates, affiliates,

known to Appellants, are as follows:

1. Plaintiff-Appellants "Does 1-254," whose real names are:

Agudelo Castano, Margrieth Cecilia

Aguirre Braun, Irma Nury

Alzate de Escobar, Maria Leonilda

Anay Mosquera, Rosa

Anaya Dias, Lesvia Petrona

Angarita Gomez, Maria Estela

Arbelaez Marin, Alba Nidia

Arenas Gil, Ancizar Alexander

Arias Arias, Adriana Patricia

Arias de Moscoso, Luz Mariela

Arismendes, Blanca Libia

Arrieta Zumaque, Carmen

Page C-1 of C-39

Asprilla de Barrios, Maria Isabel

Asprilla Rivas, Ana Joaquina

Avendano Suarez, Maria Orfelina

Avila Payares, William Antonio

Balenzuela Escobar, Rosa Margarita

Barrientos Gomez, Maria Rocio

Bedoya Mosquera, Marlenis

Bedoya de Torres, Margarita

Bedoya Gomez, Alirio de Jesus

Bedoya Correa, Uverly

Benitez Varilla, Maria Judith

Benitez Sepulveda, Consuelo

Berrio de Usuga, Berta Oliva

Blanquicet Gonzalez, Sara del Carmen

Bohorquez Borja, Omar de Jesus

Borja Arias, Aracely

Bram Cartagena, Mariela de Jesus

Burgos Genes, Gabriel

Burgos Villalobo, Esbil

Page C-2 of C-39

Cabadia de Aguilar, Sixta Tulia

Caceres Zumaque, Magdalena

Caicedo Mena, Gregoria

Camano Mora, Marve Luz

Campo Rodriguez, Maria Ines

Cano David, Ana Maria

Cano Sepulveda, Migdonia

Cantero Cordoba, Elizabeth

Cardona Goez, Rosalbina

Cardona Echavarria, Oliva

Castellanos Cogollo, Ramona del Carmen

Castellanos Yanos, Elizabeth

Castro Gomez, Alina Yaneth

Causil Almario, Arnoli

Chaverra de Cano, Teresita de Jesus

Chica Chica, Libia

Cordoba Chala, Alexandra