Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Finance
Notes
2013
Compiled
by
Jörg
Stegemann
4.
Company
investment
decisions
using
the
weighted
average
cost
of
capital
.................................................................................................................................................15
APV ............................................................................................................................................................................ 15
Adjusted
Present
Value .......................................................................................................................................................15
WACC......................................................................................................................................................................... 15
Weighted
Average
Cost
of
Capital...................................................................................................................................15
SML
(Security
Market
Line)............................................................................................................................... 16
A:
Acronyms........................................................................................................................52
1.
The
basic
idea,
scope
and
tools
of
finance
In
a
developed
economy
most
people
participate
frequently
in
financial
markets.
Individuals
borrow
from
and
lend
to
financial
institutions
such
as
banks.
A
financial
market
allows
people
to
shift
resources
between
points
in
time.
Someone
lending
money
shifts
his
consumption
into
the
future
while
someone
borrowing
shift
his
consumption
from
a
point
in
the
future
into
the
present.
When
some
participants
wish
to
bring
future
resources
to
the
present
by
borrowing,
and
others
wish
to
shift
present
resources
to
the
future
by
lending,
the
possibility
of
beneficial
transactions
is
obvious.
The
parties
to
the
transac-‐
tion
must
decide
on
the
amount
of
future
resources
to
be
exchanged
for
present
ones.
Present
value
Present
value
is
defined
as
the
amount
of
money
you
must
invest
or
lend
at
the
present
time
so
as
to
end
up
with
a
particular
amount
of
money
in
the
future.
Finding
the
present
value
of
a
future
cash
flow
is
often
called
discounting
the
cash
flow.
Discounting
is
done
by
dividing
the
future
cash
flows
by
the
appropri-‐
ate
market
interest
rate.
Cash
flows
that
occur
multiple
periods
in
the
future
need
to
be
divided
multiple
times.
Present
value
is
also
an
accurate
representation
of
what
the
financial
market
does
when
it
sets
a
price
on
a
financial
asset.
One
cannot
change
present
wealth
merely
by
transacting
(borrowing
and
lending
at
the
market
rate)
in
the
financial
market.
Though
borrowing
and
lending
will
move
us
up
and
down
the
financial
exchange
line,
and
thereby
allow
us
to
choose
the
time
allocation
of
our
present
wealth
that
makes
us
most
happy,
such
transactions
cannot
move
the
line
and
therefore
cannot
change
our
wealth.
Investing
Investing
in
real
assets
can
change
our
present
wealth
because
it
is
not
necessary
to
find
someone
else
to
give
us
part
of
their
wealth
in
order
for
ours
to
increase.
Investing
in
real
assets
such
as
productive
machinery,
new
production
facilities,
research,
or
a
new
product
line
to
be
marketed,
because
it
creates
new
future
cash
flows
that
did
not
previously
exist,
can
generate
new
wealth
that
was
not
there
before.
Investments
are
not
free;
we
must
give
up
some
resources
in
order
to
undertake
an
investment.
If
the
present
value
of
the
amounts
we
give
up
is
greater
than
the
present
value
of
what
we
gain
from
the
investment,
the
investment
will
decrease
our
present
wealth.
The
exchange
line
has
been
shifted
outwards
from
the
origin
by
the
investment
and
is
parallel
to
the
original
line.
(It
is
parallel
because
the
market
interest
rate,
which
determines
the
line’s
slope,
has
not
changed.)
Any
outward
shift
in
the
exchange
line
signals
a
good
investment,
and
any
outward
shift
is
an
increase
in
present
wealth,
any
investment
that
increases
present
wealth
is
a
good
one.
That
is
simply
another
way
of
saying
what
we
said
earlier:
investments
are
desirable
when
they
produce
more
present
value
than
they
cost.
Net
Present
Value
(NPV)
The
difference
between
the
present
values
of
the
cash
inflows
and
outflows
of
an
investment
is
the
net
present
value
(NPV)
of
the
investment.
The
NPV
is
a
reflection
of
how
much
the
investment
differs
from
its
opportunity
cost.
It
is
the
present
value
of
the
future
amount
by
which
the
returns
from
the
investment
exceed
the
opportunity
costs
of
the
investor.
The
NPV
is:
1. The
NPV
of
an
investment
is
the
present
value
of
all
of
its
present
and
future
cash
flows,
discounted
at
the
opportunity
cost
of
those
cash
flows.
These
opportunity
costs
reflect
the
returns
available
on
investing
in
an
al-‐
ternative
of
equal
timing
and
equal
risk
2. The
NPV
of
an
investment
is
the
change
in
the
present
wealth
of
the
wise
investor
who
chooses
a
positive
NPV
investment,
and
also
of
the
unfortu-‐
nate
investor
who
chooses
a
negative
NPV
investment
3. The
NPV
of
an
investment
is
the
discounted
value
of
the
amounts
by
which
the
investment’s
cash
flows
differ
from
those
of
its
opportunity
cost.
When
NPV
is
positive,
the
investment
is
expected
to
produce
(in
present
value
total)
more
cash
across
the
future
than
the
same
amount
of
money
invested
in
the
comparable
alternative.
Perpetuity
Perpetuity
is
a
cash
flow
stream
that
is
assumed
to
continue
for
ever.
Perpetuity
present
values
are
used
because
they
are
so
easy
to
calculate.
The
formula
for
the
present
value
of
a
perpetuity
is:
CF
PV
=
-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐
i
PV
Present
Value
CF
Cash
Flow
i
Interest
rate
The
above
formula
assumes
that
the
cash
flows
will
be
constant
for
each
future
period.
That
is
not
very
representative
of
actual
patterns
of
cash
flows
that
we
see.
If
we
assume
that
the
cash
flows
will
continue
for
ever,
but
will
grow
or
decline
at
a
constant
percentage
rate
during
each
period,
the
perpetuity
formula
becomes:
CF
PV
=
-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐
(i
–
g)
g
Constant
per-‐period
growth
rate
of
the
cash
flow
Bond
pricing
Yield
to
maturity
The
Yield
to
Maturity
is
the
IRR
of
the
bonds’
promised
cash
flows.
The
yield
to
maturity
is
the
rate
that
discounts
a
bond’s
promised
cash
flows
to
equal
its
market
price,
and
is
the
‘average
per-‐period
earning
rate
on
the
money
invested
in
the
bond’.
The
yield
to
maturity
is
expressing
not
only
the
earning
rates
but
also
the
amounts
invested
in
the
bonds
across
time.
Yield
curve
The
set
of
YTMs
is
known
as
the
yield
curve.
Duration
Duration
is
the
number
of
periods
into
the
future
where
a
bond’s
value,
on
average,
is
generated.
The
greater
the
duration
of
a
bond,
the
farther
into
the
future
its
average
value
is
generated,
and
the
more
its
value
will
react
to
changes
in
interest
rates.
We
can
calculate
the
duration
of
a
bond
by
‘weighting’
the
time
points
from
which
cash
flows
are
generated,
by
the
proportion
of
total
value
generated
at
each
time.
DCF1
DCF2
DCF3
Duration
=
1
*
-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐
+
2
*
-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐
+
3
*
-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐
+
n
*
…
Price
Price
Price
2.
Fundamentals
of
company
investment
decisions
Corporate
equity
-‐ Equity
is
a
residual
claim
This
means
that
there
is
no
specific
contract
that
mandates
any
payment
to
shareholders.
The
shareholders
are
entitled
only
to
vote
for
the
directors
of
the
company
and
to
expect
that
the
company’s
directors
and
management
make
deci-‐
sions
in
the
best
interests
of
the
shareholders.
-‐ Equity
has
limited
liability
This
means
that
the
possible
losses
that
a
shareholder
can
incur
are
limited
to
the
value
of
the
shares
that
the
shareholder
owns.
The
net
result
of
these
characteristics
is
that
the
shareholders
of
a
company
do
not
have
a
contract
to
which
they
can
refer
for
developing
an
idea
of
how
much
money
they
can
expect
to
receive
or
when
they
may
receive
it.
Price/earnings
ratio
The
price/earnings
ratio
is
simply
the
earnings
per
share
divided
by
the
price
per
share,
i.e.:
EPS
P/E
ratio
=
-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐
Price
Payout
ratio
The
payout
ratio
specifies
how
much
of
the
earnings
(per
share)
are
paid
out
to
shareholders
in
the
form
of
dividends:
Dividends
per
share
Payout
ratio
=
-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐
Earnings
per
share
Investment
decisions
All-‐equity
corporations
Regardless
of
who
contributes
the
money
to
fund
a
project
(old
or
new
share-‐
holders)
the
investment’s
NPV
will
go
to
the
old
shareholders.
New
sharehold-‐
ers
will
profit
from
future
dividends.
3.
Earnings,
profit
and
cash
flow
Cash
flows
Financial
cash
flows
are
the
cash
amounts
that
are
expected
to
occur
at
the
times
for
which
the
expectations
are
recorded.
They
are
not
to
be
confused
with
the
accounting
numbers
that
are
generated
for
quite
different
purposes.
WACC
Weighted
Average
Cost
of
Capital
The
weighted
average
cost
of
capital
(WACC)
is
the
discount
rate
that
reflects
the
1. Operating
risks
of
the
project
2. Project’s
proportional
debt
and
equity
financing
with
attendant
financial
risks
(rates)
3. Effect
of
interest
deductibility
for
the
debt-‐financed
portion
of
the
project.
Companies
using
the
WACC–NPV
are
those
willing
to
specify
the
expected
proportions
of
debt
and
equity
in
terms
of
their
market
values,
but
they
do
not
know
exactly
what
the
claims
will
be
worth
until
after
the
analysis
is
complete.
It
does
not
require
that
the
amounts
of
debt
to
be
issued
are
known,
nor
does
it
require
that
the
market
values
of
any
of
the
resulting
claims
be
estimated
beforehand.
The
only
information
necessary
comprises
estimates
of
-‐ The
required
rate
for
equity
-‐ Debt’s
after-tax
cost
rate
-‐ The
all-‐equity
free
cash
flows
-‐ The
proportions
intended
for
debt
and
equity
financing.
Debt
market
value
WACC
=
-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐
*
Debt
cost
Total
market
value
Equity
market
value
+
-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐
*
Equity
required
rate
Total
market
value
Debt
cost
=
Debt
required
return
*
(1
–
Corporate
income
tax
rate)
For
calculation
of
the
proportions
of
debt
and
equity
the
market
value
has
to
be
used,
NOT
the
amounts
paid
into
the
project!
Working
capital
The
working
capital
consists
of
the
current
assets
and
the
current
liabilities
of
the
company.
Current
assets
The
current
assets
of
a
company
consist
of
-‐ Cash
-‐ Marketable
securities
-‐ Accounts
receivable
-‐ Inventory
Current
liabilities
The
current
liabilities
of
a
company
consist
of
-‐ Accounts
payable
-‐ Short
term
loans
and
other
financings
Net
working
capital
From
this
the
net
working
capital
can
be
calculated:
Net
working
capital
=
Total
current
assets
–
Total
current
liabilities
Taxes
Check
the
income
tax
row
in
the
income
statement
of
the
project.
Taxes
will
be
deducted
from
the
free
cash
flow
as
they
are
expenses
that
are
to
be
paid
to
the
state.
Fixed
assets
Check
the
Fixed
assets
numbers
in
the
company’s
balance
sheet.
Take
the
changes
to
fixed
assets
(without
depreciation!)
as
the
relevant
fixed
asset
purchasing
cash
flows.
Check
the
income
statement
for
sales
of
fixed
assets
and
use
them
is
cash
inflows.
The
delta
between
fixed
assets
purchases
and
sales
are
the
fixed
asset
cash
flows.
Market
values
Et
Market
value
of
the
equity
of
the
investment
at
time
t
Dt
Market
value
of
the
debt
of
the
investment
at
time
t
Vt
Market
value
of
the
investment
at
time
t
Discount
rates
re
Required
return
on
equity
of
the
investment
rd
Required
return
on
the
debt
of
the
investment
rd*
Cost
of
debt,
adjusted
for
the
tax
rate,
i.e.
rd
*
(1
–
Tc)
rv
Overall
weighted
average
return
on
the
capital
claims
of
the
invest
-‐
ment
(using
rd)
rv*
WACC,
using
rd*
as
the
debt
required
rate
ru
Unleveraged
(all-‐equity)
required
return
on
the
investment
6.
Applications
of
company
investment
analysis
Payback
Period
The
payback
period
method
of
investment
analysis
is
quite
straightforward.
It
is
simply
the
number
of
periods
until
a
project’s
cash
flows
accumulate
positively
to
equal
its
initial
outlay.
It
is
a
measure
of
the
length
of
time
expected
before
the
investment
outlay
is
recouped.
The
problems
with
payback
period
are:
1. It
ignores
all
cash
flows
beyond
the
minimum
acceptable
payback
period,
even
though
there
are
often
likely
to
be
cash
flows
of
importance
beyond
that
time
2. It
does
not
discount
the
cash
flows
within
the
minimum
acceptable
period,
thereby
effectively
giving
equal
weight
to
all
cash
flows
within
those
pe-‐
riods.
This
is
inconsistent
with
shareholder
opportunity
costs
on
the
mon-‐
ies
invested.
These
characteristics
of
the
technique
will
in
many
cases
cause
investments
to
be
erroneously
accepted
and
rejected.
Cost-‐Benefit
Ratio
The
cost–benefit
ratio
(CBR)
is
defined
as
the
ratio
between
the
present
value
of
the
cash
inflows
and
the
cash
outflows
of
an
investment.
Sum
of
the
PV
of
all
project
cash
inflows
CBR
=
-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐
Sum
of
the
PV
of
all
project
cash
outflows
To
use
the
CBR,
an
investment
is
accepted
if
the
ratio
is
greater
than
1
and
rejected
if
the
CBR
is
less
than
1.
The
CBR
is
giving
an
incorrect
signal
as
to
which
of
the
two
investments
should
be
preferred
if
they
are
mutually
exclusive.
The
reason
is
that
it
is
a
ratio
of
values
rather
than
a
value
measure
itself.
Capital
claimants
are
concerned
about
their
absolute
wealth
–
which
in
the
final
analysis
is
measured
in
value
amounts
not
ratios.
Profitability
Index
Sum
of
the
PV
of
all
cash
flows
from
1
period
on
the
future
PI
=
-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐
(Positive)
Value
of
the
initial
cash
outlay
to
finance
the
project
A
PI
greater
than
1
signals
an
acceptable
investment.
The
PI
is
only
used
when
the
present
cash
flow
is
a
net
outlay.
Renewable
Investments
Alternative
investments
can’t
be
expected
to
renew
at
the
same
intervals.
Example:
Investing
in
machines
with
life
expectancies
of
5
and
7
years,
respec-‐
tively.
In
order
to
compare
those
investments
the
NPV
of
the
contenders
needs
to
be
annualized.
Using
the
equivalent
annual
cost
(EAC)
the
NPV
of
each
investment
is
divided
by
the
annuity
factor
(see
statistical
tables)
and
the
resultant
values
are
compared.
Real
prices
A
real
price
is
the
number
of
£s
(or
whatever
currency)
that
would
have
been
exchanged
to
purchase
something
before
the
inflation
took
place.
We
call
the
‘inflation-‐free’
return
the
real
rate,
1
+
Nominal
return
=
(1
+
Real
return)
*
(1
+
Inflation
rate)
i.e.
1
+
15.5%
=
(1
+
10%)
*
(1
+
5%)
Investment
interrelatedness
When
the
acceptance
or
rejection
of
one
investment
affects
the
cash
flows
that
can
be
expected
on
some
other
investment,
we
say
the
investments
are
economi-
cally
interrelated.
Depreciation
Three
main
methods
mentioned
in
the
course:
-‐ Straight-‐line
method
-‐ Double
declining
balance
method
-‐ Sum
of
digits
method
Straight-‐line
method
The
straight-‐line
method
allows
a
constant
rate
of
depreciation
each
year.
If
an
asset
is
depreciated
over
5
years
for
example
the
depreciation
will
be
1/5th
of
the
value
of
the
asset
per
year.
EVA
example
A
company
has
£500m
of
assets
and
a
WACC
of
15%.
The
company
needs
to
make
£75m
(£500m
*
15%)
just
to
break
even.
Only
profits
above
that
level
are
adding
value
to
shareholders.
Operational
gearing
Operational
gearing
is
measured
by
the
level
of
fixed
costs
to
total
production
costs.
A
company
with
high
operational
gearing
has
a
high
level
of
fixed
costs
to
cover
before
generating
free
cash
flow
or
profits.
The
β
coefficient
of
a
project
with
high
operational
gearing
(compared
to
the
parent
company)
needs
to
be
adjusted
upwards
for
this
reason.
Financial
gearing
Financial
gearing
reflects
any
borrowing
that
the
company
may
have
undertaken.
The
β
coefficient
of
a
company
with
debt
in
its
financing
structure
is
higher
than
if
it
was
financed
solely
by
equity
(the
higher
the
percentage
of
debt
the
higher
the
required
return
on
equity).
The
operating
income
of
the
project
will
become
more
volatile
with
increased
financial
gearing
(borrowing).
The
β
coefficient
of
the
project
has
to
be
adjusted
if
the
level
of
borrowing
for
the
project
is
lower
or
higher
than
the
level
of
the
parent
company.
Capital
Asset
Pricing
Model
(CAPM)
E(rj)
=
rf
+
[E(rm)
-‐
rf]
*
βj
E(rj)
Estimation
of
required
return
rf
The
risk-‐free
return
(taken
from
government
bonds)
E(rm)
-‐
rf
Market
risk
premium
βj
Systematic
risk
of
asset
(debt
or
equity
rate
or
project
specific)
Keep
in
mind
that
for
calculation
of
the
applicable
debt
rate
the
company
tax
rate
has
to
be
used!
Debt
cost
=
Debt
required
return
*
(1
–
Corporate
income
tax
rate)
8.
Company
dividend
policy
There
is
a
set
of
arguments
that
says
that
the
dividend
decision
of
a
company
is
unimportant.
Higher
cash
dividends
mean
lower
market
value
to
existing
shareholders,
and
lower
cash
dividends
mean
higher
market
value
to
existing
shareholders.
If
existing
shareholder
dividends
are
reduced,
their
claim
upon
future
dividends,
and
thus
current
market
value,
is
higher
because
less
new
equity
is
raised.
If
existing
shareholder
dividends
are
increased,
their
claim
upon
future
dividends,
and
thus
current
market
value,
is
lower
because
more
new
shares
must
be
sold.
Flotation
costs
Finally,
companies
themselves
incur
costs
in
raising
money
from
capital
markets
when
they
pay
dividends
so
high
as
to
require
new
shares
to
be
sold.
These
are
called
flotation
costs,
and
they
can
be
significant
for
the
issuance
of
new
shares,
depending
upon
the
mechanism
of
sale.
If
intermediaries
such
as
investment
bankers
are
used,
the
costs
can
be
as
high
as
5
to
25
per
cent
of
the
total
value
of
issued
shares.
Combined
frictions
Real-‐market
considerations
of
taxes,
transaction
costs
and
flotation
costs
are
potentially
significant
considerations
for
companies
in
their
dividend
policy
decisions.
The
resulting
optimal
dividend
policy
of
companies
would
be
as
follows:
find
all
of
the
investments
that
have
positive
NPVs,
and
retain
as
much
cash
as
is
necessary
to
undertake
these
investments;
if
there
is
cash
left
over,
only
then
might
a
dividend
be
paid;
only
raise
new
equity
capital
when
internally
generated
funds
are
insufficient
to
provide
the
cash
necessary
to
undertake
all
good
investments.
This
is
sometimes
called
a
‘passive
residual
dividend
policy’.
If
our
discussion
of
dividends
were
complete,
we
would
expect
to
see
evidence
that
companies
actually
pursued
such
a
policy.
What
we
see
instead
is
that
companies’
dividends
across
time
are
much
more
stable
than
a
passive
residual
policy
would
require.
rd
Return
required
for
the
debt
financed
part
of
the
geared
company
Riskd
Risk
of
the
debt
part
of
the
geared
company
ru
Return
required
for
the
ungeared
(all-‐equity)
company
Risku
Risk
of
the
ungeared
company
re
Return
required
for
the
equity
financed
part
of
the
geared
company
Riske
Risk
of
the
equity
part
of
the
geared
company
The
existence
of
the
debt’s
prior
claim
has
increased
the
risk
(and
thus
the
required
return)
to
equity.
Geared
equity
(Riske)
is
riskier
than
ungeared
equity
(Risku).
Thus
debt
is
‘cheaper’
in
the
sense
of
carrying
an
interest
rate
or
required
rate
of
return
less
than
equity,
but
the
very
existence
of
debt’s
prior
claim
serves
to
increase
the
risk
of
equity
to
be
higher
than
it
would
be
without
debt.
This
means
that
debt
is
not
necessarily
a
‘cheap’
capital
source
when
the
interactions
between
debt
and
equity
financing
are
considered.
EBIT-‐EPS
By
adding
debt
to
a
company’s
financing
EBIT
and
EPS
change.
Due
to
the
first-‐
priority
nature
of
debt
the
remaining
profits
(as
expressed
by
EPS)
become
more
volatile,
i.e.
more
risky.
ru
Return
required
for
the
ungeared
(all-‐equity)
company
re
Return
required
for
the
equity
financed
part
of
the
geared
company
rd
Return
required
for
the
debt
financed
part
of
the
geared
company
rv
Return
required
for
the
geared
company
(overall
rate)
As
the
percentage
of
debt
in
the
company’s
financing
increases
the
return
required
of
debt
increase
up
to
the
level
required
of
the
ungeared
company.
Equity
required
returns
in
turn
increase
as
well,
up
from
the
ungeared
level
of
financing.
The
overall
rate
required
however
stays
constant
as
the
proportion
of
debt
vs.
equity
financing
shifts
(WACC
formula!).
Arbitrage
‘Arbitrage’
is
a
transaction
wherein
an
instantaneous
risk-‐free
profit
is
made.
Arbitrage
opportunities
cannot
be
expected
to
exist
for
any
significant
time
in
a
market
with
well-‐informed
investors.
Market
prices
must
adjust
to
cause
all
equivalent
future
cash
flows,
sold
in
whatever
form
as
single
securities
or
as
portfolios
of
holdings,
to
sell
for
the
same
price.
The
forces
of
demand
and
supply
will
quickly
cause
prices
to
adjust
so
as
to
destroy
the
arbitrage
opportunity.
Even
if
two
portfolios
have
wildly
different
securities
in
them,
if
the
portfolios’
aggregate
future
expectations
are
identical,
the
portfolios
must
be
equally
valuable,
and
the
individual
security
prices
within
them
will
adjust
to
accomplish
that.
V
Value
of
the
leveraged
company
Vu
Value
of
the
unleveraged
company
VITS
Value
of
the
Interest
Tax
Shield
E
Value
of
the
equity
in
the
company
D
Value
of
the
debt
in
the
company
ru
Return
required
for
the
ungeared
(all-‐equity)
company
re
Return
required
for
the
equity
financed
part
of
the
geared
company
rd
Return
required
for
the
debt
financed
part
of
the
geared
company
rv
Return
required
for
the
geared
company
(overall
rate)
rv*
Company
cost
of
capital
(WACC)
A
company’s
cost
of
capital
is
affected
by
the
amount
of
debt
in
its
capital
structure,
and
if
interest
is
deductible
for
company
income
tax
purposes,
the
company’s
cost
of
capital
will
be
lower
the
more
debt
it
uses.
The
reason
for
this
is
simply
that
interest
deductibility
is
a
kind
of
tax
subsidy
for
corporate
borrowing
that
is
not
available
for
equity
financings.
Financings
Short-term
financings
exhibit
relatively
higher
expected
risk
and
return.
Long-term
financings
are
characterised
by
lower
risk
and
return.
This
is
exactly
the
opposite
of
the
risk
return
characteristic
of
its
assets.
Combining
risk
and
rates
of
return
on
assets
and
financings
There
is
an
old
rule
of
thumb
in
finance,
which
goes:
‘Finance
short-‐term
assets
with
short-‐term
liabilities,
and
long-‐term
assets
with
long-‐term
liabilities.’
This
is
called
maturity
matching.
Mix
of
long-‐
and
short-‐term
assets
Management
of
cash
balances
The
optimising
of
cash
replenishment
amounts
is
solved
by
the
following:
£r
=
[(2
*
£D
*
£T)
/
i]1/2
£r
Optimal
amount
of
cash
replenishment
£D
Total
annual
amount
of
cash
spent
by
firm
£T
Transaction
costs
for
converting
interest-‐bearing
securities
to
cash
i
Interest
earned
on
interest-‐bearing
securities
General
solution
to
the
cash
management
problem
£R
=
[(3
*
£T
*
s2)
/
(4
*
i)]1/3
+
£M
£R
Return
point
£U
Upper
limit
of
cash
£M
Minimum
amount
of
cash
required
£T
Transaction
costs
for
converting
interest-‐bearing
securities
to
cash
i
Interest
earned
on
interest-‐bearing
securities
s2
Variance
of
the
changes
in
the
cash
balance
(square
of
standard
deviation)
Quick
ratio
Current
assets
-‐
Inventory
Quick
ratio
=
-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐
Current
liabilities
Profit
margin
Net
profit
after
taxes
Profit
margin
=
-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐
Sales
Debt
ratio
Total
debt
Debt
ratio
=
-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐
Total
assets
Inventory
turnover
Sales
Inventory
turnover
=
-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐
Inventory
Call
option
A
‘call
option’
allows
you
to
purchase
(‘call’)
another
security
or
asset
at
a
fixed
price
for
a
fixed
period
of
time.
Put
option
A
put
option
allows
the
holder
to
sell
something
(usually
shares)
at
a
fixed
price
for
a
fixed
period
of
time.
The
amount
that
the
market
value
of
the
options
exceeds
the
exercise
value
of
the
option
is
called
the
option
premium.
Option
valuations
Call
option
payoff
diagram
S0
The
current
price
of
the
underlying
security
q
The
probability
of
the
underlying
security
price
increase
u
Upward
multiplier
for
the
underlying
security
price
d
Downward
multiplier
for
the
underlying
security
price
uS0
The
underlying
security
increased
price
result
dS0
The
underlying
security
decreased
price
result
C0
Current
market
value
of
the
option
Cu
Option
payoff
at
expiration
if
the
underlying
security
price
is
up
Cd
Option
payoff
at
expiration
if
the
underlying
security
price
is
down
X
Exercise
(strike)
price
of
the
option
Payoff
diagram
from
call
equivalent
portfolio
rf
The
risk-‐free
interest
rate
Y
The
number
of
underlying
shares
to
purchase
(to
sell
if
negative)
Z
The
amount
of
lending
(borrowing
if
negative)
at
the
risk-‐free
rate
Cu
-‐
Cd
Y
=
-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐
S0
*
(u
–
d)
u
*
Cd
–
d
*
Cu
Z
=
-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐
(u
–
d)
*
(1
+
rf)t
Cost
of
the
call-‐equivalent
portfolio:
Y
*
S0
+
Z
The
market
value
of
the
call
option
is
the
same
as
the
cost
of
the
call-‐equivalent
portfolio
(the
same
cash
flows
must
sell
for
the
same
price!),
hence:
C0
=
Y
*
S0
+
Z
Exercise
value
of
put
and
underlying
asset
Exercise
value
of
call
and
riskless
asset
The
first
thing
one
notices
about
above
figures:
the
payoffs
from
holding
a
call
and
the
present
value
of
its
exercise
price
appear
to
be
the
same
as
those
of
holding
a
put
and
its
underlying
asset.
The
notion
of
put–call
parity
implies
that
the
following
relationship
must
hold:
Put
+
Underlying
Asset
=
Call
+
Riskless
PV
of
exercise
price
Or
in
a
formula
P0
+
S0
=
C0
+
X
/
rft
P0
Market
value
of
the
put
option
S0
The
current
price
of
the
underlying
security
C0
Market
value
of
the
call
option
X
Exercise
(strike)
price
of
the
option
rf
The
risk-‐free
interest
rate
t
Time
until
expiration
Put–call
parity
not
only
gives
us
an
easy
way
to
value
a
put
option
(if
we
know
the
call
value).
It
also
specifies
a
general
relationship
among
puts,
calls
and
their
underlying
asset.
This
can
be
a
potentially
useful
piece
of
information
in
that
this
relationship
can
be
manipulated
just
as
any
algebraic
one,
solving
for
whatever
variable
is
of
interest.
Real
options
Real
options
are
options
to
alter,
abandon,
or
extend
a
project’s
cash
flows
at
some
future
point.
Because
of
the
nature
of
real
options,
conventional
capital
budgeting
is
not
appropriate
for
their
evaluation.
The
NPV
of
the
conventional
project
would
be
calculated,
then
the
value
of
the
real
option(s)
would
be
calculated
using
the
binomial
or
Black–Scholes
option
pricing
model.
The
values
for
the
options
would
then
be
added
to
the
basic
NPV
of
the
project
to
give
a
true
indication
of
the
NPV
of
the
project.
Swaps
Swaps
are
like
a
series
of
forward
contracts
without
the
need
to
continually
renew
the
contract.
‘Swaps’
are
derivatives
designed
to
allow
hedging
the
risks
of
interest
rate
and
foreign
exchange-‐rate
movements.
A
swap
is
a
conceptually
straightforward
transaction
where
one
party
to
the
transaction
exchanges
one
stream
of
cash
flow
with
a
‘counterparty’,
who
provides
the
other
stream
of
cash
flow
to
be
ex-‐
changed.
There
are
often
‘side
payments’
of
some
type
to
or
from
one
or
the
other
party
or
a
third-‐party
facilitator
to
the
swap.
They
are
better
for
longer-‐term
positions,
where
it
is
difficult
to
get
coverage
with
futures
and
forward
agreements.
These
(futures
and
forwards)
tend
to
be
used
for
durations
of
up
to
1
year.
Swaps
allow
companies
to
take
advantage
of
market
imperfections
in
that
a
company
may
be
charged
different
rates
for
borrowing
fixed
or
floating
and
they
can
use
their
comparative
advantage
in
one
form
of
borrowing
to
allow
everyone
in
the
swap
transaction
to
benefit.
Swaps
are
cheaper
because
you
would
have
to
be
renewing
futures
or
forward
contracts
continually
to
get
the
same
coverage
if
the
coverage
was
required
for
periods
exceeding
one
year.
Exotics
‘Exotics’
are
true
derivatives,
but
ones
formulated
from
combinations
or
mixtures
of
other
types
of
derivatives.
These
are
conceptually
important
derivatives.
They
are
tailored
to
the
very
specific
risk
exposures
of
a
single
firm,
and
can
be
very
complicated
–
so
complicated,
in
fact,
that
there
have
been
instances
where
there
is
at
least
an
allegation
that
not
even
the
inventor
of
the
security
understood
the
potential
range
of
outcomes
that
could
be
experienced
by
the
firm
entering
into
the
transaction.
A:
Acronyms
ACT
Advance
Corporation
Tax
APV
Adjusted
Present
Value
AROI
Average
(accounting)
Return
On
Investment
CAPM
Capital
Asset
Pricing
Model
CBR
Cost
Benefit
Ratio
DCF
Discounted
Cash
Flow
EAC
Equivalent
Annual
Cost
EBIT
Earnings
Before
Interest
and
Taxes
EPS
Earnings
Per
Share
EVA
Economic
Value
Added
FCF
Free
Cash
Flow
IRR
Internal
Rate
of
Return
ITS
Interest
Tax
Shield
NPV
Net
Present
Value
PI
Profitability
Index
SML
Security
Market
Line
WACC
Weighted
Average
Cost
of
Capital
YTM
Yield
To
Maturity