In short Of these What were How did she What are

phrases, phrases, some support this your

describe the what is the arguments, argument? question
article? relevance to Ms. Jane in her
the story Austen support of
itself? presented. the
argument
she
presented
?
Wealth is Self-interest Ms. Jane She supported Is this
associated to can be in the Austen cited this as she argument
satiating our form of Smith who mentioned that: trying to
self-interest. power, profit, stated that “It is not from imply that
status symbol “Our self- the benevolence it should
etc. Its delusion of the butcher, be “your
relevance in [dictates us] the brewer, or wealth is
the story was that it is the baker that everyone’s
exhibited better to be we expect our wealth?”
because it rich that dinner, but from What’s so
talks about rouses and regard to their wrong in
the deception keeps in self-interest.” appeasing
of wealth and continual self-
how it suffice motion the interest
merely for industry of while
self-gains mankind.” sufficing
and not Meaning to the need of
equitably for say, we are other
the benefit of too engrossed people and
the mass. on becoming benefitting
rich that the from it?
rise of
different
industries and
businesses are
not intended
 to suffice
human social
needs, rather,
to gain and
appease self-
interest.
Acquisition The article Ms. Jane Ms. Jane Austen What if
of wealth at implies our Austen quoted supported this wealth is
the expense social reality.Smith who by presenting something
of personal Humans stated that “it Marianne that could
happiness. think that is our Elinori as an really
happiness imaginative example make
comes solely sympathies, wherein Ms. others feel
from our way of Austen stated happy?
acquiring picturing how that: “She People
material much fun it (referring to have
things or would be to Elinori) isn’t different
being rich be rich, that theorizing about perspectiv
and wealthy. do in fact what will make es in life.
create the her happy; My
Just like wealthy, she’s imagining definition
these women bustling world her of
that were around us, but establishment happiness
stated as an which may with her love may not be
example in deform our interest, John the same
the article, moral Willoughby, for others.
they set aside characters once they are Others
their own and even our married.” may see
personal ability to be and value
preference in happy in the “wealth”
men – process.” as their
sacrificing only way
true of
happiness achieving
just to marry happiness
a wealthy and
man that
 could provide satisfactio
and satisfy n in life.
their needs.

Greed is The reading As mentioned She supported How could

dangerous implies that by Jane this by citing we
for greed makes Austen in her Smith who maintain
humankind us more article, pointed out as equal
and it causes ambitious. “Greed, for quoted: “The distributio
unequal Since we are us utilitarian rich only select n of
distribution blinded by moderns, is from the heap wealth if
of wealth. our dangerous what is most greed and
selfishness to because it precious.” rapacity
appease our prioritizes the have been
self-interest, individual This implies deeply
to achieve over the that wealth is ingrained
our goal or society, unequally in us? Is
ambition to accruing distributed that still
be wealthy, benefits to a because of our possible to
we forget to small number own selfishness attain?
be of people at and rapacity to
sympathetic the expense of acquire things
to other larger groups. without even
people. Thus, considering
unequal others.
distribution
of wealth
arises.
The It was Ms. Austen The author Since
definition of evident in the cited Smith supported the wealth is
wealth is story as the wherein it was argument by subjective
subjective. author has mentioned mentioning the and
given many that he never two sisters as an personal,
characters can decide on example. To how does
who have how one quote the it affect
 exhibited should feel scenario: “But it our
their different about the turns out that principles,
beliefs and pursuit of Elinor’s idea of moral
viewpoints wealth. Smith “wealth” differs standards
regarding added that: substantially and virtues
wealth. “On the one from her as an
hand, it keeps sister’s. When individual
in motion the Elinor asks ?
industry of Marianne what
mankind. On her idea of a
the other, it subsistence-
doesn’t make level
people very “competence”
happy.” is, it turns out
Simply that it is nearly
saying, we double what
have our own Elinor would
perspective consider gross
and level of wealth.”
valuing
wealth.
The We live our Ms. Jane The author Does the
relationship entire life Austen cited mentioned pursuit of
between thinking that Smith’s Smith who gave wealth
wealth and only wealth concern us a parable of diminish
virtue is can satisfy regarding the poor man’s human’s
diametricall and give us a wealth and son which states virtues and
y opposite. comfortable virtue that is that: “Through moral
life. The diametrically the whole of his standard?
story implies opposite. As life [the poor What if we
that we have quoted also by man’s son] have
to have a Jane Austen: pursues the idea different
complex “The of a certain level of
“view” of relationship artificial and valuing
wealth. The between elegant repos wealth?
story made us wealth and which he may
realize that virtue – the never arrive at,
wealth regrettable for which he
doesn’t just way that we sacrifices a real
refer money, seek what we tranquility that
property or already had to is at all times in
other begin with, to his power, and
material our great which, if in the
things that mental and extremity of old
deforms our moral harm.” age he should at
virtues and last attain to it,
principles. It he will find to
can come be in no respect
from the preferable to
things that that humble
we already security and
have; we just contentment
failed to which he had
recognize it. abandoned for
it.” The story
implies that
because we are
too focused on
becoming rich,
our virtues are
distorted. For
us, it has always
been the
person’s motive
in life to
become rich just
for mere
existence.