Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/271529439
CITATIONS READS
6 240
1 author:
Razieh Rafieenia
University of Surrey
15 PUBLICATIONS 177 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Evaluation of Air Pollution Control Strategies for dust removal in Cement Factories in Cameroon View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Razieh Rafieenia on 30 January 2015.
Vol. 31, No. 04, pp. 859 - 865, October - December, 2014
dx.doi.org/10.1590/0104-6632.20140314s00002997
(Submitted: September 28, 2013 ; Revised: January 22, 2014 ; Accepted: February 10, 2014)
Abstract - Attention has been focused on microbial succinic acid production as an alternative for
conventional chemical synthesis that is associated with environmental pollution. A metabolic model for
Actinobacillus succinogenes 130Z was developed with a mixture of glucose and xylose as substrate. The
metabolic fluxes during succinicate production were determined using flux balance analysis by linear
programming optimization in the MATLAB environment. Different glucose ratios (0.3, 0.4 and 0.7 mol.mol-
1
substrate) were used as model assumptions to calculate optimal fluxes, maximum growth and succinate
production. The model revealed that higher growth rates and product yields were correlated with higher
glucose content in the substrate mixture. When glucose constituted 0.5 mol.mol-1 substrate, a lower succinate
yield (0.64 mol.mol-1 substrate) was obtained, compared to 0.73 mol.mol-1 substrate when glucose was used
individually. Deletion of different unessential reactions in the model showed that a knockout of the acetate
formation pathway would increase the succinate yield by 21% when glucose and xylose were used in equal
molar ratios.
Keywords: Succinic Acid; Actinobacillus succinogenes; Xylose; Metabolic Model.
Transhydrogenation
NADPH↔NADH
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering Vol. 31, No. 04, pp. 859 - 865, October - December, 2014
862 R. Rafieenia
GLC XYL
30 70
50 0 26.89 50
70 0 20.36 30
0 13.83
G6P RU5P X5P
S7P
68.92
75.30
81.67 GA3P
F1, 6P
137.84
150.60
163.34 21.55
14.81 E4P
GA3 + DHAP F6P 8.08
158.63
164.62
170.60
3PG
147.96
153.54
159.12
2PG
147.96
73.48 153.54
76.25 159.12
79.02 PEP
70.36
73.02
75.67 48.83
OAA PYR 50.67
61.78 52.51
64.11
66.43 FOR
MAL AcCoA 0
0
61.78 0
64.11 25.41
66.43 26.37
27.33
FUM ETH
61.78 ACE
64.11
66.43
SUC
Figure 1: Metabolic fluxes of A. succinogenes with different glucose ratios (0.3, 0.5 and
0.7 mol.mol-1 substrate, respectively). All the fluxes are calculated per 100 mol substrate.
also produced in its metabolic network in high vol- flux distribution which supports higher NADH pro-
umes (McKinlay et al., 2007a). One of the metabolic duction is desirable for succinate formation (Singh et
engineering strategies for improving succinic acid al., 2011; Zheng et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2010; Zheng
yields is to remove competitive pathways (Liu et al., et al., 2013; Li et al., 2010).
2013). Phosphoenol pyruvate (PEP) is an important In this study three mutants were proposed with
node in the metabolic network of A. succinogenes as different knockouts in the metabolic pathways. Flux
it is the origin for directing the carbon flux towards distributions for these mutants are given in Figure 2. As
succinate or other byproduct formation pathways. can be seen, the mutant 1 lacking the acetate produc-
Besides PEP, oxaloacetate (OAA) seems to be an- tion pathway showed the highest succinate yields
other important branchpoint for succinate synthesis among the others. For a glucose ratio of 0.5 mol.mol-1
or transferring the flux towards pyruvate. OAA con- substrate, a succinate yield of 0.85 mol.mol-1 sub-
verts to succinate with malate (MAL) and fumarate strate was calculated by the model for mutant1 com-
(FUM) as intermediates. The yield of succinate is pared to 0.64 mol.mol-1 substrate for the wild type
strongly related to NADH availability. Therefore, a strain.
GLC XYL
50 50
50 37.72 5.09 50
50 0 2.64 50
0 20.36
G6P RU5P X5P
S7P
63.41
47.93
75.30 GA3P
F1, 6P
63.41
47.93
75.30 27.54
0 E4P
GA3 + DHAP F6P 14.81
153.64
95.49
164.62
3PG
143.51
90.21
153.54
2PG
147.96
96.94 153.54
47.70 159.12
149.27 PEP
42.66
40.47
0
22.22
OAA PYR 29.83
85.83 50.67
41.92
64.11 FOR
MAL AcCoA 0
0
85.83 0
41.92 0
64.11 18.25
26.37
FUM ETH
85.83 ACE
41.92
64.11
SUC
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering Vol. 31, No. 04, pp. 859 - 865, October - December, 2014
864 R. Rafieenia
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering Vol. 31, No. 04, pp. 859 - 865, October - December, 2014