You are on page 1of 8

Reproductive Management of Dairy Cattle Based

on Synchronization of Estrous Cycles z

Y. FOLMAN, M. KAIM, Z. HERZ, and MIRIAM ROSENBERG


Institute of Animal Science
Agricultural Research Organization
The Volcani Center
P.O.B. 6
Bet Dagan 50250, Israel

ABSTRACT at 100 days after calving, 57, 75, and


High-yielding dairy cows (199) were 65%. A system of reproductive manage-
allotted to a control group or one of two ment is proposed in which observations
groups for synchronization of estrus. Syn- for estrous behavior and inseminations
chronization of estrus was accomplished are only during 6 days out of each 3 wk.
by either insertion of a progesterone-
releasing intravaginal device (progesterone INTRODUCTION
coil) for 7 days with .5 mg of the prosta-
Long intervals between calvings decrease
glandin analogue cloprostenol (Estru-
milk production (1, 12, 14) and hamper genetic
mate) administered 1 day before removal
progress of the dairy herd (15). Increased inter-
of the progesterone coil, or by adminis-
vals between calvings are mainly due to silent
tration of .5 mg of Estrumate followed
ovulations or undetected estrous periods and
13 days later by a progesterone coil in-
low conception rates (2, 5, 13, 15). Because of
serted for 9 days. Following each estrous
the short duration of many estrous periods (6,
synchronization regimen, cows were in-
10, 11), signs of estrus should be observed three
seminated during a fixed 6-day period (in-
or four times daily, and inseminations should
semination week). Into one-half of the
be once a day. On many farms, especially in
cows of each treatment group, a second
large herds containing 200 cows or more, there
progesterone coil was inserted 12 days
are many difficulties of employing such rou-
following the fixed-time insemination for
tines, and as a result many estrous periods are
9 days. Cows that calved within 21 days
missed.
were included in a cluster and were
The purpose of this study was to develop for
treated and inseminated simultaneously
large dairy herds a system that would reduce
at regular 3-wk intervals. Thus, insemina-
the effort required for detection of estrus. A
tion of synchronized cows was during
further aim of the investigation was to find a
only 6 out of each 21 days. The estrous
method by which most of the cows in the herd
synchronization regimens were applied so
would conceive within a defined narrow inter-
that the first fixed-time insemination for
val after parturition. Under this kind of repro-
any cow occurred between 59 and 79
ductive management it would be possible to
days after calving. Control cows were in-
start inseminations in each group of cows at
seminated following estrus, commencing
an interval postpartum that is optimal for high
59 days after calving.
milk yields.
Conception rates for cows of groups 1,
2, and 3 were 50, 56, and 51%. Pregnancy
MATERIALS A N D METHODS
rates at 25 days following the fixed-time
insemination were 53, 78, and 69%, and
Animals
The study included 199 cows out of a herd
of 350 dairy cows yielding approximately 8000
Received May 20, 1982.
1Contribution from the Agricultural Research kg of milk per lactation. Experimental cows
Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel. that calved between August 29, 1980, and
No. 359-E, 1982 Series. March 5, 1981, were housed and fed in open

1984 J Dairy Sci 67:153--160 153


154 FOLMAN ET AL.

GROUP TREATMENT SCHEDULE


sheds. Cows that calved within each 21-day
CONTROL INSEMINATED
AT OBSERVED ESTRUS
period were assigned to a cluster that was FIXED 2nd
ESTR TiME PRND PRID
treated simultaneously. Thus, during the experi- ADM , OUT

mental period of 27 wk, nine clusters were


formed that included 16 to 34 cows each. Cows P R,OT, E,TRUMA'EB - -- lNO nd;:--
of different clusters were housed together. FIXED
TIME 2 n d p R I D PRID
During the 1st mo following calving, cows with AI IN OUT
ESTR PRID PRID] ~ /~
low milk yields were culled. All other cows ADM IN OUr, A,OEDO' S
ESTRUMATE 13/PRID 9 L ~[~ /~ ____tNO2 n IN ESTRUS
that calved, including those with reproductive d PRID
problems, were included in the study. Cows
were examined by a veterinarian between 30 12 16 42 46 56
DAYS FOLLOWING THE BEGINNING OF TREATMENT
and 37 days after calving. Following these
examinations, 28 cows that were diagnosed to Figure 1. Treatment schedule of the control
and synchronization groups. PRID 7/Estrumate
have retained placentas, metritis, or cystic 6 = a progesterone-releasing intravaginal device
ovaries were given appropriate medical treat- (PRID) inserted for 7 days with .5 mg of cloprostenol
ment. Cows not considered healthy when syn- administered 1 day before PRID removal. Estrumate
chronization treatments were applied to the 13/PRID 9 = administration of .5 mg of cloprostenol
cluster to which they originally belonged were followed 13 days later by a PRID inserted for 9 days.
ESTR. ADM. = Estrumate (cloprostenol) administra-
transferred and synchronized with the subse- tion;Al = artificial insemination.
quent cluster. Following insemination, another
8 cows, diagnosed to have follicular cysts or
metritis, received medical treatment. insemination a second PRID was inserted into
Cows of each cluster were allotted into three half of the cows in each treatment group for
groups balanced relative to lactation number,
9 days.
body condition score, date of calving, manifes-
tation of estrus prior to treatment, and diag- Management of Reproduction
nosis of reproductive problems. Twenty-five
percent of the cows received no estrous syn- Throughout the experiment cows were ob-
chronization treatment (controls); the others served for signs of estrus four times daily, ap-
were allotted into two treatment groups (Figure proximately every 6 h; each observation lasted
1). at least 30 rain. Observation periods did not
coincide with feeding or milking periods. Cows
that were standing while mounted and cows
Synchronization Treatments that mounted cows not showing estrus during
Progesterone-releasing intravaginal devices two subsequent observations were regarded as
(PRID; CEVA, France), containing 1.55 or 2.25 being in estrus.
g of progesterone, and a prostaglandin F2a Insemination of control cows commenced
(PGF2o~) analogue cloprostenol (Estrumate; 59 days after calving. Following detection of
I.C.I., Great Britain) were used. In three clus- estrus, control cows were inseminated once at
ters, PRIDs of the two types were compared; 0700 h on any day except Saturday. Treated
the difference in conception rate was small and cows first were inseminated between 59 and 79
statistically not significant. In all treatments days following parturition.
the PRID was used without the estradiol ben- Cows of the treatment groups were insemi-
zoate capsule with which it is marketed. nated only during days 2 to 7 following
Prior to first insemination methods of syn- removal of the first PRID (day of PRID re-
chronization were: (1) a PRID was inserted for moval = day 0). The 6 days in which insemi-
7 days with .5 mg of Estrumate injected intra- nations were performed were designated "the
muscularly 1 day before PRID removal. This insemination week." Each insemination week
method is designated PRID 7/Estrumate 6. was followed by 2 wk during which no treated
(II) .5 mg of Estrumate was administered, fol- cows were inseminated. Every 3rd wk a new
lowed 13 days later by a PRID, which was in- cluster of cows was given synchronization
serted for 9 days. This method is designated treatments and inseminated. Thus, insemina-
Estrumate 13/PRID 9. Twelve days after first tions of consecutive clusters were at regular 3-

Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 67, No. 1, 1984


REPRODUCTION BY ESTRUS-SYNCHRONIZED COWS 155

removal. C o w s d e t e c t e d in estrus 3 to 6 d a y s
I 21 days ~ 21 days I ~1 days i
f o l l o w i n g P R I D removal were r e i n s e m i n a t e d t h e
OEQRdA] OEQnd AI OEend AI
L week ~ iweek p q week I f o l l o w i n g m o r n i n g . C o w s o f t r e a t m e n t groups,
w h e t h e r or n o t a s e c o n d P R I D was inserted,
I~'c ...... SY~nechrt°n~Zn~ti°nI l St A[~] [ 7n. . . . . ~,d A~
t h a t r e t u r n e d to estrus w i t h i n t h e s u b s e q u e n t
Synchronization
2 nd cluster treatment I lS~ A] I 12 ndAI i n s e m i n a t i o n w e e k and were i n s e m i n a t e d o n t h e
Synchronization
3 ~d cluster ~re~tment ~ s t AI m o r n i n g f o l l o w i n g estrus. C o n t r o l and t r e a t e d
c o w s o f each cluster were i n s e m i n a t e d w i t h
s e m e n o b t a i n e d in a single ejaculate.
Figure 2. Schedule of activities under the described Diagnosis o f p r e g n a n c y was b y p a l p a t i o n o f
system of reproductive management. Every 3 wk a t h e u t e r u s per r e c t u m 45 t o 50 days f o l l o w i n g
new cluster of cows that calved within 21 days was i n s e m i n a t i o n . T h e p e r c e n t a g e o f cows diag-
treated and inseminated. OE = Observation for estrus;
AI = artificial insemination. n o s e d as p r e g n a n t f r o m t h e n u m b e r o f c o w s
i n s e m i n a t e d was c o n c e p t i o n rate. The p e r c e n t -
age o f c o w s p r e g n a n t f r o m t h e t o t a l n u m b e r o f
w k intervals, t h e first i n s e m i n a t i o n o f cows o f
c o w s in a g r o u p was p r e g n a n c y rate. C o w s o f
t h e third d u s t e r coinciding with t h e s e c o n d
i n s e m i n a t i o n o f c o w s o f t h e s e c o n d cluster and t h e t r e a t m e n t groups diagnosed n o t p r e g n a n t
w i t h t h e t h i r d i n s e m i n a t i o n o f cows o f t h e first were t r a n s f e r r e d t o t h e s u b s e q u e n t d u s t e r and
cluster (Figure 2). given t h e PRID 7 / E s t r u m a t e 6 t r e a t m e n t . In-
C o w s in estrus w i t h i n 40 h f o l l o w i n g re- c l u d e d in this c a t e g o r y are cows t h a t a p p e a r e d
moval o f t h e first PRID were i n s e m i n a t e d at in h e a t o u t s i d e t h e i n s e m i n a t i o n weeks.
49 and 56 h after PRID removal. All o t h e r cows
o f the t r e a t m e n t g r o u p s (including t h o s e t h a t Progesterone Determination
had lost PRIDs) were given t w o f i x e d - t i m e T o characterize the p r o g e s t e r o n e profile in
i n s e m i n a t i o n s , 56 and 72 h f o l l o w i n g PRID plasma p r i o r to first i n s e m i n a t i o n , b l o o d was

TABLE 1. Frequency distribution (%) of estrus appearance in treated cows during the "insemination week".

Estrus subsequent
Following removal of to first insemination
the first PRID
Following
PRID 7/ Estrumate 13/ removal of Without
Days following Estrumate 6 PRID 9 a second a second
PRID removal 2 (74) 3 (72) 4 PRID s (19) PRID (29)

1-2 66.2* 50.0* 94.7** 62.1"*


3-4 10.8 20.8 5.3 13.7
5-6 2.7 8.3 0 6.9
7--21 2.7 5.6 0 17.2

Not observed in
estrus within
21 days 17.6 15.3

Insemination week = 6 days out of each 3 wk during which artificial inseminations were carried out.
2Day of PRID (progesterone-releasing intravaginal device) removal = day O.
3Number of cows in parentheses.
4Not including two cows that lost PRIDs.
SA second PRID was inserted 12 days after the fixed-time insemination for 9 days.
*P~<.05.
**P~<.02.

Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 67, No. 1, 1984


156 FOLMAN ET AL.

collected from the jugular vein three times they had reached by June 30.
weekly from 76 cows belonging to four clus- Differences in progesterone between the
ters during 20 days preceding the first syn- various treatment groups were evaluated by an
chronized estrus. Plasma was separated, stored analysis of variance which was followed by the
at - 1 8 ° C , and progesterone concentration was Student-Newman-Keuls multiple range test.
determined as in (17). Differences in the appearance of estrus follow-
ing synchronization, conception, and pregnancy
Analysis of Data rates were analyzed by Chi-square.
The interval from PRID removal to manifes-
tation of estrus was determined for all cows
except two animals of the Estrumate 13/PRID RESULTS
9 treatment that lost the first PRID and two
cows of the same treatment that lost the second Plasma Progesterone
PRID. Percentages of cows in esrrus at vari- Progesterone concentrations in plasma col-
ous intervals after treatment are in Table lected from the jugular vein during the estrous
1. Intervals between calving and first insemina- cycle preceding the first synchronized estrus
tions were computed for ali 199 cows in- are in Figure 3. Progesterone concentrations of
cluded in the experiment (Table 2). Concep- cows given Estrumate 13/PRID 9 treatment
tion rates (Table 3) were computed for all cows were similar to those of control cows. However,
except one of the control group that did not progesterone concentrations of cows given
show heat and was not inseminated. One cow PRID 7/Estrumate 6 treatment differed from
from the PRID 7/Estrumate 6 group that suf- those of control and Estrumate 13/PRID 9 ani-
fered a sudden decline of milk yield and was mals. Furthermore, the progesterone profile
culled after her second insemination, was not differed between cows in which the PRID was
included in computation of pregnancy rates or inserted during the first 10 days of the estrous
open days. cycle and those in which the PRID was inserted
Eight cows from the last two clusters were during the later part of the cycle. In cows of
not pregnant by the end of June. Because of the PRID 7/Estrumate 6 group in which PRIDs
the possible stress effect of summer heat on were inserted on days 1 to 10 of the estrous
conception rate (6), inseminations on these cycle, progesterone increased 8 to 10 days later
cows later than June 30 were not included in and declined 2 to 6 days after those of the
computation of conception rates (Table 3). The other groups. In these cows progesterone was
number of open days o f these cows was com- higher than 2 ng/ml plasma, on the average,
puted by adding 21 to the number of open days during 8 days only versus 14 days for cows of

TABLE 2. Frequency distribution (%) of the interval between calving and the first insemination.

Group
Postpartum PRID 72/ Estrumate 13/
interval Control Estrumate 6 PRID 9
(days) (51) 1 (74) (74)

59-70 41.1 43.2 44.6


71-80 29.4 47.3 45.9
81-90 13.7 6.8 4.1
91--100 5.9 2.7 1.4
101--120 7.8 . .. 4.1

Not inseminated
until 120 days 2.0

Number of cows in parentheses.


2 PRID = Progesterone-releasing intravaginal device.

Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 67, No. 1, 1984


TABLE 3. Conception and pregnancy rates (%) of control and treated cows. 70
t~
70
PRID 7/Estrumate 6 Estrumate 13/PR1D 9 0
With a Without With a Without
second a second second a second
Control PRID 2 PRID Total PRID 2 PRID Total
Group (51) ~ (37) (37) (74) (37) (37) ( 7 4) Z

Conception rate (%) after: t~


1st insemination 52.0 64.9 43.2 54.1 48.6 51.4 50.0
70
1st and 2nd inseminations 49.3 63.0 56.0 59.4 51.0 54.2 52.6
All inseminations 49.5 60.7 50.8 55.5 47.6 53.8 50.8
,<
Pregnancy rate (%) at: Z
25 days after the date of the
fixed-time insemination 52.9 a 80.6 75.7 78.1 b 67.6 70.3 68.9 ab 70
©
100 days after calving 56.9 80.6 70.3 75.3 62.2 67.6 64.9

I One cow not inseminated was not included in the calculation of conception rate; number o f cows in parentheses. ~7
2A second PRID (progesterone-releasing intravaginal device) was inserted 12 days after the fixed-time insemination for 9 days. ©
a,bp~<.02.

<
o

ox

Z
.o

00
4~
158 FOLMAN ET AL.

all the other groups. Thus, a reduction of length estrus (7.8%); not inseminated because of
of the estrous cycle prior to first insemination human error (3.9%); inseminations due but not
occurred for cows of the PRID 7/Estrumate 6 performed on Saturday (3.9%); inseminations
group treated at the beginning of the cycle. postponed because of medical treatment
(3.9%). The delay of synchronization treatment
Synchronization of Estrus and insemination of 9.5% of the cows in the
Prior to First Insemination treated groups was for medical problems.
During 2 days following removal of the first
PRID, 66.2 and 50.0% of the cows of treat- Conception and Pregnancy Rates
ments PRID 7/Estrumate 6 and Estrumate 13/
Conception rate from first insemination was
PRID 9, respectively, were observed in estrus
similar and statistically not different for all
(P<.05; Table 1). During days 3 and 4 follow-
groups (Table 3) except treatment PRID 7/
ing PRID removal an additional 10.8 and 20.8%
Estrumate 6 where cows that were inserted
of cows of PRID 7/Estrumate 6 and Estrumate
with a second PRID had a higher (P<.07) con-
13/PRID 9 treatments, respectively, were
ception rate than cows without a second PRID.
detected in estrus. Twenty-four cows (16.4%)
Conception rate from first insemination of
of both synchronization treatment groups were
cows of the PRID 7/Estrumate 6 treatments
not detected in estrus within 3 wk of PRID
that were inserted with a PRID during days 1 to
removal. Nevertheless, 45.8% of these con-
10 of the estrous cycle was 69 versus 42% of
ceived from the fixed-time insemination, indi-
cows that were treated during days 11 to 20 of
cating that ovulation must have occurred. Six the cycle (P<.10). Six and 17 cows of the
cows appeared in heat outside the insemination
PRID 7/Estrumate 6 and the Estrumate 13/
week during days 7 to 21 following removal of
PRID 9 groups, respectively, were reinsemi-
the first PRID.
nated 2 to 5 days following the fixed-time in-
semination; 19 (82.6%) of these cows became
Synchronization of Estrus
Prior to the Second or Later Inseminations
pregnant. Data of Table 3 include under "all
inseminations" the conception rates of 22 cows
Following the first insemination, 48 cows from treatment groups that were "nonpreg-
returned to estrus in the subsequent insemina- n a n t " at pregnancy diagnosis and that were
tion week. Among cows that returned and were retreated with PRID 7/Estrumate 6. Fifteen of
treated with a second PRID, 95% were detected these cows had been observed in estrus outside
in estrus on days 1 and 2 of the insemination the "insemination weeks" but were not treated
week. Only 62% of the cows that did not before regular examination of pregnancy.
receive a second PRID appeared in estrus during Data in Table 3 indicate that between 68
the first 2 days of the insemination week and 81% of the treated cows were pregnant 25
(P<.02). Subsequent to second insemination, days following the fixed-time insemination; at
62 estrous periods were recorded. Of these that time only 53% of the control cows had
periods, 62.9 and 19.3% were observed during conceived (P<.02). Eighty days after calving
days 1 to 3 and 4 to 6, respectively, of the in- percentage of pregnant cows were 33.3, 50.7,
semination weeks, whereas 17.7% of the heats and 48.0 for control, PRID 7/Estrumate 6, and
were recorded outside the insemination weeks. Estrumate 13/PRID 9, respectively (NS). One
hundred days following parturition, percentages
Interval to First Insemination
of pregnant cows were 56.9, 75.3, and 64.9 for
The proportion of synchronized cows that control, PRID 7/Estrumate 6, and Estrumate
were inseminated by 80 days after parturition 13/PRID 9 (P<.10). The difference between
was larger than of control cows-90.5% for cows that were treated with a second PRID and
both treatment groups versus 70.5% for con- those that were not treated was small and statis-
trols (Table 2). Several reasons caused the de- tically not significant. At 120 and 140 days
lay of the first insemination of control cows: after calving, the difference in pregnancy rate
estrus was not observed between 59 and 80 between the three groups was less than 10
days after calving, although it was observed percentage points.
earlier (9.8%); late appearance of the first The mean (± SE) interval between calving

Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 67, No. 1, 1984


REPRODUCTION BY ESTRUS-SYNCHRONIZED COWS 159

and c o n c e p t i o n for cows o f the control, P R I D


7 / E s t r u m a t e 6, and Estrumate 13/PRID 9
groups was 99 + 5, 93 -+ 4 and 98 +- 5. Percents v

of cows culled f r o m the three groups 141 days


or more after calving were 9.8, 5.5 and 5.4.
N o n e of these cows was diagnosed pregnant
when culled.

DISCUSSION

R e p r o d u c t i o n in large dairy herds can be


S.E. .4z, 55 .59 .38 .52 56 .48 .54 .41 30.09
managed by a c o n t i n u o u s system based on
I I P I I I I I I I I
synchronization o f estrous cycles by c o m m e r - 19-20 17-18 ~5-16 13-14 11-12 9-10 7-8 5-6 3-~ 1-2 0
DAYS PRECEDING ESTRUS
cially available products. U n d e r the p r o p o s e d
system, observations for estrus behavior and in- Figure 3. Mean (-+ SE)jugular vein progesterone
(ng/ml plasma) in cows during 20 days preceding the
seminations are during 6 days o u t of every 3
first synchronized estrus: 11 unsynchronized control
wk. In the t w o estrus s y n c h r o n i z a t i o n m e t h o d s cows (z~); PRID 7/Estrumate 6--PRIDs inserted on
investigated, progesterone was d e p l o y e d in con- days 1 to 10 of the estrous cycle, 23 cows (o); PRID
j u n c t i o n with a prostaglandin F2a analog (7, 8, 7/Estrumate 6--PRIDs inserted on days 11 to 20 of
16). These t r e a t m e n t s were preferred to breed- the estrous cycle, 10 cows (o); and Estrumate 13/
PRID 9, 32 cows (A). *Significantly different (P<.05)
ing of groups of cows f o l l o w i n g synchroniza- from the three other groups.
tion by melengestrol acetate or by G n R H
(gonadotropin releasing h o r m o n e ) f o l l o w e d by
t w o P G F 2 a injections applied or proposed
( 3 , 4 , 9). three times as large as in the treated groups.
The similarity b e t w e e n progesterone concen- F o l l o w i n g first insemination, cows of the
trations in plasma of cows of control and Estru- P R I D 7 / E s t r u m a t e 6 t r e a t m e n t that were n o t
m a t e 13/PRID 9 groups (Figure 3) indicates treated with a second P R I D had a lower con-
that the latter treatment, although causing ception rate than cows of the control and o t h e r
synchronization, mimics the profile of proges- t r e a t m e n t groups (Table 3). C o n c e p t i o n was
t e r o n e during an estrous cycle. However, the particularly l o w for cows o f this t r e a t m e n t that
P R I D 7 / E s t r u m a t e 6 treatment, d e p e n d i n g received the PRID during the second half o f
u p o n the stage of the estrous cycle when treat- the estrous cycle preceding insemination. These
m e n t begins, affects lengths of cycles and con- cows also had lower progesterone concentra-
centrations of progesterone in plasma. tions 3 to 4 days before insemination than cows
C o n c e p t i o n rate o f treated cows was equal that were treated on days 1 to 10 of the cycle
to or higher than that of control cows, which (Figure 3). L o w progesterone in plasma and ab-
were k e p t under careful reproductive manage- sence of a steep decline of the progesterone
m e n t including four daily observations for curve before insemination are correlated with
estrous behavior (Table 3). The percentage of p o o r c o n c e p t i o n (17). In the P R I D 7 / E s t r u m a t e
cows f r o m the PRID 7 / E s t r u m a t e 6 t r e a t m e n t 6 group, the insertion of a second PRID seems
pregnant 25 days after the fixed-time insemina- to have had a favorable effect on c o n c e p t i o n
tion was significantly greater than that of the f r o m the first insemination (P<.07).
control group (Table 3). The main reason for In the PRID 7 / E s t r u m a t e 6 t r e a t m e n t only
the earlier c o n c e p t i o n of treated cows was that, 8% of all inseminations were on days 5 to 7 of
as a result of the fixed-time insemination, the insemination week. It seems possible, there-
90.5% of the treated cows were inseminated fore, that estrus observation and insemination
first b e t w e e n 59 and 80 days after calving periods could be reduced to as few as 3 days of
(Table 2). The remainder were cows that suf- every 3 wk. Also treated cows were given two
fered f r o m medical p r o b l e m s and were trans- inseminations following removal of the first
ferred to a subsequent cluster. In the control PRID. More work is required to determine
group the percentage of cows that were insemi- w h e t h e r fewer days of insemination and one in-
nated first m o r e than 80 days after calving was semination at a fixed-time will result in con-

Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 67, No. 1, 1984


160 FOLMAN ET AL.

c e p t i o n o r p r e g n a n c y rates c o m p a r a b l e t o t h o s e nents of a herd calving interval. Vet. Rec. 95:319.


6 Folman, Y., A. Berman, Z. Herz, M. Kaim, M.
in this r e p o r t .
Rosenberg, M. Maman, and S. Gordin. 1979. Milk
The difference between control and treated yield and fertility of high-yielding dairy cows in a
g r o u p s in p e r c e n t a g e o f cows p r e g n a n t at 25 sub-tropical climate during summer and winter. J.
days a f t e r t h e f i x e d - t i m e i n s e m i n a t i o n ( P < . 0 2 ) Dairy Res. 46:411.
a n d at 100 d a y s a f t e r calving ( P < . 1 0 ) i n d i c a t e s 7 Folman, V., S. R. McPhee, and I. A. Cumming.
1981. The effect of 'estrumate' followed by pro-
t h a t t h e s y n c h r o n i z a t i o n t r e a t m e n t significantly
gesterone coils on oestrus synchronization and con-
increased t h e p e r c e n t a g e o f cows p r e g n a n t 80 ception of post-partum beef and dairy cows. Anim.
to 100 d a y s a f t e r calving. Reprod. Sci. 4:117.
8 Hansel, W., and W. E. Beal. 1979. Ovulation con-
trol in cattle. Page 91 in Animal reproduction. H.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Hawk, ed. Allanheld, Osmun, Montclair, NJ.
A u t h o r s t h a n k t h e dairy f a r m s t a f f o f 9 Huertas Vega, E., J. H. Britt, and L. C. Ulberg.
K i b b u t z N a ' a n , Mara Heller, E s t h e r Yizreeli, 1972. System for managing reproduction in dairy
cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 55:401. (Abstr.)
a n d Lev G e l f e n d f o r t h e i r skillful assistance in
10 Hurnik, J. F., G. J. King, and H. A. Robertson.
this e x p e r i m e n t . 1975. Estrous and related behavior in postpartum
This w o r k was s u p p o r t e d b y t h e Israel C a t t l e Holstein cow~ Appl. Anim. Ethol. 2: 55.
Breeders A s s o c i a t i o n a n d t h e I n t e r n a t i o n a l 11 Itamar, M., and H. Schindler. 1976. Length of
A t o m i c Energy A g e n c y , V i e n n a . We also t h a n k oestrus and mounting activity of postpartum dairy
cows. Page 1192 in Proc. VIIIth Int. Congr. Anim.
CEVA, France, a n d ABIC a n d P R O M E D I C O , Reprod. Artif. Insem., Vol. V., Krakow.
Israel, f o r t h e k i n d supplies of P R I D s a n d 12 James, A. D., and R. J. Esslemont. 1979. The eco-
Estrumate. nomics of calving intervals. Anim. Prod. 29:157.
REFERENCES 13 Olds, D. 1974. Probability of failing to observe or
report cows in estrus. J. Dairy Sci. 57:626. (Abstr.)
1 Bar-Anan, R., and M. Soller. 1979. The effects of 14 Olds, D., T. Cooper, and F. A. Thrift. 1979.
days open on milk yield and on breeding policy Effects of days open on economic aspects of cur-
post-partum. Anim. Prod. 29:109. rent lactation. J. Dairy Sci. 62:1167.
2 Barr, H. L. 1975. Influence of estrus detection on 15 Pelissier, C. L. 1978. Fertility problems under large
days open in dairy herds. J. Dairy Sci. 58:246. herd management. Page 201 in Large dairy herd
3 Britt, J. H. 1978. Systematic management of re- management. C. J. Wilcox et al., ed. Univ. Presses
production in groups of dairy cows. Page 179 in Florida, Gainesville.
Large dairy herd management. C. J. Wilcox et al., 16 Roche, J. F. 1976. Fertility in cows after treat-
ed. Univ. Presses Florida, Gainesville. ment with a prostaglandin analogue with or with-
4 Britt, J. H., E. Huertas Vega, and L. C. Ulberg. out progesterone. J. Reprod. Fertil. 46: 341.
1972. Managing reproduction in dairy cattle: 17 Rosenberg, M., Z. Herz, M. Davidson, and Folman,
1. progestogens for control of estrus in dairy cows. Y. 1977. Seasonal variation in post-partum plasma
J. Dairy Sci. 55:598. progesterone levels and conception in primiparous
5 Esslemont, R. J., and P. R. Ellis. 1974. Compo- and multiparous cows. J. Reprod. Fertil. 51:363.

Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 67, No. 1, 1984

You might also like