Genria Nicole G.

Guzman
LEGARES (Special Class)
11621249

1. Under RA No. 9165, what are the procedures that must be observed by the authorities
with respect to the custody and disposition of confiscated, seized, and/or surrendered
dangerous drugs, plant sources of dangerous drugs, controlled precursors and essential
chemicals, instruments/paraphernalia and/or laboratory equipment?

Answer:
Sec. 21. of RA No. 9165 states:
The PDEA shall take charge and have custody of all dangerous drugs, plant sources of dangerous
drugs, controlled precursors and essential chemicals, as well as instruments/paraphernalia and/or
laboratory equipment so confiscated, seized and/or surrendered, for proper disposition in the
following manner:
1) The apprehending team having initial custody and control of the drugs shall, immediately after
seizure and confiscation, physically inventory and photograph the same in the presence of the
accused or the person/s from whom such items were confiscated and/or seized, or his/her
representative or counsel, a representative from the media and the Department of Justice, and any
elected public official who shall be required to sign the copies of the inventory and be given a
copy thereof.
2) Within twenty-four (24) hours upon confiscation/seizure of dangerous drugs, plant sources of
dangerous drugs, controlled precursors and essential chemicals, as well as
instruments/paraphernalia and/or laboratory equipment, the same shall be submitted to the PDEA
Forensic Laboratory for a qualitative and quantitative examination.
3) A certification of the forensic laboratory examination results, which shall be done under oath
by the forensic laboratory examiner, shall be issued within twenty-four (24) hours after the
receipt of the subject item/s: Provided, That when the volume of the dangerous drugs, plant
sources of dangerous drugs, and controlled precursors and essential chemicals does not allow the
completion of testing within the time frame, a partial laboratory examination report shall be
provisionally issued stating therein the quantities of dangerous drugs still to be examined by the
forensic laboratory: Provided, however, That a final certification shall be issued on the
completed forensic laboratory examination on the same within the next twenty-four (24) hours.
4) After the filing of the criminal case, the Court shall, within seventy-two (72) hours, conduct
an ocular inspection of the confiscated, seized and/or surrendered dangerous drugs, plant sources
of dangerous drugs, and controlled precursors and essential chemicals, including the
instruments/paraphernalia and/or laboratory equipment, and through the PDEA shall within
twenty-four (24) hours thereafter proceed with the destruction or burning of the same, in the
presence of the accused or the person/s from whom such items were confiscated and/or seized, or
his/her representative or counsel, a representative from the media and the Department of Justice,
civil society groups and any elected public official. The Board shall draw up the guidelines on
the manner of proper disposition and destruction of such item/s which shall be borne by the
offender: Provided, That - 18 - those item/s of lawful commerce, as determined by the Board,
shall be donated, used or recycled for legitimate purposes: Provided, further, That a
representative sample, duly weighed and recorded is retained.
5) The Board shall then issue a sworn certification as to the fact of destruction or burning of the
subject item/s which, together with the representative sample/s in the custody of the PDEA, shall
be submitted to the court having jurisdiction over the case. In all instances, the representative
sample/s shall be kept to a minimum quantity as determined by the Board.
6) The alleged offender or his/her representative or counsel shall be allowed to personally
observe all of the above proceedings and his/her presence shall not constitute an admission of
guilt. In case the said offender or accused refuses or fails to appoint a representative after due
notice in writing to the accused or his/her counsel within seventy-two (72) hours before the
actual burning or destruction of the evidence in question, the Secretary of Justice shall appoint a
member of the public attorney’s office to represent the former.
7) After the promulgation and judgment in the criminal case wherein the representative sample/s
was presented as evidence in court, the trial prosecutor shall inform the Board of the final
termination of the case and, in turn, shall request the court for leave to turn over the said
representative sample/s to the PDEA for proper disposition and destruction within twenty-four
(24) hours from receipt of the same.
8) Transitory Provision: a) Within twenty-four (24) hours from the effectivity of this Act,
dangerous drugs defined herein which are presently in possession of law enforcement agencies
shall, with leave of court, be burned or destroyed, in the presence of representatives of the court,
Department of Justice, Department of Health and the accused/and or his counsel, and, b) Pending
the organization of PDEA, the custody, disposition, and burning or destruction of
seized/surrendered dangerous drugs provided under this Section shall be implemented by the
Department of Health.

2. Under RA No. 10175, what are the different offenses considered as cybercrimes?

Answer: Sec. 4. of RA No. 10175 states that, The following acts constitute the offense of
cybercrime punishable under this Act:

(a) Offenses against the confidentiality, integrity and availability of computer data and systems:

(1) Illegal Access. – The access to the whole or any part of a computer system without right.

(2) Illegal Interception. – The interception made by technical means without right of any non-
public transmission of computer data to, from, or within a computer system including
electromagnetic emissions from a computer system carrying such computer data.

(3) Data Interference. — The intentional or reckless alteration, damaging, deletion or

deterioration of computer data, electronic document, or electronic data message, without right,
including the introduction or transmission of viruses.

(4) System Interference. — The intentional alteration or reckless hindering or interference with
the functioning of a computer or computer network by inputting, transmitting, damaging,
deleting, deteriorating, altering or suppressing computer data or program, electronic document,
or electronic data message, without right or authority, including the introduction or transmission
of viruses.
(5) Misuse of Devices.

(i) The use, production, sale, procurement, importation, distribution, or otherwise making
available, without right, of:

(aa) A device, including a computer program, designed or adapted primarily for the purpose of
committing any of the offenses under this Act; or

(bb) A computer password, access code, or similar data by which the whole or any part of a
computer system is capable of being accessed with intent that it be used for the purpose of
committing any of the offenses under this Act.

(ii) The possession of an item referred to in paragraphs 5(i)(aa) or (bb) above with intent to use
said devices for the purpose of committing any of the offenses under this section.

(6) Cyber-squatting. – The acquisition of a domain name over the internet in bad faith to profit,
mislead, destroy reputation, and deprive others from registering the same, if such a domain name
is:

(i) Similar, identical, or confusingly similar to an existing trademark registered with the
appropriate government agency at the time of the domain name registration:

(ii) Identical or in any way similar with the name of a person other than the registrant, in case of
a personal name; and

(iii) Acquired without right or with intellectual property interests in it.

(b) Computer-related Offenses:

(1) Computer-related Forgery. —

(i) The input, alteration, or deletion of any computer data without right resulting in inauthentic
data with the intent that it be considered or acted upon for legal purposes as if it were authentic,
regardless whether or not the data is directly readable and intelligible; or

(ii) The act of knowingly using computer data which is the product of computer-related forgery
as defined herein, for the purpose of perpetuating a fraudulent or dishonest design.

(2) Computer-related Fraud. — The unauthorized input, alteration, or deletion of computer data
or program or interference in the functioning of a computer system, causing damage thereby with
fraudulent intent: Provided,  That if no

damage has yet been caused, the penalty imposable shall be one (1) degree lower.

(3) Computer-related Identity Theft. – The intentional acquisition, use, misuse, transfer,
possession, alteration or deletion of identifying information belonging to another, whether
natural or juridical, without right: Provided, That if no damage has yet been caused, the penalty
imposable shall be one (1) degree lower.

(c) Content-related Offenses:

(1) Cybersex. — The willful engagement, maintenance, control, or operation, directly or

indirectly, of any lascivious exhibition of sexual organs or sexual activity, with the aid of a
computer system, for favor or consideration.

(2) Child Pornography. — The unlawful or prohibited acts defined and punishable by Republic
Act No. 9775 or the Anti-Child Pornography Act of 2009, committed through a computer
system: Provided, That the penalty to be imposed shall be (1) one degree higher than that
provided for in Republic Act No. 9775.

(3) Unsolicited Commercial Communications. — The transmission of commercial electronic

communication with the use of computer system which seek to advertise, sell, or offer for sale
products and services are prohibited unless:

(i) There is prior affirmative consent from the recipient; or

(ii) The primary intent of the communication is for service and/or administrative announcements
from the sender to its existing users, subscribers or customers; or

(iii) The following conditions are present:

(aa) The commercial electronic communication contains a simple, valid, and reliable way for the
recipient to reject. receipt of further commercial electronic messages (opt-out) from the same
source;

(bb) The commercial electronic communication does not purposely disguise the source of the
electronic message; and

(cc) The commercial electronic communication does not purposely include misleading
information in any part of the message in order to induce the recipients to read the message.

(4) Libel. — The unlawful or prohibited acts of libel as defined in Article 355 of the Revised
Penal Code, as amended, committed through a computer system or any other similar means
which may be devised in the future.

Sec. 5. Of RA No. 10175 also states that that following acts shall also constitute offense:

(a) Aiding or Abetting in the Commission of Cybercrime. – Any person who willfully abets or
aids in the commission of any of the offenses enumerated in this Act shall be held liable.

(b) Attempt in the Commission of Cybercrime. — Any person who willfully attempts to commit
any of the offenses enumerated in this Act shall be held liable.
3. Cite an example of a recent law that has expressly repealed a previously enacted law.
Cite the specific repeal provision of the law.

Answer:
Republic Act No. 11229 expressly repealed Section 5 on the age of the children prohibited to sit
in front seat of Republic Act No. 8750 and Section 11 thereof on the use of special car seats.

SEC. 17. Repealing Clause. - Section 5 on the age of the children prohibited to sit in
front seat of Republic Act No. 8750 and Section 11 thereof on the use of special car seats are
hereby amended. All other laws, decrees, executive orders, rules and regulations, issuances or
parts thereof inconsistent with this Act are hereby repealed or amended accordingly.

4. According to the Official Gazette, what is the most recent law enacted?

Answer:
According to the Official Gazette, the most recent law enacted is Executive Order No. 80, signed
on May 28, 2019 and was uploaded on the Official Gazette Website on May 31, 2019.

5. What are anti-competitive agreements under RA No. 10667?

Answer:
Chapter III. Sec. 14. states what the anti-competitive agreements are under RA No. 10667:

(a) The following agreements, between or among competitors, are per se prohibited:

(1) Restricting competition as to price, or components thereof, or other terms of trade;

(2) Fixing price at an auction or in any form of bidding including cover bidding, bid suppression,
bid rotation and market allocation and other analogous practices of bid manipulation;

(b) The following agreements, between or among competitors which have the object or effect of
substantially preventing, restricting or lessening competition shall be prohibited:

(1) Setting, Kmiting, or controlling production, markets, technical development, or investment;

(2) Dividing or sharing the market, whether by volume of sales or purchases, territory, type of
goods or services, buyers or sellers or any other means;

(c) Agreements other than those specified in (a) and (b) of this section which have the object or
effect of substantially preventing, restricting or lessening competition shall also be
prohibited: Provided, Those which contribute to improving the production or distribution of
goods and services or to promoting technical or economic progress, while allowing consumers a
fair share of the resulting benefits, may not necessarily be deemed a violation of this Act.

An entity that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with another entity or
entities, have common economic interests, and are not otherwise able to decide or act
independently of each other, shall not be considered competitors for purposes of this section.