Date : December 17, 2020

Submitted by : Acejan L. Jadie, LPT

Master of Arts in Education – Mathematics Education
College of Education
Submitted to :Marlon Ebaeguin
Assistant Professor of Educational Research and Evaluation
College of Education

Test I
1. A
2. B
3. C
4. A
5. B
6. A
Test II
A researcher wants to test the hypothesis that the correlation between variable A and variable B is
greater than zero. He has obtained an r = 0.21 between the two variables using 22 subjects.
Determine if the hypothesis can be rejected at the 0.05 level (two-tailed).
𝑯𝟎 : 𝝆 = 𝟎
𝐻𝑎 : 𝝆 ≠ 𝟎

Df = 22 – 2 = 20
Alpha = 0.05 (two-tailed)
Critical Value : 0.422714
Test Value:

Decision:
Since 0.9113 > 0.4227, we can conclude there is not enough evidence at the 0.05 level to conclude
that there is a linear relationship in the population between the A and B.
Date : December 17, 2020
Submitted by : Acejan L. Jadie, LPT
Master of Arts in Education – Mathematics Education
College of Education
Submitted to :Marlon Ebaeguin
Assistant Professor of Educational Research and Evaluation
College of Education

Test III
Find the chi-square value for the following set of data. Then indicate if the obtained value of the chi-
square is statistically significant at the 0.05 level.

𝑯𝟎 : 𝑶 = 𝑬
𝐻𝑎 : 𝑶 ≠ 𝑬

Df = 2-1 = 1
Alpha = 0.05
Critical Value : 3.841
Test Value:

O
2 8 10
6 4 10
8 12 20

E
4 6 10
4 6 10
8 12 20

1 0.666667
1 0.666667

3.333333

Decision:
Since 3.333 < 3.841, then we fail to reject Ho. We can conclude there is not enough evidence at the
0.05 level to conclude that there is a significant difference.
Date : December 17, 2020
Submitted by : Acejan L. Jadie, LPT
Master of Arts in Education – Mathematics Education
College of Education
Submitted to :Marlon Ebaeguin
Assistant Professor of Educational Research and Evaluation
College of Education

Test IV
You have the responses of two groups of students (education and non-education majors) to an item in
an attitude scale. Find the chi-square value for this problem and indicate whether your obtained chi-
square value is statistically significant

𝑯𝟎 : 𝑶 = 𝑬
𝐻𝑎 : 𝑶 ≠ 𝑬

Df = (2-1)(5-1)=4
Alpha = 0.05
Critical Value : 9.488
Test Value:

O
7 8 10 9 6 40
8 10 7 8 7 40
15 18 17 17 13 80

E 7.5 9 8.5 8.5 6.5 40

7.5 9 8.5 8.5 6.5 40
15 18 17 17 13 80

0.033333 0.111111 0.264706 0.029412 0.038462

0.033333 0.111111 0.264706 0.029412 0.038462

0.954047

Decision:
Since 0.954047 < 9.488, then we fail to reject Ho. We can conclude there is not enough evidence at
the 0.05 level to conclude that the responses of two groups of students (education and non-
education majors) to an item in an attitude scale are significantly different.
Date : December 17, 2020
Submitted by : Acejan L. Jadie, LPT
Master of Arts in Education – Mathematics Education
College of Education
Submitted to :Marlon Ebaeguin
Assistant Professor of Educational Research and Evaluation
College of Education

Test V

1.

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0
1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020

2. 𝑦 = −377.234 + 0.22748𝑥
SUMMARY OUTPUT

Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.961261
R Square 0.924023
Adjusted R Square
0.913169
Standard Error 1.820233
Observations 9

ANOVA
df SS MS F Significance F
Regression 1 282.0673 282.0673 85.13317 3.6273E-05
Residual 7 23.19273 3.313247
Total 8 305.26

Coefficients
Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95% Upper 95%Lower 95.0%
Upper 95.0%
Intercept -377.243 48.57009 -7.76698 0.00011 -492.09311 -262.393 -492.093 -262.393
X Variable 1 0.22748 0.024654 9.226764 3.63E-05 0.16918148 0.285778 0.169181 0.285778

3. R =0.961261
Date : December 17, 2020
Submitted by : Acejan L. Jadie, LPT
Master of Arts in Education – Mathematics Education
College of Education
Submitted to :Marlon Ebaeguin
Assistant Professor of Educational Research and Evaluation
College of Education

Since P value is less than alpha=0.05, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a
significant linear relationship between x and y because the correlation coefficient is significantly
different from zero.

4. 1950: Table – 70.2, Equation - -377.234+0.22748(1950) =66.352

1982: Table – 74.5, Equation - -377.234+0.22748(1982)= 73.63136
5. There are slight difference based from no. 4 probably because of error residual variation of 0.076
or 7.6%.

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0
1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
6.
7. Yes, there is significant linear relationship that can be modelled by the equation: 𝑦 = −377.234 +
0.22748𝑥
8. Yes, during 1950 where recorded with 70 life expectancy.
9. No. 1950: Table – 70.2, Equation - -377.234+0.22748(1950) =66.352. There is a difference of
3.484 from the table and from the estimated value.
10. m=0.22748, this can be interpreted as the life expectancy increases by 0.22748 every year.
Date : December 17, 2020
Submitted by : Acejan L. Jadie, LPT
Master of Arts in Education – Mathematics Education
College of Education
Submitted to :Marlon Ebaeguin
Assistant Professor of Educational Research and Evaluation
College of Education

Test VI
a. r=0.673, p=0.033
b. Since 0.033 , 0.05, then we reject null hypothesis. Thus there is a significant difference.
Test VII
1. L
2. K
3. A
4. N
5. E
6. P
7.M
8.F
9. G
10. I
11. B
12. O
13. J
Date : December 17, 2020
Submitted by : Acejan L. Jadie, LPT
Master of Arts in Education – Mathematics Education
College of Education
Submitted to :Marlon Ebaeguin
Assistant Professor of Educational Research and Evaluation
College of Education

Test VIII
a.

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 9
1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 8
1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 7
1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 6
0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 6
1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 5
1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5
0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 4
1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 3
4.9
Cor 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3
Inc 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.7
0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.24 0.25 0.25 0.24 0.21 0.659864

1.99

b. Somewhat low. This test needs to be supplemented by other measures to determine grades.
There are probably some items which could be improved.

Test IX
Since we have 2 paired samples in an ordinal level, the fitting treatment for this is Wilcoxon Signed
Rank Test. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed that the test did elicit a statistically significant
change in Test A and Test B (W=6, p = 0.891). Thus, there is a significant difference between the
ranks of students who took the tests. Meaning the test is not consistent as a tool for measuring.