Professional Documents
Culture Documents
and Services
Chapter Eight
Publically produced Private Goods & Services (Rival & Excludable) for their MERIT
Health & Education
Publically provided club goods (Non-Rival but Excludable)
Postal Services, Telecommunications with changing trend
Public provision of Common Goods (Rival but Non-Excludable)
Development of a tourist resort with public exchequer
There is a shift away from public production to private production (with regulation)
especially in Gas, electricity, telecom and transportation (Air, road and Rail) sectors
Public Interest
Served by the Government like
National defence for collective national welfare
Public schools for promoting national values not just skills
Support of a specific industry (like textile)
Civil Services Academy 48th CTP Muhammad Salahuddin Ayyubi *
Nationalization by taking control of key economic sectors
Difference between ideology-driven and
5
circumstances-driven Nationalization
Nationalization of some Swedish banks in 1992 and nationalization of several severely
distressed financial institutions in the United States in 2008,
These government takeovers are meant to be temporary, as indicated by the terms and form of
the takeover
There is often a timetable for the public sale of the government’s stake
Adoption of conservatorship model
purchase of preferred (nonvoting) shares signal the government’s desire to refrain from engagement in the
business’s day-to-day operations
The rest of the chapter is meant for better understanding of how to strike that balance
Civil Services Academy 48th CTP Muhammad Salahuddin Ayyubi *
Natural Monopoly: Public
Production of Private Goods
1 10 10 10
2 18 9 8
3 24 8 6
4 28 7 4 Demand
5 30 6 2
0 1 Quantity of Output
6
6 30 5 0
For any level of output blue line
Those who cant afford at higher price (price or AR) is more than
are allowed to use with lower price. incremental revenue (MR).
11
The Basic Economics of Natural Monopoly
Q* Output with no threat of a rival
Increase revenue from less elastic product could be used to cross-subsidise the users of more elastic product
Natural monopolist of postal services may charge a higher price for urgent postal deliveries (less elastic)
to cross-subsidize normal postal deliveries (More elastic)
Natural monopolist of power supply could do the same for users of electricity
The issue of cross-subsidy is deeply political for its consequences across groups for
politically determined elasticities and prices.
Civil Services Academy 48th CTP Muhammad Salahuddin Ayyubi *
14 There is less decrease in
demand (horizontal axis) for
the same ‘Price increase’
(on vertical axis) in Case-A
[less elastic] than in Case-B
[more elastic].
The multi-product
monopolist may be allowed
to charge higher price in
Case-A to cross-subsidise
users in Case-B
Critical Evaluation
of Possible Choices