Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The origin of management can be traced back to the days when man started living in groups.
Early examples of management can be found in the organization of:
The public life in ancient Greece and Romans
The organization of the Roman Catholic Church
The organization of military forces.
“Treat those who are junior to you as you wish to be treated by your superiors.”
- Seneca
“We need not prolong this meeting any further. There’s proper work to be done.”
- Homer (in the Iliad)
“Stress and anxiety make it impossible for workers to get any sleep.”
- Theocritus
“When making an entrance, exercise caution: don’t hold back, but don’t be over-
keen either.”
- Horace
“A good reputation shines brightly in dark times.”
- Publilius Syrus
“Call this accounting? The figure in the ‘total column’ is wrong and calculated
badly.”
- Gaius Lucilius
“There hasn’t been a great genius who didn’t have a touch of madness.”
- Seneca
“Anyone who thinks that his close competitor knows nothing, and that he is the
only one to craft clever strategic plans, is an idiot, his common sense deeply
flawed.”
- Theognis
“How often the best brains lie hidden away!”
Prepared by: Mr. Nguyen Vuong Khoi (MIB) - Plautus
EVIDENCE FROM THE PUBLIC LIFE IN ANCIENT GREECE AND ROMANS
1.1. ANCIENT THOUGHTS http://www.reversalpoint.com/contrast-socrates-vs-aristotle.html
James Watt Jr. (1796 - 1848) Mathew R. Boulton (1770 - 1842) Seebohm Rowntree (1871- 1954)
Frederick Winslow Taylor was the first to recognize and adopt a scientific approach to enterprise
management.
Taylor’s early findings:
Lack of order and system were main reasons of inefficiency and wastes.
Daily productivity of workers and the best method of performing the job were under-investigated.
The scientific methods are suggested, fundamentally including:
Observation
Measurement
Experimentation and QUESTION: WHAT IS THE MAIN LIMITATION OF THIS THEORY?
Inference. Now let’s do a small experiment
Prepared by: Mr. Nguyen Vuong Khoi (MIB)
Frederick Winslow Taylor (1856 – 1915)
2.1. SCIENTIFC MANAGEMENT THEORY KEY ELEMENTS
Work study: A systematic, objective and critical examination of all factors governing the operational efficiency must be conducted for
improvement.
Task planning: Having set the task which an average worker must strive to perform to get wages at the higher piece-rate, necessary steps
have to be taken to plan the production thoroughly so that there is no bottlenecks and the work goes on systematically.
Selection and Training:
Selection should be based on scientific methods and procedures.
Selection must be systemized and entrusted to a central personnel department.
Training must be conducted in the correct methods of work.
Standardization: Standardization of inputs (tools, equipment, materials), optimum speed for every machine, work conditions (e.g.,
ventilation, heating, cooling, humidity, floor space, safety etc.), and methods of handling materials.
Specialization:
The two functions of ‘planning’ and ‘doing’ are separated.
The ‘functional foremen’ are specialists who get involved in operational performance planning in the workshop.
Mental Revolution:
The industry was divided into management and labor whose interests conflicted.
Prepared by: Mr. Nguyen Vuong Khoi (MIB)
Such conflict could be solved by improving productivity
2.1. SCIENTIFC MANAGEMENT THEORY CONTRIBUTIONS & LIMITATIONS
Contributions
Focus on rational thinking on the part of management.
Focus on systematic study and research.
Focus on planning and control of production.
Development of cost accounting.
Development of scientific incentive plans.
Focus on need for a separate personnel department.
Focus on fatigue industrial work.
For workers
Speeding up of workers
Loss of individual worker's initiative
Problem of monotony
Reduction of Employment
Weakening of Trade Unions
Exploitation of workers
For employers
Heavy Investment
Loss due to re-organization
Prepared by: Mr. Nguyen Vuong Khoi (MIB)
Unsuitable for small scale firms
2.2. ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT THEORY
Division of work
Authority and Responsibility
Discipline
Unity of Command
Unity of Direction
Emphasis on Subordination of Personal Interest to General or Common Interest
Remuneration
Centralization vs. Decentralization
Scalar Chain
Order
Henri Fayol (1841 – 1925)
Equity
Stability of Tenure
Security of income
Security of employment
Esprit de Corps
Unity and cooperation make strength.
Pride, loyalty and sense of belonging contribute to a good performance.
Initiative
Creative thinking and capacity to take initiative can give us sound managerial planning and execution
of predetermined plans.
Prepared by: Mr. Nguyen Vuong Khoi (MIB)
2.2. ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT THEORY CONTRIBUTIONS & LIMITATIONS
Contributions
The theory provides principles for sound organization and efficient management
The theory serves as a foundation for management training
The theory consider organizations as living organisms rather than as mechanical machines
Henri Fayol (1841 – 1925)
Limitations
The principles describe a vision rather than reality
The principles are based on personal experience rather than empirical evidence
Successful managers rely more on developing networks and cultivating personal contacts,
rather than focus on the 14 activities recommended by Fayol.
Prepared by: Mr. Nguyen Vuong Khoi (MIB)
2.3. BUREAUCRATIC MANAGEMENT THEORY
Hierarchy of authority
Division of labor based upon functional specialization
A system of rules
Impersonality of interpersonal relationships
A system of work procedures
Placement of employees based upon technical competence
Legal authority and power
Contributions
Bureaucratic management is preferred where change is not anticipated, or where rate of change
can be predicated.
The theory support the practice of standard operating procedures.
The bureaucratic model brings about the conformity and formality.
Central authority makes it effective in organizing.
The theory supports the merit-based hiring of specialized officials.
Limitations
The bureaucratic model implies high costs of controls.
The model is rigid, inflexible and impersonal.
The model implies a dominance of one-way communication.
The model leaves room for the exploitation of power.
Bureaucracy may trigger anxiety amongst employees due to the pressure of rules and regulations.
Over-focus on control may detract the organization from its ultimate goals and objectives.
Hierarchical structures may cause the waste of time, efforts and money.
Hierarchical structures may lead to delay in decision making.
Bureaucracy may hinder
Prepared creativity
by: Mr. andKhoi
Nguyen Vuong innovativeness.
(MIB)
HUMAN RELATIONS, BEHAVIORAL
3. NEO-CLASSICAL MANAGEMENT THEORIES SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL APPROACH
Illumination Experiment
This investigated the relationship between illumination intensity and the productivity.
The findings supported that there would be other factors that affect the productivity, rather than illumination.
Contributions
An organization is a social system, not merely a techno-economic system.
People are also motivated by non-financial incentives, not merely financial incentives.
Management must be based on the development of cooperative attitudes, not merely command.
Participation and two-way communication are an important instrument in human relations movement.
Group psychology plays an important role in any business organization.
The key to higher productivity lies in employee morale.
Management must pay attention to employee satisfaction for a better outcome.
Limitations
Mayo’s recommendations remained unidimensional, as he did not try to integrate his
conclusions with scientific management.
Some other causes of motivation within informal groups (e.g., learning, expertise,
reflection, etc.) were unexamined.
Re-investigation of the Hawthorne effects did not find strong empirical support to
Mayo’s conclusions.
In dynamic organizations, it is difficult to identify the critical working environment
attributes.
Prepared by: Mr. Nguyen Vuong Khoi (MIB)
3.2. HUMAN RELATIONS APPROACH TO MANAGEMENT
Prepared
QUESTION: WHAT IS THE FOUNDATION IDEA by:THAT
Mr. Nguyen Vuong Khoi (MIB)
UNDERLIES THE HUMAN RELATIONS APPROACH?
3.2. HUMAN RELATIONS APPROACH TO MANAGEMENT KEY ELEMENTS
Management should allow workers to participate in decision making, job content and job operation planning.
Work conditions (e.g., plant layout, machinery, tools, etc.) must be sufficient and convenient for employees.
Personal security and social needs of workers must be satisfied.
Contributions
Human relationists focused on human and social factors in organizations.
The effect that behaviors have on the organizational performance was discussed.
Task and psychological conditions under which employees work well were discussed.
Limitations
The conclusions were based on clinical insights from the Hawthorne studies, rather
than scientific evidence.
There was an overemphasis on the psychological aspects, rather than on the
structural and technical aspects.
It is based on the assumption that all organizational problems could be solved
through improved human relations.
There was an overemphasis on the group work and group decision-making, but
groups may create problems and collective decision-making may not be possible in
practice.
Prepared by: Mr. Nguyen Vuong Khoi (MIB)
4. MODERN APPROACH TO MANAGEMENT
QUESTION: WHAT IS A SYSTEM? Prepared by: Mr. Nguyen Vuong Khoi (MIB)
4.2. SYSTEM APPROACH TO MANAGEMENT WHAT IS A SYSTEM?
Cole (2004)